JPH059679A - Manufacture of thin aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fin excellent in ironability - Google Patents

Manufacture of thin aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fin excellent in ironability

Info

Publication number
JPH059679A
JPH059679A JP19069391A JP19069391A JPH059679A JP H059679 A JPH059679 A JP H059679A JP 19069391 A JP19069391 A JP 19069391A JP 19069391 A JP19069391 A JP 19069391A JP H059679 A JPH059679 A JP H059679A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
ironing
subjected
weight
drawless
cold rolling
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP19069391A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Hiroaki Takeuchi
宏明 竹内
Hiroshi Shibata
浩 柴田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Furukawa Aluminum Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Furukawa Aluminum Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Furukawa Aluminum Co Ltd filed Critical Furukawa Aluminum Co Ltd
Priority to JP19069391A priority Critical patent/JPH059679A/en
Publication of JPH059679A publication Critical patent/JPH059679A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Shaping Metal By Deep-Drawing, Or The Like (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To provide a method for manufacturing a thin aluminum alloy sheet for a drawless fin excellent in ironability and used as a fin for a room air conditioner by executing bulging, ironing and stretch-flanging. CONSTITUTION:This is a method for manufacturing a thin Al alloy sheet in which the number of intermetallic compounds with >=0.1mum diameter in the metallic structure before the forming is regulated to 5 pieces/mum<3> and specific resistance value is regulated to <=33.5nOMEGAm and excellent in ironability in which an alloy ingot contg., by weight, 0.01 to 0.15% Si, 0.10 to 0.40% Fe, 0.10 to 0.40% Mn and the balance Al with inevitable impurities is subjected to homogenizing treatment and hot rolling, and the obtd. hot rolled sheet is subjected to cold rolling at 50 to 90% draft, is subjected to precipitation treatment at 200 to 350 deg.C for >=2hr and is thereafter subjected to cold rolling at >=70% draft, and the obtd. thin sheet is subjected to temper annealing at 250 to 300 deg.C.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は張り出し加工、しごき加
工、伸びフランジ加工を施してルームエアコン用フィン
として使用されるしごき加工性に優れたドローレスフィ
ン用アルミニウム合金薄板の製造方法に関するものであ
る。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for producing an aluminum alloy thin plate for a drawless fin, which is excellent in ironing property and is used as a fin for a room air conditioner by subjecting it to overhanging, ironing and stretch-flange processing.

【0002】[0002]

【従来技術およびその課題】一般に空調用熱交換器のア
ルミニウム合金フィンは図1(イ)〜(ニ)に示すよう
に、プレート部(1)に熱交チューブを挿着するための
カラー部(2)を形成したものであり、プレート部形状
に応じて、フラットタイプ(イ)、ルーバータイプ
(ロ)、スリットタイプ(ハ)、コルゲートタイプ
(ニ)に区分される。またカラー部の成形方法はドロー
方式とドローレス方式に区分される。ドロー方式は図2
(イ)〜(ヘ)に示すように張り出し(イ)、絞り
(ロ)〜(ニ)、打ち抜き、バーリング(ホ)、リフレ
アー(ヘ)の工程からなり、張り出し加工が中心をなし
ている。従ってフィン材には優れた伸びが要求されてお
り、通常は厚さ0.13mm以上の厚いフィンの製造に
用いられている。また、ドローレス方式は図3(イ)〜
(ニ)に示すように打ち抜き、穴拡げ(イ)、バーリン
グ(ロ)、しごき(ハ)、リフレアー(ニ)の工程から
なり、しごき加工が中心をなしている。従ってフィン材
にはしごき加工性に優れる事が要求され、通常0.13
mm以下の薄いフィンの製造に用いられている。
2. Description of the Related Art Generally, an aluminum alloy fin for an air conditioner heat exchanger has a collar portion (for inserting a heat exchange tube in a plate portion (1) as shown in FIGS. 2) is formed, and is classified into a flat type (a), a louver type (b), a slit type (c), and a corrugated type (d) according to the shape of the plate portion. The molding method of the collar portion is classified into a draw method and a drawless method. Drawing method is shown in Figure 2.
As shown in (a) to (f), the process of overhanging (a), drawing (b) to (d), punching, burring (e), and flare (f) is the main process. Therefore, the fin material is required to have excellent elongation and is usually used for manufacturing a thick fin having a thickness of 0.13 mm or more. In addition, the drawless method is shown in Fig. 3 (a)-
As shown in (d), the process consists of punching, hole expansion (a), burring (b), ironing (c), and refraining (d), and ironing is the main process. Therefore, it is required that the fin material has excellent ironing workability.
It is used for manufacturing thin fins of less than mm.

