JP5937243B1 - Time synchronization method and time synchronization apparatus - Google Patents

Abstract

Conventionally, in a BMCA algorithm for judging the superiority or inferiority of a plurality of time information generated by a plurality of master devices based on the time quality information, the quality deterioration of the time information in the packet network has not been considered. In a time synchronization method for synchronizing a time of a slave device by transmitting and receiving a time synchronization packet including time information to and from a plurality of master devices having a reference time, the slave device includes a plurality of slave devices based on the time information of the time synchronization packet. Store the offset calculated for each master device, measure the evaluation value indicating the time quality status for each master device from the stored offset, compare the evaluation values for each master device and evaluate the evaluation value Is switched to the time information of the master device having the higher time quality state. [Selection] Figure 6

Description

  The present invention relates to a technique for realizing time synchronization between a plurality of devices.

  Time synchronization between devices is important for performing coordinated operations between multiple devices connected via a network, such as a mobile phone base station, and the time between devices can be obtained by transmitting and receiving time information via the network. A technique for realizing synchronization is used. For example, a master device that supplies a standard time generates a time synchronization packet (PTP (Precision Time Protocol) packet) with a time stamp and transmits the packet to a slave device. By terminating the received time synchronization packet and holding it as the time in the device, time synchronization via the packet network is realized (for example, see Non-Patent Document 1). However, while the slave device does not receive the time synchronization packet, the slave device itself counts up the time in the device with the free-running clock held by the slave device itself, so the time count-up speed differs between the master device and the slave device. There is a problem that the accuracy of the system deteriorates.

  Therefore, the slave device accumulates time information every time a time synchronization packet is received, and monitors the quality of time accuracy by comparing the accumulated past time information with the time information of the received time synchronization packet. (For example, refer to Patent Document 1).

  In addition, when the slave device receives time information supplied from a plurality of master devices through a plurality of time paths to achieve time synchronization, the slave device receives a plurality of time information from a plurality of master devices, The most appropriate time information is selected from the pieces of time information, and the time of the slave device itself is synchronized. BMCA (Best Master Clock Algorithm) has been disclosed as an algorithm for selecting the most appropriate time information from a plurality of time information (see, for example, Non-Patent Document 2).

IEEE 1588-2008 ITU-T G. 8285.1

Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-170095

  However, BMCA is an algorithm for determining the superiority or inferiority of a plurality of time information generated by a plurality of master devices based on the time quality information, and the quality deterioration of the time information in the transmission path (packet network) from the master device to the slave device. There is a problem that is not considered.

  The present invention relates to a time synchronization method capable of performing highly accurate time synchronization by performing determination in consideration of quality degradation of time information in an algorithm for determining superiority or inferiority of a plurality of time information generated by a plurality of master devices. And it aims at providing a time synchronizer.

The first invention is a time synchronization method of time synchronization packets and quality message includes a plurality of master devices and the time information with a reference time to communicate synchronize the time of the slave device, the slave device, the time synchronization packet Stores the offset calculated for each master device based on the time information, measures the evaluation value indicating the time quality status for each master device from the stored offset, and receives the quality from each master device After performing the time accuracy comparison process and the phase fluctuation comparison process in the BMCA algorithm using the message, the evaluation value comparison process is executed, and the master having the higher time quality state indicated by the evaluation value It is characterized by switching to the time information of the device.

The second invention is a slave device integrates preset time offset shall be the evaluation value difference between the maximum integrated value and the minimum integrated value by comparing the accumulated value of each for calculating an offset It is characterized by that.

The third aspect of the present invention, in a time synchronizer to synchronize the time the time synchronization packet and the quality message and communication including a plurality of master devices and the time information with the reference time, for each of the plurality of master devices located A plurality of time synchronization processing units for obtaining an offset from the master device by transmitting and receiving a time synchronization packet including time information to and from each master device, and a plurality of offsets obtained by each time synchronization processing unit. And a storage monitoring unit that measures an evaluation value indicating a state of time quality for each of a plurality of master devices from the stored offset, and a BMCA algorithm using a quality message received from each master device after performing comparison processing of the comparison processing and the phase fluctuation of time accuracy in, before storage monitoring portion outputs It performs a process of comparing the evaluation value, and having a time selector for selecting the time synchronization processing unit corresponding to the master device with the higher state at the time the quality indicated by the evaluation value.

