JP6939016B2 - Worker decision support device - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to a worker determination support device.

Patent Document 1 describes a system for determining the arrangement of workers who can develop their abilities without disturbing the production plan. When the production plan is hindered, the system changes the worker arrangement so that a highly skilled worker who can support the worker in the process is placed in the vicinity.

Further, Patent Document 2 describes an apparatus capable of assigning an appropriate worker to work according to the situation of production planning. The device calculates a margin of work time in a work plan, and selects a worker based on the margin and the work capacity of each worker. When the margin is high, the worker with low work ability is preferentially selected, and when the margin is low, the worker with high work ability is preferentially selected.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2000-172758 Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2008-158971

According to the technique described in Patent Document 2, a worker having a low working ability is always selected when the margin is high. However, the workers to be educated may be targeted at workers with moderate work ability, regardless of those with low work ability. Furthermore, when a worker with low work ability is made to perform work, the former is compared with the case where a specific worker is concentrated on performing many tasks and the case where a large number of workers are made to perform the work evenly. Can be expected to improve work ability.

An object of the present invention is to provide a worker determination support device capable of more effectively improving the work ability of a worker.

The worker determination support device as the first aspect of the present invention includes a process plan storage unit that stores a process plan in which an execution order for processing by a plurality of processing machines and work by a worker on a plurality of processing machines is defined. , Ability database for storing work ability for each work type for each worker and a plurality of work types, a plurality of work education target persons requiring work education among a plurality of workers, and a plurality of workers. Work education list including work education priorities of work education target persons, multiple instructor education target persons requiring instructor education among multiple workers, and instructor education of multiple instructor education target persons Instructor education list including priority , busyness of process plan, ability database , work education list , and instructor education list , the person in charge decision department that decides the person in charge to perform the work in the process plan And.

When the busyness of the process plan is high, the person in charge determination unit determines the person in charge by giving priority to the worker with high work ability based on the work ability stored in the ability database. In addition, when the busyness of the process plan is low, the worker in charge determination department decides the worker in charge by giving priority to the work education target person having a high work education priority in the work education list, and also determines the instructor education list. In the leader education priority, the leader education target person is prioritized and decided as the leader for the worker in charge .
Further, the worker determination support device as the second aspect of the present invention stores a process plan storage in which an execution order for processing by a plurality of processing machines and work by a worker on a plurality of processing machines is defined. Ability database that stores the work ability of each work type for each department, a plurality of workers and a plurality of work types, a plurality of work education target persons requiring work education among a plurality of workers, and , Responsible for determining the person in charge of performing work in the process plan based on the work education list including the work education priority of multiple work education subjects, the busyness of the process plan, the ability database, and the work education list. It is equipped with a worker determination unit.
When the busyness of the process plan is high, the worker in charge determination department decides the worker in charge by giving priority to the worker with high work ability based on the work ability stored in the ability database, and the work education list. In, priority is given to those who are subject to work education, which has a high priority for work education, and are decided as visitors who accompany the workers in charge. When the busyness of the process plan is low, the worker in charge is determined by giving priority to the work education target person having a high work education priority in the work education list.

When the degree of busyness is high, the worker in charge is determined by giving priority to the worker with high work ability based on the work ability stored in the ability database. Therefore, even if the process plan is busy, the work can be executed without causing a delay in the process plan. On the other hand, when the busyness is low, the worker in charge is not determined based on the work ability, but the worker in charge is determined based on the work education list. Here, the work education list is not directly related to the work ability, and the work education priority can be raised regardless of whether the worker has a high work ability or a low work ability. .. Then, the person subject to work education, which has a high priority for work education, is given priority as the worker in charge. In other words, a specific work education target person with a high work education priority can concentrate a lot of work experience. Therefore, the work ability of the person subject to work education can be effectively improved.

It is a figure which shows the structure of the target equipment of the worker decision support device 10. It is a figure which shows the structure of the worker decision support apparatus 10 of 1st Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the ability database 11. It is a figure which shows the process plan. It is a figure which shows the work education list 14. It is a flowchart which shows the process by the person-in-charge worker determination unit 15. It is a figure which shows the person in charge of each work in a busy mode. It is a figure which shows the person in charge of each work in an education mode. It is a figure which shows the structure of the worker decision support device 20 of the 2nd Embodiment. It is a flowchart which shows the process by the person in charge decision unit 15 of the worker decision support apparatus 10 of the 3rd Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the structure of the worker decision support device 30 of 4th Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the leader education list 31. It is a flowchart which shows the process by the person-in-charge worker determination unit 32. It is a figure which shows the person in charge of each work and the instructor in an education mode. It is a flowchart which shows the process by the person in charge decision unit 32 of the worker decision support device 30 of 5th Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the person in charge of each work and a visitor in a busy mode. In the sixth embodiment, it is a figure which shows the work education list 14 before and after the change. In the seventh embodiment, it is a figure which shows the leader education list 31 before and after the change.

