KR102022908B1 - Filter for a smoking article with technology reducing smoking smell on hands and mouth, and a smoking article including the same - Google Patents

Abstract

A filter for smoking articles to which hand odor and bad breath reduction technology is applied of the present invention comprises: a first filter having an upstream end coupled to a smoking material portion of a smoking article; a first wrapper surrounding the first filter; a second filter coupled to a downstream end of the first filter; a second wrapper surrounding the second filter; and a coupling wrapper wrapping the first and second filters so as to couple the first and second filters. The first filter comprises a first capsule comprising a first perfume and the second filter comprises a second capsule comprising a second perfume.

Description

FILTER FOR A SMOKING ARTICLE WITH TECHNOLOGY REDUCING SMOKING SMELL ON HANDS AND MOUTH, AND A SMOKING ARTICLE INCLUDING THE SAME}

The present invention relates to a smoking article filter and a smoking article comprising the same, and more particularly, to a smoking article filter and smoking article comprising two capsules and the resulting structure for reducing the smell of the hand and breath.

The smoke generated during the smoking process is absorbed by the smoker's finger holding the cigarette filter and can also cause bad breath after smoking.

Accordingly, there is a need for the development of a filter and a smoking article that can minimize the smell of cigarettes while smoking and also reduce the bad breath after smoking.

The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, an object of the present invention is to provide a filter comprising two capsules and a smoking article comprising the same.

The technical problems of the present invention are not limited to the technical problems mentioned above, and other technical problems not mentioned will be clearly understood by those skilled in the art from the following description.

According to an embodiment of the present invention to solve this problem, the upstream end is coupled to the smoking material portion of the smoking article; A first wrapper surrounding the first filter; A second filter coupled to the downstream end of the first filter; A second wrapper surrounding the second filter; And a coupling wrapper surrounding the first filter and the second filter to be coupled, wherein the first filter comprises a first capsule containing a first perfume and the second filter comprises a second perfume Provided are filters for smoking articles, including capsules, to which hand and odor reduction techniques are applied.

The first perfume and the second perfume may be different materials. The second flavor may be any one selected from apple mint, orange flavor, strawberry flavor, wine flavor and mango flavor. As an example, the first flavor may be a mango flavor, and the second flavor may be any one selected from apple mint, wine flavor and mango flavor.

The first wrapper and the coupling wrapper may be paper sheets not subjected to oil treatment, and the second wrapper may be oil resistant sheets subjected to oil treatment.

At least one of the first wrapper and the coupling wrapper may be a porous wrapper having a porosity of 6500 CU or more.

At least one of the first wrapper and the coupling wrapper may be a porous wrapper having a porosity of 24000 CU or more.

The first capsule and the second capsule may be formed at a position spaced apart from each other 10mm to 14mm.

The second filter may be a filter in which a third fragrance equal to or different from the first fragrance or the second fragrance is flavored. For example, the first flavor may be mango flavor, and the second flavor may be any one selected from applemint flavor, wine flavor and mango flavor, and the third flavor may be green apple herb flavor.

In addition, according to another embodiment of the present invention, the smoking material wrapper wrapped smoking material portion; A first filter having an upstream end coupled to the smoking material portion, the first filter wrapped with a first wrapper; A second filter coupled to the downstream end of the first filter and wrapped with a second wrapper; A coupling wrapper wrapped to join the first filter and the second filter; And a tipping wrapper surrounding at least a portion of the smoking material portion and the first filter and the second filter, wherein the first filter comprises a first capsule comprising a first perfume and the second filter comprises: Provided is a smoking article to which the smell of smell and breath techniques are applied, comprising a second capsule comprising two fragrances.

The tipping wrapper may include a first punctured region located in an area overlapping with the first filter and a second punctured region located in an area overlapping with the second filter.

At least a portion of the first perforated region may overlap with the first capsule, and the second perforated region may be located upstream than the second capsule.

The first perforated region includes a plurality of first holes formed along the outer circumferential surface of the tipping wrapper and a plurality of second holes formed along the outer circumferential surface of the tipping wrapper downstream from the first holes. The second perforation region includes a plurality of third holes formed along the outer circumferential surface of the tipping wrapper and a plurality of fourth holes formed along the outer circumferential surface of the tipping wrapper downstream from the third holes, wherein the first holes and the second hole are formed. Holes may be formed in the tipping wrapper, and the third and fourth holes may be formed through all of the tipping wrapper, the coupling wrapper, and the second wrapper.

The tipping wrapper may have a porosity of 190CU to 210CU in the first puncturing area where the first holes and the second holes are formed.

The second holes may be located 1.5 mm to 2.5 mm apart from the first holes in the downstream direction, and the fourth holes may be located 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm apart from the third holes in the downstream direction.

The third holes may be positioned to be 9mm to 11mm away from the second holes in the downstream direction.

The first holes may be positioned to be spaced apart from the upstream end of the tipping wrapper by 10 mm to 13 mm in the downstream direction, and the second holes may be positioned 20 mm to 23 mm apart in the upstream direction from the downstream end of the second filter.

In some embodiments, the circumference of the smoking article may be between 14 mm and 19 mm. Alternatively, the circumference of the smoking article may be 22.5mm to 26.5mm.

In some embodiments, the secondary smoke component collected in a region overlapping with the first filter as the outer surface of the tipping wrapper when smoking the smoking article with the first capsule and the second capsule broken, is D-Limonene. , 1-Hexanol, 3-Hexen-1-ol (Z)-, Decanoic acid, methyl ester, Geranyl Alcohol, 1,6-0ctadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl- and 2 (3H) -Furanone, It may comprise at least one or more of 5-hexyldi hydro-. The detection amount of 2 (3H) -Furanone, 5-hexyldihydro- in the sidestream component may be greater than the detection amount of 1,6-0ctadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-. The amount of 1-Hexanol detected in the sidestream component may be greater than that of the decanoic acid and methyl ester.

According to embodiments of the present invention, through the smoking article structure employing the first filter including the first capsule and the second filter including the second capsule to reduce both the smell of the hand and bad breath generated after the smoker's smoking It can be effected.

In addition, by applying wrappers of different characteristics as the respective wrappers surrounding the first and second filters, and by properly setting the positional relationship between the first and second perforated regions, the effect of reducing the smell of hands due to the fracture of the first capsule can be obtained. At the same time, the second capsule contents are directly delivered to the smoker's mouth by crushing the second capsule, thereby giving an unpleasant feeling or leaking mainstream smoke, thereby preventing the satisfaction of smoking from being reduced.

Furthermore, by appropriately setting the content and type of the fragrance contained in the first capsule, there is an effect of maximizing the rate at which the fragrance is transferred to the finger through the wrappers surrounding the first filter after the first capsule is broken.

1 is a view illustrating a schematic configuration of a filter for a smoking article according to some embodiments of the present invention.
2 is a view illustrating a schematic configuration of a smoking article employing a filter for smoking article according to some embodiments of the present invention.
3 is a partial cross-sectional view of a central axis of a smoking article in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
4 is a partial sectional view in the central axis direction of the smoking article, according to some embodiments of the invention.
5 is a sensory evaluation result according to whether the first capsule crushing smoking article according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a result of evaluating sensory properties according to whether the tipping wrapper in which the first filter is positioned is applied to the double perforation. FIG.
7 to 13 is a result of the evaluation of the sensory characteristics of the first capsule and the second capsule of the smoking article according to some embodiments of the present invention.

Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Advantages and features of the present invention and methods for achieving them will be apparent with reference to the embodiments described below in detail with the accompanying drawings. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed below, but may be implemented in various forms, and only the embodiments are intended to complete the disclosure of the present invention, and the general knowledge in the art to which the present invention pertains. It is provided to fully inform the person having the scope of the invention, which is defined only by the scope of the claims. Like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.

Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used in the present specification may be used in a sense that can be commonly understood by those skilled in the art. In addition, the terms defined in the commonly used dictionaries are not ideally or excessively interpreted unless they are specifically defined clearly.

In addition, the singular forms in the present specification may also include the plural forms unless specifically stated in the text. As used herein, “comprises” and / or “comprising” refers to the presence of one or more other components, steps, operations and / or elements. Or does not exclude additions.

As used herein, terms including ordinal numbers such as 'first' or 'second' may be used to describe various components, but the components should not be limited by the terms. The terms are used only for the purpose of distinguishing one component from another.

Throughout the specification, 'smoking article' may refer to an article capable of generating an aerosol, such as cigarettes (cigarettes), cigars, and the like. Smoking articles may include an aerosol generating material or an aerosol forming substrate. In addition, the smoking article may include a solid material based on tobacco raw material, such as leaf tobacco, vinegar, reconstituted tobacco. Smoking materials may include volatile compounds.

