JPH07109545A - Non-heat treated steel for hot forging excellent in tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability - Google Patents

Non-heat treated steel for hot forging excellent in tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability

Info

Publication number
JPH07109545A
JPH07109545A JP5254335A JP25433593A JPH07109545A JP H07109545 A JPH07109545 A JP H07109545A JP 5254335 A JP5254335 A JP 5254335A JP 25433593 A JP25433593 A JP 25433593A JP H07109545 A JPH07109545 A JP H07109545A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
machinability
ratio
bainite
heat treated
tensile strength
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP5254335A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3241897B2 (en
Inventor
Toshihiko Takahashi
高橋稔彦
Fusao Ishikawa
石川房男
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP25433593A priority Critical patent/JP3241897B2/en
Priority to PCT/JP1994/001693 priority patent/WO1995010637A1/en
Priority to DE69419720T priority patent/DE69419720T2/en
Priority to EP94929026A priority patent/EP0674014B1/en
Priority to CN94190781A priority patent/CN1039035C/en
Priority to KR1019950702391A priority patent/KR0180938B1/en
Publication of JPH07109545A publication Critical patent/JPH07109545A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3241897B2 publication Critical patent/JP3241897B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/001Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing N
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/14Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing titanium or zirconium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/28Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with titanium or zirconium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/60Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing lead, selenium, tellurium, or antimony, or more than 0.04% by weight of sulfur

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
  • Forging (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To obtain a non-heat treated steel for hot forging excellent in tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability by specifying the chemical components in a steel and controlling its metallic structure. CONSTITUTION:This steel contains, by weight, 0.10 to 0.35% C, 0.15 to 2.00% Si, 0.40 to 2.0% Mn, 0.03 to 0.10% S, 0.0005 to 0.050% Al, 0.003 to 0.050% Ti, 0.0020 to 0.0070% N, 0.30 to 0.70% V, and the balance Fe with inevitable impurities, and in its metallic structure after cooling at a room temp. following hot forging, the structural rate (f) of the bainitic structure is regulated to 1.4C+0.4>=f>=1.4C based on the C-contg. %. Thus, the ferrite-bainite type non- heat treated steel having high tensile strength, high fatigue strength and excellent machinability and used in hot-forged state as it is can be obtd..

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は熱間鍛造後に焼入れ焼戻
し等の調質処理を施さなくとも、優れた引張強度と疲労
強度および被削性を同時に有する熱間鍛造ままで使用す
る非調質鋼に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention is a non-heat treated material that has excellent tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability at the same time without being subjected to heat treatment such as quenching and tempering after hot forging. It is about steel.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】工程省略、製造コストの低減の観点から
自動車を始めとする機械構造用部品に対して非調質鋼の
適用が普及している。
2. Description of the Related Art The application of non-heat treated steel is widely used for mechanical structural parts such as automobiles from the viewpoint of omitting steps and reducing manufacturing costs.

【0003】これらの非調質鋼は主に高い引張強度(あ
るいは硬さ)と降伏強度および靭性を有することを主眼
に開発が行われてきた。そこで例えば特開昭62−20
5245号公報などに見られるように、析出強化の代表
的元素であるVを使った非調質鋼が提案されてきた。と
ころがこの様な高強度高靭性の非調質鋼の機械部品への
適用において真に障害となるものは疲労強度および被削
性である。
These non-heat treated steels have been mainly developed to have high tensile strength (or hardness), yield strength and toughness. Then, for example, JP-A-62-20
As seen in Japanese Patent No. 5245, non-heat treated steels using V, which is a typical element for precipitation strengthening, have been proposed. However, fatigue strength and machinability are the real obstacles to the application of such high strength and high toughness non-heat treated steel to mechanical parts.

【0004】疲労強度は、一般に引張強度に依存すると
され、引張強度を高くすれば高くなる。しかし引張強度
を上げることによって被削性は極端に劣化し引張強度が
120kgf/mm2 を超えるともはや通常の生産能率
では生産ができなくなってしまう。そこで被削性を劣化
させずに疲労強度を向上させる非調質鋼の具現化が切望
された。
Fatigue strength is generally considered to depend on tensile strength, and the higher the tensile strength, the higher the fatigue strength. However, the machinability is extremely deteriorated by increasing the tensile strength, and when the tensile strength exceeds 120 kgf / mm 2 , it is no longer possible to produce with normal production efficiency. Therefore, it has been earnestly desired to realize a non-heat treated steel that improves fatigue strength without deteriorating machinability.

【0005】これには疲労強度と引張強度の比すなわち
耐久比を向上させることが有効な手段である。そこで例
えば特開平4−176842号公報などに見られるよう
に、ベイナイト主体の金属組織とし組織中の高炭素島状
マルテンサイトおよび残留オーステナイトを低減する方
法などが提案されてきた。
For this, it is an effective means to improve the ratio of fatigue strength to tensile strength, that is, the durability ratio. Therefore, as disclosed in, for example, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 4-176842, a method has been proposed in which a metal structure mainly composed of bainite is used to reduce high carbon island martensite and retained austenite in the structure.

【0006】しかし、このような開発努力にもかかわら
ず、耐久比はせいぜい0.55程度であり、被削性も極
めて不良である従来型のベイナイト非調質鋼の高々2倍
程度にしか改善されない。
However, in spite of such development efforts, the durability ratio is about 0.55 at most, and the machinability is improved to only about twice as high as that of the conventional bainite non-heat treated steel which is extremely poor in machinability. Not done.