According to a fourth aspect of the invention, the accumulation monitoring unit integrates the offset for a preset time, compares the integrated values every time the offset is calculated, and uses the difference between the maximum integrated value and the minimum integrated value as an evaluation value. characterized that you output to the selection unit.

  A time synchronization method and a time synchronization device according to the present invention provide a highly accurate time by performing determination in consideration of quality deterioration of time information in an algorithm for determining superiority or inferiority of a plurality of time information generated by a plurality of master devices. Synchronization can be performed.

It is a figure which shows an example of the time synchronous network in this embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of BMCA in the apparatus Co. It is a figure which shows an example of the conventional data set comparison algorithm. It is a figure which shows the process example of a data set comparison algorithm. It is a figure which shows the process example of the data set comparison algorithm of the time synchronizer in this embodiment. It is a block diagram which shows an example of the time synchronizer in this embodiment.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of a time synchronization method and a time synchronization apparatus according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 shows an example of a time synchronization network in the present embodiment. The time synchronization network shown in FIG. 1 includes two master devices 101 (0) and 101 (1), and one slave device 102. The slave device 102 is connected to the slave unit 112 (0) connected to the master device 101 (0) via the transmission path 103 (0) and to the master device 101 (1) via the transmission path 103 (1). Slave unit 112 (1). In the present embodiment, the slave device 102 has two systems of blocks, that is, the slave unit 112 (0) and the slave unit 112 (1), but may have two or more systems.

  Here, in the following description, when a matter common to the Master device 101 (0) and the Master device 101 (1) is described, (number) at the end of the code is omitted and expressed as the Master device 101. Further, when referring to a specific master device 101, (number) is added and expressed as, for example, the master device 101 (0). The slave unit 112 (0), the slave unit 112 (1), the transmission path 103 (0), the transmission path 103 (1), and the like are similarly described.

  The Master device 101 and the Slave device 102 have a time synchronization function that complies with the IEEE 1588-2008 standard. Then, the slave unit 112 (0) of the slave device 102 does not synchronize with the time acquired from the master device 101 (0) connected via the transmission path 103 (0) or the time of the external device. It operates based on the time when the clock inside the unit 112 (0) is generated in the free-running state. Similarly, the slave unit 112 (1) operates based on the time acquired from the master device 101 (1) connected via the transmission path 103 (1). Alternatively, the Slave unit 112 (1) operates based on the time when the clock inside the Slave unit 112 (1) is generated in a free-running state without being synchronized with the time of the external device. In addition, although the method of acquiring time from a global navigation satellite system (GNSS: Global Navigation Satellite System) and performing time synchronization is also considered, the Slave apparatus 102 which concerns on this embodiment transmits / receives between the Master apparatuses 101. Time information is acquired from the time synchronization packet and time synchronization is performed. Then, the slave device 102 itself uses the BMCA data set comparison algorithm to select the most appropriate time information from the two time information received from the master device 101 (0) and the master device 101 (1). Synchronize the time. Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the slave device 102 can realize highly accurate time synchronization by providing a determination process in consideration of quality degradation of time information in the BMCA data set comparison algorithm.

  Here, the BMCA is composed of the following two calculation processes as described in the IEEE 1588-2008 standard. The first process is a data set comparison process that determines the best port with the highest time quality among the plurality of ports that receive the time information, and the second process is a recommended state for calculating a recommended state in the state state machine. It is a calculation process.

  FIG. 2 shows an example of BMCA in a device Co of GM (Grand Master) or BC (Boundary Clock) defined in the IEEE 1588-2008 standard. The device Co has N ports (N is an integer of 2 or more) (N = 2 in the example of FIG. 2). In FIG. 2, the device Co includes a REC (0) unit 251, a REC (1) unit 252, a BMCA processing unit 203, and a DIS unit 253. The REC (0) unit 251 and the REC (1) unit 252 have a reception port and receive an announce message from the grand master (GM) side having a reference time. The Announce message is a quality message defined by the IEEE 1588-2008 standard as well as the time synchronization packet, and includes information on the clock source and quality. The BMCA processing unit 203 executes an algorithm for selecting the most appropriate time information from a plurality of time information. The DIS unit 253 distributes the most appropriate time information determined by the data set comparison algorithm.