(1. First Embodiment)
(1-1. Configuration of target equipment)
The target equipment of the worker determination support device 10 will be described with reference to FIG. The worker determination support device 10 determines a worker in charge from a plurality of workers AF for each work of the process plan in a process plan using equipment composed of a plurality of processing machines MC1-MC4. .. The plurality of processing machines MC1-MC4 are, for example, production equipment for producing various objects, distribution machines for transporting the objects, and the like. The processing machines MC1-MC4 as production equipment are machine tools such as a machining center, a lathe, and a grinding machine, and are arranged in a line.

(1-2. Configuration of worker determination support device 10)
The configuration of the worker determination support device 10 will be described with reference to FIGS. 2 to 8. As shown in FIG. 2, the worker determination support device 10 includes an ability database 11, a process plan storage unit 12, a busyness acquisition unit 13, a work education list 14, and a worker determination unit 15 in charge.

As shown in FIG. 3, the ability database (DB) 11 has an index value Lv indicating the high level of work ability for each work type for each worker AF with respect to a plurality of workers AF and a plurality of work types. (Upper row), unit work time for deriving the index value Lv (middle row), and total work time (lower row) are stored. Here, the work types are classified according to the parts ad to be produced and the processing machines MC1-MC4 to be used. For example, in the case of the component a, since the three processing machines MC1-MC3 are used, each of the processing machines MC1-MC3 is classified as each work type.

The unit work time is the shortest time required for one work of the target work type in the past. In addition to this, the unit work time may be the latest time required for one work when the work of the target work type is recently performed. Further, when the work of the work type is frequently performed, the unit work time is set to the shortest time, and when the work of the work type is performed only a small number of times such as twice a year, the unit is used. The working time may be the latest time.

The index value Lv indicating the high working ability is determined based on the unit working time. For example, the index value Lv becomes a higher value as the unit work time is shorter, and becomes a lower value as the unit work time is longer. In the present embodiment, the index value Lv exemplifies five stages from 0 to 4. Index value Lv. 0 corresponds to the working ability of an inexperienced person or a person close to it. Index value Lv. 4 corresponds to the working ability of a skilled worker. Then, the index value Lv. 1-Lv. 3 is Lv. The closer it is to 4, the higher the working ability.

In addition, standard work time is set for each work type. The standard working time is the index value Lv. 3 to Lv. The average unit work time by 4 workers is used. For example, when the unit work time is equal to or less than the standard work time, the index value Lv indicating the work ability of the worker is Lv. Let it be 4. Furthermore, the index value Lv. 1-Lv. Also for No. 3, the boundary time is set based on the standard working time.

The total work time shown in the lower row in each column of FIG. 3 is the total time of the work performed in the past for the work of the target work type. That is, the total working time is an index regarding the degree of experience of the work. Therefore, it can be considered that the longer the total working time is, the higher the working ability is in a plurality of workers having the same index value Lv indicating the working ability. For example, the index value Lv. Among the plurality of skilled workers in 4, the longer the total working time, the higher the skill level can be considered.

Here, the unit work time and the total work time stored in the capacity database 11 are updated by acquiring the work time measured by the capacity measuring device 2 as shown in FIG. The capacity measuring device 2 considers, for example, the working time while recognizing that the worker exists in the working area set in the vicinity of the processing machine MC1. The ability measuring device 2 is not limited to the above method, and various methods can be applied.

As shown in FIG. 4, the process plan storage unit 12 creates a process plan in which the execution order regarding the processing by the plurality of processing machines MC1-MC4 and the work by the workers AF on the plurality of processing machines MC1-MC4 is defined. Remember. For example, the process plan storage unit 12 stores the process plan for one day.

