JP4780334B2 - Weld crack detection method - Google Patents

Weld crack detection method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4780334B2
JP4780334B2 JP2007128439A JP2007128439A JP4780334B2 JP 4780334 B2 JP4780334 B2 JP 4780334B2 JP 2007128439 A JP2007128439 A JP 2007128439A JP 2007128439 A JP2007128439 A JP 2007128439A JP 4780334 B2 JP4780334 B2 JP 4780334B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
weld
welding
weld crack
temperature change
crack
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2007128439A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2008279497A (en
Inventor
雅志 古川
博成 三方
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toyota Motor Corp
Original Assignee
Toyota Motor Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toyota Motor Corp filed Critical Toyota Motor Corp
Priority to JP2007128439A priority Critical patent/JP4780334B2/en
Publication of JP2008279497A publication Critical patent/JP2008279497A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4780334B2 publication Critical patent/JP4780334B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Description

本発明は、溶接欠陥を検出するための技術に係り、特に溶接ビード内に発生する溶接割れを検出するための溶接割れ検出方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a technique for detecting a weld defect, and more particularly, to a weld crack detection method for detecting a weld crack generated in a weld bead.

従来、溶接欠陥を検出するための方法としては、たとえば、特許文献1に記載の方法がある。この方法では、溶接ビードに斜め方向からスリット状の光を照射し、この照射されたスリット光をテレビカメラによって撮像して、その画像をデータ処理することによって良否判定を行うようにしている。
特開平5−71932号公報
Conventionally, as a method for detecting a welding defect, for example, there is a method described in Patent Document 1. In this method, the weld bead is irradiated with slit-shaped light from an oblique direction, the irradiated slit light is imaged by a television camera, and the image is subjected to data processing to perform pass / fail judgment.
JP-A-5-71932

しかしながら、上記特許文献1に記載の方法によれば、溶接ビードの形状的な特徴から良否判定を行うため、大きな盛上りやひけ、あるいは穴明き等の欠陥は検出できるものの、溶接ビードに生じている溶接割れを検出することは困難で、特に微小な溶接割れの検出は不可能である。また、凹凸の大きい溶接ビートで画像認識を行うため、ノイズ(外乱)の影響を受けやすく、ノイズ成分を打消すための面倒なデータ処理が必要になって、処理システムの複雑化が避けられない,という問題もあった。   However, according to the method described in Patent Document 1, the quality of the weld bead is determined based on the shape characteristics of the weld bead. Therefore, defects such as large swells, sink marks, or perforations can be detected, but they occur in the weld bead. It is difficult to detect weld cracks that are present, and in particular, it is impossible to detect minute weld cracks. In addition, since image recognition is performed using welding beats with large irregularities, it is easy to be affected by noise (disturbance), requiring troublesome data processing to cancel out noise components, and the complexity of the processing system is inevitable. There was also a problem.

本発明は、上記した従来の問題点に鑑みてなされたもので、その課題とするところは、溶接ビードに生じる溶接割れを簡単かつ確実に検出できる溶接割れ検出方法を提供することにある。   The present invention has been made in view of the above-described conventional problems. An object of the present invention is to provide a weld crack detection method capable of easily and reliably detecting a weld crack generated in a weld bead.

上記課題を解決するため、本発明に係る溶接割れ検出方法は、溶接中におけるワークの温度変化を監視し、その温度変化に基づいて溶接割れの有無を判定することを特徴とする。   In order to solve the above problems, a weld crack detection method according to the present invention is characterized by monitoring a temperature change of a workpiece during welding and determining the presence or absence of a weld crack based on the temperature change.