  The BMCA processing unit 203 includes an Erbest (0) unit 254, an Erbest (1) unit 255, an Ebest unit 256, and a Do unit 257. Here, the Do unit 257 has a default data set Do.

In FIG. 2, the device Co executes the following processing.
(a) The device Co is respectively connected from the transmission line of the system 201 connected to the port “r” of the REC (0) unit 251 and the transmission line of the system 202 connected to the port “r” of the REC (1) unit 252. Receive announce message.
(b) The Erbest (0) unit 254 and Erbest (1) unit 255 unit of the BMCA processing unit 203 perform a data set comparison algorithm for each port “r” of the REC (0) unit 251 and the REC (1) unit 252. Is used to determine the best message Erbest. The data set comparison algorithm is a “data set comparison algorithm” described in Non-Patent Document 1, and uses predetermined information (data set) such as a clock source, quality, and priority obtained from an Announce message or the like. This is a process for determining the best message by comparison.
(c) The Ebest unit 256 includes a set of N ports (all best messages Erbest determined by the N Erbest units (Erbest (0) unit 254 and Erbest (1) unit 255 in the example of FIG. 2)). A data set comparison algorithm is performed on the set). Then, the Ebest unit 256 determines the best message Ebest from among all N messages (all best messages Erbest respectively determined by the Erbest (0) unit 254 and the Erbest (1) unit 255).

  The BMCA processing unit 203 uses the messages Ebest, Erbest, and Do to determine the event to be applied to the state machine (state machine) of each of the N ports “r”. Run the algorithm. The state determination algorithm is “State decision algorithm” described in Non-Patent Document 1.

  In this way, the device Co can be synchronized with the time of the best time quality by executing BMCA.

  Here, for example, in the case of FIG. 1, the BMCA defined by the IEEE 1588-2008 standard is an algorithm for determining superiority or inferiority of time information generated by the Master device 101 (0) and the Master device 101 (1) based on time quality information. However, there is a problem that quality degradation of time information is not taken into consideration. Then, when the quality of the time information determined to be the best deteriorates, the slave device 102 continues to synchronize with the time information with the deteriorated quality, so that there is a problem that the accuracy of time synchronization is deteriorated. Therefore, in the present embodiment, in the algorithm (BMCA) for determining the superiority or inferiority of a plurality of time information generated by a plurality of master devices, the time determined to be the best by incorporating the determination considering the quality deterioration of the time information. Even when the quality of information deteriorates, it is possible to always synchronize with the best quality time information.

FIG. 3 shows an example of a conventional data set comparison algorithm that does not consider the quality degradation of time information. Here, the data sets to be compared in FIG. 3 have the following information, and are information obtained from the Announce message, the state of the device Co, and the like.
(1) GM clockClass Grandmaster (GM) traceability
(2) GM clockAccuracy GM time accuracy
(3) GM offsetScaledLogVariance GM phase fluctuation
(4) GM priority2 GM priority
(5) localPriority Receive port priority
(6) GM clockIdentity GM identification code
(7) Steps Removed Number of steps connected from GM
(8) portIdentity of Sender upstream port identification number
(9) port Number of Receiver Port number on the receiving side Hereinafter, the flowchart shown in FIG. 3 will be described. Note that the data set comparison algorithm in FIG. 3 shows processing for comparing two arbitrary data sets among Ebest, Erbest, and Do. In FIG. 3, the two data sets are a data set A and a data set B.

  In step S101, the device Co traces the ground master (GM) of the data set A (traceability to standard time: equivalent to an index indicating time reliability) and the traceability of the grand master (GM) of the data set B. And compare. Here, it is assumed that the smaller the values of the data sets A and B, the higher the traceability (reliability) of the GM. If the comparison result is A> B, the process proceeds to step S108. If the comparison result is A <B, the process proceeds to step S109. If the comparison result is A = B, the process proceeds to step S102.

  In step S102, the device Co compares the time accuracy of the GM of the data set A with the time accuracy of the GM of the data set B. Here, it is assumed that the smaller the values of the data sets A and B, the higher the accuracy. If the comparison result is A> B, the process proceeds to step S108. If the comparison result is A <B, the process proceeds to step S109. If the comparison result is A = B, the process proceeds to step S103.

  In step S103, the device Co compares the GM phase fluctuation of the data set A with the GM phase fluctuation of the data set B. Here, it is assumed that the smaller the values of the data sets A and B, the smaller the phase fluctuation. If the comparison result is A> B, the process proceeds to step S108. If the comparison result is A <B, the process proceeds to step S109. If the comparison result is A = B, the process proceeds to step S104.

  In step S104, the device Co compares the GM priority of the data set A with the GM priority of the data set B. Here, it is assumed that the smaller the values of the data sets A and B, the higher the priority. If the comparison result is A> B, the process proceeds to step S108. If the comparison result is A <B, the process proceeds to step S109. If the comparison result is A = B, the process proceeds to step S105.

  In step S105, the device Co compares the priority of the reception port of the data set A with the priority of the reception port of the data set B. Here, it is assumed that the smaller the values of the data sets A and B, the higher the priority. If the comparison result is A> B, the process proceeds to step S108. If the comparison result is A <B, the process proceeds to step S109. If the comparison result is A = B, the process proceeds to step S106.

  In step S106, the device Co determines whether or not the GM traceability of the data set A is equal to or less than a threshold value (for example, 127 or less). If the determination result is Yes, the process proceeds to step S110 in FIG. 4, and if the determination result is No, the process proceeds to step S107.

  In step S107, the device Co compares the GM identification code of the data set A with the GM identification code of the data set B. Here, the smaller identification code is selected with priority. If the comparison result is A> B, the process proceeds to step S108. If the comparison result is A <B, the process proceeds to step S109. If the comparison result is A = B, the process proceeds to step S110 in FIG.

  In step S108, the device Co determines the data set B having a better quality than the data set A.

  In step S109, the device Co determines the data set A having a better quality than the data set B.

  FIG. 4 shows a processing example subsequent to the data set comparison algorithm shown in FIG. Note that the flowchart shown in FIG. 4 is the same processing as that of the time synchronization apparatus according to the present embodiment.

  In step S110, the device Co compares the number of connection stages from the GM. When the comparison result is that the number of connection stages of A is within one of the number of connection stages of B, the process proceeds to step S111, and when the comparison result is A> B + 1 (the number of connection stages of A is the number of stages obtained by adding one stage to the number of connection stages of B) When the comparison result is A + 1 <B (when the number of connection stages of B is greater than the number of stages obtained by adding one stage to the number of connection stages of A), the process proceeds to step S117.

  In step S111, the device Co compares the number of connection stages from the GM. When the comparison result is A = B (when the number of connection stages from the GM is equal), the process proceeds to step S112. When the comparison result is A> B (when the number of connection stages of A is larger), the process proceeds to step S114. When the result is A <B (when the number of connection stages of B is larger), the process proceeds to step S115.

  Here, in the processing from step S112 to step S115 below, when the superiority or inferiority of the time quality of the data set A or the data set B cannot be compared in the upper processing, one of the data sets is mechanically determined. And is not a process for comparing the quality of time information. Specifically, the device Co includes the port identification number upstream of the data set A, the port identification number upstream of the data set B, the port number on the receiving side of the data set A, and the port identification number on the receiving side of the data set B. The size is determined by the combination of the four parameters, and the data set A or data set B is determined.

  In step S112, the device Co compares the upstream port identification number of the data set A with the upstream port identification number of the data set B. If the comparison result is A = B, the process proceeds to step S113. If the comparison result is A> B, the process proceeds to step S118. If the comparison result is A <B, the process proceeds to step S119.

  In step S113, the device Co compares the port number on the receiving side of the data set A with the port number on the receiving side of the data set B. If the comparison result is A = B, the process is terminated. If the comparison result is A> B, the process proceeds to step S118. If the comparison result is A <B, the process proceeds to step S119.

  In step S114, the device Co compares the port number on the receiving side of the data set A with the port identification number upstream of the data set A. If the comparison result is the reception side = upstream side, the process ends. If the reception side <upstream side, the process proceeds to step S116. If the reception side> upstream side, the process proceeds to step S118.

  In step S115, the device Co compares the port number on the receiving side of the data set B with the upstream port identification number of the data set B. If the comparison result is the reception side = upstream side, the process ends. If the reception side <upstream side, the process proceeds to step S117. If the reception side> upstream side, the process proceeds to step S119.

  In step S116, the device Co determines the data set B having better time information quality than the data set A.

  In step S117, the device Co determines the data set A with better quality of time information than the data set B.

  In step S118, the device Co determines the data set B having a better topology (network connection form) than the data set A.

  In step S119, the device Co determines the data set A having a better topology than the data set B.

  As described above, in the conventional BMCA, the better data set comparison result is in the recommended state, and the recommended time information of the system is selected.

  The BMCA defined in the IEEE 1588-2008 standard described with reference to FIG. 3 is an algorithm for determining the best quality time information, but does not take into account the quality deterioration of the time information. On the other hand, in the present embodiment, in the conventional BMCA, by incorporating the determination considering the change in the quality state of the time information, even when the quality of the time information determined to be the best is always the best Can be synchronized with quality time information.

  FIG. 5 shows a processing example of the data set comparison algorithm of the time synchronizer 301 in this embodiment. Unlike the data set comparison algorithm of the comparative example described in FIG. 3, the data set comparison algorithm of the time synchronization apparatus 301 in the present embodiment incorporates a determination process that takes into account changes in the quality state of time information. Thereby, the time synchronizer 301 can switch to the time information of the best quality even when the quality of the time information deteriorates. In FIG. 5, the processes with the same reference numerals as in the conventional example described in FIG. 3 (steps S101 to S103, steps S104 to S109) are the same or similar to those in FIG. Further, the flowchart described in FIG. 4 following the flowchart in FIG. 5 is the same in this embodiment.

  5 differs from FIG. 3 in that the process of step S201 is executed between step S103 and step S104.

In step S201, the time synchronizer 301 in this embodiment measures the quality state of time information. The quality state of the time information can be measured, for example, by accumulating an offset calculated based on a time synchronization packet transmitted / received to / from an upstream device and obtaining an offset fluctuation amount as a TIE (Time Interval Error). Further, an arithmetic processing predetermined for TIE, for example, an average value MTIE (Mean TIE) is calculated and used as an evaluation value of the quality state of the time information. Then, the MTIE of data set A is compared with the MTIE of data set B. Here, although details of MTIE will be described later, the quality state decreases as the value of MTIE increases, and conversely, the quality state increases as the value of MTIE decreases. If the comparison result is A> B, the process proceeds to step S108. If the comparison result is A <B, the process proceeds to step S109. If the comparison result is A = B, the process proceeds to step S104.

  Here, the reason why the process of step S201 is performed between step S103 and step S104 will be described. As a first reason, the deterioration in clockQuality such as the time accuracy in step S102 and the phase fluctuation in step S103 includes a state in which time synchronization is not normally performed in the upstream device, and thus depends on the time quality in step S201. It is necessary to prioritize switching with clockQuality over switching. As a second reason, rather than intentional prioritization on the system side such as the priority (priority 2) of the GM in step S104 and the priority (localPriority) of the reception port in step S105, the time is supplied to the time supply destination. Therefore, it is necessary to perform switching based on the time quality in step S201 with priority over steps S104 and S105.

  Next, the process for measuring the quality state of the time information in step S201 will be described in detail. In the present embodiment, TIE is used as a method for measuring the quality state of time information, but the quality state of time information may be measured by other methods.

  Hereinafter, a method of using MTIE (Mean TIE) as the quality state of time information will be described. For example, the time synchronizer 301 on the slave side accumulates past time information (offset calculation result) that is calculated every time a time synchronization packet is received from the master side, and monitors the amount of fluctuation to thereby determine the quality state of time accuracy. Can be monitored.

Here, the time error TIE will be described as the time TIE per unit time. For example, the time synchronization apparatus 301 integrates the offset value per unit time per unit time t seconds (assuming t = 1), and sets the value as Offset (i). Here, i is an integer of 1 or more. In this case, the time TIE (i) of the unit time can be expressed by (Formula 1).
Time TIE (i) = Time TIE (i-1) + Offset (i) (Equation 1)
Then, the time synchronization apparatus 301 according to the present embodiment extracts the maximum time TIE_MAX and the minimum time TIE_MIN from the time TIE for the past T seconds (for example, T = 100 seconds), and calculates the time MTIE100 (Formula 2). Calculate from The time MTIE 100 is an evaluation value of the quality state of the time information.
Time MTIE100 = Time TIE_MAX-Time TIE_MIN (Formula 2)
Here, the time synchronization apparatus 301 according to the present embodiment presets a threshold for detecting the quality state of the time information. Then, the time synchronization apparatus 301 compares whether the time MTIE100 calculated by (Equation 2) is equal to or greater than the threshold or less than the threshold, and if the time MTIE value is equal to or greater than the threshold or less than the threshold, the time quality abnormality state Is detected. Here, the time synchronization device 301 detects the abnormality of the time MTIE at the time of comparison, and the result corresponds to the timeMTIEstate value in step S201. For example, in the software processing of BMCA, when the time quality is managed as binary values of normal state and abnormal state, the detection result of the time MTIE value at the time of comparison is defined as a bool type variable, and {OK, NG} can correspond to numerical values {0, 1}, respectively. Also, if the time quality abnormal state is divided into two stages, Degrade (degradation) and Fatal (fatal deterioration) (when the time quality deterioration degree is Degrade <Fatal), the time of comparison in the BMCA software processing The detection result of the MTIE value can be defined as an enum type variable and set as {OK, Degrade, Fatal}, which can correspond to the numerical values {0, 1, 2}, respectively. Alternatively, the time MTIE value itself may be determined by BMCA software.

  In this way, the time synchronization apparatus 301 according to the present embodiment can execute the process of step S201 in FIG. In FIG. 5, the time synchronization apparatus 301 obtains a comparison result in each comparison process of GM traceability (clockClass), GM time accuracy (clockAccuracy), and GM phase fluctuation (offsetScaledLogVarience) from step S101 to step S103. When all A = B, the quality states of the data sets A and B are compared in step S201, and the one with the better quality is set as the selection system. As a result, the time synchronization apparatus 301 according to the present embodiment discriminates deterioration of the quality state of the time information even when the comparison results between the data set A and the data set B are all the same in steps S101 to S103. The time information with less deterioration can be selected.

  FIG. 6 shows an example of the time synchronization apparatus 301 in the present embodiment described in FIG. 6, the time synchronization apparatus 301 includes a PTP processing unit 302 (0), a PTP processing unit 302 (1), a time selection unit 303, a distribution time oscillation unit 304, a PTP processing unit 305 (0), and a PTP processing unit 305 ( 1) and an accumulation monitoring unit 306. Here, the accumulation monitoring unit 306 may be divided into a time information accumulation unit that accumulates time information and a time accuracy monitoring unit that monitors the accuracy of time information. In addition, in the example of FIG. 6, a case where two systems of routes are provided in the upstream device and the downstream device will be described, but two or more routes may be provided.

  The PTP processing unit 302 (0) calculates a time lag (offset) with the upstream device (the master device 101 (0) in the example of FIG. 1) based on the IEEE 1588-2008 standard. The PTP processing unit 302 (0) includes a packet transmission / reception processing unit 351 (0), a time stamp processing unit 352 (0), and an offset calculation processing unit 353 (0). The packet transmission / reception processing unit 351 (0) transmits / receives a time synchronization packet to / from the upstream device. The time stamp processing unit 352 (0) adds or acquires time information (time stamp) when transmitting / receiving the time synchronization packet. The offset calculation processing unit 353 (0) calculates an offset with respect to the upstream side device based on the time stamp information of the time synchronization packet.

  Similar to the PTP processing unit 302 (0), the PTP processing unit 302 (1) is based on the time synchronization packet transmitted / received to / from the upstream device (Master device 101 (1) in the example of FIG. 1). Calculate the offset with the device. The PTP processing unit 302 (1) includes a packet transmission / reception processing unit 351 (1), a time stamp processing unit 352 (1), and an offset calculation processing unit 353 (1). The packet transmission / reception processing unit 351 (1), the time stamp processing unit 352 (1), and the offset calculation processing unit 353 (1) are the packet transmission / reception processing unit 351 (0), the time stamp processing unit 352 (0), and the offset calculation processing unit. It operates similarly to 353 (0).

  The time selection unit 303 executes the BMCA process described with reference to FIG. 5 based on information of an announce message that is a type of time synchronization packet. Further, the time selection unit 303 determines a time path selection system by switching control from an accumulation monitoring unit 306 described later. For example, when the accumulation monitoring unit 306 controls to switch to the 0-system time path, the time selection unit 303 switches to the PTP processing unit 302 (0) side, and the 0-system adjusted by the PTP processing unit 302 (0) is offset. The time of the upstream device (Master device 101 (0) in the example of FIG. 1) connected to the time path is selected. On the other hand, when the accumulation monitoring unit 306 controls to switch to the 1-system time path, the time selection unit 303 switches to the PTP processing unit 302 (1) side, and the PTP processing unit 302 (1) adjusts the offset. The time of the upstream device (Master device 101 (1) in the example of FIG. 1) connected to the 1-system time path is selected.

  The distribution time oscillating unit 304 is a master clock for the slave device to which the time synchronization device 301 is connected downstream, and holds time information that the slave device should be subordinate to.

  The PTP processing unit 305 (0) is based on the IEEE 1588-2008 standard so that the downstream device can calculate a deviation (offset) from the time of the distribution time oscillation unit 304 and synchronize with the distribution time oscillation unit 304. The time synchronization packet is transmitted / received to / from the downstream device (Slave device). In addition, the PTP processing unit 305 (0) transmits an Announce message to the downstream device, and when the downstream device has a plurality of ports as in the time synchronization device 301, the PMC processing unit 305 (0) executes the BMCA processing described in FIG.

  Similar to the PTP processing unit 305 (0), the PTP processing unit 305 (1) transmits and receives a time synchronization packet including an Announce message to and from the downstream device.

  As described in step S201, the accumulation monitoring unit 306 accumulates the offset calculation result output from the 0-system PTP processing unit 302 (0), and monitors the amount of variation to monitor the quality state of time accuracy. To do. 6, the accumulation monitoring unit 306 includes a TIE measurement unit 361 (0), a TIE measurement unit 361 (1), an MTIE calculation processing unit 362, and an alarm processing unit 363.

  As described in step S201, the TIE measurement unit 361 (0) accumulates the offset calculation result output from the 0-system PTP processing unit 302 (0), and measures the variation amount as TIE. For example, the TIE is measured as a fluctuation amount from the offset value obtained by the PTP processing unit 302 (0) before and after the time.

  Similar to the TIE measurement unit 361 (0), the TIE measurement unit 361 (1) accumulates the offset calculation results output from the 1-system PTP processing unit 302 (1), and measures the amount of variation as TIE.

  As described in step S201, the MTIE arithmetic processing unit 362 obtains MTIE from the TIE for a predetermined period set in advance. For example, as in (Expression 2) in step S201, the difference between the maximum value TIE_MAX and the minimum value TIE_MIN of the TIE for a predetermined period is set as MTIE.

  The alarm processing unit 363 performs a process of notifying a server or a monitoring terminal that monitors the time synchronization device through a communication path (not shown) when the time accuracy is deteriorated.

  As described above, the time synchronization apparatus 301 according to the present embodiment, by providing the accumulation monitoring unit 306, detects that the time accuracy has deteriorated, and outputs a parameter indicating the deterioration in time accuracy to the time selection unit 303. The time synchronizer 301 incorporates a process for determining deterioration in time accuracy into the BMCA data set comparison algorithm executed by the time selection unit 303, so that even when the quality of time information determined to be the best deteriorates. Can always be synchronized with the best quality time information.

  For example, even if the time synchronization accuracy deteriorates due to a state in which the time synchronization packet cannot be temporarily received or the occurrence of an abnormal state of the relay transmission path between devices that are time synchronized using the time synchronization packet, The time synchronization apparatus 301 according to the embodiment can select an optimal time path. As a result, the time synchronization apparatus 301 according to the present embodiment can maintain the accuracy of the distribution time so as not to deteriorate, and the influence on the service providing the time information can be minimized.

  As described above, the time synchronization method and the time synchronization apparatus according to the present invention perform determination in consideration of quality degradation of time information in an algorithm for determining superiority or inferiority of time information generated by a plurality of Master devices. Thus, highly accurate time synchronization can be performed.

101 (0), 101 (1) ... Master device; 102 ... Slave device; 103 (0), 103 (1) ... Transmission path; 112 (0) ... Slave unit; 201, 202・ ・ ・ System 203 BMCA processing unit 251 REC (0) unit 252 REC (1) unit 253 DIS unit 254 Erbest (0) unit 255 ... Erbest (1) part; 256 ... Ebest part; 257 ... Do part; 301 ... Time synchronization device; 302 (0), 302 (1) ... PTP processing part; ··· Time selection unit; 304 ··· Distribution time oscillation unit; 305 (0), 305 (1) ··· PTP processing unit; 306 ··· Accumulation monitoring unit; 351 (0) and 351 (1) ··· Packet transmission / reception processing unit: 352 (0), 352 (1) ... Time stamp processing unit; 353 (0), 353 (1) ... Offset calculation Processing section; 361 (0), 361 (1) ··· TIE measuring unit; 362 ... MTIE processing unit; 363 ... alarm processing unit

Claims (4)

At time synchronization method for synchronizing the time of a plurality of master devices and the time synchronization packet and a quality message with communication slave device including a time information with the reference time,
The slave device accumulates an offset calculated for each of the plurality of master devices based on time information of the time synchronization packet, and an evaluation indicating a state of time quality for each of the plurality of master devices from the accumulated offset Measure the value, perform the time accuracy comparison processing and phase fluctuation comparison processing in the BMCA algorithm using the quality message received from each master device, and then execute the processing for comparing the evaluation values Then , the time synchronization method is characterized by switching to the time information of the master device having the higher time quality state indicated by the evaluation value. The time synchronization method according to claim 1,
The slave device, the offset integrates the preset time, that the difference between the maximum integrated value and the minimum integrated value by comparing the accumulated value for each of calculating the offset you and the evaluation value A characteristic time synchronization method. In a time synchronization device that synchronizes time by communicating a time synchronization packet including a time information and a quality message with a plurality of master devices having a reference time ,
A plurality of time synchronization processes arranged corresponding to each of the plurality of master devices, and transmitting / receiving the time synchronization packet including time information to / from each of the master devices to obtain an offset from the master device And
An accumulation monitoring unit that accumulates the offset obtained by each time synchronization processing unit for each of the plurality of master devices, and measures an evaluation value indicating a state of time quality for each of the plurality of master devices from the accumulated offset. When,
Processing for comparing the evaluation values output by the accumulation monitoring unit after performing time accuracy comparison processing and phase fluctuation comparison processing in the BMCA algorithm using the quality message received from each master device And a time selection unit that selects the time synchronization processing unit corresponding to the master device having a higher time quality state indicated by the evaluation value;
Time synchronization apparatus characterized by having a. In the time synchronizer of Claim 3 ,
The accumulation monitoring unit integrates the offset for a preset time, compares the integrated values every time the offset is calculated, and selects the time as a difference between the maximum integrated value and the minimum integrated value as the evaluation value Output to
Time synchronization device comprising a call.

Images