JP2021089591A - Project management system, project management method, and program - Google Patents

Abstract

To provide a project management system, a project management method, and a program that enable an administrator to adequately manage a whole project by displaying on a display device a scored relationship between an actual degree of progress and a standard degree of progress for each task of a project.SOLUTION: A project management system 10 comprises: a reception unit 12 that receives task information indicating each task being processed by each operation group; a progress level determination unit 13 that determines an actual progress level of each task being processed by each operation group at a predetermined time point on the basis of the task information; a first score calculation unit 16 that calculates a first score indicating a relationship between the actual progressing level and a standard progress level of each task for each operation group at the predetermined time point; and a display processing unit 18 that executes a process for displaying the first score of each operation group on a display device.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2

Description

The present invention relates to a project management system, a project management method, and a program.

A project management system that supports management of the progress of a plurality of projects is disclosed (Patent Document 1).

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2016-118832

In the system described in Patent Document 1, in a project, tasks are classified according to statuses indicating completion, delay, and no delay, the ratio of tasks classified into the status is calculated, and the ratio of the tasks is graphed. Display in format. This allows the administrator to visually grasp the progress of the project.

However, in the system described in Patent Document 1, although it is possible to calculate whether or not the progress of the task is delayed with respect to the work execution schedule and visually grasp the progress status of the entire project, the progress of each task is standard. We have not made a quantitative evaluation of the relationship with the progress. That is, in the system, in the project of the iterative development model, there is a possibility that the cause of the delay, such as which task causes the delay and how much the delay occurs, becomes insufficient.

Therefore, in order to solve the above problems, the present invention scores the relationship between the actual progress and the standard progress for each project task and displays it on the display device, and the administrator displays the entire project. The purpose is to provide a system that can be managed accurately.

The project management system according to one aspect of the present invention accepts task information indicating the state of each task of each work group in a situation where a plurality of work groups executing a project in a repetitive development model process a plurality of tasks. A progress specifying unit that specifies the actual progress of each task of the work group at a predetermined time based on the task information, and the progress specifying unit of the work group at the predetermined time. The first score calculation unit that calculates the first score indicating the relationship between the actual progress and the standard progress corresponding to each task, and the first score of each work group are displayed on the display device. It includes a display processing unit that executes processing.

In the iterative development method according to one aspect of the present invention, the computer receives task information indicating the state of each of the plurality of tasks of each of the plurality of work groups that execute the project in the iterative development model, and the task information includes the task information. Based on this, the actual progress of each task of each work group at a predetermined time point is specified, and the actual progress of each work group at the predetermined time point corresponds to the actual progress of each task. The first score indicating the relationship with the standard progress is calculated, and the process of displaying the first score of each work group on the display device is executed.

The program according to one aspect of the present invention receives task information indicating the state of each of a plurality of tasks of each of a plurality of work groups for developing a project in a repetitive development model on a computer, and based on the task information. Identifying the actual progress of each task of each work group at a predetermined time point, the actual progress of each work group at the predetermined time point, and the standard corresponding to each task. The process of calculating the first score indicating the relationship with the progress and executing the process of displaying the first score of each work group on the display device is executed.

According to the present invention, in a project processed by the iterative development model, the administrator can accurately manage the entire project by displaying the progress status of the scored tasks on the display device.

It is a figure which shows an example of the organizational structure of the agile software development method. It is a figure which shows the structure of the project management system. There is a burndown chart showing the relationship between the actual progress and the threshold value. It is a graph which shows the correspondence relationship between a 1st score and a distance. It is a figure which shows the burndown chart. It is a figure which showed the relationship between the 1st score and the 2nd score in a drill-down format. It is a flow chart which shows an example of the processing procedure of a project management system. It is a figure which shows an example of the hardware configuration of a computer. It is a figure which shows an example of the influence degree table. It is a figure which shows the task arrangement image acquired by the image acquisition part.