広い板面を有するワークを溶接する場合、溶接の熱は、溶接部(溶接ビード)の左右方向へほぼ均等に熱伝導し、溶接部の左右方向で温度変化に大きな差が生じることはない、しかし、ワークのエッジ(側縁)に沿って溶接を行う場合は、エッジ部分で熱の移動が停止するので、該エッジ部分に熱が蓄積され、この蓄積された熱がエッジと反対側、すなわち溶接部側へ移動(逆流)する。このとき、溶接ビード内に割れが発生していると、該割れの内部が断熱層となるので、溶接ビード内を伝達してさらに反対側へ向う熱の移動が阻止される。この結果、溶接ラインよりもエッジ側部分では、溶接割れが発生している箇所に対応する部分と溶接割れが発生していない箇所に対応する部分とで、温度変化に差が生じる。すなわち、溶接割れが発生している箇所に対応する部分では、溶接割れが発生していない箇所に対応する部分よりも冷却に遅滞を生じることになる。本発明は、前記した知見に基づいてなされたもので、上記したように溶接中におけるワークの温度変化を監視することで、その温度変化から溶接割れの有無を簡単かつ確実に検出することができる。
以下に、本発明の態様をいくつか例示し、それらについて項分けして説明する。
When welding a workpiece having a wide plate surface, the heat of welding conducts heat almost evenly in the left-right direction of the welded portion (weld bead), and there is no great difference in temperature change in the left-right direction of the welded portion. However, when welding is performed along the edge (side edge) of the workpiece, the movement of heat stops at the edge portion, so that heat is accumulated at the edge portion, and this accumulated heat is opposite to the edge, that is, Move (back flow) to the weld side. At this time, if a crack is generated in the weld bead, the inside of the crack becomes a heat insulating layer, so that the heat transfer to the opposite side through the weld bead is prevented. As a result, in the edge side portion from the welding line, a difference in temperature change occurs between the portion corresponding to the portion where the weld crack is generated and the portion corresponding to the portion where the weld crack is not generated. That is, in the part corresponding to the place where the weld crack is generated, the cooling is delayed more than the part corresponding to the place where the weld crack is not generated. The present invention has been made based on the above-described knowledge, and by monitoring the temperature change of the workpiece during welding as described above, the presence or absence of a weld crack can be easily and reliably detected from the temperature change. .
In the following, some aspects of the present invention will be illustrated and described.

(1)ワークのエッジに沿って溶接を行っている最中、溶接ラインよりエッジ側部分の温度変化を監視し、冷却過程の温度変化に基づいて溶接割れの有無を判定することを特徴とする溶接割れ検出方法。   (1) During welding along the edge of the workpiece, the temperature change at the edge side from the welding line is monitored, and the presence or absence of a weld crack is determined based on the temperature change in the cooling process. Weld crack detection method.

上記したように溶接割れが発生している箇所に対応する部分では、溶接割れが発生していない箇所に対応する部分よりも冷却に遅滞を生じるので、特に温度変化の冷却過程に大きな差が現れる。本(1)項記載の溶接割れ検出方法においては、この冷却過程の温度変化に基づいて溶接割れの有無を判定するので、溶接割れの検出精度が高まり、微小な溶接割れの検出も可能になる。   As described above, in the portion corresponding to the portion where the weld crack is generated, the cooling is delayed more than the portion corresponding to the portion where the weld crack is not generated. . In the weld crack detection method described in the item (1), since the presence or absence of the weld crack is determined based on the temperature change in the cooling process, the detection accuracy of the weld crack is increased, and the detection of a minute weld crack is also possible. .

(2)予め把握した、溶接割れが発生していない場合の温度変化と比較して、溶接割れの有無を判定することを特徴とする(1)項に記載の溶接割れ検出方法。   (2) The weld crack detection method according to item (1), characterized in that the presence or absence of a weld crack is determined in comparison with a temperature change in a case where no weld crack has occurred.