In FIG. 4, the white frame is the work performed by the workers AF, and the hatched frame is the work performed by the processing machines MC1-MC4. FIG. 4 illustrates a case where the setup work is performed by the workers AF before the processing by the processing machines MC1-MC4. For example, the component a needs to be machined in the order of the processing machines MC1, MC2, and MC3, and the setup work by the workers AF is performed before each of the processing machines MC1-MC3.

Here, the process plan is predetermined by the manager based on, for example, the production plan of the object. Further, in the process plan, the work by the worker is set based on the above-mentioned standard work time. That is, when each work is performed in the standard work time, it is executed according to the process plan.

The busyness acquisition unit 13 acquires the busyness input by an input operation of the external device 3 by an operator such as an administrator, for example. An operator such as an administrator determines the busyness of the next day by viewing the process plan of the next day, for example, and inputs the busyness of the next day by the external device 3. The degree of busyness may be two levels, high or low, or three or more levels.

As shown in FIG. 5, the work education list 14 shows the work of a plurality of work education target persons AC and a plurality of work education target persons AC among a plurality of workers AF. Includes educational priorities. For example, the work education priority is No. The target person for work education in 1 is worker A, and No. The person subject to work education in 2 is worker B.

The work education list 14 is set by, for example, an administrator, and a worker who the administrator wants to perform work intensively is set at a higher level of the work education list 14. That is, the work education target persons AC may include workers with high work ability or only workers with low work ability, regardless of the work ability. For example, a worker D having a high work ability in general can be a work education target person. Further, the work education list 14 can raise the priority of work education regardless of whether the worker has a high work ability or a low work ability. For example, worker D, who has a high work ability in general, is assigned to work education priority No. It can also be set to 1.

Further, the work education list 14 identifies the worker himself and is irrelevant to the work type. Here, as shown in FIG. 3, the working ability of the workers AF differs depending on the work type. For example, with respect to the work type of the processing machine MC2 of the part c, the index value indicating the work ability of the worker A is Lv. On the other hand, the index value indicating the working ability of the worker B is Lv. It is 1. That is, with respect to the work type, the worker A has a higher work capacity than the worker B. However, for other work types, worker A has a lower work capacity than worker B. As described above, although the work ability of the worker differs depending on the work type, the work education priority is set in the work education list 14 regardless of the work ability.

The person in charge determination unit 15 determines the person in charge of performing each work in the process plan based on the ability database 11, the busyness of the process plan acquired by the busyness acquisition unit 13, and the work education list 14. .. The process performed by the worker determination unit 15 in charge will be described with reference to FIG.

The worker determination unit 15 in charge acquires the busyness of the process plan acquired by the busyness acquisition unit 13 (S1). Subsequently, the worker in charge determination unit 15 determines whether or not the acquired busyness is high (S2). For example, if the degree of busyness is two levels of high and low, it is judged whether or not the degree of busyness is high, and if the degree of busyness is acquired in three or more levels, the degree of busyness is higher than a predetermined value. Is judged to be high.

When it is determined that the degree of busyness is high (S2: Y), the responsible worker determination unit 15 determines the responsible worker for each work using the ability database 11 (S3). The decision mode in this case is called a busy mode. Specifically, the person in charge determination unit 15 determines the person in charge by giving priority to the worker having a high index value Lv indicating the work ability in the busy mode. Therefore, even if the process plan is busy, the work can be executed without causing a delay in the process plan.

For example, the index value Lv. 3 to Lv. The worker in charge is determined with priority given to the worker of 4. Of course, the worker in charge may be determined in descending order of the index value Lv indicating the work ability. That is, the index value Lv. The worker of 4 is determined as the worker in charge with the highest priority, and then the index value Lv. The worker of 3 may be determined as the worker in charge.

In this case, the index value Lv. When there are a plurality of workers of 4, the worker in charge determination unit 15 may use the total work time in addition to the index value indicating the work ability. That is, the person in charge determination unit 15 determines the person in charge by giving priority to the worker having a long total work time among the workers having a high index value Lv indicating the work ability.

Then, if there are a plurality of target works at the same time, the worker in charge is assigned in order from the work having the earliest start time. The worker in charge of each work in the busy mode is as shown in FIG. For example, regarding the work of the processing machine MC1 of the part a ((1) in FIG. 7), the worker E has the highest index value Lv. It is 4. Therefore, the worker in charge of the work is referred to as worker E. The same applies to the worker in charge of other work ((2)-(6) in FIG. 7).