【0003】最近、省エネルギー、省資源の面から熱交
換器の軽量化が望まれ、アルミニウム合金フィンにおい
ても、薄肉軽量化が図られ、フィンの製造にもドローレ
ス方式が多用されるようになった。ドローレス方式フィ
ンの成形時に生じる成形不良としては、アイアニング工
程で発生するしごき割れ、リフレアー工程で発生する花
割れ等がある。特にしごき割れはしごき率が高くなるほ
ど発生しやすくなり、特定高さ以上の製品寸法が得られ
ない等の問題があった。またこれらの割れは何れもカラ
ー部と熱交チューブの密着性を損ない、熱交特性を低下
させるとともに成形フィンの外観を害するものであり、
製品としての価値を下げる場合があるため、これらの成
形不良の低減が強く望まれている。また、コルゲートタ
イプでは張出加工が行われるため、強度と同時に高い伸
びが要求されるが、従来の通常の製造方法で製造したア
ルミニウム合金薄板では十分な強度、伸びが得られない
ばかりか、成形性の良好なものが得られないという欠点
があった。
Recently, it has been desired to reduce the weight of the heat exchanger from the viewpoint of energy saving and resource saving, and the aluminum alloy fins have been made thinner and lighter, and the drawless method has been widely used for manufacturing the fins. .. Molding defects that occur during molding of the drawless fins include ironing cracks that occur in the ironing process and flower cracks that occur in the flare process. In particular, ironing cracks are more likely to occur as the ironing rate becomes higher, and there is a problem that a product dimension above a specific height cannot be obtained. Further, all of these cracks impair the adhesion between the collar portion and the heat exchange tube, reduce the heat exchange characteristics, and impair the appearance of the molding fins.
Since the value as a product may be reduced, it is strongly desired to reduce these molding defects. In addition, since the corrugated type requires bulging, it requires high elongation at the same time as strength.However, the aluminum alloy sheet manufactured by the conventional ordinary manufacturing method does not provide sufficient strength and elongation, and There is a drawback that a product with good properties cannot be obtained.

【0004】[0004]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明者らは上記問題点
を解決するために検討を重ねた結果、熱間圧延後の析出
処理によりフィン材を組織制御すれば成形性は向上する
ことを見出したのである。従来のドローレスフィン用硬
質アルミニウム材を用いた場合は、ドローレスフィン成
形工程中のしごき工程において、予加工で形成された転
位組織がしごき加工時の加工発熱により回復するため、
しごき率が大きい場合すなわち加工発熱量が大きい場合
には回復サブグレインを不均一に生じ、材料の破断抵抗
力がしごき力を下回る結果、そこを起点としてしごき割
れが発生することを知見した。そこで、この知見に基づ
き、しごき加工時に回復しにくい、すなわち高温強度の
高い材料について鋭意検討を行った結果、得られた熱間
圧延板に50〜90%の圧下率で冷間圧延を行い、その
板厚で200〜350℃で2時間以上保持の析出処理を
行った後、圧下率70%以上で冷間圧延し、得られた薄
板に250〜300℃の範囲内の温度で調質焼鈍を施す
ことにより、成形加工前のアルミニウム合金板のアルミ
マトリックス中に微細な金属間化合物が均一に分散さ
れ、しごき加工時の加工発熱による回復サブグレインの
成長を妨げる効果が得られ、しごき性が向上するという
知見を得たのである。また、微細な金属間化合物を均一
に分散させておくことにより、素板自体の伸び値も向上
するという知見を得たのである。さらに検討を重ねた結
果、上記に加えアルミニウムマトリックス中の固溶量を
低減させることにより、しごき成形時の加工硬化が抑制
され、しごき抵抗力が低減される結果、さらにしごき性
が向上することを見出したのである。
The inventors of the present invention have conducted extensive studies to solve the above-mentioned problems, and as a result, it has been found that if the fin material is microstructure-controlled by a precipitation treatment after hot rolling, the formability is improved. I found it. When a conventional hard aluminum material for drawless fins is used, in the ironing process during the drawless fin forming process, the dislocation structure formed by pre-processing recovers due to processing heat during ironing,
It has been found that when the ironing rate is large, that is, when the amount of heat generated by working is large, recovery subgrains are nonuniformly generated, and as a result, the fracture resistance of the material falls below the ironing force, and as a result, ironing cracks occur. Therefore, based on this knowledge, it is difficult to recover during ironing, that is, as a result of diligent study on a material having high high-temperature strength, as a result, cold rolling was performed on the obtained hot-rolled sheet at a reduction rate of 50 to 90%, After performing a precipitation treatment of maintaining the plate thickness at 200 to 350 ° C. for 2 hours or more, cold rolling is performed at a reduction rate of 70% or more, and the obtained thin plate is temper-annealed at a temperature in the range of 250 to 300 ° C. By applying the, the fine intermetallic compound is uniformly dispersed in the aluminum matrix of the aluminum alloy sheet before forming, and the effect of inhibiting the growth of recovery subgrains due to the heat generated during ironing can be obtained, and ironing is improved. We have obtained the knowledge that it will improve. Further, they have found that evenly dispersing the fine intermetallic compound improves the elongation value of the base plate itself. As a result of further studies, in addition to the above, by reducing the amount of solid solution in the aluminum matrix, work hardening during ironing forming is suppressed, ironing resistance is reduced, and as a result, ironing property is further improved. I found it.

