JP3503552B2 - Seamless pipe manufacturing method - Google Patents

Seamless pipe manufacturing method

Info

Publication number
JP3503552B2
JP3503552B2 JP34651399A JP34651399A JP3503552B2 JP 3503552 B2 JP3503552 B2 JP 3503552B2 JP 34651399 A JP34651399 A JP 34651399A JP 34651399 A JP34651399 A JP 34651399A JP 3503552 B2 JP3503552 B2 JP 3503552B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
roll
plug
rolling
slab
billet
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP34651399A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2001162307A (en
Inventor
龍郎 勝村
孝 有泉
祥三 東
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP34651399A priority Critical patent/JP3503552B2/en
Publication of JP2001162307A publication Critical patent/JP2001162307A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3503552B2 publication Critical patent/JP3503552B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、噛み込み不良を生
じることなく、難加工材であっても内面疵の発生を抑制
することができる継目無管の製造方法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for manufacturing a seamless pipe capable of suppressing the occurrence of internal flaws even in a difficult-to-machine material without causing a biting failure.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】継目無管は一般に鋳造した鋼片に加工を
加えて、あるいは連続鋳造により作られた丸または角鋼
片上のビレットを用い、マンネスマン穿孔あるいはプレ
ス穿孔、または熱間押し出し等により中空素管にされ、
その後エロンゲータ、プラグミルまたはマンドレルミル
等の圧延機により延伸され、最終的にサイザーやストレ
ッチレデューサにより定型される工程を経て製品とな
る。
2. Description of the Related Art Generally, a seamless pipe is a hollow steel formed by mannesmann punching, press punching, or hot extrusion by using a billet on a round or square steel billet produced by processing a cast steel billet or by continuous casting. Made into a tube
After that, the product is drawn by a rolling machine such as an elongator, a plug mill, or a mandrel mill, and finally subjected to a process of being standardized by a sizer or a stretch reducer to obtain a product.

【0003】継目無管の素材には、合金成分の少ない一
般の低炭素鋼のように丸形鋼片への連続鋳造が比較的容
易に行え、素材の熱間加工性が良いものは鋳造まま、鋳
造ままでは鋼片中央部にポロシティや偏析が生じやすい
ステンレス鋼など、熱間加工性の悪いものであれば大き
な加工を施して丸形鋼片とするものがある。
As a material for a seamless pipe, continuous casting into a round billet can be relatively easily performed, such as a general low carbon steel having a small alloy content, and a material having a good hot workability can be cast as it is. If there is poor hot workability, such as stainless steel, which is likely to cause porosity or segregation in the center of the billet as cast, a large work is applied to form a round billet.

【0004】加工性劣化の主とした理由は連続鋳片の中
心部偏析やポロシティであり、特に大きな影響を与える
ポロシティの発生機構は一般に、鋳片の最終凝固段階に
おいて空隙が生じ、本来溶鋼が供給されるべきところが
高合金鋼などの場合ではCr等の含有量が高いために溶
鋼の粘性が上昇するなどの理由で溶鋼が供給されないこ
とに起因する。例えばCr量では、図5および図6に示
すように、Cr含有量が0.5質量%を超えると溶鋼の
粘性が急激に増加し、このためポロシティが生じやすく
なる。このように内部に欠陥を内包する可能性のある素
材を鋳造ままで用いた場合は、製管工程の最初にマンネ
スマン穿孔という過酷な加工を受けるため、軸芯部のポ
ロシティや偏析により管内面疵が発生する。このため、
特に難加工性材料と呼ばれる、合金成分を多く含有する
鋼や加工性を劣化させる硫黄Sを比較的多く含有する快
削鋼などの炭素鋼はもとより、炭素量の多い普通鋼種や
Crが添加された鋼種についても内部品質を向上させる
ための穿孔前圧延が必要であるといわれていた。例え
ば、高Cr鋼の継目無管素材の製造方法として、400
×520mmの比較的大断面を持つ角形状のブルームを
連続鋳造機等により鋳造し、加熱後、分塊圧延等を用い
て矩形型形状鋼塊から小断面の丸形鋼塊、すなわち丸ビ
レットを製造するといった要領である。このような、鋳
造材に予加工を加え継目無管素材とする製造は鋳造まま
で素材となすことのできる鋼種と比べ、工程の増加、予
加工時の加熱などによるコストの増加につながるため、
できる限り予加工を加えずに製管する手法が求められて
いた。
The main reason for the deterioration of the workability is the segregation and porosity of the central part of the continuous slab. The porosity generation mechanism, which has a particularly large effect, generally causes voids in the final solidification stage of the slab, and the molten steel is essentially This is because when high alloy steel or the like is to be supplied, the molten steel is not supplied because the content of Cr and the like is high and the viscosity of the molten steel increases. For example, as for the Cr amount, as shown in FIG. 5 and FIG. 6, when the Cr content exceeds 0.5 mass%, the viscosity of the molten steel sharply increases, which easily causes porosity. In this way, when a material that may contain defects inside is used as it is, it undergoes a severe process called Mannesmann drilling at the beginning of the pipe manufacturing process, and the pipe inner surface defects due to porosity and segregation of the shaft core. Occurs. For this reason,
In particular, not only carbon steels such as steels containing a large amount of alloying components and free-cutting steels containing a relatively large amount of sulfur S that deteriorates workability, which are called difficult-to-process materials, but ordinary steel grades with high carbon content and Cr are added. It has been said that pre-perforation rolling is also necessary for the steel grades to improve the internal quality. For example, as a method for producing a seamless pipe material of high Cr steel, 400
A square-shaped bloom having a relatively large cross section of 520 mm is cast by a continuous casting machine or the like, and after heating, slab rolling or the like is used to change a round-shaped steel ingot having a small cross-section from a rectangular-shaped steel ingot, that is, a round billet. It's like manufacturing. In this way, the production of a seamless pipe material by adding pre-processing to a cast material leads to an increase in the number of processes and costs due to heating during pre-processing, compared to steel types that can be used as a raw material as cast,
There has been a demand for a method of producing a pipe without adding pre-processing as much as possible.

【0005】この問題を解決するために、一つは鋳造方
法の改善、また一つは製管方法の改善が多く提案されて
いる。
To solve this problem, many proposals have been made to improve the casting method and the tube manufacturing method.

【0006】鋳造方法の改善については、連続鋳造材を
鋳造中に圧下し、欠陥を機械的に圧着させる方法がスラ
ブなど、矩形断面の鋳片においては良く適用されてい
る。この軽圧下プロセスを丸ビレットに適応したときの
大きな問題は、圧下ロールにより引き起こされる鋳片形
状の悪化と圧下を増加したときに発生する可能性のある
凝固界面の割れである。単純に丸鋳片を一対の平ロール
により圧下すれば、当然圧下部はつぶれ、断面は扁平化
する。しかも圧下により、断面内で圧下方向と直交する
方向に引っ張り応力が発生することで割れが生じやすく
なる。またポロシティの圧着効果を高めるために圧下量
を大きくすれば、形状はさらに真円から遠ざかり、割れ
の発生率は高くなり、継目無管製造用の丸ビレットとし
て用いるには、ビレットを転がすことによって行う搬送
ができなくなったり、また穿孔時の噛込みが不安定にな
る等の重大な問題が発生し、結局、鋳片の内部品質が不
十分なままで我慢せざるを得ない。この問題を解決する
ため、例えば特開平7−108358号公報(以下、先
行技術1)のように、圧下される部分を予め大きめにし
ておくという、楕円モールドによる鋳造法も提案されて
いる。この方法は軽圧下に対しては有効であるものの、
真円モールドに比べ鋳造時の流れが不均一になることに
起因する湯面変動やパウダーの引き込みにより、新たな
欠陥の原因になることが明らかであり、完全な解決策に
はなり得ない。
Regarding the improvement of the casting method, a method of mechanically crimping a continuously cast material during casting and mechanically crimping defects is often applied to a slab or the like having a rectangular cross section. A major problem when applying this light reduction process to round billets is the deterioration of the slab shape caused by the reduction roll and the cracking of the solidification interface that can occur when the reduction is increased. If the round slab is simply pressed down by a pair of flat rolls, naturally the pressure lower part is crushed and the cross section is flattened. Moreover, due to the rolling reduction, tensile stress is generated in the cross-section in a direction orthogonal to the rolling direction, so that cracking is likely to occur. If the amount of reduction is increased in order to increase the porosity pressure bonding effect, the shape will move further from the true circle and the rate of cracking will increase.To use it as a round billet for seamless pipe manufacturing, roll the billet by rolling it. Serious problems such as the inability to carry the material and the unstable biting during drilling occur, and in the end, the internal quality of the slab remains inadequate. In order to solve this problem, a casting method using an elliptical mold has been proposed, for example, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 7-108358 (hereinafter, Prior Art 1), in which a portion to be pressed is made larger in advance. Although this method is effective under light pressure,
It is obvious that it causes a new defect due to the fluctuation of the molten metal surface and the drawing of the powder due to the non-uniformity of the flow at the time of casting as compared with the perfect circular mold, and it cannot be a complete solution.

