JPH0280987A - Inspection apparatus of logical circuit - Google Patents

Inspection apparatus of logical circuit

Info

Publication number
JPH0280987A
JPH0280987A JP63232321A JP23232188A JPH0280987A JP H0280987 A JPH0280987 A JP H0280987A JP 63232321 A JP63232321 A JP 63232321A JP 23232188 A JP23232188 A JP 23232188A JP H0280987 A JPH0280987 A JP H0280987A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
circuit
output value
circuits
test
inspected
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP63232321A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Shusuke Suzuki
秀典 鈴木
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Ltd
Priority to JP63232321A priority Critical patent/JPH0280987A/en
Publication of JPH0280987A publication Critical patent/JPH0280987A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Tests Of Electronic Circuits (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To perform inspection at a high speed by a method wherein the output values between a plurality of inspection circuits are compared and, when non- coincidence is generated, a circuit to be inspected having a minority output value is confirmed to be inferior to judge a logical circuit. CONSTITUTION:In judging the quality of each of circuits 20-22 to be inspected, the output expected value calculated by a trouble simulation control part 13 and the output value of the circuit to be inspected having the minority output value shown by a test number 1 are compared by an output value comparator 12 and, when non-coincidence is generated, the circuit to be inspected having a majority output value is judged to be an inferior circuit and data of a non- coincidence logical circuit ratio and a non-coincidence logical circuit number are altered to the data of the circuit to be inspected having the majority output value. Since a logical circuit number has '1' different from other output value in a test number 2, a logical circuit number (n) is judged to be inferior because said number has '0' in a test number (n). Further, it is checked whether a non-coincidence dictionary 14 is formed and, when there is no non-coincidence, all of the circuits 20-22 to be inspected are regarded as a good product.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は、集積回路やプリント基板の検査方式に係り、
特に入力テストパターンに関らず、高速で、高品質に故
障部位を指摘可能な、論理回路の検査装置に関する。
[Detailed Description of the Invention] [Industrial Application Field] The present invention relates to an inspection method for integrated circuits and printed circuit boards,
In particular, the present invention relates to a logic circuit testing device capable of pointing out faulty parts at high speed and with high quality, regardless of input test patterns.

〔従来の技術〕[Conventional technology]

従来の検査装置は、特開昭61−117471に記載の
ように、被検査回路と良品論理回路に、同一信号を入力
し、その出力信号を比較することで良否の判定を行って
いた。このため、検査前に論理動作が保証された良品回
路を用意する必要があり、被検査回路の出力論理値のみ
から、良否を判定する点、および故障部位の指摘につい
て配慮されていなかった。
As described in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 61-117471, a conventional inspection device inputs the same signal to a circuit to be inspected and a non-defective logic circuit, and compares the output signals to determine pass/fail. For this reason, it is necessary to prepare a non-defective circuit whose logical operation is guaranteed before testing, and no consideration has been given to determining pass/fail based only on the output logic value of the circuit under test and pointing out faulty parts.

〔発明が解決しようとする課題〕[Problem to be solved by the invention]

上記従来技術は、被検査回路間の出力値の比較の点につ
いて配慮がされておらず、論理検査実施前に、論理動作
が保証された、良品論理回路を用意しておかなければな
らない点、および故障部位が指摘できないといった問題
があった。
The above conventional technology does not take into consideration the comparison of output values between circuits under test, and requires a good logic circuit with guaranteed logic operation to be prepared before performing a logic test. There were also problems in that it was not possible to pinpoint the faulty part.

本発明の目的は、複数の被検査回路を同時に検査する検
査装置において、各被検査回路の出力値を、検証するこ
とで、これら被検査回路の良否を判定可能とし、かつ故
障部位を指摘可能な検査装置を提供することにある。
An object of the present invention is to use a testing device that simultaneously tests multiple circuits under test to verify the output value of each circuit under test, thereby making it possible to determine whether the circuits under test are good or not, and to point out a faulty part. The purpose of this invention is to provide an inspection device that is suitable for use.

〔課題を解決するための手段〕[Means to solve the problem]

上記目的を達成するために、複数の各被検査回路間の出
力値を比較し、不一致が発生した場合には、少数派出力
値を持つ被検査回路を不良と認識することで、論理回路
の良否を判定可能としたものである。
In order to achieve the above objective, the output values of multiple test circuits are compared, and if a mismatch occurs, the test circuit with the minority output value is recognized as defective. It is possible to judge whether the product is good or bad.

さらに、良否の判定を保証するために被検査回路出力値
に不一致が発生した場合には、この時のテストパターン
番号、不一致被検査回路番号、全被検査回路中の不一致
回路の割合を登録する辞書を設けるにの辞書を元に、不
一致を発見したテストパターンのみの、故障シミュレー
ションを行い、その出力期待値と、被検査回路の出力値
を比較し、一致の有無を認識することで、被検査回路の
良否の判定を保証し信頼性を増したものである。
Furthermore, in order to guarantee pass/fail judgment, if a discrepancy occurs in the output values of the tested circuit, the test pattern number, discrepancy tested circuit number, and percentage of discrepant circuits among all tested circuits are registered. Based on the dictionary, we perform a fault simulation for only the test pattern in which a mismatch was found, compare the expected output value with the output value of the circuit under test, and recognize whether there is a match. This guarantees the quality of the test circuit and increases its reliability.

〔作用〕[Effect]

論理回路の検査結果に於いては、良品と不良品の割合は
良品の方がはるかに多い。これは、プロセス技術の向上
によるものである。従って、複数の被検査回路間の出力
値を比較して、不一致が発生した場合、この少数派出力
値を有する被検査回路を不良論理回路とみなすことが可
能である。
In the inspection results of logic circuits, the ratio of non-defective products to defective products is much higher. This is due to improvements in process technology. Therefore, when the output values of a plurality of circuits to be tested are compared and a mismatch occurs, the circuit to be tested having the minority output value can be regarded as a defective logic circuit.

しかし、この少数派出力値を有する被検査回路は、必ず
しも不良論理回路とは限らない。そこで。
However, the circuit under test having this minority output value is not necessarily a defective logic circuit. Therefore.

複数の被検査回路に同一テストパターンを同時に入力し
、これより得られた出力値に不一致が生じた場合には、
不一致が発生したテストパターン番号、少数派出力値を
有する被検査回路番号、少数派出力値を有する被検査回
路が全被検査回路中に示める割合を不一致辞書に登録す
る。これら手続きを全てのテストパターンについて実施
した後。
If the same test pattern is input to multiple circuits under test at the same time and there is a discrepancy in the output values obtained,
The test pattern number in which a mismatch has occurred, the number of the circuit under test having a minority output value, and the ratio of the circuit under test having a minority output value among all circuits under test are registered in the mismatch dictionary. After performing these procedures for all test patterns.

不一致辞書を用いて良否判定を行う。まず、不一致が発
生した時のテストパターンを利用し、良品サンプル回路
または、故障シミュレータにより正常回路の出力値を求
め、不一致辞書中の少数派出力値を有する被検査回路の
出力値と比較し、不−敦であれば不良品と判定し、一致
していれば逆に多数派出力値を有する被検査回路を不良
品と判定することかでざる。尚、全てのテストパターン
において、出力値が一軟した場合には、ランダムに抽出
した被検査回路と故障シミュレーションの出力値を比較
することにより、良否の判定を保証することができる。
A pass/fail judgment is made using a mismatch dictionary. First, using the test pattern when the mismatch occurred, find the output value of a good sample circuit or a normal circuit using a fault simulator, and compare it with the output value of the circuit under test that has the minority output value in the mismatch dictionary. If they do not match, it is determined to be a defective product, and if they match, the circuit under test having the majority output value is determined to be a defective product. In addition, in all the test patterns, when the output values are slightly softened, the judgment of pass/fail can be guaranteed by comparing the randomly extracted circuits to be inspected with the output values of the failure simulation.

加えて、故障シミュレータにて各テストパターンにて検
出可能な故障部位を不一致辞書に追加することにより、
複数テストパターンにて不良と判定された被検査回路の
故障部位を指摘可能となる。
In addition, by adding the fault parts that can be detected by each test pattern in the fault simulator to the mismatch dictionary,
It becomes possible to point out a faulty part of a circuit to be inspected that is determined to be defective using multiple test patterns.

〔実施例〕〔Example〕

以下、本発明の一実施例を第1図、第2図、第3図、第
4図において説明する。
An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS. 1, 2, 3, and 4.

第1図において、複数個の被検査回路20〜22は、論
理動作が保証された良品サンプル回路を有しておらず、
被検査回路20〜22のみで構成されている。
In FIG. 1, a plurality of circuits 20 to 22 to be tested do not have good sample circuits whose logical operation is guaranteed.
It is composed of only the circuits to be tested 20 to 22.

この被検査回路20〜22に、検査用テストパターンを
テストパターン生成部IIより同時に入力する。
Inspection test patterns are simultaneously input to the circuits under test 20 to 22 from the test pattern generation section II.

これにより各被検査回路20〜22の出力値を同時に圧
縮器15〜17に取り込み、複数信号をコード化し一信
号に変換した後、出力値比較器12に取り込む。
As a result, the output values of the circuits to be tested 20 to 22 are simultaneously taken into the compressors 15 to 17, the plurality of signals are coded and converted into one signal, and then the output values are taken into the output value comparator 12.

この取り込まれた出力値は、出力値比較器12において
比V演算され、不一致が発生した場合には、不一致辞書
14に、第2図に示す形式で、不一致が発生した時のテ
ストパターン番号、少数派出力値を有する被検査回路番
号、少数派出力値を有する被検査回路が、全被検査回路
20〜22に示める割合を登録する。ここで不一致論理
回路比率は、全被検査回路の内子一致出力値を持った回
路の割合であり、故障部位とは故障シミュレーションに
より指摘された故障部位である。これら手続きを、全て
のテストパターンが無くなるまで繰り返す。この繰り返
しが終了した時点で、制御を図1に示す故障シミュレー
ション制御部13に渡す。
This captured output value is subjected to a ratio V calculation in the output value comparator 12, and if a mismatch occurs, the test pattern number at the time of the mismatch is stored in the mismatch dictionary 14 in the format shown in FIG. The number of the circuit to be tested having a minority output value and the ratio of the circuit to be tested having the minority output value to all the circuits to be tested 20 to 22 are registered. Here, the unmatched logic circuit ratio is the ratio of circuits that have internal matching output values among all circuits to be tested, and the faulty part is the faulty part pointed out by fault simulation. These procedures are repeated until all test patterns are exhausted. When this repetition is completed, control is passed to the failure simulation control unit 13 shown in FIG.

故障シミュレーション制御部13では、不一致辞書14
の情報から不一致が発生した時のテストパターン系列を
元に正常回路の出力期待値と、上記テストパターン系列
により検出可能な故障部位を第2図に示す形式で不一致
辞#14に追加登録する。
In the failure simulation control unit 13, the mismatch dictionary 14
Based on the information on the test pattern series when the mismatch occurs, the expected output value of a normal circuit and the faulty part that can be detected by the test pattern series are additionally registered in the mismatch word #14 in the format shown in FIG.

被検査回路20〜22の良否判定は、故障シミュレーシ
ョン制御部13で求めた出力期待値と第2図のテスト番
号1で示したように少数派出力値を有する被検査回路の
出力値を出力値比較器12により比較し、不一致が発生
した場合、不良回路と判定する。
The pass/fail judgment of the circuits under test 20 to 22 is made by using the expected output value obtained by the failure simulation control unit 13 and the output value of the circuit under test having a minority output value as shown in test number 1 in FIG. A comparison is made by the comparator 12, and if a mismatch occurs, it is determined that the circuit is defective.

逆に、出力値が一致した場合は、多数派出力値を有する
被検査回路を不良回路と判定し不一致辞書14の不一致
論理回路比率、不一致論理回路番号の情報を、多数派出
力値を有した被検査回路の情報に更新する。第4図は、
被検査回路20〜22の出力論理値から被検査回路20
〜22の良否を判定した結果である。論理回路番号(1
,nが判定において不良となっている。論理回路番号α
は、テスト番号1において他の出力値と異なる′1′を
有する為、論理回路番号nは、テスト番号nにおいてI
 O+を有している為に不良と判定された。一方、不一
致辞書14作成の有無をチエツクし、不一致が無ければ
全ての被検査回路20〜22は良品とみなされる。
On the other hand, if the output values match, the circuit to be inspected having the majority output value is determined to be a defective circuit, and the information on the mismatch logic circuit ratio and mismatch logic circuit number in the mismatch dictionary 14 is transferred to the circuit having the majority output value. Update to the information of the circuit under test. Figure 4 shows
The circuit under test 20 is determined from the output logic values of the circuits under test 20 to 22.
This is the result of determining the pass/fail of 22. Logic circuit number (1
, n are judged to be defective. Logic circuit number α
has a different output value of '1' from other output values in test number 1, so logic circuit number n has an I value in test number n.
It was determined to be defective because it had O+. On the other hand, it is checked whether the mismatch dictionary 14 has been created, and if there is no mismatch, all the circuits to be tested 20 to 22 are considered to be good products.

この良否判定を保証する為にランダムに1つの被検査回
路を抽出し、検査用テストパターンの一部を用いて故障
シミュレーションを実施し、被検査回路の出力値と、故
障シミュレーションの出力値とを比較する。この比較に
おいて一致すれば、全ての被検9同路20〜22を良品
と保証できる。一方、不一致になれば、全てが不良であ
ったと再判定される。故障解析は、この不一致辞書14
を元に行われる。例えば、第2図に示すように被検査回
路20は、テスト番号1.および100番で発見されて
おり、故障部位はのか共通値である。従って第3図に示
す、■の力所に故障が存在すると指摘できる。
In order to guarantee this pass/fail judgment, we randomly extract one circuit under test, perform a fault simulation using a part of the test pattern, and compare the output value of the circuit under test with the output value of the fault simulation. compare. If there is a match in this comparison, it can be guaranteed that all of the nine same paths 20 to 22 to be tested are non-defective. On the other hand, if they do not match, it is re-determined that all of them are defective. Failure analysis is performed using this discrepancy dictionary 14.
It is done based on. For example, as shown in FIG. 2, the circuit under test 20 has test number 1. and No. 100, and the failure location is a common value. Therefore, it can be pointed out that the failure exists at the force point (■) shown in FIG.

従って、本実施例によれば被検査回路の検査を高速で、
高品質に行えるという効果がある。
Therefore, according to this embodiment, the circuit under test can be tested at high speed.
This has the effect of achieving high quality.

〔発明の効果〕〔Effect of the invention〕

本発明によれば、検査前に、論理動作が保証された良品
検査回路を用意することなく、複数個の被検査回路を同
時に検査し、各出力論理値の比較結果から少数派論理値
を持つ論理回路が不良論理回路と判定できるので、論理
回路を検査する上で被検査回路の並列試験が可能なため
に高速な検査ができる。
According to the present invention, before testing, a plurality of circuits to be tested are simultaneously tested without preparing a non-defective test circuit whose logic operation is guaranteed, and a minority logic value is determined from the comparison result of each output logic value. Since the logic circuit can be determined to be a defective logic circuit, it is possible to perform parallel testing of the circuits to be tested when testing the logic circuit, thereby enabling high-speed testing.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は本発明の一実施例の複数被検査回路検査装置シ
ステム構成図、第2図は、第1図で被検査回路間の出力
論理値が不一致になった時に、不一致辞書に出力する情
報を説明するための図、第3図は、被検査回路の論理構
成図、第4図は、出力論理値と検査結果を現した図であ
る。 1・・・検査装置、 11・・・テストパターン生成部、 12・・・出力値比較器、 13・・・故障シミュレーション制御部、14・・・不
一致辞書、   15〜17・・圧縮器。 20〜22・・・被検査回路、 30〜32・・検査用駆動端子、 33〜38・・・検査用観測端子、
FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram of a multi-test circuit testing device according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 shows an output to a mismatch dictionary when the output logical values between the test circuits in FIG. 1 become inconsistent. FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining information, and FIG. 3 is a logical configuration diagram of a circuit under test, and FIG. 4 is a diagram showing output logic values and test results. DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1... Inspection device, 11... Test pattern generation part, 12... Output value comparator, 13... Failure simulation control part, 14... Mismatch dictionary, 15-17... Compressor. 20-22...Circuit to be inspected, 30-32...Drive terminal for inspection, 33-38...Observation terminal for inspection,

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] (1)集積回路、またはプリント基板を被検査回路とし
、被検査回路から得られた出力結果を元に、被検査回路
の良否を検査する装置において、一度に扱う被検査回路
を複数個とし、これら複数個の被検査回路へ同時に入力
したテストパターンにより得られる出力値を各被検査回
路間で比較し、不一致が存在する場合、少数派出力値を
有する被検査回路を不良回路とみなし、その不良回路に
対して故障シミュレーションを行い、不良論理回路の判
定の保証、および故障部位を指摘することを特徴とする
論理回路の検査装置。
(1) In an apparatus that uses an integrated circuit or a printed circuit board as a circuit to be tested and tests the quality of the circuit to be tested based on the output results obtained from the circuit to be tested, a plurality of circuits to be tested are handled at one time, The output values obtained by the test patterns input simultaneously to these multiple circuits under test are compared between each circuit under test, and if there is a mismatch, the circuit under test with the minority output value is regarded as a defective circuit, and A logic circuit inspection device is characterized in that it performs a failure simulation on a defective circuit, guarantees the determination of a defective logic circuit, and points out a failure location.
JP63232321A 1988-09-19 1988-09-19 Inspection apparatus of logical circuit Pending JPH0280987A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP63232321A JPH0280987A (en) 1988-09-19 1988-09-19 Inspection apparatus of logical circuit

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP63232321A JPH0280987A (en) 1988-09-19 1988-09-19 Inspection apparatus of logical circuit

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0280987A true JPH0280987A (en) 1990-03-22

Family

ID=16937368

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP63232321A Pending JPH0280987A (en) 1988-09-19 1988-09-19 Inspection apparatus of logical circuit

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0280987A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0479346A (en) * 1990-07-23 1992-03-12 Matsushita Electron Corp Method for measuring semiconductor element

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0479346A (en) * 1990-07-23 1992-03-12 Matsushita Electron Corp Method for measuring semiconductor element

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPS5940666Y2 (en) Fault detection and identification system
US5189365A (en) Method of locating a fault in a logic IC device
US9400311B1 (en) Method and system of collective failure diagnosis for multiple electronic circuits
US3851161A (en) Continuity network testing and fault isolating
US7382141B2 (en) Testing a batch of electrical components
JPH0280987A (en) Inspection apparatus of logical circuit
CN111143211A (en) Method for quickly detecting test setting accuracy in offline manner
Millman et al. Diagnosing CMOS bridging faults with stuck-at, IDDQ, and voting model fault dictionaries
JP2000155156A (en) Failure-diagnostic device of semiconductor integrated device
JPH01156680A (en) Fault diagnosing method for logic circuit
JPH0540151A (en) Scan path failure diagnosis method
JP2511255B2 (en) Failure diagnosis method and device
JPH07191102A (en) Automatic inspection line producer
JPH11295389A (en) Device for testing digital component mounted on pcb
JPH0342736A (en) Fault simulation method
JP2000046917A (en) Failure diagnostic method for logic integrated circuit
Boudreault Automatic Test Equipment in the Production Process
JPH0416782A (en) Method and apparatus for testing lsi
JPH1183945A (en) Failure diagnostic system for logic circuit
JPS58158565A (en) Inspection of logic circuit
JPH05341005A (en) Failure detection system
JPH0259967A (en) Method for designing test facilitating circuit
JP2005077174A (en) Electronic circuit, inspection device, and test method for electronic circuit
JPH08286941A (en) Method and device for checking bus fight
JPH0526961A (en) Method and apparatus for estimating defective part in lsi