【0005】すなわち、本発明は、Si0.01〜0.
15重量%、Fe0.10〜0.40重量%、Mn0.
10〜0.40重量%、を含み残部Alと不可避的不純
物とからなる合金鋳塊に均質化処理および熱間圧延を行
った後、得られた熱間圧延板に50〜90%の圧下率で
冷間圧延を行い、200〜350℃で2時間以上保持の
析出処理を行った後、圧下率70%以上で冷間圧延し、
得られた薄板に250〜300℃の範囲内の温度で調質
焼鈍を施し、該薄板の成形加工前の金属組織中の直径が
0.1μm径以下の金属間化合物を数密度にして5個/
μm3 以上とし、かつ比抵抗値を33.5nΩm以下と
することを特徴とするしごき加工性に優れたドローレス
フィン用アルミニウム合金薄板の製造方法である。
That is, according to the present invention, Si0.01-0.
15% by weight, Fe 0.10 to 0.40% by weight, Mn0.
After homogenizing and hot rolling an alloy ingot containing 10 to 0.40% by weight and the balance Al and unavoidable impurities, a reduction ratio of 50 to 90% is applied to the obtained hot rolled sheet. After performing a cold rolling at 200 to 350 ° C. for 2 hours or more, a cold rolling at a rolling reduction of 70% or more,
The thin plate thus obtained is subjected to temper annealing at a temperature in the range of 250 to 300 ° C., and the intermetallic compound having a diameter of 0.1 μm or less in the metal structure of the thin plate before forming is made to have a number density of 5 /
A method for producing an aluminum alloy thin plate for drawless fins having excellent ironing workability, characterized in that the specific resistance value is 3 μm 3 or more and the specific resistance value is 33.5 nΩm or less.