In addition, the worker determination unit 15 in charge determines the index value Lv. Priority is given to the worker in 4 as the worker in charge, and when the busyness is moderate or higher, the index value Lv. 3 to Lv. The worker of 4 may be prioritized and determined as the worker in charge.

On the other hand, when it is determined that the busyness is low (S2: N), the worker in charge determination unit 15 uses the work education list 14 without using the ability database 11 and the worker in charge of each work. Is determined (S4). The decision mode in this case is called an education mode. Specifically, in the education mode, the worker in charge determination unit 15 determines the worker in charge by giving priority to the work education target person having a higher work education priority in the work education list. Work education priority No. Since the person subject to work education with a high value of 1 is worker A, worker A has priority and becomes the worker in charge.

Then, if there are a plurality of target works at the same time, the worker in charge is assigned in order from the work having the earliest start time. The worker in charge of each work in the education mode is as shown in FIG. Work education priority No. The work education target person A of 1 is the work of the processing machine MC1 of the part a ((1) in FIG. 8), the work of the processing machine MC3 of the part d ((6) in FIG. 8), and the processing machine of the part a. Be the worker in charge of the work of MC3 ((3) in FIG. 8). In this way, a specific work education target person having a high work education priority can intensively accumulate a lot of work experience. Therefore, the work ability of the person subject to work education can be effectively improved.

(2. Second embodiment)
The worker determination support device 20 of the second embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. As shown in FIG. 9, the worker determination support device 20 includes an ability database 11, a process plan storage unit 12, a busyness determination unit 21, a work education list 14, and a worker determination unit 15 in charge. Of the configurations, the same configurations as those in the first embodiment are designated by the same reference numerals and the description thereof will be omitted.

The busyness determination unit 21 determines the busyness by executing a computer program based on the process plan stored in the process plan storage unit 12. For example, the busyness determination unit 21 acquires the time when all the work by the workers AF and the processing by the processing machines MC1-MC4 are completed from the process plan, and determines the busyness based on the end time. You may. Further, the busyness determination unit 21 acquires the length of the blank time in which neither the work by the workers AF nor the processing by the processing machines MC1-MC4 exists, and determines the busyness based on the length of the blank time. You may.

In this case, it is not necessary for a human to judge whether or not the busyness is high, and the influence of human judgment variation can be suppressed. As a result, by making a more appropriate judgment between the busy mode and the education mode, it is possible to prevent delays in the process plan and secure many opportunities for work education.

(3. Third Embodiment)
In the worker determination support device 10 of the third embodiment, the processing by the worker determination unit 15 in charge will be described with reference to FIG. Of the steps, the same steps as those in the first embodiment are designated by the same reference numerals and the description thereof will be omitted.

When it is determined that the degree of busyness is low (S2: N), the worker in charge determination unit 15 determines the worker in charge for each work using the work education list 14 (S4). Then, the responsible worker determination unit 15 determines the progress of the process plan when the responsible worker is determined by giving priority to the work education target persons AC (S41). The progress of the process plan corresponds to the progress of the actual results when compared with the process plan. If there is no delay in achievements, the progress will be high, and if there is a delay in achievements, the progress will be low.

If the progress is high (S42: Y), the worker determination unit 15 in charge continues to determine the progress. On the other hand, when the progress is low (S42: N), the person in charge determination unit 15 determines the person in charge by giving priority to the worker with high work ability by using the ability database 11 (S43). If you continue the education mode when the progress is extremely low, you may not be able to complete the work scheduled for today. Therefore, the worker in charge determination unit 15 switches from the education mode to the busy mode and determines the worker in charge of the subsequent work. In this way, by switching the mode in the middle, even if the progress is extremely low at a certain point in time, the work scheduled for today can be completed in time.

(4. Fourth Embodiment)
The configuration of the worker determination support device 30 of the fourth embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. 11-14. The worker determination support device 30 includes an ability database 11, a process plan storage unit 12, a busyness acquisition unit 13, a work education list 14, an instructor education list 31, and a worker determination unit 32 in charge. Of the configurations, the same configurations as those in the first embodiment are designated by the same reference numerals and the description thereof will be omitted.

As shown in FIG. 12, the instructor education list 31 includes a plurality of instructor education target persons DF requiring instructor education among a plurality of workers AF, and a plurality of instructor education target persons D. -Includes F leader education priorities. For example, the leader education priority is No. The instructor education target person of No. 1 is worker D, and No. The target of the leader education of 2 is worker E.

The instructor education list 31 is set by, for example, an administrator, and a worker who the administrator wants to intensively give instruction is set at a higher level of the instructor education list 31. That is, the instructor education target person DF may be only a worker having a high working ability, or may include a worker having a low working ability, regardless of the working ability. However, usually, a worker having a high working ability is set as an instructor education target person DF.

The person in charge determination unit 32 determines the person in charge of performing each work in the process plan based on the ability database 11, the busyness of the process plan acquired by the busyness acquisition unit 13, and the work education list 14. .. Further, the responsible worker determination unit 32 determines the instructor for the responsible worker based on the instructor education list 31. The process performed by the worker determination unit 32 in charge will be described with reference to FIG. Of the steps, the same steps as those in the first embodiment are designated by the same reference numerals and the description thereof will be omitted.

When it is determined that the busyness of the process plan is low (S2: N), the worker in charge determination unit 32 determines the worker in charge for each work using the work education list 14 (S4). Then, the in-charge worker determination unit 32 gives priority to the instructor education target person DF having a high instructor education priority in the instructor education list 31 and determines as an instructor for the in-charge worker A-C (S21). ). Leader education priority No. Since the person subject to work education with a high value of 1 is the worker D, the worker D has priority and becomes the instructor.

Then, if there are a plurality of target tasks at the same time, the instructor is assigned in order from the task with the earliest start time. The leader of each work in the education mode is as shown in FIG. Leader education priority No. The instructor education target person D of 1 is the work of the processing machine MC1 of the part a ((1) of FIG. 14), the work of the processing machine MC3 of the part d ((6) of FIG. 14), and the processing of the part a. Become an instructor on the work of the machine MC3 ((3) in FIG. 14). In this way, a specific instructor education target person having a high instructor education priority can intensively accumulate a lot of instruction experience. Therefore, it is possible to effectively improve the teaching ability of the instructor education target person.

(5. Fifth Embodiment)
In the worker determination support device 30 of the fifth embodiment, the processing by the worker determination unit 32 in charge will be described with reference to FIGS. 15 and 16. Of the steps, the same steps as those in the fourth embodiment are designated by the same reference numerals and the description thereof will be omitted.

When it is determined that the busyness of the process plan is high (S2: Y), the person in charge determination unit 32 uses the ability database 11 to give priority to the worker having a high index value Lv indicating the work ability. The worker in charge of each work is determined (S3).

Subsequently, the worker in charge determination unit 32 determines in the work education list 14 as a visitor who gives priority to the work education target persons AC having a higher priority in work education and accompanies the worker in charge (S31). The workers and visitors in charge of each work in the busy mode are as shown in FIG. Work education priority No. The work education target person A of 1 is the work of the processing machine MC1 of the part a ((1) of FIG. 16), the work of the processing machine MC3 of the part d ((6) of FIG. 16), and the processing machine of the part a. Be a visitor to the work of MC3 ((3) in FIG. 16).

In the busy mode, the work education target person AC is less likely to be the worker in charge. Therefore, the work education target person AC can acquire the know-how of the skilled work by observing the skilled work by the worker accompanied by the worker having a high working ability. Further, even when a specific work education target person having a high work education priority does not become the worker in charge, the skilled work can be frequently observed. Therefore, the work ability of the person subject to work education can be effectively improved.

(6. Sixth Embodiment)
The worker determination support device 10 of the sixth embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. In the work education list 14, the work education priority is initially No. The target person for work education in 1 is worker A, and No. The target person for work education in 2 is worker B, and No. The target person for work education in 3 is worker C.

Workers with higher work education priorities can gain more work experience. However, if this state is continued, workers with lower work education priorities will not be able to easily gain work experience. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 17, the work education priority in the work education list 14 is sequentially changed every time a predetermined period elapses from the previous change. This change process is done automatically by the computer.

For example, the highest-ranked work education subject A moves to the lowest rank, and the ranks of other work-education subjects BC are moved up. By doing so, each of the specific work education target persons AC can concentrate and gain work experience at predetermined periods. As a result, the work ability of many work education subjects AC can be effectively improved.

(7. Seventh Embodiment)
The worker determination support device 10 of the seventh embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. In the leader education list 31, the leader education priority is No. 1 at the initial stage. The instructor education target person of No. 1 is worker D, and No. The instructor education target person of No. 2 is worker E, and No. The instructor education target of 3 is worker F.

