JP5928231B2 - Surface defect inspection method - Google Patents

Surface defect inspection method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5928231B2
JP5928231B2 JP2012171650A JP2012171650A JP5928231B2 JP 5928231 B2 JP5928231 B2 JP 5928231B2 JP 2012171650 A JP2012171650 A JP 2012171650A JP 2012171650 A JP2012171650 A JP 2012171650A JP 5928231 B2 JP5928231 B2 JP 5928231B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
defect
area
surface defect
inspection method
heel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2012171650A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2014032058A (en
Inventor
鶴丸 英幸
英幸 鶴丸
鈴木 克一
克一 鈴木
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP2012171650A priority Critical patent/JP5928231B2/en
Publication of JP2014032058A publication Critical patent/JP2014032058A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5928231B2 publication Critical patent/JP5928231B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Description

本発明は、金属板(金属帯を含む)の表面欠陥を検査する、表面欠陥検査方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a surface defect inspection method for inspecting a surface defect of a metal plate (including a metal strip).

金属板の製造工程における溶融亜鉛めっきライン(以下、CGLと略称する)では、金属板を溶融亜鉛浴に浸漬させて表面に亜鉛を付与した後、亜鉛浴の直上にあるワイピングノズルでエアを金属板表面に吹き付けることで亜鉛付着量の制御を行なっている。
ワイピングノズルによる亜鉛付着量の制御は、吹きつけるエアの圧力、ノズルと金属板間の距離、ノズル高さ(亜鉛浴とノズル間の距離)等を調整することで行なわれる。しかしながら、亜鉛付着量の目標値が小さく、ワイピングノズルによる気体絞りが大きな金属板の場合や、ワイピングノズルの詰り等の設備異常があった場合には、ワイピングノズルからのエアが亜鉛浴面の溶融亜鉛を飛散させてしまうという事態を生じやすい。
この飛散した溶融亜鉛が金属板表面に付着した場合には、飛散亜鉛付着部のめっき厚は正常部と比較し、厚くなってしまう。この異常部分は、「スプラッシュ」と通常呼ばれており、金属板の表面外観を低下させるばかりでなく、自動車メーカー等の需要家においてプレス加工時にプレス金型の損傷を引き起こすため、品質上の大きな問題である。
In the hot dip galvanizing line (hereinafter abbreviated as CGL) in the metal plate manufacturing process, after immersing the metal plate in the hot dip zinc bath to give zinc to the surface, the air is metalized by a wiping nozzle directly above the zinc bath. The amount of zinc adhesion is controlled by spraying on the plate surface.
The amount of zinc adhered by the wiping nozzle is controlled by adjusting the pressure of air to be blown, the distance between the nozzle and the metal plate, the nozzle height (distance between the zinc bath and the nozzle), and the like. However, when the target value of the zinc adhesion amount is small and the gas squeezing by the wiping nozzle is large, or when there is equipment abnormality such as clogging of the wiping nozzle, the air from the wiping nozzle melts the zinc bath surface. It tends to cause a situation where zinc is scattered.
When the scattered molten zinc adheres to the surface of the metal plate, the plating thickness of the scattered zinc adhering portion becomes thicker than the normal portion. This abnormal part is usually called “splash” and not only deteriorates the surface appearance of the metal plate, but also causes damage to the press die during press processing in a consumer such as an automobile manufacturer. It is a problem.

従来における、金属板製造工程での品質管理技術としては、例えば、特許文献1に開示された技術がある。この技術は、鋼板の表面状態を検出する検出手段と、検出手段によって得られた信号を所定の基準値と比較する比較手段と、比較手段によって得られた表面欠陥信号に基づいて、表面欠陥名および欠陥グレードを演算する演算手段とを備える技術である。   As a conventional quality control technique in the metal plate manufacturing process, for example, there is a technique disclosed in Patent Document 1. This technique is based on detection means for detecting the surface condition of a steel sheet, comparison means for comparing a signal obtained by the detection means with a predetermined reference value, and a surface defect name based on the surface defect signal obtained by the comparison means. And a calculation means for calculating a defect grade.

