JP2018169199A - Evaluation method of coal degradation - Google Patents

Evaluation method of coal degradation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2018169199A
JP2018169199A JP2017064862A JP2017064862A JP2018169199A JP 2018169199 A JP2018169199 A JP 2018169199A JP 2017064862 A JP2017064862 A JP 2017064862A JP 2017064862 A JP2017064862 A JP 2017064862A JP 2018169199 A JP2018169199 A JP 2018169199A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
coal
pulverization
evaluation method
rpm
sample
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2017064862A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP6862996B2 (en
Inventor
小林 浩
Hiroshi Kobayashi
浩 小林
記央 山田
Norio Yamada
記央 山田
一浩 ▲虫▼合
一浩 ▲虫▼合
Kazuhiro Saiai
龍海 田野
Tatsumi Tano
龍海 田野
剛 村谷
Takeshi Muratani
剛 村谷
孝 本郷
Takashi Hongo
孝 本郷
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ube Corp
Original Assignee
Ube Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ube Industries Ltd filed Critical Ube Industries Ltd
Priority to JP2017064862A priority Critical patent/JP6862996B2/en
Publication of JP2018169199A publication Critical patent/JP2018169199A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6862996B2 publication Critical patent/JP6862996B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Abstract

To provide a method to easily evaluate degradation characteristics during bulk transportation of coal without a large scale facility.SOLUTION: This degradation evaluation method has a volume breaking step of volumetrically breaking coal and a surface breaking step of breaking the surface of fallen coal. In the volume breaking step, 0.5-5 kg of the coal is placed in a cloth bag and fallen from a height of 8-10 m. In the surface breaking step, the fallen coal is charged into a rotary machine of φ300 mm or more and rotated 500-1000 times at 30-50 rpm.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

本発明は、石炭の粉化評価方法に関し、特には、大規模な設備を必要とすることなく簡便に石炭の粉化特性を評価することができる石炭の粉化評価方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a coal pulverization evaluation method, and more particularly, to a coal pulverization evaluation method that can easily evaluate coal pulverization characteristics without requiring a large-scale facility.

一般に、褐炭などを成型して得られる改質炭は、既存の石炭インフラ設備にてバルク輸送(船舶への積み込み・荷揚げ、車両による運搬、貯蔵ヤードでの横持ち)され、目的の荷揚地へと出荷される。バルク輸送中は、落下や擦れなどの衝撃を受けて製品が粉化することが予想される。   In general, reformed coal obtained by molding lignite etc. is bulk transported (loading and unloading to ships, transporting by vehicle, horizontal holding in a storage yard) with existing coal infrastructure facilities, and to the target landing site Shipped. During bulk transportation, it is expected that the product will be powdered by impact such as dropping or rubbing.

したがって出荷される製品はバルク輸送に耐える十分な粉化特性を有することが求められる。なお、石炭の粉化特性を評価するものとしては、JIS Z 8841造粒物―強度試験法がある。加えて、特許文献1では、回転試験後に篩にかける手法にて評価を行っている。   Therefore, the product to be shipped is required to have sufficient pulverization characteristics to withstand bulk transportation. In addition, as what evaluates the pulverization characteristic of coal, there exists a JISZ8841 granulated material-strength test method. In addition, in patent document 1, it evaluates with the method of sieving after a rotation test.

特開2014−19746JP 2014-19746

ところで、石炭のバルク輸送中の粉化特性を評価しようとする場合、図面を参照して後述するように、従来、大規模な設備での評価が必要であり、煩雑である。また、特許文献1の評価方法はバルク輸送時の粉化を想定しておらず、バルク輸送時の粉化を適切に評価するものではない。   By the way, when it is going to evaluate the pulverization characteristic in the bulk transport of coal, conventionally, evaluation with a large-scale installation is required and complicated as described later with reference to the drawings. Moreover, the evaluation method of patent document 1 does not assume the powdering at the time of bulk transport, and does not evaluate powdering at the time of bulk transport appropriately.

そこで本発明の目的は、大規模な設備を必要とすることなく簡便に石炭のバルク輸送中の粉化特性を評価することができる石炭の粉化評価方法を提供することにある。   Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a coal pulverization evaluation method that can easily evaluate pulverization characteristics during bulk transportation of coal without requiring a large-scale facility.