Hereinafter, the project management system 10 according to the embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. However, the embodiments described below are merely examples, and there is no intention of excluding the application of various modifications and techniques not specified below. That is, the present invention can be implemented in various ways without departing from the spirit of the present invention, or by combining the examples. Further, in the description of the following drawings, the same or similar parts are represented by the same or similar reference numerals.
=== Outline of project management system 10 ===

The project management system 10 is a system for appropriately managing a project in a situation where a plurality of work groups carrying out the project by a repetitive development method process a plurality of tasks, for example.

Here, the iterative development method is an agile software development method, an iterative development method, or the like. Hereinafter, as an example, the iterative development method will be described as an agile software development method.

The agile software development method is, for example, a method of dividing a target to be developed into a large number of small functions and developing one function by one iteration. In the agile software development method, additional functions are developed while iterating. That is, in an agile software development method, planning, requirements analysis, design, implementation, testing, and documentation are performed in one iteration, so that one iteration is processed in the same way as a small-scale software development project.

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of an organizational structure of an agile software development method. As shown in FIG. 1, in the agile software development method, a work group is organized for each divided function to be developed. In the agile software development method, for example, it is possible to combine a plurality of work groups into one or group them into a specific category.

In the project management system 10, by managing the progress status of each of the plurality of work groups in the agile software development method, the person in charge of the project can easily grasp the progress status and smoothly proceed with the project. Progress management will be described later.

Hereinafter, the configuration when the project management system 10 is applied to the agile software development method as an example will be described. The project management system 10 is used for system development such as a development method different from the agile software development method (including scrum development method, extreme programming, user function driven development method, etc.), for example, the iterative development method described above. It can be widely applied to development methods that require progress management for work groups that process each task in a project.
=== Configuration of project management system 1 ===

The configuration of the project management system 10 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a configuration of the project management system 10. As shown in FIG. 2, the project management system 10 includes a storage unit 11, a reception unit 12, a progress specification unit 13, a threshold value determination unit 14, a warning output unit 15, a first score calculation unit 16, and the like. A second score calculation unit 17 and a display processing unit 18 are included.

The storage unit 11 stores various information.

The reception unit 12 receives task information indicating the status of each of the plurality of tasks of the plurality of work groups. The received task information is stored in the storage unit 11. Here, the task is, for example, one unit function that constitutes a function developed by a work group. The state of each task indicates, for example, that the task is waiting for processing, is being processed, or has been processed. The reception unit 12 may acquire the task information from the operator via the input I / F unit 104, which will be described later, or from another device, and the reception route is not limited.

The progress degree specifying unit 13 specifies the actual progress degree in a plurality of tasks of each of the plurality of work groups at a predetermined time point based on the task information received by the reception unit 12. Here, the progress level is, for example, the processing time required for processing the remaining tasks that must be processed. The processing time is determined by, for example, a working group. As a result, the burndown chart described later can be created, so that the administrator can appropriately grasp the progress status of the task. The progress specified by the progress specifying unit 13 will be described later using a burndown chart (FIG. 5).

The degree of progress may be the ratio of the processing time required for processing the remaining tasks to be processed to the processing time required for processing all the tasks that the work group must process. In the following, for convenience of explanation, the progress level will be described as the processing time related to the processing of the remaining tasks to be processed as an example.

The threshold value determination unit 14 determines whether or not the actual progress degree specified by the progress degree identification unit 13 exceeds a predetermined threshold value at a predetermined time point. FIG. 3 is a burndown chart showing the relationship between the actual progress and the threshold value. A burndown chart is a plot of the time required to process the remaining tasks that must be processed at a given time in the entire project or in a given working group. In FIG. 3, the vertical axis indicates the processing time, and the horizontal axis indicates the number of days elapsed (may be a date or the like). In addition, the actual progress is indicated by a solid line, the standard progress is indicated by a broken line, the danger progress index is indicated by a one-dot chain line, and the warning progress index is indicated by a two-dot chain line. Here, the standard progress level is an ideal progress level at a predetermined time point for completing the processing of a predetermined task by the due date. The risk progress index is, for example, the degree of progress at which it is extremely difficult to complete the process by the due date. The warning progress index is, for example, the degree of progress at which processing may not be completed by the due date as it is.