本(2)項記載の溶接割れ検出方法においては、予め把握した、溶接割れが発生していない場合の温度変化と比較することで、溶接割れの有無を簡単に判定することができる。この場合、温度変化を把握する判定基準は任意であり、冷却速度で判定しても、所定温度に降下するまでの時間で判定しても、あるいは冷却曲線の内側の面積で判定してもよく、これらの値に適当なしきい値を設定することで、溶接割れの有無を簡単に判定することができる。   In the weld crack detection method described in the item (2), the presence or absence of a weld crack can be easily determined by comparing with a change in temperature when the weld crack is not generated. In this case, the determination criterion for grasping the temperature change is arbitrary, and it may be determined by the cooling rate, by the time until the temperature falls to the predetermined temperature, or by the area inside the cooling curve. By setting appropriate threshold values for these values, the presence or absence of weld cracks can be easily determined.

(3)赤外線撮像装置により温度変化を監視することを特徴とする(1)または(2)項に記載の溶接割れ検出方法。   (3) The method for detecting a weld crack according to (1) or (2), wherein a temperature change is monitored by an infrared imaging device.

本(3)項記載の溶接割れ検出方法によれば、赤外線撮像装置により広域に温度変化を監視することができるので、溶接ビードの全長にわたって溶接割れ有無を判定することができ、品質保証に対する信頼性が向上する。   According to the weld crack detection method described in the item (3), since the temperature change can be monitored over a wide area by the infrared imaging device, the presence or absence of the weld crack can be determined over the entire length of the weld bead, and reliability for quality assurance can be determined. Improves.

(4)熱電対により温度変化を監視することを特徴とする(1)または(2)項に記載の溶接割れ検出方法。   (4) The method for detecting a weld crack according to (1) or (2), wherein a temperature change is monitored by a thermocouple.

重ねレーザ溶接の場合は、溶接終端付近で溶接割れが発生しやすいので、溶接終端付近のみを集中的に監視すればよく、この場合は、本(4)項に記載のように熱電対を用いてコスト安に温度変化を監視することができる。   In the case of lap laser welding, weld cracks are likely to occur near the end of welding, so it is only necessary to centrally monitor the vicinity of the end of welding. In this case, a thermocouple is used as described in this section (4). Temperature changes can be monitored at low cost.

(5)溶接が、二枚重ねの鋼板の重ねレーザ溶接であることを特徴とする(1)乃至(4)項の何れか1項に記載の溶接割れ検出方法。   (5) The welding crack detection method according to any one of (1) to (4), wherein the welding is a lap laser welding of a two-ply steel sheet.

溶接割れは、二枚重ねの鋼板の重ねレーザ溶接において発生しやすいので、(5)項記載のように重ねレーザ溶接に適用する場合に、特に本発明は有用となる。   Since weld cracks are likely to occur in overlap laser welding of two-layer steel sheets, the present invention is particularly useful when applied to overlap laser welding as described in (5).

本発明に係る溶接割れ検出方法によれば、溶接ビードに生じる溶接割れを簡単かつ確実に検出できるので、溶接品の品質保証に向けてきわめて有用となる。   According to the weld crack detection method of the present invention, a weld crack generated in a weld bead can be detected easily and reliably, which is extremely useful for quality assurance of a welded product.

以下、本発明を実施するための最良の形態を添付図面に基づいて説明する。   The best mode for carrying out the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