上記課題を解決するための本発明の一形態の粉化評価方法は下記の通りである:
石炭を体積破壊させる体積破壊工程と、
落下させた前記石炭を表面破壊させる表面破壊工程と
を有する石炭の粉化特性評価方法であって、
前記体積破壊工程では、前記石炭を布製の袋に0.5〜5kg入れて高さ8〜10mから落下させ、
前記表面破壊工程では、落下させた前記石炭をφ300mm以上1400mm以下の回転機に装入して30〜50rpmで500〜1000回転させること
を特徴とする石炭の粉化特性評価方法。
The powder evaluation method of one form of the present invention for solving the above problems is as follows:
A volume destruction process for destroying the volume of coal;
A method for evaluating the pulverization characteristics of coal, the method comprising: a surface breaking step of breaking the surface of the dropped coal,
In the volume destruction step, 0.5-5 kg of the coal is put into a cloth bag and dropped from a height of 8-10 m,
In the surface breaking step, the dropped coal is charged into a rotating machine having a diameter of 300 mm or more and 1400 mm or less and rotated at 500 rpm to 1000 rpm at 30 to 50 rpm.

本発明によれば、大規模な設備を必要とすることなく簡便に石炭の粉化特性を評価することができる石炭の粉化評価方法を提供することができる。   ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the coal pulverization evaluation method which can evaluate the pulverization characteristic of coal simply without requiring a large-scale installation can be provided.

本発明の一形態に係る粉化評価方法のフローチャートである。It is a flowchart of the pulverization evaluation method concerning one form of the present invention. 本発明の一形態に係る粉化評価方法を実施した結果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the result of having implemented the pulverization evaluation method concerning one form of the present invention. 袋の形状を模式的に示す図であり、(a)が空の状態、(b)が試料を入れた状態を示す。It is a figure which shows the shape of a bag typically, (a) is an empty state, (b) shows the state which put the sample. 回転試験機の回転部の構成を模式的に示す図であり、(a)が正面図、(b)が斜視図である。It is a figure which shows typically the structure of the rotation part of a rotation testing machine, (a) is a front view, (b) is a perspective view. 大規模なハンドリング設備の構成を模式的に示す図である。It is a figure which shows typically the structure of a large-scale handling equipment. 図5の設備を使った粉化評価方法の結果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the result of the pulverization evaluation method using the installation of FIG.

(1.ハンドリング設備での粉化評価方法)
ハンドリング設備の一例を図5に模式的に示す。このハンドリング設備1は、一例で、受入ホッパ11と、ベルトコンベア12と、ホッパ13と、抜出しベルトコンベア15と、二軸パドルミキサ17と、ベルトコンベア18〜20とを備えている。ハンドリング設備1は、受入ホッパ11に石炭の試料を供給すると、ベルトコンベア12によってそれがホッパ13に搬送され、次いで、ホッパ13、ベルトコンベア15、二軸パドルミキサ17、ベルトコンベア18〜20、ベルトコンベア12の順で試料を循環させるものである。
(1. Evaluation method for pulverization in handling equipment)
An example of the handling equipment is schematically shown in FIG. The handling facility 1 includes, for example, a receiving hopper 11, a belt conveyor 12, a hopper 13, an extraction belt conveyor 15, a biaxial paddle mixer 17, and belt conveyors 18 to 20. When handling equipment 1 supplies a sample of coal to receiving hopper 11, it is conveyed to hopper 13 by belt conveyor 12, and then hopper 13, belt conveyor 15, biaxial paddle mixer 17, belt conveyors 18 to 20, belt conveyor. The sample is circulated in the order of twelve.

ベルトコンベア18、19の接続部分、ベルトコンベア19、20の接続部分、ベルトコンベア20、12の接続部分にはそれぞれシュート20−1〜20―3が設けられ、石炭は、このシュートを通って落下するようになっている。このようなハンドリング設備1を用いて、石炭の粉化特性評価が行われる。   Chute 20-1 to 20-3 are provided at the connecting portion of the belt conveyors 18 and 19, the connecting portion of the belt conveyors 19 and 20, and the connecting portion of the belt conveyors 20 and 12, respectively, and the coal falls through this chute. It is supposed to be. The coal pulverization characteristics are evaluated using such handling equipment 1.

(参考例1)
参考例1の粉化評価は一例で次のような手順で行われる。
(i)まず、成型した石炭を、ハンドリング設備1の循環経路に供給して、所定時間、循環搬送を行う。(ii)その後、サンプルを採取し、粒度分布を測定する。循環時間による粉化の程度は、限定されるものではないが、2mm篩(ふるい)通過質量百分率で評価する。
(Reference Example 1)
The pulverization evaluation of Reference Example 1 is performed by the following procedure as an example.
(I) First, the formed coal is supplied to the circulation path of the handling facility 1 and is circulated and conveyed for a predetermined time. (Ii) Thereafter, a sample is taken and the particle size distribution is measured. The degree of pulverization due to the circulation time is not limited, but the evaluation is based on a mass passing through a 2 mm sieve.

ハンドリング設備1の搬送能力は一例で50t/hである。循環させる石炭は一例でインドネシア亜瀝青炭であるA炭である。試料量は一例で2mである。参考例1における成型した石炭の粒度分布(粉化評価試験前、及びハンドリング設備1での評価試験後)を表1に示す。 The handling capacity of the handling facility 1 is 50 t / h as an example. The coal to be circulated is, for example, Indonesian subbituminous coal A. The sample amount is 2 m 3 as an example. Table 1 shows the particle size distribution of the molded coal in Reference Example 1 (before the pulverization evaluation test and after the evaluation test in the handling facility 1).

(参考例2)
参考例2の評価方法では、試料を改質炭に変えた以外は参考例1と同様の装置、条件で試験を実施した。改質炭はインドネシア褐炭であるB炭を粉砕後圧縮成型したものを用いる。参考例2における改質炭の粒度分布(粉化評価試験前、及びハンドリング設備1での評価試験後)を表2に示す。
(Reference Example 2)
In the evaluation method of Reference Example 2, the test was performed with the same apparatus and conditions as in Reference Example 1 except that the sample was changed to modified coal. The reformed coal is obtained by crushing and compression-molding B coal, Indonesian lignite. Table 2 shows the particle size distribution of the modified coal in Reference Example 2 (before the pulverization evaluation test and after the evaluation test in the handling facility 1).

(結果)
参考例1、2の結果を図6に示す。また、図6のグラフにおいて、横軸はハンドリング設備1における循環時間(min)であり、縦軸は2mm篩通過質量百分率(質量%)である。
(result)
The results of Reference Examples 1 and 2 are shown in FIG. Moreover, in the graph of FIG. 6, a horizontal axis | shaft is the circulation time (min) in the handling equipment 1, and a vertical axis | shaft is 2 mm sieve passage mass percentage (mass%).

石炭および改質炭のいずれも循環時間が長くなるほど、ハンドリング時の衝撃で破砕され、当然ながら、微粉(2mm篩通過質量百分率)が増加していくが、改質炭(参考例2)は石炭(参考例1)よりも微粉が少なくなっている。この結果から、改質炭は石炭と比べ粉化が抑制されていることが分かる。また、参考例1、2いずれの試料においても循環後約50分を経過すると、粉化の進行が停滞することが分かる。   Both the coal and the reformed coal are crushed by the impact during handling as the circulation time becomes longer. Naturally, the fine powder (mass percentage passing through the 2 mm sieve) increases, but the reformed coal (Reference Example 2) is coal. There is less fine powder than (Reference Example 1). From this result, it can be seen that the reformed coal is less pulverized than the coal. Moreover, it turns out that progress of pulverization stops in about 50 minutes after circulation also in any sample of the reference examples 1 and 2.

このことから、同設備で50分間の処理を行えば、改質炭のバルク輸送中の粉化の限界が確認できることが分かった。   From this, it was found that if processing was performed for 50 minutes with the same equipment, the limit of pulverization during bulk transport of the modified coal could be confirmed.

(2.本実施形態に係る評価方法)
石炭の粉化特性は重要な品質評価項目であるが、図5のような大型の試験機で評価することはサンプル量確保の観点から、改質炭などの開発段階では利用するのが困難であるし、評価に多くの人員や重機が必要である。改質炭などの製造方法を迅速に最適化するに当っては、最小量のサンプルで簡便かつ短時間に複数のサンプルの粉化特性を評価することが望ましい。
(2. Evaluation method according to this embodiment)
The pulverization characteristics of coal is an important quality evaluation item, but it is difficult to use a large-scale testing machine as shown in Fig. 5 in the development stage of reformed coal from the viewpoint of securing a sample amount. There are many people and heavy equipment for evaluation. In order to quickly optimize the production method of modified coal and the like, it is desirable to evaluate the pulverization characteristics of a plurality of samples simply and in a short time with a minimum amount of samples.

そこで、本発明者らは、図5のようなハンドリング試験装置(50分間の循環処理)で得られる結果を、少量サンプル・実験室規模で再現可能な評価方法を検討した。具体的には、バルク輸送時の石炭または改質炭に対しては体積破壊と表面破壊が複合的に行われていると考え、体積破壊を与えるために高所から落下させた後、表面破壊を与えるための回転処理を行うことで評価設備、手順の小規模化および簡略化を図ることとした。種々の検討の結果、次のような評価方法が有用であることを見出した。本実施形態に係る評価方法は、体積破壊工程(ステップS1)と表面破壊工程(ステップS2)との2工程を有する(図1も参照)。   Therefore, the present inventors examined an evaluation method capable of reproducing the results obtained with a handling test apparatus (circulation treatment for 50 minutes) as shown in FIG. 5 on a small sample / laboratory scale. Specifically, it is considered that volume destruction and surface destruction are performed in combination for coal or modified coal during bulk transportation, and surface destruction after dropping from a high place to give volume destruction. It was decided to reduce the scale and simplification of the evaluation equipment and procedure by performing the rotation process to give As a result of various studies, it has been found that the following evaluation method is useful. The evaluation method according to the present embodiment has two processes, a volume destruction process (step S1) and a surface destruction process (step S2) (see also FIG. 1).

ステップS1は、体積破壊工程である。この工程では、石炭または改質炭の試料を袋の中に入れて所定高さから落下させる。袋は一例で布製である。袋に入れる量は一例で0.5kg以上5.0kg以下である。「所定高さ」は一例で8m以上10m以下である。落下させる回数は一例で5回以上25回以下である。袋の材質は、どのようなものであっても原則構わないが、落下衝撃が内容物に伝わるように生地がある程度薄く、かつ、破れが生じないように十分丈夫なものであることが好ましい。また、軽量であるものも好ましい。   Step S1 is a volume destruction process. In this step, a sample of coal or modified coal is placed in a bag and dropped from a predetermined height. The bag is made of cloth as an example. The amount put in the bag is, for example, 0.5 kg or more and 5.0 kg or less. The “predetermined height” is, for example, 8 m or more and 10 m or less. The number of times of dropping is, for example, 5 times or more and 25 times or less. Any material can be used for the bag, but it is preferable that the fabric is thin enough to prevent a drop impact from being transmitted to the contents, and is sufficiently strong so as not to break. Moreover, what is lightweight is also preferable.

ステップS2は、表面破壊工程である。この工程では、上記工程で落下させた試料を所定の回転試験機に入れて、所定の回転速度で、所定の回転数だけ回転させる。表面破壊工程に用いる装置は、回転試験機に限らず表面破壊が与えられる装置であれば、どのようなものでも良い。   Step S2 is a surface destruction process. In this step, the sample dropped in the above step is put in a predetermined rotation testing machine and rotated at a predetermined rotation speed by a predetermined number of rotations. The apparatus used for the surface destruction process is not limited to a rotary testing machine, and any apparatus can be used as long as it can provide surface destruction.

所定の回転試験機としては、例えば、回転部の内径がφ300mm以上のものを利用してもよい。所定の回転速度としては、一例で、30rpm以上50rpmである。所定の回転数としては、一例で、500回転以上1000回転以下である。試験機の構成例については他の図面も参照して後述する。   As the predetermined rotation tester, for example, a rotating unit having an inner diameter of 300 mm or more may be used. The predetermined rotation speed is, for example, 30 rpm or more and 50 rpm. The predetermined number of rotations is, for example, 500 rotations or more and 1000 rotations or less. A configuration example of the testing machine will be described later with reference to other drawings.

下記のような具体的な条件にて本発明の一形態に係る粉化評価方法を実施した。   The pulverization evaluation method according to one embodiment of the present invention was performed under the following specific conditions.

ステップS1として、石炭(実施例1)または改質炭(実施例2)の試料1kgを8.6mの高さから20回落下させた。なお、落下後のサンプルを全量回収する必要があるため、落下の際は、布製の袋に試料を梱包し、袋ごと落下させた。落下に当っては、試料を入れた布製袋を重力落下させて地上のコンクリート面に激突させる方法とした。   As Step S1, 1 kg of a sample of coal (Example 1) or modified coal (Example 2) was dropped 20 times from a height of 8.6 m. In addition, since it is necessary to collect the entire sample after dropping, the sample was packed in a cloth bag and dropped together with the bag. In dropping, the cloth bag containing the sample was dropped by gravity and collided with the ground concrete surface.

落下試験に用いた袋を図3に示す。袋41の形状は下記の通りである。
・材質:PE織布(フレキシブルコンテナバッグとして使用されるようなもの。通気性有り。)
・形状:平底の底部直径がφ500mmで高さ(深さ)が500mmの円筒形状
・容量(梱包前、円筒形として):79.5リットル
The bag used for the drop test is shown in FIG. The shape of the bag 41 is as follows.
-Material: PE woven fabric (used as a flexible container bag. Breathable.)
・ Shape: Cylindrical shape with flat bottom diameter of φ500mm and height (depth) of 500mm ・ Capacity (before packing, as cylinder): 79.5 liters

袋への試料の充填に関し、1袋当たり1kg充填した。図3(a)のような空の状態の袋(上端開口部に紐を有する)に試料を入れ、図3(b)のような形態で袋を閉じた。   Regarding the filling of the sample into the bag, 1 kg was filled per bag. A sample was put in an empty bag (having a string at the upper end opening) as shown in FIG. 3 (a), and the bag was closed in a form as shown in FIG. 3 (b).

試料1kgの充填量(容積)は、かさ密度が0.5〜0.9kg/リットルの場合、1.1〜2.0リットルとなる。試料の充填率は、したがって1.4〜2.5%の範囲内である(「a〜b」はa以上b以下を示す。)。なお、本発明の一形態においては、充填率は1.0〜10%の範囲内としてもよい。   The filling amount (volume) of 1 kg of the sample is 1.1 to 2.0 liters when the bulk density is 0.5 to 0.9 kg / liter. The filling rate of the sample is therefore in the range of 1.4 to 2.5% (“ab” indicates a to b). Note that in one embodiment of the present invention, the filling rate may be in the range of 1.0 to 10%.

ステップS2として、その後に回転試験機(40rpm)で10分間処理を行った。回転強度はJISZ8841造粒物―強度試験法で規定されている回転強度試験機を用いたが、衝撃力を増加させるため、内部に高さ60mmのリフターを2箇所(0°と180°の位置)に設置したものを使用した。   As step S2, processing was performed for 10 minutes with the rotation tester (40 rpm) after that. The rotational strength was measured using the rotational strength tester specified in the JISZ8841 granulated product-strength test method. However, in order to increase the impact force, two lifters with a height of 60 mm were placed inside (positions at 0 ° and 180 °). ) Was used.

回転強度試験機は、具体的には図4(a)の正面図および図4(b)の斜視図に模式的に示すような回転部を有するものである。回転部は、内部に試料を入れて回転する円筒部材45を有している。円筒部材45は、内径が350mmで内部の軸方向長さが175mmである。この円筒部材45の内部2個所(0°と180°の位置)に高さ60mmのリフター45a、45aを設置した。なお、JIS規格ではリフターの高さは10mmである。リフター45aは、平板状の部材であり、図4(a)に示すように半径方向に延びるように配置され、より具体的には、内周面から中心側に向かって延在している。また、図4(b)に示すように、リフター45aは、円筒部材45と同じく175mmに形成されている。リフター45aの厚みはこの例では10mmである。   Specifically, the rotational strength tester has a rotating part as schematically shown in the front view of FIG. 4A and the perspective view of FIG. The rotating part has a cylindrical member 45 that rotates by putting a sample therein. The cylindrical member 45 has an inner diameter of 350 mm and an inner axial length of 175 mm. Lifters 45 a and 45 a having a height of 60 mm were installed at two locations (positions of 0 ° and 180 °) inside the cylindrical member 45. In the JIS standard, the height of the lifter is 10 mm. The lifter 45a is a flat plate-like member, and is arranged so as to extend in the radial direction as shown in FIG. 4A. More specifically, the lifter 45a extends from the inner peripheral surface toward the center side. Further, as shown in FIG. 4B, the lifter 45 a is formed to be 175 mm like the cylindrical member 45. The thickness of the lifter 45a is 10 mm in this example.

図2は、ステップS1、S2の処理を行った後、2mmの篩を通過したものの割合(質量%)をプロットしたものである。比較のため参考例1、2も併せて示す。実施例1の試料は参考例1で用いたA炭であり、実施例2の試料は参考例2で用いたB炭の改質炭である。また、実施例1における試料の粒度分布を表1に示し、実施例2における試料の粒度分布を表2に示す。   FIG. 2 is a plot of the ratio (mass%) of those passing through a 2 mm sieve after the processing of steps S1 and S2. Reference examples 1 and 2 are also shown for comparison. The sample of Example 1 is A coal used in Reference Example 1, and the sample of Example 2 is modified coal of B coal used in Reference Example 2. Table 1 shows the particle size distribution of the sample in Example 1, and Table 2 shows the particle size distribution of the sample in Example 2.

図2では実施例1,2の評価条件(8.6mの高さから20回落下させ、かつ40rpmで20分間回転)を参考例1,2の評価条件(ハンドリング設備1での循環時間50分)と同等と見做して記載した。そのため図2の横軸は図6と同様(ハンドリング設備1での循環時間)である。図6では実施例1、2いずれも参考例1、2と同様の挙動を示している。   In FIG. 2, the evaluation conditions of Examples 1 and 2 (dropping 20 times from a height of 8.6 m and rotating at 40 rpm for 20 minutes) are the same as the evaluation conditions of Reference Examples 1 and 2 (circulation time 50 minutes in handling equipment 1). ) And described as equivalent. Therefore, the horizontal axis in FIG. 2 is the same as that in FIG. 6 (circulation time in the handling facility 1). In FIG. 6, both Examples 1 and 2 show the same behavior as Reference Examples 1 and 2.

以上より、ハンドリング試験50分間の衝撃に相当するラボ試験法(落下8.6mを20回し、回転40rpmを20分)で改質炭のバルク輸送中の粉化特性が評価できた。また、評価に必要な試料量は1kgと小規模化を図ることができた。   From the above, the pulverization characteristics during the bulk transportation of the modified coal could be evaluated by the laboratory test method corresponding to the impact for 50 minutes in the handling test (20 turns of falling 8.6 m, 20 minutes of rotation at 40 rpm). In addition, the sample amount necessary for evaluation could be reduced to 1 kg.

(付記)
本出願は以下の発明を開示する:
1.石炭を体積破壊させる体積破壊工程と、
落下させた前記石炭を表面破壊させる表面破壊工程と
を有する石炭の粉化特性評価方法であって、
前記体積破壊工程では、前記石炭を布製の袋に0.5〜5kg入れて高さ8〜10mから落下させ、
前記表面破壊工程では、落下させた前記石炭をφ300mm以上の回転機に装入して30〜50rpmで500〜1000回転させること
を特徴とする石炭の粉化特性評価方法。
(Appendix)
This application discloses the following inventions:
1. A volume destruction process for destroying the volume of coal;
A method for evaluating the pulverization characteristics of coal, the method comprising: a surface breaking step of breaking the surface of the dropped coal,
In the volume destruction step, 0.5-5 kg of the coal is put into a cloth bag and dropped from a height of 8-10 m,
In the surface destruction step, the dropped coal is charged into a rotating machine having a diameter of 300 mm or more and rotated at 500 rpm to 1000 rpm at 30 to 50 rpm.

このような方法によれば、次のような作用効果が得られる。すなわち、石炭はハンドリング中に一定量が粉化するが、上記の試験を行うことで採掘−積出−運搬−陸揚げ−運搬、を経て発電所等で使用されるまでの粉化量を高い精度で推定し、粉化特性を評価することが可能となる。特に、図5に示したような大規模な設備を用いる必要もないので、簡便に粉化特性を評価することができるものとなる。   According to such a method, the following effects can be obtained. In other words, a certain amount of coal is pulverized during handling, but by performing the above test, the amount of pulverization until mining, shipping, transportation, landing, transportation, etc. is used at a power plant, etc. is highly accurate. It is possible to estimate and evaluate the powdering characteristics. In particular, since it is not necessary to use a large-scale facility as shown in FIG. 5, the powdering characteristics can be easily evaluated.

2.上記粉化特性評価方法において、前記体積破壊工程における高さは8.6mであることを特徴とする方法。本発明は具体的にはこのような高さからの落下を行うことで実施可能である。 2. In the above pulverization property evaluation method, the height in the volume breaking step is 8.6 m. Specifically, the present invention can be implemented by dropping from such a height.

3. 前記表面破壊工程ではφ350mmの回転機を用い、40rpmで800回転させることを特徴とする方法。本発明は具体的にはこのような回転試験を行うことで実施可能である。 3. In the surface destruction step, a rotating machine having a diameter of 350 mm is used and the method is performed by rotating 800 times at 40 rpm. Specifically, the present invention can be implemented by performing such a rotation test.

4.上記記載石炭の粉化特性評価方法において、前記石炭は改質炭であることを特徴とする方法。この方法によれば、改質炭においても上記手法により粉化特性を評価できる。   4). The method for evaluating coal pulverization characteristics as described above, wherein the coal is modified coal. According to this method, it is possible to evaluate the pulverization characteristics of the modified coal using the above method.

41 袋
45 円筒部材
45a リフター
41 bag 45 cylindrical member 45a lifter

Claims (4)

石炭を体積破壊させる体積破壊工程と、
落下させた前記石炭を表面破壊させる表面破壊工程と
を有する石炭の粉化特性評価方法であって、
前記体積破壊工程では、前記石炭を布製の袋に0.5〜5kg入れて高さ8〜10mから落下させ、
前記表面破壊工程では、落下させた前記石炭をφ300mm以上1400mm以下の回転機に装入して30〜50rpmで500〜1000回転させること
を特徴とする石炭の粉化特性評価方法。
A volume destruction process for destroying the volume of coal;
A method for evaluating the pulverization characteristics of coal, the method comprising: a surface breaking step of breaking the surface of the dropped coal,
In the volume destruction step, 0.5-5 kg of the coal is put into a cloth bag and dropped from a height of 8-10 m,
In the surface breaking step, the dropped coal is charged into a rotating machine having a diameter of 300 mm or more and 1400 mm or less and rotated at 500 rpm to 1000 rpm at 30 to 50 rpm.
請求項1に記載の石炭の粉化特性評価方法において、
前記体積破壊工程における高さは8.6mであること
を特徴とする石炭の粉化特性評価方法。
In the coal pulverization characteristic evaluation method according to claim 1,
The height in the said volume destruction process is 8.6 m. The coal pulverization characteristic evaluation method characterized by the above-mentioned.
請求項1または請求項2に記載の石炭の粉化特性評価方法において、
前記表面破壊工程ではφ350mmの回転機を用い、40rpmで800回転させること
を特徴とする石炭の粉化特性評価方法。
In the coal pulverization characteristic evaluation method according to claim 1 or 2,
In the surface destruction step, a pulverizing characteristic evaluation method for coal, wherein a rotating machine with a diameter of 350 mm is used and the rotating speed is 800 rpm at 40 rpm.
請求項1ないし請求項3のいずれか1項に記載の石炭の粉化特性評価方法において、
前記石炭は改質炭であること
を特徴とする石炭の粉化特性評価方法。
In the coal pulverization characteristic evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
The method for evaluating coal pulverization characteristics, wherein the coal is modified coal.
JP2017064862A 2017-03-29 2017-03-29 Coal pulverization evaluation method Active JP6862996B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017064862A JP6862996B2 (en) 2017-03-29 2017-03-29 Coal pulverization evaluation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017064862A JP6862996B2 (en) 2017-03-29 2017-03-29 Coal pulverization evaluation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2018169199A true JP2018169199A (en) 2018-11-01
JP6862996B2 JP6862996B2 (en) 2021-04-21

Family

ID=64017861

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2017064862A Active JP6862996B2 (en) 2017-03-29 2017-03-29 Coal pulverization evaluation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6862996B2 (en)

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4169170A (en) * 1974-03-29 1979-09-25 Cominco Ltd. Control of dust during coal transportation
JPS6044432A (en) * 1983-08-17 1985-03-09 Kansai Coke & Chem Co Ltd Transporting method of molded coal
JPS61213288A (en) * 1985-03-19 1986-09-22 Hinode Kagaku Kogyo Kk Oil coke briquette and production thereof
JP2003041263A (en) * 2001-07-30 2003-02-13 Kawasaki Steel Corp Method for estimating cold strength of metallurgical coke
JP2006283008A (en) * 2005-03-09 2006-10-19 Nippon Steel Corp Method for producing blast furnace coke
JP2007284615A (en) * 2006-04-19 2007-11-01 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Method for estimating coke strength
JP2007291262A (en) * 2006-04-26 2007-11-08 Nippon Steel Corp Method for estimating coke strength
JP2008297385A (en) * 2007-05-30 2008-12-11 Nippon Steel Corp Method for producing coke for blast furnace
JP2009221361A (en) * 2008-03-17 2009-10-01 Kobe Steel Ltd Method for producing coke, and method for producing pig iron
JP2014019746A (en) * 2012-07-13 2014-02-03 Kobe Steel Ltd Production method of by-product coal molded product
JP2014019814A (en) * 2012-07-20 2014-02-03 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Strength estimation method of formed coke
JP2014077035A (en) * 2012-10-09 2014-05-01 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Blending method of blast furnace coke raw material

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4169170A (en) * 1974-03-29 1979-09-25 Cominco Ltd. Control of dust during coal transportation
JPS6044432A (en) * 1983-08-17 1985-03-09 Kansai Coke & Chem Co Ltd Transporting method of molded coal
JPS61213288A (en) * 1985-03-19 1986-09-22 Hinode Kagaku Kogyo Kk Oil coke briquette and production thereof
JP2003041263A (en) * 2001-07-30 2003-02-13 Kawasaki Steel Corp Method for estimating cold strength of metallurgical coke
JP2006283008A (en) * 2005-03-09 2006-10-19 Nippon Steel Corp Method for producing blast furnace coke
JP2007284615A (en) * 2006-04-19 2007-11-01 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Method for estimating coke strength
JP2007291262A (en) * 2006-04-26 2007-11-08 Nippon Steel Corp Method for estimating coke strength
JP2008297385A (en) * 2007-05-30 2008-12-11 Nippon Steel Corp Method for producing coke for blast furnace
JP2009221361A (en) * 2008-03-17 2009-10-01 Kobe Steel Ltd Method for producing coke, and method for producing pig iron
JP2014019746A (en) * 2012-07-13 2014-02-03 Kobe Steel Ltd Production method of by-product coal molded product
JP2014019814A (en) * 2012-07-20 2014-02-03 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Strength estimation method of formed coke
JP2014077035A (en) * 2012-10-09 2014-05-01 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Blending method of blast furnace coke raw material

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"コークス類−試験方法", JIS K 2151:2004, JPN6020039101, 2004, JP, pages 1 - 3, ISSN: 0004365917 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6862996B2 (en) 2021-04-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20110309175A1 (en) Milling apparatus
CN103420374A (en) Polycrystalline silicon
WO2008027303A3 (en) Continuous bulk bag discharging facility
CN107972919A (en) A kind of powder or granule material package machine, the method for packing with the packing machine powder
JP6862996B2 (en) Coal pulverization evaluation method
CN107972925A (en) Material packing machine, the method packed with the material packing machine to seed
JP5344304B2 (en) Trough swinging type shot blasting apparatus and trough swinging type shot blasting method
US9192984B2 (en) Waste foundry sand to frac sand process
CN107856911A (en) A kind of powder or granule material package machine, the method for packing with the packing machine powder
JP2004149218A (en) Article transfer device and device for turning direction of rod-like item
CN206145687U (en) Special type hazardous waste preliminary treatment and ejection of compact system
JP2012041106A (en) Partition plate of fixed quantity feeder device of powder
CN210479668U (en) Prevent shutoff pigment package conveyor
CN107878823A (en) A kind of material packing machine, the method packed with the material packing machine to seed
JP6632496B2 (en) Method for manufacturing solid fuel
US10981735B2 (en) Pneumatic conveyance method for methionine
JP6399265B1 (en) Conveyor system
JP2004089441A (en) Powder raw material supplying apparatus
JP4040904B2 (en) Powder filling method
JP2008239455A (en) Aggregate production delivery system and aggregate production delivery method
JP6640679B2 (en) Method for manufacturing solid fuel
Hlosta et al. Mechanical properties of powdered coal and their influence to technological processes
CN204078087U (en) Powder pesticide bin stock, conveying and packing device
JP7028046B2 (en) Coke manufacturing method and coal pretreatment equipment used for coke manufacturing
JP6010793B2 (en) Apparatus and method for selectively fractionating granular material containing base metal and compound thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
RD04 Notification of resignation of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424

Effective date: 20180425

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20200122

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20201007

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20201020

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20210302

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20210315

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6862996

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250