The threshold value determination unit 14 determines whether or not the actual progress exceeds a predetermined threshold value at a predetermined time point. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3, when the number of days elapsed is "16" days, the actual progress is "200" hours and the warning progress index is "130" hours, so that the threshold value determination unit 14 determines that the warning progress index, which is a predetermined threshold value, is exceeded. As a result, it can be determined whether or not the task processing is smooth, so that the administrator can support the work group at an appropriate timing and smoothly process the project.

The threshold value determination unit 14 may determine whether or not the actual progress exceeds the danger progress index instead of the warning progress index at a predetermined time point. Further, the threshold value determination unit 14 may determine whether or not the first score calculated by the first score calculation unit 16 described later exceeds a predetermined threshold value at a predetermined time point.

When the threshold value determination unit 14 determines that the threshold value exceeds a predetermined threshold value, the warning output unit 15 outputs a predetermined warning signal. Based on the warning signal, the display processing unit 18 described later causes the display device 107 to display the warning information. As a result, the project manager can know the work group in which the processing of the task is delayed, and can take appropriate measures for the work group.

The first score calculation unit 16 calculates a first score indicating the relationship between the actual progress of a predetermined task and the standard progress of a predetermined task in a predetermined work group at a predetermined time point. Here, when the first score overlaps with the standard progress, for example, the progress is set to "100", indicating that there is no delay in the processing of the task. On the other hand, when it overlaps with the danger progress index at a predetermined time, the progress is set to "0", indicating that the processing is significantly delayed. That is, the first score calculation unit 16 may calculate the first score so as to decrease, for example, linearly as the progress approaches the danger progress index from the standard progress. As a result, the administrator can quantitatively check the progress status of the task, so that the work status can be grasped appropriately and quickly.

The first score calculation unit 16 may calculate the first score so as to decrease, for example, in a quadratic function as the progress approaches the risk progress index from the standard progress. A specific description will be given with reference to FIG. FIG. 4 is a graph showing the correspondence between the first score and the distance. In FIG. 4, the vertical axis represents the first score and the horizontal axis represents the distance of the actual progress to the standard progress. The maximum value of the distance shown on the horizontal axis is, for example, the distance between the standard progress and the danger progress index at a predetermined time point. As shown in FIG. 4, in the first score calculation unit 16, the smaller the delay in progress, the larger the fluctuation range of the first score. As a result, the administrator can quickly grasp the progress delay for agile software development in which a small progress delay often occurs as compared with the waterfall development method. On the other hand, in the first score calculation unit 16, the greater the delay in progress, the smaller the fluctuation range of the first score. This makes it possible to properly grasp the progress of the entire project in agile software development that handles many small tasks compared to the waterfall development method. Hereinafter, for convenience, the first score will be described as linearly decreasing as the progress approaches the risk progress index from the standard progress. The first score calculated by the first score calculation unit 16 will be specifically described later using a burndown chart (FIG. 5).

The first score may be a value obtained by averaging the total of the first scores accumulated up to a predetermined time point. As a result, since the first score in the period is adopted, the reliability of the first score is improved. Further, the first score calculation unit 16 sets the deviation (20 hours) between the standard progress (for example, 100 hours) and the actual progress (for example, 120 hours) as a ratio (20%) to the standard progress time. The first score may be calculated by subtracting (for example, 80) from the standard progress degree “100”.

Further, the first score calculation unit 16 may add various indexes in addition to the first score. Here, the various indicators are, for example, the number of source code lines, the number of unit tests, the number of automatic integration tests, the number of build failures, the number of commits / time, the number of completed tasks, the number of interrupt work, or the total time. As a result, by adding a specific quantitative index to the first score, the manager can grasp the work status more appropriately and quickly.

Here, with reference to FIG. 5, the progress degree specified by the progress degree specifying unit 13 and the first score calculated by the first score calculation unit 16 will be specifically described. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a burndown chart. In FIG. 5, the vertical axis indicates the processing time, and the horizontal axis indicates the number of days elapsed (may be a date or the like). In FIG. 5, the actual progress is indicated by a solid line, the standard progress is indicated by a broken line, and the danger standard index is indicated by a chain line.

As shown in FIG. 5, in the progress degree specifying unit 13, the actual progress degree is specified as "180" hours when, for example, the number of days elapsed is "11" days. This indicates that when the number of days elapsed is "11", another "180" hours are needed to process the task. Then, in FIG. 5, when the number of days elapsed is "11", the difference between the actual progress of "180" hours and the standard progress of "120" hours is "60" hours. Therefore, it is shown that the processing of the task is delayed.

Further, as shown in FIG. 5, the first score calculation unit 16 calculates the first score as "50" when, for example, the number of days that have passed is "11". Specifically, the number of days elapsed is "11", the standard progress is "120" hours, and the risk progress index is "240" hours. In this case, the standard progress "120" time is set as the first score "100", and the risk progress index "240" time is set as the first score "0". As the progress approaches from "120" hours to "240" hours, the first score becomes smaller, for example, at a predetermined rate (for example, linearly). Therefore, the first score for the actual progress of "180" hours is "50".

The second score calculation unit 17 calculates, for example, the average value of the first scores in each of the plurality of work groups as the second score of the project. The second score is not limited to the average value of the first score, but it is most desirable to adopt the average value of the first score. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the relationship between the first score and the second score in a drill-down format. In FIG. 6, for example, the objects 16a and 16b at the lower end of the page show the first score for each of a plurality of working groups (for example, "cash group" and "banking group"). Further, in the middle object 17b associated with the objects 16a and 16b, a second score is shown for a group (for example, a “deposit group”) that organizes a plurality of work groups. The second score (the average value of the second scores of the objects 17a to 17c in the middle row) is also shown in the objects 17d in the uppermost row associated with the objects 17a to 17c in the middle row. As a result, the manager can grasp the progress status of the entire project from a bird's-eye view, and can realize appropriate project progress. Note that FIG. 6 shows an example, and the hierarchical structure thereof can be changed according to the organization of the work group.

Further, the second score calculation unit 17 calculates at least one of the minimum value, the maximum value, and the average value of the first score (or the second score) located in the lower row of the predetermined object as the second score. You may. As a result, it is possible to easily grasp which work group of the entire project is causing the delay, and thus more appropriate project progress can be realized.

The display processing unit 18 causes the display device 107 to display the first score and the second score of each of the plurality of work groups. The first score of each of the plurality of work groups and the second score associated with the first score are displayed on the display device 107, for example, in a drill-down format. This allows the administrator to easily grasp the progress of the project on the personal computer.
=== Processing procedure of project management system 10 ===

The processing procedure of the project management system 10 will be described with reference to FIG. 7. FIG. 7 is a flow chart showing an example of the processing procedure of the project management system 10.

First, in S100, the project management system 10 receives task information for each task by an input operation of the administrator or an input from another device.

Next, in S101, the project management system 10 specifies the progress of each task at a predetermined time point in the progress specifying unit 13. The progress is entered, for example, by a working group.

Next, in S102, the project management system 10 determines whether or not the progress exceeds a predetermined threshold value (for example, a warning progress index). When it is determined that the progress exceeds a predetermined threshold value (S102: YES), the warning output unit 15 outputs a warning signal (S103). This allows the administrator to know that the progress of the task is delayed. Then, the process is transferred to S104. When the progress is equal to or less than a predetermined threshold value (S102: NO), the process is shifted to S104.

Next, in S104, the project management system 10 calculates the first score of each task at a predetermined time in the first score calculation unit 16.

Next, in S105, the project management system 10 calculates the average value of the first scores as the second score in the second score calculation unit 17.

Next, in S106, the project management system 10 displays the first score and the second score on the display device 107 in a drill-down format as shown in FIG. 6 in the display processing unit 18. As a result, the administrator can easily grasp the progress status of the entire project and can easily grasp the tasks whose progress is stagnant, so that appropriate measures can be taken.
=== Hardware ===

An example of the hardware configuration when the project management system 10 is realized by the computer 100 will be described with reference to FIG. The various functions of the project management system 10 can be realized by dividing them into a plurality of devices.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of the hardware configuration of the computer. As shown in FIG. 8, the computer 100 includes a processor 101, a memory 102, a storage device 103, an input I / F unit 104, a data I / F unit 105, a communication I / F unit 106, and a display device. Includes 107.