図1は、本発明の一つの実施形態を示したものである。本実施形態は、二枚の薄鋼板1、2のフランジ部1a、2aを重ねレーザ溶接するに際し、これと並行して溶接部である溶接ビード3に発生する溶接割れの有無を検出するものである。重ねレーザ溶接は、ここではフランジ部1a、2aのエッジ(側縁)に近接する溶接ラインLに沿って断続的に行われるようになっており、レーザ光を出射する溶接トーチ4が溶接ラインL上を溶接方向Fへ移動する。溶接割れを検出するための割れ検出装置10は、溶接ラインLの上方に配置された赤外線撮像装置11と、この赤外線撮像装置11により撮像された画像をデータ処理して、フランジ部1a、2aのエッジに近接する部位における温度変化曲線を求める画像データ処理装置12と、この画像データ処理装置12で得られた温度変化曲線に基づいて溶接ビード3内の溶接割れの有無を判定する良否判定装置13と、良否判定装置13の判定結果を画面表示する表示装置14とから概略構成されている。   FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of the present invention. In the present embodiment, when the flange portions 1a and 2a of the two thin steel plates 1 and 2 are overlapped and laser-welded, the presence or absence of weld cracks occurring in the weld bead 3 which is a welded portion is detected in parallel. is there. Here, the lap laser welding is intermittently performed along the welding line L close to the edges (side edges) of the flange portions 1a and 2a, and the welding torch 4 that emits laser light is connected to the welding line L. Move up in the welding direction F. The crack detection device 10 for detecting a weld crack is an infrared imaging device 11 arranged above the welding line L and an image captured by the infrared imaging device 11 is subjected to data processing, and the flange portions 1a and 2a are processed. An image data processing device 12 that obtains a temperature change curve at a site close to the edge, and a quality determination device 13 that determines the presence or absence of weld cracks in the weld bead 3 based on the temperature change curve obtained by the image data processing device 12. And a display device 14 that displays the determination result of the pass / fail determination device 13 on the screen.

溶接トーチ4による溶接範囲を広域に撮像できるように重ねレーザ溶接中、溶接ビード3内に溶接割れが発生すると、図2に示されるように、溶接割れ5が発生した箇所に対応するエッジ側部位(ここでは、エッジ近接部位)P1における温度変化曲線と溶接割れ5が発生していない箇所に対応するエッジ側部位(エッジ近接部位)P2における温度変化曲線とに差が生じる。図3は、その温度変化曲線の一例を示したもので、溶接割れ5が発生した箇所に対応するエッジ側部位P1における温度変化曲線(点線で表す)は、溶接割れ5が発生していない箇所に対応するエッジ側部位P2における温度変化曲線(実線で表す)と比べて、冷却過程に遅滞を生じる。この理由は、前記したように溶接割れ5によってエッジ側から反対方向への熱の移動が阻止されたためである。   When a weld crack occurs in the weld bead 3 during the overlap laser welding so that the welding range by the welding torch 4 can be imaged over a wide area, as shown in FIG. 2, the edge side part corresponding to the place where the weld crack 5 has occurred There is a difference between the temperature change curve at P1 (here, the edge proximity portion) P1 and the temperature change curve at the edge side portion (edge proximity portion) P2 corresponding to the location where the weld crack 5 is not generated. FIG. 3 shows an example of the temperature change curve. The temperature change curve (represented by a dotted line) in the edge side portion P1 corresponding to the location where the weld crack 5 occurs is a location where the weld crack 5 does not occur. Compared with the temperature change curve (represented by a solid line) in the edge side portion P2 corresponding to, the cooling process is delayed. This is because the heat transfer from the edge side to the opposite direction is prevented by the weld crack 5 as described above.

上記割れ検出装置10を構成する赤外線撮像装置11は、溶接トーチ4による溶接範囲を広く撮像できる位置に配置されている。そして、溶接中、赤外線撮像装置11によって溶接範囲が高速で撮像され、その1コマごとの画像が画像データ処理装置12へ高速で送られる。画像データ処理装置12は、赤外線撮像装置11から送られた画像に対して、溶接方向Fへ所定のピッチで複数の測定ポイントを設定し、各測定ポイントについて温度変化曲線を求め、その結果を良否判定装置13へ送出する。良否判定装置13には、予め溶接割れ5が発生していない箇所に対応するエッジ側部位の良好な温度変化曲線が記憶されており、良否判定装置13は、この良好な温度変化曲線と前記実際に求めた温度変化曲線とを比較し、溶接割れ5の有無を判定する。この場合、良否判定装置13は、たとえば、冷却速度、所定温度に降下するまでの時間、冷却曲線の内側の面積等を判断基準として、これらの値に適当なしきい値を設定し、該しきい値との関係で良否を判定することができる。   The infrared imaging device 11 constituting the crack detection device 10 is arranged at a position where a wide range of welding by the welding torch 4 can be imaged. Then, during welding, the infrared imaging device 11 images the welding range at high speed, and an image for each frame is sent to the image data processing device 12 at high speed. The image data processing device 12 sets a plurality of measurement points at a predetermined pitch in the welding direction F with respect to the image sent from the infrared imaging device 11, obtains a temperature change curve for each measurement point, and determines the result as good or bad. The data is sent to the determination device 13. The pass / fail judgment device 13 stores in advance a good temperature change curve of the edge side portion corresponding to the location where the weld crack 5 has not occurred, and the pass / fail judgment device 13 determines the good temperature change curve and the actual temperature change curve. The presence or absence of the weld crack 5 is determined by comparing the obtained temperature change curve. In this case, the pass / fail judgment device 13 sets appropriate thresholds for these values based on, for example, the cooling rate, the time until the temperature falls to a predetermined temperature, the area inside the cooling curve, etc. Pass / fail can be determined in relation to the value.