Workers with higher priority in training can gain more teaching experience. However, if this state is continued, workers with lower instructor education priorities will not be able to easily gain teaching experience. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 18, the instructor education priority in the instructor education list 31 is sequentially changed every time a predetermined period elapses from the previous change. This change process is done automatically by the computer.

For example, the highest instructor education target person D moves to the lowest position, and the ranking of other instructor education target persons EF is moved up. By doing so, each of the specific instructor education target persons DF can concentrate and gain teaching experience at predetermined intervals. As a result, the teaching ability of many instructor-educated subjects DF can be effectively improved.

10: Worker decision support device, 11: Ability database, 12: Process plan storage department, 13: Busyness acquisition department, 14: Work education list, 15: Worker decision support department in charge, 20: Worker decision support device, 21 : Busyness judgment department, 30: Worker decision support device, 31: Instructor education list, 32: Worker decision department in charge, AC: Work education target person, DF: Instructor education target person, Lv: Index value indicating work capacity, MC1-MC4: Processing machine

Claims (9)

A process plan storage unit that stores a process plan in which an execution order for processing by a plurality of processing machines and work by a worker on the plurality of processing machines is defined, and
An ability database that stores the work capacity of each work type for each of the plurality of workers and a plurality of work types, and
Among the plurality of workers, a plurality of work education subjects requiring work education, and a work education list including the work education priorities of the plurality of work education subjects, and a work education list.
A list of instructor education targets including a plurality of instructor education subjects requiring instructor education among the plurality of workers, and instructor education priorities of the plurality of instructor education subjects,
Based on the busyness of the process plan, the ability database , the work education list , and the instructor education list , the person in charge determination unit that determines the person in charge of performing the work in the process plan, and the person in charge determination unit.
With
The worker determination department in charge
When the busyness of the process plan is high, the worker in charge is determined by giving priority to the worker having the higher work ability based on the work ability stored in the ability database.
When the busyness of the process plan is low, the worker in charge is determined by giving priority to the work education target person having a higher work education priority in the work education list , and the instructor education list is described. Instructor education A worker determination support device that gives priority to the instructor education target person having a high priority and determines as an instructor for the worker in charge. When the busyness of the process plan is high, the worker-in-charge determination unit gives priority to the work-education target person having a higher work-education priority in the work-education list as a visitor who accompanies the worker in charge. The worker determination support device according to claim 1, which determines. A process plan storage unit that stores a process plan in which an execution order for processing by a plurality of processing machines and work by a worker on the plurality of processing machines is defined, and
An ability database that stores the work capacity of each work type for each of the plurality of workers and a plurality of work types, and
Among the plurality of workers, a plurality of work education subjects requiring work education, and a work education list including the work education priorities of the plurality of work education subjects, and a work education list.
Based on the busyness of the process plan, the ability database, and the work education list, the person in charge determination unit that determines the person in charge of performing the work in the process plan, and the person in charge determination unit.
With
The worker determination department in charge
When the busyness of the process plan is high, the worker with high work ability is prioritized based on the work ability stored in the ability database, and the person in charge is determined, and in the work education list. The person subject to the work education, which has a high priority for the work education, is prioritized and determined as a visitor to accompany the worker in charge.
A worker determination support device that determines a worker in charge by giving priority to a work education target person having a higher work education priority in the work education list when the busyness of the process plan is low. The worker determination support device according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein the work education priority in the work education list is sequentially changed every time a predetermined period elapses since the last change. The worker determination support device according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the instructor education priority in the instructor education list is sequentially changed every time a predetermined period elapses since the last change. The worker determination department in charge
When the person in charge is determined with priority given to the person subject to work education, the progress of the process plan is determined.
When the progress is low, the worker with high work ability stored in the ability database is prioritized to determine the worker in charge.
The worker determination support device according to any one of claims 1-5. The person in charge determination unit determines the busyness degree by executing a computer program based on the process plan, and determines the person in charge based on the determined busyness degree, claim 1-6. The worker determination support device according to any one of the above. The worker-in-charge determination unit acquires the busyness input by an input operation of an external device by the operator, and determines the worker in charge based on the acquired busyness, claim 1-6. The worker determination support device according to any one item. The ability database further stores the total work time for each work type for each worker.
When the busyness of the process plan is high, the worker determining unit in charge gives priority to a worker having a high working capacity and a worker having a long total working time based on the working capacity and the total working time. The worker determination support device according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the worker in charge is determined.

Images