特開2000−28547号公報JP 2000-28547 A

上述したCGLではライン速度が速いため、表面外観検査を主に光学式表面欠陥計にて実施している。光学式表面欠陥計では、投光機から金属板表面に光を照射し、反射光を受光機で検出、正常部と異常部の輝度の差、異常部のサイズなどから欠陥名・欠陥等級(疵の有害度)の判定を行なう。
しかしながら、表面欠陥がスプラッシュの場合には、めっき厚は厚くなっているものの、表面外観としては正常部と比較して、大きな差がないことが多く、表面欠陥計により軽度(有害度の低い)の欠陥として判定され、製品出荷されてしまうという問題がある。
Since the above-mentioned CGL has a high line speed, surface appearance inspection is mainly performed with an optical surface defect meter. In the optical surface defect meter, the surface of the metal plate is irradiated from the projector, the reflected light is detected by the receiver, the difference in brightness between the normal and abnormal parts, the size of the abnormal part, etc. (Degree of harmfulness of sputum).
However, when the surface defect is splash, the plating thickness is thick, but the surface appearance is often not much different from the normal part, and it is mild (less harmful) by the surface defect meter. There is a problem that the product is shipped as a defect.

本発明では、これら従来技術の問題点に鑑み、表面欠陥がスプラッシュの場合には、重度の欠陥として判定させることで、当該製品の出荷を停止し、需要家へのスプラッシュ部分を有する製品流出を防止することにより、プレス金型損傷を防止することができる、表面欠陥検査方法を提供することを目的とする。   In the present invention, in view of the problems of these prior arts, when the surface defect is splash, it is determined that the defect is a severe defect, thereby stopping the shipment of the product and causing the product outflow having a splash part to the consumer. An object of the present invention is to provide a surface defect inspection method capable of preventing damage to a press die by preventing the damage.

上記課題は、以下の発明によって解決できる。   The above problems can be solved by the following invention.

[1] 金属板の表面欠陥を検査する光学式表面欠陥計を用いた表面欠陥検査方法であって、
金属板の表面および裏面を撮影した画像を受信し、
受信画像の画像処理により表面疵および裏面疵検出を行い、
検出した前記疵の欠陥等級が、軽度か重度かどうかの1次判定を行い、
軽度と1次判定されたものの内、表面および裏面のほぼ同じ位置に疵を検出した場合には、重度と2次判定することを特徴とする表面欠陥検査方法。
[1] A surface defect inspection method using an optical surface defect meter for inspecting a surface defect of a metal plate,
Receive images of the front and back of the metal plate,
Detect front and back flaws by image processing of received images,
Perform a primary determination as to whether the detected defect grade of the flaw is mild or severe,
A surface defect inspection method, characterized in that, when wrinkles are detected at substantially the same position on the front surface and the back surface of those determined to be mild and primary, the surface is determined to be severe and secondary.

[2] 上記[1]に記載の表面欠陥検査方法において、
前記1次判定にあたっては、
疵長さ、疵幅、疵面積、および疵輝度を元に前記疵の欠陥等級を行い、
前記2次判定にあたっては、
軽度の表面疵を含有する外接長方形をオモテ疵エリアとして設定し、これに予め定めた許容範囲を加えたオモテ疵許容エリアを設定し、
軽度の裏面疵を含有する外接長方形をウラ疵エリアとして設定し、
オモテ疵許容エリアとウラ疵エリアの両エリアが位置的に重なり合う部分がある場合には、重度と判定することを特徴とする表面欠陥検査方法。
[2] In the surface defect inspection method according to [1] above,
In the primary determination,
Based on the heel length, heel width, heel area, and heel brightness, the defect grade of the heel is performed,
In the secondary determination,
Set a circumscribed rectangle containing a slight surface defect as a front area, set a front tolerance area by adding a predetermined tolerance to this,
Set a circumscribed rectangle containing a mild backside flaw as a backside area,
A surface defect inspection method, characterized in that if there is a portion where both the front side allowable area and the back side area overlap in position, it is determined to be severe.

本発明によれば、表面欠陥がスプラッシュの場合には、重度の欠陥として判定させるようにしたので、当該製品の出荷を停止し、需要家へのスプラッシュ流出を防止することにより、需要家におけるプレス加工時のプレス金型損傷も防止することができる。   According to the present invention, when the surface defect is a splash, it is determined as a severe defect. Therefore, the shipment of the product is stopped and the splash outflow to the consumer is prevented, thereby pressing the consumer. It is also possible to prevent damage to the press die during processing.

本発明に係る表面欠陥検査方法の処理フローの一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the processing flow of the surface defect inspection method which concerns on this invention. 2次判定にて1次判定と同様に「軽度」と判定した場合の例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example at the time of determining with "mild" similarly to the primary determination by secondary determination. 2次判定にて1次判定と異なる「重度」と判定した場合の例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example at the time of determining with "severity" different from primary determination by secondary determination. 本発明に係る表面欠陥検査方法を適用したシステム構成例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the system structural example to which the surface defect inspection method which concerns on this invention is applied. 光学装置の装置構成例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the apparatus structural example of an optical apparatus.

スプラッシュ欠陥部は正常部と比較してめっき厚が厚くなるため、結果としてCGL通板中に当該欠陥部の表・裏面がより強く搬送ロールに接触することで、外観上軽度ではあるものの、表・裏面のほぼ同じ位置に欠陥として現れるという、本発明者らの知見により本発明に想到したものである。   The splash defect part is thicker than the normal part, and as a result, the front and back surfaces of the defect part come into contact with the transport roll more strongly during the CGL plate, but the appearance is mild. The present inventors have conceived the present invention based on the knowledge of the present inventors that defects appear at substantially the same position on the back surface.

すなわち、表面欠陥計で表・裏面のほぼ同じ位置に欠陥を認識した場合には、1次判定で表・裏面がそれぞれで軽度と判定したとしても、2次判定で重度と再判定とする「表裏抜け判定ロジック」を考案した。   That is, when a defect is recognized at approximately the same position on the front and back surfaces by the front surface defect meter, even if the front and back surfaces are determined to be light in the primary determination, the secondary determination is determined as severe and redetermined. I devised a "front / reverse judgment logic".

この「表裏抜け判定ロジック」により、重度と再判定した場合には、製品出荷停止として、需要家へのスプラッシュ欠陥部を有する製品流出を防止し、さらには需要家でのプレス金型損傷を防止することができる。この「表裏抜け判定ロジック」は、スプラッシュ欠陥部のみならず、ブリスター等の膨れ状欠陥部についても有効である。   If it is re-determined as severe by this “front and back side detection logic”, the product shipment will be stopped, preventing the product from having a splash defect to the customer and preventing the press die from being damaged by the customer. can do. This “front / reverse penetration determination logic” is effective not only for splash defects but also for blister defects such as blisters.

図1は、本発明に係る表面欠陥検査方法の処理フローの一例を示す図である。先ず、Step01にて、金属板表面からの反射光をCCDカメラで受光し、CCDカメラで撮影した画像を受信する。CCDカメラでの撮像は、金属板の表面(以下、オモテ面とも表記する)および裏面(以下、ウラ面とも表記する)の両面を行う。   FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of a processing flow of a surface defect inspection method according to the present invention. First, in Step 01, reflected light from the surface of the metal plate is received by the CCD camera, and an image taken by the CCD camera is received. Imaging with a CCD camera is performed on both the front surface (hereinafter also referred to as the front surface) and the back surface (hereinafter also referred to as the back surface) of the metal plate.

次に、Step02にて、受信画像の画像処理により疵の検出を行う。画像の信号強度(輝度)が予め設定された閾値を超えた画素(金属板表面の最小評価区画)について、長手方向(y方向)と板幅方向(x方向)に連続する画素を連結させ、1つの疵と見なす。この処理を、オモテ面およびウラ面それぞれで行い、表面疵(以下、オモテ疵とも表記する)および裏面疵(以下、ウラ疵とも表記する)とするNext, in Step 02, wrinkles are detected by image processing of the received image. For pixels in which the signal intensity (luminance) of the image exceeds a preset threshold value (minimum evaluation section on the surface of the metal plate), continuous pixels in the longitudinal direction (y direction) and the plate width direction (x direction) are connected, Think of it as one trap. This process is performed on each front surface and back surface, surface defects (hereinafter, also referred to as front scratches) and the back surface flaws (hereinafter also reverse flaw hereinafter) to.

そして、Step03にて、1次判定、すなわちオモテ疵およびウラ疵の欠陥等級判定を行う。疵長さ(y方向長さ)、疵幅(x方向長さ)、疵面積、疵輝度を元に疵の欠陥等級を判定する。   In Step 03, the primary determination, that is, the defect grade determination for the front and back defects is performed. The defect grade of the defect is determined based on the defect length (the length in the y direction), the defect width (the length in the x direction), the defect area, and the defect luminance.

以上の1次判定の後、本発明では、Step04にて、欠陥等級が「軽度」か「重度」かの判定を行う。ここで、欠陥等級が「重度」と判定されたオモテ疵については、以下に示す2次判定を経ることなく「重度」判定を維持する(Step10)。   After the above primary determination, in the present invention, in Step 04, it is determined whether the defect grade is “mild” or “severe”. Here, the “severe” judgment is maintained without passing through the secondary judgment shown below for the front face for which the defect grade is judged as “severe” (Step 10).

欠陥等級が「軽度」のオモテ疵では、Step05にて、オモテ疵を含有する外接長方形をオモテ疵エリアとして設定する。さらに、Step07にて、予め定めた許容範囲(例えば、オモテ疵エリアの長手方向の先尾端にそれぞれ長さA、板幅方向の両サイドにそれぞれ長さB、後述する図2および3を参照)を加えたオモテ疵許容エリアを設定する。   For a front with a “minor” defect grade, in Step 05, a circumscribed rectangle containing the front is set as the front area. Further, in Step 07, a predetermined allowable range (for example, length A at the front end in the longitudinal direction of the front ridge area, length B at both sides in the plate width direction, see FIGS. 2 and 3 described later) Set the front tolerance area with) added.

そして、欠陥等級が「軽度」のウラ疵では、Step06にて、Step05と同様にウラ疵エリアを設定する。   Then, in the case of a back surface with a defect grade of “mild”, a back surface area is set in Step 06 as in Step 05.

次に、Step08にて、オモテ疵許容エリアとウラ疵エリアの両エリアが位置的に重なり合う部分があるかどうかを判定する。両エリアが位置的に重なり合う部分がない場合には、1次判定と同様に「軽度」と判定(Step09)し、両エリアが位置的に重なり合う部分がある場合には、「重度」と判定(Step10)する。   Next, in Step 08, it is determined whether or not there is a portion where both the front side allowable area and the back side area overlap in position. If there is no part where both areas overlap in position, it is determined as “mild” (Step 09) as in the primary determination, and if there is a part where both areas overlap in position, it is determined as “severe” ( Step10).

なお、以上では、オモテ疵許容エリアとウラ疵エリアとの位置比較の例を説明したが、ウラ疵エリアからウラ疵許容エリアを設定し、ウラ疵エリアとオモテ疵エリアとの位置比較による判定を行うようにしても良い。   In the above, an example of the position comparison between the front area and the back area has been described, but the back area is set from the back area, and the determination is made by comparing the position between the back area and the front area. You may make it do.

図2は、2次判定にて1次判定と同様に「軽度」と判定した場合の例を示す図である。オモテ疵許容エリアとウラ疵エリアとで重なり合う部分がない場合であり、この場合は「軽度」の欠陥と判定している。   FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example in which “mild” is determined in the secondary determination similarly to the primary determination. This is a case in which there is no overlapping portion between the front tolerance area and the back area. In this case, it is determined that the defect is “mild”.

また、これとは異なり、図3は、2次判定にて1次判定と異なる「重度」と判定した場合の例を示す図である。オモテ疵許容エリアとウラ疵エリアとに重なり合う部分があるため、「重度」の欠陥と判定している。   Unlike this, FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of a case where “secondary determination” is determined to be “severe” different from the first determination. Since there is an overlapping portion between the front side allowable area and the back side area, it is determined as a “severe” defect.

図3に示すように、「重度」すなわち重度の欠陥(有害な欠陥)と2次判定した場合には、当該製品の出荷を停止する。これにより、需要家へのスプラッシュ部分を有する製品流出が防止でき、需要家でのプレス金型損傷も防止することができる。   As shown in FIG. 3, when it is secondarily determined as “severe”, that is, a severe defect (harmful defect), shipment of the product is stopped. Thereby, the product outflow which has a splash part to a consumer can be prevented, and the press die damage by a consumer can also be prevented.

本発明を適用した実施例について、以下に説明する。   Embodiments to which the present invention is applied will be described below.

図4は、本発明に係る表面欠陥検査方法を適用したシステム構成例を示す図である。さらに、図5は、光学装置の装置構成例を示す図である。図中、1は鋼板、10は光学装置、11は線状光源、12はCCDカメラ、20は信号処理システム、21は前処理装置、22は画像処理装置、23は欠陥判定装置、および24は光量制御装置をそれぞれ示す。   FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a system configuration example to which the surface defect inspection method according to the present invention is applied. Furthermore, FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a device configuration example of the optical device. In the figure, 1 is a steel plate, 10 is an optical device, 11 is a linear light source, 12 is a CCD camera, 20 is a signal processing system, 21 is a preprocessing device, 22 is an image processing device, 23 is a defect determination device, and 24 is Each light quantity control device is shown.

全体構成は、図4に示すように、光学装置10と信号処理システム20とから構成される。そして、光学装置10は、鋼板1に光を当てる線状光源11と鋼板1からの反射光を受けるCCDカメラ12から成っている。CCDカメラ12は、鋼板1の幅方向に並べて配置される。   The overall configuration includes an optical device 10 and a signal processing system 20, as shown in FIG. The optical device 10 includes a linear light source 11 that applies light to the steel plate 1 and a CCD camera 12 that receives reflected light from the steel plate 1. The CCD cameras 12 are arranged side by side in the width direction of the steel plate 1.

CCDカメラ12からの撮像信号は、信号処理システム20に送られ、先ず、前処理装置21にて、平均化処理、シェーディング補正、および視野合成がなされ、画像処理装置22にて、ピーク輝度などに疵特徴量から欠陥の抽出が行われる。   The image pickup signal from the CCD camera 12 is sent to the signal processing system 20. First, the preprocessing device 21 performs averaging processing, shading correction, and visual field synthesis, and the image processing device 22 adjusts the peak luminance and the like. The defect is extracted from the feature amount.

次の欠陥判定装置23が、上述した本発明の表面欠陥検査方法を実施する装置である。ここで、疵種・等級の判定が行われる。なお、光量制御装置24は、CCDカメラ12からの撮像信号からの信号処理結果に基づいて、線状光源の光量の強弱をコントロールする。   The next defect determination apparatus 23 is an apparatus for performing the above-described surface defect inspection method of the present invention. Here, the species / grade is determined. The light quantity control device 24 controls the intensity of the light quantity of the linear light source based on the signal processing result from the imaging signal from the CCD camera 12.

以上説明したシステムを溶融亜鉛鍍金鋼板を製造するCGLラインに設置し、需要家へのスプラッシュ部分を有する製品流出を防止した。これにより、これまでスプラッシュ部分を有する製品による需要家プレス金型損傷が、年に2回ほど起きていたところ皆無となった。プレス金型補修費の削減と需要家信頼度の向上を実現できた。   The system described above was installed in a CGL line for producing a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet to prevent product outflow having a splash part to consumers. As a result, there has been no damage to customer press dies due to products with a splash part, which has occurred twice a year. Reduced press die repair costs and improved customer reliability.

1 鋼板
10 光学装置
11 線状光源
12 CCDカメラ
20 信号処理システム
21 前処理装置
22 画像処理装置
23 欠陥判定装置
24 光量制御装置
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Steel plate 10 Optical apparatus 11 Linear light source 12 CCD camera 20 Signal processing system 21 Preprocessing apparatus 22 Image processing apparatus 23 Defect determination apparatus 24 Light quantity control apparatus

Claims (2)

溶融亜鉛鍍金をした金属板の表面欠陥を検査する光学式表面欠陥計を用いた表面欠陥検査方法であって、
前記金属板の表面および裏面を撮影した画像を受信し、
受信画像の画像処理により表面疵および裏面疵検出を行い、
検出した前記疵の欠陥等級が、軽度か重度かどうかの1次判定を行い、
軽度と1次判定されたものの内、表面および裏面のほぼ同じ位置に疵を検出した場合には、その疵はスプラッシュ欠陥であり重度と2次判定することを特徴とする表面欠陥検査方法。
A surface defect inspection method using an optical surface defect meter for inspecting a surface defect of a metal plate plated with molten zinc ,
Receives the image obtained by photographing the front and back surfaces of the metal plate,
Detect front and back flaws by image processing of received images,
Perform a primary determination as to whether the detected defect grade of the flaw is mild or severe,
A surface defect inspection method characterized in that, when a wrinkle is detected at substantially the same position on the front surface and the back surface among those determined to be mild and primary, the wrinkle is a splash defect and secondarily determined to be severe.
請求項1に記載の表面欠陥検査方法において、
前記1次判定にあたっては、
疵長さ、疵幅、疵面積、および疵輝度を元に前記疵の欠陥等級を行い、
前記2次判定にあたっては、
軽度の表面疵を含有する外接長方形をオモテ疵エリアとして設定し、これに予め定めた許容範囲を加えたオモテ疵許容エリアを設定し、
軽度の裏面疵を含有する外接長方形をウラ疵エリアとして設定し、
オモテ疵許容エリアとウラ疵エリアの両エリアが位置的に重なり合う部分がある場合には、重度と判定することを特徴とする表面欠陥検査方法。
The surface defect inspection method according to claim 1 ,
In the primary determination,
Based on the heel length, heel width, heel area, and heel brightness, the defect grade of the heel is performed,
In the secondary determination,
Set a circumscribed rectangle containing a slight surface defect as a front area, set a front tolerance area by adding a predetermined tolerance to this,
Set a circumscribed rectangle containing a mild backside flaw as a backside area,
A surface defect inspection method, characterized in that if there is a portion where both the front side allowable area and the back side area overlap in position, it is determined to be severe.
JP2012171650A 2012-08-02 2012-08-02 Surface defect inspection method Active JP5928231B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012171650A JP5928231B2 (en) 2012-08-02 2012-08-02 Surface defect inspection method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012171650A JP5928231B2 (en) 2012-08-02 2012-08-02 Surface defect inspection method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2014032058A JP2014032058A (en) 2014-02-20
JP5928231B2 true JP5928231B2 (en) 2016-06-01

Family

ID=50282000

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2012171650A Active JP5928231B2 (en) 2012-08-02 2012-08-02 Surface defect inspection method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5928231B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6666171B2 (en) * 2016-03-09 2020-03-13 株式会社東芝 Defect inspection equipment
JP7157355B1 (en) * 2021-06-04 2022-10-20 ダイキン工業株式会社 Evaluation method, evaluation device and computer program
CN115049644B (en) * 2022-08-12 2022-11-01 山东三微新材料有限公司 Temperature control method and system based on aluminum pipe surface flaw identification

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH04184245A (en) * 1990-11-20 1992-07-01 Toshiba Corp Apparatus for inspecting surface
JP3728965B2 (en) * 1999-02-01 2005-12-21 Jfeスチール株式会社 Surface inspection device
JP3669256B2 (en) * 2000-09-19 2005-07-06 Jfeスチール株式会社 Surface defect inspection equipment
JP5104004B2 (en) * 2007-04-19 2012-12-19 Jfeスチール株式会社 Surface defect inspection apparatus and surface defect inspection method
JP5257179B2 (en) * 2009-03-19 2013-08-07 新日鐵住金株式会社 Surface defect inspection apparatus and surface defect inspection method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2014032058A (en) 2014-02-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5659540B2 (en) Steel plate surface defect inspection method and apparatus
TWI425205B (en) Method for detecting defect in material and system for the method
JP6117398B1 (en) Steel plate surface defect inspection apparatus and surface defect inspection method
JP5928231B2 (en) Surface defect inspection method
JP4956673B2 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting joints of steel plates in endless hot rolling process
US20200038929A1 (en) Apparatus, method, and program for monitoring operation of high frequency resistance welding and induction heating welding of electric resistance welded steel pipe
KR101800597B1 (en) Apparatus for inspecting surface defects of a hot-dip coated steel sheet and method for inspecting surface defects
JP2009072788A (en) Method and device for detecting spark of welding and method of manufacturing welded product
WO2020067262A1 (en) Method and device for detecting defect in surface of metal sheet, and method for manufacturing plated steel sheet
JP5354187B2 (en) Traveling material surface quality judging device and surface quality judging method
JP5262300B2 (en) Steel strip surface inspection apparatus and surface defect detection method
JP4780334B2 (en) Weld crack detection method
JP6249241B2 (en) Metal plate surface defect detection method
JP2018065190A (en) Steel plate shape correction device, correction method, and continuous acid cleaning device for steel plate
JP2017145133A (en) Tension correction method of web and manufacturing method of processed film
JP6768916B2 (en) Plate edge detection device and plate edge detection method
JP2007139630A (en) Surface inspection device and method
JP2008196866A (en) Weld crack detection method and device
KR101086333B1 (en) Detection method of surface defect on strip
JP2010112846A (en) Method and apparatus for adjusting surface inspecting device
KR20140084612A (en) Strip edge monitoring system and method
JP2007101239A (en) Visual inspection device and visual inspection method
JP2013134136A (en) Surface defect inspection system
KR101243126B1 (en) Apparatus for detecting defects of strip edge by using visible ray and thereof detecting method
JP2000002668A (en) Inspection method for surface defect

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20150223

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20151125

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20151215

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20160204

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20160329

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20160411

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5928231

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250