このように、本実施形態においては赤外線撮像装置11によりエッジ側部位の温度変化を監視して、該赤外線撮像装置11により撮像した画像をデータ処理し、溶接割れ5の有無を判定するので、微小な溶接割れであっても検出可能であり、検出精度に対する信頼性は十分高いものとなる。また、溶接ビード4の全長にわたって溶接割れ有無を検出するので、品質保証に対する信頼性が向上する。   As described above, in the present embodiment, the temperature change of the edge side portion is monitored by the infrared imaging device 11, the image captured by the infrared imaging device 11 is processed, and the presence or absence of the weld crack 5 is determined. Even a simple weld crack can be detected, and the reliability with respect to the detection accuracy is sufficiently high. Moreover, since the presence or absence of a weld crack is detected over the entire length of the weld bead 4, the reliability for quality assurance is improved.

なお、上記実施形態においては、フランジ部1a、2aのエッジ近接部位の温度変化を監視するようにしたが、この監視部位(設定位置)は、溶接ラインLよりエッジ側部分であれば任意であり、エッジからわずか離れた部位であってもよい。また、上記実施形態においては、フランジ部1a、2aの溶接に適用した例を示したが、この溶接対象は任意であり、製品一般部であってもよい。さらに、上記実施形態においては、重ね溶接に適用した例を示したが、ワークのエッジ(側縁)沿って溶接する態様であれば、突き合せ溶接であっても、隅肉溶接であってもよい。   In the above embodiment, the temperature change of the edge proximity portion of the flange portions 1a and 2a is monitored. However, this monitoring portion (setting position) is arbitrary as long as it is an edge side portion from the welding line L. It may be a part slightly away from the edge. Moreover, in the said embodiment, although the example applied to welding of the flange parts 1a and 2a was shown, this welding object is arbitrary and a product general part may be sufficient. Furthermore, in the said embodiment, although the example applied to the lap welding was shown, as long as it is the aspect welded along the edge (side edge) of a workpiece | work, even if it is butt welding or fillet welding Good.

板厚1.4mmの高張力鋼板を素材として、その二枚を重ね合せ、レーザ出力4kW、溶接速度2mm/minの条件でエッジから5mm離れた部位を重ねレーザ溶接した。この重ねレーザ溶接に際しては、事前にエッジ近接部位に溶接方向へ所定のピッチで複数の熱電対を取付けて温度変化を監視し、溶接割れが発生の有無と温度変化との関係について実験した。   Using a high-strength steel sheet having a thickness of 1.4 mm as a raw material, the two sheets were overlapped, and a part 5 mm away from the edge was overlapped and laser welded under the conditions of a laser output of 4 kW and a welding speed of 2 mm / min. In this lap laser welding, a plurality of thermocouples were attached to the edge proximate portion at a predetermined pitch in the welding direction in advance to monitor the temperature change, and an experiment was conducted on the relationship between the occurrence of weld cracking and the temperature change.