【0007】本発明者らは先に被削性の良好なパーライ
ト含有組織に着目しこれにまずMnS上にTiNおよ
びVNを複合析出させこれによって鍛造加熱時のオース
テナイト結晶粒を微細化するとともにこの複合析出物を
核発生サイトとしてフェライトを微細析出させる、つ
いでパーライトが析出するに当たって、析出したパーラ
イト中のフェライトマトリックス地にさらにV炭化物ま
たはV炭室化物を極めて微細に析出させる、このような
2段の析出を活用した手法により組織全体が微細でかつ
析出強化されたパーライトを有する金属組織を得ること
を組み合わすことによって疲労強度および被削性の優れ
る熱間鍛造用非調質鋼を発明した。しかしこの型の非調
質鋼では引張強度で高々100kgf/mm2 程度が限
界でありそれ故耐久比を向上させたとしても疲労強度に
も限界があった。
The inventors of the present invention first focused on a pearlite-containing structure having good machinability, and first of all, by precipitating TiN and VN on MnS in combination, thereby finely converting the austenite crystal grains during forging heating and Ferrite is finely precipitated by using the composite precipitate as a nucleation site, and then, when pearlite is precipitated, V carbide or V carbon chamber compound is further extremely finely precipitated on the ferrite matrix material in the precipitated pearlite. A non-heat treated steel for hot forging excellent in fatigue strength and machinability was invented by combining a method utilizing the precipitation of (1) to obtain a metal structure having a fine pearlite structure and a precipitation strengthened structure. However, in this type of non-heat treated steel, the tensile strength is limited to about 100 kgf / mm 2 at most, and therefore even if the durability ratio is improved, the fatigue strength is also limited.

【0008】[0008]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明は、従来の非調
質鋼では実現が困難であった、高い疲労強度および引張
強度と被削性を有する熱間鍛造用非調質鋼を提供するも
のである。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a non-heat treated steel for hot forging having high fatigue strength, tensile strength and machinability, which has been difficult to realize with conventional non-heat treated steel. It is a thing.

【0009】[0009]

【課題を解決するための手段】高疲労強度を得ようとし
た場合、最も容易な方法は引張強度(硬さ)を上げるこ
とである。引張強度を上げるためには、マルテンサイト
あるいはベイナイトといった低温変態組織を導入すれば
良いが、従来技術の中で述べたごとく、このような方法
は被削性を顕著に劣化せしめる。
To obtain high fatigue strength, the easiest method is to increase tensile strength (hardness). In order to increase the tensile strength, a low temperature transformation structure such as martensite or bainite may be introduced. However, as described in the prior art, such a method causes a remarkable deterioration in machinability.

【0010】本発明者らはフェライト組織に適当量のベ
イナイト組織が混ざる金属組織を持つ数種類の熱間鍛造
材について、その疲労特性および被削性について検討し
た。その結果、組織を微細化する目的でMnS+Ti
N+VNの複合析出物をフェライトの析出核として活用
する低Cおよび低N化により硬さを制御したベイナイ
ト組織を適当量含有するフェライト−ベイナイト2相組
織とするベイナイト組織中にV炭化物を析出させるこ
との3点から、引張強度および疲労強度を向上させかつ
被削性も現行の切削工程で許容可能なレベルを確保でき
るフェライト−ベイナイト型の熱間鍛造用非調質鋼を発
明するに至った。
The present inventors have examined the fatigue characteristics and machinability of several types of hot forged materials having a metallic structure in which an appropriate amount of bainite structure is mixed with the ferrite structure. As a result, MnS + Ti for the purpose of refining the structure
Utilizing a composite precipitate of N + VN as a precipitation nucleus of ferrite Precipitating V carbide in a bainite structure having a ferrite-bainite two-phase structure containing an appropriate amount of bainite structure whose hardness is controlled by low C and low N From the above three points, the inventors have invented a ferrite-bainite type non-heat treated steel for hot forging which can improve tensile strength and fatigue strength and can secure machinability at an acceptable level in the current cutting process.

【0011】すなわち本発明の第1発明は、重量比にし
てC:0.10〜0.35%、Si:0.15〜2.0
0%、Mn:0.40〜2.00%、S:0.03〜
0.10%、Al:0.0005〜0.050%、T
i:0.003〜0.050%、N:0.0020〜
0.0070%、V:0.30〜0.70%を含有し、
残部はFeならびに不純物元素からなる組成を有し、熱
間鍛造を施し室温まで冷却した後の金属組織においてベ
イナイト組織の組織率fが含有炭素量C(%)に対して
1.4C+0.4≧f≧1.4Cであることを特徴とす
る熱間鍛造したままで使用するフェライト−ベイナイト
型非調質鋼であり、第2発明は結晶粒微細化とベイナイ
ト組織率の調整および被削性のさらなる向上のため、第
1発明鋼の成分にさらにCr:0.02〜1.50%、
Mo:0.02〜1.00%、Nb:0.001〜0.
20%、Pb:0.05〜0.30%、Ca:0.00
05〜0.010%の内の1種または2種以上を含有さ
せたものである。
That is, in the first aspect of the present invention, the weight ratio of C: 0.10 to 0.35%, Si: 0.15 to 2.0.
0%, Mn: 0.40 to 2.00%, S: 0.03 to
0.10%, Al: 0.0005 to 0.050%, T
i: 0.003 to 0.050%, N: 0.0020 to
0.0070%, V: 0.30 to 0.70% is contained,
The balance has a composition consisting of Fe and an impurity element, and the microstructure ratio f of the bainite structure in the metal structure after hot forging and cooling to room temperature is 1.4C + 0.4 ≧ with respect to the carbon content C (%). It is a ferrite-bainite type non-heat treated steel to be used as it is hot forged, characterized in that f ≧ 1.4 C, and the second invention is grain refinement, bainite microstructure ratio adjustment and machinability. For further improvement, the composition of the first invention steel further contains Cr: 0.02 to 1.50%,
Mo: 0.02 to 1.00%, Nb: 0.001 to 0.
20%, Pb: 0.05-0.30%, Ca: 0.00
One or two or more of 05 to 0.010% are contained.

