JP6680167B2 - Method for producing coal-free uncalcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace - Google Patents

Method for producing coal-free uncalcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6680167B2
JP6680167B2 JP2016186255A JP2016186255A JP6680167B2 JP 6680167 B2 JP6680167 B2 JP 6680167B2 JP 2016186255 A JP2016186255 A JP 2016186255A JP 2016186255 A JP2016186255 A JP 2016186255A JP 6680167 B2 JP6680167 B2 JP 6680167B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
agglomerates
steam
blast furnace
curing
coal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2016186255A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2018048390A (en
Inventor
謙一 樋口
謙一 樋口
洋之 佐藤
洋之 佐藤
浩一 横山
浩一 横山
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP2016186255A priority Critical patent/JP6680167B2/en
Publication of JP2018048390A publication Critical patent/JP2018048390A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6680167B2 publication Critical patent/JP6680167B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Description

この発明は、高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法に係るものであり、配合原料を水分調整して成形した塊成物を処理ピット内に山積みし、処理ピットの床面から蒸気を噴射して加温しながら塊成物を一次養生して、高炉用の含炭非焼成塊成鉱を製造する方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a method for producing a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for a blast furnace, in which agglomerates formed by adjusting the water content of a raw material mixture are piled up in a processing pit, and steam is generated from the floor surface of the processing pit. The present invention relates to a method for producing a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for a blast furnace by first curing an agglomerate while injecting and heating.

現在の製鉄プロセスにおける高炉用鉄原料は、平均粒度が約2〜3mmの粉状鉄鉱石を主要な鉄含有原料とし、これに石灰石や珪石等の副原料と、粉コークスや無煙炭等の炭材とを配合して、水分を調整しながら混合、造粒して擬似造粒子(1mm以上の核粒子の表面に0.5mm以下の微粉粒子が付着した造粒物)とし、その後、焼結機で焼結した焼結鉱が主流を占めている。   The iron raw material for the blast furnace in the current iron making process mainly uses powdered iron ore with an average particle size of about 2 to 3 mm as an iron-containing raw material. And are mixed together while adjusting the water content, and granulated to form pseudo-granulated particles (granulated product in which fine powder particles of 0.5 mm or less are attached to the surface of core particles of 1 mm or more), and then using a sintering machine. Sintered ore sinters dominate the mainstream.

一方、製鉄プロセスにおいて多量に発生する焼結ダストや高炉ダスト等を集塵機で回収した含鉄集塵ダストをはじめ、スラッジ、スケール粉等の微粉のダスト(これらは一般に製鉄ダストと称する)や、ペレットフィード(ペレット用原料)等の微粉状鉄鉱石も塊成化することにより高炉用鉄原料として用いられる。これらは、粒径0.25mm以下の微粉粒子が全体の80%以上を占める微粉状鉄含有原料であるため、上記のような焼結鉱プロセスで造粒し、焼結する際に、造粒物が崩壊して原料充填層の通気性が悪化し、生産性が低下してしまう。   On the other hand, in addition to iron-containing dust collected by a dust collector that collects a large amount of sintering dust, blast furnace dust, etc. generated in the iron-making process, fine dust such as sludge and scale powder (these are generally called iron-making dust), and pellet feed. Finely powdered iron ore such as (raw material for pellets) is also used as an iron raw material for a blast furnace by agglomerating. Since these are fine-powdered iron-containing raw materials in which fine powder particles having a particle diameter of 0.25 mm or less account for 80% or more of the whole, they are granulated by the above-described sinter ore process, and when granulated, they are granulated. The material collapses, the air permeability of the raw material packed layer deteriorates, and the productivity decreases.

そのため、このような微粉状原料を主要な鉄含有原料として焼成により塊成化する場合には、上記焼結鉱プロセスよりも高い混合・造粒機能が求められ、例えば、混合機を用いて鉄含有原料と副原料に水分を添加し混合した後、さらに、ドラムミキサーに比べて高い造粒能力を有するディスクペレタイザーなどの造粒機を用いて、粒径0.25mm以下の微粉粒子を主体とする球状のペレットを製造することが行なわれている。また、このようなペレットは、焼結プロセスにおける擬似造粒子に比べて密度が高い造粒物であるため、ペレットを焼成する場合には、燃焼ガスなどを熱源とする外部加熱型の焼成機が用いられることから、莫大な製造エネルギーや製造コストが掛かってしまう。   Therefore, when agglomerated by firing such a finely powdered raw material as a main iron-containing raw material, a higher mixing / granulating function than that of the above-mentioned sinter process is required. After adding and mixing water to the raw material and the auxiliary raw material, further using a granulating machine such as a disc pelletizer having a higher granulating ability than a drum mixer, mainly fine powder particles having a particle diameter of 0.25 mm or less Spherical pellets are manufactured. Further, since such a pellet is a granulated material having a higher density than pseudo-granulated particles in the sintering process, when firing the pellet, an external heating type firing machine using combustion gas as a heat source is used. Since it is used, enormous manufacturing energy and manufacturing cost are required.

一方、粒径0.25mm以下の微粉粒子が全体の80%以上を占める微粉状鉄含有原料は、セメント等の結合材(バインダー)と共に水を添加し、造粒してペレット等の塊成物に成形した後、養生して強度を高めて塊成鉱を得る非焼成型の塊成化プロセスを用いて、そのまま高炉用鉄原料として使用することが古くから行われている。   On the other hand, a fine powdery iron-containing raw material in which fine powder particles having a particle diameter of 0.25 mm or less occupy 80% or more of the whole is agglomerated such as pellets by granulating by adding water together with a binder (binder) such as cement. It has been used for a long time as a raw material for iron for a blast furnace by using a non-calcining type agglomeration process in which the agglomerated ore is obtained by curing after being molded into an agglomerate.

このような非焼成型塊成化プロセスによれば、焼結鉱や焼成ペレットを得るような焼成型塊成化プロセスでは不可能である炭材の塊成鉱内への多量添加が可能となるため、近年、高炉操業時の還元材比の低減を目的とし、このプロセスを利用したカーボン内装非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法が検討されている。   According to such a non-fired agglomeration process, it becomes possible to add a large amount of carbonaceous material into the agglomerated ore, which is not possible in a fired agglomeration process such as obtaining sintered ore or fired pellets. Therefore, in recent years, for the purpose of reducing the reducing material ratio during the operation of the blast furnace, a method for producing a carbon-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore utilizing this process has been studied.

例えば、鉄鉱石、又は、製鉄所で発生した多種の含鉄、含炭系集塵ダストからなる含酸化鉄原料に、鉄鉱石類の被還元酸素を還元して金属鉄とするために必要な理論炭素量の80〜120%のカーボン量(全原料中のC含有量:10〜15質量%程度)に相当するカーボン系炭材を配合し、早強ポルトランドセメントを加えて混錬、成型した後、7日間の養生により、常温での圧潰強度が7850kN/m(80kg/cm2に相当)以上のカーボン内装非焼成塊成鉱を製造する方法が提案されている(特許文献1参照)。 For example, iron ore, or iron-containing iron oxide raw material consisting of various types of iron-containing, carbon-containing dust collected in iron mills, the theory necessary for reducing oxygen to be reduced of iron ores to metallic iron After mixing carbon-based carbonaceous material corresponding to the carbon content of 80 to 120% of the carbon content (C content in all raw materials: about 10 to 15 mass%), kneading and molding by adding early strength Portland cement , A method for producing a carbon-containing non-calcined agglomerate having a crushing strength at room temperature of 7850 kN / m 2 (corresponding to 80 kg / cm 2 ) or more by curing for 7 days (see Patent Document 1).

しかしながら、上記特許文献1のような含炭非焼成塊成鉱では、高炉用原料として要求される冷間圧潰強度85kg/cm以上を維持するために、全原料中の炭素含有割合(T.C)を15質量%(炭素当量で1.2に相当)未満に制限せざるを得なかった。そのため、含炭非焼成塊成鉱中の酸化鉄の直接還元は進んでも、含炭非焼成塊成鉱以外に高炉に装入される焼結鉱等の主要な高炉用鉄含有原料の還元を十分に促進することができない。 However, in the carbon-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore as disclosed in Patent Document 1, in order to maintain the cold crushing strength of 85 kg / cm 2 or more required as a raw material for the blast furnace, the carbon content ratio (TC) in the total raw material Had to be limited to less than 15% by mass (corresponding to 1.2 in terms of carbon equivalent). Therefore, even if direct reduction of iron oxide in coal-containing non-calcined agglomerates proceeds, reduction of major iron-containing raw materials for blast furnaces such as sinter ore charged into blast furnaces other than carbon-containing non-calcined agglomerated ores It cannot be promoted enough.

そこで、含炭非焼成塊成鉱を得るにあたり、全原料の粒度を2mm以下として、全原料中の炭素含有割合(T.C)が15〜25質量%となるように微粉状炭材の配合割合を調整し、かつ、微粉状炭材のメジアン径を100〜150μmとする高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法が提案されている(特許文献2参照)。この方法によって得られた含炭非焼成塊成鉱によれば、高炉で使用する際に、含炭非焼成塊成鉱だけではなく、焼結鉱等の他の鉄含有原料の被還元率を向上させることができ、高炉操業時の還元材比の低減が図られる。   Therefore, in obtaining a coal-containing uncalcined agglomerated ore, the mixing ratio of the finely powdered carbonaceous material is set so that the particle size of all raw materials is 2 mm or less and the carbon content ratio (TC) in all the raw materials is 15 to 25% by mass. A method for producing a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace in which the median diameter of the finely powdered carbon material is adjusted to 100 to 150 μm has been proposed (see Patent Document 2). According to the coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore obtained by this method, when used in a blast furnace, not only the carbon-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore, but also the reduction rate of other iron-containing raw materials such as sinter ore It can be improved, and the reducing agent ratio during blast furnace operation can be reduced.

ところが、含炭非焼成塊成鉱は、カーボンを含有しない非焼成塊成鉱に比べて成形直後の塊成物強度が低下し、また、カーボンは疎水性を有して、かつ多孔質であるため、塊成物の強度維持に必要となる添加水分量もカーボンを含有しない場合に比べて多くなってしまう。そのため、カーボン含有量の増加とともに、冷間圧潰強度を維持するための含炭非焼成塊成鉱中の水分含有量が高くなり、ペレット等に成形した後の養生(セメントの水和反応の促進及び乾燥)における強度発現までの時間が長くなってしまうという問題がある。   However, the non-calcined agglomerated ore containing carbon has a lower agglomerate strength immediately after forming as compared with the non-calcined agglomerated ore containing no carbon, and the carbon is hydrophobic and porous. Therefore, the amount of added water required to maintain the strength of the agglomerate becomes larger than that in the case where carbon is not contained. Therefore, as the carbon content increases, the water content in the coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for maintaining the cold crushing strength increases, and curing after molding into pellets (acceleration of hydration reaction of cement And drying), there is a problem that it takes a long time to develop strength.

このように、含炭非焼成塊成鉱は、冷間圧潰強度が比較的低く、また、必要な強度を発現するために比較的長い養生時間を要してしまう。これらの傾向は、特に、上記特許文献2のように炭素含有割合を高くするとより顕著になる。そこで、配合原料を成形した塊成物を養生する際に、蒸気を流して養生処理を促進させる方法が知られている(例えば特許文献3、4参照)。   As described above, the coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore has a relatively low cold crushing strength and requires a relatively long curing time in order to develop the required strength. These tendencies become more remarkable especially when the carbon content ratio is increased as in Patent Document 2. Therefore, when curing an agglomerate obtained by molding a blended raw material, a method of flowing steam to accelerate the curing treatment is known (see, for example, Patent Documents 3 and 4).

ところで、上記のような非焼成型塊成化プロセスでは、一般に、微粉状鉄含有原料、微粉状炭材、水硬性バインダー等の配合原料がそれぞれ所定の配合量となるようにホッパー等から切り出して、配合原料を粉砕し(或いは各原料を事前に粉砕して配合し)、混錬機を用いて水分量を調整しながら混錬し、例えば、造粒機で造粒して篩い分けを行い、ペレット(塊成物)を得る。   By the way, in the non-firing type agglomeration process as described above, generally, the finely powdered iron-containing raw material, the finely powdered carbonaceous material, and the blended raw materials such as the hydraulic binder are cut out from the hopper or the like so that each has a predetermined blending amount. , The compounded raw materials are crushed (or each raw material is crushed and compounded in advance) and kneaded while adjusting the water content using a kneader, for example, granulated by a granulator and sieved , Pellets (agglomerates) are obtained.

そして、造粒して得られたペレットは、高炉用鉄原料としての強度となるように養生するが、その際、側壁で囲まれた処理ピットに山積みして一次養生する場合、処理ピットの上部を跨るように設置された架台の上を走行する給鉱台車にベルトコンベア等を接続させてペレットを供給し、給鉱台車から処理ピット内にペレットを落下させて投入しながら積み付けていく。例えば、26m×13m程度の面積を有する処理ピットに3〜5mほどの高さでペレットを山積みし、ブルーシート等のような保温シートで覆い、2日ほどの一次養生を行う。このとき、蒸気を流して養生する場合には、処理ピットの床面に蒸気噴出管を設けておき、ペレットを山積みして保温シートを掛けてから、処理ピットの下方から上方に向けて蒸気を吹き出し、山積みされたペレットの下層から上層にかけて(山の下層部から上層部にかけて)水と熱を付与していく。一次養生後は、処理済みのペレットを処理ピットから払い出し、原料ヤード(二次養生ヤード)に搬出して8〜12日程度大気中で放置して二次養生を行い、強度の発現した含炭非焼成塊成鉱が得られる。   Then, the pellets obtained by granulation are cured so as to have the strength as the iron raw material for the blast furnace. At that time, when piled up in the processing pit surrounded by the side wall for primary curing, the upper part of the processing pit is used. Pellets are supplied by connecting a belt conveyor or the like to a feed truck that runs on a pedestal installed so as to straddle the pellets, and the pellets are dropped from the feed truck into the processing pit for loading while loading. For example, pellets are piled up in a processing pit having an area of about 26 m × 13 m at a height of about 3 to 5 m, covered with a heat insulating sheet such as a blue sheet, and primary curing is performed for about 2 days. At this time, when steaming is used for curing, a steam jetting pipe is provided on the floor surface of the processing pit, piles of pellets are placed on the heat insulating sheet, and then steam is directed upward from below the processing pit. Water and heat are applied from the lower layer to the upper layer of the piled pellets (from the lower layer to the upper layer of the pile). After the primary curing, the treated pellets are discharged from the processing pit, carried out to the raw material yard (secondary curing yard) and left in the atmosphere for about 8 to 12 days to carry out the secondary curing. An unfired agglomerated ore is obtained.

ところが、ペレットのような塊成物を山積みして一次養生する場合、山の下層部と上層部とでは強度(冷間強度)にばらつきが生じてしまう。一次養生後の塊成物に強度のばらつきが存在すると、養生が不十分な塊成物は二次養生のための積み替え作業中に粉化してしまったり、二次養生後の含炭非焼成塊成鉱の歩留まりが低下してしまう。   However, when agglomerates such as pellets are piled up for primary curing, the strength (cold strength) varies between the lower and upper layers of the mountain. If the agglomerates after primary curing have variations in strength, the agglomerates with insufficient curing will be pulverized during the transshipment work for secondary curing, or non-fired coal-containing agglomerates after secondary curing. The yield of the ore will decrease.

強度の低い塊成物が混在することについて、セメント等の水硬性バインダーの配合量を増やすと、得られた含炭非焼成塊成鉱を高炉で使用した場合にスラグの発生量が増大したり、高炉内での水硬性バインダーの脱水吸熱が顕在化し、還元材比の低減効果が損なわれるなどの悪影響が引き起こされる。また、ばらつきを抑えるために塊成物の山積み高さを低くすると、その分だけ広大な処理ピット面積が必要となる上に、作業効率の悪化を招いてしまう。   Regarding the inclusion of low-strength agglomerates, increasing the blending amount of hydraulic binder such as cement increases the amount of slag generated when the obtained coal-containing uncalcined agglomerates are used in a blast furnace. However, the dehydration endotherm of the hydraulic binder in the blast furnace becomes apparent, which causes adverse effects such as impairing the reducing agent ratio reducing effect. Further, if the pile height of the agglomerates is reduced in order to suppress the variation, a correspondingly large processing pit area is required and the work efficiency is deteriorated.

そこで、このようなばらつきの問題に対して、例えば、塊成物を山積みした山の下層部ではバインダーの添加量を多くし、山の上層部では水硬性バインダーの添加量を少なくして、強度のばらつきを低減させる方法が提案されている(特許文献5参照)。また、山形の傾斜面に生ペレットを載置して養生することで、ばらつきを抑える方法も知られている(特許文献6参照)。しかしながら、前者の方法では、積み付けのタイミングに応じて塊成物の配合を調整しなければならず、また、後者の方法では、特殊な装置を構成する必要があると共に、塊成物の堆積層の厚さが山積みの場合に比べて小さくなるため生産性が低下してしまい、いずれの方法においても作業性やコストの面で検討の余地がある。   Therefore, with respect to such a problem of variation, for example, the binder addition amount is increased in the lower layer portion of the pile of agglomerates and the hydraulic binder is reduced in the upper layer portion of the pile to improve the strength. A method for reducing variations has been proposed (see Patent Document 5). In addition, a method is also known in which raw pellets are placed on a mountain-shaped inclined surface and cured to suppress variations (see Patent Document 6). However, in the former method, the agglomeration of the agglomerate must be adjusted according to the timing of packing, and in the latter method, it is necessary to configure a special device and the agglomeration of the agglomerate. Since the layer thickness is smaller than in the case of piles, the productivity is reduced, and there is room for study in terms of workability and cost in any method.

特開2003−342646号公報JP, 2003-342646, A 特開2008−95177号公報JP, 2008-95177, A 特開2001−348624号公報JP 2001-348624 A 特開2009−161791号公報JP, 2009-161791, A 特開平6−145824号公報JP-A-6-145824 特開2013−79433号公報JP, 2013-79433, A

そこで、本発明者らは、上記のような非焼成型塊成化プロセスにおいて、山積みした塊成物を一次養生した場合の強度のばらつきに関して鋭意検討した結果、処理ピットの上方から塊成物を落下投入して積み付けながら山積みする途中で、蒸気噴出管から蒸気を噴射して塊成物の加温を開始することで、山の上層部と下層部とにおける塊成物の強度のばらつきを低減できるようになることを見出し、本発明を完成した。   Therefore, as a result of diligent studies on the variation in strength when primary curing of piled agglomerates in the non-firing type agglomeration process as described above, the present inventors found that agglomerates were formed from above the processing pits. By dropping steam and injecting steam to start heating of the agglomerates while piled up while dropping and loading, variation in strength of agglomerates between the upper and lower layers of the mountain is reduced. The present invention has been completed by finding that it can be done.

したがって、本発明の目的は、山積みした塊成物を一次養生したときの山の上層部と下層部とにおける塊成物の強度のばらつきを低減して、安定した品質の含炭非焼成塊成鉱を簡便に、かつ低コストで得ることができる高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法を提供することにある。   Therefore, an object of the present invention is to reduce the variation in the strength of the agglomerates in the upper and lower layers of the mountain when the piled agglomerates are first cured, and to obtain a stable quality coal-free uncalcined agglomerated ore. The object is to provide a method for producing a coal-containing uncalcined agglomerated ore for a blast furnace, which can be obtained easily and at low cost.

すなわち、本発明の要旨は次のとおりである。
(1)微粉状鉄含有原料、微粉状炭材、及び水硬性バインダーを含んだ配合原料を水分調整した後に成形した塊成物を、側壁で囲まれた処理ピット内に山積みし、保温シートで覆うと共に、処理ピットの床面から所定量の蒸気を噴射して加温しながら塊成物を一次養生する工程を含んだ高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法であって、処理ピットの上方から塊成物を投入して積み付けながら山積みする途中で、処理ピットの床面から蒸気を噴射して塊成物の加温を開始することを特徴とする高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。
(2)処理ピット内に山積みする塊成物の山積み高さHに対して、塊成物の積み付け高さhが50〜70%(0.5H≦h≦0.7H)のタイミングで処理ピットの床面から蒸気を噴射して塊成物の加温を開始する(1)に記載の高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。
(3)処理ピット内に山積みする塊成物の山積み高さHが3〜5mである(1)又は(2)に記載の高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。
(4)前記配合原料中の炭素含有割合(T.C)が15〜25質量%である(1)〜(3)のいずれかに記載の高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。
(5)前記一次養生において蒸気を噴射して養生する時間が15〜30時間である(1)〜(4)のいずれかに記載の高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。
(6)前記一次養生における蒸気使用量が、塊成物1トンあたり13〜17トンである(1)〜(5)のいずれかに記載の高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。
That is, the gist of the present invention is as follows.
(1) Finely powdered iron-containing raw material, finely powdered carbonaceous material, and a compounded raw material containing a hydraulic binder, after adjusting the water content, formed agglomerates, piled up in a processing pit surrounded by side walls, and used a heat insulating sheet. A method for producing a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for a blast furnace, which includes a step of covering and covering a primary surface of an agglomerate while injecting a predetermined amount of steam from the floor surface of the processing pit to heat it. The coal-containing non-calcined lump for a blast furnace characterized by injecting steam from the upper part of the blast furnace to start heating the agglomerate while injecting steam from the floor surface of the processing pit during the pile process. Method for producing ore.
(2) The stacking height h of the agglomerates is 50 to 70% (0.5H ≦ h ≦ 0.7H) with respect to the stacking height H of the agglomerates stacked in the processing pit. The method for producing a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace according to (1), wherein steam is injected from the floor surface to start heating the agglomerate.
(3) The method for producing a carbonized non-calcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace according to (1) or (2), wherein the pile height H of the agglomerates piled up in the processing pit is 3 to 5 m.
(4) The method for producing a carbonized non-calcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace according to any one of (1) to (3), wherein the carbon content ratio (TC) in the blended raw material is 15 to 25 mass%.
(5) The method for producing a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace according to any one of (1) to (4), in which steam is injected and cured in the primary curing for 15 to 30 hours.
(6) The method for producing a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace according to any one of (1) to (5), wherein the amount of steam used in the primary curing is 13 to 17 tons per ton of agglomerate.

本発明によれば、非焼成型塊成化プロセスにおいて山積みした塊成物を一次養生したときに、山の上層部と下層部とにおける塊成物の強度のばらつきを低減することができる。そのため、安定した品質の含炭非焼成塊成鉱を簡便に、かつ低コストで得ることができるようになる。   According to the present invention, when the agglomerates piled up in the non-firing type agglomeration process are subjected to primary curing, it is possible to reduce variations in the strength of the agglomerates in the upper layer portion and the lower layer portion of the mountain. Therefore, a stable quality coal-free non-calcined agglomerated ore can be easily obtained at low cost.

図1は、塊成物を一次養生する養生処理装置の一例を示す模式説明図である。FIG. 1 is a schematic explanatory view showing an example of a curing treatment device for primary curing an agglomerate. 図2(a)は、含炭非焼成塊成鉱のカーボン(炭素)含有量と圧潰強度との関係を示すグラフであり、図2(b)は、養生前のペレット(塊成物)の強度維持に必要となる添加水分量とカーボン含有量との関係を示すグラフである。FIG. 2 (a) is a graph showing the relationship between the carbon (carbon) content and the crushing strength of a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore, and FIG. 2 (b) is a graph of pellets (agglomerates) before curing. It is a graph which shows the relationship between the amount of added water required for strength maintenance, and carbon content. 図3は、下記製造実験Iの一次養生において、温度履歴及びペレットの強度を測定した山の個所を示す模式図である。FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing the locations of peaks where the temperature history and the strength of pellets were measured in the primary curing of the following Production Experiment I. 図4は、下記製造実験Iの一次養生における温度履歴を示すグラフであり、(a)は養生条件1、(b)は養生条件2、(c)は養生条件3の場合を示す。FIG. 4 is a graph showing the temperature history in the primary curing of the following manufacturing experiment I, where (a) is the curing condition 1, (b) is the curing condition 2, and (c) is the curing condition 3. 図5は、下記製造実験Iの一次養生の違いによる山の高さとペレット強度との関係を示すグラフであり、(a)は山の高さの各層におけるペレットの平均強度を示し、(b)は山の高さの各層におけるペレット中の低強度品の割合を示す。FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between the mountain height and the pellet strength due to the difference in the primary curing in the following manufacturing experiment I, (a) shows the average strength of the pellet in each layer of the mountain height, (b) Indicates the proportion of low-strength products in the pellet in each layer at the mountain height.

以下、本発明について詳しく説明する。
本発明における高炉用の含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法では、微粉状鉄含有原料、微粉状炭材、及び水硬性バインダーを含んだ配合原料を水分調整した後に塊成物に成形した上で、側壁で囲まれた処理ピット内に山積みし、保温シートで覆うと共に、処理ピットの床面から所定量の蒸気を噴射して加温しながら塊成物を一次養生する際に、処理ピットの上方から塊成物を投入して積み付けながら山積みする途中で、処理ピットの床面から蒸気を噴射して塊成物の加温を開始するようにする。
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail.
In the method for producing a coal-containing non-fired agglomerated ore for a blast furnace according to the present invention, finely powdered iron-containing raw material, finely powdered carbonaceous material, and a blended raw material containing a hydraulic binder are water adjusted to form agglomerates. Then, when piled up in the processing pit surrounded by the side wall and covered with a heat insulating sheet, a predetermined amount of steam is jetted from the floor surface of the processing pit to heat the agglomerates for primary curing of the agglomerates. In the middle of loading and stacking the agglomerates from above, steam is injected from the floor surface of the processing pit to start heating the agglomerates.

一般に、非焼成型塊成化プロセスにおいて山積みした塊成物を一次養生する場合、水硬性バインダーの水和反応(発熱反応)により塊成物の温度は40〜60℃程度になる。このとき、山の下層部にあたる位置の塊成物は処理ピットの床面に熱が奪われるのに対し、山の上層部にあたる位置の塊成物はそれ自身の発熱と共に、下層部側からの伝熱により予熱されるため、下層部と上層部とでは塊成物に温度差が生じてしまう。これは、処理ピットの床面から蒸気を噴射して加温する場合でも同様であり、下層部側からの伝熱により上層部側は下層部に比べてより高温になることから、山の上層部と下層部とにおける塊成物の強度にばらつきが生じてしまうと考えられる。   Generally, when primary curing of piled agglomerates in the non-baking type agglomeration process, the temperature of the agglomerates is about 40 to 60 ° C. due to the hydration reaction (exothermic reaction) of the hydraulic binder. At this time, the agglomerates in the lower layer of the mountain lose heat to the floor surface of the processing pit, while the agglomerates in the upper layer of the mountain generate their own heat and are transferred from the lower layer side. Since it is preheated by heat, a temperature difference occurs in the agglomerates between the lower layer portion and the upper layer portion. This is also the case when heating by injecting steam from the floor of the processing pit, and the heat transfer from the lower layer side causes the upper layer side to have a higher temperature than the lower layer portion. It is considered that the strength of the agglomerate varies between the lower layer and the lower layer.

加えて、実際の製造では、処理ピット内への塊成物の積み付け開始から山積みが完了するまでに24時間程度の時間を要してしまう。これは、ヤードで保管されたスラグを重機でまとめて処理ピットに投入するスラグの蒸気エージングのような場合と異なり、高炉用の含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造では、原料配合と成形により得られた塊成物を順次、処理ピットの上方から投入して積み付けを行うためである。そのため、山の下層部に位置する塊成物と上層部に位置する塊成物とでは必然的に養生時間に差が生じ、塊成物の強度にばらつきを生む原因になるとも考えられる。   In addition, in the actual manufacturing, it takes about 24 hours from the start of the agglomeration of the agglomerates in the processing pit to the completion of the pile. This is different from the case of steam aging of slag that is stored in a yard and put into a processing pit with a heavy machine, and in the production of coal-containing non-fired agglomerated ore for blast furnace, it is obtained by blending raw materials and molding. This is because the agglomerates thus obtained are sequentially loaded from above the processing pit to be stacked. Therefore, it is considered that the curing time inevitably differs between the agglomerates located in the lower part of the mountain and the agglomerates located in the upper part, which causes variations in the strength of the agglomerates.

一般に、含炭非焼成塊成鉱を得るにあたり、塊成物を処理ピットに山積みして一次養生する際には、微粉状鉄含有原料、微粉状炭材、水硬性バインダー等の配合原料を所定の配合量となるようにホッパーから切り出し、ボールミル等の粉砕機で粉砕して、レディゲミキサーやアイリッヒミキサー等の混錬機を用いて、水分量を調整しながら混錬する(水分含有量は9〜14質量%程度)。その後、例えば、パンペレタイザー等の造粒機で造粒し、更に、振動篩等で篩い分けして、造粒したペレット(塊成物として)を得る。このとき、配合原料を構成する各原料を粉砕した後、配合して配合原料としてもよい。また、水分調整して混錬した配合原料を造粒機による造粒して塊成物にするかわりに、例えば、圧縮成型機を用いてブリケットにしたり、押出し成型機により押出し成型するなどして塊成物を得るようにしてもよい。   In general, when obtaining a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore, when agglomerates are piled up in the processing pit and primary curing is performed, raw materials containing fine iron powder, fine carbonaceous materials, hydraulic binders, and other raw materials are specified. Cut out from the hopper so that the compounding amount becomes, and crush with a crusher such as a ball mill, and knead while adjusting the water content using a kneader such as a Loedige mixer or an Eirich mixer (water content Is about 9 to 14% by mass). Then, for example, it is granulated with a granulating machine such as a pan pelletizer, and further sieved with a vibrating sieve or the like to obtain granulated pellets (as agglomerates). At this time, each raw material constituting the blended raw material may be crushed and then blended to obtain a blended raw material. Further, instead of granulating the compounded raw material adjusted with water content with a granulator to form an agglomerate, for example, a briquette using a compression molding machine or extrusion molding with an extrusion molding machine is performed. Agglomerates may be obtained.

そして、例えば、図1に示したようにして、側壁で囲まれた処理ピット1に得られた塊成物を山積みする。すなわち、この例では屋根のある建屋10内にコンクリート擁壁等からなる側壁2で三方が囲まれた処理ピット1が形成されており、この処理ピット1の上方を跨るように架台3が設置されている。また、架台3は側壁2の上端面に設けられたレールに沿って処理ピット1を横幅方向(x方向)に移動可能であると共に(この図1の例では架台3の一端が建屋10の壁に設けられたレール上を移動する)、架台3の上には給鉱台車(積付機)4が積載されて、この給鉱台車4が処理ピット1の奥行き方向(y方向)に移動することができる。また、給鉱台車4には、ベルトコンベア5が接続されて製造した塊成物が供給されるようになっており、架台3と給鉱台車4の移動により処理ピット1の上方から塊成物を投入して、処理ピット内に塊成物を積み付けて、山積みされた塊成物の山6が形成される。   Then, for example, as shown in FIG. 1, the obtained agglomerates are piled up in the processing pit 1 surrounded by the side wall. That is, in this example, a processing pit 1 surrounded on three sides by a side wall 2 made of a concrete retaining wall or the like is formed in a building 10 having a roof, and a pedestal 3 is installed so as to extend over the processing pit 1. ing. Further, the pedestal 3 can move in the lateral width direction (x direction) along the rail provided on the upper end surface of the side wall 2 (in the example of FIG. 1, one end of the pedestal 3 is a wall of the building 10). Of the ore), and the ore feeding dolly (loading machine) 4 is loaded on the gantry 3, and the ore feeding dolly 4 moves in the depth direction (y direction) of the processing pit 1. be able to. Further, the agglomerates produced by connecting the belt conveyor 5 to the ore feeding dolly 4 are supplied, and the agglomerates are produced from above the processing pit 1 by the movement of the gantry 3 and the ore feeding dolly 4. Is charged and the agglomerates are stacked in the processing pit, so that the piles 6 of piled agglomerates are formed.

ここで、従来の方法では、図1に示したような養生処理装置の処理ピット1内に塊成物を山積みした後には、建屋10の天井に設置されたホイスト式クレーン7を使って塊成物の山6をブルーシート等のような保温シート8で覆い、処理ピット1の床面に備え付けられた蒸気噴出管9から蒸気を噴射して、山積みされた塊成物の山6の下層部から上層部にかけて水と熱を付与し、水硬性バインダーの水和反応を促進させて塊成物の強度を発現させる(以下、「従来法」と言う)。これは、蒸気噴出管9から噴射される蒸気の無駄を無くすためであり、塊成物の山6を保温シート8で覆った上で、処理ピット1の床面の蒸気噴出管9から蒸気を噴射することで、蒸気からの熱と水分を極力逃がさずに、より効率的に塊成物の養生を進めるためと考えられてきた。   Here, in the conventional method, after agglomerating the agglomerates in the treatment pit 1 of the curing treatment apparatus as shown in FIG. 1, the agglomeration is performed using the hoist type crane 7 installed on the ceiling of the building 10. The pile 6 of objects is covered with a heat insulating sheet 8 such as a blue sheet, and steam is jetted from a steam jet pipe 9 provided on the floor surface of the processing pit 1 to form a lower layer portion of the pile 6 of piled agglomerates. To the upper layer, water and heat are applied to accelerate the hydration reaction of the hydraulic binder to develop the strength of the agglomerate (hereinafter, referred to as "conventional method"). This is to eliminate waste of the steam ejected from the steam ejection pipe 9, and after covering the mountain 6 of the agglomerate with the heat insulating sheet 8, the steam is ejected from the steam ejection pipe 9 on the floor surface of the processing pit 1. It has been thought that by injecting, the heat and water from the steam are not released as much as possible, and the agglomeration of the agglomerate is promoted more efficiently.

ところが、本発明者らが試行錯誤を重ねた結果、塊成物を山積みする途中で蒸気噴出管から蒸気の噴射を開始し、蒸気を噴射させながら残りの塊成物の積み付けを行い、山積みが完了して保温シートで覆うようにしたところ、驚くべきことには、従来法に比べて山の上層部と下層部とにおける塊成物の強度のばらつきが抑えられ、しかも、蒸気の使用量を従来法の場合と同じにしても(つまり、本発明の場合には、蒸気の噴射を開始してから残りの塊成物の積み付けを行っている間は保温シートで覆わずに、蒸気は積み付けた塊成物の間から放出される)、一次養生後に得られる塊成物の平均強度(一次養生した山の平均)が従来法の場合よりも高くなることが分かった。このような理由のひとつとして、山の下層部に位置する塊成物の強度が向上して、上層部との強度差が解消するためと考えられる。   However, as a result of repeated trial and error by the present inventors, steam injection was started from the steam ejection pipe in the middle of stacking the agglomerates, and while the steam was being injected, the remaining agglomerates were stacked and piled up. After the completion of the procedure and covering with a heat insulating sheet, surprisingly, the variation in the strength of the agglomerates in the upper and lower layers of the mountain was suppressed compared to the conventional method, and the amount of steam used was reduced. Even if it is the same as the case of the conventional method (that is, in the case of the present invention, the steam is not covered with the heat insulating sheet during the loading of the remaining agglomerates after the start of the steam injection, It was found that the average strength of the agglomerates obtained after primary curing (released between the agglomerated agglomerates) (average of primary cured piles) was higher than in the conventional method. It is considered that one of the reasons for this is that the strength of the agglomerates located in the lower layer of the mountain is improved and the strength difference from the upper layer is eliminated.

好ましくは、処理ピット内に山積みする塊成物の山の山積み高さHに対して、塊成物の積み付け高さhが50〜70%(0.5H≦h≦0.7H)のタイミングで処理ピットの床面に設置された蒸気噴出管等から蒸気を噴射して塊成物の加温を開始するのがよい。蒸気を噴射するタイミングがこの範囲外であると、一次養生後に得られる塊成物の平均強度(一次養生した山の平均)が従来法と同じか、それよりも下がってしまう場合があり、また、山の上層部と下層部とにおける塊成物の強度のばらつきを十分に抑えることができないこともある。   It is preferable that the agglomeration height h of the agglomerates is 50 to 70% (0.5H ≦ h ≦ 0.7H) with respect to the heap height H of the agglomerates of the agglomerates piled in the processing pit. It is advisable to start the heating of the agglomerates by injecting steam from a steam injection pipe or the like installed on the floor surface of the pit. If the timing of injecting steam is outside this range, the average strength of the agglomerates obtained after primary curing (the average of the primary cured mountains) may be the same as or lower than that of the conventional method. In some cases, it is not possible to sufficiently suppress the variation in the strength of the agglomerate between the upper layer portion and the lower layer portion of the mountain.

勿論、塊成物の積み付けと同時にするなど、より早いタイミングで処理ピットの床面からの蒸気の噴射を開始することで山の下層部に位置する塊成物の強度の向上を図ることもできるが、比較的に製造コストが掛かる蒸気を限りなく使用することは現実的ではなく、また、蒸気量が増え過ぎてしまうと凝集水分の影響で塊成物が膨潤して、むしろ塊成物の強度が低下してばらつきが大きくなってしまうおそれがある。そのため、本発明においては、従来法と同程度に所定量の蒸気を使用することを考慮して、上記のようなタイミングにすることがコストバランスの点で有利である。   Of course, it is also possible to improve the strength of the agglomerates located in the lower layer of the mountain by starting the injection of steam from the floor surface of the processing pit at an earlier timing, such as simultaneously with the agglomeration of the agglomerates. Although it is possible, it is not practical to use steam that requires a relatively high manufacturing cost as much as possible, and if the amount of steam increases too much, the agglomerates swell due to the influence of coagulated water, and rather the agglomerates There is a risk that the strength will decrease and the variation will increase. Therefore, in the present invention, it is advantageous in terms of cost balance to set the timing as described above in consideration of using a predetermined amount of steam in the same degree as in the conventional method.

ここで、図2(a)には、含炭非焼成塊成鉱を得るにあたっての蒸気養生の有効性が示されている。一般に、蒸気がないとカーボン(炭素)含有量の増加に伴い直線的に含炭非焼成塊成鉱の強度(圧潰強度)が低下する。これには2つの原因が考えられ、ひとつは、炭材が多孔質であるため、気孔内にセメント等の水硬性バインダーがトラップされて、結合に有効に働かなくなるためである。もうひとつは、炭材は疎水性を有し、かつ多孔質であるため、ペレットのような塊成物の強度維持に必要となる添加水分量が、炭材を含有しない場合に比べて多くなり、塊成物間の水分ばらつきに起因して成品(含炭非焼成塊成鉱)でのばらつきが助長されるためである。そこで、蒸気養生を実施すると、セメント水和反応が促進されるだけではなく、水分のばらつきが解消されて平均の成品強度が向上する。その効果はカーボン含有量の高い塊成物ほど顕著である。ただし、蒸気養生を行っても、炭材が多孔質なため、気孔内に水硬性バインダーがトラップされて、結合に有効に働かなく悪影響は解消されず、カーボン含有量には上限が存在する。カーボン含有量15〜25%であれば、蒸気養生の効果を最大限発揮して、高炉使用に耐えうる所定の強度を具備した塊成物の製造が可能である。なお、図2(b)は、ペレット(塊成物)の強度維持に必要となる添加水分量とカーボン含有量との関係を示すものである。   Here, FIG. 2 (a) shows the effectiveness of steam curing in obtaining a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore. Generally, in the absence of steam, the strength (crush strength) of a coal-containing uncalcined agglomerate decreases linearly with an increase in carbon content. There are two possible causes for this. One is that since the carbonaceous material is porous, a hydraulic binder such as cement is trapped in the pores and does not work effectively for bonding. Second, since carbonaceous materials are hydrophobic and porous, the amount of added water required to maintain the strength of agglomerates such as pellets is greater than when carbonaceous materials are not included. This is because variation in water content among agglomerates promotes variation in products (non-calcined agglomerated ore). Therefore, when steam curing is carried out, not only the cement hydration reaction is promoted, but also variations in water content are eliminated and the average product strength is improved. The effect is more remarkable in the agglomerates having a higher carbon content. However, even if steam curing is performed, since the carbonaceous material is porous, the hydraulic binder is trapped in the pores, does not work effectively for binding and the adverse effect is not eliminated, and the carbon content has an upper limit. If the carbon content is 15 to 25%, it is possible to produce the agglomerate having a predetermined strength that can withstand the use of the blast furnace by maximizing the effect of steam curing. Note that FIG. 2B shows the relationship between the amount of added water and the carbon content necessary to maintain the strength of pellets (agglomerates).

なお、高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱に要求される強度としては、高炉までの搬送や装入時に崩壊しないことが求められ、その搬送や装入の方法によっても異なるが、概ね85kg/cm程度以上の強度が必要である。一般に、含炭非焼成塊成鉱の圧潰強度は、JIS M8718「鉄鉱石ペレット圧潰強度試験方法」に準じて、被測定試料1個に対して規定の加圧速度で圧縮荷重を掛けることにより、破壊させた時の荷重値を測定し、強度指数として、通常、単位断面積当たりの荷重値(kg/cm2)が用いられる。また、この強度指数に代えて、便宜的に被測定試料1個に対する荷重値そのもの(kg/Piece)を強度指数として表すこともある。ちなみに、焼成により製造されたペレットの冷間圧潰強度は一般に150kg/cm程度である。 The strength required for a coal-containing uncalcined agglomerated ore for a blast furnace is such that it does not collapse at the time of transportation to the blast furnace or charging, and it depends on the method of transportation or charging, but it is generally 85 kg / cm. A strength of about 2 or more is required. Generally, the crushing strength of a coal-containing uncalcined agglomerated ore is determined by applying a compressive load at a specified pressing speed to one measured sample in accordance with JIS M8718 "Iron ore pellet crushing strength test method". The load value at the time of breaking is measured, and the load value per unit cross-sectional area (kg / cm 2 ) is usually used as the strength index. Further, instead of this strength index, the load value itself (kg / Piece) for one measured sample may be represented as a strength index for convenience. By the way, the cold crushing strength of pellets produced by firing is generally about 150 kg / cm 2 .

本発明においては、蒸気を噴出するタイミングの他は特に制限されず、含炭非焼成塊成鉱を得るための公知の方法と同様にすることができる。
例えば、含炭非焼成塊成鉱の配合原料については、微粉状鉄含有原料、微粉状炭材、及び水硬性バインダーを含むものであれば特に制限はなく、公知のものを用いることができる。なかでも、特許文献2に記載されるように、全原料中の炭素含有割合(T.C)を15〜25質量%にした配合原料を用いれば、高炉操業時の還元材比の低減を図ることができる。このように炭素含有割合が高い配合原料の場合には、一般に強度が発現しにくいが、本発明の方法を用いることで、還元材比の低減を図ることができる含炭非焼成塊成鉱を品質のばらつきを抑えて安定的に供給することが可能になる。なお、配合原料から塊成物を得るための手段やその手順についても特に制限はなく、上述したような公知の方法を用いることができる。
In the present invention, there is no particular limitation except for the timing of ejecting steam, and the same method as a known method for obtaining a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore can be used.
For example, the compounded raw material of the coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore is not particularly limited as long as it contains the finely powdered iron-containing raw material, the finely powdered carbonaceous material, and the hydraulic binder, and known materials can be used. Among them, as described in Patent Document 2, if a blended raw material in which the carbon content ratio (TC) in all raw materials is 15 to 25 mass% is used, it is possible to reduce the reducing material ratio during blast furnace operation. it can. In the case of such a blended raw material having a high carbon content ratio, strength is generally difficult to develop, but by using the method of the present invention, a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore capable of reducing the reducing agent ratio can be obtained. It is possible to suppress the variation in quality and to supply stably. There are no particular restrictions on the means or procedure for obtaining the agglomerates from the blended raw materials, and the known methods described above can be used.

ここで、微粉状鉄含有原料とは、粒径0.25mm以下の微粉粒子が全体の80%以上を占めるものであり、例えば、製鉄プロセスにおいて発生する焼結ダストや高炉ダスト等の含鉄ダストをはじめ、ペレットフィード(ペレット用原料)として用いられる微粉状鉄鉱石や、粉状鉄鉱石を破砕機で予め粉砕したものなどを挙げることができる。また、微粉状炭材としては、例えば、高炉一次灰、コークスダスト、粉コークス、石炭等を挙げることができ、なかでも質量基準のメジアン径(d50)が100〜150μmの微粉状炭材であるのがよい。更に、水硬性バインダーとしては、一般的に用いられる高炉水砕スラグを主成分とする微粉末とアルカリ刺激剤からなる時効性バインダーや、ポルトランドセメント、ベントナイト、生石灰等が挙げられる。   Here, the finely powdered iron-containing raw material means that fine powder particles having a particle size of 0.25 mm or less occupy 80% or more of the whole, and for example, iron-containing dust such as sintering dust or blast furnace dust generated in the iron-making process is used. First, there may be mentioned finely powdered iron ore used as a pellet feed (raw material for pellets) and powdered iron ore previously crushed by a crusher. Examples of the fine carbonaceous materials include blast furnace primary ash, coke dust, coke dust, coal, and the like. Among them, the mass-based median diameter (d50) is 100 to 150 μm. Is good. Further, examples of the hydraulic binder include an aging binder composed of fine powder containing generally used ground granulated blast furnace slag as a main component and an alkali stimulant, Portland cement, bentonite, quick lime and the like.

また、一次養生に用いる処理ピットについては、製鋼スラグの蒸気養生に使用されているような従来のものをそのまま使用することができ、塊成物の積み付けについても従来法と同様にして行うことができる。このとき、処理ピット内に山積みする塊成物の山積み高さHは一般的に3〜5mであり、本発明においても同様である。これより高くなり過ぎると塊成物が荷重により崩壊してしまう場合があり、低くなり過ぎると作業効率を低下させてしまうおそれがある。   Regarding the treatment pit used for primary curing, the conventional one used for steam curing of steelmaking slag can be used as it is, and the agglomeration of agglomerates can be performed in the same manner as the conventional method. You can At this time, the pile height H of the agglomerates piled in the processing pit is generally 3 to 5 m, and the same is true in the present invention. If it is too high, the agglomerate may collapse due to the load, and if it is too low, the work efficiency may be reduced.

本発明においては、処理ピット内に塊成物を積み付けてから山積みが完了するまでに処理ピットの床面からの蒸気の噴射を開始して、一定の時間で蒸気を噴射し、山積みが完了したところで保温シートを被せるようにする。ここで、蒸気を噴射する時間としては従来法と同様にすることができ、なかでも、全原料中の炭素含有割合(T.C)を15〜25質量%にした配合原料を用いる場合には、一般には15〜30時間であり、また、そのときの蒸気使用量は塊成物1トンあたり13〜17トンである。   In the present invention, the injection of steam from the floor surface of the processing pit is started from the time when the agglomerates are stacked in the processing pit to the time when the stacking is completed, and the steam is injected at a fixed time to complete the stacking. At that point, cover it with a heat insulating sheet. Here, the time for injecting steam can be the same as in the conventional method, and in particular, when using a blended raw material in which the carbon content ratio (TC) in the total raw material is 15 to 25 mass%, Is 15 to 30 hours, and the amount of steam used at that time is 13 to 17 tons per ton of agglomerate.

また、本発明においては、従来法と同様に、所定量の蒸気の噴射を終了した後にも保温シートを被せたまま一次養生を続けるようにする。詳しくは、山積みされた塊成物に保温シートを被せてから42〜50時間程度養生を続けるようにするのがよい。すなわち、塊成物の積み付けを開始してからの一次養生の時間は64〜74時間程度になる。そして、一次養生が終了した後は、塊成物を処理ピットから搬出し、必要に応じて振動篩等を用いて篩い分けした上で、原料ヤード(二次養生ヤード)に積み直して大気中で5〜8日程度の二次養生を行い、高炉用鉄原料として強度の発現した含炭非焼成塊成鉱を得ることができる。   Further, in the present invention, similarly to the conventional method, the primary curing is continued with the heat insulation sheet being covered even after the injection of the predetermined amount of steam is completed. Specifically, it is preferable to continue the curing for about 42 to 50 hours after covering the piled agglomerates with a heat insulating sheet. That is, the time for primary curing after starting to load agglomerates is about 64 to 74 hours. Then, after the primary curing is completed, the agglomerate is taken out of the processing pit, sieved using a vibrating sieve, etc., if necessary, and then reloaded in the raw material yard (secondary curing yard) and put into the atmosphere. Secondary curing for about 5 to 8 days can be carried out to obtain a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore showing strength as an iron raw material for blast furnace.

本発明について、実施例に基づいて具体的に説明する。なお、本発明はこれらの内容に制限されるものではない。   The present invention will be specifically described based on Examples. The present invention is not limited to these contents.

(製造実験I)
焼結ダスト及び微粉状鉄鉱石からなる微粉状鉄含有原料に、全原料中の炭素含有量(T.C)が20質量%となるように配合割合を調整しながら、高炉1次バイ及びコークスダストからなる微粉状炭材を配合し、更に、水硬性バインダーとしてポルトランドセメントを添加して、これら配合原料の最大粒度が2mm以下になるようにボールミルで粉砕して、その後、水分量が12質量%となるように調整しながらパンペレタイザーを用いて造粒して、平均粒径14mmのペレットの製造を行った。なお、このときのペレットの製造能力はおよそ60t/時間である。
(Manufacturing experiment I)
From the blast furnace primary bye and coke dust while adjusting the blending ratio so that the carbon content (TC) in the total raw material is 20 mass% in the pulverized iron-containing raw material composed of sintered dust and fine pulverized iron ore. Finely powdered carbonaceous material is further added, and Portland cement is added as a hydraulic binder, and the mixture is crushed with a ball mill so that the maximum particle size of these raw materials is 2 mm or less, and then the water content is 12% by mass. Granulation was performed using a pan pelletizer while adjusting so that pellets having an average particle diameter of 14 mm were produced. The pellet production capacity at this time is approximately 60 t / hour.

上記のようにしてペレットを製造しながら、図1に示した養生処理装置を用いて処理ピット1内にペレットの積み付けをして、以下のような養生条件1〜3により一次養生を行い、その後、二次養生する製造実験(比較例1〜2、本発明1)を行った。ここで、処理ピット1は、高さ4mのコンクリート擁壁からなる側壁2で三方を囲まれており、幅26m×奥行13mの面積を有している。そして、処理ピット1の上方に設置された架台3と給鉱台車(積付機)4を駆動させてペレットを投入して積み付けを行い、幅方向に26m、奥行き方向に13m、高さ(H)4mのペレットの山6を山積みした。このとき、山積みが完了するまでに24時間(積み付け開始から終了まで)を要した。   While manufacturing the pellets as described above, the pellets are stacked in the treatment pit 1 using the curing treatment apparatus shown in FIG. 1, and the primary curing is performed under the following curing conditions 1 to 3, Then, the manufacturing experiment (Comparative Examples 1 and 2 and Invention 1) of secondary curing was performed. Here, the processing pit 1 is surrounded on three sides by a side wall 2 made of a concrete retaining wall having a height of 4 m, and has an area of width 26 m × depth 13 m. Then, the gantry 3 and the ore feeding trolley (loading machine) 4 installed above the processing pit 1 are driven to load and pellet the pellets, 26 m in the width direction, 13 m in the depth direction, and the height ( H) A pile of 4 m pellets 6 was piled up. At this time, it took 24 hours (from the start to the end of the stacking) until the stacking was completed.

先ず、比較例1に係る養生条件1として、ペレットの山積みが完了したところで、このペレットの山6を全て覆うようにして樹脂製のブルーシート(保温シート)8を被せ、水蒸気の噴射は一切行わずに、ブルーシートのシート掛けから48時間経過するまで養生した。
また、比較例2に係る養生条件2としては、養生条件1と同様にペレットの山積み完了後に樹脂製のブルーシート8を被せて、処理ピット1の床面に設置された蒸気噴出管9から水蒸気の噴射を開始し、水蒸気は噴射から24時間経過したところで止めて、ブルーシートのシート掛けから48時間経過するまで養生した。
一方、本発明1に係る養生条件3としては、山積みの途中でペレットの積み付け高さ(h)が2mになったところで(積み付け開始から12時間)、蒸気噴出管9から水蒸気の噴射を開始し、そのまま水蒸気を流し続けながら、ペレットの山積みが完了したところで(山の高さ4m)ブルーシート8を被せて、水蒸気は噴射から24時間経過したところで止めて、ブルーシートのシート掛けから48時間経過するまで養生した。
First, as a curing condition 1 according to Comparative Example 1, when piles of pellets are completed, a resin blue sheet (heat insulating sheet) 8 is covered so as to cover all the piles 6 of pellets, and no steam is injected. Instead, it was cured until 48 hours passed after the blue sheet was hung.
Further, as the curing condition 2 according to the comparative example 2, similarly to the curing condition 1, after the pile of the pellets is completed, the resin blue sheet 8 is covered, and the steam is discharged from the steam ejection pipe 9 installed on the floor surface of the processing pit 1. The injection was started, the water vapor was stopped 24 hours after the injection, and the steam was cured until 48 hours after the blue sheet was hung.
On the other hand, as the curing condition 3 according to the first aspect of the present invention, when the stacking height (h) of pellets reaches 2 m during stacking (12 hours from the start of stacking), injection of steam from the steam ejection pipe 9 is performed. Start, and while continuing to flow steam, cover the blue sheet 8 when the pile of pellets is completed (the height of the pile is 4 m), stop the steam 24 hours after the injection, and stop it from the seating of the blue sheet. I was cured until time passed.

そして、これらの条件で一次養生を終えた各ペレットについて、それぞれショベルローダーで払い出し、ダンプにてヤードに運搬して、積み付け機を介して再度ヤードに積み付けて8日間の二次養生を行い、比較例1(養生条件1(一次養生)、二次養生)、比較例2(養生条件2(同)、二次養生)、本発明1(養生条件3(同)、二次養生)の各製造実験に係る含炭非焼成塊成鉱を得た。なお、養生条件2及び3で使用した水蒸気の量は、いずれもペレット1トンあたり15トン(水蒸気使用量15トン/トン成品)である。   Then, for each pellet that has undergone the primary curing under these conditions, the pellets are discharged by a shovel loader, transported to the yard by a dumper, loaded again into the yard via a loading machine, and then subjected to the secondary curing for 8 days. Comparative Example 1 (curing condition 1 (primary curing), secondary curing), Comparative Example 2 (curing condition 2 (same), secondary curing), Invention 1 (curing condition 3 (same), secondary curing) Coal-free uncalcined agglomerated ore according to each manufacturing experiment was obtained. The amount of water vapor used under curing conditions 2 and 3 is 15 tons per ton of pellets (amount of water vapor used is 15 tons / ton product).

これら各製造実験における一次養生の際には、図3に示したように、山積みしたペレットの山の異なる高さの位置で温度測定を行った。測定では、ペレットの山6の幅方向、奥行き方向ともにほぼ中央の位置において、高さh=80cm(層高比h/H=0.2)、h=200cm(層高比h/H=0.5)、h=320cm(層高比h/H=0.8)の3箇所の温度履歴を計測した。結果を図4に示す。   During the primary curing in each of these manufacturing experiments, as shown in FIG. 3, the temperature was measured at different heights of the piles of the piled pellets. In the measurement, the height h = 80 cm (layer height ratio h / H = 0.2), h = 200 cm (layer height ratio h / H = 0.5) at a position approximately in the center in both the width direction and the depth direction of the pellet mountain 6. The temperature history was measured at three points of h = 320 cm (layer height ratio h / H = 0.8). The results are shown in Fig. 4.

図4(a)に示した“水蒸気を使用しない養生条件1”については、層高比0.8の山の上層部では、積み付け開始(養生開始)から50時間ごろに温度が65℃を超え、その後はわずかに下降して、最終的には60℃程度になった。また、層高比0.5の山の中層部では、養生開始から36時間ごろに温度が60℃まで上昇し、その後は下降して、最終的には52℃程度となった。また、層高比0.2の山の下層部では、養生開始から24時間経過後頃に温度が55℃まで上昇したが、シート掛け後は下降しつづけ、最終的には45℃となった。
また、図4(b)に示した“山積み後に水蒸気を噴射する養生条件2”では、層高比0.8の山の上層部、層高比0.5の山の中層部ともに、水蒸気の噴射中に温度が上がり、山の上層部では最大85℃(養生開始42時間後)、山の中層部では最大72℃(同48時間後)に達した。一方、層高比0.2の山の下層部では、水蒸気の噴射中に温度は55℃ほどで維持されたが、その後は下降して最終的に50℃となり、養生終了時には、山の下層部と上層部との間に50〜75℃の大きな温度差が形成され、水蒸気を使用しない養生条件1の場合(45〜60℃)と比べて温度差が拡がった。
Regarding "curing condition 1 without using steam" shown in Fig. 4 (a), in the upper part of the mountain with a layer height ratio of 0.8, the temperature exceeds 65 ° C about 50 hours after the start of packing (start of curing). After that, it dropped slightly and finally reached about 60 ° C. In the middle part of the mountain with a bed height ratio of 0.5, the temperature rose to 60 ° C. about 36 hours after the start of curing, then dropped, and finally reached about 52 ° C. In the lower part of the mountain with a bed height ratio of 0.2, the temperature rose to 55 ° C 24 hours after the start of curing, but continued to drop after seating, and finally reached 45 ° C. .
Further, under the "curing condition 2 of injecting steam after pile-up" shown in FIG. 4B, steam is injected into both the upper layer part of the mountain with a bed height ratio of 0.8 and the middle layer part of the mountain with a bed height ratio of 0.5. The temperature rose to a maximum of 85 ° C in the upper part of the mountain (42 hours after the start of curing) and 72 ° C in the upper part of the mountain (48 hours after the same). On the other hand, in the lower part of the mountain with a bed height ratio of 0.2, the temperature was maintained at about 55 ° C. during the steam injection, but after that, it decreased to 50 ° C., and at the end of curing, the lower part of the mountain A large temperature difference of 50 to 75 ° C. was formed between the upper part and the upper part, and the temperature difference was widened as compared with the case of curing condition 1 (45 to 60 ° C.) where steam was not used.

それに対して、図4(c)に示した“山積み途中で水蒸気を噴射する養生条件3”では、山の中層部(最大72℃)と上層部(最大80℃)の温度上昇は先の“養生条件2”の場合に比べて低位であるものの、山の下層部の温度が55℃で維持される時間が延長されて、養生終了時には、山の下層部と上層部との間の温度差(50〜70℃)が“養生条件2”に比べて縮小された。
なお、これらいずれの養生条件においても外気温は20℃であった。また、ペレットの積み付け直後から温度が上昇するのは、セメントの水和反応(発熱反応)によるものである。
On the other hand, under the "curing condition 3 in which steam is injected during pile-up" shown in FIG. 4C, the temperature rise in the middle layer (maximum 72 ° C.) and the upper part (maximum 80 ° C.) of the mountain is the same as in the previous case. Although it is lower than the case of curing condition 2 ", the temperature of the lower part of the mountain is maintained at 55 ° C for an extended period of time, and at the end of curing, the temperature difference between the lower and upper parts of the mountain (50-70 ° C) was reduced as compared with "curing condition 2".
The outside air temperature was 20 ° C under any of these curing conditions. The temperature rise immediately after the pellets are loaded is due to the hydration reaction (exothermic reaction) of the cement.

そこで、上記のような養生条件1〜3後に二次養生して得られた各製造実験のペレット(含炭非焼成塊成鉱)について、一次養生での山の高さの位置ごとに圧潰強度を測定した。ここで、一次養生の際に下層部(層高比h/H=0.2)、中層部(層高比h/H=0.5)、上層部(層高比h/H=0.8)に位置したペレットをそれぞれ無作為に100個選び出し、これら100個のサンプル(ペレット)について圧潰強度を測定して、養生条件ごとに平均値を求めた。その結果は図5(a)に示したとおりである。また、上記で山の高さの位置ごとに選び出したサンプル100個のうち、圧潰強度が50kg/cm以下となるサンプルの割合を求めた。その結果は図5(b)に示したとおりである。なお、圧潰強度の測定方法は、JIS M8718「鉄鉱石ペレット圧潰強度試験方法」に準じて、被測定サンプル1個に対して、規定の加圧速度で圧縮荷重を掛けることにより、破壊させたときの荷重値を測定し、単位断面積当たりの荷重値(kg/cm2)を圧潰強度とした。 Therefore, for the pellets (coal-containing non-calcined agglomerate) of each production experiment obtained by secondary curing after the above curing conditions 1 to 3, crushing strength for each position of the mountain height in primary curing Was measured. Here, the pellets located in the lower layer (layer height ratio h / H = 0.2), middle layer (layer height ratio h / H = 0.5), and upper layer (layer height ratio h / H = 0.8) during primary curing 100 were randomly selected, and the crushing strength of these 100 samples (pellets) was measured to obtain an average value for each curing condition. The result is as shown in FIG. In addition, the ratio of the samples having a crushing strength of 50 kg / cm 2 or less was calculated from the 100 samples selected for each position of the mountain height. The result is as shown in FIG. In addition, the crushing strength is measured according to JIS M8718 “Iron ore pellet crushing strength test method”, when one sample to be measured is crushed by applying a compressive load at a specified pressing speed. The load value per unit cross-sectional area (kg / cm 2 ) was measured as the crush strength.

図5(a)に示されるように、水蒸気を使用しない養生条件1により一次養生した比較例1の場合に比べて、水蒸気を使用する養生条件2及び養生条件3で一次養生した比較例2及び本発明1の場合には、山の下層部、中層部、上層部にかけて、いずれもペレットの圧潰強度は高くなっていた。その際、養生条件1で一次養生した比較例1では、山の上層部に位置したペレットと下層部に位置したペレットとの強度差がおよそ75kg/cm(150-75=75kg/cm2)であり、同じく、養生条件2で一次養生した比較例2では100kg/cm(180-80=100kg/cm2)であるのに対して、養生条件3で一次養生した本発明1では、山の上層部に位置したペレットと下層部に位置したペレットとの強度差がおよそ60kg/cm(170-110=60kg/cm2)であり、比較例1及び2に比べて一次養生における山の品質差が緩和されていた。また、図5(b)によれば、特に山の下層部に位置したペレットが強度不足となる割合が著しく低減されており(比較例1では30%、比較例2では25%であるのに対して、本発明1では15%)、山全体として含炭非焼成塊成鉱としたときの均質化が図られることが分かった。なお、本発明1で最終的に得られたペレット(含炭非焼成塊成鉱)は、一次養生の際の山の下層部、中層部、及び上層部の各100個のサンプルを合計した全体で平均圧潰強度は130kg/cmであり、また、これら合計サンプルのうち圧潰強度が50kg/cm以下となるサンプルの割合は7.8%であった。 As shown in FIG. 5 (a), as compared with Comparative Example 1 in which primary curing was performed under Curing Condition 1 without using steam, Comparative Example 2 in which primary curing was performed under Curing Condition 2 using steam and Curing Condition 3 and In the case of the present invention 1, the crush strength of the pellet was high in all of the lower layer portion, the middle layer portion, and the upper layer portion of the mountain. At that time, in Comparative Example 1 in which primary curing was performed under curing condition 1, the strength difference between the pellets located in the upper layer and the pellets located in the lower layer was approximately 75 kg / cm 2 (150-75 = 75 kg / cm 2 ). Similarly, in Comparative Example 2 which was primary cured under curing condition 2, it was 100 kg / cm 2 (180-80 = 100 kg / cm 2 ), whereas in Invention 1 which was primary cured under curing condition 3, the upper layer of the mountain The difference in strength between the pellets located in the lower part and the pellets located in the lower layer is about 60 kg / cm 2 (170-110 = 60 kg / cm 2 ), and the quality difference of the mountain in the primary curing is higher than in Comparative Examples 1 and 2. Was relaxed. Further, according to FIG. 5 (b), the ratio of insufficient strength of the pellets located in the lower layer of the mountain is remarkably reduced (30% in Comparative Example 1 and 25% in Comparative Example 2). On the other hand, in the present invention 1, 15%), it was found that homogenization can be achieved when the whole mountain is a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore. In addition, the pellet finally obtained in the present invention 1 (non-calcined agglomerated ore) is a total of 100 samples of the lower layer, the middle layer and the upper layer of the mountain during the primary curing. The average crush strength was 130 kg / cm 2 , and the proportion of the samples having a crush strength of 50 kg / cm 2 or less was 7.8% of the total samples.

(製造実験II)
水蒸気の噴出を開始するタイミング(蒸気開始時積み付け層高比)、ペレット1トンあたりの水蒸気使用量(蒸気原単位)、水蒸気を噴出する時間(蒸気養生時間)、及びペレットの積み付け高さを表1に示したように変更して一次養生を行った以外は製造実験Iと同様にして、本発明2〜16に係る含炭非焼成塊成鉱を得た。そして、得られた各含炭非焼成塊成鉱について、全体での平均圧潰強度(平均成品圧潰強度)と、圧潰強度50g/cm以下の割合を製造実験Iと同様にして求めた。結果は表1に示したとおりであり、本発明1〜16は、いずれも比較例1や比較例2に比べて山全体での圧潰強度の均質化が図られていたが、一次養生の条件の最適化を図る意味から、以下のような考察ができる。
(Manufacturing experiment II)
Timing of starting steam ejection (ratio of stacking layer at steam start), amount of steam used per ton of pellets (steam basic unit), time to eject steam (steam curing time), and stacking height of pellets Was carried out in the same manner as in Production Experiment I except that the primary curing was carried out by changing as shown in Table 1 to obtain a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore according to the present invention 2 to 16. Then, with respect to each of the obtained coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ores, the average crush strength (average product crush strength) and the ratio of the crush strength of 50 g / cm 2 or less were obtained in the same manner as in Production Experiment I. The results are as shown in Table 1. In all of the present inventions 1 to 16, compared to Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2, the crush strength in the entire mountain was homogenized, but the condition of primary curing was used. The following considerations can be made in the sense of optimizing.

先ず、蒸気を噴射するタイミングについては、本発明1〜5で比較検討することができ、ペレットの積み付け高さhがペレットの山積み高さHに対して0.6のタイミング(層高比0.6)で蒸気を噴射した場合(本発明3)、得られた含炭非焼成塊成鉱の平均圧潰強度が最も高く、圧潰強度50g/cm以下が占める割合が一番少なかった。すなわち、蒸気の噴出タイミングが早くなると山の中層部、上層部の強度発現が不足する可能性があり、また、蒸気の噴出タイミングが遅くなると山の下層部の強度発現が不足する可能性が考えられる。 First, the timing of injecting steam can be compared and examined in the present inventions 1 to 5, and the timing at which the pellet stacking height h is 0.6 with respect to the pellet stacking height H (layer height ratio 0.6 )) (Invention 3), the obtained coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore had the highest average crush strength, and the crush strength of 50 g / cm 2 or less was the lowest. That is, if the steam ejection timing is early, strength development in the middle and upper layers of the mountain may be insufficient, and if the steam ejection timing is delayed, strength development in the lower layer of the mountain may be insufficient. To be

また、水蒸気使用量については、本発明1、6〜9で比較検討することができ、本発明1の場合が最も効果的であり、蒸気の量が少ないと全体的に強度発現が不足する可能性があり、反対に蒸気の量が多くなり過ぎるとペレットの膨潤を招いてかえって強度が低下することが考えられる。
更に、蒸気養生時間については、本発明1、10〜13で比較検討することができ、本発明1の場合が最も効果的である。ここで、水蒸気の使用量自体はどれも同じであることから(15t/t成品)、蒸気養生時間が短くなると単位時間当たりの蒸気量が過剰となり、水分過多によりペレットの膨潤を招くことが考えられる。一方で、蒸気養生時間が長くなり過ぎると、単位時間当たりの蒸気量が少なくなり、本発明による効果の発現が限定的になってしまうことが考えられる。
更にまた、ペレットを山積みする際の積み付け高さについては、本発明1、14〜16で比較検討することができ、本発明1の場合が最も効果的である。積み付け高さが低くなり過ぎると、本発明の効果が限られてしまうこともある。なお、積み付け高さが高くなり過ぎる場合には、前述したように積み付け荷重によりペレットが崩壊してしまうことも考えられる。
Further, the amount of steam used can be compared and examined in Inventions 1 and 6 to 9, and the case of Invention 1 is most effective. When the amount of steam is small, strength development as a whole may be insufficient. On the contrary, if the amount of steam becomes too large, the pellets may swell and the strength may be lowered.
Further, steam curing time can be compared and examined in Inventions 1 and 10 to 13, and Invention 1 is most effective. Since the amount of steam used is the same (15t / t product), it is thought that the amount of steam per unit time becomes excessive when the steam curing time is shortened, resulting in swelling of pellets due to excess water content. To be On the other hand, if the steam curing time becomes too long, the amount of steam per unit time will decrease, and the effect of the present invention may be limited.
Furthermore, the stacking height when stacking the pellets can be compared and examined in Inventions 1 and 14 to 16, and the case of Invention 1 is most effective. If the stacking height becomes too low, the effect of the present invention may be limited. If the loading height becomes too high, the pellets may collapse due to the loading load as described above.

Figure 0006680167
Figure 0006680167

以上のように、本発明によれば、非焼成型塊成化プロセスにおいて山積みしたペレット等の塊成物を一次養生したときに、積み付け高さ方向における強度のばらつきが縮小され、平均強度が向上する。そのため、含炭非焼成塊成鉱を安定した品質で得ることができるようになる。また、本発明によれば、炭素含有割合の高い含炭非焼成塊成鉱を品質のばらつきを抑えて安定的に供給することも可能になることから、高炉使用時の還元材比の低減を図る上で有利である。更には、一次養生における塊成物の強度指標の管理が緩和されたり、セメント等の水硬性バインダーの使用量を削減することも可能になり、含炭非焼成塊成鉱を簡便に、かつ低コストで得ることができるようになる。   As described above, according to the present invention, when primary curing of agglomerates such as piled pellets in the non-firing type agglomeration process, variation in strength in the stacking height direction is reduced, and the average strength is improves. Therefore, it becomes possible to obtain a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore with stable quality. Further, according to the present invention, since it becomes possible to stably supply a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore having a high carbon content while suppressing variations in quality, it is possible to reduce the reducing agent ratio when using a blast furnace. It is advantageous in trying. Furthermore, the management of the strength index of the agglomerates in the primary curing can be eased, and the amount of hydraulic binder such as cement used can be reduced, making it easy and low to use coal-containing non-calcined agglomerates. You will be able to get it at cost.

1:処理ピット、2:側壁、3:架台、4:給鉱台車(積付機)、5:ベルトコンベア、6:塊成物の山、7:ホイスト式クレーン、8:保温シート、9:蒸気噴出管、10:建屋。
1: Processing pit, 2: Side wall, 3: Stand, 4: Feeding cart (loading machine), 5: Belt conveyor, 6: Pile of agglomerates, 7: Hoist type crane, 8: Heat insulation sheet, 9: Steam ejection pipe, 10: Building.

Claims (6)

微粉状鉄含有原料、微粉状炭材、及び水硬性バインダーを含んだ配合原料を水分調整した後に成形した塊成物を、側壁で囲まれた処理ピット内に山積みし、保温シートで覆うと共に、処理ピットの床面から所定量の蒸気を噴射して加温しながら塊成物を一次養生する工程を含んだ高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法であって、処理ピットの上方から塊成物を投入して積み付けながら山積みする途中で、処理ピットの床面から蒸気を噴射して塊成物の加温を開始することを特徴とする高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。   Finely powdered iron-containing raw material, finely powdered carbonaceous material, and an agglomerate formed after adjusting the water content of the blended raw material containing a hydraulic binder, piled up in the processing pit surrounded by the side wall and covered with a heat insulating sheet, A method for producing a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for a blast furnace, which includes a step of primary curing an agglomerate while injecting a predetermined amount of steam from the floor surface of the treatment pit to heat it, and During the process of loading and stacking agglomerates, steam is injected from the floor surface of the processing pit to start heating of the agglomerates. Production method. 処理ピット内に山積みする塊成物の山積み高さHに対して、塊成物の積み付け高さhが50〜70%(0.5H≦h≦0.7H)のタイミングで処理ピットの床面から蒸気を噴射して塊成物の加温を開始する請求項1に記載の高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。   With respect to the pile height H of the agglomerates piled up in the processing pit, the agglomeration height h of the agglomerates is 50 to 70% (0.5H ≦ h ≦ 0.7H) from the floor of the processing pit. The method for producing a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace according to claim 1, wherein steam is injected to start heating of the agglomerate. 処理ピット内に山積みする塊成物の山積み高さHが3〜5mである請求項1又は2に記載の高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。   The method for producing a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace according to claim 1 or 2, wherein a pile height H of the agglomerates piled up in the processing pit is 3 to 5 m. 前記配合原料中の炭素含有割合(T.C)が15〜25質量%である請求項1〜3のいずれかに記載の高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。   The method for producing a carbonized non-calcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein a carbon content ratio (T.C) in the blended raw material is 15 to 25 mass%. 前記一次養生において蒸気を噴射して養生する時間が15〜30時間である請求項1〜4のいずれかに記載の高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。   The method for producing a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the steam is injected and cured in the primary curing for 15 to 30 hours. 前記一次養生における蒸気使用量が、塊成物1トンあたり13〜17トンである請求項1〜5のいずれかに記載の高炉用含炭非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。
The method for producing a coal-containing non-calcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace according to claim 1, wherein the amount of steam used in the primary curing is 13 to 17 tons per 1 ton of agglomerate.
JP2016186255A 2016-09-23 2016-09-23 Method for producing coal-free uncalcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace Active JP6680167B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016186255A JP6680167B2 (en) 2016-09-23 2016-09-23 Method for producing coal-free uncalcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016186255A JP6680167B2 (en) 2016-09-23 2016-09-23 Method for producing coal-free uncalcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2018048390A JP2018048390A (en) 2018-03-29
JP6680167B2 true JP6680167B2 (en) 2020-04-15

Family

ID=61767279

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2016186255A Active JP6680167B2 (en) 2016-09-23 2016-09-23 Method for producing coal-free uncalcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6680167B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7188126B2 (en) 2019-01-24 2022-12-13 日本製鉄株式会社 Method for manufacturing carbon-containing non-fired pellets for blast furnace
CN113136487B (en) * 2021-04-07 2021-12-31 内蒙古金辉稀矿股份有限公司 Preparation process of bentonite additive based on pellet production

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS56105432A (en) * 1980-01-28 1981-08-21 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Method and apparatus for producing cold-briquetted ore
JPS6047330B2 (en) * 1982-02-02 1985-10-21 日本鋼管株式会社 Method and apparatus for producing uncalcined agglomerate ore
JP2001348624A (en) * 2000-06-08 2001-12-18 Nippon Steel Corp Method for producing non-firing agglomerate
JP2009030116A (en) * 2007-07-27 2009-02-12 Jfe Steel Kk Method for producing ore raw material for blast furnace
JP5114742B2 (en) * 2007-12-28 2013-01-09 新日鐵住金株式会社 Method for producing carbon-containing unfired pellets for blast furnace
JP2013079433A (en) * 2011-10-05 2013-05-02 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp Apparatus and method for aging nonfired agglomerate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2018048390A (en) 2018-03-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2008214715A (en) Method for manufacturing nonfired agglomerated ore for iron manufacture
JP4627236B2 (en) Manufacturing method of carbonized material agglomerates
JP6056492B2 (en) Method for producing unfired carbon-containing agglomerated blast furnace
JP6680167B2 (en) Method for producing coal-free uncalcined agglomerated ore for blast furnace
JP5803540B2 (en) Method for producing unfired carbon-containing agglomerated mineral
TWI776268B (en) Iron ore powder agglomerate production method and agglomerate product
JP6228101B2 (en) Manufacturing method of carbon material interior ore
JP5512205B2 (en) Strength improvement method of raw material for agglomerated blast furnace
JPWO2010041770A1 (en) Blast furnace operation method using carbon-containing unfired pellets
JP3863052B2 (en) Blast furnace raw material charging method
AU2017388174B2 (en) Sintered ore manufacturing method
CA2719899C (en) Method of production of cement bonded agglomerated ore
JP5786668B2 (en) Method for producing unfired carbon-containing agglomerated mineral
JP2009030114A (en) Method for producing ore raw material for blast furnace
JP5454505B2 (en) Method for producing unfired carbon-containing agglomerated blast furnace
JP7252454B2 (en) Method for producing non-fired agglomerate ore for blast furnace
JP5729256B2 (en) Non-calcined hot metal dephosphorization method and hot metal dephosphorization method using non-fired hot metal dephosphorization material
JP2009030115A (en) Method for producing ore raw material for blast furnace
JP6992734B2 (en) Method for manufacturing charcoal interior particles and method for manufacturing charcoal interior sintered ore
JP5835144B2 (en) Method for producing unfired carbon-containing agglomerated blast furnace
JP6885386B2 (en) Manufacturing method of carbon material interior particles and manufacturing method of carbon material interior sintered ore
RU2781327C1 (en) Method for creating iron ore fines agglomerate and agglomerated product
JP6996485B2 (en) Method for manufacturing charcoal interior particles and method for manufacturing charcoal interior sintered ore
KR101676227B1 (en) The method for preparing molten iron by recycling by-product emitted from coal-based iron making process
KR102045597B1 (en) The method for recycling by-product emitted from coal-based iron making process and equipment for hot compacting iron

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20190415

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20200207

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20200218

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20200302

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 6680167

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151