The processor 101 is a control unit that controls various processes in the computer 100 by executing a program stored in the memory 102.

The memory 102 is, for example, a storage medium such as a RAM (Random Access Memory). The memory 102 temporarily stores the program code of the program executed by the processor 101 and the data required when the program is executed.

The storage device 103 is a non-volatile storage medium such as a hard disk drive (HDD) or a flash memory. The storage device 103 stores an operating system and various programs for realizing each of the above configurations.

The input I / F unit 104 is a device for receiving input from the user. Specific examples of the input I / F unit 104 include a keyboard, a mouse, a touch panel, various sensors, a wearable device, and the like. The input I / F unit 104 may be connected to the computer 100 via an interface such as USB (Universal Serial Bus).

The data I / F unit 105 is a device for inputting data from the outside of the computer 100. Specific examples of the data I / F unit 105 include a drive device for reading data stored in various storage media. It is also conceivable that the data I / F unit 105 is provided outside the computer 100. In that case, the data I / F unit 105 is connected to the computer 100 via an interface such as USB.

The communication I / F unit 106 is a device for performing data communication via the Internet N by wire or wirelessly with an external device of the computer 100. It is also conceivable that the communication I / F unit 106 is provided outside the computer 100. In that case, the communication I / F unit 106 is connected to the computer 100 via an interface such as USB.

The display device 107 is a device for displaying various types of information. Specific examples of the display device 107 include a liquid crystal display, an organic EL (Electro-Lumisensence) display, a display of a wearable device, and the like. The display device 107 may be provided outside the computer 100. In that case, the display device 107 is connected to the computer 100 via, for example, a display cable or the like. Further, when the touch panel is adopted as the input I / F unit 104, the display device 107 can be integrally configured with the input I / F unit 104.
=== Other embodiments ===
<< First Other Embodiment >>

Further, the project management system 10 may have a task acquisition unit (not shown) and an impact degree specifying unit (not shown). The storage unit 11 has, for example, an influence degree table 11a. FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an influence degree table 11a. As shown in FIG. 9, the impact degree table 11a includes a task major classification item, a task minor classification item, and an impact degree item. The problem major classification item is an item indicating a higher-level concept of a problem such as "requirement error" or "software error". The task middle classification item is, for example, an item indicating a specific task included in the task major classification item. The impact degree item indicates the impact degree corresponding to each task shown in the classification item in the task. Here, for example, the degree of influence is set to "1" for a task that has no influence on the processing of the task, and is a value larger than "1" as the task has a large influence on the processing of the task. To set. The influence degree table 11a of FIG. 9 shows an example, and each item, the content of the task shown in the item, and the numerical value of the influence degree are not limited.

The task acquisition unit acquires task information related to a task that occurred in a task being processed in a plurality of work groups. Then, the impact degree specifying unit specifies the impact degree corresponding to the task information acquired by the task acquisition unit with reference to the impact degree table 11a. The first score calculation unit 16 calculates the first score based on the difference between the actual progress and the predetermined standard progress and the influence specified by the influence specifying unit.

Specifically, when the actual progress is "90 hours" and the standard progress is "80 hours", the divergence is specified as "10 hours", and the task of "program function deficiency" is a problem. If so, the degree of influence is specified as "1.10" with reference to the degree of influence table 11a. The first score calculation unit 16 can calculate the divergence "11 hours" according to the degree of influence by, for example, multiplying the divergence "10 hours" by the degree of influence "1.10". The first score is calculated as described above based on the calculated deviation "11 hours". That is, the larger the degree of influence, the larger the dissociation becomes, so that the first score decreases. As a result, the task generated in the processing of the task can be reflected in the first score, so that the manager can manage the situation of each work group more appropriately. The degree of influence is not limited to one, and the divergence may be multiplied by a plurality of degrees of influence.
<< Second Other Embodiment >>

Further, the repetitive development system may have an image acquisition unit (not shown). The image acquisition unit acquires a task organization image including the status of each of the plurality of tasks in charge of each of the plurality of work groups. FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a task rearranging image acquired by the image acquisition unit. The task organizing image is, for example, an image showing a state in which a sticky note on which a task is described is attached to a board. As shown in FIG. 10, the task rearranging image includes a first partial image 19a showing a task waiting to be processed, a second partial image 19b showing a task being processed, and a third partial image 19c showing a processed task. Including.