【0012】次に本発明のフェライト−ベイナイト型非
調質鋼における化学成分および熱間鍛造を施し室温まで
冷却した後の金属組織の限定理由について以下に説明す
る。
Next, the chemical composition of the non-heat treated ferrite-bainite type steel of the present invention and the reasons for limiting the metal structure after hot forging and cooling to room temperature will be described below.

【0013】C:ベイナイト組織率を調整しひいては最
終製品の引張強度を増加させる重要な元素であるが過多
であると強度が上がりすぎて被削性が顕著に劣化する。
すなわち、0.10%未満では低引張強度および低疲労
強度となり、逆に0.35%超過では高引張強度となり
すぎ被削性が顕著に低下するので0.10〜0.35%
とする。
C: It is an important element that adjusts the bainite structure ratio and thus increases the tensile strength of the final product. However, if it is too much, the strength increases too much and the machinability deteriorates significantly.
That is, if it is less than 0.10%, the tensile strength and fatigue strength are low, and if it exceeds 0.35%, the tensile strength is too high and the machinability is significantly reduced.
And

【0014】Si:脱酸およびベイナイト組織率を調整
する元素で、0.15%未満ではその効果は小さく、
2.00%超過では耐久比、被削性、のいずれも低下す
るので0.15%〜2.00%とする。
Si: an element for adjusting the deoxidation and bainite structure ratio, and if less than 0.15%, its effect is small,
If it exceeds 2.00%, both the durability ratio and the machinability deteriorate, so 0.15% to 2.00% is set.

【0015】Mn:ベイナイト組織率を調整するととも
にMnSとなることによりフェライトの析出サイトであ
る複合析出物の基盤となる元素で、0.40%未満では
その効果が小さく、2.00%超過ではベイナイトが多
量発生して耐久比、被削性のいずれも低下するので0.
40〜2.00%とする。
Mn: An element which becomes the base of a composite precipitate which is a ferrite precipitation site by adjusting the bainite structure ratio and becoming MnS. If less than 0.40%, its effect is small, and if it exceeds 2.00%. Since a large amount of bainite is generated and both the durability ratio and the machinability are deteriorated, 0.
40 to 2.00%.

【0016】S:MnSとなることによりフェライトの
析出サイトである複合析出物の基盤となりかつ被削性を
向上させる元素で、0.03〜0.10%とする。
S: MnS is an element that serves as a base of a composite precipitate that is a ferrite precipitation site and improves machinability, and is 0.03 to 0.10%.

【0017】Al:脱酸および結晶粒微細化効果をもつ
元素で、0.0005%未満ではその効果が小さく、
0.050%超過では硬質介在物を形成し耐久比、被削
性のいずれも低下するので0.0005〜0.050%
とする。
Al: an element having an effect of deoxidizing and refining crystal grains, and if less than 0.0005%, the effect is small,
If it exceeds 0.050%, hard inclusions are formed and both the durability ratio and the machinability deteriorate, so 0.0005 to 0.050%
And

【0018】Ti:MnS上に窒化物となって析出しフ
ェライトの析出サイトとなる複合析出物を形成する元素
で、0.003%未満ではその効果が小さく、0.05
0%超過では粗大硬質介在物の形成を促し耐久比、被削
性のいずれも低下するので0.003〜0.050%と
する。
Ti: An element that forms a nitride on the MnS to form a composite precipitate that serves as a ferrite precipitation site. If less than 0.003%, its effect is small, and 0.05
If it exceeds 0%, the formation of coarse hard inclusions is promoted and both the durability ratio and the machinability deteriorate, so the content is made 0.003 to 0.050%.

【0019】N:TiおよびVと窒化物あるいは炭窒化
物を形成する元素で、0.0020%未満ではその効果
が小さく、0.0070%超過では耐久比、被削性のい
ずれも低下するので、0.0020〜0.0070%と
する。
N: An element which forms a nitride or carbonitride with Ti and V. If it is less than 0.0020%, its effect is small, and if it exceeds 0.0070%, both the durability ratio and the machinability deteriorate. , 0.0020 to 0.0070%.

【0020】V:MnSおよびTiNと複合析出物を形
成するとともにベイナイト中のマトリックスフェライト
を析出強化する元素で、0.30%未満ではその効果が
小さく、0.70%超過では耐久比、被削性のいずれも
低下するので、0.30〜0.70%とする。
V: An element that forms a composite precipitate with MnS and TiN and precipitation strengthens the matrix ferrite in bainite. If it is less than 0.30%, its effect is small, and if it exceeds 0.70%, the durability ratio and the cutting ratio are reduced. Since all of the properties are deteriorated, the content is set to 0.30 to 0.70%.

【0021】以上が本願第1発明の鋼の化学成分の限定
理由である。本願第2発明においては、結晶粒微細化と
ベイナイト組織率の調整および被削性のさらなる向上の
ため、第1発明鋼の成分にさらにCr、Mo、Nb、P
b、Caの内の1種または2種以上を含有させる。これ
らの化学成分の限定理由について以下に述べる。
The above are the reasons for limiting the chemical composition of the steel of the first invention of the present application. In the second invention of the present application, in order to refine the crystal grains, adjust the bainite structure ratio, and further improve the machinability, Cr, Mo, Nb, and P are added to the components of the first invention steel.
One or more of b and Ca are contained. The reasons for limiting these chemical components will be described below.

【0022】Cr:Mnとほぼ同様に、ベイナイト組織
率を調整する元素で、0.02%未満ではその効果が小
さく、1.50%超過ではベイナイトが多量発生して耐
久比、被削性のいずれも低下するので0.02〜1.5
0%とする。
Similar to Cr: Mn, it is an element for adjusting the bainite structure ratio. If it is less than 0.02%, its effect is small, and if it exceeds 1.50%, a large amount of bainite is generated and the durability ratio and machinability are improved. 0.02 to 1.5 because all of them decrease
0%

【0023】Mo:Mn、Crとほぼ同様の効果をもつ
元素で、0.02%未満ではその効果が小さく、1.0
0%超過ではベイナイトが多量発生して耐久比、被削性
のいずれも低下するので0.02〜1.00%とする。
Mo: An element having almost the same effect as Mn and Cr. If the content is less than 0.02%, the effect is small and 1.0
If it exceeds 0%, a large amount of bainite is generated and both the durability ratio and the machinability deteriorate, so the content is made 0.02 to 1.00%.

【0024】Nb:TiおよびVとほぼ同様の効果をも
つ元素で、0.001%未満ではその効果が小さく、
0.20%超過では耐久比、被削性のいずれも低下する
ので、0.001〜0.20%とする。
Nb: an element having almost the same effect as Ti and V, and if less than 0.001%, the effect is small.
If it exceeds 0.20%, both the durability ratio and the machinability deteriorate, so the content is made 0.001 to 0.20%.

【0025】Pb:被削性を向上せしめる元素で、0.
05%未満ではその効果が小さく、0.30%超過では
その効果は飽和し疲労強度および耐久比が低下するの
で、0.05〜0.30%とする。
Pb: an element that improves the machinability, and is 0.
If it is less than 05%, the effect is small, and if it exceeds 0.30%, the effect is saturated and the fatigue strength and the durability ratio decrease, so the content is made 0.05 to 0.30%.

【0026】Ca:Pbとほぼ同様な効果をもつ元素
で、0.0005%未満ではその効果が小さく0.01
0%超過ではその効果は飽和し疲労強度および耐久比が
低下するので0.0005〜0.010%とする。
Ca: Pb is an element having almost the same effect as Pb. If it is less than 0.0005%, the effect is small and 0.01
If it exceeds 0%, the effect is saturated and the fatigue strength and the durability ratio decrease, so the content is made 0.0005 to 0.010%.

【0027】以上が本願第2発明の鋼において付加され
た化学成分の限定理由である。次に本願発明の鋼におい
て熱間鍛造後室温まで冷却した際の金属組織の限定理由
について述べる。
The above are the reasons for limiting the chemical components added in the steel of the second invention of the present application. Next, the reasons for limiting the metal structure of the steel of the present invention when it is cooled to room temperature after hot forging will be described.

【0028】先に述べたように、フェライト−ベイナイ
トの2相組織としベイナイトが適当量存在することが高
い引張強度、高い疲労強度および被削性の確保をもたら
す。ベイナイト組織率は鋼のC含有量と焼入れ性および
オーステナイト域からの冷却速度で制御できる。ベイナ
イト組織を有効に活用するためには、その組織率fが含
有炭素量C(%)に対して1.4C以上が必要であり、
一方1.4C+0.4超過となると被削性が極端に劣化
するので、ベイナイト組織率fを含有炭素量C(%)に
対して1.4C以上1.4C+0.4以下とした。この
ようなベイナイト組織を含む金属組織を達成できれば、
熱間鍛造後の冷却方法は特に指定しないが、設備や製造
コストの点からは自然放冷が当然望ましい。なお、ベイ
ナイト組織率fは腐食した試験片を光学顕微鏡等で観察
するとともにマイクロビッカース硬度計によりその組織
硬度を求め、最終的に面積率を測定することによって求
める。
As described above, the presence of an appropriate amount of bainite in the two-phase structure of ferrite-bainite ensures high tensile strength, high fatigue strength and machinability. The bainite microstructure ratio can be controlled by the C content and hardenability of steel and the cooling rate from the austenite region. In order to effectively utilize the bainite structure, the structure ratio f needs to be 1.4 C or more with respect to the carbon content C (%),
On the other hand, if it exceeds 1.4C + 0.4, the machinability is extremely deteriorated. Therefore, the bainite structure ratio f is set to 1.4C or more and 1.4C + 0.4 or less with respect to the carbon content C (%). If a metal structure including such bainite structure can be achieved,
Although the cooling method after hot forging is not specified, natural cooling is naturally desirable in terms of equipment and manufacturing cost. The bainite texture ratio f is determined by observing the corroded test piece with an optical microscope or the like, determining the texture hardness by a micro Vickers hardness meter, and finally measuring the area ratio.

【0029】以下に、本発明の効果を実施例により、さ
らに具体的に示す。
The effects of the present invention will be described more specifically below with reference to examples.

【0030】[0030]

【実施例】以下に挙げる各表において、太枠で囲んだ条
件が本発明を満足する実施例であり、それ以外は比較例
である。
EXAMPLES In each of the following tables, the conditions surrounded by thick frames are examples satisfying the present invention, and the other conditions are comparative examples.