【0007】一方、製管プロセスにおいても、穿孔時の
マンネスマン割れに起因する内面疵発生防止技術を検討
した事例は多い。例えば、特開昭55−106611号
公報(以下、先行技術2)では内面疵の発生限界のみな
らず、噛込みや偏肉についても穿孔条件を規定できると
の提案が成されている。ところが、先行技術2中にも記
されているように、内面疵の発生限界は素材の材質、温
度、製法に依存するために、連続鋳造ままの素材や難加
工材と呼ばれるものについてはこの先行技術を適用して
も疵の発生を防止できない。
On the other hand, also in the pipe manufacturing process, there are many cases in which a technique for preventing the generation of internal flaws due to the Mannesmann crack at the time of drilling was examined. For example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 55-106611 (hereinafter referred to as Prior Art 2) proposes that not only the limit of occurrence of inner surface flaws but also the condition of punching can be defined not only for biting or uneven thickness. However, as described in Prior Art 2, the limit of occurrence of inner surface flaw depends on the material, temperature, and manufacturing method of the raw material, so that the continuous casting material and the so-called difficult-to-process material are Even if the technology is applied, the occurrence of defects cannot be prevented.

【0008】また、穿孔ロールの傾斜角を噛込み前から
その直後まで、および尻抜け直前と直後、これらと定常
圧延中との水準を変化させることで、内面疵の発生を抑
制するという技術が特許第1811008号(以下、先
行技術3)にある。この先行技術3は内面疵の発生を抑
制するという点では、理にかなった方法を適用してい
る。すなわち、マンネスマン割れを抑制する手段とし
て、ロール傾斜角の高い状態で穿孔を継続したい、とこ
ろが、その場合には噛込み不良が生じやすくなるため
に、噛込み・尻抜け時のみ傾斜角を小さくするというも
のである。しかしながら、この技術も万能とは言いがた
い。この技術によれば、素材材質が劣悪である場合に
は、かなりの低傾斜角で噛込ませ、その直後に能率を維
持するために高傾斜角にロールを配置せねばならず、か
なりの機械的負荷が発生する。このため故障の危険があ
り、本来の目的である生産能率の向上には必ずしも寄与
できない。しかも、疵そのものは低傾斜角で噛込ませる
間にも生じているから、噛込み時と尻抜け時、すなわち
管の先後端に生ずる疵は抑制できない。しかるに生産能
率を維持しつつ、内面品質の良い製品を作ることは困難
である。また、大きな機械的付加に耐えられるように設
計する必要があるので設備費も高価なものとなる。
Further, there is a technique for suppressing the occurrence of inner surface defects by changing the inclination angle of the piercing roll from before biting to immediately after that, and immediately before and after the trailing edge slip and during steady rolling. Japanese Patent No. 1811008 (hereinafter, Prior Art 3). This prior art 3 applies a rational method in terms of suppressing the occurrence of internal defects. That is, as a means for suppressing Mannesmann cracking, it is desired to continue drilling in a state where the roll inclination angle is high. However, in that case, defective biting is likely to occur, so the angle of inclination is reduced only when biting or slipping out. That is. However, this technology is not universal. According to this technology, when the material is poor, it must be bitten at a fairly low angle of inclination, and immediately after that, the roll must be placed at a high angle of inclination to maintain efficiency. Load is generated. Therefore, there is a risk of failure, and it cannot necessarily contribute to the original purpose of improving the production efficiency. Moreover, since the flaw itself occurs during the biting at a low inclination angle, it is not possible to suppress the flaws at the time of biting and slipping out, that is, at the front and rear ends of the pipe. However, it is difficult to produce products with good inner quality while maintaining production efficiency. In addition, since it is necessary to design it so as to withstand a large mechanical load, the equipment cost becomes expensive.

【0009】一方、素材の加工性が劣悪である場合に、
その製造方法を検討した例も多くある。例えば特許第1
828639号(以下、先行技術4)では、硫黄快削
鋼、鉛快削鋼等の快削鋼継目無管をマンネスマン製管法
にて製造するにあたり、素材先端外径をロール開度以下
にすべくテーパ加工し、内面疵を抑制する技術が開示さ
れている。この先行技術4は特開昭56−89307号
公報等の先行技術を引き合いに出し、素材の加工を施す
という点でその枠を超えるものではなく、製造コストを
低減できる技術ではない。
On the other hand, when the workability of the material is poor,
There are many examples of examining the manufacturing method. For example, Patent No. 1
In No. 828639 (hereinafter, Prior Art 4), when manufacturing free-cutting steel seamless pipes such as sulfur free-cutting steel and lead free-cutting steel by the Mannesmann pipe manufacturing method, the outer diameter of the material tip is set to a roll opening or less. A technique for suppressing inner surface defects by appropriately tapering is disclosed. This prior art 4 does not exceed the frame in that the prior art such as Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 56-89307 is cited and the material is processed, and the manufacturing cost cannot be reduced.

【0010】また、製造コストを低減するために、なる
べく素材に予加工を加えないようにしながら製管する技
術については、例えば特開平1−228603号公報に
あるように特定の鋼種、ここでは二相ステンレス鋼に対
し連続鋳造された丸ビレットの加工度および加熱温度を
限定するといった先行技術や、特開平6−106209
号公報のような穿孔機およびプラグからなる幾何学的関
係より穿孔圧延方法を開示している先行技術もある。後
者は素材を限定せず、一見かなり有効な提案であるよう
に見える。ところが、素材品質が劣悪である場合には、
「鉄と鋼」誌第56年第7号「継目無管の製造技術につ
いて」(以下、先行文献)等において記されるように、
内面疵を抑制し得るある圧下率が存在し、少なくとも材
質の特性を把握しなくてはならないため、この様な提案
は全く無力に等しい。なぜならばマンネスマン穿孔とい
う過酷な加工を受けるが故に、内面疵の発生源ともなる
ビレット軸芯部の状態は、素材の鋼種あるいは製法によ
って全く異なるからである。
Further, in order to reduce the manufacturing cost, a technique for producing a pipe while pre-processing the raw material as little as possible is disclosed in, for example, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 1-282803, in which a specific steel type, here, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 6-106209, which is a prior art for limiting the working degree and heating temperature of a round billet continuously cast on a duplex stainless steel.
There is also a prior art which discloses a piercing and rolling method based on a geometrical relationship of a piercing machine and a plug as in Japanese Patent Publication No. The latter does not limit the material and seems to be a fairly effective proposal at first glance. However, if the material quality is poor,
As described in "Iron and Steel" magazine No. 56, No. 7, "Manufacturing technology for seamless pipes" (hereinafter referred to as prior literature),
There is a certain reduction rate that can suppress internal defects, and at least the characteristics of the material have to be grasped, so such a proposal is completely powerless. This is because the state of the billet shaft core, which is the source of internal flaws, is completely different depending on the steel type of the raw material or the manufacturing method because it undergoes severe processing such as Mannesmann drilling.

【0011】しかしながら直鋳ままの素材、特にそれが
高合金鋼であるような場合にはビレット内質の劣化が著
しく、先行技術に示されたような圧下率ではとても内面
疵は抑制できないのが現状である。また、その圧下率を
取るべく、穿孔条件を変更しようとしても、今度は素材
が噛込み不良を起こしてしまい、結局、内面疵の抑制を
行えないという問題があった。
However, when the material is directly cast, especially when it is a high-alloy steel, the internal quality of the billet is significantly deteriorated, and the inner surface defects cannot be suppressed with the reduction ratio as shown in the prior art. The current situation. Further, even if an attempt is made to change the perforation conditions in order to obtain the reduction rate, the material will cause a bite failure this time, and eventually there is a problem that the inner surface defects cannot be suppressed.

