<div class="application article clearfix" id="description">
<p class="printTableText" lang="en">New Zealand Paient Spedficaiion for Paient Number £00967 <br><br>
70096 <br><br>
Priority Dat^aj; A <br><br>
Complete Specification Filed: <br><br>
Class: .... <br><br>
Publication Date: ... JkJ.2 AvT p-0. Jourr/il. No: «/?"?« <br><br>
NEW ZEALAND <br><br>
Patents Act 1953 <br><br>
COMPLETE SPECIFICATION <br><br>
"IMIDAZOLYLPROPIONITRILES, PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF THESE COMPOUNDS AND THEIR USE AS BIOCIDAL AGENTS." <br><br>
We, SCHERING AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, a body corporate organized according to the laws of Germany, of 170-178 Mullerstrasse, D-1000 Berlin 65, Germany and Waldstrasse 14, 4619 Bergkamen, Germany, do hereby declare the invention, for which we pray that a Patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed to be particularly described in and by the follov.d nc- ,<r LtitomoivL <br><br>
_ 1 _ <br><br>
200967 <br><br>
- 2 - <br><br>
The invention relates to imidazolylpropionitriles and biocidal agents containing them. <br><br>
Imidazolylpropionitrile derivatives having fungicidal action have already been disclosed. <br><br>
5 These, however, have a relatively narrow spectrum of action, and this is unsatisfactory. <br><br>
This present invention provides imidazolylpropionitriles of the general formula <br><br>
10 in which represents an aromatic hydrocarbon radical that is unsubstituted or substituted by one or more of the same or different substituents selected from halogen atoms, (C^-C^)-alkyl, (C^-C4)-alTcoxy and (C^-C^-alkylthio radicals, and trifluoromethyl and nitro groups, and represents a (C^-C^Q)-alkyl, (C^-CgJ-alkenyl, (C3-C3)-alkynyl or phenylalkyl radical each of which is unsubstituted or substituted by one or more of the same or different substituents selected from halogen atoms, (C^-C^)-alkyl, (C^-C^)-alkoxy and (C^-C^J-alkylthio radicals, and tri-fluoromethyl and nitro groups, <br><br>
and acid addition salts thereof with inorganic and 25 organic acids. <br><br>
15 <br><br>
R< <br><br>
- 3 - <br><br>
(f^ ^ /? <br><br>
• . i /J ^ // <br><br>
It will be understood that compounds of the invention can exist in the form of isomers and the written nomenclature and structural formulae shown in the specification and claims should be taken to include the 5 individual isomers as well as mixtures thereof. <br><br>
The imidazolylpropionitriles according to the invention are biocidally active in the widest sense but are especially distinguished by a fungicidal action in which, surprisingly, they are superior to known active 10 substances of analogous constitution and mode of action. They have a broad spectrum of fungicidal action. Thus the imidazolylpropionitriles of the present invention open up a wide range of possible uses, especially in the field of plant protection. <br><br>
15 Surprisingly, their fungicidal action extends to combating fungi of the most varied systematic position. In the treatment of parts of the plant above the soil, they provide protection against wind-borne causative organisms. The compounds can also be used for treating 20 seeds for protection against seed-transferable causative organisms. In addition, they have systemic action, <br><br>
that is, they are absorbed by the roots of the plants, for example, after being introduced during sowing, and are transported to the parts of the plant above the soil 25 and protect these against causative organisms. <br><br>
Further actions that may be mentioned are growth-regulating and bactericidal actions. <br><br>
?00967 <br><br>
- 4 - <br><br>
Because of their recognised broad spectrum of action, the compounds are suitable not only for protecting crop plants but also for protecting material and for combating human-pathogenic and animal-pathogenic 5 microbes and they therefore have a wide range of possible uses. <br><br>
The fields of application in which the compounds exhibit outstanding effects depend on the particular meaning of the substituents. Thus, they can be used as 10 fungicides, plant growth regulators or bactericides, <br><br>
as the case may be. <br><br>
In the compounds "of the invention I, an alkyl, <br><br>
alkenyl or alkynyl radical or a phenylalkyl radical represented by is unsubstituted or substituted as 15 specified above. An alkyl, alkenyl or alkynyl radical may, for example, be substituted by one or more alkoxy radicals, although an alkenyl or alkynyl radical, especially, is preferably unsubstituted. Thus, <br><br>
R may represent, for example, 2-fluoropheny1, 3-fluoro-20 phenyl, 4-f luorophenyl, 2-chlorop'nenyl, 3-chlorophenyl, <br><br>
4-chlorophenyl, 2-bromophenyl, 3-bromopheny1, 4-bromo-phenyl, 2-iodophenyl, 3-iodophenyl, 4-iodophenyl, 2,3-dichlorcphenyl, 2,4-dichlorophenyl, 3,4-dichlorophenyl, 2,6-dichlorophenyl, 2-methylphenv1, 3-methylphenyl, ^ 4-methylpheny1, 2-ethylphenyl, 3-ethylphenyl, 4-ethyl- <br><br>
phenyl, 2-prcpylphenyl, 3-propylphenyl, 4-propylphenyl, 2-isopropylpheny1, 3-isopropylphenyl, 4-isopropylphenyl, <br><br>
- 00967 <br><br>
- 5 - <br><br>
2-butylpheny1, 3-butylpnenyl, 4-fcutylphenyl, 2-sec — butylphenyl, 3-sec—butylphenyl, 4-sec—butylphenyl, 2-tert-butylphenyl, 3-tert-butylphenyl, 4-tert-butylphenyl, 2-methoxypheny 1, 3-methoxypheny 1, 4-methoxypheny1, 2-ethoxypheny1, 3-ethoxypheny1, 4-ethoxypheny1, 2-methyl-thiophenyl, 3-methylthiophenyl, ^-methylthiophenyl, 2-ethylthiophenyl, 3-ethylthiophenyl, 4-ethylthiophenyl, 2-trifluoromethylphenyl, 3-trifluoromethylphenyl, 4-trifluoromethylphenyl, 2-nitrophenyl, 3-nitrophenyl, 4-nitrophenyl, 3-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl, 2-chloro-5-nitrophenyl, 4-chloro-2-fluorophenyl, 3,4,5-trimethoxy-phenyl, or 5-chloro-2-nitrophenyl, <br><br>
may represent, for example, (C^-C^0)-alkyl, for example methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, hexyl, heptyl, <br><br>
octyl, nonyl, decyl, isopropyl, 2,2-dimethylprop-l-yl , <br><br>
3 , 3-dimethylbut-2-yl,(C -CQ)-alkenyl, for <br><br>
-5 o example 2-buten-l-yl, 3-methyl-2-buten-l-yl, hexenyl, heptenyl, octenyl, (C^-Cg^alkynyl, for example propargyl, butynyl, pentynyl, hexynyl, heptvnyl, octynyl, or phenylalkyl, for example benzyl, 2-fluorobenzyl, 3-fluorobenzyl, 4-fluorobenzyl, 2-chlorobenzyl, 3-chloro-benzyl, 4-chlorobenzyl, 2-bromobenzyl, 3-bromobenzyl, 4-bromobenzyl, 2,4-dichlorobenzvl, 2,6-dichlorobenzyl, 3,4-dichlorobenzyl, 2-methylbenzyl, 3-methylbenzyl, 4-methylbenzyl, 2-nitrobenzyl, 3-nitrobenzyl, 4-nitro-benzyl, 2-trifluoromethylbenzyl, 3-trifluoromethylbenzyl, 4-trifluoromethylbenzyl, 2-methoxybenzyl, 3-methoxy- <br><br>
"009 6 7 <br><br>
- 6 - <br><br>
benzyl, 4-methoxybenzyl, 2-ethcxybenzyl, 3-ethoxybenzyl, 4-ethoxybenzyl, 2-propoxybenzyl, 3-propoxybenzyl, 4-propoxybenzyl, 2-butoxybenzy1, 3-butoxybenzyl, 4-butoxybenzyl, 2-rriethyl thiobenzyl, 3-methylthiobenzvl, 4-methylthiobenzyl, 2-ethylthiobenzyl, 3-ethylthiobenzvl 4-ethylthiobenzyl, 2-butylthiobenzyl, 3-butylthiobenzyl and 4-butylthiobenzyl. <br><br>
may also represent, for example, an alkoxyalkyl or dialkoxyalkyl group, for example 2-methoxyethyl or 3,3-dimethoxybutyl. <br><br>
Suitable inorganic and organic acids for forming the acid addition salts are, for example, hydrohalic acids, such as, for example, hydrochloric acid and hyarobromic acid; phosphoric acid, sulphuric acid, and, especially, nitric acid; monofunctional and bifunc-tional carboxylic acids and hydroxycarboxylic acids, <br><br>
such as, for example, acetic acid, maleic acid, succinic acid, fumaric acid, tartaric acid, citric acid, salicylic acid, sorbic acid and lactic acid: and sulphonic acids, such as, for example, £-toluenesulphonic acid and 1,5-naphthalenedisulphonic acid. <br><br>
Compounds according to the invention having an especially good fungicidal action are those in which R represents a phenyl group unsubstituted or substituted by one or more of the same or different substituents selected from halogen atoms, (C^-C^)-alkyl, (C^-C^J-alkoxy and (C^-C^J-alkylthio <br><br>
- 7 - <br><br>
•'00967 <br><br>
radicals, and trifluoromethyl and nitro groups, and represents a (C^-C^J-alkyl radical, an allyl or propargyl group, or a benzyl group unsubstituted or substituted by one or more of the same or dif-5 ferent substituents selected from halogen atoms, <br><br>
(C1-C4)-alkyl, (C1-C4)-alkoxy and (C1-C^)-alkyl-thio radicals, trifluoromethyl and nitro groups, and their salts. <br><br>
Especially, there should be mentioned those in <br><br>
10 which <br><br>
R represents a phenyl, 2-chlorophenyl, 3-chlorophenyl, 4-chlorophenyl, 2,4-dichlorophenyl, 2,6-dichloro-phenyl, 3,4-dichlorophenyl, 2-fluorophenyl, 4-fluorophenyl, 4-bromophenvl, 2-methylphenyl, 15 4-methylphenyl, 4-methoxyphenyl or 4-nitrophenyl group, <br><br>
and <br><br>
R.j represents a methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, <br><br>
pentyl, hexyl, allyl, propargyl, benzyl, 2-cnloro-20 benzyl, 4-chlorobenzyl, 2., 4-dic'hlorobenzyl or 3,4- <br><br>
dichlorobenzyl group, <br><br>
and their salts. <br><br>
The following compounds have outstanding action: 2-n-butoxv-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-3-(imi dazol-1-yl)-propio-25 nitrile, hydronitrate, <br><br>
2-n-butoxy-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-1-yl)-propio-nitrile, <br><br>
200967 <br><br>
- 8 - <br><br>
2-n-butoxy-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-1-yl)-propio- <br><br>
nitrile, hydronitrate <br><br>
2-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-1-yl)-2-n-propoxypropio-nitrile, hydronitrate <br><br>
2-(2-chlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-1-yl)-2-n-propoxypropio-nitrile. <br><br>