【0031】(1)鋼材化学成分の影響 表1に示す化学成分の鋼を高周波炉にて溶解し、150
kgの鋼塊としこれから鍛造用材料を切り出し、一旦9
50℃加熱放冷で焼準した後、1100〜1250℃に
加熱して1050〜1200℃の温度で熱間鍛造を行
い、その後放冷した。この材料の中央部よりJIS4号
引張試験片、JIS1号回転曲げ試験片を採取し、引張
試験および回転曲げ疲労試験を行った。同材料から光学
顕微鏡観察試験片を採取し5%ナイタールで腐食して2
00倍で観察しベイナイト組織率を求めた。さらに同材
料より切削試験片を採取し、SKH9製10mmφスト
レートシャンクドリルを用いて30mm深さのブライン
ドホールを穿孔し、ドリルが寿命破壊するまでの総穿孔
距離を測定した。測定した結果は従来鋼であるNo鋼の
総穿孔距離を1.00とし、それとの相対比で切削性を
評価した。なお、切削速度は50m/min、送り速度
は0.35mm/rev、切削油7L/minの条件と
した。
(1) Effects of chemical composition of steel material Steel having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 was melted in a high-frequency furnace to obtain 150
A forging material is cut out from a steel ingot of 9 kg,
After normalizing by heating and cooling at 50 ° C., it was heated to 1100 to 1250 ° C., hot forged at a temperature of 1050 to 1200 ° C., and then allowed to cool. A JIS No. 4 tensile test piece and a JIS No. 1 rotary bending test piece were sampled from the central portion of this material and subjected to a tensile test and a rotary bending fatigue test. Optical microscope observation specimens were taken from the same material and corroded with 5% Nital 2
The observation was performed at 00 times to obtain the bainite structure rate. Further, a cutting test piece was sampled from the same material, a blind hole having a depth of 30 mm was drilled using a 10 mmφ straight shank drill made of SKH9, and the total drilling distance until the life of the drill was destroyed was measured. The result of the measurement was that the total drilling distance of No steel, which is a conventional steel, was set to 1.00, and the machinability was evaluated by the relative ratio thereof. The cutting speed was 50 m / min, the feed speed was 0.35 mm / rev, and the cutting oil was 7 L / min.

【0032】[0032]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0033】[0033]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0034】表2に各供試材のベイナイト組織率および
性能評価結果を示す。
Table 2 shows the bainite microstructure ratio and performance evaluation results of each test material.

【0035】まず調質鋼であるNo.42の耐久比0.
47・切削性1.00に対し、本発明例であるNo.1
〜20はいずれも耐久比は0.57以上であり、また切
削性もNo.42の2倍から3倍近く良好である。
First, heat treated steel No. 42 durability ratio of 0.
No. 47, which is an example of the present invention, has a machinability of 1.00. 1
Nos. 20 to 20 each have a durability ratio of 0.57 or more, and also have machinability of No. 20. It is about 2 to 3 times better than 42.

【0036】比較例のNo.21はC量が低いため引張
強度が低くかつ耐久比も低いので疲労特性は不良であ
る。比較例のNo.22はC量が高すぎるためマルテン
サイトが発生し本発明のベイナイト組織率の条件が満足
できず、引張強度は高くなるが本発明例に比べ耐久比が
低く切削性も不良である。
No. of the comparative example. Since No. 21 has a low C content and a low tensile strength and a low durability ratio, the fatigue property is poor. No. of the comparative example. In No. 22, martensite is generated because the amount of C is too high, the condition of the bainite structure ratio of the present invention cannot be satisfied, and the tensile strength is high, but the durability ratio is low and the machinability is poor as compared with the examples of the present invention.

【0037】比較例のNo.23はSi量が低いため脱
酸程度が低く耐久比は本発明例に比べ低い。比較例のN
o.24はSi量が高いためマルテンサイトが発生し本
発明のベイナイト組織率の条件が満足できず、耐久比は
本発明例に比べ低く切削性も不良である。
No. of the comparative example. Since 23 has a low Si content, the degree of deoxidation is low and the durability ratio is lower than that of the examples of the present invention. Comparative example N
o. In No. 24, martensite is generated because the Si content is high, the condition of the bainite structure ratio of the present invention cannot be satisfied, the durability ratio is lower than that of the present invention example, and the machinability is also poor.

【0038】比較例のNo.25はMn量が低いため複
合析出物の析出が少なく、耐久比が本発明例に比べ低
い。比較例のNo.26はMn量が高いためマルテンサ
イトが発生し本発明のベイナイト組織率の条件が満足で
きず、耐久比は本発明例に比べ低く切削性も不良であ
る。
No. of the comparative example. In No. 25, since the amount of Mn is low, the precipitation of complex precipitates is small and the durability ratio is lower than that of the examples of the present invention. No. of the comparative example. In No. 26, martensite is generated because the Mn content is high, the condition of the bainite structure ratio of the present invention cannot be satisfied, the durability ratio is lower than that of the present invention example, and the machinability is also poor.

【0039】比較例のNo.27はS量が低いため複合
介在物の析出が少なく、耐久比が本発明例に比べ低く、
またMnSの切削性向上効果を得られないので切削性も
不良である。比較例のNo.28はS量が高いためMn
Sの析出が過多となり、耐久比が本発明例に比べ低い。
No. of the comparative example. In No. 27, since the S content is low, precipitation of composite inclusions is small, and the durability ratio is lower than that of the examples of the present invention.
Further, since the effect of improving the machinability of MnS cannot be obtained, the machinability is also poor. No. of the comparative example. 28 has a high S content, so Mn
Precipitation of S becomes excessive and the durability ratio is lower than that of the examples of the present invention.

【0040】比較例のNo.29はAl量が低いため脱
酸程度および結晶粒微細化効果が小さく、耐久比が本発
明例に比べ低い。比較例のNo.30はAl量が高いた
め硬質介在物が形成され、耐久比は本発明例に比べ低く
切削性も不良である。
No. of the comparative example. No. 29, which has a low Al content, is less effective in deoxidation and grain refinement, and has a lower durability ratio than the examples of the present invention. No. of the comparative example. In No. 30, hard inclusions are formed due to the high Al content, the durability ratio is lower than in the examples of the present invention, and the machinability is also poor.

【0041】比較例のNo.31はTi量が低いため複
合析出物の析出が少なく、耐久比が本発明例に比べ低
い。比較例のNo.32はTi量が高いため硬質介在物
が形成され、耐久比は本発明例に比べ低く切削性も不良
である。
No. of the comparative example. In No. 31, since the amount of Ti is low, the precipitation of complex precipitates is small and the durability ratio is lower than that of the examples of the present invention. No. of the comparative example. In No. 32, since the amount of Ti is high, hard inclusions are formed, the durability ratio is lower than that of the examples of the present invention, and the machinability is also poor.

【0042】比較例のNo.33はN量が低いため複合
析出物の析出が少なく、耐久比が本発明例に比べ低い。
比較例のNo.34はN量が高いためマトリックスが硬
化し、耐久比は本発明例に比べ低く切削性も不良であ
る。
No. of the comparative example. In No. 33, since the amount of N was low, the precipitation of complex precipitates was small, and the durability ratio was lower than that of the examples of the present invention.
No. of the comparative example. In No. 34, the matrix is hardened due to the high N content, the durability ratio is lower than that of the examples of the present invention, and the machinability is also poor.

【0043】比較例のNo.35はV量が低いため複合
析出物の析出が少なくかつマトリックスフェライトを析
出強化する効果が小さいので、耐久比が本発明例に比べ
低い。比較例のNo.36はV量が高いため、耐久比は
本発明例に比べ低く切削性も不良である。
Comparative Example No. No. 35, which has a low V content, has less precipitation of composite precipitates and a small effect of precipitation strengthening the matrix ferrite, and therefore has a lower durability ratio than the examples of the present invention. No. of the comparative example. Since 36 has a high V content, the durability ratio is lower than that of the examples of the present invention and the machinability is also poor.

【0044】比較例のNo.37はCr量が高いためマ
ルテンサイトが発生し本発明のベイナイト組織率の条件
が満足できず、耐久比は本発明例に比べ低く切削性も不
良である。
No. of the comparative example. In No. 37, since the amount of Cr is high, martensite is generated and the bainite structure ratio condition of the present invention cannot be satisfied, and the durability ratio is lower than that of the present invention example and the machinability is also poor.

【0045】比較例のNo.38はMo量が高いためマ
ルテンサイトが発生し本発明のベイナイト組織率の条件
が満足できず、耐久比は本発明例に比べ低く切削性も不
良である。
No. of the comparative example. In No. 38, since the amount of Mo is high, martensite occurs and the bainite structure ratio condition of the present invention cannot be satisfied, and the durability ratio is lower than that of the present invention example, and the machinability is also poor.

【0046】比較例のNo.39はNb量が高いため、
耐久比は本発明例に比べ低く切削性も不良である。
No. of the comparative example. 39 has a high Nb content,
The durability ratio is lower than that of the examples of the present invention and the machinability is also poor.

【0047】比較例のNo.40はPb量が高いため、
切削性は良好なるも耐久比が不良である。
No. of the comparative example. 40 has a high Pb content,
The machinability is good but the durability ratio is poor.

【0048】比較例のNo.41はCa量が高いため、
切削性は良好なるも耐久比が不良である。
No. of the comparative example. 41 has a high Ca content,
The machinability is good but the durability ratio is poor.

【0049】[0049]

【表3】 [Table 3]

【0050】[0050]

【表4】 [Table 4]

【0051】(2)熱鍛後の冷却方法によるベイナイト
組織率変化の影響 表1に示す化学成分の鋼を高周波炉にて溶解し、150
kgの鋼塊としこれから鍛造用材料を切り出し、一旦9
50℃加熱放冷で焼準した後、1100〜1250℃に
加熱して1050〜1200℃の温度で熱間鍛造を行
い、その後同じく表3に示す方法で放冷した。この材料
の中央部より実施例1と同様の方法で、引張強度、疲労
強度、被削性およびベイナイト組織率を求めた。表4に
各供試材のベイナイト組織率および性能評価結果を示
す。
(2) Effect of change in bainite microstructure ratio by cooling method after hot forging Steel having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 was melted in a high-frequency furnace to obtain 150
A forging material is cut out from a steel ingot of 9 kg,
After normalizing by heating and cooling at 50 ° C., heating was performed at 1100 to 1250 ° C., hot forging was performed at a temperature of 1050 to 1200 ° C., and then, cooling was performed by the method shown in Table 3 as well. The tensile strength, the fatigue strength, the machinability and the bainite structure rate were determined from the center of this material by the same method as in Example 1. Table 4 shows the bainite microstructure ratio and performance evaluation result of each test material.

【0052】No.45、46、47および48は、本
発明のベイナイト組織率の条件である組織率fが含有炭
素量C(%)に対して1.4C+0.4以上1.4C以
下を満足する本発明の例であり、いずれも耐久比は0.
55以上を確保しまた切削性も現行調質鋼であるNo.
42の2.5倍程度と良好である。
No. 45, 46, 47 and 48 are examples of the present invention in which the texture ratio f, which is the condition of the bainite structure ratio of the present invention, satisfies 1.4C + 0.4 or more and 1.4C or less with respect to the carbon content C (%). And the durability ratio is 0.
No. 55, which is a current tempered steel that secures 55 or more and has machinability.
It is about 2.5 times as high as 42.

【0053】No.43および44は冷却速度を小さく
したもので、その組織は大部分がフェライトまたはフェ
ライト+球状セメンタイトであってベイナイト組織率が
小さい。そのため引張強度自体が低いが、フェライト+
ベイナイト2相組織化による効果が消失し、耐久比は
0.54以下と低く、切削性も本発明例に比較して不良
である。
No. Reference numerals 43 and 44 are cooling rates that are small, and most of the structures are ferrite or ferrite + spherical cementite, and the bainite structure ratio is small. Therefore, the tensile strength itself is low, but ferrite +
The effect due to bainite two-phase organization disappears, the durability ratio is as low as 0.54 or less, and the machinability is poor as compared with the examples of the present invention.

【0054】一方、No.49は冷却速度を高めること
によりマルテンサイトを主とする組織としたものであ
り、引張強度は高くなるものの耐久比は極めて低く、ま
た切削性も不良で工具寿命は小さい。
On the other hand, No. 49 has a structure mainly composed of martensite by increasing the cooling rate, and although the tensile strength is increased, the durability ratio is extremely low, and the machinability is poor, and the tool life is short.

【0055】[0055]

【表5】 [Table 5]

【0056】[0056]

【表6】 [Table 6]

【0057】[0057]

【発明の効果】以上述べた如く、本発明鋼はフェライト
−ベイナイト2相組織とすることにより高い引張強度を
得ると共に被削性を確保し、さらにMnS,Ti窒化物
およびV窒化物から形成される複合析出物を使って金属
組織の微細化とV炭化物(または炭窒化物)によるベイ
ナイト中のフェライトマトリックスの強化を同時に行う
ことにより被削性を損なわずに耐久比すなわち疲労特性
を向上させることが可能となり、従来、切望されていた
高引張強度でかつ高い疲労強度と被削性の兼備を満足す
る熱間鍛造用非調質鋼を提示することが可能となり、産
業上極めて効果が大きい。
As described above, the steel of the present invention has a ferrite-bainite two-phase structure to obtain high tensile strength and secures machinability, and is formed from MnS, Ti nitride and V nitride. Improving the durability ratio, that is, the fatigue property without damaging the machinability by simultaneously refining the metal structure using the composite precipitate and strengthening the ferrite matrix in bainite with V carbide (or carbonitride). This makes it possible to present a non-heat treated steel for hot forging, which satisfies the long-awaited high tensile strength, high fatigue strength, and machinability, and is extremely effective in industry.

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】重量比にして C :0.10〜0.35% Si:0.15〜2.00% Mn:0.40〜2.00% S :0.03〜0.10% Al:0.0005〜0.050% Ti:0.003〜0.050% N :0.0020〜0.0070% V :0.30〜0.70%を含有し 残部はFeならびに不純物元素からなる組成を有し熱間
鍛造を施し室温まで冷却した後の金属組織においてベイ
ナイト組織の組織率fが含有炭素量C(%)に対して
1.4C+0.4≧f≧1.4Cであることを特徴とす
る熱間鍛造したままで使用するフェライト−ベイナイト
型非調質鋼。
1. A weight ratio of C: 0.10 to 0.35% Si: 0.15 to 2.00% Mn: 0.40 to 2.00% S: 0.03 to 0.10% Al : 0.0005 to 0.050% Ti: 0.003 to 0.050% N: 0.0020 to 0.0070% V: 0.30 to 0.70% and the balance Fe and impurity elements The composition ratio f of the bainite structure in the metal structure having the composition and subjected to hot forging and cooling to room temperature is 1.4C + 0.4 ≧ f ≧ 1.4C with respect to the carbon content C (%). Characteristic Ferrite-bainite type non-heat treated steel used as hot forged.
【請求項2】成分がさらに Cr:0.02〜1.50% Mo:0.02〜1.00% Nb:0.001〜0.20% Pb:0.05〜0.30% Ca:0.0005〜0.010% の内の1種または2種以上を含有することを特徴とする
請求項1記載の熱間鍛造したままで使用するフェライト
−ベイナイト型非調質鋼。
2. A further component is Cr: 0.02 to 1.50% Mo: 0.02 to 1.00% Nb: 0.001 to 0.20% Pb: 0.05 to 0.30% Ca: The ferrite-bainite non-heat treated steel used as hot forged according to claim 1, characterized in that it contains one or more of 0.0005 to 0.010%.
JP25433593A 1993-10-12 1993-10-12 Non-heat treated steel for hot forging with excellent tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability Expired - Fee Related JP3241897B2 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP25433593A JP3241897B2 (en) 1993-10-12 1993-10-12 Non-heat treated steel for hot forging with excellent tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability
PCT/JP1994/001693 WO1995010637A1 (en) 1993-10-12 1994-10-11 Non-heat-treated hot-forging steel excellent in tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability
DE69419720T DE69419720T2 (en) 1993-10-12 1994-10-11 HEAT-TREATED HEAT-FORGED STEEL WITH EXCELLENT TENSILE STRENGTH, FATIGUE RESISTANCE AND MACHINABILITY
EP94929026A EP0674014B1 (en) 1993-10-12 1994-10-11 Non-heat-treated hot-forging steel excellent in tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability
CN94190781A CN1039035C (en) 1993-10-12 1994-10-11 Non-heat-treated hot-forging steel excellent in tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability
KR1019950702391A KR0180938B1 (en) 1993-10-12 1994-10-11 Non-heat-treated hot forging steel excellent in tensile strength fatigue strength and machinability

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP25433593A JP3241897B2 (en) 1993-10-12 1993-10-12 Non-heat treated steel for hot forging with excellent tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH07109545A true JPH07109545A (en) 1995-04-25
JP3241897B2 JP3241897B2 (en) 2001-12-25

Family

ID=17263582

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP25433593A Expired - Fee Related JP3241897B2 (en) 1993-10-12 1993-10-12 Non-heat treated steel for hot forging with excellent tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0674014B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3241897B2 (en)
KR (1) KR0180938B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1039035C (en)
DE (1) DE69419720T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1995010637A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100435461B1 (en) * 1999-12-20 2004-06-10 주식회사 포스코 A method for manufacturing steel material for cold forging with low property deviation