【0006】次に、成分組成を本発明の通り限定した理
由を説明する。本発明アルミニウム合金板は、Si0.
01〜0.15重量%、Fe0.10〜0.40重量
%、Mn0.10〜0.40重量%、を含み残部Alと
不可避的不純物とからなる組成を有することを特徴とす
る。Si、FeおよびMn成分には一部アルミニウムに
固溶し、薄板の強度を高める効果に加え、合金板中に直
径が1〜10μm程度のAl−Fe系、Al−Fe−M
n系、Al−(Fe、Mn)−Si系の非常に硬い金属
間化合物となって均一に分散し、しごき加工における工
具との焼き付きを防止し、しごき性を向上する効果があ
る。さらにMn成分には合金薄板の伸び値を向上する効
果がある。ここで、Si添加量が0.01重量%未満、
Fe添加量が0.10重量%未満、Mn添加量が0.1
0重量%未満では所望の強度、伸びが得られないばかり
か金属間化合物の数および大きさが減少するため焼き付
きが多発し、しごき性が劣化する。一方、Si添加量が
0.15重量%より多く、Fe添加量が0.40重量%
より多く、かつMnの添加量が0.40重量%より多く
なると、しごき加工時に加工硬化が促進されやすくなる
とともに、金属間化合物の粗大化を生じて、しごき加工
時、リフレアー加工時にその金属間化合物が割れの起点
となるため成形性が劣化する。したがって、Siは0.
01〜0.15重量%、Fe添加量は0.10〜0.4
0重量%であり、Mn添加量は0.10〜0.40重量
%であることが必要である。本発明で金属間化合物の直
径を0.1μm径以下と規定したのは、径が0.1μm
を越えると大きいとサブグレイン粒界の移動を遅延する
効果が小さくなり回復サブグレインが発生しやすくなる
ためである。さらに直径0.1μm径以下の金属間化合
物の分布を数密度にして5個/μm3 以上と規定したの
は、5個/μm3 未満では上記の効果が得られにくく、
したがってしごき性向上効果がないためである。なお、
上記金属間化合物はマトリックス中に不均一に分布して
も効果が少なく望ましくは均一に分散させた方が効果が
高い。本発明は上記の微細金属間化合物分布に加え、成
形加工前の金属組織の比抵抗値を33.5nΩm以下と
規定することを特徴とする。これは加工硬化性を支配す
る添加元素固溶量を比抵抗値で数値化したものであり、
固溶量の指標となる比抵抗値が33.5nΩmより大き
い場合、加工硬化し易くなって、しごき加工時に割れが
生じやすくなるためである。したがって、比抵抗値が3
3.5nΩm以下であることが必要である。
Next, the reason why the component composition is limited as in the present invention will be explained. The aluminum alloy sheet of the present invention has a Si0.
It is characterized in that it has a composition including 01 to 0.15% by weight, 0.10 to 0.40% by weight of Fe, 0.10 to 0.40% by weight of Mn, and the balance Al and unavoidable impurities. The Si, Fe, and Mn components are partially solid-dissolved in aluminum, and in addition to the effect of increasing the strength of the thin plate, the alloy plate has an Al-Fe system having a diameter of about 1 to 10 µm,
It is an n-type and Al- (Fe, Mn) -Si type very hard intermetallic compound, which is uniformly dispersed and has the effect of preventing seizure with a tool during ironing and improving the ironing property. Further, the Mn component has an effect of improving the elongation value of the alloy thin plate. Here, the amount of Si added is less than 0.01% by weight,
Fe addition amount is less than 0.10% by weight, Mn addition amount is 0.1
If it is less than 0% by weight, not only the desired strength and elongation cannot be obtained, but also the number and size of the intermetallic compounds decrease, so that seizure frequently occurs and ironing property deteriorates. On the other hand, the Si addition amount is more than 0.15% by weight, and the Fe addition amount is 0.40% by weight.
If the amount of Mn added is more than 0.40% by weight, work hardening is likely to be promoted during ironing, and the intermetallic compound is coarsened, so that the intermetallic compound is removed during ironing and flare processing. Since the compound becomes the starting point of cracking, the moldability deteriorates. Therefore, Si is 0.
01-0.15 wt%, Fe addition amount is 0.10-0.4
It is necessary that the content of Mn is 0% by weight and the amount of Mn added is 0.10 to 0.40% by weight. In the present invention, the diameter of the intermetallic compound is defined as 0.1 μm or less because the diameter is 0.1 μm.
If it exceeds, the effect of delaying the movement of the sub-grain boundaries is reduced and recovery sub-grains are likely to occur. Even more was defined as the diameter 0.1μm and distribution of intermetallic compounds under diameter or less to the number density of 5 / [mu] m 3 or more, the above effect is difficult to obtain in less than 5 / [mu] m 3,
Therefore, there is no ironing property improving effect. In addition,
The intermetallic compound has little effect even if it is unevenly distributed in the matrix, and it is more effective if it is dispersed uniformly. The present invention is characterized in that, in addition to the distribution of the fine intermetallic compounds described above, the specific resistance value of the metal structure before forming is specified to be 33.5 nΩm or less. This is a numerical representation of the solid solution amount of the additive element that governs work hardenability, and
This is because when the specific resistance value, which is an index of the amount of solid solution, is larger than 33.5 nΩm, work hardening is likely to occur and cracks are likely to occur during ironing. Therefore, the specific resistance value is 3
It should be 3.5 nΩm or less.