図5は、上記した実験結果を示したもので、同図(A)は、溶接割れが発生しない場合の温度変化曲線を、同図(B)は溶接割れが発生した場合の温度変化曲線をそれぞれ表わしている。これより溶接割れが発生した場合は、溶接割れが発生しない場合に比べて、冷却に大幅な遅滞が生じている。因みに、400℃まで降下するまでの時間で比較すると、溶接割れが発生しない場合(A)の時間TAが約3秒であるのに対し、溶接割れが発生した場合(B)の時間TBは約27秒であり、両者の間には極めて大きな時間差が認められる。したがって、たとえば、前記した時間TAとTBとの間に適当なしきい値を設定することで、本発明の方法により溶接割れを確実に検出できることが明らかである。 FIG. 5 shows the above experimental results. FIG. 5A shows a temperature change curve when no weld crack occurs, and FIG. 5B shows a temperature change curve when a weld crack occurs. Each represents. Thus, when the weld crack occurs, the cooling is significantly delayed as compared with the case where the weld crack does not occur. Incidentally, when compared with the time to drop to 400 ° C., while the time T A in the case of weld crack is not generated (A) is about 3 seconds, the time T B in the case of weld crack is generated (B) Is about 27 seconds, and a very large time difference is recognized between the two. Therefore, for example, it is clear that a weld crack can be reliably detected by the method of the present invention by setting an appropriate threshold value between the above-described times T A and T B.

本発明に係る溶接割れ検出方法および装置の一つの実施形態を模式的に示す斜視図である。1 is a perspective view schematically showing one embodiment of a welding crack detection method and apparatus according to the present invention. 溶接割れの発生状況を模式的に示す平面図である。It is a top view which shows typically the generation | occurrence | production state of a weld crack. 溶接割れが発生した箇所に対応する部位(P1)と溶接割れが発生していない箇所に対応する部位(P2)とにおける冷却曲線の差を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the difference of the cooling curve in the site | part (P1) corresponding to the location (P1) corresponding to the location where the weld crack generate | occur | produced, and the location where the weld crack does not generate | occur | produce. 溶接割れの実験結果を示したもので、(A)は、溶接割れが発生しない場合の温度変化曲線を、(B)は溶接割れが発生した場合の温度変化曲線をそれぞれ示すグラフである。The experimental result of a weld crack is shown, (A) is a graph which shows the temperature change curve when a weld crack does not generate | occur | produce, (B) is a graph which respectively shows the temperature change curve when a weld crack occurs.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1、2 薄鋼板
1a、2a フランジ部
3 溶接ビード
4 溶接トーチ
5 溶接割れ
10 溶接割れ検出装置
11 赤外線撮像装置
12 画像データ処理装置
13 良否判定装置
14 表示装置
L 溶接ライン
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1, 2 Thin steel plate 1a, 2a Flange part 3 Weld bead 4 Welding torch 5 Weld crack 10 Weld crack detection apparatus 11 Infrared imaging device 12 Image data processing apparatus 13 Pass / fail judgment apparatus 14 Display apparatus L Welding line

Claims (5)

ワークのエッジに沿って溶接を行っている最中、溶接ラインよりエッジ側部分の温度変化を監視し、冷却過程の温度変化に基づいて溶接割れの有無を判定することを特徴とする溶接割れ検出方法。   Welding crack detection characterized by monitoring the temperature change at the edge side from the welding line during welding along the edge of the workpiece and determining the presence or absence of weld cracking based on the temperature change in the cooling process Method. 予め把握した、溶接割れが発生していない場合の温度変化と比較して、溶接割れの有無を判定することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の溶接割れ検出方法。   The weld crack detection method according to claim 1, wherein the presence / absence of a weld crack is determined by comparing with a change in temperature when a weld crack does not occur, which is grasped in advance. 赤外線撮像装置により温度変化を監視することを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の溶接割れ検出方法。   The method for detecting a weld crack according to claim 1 or 2, wherein a temperature change is monitored by an infrared imaging device. 熱電対により温度変化を監視することを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の溶接割れ検出方法。   The method for detecting a weld crack according to claim 1, wherein a temperature change is monitored by a thermocouple. 溶接が、二枚重ねの鋼板の重ねレーザ溶接であることを特徴とする請求項1乃至4の何れか1項に記載の溶接割れ検出方法。   The welding crack detection method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the welding is a lap laser welding of two steel sheets.
JP2007128439A 2007-05-14 2007-05-14 Weld crack detection method Expired - Fee Related JP4780334B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007128439A JP4780334B2 (en) 2007-05-14 2007-05-14 Weld crack detection method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007128439A JP4780334B2 (en) 2007-05-14 2007-05-14 Weld crack detection method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008279497A JP2008279497A (en) 2008-11-20
JP4780334B2 true JP4780334B2 (en) 2011-09-28

Family

ID=40140764

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2007128439A Expired - Fee Related JP4780334B2 (en) 2007-05-14 2007-05-14 Weld crack detection method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4780334B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106583927A (en) * 2016-12-13 2017-04-26 苏州大学 Laser-arc hybrid welding on-line monitoring method

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7243812B2 (en) 2019-11-27 2023-03-22 Jfeスチール株式会社 Welding inspection equipment
CA3165866A1 (en) 2020-01-27 2021-08-05 Comau S.P.A. Method of monitoring the quality of a weld bead, related welding station and computer-program product
DE102021103881A1 (en) 2021-02-18 2022-08-18 Precitec Gmbh & Co. Kg Method and laser processing system for analyzing a weld seam formed by a laser welding process

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106583927A (en) * 2016-12-13 2017-04-26 苏州大学 Laser-arc hybrid welding on-line monitoring method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2008279497A (en) 2008-11-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101361013B1 (en) Method for the automatic analysis of a material bond
JP6206350B2 (en) Ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus and ultrasonic flaw detection method
JP4696325B2 (en) Automatic welding and defect repair method and automatic welding equipment
KR101719391B1 (en) Method and installation for ultrasound inspection of butt-welding of two transverse ends of two metal strips
JP4780334B2 (en) Weld crack detection method
KR20130043105A (en) Thermographic test method and testing device for carrying out the test method
JP2005508759A (en) Method and apparatus for evaluating workpiece joints
US20080237197A1 (en) System and method for welding and real time monitoring of seam welded parts
JP2005014027A (en) Weld zone image processing method, welding management system, feedback system for welding machine, and butt line detection system
JP5611177B2 (en) Ablation abnormality detection device and anomaly detection method
JP2007330987A (en) Apparatus and method for analyzing welding condition using weld zone visualizing apparatus
WO2016143473A1 (en) Method of monitoring manufacturing status of electric resistance welded pipe, device for monitoring manufacturing status of electric resistance welded pipe, and method of manufacturing electric resistance welded pipe
JP2010279994A (en) Method for detecting abnormality of laser beam welding system
JP2008196866A (en) Weld crack detection method and device
JP5928231B2 (en) Surface defect inspection method
WO2018042882A1 (en) Welding system
JP2000337832A (en) Method and device for determining quality of welding
JP5920401B2 (en) Ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus and method for electric sewing tube and quality assurance method
JP4532977B2 (en) Welding method for ERW steel pipe with excellent welding quality
JP3148658B2 (en) Abnormal cause determination device for butt weld
CN113714635A (en) Laser processing apparatus
JPH0972721A (en) Method and apparatus for diagnosing welded part of thin plate material of continuous processing line
JPH05115903A (en) Quality determining device for strip weld zone
JP6597695B2 (en) Cold rolled steel sheet welding apparatus and welding method
JP2002210575A (en) Method for discriminating weld condition in laser welding

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20090703

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20110519

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20110608

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20110621

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140715

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140715

Year of fee payment: 3

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees