JP2020095721A5 - - Google Patents

Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2020095721A5
JP2020095721A5 JP2019222714A JP2019222714A JP2020095721A5 JP 2020095721 A5 JP2020095721 A5 JP 2020095721A5 JP 2019222714 A JP2019222714 A JP 2019222714A JP 2019222714 A JP2019222714 A JP 2019222714A JP 2020095721 A5 JP2020095721 A5 JP 2020095721A5
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
evaluator
evaluation information
evaluation
user
data
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2019222714A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2020095721A (en
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed filed Critical
Priority to JP2019222714A priority Critical patent/JP2020095721A/en
Priority claimed from JP2019222714A external-priority patent/JP2020095721A/en
Publication of JP2020095721A publication Critical patent/JP2020095721A/en
Publication of JP2020095721A5 publication Critical patent/JP2020095721A5/ja
Priority to JP2023133895A priority patent/JP7412828B2/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

<スコア算出部12>
スコア算出部12は、取得部11により取得された操作の種別に基づいて、第1ユーザーの信用度を表すスコアを算出する。本実施形態では、スコア算出部12は、予め定められた規則に基づいて、スコアを算出する。ここで、かかる規則は、第1端末20の操作の種別及びスタッフレベルの組み合わせにより所定のスコアが定められている。本実施形態では、スタッフレベルは、第1ユーザーが所属する組織の従業員の職能又は役職を表すレベルである。そして、かかる規則は、記憶部3にルールテーブルとして記憶される。ルールテーブルの詳細については、図3を用いて後述する。
<Score calculation unit 12>
The score calculation unit 12 calculates a score representing the creditworthiness of the first user based on the type of operation acquired by the acquisition unit 11. In the present embodiment, the score calculation unit 12 calculates the score based on a predetermined rule. Here, in such a rule, a predetermined score is determined by a combination of the operation type and the staff level of the first terminal 20. In the present embodiment, the staff level is a level representing the function or position of an employee of the organization to which the first user belongs. Then, such a rule is stored in the storage unit 3 as a rule table . The details of the rule table will be described later with reference to FIG.

<更新部15>
更新部15は、ルールテーブルにおいて第1端末20の操作の種別及びスタッフレベルの組み合わせにより定められたスコアを、第1端末20の操作の種別及びスタッフレベルの組み合わせ毎に更新するものである。
<Update part 15>
The update unit 15 updates the score determined by the combination of the operation type and the staff level of the first terminal 20 in the rule table for each combination of the operation type and the staff level of the first terminal 20.

<記憶部3>
記憶部3は、種々のプログラム及びデータを記憶するものであり、例えばメモリ、ハードディスク、SSD等により構成される。本実施形態では、記憶部3は、ルールテーブル、従業員データ、報告書データ、評価データ、進捗データ、メンタルデータを記憶する。ルールテーブルは、スコア算出部12が第1ユーザー及び第2ユーザーの信用度を表すスコアを算出する際に参照する規則を表すテーブルである。ここで、かかる規則はテーブルとして記憶されることに変えて、任意の関数として記憶されてもよい。従業員データは、従業員である第1ユーザー及び第2ユーザーの氏名、社員番号、役職、勤続年数、階級等を表すデータである。報告書データは、第1ユーザー及び第2ユーザーの業務に関する
報告書の記載内容を表すデータである。報告書データには、テキストデータ、画像データ、動画データ、音声データが含まれてもよい。評価データは、評価情報を表すデータである。本実施形態では、評価情報は、他のユーザーに関する言動、健康状態、知識、能力及び評価の少なくとも1つに関する情報である。
<Memory unit 3>
The storage unit 3 stores various programs and data, and is composed of, for example, a memory, a hard disk, an SSD, or the like. In the present embodiment, the storage unit 3 stores the rule table , employee data, report data, evaluation data, progress data, and mental data. The rule table is a table representing the rules referred to by the score calculation unit 12 when calculating the scores representing the creditworthiness of the first user and the second user. Here, such a rule may be stored as an arbitrary function instead of being stored as a table. The employee data is data representing the names, employee numbers, job titles, years of service, class, etc. of the first user and the second user who are employees. The report data is data representing the description contents of the report regarding the business of the first user and the second user. The report data may include text data, image data, moving image data, and audio data. The evaluation data is data representing evaluation information. In this embodiment, the evaluation information is information regarding at least one of behavior, health condition, knowledge, ability, and evaluation regarding another user.

2.ルールテーブル
次に、図2を用いて、一実施形態に係るルールテーブルについて説明する。
2. 2. Rule table Next, a rule table according to an embodiment will be described with reference to FIG.

図2に示されるように、ルールテーブルは、第1端末20の操作の種別及びスタッフレベルの組み合わせにより所定のスコアが定められたテーブルである。本実施形態では、ルールテーブルの各マトリックスに記載された数字がスコアを表す。 As shown in FIG. 2, the rule table is a table in which a predetermined score is determined by a combination of an operation type and a staff level of the first terminal 20. In this embodiment, the numbers described in each matrix of the rule table represent the score.

ここで、本実施形態では、情報処理装置10の更新部15により、図2に示されるルールテーブルの各マトリックスで規定されるスコアを変更することができる。これにより、システム100の管理者は、時期、時間帯、曜日、イベント等に応じて、適切なスコアを個別に指定することが可能になる。 Here, in the present embodiment, the update unit 15 of the information processing apparatus 10 can change the score defined in each matrix of the rule table shown in FIG. As a result, the administrator of the system 100 can individually specify an appropriate score according to the time, time zone, day of the week, event, and the like.

Claims (5)

システムであって、It ’s a system,
プロセッサを備え、Equipped with a processor
前記プロセッサは、次の各ステップを実行させるプログラムを実行するように構成され、The processor is configured to execute a program that causes each of the following steps to be performed.
管理ステップでは、評価者及び被評価者を含む各ユーザーの評価を示す評価情報を管理し、The management step manages evaluation information that indicates the evaluation of each user, including the evaluator and the evaluated person.
更新ステップでは、前記評価者による前記被評価者の評価を含む入力に基づいて、前記評価者の評価情報と、前記被評価者の評価情報との両方を更新し、In the update step, both the evaluator's evaluation information and the evaluator's evaluation information are updated based on the input including the evaluator's evaluation by the evaluator.
算出ステップでは、前記評価情報と、前記ユーザーの職能又は役職とに基づいて、法定通貨と互換性を有する対価として換算可能なスコアを算出する、もの。In the calculation step, a score that can be converted as consideration compatible with legal tender is calculated based on the evaluation information and the function or position of the user.
請求項1に記載のシステムにおいて、In the system according to claim 1,
さらに、解析ステップでは、前記評価情報に含まれるテキストに対して自然言語解析を実行し、Further, in the analysis step, a natural language analysis is performed on the text included in the evaluation information.
さらに、表示制御ステップでは、解析された結果に基づいて、前記評価情報がポジティブな内容かネガティブな内容かを表示させる、もの。Further, in the display control step, based on the analyzed result, whether the evaluation information has positive content or negative content is displayed.
請求項1又は請求項2に記載のシステムにおいて、In the system according to claim 1 or 2.
前記対価は、電子マネー、金券又は前記ユーザーが決済をする際に享受される割引である、もの。The consideration is electronic money, a cash voucher, or a discount enjoyed when the user makes a payment.
情報処理方法であって、It is an information processing method
請求項1〜請求項3の何れか1つに記載のシステムにおける各ステップを備える、方法。A method comprising each step in the system according to any one of claims 1 to 3.
プログラムであって、It ’s a program,
コンピュータに、請求項1〜請求項3の何れか1つに記載のシステムにおける各ステップを実行させる、もの。A computer that performs each step in the system according to any one of claims 1 to 3.
JP2019222714A 2019-12-10 2019-12-10 System, information processing device, and program Pending JP2020095721A (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019222714A JP2020095721A (en) 2019-12-10 2019-12-10 System, information processing device, and program
JP2023133895A JP7412828B2 (en) 2019-12-10 2023-08-21 Systems, information processing devices and programs

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019222714A JP2020095721A (en) 2019-12-10 2019-12-10 System, information processing device, and program

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2018231349A Division JP6635449B1 (en) 2018-12-11 2018-12-11 System, information processing device and program

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2023133895A Division JP7412828B2 (en) 2019-12-10 2023-08-21 Systems, information processing devices and programs

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2020095721A JP2020095721A (en) 2020-06-18
JP2020095721A5 true JP2020095721A5 (en) 2022-01-11

Family

ID=71084994

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2019222714A Pending JP2020095721A (en) 2019-12-10 2019-12-10 System, information processing device, and program
JP2023133895A Active JP7412828B2 (en) 2019-12-10 2023-08-21 Systems, information processing devices and programs

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2023133895A Active JP7412828B2 (en) 2019-12-10 2023-08-21 Systems, information processing devices and programs

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (2) JP2020095721A (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7390264B2 (en) 2020-07-28 2023-12-01 本田技研工業株式会社 Information sharing system and information sharing method
JP7562084B2 (en) 2021-03-11 2024-10-07 北菱電興株式会社 Voluntary reward acquisition system, voluntary reward acquisition method, and program

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001222597A (en) * 2000-02-08 2001-08-17 Mitani Sangyo Co Ltd Enterprise information registration application promotion system and its method and recording medium with programmed the method recorded therein
JP2010256987A (en) 2009-04-21 2010-11-11 Bellsystem 24 Inc Network service system
JP5759277B2 (en) * 2011-06-10 2015-08-05 株式会社アルファ新洋 Evaluation apparatus, evaluation method, and program
JP5937810B2 (en) 2011-11-22 2016-06-22 株式会社横田製作所 Self-priming centrifugal pump device
JP5897607B2 (en) * 2012-01-19 2016-03-30 株式会社日立ソリューションズ Production performance evaluation processing system, production performance evaluation processing method
JP6160362B2 (en) * 2013-08-21 2017-07-12 富士通株式会社 Information evaluation apparatus, information evaluation method, and information evaluation program
JP2015106234A (en) * 2013-11-29 2015-06-08 アルパイン株式会社 Display control device and display control method for content information
JP2016049947A (en) 2014-09-02 2016-04-11 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Failure diagnosis support system
JP6796384B2 (en) 2016-02-19 2020-12-09 株式会社アイスタイル Dictionary construction device, information processing device, evaluation word dictionary production method, information processing method, and program
JP6379270B1 (en) * 2017-11-30 2018-08-22 株式会社クーバル Thank-you message sending / receiving system, thank-you message sending / receiving method, and thank-you message sending / receiving program

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Smith et al. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Stanowski et al. Pay for performance: are hospitals becoming more efficient in improving their patient experience?
Hollyer et al. Why do autocrats disclose? Economic transparency and inter-elite politics in the shadow of mass unrest
Arthur Studying the UK job market during the COVID-19 crisis with online job ads
Griffith Understanding high-reliability organizations: are baldrige recipients models?
Brosnan et al. Effects of false-start disqualification rules on response-times of elite-standard sprinters
JP2020095721A5 (en)
Mader et al. Update on performance in tobacco control: a longitudinal analysis of the impact of tobacco control policy and the US adult smoking rate, 2011-2013
Tryon et al. Making the workplace a more effective site for prevention of noncommunicable diseases in adults
JP2022044057A (en) Program, method, information processing device and system
JP2007114819A (en) Business evaluation system
Kang et al. The impact of COVID-19 on small businesses in the US: A longitudinal study from a regional perspective
Kim et al. The potential health and economic impact of improving stroke care standards for Australia
US10133706B2 (en) Electronic book system, electronic book provision method, recording medium, and program
KR102024213B1 (en) Method for managing game using proficiency in game and apparatus thereof
Schubel et al. Informatics and interaction: applying human factors principles to optimize the design of clinical decision support for sepsis
JP5425737B2 (en) Health guidance support plan creation system
JP2019215737A (en) Determination program, determination method, and determination device
JP2004334294A (en) Planning system
US11948114B2 (en) Audit-based compliance detection for healthcare sites
US8952898B1 (en) Method and system for displaying a quicktip
Robertson Evaluation of a modified BOOST Tool in the acute care setting: a retrospective analysis
JP2010277481A (en) Pseudo data generation apparatus, pseudo data generation method and computer program
Boschman et al. Preventive actions taken by workers after workers' health surveillance: a controlled trial
JP2020107293A (en) Information providing device, information providing method, and information providing program