【0007】次に本発明の製造方法について説明する。
本発明は、0.1μm径以下の微細な金属間化合物の析
出を促進すると共に、固溶量の低減を図ることを目的と
しており、そのためにまず均質化処理を施し、熱間圧延
を行った後、得られた熱間圧延板に50〜90%の圧下
率で冷間圧延を行い、200〜350℃で2時間以上保
持の析出処理を行うことが必要である。ここで、析出処
理温度が200℃未満ではその効果が不十分であり、3
50℃より高い場合、析出した金属間化合物が粗大化
し、温度によっては再結晶粒を生じて、これが割れの起
点となるために、かえって成形性が劣化してしまう。ま
た、熱間圧延板から析出処理する板までの冷間圧延率が
50%未満では、200〜350℃で十分に析出するだ
けの転位密度が得られないため、析出処理の効果が不十
分であり、上記の冷間圧延率が90%を超える場合、析
出処理後の最終冷間圧延率が低くなり、ドローレスフィ
ン材としての強度が不足するという問題が生じる。均質
化処理は常法に基づき行えば良いが、500〜620℃
の高温で短時間、望ましくは3時間以内の保持を行い、
熱間圧延前の添加元素固溶量を高くすれば、上記の析出
処理の効果は大きい。圧下率70%以上で冷間圧延を行
うのは、70%より低い場合、ドローレス用フィン材と
して必要な強度が不足するためである。また得られた薄
板に250〜300℃の範囲内の温度で調質焼鈍を施す
ことにより、コルゲートタイプドローレスフィン材とし
て必要なコルゲート加工性(張出性)が得られる。ここ
で、調質温度が250℃未満では十分な成形性が得られ
ず、300℃より高い温度で調質焼鈍した場合、再結晶
粒を生じて、これが割れの起点となるため、かえって成
形性が劣化してしまう。したがって、得られた薄板を2
50〜300℃の温度で調質焼鈍を施す必要がある。
Next, the manufacturing method of the present invention will be described.
The present invention aims to promote the precipitation of fine intermetallic compounds having a diameter of 0.1 μm or less and to reduce the amount of solid solution. For that purpose, first, a homogenizing treatment is performed and hot rolling is performed. After that, it is necessary to perform cold rolling on the obtained hot-rolled sheet at a reduction rate of 50 to 90% and perform a precipitation treatment of holding at 200 to 350 ° C for 2 hours or more. Here, if the precipitation treatment temperature is less than 200 ° C., the effect is insufficient, and 3
When the temperature is higher than 50 ° C., the precipitated intermetallic compound becomes coarse, and recrystallized grains are generated depending on the temperature, which becomes a starting point of cracking, which rather deteriorates formability. Further, if the cold rolling ratio from the hot rolled plate to the plate to be subjected to the precipitation treatment is less than 50%, the dislocation density sufficient for precipitation at 200 to 350 ° C. cannot be obtained, so that the effect of the precipitation treatment is insufficient. If the above-mentioned cold rolling rate exceeds 90%, the final cold rolling rate after the precipitation treatment becomes low, which causes a problem that the strength as a drawless fin material is insufficient. The homogenization treatment may be performed according to a conventional method, but 500 to 620 ° C
At high temperature for a short time, preferably within 3 hours,
If the solid solution amount of the additional element before hot rolling is increased, the effect of the above precipitation treatment is great. The reason why cold rolling is performed at a rolling reduction of 70% or more is that the strength required as a drawless fin material is insufficient when the rolling reduction is lower than 70%. Further, by subjecting the obtained thin plate to temper annealing at a temperature in the range of 250 to 300 ° C., corrugation workability (protrudability) required as a corrugated type drawless fin material can be obtained. Here, if the tempering temperature is less than 250 ° C, sufficient formability cannot be obtained, and if tempering annealing is performed at a temperature higher than 300 ° C, recrystallized grains are generated, and this becomes a starting point of cracking, so rather formability Will deteriorate. Therefore, the obtained thin plate is
It is necessary to perform temper annealing at a temperature of 50 to 300 ° C.

【0008】[0008]

【実施例】【Example】

〔実施例1〕表1に示す組成の合金鋳塊を水冷鋳造によ
り作製し、その鋳塊(厚さ400mm)を片面10mm
ずつ両面面削後、表2に示した条件で均質化処理を施し
熱間圧延を行った後、熱延板に冷間圧延を行ってから、
表2に示す条件下で析出処理を行ってからさらに、冷間
圧延を行い厚さ0.115mmの薄板とした後、250
〜300℃の範囲で調質焼鈍を施して引張強さが14.
0〜15.5kgf/mm2 のドローレスフィン用薄板
を得た。このようにして得られたフィン材の金属間化合
物の分布状態、比抵抗値および成形性評価結果を表3に
示す。ここで、金属間化合物の分布状態は、透過型電子
顕微鏡を用いて金属間化合物の粒子径およびその粒子の
一定体積中の存在数を測定した。なお、その粒子径は粒
子の投影面積と等しい面積の円の直径とした。電気比抵
抗値については、JIS規格に基づきダブルブリッジを
用いて調質焼鈍後の薄板を測定した。しごき加工性は、
ドローレスフィン実機により、直径8.29mmの第2
アイアニングダイスと直径8.24mmの第2アイアニ
ングポンチを用い、しごき率78%の過酷条件でフィン
カラー部を160個成形した時のしごき割れ不良率で評
価した。コルゲート加工性は、ドローレスフィン実機に
より、成形高さ1.3mmのコルゲート板を用いてコル
ゲート部を100個成形した時の割れの有無により評価
した。
[Example 1] An alloy ingot having the composition shown in Table 1 was produced by water cooling casting, and the ingot (thickness 400 mm) was formed on one side of 10 mm.
After performing double-sided surface cutting on each side, performing homogenizing treatment under the conditions shown in Table 2 and performing hot rolling, and then performing cold rolling on the hot rolled sheet,
After performing the precipitation treatment under the conditions shown in Table 2, cold rolling was further performed to form a thin plate having a thickness of 0.115 mm, and then 250
The tensile strength is 14.
A thin plate for a drawless fin having a weight of 0 to 15.5 kgf / mm 2 was obtained. Table 3 shows the distribution state of the intermetallic compound of the fin material thus obtained, the specific resistance value and the formability evaluation result. Here, regarding the distribution state of the intermetallic compound, the particle diameter of the intermetallic compound and the number of the particles present in a given volume were measured using a transmission electron microscope. The particle diameter was the diameter of a circle having an area equal to the projected area of the particles. Regarding the electrical resistivity, the thin plate after temper annealing was measured using a double bridge based on JIS standard. Ironing processability is
With the drawless fin actual machine, the second with a diameter of 8.29 mm
Using an ironing die and a second ironing punch having a diameter of 8.24 mm, the ironing cracking failure rate was evaluated when 160 fin collar parts were molded under severe conditions with an ironing rate of 78%. The corrugation processability was evaluated by the presence or absence of cracks when 100 corrugated parts were molded with a drawless fin actual machine using a corrugated plate having a molding height of 1.3 mm.

【0009】[0009]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0010】[0010]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0011】[0011]

【表3】 [Table 3]

【0012】表1,2,3から明らかなように本発明合
金板試料No.1〜7は従来合金板試料No.13に比べ、
しごき性、コルゲート性に優れている。これは、析出処
理を、熱間圧延板から50〜90%の冷間圧延を行った
板に200〜350℃で2時間以上保持となる条件下で
行っているからである。これにより、本発明合金板には
従来合金板試料No.13に比べ、0.1μm径以下の微
細な金属間化合物が数多く均一に存在しており、これら
の微細金属間化合物がしごき加工時に回復サブグレイン
の成長を抑制する結果、しごき加工時の材料の破断抵抗
力は高まるのである。それに加え、本発明合金板は従来
合金板に比べ成形加工前のアルミマトリックス中の添加
元素固溶量がかなり低減され、しごき加工時の加工硬化
が抑制され、しごき力もかなり低減されるのである。こ
れに対して本発明合金板の範囲からはずれる比較合金板
試料No.8〜12はしごき性、コルゲート性のいずれか
が劣化することがわかる。すなわち、Fe、Si、Mn
含有量のいずれかが上限を超える比較合金板試料No.9
は、所定の製造条件で薄板を作製しても加工前の添加元
素固溶量を低減することができず、伸び値は低下しない
ものの、しごき加工時に著しい加工硬化を生じて割れが
多発する。一方、Fe、Si、Mn含有量のいずれかが
下限未満の比較合金板試料No.11、12は、微細金属
間化合物が少なく、しごき加工時に回復し易くなるため
苛酷なしごき条件下ではしごき破断を起こしやすい。ま
た、析出処理の温度、および熱間圧延板から析出処理す
る板までの冷間圧延率が本発明の範囲からはずれる比較
合金板試料No.8、10、11はいずれも微細金属間化
合物が少なく、固溶量も多いため、しごき性、コルゲー
ト性の向上が見られない。特に、比較合金板試料No.1
1は析出処理温度が高くそのため金属間化合物が粗大化
し、温度によっては再結晶粒を生じて、これが割れの起
点となるために、かえって成形性が劣化してしまう。
As is clear from Tables 1, 2, and 3, the alloy plate sample No. 1 to 7 are conventional alloy plate sample Nos. Compared to 13,
Excellent ironing and corrugating properties. This is because the precipitation treatment is carried out under the condition that the hot rolled plate is cold rolled by 50 to 90% at 200 to 350 ° C. for 2 hours or more. As a result, the conventional alloy plate sample No. Compared with No. 13, many fine intermetallic compounds having a diameter of 0.1 μm or less are uniformly present, and these fine intermetallic compounds suppress the growth of recovered subgrains during ironing, and as a result, Breaking resistance is increased. In addition, the alloy sheet of the present invention has a considerably reduced amount of the added element solid solution in the aluminum matrix before forming, the work hardening during ironing is suppressed, and the ironing force is also considerably reduced as compared with the conventional alloy sheet. On the other hand, comparative alloy plate sample No. out of the range of the alloy plate of the present invention. It can be seen that either the ironing property of 8 to 12 or the corrugating property is deteriorated. That is, Fe, Si, Mn
Comparative alloy plate sample No. with any of the contents exceeding the upper limit 9
The alloy cannot reduce the solid solution amount of the additional element before processing even if a thin plate is manufactured under a predetermined manufacturing condition, and the elongation value does not decrease, but it causes remarkable work hardening during ironing and frequently cracks. On the other hand, comparative alloy plate sample No. 1 having Fe, Si, or Mn content less than the lower limit. Since Nos. 11 and 12 have a small amount of fine intermetallic compounds and are easily recovered during ironing, ironing fracture is likely to occur under severe ironing conditions. In addition, the temperature of the precipitation treatment and the cold rolling ratio from the hot rolled plate to the plate subjected to the precipitation treatment were out of the range of the present invention. Nos. 8, 10 and 11 had a small amount of fine intermetallic compound and a large amount of solid solution, and therefore, improvement in ironing property and corrugation property was not observed. In particular, the comparative alloy plate sample No. 1
In No. 1, since the precipitation treatment temperature is high, the intermetallic compound is coarsened, and recrystallized grains are generated depending on the temperature, which becomes a starting point of cracking, which rather deteriorates formability.

【0013】〔実施例2〕表3に示す調質焼鈍前の本発
明合金板試料No.5および比較合金板試料No.9、11
を用いて、表4に示す温度で調質焼鈍を行ない、引張試
験およびドローレスフィン実機による成形性試験を行っ
た。その結果を表4に併記する。なお、成形性試験の条
件は実施例1に記載した条件と同条件である。
Example 2 As shown in Table 3, the alloy plate sample No. of the present invention before temper annealing was used. 5 and comparative alloy plate sample No. 9, 11
Was subjected to temper annealing at a temperature shown in Table 4, and a tensile test and a formability test using a drawless fin actual machine were performed. The results are also shown in Table 4. The conditions of the moldability test are the same as those described in Example 1.

【0014】[0014]

【表4】 [Table 4]

【0015】表4から明らかなように、本発明合金板試
料No.5は250〜300℃の調質焼鈍を施すことによ
り、比較合金板試料No.9、11に比べてしごき性が優
れると共に、コルゲート性も良好である。これに対し調
質焼鈍の温度が本発明の範囲からはずれる比較合金板試
料No.5′、5″はしごき性、コルゲート性が劣ること
が判る。
As is clear from Table 4, the alloy plate sample No. of the present invention. No. 5 was subjected to tempering annealing at 250 to 300 ° C. to obtain a comparative alloy plate sample No. The ironing property is excellent as compared with 9 and 11, and the corrugation property is also good. On the other hand, the tempering annealing temperature deviates from the range of the present invention. It can be seen that 5 ′ and 5 ″ have poor ironing and corrugating properties.

【0016】[0016]

【発明の効果】このように本発明によって得られたフィ
ン材はドローレス方式フィン成形におけるしごき性、コ
ルゲート性に優れ、不良率を著しく低減し得るという顕
著な効果を奏するものである。
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY As described above, the fin material obtained according to the present invention has excellent ironing property and corrugation property in drawless fin formation, and has a remarkable effect that the defective rate can be remarkably reduced.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】(イ)〜(ニ)はそれぞれ熱交換器のアルミニ
ウムフィンの形態を示す断面図であり、(イ)はフラッ
トタイプ、(ロ)はルーバータイプ、(ハ)はスリット
タイプ、(ニ)はコルゲートタイプである。
1A to 1D are cross-sectional views showing a form of an aluminum fin of a heat exchanger, FIG. 1A is a flat type, FIG. 1B is a louver type, and FIG. 1C is a slit type. D) is a corrugated type.

【図2】(イ)〜(ヘ)はドロー方式によるフィンの成
形方法を断面図で示す説明図。
2A to 2F are explanatory views showing a cross-sectional view of a fin forming method by a draw method.

【図3】(イ)〜(ニ)はドローレス方式によるフィン
の成形方法を、断面図で示す説明図。
3A to 3D are explanatory views showing a cross-sectional view of a fin forming method by a drawless method.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 プレート部 2 カラー部 1 Plate 2 Color

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 【請求項1】 Si0.01〜0.15重量%、Fe
0.10〜0.40重量%、Mn0.10〜0.40重
量%、を含み残部Alと不可避的不純物とからなる合金
鋳塊に均質化処理および熱間圧延を行った後、得られた
熱間圧延板に50〜90%の圧下率で冷間圧延を行い、
その板厚で200〜350℃で2時間以上保持の析出処
理を行った後、圧下率70%以上で冷間圧延し、得られ
た薄板に250〜300℃の範囲内の温度で調質焼鈍を
施し、該薄板の成形加工前の金属組織中の直径が0.1
μm径以下の金属間化合物を数密度にして5個/μm3
以上とし、かつ比抵抗値を33.5nΩm以下とするこ
とを特徴とするしごき加工性に優れたドローレスフィン
用アルミニウム合金薄板の製造方法。
Claims 1. Si 0.01 to 0.15% by weight, Fe
The alloy ingot containing 0.10 to 0.40% by weight and Mn 0.10 to 0.40% by weight and obtained by performing homogenization treatment and hot rolling on the alloy ingot and the balance of Al and unavoidable impurities. Cold rolling the hot-rolled sheet at a reduction rate of 50 to 90%,
After performing a precipitation treatment of maintaining the plate thickness at 200 to 350 ° C. for 2 hours or more, cold rolling is performed at a reduction rate of 70% or more, and the obtained thin plate is temper-annealed at a temperature in the range of 250 to 300 ° C. And the diameter of the metal structure before forming of the thin plate is 0.1.
The number density of intermetallic compounds with a diameter of μm or less is 5 / μm 3
The method for producing an aluminum alloy thin plate for drawless fin excellent in ironing workability as described above, wherein the specific resistance value is 33.5 nΩm or less.
JP19069391A 1991-07-03 1991-07-03 Manufacture of thin aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fin excellent in ironability Pending JPH059679A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19069391A JPH059679A (en) 1991-07-03 1991-07-03 Manufacture of thin aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fin excellent in ironability

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19069391A JPH059679A (en) 1991-07-03 1991-07-03 Manufacture of thin aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fin excellent in ironability

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH059679A true JPH059679A (en) 1993-01-19

Family

ID=16262294

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP19069391A Pending JPH059679A (en) 1991-07-03 1991-07-03 Manufacture of thin aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fin excellent in ironability

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH059679A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4856368B2 (en) Aluminum alloy fin material with excellent formability
JP2009148823A (en) Warm press-forming method for aluminum alloy cold-rolled sheet
JP3345839B2 (en) Method of manufacturing high strength aluminum alloy fin material for forming
JP4275560B2 (en) Aluminum alloy fin material for heat exchangers with excellent Abeck resistance and stackability
JPH05271833A (en) High strength aluminum alloy fin material for forming and its production
JP2931136B2 (en) Method for producing aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fin with excellent hole enlargement processability
JP3810902B2 (en) Aluminum alloy fin material and method for producing aluminum alloy fin material
JP2004027253A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for molding, and method of producing the same
JP5830451B2 (en) Aluminum alloy fin material for heat exchanger for combination press
JP2931137B2 (en) Manufacturing method of aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fins with excellent ironing workability
JPH059636A (en) Thin aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fin having excellent ironing property and production thereof
JP2862198B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate for DI can body
JPH10310834A (en) Aluminum alloy thin sheet for cross fin and its production
JPS58224156A (en) Manufacture of thin aluminum alloy plate for sag resistant fin
JPH059679A (en) Manufacture of thin aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fin excellent in ironability
JP4704557B2 (en) Aluminum alloy fin material excellent in reflaring formability and its manufacturing method
JPH05156412A (en) Production of aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fin having excellent formability
JP3735700B2 (en) Aluminum alloy fin material for heat exchanger and method for producing the same
JPH05230579A (en) High strength thin aluminum alloy sheet for fin of air conditioner and its production
JPH05179382A (en) Aluminum alloy thin sheet for drawless fin
JPH059678A (en) Manufacture of thin aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fin excellent in ironability
JPH05117795A (en) Thin aluminum alloy sheet for drawless fin having excellent suitability to burring and production thereof
JPS5910987B2 (en) Aluminum alloy with excellent formability and method for manufacturing its thin plate
JP7222046B1 (en) Aluminum alloy extruded tube, manufacturing method thereof, and piping member for heat exchanger
WO2012132785A1 (en) Combination press aluminium alloy fin material for heat exchanger, and manufacturing method for same