In addition, throughout the specification, 'upstream' or 'upstream direction' refers to a direction away from the user's bend of smoking the smoking article 100, and 'downstream' or 'downstream direction' refers to a user smoking the smoking article 100. It means the direction approaching from the bend. For example, in the smoking article 100 shown in FIG. 2, the smoking material portion 120 is located upstream or upstream of the filters 112, 114.

Furthermore, in the present specification, the smoking article 100 has been described as an example of a combustion type cigarette, but the present invention is not limited thereto. The smoking article 100 is a heated cigarette used with an aerosol generating device (not shown) such as an electronic cigarette. Of course, it may be.

1 is a view illustrating a schematic configuration of a filter for a smoking article according to some embodiments of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, the filter 110 for smoking article includes a first filter 112, a second filter 114, a first wrapper 112a, a second wrapper 114a, a first capsule 112c, and a first filter 112c. Two capsules 114c and a combination wrapper 116.

The smoking article filter 110 may be disposed downstream of the smoking material portion, and may be an area that passes through the aerosol material generated in the smoking material portion immediately before the user inhales the aerosol material.

The first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be formed of various materials. For example, the first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be cellulose acetate filters. The first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may have the same specification and composition, but are not limited thereto. For example, the first filter 112 is a cellulose acetate filter in which the perfume material is not flavored, and the second filter 114 is a filter in which the perfume material is flavored, for example, a TJNS (transfer jet nozzle system) filter. Can be.

In some embodiments, the length of each of the first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be appropriately employed within the range of 4 mm to 30 mm, and the first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be appropriately employed. Each diameter may be appropriately employed within the range of 5m to 8mm, but is not limited thereto. Preferably, the length of each of the first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be approximately 15 mm, and the diameter of each of the first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be approximately 5.4 mm.

In some embodiments, first filter 112 and / or second filter 114 may be a tube-shaped structure including a hollow therein. In this case, a diameter of the hollow included in the first filter 112 and / or the second filter 114 may be an appropriate diameter within the range of 2mm to 4.5mm, but is not limited thereto. In addition, the first filter 112 and / or the second filter 114 may be manufactured by inserting a structure such as a film or a tube of the same or different material in the interior (eg, a hollow).

The hardness of the first filter 112 and / or the second filter 114 may be adjusted by adjusting the amount of plasticizer in the manufacture of the first filter 112 and / or the second filter 114.

Triacetin may be applied as a plasticizer, and triacetin may be included in an amount of 5 to 15 wt% based on the total weight of the first and second filters 112 and 114, but the type and content of the plasticizer are not limited thereto. It can be suitably adjusted as needed.

The first capsule 112c is included in the first filter 112, and the second capsule 114c is included in the second filter 114. The first capsule 112c and / or the second capsule 114c may have a structure in which a liquid-containing solution containing fragrance is encapsulated, for example, the first capsule 112c and / or the second capsule 114c. May have a spherical or cylindrical shape.

The material forming the coating of the first capsule 112c and / or the second capsule 114c may be starch and / or gelling agent. For example, gelling gum or gelatin may be used as the gelling agent. In addition, a gelling aid may further be used as a material for forming the film of the first capsule 112c and / or the second capsule 114c. Here, calcium chloride can be used as the gelling aid, for example. In addition, a plasticizer may be further used as a material for forming the film of the first capsule 112c and / or the second capsule 114c. Here, glycerin and / or sorbitol may be used as the plasticizer. In addition, a coloring agent may be further used as a material for forming a film of the first capsule 112c and / or the second capsule 114c.

The contents of the first capsule 112c and / or the second capsule 114c may include fragrances such as menthol and essential oils of plants.

In some embodiments, each of the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c has a mango flavor, wine flavor, mojito lime flavor, apple mint flavor, orange flavor, strawberry flavor, green apple herb flavor, apple mango flavor and sweet flavor. One of the flavors selected from the mango flavor may be included. Here, the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c may include different kinds of flavors, but are not limited thereto. For example, the first capsule 112c may include a mango flavored flavor, and the second capsule 114c may include an applemint flavored flavor.

Meanwhile, in order to maximize the speed at which the fragrance contained in the first capsule 112c passes through the wrappers 112a, 116, and 130 to the finger after the first capsule 112c is broken, the first capsule 112c The amount of flavor included in the) may be about 20% to 50% by weight relative to the total weight of the capsule, the flavor may be a volatile fruit-based flavor that can be easily released to the outside of the wrapper.

In some embodiments, as a solvent of the fragrance included in the contents of the first capsule 112c and / or the second capsule 114c, for example, medium chain fatty acid triglyceride (MCTG) may be used. Can be used. In addition, the content solution may contain other additives such as a dye, an emulsifier, and a thickener.

The first filter 112 and the second filter 114 may be wrapped by the wrappers 112a, 114a, 116. More specifically, the first filter 112 is wrapped by the first wrapper 112a, the second filter 114 is wrapped by the second wrapper 114a, and the first filter 112 and the second filter. 114 may be bonded wrapped by the binding wrapper 116. In other words, the first filter 112 wrapped by the first wrapper 112a and the second filter 114 packed by the second wrapper 114a are further packed and physically bonded by the bonding wrapper 116. Can be.

The first wrapper 112a and the coupling wrapper 116 may be made of a general winding that is not oil resistant. For example, the first wrapper 112a and the bond wrapper 116 may be porous wrappers or nonporous wrappers. For example, the first wrapper 112a and the coupling wrapper 116 may be a nonporous wrapper having a porosity of about 10 CU to 20 CU in a Couperation Center for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA) unit, or a porosity of about 6500 CU or more (for example, , 24000CU).

The same wrapper may be applied to the first wrapper 112a and the coupling wrapper 116, but a wrapper having different characteristics may be applied thereto without being limited thereto. For example, either the wrapper of the first wrapper 112a and the bonding wrapper 116 may be porous wrapper, and the other wrapper may be a nonporous wrapper.

The first wrapper 112a and the coupling wrapper 116 may be made of a wrapper that is not oil resistant. That is, in the first wrapper 112a and the coupling wrapper 116, the capsule contents liquid discharged to the outside of the first capsule 112c by the smoker is broken by the smoker and passes through the first wrapper 112a. In order to be delivered to the smoker's hand it can be made of a wrap that is not oil-resistant.

The second wrapper 114a may be made of a wrapper having oil resistance. That is, the second wrapper (114a) is to the oil-resistant paper to prevent the capsule contents liquid discharged to the outside of the second capsule (114c) through the second wrapper (114a) by crushing the second capsule (114c) by the smoker. Can be made. In some embodiments, the inner side of the second wrapper 114a may further include aluminum foil.

The above-described smoking article filter 110 is disposed downstream of the smoking substance portion 120 as shown in FIG. 2, and serves as a filter for passing the aerosol substance generated in the smoking substance portion 120 immediately before a user inhales. It will be carried out, hereinafter will be described in detail with respect to the smoking article 100 including a smoking article filter 110.

2 is a view showing a schematic configuration of a smoking article employing a filter for smoking article according to some embodiments of the present invention, Figure 3 is a partial cross-sectional view in the central axis direction of the smoking article.

2 and 3, the same reference numerals as those in FIG. 1 denote the same members, and redundant description thereof is omitted here for the sake of simplicity.

2 and 3, the smoking article 100 may include a smoking material unit 120, a smoking material wrapper 120a, a filter for smoking article 110, and a tipping wrapper 130. The filter 110 for an article includes a first filter 112, a second filter 114, a first wrapper 112a, a second wrapper 114a, a first capsule 112c, a second capsule 114c, and a combination. It may include a wrapper 116.

Smoking material portion 120 may contain an aerosol-generating material. For example, the smoking material portion 120 may include tobacco strands.

In some embodiments, the aerosol generating material may comprise at least one of glycerin, propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol and oleyl alcohol.

Smoking material portion 120 may have a long elongated rod shape and its length and diameter may vary. For example, the length of the smoking material part 120 may be about 15 mm to 70 mm, and the diameter may be about 5 mm to 9 mm.

In some embodiments, smoking material portion 120 may contain other additive materials such as flavoring agents, wetting agents, and / or acetate compounds. For example, flavors include licorice, sucrose, fructose syrup, isosweet, cocoa, lavender, cinnamon, cardamom, celery, fenugreek, cascarilla, sandalwood, bergamot, geranium, honey essence, rose oil, Vanilla, lemon oil, orange oil, mint oil, cinnamon, caraway, cognac, jasmine, chamomile, menthol, cinnamon, ylang-ylang, sage, spearmint, ginger, coriander or coffee and the like. Wetting agents may also include glycerin or propylene glycol and the like.