The progress degree specifying unit 13 specifies the actual progress degree at a predetermined time point based on the task arrangement image acquired by the image acquisition unit. Specifically, using a well-known image processing technique, for example, the number of tasks waiting to be processed (“8” in FIG. 10), processing from the first partial image 19a, the second partial image 19b, and the third partial image 19c. The number of tasks inside (“12” in FIG. 10) and the number of processed tasks (“3” in FIG. 10) are specified. Here, for example, the number of unprocessed tasks is counted from the first and second partial images 19a and 19b, and the number of unprocessed tasks is specified (“20” in the example of FIG. 10). The iterative development system may automatically calculate the actual progress based on the number of unprocessed tasks, or the administrator may calculate the actual progress. As a result, for example, when a situation in which a sticky note related to an unprocessed task is attached to a board is photographed, the actual progress is specified, so that the administrator's input time and the like can be reduced.
<< Third Other Embodiment >>

Further, in the repetitive development system, in the first score calculation unit 16, in addition to the first score, the members participating in the task may be specified. As a result, the members participating in the task with a high first score or the task with a low first score can be confirmed, and the compatibility between the members can be analyzed. Can be selected. The display processing unit 18 displays the member specified together with the first score on the display device 107.
<< Fourth Other Embodiment >>

Further, the repetitive development system may have a report preparation unit (not shown). The report preparation unit puts the progress level specified by the progress level identification unit 13, the first score calculated by the first score calculation unit 16, or the task information acquired by the task acquisition section into a predetermined report format. Make a report by reflecting it. As a result, the administrator can reduce the time and effort required to create a report. The display processing unit 18 displays the created report on the display device 107.
<< Fifth Other Embodiment >>

Further, the repetitive development system may have a backlog creation unit (not shown). In the backlog creation unit, for example, priorities and progress status (time) are set for each task by the administrator based on the task information, and the tasks are organized according to the set contents. As a result, the progress status of the project can be shared and grasped by the administrator and the work group, so that the repetitive development project can proceed smoothly.
=== Summary ===

The project management system 10 in the present embodiment provides task information indicating the status of each of the plurality of tasks of each of the plurality of work groups in a situation where a plurality of work groups executing the project in the iterative development model process a plurality of tasks. The reception unit 12 that accepts, the progress specification unit 13 that specifies the actual progress of each of the plurality of tasks of the plurality of work groups at a predetermined time based on the task information, and the plurality of work groups at the predetermined time. The first score calculation unit 16 that calculates the first score showing the relationship between the actual progress and the standard progress corresponding to a plurality of tasks in each, and the first score of each of the plurality of work groups are displayed. A display processing unit 18 for executing a process for displaying on the device 107 is provided. According to this embodiment, the manager can grasp the progress status of the entire project from a bird's-eye view, so that the appropriate project progress can be realized.

Further, the project management system 10 in the present embodiment further includes a second score calculation unit 17 that calculates the average value of the first scores in each of the plurality of work groups as the second score of the project, and the display processing unit 18 includes a display processing unit 18. A process is performed in which the first score of each of the plurality of work groups calculated by the first score calculation unit 16 and the second score of the project calculated by the second score calculation unit 17 are associated and displayed on the display device 107. .. According to this embodiment, the manager can easily grasp which work group of the entire project is causing the delay, and thus can realize more appropriate project progress.

Further, the project management system 10 in the present embodiment has a threshold value determination unit 14 for determining whether or not the actual progress degree specified by the progress degree identification unit 13 exceeds a predetermined threshold value at a predetermined time point, and a threshold value. A warning output unit 15 that outputs a predetermined warning when the determination unit 14 determines that the threshold value has been exceeded is further provided. According to the present embodiment, since the administrator can know the work group in which the processing of the task is delayed, it is possible to take appropriate measures for the work group.

Further, the project management system 10 in the present embodiment is acquired by the task acquisition unit that acquires a task for processing a predetermined task from each of the plurality of work groups and the task acquisition unit by referring to the predetermined information. The first score calculation unit 16 further includes an impact level specifying unit that specifies the impact level for processing a predetermined task based on the task, and the first score calculation unit 16 has an actual progress level and a predetermined standard progress level. The first score is calculated based on the relationship between the above and the degree of influence specified by the degree of influence specifying unit. According to the present embodiment, since the problem generated in the processing of the task can be reflected in the first status, the administrator can manage the situation of each work group more appropriately.

Further, the project management system 10 in the present embodiment further includes an image acquisition unit that acquires image information including the states of the plurality of tasks that each of the plurality of work groups is in charge of, and the progress identification unit 13 uses the image information as the image information. Based on this, the actual progress of a plurality of tasks in each of the plurality of work groups at a predetermined time point is specified. According to the present embodiment, for example, when a situation in which a sticky note related to an unprocessed task is attached to a board is photographed, the actual progress is specified, so that the administrator's input time and the like can be reduced.

10 ... project management system, 11 ... storage unit, 12 ... reception unit, 13 ... progress identification unit, 14 ... threshold value determination unit, 15 ... warning output unit, 16 ... first score calculation unit, 17 ... second score calculation unit , 18 ... Display processing unit

Claims (7)

In a situation where each of multiple work groups that execute a project in a repetitive development model processes multiple tasks, a reception unit that receives task information indicating the status of each task processed by each work group, and a reception unit.
Based on the task information, a progress specification unit that specifies the actual progress of each task processed by each work group at a predetermined time point, and
A first score calculation unit that calculates a first score indicating the relationship between the actual progress and the standard progress of each task in each work group at the predetermined time point.
A display processing unit that executes a process of displaying the first score of each work group on the display device,
Project management system with. A second score calculation unit for calculating the average value of the first score in each work group as the second score of the project is further provided.
The display processing unit associates the first score of each work group calculated by the first score calculation unit with the second score of the project calculated by the second score calculation unit. The project management system according to claim 1, wherein the process of displaying on the display device is performed. A threshold value determination unit for determining whether or not the actual progress specified by the progress specification unit exceeds a predetermined threshold at the predetermined time point.
When the threshold value determination unit determines that the predetermined threshold value is exceeded, a warning output unit that outputs a predetermined warning and a warning output unit
The project management system according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising. From each of the work groups, a task acquisition unit that acquires a task for processing a predetermined task, and a task acquisition unit.
With reference to the predetermined information, the impact level specifying unit that specifies the impact level for processing the predetermined task based on the task acquired by the task acquisition unit, and
With more
The first score calculation unit calculates the first score based on the relationship between the actual progress and the predetermined standard progress, and the influence specified by the influence specifying unit. The project management system according to any one of claims 1 to 3. An image acquisition unit for acquiring image information including the state of each task in charge of each work group is further provided.
The progress degree specifying unit corresponds to any one of claims 1 to 4, which specifies the actual progress of each task of each work group at a predetermined time point based on the image information. Described project management system. The computer
Receiving task information indicating the status of multiple tasks in each of multiple work groups that carry out projects in a repetitive development model
To identify the actual progress of each task in each work group at a predetermined point in time based on the task information.
At the predetermined time point, calculating the first score indicating the relationship between the actual progress in each work group and the standard progress corresponding to each task.
Executing the process of displaying the first score of each work group on the display device, and
How to manage a project to run. On the computer
Receiving task information indicating the status of multiple tasks in each of multiple work groups that carry out projects in a repetitive development model
To identify the actual progress of each task in each work group at a predetermined point in time based on the task information.
At the predetermined time point, calculating the first score indicating the relationship between the actual progress in each work group and the standard progress corresponding to each task.
Executing the process of displaying the first score of each work group on the display device, and
A program to execute.

Images