The present invention also provides a process for preparing a compound of the general formula I or a salt thereof, which comprises reacting a propionitrile of the general formula <br><br>
0 - R, <br><br>
1 ' <br><br>
R - C - CH_ - Y II <br><br>
I 2 <br><br>
CN <br><br>
in which R and R^ have the meanings given above and Y represents a halogen atom or an alkylsulphonyloxy or arylsulphonyloxy radical which is optionally halogenated in the side chain, with imidazole of the formula <br><br>
HC - NH <br><br>
II I <br><br>
HC CH <br><br>
\/ <br><br>
N <br><br>
or a salt thereof, in the presence of a solvent and optionally in the presence of a base. <br><br>
A halogen atom represented by Y is, for example, chlorine, bromine or iodine; an alkylsulphonyloxy <br><br>
2 009 6 <br><br>
- 9 - <br><br>
radical is, for example, a methyl-, ethyl-, propyl- or trifluoromethyl-sulphonyloxy group, and an aryl-sulphonyloxy radical is, for example, a benzylsulphonyloxy or p-toluenesulphonyloxy group. <br><br>
5 The reaction may be carried out both with an excess of imidazole, if desired in the presence of a solvent, or with the addition of a strong base, for example sodium or potassium hydroxide. Further, it is possible to use an alkali metal imidazole instead of imidazole. 10 Suitable solvents are substances that are inert towards the reactants, preferably substances of polar, aprotic cuaracter, such, for example, as N,N-dimethyl-formamide, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N-methylpyrrolidone, tetramethylurea, hexamethylphosphoric acid triamide and 15 benzonitrile, and also higher-boiling optionally substituted aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons, such, for example, as toluene, chlorobenzene or xylene. <br><br>
The reaction temperature may be varied within wide limits. A temperature of from 100°C to 200°C is 20 preferred. The reaction is generally carried out under normal or excess pressure. <br><br>
The acid addition salts can be obtained according to conventional salt-forming processes, for example by dissolving a compound of the formula I in a suitable 25 solvent and adding the acid. <br><br>
The imidazolylpropionitriles of the general formula I according to the invention are generally almost <br><br>
-10- <br><br>
colourless and odourless oils. The acid addition salts derived therefrom are generally colourless and odourless crystalline compounds. The oils dissolve sparingly in water and more or less readily in organic solvents, 5 such as, for example, alcohols, ethers or chlorinated hydrocarbons. The acid addition salts dissolve partially in water and readily in polar organic solvents, such, for example, as acetonitrile, N,N-dirnethylformamide, <br><br>
lower alcohols, chloroform and methylene chloride. 10 Compounds of the general formula I and their salts have, especially, fungicidal action but they are at the same time distinguished by growth-regulating effects on a number of crop plants. <br><br>
As already mentioned, the compounds are transported 15 svstemically in the plant. <br><br>
Accordingly, they exhibit their growth-regulating action both in the case of applications over the soil and also in the case of spray treatment. <br><br>
Growth-inhibiting effects on cress and cotton are 20 particularly pronounced. <br><br>
Apart from the actions specified above, compounds of the general formula I and their salts also exhibit a bactericidal action which permits further possible uses. <br><br>
25 The active substances of the invention may be used alone, in admixture with one another or with other active substances. Other plant-protecting or pest- <br><br>
-11- <br><br>
combating agents may, if desired, be added, depending on the desired purpose. <br><br>
The active substances or mixtures mentioned above are advantageously used in the form of preparations, 5 such, for example, as powders, strewable agents, granulates, solutions, emulsions or suspensions, with the addition of liquid and/or solid carriers or diluents and, if desired, wetting, adhesion, emulsifying and/or dispersion auxiliaries. <br><br>
10 Suitable liquid carriers are, for example, water, <br><br>
aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, e.g. benzene, <br><br>
toluene and xylene, cyclohexanone, isophorone, dimethyl sulphoxide, dimethylformamide, and also mineral oil fractions and vegetable oils. <br><br>
15. Suitable solid carriers are mineral earths, for example tonsil, silica gel, talcum, kaolin, attapulgite, limestone, silicic acid and vegetable products, for example meals. <br><br>
Surface-active substances that may be present in 20 the preparations are, for example, calcium ligninsul- <br><br>
phonate, polyoxyethylene alkylphenyl ethers, naphthalene-sulphonic acids and their salts, phenolsulphonic acids and their salts, formaldehyde condensates, fatty alcohol sulphates and substituted benzenesulphonic acids and 25 their salts. <br><br>
If the active substances are to be used for dressing seeds, colouring substances may also be admixed in <br><br>
200967 <br><br>
- 1? - <br><br>
order to give the dressed seeds a clearly visible colour. <br><br>
The proportion of the active substance(s) in the various preparations may vary within wide limits. For example, preparations may contain from 10 to 90 % by 5 weight of active substances, from 90 to 10 % by weight of liquid or solid carriers and, if desired, up to 20 % by weight of surface-active substances. <br><br>
The agents may be applied in customary manner, for example with water as the carrier in quantities of 10 spray liquor of from 100 to 1000 litres/ha. The application of the agents by the so-called "low-volume process" or "ultra-low-volume process" is also possible, as is their application in the form of so-called microgranulates. 15 3-Arylsulphonyloxypropionitriles or 3-alkylsul- <br><br>
phonyloxypropionitriles of the general formula II used as starting materials for preparing compounds of the general formula I, in whiich Y represents an arylsulphonyloxy or alkylsulphonyloxy radical, have hitherto 20 not been described in the literature. <br><br>
Accordingly, the present invention provides a compound of the general formula II in which R and have the meanings given above and Y represents an unsubstituted or halogen-substituted arylsulphonyloxy radical 25 or alkylsulphonyloxy radical, and a process for its preparation. The alkylsulphonyloxy radical preferably has 1 to 4 carbon atoms. <br><br>
2009 <br><br>
- 13 - <br><br>
Arylsulphonyloxy and alkylsulphonyloxy compounds of the general formula II may be obtained by methods known per se, for example by hydroxymethylating a phenylacetonitrile of the general formula <br><br>
0 - R, <br><br>
1 1 <br><br>
R - CH III <br><br>
I <br><br>
CN <br><br>
in which and R have the meanings given under formula I, and reacting the resulting 3-hydroxypropionitrile of the general formula <br><br>
0 - R, <br><br>
1 1 <br><br>
R - C - CH0 - OH IV <br><br>
l 2 <br><br>
CN <br><br>
10 in which and R have the meanings given under formula I, with a suitable sulphonic acid derivative, such as, for example, a sulphonic acid chloride, optionally with the addition of an acid binder. <br><br>
Some of the phenylacetonitriles of the general 15 formula III are known; others may be obtained according to methods known per se (cf., for example, Rubin et a_l. , JACS 67, 192 f (1945); Hess. et , Ber. dt. chem. Ges. 50, 394 (1917)). <br><br>
The hydroxymethyl compounds of the general formula 20 IV have not been described hitherto in the literature. <br><br>
Accordingly, the present invention provides a <br><br>
- 14 - <br><br>
compound of the general formula IV given above and a process for its preparation by the method described above. <br><br>
The 3-halopropionitriles of the general formula II 5 in which Y represents a halogen atom are known in literature and may be obtained by reacting the above-mentioned phenylacetonitriles of the general formula III with dihalomethanes according to methods known per se. <br><br>
10 The following Examples 1 to 91 illustrate the manufacture of imidazolylpropionitriles according to the invention. Example 92 illustrates the manufacture of an alkylsulphonyloxypropionitrile suitable as starting material. <br><br>
15 Examples (i) to (iii) illustrate preparations con taining compounds of the invention and Examples A to U illustrate their use. <br><br>
- 15 - <br><br>
EXAMPLE 1 <br><br>
3 - (Irnidazol-l-yl )-2-phenyl-2-propoxypropionitrile# hydronitrate <br><br>
(Compound no. 1) <br><br>
15 g (0.053 mol) of 3-methylsulphonyloxy-2-phenyl~2-propoxypropionitrile and 17.89 g (0.263 mol) of imidazole are maintained at 140°C for 16 h, during which period 1 ml of dimethylformamide is added and moisture is excluded. <br><br>
The mixture is poured into ice-water, extracted twice with 75 ml of methylene chloride each time, the methylene chloride phase is washed twice with water, dried with magnesium sulphate and concentrated in vacuo after filtering off the drying agent. The remaining dark oil is dissolved in isopropanol and a little more than the theoretical quantity of 100 % nitric acid is added. A little diethyl ether is added to complete the precipitation. The precipitated product is filtered off with suction and dried. <br><br>
Yield: 12 g = 71 % of the theoretical yield M.p.: 168-171°C (decomposition) <br><br>
EXAMPLE 2 <br><br>
3-(Imidazol-l-yl)-2-phenyl-2-propoxypropionitrile <br><br>
(Compound no. 2) <br><br>
6.2 g (0.0195 mol) of the hydronitrate are dissolved in methanol and rendered basic with dilute ammonia solution <br><br>
20096 <br><br>
- 1 6 - <br><br>
while cooling with an ice bath. After diluting with water the solution is extracted with ethyl acetate, the organic phase is washed with water and then dried with magnesium sulphate. After filtering, concentration is effected in vacuo. An oil remains which is dried iri vacuo. <br><br>
Yield: 4.85 g = 97 % of the theoretical yield n^1 = 1.5260 <br><br>
Examples 3-91 <br><br>
The following compounds according to the invention can be manufactured in an analogous manner. <br><br>
Name of the compound Physical constant <br><br>
3C 2-Butcxy-3-(imidazol—1-yl)-2- m.p«:155-157°C(D) <br><br>
phenylpropionitrile, hydronitrate <br><br>
4. 2-5utoxy-3-(imidazol—1-yl)-2- n^ = 1.5208 <br><br>
phenylpropionitrile <br><br>
5. 2-Allvloxy-3-(imiaazol-l-yl )-2— m.p. : 162—164°C (D ) phenylpropionitrilet hydronitrate <br><br>
6. 2-Allylcxy—3-(imidazol—1-yl)-2— nD^ = 1*5402 <br><br>
phenylpropionitrile <br><br>
7. 2-Ethoxy—3-(imidazol—1—yl)-2- m.p.:182-186°C(D) phenylpropionitrilet hydronitrate <br><br>
44 <br><br>
8. 2-Ethoxy-3-(imidazol—1-yl)-2- nQ = 1.5247 phenylpropionitrile <br><br>
9„ 3—(Imidazol-l-yl )—2-mathoxy-2- m.'p. : 189—191°C (D) phenylpropionitrile, hydronitrate <br><br>
10. 3—(Imidazol-l-yl)-2—methoxy-2- m.p.: 57— 60°C phenylpropionitrile <br><br>
2 009 6 7 <br><br>
Name of the compound Physical constant <br><br>
11. 2-(2-Chlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)- <br><br>
2-propoxypropionitrile, hydronitrate m.p. :162-165°C(D) <br><br>
12. 2-Butoxy-2-( 4-chlorophenyl)-3-( imidazol- <br><br>
l-yl )-propionitrile , hydronitrate m.p.: 178-181°C(D) <br><br>
13. 2-Butoxy-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-3-{irnidazol- <br><br>
1-yl)-propionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.:177-178°C(D) <br><br>
14. 2-Allyloxy-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, hydronitrate m.p. :153-155°C(D) <br><br>
15. 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2- <br><br>
propoxypropionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.:174-177°C(D) <br><br>
16. 2-Allyloxy-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.:152-155°C(D) <br><br>
17. 2-(2-Chlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2-propoxypropionitrile n^ = 1.5343 <br><br>
18. 2-Butoxy-2-(4-chlorophenyl) -3- <br><br>
41 <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile nQ = 1.5288 <br><br>
19. 2-Butoxy-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
4 1 <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile n^ = 1.5329 <br><br>
20. 2-Allyloxy-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
4 1 <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile nQ = 1.5490 <br><br>
21. 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)- <br><br>
4 1 <br><br>
2-propoxypropionitrile - n^ = 1.5337 <br><br>
22. 2-Allyloxy-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
4 1 <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile nD = 1.5476 <br><br>
23. 2-Benzyloxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl )-2-phenyl- <br><br>
propionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.:166-168°C(D) <br><br>
Name of the compound <br><br>
Physical constant <br><br>
24- 2-Benzyloxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2- <br><br>
phenylpropionitrile n^° = 1.5638 <br><br>
25. 3-(Imidazol-l-yl)-2 — isopropoxy-2- <br><br>
phenylpropionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 165-168°C(D) <br><br>
26. 3-(Imidazol-l-yl)-2-isopropoxy-2-phenylpropionitrile n^° : 1.5254 <br><br>
27. 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-hexyloxy-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.:152-154°C(D) <br><br>
28. 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-hexyloxy-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-prcpionitrile n^ : 1.5197 <br><br>
29. 2-Allyloxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2-(2-methvlphenyl)-propionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 160°C (D) <br><br>
30. 2-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl )-2-propoxypropionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 169-170°C (D) <br><br>
31. 2-Butoxy-2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 148-50°C (D) <br><br>
32. 2-Allyloxy-2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-1-yl)-propionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 158-60°C (D) <br><br>
33. 2-Ethoxy-2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, hydronitrate m.p. : 105-06°C (D) <br><br>
Name of the Compound Physical constant <br><br>
34. 2-Allyloxy-3-(imidazol-1-yl)-2- <br><br>
(2-methylphenyl)-propionitrile n^° : 1.5388 <br><br>
D <br><br>
35. 2-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-1- <br><br>
.40 <br><br>
36. 2-Allyloxy-2-(3,4-dichlorophenvl)-3- <br><br>
yl)-2-propoxypropionitrile n^ : 1.5360 <br><br>
,.40 <br><br>
37. 2-Butoxy-2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)- 3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile nQ : 1.5500 <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile n^ : 1.5381 <br><br>
38. 2-Allyloxy-2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile n^® : 1.5531 <br><br>
39. 2-Ethoxy-2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile n^ : 1.5372 <br><br>
40. 3-(Imidazol-l-yl)-2-phenyl-2-(1,2,2-trimethylpropoxy)-propionitrile , <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 168-173°C (D) <br><br>
41. 3-(Imidazol-1-yl)-2-(2-methoxy-ethoxy)-2-phenylpropionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 158-160°C (D) <br><br>
42. 2-(2,2-Dimethylpropoxy)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-2-phenylpropionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 168-171°C (D) <br><br>
4 3. 2-(2,2-Dimethylpropoxy)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-2-phenylpropionitriie m.p.: 89- 91°C <br><br>
44. 2-(2-Fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l- <br><br>
yl )-2-prop"oxypropionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 170-172°C (D) <br><br>
200967 <br><br>
Name of the compound Physical constant <br><br>
45. 2-Butoxy-2-(2-fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 173-176°C (D) 4 6. 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl) - <br><br>
2-propoxypropionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 150-152°C (D) <br><br>
47. 2-Butoxy-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 162-165°C (D) <br><br>
48. 2-Allyloxy-2-(2-fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 169-171°C (D) <br><br>
49. 2-Ethoxy-2-(2-fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 172-175°C (Z) <br><br>
50. 2-(2-Fluoropheny1)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)- <br><br>
2-methoxypropionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 177-179°C (D) <br><br>
51. 3-(Imidazol-l-yl)-2-phenyl-2-(1,2,2- <br><br>
trimethylpropoxy)-propionitrile m.p.: 113-116°C <br><br>
52. 3-(Imidazol-1-yl)-2-(2-methoxy- <br><br>
ethoxy)-2-phenylpropionitrile n^ : 1.5212 <br><br>
53. 2-(2-Fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)- <br><br>
'•D <br><br>
40 <br><br>
2-propoxypropionitrile > n : 1.5143 <br><br>
54. 2-Butoxy-2-(2-fluorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
... 40 <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile nD : 1.5108 <br><br>
55. 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-1- <br><br>
... 40 <br><br>
yl)-2-propoxypropionitrile n^ : 1.5115 <br><br>
- 21 - <br><br>
2 009 6 7 <br><br>
Name of the compound Physical constant <br><br>
56. 2-Butoxy-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile n^° : 1.5085 <br><br>
57. 2-(2-Fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l- <br><br>
yl )-2-methoxypropionitrile n£° : 1.5280 <br><br>
58. 2-Ethoxy-2-(2-fluorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile n40 : 1.5187 <br><br>
D <br><br>
59. 2-Allyloxy-2-(2-fluorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile n^° : 1.5258 <br><br>
60. 2-Allyloxy-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 159-161°C (D) <br><br>
61. 2-Ethoxy-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 182-184°C (D) <br><br>
62. 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl )-2-methoxypropionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 194-196°C (D) <br><br>
63. 2-Ethoxy-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile m.p.: 54- 57°C <br><br>
64. 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-3-(imidazol-1- <br><br>
yl)-2-methoxypropionitrile m.p.: 88°C <br><br>
65. 2-Allyloxy-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile n^° : 1.5219 <br><br>
66. 2-Decyloxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl) - 2- <br><br>
phenylpropionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 126-128°C (D) <br><br>
- 2? - <br><br>
Name of the compound Physical constant <br><br>
67. 2-(3,3-Dimethylbutoxy)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-2-phenylpropio- <br><br>
nitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 195-198°C (D) <br><br>
68. 3-(Imidazol-l-yl)-2-octyloxy-2- <br><br>
phenylpropionitrile n^° : 1.5055 <br><br>
69. 2-(3,3-Dimethoxybutoxy)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-2-phenylpropionitrile n^° : 1.5093 <br><br>
70. 2-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-butoxy-3- <br><br>
( imidazol-l-yD-propionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 171-174°C (D) <br><br>
71. 2-( 4-Bromophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)- <br><br>
2-propoxypropionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 162-165°C (D) <br><br>
72. 2-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-hexyloxy-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 135-138°C (D) <br><br>
73. 3-(Imidazol-l-yl)-2-(2-methyl-phenyl)-2-propoxypropionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 180-183°C (D) <br><br>
74. 2-Hexyloxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2-(2-methylphenyl)-propionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 170-173°C (D) <br><br>
7 5. 2-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-butoxy-3- <br><br>
40 <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile nQ : 1.5405 <br><br>
76. 2-(4-Bromophenyl)-3-(imidazol-l-yl)- <br><br>
40 <br><br>
2-propoxypropionitrile nQ : 1.5418 <br><br>
77. 2-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-hexyloxy-3- <br><br>
40 <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yD-propionitrile n : 1.5274 <br><br>
- 23 - <br><br>
J O (H) Q) (£ <br><br>
Name of the compound <br><br>
Physical constant <br><br>
78. 2-Butoxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2- <br><br>
(2-methylphenyl)-propionitrile : 1.5248 <br><br>
79. 2-Butoxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2-( 2-rnethylphenyl)-propionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 184-186°C <br><br>
80. 2-Hexyloxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2- <br><br>
( 2-rnethylphenyl)-propionitrile n^ : 1.5163 <br><br>
81. 2-Decyloxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2- <br><br>
£0 <br><br>
phenylpropionitrile nQ : 1.5020 <br><br>
82. 3-(Imidazol-l-yl')-2-( 2-methylphenyl)-2-propoxypropionitrile n^° : 1.5276 <br><br>
83. 2-Butoxy-2-(3-chlorophenyl)-3- <br><br>
(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile n^° : 1.5282 <br><br>
84. 2-(3-Chlorophenyl)-2-hexyloxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 162-165°C (D) <br><br>
85. 2-Decyloxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2-(2-methylphenyl)-propionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate m.p.: 151-155°C (D) <br><br>
86. 3-(Imidazol-l-yl)-2-(2-methyl- <br><br>
40 <br><br>
phenyl)-2-octyloxypropionitrile, n^ : 1.5173 <br><br>
87. 2-Decyloxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2- <br><br>
(2-methylphenyl)-propionitrile n^° : 1.5139 <br><br>
88. 2-Butoxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2-( 4-methoxyphenyl)-propionitrile, hydronitrate m.p.: 163-167°C (D) <br><br>
- 24 - <br><br>
200967 <br><br>
Name of the compound <br><br>
Physical constant <br><br>
89. 2-Butcxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-propionitrile <br><br>
90. 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-hexyloxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, hydrogen oxalate <br><br>
91. 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-hexyloxy-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-propionitrile, bisulohate m.p. : 195-197°C (D) <br><br>
m.p.: 158-163°C (D) <br><br>
(D = decomposition) <br><br>
In the following, the manufacture of a starting material is described. <br><br>
Example 9 2 <br><br>
3-methyl sulphonyl-2-phenyl - 2-propox\fr)ropioni tr i le <br><br>
27 g (0.154 mol) of 2-phenyl-2-propoxyacetcnitrile are dissolved in 120 ml of pyridine, and 18.5 g (0.614 mol) of paraformaldehyde are added. 7.7 ml of tetra-butylammonium hydroxide (TBA0H) are added to this suspension while cooling with ice and the mixture is stirred <br><br>
200967 <br><br>
vigorously for 17 hours. The reaction mixture is poured into ice-water and extracted twice with ether. The ether phase is then washed twice with aqueous sodium chloride solution and dried with magnesium sulphate. After filtering off the drying agent and concentrating by rotation in vacuo, a colourless oil remains which proves to be uniform according to thin layer chromatography and can be further processed without further purification. Yield: 28.4 g = 90 % of the theoretical yield 3-hydroxy-2-phenyl-2-propoxypropionitrile <br><br>
28 g (0.136 mol) of 3-hydroxy-2-phenyl-2-propoxypropionitrile are dissolved in 200 nil of toluene, and 19.5 g (0.171 mol) of methanesulphcnic acid chloride are added. 18.6 g (0.184 mol) of triethylamine are added dropwise at 10°C. The mixture is then stirred for 30 minutes at room temperature, the precipitated triethylamine hydrochloride is filtered off and the filtrate is concentrated. The residue is taken up in ether, washed with dilute HCl solution, water and sodium bicarbonate solution and twice more with water. The residue is dried with magnesium sulphate, the drying agent is filtered off with suction and concentration is carried out. The oily residue is dried _in vacuo. According to thin layer chromatography, it is pure. <br><br>
Yield: 32.27 g = 86 % of the theoretical yield nD = 1. 5000 <br><br>
3-methylsulphonyl-2-phenyl-2-propoxypropionitrile <br><br>
IJ Sv - <br><br>
_ 26 - ™ w O ^ <br><br>
7 <br><br>
Examples of preparations <br><br>
Example (i) <br><br>
Wettable powder a) 40 % by weight active substance 5 25 % by weight clay minerals <br><br>
20 % by weight silicic acid 10 % by weight cellulose pitch 5 % by weight surface-active substances based on a mixture of the calcium salt of 10 ligninsulphonic acid with alkylphenol polyglycol ethers b) 25 % by weight active substance 60 % by weight kaolin <br><br>
10 % by weight silicic acid 15 5 % by weight surface-active substances based on the sodium salt of N-methyl-N-oleyl-taurine and the calcium salt of ligninsulphonic acid. <br><br>
c) 10 % by weight active substance 20 60 % by weight clay minerals <br><br>
15 % by weight silicic acid 10 % by weight cellulose pitch -5 % by weight surface-active substances based on the sodium salt of N-methyl-N-oleyl-25 taurine and the calcium salt of ligninsulphonic acid. <br><br>
- 27 - <br><br>
% 009 67 <br><br>
Example (ii) <br><br>
Paste <br><br>
45 % by weight active substance 5 % by weight sodium aluminium silicate 5 15 % by weight cetyl polyglycol ether with 8 moles of ethylene oxide 2 % by weight spindle oil 10 % by weight polyethylene glycol 23 parts water <br><br>
10 Example (iii) <br><br>
Emulsion concentrate <br><br>
25 <br><br>
% <br><br>
by weight active substance <br><br>
15 <br><br>
0/ <br><br>
/o by weight cyclohexanone <br><br>
55 <br><br>
% <br><br>
by weight xylene <br><br>
15 <br><br>
5 <br><br>
e/ <br><br>
/o by weight mixture of nonylphenylpolyoxyethylene or calcium dodecylbenzenesulphonate. <br><br>
% 009 6 <br><br>
The following Examples illustrate possible uses of the compounds according to the invention which were used in the form of the above-mentioned preparations. <br><br>
EXAMPLE A <br><br>
Effect of seed treatment against Helminthosporium spec, in barley. <br><br>
Barley seeds infected naturally with Helminthosporium oramineum were sown either untreated or treated as indicated in the Table in soil-filled plant containers and left to germinate at temperatures below +16°C. After emergence, the seedlings were illuminated with artificial light for 12 hours daily. After approximately 5 weeks, all the plants that had emerged and the plants attacked by fungi were counted per test unit. <br><br>
The fungicidal action was calculated as follows: <br><br>
100 x attack in treated group 100 - = % action attack in untreated group The compounds were in the form of 20 % wettable powders. <br><br>
- ?9 - <br><br>
Compound according to g active substance the invention no. loo kg seeds % action <br><br>
1 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
95.6 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
3 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
4 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
5 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
6 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
ioo <br><br>
7 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
8 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
9 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
10 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
11 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
IOO <br><br>
12 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
13 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
14 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
15 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
16 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
17 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
18 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
19 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
20 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
21 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
Comparison aaent methoxyethyl mercury silicate <br><br>
2.63 <br><br>
87 <br><br>
200967 <br><br>
EXAMPLE B <br><br>
Effect of prophylactic leaf treatment against Erysiphe cichoracearum in pumpkin plants in a greenhouse. <br><br>
Young pumpkin plants sprayed until dripping wet with the indicated active substance concentrations were inoculated, after the spray coating had dried on, by dusting with dry mildew spores of Erysiphe cichoracearum and incubated in a greenhouse at 24°C together with inoculated untreated control plants. After one week, the surface area of the leaves attacked by mildew was estimated as a percentage of the total surface area of the leaf. The fungicidal action was calculated as follows: <br><br>
100 x attack in treated plants <br><br>
100 - = '% action attack in untreated plants <br><br>
The substances were in the form of 20 % wettable powders. Compound according to active substance the invention no. concentration as % action <br><br>
-5 ©/ <br><br>
a /o <br><br>
1 0.025 100 <br><br>
0.005 100 <br><br>
0.001 100 <br><br>
2 0.025 100 <br><br>
0.005 100 <br><br>
0.OOl 100 <br><br>
3 0.025 100 <br><br>
0.005 100 <br><br>
O.OOl 100 <br><br>
200967 <br><br>
Compound according to active substance the invention no. concentration as a % % action <br><br>
4 <br><br>
0. 025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.005 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
5 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.005 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
6 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0. 005 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.OOl lOO <br><br>
7 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.005 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
8 <br><br>
O. 025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.005 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
9 <br><br>
O. 025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O. 005 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
10 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0. 005 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0. 001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
11 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O. 005 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
12 <br><br>
O. 025 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
0.005 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.OOl loo <br><br>
13 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.005 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.OOl loo <br><br>
14 <br><br>
O. 025 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
O.005 - <br><br>
• 100 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
-87 <br><br>
15 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.005 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
« <br><br>
O.OOl loo <br><br>
16 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
0.005 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
2 009 6/ <br><br>
Compound according to active substance the invention no. concentration as a % % action <br><br>
17 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
0.005 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
18 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O. 005 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0. OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
19 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0. 005 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
0. OOl loo <br><br>
20 <br><br>
O. 025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0. 005 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
O. 001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
21 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O. 005 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0. OOl • <br><br>
100 <br><br>
22 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0. 0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
23 <br><br>
0.001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
24 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
25 <br><br>
0. 001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O. 0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
26 <br><br>
O. 001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
27 <br><br>
0. 001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
28 <br><br>
O. 001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
29 <br><br>
0.001 . <br><br>
100 <br><br>
\ <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
30 <br><br>
O. 001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
31 <br><br>
O.OOl O.0002 <br><br>
100 100 <br><br>
Compound according to active substance the invention no. concentration as a % % action <br><br>
32 O.OOl 100 <br><br>
0.0002 100 <br><br>
33 O.OOl 100 <br><br>
0.0002 100 <br><br>
34 O.OOl 100 <br><br>
O.0002 100 <br><br>
35 O.OOl 100 <br><br>
0.0002 lOO <br><br>
36 O.OOl 100 <br><br>
O.0002 98 <br><br>
37 O.OOl 100 <br><br>
O.0002 lOO <br><br>
38 O.OOl 100 <br><br>
O.0002 100 <br><br>
39 O. OOl 100 <br><br>
0.0002 100 <br><br>
4-0 O.OOl 100 <br><br>
O.0002 100 <br><br>
41 O.OOl 100 <br><br>
O.0002 100 <br><br>
42 0.001 100 <br><br>
0.0002 - lOO <br><br>
43 0.001 100 <br><br>
0.0002 100 <br><br>
44 O.OOl 100 <br><br>
O.0002 100 <br><br>
45 0.001 100 <br><br>
O.0002 • 100 <br><br>
46 O.OOl 100 <br><br>
0.0002 100 <br><br>
47 O.OOl 100 <br><br>
0.0002 100 <br><br>
48 " O.OOl 100 <br><br>
O.0002 100 <br><br>
J00?67 <br><br>
Compound according to active substance the invention no. concentration as a % % action <br><br>
49 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
• 100 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
51 <br><br>
0. OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0. 0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
52 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
53 <br><br>
O. 001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
54 <br><br>
O. OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
55 <br><br>
0. 001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
56 <br><br>
O. 001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
57 <br><br>
O. 001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
58 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
O.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
59 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
60 <br><br>
O. OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
61 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
62 <br><br>
0.001 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
0.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
63 <br><br>
0. 001 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
O.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
64 <br><br>
O.OOl <br><br>
100 <br><br>
- <br><br>
O.0002 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
65 <br><br>
0.001 O.0002 <br><br>
100 100 <br><br>
- 35 - <br><br>
2 009 67 <br><br>
Compound according to active substance the invention no. concentration as a % % action <br><br>
66 0.0025 100 <br><br>
0.00025 lOO <br><br>
67 0.0025 100 <br><br>
O.00025 100 <br><br>
68 0.0025 lOO <br><br>
O.00025 lOO <br><br>
69 0.0025 lOO <br><br>
O.00025 100 <br><br>
70 0.0025 lOO <br><br>
0.00025 lOO <br><br>
71 O.0025 100 <br><br>
O.00025 100 <br><br>
72 0.0025 100 <br><br>
O.00025 100 <br><br>
73 0.0025 lOO <br><br>
0.00025 100 <br><br>
74 0.0025 lOO <br><br>
O.00025 lOO <br><br>
75 0.0025 100 <br><br>
0.00025 100 <br><br>
76 0.0025 100 <br><br>
0.00025 100 <br><br>
77 0.0005 99 <br><br>
0.00005 100 <br><br>
78 O.0005 100 <br><br>
O.00005 100 <br><br>
EXAMPLE C <br><br>
Effect of leaf treatment against Piricularia oryzae in rice seedlings in a greenhouse. <br><br>
Young rice plants were sprayed until dripping wet <br><br>
- 36 - <br><br>
,-=Ss <br><br>
i i <br><br>
10 <br><br>
with the active substance concentrations indicated in the Table. After the spray coating had dried on, the treated plants and the untreated control plants were inoculated by being sprayed with a suspension of spores (approximately 200,000 per ml) of the causative organism of leaf spot, Piricularia oryzae, and incubated in the moist state at from +25 to +27°C in a greenhouse. <br><br>
After 5 days, the percentage of the surface area of the leavesthat had been attacked was ascertained. <br><br>
From these attack figures, the fungicidal action was calculated as follows: <br><br>
100 x attack in treated plants lOO - : = % action attack in untreated plants The substances were in the form of 20 % wettable powders. <br><br>
15 Compound according to the invention no. <br><br>
active substance concentration as a % <br><br>
% action <br><br>
20 <br><br>
25 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 4 5- <br><br>
11 <br><br>
12 <br><br>
0.1 <br><br>
0.02 <br><br>
0. 1 0. 02 <br><br>
O. 1 0.02 <br><br>
0. 1 0. 02 <br><br>
0.1 0. 02 <br><br>
0.1 0.02 <br><br>
89 63 <br><br>
97.3 <br><br>
89 <br><br>
9A.5 70 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
77.5 <br><br>
95 80 <br><br>
95 65 <br><br>
200967 <br><br>
Compound according active substance to the invention no. concentration as a % % action <br><br>
13 <br><br>
O. 1 <br><br>
92.5 <br><br>
0.02 <br><br>
70 <br><br>
14 <br><br>
O. 1 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
0.C2 <br><br>
80 <br><br>
15 <br><br>
O. 1 <br><br>
98 <br><br>
0.02 <br><br>
65 <br><br>
16 <br><br>
0.1 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
O. 02 <br><br>
55 <br><br>
17 <br><br>
0.1 <br><br>
97.5 <br><br>
O. 02 <br><br>
90 <br><br>
18 <br><br>
O. 1 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
O. 02 <br><br>
80 <br><br>
19 <br><br>
O.l <br><br>
92.5 <br><br>
O. 02 <br><br>
65 <br><br>
20 <br><br>
O. 1 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
0.02 <br><br>
85 <br><br>
21 <br><br>
O. 1 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
0.02 <br><br>
80 <br><br>
EXAMPLE D <br><br>
Effect of prophylactic leaf treatment against Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants in a greenhouse. <br><br>
Young tomato plants were sprayed until dripping wet with the active substance concentrations indicated in the Table. After the spray coating had dried on, the treated plants and the untreated plants were inoculated by being sprayed with a suspension of spores (approximately 1 million per ml fruit juice solution) of the causative organism of grey mould, Botrvtis cinerea. and <br><br>
- 38 - <br><br>
*©0967 <br><br>
incubated in the moist state at approximately 20°C in a greenhouse. After the untreated plants had collapsed <br><br>
(= lOO % attack), the degree of attack in the treated plants was ascertained. The fungicidal action was calculated as follows: <br><br>
lOO x attack in treated plants <br><br>
100 - = % action attack in untreated plants <br><br>
The compounds according to the invention were in the form of 20 % formulations. <br><br>
Compound according active substance to the invention no. concentration as a % % action <br><br>
2 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
3 <br><br>
O. 025 <br><br>
80 <br><br>
12 <br><br>
0. 025 <br><br>
90 <br><br>
13 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
14 <br><br>
O. 025 <br><br>
60 <br><br>
15 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
85 <br><br>
16 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
70 <br><br>
17 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
90 <br><br>
18 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
90 <br><br>
19 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
20 <br><br>
0.025 " <br><br>
90 <br><br>
21 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
80 <br><br>
Comparison test <br><br>
1-(4-chlorophenoxy)-3,3-dimethyl-l-(1,2,4~tria— <br><br>
zol-l-yl)-butan-2-one 0.025 60 <br><br>
EXAMPLE'E <br><br>
Effect of prophylactic leaf treatment against Plasmooara viticola in vines in a greenhouse. <br><br>
Young vines having approximately 5 to 8 leaves were sprayed until dripping wet with the indicated concentration and, after the spray coating had dried on, the undersides of their leaves and of leaves of control plants were sprayed with an aqueous suspension of sporangia of the above fungus (approximately 20,000 per ml) and the plants were immediately incubated in a greenhouse at from 22 to 24°C in an ato'msphere that was as saturated as possible with steam. <br><br>
After the second day, the air humidity was reduced to the normal level for from 3 to L days (30 to 70 % saturation) and then maintained at steam saturation for one day. The percentage surface area attacked by the fungus was then noted for each leaf and the average per treatment was then calculated as follows to ascertain the fungicidal action: <br><br>
100 x attack in treated plants lOO - = % action attack in untreated plants The substances were in the form of 20 % wettable powders. <br><br>
Compound according to the invention no. <br><br>
- 40 - <br><br>
20096 <br><br>
active substance concentration as a % <br><br>
% action <br><br>
10 <br><br>
11 <br><br>
O. 025 <br><br>
89 <br><br>
12 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
93. 3 <br><br>
13 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
92.5 <br><br>
14 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
73 <br><br>
15 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
95.4 <br><br>
16 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
82 <br><br>
17 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
92.7 <br><br>
18 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
94.6 <br><br>
19 <br><br>
O. 025 <br><br>
95.5 <br><br>
20 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
65 <br><br>
21 <br><br>
0.025 <br><br>
81 <br><br>
EXAMPLE F <br><br>
In a laboratory, cress seeds were treated with an aqueous emulsion of the agents according to the invention. <br><br>
The concentration of the active substances in the emulsion was lOO ppm. For this purpose, a slide was placed in a 200 ml glass vessel containing 10 ml of 2o active substance emulsion. Filter paper was drawn onto the slide. When the filter paper was thoroughly soaked with the emulsion, 10 cress seeds were evenly distributed over it. The lid of a petri dish was then placed on the vessel. Two glass vessels were used for each substance 25 For the evaluation, the length of the shoots and roots of the germinated seeds was measured after <br><br>
-41 - <br><br>
15 <br><br>
20 <br><br>
25 <br><br>
200961 <br><br>
7 days. <br><br>
In the Table, the values are given in relation to a control and expressed as percentages. <br><br>
It is apparent that the compcunds according to 5 the invention exert a strong influence on the growth of roots and shoots in cress. This is clearly shown by the results. Promotion would be indicated by a result of 100 % and inhibition by <C100 %. <br><br>
Compound according Growth as a % of normal growth lO to the invention no. shoot root <br><br>
1 <br><br>
71 <br><br>
57 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
86 <br><br>
71 <br><br>
3 <br><br>
67 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
4 <br><br>
67 <br><br>
57 <br><br>
5 <br><br>
67 <br><br>
43 <br><br>
6 <br><br>
67 <br><br>
71 <br><br>
7 <br><br>
83 <br><br>
86 <br><br>
8 <br><br>
67 <br><br>
71 <br><br>
9 <br><br>
67 <br><br>
71 <br><br>
10 <br><br>
83 <br><br>
71 <br><br>
11 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
67 <br><br>
12 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
22 <br><br>
13 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
22 <br><br>
14 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
78 <br><br>
15 <br><br>
67 <br><br>
44 <br><br>
16 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
44 <br><br>
42 - <br><br>
2009B? <br><br>
Compound according Growth as a % of normal growth to the invention no. shoot root <br><br>
17 <br><br>
83 <br><br>
56 <br><br>
18 <br><br>
67 <br><br>
67 <br><br>
19 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
56 <br><br>
20 <br><br>
83 <br><br>
78 <br><br>
21 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
44 <br><br>
22 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
57 <br><br>
EXAMPLE G <br><br>
10 Cotton was grown under greenhouse conditions until the cotyledon stage was reached. <br><br>
The compounds according to the invention and a comparison agent were sprayed onto the plants in application quantities of 1 and 2 kg active substance/ha. <br><br>
15 3 weeks after application, the total length of the plants and the length of the first internode were measured. In the Table, the results are given as percentages in comparison with a control. <br><br>
There is a reduction in growth which, in most <br><br>
I <br><br>
20 cases, is greater than in the case of the comparison preparation. <br><br>
- A *J <br><br>
009 67 <br><br>
Compound according to the invention no. <br><br>
kg active substance/ha <br><br>
:otal length :f the plants is a % of lormal length length of the 1st internode as a % of normal length <br><br>
10 <br><br>
15 <br><br>
20 <br><br>
25 <br><br>
11 <br><br>
12 <br><br>
13 <br><br>
14 <br><br>
15 <br><br>
16 <br><br>
17 <br><br>
18 <br><br>
19 <br><br>
20 <br><br>
21 <br><br>
22 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
1 <br><br>
2 <br><br>
Comparison aoent 30 2-chloroethyltrimethyl- 1 ammonium chloride 2 <br><br>
75 46 <br><br>
83 <br><br>
59 <br><br>
69 37 <br><br>
82 65 <br><br>
83 <br><br>
60 <br><br>
87 69 <br><br>
60 41 <br><br>
69 52 <br><br>
48 45 <br><br>
75 52 <br><br>
95 71 <br><br>
100 55 <br><br>
52 44 <br><br>
32 9 <br><br>
60 19 <br><br>
34 4 <br><br>
57 42 <br><br>
66 42 <br><br>
66 <br><br>
42 <br><br>
32 9 <br><br>
15 13 <br><br>
15 9 <br><br>
43 9 <br><br>
72 34 <br><br>
70 62 <br><br>
23 <br><br>
23 <br><br>
- 44 - <br><br>
200967 <br><br>
EXAMPLE H _ <br><br>
Effect of seed treatment against the cereal mildew Erysiphe oraminis in barley. <br><br>
Seeds of summer barley were sewn untreated or dressed with lOO g of active substance/100 kg in soil-filled plant containers and left to germinate at temperatures of approximately 20°C in a greenhouse- After the formation of the first foliage leaf, the plants were inoculated by brushing them with plants attacked by mildew. One week later, a note was made of the percentage of the surface area of the leaves covered in mildew. <br><br>
The fungicidal action was calculated as follows : <br><br>
lOO x attack in treated group lOO - —— — = % action attack in untreated group <br><br>
Any incompatibility of the treatment with the barley was assessed after the plants had emerged. The assessment was according to the scheme: <br><br>
0 = total destruction <br><br>
1 = 90 % destruction <br><br>
2 = 80 % destruction <br><br>
3 = 70 % destruction <br><br>
4 = 60 % destruction <br><br>
5 = 50 % destruction <br><br>
6 = 40 % destruction <br><br>
7 = 30 % destruction <br><br>
8 = 20 % destruction <br><br>
- 45 - <br><br>
:• "\ f\ <br><br>
, v< y <br><br>
9 = 10 % destruction 10 = undamaged. <br><br>
The compounds according to the invention were in the form of wettable powders with a 20 % active substance content. <br><br>
In contrast to the comparison agent used, the compound according to the invention proved to be not only completely effective against Erysiphe craminis but also completely compatible with the barley. <br><br>
10 Compound according to the invention no. % action <br><br>
1 100 <br><br>
2 lOO 5 lOO <br><br>
15 6 100 <br><br>
7 100 <br><br>
8 100 <br><br>
9 99.5 10 lOO <br><br>
20 11 93 <br><br>
15 100 <br><br>
16 99 <br><br>
17 95 21 100 <br><br>
25 22 100 <br><br>
Comparison agent <br><br>
1-(4-chlorophenoxy)-3,3-dimethyl-l-(1,2,4-triazol-l-yl)-butan-2-one 100 <br><br>
compatibility lO lO 10 10 10 10 lO lo lo io lo lo lo io <br><br>
46 - <br><br>
7.00967 <br><br>
EXAMPLE I <br><br>
Effect of prophylactic leaf treatment against the leaf spot disease (Cercospora beticola) in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). <br><br>
5 Sugarbeet plants having 4 well developed foliage leaves were sprayed until dripping wet with the indicated concentrations, After the spray coating had dried on, the treated plants and . untreated control plants were evenly sprayed with a suspension of 15,000 Cercospora 10 spores per millilitre. The plants were incubated for four days in a greenhouse at 26°C in steam-saturated air and then maintained at approxirr.ately 22°C for a further 10 days in the greenhouse. The proportion of the surface area of the leaves attacked was then noted. 15 From this, the action of the fungicides was calculated as follows: <br><br>
lOO x attack in treated plants 100 - = % action attack in untreated plants <br><br>
Compound according active substance <br><br>
20 to the invention no. concentration as a % % action <br><br>
1 0.05 100 <br><br>
0.01 100 <br><br>
2 0.05 100 <br><br>
0.01 100 <br><br>
25 4 0.05 100 <br><br>
0.01 99 <br><br>
5 0.05 100 <br><br>
0.01 96 <br><br>
- 47 - <br><br>
7.0096 7 <br><br>
Compound according active substance to the invention no. concentration as a % % action <br><br>
11 0.05 lOO <br><br>
O.Ol 100 <br><br>
5 12 0.05 lOO <br><br>
O.Ol 99.6 <br><br>
13 0.05 lOO <br><br>
O.Ol 93 <br><br>
14 0.05 lOO 10 O.Ol 99.6 <br><br>
15 0.05 100 <br><br>
0.01 98 <br><br>
17 0.05 100 <br><br>
0.01 99 <br><br>
15 18 O.05 100 <br><br>
O.Ol 99.6 <br><br>
19 O.05 100 <br><br>
0.01 99.3 <br><br>
20 0.05 100 20 O.Ol 98 <br><br>
21 0.05 100 <br><br>
0.01 99.6 <br><br>
Comparison agent manqanese ethylene bis- 0.05 100 <br><br>
25 J 0.01 79 <br><br>
dithiocarbamate <br><br>
EXAMPLE J' <br><br>
Inhibition of fungal growth on a nutrient solution. <br><br>
20 ml of a nutrient solution consisting of grape juice and water (1:1) were poured into 100 ml glass 30 flasks the pulverulent active substance preparations were added. Inoculation of the treated nutrient solutions and of an untreated nutrient solution was then carried out with conidia (spores) of PeniciIlium cicitatum. After an <br><br>
- 48 - <br><br>
? 7 <br><br>
«w"f/ ** <br><br>
10 <br><br>
incubation period of 5 days at from 22 to 24°C, the development of the fungus on the surface of the nutrient solution was assessed. <br><br>
Evaluation: 0 = no fungal growth <br><br>
1 = individual fungal colonies on the surface <br><br>
2 = 5-10 % of the surface covered in fungus <br><br>
3 = 10-30 % of the surface covered in fungus <br><br>
4 = 30-60 % of the surface covered in fungus <br><br>
5 = 60-100 % of the surface covered in fungus. <br><br>
Active substances, active substance concentrations in the nutrient solution, and results are given in the following Table. <br><br>
15 <br><br>
Compound according to the invention no. <br><br>
active substance concentration in the nutrient solution as a % <br><br>
fungal development <br><br>
5 0.0005 c/i 4 <br><br>
0.001 % 0 <br><br>
6 0.0005 % 4 <br><br>
O.OOl % 1 <br><br>
20 17 0.0005 % 0 <br><br>
O.OOl % 0 <br><br>
20 0.0005 % 0 <br><br>
0.001 % 0 <br><br>
21 0.0005 % 2 <br><br>
25 0.001 % 0 <br><br>
23 0.0005 % 0 <br><br>
O.OOl % 0 <br><br>
24 0.0005 % 1 • <br><br>
0.001 % 0 <br><br>
30 27 0.0005 % 0 <br><br>
0.001 % 0 <br><br>
& <br><br>
. ^ »l * \ • \ . * \ <br><br>
4 9 - \jj y) <br><br>
Compound according active substance concen- fungal to the invention no. tration in the nutrient cevelop- <br><br>
solution 'as a % reent <br><br>
28 0.0005 % 0 5 0.001 % 0 <br><br>
29 0.0005 % 0 <br><br>
O.OOl % 0 <br><br>
31 0.0005 % 0 <br><br>
O.OOl % 0 <br><br>
10 32 0.0005 % 0 <br><br>
O.OOl % O <br><br>
34 0.0005 % O <br><br>
O.OOl % O <br><br>
37 0.0005 % O <br><br>
15 O.OOl % 0 <br><br>
N 33 0.0005 % O <br><br>
O.OOl % O <br><br>
Comparison aoent (according to DE-CS 26 04 0^7) <br><br>
3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2-phenyl-20 2-butvlpropionitrile hydronitrate ' 0.0005 % 5 <br><br>
0.001 % 4 <br><br>
untreated nutrient solution control - 5 <br><br>
25 EXAMPLE K <br><br>
Effect of prophylactic leaf treatros."z against: the true vine mildew Uncinula nacator. <br><br>
Young vines of the Silvaner type having approximately 8 to 10 leaves were sprayed until dripping wet 30 with the concentrations indicated in the Table. ■ After the spray coatings had dried on, the plants together with untreated control plants were ousted in the dry state with conidiospores of the fungus <br><br>
: <br><br>
15 <br><br>
20 <br><br>
25 <br><br>
- 50 - <br><br>
100967 <br><br>
Uncinula necator and incubated in a greenhouse for 12 days at approximately 22°C. The proportion of the surface area cfthe leaves attacked by mildew was then estimated as a percentage and the fungicidal action 5 was calculated as follows: <br><br>
attack in treated plants x lOO lOO - = % action attack in untreated plants <br><br>
The degree of attack in the untreated plants was 88.3 %. The agents were in the form of 20 % wettable powders. <br><br>
IO The action is shown in the Table. <br><br>
Compound according to % action against Uncinula necator with the invention no. 0.025 0.005 % active substance <br><br>
2 <br><br>
93 <br><br>
85 <br><br>
3 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
100 <br><br>
4 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
100 <br><br>
5 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
6 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
99 <br><br>
7 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
89 <br><br>
8 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
95 <br><br>
9 <br><br>
87 <br><br>
63 <br><br>
10 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
49 <br><br>
11 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
12 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
63 <br><br>
13 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
95 <br><br>
14 <br><br>
66 <br><br>
43 <br><br>
15 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
100 <br><br>
- 51 - <br><br>
->00967 <br><br>
Compound according % action against Uncinula necator with to the invention no. 0.025 0.005 % active substance <br><br>
16 <br><br>
99 <br><br>
89 <br><br>
17 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
100 <br><br>
18 <br><br>
86 <br><br>
80 <br><br>
19 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
89 <br><br>
20 <br><br>
93 <br><br>
86 <br><br>
21 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
22 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
92 <br><br>
10 EXAMPLE L <br><br>
Effect of prophylactic leaf treatment against apple scab, Venturia inaeaualis sin the open air. <br><br>
Growing shoots of apple plants of the MM 106 type were treated until dripping wet with O.l % active substance <br><br>
15 concentration. After the spray coalings had dried on, a suspension of conidiospores (330,000 per millilitre) was sprayed onto the leaves and, after polythene bags, had been slipped over the shoots, the plants were left for three days in half-shadow to be infected by the fungus. <br><br>
20 The bags were then removed. After the experiment had lasted 2h weeks, the proportion of the surface area attacked by scab was estimated as a percentage. An untreated control showed a 99 % attack. The success of the treatments was calculated as follows: <br><br>
25 attack in treated plants x 100 <br><br>
lOO - ; = % action attack in untreated plants <br><br>
t <br><br>
- 52 - <br><br>
The compounds were in the form of 20 % wettable powders. Compound according <br><br>
% action to the invention no. <br><br>
18 100 <br><br>
5 19 85 <br><br>
EXAMPLE M <br><br>
Effect of curative leaf treatment against apple scab, <br><br>
Venturia inaequalis, in the open air. <br><br>
Growing shoots of apple plants of the MM 106 type <br><br>
10 were sprayed with a suspension of conidiospores (330,000 <br><br>
per millilitre) and immediately maintained in the moist state by slipping polythene bags over them. The plants stood in half-shadow. After 3 days, the bags were removed. <br><br>
Seven days after inoculation, seme plants were treated until <br><br>
15 dripping wet with 0.1 % active substance concentration. <br><br>
After a further 1% weeks, the proportion of the surface area of the leaf attached by apple scab was estimated as a percentage; in the untreated plants it was 99 %. <br><br>
The compounds according to the invention were in the <br><br>
20 form of 20 % wettable powders. The effect of the treatment was calculated as follows: <br><br>
attack in treated plants x 100 100 - = % action attack in untreated plants <br><br>
* <br><br>
• 10 <br><br>
• 15 <br><br>
- 53 <br><br>
7 <br><br>
Compound according to the invention no. <br><br>
% action <br><br>
2 93 <br><br>
18 100 <br><br>
19 100 <br><br>
Comparison aaent <br><br>
2-butyl-3-( irnidazol-l-yl)-2- 90 <br><br>
phenylpropionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate <br><br>
EXAMPLE N <br><br>
Prophylactic leaf treatment against Erysiphe craminis in barley. <br><br>
Barley plants at the stage of having their first leaf were sprayed until dripping wet with the indicated active substance concentration with the addition of an alkaryl polyglycol ether as wetting agent (0.05 %). After the spray coating had dried on, these plants and untreated control plants were evenly brushed with cereal plants attacked by mildew and then incubated in a greenhouse at from 20 to 22°C for a week. The average mildew attack per plant container (18 to 20 plants) was then noted. The fungicidal action was calculated according to the formula <br><br>
100 x attack in treated plants <br><br>
100 - = % action attack in untreated plants <br><br>
The substances according to the invention were in the form of 20 % formulations. <br><br>
- 54 - <br><br>
" 0 9 <g> J <br><br>
Compound according % action with % action with <br><br>
0.025 % O.005 % <br><br>
to the invention no. active substance active substance <br><br>
3 100 100 <br><br>
4 100 lOO <br><br>
5 100 100 <br><br>
6 100 100 <br><br>
7 100 lOO <br><br>
8 100 lOO <br><br>
9 lOO 92 <br><br>
10 92 90 <br><br>
11 lOO lOO <br><br>
12 100 lOO <br><br>
13 100 100 <br><br>
14 lOO lOO <br><br>
15 100 lOO '16 lOO lOO <br><br>
17 100 100 <br><br>
18 100 lOO <br><br>
19 100 100 <br><br>
20 100 100 <br><br>
21 100 100 <br><br>
22 100 100 <br><br>
EXAMPLE O <br><br>
Effect of prophylactic leaf treatment against Uromyce appendiculatus (bean rust) in a greenhouse <br><br>
French bean plants at the stage of having half- <br><br>
2009 <br><br>
developed primary leaves were sprayed until dripping wet with lOO pprn active substance concentration. After the spray coatings had dried on, the treated plants and untreated control plants were sprayed with a suspension of the uredospores of Uromyces appendiculatus. The plants were then incubated for two days in a moist charrbe at 22°C and subsequently maintained at approximately 22°C <br><br>
under greenhouse conditions. 11 days after spraying the spores, the rust pustules were counted (an average of 253 per leaf in the untreated control plants). The fungicidal action was calculated as follows: <br><br>
pustules in treated plants x 100 <br><br>
lOO - = % act pustules in untreated plants <br><br>
The substances according to the invention were in the form of 20 % formulations and exhibited over 90 % acticn. <br><br>
Compound according to the invention no. % action <br><br>
1 91 <br><br>
2 96 <br><br>
3 95 <br><br>
4 94 12 100 <br><br>
15 99.5 <br><br>
16 95 <br><br>
17 99.4 <br><br>
18 . 99.9 <br><br>
« <br><br>
- 56 - <br><br>
20096 <br><br>
Compound according to the invention no. % action <br><br>
19 98 <br><br>
21 98.6 <br><br>
5 22 95 <br><br>
27 95 <br><br>
28 97 <br><br>
EXAMPLE P <br><br>
Effect of prophylactic leaf treatment against Kelmintho-lO sporium teres (= Pyrenophora teres), net blotch, in barley. <br><br>
Young barley plants at the stage of having their first leaf were sprayed until dripping wet with the indicated concentrations. After the spray coatings had dried on, the treated plants and untreated control 15 plants were sprayed with a suspension of the conidiospores of Helminthosporium teres and cultivated in a moist chamber for 2 days at from 20 to 22°C. One week after inoculation, the percentage of the surface area of the leaves that had been attacked was noted. The fungicidal 20 action was calculated as follows: <br><br>
lOO _ attack in treated Dlanfcs x IOO = <br><br>
attack in untreated plants <br><br>
The compounds were in the form of 20 % formulations. <br><br>
Compound according to the invention no. <br><br>
% action 500 ppm 100 ppm <br><br>
35 <br><br>
36 <br><br>
37 <br><br>
38 <br><br>
39 <br><br>
40 <br><br>
41 <br><br>
42 <br><br>
43 <br><br>
44 <br><br>
46 <br><br>
47 <br><br>
48 <br><br>
49 <br><br>
50 <br><br>
51 <br><br>
52 <br><br>
53 <br><br>
54 <br><br>
55 <br><br>
57 <br><br>
58 <br><br>
59 <br><br>
90 90 90 90 <br><br>
95 100 <br><br>
98 100 100 lOO 100 100 89 100 <br><br>
96 100 <br><br>
89 100 96 lOO 100 96 89 <br><br>
90 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
95 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
98 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
9c <br><br>
IOC <br><br>
103 <br><br>
lOO <br><br>
100 <br><br>
- 58 - <br><br>
20096 <br><br>
EXAMPLE Q <br><br>
Effect of prophylactic leaf treatment against brown rust, Puccinia horde_i,in barley in a climatised plant-growing chamber. <br><br>
5 Young barley plants at the stage of having their first leaf were sprayed until dripping wet with the indicated concentration. After the spray coatings had dried on, the treated plants and untreated control plants were inoculated by brushing them with plants attacked <br><br>
10 by brown rust and then placed in a plant-growing chamber. <br><br>
The plants were cultivated for 10 days at 15°C, cultivation for the first two days being in air practically saturated with moisture. The percentage proportion of the surface area of the leaves attacked by rust was then noted. The <br><br>
15 fungicidal action was calculated as follows: <br><br>
attack in treated plants x 100 <br><br>
100 - = % action attack in untreated plants <br><br>
The compounds were in the form of 20 % formulations. The Table indicates good to very good action for numerous 20 compounds according to the invention. <br><br>
Compound according to the invention no. % action <br><br>
5oo ppm <br><br>
32 100 <br><br>
42 100 <br><br>
25 43 100 <br><br>
45 lOO <br><br>
- 59 - <br><br>
?H09 67 <br><br>
Compound according to the invention no. % action <br><br>
46 100 <br><br>
47 100 <br><br>
48 lOO <br><br>
49 lOO <br><br>
54 lOO <br><br>
55 lOO 58 lOO 61 lOO <br><br>
64 lOO <br><br>
65 100 <br><br>
66 lOO <br><br>
67 lOO 69 100 71 lOO 7 2 lOO <br><br>
74 100 <br><br>
75 lOO <br><br>
76 lOO 7 7 lOO <br><br>
78 100 <br><br>
79 100 <br><br>
80 1O0 <br><br>
EXAMPLE R <br><br>
Effect of prophylactic leaf treatment against yellow rust <br><br>
Puccinia striiformis in barley in a climatised plant- <br><br>
growing chamber. <br><br>
5 Young barley plants at the stage of having their first leaf were sprayed until dripping wet with the indicated concentrations. After the spray coatings had dried on, the treated plants and untreated control plants were sprayed with a suspension of the uredospores of <br><br>
10 Puccinia striiformis in 1,1,2-trifluoro-1,2,2-tricnloro- <br><br>
ethane and incubated at 150°C in a plant-growing chamber. <br><br>
For the first two days, it was ensured that the air was almost completely saturated with moisture. After 15 <br><br>
days, the percentage proportion of the surface area <br><br>
15 of the leaves attacked by rust was noted. The fungicidal action was calculated as follows: <br><br>
attack in treated plants x 100 <br><br>
100 - = % action attack in untreated plants <br><br>
Compound according to % action with <br><br>
20 the invention no. 100 33 11 ppm <br><br>
5 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
— <br><br>
- <br><br>
12 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
14 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
- <br><br>
- <br><br>
15 <br><br>
loo <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
16 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
- <br><br>
- <br><br>
17 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
18 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
93 <br><br>
28 <br><br>
100 <br><br>
98 <br><br>
78 <br><br>
- 61 - <br><br>
©09 5,7 <br><br>
EXAMPLE S <br><br>
Effect of seed treatment against Helminthosporium sativum in barley in a climatised plant-grcwing chamber. <br><br>
Barley seeds infected artificially with Helminthospor ium sativum were dusted with 50 g of active substance according to the invention and of comparison agent per 100 kg. For each test unit, 2 g of treated seeds and 2 g of untreated seeds were sowti in plastics pots measuring 6.5 x 6.5 cm. Sand was used as the substrate. The experiment was repeated twice for each unit. The pots were placed in a plant-growing chamber at 15°C. After 4 weeks, the plants that had emerged were examined for percentage attack of the base of the stem. Tne fungicidal action was calculated as follows from the average of the repeated tests attack in treated group x lOO <br><br>
100 - = % action attack in untreated group <br><br>
The agents according to the invention were in the form of 20 % formulations. <br><br>
Compound according to % action against the invention no. Helminthosporium sativum <br><br>
7 99 <br><br>
17 99 21 99.5 <br><br>
25 lOO <br><br>
26 lOO 29 lOO <br><br>
- 62 ~ <br><br>
**00967 <br><br>
Compound according to % action against the invention no. Helminthosporium sativum <br><br>
3 2 lOO <br><br>
38 100 <br><br>
Comparison agent 2-butyl-3-(imida2ol-l-yl)-2- <br><br>
phenylpropionitrile 98. 5 <br><br>
2-butyl-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2-phenylpropionitrile, <br><br>
hydronitrate 98 <br><br>
EXAMPLE T <br><br>
Effect against Pseudomonas phaseolicola, causative organism of grease spot disease in beans, _in vitro. <br><br>
After heat sterilisation, biomalt agar was cooled to approximately 45°C and then, mixed with the test substances in aqueous preparation, poured into plastics petri dishes. After the nutrient substrate had solidified, the dishes of treated agar and dishes of untreated agar as the control were inoculated in the centre with a suspension of the causative organism of grease spot, Pseudomonas phaseolicola, by means of an inoculation loop. The dishes were then incubated at 22°C. After 2\ weeks, the radial spread of the bacteria colonies that had grown was measured. The bacteria-inhibiting action was calculated as follows from the average of two repeats per test unit: <br><br>
- 6? <br><br>
2 00967 <br><br>
radial growth in treated agar x 100 <br><br>
lOO - — —— = % inhibiting radial growth in untreated agar action <br><br>
The compounds were in the form of 20 % formulations. <br><br>
% inhibiting action of 250 ppm active substance 5 in agar against Pseudomonas phaseolicola: <br><br>
Compound according to the invention no. % inhibiting action <br><br>
3 71 <br><br>
4 71 IO 11 67 <br><br>
12 86 <br><br>
13 78 15 75 17 67 <br><br>
15 18 75 <br><br>
19 71 <br><br>
21 71 Comparison aoent 2-butyl-3-(imidazol-l-yl)-2- <br><br>
20 phenylpropionitrile, hydronitrate 42 <br><br>
EXAMPLE U <br><br>
Effect of prophylactic leaf treatment against true mildew Erysiphe qraminis in barley in a greenhouse. <br><br>
Young barley plants at the stage of having their 25 first leaf were sprayed until dripping wet with the <br><br>
- 64 - ; v) >J <br><br>
indicated concentrations. After the spray coatings had dried on, the treated plants and untreated control plants were inoculated with dry mildew spores by brushing the small test plants with infected plants. The test plants were then cultivated in a greenhouse at approximately from 20 to 22°C and after a veek the percentage of the surface area of the leaves that had been attacked was assessed. The fungicidal action was calculated as follows: <br><br>
attack in treated plants x 100 <br><br>
lOO - = % action attack in untreated plants <br><br>
The compounds were in the form of 20. % formulations. <br><br>
Compound according to % action the invention no. lOO pprr. 20 ppm <br><br>
28 lOO 100 <br><br>
29 100 100 <br><br>
30 lOO 99 <br><br>
31 lOO 100 <br><br>
32 - 100 <br><br>
33 100 100 <br><br>
34 100 100 <br><br>
35 lOO 100 <br><br>
36 lOO 100 <br><br>
37 100 100 <br><br>
38 lOO " 100 <br><br>
39 98 90 <br><br></p>
</div>