In some embodiments, the smoking material unit 120 is pulverized tobacco raw material and then mixed with a solvent and various additives in the form of a slurry and dried to form a sheet, and then processed such a sheet in the form of pieces such as rods Formed reconstituted tobacco material. For example, the smoking material portion 120 includes a plurality of tobacco material strands, each of which has a length of about 10 mm to 14 mm (eg 12 mm) and a width of about 0.8 mm to 1.2 mm (eg 1 mm) and a thickness of about 0.08 mm to 0.12 mm (eg, 0.1 mm), but is not limited thereto.

By having the smoking material portion 120 include a plurality of strand materials processed in the form of a wide tobacco sheet, the density of the tobacco material filled in the smoking material portion 120 may be increased, thereby increasing the aerosol generation amount, and smoking Smoking characteristics of the material part 120 may be improved.

The smoking material unit 120 may be packaged by the smoking material wrapper 120a. The smoking material wrapper 120a may be made of the same wrapper as the first wrapper 112a or the coupling wrapper 116 described with reference to FIG. 1, but is not limited thereto.

The smoking materials portion 120 wrapped by the smoking material wrapper 120a and the filters 112, 114 wrapped by the bonding wrapper 116 may be combined wrapped by the tipping wrapper 130. That is, the tipping wrapper 130 may be surrounded by at least a portion (eg, a downstream partial region) of the smoking material wrapper 120a and the outside of the bonding wrapper 116. In other words, at least a portion of the smoking material portion 120 and the filters 112, 114 may be further packaged and physically coupled by the tipping wrapper 130.

In some embodiments, the length 130L1 of the tipping wrapper 130 may be approximately 33 mm to 37 mm. Assuming that the length of the smoking article filter 110 is 30 mm, the length 130L2 of the tipping wrapper 130 overlapping the smoking material part 120 may be approximately 3 mm to 7 mm.

Tipping wrapper 130 may be made of a general winding. For example, tipping wrapper 130 may be porous wrapper or nonporous wrapper. For example, the tipping wrapper 130 may be a non-porous wrapper having a porosity of about 10CU to 20CU or a porous wrapper having a porosity of about 6500CU or more (eg, 24000CU).

The tipping wrapper 130 may be made of the same wrapper as the first wrapper 112a or the coupling wrapper 116, but is not limited thereto. For example, the tipping wrapper 130 is a nonporous wrapper, and the first wrapper 112a and / or the bond wrapper 116 may be a porous wrapper.

Tipping wrapper 130 may be made of a wrapper that is not oil-resistant. That is, in the tipping wrapper 130, the capsule contents solution discharged to the outside of the first capsule 112a by being broken by the smoker by the first capsule 112a is combined with the first wrapper 112a, the coupling wrapper 116, and the tipping wrapper. It may be made of a roll of unoil-resistant oil that can pass through the 130 to be delivered to the smoker's hand. In addition, the tipping wrapper 130 may be coated with a sweetener such as sucralose, citric acid.

In some embodiments, the tipping wrapper 130 may incorporate some material. Examples of the predetermined material may include silicon, but are not limited thereto. For example, silicon has characteristics such as heat resistance with little change with temperature, oxidation resistance without oxidation, resistance to various chemicals, water repellency for water, or electrical insulation. However, even if not silicon, any material having the above-described characteristics may be applied or coated on the tipping wrapper 130 without limitation.

The tipping wrapper 130 may prevent the smoking filter 110 from burning. For example, when the smoking material portion 120 is burned to a portion adjacent to the smoking article filter 110, there is a possibility that the smoking material section 120 is burned. Even in this case, since the tipping wrapper 130 includes a non-combustible material, the phenomenon in which the smoking article filter 110 is burned can be prevented.

Smoking article 100 may have a long, elongated rod form and its length, diameter and perimeter may vary.

In some embodiments, the length of smoking article 100 may be approximately 45 mm to 100 mm, the diameter may be approximately 4 mm to 6 mm (eg, about 5.4 mm), and the circumference may be approximately 14 mm to 19 mm (eg, For example, about 17 mm). The length of the smoking material part 120 may be about 70 mm, the length 112L of the first filter 112 may be about 15 mm, and the length 114L of the second filter 114 may be about 15 mm, but is not limited thereto.

In some other embodiments, the diameter of the smoking article 100 may be approximately 7 mm to 9 mm (eg, about 7.8 mm), and the circumference may be approximately 22.5 mm to 26.5 mm (eg, about 24.5 mm). Can be.

The first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c may have a spherical shape, and the diameter 112c_D of the first capsule 112c and the diameter 114c_D of the second capsule 114c may be approximately 2.6 mm to 3.0. may be mm. In some embodiments, the diameter 112c_D of the first capsule 112c and the diameter 114c_D of the second capsule 114c may be the same, but are not limited thereto.

The first capsule 112c may be disposed at a position at which general smokers grip the smoking article 100 when smoking. Preferably, the first capsule 112c may be positioned approximately 18 mm to 27 mm apart in an upstream direction from the downstream end of the second filter 114, that is, the downstream end of the smoking article 100. More specifically, the center point of the first capsule 112c is positioned to be spaced apart from the downstream end of the smoking article 100 by approximately 21 mm to 24 mm in the upstream direction, and the upstream end of the first capsule 112c is downstream of the smoking article 100. It is positioned to be spaced apart approximately 22.5mm to 25.5mm in the upstream direction from the end, the downstream end of the first capsule (112c) may be positioned to be spaced approximately 19.5mm to 22.5mm in the upstream direction from the downstream end of the smoking article 100.

The first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c may have a separation distance Cap_D of about 10 mm to 14 mm. In other words, the first capsule 112c may be positioned to be spaced apart from the second capsule 114c in an upstream direction by about 10 mm to 14 mm.

The second punched region 114P may be formed in the wrappers 114a, 116, and 130 positioned at the portion covering the second filter 114. As shown in FIG. 3, the second punching region 114P has a tipping wrapper 130 downstream from the plurality of first holes 114P1 and the first holes 114P1 formed along the outer circumferential surface of the tipping wrapper 130. A plurality of second holes 114P2 may be provided along the outer circumferential surface thereof, but is not limited thereto. For example, unlike the one shown in FIG. 3, only one of the plurality of first holes 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2 may be provided (single perforated) in the second drilling area 114P, or In addition to the plurality of first holes 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2, holes may be further provided.

Each of the plurality of first holes 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2 may include, for example, 4 to 10 holes, and the holes may be spaced along the outer circumferential surface of the tipping wrapper 130. It may be formed to be spaced apart, but is not limited thereto. The diameter of each of the holes may be approximately 0.02 mm to 0.08 mm (eg, 0.05 mm), but is not limited thereto.

The holes may be formed by an on-line punching method, ie, by manufacturing a cigarette using a non-perforated tipping wrapper and then punching the filter part. Online drilling may be performed using a laser, but is not limited thereto. As the holes are drilled online as described above, the holes may extend not only to the tipping wrapper 130 but also to the coupling wrapper 116, the second wrapper 114a, and further to a partial area outside the second filter 114 as shown in FIG. 3. Accordingly, external air may flow from the outside to the inside of the second filter 114 through the second puncturing region 114P. Outside air introduced through the second perforations 114P may be mixed with the mainstream smoke and delivered to the smoker.

In some embodiments, the plurality of first holes 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2 may have a separation distance 114Pw of about 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm. In other words, the plurality of first holes 114P1 may be positioned to be spaced apart from each other by about 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm in the upstream direction from the plurality of second holes 114P2.

In some embodiments, the plurality of first holes 114P1 are positioned approximately 22 mm to 25 mm apart 114P_TEd from the upstream end of the tipping wrapper 130, and the plurality of second holes 114P2 are second filter 114. Can be positioned approximately 9 mm to 12 mm apart (114P_MEd) from the downstream end of

The plurality of first holes 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2 may be located upstream than the area of the second capsule 114c, that is, the second capsule 114c, as shown in FIG. 3. .

4 is a partial sectional view in the central axis direction of the smoking article, according to some embodiments of the invention.

In Fig. 4, the same reference numerals as those in Figs. 1 to 3 denote the same members, and redundant description thereof is omitted here for the sake of simplicity.

Referring to FIG. 4, the smoking article 200 may include a smoking material unit 120, a smoking material wrapper 120a, a smoking article filter 110, and a tipping wrapper 230, and a smoking article filter ( 110 includes a first filter 112, a second filter 114, a first wrapper 112a, a second wrapper 114a, a first capsule 112c, a second capsule 114c, and a combination wrapper 116. It may include.

The first perforation region 212P may be formed in the tipping wrapper 230 of the smoking article 200. As shown in FIG. 4, the first puncturing region 212P has a double boring, that is, a tipping wrapper 130 downstream from the plurality of first holes 212P1 and the first holes 212P1 formed along the outer circumferential surface of the tipping wrapper 230. A plurality of second holes 212P2 formed along the outer circumferential surface of) may be provided, but is not limited thereto. For example, unlike the one shown in FIG. 4, only one of the plurality of first holes 212P1 and the plurality of second holes 212P2 may be provided (single perforated) in the first drilling area 212P, or Holes added in addition to the plurality of first holes 212P1 and the plurality of second holes 212P2 may be further provided.

Each of the plurality of first holes 212P1 and the plurality of second holes 212P2 may be formed at regular intervals along the outer circumferential surface of the tipping wrapper 130, but is not limited thereto.

The holes may be formed by an off-line drilling method, that is, by manufacturing a cigarette using the tipping wrapper 230 previously drilled into the tipping wrapper 230. Offline drilling may be performed using a laser, but is not limited thereto.

By forming the plurality of first holes 212P1 and / or the plurality of second holes 212P2, the porosity of the tipping wrapper 230 in the first puncturing area 212P may be approximately 190 CU to 210 CU. In other words, the plurality of first holes 212P1 and / or the plurality of second holes 212P2 may be drilled to a size such that the porosity of the tipping wrapper 230 is approximately 190 CU to 210 CU. When the perforation of the tipping wrapper 230 is less than about 190 CU, the practical benefit is less in terms of the effect of increasing the transfer rate of the capsule contents, and when the perforation of the tipping wrapper 230 is about 210 CU or more, the first perforation is performed. This is because mainstream smoke may leak through the area 212P.

As such, the holes are drilled offline, and as the porosity of the tipping wrapper 230 in the first puncturing area 212P becomes approximately 190CU to 210CU, the holes are formed only in the tipping wrapper 230 as shown in FIG. It does not extend to 116 and the first wrapper 112a. Accordingly, the first capsule 112c is crushed by the smoker, so that the capsule contents released outside the first capsule 112c can be better delivered to the smoker's hand, and the holes are combined with the wrapper 116. And by not extending to the first wrapper (112a) it is possible to prevent the mainstream smoke from leaking out of the smoking article 200.

In some embodiments, the plurality of first holes 212P1 and the plurality of second holes 212P2 may have a separation distance 212Pw of about 1 mm to 3 mm. In other words, the plurality of first holes 212P1 may be positioned to be spaced apart from the plurality of second holes 212P2 by about 1 mm to 3 mm in an upstream direction.

In some embodiments, the separation distance 212Pw of the plurality of first holes 212P1 and the plurality of second holes 212P2 of the first puncturing area 212P is a plurality of first of the second puncturing areas 114P. It may be about 1.5 to 3 times (eg, 2 times) the separation distance 114Pw of the holes 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2. For example, the separation distance 212Pw may be about 2 mm, and the separation distance 114Pw may be about 1 mm, but is not limited thereto.

In some embodiments, the plurality of first holes 212P1 are positioned to be approximately 10 mm to 13 mm spaced 212P_TEd from the upstream end of the tipping wrapper 230, and the plurality of second holes 212P2 are second filter 114. May be positioned approximately 20 mm to 23 mm apart (212P_MEd) from the downstream end of

In some embodiments, the separation distance Per_D of the plurality of second holes 212P2 of the first punctured region 212P and the plurality of first holes 114P1 of the second punctured region 114P is approximately 9 mm to 10 mm. Can be.

Meanwhile, unlike the plurality of first holes 114P1 and the plurality of second holes 114P2 of the second hole area 114P, the plurality of first holes 212P1 and the plurality of first holes of the first hole area 212P may be used. The two holes 212P2 are located in an area overlapping with the first capsule 112c as shown in FIG. 4, whereby the first capsule 112c is crushed by the smoker to release the capsule contents outside the first capsule 112c. The fluid can be better delivered to the smoker's hand.

Hereinafter, the configuration and effects of the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to Examples and Comparative Examples. However, this embodiment is intended to illustrate the present invention in more detail, and the scope of the present invention is not limited to these examples.

Example 1

For example, the filter part of the cigarette prepared for the test was cut apart. Cellulose acetate material surrounded by an oil-resistant oil-resistant paper wrapper containing a first capsule of cellulose acetate material comprising a first capsule containing mango fragrance flavoring and a second filter comprising an applemint flavoring agent The second filter of was bonded to the tobacco material part using the tip paper.

In this case, the used tip paper includes offline perforation in an area overlapping with the first capsule, and forms a double perforation at a position spaced about 2 mm in the upstream direction of the second capsule through online perforation after joining the tip paper, thereby smoking. The article was prepared.

Example 2

A smoking article was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the tip paper was not formed in the region overlapping with the first capsule.

Comparative Example 1

A smoking article was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 2 except that the oil-resistant oil-resistant paper sheet was applied as the paper applied to the first filter.

Experimental Example 1 Analysis of Side-Lead Lead Components Before and After First Capsule Crushing

In order to measure the effect of reducing hand odor when the filter according to the embodiment of the present invention was applied, the side smoke component change in the first filter region occurring before and after the first capsule crushing was analyzed.

Table 1 is in Examples 1, 2 and Comparative Example 1 for measuring the change in the smoke (side smoke) component in the tipping wrapper region where the first filter 112 is located before and after crushing the first capsule (112c). According to the specifications of the smoking articles, Table 2 is a tipping wrapper region in which the first filter 112 is located before and after crushing of the first capsule 112c using the smoking articles according to Examples 1, 2 and Comparative Example 1 This is the result of measuring the change of the smoke component in. Typical smokers may be in the tipping wrapper region where the first filter 112 is positioned, specifically about 15 mm to 30 mm upstream from the downstream end of the smoking article 100, more specifically, the smoking article 100. Since a region of approximately 18 mm to 27 mm spaced apart from the downstream end of the upstream side is gripped, the results of Table 2 can identify the smoke component delivered to the smoker's hand in the gripped region.

division Capsule Flavor / First Wrapper Capsule Flavor / Second Wrapper Combined wrapper Perforation First filter part Second filter part Example 1 Mango / General Paper Apple Mint / Oil Resistance General Rights Offline (200 CU) online Example 2 Mango / General Paper Apple Mint / Oil Resistance General Rights Perforation online Comparative Example 1 Mango / Oil Resistance Apple Mint / Oil Resistance General Rights Perforation online

Example 1, Example 2 and Comparative Example 1 are all smoking articles having a length of approximately 100 mm in the upstream and downstream direction, approximately 17 mm in circumference, and an approximately 2.0 mg tar content, and all specifications not shown in Table 1 are the same. The smoking items were all smoked in the unharmonized state. Smoking conditions were set to 55 ml of puff volume, 2 seconds of puff time, 20 seconds of puff cycle, and 12 times of puff count, and smoke component measurement was performed with the first filter 112 positioned. The gas trapped by wrapping the CFP (Cambridge filter pad) in the tipping wrappers 130 and 230 were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC). Nicotine, 3-Ethyl pyridine, 3-Ethenyl pyridine, Pyridine and Menthol components were measured by GC analysis, but 3-Ethyl pyridine and 3-Ethenyl pyridine values were excluded from Table 2 as the limit of quantitation (LOQ). It was.

division First Capsule
Shredding Nicotine Pyridine Menthol ug / cig % Reduction ug / cig % Reduction ug / cig Example 1 Before shredding 2.54 19.3 0.039 -5.1 0 After shredding 2.05 0.041 2.53 Example 2 Before shredding 2.20 -3.2 0.044 18.2 0 After shredding 2.27 0.036 1.54 Comparative Example 1 Before shredding 2.10 10.0 0.038 5.3 0 After shredding 1.89 0.036 1.34

As shown in Table 2, as a result of measuring the smoke components in the tipping wrappers 130 and 230 in which the first filter 112 is positioned using smoking articles according to Example 1, Example 2 and Comparative Example 1, In both Examples 1, 2 and Comparative Example 1, the menthol content increased after crushing the first capsule 112c, and nicotine in the side smoke of smoking soreness according to Examples 1, 2 and Comparative Example 1 Pyridine was decreased in the side smoke of smoking articles according to Example 2 and Comparative Example 1. Based on the results in Table 2, but considering the importance of menthol delivery, which plays a role in masking the specific gravity and smell of nicotine as the cause of tobacco odor, the first wrapper 112a is a general wrap (ie, an unoiled wrap). In Example 1, which was double-drilled in an offline manner such that the porosity was approximately 200 CU in the tipping wrapper 230 in the region where the first wrapper 112a is located, it was expected that the effect of reducing hand odor due to smoking was the best. . In addition, in the case of Example 2 to which the oil-free general paper was applied as the first wrapper 112a, it was confirmed that the amount of delivery of menthol increased compared to Comparative Example 1 to which the oil-resistant paper was applied as the first wrapper 112a. As a result, it was expected to reduce the smell of hand smoke caused by smoking.

Experimental Example 2: Sensory evaluation of the hand odor reduction effect by applying the first capsule

In order to examine the effect of reducing the hand odor before and after capsule crushing of the smoking article according to Example 1, the sensory evaluation was performed on the degree of smell of cigarettes and smells other than the smell of cigarettes.

Sensory characteristics evaluation was carried out for 10 members of the evaluation panel using the smoking article of Example 1, based on a total of 9 points.

5 is a sensory evaluation result according to whether the first capsule crushing of the smoking article according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in FIG. 5, the sensory properties of the smoking article of Example 1 in which the first capsule was crushed and the smoking article of Example 1 in which the first capsule was not crushed were analyzed. The degree of cigarette smell from fingers after smoking of the crushed smoking article of Example 1 was reduced by approximately 59% compared to the case of non-crushing, and the smell of cigarette from fingers after smoking of the smoking article of Example 1 of crushed smoking articles was reduced. Other fragrances showed an increase of about 208% compared to the case of unfragmentation.

This is because the first filter includes a first capsule for reducing odor, and smoking after breaking the first capsule does not break the first capsule (ie, does not include the first capsule). This means that the effect of reducing hand odor after smoking is superior.

Experimental Example 3: Sensory evaluation of the hand odor reduction effect by the puncture application of the first filter

Sensory evaluation of the smell of cigarettes and other odors in the hands after smoking of smoking articles according to Examples 1 and 2 in order to determine the effect of hand odor according to whether the first filter puncture of the smoking article is applied Was carried out.

Evaluation of sensory characteristics was carried out using 10 smoking panel members using the smoking article of Example 1 and Example 2, based on a total of 9 points.

FIG. 6 is a result of evaluating sensory properties according to whether the tipping wrapper in which the first filter is positioned is applied to the double perforation. FIG.

As a result of analyzing the sensory characteristics expressed after smoking of the smoking article of Example 1 to which the double perforation structure is applied and the smoking article of Example 2 to which the double perforation structure is not applied, as shown in FIG. There was no significant difference in the degree of. On the contrary, the aroma level other than the smell of cigarettes from the finger after smoking of the smoking article of Example 1 to which the double perforation structure was applied was increased by approximately 27% compared to the smoking article of Example 2 to which the double perforation structure was not applied.

Although it is difficult to see that the adoption of the puncture structure 212P described with reference to FIG. 4 eliminates or reduces the smell of the cigarette itself, the fragrance material contained in the first capsule by the puncture structure is better delivered to the smoker's finger, thereby aroma It can be seen that the cigarette masking effect of the finger by the can be improved.

Experimental Example 4: Component Analysis of Mainstream Smoke Before and After Capsule Crushing

In order to measure the effect of reducing bad breath when applying the filter according to the embodiment of the present invention, the change in the mainstream smoke before and after capsule breakdown was analyzed.

Table 3 is a result of analyzing the change in the mainstream smoke component before and after the crushing of the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c included in the smoking article according to Example 1 of Table 1. Through the results in Table 3, it is possible to confirm the smoke component of the mainstream smoke generated by the smoker, and through this, it is possible to infer the degree of reduction of the smell of cigarettes from the smoker's mouth.

division TPM
(mg / cig.) Tar
(mg / cig.) Nic
(mg / cig.) moisture
(mg / cig.) Menthol
(mg / cig.) TPM-Moisture
(mg / cig.) Nic /
(TPM-moisture)
* 100
(%) Menthol /
(TPM-moisture) * 100
(%) Shred
I'm 1.00 0.89 0.07 0.05 Not detected 0.96 7.2 - After shredding 1.75 1.58 0.09 0.07 0.29 1.68 5.4 17.3

As a result of analyzing the smoke component of mainstream smoke, the ratio of nicotine to total particle materials (TPM) value excluding water after crushing the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c was 7.2% to 5.4 after crushing the capsule compared to before crushing the capsule. The percentage of menthol to TPM excluding moisture increased from 0% to 17.3% before crushing. On the other hand, the total particle materials (TPM) value after crushing the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c. Was increased by about 75% compared to the pre-crushing of the first capsule (112c) and the second capsule (114c), the tar value was increased by about 77% compared to the pre-crushing of the first capsule (112c) and the second capsule (114c), This corresponds to an increase in menthol and other flavors contained in the contents of the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c.

That is, as the nicotine to TPM decreases and the menthol ratio increases after the crushing of the first capsule 112c and the second capsule 114c, the smell of cigarettes in the smoker's mouth is reduced and the smell of tobacco is increased. There was a masking effect of the smell of tobacco was found.

Hereinafter, the constitution and effects of the present invention will be described in more detail through examples and comparative examples according to the fragrance combinations of the first capsule and the fragrance of the second capsule and their crushing. However, this embodiment is intended to illustrate the present invention in more detail, and the scope of the present invention is not limited to these examples.

Example 3

The filter section of Esthe Himalayas (KT & G) was cut off. Tobacco material cut using a tip paper with a first filter of cellulose acetate material comprising a first capsule and surrounded by an oil-free wrapper and a second filter of cellulose acetate material comprising a second capsule and surrounded by an oil-resistant wrapper Bound to wealth.

Here, the first capsule contained a mango flavored flavor, the second capsule contained an applemint flavored flavor, the experiment was performed in a state in which both the first capsule and the second capsule is broken.

Example 4

The first capsule contained a mango flavored flavor, the second capsule contained an orange flavored flavor, the experiment was performed in a state in which both the first capsule and the second capsule is broken. For other conditions, the same smoking article as in Example 3 was used.

Example 5

The first capsule contained a mango flavored flavor, the second capsule contained a strawberry flavored flavor, the experiment was performed with both the first capsule and the second capsule is broken. For other conditions, the same smoking articles as in Example 3 and Example 4 were used.

Example 6

The first capsule contained a mango flavored flavor, the second capsule contained a wine flavored flavor, the experiment was performed in a state in which both the first capsule and the second capsule is broken. For other conditions, the same smoking articles as in Examples 3 to 5 were used.

Example 7

Mango flavor was included in each of the first capsule and the second capsule, and the experiment was performed with both the first capsule and the second capsule broken. For other conditions, the same smoking articles as in Examples 3 to 6 were used.

Comparative Example 3

Experiments were carried out using the same smoking article as in Example 3, with both the first capsule and the second capsule not broken. Since each of the first capsule and the second capsule has a structure in which the contents solution including the fragrance is encapsulated, the experiment related to perfumery in the state in which both the first capsule and the second capsule are not crushed is performed. It may also refer to experiments with flavors of smoking articles that do not contain all capsules.

Comparative Example 4

The experiment was carried out using the same smoking article as in Example 3, with only the first capsule broken and the second capsule not broken. For similar reasons as in Comparative Example 3, the perfume related experiments in which only the first capsule was crushed and the second capsule was not crushed, the fragrance of smoking articles containing only the first capsule and not the second capsule were included. It may also mean related experiments.

Comparative Example 5

The experiment was carried out using the same smoking article as in Example 3, with only the second capsule broken and the first capsule not broken. For similar reasons, a flavor related experiment with only the second capsule broken and the first capsule not broken may mean a flavor related experiment of a smoking article that contains only the second capsule and does not include the first capsule. have.

On the other hand, in Experimental Examples 5 to 7 to be described later, the cellulose acetate filter was not used for flavoring material as a second filter of each smoking article of Examples 3 to 7, but the filter is flavored treatment as a second filter, For example, when the TJNS filter is used, the effect of reducing bad breath and hand smell, which will be described later, is expected to be more excellent. For example, the TJNS filter may be a filter that has been flavored with any one of mango, wine, mojito lime, apple mint, orange, strawberry, green apple herb, apple mango and sweet mango. Can be.

In some embodiments, the second filter of the smoking article may be a TJNS filter flavored with greens herbs. Preferably, the second filter may be a TJNS filter flavored with approximately 2 mg to 8 mg of green apple herb flavor per filter (ie, cigarettes). More preferably, the second filter may be a TJNS filter flavored with approximately 2.5 mg to 3.5 mg of green apple herb flavor per filter.

Experimental Example 5: Analysis of the breakdown component of the capsule by the crushing capsule and the flavor in the capsule

In order to measure the effect of reducing the smell of the hand when applying the filter according to the embodiments of the present invention, the smoke (side smoke) component in the first filter region occurring before and after the first and second capsule crushing was analyzed. .

Table 4 shows the types and fragrance of flavors in capsules of smoking articles according to Examples 3 to 7 and Comparative Examples 3 to 5. Table 5 shows the measurement results of the menthol content in the sidestream component in the tipping wrapper region where the first filter of smoking articles according to Examples 3 to 7 and Comparative Examples 3 to 5 is located, and Tables 6 to 11 are Comparative Examples 3 and It is a measurement result which shows the name and detection amount of the fragrance expression component except menthol among the class smoke components of the smoking articles which concerns on Examples 3-7.

Typical smokers have a tipping wrapper area in which the first filter is located when smoking, specifically about 15 mm to 30 mm upstream from the downstream end of the smoking article, more specifically approximately 18 mm upstream from the downstream end of the smoking article. Since the area is separated from the 27mm, it is possible to check the smoke component delivered to the smoker's hand in the gripped region through the results of Table 5 and Tables 6 to 11.

division First capsule Second capsule Spices Shredding Spices Shredding Example 3 mango Shred Apple Mint Shred Example 4 Orange Example 5 Strawberry Example 6 wine Example 7 mango Comparative Example 3 X Apple Mint X Comparative Example 4 Shred X Comparative Example 5 X Shred

Examples 3 to 7 and Comparative Examples 3 to 5 are smoking articles having a length of approximately 100 mm in a vertical direction, a width of approximately 17 mm, and a tar content of approximately 2.0 mg, wherein the first filter including the first capsule is oil-treated. Unwrapped paper, and a second filter comprising a second capsule was surrounded by an oil-resistant oil resistant paper. The used tip paper includes offline perforations in the region overlapping the first capsule, and after joining the tip paper, double perforations are formed at about 2 mm spaced upstream of the second capsule through online perforation to produce smoking articles. It became. All other specifications not shown in Table 4 were performed under the same conditions. Smoking conditions were set to 55 ml of puff volume, 2 seconds of puff time, 20 seconds of puff cycle and 12 times of puff count. Smoke component measurement was repeated by five times for each sample, wrapped with CFP in the tipping wrapper in which the first filter is located, and after smoking, the CFP was put into a glass bottle, extracted with methanol (MeOH) and analyzed by GC. GC analysis was carried out to measure Menthol and Furaneol components related to hand odor reduction except Nicotine, Pyridine, 3-Ethyl pyridine and 3-Ethenyl pyridine, which are major components of hand odor. Excluded in Table 5 below.

division First capsule Second capsule Menthol content
(ug / cig) Spices Shredding Spices Shredding Example 3 mango Shred Apple Mint Shred 33.1 Example 4 Orange 31.5 Example 5 Strawberry 29.5 Example 6 wine 28.7 Example 7 mango 26.2 Comparative Example 3 X Apple Mint X 1.9 Comparative Example 4 Shred X 19.3 Comparative Example 5 X Shred 8.8

As shown in Table 5, approximately 26 ug / cig in all of Examples 3-7. To 33 ug / cig. A level of menthol content was shown to detect approximately 13-17 times the menthol content compared to Comparative Example 3 (ie, the first and second capsules not crushed). Considering the importance of menthol delivery, which acts as a masking cigarette tobacco Referring to the results of Table 5, in both Examples 3 to 7 where both the first capsule and the second capsule were crushed, neither the first capsule nor the second capsule was crushed (Comparative Example 3) and only one was crushed. In comparison with the case (Comparative Examples 4 and 5), it was expected to increase the masking effect of hand odor due to smoking. In particular, in Example 1, where the flavor of the first capsule is mango flavor and the flavor of the second capsule is applemint, it was expected that the hand-odor masking effect would be the best.

In Tables 6 to 11 below, in which the fragrance-expressing components except menthol were analyzed, the components that were not detected in Comparative Example 3 in which the first capsule and the second capsule were not crushed (D-Limonene, 1-Hexanol, 3). -Hexen-1-ol (Z)-, Decanoic acid, methyl ester, Geranyl Alcohol, 1,6-0ctadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, 2 (3H) -Furanone, 5-hexyldi hydro-) It was confirmed that this was delivered to the outside of the tipping wrapper through the fracture of the first capsule and the second capsule, and delivered to the smoker's hand to express a tobacco smell masking effect.

In addition, the sensory evaluation may have different results due to various factors. However, when the sensory evaluation results in Experimental Example 7 are considered considering only the analysis results of the fragrance expression components in Tables 6 to 11, 2 (3H)- When the furanone, 5-hexyldihydro- component contains more than the 1,6-0ctadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl- component, or when the 1-Hexanol component is included in the sidestream more than the Decanoic acid and methyl ester components. It can be expected that there is an advantage in the figures for the refreshment during smoking, the aftertaste during smoking, the overall satisfaction after smoking, and the degree of finger odor after smoking.

Comparative Example 3 (first capsule: mango (not crushed), second capsule: apple mint (un crushed)) Detection Detection amount Oleic acid, methyl ester 3198326 Pyridine, 3- (1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)- 1071618 Unknown 810038 Unknown 733862 1-Nonanamine, N, N-dimethyl- 370655 1-Butanol 249872 Dimethoxymethylphenylsilane 219430 Glycidol 187483 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 133482 Methyl caprylate 73918 D-Limonene 0 1-Hexanol 0 3-Hexen-1-ol (Z)- 0 Decanoic acid, methyl ester 0 Geranyl alcohol 0 1,6-0ctadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl- 0 2 (3H) -Furanone, 5-hexyldi hydro- 0

Example 3 (first capsule: mango (crushed), second capsule: applemint (crushed)) Detection Detection amount Oleic acid, methyl ester 2129103 Pyridine, 3- (1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)- 968058 Geranyl alcohol 862485 Unknown 658554 Unknown 509717 2 (3H) -Furanone, 5-hexyldihydro- 403378 D-Limonene 394622 1,6-0ctadien-3-ol, 3, 7-dimethyl- 374608 1-Nonanamine, N, N-dimethyl- 363750 3-Hexen-1-ol, (Z)- 353251 Dimethoxymethylphenylsilane 244790 Glycidol 224853 Methyl caprylate 215431 1-Butanol 206537 1-Hexanol 151770 Decanoic acid, methyl ester 141131 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 118359

Example 4 (first capsule: mango (crushed), second capsule: orange (crushed)) Detection Detection amount Oleic acid, methyl ester 3067165 Pyridine, 3- (1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)- 1318457 Geranyl alcohol 763669 Unknown 651770 Unknown 597494 1-Nonanamine, N, N-dimethyl- 395603 D-Limonene 355193 1,6-0ctadien-3-ol, 3, 7-dimethyl- 352962 2 (3H) -Furanone, 5-hexyldihydro- 349476 Glycidol 310001 Methyl caprylate 278510 3-Hexen-1-ol, (Z)- 276941 1-Butanol 226554 Decanoic acid, methyl ester 212773 Dimethoxymethylphenylsilane 141895 1-Hexanol 118093 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 100664

Example 5 (first capsule: mango (crushed), second capsule: strawberry (crushed)) Detection Detection amount Oleic acid, methyl ester 1825988 Pyridine, 3- (1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)- 826495 Unknown 810356 Geranyl alcohol 696762 Unknown 526448 1-Nonanamine, N, N-dimethyl- 465709 1,6-0ctadien-3-ol, 3, 7-dimethyl- 380492 Methyl caprylate 348278 2 (3H) -Furanone, 5-hexyldi hydro- 307410 D-Limonene 287538 Decanoic acid, methyl ester 267854 3-Hexen-1-ol, (Z)- 258167 Glycidol 156890 1-Butanol 133957 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 126925 Dimethoxymethylphenylsilane 125317 1-Hexanol 122216

Example 6 (first capsule: mango (crushed), second capsule: wine (crushed)) Detection Detection amount Oleic acid, methyl ester 1550479 Methyl caprylate 1045830 1-Nonanamine, N, N-dimethyl 768348 Decanoic acid, methyl ester 757531 Pyridine, 3- (1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)- 753810 Geranyl alcohol 687759 Unknown 660038 Unknown 406702 1,6-0ctadien-3-ol, 3, 7-dimethyl- 289642 3-Hexen-1-ol, (Z)- 207842 Dimethoxymethylphenylsilane 172487 D-Limonene 169538 Glycidol 148085 1-Hexanol 135717 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 132150 1-Butanol 115709 2 (3H) -Furanone, 5-hexyldi hydro- 0

Example 7 (first capsule: mango (crushed), second capsule: mango (crushed)) Detection Detection amount Oleic acid, methyl ester 1800990 Methyl caprylate 1415909 Pyridine, 3- (1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)- 1102874 Decanoic acid, methyl ester 1049434 Geranyl alcohol 663105 1-Nonanamine, N, N-dimethyl- 658344 Unknown 479359 D-Limonene 320644 1, 6-0ctadien-3-oI, 3, 7-dimethyI- 288102 3-Hexen-1-ol, (Z)- 275433 Dimethoxymethylphenylsilane 172933 1-Hexanol 157789 2-Ethyl-1- hexanol 150781 Glycidol 149172 1-Butanol 118312 Unknown 116090 2 (3H) -Furanone, 5-hexyldihydro- 0

Experimental Example 6: Collection and Analysis of Bad Breath by Capsules and Perfumes in Capsules

In order to measure the effect of reducing the bad breath when applying the filter according to the embodiments of the present invention, by the flavor and before and after the first and second capsule crushing was analyzed by collecting, Table 12 is Examples 3 to 7 and Analysis results according to Comparative Examples 3 to 5.

division First capsule Second capsule MM TI
(stomach) Spices Shredding Spices Shredding Example 3 mango Shred Apple Mint Shred 1.3 Example 4 Orange 1.9 Example 5 Strawberry 2.3 Example 6 wine 1.4 Example 7 mango 1.4 Comparative Example 3 X Apple Mint X 2.0 Comparative Example 4 Shred X 2.1 Comparative Example 5 X Shred 1.7

The collection of bad breath was performed five times per example for a total of five smokers, the interval was set to 30 minutes per session. The collection of bad breath was carried out after each smoker scavenged for 2 minutes after smoking a single cigarette, and the collected smoke was sampled in a 3L tethered bag and subjected to thermal desorber (TC) / gas chromatography (PCD) -pulsed flame photometric detector (PFPD) analysis. Analysis was performed on H ₂ S (Hydrogen Sulfide), MM (Methyl Mercaptan), Di-Methyl Sulfide (DMS) and Di-Methyl Di-Sulfide (DMDS). ₂ S, DMS and DMDS were excluded from Table 12 because of the difficulty in deriving meaningful results, such as the detection of concentrations below the threshold level.

Table 12 shows the results of measuring the Threshold Index (TI) of the MM (Methylmercaptan, also referred to as methanethiol, which is referred to as methanethiol, and hereinafter referred to as methylmercaptan for convenience of description) for each example. have. The TI was calculated by dividing the median value of the five measurements for each example by the threshold (0.07 ppb).

As shown in Table 12, of the examples in which both the first and second capsules were broken, the TI values of the methylmercaptans in Examples 3, 4, 6, and 7 were determined. Lower than the TI value of methylmercaptan in Comparative Example 3, in which all capsules were not broken. Accordingly, in the case where both the first and second capsules were crushed, the reduction effect of methylmercaptan generally appeared more than when the first and second capsules were not crushed or only one was crushed.

On the other hand, the reduction effect of the methyl mercaptan was confirmed that the expression and maximized by the interaction of the appropriate combination of the first and second capsules, rather than simply expressed by the capsule crushing using a fruit-based flavor. This is because, even if both the first and second capsules were broken, in the case of Examples 4 and 5, the reduction effect of methylmercaptan did not appear to be a significant value or the TI value of methylmercaptan was rather increased.

In both Example 3 (first capsule = mango, second capsule = applemint), Example 6 (first capsule = mango, second capsule = wine) and Example 7 (first and second capsule = mango) In comparison with Comparative Example 3 (first and second capsules not crushed), the effect of reducing the amount of methyl mercaptan generated by about 30% or more was shown, and the effect of reducing the amount of methyl mercaptan generated in Example 3 was slightly superior. Methylmercaptan is an organic sulfur compound that gives off odors, such as rotten cabbage, mainly found in peanuts, cheese, radishes, and the like. Example 3 (first capsule = mango, second capsule = applemint), Example 6 (first capsule = The smoking articles according to mango, second capsule = wine) and Example 7 (first and second capsule = mango) are expected to have an excellent effect of reducing bad breath due to smoking. The effect was expected to be the best.

Experimental Example 7: Sensory evaluation after smoking during smoking according to Examples 3 to 7 and Comparative Examples 3 to 5

Sensory evaluation was conducted on the aroma intensity, the refreshing feeling, the aroma satisfaction and the aftertaste of the smoking articles of each example, the overall satisfaction after smoking, the degree of cigarette odor on the finger and the smell of cigarette odor on the finger.

The evaluation of sensory characteristics was carried out on 60 evaluation panel members using smoking articles of Examples 3 to 7 and Comparative Examples 3 to 5, based on a total of 7 points.

Table 13 shows the sensory properties evaluation results of smoking articles according to Examples 3 to 7 and Comparative Examples 3 to 5 of the present invention, Figures 7 to 13 are according to Examples 3 to 7 and Comparative Examples 3 to 5 of the present invention. It is a diagram showing the results of evaluation of sensory properties of smoking articles in the item-specific graph.

division Smoking After smoking incense
burglar Refreshing feeling incense
satisfaction aftertaste
neatness Overall
satisfaction finger
Smell of cigarette
Degree finger
Smell of cigarette
Fragrance Example 3
(Mango + Apple Mint) 5.0 5.7 5.0 5.6 5.4 2.7 4.1 Example 4
(Mango + orange) 4.9 5.1 4.8 5.0 5.1 3.6 4.4 Example 5 (Mango + Strawberry) 4.7 4.3 4.9 4.7 4.9 2.8 4.4 Example 6 (Mango + Wine) 5.3 5.7 5.1 5.4 5.3 2.8 4.6 Example 7 (mango + mango) 5.0 5.2 5.0 4.9 5.0 2.9 4.2 Comparative Example 3
(Mango + Apple Mint)
(All unshredded) 3.1 2.6 3.6 4.4 3.7 5.4 1.8 Comparative Example 4 (mango + apple mint)
(Mango shred) 3.3 2.8 4.0 4.2 3.5 3.4 4.2 Comparative Example 5 (mango + apple mint)
(Apple Mint Smash) 4.7 4.7 3.9 5.1 4.2 5.5 4.3

As shown in Table 13 and FIG. 7, the fragrance intensity during smoking in the smoking articles of Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first and second capsules were crushed regardless of the type of perfume, both the first and second capsules were used. It was found to increase compared to Comparative Examples 3 to 5 which did not break or break only one. In Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first and second capsules were broken, the first and second capsules were increased by about 50% or more compared to the comparative example in which both the first and second capsules were not broken, and compared to Comparative Example 4 in which only the first capsule was broken. It was increased by more than 40%, the same or higher than the comparative example 5 which only crushed the second capsule was shown. The influence of the first capsule crushing (comparative example 4) on the fragrance strength during smoking showed a slight tendency It can be seen that the influence by the second capsule is greater than the first capsule.

Comparing the results according to the flavors of Examples 3 to 7, it was found that the fragrance intensity during smoking was the best when the second capsule is wine flavor, and then the second capsule is excellent when the apple mint or mango flavor. appear.

As shown in Table 13 and FIG. 8, it was found that the refreshment during smoking tends to be generally similar to the fragrance intensity during smoking. In other words, the comparison between the first and second capsules in which the refreshing feeling during smoking in the smoking articles of Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first and second capsules were crushed regardless of the type of the perfume was not crushed or crushed only one of them. It was shown to increase generally compared with Examples 3-5. Similarly, it was confirmed that the influence of the first capsule fracture (comparative example 4) on the cooling sensation during smoking showed a slight tendency, and the influence by the second capsule was greater than that of the first capsule.

Comparing the perfume-specific results of Examples 3 to 7, it was found that the refreshing feeling during smoking was excellent when the second capsule was wine or apple mint.

As shown in Table 13 and FIG. 9, the fragrance satisfaction during smoking did not have a biased dependency on either of the first and second capsules.

Throughout Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first and second capsules were broken, it was confirmed that a higher score was shown in Comparative Examples 3 to 5 in which both the first and second capsules were not broken or only one was broken. .

Regarding the aroma satisfaction during smoking, the difference in the numerical value of each type of perfume was found to be slight.

As shown in Table 13 and FIG. 10, the neatness of aftertaste during smoking in the smoking articles of Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first and second capsules were broken regardless of the kind of flavor, the first and second capsules It was found to increase compared to Comparative Examples 3 to 4, in which all were not broken or only the first capsule was broken. Regarding the neatness of aftertaste during smoking, it can be seen that the influence by the second capsule is greater than that of the first capsule.

Comparing the results of the flavors of Examples 3 to 7, the neatness of aftertaste during smoking was shown to be the best when the second capsule is applemint flavor, and the second capsule was shown to be excellent when the wine flavor.