【0012】[0012]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】以上述べたように、従
来の素材製造・製管工程により内面品質の良い製品を得
るためには、素材に予加工を加える必要があるが、予加
工をするための特別な設備投資が必須となりコストが上
昇するデメリットがある。一方、素材内質の悪い部分を
容認しつつ製管しようとするならば、比較的大がかりな
設備改造等を伴うことや、素材一つ一つに加工をする必
要が生じ、やはりコスト負担は免れ得ずデメリットが発
生する問題点があった。したがって、ほぼ従来通りの工
程を経ながら難加工材、特に鋳造ままの低合金鋼・高合
金鋼などを製管後も、管内面疵を残さないようにするこ
とは極めて困難であった。したがって、可能な限り直鋳
ままなどの予加工を施さない素材を用い、かつ穿孔で内
面疵を作らず、それを大きな設備投資なく製造できる
「コスト増のデメリット」を解決する技術が切望されて
いる。
As described above, in order to obtain a product having a good inner surface quality by the conventional material manufacturing / pipe making process, it is necessary to pre-process the material, but the pre-processing is performed. Therefore, there is a demerit that a special capital investment is required and the cost will rise. On the other hand, if we try to manufacture a pipe while accepting the poor quality of the material, it will be accompanied by a relatively large-scale modification of the equipment, and it will be necessary to process each material individually. There was a problem that disadvantages occurred because it was not obtained. Therefore, it has been extremely difficult to prevent defects on the inner surface of the pipe even after pipes of difficult-to-machine materials, particularly as-cast low-alloy steel and high-alloy steel, have been produced through almost the same steps. Therefore, there is a long-felt need for a technology that solves the "demerit of cost increase" by using materials that are not subjected to pre-processing such as direct casting as much as possible, and without making internal flaws by drilling, without large capital investment. There is.

【0013】本発明は上記の課題を解決するためになさ
れたものであって、内質が劣化しやすい快削鋼や難加工
性の高合金鋼を素材とするマンネスマン押込み穿孔法に
おいて噛み込み不良を生じることなく、内面疵の発生を
効果的に抑制することができる継目無管の製造方法を提
供することを目的とする。
The present invention has been made in order to solve the above-mentioned problems, and the biting failure in the Mannesmann indentation perforation method using free-cutting steel whose internal quality easily deteriorates or high-alloy steel that is difficult to work as a material. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for producing a seamless pipe which can effectively suppress the generation of inner surface defects without causing any defects.

【0014】[0014]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明はかかる事情に鑑
み、難加工材や鋳造ままの素材を、コスト負担増のデメ
リットを生じさせることのない極めて合理的な手段で従
来通りの製造を行い、かつ管内面疵を抑制するため、既
存設備を最大限利用することを検討した。その結果、上
記課題を解決する本発明を完成させた。本発明に係る継
目無管の製造方法は、Cr含有量が0.5質量%以上の
高合金鋼からなり、横断面が丸形状の鋳造ままの鋳片を
傾斜圧延ロールに噛み込ませて穿孔プラグで穿孔する継
目無管の製造方法において、鋳片を穿孔するにあたり傾
斜圧延ロールを毎秒4.5m未満の周速度で回転させ、
プッシャーにより鋳片に背圧を付与しながら押込みマン
ネスマン穿孔を行い、前記鋳片が傾斜圧延ロールに安定
に噛み込むまでプッシャーにより鋳片に背圧を付与し、
下式で定義されるプラグ先端圧下率を97%以上で穿孔
を行うことを特徴とする継目無管の製造方法。 M=d/D 但し、Mはプラグ先端圧下率、dはプラグ先端位置での
ロール間隔、Dは鋳片の直径とする。 以下に本件発明の
原理を説明する。
In view of the above circumstances, the present invention performs conventional manufacturing of difficult-to-machine materials and as-cast materials by extremely rational means that does not cause the disadvantage of increased cost burden. In addition, in order to suppress the inner surface defects of the pipe, we examined the maximum use of the existing equipment. As a result, the present invention that solves the above problems has been completed. Succession according to the present invention
The method for producing a seamless tube has a Cr content of 0.5 mass% or more.
As-cast slab made of high alloy steel with a round cross section
A joint that bites into an inclined rolling roll and pierces with a piercing plug.
In the method for producing a seamless pipe, the
The oblique rolling roll is rotated at a peripheral speed of less than 4.5 m / sec,
Pushing man while applying back pressure to the slab with a pusher
Nesmann drilling is performed, and the slab is stable on inclined rolling rolls.
Back pressure is applied to the slab with a pusher until it bites into
Perforation with a plug tip reduction defined by the following formula of 97% or more
A method for producing a seamless pipe, which comprises: M = d / D where M is the plug tip rolling reduction, and d is the plug tip position.
Roll interval, D is the diameter of the slab. The principle of the present invention will be described below.

【0015】先に述べた先行文献等の知見を元にすれ
ば、加工性の劣悪な素材を疵なく穿孔・製管するには、
軽圧下穿孔が必要であることが示唆されている。これを
実現するためには、穿孔プラグを素材側へ前進させ、軽
圧下状態を作り出すことが必要になる。このことは、一
見矛盾するが、傾斜穿孔圧延法を用いながらマンネスマ
ン効果、すなわち回転鍛造効果をできる限り抑制しつつ
穿孔すればいかなる素材に対しても内面疵を生ずること
なく製管することが可能となることを意味している。
Based on the findings of the above-mentioned prior documents, etc., in order to perforate and manufacture a material having poor workability without defects,
It has been suggested that light pressure perforation is necessary. In order to achieve this, it is necessary to advance the piercing plug toward the blank side to create a light reduction state. This seems to be contradictory, but it is possible to manufacture pipes without causing internal defects on any material if the Mannesmann effect, that is, the rotary forging effect is suppressed as much as possible while using the inclined piercing and rolling method. It means that

【0016】そこで、本発明者らは、鋭意研究を重ねた
結果、従来よりも遙かに小さい圧下率で穿孔を可能に
し、内面疵を抑制できる技術を見出した。それは、穿孔
に用いられる主ロールの回転速度を毎秒4.5m未満と
し、加えて従来より穿孔に用いられていたプッシャーを
最大限に利用し、噛込み不良が生ずる前にプッシャーに
よってロールへ材料を押込むことで内面疵を抑制する穿
孔法である。なお、ここでいうロール回転速度とは、あ
る速度にて穿孔を実施したときの噛込み不良が発生する
直前、すなわち噛み込み限度での速度であり、例えばマ
ンネスマン穿孔に使用されるロール形状が樽型である場
合には、その最大となる点、すなわち最もロール径が大
きい部分での周速をもって評価する。
Therefore, as a result of intensive studies, the inventors of the present invention have found a technique that enables perforation with a much smaller rolling reduction than in the past and can suppress inner surface defects. That is, the rotation speed of the main roll used for perforation is less than 4.5 m / s, and in addition, the pusher conventionally used for perforation is used to the maximum, and the material is pushed to the roll by the pusher before biting failure occurs. This is a perforation method that suppresses inner surface flaws by pushing. Note that the roll rotation speed here is a speed immediately before the occurrence of a biting failure when punching is performed at a certain speed, that is, a speed at the biting limit, for example, a roll shape used for Mannesmann drilling is a barrel. In the case of a die, the maximum point, that is, the peripheral speed at the portion having the largest roll diameter is evaluated.

【0017】軽圧下穿孔、すなわち下式(1)にて定義
されるプラグ先端圧下率Mの拡大は、通常の穿孔圧延条
件下ではある限界が存在する。但し、dはプラグ先端位
置でのロール間隔を、Dはビレット径を表わす。また、
ロールとプラグから素材が受ける圧下率Nは下式(2)
で与えられる。例えばプラグ先端圧下率Mが0.97
(97%)の場合は、素材の圧下率Nは0.03(3
%)となる。
There is a certain limit under the normal piercing and rolling conditions for light reduction piercing, that is, the expansion of the plug tip reduction rate M defined by the following formula (1). However, d represents the roll interval at the plug tip position, and D represents the billet diameter. Also,
The rolling reduction N that the material receives from the roll and plug is expressed by the following formula (2).
Given in. For example, the plug tip rolling reduction M is 0.97.
In case of (97%), the material rolling reduction N is 0.03 (3
%).

【0018】M=d/D …(1) N=1−M …(2) 上式(1)によればプラグ先端でのロール間隔を大きく
することがプラグ先端圧下率を高めることと同義であ
り、その方法にはロール間隔を大きく開ける穿孔方法と
穿孔プラグをビレット方向へ予め前進させておく穿孔方
法とが考えられる。いずれにしてもビレットがロールに
接触してからプラグに当たるまでの接触面積が少なくな
り、プラグの抗力に打ち勝つだけの推力をロールから得
難いことになる。このため素材が主ロールに噛込んだ
後、穿孔プラグに接触し、圧延進行方向への抗力を受け
ることで素材が進まなくなる。
M = d / D (1) N = 1-M (2) According to the above equation (1), increasing the roll interval at the plug tip is synonymous with increasing the plug tip rolling reduction. There are a perforating method for widening the roll interval and a perforating method for advancing the perforating plug in the billet direction in advance. In any case, the contact area from the billet contacting the roll to the contact with the plug is reduced, and it is difficult to obtain thrust from the roll to overcome the drag force of the plug. For this reason, after the raw material is bitten into the main roll, the raw material comes into contact with the perforated plug and receives a drag force in the rolling direction, so that the raw material does not advance.

【0019】一方、本発明者らは多くの実測データに基
づいて、内質が劣化した高合金鋼等の鋳片(例えば鋳造
まま)のような難加工材を穿孔する場合は、95%を超
えるプラグ先端圧下率を確保できればある程度、工業生
産には十分な疵の抑制が可能で、さらに97%程度まで
それを高めればほぼ完全に内面疵を解消することができ
るという知見を得た。その結果を図7に示す。
On the other hand, the present inventors, based on a large amount of actual measurement data, when drilling a difficult-to-machine material such as a slab (for example, as-cast) of a high alloy steel or the like with deteriorated internal quality, 95% is required. It has been found that if a plug tip rolling reduction exceeding the above level can be secured, it is possible to suppress defects to a sufficient extent for industrial production, and further increase it to about 97% to eliminate internal defects almost completely. The result is shown in FIG. 7.

【0020】さらに本発明者らは、素材をロールに対
し、いかに効率よく引き込み、プラグの抗力に打ち勝つ
推力を付与できるかという点について多くの検討を重ね
た。その結果、ロール・素材間の摩擦係数を高めるこ
と、及び同時に噛込み不良を解消できるよう外力を付与
することが有利であるとの結論を得た。以下、これらに
ついて順次説明する。
Further, the present inventors have made many studies on how efficiently the material can be drawn into the roll to give a thrust force that overcomes the drag force of the plug. As a result, it was concluded that it is advantageous to increase the friction coefficient between the roll and the material, and at the same time, to apply an external force so as to eliminate defective biting. These will be sequentially described below.

【0021】ロールの素材引き込み力を大きくする方法
としては、既にロール表面に凹凸を付与する特開平2−
251305号公報等が考案されているが、ロールの使
用による表面の凹凸の継時変化には対応できない点や、
凹凸形状が不適切に大きい場合には製品表面性状の劣化
を招くという問題もある。一方、ロール・素材間の摩擦
係数については、例えば特開平5−57307号公報の
ように、増摩擦剤なるものを穿孔ロールと素材ビレット
間に供給する技術も提案されている。しかしながら、こ
の技術も高合金鋼等で生じやすい、ロール表面の劣化に
起因する「すべり」を低減し、穿孔本数の増加に伴うビ
レット前進効率を補償するものである。また同公報の実
施例中にも明記されているように、適用例のうち、疵が
生じたものは素材性である、との表現もあり、これは換
言すれば素材に起因する内面疵は抑制できないことに他
ならない。いずれにしても、常時、ある程度の摩擦係数
を維持し、穿孔プラグの抗力に打ち勝つだけの推力を付
与し得る有効な圧延方法は確認されていなかった。
As a method for increasing the material pull-in force of the roll, unevenness has already been provided on the roll surface.
No. 251305 has been devised, but it cannot cope with the continuous change of surface irregularities due to the use of rolls,
There is also a problem that the product surface quality is deteriorated when the uneven shape is inappropriately large. On the other hand, regarding the friction coefficient between the roll and the material, for example, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 5-57307, a technique has been proposed in which a friction-increasing agent is supplied between the perforating roll and the material billet. However, this technique also reduces "slip" caused by deterioration of the roll surface, which is likely to occur in high-alloy steels, and compensates billet advancing efficiency with an increase in the number of holes. In addition, as clearly described in the examples of the publication, there is also an expression that among the application examples, those in which a flaw has occurred are material properties. In other words, internal flaws caused by the material are It cannot be suppressed. In any case, an effective rolling method capable of constantly maintaining a certain coefficient of friction and imparting thrust sufficient to overcome the drag of the piercing plug has not been confirmed.

【0022】そこで、本発明者らはロール回転速度に着
目して検討を行った。摩擦力とロール回転速度または圧
延速度との間には相関があるといわれてきた。しかしな
がら、この相関は表面に何の加工も施されていない、材
料の進行方向と完全に直交したロールを用いた通常の板
圧延で確認された事項である。対して穿孔圧延は先述し
たように、表面に十分な加工が施され、かつロールは材
料の進行方向と若干の角度しか持たない軸におかれてい
る、全く異なった圧延である。しかも穿孔プラグという
材料の進行を阻むものである。さらには摩擦係数とプラ
グ先端圧下率の間には、何の相関も見出されていなかっ
た。
Therefore, the present inventors have conducted a study focusing on the roll rotation speed. It has been said that there is a correlation between the frictional force and the roll rotation speed or rolling speed. However, this correlation is a matter confirmed by ordinary plate rolling using a roll whose surface is not processed at all and which is completely orthogonal to the traveling direction of the material. On the other hand, the piercing rolling is a completely different rolling in which the surface is sufficiently processed and the roll is placed on an axis having only a slight angle with the traveling direction of the material, as described above. Moreover, it hinders the progress of the material called the perforated plug. Furthermore, no correlation was found between the friction coefficient and the plug tip rolling reduction.

【0023】そこで本発明者らは多くの実験を重ねた結
果、ある条件下ではロール回転速度とプラグ先端圧下率
との間に明白な関係があるという知見を得た。図7は横
軸にロール回転速度(m/秒)をとり、縦軸に前述の噛
み込み限界でのプラグ先端圧下率をとって、ロール回転
速度とプラグ先端圧下率との相関について調べた結果を
示す特性図である。この図から明らかなように、ロール
回転速度を低速とする領域では高いプラグ先端圧下率で
の穿孔、すなわち軽圧下穿孔が可能になる。これからロ
ール回転速度が4.5m/秒未満の領域では、95%以
上のプラグ先端圧下率を確保することができ、高合金鋼
で一旦穿孔前に圧延等の工程を経た素材のように、ある
程度内質が確保された素材を穿孔した際に生ずる内面疵
を抑制するために十分な圧延条件であるプラグ先端圧下
率95%を確保でき、実際に穿孔後の管の品質を調査し
たところ、疵抑制が工業生産ベースで充分おこなえるこ
とが明らかである。
Therefore, the present inventors have conducted many experiments and have found that under certain conditions, there is a clear relationship between the roll rotation speed and the plug tip rolling reduction. In FIG. 7, the horizontal axis represents the roll rotation speed (m / sec), and the vertical axis represents the plug tip reduction rate at the above-mentioned bite limit, and the result of examination of the correlation between the roll rotation speed and the plug tip reduction rate is shown. FIG. As is apparent from this figure, perforation with a high plug tip reduction rate, that is, light reduction perforation is possible in a region where the roll rotation speed is low. From this, in the region where the roll rotation speed is less than 4.5 m / sec, the plug tip reduction ratio of 95% or more can be secured, and to some extent, like a material that has undergone a process such as rolling once before drilling with high alloy steel. A rolling condition of 95% for the tip of the plug tip, which is a rolling condition sufficient to suppress inner surface defects caused when drilling a material with secured internal quality, can be secured, and the quality of the pipe after actual drilling was investigated. It is clear that the suppression can be done on an industrial production basis.