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2774098B1 (en) * 1998-01-28 2001-08-03 Ascometal Sa STEEL AND PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF SECABLE MECHANICAL PARTS
KR20010048426A (en) * 1999-11-26 2001-06-15 이계안 A compound of non-quenched and tempered steel of low carbon and high toughness for the front axle beam
JP3888865B2 (en) * 2000-10-25 2007-03-07 株式会社ゴーシュー Forging method
KR100401571B1 (en) * 2001-02-20 2003-10-17 한국기계연구원 High strength microalloyed steel having bainite structure for hot forging and manufacturing method therefor
DE602004017144D1 (en) * 2003-03-18 2008-11-27 Sumitomo Metal Ind NON-SCREENED / TEMPERED PULLEY AND ASSOCIATED METHOD OF MANUFACTURE
CA2531615A1 (en) * 2004-12-28 2006-06-28 Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) High strength thin steel sheet having high hydrogen embrittlement resisting property
CN100500918C (en) * 2007-03-29 2009-06-17 攀钢集团成都钢铁有限责任公司 Steel for large diameter non-tempering petroleum sleeve
CN102851471A (en) * 2012-09-27 2013-01-02 攀枝花学院 Heat treatment method for rapidly obtaining fine ferrite grains by low carbon alloy steel
DK3168312T3 (en) * 2015-11-16 2019-07-01 Deutsche Edelstahlwerke Specialty Steel Gmbh & Co Kg Structural steel with bainitic structure, forging blank made therefrom and method for producing a forging blank
CN105734414A (en) * 2016-02-19 2016-07-06 唐山钢铁集团有限责任公司 Medium-carbon non-quenched and tempered steel and production method thereof
WO2019088190A1 (en) * 2017-10-31 2019-05-09 日本製鉄株式会社 Hot forged steel
CN111154945B (en) * 2020-01-17 2021-05-28 中天钢铁集团有限公司 Control method for liquated nitrides in Ti and V microalloyed aluminum deoxidized sulfur-containing non-quenched and tempered steel
CN115896614A (en) * 2022-10-31 2023-04-04 中国第一汽车股份有限公司 Niobium-containing bainite non-quenched and tempered steel material, steering knuckle and preparation method

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS589813B2 (en) * 1978-03-14 1983-02-23 住友金属工業株式会社 Manufacturing method for non-thermal forged steel products
JPS61104049A (en) * 1984-10-26 1986-05-22 Daido Steel Co Ltd Steel for machine structural use
JPS61261464A (en) * 1985-05-13 1986-11-19 Daido Steel Co Ltd Steel for machine structural use
JPS62167855A (en) * 1986-01-21 1987-07-24 Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> Unrefined steel for hot forging having superior fatigue resistance
JPH01176055A (en) * 1987-12-28 1989-07-12 Kawasaki Steel Corp Non-heat treated steel for hot forging having excellent machinability
JPH04210449A (en) * 1990-12-12 1992-07-31 Toa Steel Co Ltd High toughness non-heat treated steel for hot forging
JP2929835B2 (en) * 1992-03-30 1999-08-03 住友金属工業株式会社 High-strength non-heat treated steel with excellent hot ductility
JPH0673490A (en) * 1992-08-26 1994-03-15 Aichi Steel Works Ltd High toughness non-heat-treated rolled bar steel

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100435461B1 (en) * 1999-12-20 2004-06-10 주식회사 포스코 A method for manufacturing steel material for cold forging with low property deviation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3241897B2 (en) 2001-12-25
KR950704530A (en) 1995-11-20
EP0674014A4 (en) 1996-02-07
DE69419720D1 (en) 1999-09-02
CN1039035C (en) 1998-07-08
EP0674014B1 (en) 1999-07-28
WO1995010637A1 (en) 1995-04-20
CN1115582A (en) 1996-01-24
KR0180938B1 (en) 1999-02-18
EP0674014A1 (en) 1995-09-27
DE69419720T2 (en) 1999-12-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3300500B2 (en) Method for producing hot forging steel excellent in fatigue strength, yield strength and machinability
JP3241897B2 (en) Non-heat treated steel for hot forging with excellent tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability
JPH11335777A (en) Case hardening steel excellent in cold workability and low carburizing strain characteristics, and its production
CN112877591B (en) High-strength and high-toughness hardware tool and steel for chain and manufacturing method thereof
JP2000178645A (en) Production of steel excellent in strength and toughness
JPH0892687A (en) High strength and high toughness non-heattreated steel for hot forging and its production
JPH09143610A (en) Hot forged non-heat treated steel having high fatigue strength and its production
JP2004204263A (en) Steel material for case hardening superior in cold workability and coarse-particle-preventing property in carburization, and manufacturing method therefor
JP3327635B2 (en) Non-tempered steel for hot forging excellent in fatigue strength and method for producing non-heat-treated hot forged product using the steel
JPH11293390A (en) High strength free cutting non-heat treated steel
JP3196579B2 (en) Free-cutting non-heat treated steel with excellent strength and toughness
JPH08277437A (en) Production of high strength and high toughness non-heat treated steel for hot forging and forged product thereof
JP3774697B2 (en) Steel material for high strength induction hardening and method for manufacturing the same
JP3300511B2 (en) Manufacturing method of sub-hot forging steel excellent in toughness, durability ratio, yield ratio and machinability
JP4556770B2 (en) Carburizing steel and method for producing the same
JP3261552B2 (en) Manufacturing method of non-heat treated steel with excellent fatigue properties
JP4232242B2 (en) High strength high toughness non-tempered steel
JP2000017374A (en) Age hardening type high strength bainitic steel and its production
JP2000160286A (en) High-strength and high-toughness non-heat treated steel excellent in drilling machinability
JP2004124190A (en) Induction-tempered steel having excellent twisting property
JP4121416B2 (en) Non-tempered hot forged parts for machine structure and manufacturing method thereof
JPH07116550B2 (en) Low alloy high speed tool steel and manufacturing method thereof
JPH07157824A (en) Production of semi-hot forged non-heat treated steel material excellent in yield strength, toughness, and fatigue characteristic
JP3238544B2 (en) Manufacturing method of non-heat treated hot forged parts
JPH10212559A (en) Non-heat treated steel excellent in fatigue resistance and its production

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20010904

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20071019

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081019

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091019

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101019

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101019

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111019

Year of fee payment: 10

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees