JP6246081B2 - Simulator for driving training - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to an operation training simulator device that supports an operator's training so that the operator can accurately monitor and operate a plant such as a thermal power plant.

  As a conventional driving training simulator, a schedule table describing the contents of the curriculum to be trained, start conditions, end conditions, etc. is created in advance, and if the schedule table is selected during training, the simulator for driving training is automatically In particular, there is a technique that enables self-study by presenting a curriculum to a trainee (for example, Patent Document 1).

JP 59-68773 (pages 3-4, FIG. 2)

In conventional driving training simulators, driving training instructors (hereinafter referred to as instructors) set plant conditions, set external factors such as outside air temperature and seawater temperature, and simulate accidents according to the level of understanding and training objectives of the trainers. Manual operations such as generating malfunctions are being performed.
Therefore, when a trainee wants to perform training alone, there is a problem that it is necessary to extract setting items that match his / her purpose from various setting items and perform necessary settings.

  The present invention has been made to solve the above-described problems, and an object of the present invention is to obtain an operation training simulator device that reduces a burden when a trainer independently performs plant operation training.

  The simulator for operation training according to the present invention is an simulator for operation training configured to simulate the operation of the plant and allow the trainer to perform the operation training of the plant, and is operated by the trainer. A plurality of man-machine devices, initial values of the plant state, and external operation settings that are settings for executing an external operation for changing an external factor when the plant state satisfies a predetermined condition Training menu storage device for storing training menus of a plurality of training menus, simulators for changing plant states according to the operation of a trainer's man-machine device based on the initial values of the plant state of a selected training menu among a plurality of training menus When the plant state of the computer and this simulator computer is monitored and the plant state satisfies a predetermined condition , Insert the setting external operation simulator computer, those having a plant state monitoring apparatus for executing external operation.

  According to the present invention, an operation training simulator device configured to simulate plant operation and allow a trainer to perform plant operation training, which is a man-machine device operated by the trainer, plant state And an external operation setting, which is a setting for executing an external operation for changing an external factor when the plant state satisfies a predetermined condition, each stores a plurality of predefined training menus. A training menu storage device, a simulator computer that changes a plant state according to an operation of a man-machine device of a trainer based on an initial value of a plant state of a training menu selected from a plurality of training menus, and the simulator computer The plant status is monitored, and when the plant status meets a predetermined condition, the settings for external operation are calculated by the simulator. Insert, since with a plant state monitoring apparatus for executing external operation, even in the case of performing the operation training only trainee can automatically insert a external operation at the required scene.

It is a block diagram which shows the simulator for driving training by Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows operation | movement of the simulator device for driving training by Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a figure which shows external operation insertion of the simulator apparatus for driving training by Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the simulator device for driving training by Embodiment 2 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows operation | movement of the simulator apparatus for driving training by Embodiment 2 of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the simulator device for driving training by Embodiment 3 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows operation | movement of the simulator apparatus for driving training by Embodiment 3 of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the simulator for driving training by Embodiment 4 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows operation | movement of the simulator device for driving training by Embodiment 4 of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the simulator apparatus for driving training by Embodiment 5 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows operation | movement of the simulator device for driving training by Embodiment 5 of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the simulator for driving training by Embodiment 6 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows operation | movement of the simulator device for driving training by Embodiment 6 of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the simulator for driving training by Embodiment 7 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows operation | movement of the simulator device for driving training by Embodiment 7 of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the simulator for driving training by Embodiment 8 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows operation | movement of the simulator device for driving training by Embodiment 8 of this invention.

Embodiment 1 FIG.
Embodiment 1 of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram showing a driving training simulator apparatus according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
In FIG. 1, an operation training simulator device that simulates the operation of a thermal power plant is configured as follows.
The man-machine device 1 includes a display unit 11 and an input processing device 12, and is operated by a trainer during driving training. The simulator computer 2 is a computer for simulating a plant according to the operation of the man-machine device 1. The instructor console 3 has display means 31 and an input processing device 32, and is mainly operated by the instructor.
The initial value setting device 4 (training menu storage device) has an input processing device 46 and stores an initial value set by an operation by the instructor console 3. The training menu storage area 41 of the initial value setting device 4 stores a plurality of training menus created in advance, and for each training menu, a plant state initial value 42 indicating the initial state of the plant for operation training, And an external operation setting 43 for setting an external operation for changing an external factor performed by the instructor (for example, a change in outside air temperature, seawater temperature, or a decrease in atmospheric pressure assuming a low pressure invasion).
The plant state monitoring device 44 of the initial value setting device 4 monitors the variation of the plant state of the simulator computer 2 to determine whether or not the plant state has reached a preset external operation insertion condition 45, and if so, Issue external operation insertion command. The external operation insertion condition 45 indicates a prescribed plant state.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing external operation insertion of the simulator for driving training according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
In FIG. 3, the vertical axis represents the fuel flow rate, the horizontal axis represents time, and the external operation insertion timing by the external operation setting 43 is shown. FIG. 3 shows that an external operation has been inserted when the flow rate control valve is operated and the fuel flow rate reaches the fuel flow rate fluctuation target value Wa.

Next, the operation will be described.
In the present invention, items such as change of external factors, which are originally set by an external operation performed by the instructor, are included in the training menu, and the external operation by the instructor is not required at the time of the individual training of the trainer. .
This will be described below with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
First, the instructor sets a plurality of training menus in advance according to each skill level and training purpose of the trainee (Step 0).
The trainee operates the instructor console 3 to select one that matches the purpose of his / her training from among a plurality of training menus (Step 1). By this selection, the plant state initial value 42 is input from the initial value setting device 4 to the simulator computer 2, and plant operation training is started (Step 2).

After starting the training, the trainee performs an operation using the man-machine device 1 (Step 3). The plant state monitoring device 44 constantly monitors the plant state of the simulator computer 2, and the external operation insertion condition 45 (for example, the fuel flow rate fluctuation in FIG. 3) is a plant state that is a predetermined plant state set in advance by the instructor. When the target value Wa = 100 t / h) is reached (Step 4), the plant state monitoring device 44 issues an external operation insertion command, and the initial value setting device 4 assumes an external operation setting 43 (for example, low pressure invasion) Is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 5). With this insertion, the simulator computer 2 executes the set external operation, and the plant state changes as shown in FIG. An example of the insertion timing at this time is shown in FIG.
If the external operation insertion condition 45 has not been reached, the insertion is not performed (Step 5 ′).
After that, driving training is continued (Step 6).

  According to the first embodiment, conventionally, in the case of training by a trainee alone, it has been necessary for the trainer himself to perform an external operation during the training, but the external operation can be performed without the operation. it can.

Embodiment 2. FIG.
The second embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a driving training simulator apparatus according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
In FIG. 4, 1-4, 11, 12, 31, 32, 41-46 are the same as those in FIG. In FIG. 4, in the training menu storage area 41, an instrument failure / equipment failure setting 47 which is a setting for causing a failure of an instrument or an instrument in the operation panel simulation function is provided.

Next, the operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
In FIG. 5, the operations of Step 0 to Step 3 and Step 6 are the same as those in FIG.
The plant state monitoring device 44 always monitors the plant state of the simulator computer 2, and the plant state is the external operation insertion condition 45 (for example, fuel flow fluctuation target value Wa = 100 t / 100 in FIG. 3) set in advance by the instructor. h) is reached (Step 4), the plant state monitoring device 44 issues an external operation insertion command and an instrument failure / equipment failure insertion command, and the initial value setting device 4 causes the external operation setting 43 (for example, a low-pressure attack) Is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 5). With this insertion, the simulator computer 2 executes the set external operation, and the plant state changes. In parallel with Step 5, the instrument failure / equipment failure setting 47 is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 15). Due to this insertion, the simulator computer 2 causes a device failure or a meter failure as set.
If the external operation insertion condition 45 has not been reached, the insertion is not performed (Step 5 ′).

  In addition to the effect of the first embodiment, the effect of the second embodiment is obtained in a more realistic situation such as a failure of an instrumentation device (for example, a fuel flow meter display failure) that occurs in an actual operation panel. Training can be performed only by trainees.

Embodiment 3 FIG.
The third embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
6 is a block diagram showing a driving training simulator apparatus according to Embodiment 3 of the present invention.
In FIG. 6, 1-4, 11, 12, 31, 32, 41-46 are the same as those in FIG. In FIG. 6, the training menu storage area 41 is provided with a malfunction setting 48 which is a setting for causing a simulated accident such as a boiler accident.

Next, the operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
In FIG. 7, the operations of Step 0 to Step 3 and Step 6 are the same as those in FIG.
The plant state monitoring device 44 always monitors the plant state of the simulator computer 2, and the plant state is the external operation insertion condition 45 (for example, fuel flow fluctuation target value Wa = 100 t / 100 in FIG. 3) set in advance by the instructor. h) (Step 4), the plant state monitoring device 44 issues an external operation insertion command, and the initial value setting device 4 sets the external operation setting 43 (for example, a decrease in atmospheric pressure assuming a low pressure invasion). Insert into the simulator computer 2 (Step 5). With this insertion, the simulator computer 2 executes the set external operation, and the plant state changes.
In parallel with Step 5, the malfunction setting 48 is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 25). As a result of this insertion, the simulator computer 2 causes a simulated accident as set up and can cope with training.
If the external operation insertion condition 45 has not been reached, the insertion is not performed (Step 5 ′).

  According to the third embodiment, in addition to the effects of the first embodiment, the training for coping with the occurrence of a sudden accident can be performed only by the trainee.

Embodiment 4 FIG.
Embodiment 4 of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing a driving training simulator apparatus according to Embodiment 4 of the present invention.
In FIG. 8, 1-4, 11, 12, 31, 32, 41-47 are the same as in FIG. 4, and 48 is the same as in FIG. In FIG. 8, the training menu storage area 41 is provided with an instrument failure / equipment failure setting 47 that is a setting for causing a failure of an instrument or device, and a malfunction setting 48 that is a setting for causing a simulated accident. Yes.

Next, the operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
In FIG. 9, the operations of Step 0 to Step 3 and Step 6 are the same as those in FIG.
The plant state monitoring device 44 always monitors the plant state of the simulator computer 2, and the plant state is the external operation insertion condition 45 (for example, fuel flow fluctuation target value Wa = 100 t / 100 in FIG. 3) set in advance by the instructor. h) is reached (Step 4), the plant state monitoring device 44 issues an external operation insertion command and an instrument failure / equipment failure insertion command, and the initial value setting device 4 causes the external operation setting 43 (for example, a low-pressure attack) Is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 5). With this insertion, the simulator computer 2 executes the set external operation, and the plant state changes.

In parallel with Step 5, the instrument failure / equipment failure setting 47 is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 15). Due to this insertion, the simulator computer 2 causes a device failure or a meter failure as set. Further, in parallel with Step 5, the malfunction setting 48 is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 25). As a result of this insertion, the simulator computer 2 causes a simulated accident as set up and can cope with training.
If the external operation insertion condition 45 has not been reached, the insertion is not performed (Step 5 ′).

  According to the fourth embodiment, in addition to the effects of the first embodiment, in a situation that is more realistic, such as a failure of an instrumentation device (for example, display failure of a fuel flow meter) that occurs in an actual operation panel, Training for coping with the occurrence of a typical accident can be performed only by trainers.

Embodiment 5. FIG.
Embodiment 5 of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing a driving training simulator apparatus according to Embodiment 5 of the present invention.
10, 1-4, 11, 12, 31, 32, 41-46 are the same as those in FIG. In FIG. 10, the driving training simulator device is provided with a personal authentication device 5 that stores personal information such as the trainee's identification information and training history, and performs personal authentication of the trainer.

Next, the operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
In FIG. 11, the operations of Step 0 to Step 6 are the same as those in FIG. 2, and the description thereof is omitted. In FIG. 11, a training person authentication process by the personal authentication device 5 is inserted before Step 1.
After Step 0, the trainee authenticates himself / herself with the personal authentication device 5 (Step 51). Based on the authenticated personal information, the personal authentication device 5 extracts items that match the objectives of the trainer and the instructor from a plurality of training menus, and issues a selection command to the instructor console 3 (Step 52). If there is no match, the trainee selects from the training menu pre-registered by himself / herself (Step 1). The subsequent operations are the same as the operations after Step 2 in FIG.

  According to the fifth embodiment, in addition to the effects of the first embodiment, even when the instructor itself is absent, the trainer can perform arbitrary training.

Embodiment 6 FIG.
Embodiment 6 of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 12 is a block diagram showing a driving training simulator apparatus according to Embodiment 6 of the present invention.
In FIG. 12, in FIG. 10, 1-5, 11, 12, 31, 32, 41-46 are the same as those in FIG. In FIG. 12, an instrument failure / equipment failure setting 47, which is a setting for causing a failure of an instrument or an instrument, is provided in the training menu storage area 41.

Next, the operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
In FIG. 13, operations of Step 0 to Step 3, Step 6, Step 51, and Step 52 are the same as those in FIG. 11, and description thereof is omitted.
The plant state monitoring device 44 always monitors the plant state of the simulator computer 2, and the plant state is the external operation insertion condition 45 (for example, fuel flow fluctuation target value Wa = 100 t / 100 in FIG. 3) set in advance by the instructor. h) is reached (Step 4), the plant state monitoring device 44 issues an external operation insertion command and an instrument failure / equipment failure insertion command, and the initial value setting device 4 causes the external operation setting 43 (for example, a low-pressure attack) Is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 5). With this insertion, the simulator computer 2 executes the set external operation, and the plant state changes.
In parallel with Step 5, the instrument failure / equipment failure setting 47 is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 15). Due to this insertion, the simulator computer 2 causes a device failure or a meter failure as set.
If the external operation insertion condition 45 has not been reached, the insertion is not performed (Step 5 ′).

  According to the sixth embodiment, in addition to the effects of the second embodiment, even when the instructor itself is absent, the trainer can perform arbitrary training.

Embodiment 7 FIG.
Embodiment 7 of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 14 is a block diagram showing a driving training simulator apparatus according to Embodiment 7 of the present invention.
In FIG. 14, 1 to 5, 11, 12, 31, 32, 41 to 46 are the same as those in FIG. In FIG. 14, a malfunction setting 48 that is a setting for causing a simulated accident is provided in the training menu storage area 41.

Next, the operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
In FIG. 15, operations of Step 0 to Step 3, Step 6, Step 51, and Step 52 are the same as those in FIG. 11, and description thereof is omitted.
The plant state monitoring device 44 always monitors the plant state of the simulator computer 2, and the plant state is the external operation insertion condition 45 (for example, fuel flow fluctuation target value Wa = 100 t / 100 in FIG. 3) set in advance by the instructor. h) (Step 4), the plant state monitoring device 44 issues an external operation insertion command, and the initial value setting device 4 sets the external operation setting 43 (for example, a decrease in atmospheric pressure assuming a low pressure invasion). Insert into the simulator computer 2 (Step 5). With this insertion, the simulator computer 2 executes the set external operation, and the plant state changes.
In parallel with Step 5, the malfunction setting 48 is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 25). As a result of this insertion, the simulator computer 2 causes a simulated accident as set up and can cope with training.
If the external operation insertion condition 45 has not been reached, the insertion is not performed (Step 5 ′).

  According to the seventh embodiment, in addition to the effects of the third embodiment, it is possible to allow the trainer to perform arbitrary training even when the instructor is absent.

Embodiment 8 FIG.
Embodiment 8 of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 16 is a block diagram showing a driving training simulator apparatus according to Embodiment 8 of the present invention.
In FIG. 16, 1 to 5, 11, 12, 31, 32, 41 to 47 are the same as those in FIG. 12, and 48 is the same as that in FIG. In FIG. 16, the training menu storage area 41 is provided with an instrument failure / equipment failure setting 47 that is a setting for causing a failure of an instrument or device, and a malfunction setting 48 that is a setting for causing a simulated accident. Yes.

Next, the operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
In FIG. 17, operations of Step 0 to Step 3, Step 6, Step 51, and Step 52 are the same as those in FIG.
The plant state monitoring device 44 always monitors the plant state of the simulator computer 2, and the plant state is the external operation insertion condition 45 (for example, fuel flow fluctuation target value Wa = 100 t / 100 in FIG. 3) set in advance by the instructor. h) is reached (Step 4), the plant state monitoring device 44 issues an external operation insertion command and an instrument failure / equipment failure insertion command, and the initial value setting device 4 causes the external operation setting 43 (for example, a low-pressure attack) Is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 5). With this insertion, the simulator computer 2 executes the set external operation, and the plant state changes.

In parallel with Step 5, the instrument failure / equipment failure setting 47 is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 15). Due to this insertion, the simulator computer 2 causes a device failure or a meter failure as set. Further, in parallel with Step 5, the malfunction setting 48 is inserted into the simulator computer 2 (Step 25). As a result of this insertion, the simulator computer 2 causes a simulated accident as set up and can cope with training.
If the external operation insertion condition 45 has not been reached, the insertion is not performed (Step 5 ′).

  According to the eighth embodiment, in addition to the effect of the fourth embodiment, even when the instructor itself is absent, the trainer can perform arbitrary training.

  It should be noted that the present invention can be freely combined with each other within the scope of the invention, and each embodiment can be appropriately modified or omitted.

1 Man-machine device, 2 simulator computer, 3 instructor console,
4 initial value setting device, 5 personal authentication device, 11 display means, 12 input processing device,
31 display means, 32 input processing device, 41 training menu storage area,
42 plant state initial value, 43 setting for external operation, 44 plant state monitoring device,
45 External operation insertion conditions, 46 Input processing device, 47 Instrument failure / equipment failure setting,
48 Multifunction setting.

Claims (5)

An operation training simulator device configured to simulate the operation of the plant and allow a trainer to perform the operation training of the plant,
A man-machine device operated by the trainee,
A plurality of training menus in which an initial value of the plant state and a setting for external operation that is a setting for executing an external operation for changing an external factor when the plant state satisfies a predetermined condition are respectively defined in advance Training menu storage device,
A simulator computer that changes the plant state according to the operation of the man-machine device of the trainer based on the initial value of the plant state of the selected training menu among the plurality of training menus;
And a plant state monitoring device for monitoring the plant state of the simulator computer and inserting the external operation setting into the simulator computer and executing the external operation when the plant state satisfies a predetermined condition. A driving training simulator device characterized by that.   The training menu stored in the training menu storage device defines an instrument failure / equipment failure setting which is a setting for causing a failure of an instrument or device constituting the plant. Item 1. The simulator for driving training according to Item 1.   The malfunction setting, which is a setting for generating a simulated accident in the plant, is defined in the training menu stored in the training menu storage device. Simulator for driving training.   The driving training simulator device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, further comprising a personal authentication device that performs personal authentication of the trainee.   The driving training according to claim 4, wherein the personal authentication device has a training history of the trainer and automatically selects a training menu according to the training history of the trainee who has been personally authenticated. Simulator device.

Images