【0024】ところで、プッシャーは本来、素材を傾斜
穿孔機まで搬送する目的で設けられており、穿孔ロール
へ素材ビレットを噛み込ませると自動的に後退したり、
手動運転時にはオペレータが手動で後退させている。こ
の場合に噛込みとは、回転する穿孔ロールと素材ビレッ
トが接触することにより、自動的に開始されるものであ
り、プッシャーが素材の搬送以外に特に意味を持つもの
ではない。一方、穿孔プラグを素材側へ前進させ素材を
軽圧下にて穿孔する場合には、ロール・素材間の摩擦力
によって駆動されていた素材が穿孔プラグと接触するこ
とにより効力が発生し、これがロールにより素材に与え
られる駆動力に勝るため噛込み不良となる。噛込み不良
の要因としては、穿孔プラグによる抗力以外にも、ロー
ル・素材間の摩擦力の不足に起因する素材への駆動力の
伝達不十分も考えられる。しかしながら、摩擦力を増加
させることでこの問題を解決しようとする試みについて
は、すでに穿孔ロール表面にはよく知られているナーリ
ングと呼ばれる凹凸あるいはローレットと呼ばれる表面
加工痕があるため、経時変化によるロール表面の変動を
除けば、噛込みに大きな影響を与えることはできなかっ
た。そこで、あらためて穿孔プラグによる抗力の問題を
十分検討したところ、この噛込み不良が生じた状態と、
通常の穿孔状態での違いは、図1に示すように、通常穿
孔時の素材変形により得られるロール・素材間の接触面
積が異なることに起因する駆動力と抗力のバランスだけ
である。この点に発明者らは着目し、噛込み不良が生じ
ないようにプッシャーにより、穿孔プラグの抗力に打ち
勝つだけの背圧を付与し、穿孔可能な状態の接触面積が
確保でき穿孔が通常通り進行することを可能とすること
で、軽圧下穿孔、すなわち内面疵の抑制をできることを
見出した。
By the way, the pusher is originally provided for the purpose of transporting the material to the inclined punching machine, and when the material billet is caught in the punching roll, the pusher automatically retracts,
The operator manually retracts during manual operation. In this case, the bite is automatically started when the rotating piercing roll and the material billet come into contact with each other, and the pusher has no special meaning other than the material conveyance. On the other hand, when the piercing plug is advanced to the material side and the material is pierced under a light pressure, the material driven by the frictional force between the roll and the material comes into contact with the piercing plug to produce the effect. As a result, the driving force applied to the material is exceeded, resulting in defective biting. In addition to the drag force caused by the perforated plug, insufficient factor of the bite may be insufficient transmission of driving force to the material due to insufficient frictional force between the roll and the material. However, in an attempt to solve this problem by increasing the frictional force, the perforated roll surface already has well-known unevenness called knurling or surface processing marks called knurling, so the roll due to aging changes. Except for surface variations, it was not possible to have a significant effect on bite. Therefore, when the problem of the drag force due to the piercing plug was thoroughly examined again, it was found that this biting failure occurred.
As shown in FIG. 1, the difference in the normal perforated state is only the balance between the driving force and the drag force due to the difference in the contact area between the roll and the raw material obtained by the deformation of the raw material during the normal perforation. The inventors paid attention to this point and applied a back pressure sufficient to overcome the drag of the piercing plug with a pusher so that defective biting did not occur, and a contact area in a pierceable state could be secured, and piercing proceeded normally. It has been found that it is possible to suppress perforation under light pressure, that is, to suppress inner surface flaws.

【0025】なお、内質が劣化しやすい、硫黄を多く含
んだ炭素鋼や高合金鋼などの難加工材の直鋳材について
も内面疵の発生を従来の炭素鋼程度まで抑制できること
が認められた。
It has been recognized that the occurrence of inner surface defects can be suppressed to the level of conventional carbon steel even for direct cast materials of difficult-to-machine materials such as carbon steel containing a large amount of sulfur and high-alloy steel, whose internal quality is likely to deteriorate. It was

【0026】[0026]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、添付の図面を参照しながら
本発明の種々の好ましい実施の形態について説明する。
Various preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

【0027】図1に示すように、マンネスマンプラグミ
ル1は、上下一対の傾斜圧延ロール7と、傾斜圧延ロー
ル7の上流側に設けられたプッシャー5と、傾斜圧延ロ
ール7の下流側に設けられたマンドレル装置9とを備え
ている。
As shown in FIG. 1, the Mannesmann plug mill 1 is provided with a pair of upper and lower inclined rolling rolls 7, a pusher 5 provided on the upstream side of the inclined rolling rolls 7, and a downstream side of the inclined rolling rolls 7. And a mandrel device 9.

【0028】傾斜圧延ロール7は樽状の周面を有し、ビ
レット2を噛み込み圧下するための中央部分が最大径と
なっている。上下ロール7は図示しない油圧シリンダと
ロールチョックを介して昇降可能に図示しないハウジン
グ内に設けられている。図2に示すように、上下ロール
の軸7aはビレット2の搬送ラインに対して角度θずつ
左右に振り分け変位している。
The inclined rolling roll 7 has a barrel-shaped peripheral surface, and has a maximum diameter in the central portion for biting and reducing the billet 2. The upper and lower rolls 7 are provided in a housing (not shown) so as to be able to move up and down via a hydraulic cylinder (not shown) and a roll chock. As shown in FIG. 2, the shaft 7a of the upper and lower rolls is laterally displaced by an angle θ with respect to the transport line of the billet 2.

【0029】プッシャー5はクラッチ4を介して油圧シ
リンダ3に回転自由に連結されている。プッシャー5の
先端はビレット2の後端に当接可能に設けられ、複数の
ピンチロール6で支持案内されながらビレット2を傾斜
圧延ロール7に対して押出し搬送するようになってい
る。
The pusher 5 is rotatably connected to the hydraulic cylinder 3 via a clutch 4. The tip of the pusher 5 is provided so as to be able to contact the rear end of the billet 2, and the billet 2 is pushed and conveyed to the inclined rolling roll 7 while being supported and guided by a plurality of pinch rolls 6.

【0030】圧延ロール7の下流側にはマンドレル装置
9が配置されている。このマンドレル装置9は、大荷重
の油圧シリンダおよび穿孔プラグ8を備えている。マン
ドレル装置9は上下ロール7間に噛み込まれたビレット
2に対して穿孔プラグ8を押込むようになっている。
A mandrel device 9 is arranged downstream of the rolling roll 7. The mandrel device 9 includes a heavy-duty hydraulic cylinder and a piercing plug 8. The mandrel device 9 pushes the piercing plug 8 into the billet 2 that is caught between the upper and lower rolls 7.

【0031】次に、図3および図4を参照して噛み込み
不良を生じた場合と、通常の穿孔圧延の場合と、本発明
を適用してロール回転速度を制御しつつプッシャーでビ
レットに背圧を付与する場合とを比較しながら説明す
る。
Next, referring to FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, the case where a bite failure occurs, the case of normal piercing and rolling, and the case where the present invention is applied to the billet with the pusher while controlling the roll rotation speed, Description will be made by comparing with the case of applying pressure.

【0032】図3の(a)はビレット2がロール7に噛
み込まれない所謂噛み込み不良を生じた状態を模式的に
示した図である。このような噛み込み不良状態では穿孔
プラグ8にかかるスラスト荷重(プラグ荷重)およびロ
ール荷重は図4の(a)に示すように推移する。すなわ
ち、ビレット2がロール7に噛み込まれないので、プラ
グ荷重P1およびロール荷重R1ともに上昇しないまま
開始時間t1から継続時間t15までの間において両者
とも低レベルに終始する。その結果としてビレット2は
まったく穿孔されない。
FIG. 3 (a) is a diagram schematically showing a state in which the billet 2 is not bited by the roll 7 and a so-called biting failure occurs. In such a defective biting state, the thrust load (plug load) and the roll load applied to the perforated plug 8 change as shown in FIG. That is, since the billet 2 is not caught in the roll 7, both of the plug load P1 and the roll load R1 are kept at a low level from the start time t1 to the continuation time t15 without increasing. As a result, the billet 2 is not perforated at all.

【0033】図3の(b)はビレット2がロール7に正
常に噛み込まれた後に通常の穿孔を行なう状態を模式的
に示した図である。このような正常噛み込み状態下での
穿孔においては、プラグ8にかかるスラスト荷重(プラ
グ荷重)およびロール荷重は図4の(b)に示すように
推移する。すなわち、先ずビレット2が時間t1にロー
ル7に噛み込まれて、ロール荷重R2が急激に増加し、
次いで穿孔プラグ8にビレット2が押込まれて、プラグ
荷重P2が急激に増加する。ロール荷重R2のピーク時
間帯t5〜t10とプラグ荷重P2のピーク時間帯t4
〜t9とは必ずしも一致しないが、穿孔中のロール荷重
R2はプラグ荷重P2を常に上回る。最終的に穿孔プラ
グ8がビレット2を貫通すると、両荷重R2,P2は急
激に減少してほぼ同じ時間t13にゼロになる。
FIG. 3B is a diagram schematically showing a state in which the billet 2 is normally bitten into the roll 7 and then a normal perforation is performed. In the perforation under such a normal biting state, the thrust load (plug load) and the roll load applied to the plug 8 change as shown in FIG. 4 (b). That is, first, the billet 2 is bitten by the roll 7 at time t1, and the roll load R2 rapidly increases,
Next, the billet 2 is pushed into the perforated plug 8 and the plug load P2 suddenly increases. Peak time t5 to t10 of the roll load R2 and peak time t4 of the plug load P2
The roll load R2 during perforation is always higher than the plug load P2, although not necessarily equal to t9. When the piercing plug 8 finally penetrates the billet 2, both loads R2 and P2 decrease sharply and become zero at almost the same time t13.