On the other hand, with regard to the neatness of aftertaste during smoking, in the case of Comparative Example 4 in which only the first capsule was crushed, a slightly lower value was obtained than in the case of Comparative Example 3 in which both the first and second capsules were not crushed. And even if all of the second capsule is broken, the numerical value may be rather lower than the case where only the second capsule is broken depending on the type of perfume (Examples 4, 5, 7). Through this, the neatness of the aftertaste during smoking was expected to be more influenced by the interaction according to the fragrance combination of the first and second capsules than the influence on the fracture of the first and second capsules.

It was confirmed that the fragrance combination in Example 3, in which the first and second capsules were mango and applemint flavors, and Example 6, in which the first and second capsules were mango and wine flavors, respectively, showed a synergistic effect in aftertaste clarity.

As shown in Table 13 and FIG. 11, the overall satisfaction after smoking was found to exhibit a trend generally similar to the neatness of aftertaste during smoking. The cleanliness of aftertaste during smoking in the smoking articles of Examples 3 to 7, in which both the first and second capsules were crushed regardless of the kind of perfume, the crushing of the first and second capsules or only one crushed It was shown to increase compared to Comparative Examples 3 to 5.

Comparing the results of the flavors of Examples 3 to 7, the overall satisfaction after smoking was also found to be the best when the second capsule is applemint flavor, similar to the neatness of aftertaste during smoking, and the second capsule is wine flavor It was found to be excellent in the case.

As shown in Table 13 and FIG. 12, the degree of finger tobacco odor after smoking in the smoking articles of Examples 3 to 7, in which both the first and second capsules were crushed regardless of the type of perfume, the first and second capsules. It was found to increase compared to Comparative Examples 3 and 5 in which all of the two capsules were not crushed or crushed. As for the degree of smell of finger tobacco after smoking, it can be confirmed that the influence by the first capsule is significantly greater than that of the second capsule. Accordingly, it was confirmed that crushing only the second capsule without crushing the first capsule did not substantially exhibit the masking effect of the smell of finger tobacco.

Comparing the flavor-specific results of Examples 3 to 7, finger smoke smell after smoking is relatively superior to the case that the second capsule is orange flavor when the second capsule is applemint flavor, strawberry flavor, wine flavor or mango flavor Appeared.

As shown in Table 13 and Fig. 13, in the smoking articles of Examples 3 to 7, in which both the first and second capsules were crushed regardless of the kind of perfume, the degree of aroma other than the smell of finger tobacco after smoking was first and third. Both capsules were significantly increased compared to Comparative Example 3, which was not broken. On the other hand, no significant difference was found in Examples 3 to 7 in which both the first and second capsules were broken and Comparative Examples 4 and 5 in which only one of the first and second capsules was broken.

Considering the fact that the reduction effect of the finger tobacco odor is not substantially shown in Comparative Example 5 in which only the second capsule is crushed as shown in FIG. 12, it is possible that simply smelling the finger may not show the cigarette odor masking effect. You can expect it.

Comparing the results of the flavors of Examples 3 to 7, after the smoking, the smell of the finger other than the smell of tobacco was found to be the best when the second capsule is a wine flavor. Considering the results of FIG. 12, it can be seen that the second capsule is an applemint flavor, but the smell of finger tobacco after smoking is less than that of other flavors, compared to other flavors.

According to the smoking article filter and the smoking article including the same according to an embodiment of the present invention as described above, there is an effect that can reduce both the smell of the hand and the smell caused by the smoker's smoking.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be embodied in a modified form without departing from the essential characteristics of the above-described substrate. Therefore, the disclosed methods should be considered in descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation. The scope of the present invention is shown in the claims rather than the foregoing description, and all differences within the scope will be construed as being included in the present invention.

100: smoking articles
120: smoking material department
120a: smoking material wrapper
112: first filter
112c: first capsule
112a: first wrapper
114: second filter
114c: second capsule
114a: second wrapper
116: binding wrapper
130: tipping wrapper

Claims (23)

A first filter whose upstream end is coupled to a smoking material portion of the smoking article;
A first wrapper that is not subjected to oil treatment surrounding the first filter;
A second filter coupled to the downstream end of the first filter;
A second wrapper having an oil treatment covering the second filter; And
And a coupling wrapper that is not oil-treated to wrap the first filter and the second filter.
Wherein the first filter comprises a first capsule comprising a first perfume and the second filter comprises a second capsule comprising a second perfume,
At least one of the first wrapper and the coupling wrapper is a porous wrapper having a porosity of 6500CU or more and 24000CU or less,
Filter for smoking articles with hand and odor reduction technology.
According to claim 1,
The first fragrance and the second fragrance are different materials,
Filter for smoking articles with hand and odor reduction technology.
According to claim 1,
The second flavor is any one selected from apple mint, orange flavor, strawberry flavor, wine flavor and mango flavor,
Filter for smoking articles with hand and odor reduction technology.
The method of claim 3, wherein
The first flavor is mango flavor, the second flavor is any one selected from apple mint, wine flavor and mango flavor,
Filter for smoking articles with hand and odor reduction technology.
delete delete delete According to claim 1,
The first capsule and the second capsule is formed in a position spaced apart from each other 10mm to 14mm,
Filter for smoking articles with hand and odor reduction technology.
According to claim 1,
The second filter is a filter in which a third fragrance equal to or different from the first fragrance or the second fragrance is flavored.
Filter for smoking articles with hand and odor reduction technology.
The method of claim 9,
The first flavor is mango flavor, the second flavor is any one selected from apple mint flavor, wine flavor and mango flavor, the third flavor is green apple herb flavor,
Filter for smoking articles with hand and odor reduction technology.
Smoking product with hand and bad breath reduction technology,
A smoking material portion wrapped with a smoking material wrapper;
A first filter having an upstream end coupled to the smoking material portion and having a first wrapper which is not subjected to oil treatment;
A second filter coupled to a downstream end of the first filter and wrapped with a second wrapper subjected to oil treatment;
A coupling wrapper that is not oil resistant, which wraps around the first filter and the second filter; And
A non-oilproof tipping wrapper that wraps to join the first filter and the second filter with at least a portion of the smoking material portion,
Wherein the first filter comprises a first capsule comprising a first perfume and the second filter comprises a second capsule comprising a second perfume,
At least one of the first wrapper and the coupling wrapper is a porous wrapper having a porosity of 6500CU or more and 24000CU or less,
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.
The method of claim 11, wherein
The tipping wrapper includes a first punctured region located in an area overlapping with the first filter and a second punched region located in an area overlapping with the second filter,
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.
The method of claim 12,
At least a portion of the first perforated region overlaps with the first capsule,
The second perforated region is located upstream than the second capsule,
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.
The method of claim 12,
The first perforated region includes a plurality of first holes formed along the outer circumferential surface of the tipping wrapper and a plurality of second holes formed along the outer circumferential surface of the tipping wrapper downstream from the first holes,
The second perforated region includes a plurality of third holes formed along the outer circumferential surface of the tipping wrapper and a plurality of fourth holes formed along the outer circumferential surface of the tipping wrapper downstream from the third holes,
The first holes and the second holes are formed in the tipping wrapper,
The third holes and the fourth holes are formed through the tipping wrapper, the coupling wrapper and the second wrapper,
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.
The method of claim 14,
The tipping wrapper has a porosity of 190CU to 210CU in the first drilling area in which the first holes and the second holes are formed.
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.
The method of claim 15,
The second holes are located 1.5 mm to 2.5 mm apart from the first holes in the downstream direction,
The fourth holes are located 0.5mm to 1.5mm away from the third holes in the downstream direction,
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.
The method of claim 16,
The third holes are located 9mm to 11mm away from the second hole in the downstream direction,
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.
The method of claim 16,
The first holes are located 10 mm to 13 mm away from the upstream end of the tipping wrapper in a downstream direction,
The second holes are located 20mm to 23mm spaced upstream from the downstream end of the second filter,
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.
The method of claim 11, wherein
The circumference of the smoking article is 14mm to 19mm,
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.
The method of claim 11, wherein
The circumference of the smoking article is 22.5mm to 26.5mm,
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.
The method of claim 11, wherein
The secondary lead component collected in the region overlapping with the first filter as the outer surface of the tipping wrapper when the smoking article is smoked while the first capsule and the second capsule are crushed is D-Limonene, 1-Hexanol, 3 -Hexen-1-ol (Z)-, Decanoic acid, methyl ester, Geranyl Alcohol, 1,6-0ctadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl- and 2 (3H) -Furanone, 5-hexyldi hydro- Comprising at least one,
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.
The method of claim 21,
The detection amount of 2 (3H) -Furanone, 5-hexyldihydro- in the side lead component is greater than the detection amount of 1,6-0ctadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-,
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.
The method of claim 21,
The amount of 1-Hexanol detected in the sidestream component is greater than that of Decanoic acid, methyl ester,
Smoking goods with hand and breath reduction technology.

Images