【0034】図3の(c)は本発明を適用してロール回
転速度を制御しながらプッシャーでビレットに背圧を付
与する状態を模式的に示す図である。上記の通常穿孔状
態と噛み込み不良状態との違いは、通常穿孔時の素材変
形により得られるロール・素材間の接触面積が異なるこ
とに起因する駆動力と素材が穿孔プラグから受ける抗力
とのバランスだけである。本発明者らは、この点に着目
して鋭意研究努力を積み重ねた結果、噛み込み不良を生
じないように穿孔プラグの抗力に打ち克つだけの背圧を
プッシャーにより素材に付与し、素材をロールに噛み込
ませ、穿孔可能な状態の接触面積を確保し、通常の穿孔
状態に移行させる条件を見出した。すなわち、図7に示
すように、プッシャー5でビレット2に背圧を付与する
一方で、ロール回転速度を4.5m/秒未満にすると、
確実にプラグ先端圧下率Mが95%を超えることが判明
した。
FIG. 3C is a diagram schematically showing a state in which the back pressure is applied to the billet by the pusher while the roll rotation speed is controlled by applying the present invention. The difference between the normal perforation state and the defective biting state is the balance between the driving force and the drag force that the material receives from the perforation plug due to the difference in the contact area between the roll and the material, which is obtained by the material deformation during normal perforation. Only. As a result of earnest research efforts focusing on this point, the present inventors applied a back pressure to the material with a pusher to overcome the drag force of the perforated plug so as not to cause defective biting, and roll the material. We have found the conditions to make the contact area in a state where punching is possible and to shift to a normal punching state. That is, as shown in FIG. 7, when the back pressure is applied to the billet 2 by the pusher 5 and the roll rotation speed is less than 4.5 m / sec,
It was found that the plug tip rolling reduction M certainly exceeded 95%.

【0035】この力学的メカニズムの概要について図4
の(c)を参照して説明する。圧延ロール7を4.5m
/秒未満で低速回転させながら、時間t3〜t6の間に
プッシャー5でビレット2を押すと、ロール荷重R3と
プラグ荷重P3は徐々に増加する。噛込み初期は噛込み
不良時と同じ荷重変動を示しているが、プッシャーによ
り素材後方から背圧を付与し始めると、ロール荷重R3
およびプラグ荷重P3ともに増加し始め、途中から通常
穿孔状態に移行していることが図から明らかである。な
お、プッシャーは、ロール荷重が増大を始める段階、す
なわち接触面積を確保し始めた段階で後退しているた
め、穿孔プラグに余計な負荷はかかっていない。このた
め、素材後方から背圧を付与しても高合金鋼穿孔で懸念
される、耐用度の減少をもたらすことはない。また、通
常穿孔時に想定されるロール・各種ガイドシュー間への
素材噛出しに伴うトラブルは、軽圧下穿孔であるために
押込みを行っても生じない。素材に付与された背圧が穿
孔プラグの抗力に打ち克つと、素材がロールに完全に噛
み込まれ、ロール荷重R3およびプラグ荷重P3はとも
に最大値を示すようになる。すなわち、ロールと素材と
の相互接触面積が十分に大きくなった後に、素材が穿孔
プラグと接触するようになる。ロール荷重R3のピーク
時間帯t7〜t12とプラグ荷重P3のピーク時間帯t
8〜t11とは必ずしも一致しないが、両荷重R3,P
3ともに最大値を有する。この領域ではロール荷重R3
が十分に大きくなる。また、図4の(c)では穿孔時間
が延びているが、素材がロールに噛み込み、通常穿孔状
態に移行した段階で、通常速度へロール速度を戻せば、
ほとんど生産性の損失もなく、内面疵の発生も抑制でき
る。
An outline of this mechanical mechanism is shown in FIG.
This will be described with reference to (c). Rolling roll 7 4.5m
When the billet 2 is pushed by the pusher 5 during the time t3 to t6 while rotating at a low speed of less than / sec, the roll load R3 and the plug load P3 gradually increase. In the initial biting, the load fluctuation is the same as when the biting is bad, but when the back pressure starts to be applied from the rear of the material by the pusher, the roll load R3
It is clear from the figure that both the plug load P3 and the plug load P3 have begun to increase, and have shifted to the normal perforation state midway. Since the pusher retracts at the stage when the roll load starts to increase, that is, when the contact area is started to be secured, no extra load is applied to the perforated plug. Therefore, even if a back pressure is applied from the rear side of the material, there is no fear of reduction in durability, which is a concern in high-alloy steel perforation. In addition, the troubles associated with the material biting between the rolls and the various guide shoes that would normally occur during perforation do not occur even if the pressing is performed because the perforation is performed with a light pressure. When the back pressure applied to the material overcomes the drag force of the perforated plug, the material is completely caught in the roll, and the roll load R3 and the plug load P3 both reach their maximum values. That is, the material comes into contact with the perforated plug after the mutual contact area between the roll and the material is sufficiently large. Peak time t7 to t12 of roll load R3 and peak time t of plug load P3
8 to t11 does not necessarily match, but both loads R3, P
3 has the maximum value. Roll load R3 in this area
Is large enough. Further, although the perforation time is extended in FIG. 4 (c), if the material is bitten into the roll and the normal perforation state is reached, if the roll speed is returned to the normal speed,
There is almost no loss of productivity and the occurrence of internal defects can be suppressed.

【0036】図9は本発明に係る継目無管の製造方法と
従来方法とを用いて大径の継目無管を製造したときのプ
ラグ先端圧下率と内ラップ疵評価点数との相関を示す特
性図である。図中にて特性線Aは各種データをプロット
したものを最小二乗法などの手法により求めた関係式に
対応するものである。図から明らかなように、内ラップ
疵評価点数はプラグ先端圧下率の上昇とともに良好とな
り、プラグ先端圧下率が95%を超える領域ではほぼ合
格ライン(内ラップ疵評価点数で50点)に到達するこ
とが判明した。とくに硫黄を多く含んだ炭素鋼(快削
鋼)のような難加工性材料については良好な結果が得ら
れた。
FIG. 9 is a characteristic showing the correlation between the plug tip reduction ratio and the inner lap flaw evaluation score when a large diameter seamless pipe is manufactured by using the method for manufacturing a seamless pipe according to the present invention and the conventional method. It is a figure. In the figure, a characteristic line A corresponds to a relational expression obtained by plotting various data by a method such as the least square method. As is clear from the figure, the inner lap flaw evaluation score becomes better as the plug tip reduction rate increases, and almost reaches the pass line (the inner lap flaw evaluation point is 50 points) in the region where the plug tip reduction rate exceeds 95%. It has been found. Particularly good results were obtained for difficult-to-work materials such as carbon steel (free-cutting steel) containing a large amount of sulfur.

【0037】図10は本発明に係る継目無管の製造方法
と従来方法とを用いて小径および大径の継目無管をそれ
ぞれ製造したときのプラグ先端圧下率と内ラップ疵評価
点数との相関を示す特性図である。図中にて特性線Bは
各種データをプロットしたものを最小二乗法などの手法
により求めた関係式に対応するものである。図から明ら
かなように、内ラップ疵評価点数はプラグ先端圧下率の
上昇とともに良好となり、プラグ先端圧下率が95%を
超える領域では合格ライン(内ラップ疵評価点数で50
点)に到達することが判明した。とくに13%Crステ
ンレス鋼の小径管(外径139.7mm×厚み7.72
mm)では97%以上を確保することで内面疵をほとん
ど生じない優秀な結果が得られた。これにより13%C
rステンレス鋼の継目無管を鋳造ままの状態の直鋳材か
ら製造することが可能となる。
FIG. 10 shows the correlation between the plug tip rolling reduction and the inner lap flaw evaluation score when a small-diameter and a large-diameter seamless pipe are manufactured using the seamless pipe manufacturing method according to the present invention and the conventional method. FIG. In the figure, a characteristic line B corresponds to a relational expression obtained by plotting various data by a method such as the least square method. As is clear from the figure, the inner wrap flaw evaluation score becomes better as the plug tip reduction rate increases, and in the region where the plug tip reduction rate exceeds 95%, the pass line (inner wrap flaw evaluation point is 50
Point) has been reached. Especially small diameter 13% Cr stainless steel tube (outer diameter 139.7 mm x thickness 7.72
In (mm), by securing 97% or more, excellent results were obtained with almost no internal defects. This gives 13% C
r It is possible to manufacture a seamless pipe of stainless steel from a directly cast material in the as-cast state.

【0038】(実施例1)熱間モデル穿孔機で本件発明
について検討を行った。素材ビレットには鋳造ままの1
%Cr鋼を用い、素材加熱温度は1250℃、ロール入
側面角は2.5度、ロール傾斜角は9度、ロールは樽型
を用い、その表面加工は通常のナーリングと呼ばれる
0.5mm深さ程度の凹凸加工を施した条件にて穿孔実
験を実施した。なお、内面不良に関しては、各水準10
本の穿孔を行い、総圧延長さあたりの疵が発生している
部分の素管長さの比率を不良率として評価した。表1に
おいて内面疵発生率が15%以上である場合をバツマー
ク、5%以上〜15%未満を三角マーク、1%以上〜5
%未満を一重丸マーク、さらに1%未満を二重丸マーク
で表示した。表1から明らかなように、プッシャー未使
用の条件で穿孔を行った比較例では、プラグ先端圧下率
を高く取ることができず、ロール回転速度の増加と共
に、内面疵が増加する傾向が見られ、5.8m/秒では
不良率が25.5%と疵抑制はできていない(サンプル
番号2)。しかしながら、プッシャーによる押込みと、
さらにはロール回転速度4.5m/秒未満の低速穿孔と
を適用した実施例においては、プラグ先端圧下率97%
を取ることが可能となる(サンプル番号8)。ちなみに
ロール回転速度を4m/秒とした場合は、内面疵をまっ
たく生じない穿孔が可能となった(サンプル番号9)。
また、プラグ先端圧下率Mを大きくする、すなわち軽圧
下穿孔とは、プラグ位置を素材入側へ前進させること
で、これはプラグ先端でのロール間隔が広がることと等
しく、このため素材ビレット径は変わらないからロール
間隔が広くなることは軽圧下状態を作り出していること
とも一致する。したがって上記結果、すなわち本発明の
適用が内面疵の低減につながることを本実施例は表して
いる。
Example 1 The present invention was studied with a hot model punch. As-cast 1 for material billet
% Cr steel, the material heating temperature is 1250 ° C., the roll-entry side angle is 2.5 degrees, the roll inclination angle is 9 degrees, the roll is barrel type, and the surface processing is 0.5 mm depth called normal knurling. A perforation experiment was carried out under the condition that roughening was performed to some extent. For internal defects, each level 10
The book was perforated, and the ratio of the length of the blank pipe in the portion where the flaw was generated to the total rolling length was evaluated as the defective rate. In Table 1, when the occurrence rate of inner surface defects is 15% or more, a cross mark is used, 5% or more and less than 15% is a triangular mark, 1% or more and 5% or more.
Less than 1% is indicated by a single circle mark, and less than 1% is indicated by a double circle mark. As is clear from Table 1, in the comparative example in which the punching was performed under the condition where the pusher was not used, the reduction rate of the plug tip could not be made high, and there was a tendency that the inner surface flaw increased with the increase of the roll rotation speed. At 5.8 m / sec, the defect rate was 25.5% and the defect was not suppressed (Sample No. 2). However, when pushing with a pusher,
Further, in an example in which low-speed perforation with a roll rotation speed of less than 4.5 m / sec is applied, the plug tip rolling reduction is 97%.
Can be obtained (sample number 8). By the way, when the roll rotation speed was set to 4 m / sec, it was possible to punch without causing any internal flaw (Sample No. 9).
Further, increasing the plug tip reduction rate M, that is, light reduction drilling, means advancing the plug position to the material entry side, which is equivalent to expanding the roll interval at the plug tip. Therefore, the material billet diameter is The fact that it does not change makes the roll interval wide, which is consistent with the fact that a light reduction state is created. Therefore, this example shows that the above result, that is, the application of the present invention leads to the reduction of inner surface defects.

【0039】(実施例2)同様の穿孔条件下で、素材と
して実施例1よりも熱間加工性に劣る鋳造ままの13%
Cr−3%Mo−5%Ni鋼材を用いて内面疵の発生に
ついて調べた結果を表2に示す。この表2から明らかな
ように本実施例2では上記の実施例1と同様に、6.3
m/秒のロール回転速度でプッシャーによる押込み不使
用の比較例(サンプル番号10)では不良率が58%と
非常に高く、とても工業生産は成り立たない。しかしな
がら、本発明方法を適用すると、ロール回転速度5.8
m/秒、プッシャー押込み適用で96%のプラグ先端圧
下率を確保することができ、不良率は13.5%(サン
プル番号15)となり、さらに低速の4.45m/秒で
97%のプラグ先端圧下率を確保することができ、4.
5%の疵発生率で製管可能となり(サンプル番号1
7)、最終的には3.4m/秒の低速穿孔と押込みとの
組合せ適用によりほぼ無傷に近い状態で製管が可能(サ
ンプル番号19)であることを見出した。この結果、実
機でもほぼ無手入れの状態で製造が可能となる見通しを
得た。本発明により素材予加工のコストをそのまま低減
さえることが可能であることを確認した。
(Example 2) Under the same perforation conditions, 13% as cast, which is inferior to Example 1 in hot workability as a raw material
Table 2 shows the results of examining the occurrence of internal flaws using a Cr-3% Mo-5% Ni steel material. As is clear from Table 2, in the second embodiment, the same as in the first embodiment, 6.3.
In the comparative example (Sample No. 10) in which pushing by the pusher was not used at the roll rotation speed of m / sec, the defective rate was very high at 58%, and industrial production was not very feasible. However, when the method of the present invention is applied, the roll rotation speed is 5.8.
Applying a pusher force of 96 m / sec, it is possible to secure a 96% plug tip reduction rate, with a defect rate of 13.5% (Sample No. 15), and a slower 4.45 m / sec 97% plug tip. A reduction rate can be secured, and 4.
Pipes can be made with a defect rate of 5% (Sample No. 1
7) Finally, it was found that a pipe can be manufactured in a state of being almost intact (Sample No. 19) by applying a combination of low speed perforation of 3.4 m / sec and indentation. As a result, we have obtained the prospect that it will be possible to manufacture the actual machine with almost no maintenance. It was confirmed that the cost of material pre-processing can be reduced as it is according to the present invention.

【0040】[0040]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0041】[0041]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0042】[0042]

【発明の効果】本発明によれば、従来、素材中心部にザ
ク等が存在するため熱間加工性が劣悪で継目無管材とし
て不適当であった鋳造ままの難加工材を穿孔圧延する際
に、設備に大幅な変更を加えることなく穿孔条件を最適
化させることができる。これにより97%という高いプ
ラグ先端圧下率で噛込み不良を生じさせることなく製管
し、内面疵の発生を抑制し、付加価値の高い高合金鋼の
継目無管を低コストで製造することができ、生産性の向
上を図ることができる。
EFFECTS OF THE INVENTION According to the present invention, when piercing and rolling a difficult-to-cast material which is conventionally unsuitable as a seamless pipe material due to poor hot workability due to the presence of zaku and the like in the center of the material. Moreover, it is possible to optimize the drilling conditions without making a large change in the equipment. As a result, it is possible to manufacture a pipe with a high plug tip reduction rate of 97% without causing defective biting, suppress the occurrence of inner surface defects, and manufacture a high-value-added high alloy steel seamless pipe at low cost. Therefore, productivity can be improved.

【0043】とくに小径管においては13%Crステン
レス鋼や快削鋼のような難加工性材料であっても内面疵
をほとんど生じることなく鋳造ままの状態の直鋳材から
継目無管を製造することが可能である。
Particularly in the case of a small diameter pipe, even a difficult-to-work material such as 13% Cr stainless steel or free-cutting steel produces a seamless pipe from a directly cast material in the as-cast state with almost no inner surface defects. It is possible.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】マンネスマン押込み穿孔法を利用した継目無管
の製造装置を示す概略構成図。
FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram showing a seamless pipe manufacturing apparatus using a Mannesmann indentation perforation method.

【図2】傾斜圧延ロールを示す平面図。FIG. 2 is a plan view showing an inclined rolling roll.

【図3】(a)は噛み込み不良の状態を示す断面模式
図、(b)は通常の穿孔状態を示す断面模式図、(c)
はプッシャーでの押込みにより穿孔を継続した状態を示
す断面模式図。
3A is a schematic cross-sectional view showing a state of defective biting, FIG. 3B is a schematic cross-sectional view showing a normal perforation state, and FIG.
[Fig. 3] is a schematic sectional view showing a state in which perforation is continued by being pushed in by a pusher.

【図4】(a)は噛込み不良時の穿孔プラグ荷重および
ロール荷重の経時変化を示す荷重変動特性線図、(b)
は通常穿孔時の穿孔プラグ荷重およびロール荷重の経時
変化を示す荷重変動特性線図、(c)はプッシャー押込
みにより穿孔を継続した時の穿孔プラグ荷重およびロー
ル荷重の経時変化を示す荷重変動特性線図。
FIG. 4 (a) is a load fluctuation characteristic diagram showing changes over time in perforation plug load and roll load at the time of defective biting, and FIG. 4 (b).
Is a load fluctuation characteristic diagram showing the changes over time of the perforation plug load and roll load during normal drilling, and (c) is a load fluctuation characteristic line showing the changes over time of the perforation plug load and roll load when the punching is continued by pushing the pusher. Fig.

【図5】Cr含有量と溶鋼の粘度との関係を示す溶鋼の
粘性特性線図。
FIG. 5 is a viscosity characteristic diagram of molten steel showing the relationship between the Cr content and the viscosity of molten steel.

【図6】Cr含有量と溶鋼の粘度との関係を示す溶鋼の
粘性特性線図。
FIG. 6 is a viscosity characteristic diagram of molten steel showing the relationship between the Cr content and the viscosity of molten steel.

【図7】本発明に係る継目無管の製造方法と従来方法と
を用いて種々の継目無管を製造したときのロール回転速
度とプラグ先端圧下率との相関を示す特性図。
FIG. 7 is a characteristic diagram showing a correlation between a roll rotation speed and a plug tip rolling reduction when various seamless pipes are manufactured by using the seamless pipe manufacturing method according to the present invention and a conventional method.

【図8】圧延ロール、穿孔プラグ、ワークの幾何学的関
係とプラグ先端圧下率との関係を説明するために穿孔時
の圧延ロール、穿孔プラグ、ワークを拡大して示す断面
模式図。
FIG. 8 is a schematic cross-sectional view showing, in an enlarged manner, the rolling roll, the piercing plug, and the work at the time of piercing in order to explain the relationship between the geometrical relationship of the rolling roll, the piercing plug, and the work and the plug tip reduction ratio.

【図9】本発明に係る継目無管の製造方法と従来方法と
を用いて大径の継目無管を製造したときのプラグ先端圧
下率と内ラップ疵評価点数との相関を示す特性図。
FIG. 9 is a characteristic diagram showing the correlation between the plug tip reduction ratio and the inner lap flaw evaluation score when a large-diameter seamless pipe is manufactured using the seamless pipe manufacturing method according to the present invention and the conventional method.

【図10】本発明に係る継目無管の製造方法と従来方法
とを用いて小径および大径の継目無管をそれぞれ製造し
たときのプラグ先端圧下率と内ラップ疵評価点数との相
関を示す特性図。
FIG. 10 shows the correlation between the plug tip rolling reduction and the inner lap flaw evaluation score when a small-diameter and a large-diameter seamless pipe are manufactured using the seamless pipe manufacturing method according to the present invention and the conventional method, respectively. Characteristic diagram.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

2…ビレット、 3…油圧シリンダ、 4…クラッチ、 5…プッシャー、 6…ピンチロール、 7…傾斜圧延ロール、 8…穿孔プラグ、 9…マンドレル装置。 2 ... billet, 3 ... hydraulic cylinder, 4 ... clutch, 5 ... Pusher, 6 ... pinch roll, 7 ... inclined rolling roll, 8 ... perforated plug, 9 ... Mandrel device.

フロントページの続き (56)参考文献 特開 平10−180312(JP,A) 特開 昭59−50906(JP,A) 特開 昭63−220907(JP,A) 特開 平10−175049(JP,A) 特開 昭62−282713(JP,A) 特開 平6−218406(JP,A) (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) B21B 19/04 Continuation of the front page (56) Reference JP-A-10-180312 (JP, A) JP-A-59-50906 (JP, A) JP-A-63-220907 (JP, A) JP-A-10-175049 (JP , A) JP 62-282713 (JP, A) JP 6-218406 (JP, A) (58) Fields investigated (Int.Cl. 7 , DB name) B21B 19/04

Claims (2)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 Cr含有量が0.5質量%以上の高合金
鋼からなり、横断面が丸形状の鋳造ままの鋳片を傾斜圧
延ロールに噛み込ませて穿孔プラグで穿孔する継目無管
の製造方法において、鋳片を穿孔するにあたり 傾斜圧延ロールを毎秒4.5m
未満の周速度で回転させ、プッシャーにより鋳片に背圧
を付与しながら押込みマンネスマン穿孔を行い、前記
片が傾斜圧延ロールに安定に噛み込むまでプッシャーに
より鋳片に背圧を付与し、下式で定義されるプラグ先端
圧下率を97%以上で穿孔を行うことを特徴とする継目
無管の製造方法。M=d/D 但し、Mはプラグ先端圧下率、dはプラグ先端位置での
ロール間隔、Dは鋳片の直径とする。
1. A high alloy having a Cr content of 0.5 mass% or more.
3. In the method for producing a seamless pipe in which an as- cast slab made of steel and having a round cross section is bitten into an inclined rolling roll and perforated with a piercing plug, the inclined rolling roll is punched every second when piercing the slab . 5m
Back pressure on the slab with a pusher
While pushing the punching mannesmann, back pressure is applied to the slab by the pusher until the slab is stably bitten into the inclined rolling roll, and the plug tip defined by the following formula
A method for producing a seamless pipe, characterized in that perforation is performed at a reduction rate of 97% or more . M = d / D where M is the plug tip rolling reduction, and d is the plug tip position.
Roll interval, D is the diameter of the slab.
【請求項2】 プッシャーの速度を鋳片の圧延方向速度
を超えない範囲とすることを特徴とする請求項1記載の
継目無管の製造方法。
2. The method for producing a seamless pipe according to claim 1, wherein the speed of the pusher is set within a range not exceeding the speed of the slab in the rolling direction.
JP34651399A 1999-12-06 1999-12-06 Seamless pipe manufacturing method Expired - Lifetime JP3503552B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP34651399A JP3503552B2 (en) 1999-12-06 1999-12-06 Seamless pipe manufacturing method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP34651399A JP3503552B2 (en) 1999-12-06 1999-12-06 Seamless pipe manufacturing method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2001162307A JP2001162307A (en) 2001-06-19
JP3503552B2 true JP3503552B2 (en) 2004-03-08

Family

ID=18383938

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP34651399A Expired - Lifetime JP3503552B2 (en) 1999-12-06 1999-12-06 Seamless pipe manufacturing method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3503552B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007116821A1 (en) 2006-03-31 2007-10-18 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Method of manufacturing seamless pipe

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102005028667A1 (en) * 2005-06-16 2006-12-21 V&M Deutschland Gmbh Apparatus for producing a seamless hollow body made of steel
JP4930002B2 (en) 2006-11-20 2012-05-09 住友金属工業株式会社 Seamless pipe manufacturing method
JP4947450B2 (en) * 2010-11-02 2012-06-06 住友金属工業株式会社 Defective detection method for piercing and rolling, and seamless pipe manufacturing method
JP5012992B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2012-08-29 住友金属工業株式会社 Seamless pipe manufacturing method
AR088498A1 (en) 2011-11-01 2014-06-11 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp PUNCHING DEVICE, PUNCH USED FOR THE PUNCHING DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF WELDED STEEL PIPES

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007116821A1 (en) 2006-03-31 2007-10-18 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Method of manufacturing seamless pipe
US7757528B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2010-07-20 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Method of manufacturing seamless pipe or tube

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2001162307A (en) 2001-06-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3425718B2 (en) Seamless pipe manufacturing method
JP4169858B2 (en) Method of manufacturing seamless steel pipe
KR910003466B1 (en) Method of piercing and manufacturing seamiless tubes
EP2098310B1 (en) Manufacturing method for seamless pipe
JP3503552B2 (en) Seamless pipe manufacturing method
JPH09300053A (en) Production of chromium alloy steel round cast billet
JPH09295113A (en) Production of round cast billet by continuous casting
JP3214377B2 (en) Manufacturing method of continuous cast slab for seamless steel pipe
WO2009119245A1 (en) Method for producing seamless pipe
JP2000000605A (en) Seamless tube and its manufacture
JP2000246311A (en) Method of manufacturing seamless pipe of difficult-to- process steel or round steel bar as cast
JP3214379B2 (en) Manufacturing method of continuous cast slab for seamless steel pipe
JP2000334506A (en) Manufacture of seamless steel tube
JP3648825B2 (en) Manufacturing method of continuous cast round slab for seamless steel pipe manufacturing with good workability
JPH09201601A (en) Production of continuously cast round billet for producing seamless steel pipe having good workability
JP2012121045A (en) Method for manufacturing seamless pipe
JP3533834B2 (en) Method for producing round billet for producing Cr-containing seamless steel pipe with good workability
JP2000334505A (en) Manufacture of seamless steel tube
JP6274449B2 (en) Seamless steel pipe manufacturing method
JP3367332B2 (en) Manufacturing method of difficult-to-work seamless steel pipe
JP3533831B2 (en) Method for producing round billet for producing Cr-containing seamless steel pipe with good workability
JP4645296B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JPH09174212A (en) Production of continuously cast billet for seamless steel pipe
JP5277907B2 (en) Billet piercing and rolling method
JPH09174211A (en) Production of continuously cast billet for seamless steel pipe

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20031201

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 3503552

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20071219

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081219

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091219

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091219

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101219

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101219

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111219

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121219

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121219

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131219

Year of fee payment: 10

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term