JP2018141234A - Magnesium alloy and method for producing magnesium alloy - Google Patents

Magnesium alloy and method for producing magnesium alloy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2018141234A
JP2018141234A JP2018027358A JP2018027358A JP2018141234A JP 2018141234 A JP2018141234 A JP 2018141234A JP 2018027358 A JP2018027358 A JP 2018027358A JP 2018027358 A JP2018027358 A JP 2018027358A JP 2018141234 A JP2018141234 A JP 2018141234A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
magnesium alloy
solid
solution treatment
treatment
temperature
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2018027358A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP7116394B2 (en
Inventor
ミンジェ ビャン
Ming-Zhe BIAN
ミンジェ ビャン
泰祐 佐々木
Yasuhiro Sasaki
泰祐 佐々木
和博 宝野
Kazuhiro Hono
和博 宝野
ビョンチャン スー
Byungchang Xu
ビョンチャン スー
重晴 鎌土
Shigeharu Kamatsuchi
重晴 鎌土
大貴 中田
Taiki Nakata
大貴 中田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
National Institute for Materials Science
Nagaoka University of Technology NUC
Original Assignee
National Institute for Materials Science
Nagaoka University of Technology NUC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by National Institute for Materials Science, Nagaoka University of Technology NUC filed Critical National Institute for Materials Science
Priority to PCT/JP2018/006088 priority Critical patent/WO2018159394A1/en
Priority to EP18761653.7A priority patent/EP3572542B1/en
Priority to US16/488,050 priority patent/US20200239992A1/en
Publication of JP2018141234A publication Critical patent/JP2018141234A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7116394B2 publication Critical patent/JP7116394B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C23/00Alloys based on magnesium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C23/00Alloys based on magnesium
    • C22C23/02Alloys based on magnesium with aluminium as the next major constituent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C23/00Alloys based on magnesium
    • C22C23/04Alloys based on magnesium with zinc or cadmium as the next major constituent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22FCHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C22F1/00Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
    • C22F1/002Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working by rapid cooling or quenching; cooling agents used therefor
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22FCHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C22F1/00Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
    • C22F1/06Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of magnesium or alloys based thereon

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a highly versatile magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength in a temperature range including normal temperature and to provide a method for producing a magnesium alloy.SOLUTION: There is provided a magnesium alloy comprising 0.2 to 2 mass% of Al, 0.2 to 1 mass% of Mn, 0.2 to 2 mass% of Zn, at least 0.2 to 1 mass% of Ca and the balance Mg with inevitable impurities, where a precipitate composed of Mg, Ca and Al is dispersed on the (0001) surface of a magnesium mother phase.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

本発明は、マグネシウム合金及びマグネシウム合金の製造方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a magnesium alloy and a method for producing the magnesium alloy.

マグネシウム合金は、実用金属中最軽量の金属として知られており、アルミニウム合金に代わる軽量材料として鉄道、航空機、自動車などへの適用が検討されている。しかし、マグネシウム合金展伸材はアルミニウム合金に比べて強度や加工性に劣る。この点を克服し、マグネシウム合金の用途を拡大するために、新しい展伸材の開発を含む様々な研究が行われてきた。   Magnesium alloy is known as the lightest metal among practical metals, and its application to railways, aircrafts, automobiles, and the like has been studied as a lightweight material replacing aluminum alloy. However, magnesium alloy wrought material is inferior in strength and workability compared to aluminum alloy. In order to overcome this point and expand the applications of magnesium alloys, various studies have been conducted including the development of new wrought materials.

従来の展伸マグネシウム合金は、強加工による結晶粒微細化や、希土類金属元素と亜鉛を合金元素として添加することで300MPaを超える強度を得ている(例えば特許文献1参照)。しかし、従来技術により開発された合金には実用上多くの問題点が存在する。   A conventional wrought magnesium alloy has obtained a strength exceeding 300 MPa by refining crystal grains by strong processing or adding a rare earth metal element and zinc as alloy elements (see, for example, Patent Document 1). However, there are many practical problems in the alloys developed by the prior art.

特許文献1のように希土類金属を合金元素として添加した合金は優れた強度を有する。しかし、高価な希土類金属を使用するために原料コストが高くなる。また、容易に熱間加工などの1次加工や最終形状への2次加工ができないため製造コストも高い。したがって、自動車や鉄道などに適用できるような汎用的な材料が開発できる可能性は著しく低い。   An alloy in which a rare earth metal is added as an alloy element as in Patent Document 1 has excellent strength. However, since the expensive rare earth metal is used, the raw material cost becomes high. In addition, since the primary processing such as hot processing and the secondary processing to the final shape cannot be easily performed, the manufacturing cost is high. Therefore, the possibility of developing a general-purpose material that can be applied to automobiles, railways, and the like is extremely low.

また、強加工による結晶粒微細化により強度を向上させた展伸材が知られている(例えば非特許文献1参照)。しかし、変形組織が形成され、既に加工硬化した状態になっているため、室温での2次加工が著しく困難である。それだけでなく、大型部材を作製することも困難である。   Further, a wrought material whose strength is improved by refining crystal grains by strong processing is known (see, for example, Non-Patent Document 1). However, since a deformed structure is formed and already in a work-hardened state, secondary processing at room temperature is extremely difficult. In addition, it is difficult to produce a large member.

一方、高強度合金の開発に加え、常温での加工性の向上に関する研究についてもこれまで多数行われている(特許文献2,3参照)。これらの報告例ではエリクセン値(IE値)によって常温の加工性が評価されている。   On the other hand, in addition to the development of high-strength alloys, many studies on the improvement of workability at room temperature have been conducted (see Patent Documents 2 and 3). In these reported examples, workability at room temperature is evaluated by the Erichsen value (IE value).

幾つかの報告において、合金元素添加や圧延プロセスの改良などによって、アルミニウム合金に匹敵する優れた常温での加工性を有する合金を開発した例が報告されている(特許文献3参照)。しかし常温加工性の向上に伴い強度が低下する傾向があった。なお、特定の鋳造材や押出材において時効処理を用いて強度を改善した例も報告されている(特許文献4,5参照)。   In some reports, an example has been reported in which an alloy having excellent workability at room temperature comparable to an aluminum alloy has been developed by adding an alloying element or improving a rolling process (see Patent Document 3). However, there was a tendency for the strength to decrease as the room temperature processability improved. In addition, the example which improved the intensity | strength using the aging treatment in the specific casting material and extrusion material is also reported (refer patent document 4, 5).

特開2013−79436号公報JP 2013-79436 A 特開2004−10959号公報JP 2004-10959 A 特開2010−13725号公報JP 2010-13725 A 特開2002−266044号公報JP 2002-266044 A 特開2016−169427号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2006-169427

W.J.Kim, I.B.Park, S.H.Han, Scripta Materialia 66 (2012) 590 - 593W.J.Kim, I.B.Park, S.H.Han, Scripta Materialia 66 (2012) 590-593

ところで、例えば自動車のボディパネルの場合、機械的性質として求められる160MPaの0.2%耐力と8mm程度のエリクセン値を有する合金が求められており、多くの用途において、強度と常温での優れた2次加工性の両者を発現する合金が強く求められている。ところが従来のマグネシウム合金やマグネシウム合金の製造方法では、強度と常温における2次加工性とを十分に兼ね備えた汎用性の高い材料は得られていなかった。   By the way, for example, in the case of an automobile body panel, an alloy having a 0.2% proof stress of 160 MPa, which is required as a mechanical property, and an Erichsen value of about 8 mm is required, and in many applications, it is excellent in strength and room temperature. There is a strong demand for alloys that exhibit both secondary workability. However, conventional magnesium alloys and magnesium alloy production methods have not yielded highly versatile materials that have both strength and secondary workability at room temperature.

そこで本発明では、常温を含む温度範囲における加工性と強度とを両立させることが可能で、汎用性の高いマグネシウム合金及びマグネシウム合金の製造方法を提供することを目的とする。   Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a highly versatile magnesium alloy and a magnesium alloy manufacturing method that can achieve both workability and strength in a temperature range including normal temperature.

上記した課題を解決する方法としては時効処理の適用が挙げられる。T6処理と呼ばれる熱処理は、熱間または温間における加工によって得た展伸材に対して施す熱処理プロセスの一種であり、合金中に合金元素を過飽和に固溶させる溶体化処理(T4処理)と、析出物を分散させて最大硬度まで強化する時効処理よりなる。   Application of an aging treatment is an example of a method for solving the above-described problems. The heat treatment called T6 treatment is a kind of heat treatment process applied to the wrought material obtained by hot or warm working, and is a solution treatment (T4 treatment) in which an alloying element is supersaturated in the alloy. And an aging treatment in which precipitates are dispersed and strengthened to the maximum hardness.

T6処理を板材や棒材などの塑性加工品に適用すると、T4処理後は析出物の母相への固溶や母相の回復、再結晶、および結晶配向度の低下により塑性加工品が軟化するので成形加工性を向上させることができ、その後の時効処理により微細な析出物を高密度に分散させることで強度を付与できる。現在の商用マグネシウム合金の板材として知られるMg−3Al−1Zn合金などは時効硬化しないためにこうした熱処理は適用できないが、本発明者らにおいて鋭意検討の結果、特定のマグネシウム合金であれば、T6処理を利用して常温を含む温度範囲における加工性と強度とを両立させることが可能であることを見出し、本発明に至った。   When T6 treatment is applied to plastic processed products such as plates and bars, plastic processed products are softened after T4 treatment due to solid solution of precipitates in the parent phase, recovery of the parent phase, recrystallization, and a decrease in crystal orientation. Therefore, moldability can be improved, and strength can be imparted by dispersing fine precipitates at high density by subsequent aging treatment. Since Mg-3Al-1Zn alloy, which is known as a current commercial magnesium alloy plate, is not age-hardened, such heat treatment cannot be applied. However, as a result of intensive studies by the present inventors, if a specific magnesium alloy is used, T6 treatment is applied. The present inventors have found that it is possible to achieve both workability and strength in a temperature range including normal temperature by utilizing the above, and have reached the present invention.

即ち、上記目的を達成する本発明のマグネシウム合金は、0.2〜2質量%のAlと、0.2〜1質量%のMnと、0.2〜2質量%のZnと、少なくとも0.2〜1質量%のCaと、を含有し、残部がMg及び不可避不純物からなり、Mg、Ca及びAlよりなる析出物がマグネシウム母相の(0001)面上に分散している。
本発明のマグネシウム合金は、さらにAl及びMnよりなる析出物を含有していてもよい。
That is, the magnesium alloy of the present invention that achieves the above object is 0.2-2% by mass of Al, 0.2-1% by mass of Mn, 0.2-2% by mass of Zn, and at least 0.1% by mass. 2 to 1% by mass of Ca, with the balance being Mg and inevitable impurities, and a precipitate made of Mg, Ca and Al is dispersed on the (0001) plane of the magnesium matrix.
The magnesium alloy of the present invention may further contain precipitates made of Al and Mn.

このマグネシウム合金では、Mg、Ca及びAlよりなる析出物の形状が板状であって、当該板状の長辺が3〜6nmの範囲にあり、当該析出物の数密度は1020〜1024/mmであるのが好適である。またマグネシウム母相の結晶粒径の平均は20μm以下であるのがよい。 In this magnesium alloy, the shape of precipitates made of Mg, Ca and Al is plate-like, the plate-like long side is in the range of 3 to 6 nm, and the number density of the precipitates is 10 20 to 10 24 / mm. 3 is preferred. The average crystal grain size of the magnesium matrix is preferably 20 μm or less.

このマグネシウム合金では、X線回折により測定した(0002)極点図の正規化したRD−TD面の板厚中央部における(0002)極の集積度が5.0以下であるのが好適である。   In this magnesium alloy, it is preferable that the degree of integration of the (0002) poles in the central portion of the plate thickness of the normalized RD-TD surface of the (0002) pole figure measured by X-ray diffraction is 5.0 or less.

本発明のマグネシウム合金では、室温におけるエリクセン値が6.5mm以上であるのが好適である。また、溶体化処理材の0.2%耐力が120MPa以上であるのがよく、最終的に成形後時効処理を施したマグネシウム合金の0.2%耐力が160MPa以上であるのが好ましい。また何れの段階においても破断伸びが20%以上であるのが好適である。   In the magnesium alloy of the present invention, the Erichsen value at room temperature is preferably 6.5 mm or more. Further, the 0.2% proof stress of the solution treated material is preferably 120 MPa or more, and the 0.2% proof stress of the magnesium alloy finally subjected to aging treatment after molding is preferably 160 MPa or more. In any stage, the breaking elongation is preferably 20% or more.

上記目的を達成する本発明のマグネシウム合金の製造方法は、Mg、Al、Mn、Zn及びCaを溶解して鋳造固体を得る工程1と、鋳造固体を均質化処理して均質化固体を得る工程2と、均質化固体を熱間または温間で加工して有形固体を得る工程3と、有形固体を溶体化処理して冷却固体を得る工程4と、冷却固体を時効処理してマグネシウム合金を得る工程5と、を含み、工程2において、400℃以上500℃以下で所定時間の均質化処理を行うことで均質化固体を得、工程5において、140〜250℃の温度で所定時間の時効処理をすることでマグネシウム合金を得ている。   The method for producing a magnesium alloy of the present invention that achieves the above object comprises the steps 1 of obtaining Mg, Al, Mn, Zn, and Ca to obtain a cast solid, and the step of homogenizing the cast solid to obtain a homogenized solid. 2, a process 3 to obtain a tangible solid by processing the homogenized solid hot or warm, a process 4 to obtain a cooling solid by solution treatment of the tangible solid, an aging treatment of the cooling solid to obtain a magnesium alloy And in step 2, a homogenized solid is obtained by performing a homogenization treatment at a temperature of 400 ° C. or higher and 500 ° C. or lower for a predetermined time. In step 5, aging is performed at a temperature of 140 to 250 ° C. for a predetermined time. The magnesium alloy is obtained by processing.

本発明のマグネシウム合金の製造方法では、工程4と工程5との間に冷却固体を二次加工する二次加工工程を含めることができる。その場合、0.2%耐力が120MPa以上の冷却固体を二次加工し、工程5により0.2%耐力を160MPa以上にすることが好ましい。また工程3において、熱間または温間での加工により処理するのが好適である。さらに工程5において、マグネシウム合金の硬さが増大する時間時効処理するのが好適である。   In the manufacturing method of the magnesium alloy of this invention, the secondary processing process of carrying out the secondary processing of the cooling solid between the process 4 and the process 5 can be included. In that case, it is preferable to perform secondary processing of a cooled solid having a 0.2% proof stress of 120 MPa or more and to make the 0.2% proof stress 160 MPa or more in Step 5. Further, in step 3, it is preferable to perform processing by hot or warm processing. Furthermore, in step 5, it is preferable to perform an aging treatment for increasing the hardness of the magnesium alloy.

本発明によれば、常温を含む温度範囲における加工性と強度とを両立させることが可能で、高価な希土類金属元素を合金元素として用いないことから、汎用性の高いマグネシウム合金及びマグネシウム合金の製造方法を提供することができる。   According to the present invention, it is possible to achieve both workability and strength in a temperature range including normal temperature, and since an expensive rare earth metal element is not used as an alloy element, it is possible to manufacture a highly versatile magnesium alloy and magnesium alloy. A method can be provided.

本発明の実施例1における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材の光学顕微鏡像を示す。The optical microscope image of the solution treatment material which is the cooling solid of the process 4 in Example 1 of this invention is shown. 実施例1における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材のX線回折より得た(0002)極点図を示す。The (0002) pole figure obtained from the X-ray diffraction of the solution treatment material which is the cooling solid of the process 4 in Example 1 is shown. 実施例1における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材と工程5の時効処理材の引張応力−ひずみ曲線を示す。The tensile stress-strain curve of the solution treatment material which is the cooling solid of the process 4 in Example 1, and the aging treatment material of the process 5 is shown. 実施例1の時効処理材を透過型電子顕微鏡により観察したもので、(a)は明視野TEM像、(b)は[011(バー)0]、[112(バー)0]方位から得た制限視野回折像、(c)は3次元アトムマップを示す図である。The aging treatment material of Example 1 was observed with a transmission electron microscope. (A) was obtained from a bright-field TEM image, and (b) was obtained from [011 (bar) 0] and [112 (bar) 0] orientations. Limited field diffraction image, (c) is a diagram showing a three-dimensional atom map. 実施例1の時効処理材を透過型電子顕微鏡により観察したもので、(a)は明視野TEM像、(b)はHAADF−STEM像(High-angle Annular Dark Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy、高角散乱環状暗視野走査透過電子顕微鏡像)、(c)は(b)のHAADF−STEM像の拡大図、(d)は(c)の矢印に沿った元素分析の結果を示す図である。The aging treatment material of Example 1 was observed with a transmission electron microscope. (A) is a bright field TEM image, (b) is a HAADF-STEM image (High-angle Annular Dark Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy, high-angle scattering ring). (Dark-field scanning transmission electron microscope image), (c) is an enlarged view of the HAADF-STEM image of (b), and (d) is a diagram showing the results of elemental analysis along the arrow of (c). 実施例5における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材の光学顕微鏡像を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the optical microscope image of the solution treatment material which is a cooling solid of the process 4 in Example 5. FIG. 実施例5における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材のX線回折より得た(0002)極点図を示す。The (0002) pole figure obtained from the X-ray diffraction of the solution treatment material which is the cooling solid of the process 4 in Example 5 is shown. 実施例5における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材と工程5の時効処理材の引張応力−ひずみ曲線を示す。The tensile stress-strain curve of the solution treatment material which is the cooling solid of the process 4 in Example 5, and the aging treatment material of the process 5 is shown. 実施例7における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材の光学顕微鏡像を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the optical microscope image of the solution treatment material which is a cooling solid of the process 4 in Example 7. FIG. 実施例7における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材のX線回折より得た(0002)極点図を示す。The (0002) pole figure obtained from the X-ray diffraction of the solution treatment material which is the cooling solid of the process 4 in Example 7 is shown. 実施例7における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材と工程5の時効処理材の引張応力−ひずみ曲線を示す。The tensile stress-strain curve of the solution treatment material which is the cooling solid of the process 4 in Example 7, and the aging treatment material of the process 5 is shown. 実施例9における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材の光学顕微鏡像を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the optical microscope image of the solution treatment material which is a cooling solid of the process 4 in Example 9. FIG. 実施例9における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材のX線回折より得た(0002)極点図を示す。The (0002) pole figure obtained from the X-ray diffraction of the solution treatment material which is the cooling solid of the process 4 in Example 9 is shown. 実施例9における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材と工程5の時効処理材の引張応力−ひずみ曲線を示す。The tensile stress-strain curve of the solution treatment material which is the cooling solid of the process 4 in Example 9, and the aging treatment material of the process 5 is shown. 比較例1における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材の光学顕微鏡像を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the optical microscope image of the solution treatment material which is the cooling solid of the process 4 in the comparative example 1. FIG. 比較例1における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材のX線回折より得た(0002)極点図を示す。The (0002) pole figure obtained from the X-ray diffraction of the solution treatment material which is the cooling solid of the process 4 in the comparative example 1 is shown. 比較例1における工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材と工程5の時効処理材の引張応力−ひずみ曲線を示す。The tensile stress-strain curve of the solution treatment material which is the cooling solid of the process 4 in the comparative example 1 and the aging treatment material of the process 5 is shown.

以下、本発明の実施形態について詳細に説明する。
本発明のマグネシウム合金は、0.2〜2質量%のAlと、0.2〜1質量%のMnと、0.2〜2質量%のZnと、少なくとも0.2〜1質量%のCaと、を含有し、残部がMg及び不可避不純物からなる合金である。
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail.
The magnesium alloy of the present invention comprises 0.2-2 mass% Al, 0.2-1 mass% Mn, 0.2-2 mass% Zn, and at least 0.2-1 mass% Ca. And the balance of Mg and inevitable impurities.

このマグネシウム合金は、Mg又はAl、Mn、Zn及びCaを固溶したMgからなるマグネシウム母相と、Al、Mn、Zn及びCaのうちの1種以上を含む析出物とを有している。マグネシウム合金の形態は、特に限定されず、例えば板材等の各種素材の形態であってもよく、中間体や最終製品の形態であってもよい。   This magnesium alloy has a magnesium matrix composed of Mg in which Mg or Al, Mn, Zn and Ca are dissolved, and a precipitate containing one or more of Al, Mn, Zn and Ca. The form of the magnesium alloy is not particularly limited, and may be, for example, a form of various materials such as a plate material, or may be a form of an intermediate or a final product.

本発明のマグネシウム合金におけるマグネシウム母相では、T4処理により結晶配向度が低下し、析出物を形成する合金元素であるAl、Ca、Zn、Mnが固溶している。マグネシウム母相の結晶粒径の平均は20μm以下であるのがよい。結晶粒径が過剰に大きいと、クラックの起点となる変形双晶の形成が容易となり、常温での成形加工性を著しく低下させることになるため好ましくない。   In the magnesium matrix in the magnesium alloy of the present invention, the degree of crystal orientation is lowered by the T4 treatment, and Al, Ca, Zn, and Mn that are alloy elements that form precipitates are dissolved. The average crystal grain size of the magnesium matrix is preferably 20 μm or less. If the crystal grain size is excessively large, the formation of a deformation twin that becomes the starting point of a crack becomes easy, and the moldability at room temperature is remarkably lowered, which is not preferable.

本発明のマグネシウム合金に含有されるAlの割合は、0.2〜2質量%とするのがよい。Alの含有割合が少ないと、後述する有用な析出物を得にくく、一方、過剰であると、析出する相が強化に有効ではないAlCa相などの粗大な析出物に変化するために好ましくない。 The proportion of Al contained in the magnesium alloy of the present invention is preferably 0.2-2% by mass. When the Al content is small, it is difficult to obtain useful precipitates to be described later. On the other hand, when the Al content is excessive, the precipitated phase is preferably changed to coarse precipitates such as an Al 2 Ca phase that is not effective for strengthening. Absent.

本発明のマグネシウム合金に含有されるMnの割合は、0.2〜1質量%とするのがよい。Mnの含有割合が少ないと、結晶粒の粗大化を抑制する役割を果たすAl−Mn系化合物が形成され易く、一方、過剰であると、Al−Mn系化合物の形成にAlが使われてしまうので大きな時効硬化を示さなくなるため好ましくない。   The ratio of Mn contained in the magnesium alloy of the present invention is preferably 0.2 to 1% by mass. When the content ratio of Mn is small, an Al—Mn compound that plays a role of suppressing the coarsening of crystal grains is easily formed. On the other hand, when it is excessive, Al is used to form an Al—Mn compound. Therefore, it is not preferable because large age hardening is not exhibited.

本発明のマグネシウム合金に含有されるZnの割合は、0.2〜2質量%とするのがよい。Znの含有割合が少ないと、結晶の配向度が高くなるので優れた常温加工性が得られない。一方で過剰であると、合金の融点が下がり、溶体化処理後の冷却時に割れる可能性があるだけでなく、時効硬化能が著しく低下し易いため好ましくない。   The proportion of Zn contained in the magnesium alloy of the present invention is preferably 0.2-2% by mass. If the Zn content is low, the degree of crystal orientation becomes high, so that excellent room temperature workability cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if the amount is excessive, the melting point of the alloy is lowered, and not only is there a possibility of cracking during cooling after the solution treatment, but also the age-hardening ability is remarkably lowered, which is not preferable.

本発明のマグネシウム合金に含有されるCaの割合は、0.2〜1質量%とするのが好ましい。Caの含有割合が少ないと、後述する有用な析出物を得にくく、一方、Caの含有割合が過剰であると、AlとCa、またはMgとCaよりなる析出物が形成し、成形性や延性の低下を招くために好ましくない。   The proportion of Ca contained in the magnesium alloy of the present invention is preferably 0.2-1% by mass. When the Ca content is small, it is difficult to obtain useful precipitates described later. On the other hand, when the Ca content is excessive, precipitates composed of Al and Ca or Mg and Ca are formed, and formability and ductility are reduced. This is not preferable because it causes a decrease in the thickness.

本発明のマグネシウム合金における析出物は、Mg、Ca及びAlよりなる析出物とAl及びMnよりなる析出物とが存在する。Mg、Ca及びAlよりなる析出物は、マグネシウム母相の(0001)面上に分散したGuinier.Preston.Zone(G.P.Zone、G.P.ゾーン)と呼ばれるナノサイズの析出物である。Mg、Ca及びAlよりなる析出物を時効処理中に形成することで、合金の強度を向上することができる。
なお、析出物が分散しているとは、微細なナノオーダーの析出物が多数析出している状態であればよい。マグネシウム合金の時効処理材で観察されるMg、Ca及びAlよりなる析出物(G.P.Zone)は板状析出物であってもよい。このナノサイズの板状析出物は、例えば板状の長辺が3〜6nmの範囲にあり、元素組成式はMg(Ca,Al)である。すなわち、Mgが67at%、Ca+Alが33at%となっているが、これらの寸法や元素組成式に限定されない。
Precipitates in the magnesium alloy of the present invention include precipitates made of Mg, Ca and Al and precipitates made of Al and Mn. Precipitates composed of Mg, Ca, and Al are obtained from Guinier. Preston. It is a nano-sized precipitate called a Zone (GP Zone, GP zone). By forming precipitates made of Mg, Ca and Al during the aging treatment, the strength of the alloy can be improved.
Note that the precipitates are dispersed as long as a large number of fine nano-order precipitates are deposited. The precipitate (GP Zone) made of Mg, Ca, and Al observed in the aging treatment material of the magnesium alloy may be a plate-like precipitate. This nano-sized plate-like precipitate has, for example, a plate-like long side in the range of 3 to 6 nm, and the elemental composition formula is Mg 2 (Ca, Al). That is, Mg is 67 at% and Ca + Al is 33 at%, but it is not limited to these dimensions and elemental composition formulas.

Al及びMnよりなる析出物は、棒状のAl−Mn系析出物である。このAl−Mn系析出物は、AlとMnとにより均質化処理や溶体化処理の際に析出物が形成されることにより、組織を微細化できる。Al及びMnよりなる析出物は、マグネシウム合金の溶体化処理材及び時効処理材で観察される。棒状のAl−Mn系析出物は、例えば長さが50nm〜300nm程度であり、直径が2−20nm程度であるが、これに限定されるものではない。   The precipitate made of Al and Mn is a rod-like Al—Mn-based precipitate. This Al—Mn-based precipitate can be refined by forming a precipitate during the homogenization treatment or solution treatment with Al and Mn. Precipitates made of Al and Mn are observed in the solution treatment material and the aging treatment material of the magnesium alloy. The rod-like Al—Mn-based precipitate has, for example, a length of about 50 nm to 300 nm and a diameter of about 2 to 20 nm, but is not limited thereto.

Mg、Ca及びAlよりなる析出物(G.P.Zone)の数密度は1020〜1024/mmであるのが好適である。数密度が過剰に低いと、ナノ析出物による強度を向上する効果が得にくくなるため好ましくない。一方、AlとMnよりなる析出物の数密度は、1020〜1021/mm程度である。このAlとMnよりなる析出物の数密度をG.P.Zoneの数密度である1020〜1024/mmと比較すると、10〜10mm−3程度低い値であるので、マグネシウム合金の強度には大きく影響しない。 The number density of precipitates (GP Zone) made of Mg, Ca and Al is preferably 10 20 to 10 24 / mm 3 . When the number density is excessively low, it is difficult to obtain the effect of improving the strength due to the nanoprecipitate, which is not preferable. On the other hand, the number density of precipitates made of Al and Mn is about 10 20 to 10 21 / mm 3 . Compared with the number density of 10 20 to 10 24 / mm 3 , which is the number density of G.P.Zone, the number density of the precipitates made of Al and Mn is about 10 3 to 10 4 mm -3 . Does not significantly affect strength.

結晶粒の配向度は、(0002)極点図の正規化したRD−TD面の板厚中央部における(0002)面の集積度が5.0未満とされている。これにより結晶粒の配向度を低くすることができ、優れた成形性を得ることができる。   Regarding the degree of orientation of crystal grains, the degree of integration of the (0002) plane at the center of the thickness of the normalized RD-TD plane of the (0002) pole figure is less than 5.0. Thereby, the orientation degree of a crystal grain can be made low and the outstanding moldability can be obtained.

本発明のマグネシウム合金は、室温におけるエリクセン値が6.5mm以上であるのがよい。これによりマグネシウム合金の常温でのプレス等の加工性を向上することができ、加熱状態での加工性も一層向上することができる。このエリクセン値(IE値)は、エリクセン試験により外周部を固定した薄板に球頭パンチを一定のスピードで押し当てることで薄板を変形させて、材料に破断が生じるまでのくぼみの高さによって常温での加工性を評価するものである。   The magnesium alloy of the present invention preferably has an Erichsen value at room temperature of 6.5 mm or more. Thereby, the workability of the magnesium alloy such as pressing at room temperature can be improved, and the workability in the heated state can be further improved. This Erichsen value (IE value) is determined by the height of the depression until the material breaks by deforming the thin plate by pressing the ball head punch at a constant speed against the thin plate with the outer periphery fixed by the Eriksen test. This is to evaluate the workability of the material.

一方、本発明のマグネシウム合金は、常温での加工性を向上しつつも、0.2%耐力が120MPa以上であるのがよく、破断伸びが20%以上であるのがよい。0.2%耐力は、降伏応力とも呼ばれている。さらにビッカース硬さが45HV以上であるのが望ましい。本発明のマグネシウム合金の時効処理材の0.2%耐力は、160MPa以上であるのが好ましい。   On the other hand, the magnesium alloy of the present invention preferably has a 0.2% proof stress of 120 MPa or more and an elongation at break of 20% or more while improving workability at room temperature. The 0.2% proof stress is also called yield stress. Furthermore, it is desirable that the Vickers hardness is 45HV or more. The 0.2% yield strength of the aging treatment material of the magnesium alloy of the present invention is preferably 160 MPa or more.

次に、マグネシウム合金の製造方法について説明する。
この製造方法は、Mg、Al、Mn、Zn及びCaを溶解して鋳造することで鋳造固体を得る工程1と、鋳造固体を均質化処理して均質化固体を得る工程2と、均質化固体を熱間または温間加工して有形固体を得る工程3と、有形固体を溶体化処理して冷却固体を得る工程4と、冷却固体を時効処理してマグネシウム合金を得る工程5と、を含んでいる。
Next, the manufacturing method of a magnesium alloy is demonstrated.
This manufacturing method includes a step 1 for obtaining a cast solid by melting and casting Mg, Al, Mn, Zn and Ca, a step 2 for obtaining a homogenized solid by homogenizing the cast solid, and a homogenized solid. Step 3 for obtaining a tangible solid by hot working or warm processing, Step 4 for obtaining a cooling solid by solution treatment of the tangible solid, and Step 5 for obtaining a magnesium alloy by aging the cooling solid. It is out.

(工程1:鋳造)
工程1では、0.2〜2質量%のAlと、0.2〜1質量%のMnと、0.2〜2質量%のZnと、少なくとも0.2〜1質量%のCaと、を含有し、残部がMg及び不可避不純物からなる合金成分を溶解して鋳造することで鋳造固体を作製する。溶解の際に用いる溶解炉や鋳造固体のサイズは特に限定されるものではなく、所望の組成の鋳造固体が作製できればよい。
(Process 1: Casting)
In step 1, 0.2 to 2 mass% Al, 0.2 to 1 mass% Mn, 0.2 to 2 mass% Zn, and at least 0.2 to 1 mass% Ca. A cast solid is produced by melting and casting an alloy component containing Mg and inevitable impurities. The size of the melting furnace and cast solid used for melting is not particularly limited as long as a cast solid having a desired composition can be produced.

(工程2:均質化処理)
工程2では、鋳造固体を400℃以上500℃以下で所定時間の均質化処理を行うことで均質化固体を作製する。均質化処理では、鋳造固体中に存在する合金元素分布を均質化し、溶湯の冷却中に形成される析出物をマグネシウム母相に固溶させる。
(Process 2: Homogenization treatment)
In step 2, the homogenized solid is produced by subjecting the cast solid to a homogenization treatment at a temperature of 400 ° C. to 500 ° C. for a predetermined time. In the homogenization treatment, the distribution of alloy elements present in the cast solid is homogenized, and precipitates formed during cooling of the molten metal are dissolved in the magnesium matrix.

Znが高濃度にマクロ偏析している領域では、340℃以上の温度で熱処理を開始すると合金が融解するおそれがある。そのため、まず340℃未満の温度で熱処理することで、鋳造時に形成されたMg−Zn相の初期溶融を抑制してZnを分散した後、400℃以上500℃以下において所定時間の熱処理を施すことで、Znの分布を均質化して均質化固体を得る。   In a region where Zn is macrosegregated at a high concentration, the alloy may be melted when heat treatment is started at a temperature of 340 ° C. or higher. Therefore, first, heat treatment is performed at a temperature of less than 340 ° C., and after initial dispersion of the Mg—Zn phase formed during casting is suppressed and Zn is dispersed, heat treatment is performed at a temperature of 400 ° C. to 500 ° C. for a predetermined time. Then, the distribution of Zn is homogenized to obtain a homogenized solid.

なお、均質化処理の条件は特に限定されるものではなく、鋳造固体や合金元素成分に応じて設定することができ、所定の温度及び時間の条件における熱処理により合金元素がマグネシウム母相に固溶できればよい。   The conditions for the homogenization treatment are not particularly limited and can be set according to the casting solid and the alloy element components. The alloy elements are dissolved in the magnesium matrix by heat treatment at a predetermined temperature and time. I can do it.

(工程3:熱間または温間加工)
工程3では、均質化固体を温間における圧延により板材に加工することで、板状の有形固体を作製する。圧延では、試料温度、ロール温度、圧下率、ロール周速、通過数、試料の中間熱処理の有無、中間熱処理の温度及び時間などの圧延条件を設定して、均質化固体を板材に加工する。
試料温度及びロール温度は圧延中に試料が割れない程度に低くしてもよい。また圧下率は圧延中に試料が割れない程度に大きくしてもよい。試料の中間熱処理は圧延途中で行う熱処理であり、冷却過程においてクラックが生じず、かつ局所的な融解が起きない範囲の高温で行ってもよい。
なお、熱間または温間加工は特に圧延加工に限定されるものではなく、微細組織が作製できる展伸加工法であればよく、例えば双ロール鋳造圧延をはじめ鍛造や押出加工など如何なる方法でもよい。
(Process 3: Hot or warm processing)
In step 3, the homogenized solid is processed into a plate material by hot rolling to produce a plate-shaped tangible solid. In rolling, the homogenized solid is processed into a plate material by setting rolling conditions such as sample temperature, roll temperature, rolling reduction, roll peripheral speed, number of passes, presence or absence of intermediate heat treatment of the sample, temperature and time of intermediate heat treatment.
The sample temperature and roll temperature may be lowered to such an extent that the sample does not break during rolling. The rolling reduction may be increased to such an extent that the sample does not break during rolling. The intermediate heat treatment of the sample is a heat treatment performed in the middle of rolling, and may be performed at a high temperature that does not cause cracks in the cooling process and does not cause local melting.
Note that the hot or warm working is not particularly limited to rolling, and any stretching method that can produce a fine structure may be used. For example, any method such as forging and extrusion, including twin-roll casting and rolling, may be used. .

(工程4:溶体化処理)
工程4では、板状の有形固体を溶体化処理し、これを冷却することで冷却固体を作製する。溶体化処理では、有形固体を熱処理することで、熱間または温間加工中に形成された微細析出物をマトリックス中に固溶させ、かつ再結晶させて組織を形成する。
(Step 4: Solution treatment)
In step 4, a plate-shaped tangible solid is subjected to a solution treatment, and this is cooled to produce a cooled solid. In the solution treatment, a tangible solid is heat-treated, so that fine precipitates formed during hot or warm processing are dissolved in a matrix and recrystallized to form a structure.

熱間または温間加工後に溶体化処理を施すことで、結晶粒の配向をランダムに配向させることができ、優れた成形性を付与することができる。溶体化処理では、有形固体に応じ350℃から500℃の溶体化処理温度で、15分から24時間の溶体化処理時間保持することで行う。ただし、熱処理時間の長時間化は製造コストの増加につながるので必要以上の時間を行う必要はない。   By applying a solution treatment after hot or warm processing, the orientation of crystal grains can be randomly oriented, and excellent formability can be imparted. The solution treatment is performed by holding the solution treatment time from 15 minutes to 24 hours at a solution treatment temperature of 350 to 500 ° C. according to the tangible solid. However, since the longer heat treatment time leads to an increase in manufacturing cost, it is not necessary to perform more time than necessary.

(二次加工工程)
工程4の後、溶体化処理後に得られた冷却固体の形状とは異なる形状のマグネシウム合金を製造する場合、冷却固体に対して二次加工を実施することができる。二次加工は特に限定されるものではなく、所望の形状に応じてプレス加工、絞り加工等の板金加工や機械加工などを適宜行うことができる。また溶体化処理により得られた冷却固体の形状のままでマグネシウム合金を製造する場合には、二次加工を実施することなく次工程を行うことが可能である。
(Secondary processing process)
When manufacturing the magnesium alloy of the shape different from the shape of the cooling solid obtained after the solution treatment after the step 4, secondary processing can be performed on the cooling solid. The secondary processing is not particularly limited, and sheet metal processing such as press processing and drawing processing, machining, and the like can be appropriately performed according to a desired shape. Moreover, when manufacturing a magnesium alloy with the form of the cooling solid obtained by solution treatment, it is possible to perform the next process, without implementing secondary processing.

(工程5:時効処理)
工程5では、冷却固体を熱処理により時効硬化処理することで、溶体化処理された冷却固体に析出した析出物を分散させて強度を付与して、本発明のマグネシウム合金を作製する。ここでは商用マグネシウム合金では従来使われなかった時効処理を用いることで、マグネシウム合金の大幅な強化を達成することができる。
時効処理では、140〜250℃の温度で所定時間の時効処理を行う。時効処理を行う時間はマグネシウム合金の硬さが増大する時間、好ましくはマグネシウム合金の硬さが最大となる時間行う。
(Process 5: Aging treatment)
In step 5, the cooling solid is age-hardened by heat treatment to disperse the precipitate deposited on the solution-treated cooling solid, thereby imparting strength to produce the magnesium alloy of the present invention. Here, a significant strengthening of the magnesium alloy can be achieved by using an aging treatment that was not conventionally used in commercial magnesium alloys.
In the aging treatment, an aging treatment is performed at a temperature of 140 to 250 ° C. for a predetermined time. The time for performing the aging treatment is a time for increasing the hardness of the magnesium alloy, preferably a time for maximizing the hardness of the magnesium alloy.

このようにして製造される本発明のマグネシウム合金は、0.2〜2質量%のAlと、0.2〜1質量%のMnと、0.2〜2質量%のZnと、少なくとも0.2〜1質量%のCaと、を含有し、残部がMg及び不可避不純物からなり、Mg、Ca及びAlよりなる析出物がマグネシウム母相の(0001)面上に分散し、好ましくはさらにAl及びMnよりなる析出物を含有している合金である。
上記のようなマグネシウム合金及びその製造方法によれば、圧延後に溶体化処理を施すことで結晶粒の配向をランダムに配向させることができ、これにより優れた成形性を付与することができる。また結晶粒の配向をランダムに配向させることで強度が急激に低下するが、時効処理によりナノサイズの析出物を形成させることで成形性、強度、延性を両立させることが可能である。
Thus, the magnesium alloy of this invention manufactured is 0.2-2 mass% Al, 0.2-1 mass% Mn, 0.2-2 mass% Zn, and at least 0. 2 to 1% by mass of Ca, the balance being made of Mg and inevitable impurities, and a precipitate made of Mg, Ca and Al is dispersed on the (0001) plane of the magnesium matrix, preferably Al and It is an alloy containing precipitates made of Mn.
According to the above magnesium alloy and its manufacturing method, the orientation of crystal grains can be randomly oriented by performing a solution treatment after rolling, thereby imparting excellent formability. In addition, the crystallinity of crystal grains is randomly oriented, so that the strength is drastically reduced. However, it is possible to achieve both formability, strength, and ductility by forming nano-sized precipitates by aging treatment.

さらにこれらのマグネシウム合金及びその製造方法によれば、常温を含む温度範囲における加工性と強度との両立が可能な汎用性の高いマグネシウム合金が得られる。例えば自動車のボディパネル等の自動車材料として、適用可能な機械的性質として求められる耐力や常温加工性を実現することができる。
高価かつ資源の少ない重希土類金属元素を用いることなく、比較的安価な合金元素からなり、また既存の設備を利用して単純な圧延と熱処理の組み合わせで行う熱処理や加工により、従来の商用マグネシウム合金板材を大きく上回る優れた成形性と室温強度を発現させることができる。これにより例えば自動車応用に要求される特性を満たすことも可能である。
Furthermore, according to these magnesium alloys and the manufacturing method thereof, a highly versatile magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength in a temperature range including normal temperature can be obtained. For example, the strength and room temperature workability required as applicable mechanical properties can be realized as an automobile material such as a body panel of an automobile.
A conventional commercial magnesium alloy made of a relatively inexpensive alloy element without using expensive and resource-free heavy rare earth metal elements, and with a combination of simple rolling and heat treatment using existing equipment. Excellent moldability and room temperature strength that greatly exceed the plate material can be exhibited. Thereby, for example, it is possible to satisfy the characteristics required for automobile applications.

なお、上記実施形態は、本発明の範囲内において適宜変更可能である。例えば上記マグネシウム合金の製造方法では、熱間または温間加工後に溶体化処理した状態のマグネシウム合金を、絞り、曲げなどの各種の加工を施して成形体を作製し、その後に時効処理を施すことで強化する例について説明したが、熱間または温間加工後に溶体化処理及び時効処理してマグネシウム合金を作製し、その後絞り、曲げなどの各種の加工を施して成形体を作製することも可能である。その場合、マグネシウム合金の製造方法としては、熱間または温間加工後に溶体化処理して時効処理を施さない状態で完了することもでき、加工材料の製造方法として本発明を適用することが可能である。   In addition, the said embodiment can be suitably changed within the scope of the present invention. For example, in the above magnesium alloy production method, a magnesium alloy that has been subjected to a solution treatment after hot or warm processing is subjected to various processes such as drawing and bending to produce a molded body, and then subjected to an aging treatment. The example of strengthening was explained, but it is also possible to produce a magnesium alloy by solution treatment and aging treatment after hot or warm working, and then make various forms such as drawing and bending to produce a molded body It is. In that case, as a manufacturing method of the magnesium alloy, it can be completed in a state where the solution treatment is performed after hot or warm processing and the aging treatment is not performed, and the present invention can be applied as a manufacturing method of the processed material. It is.

次に、本発明の実施例について説明する。なお、合金組成は全て質量%にて記載している。
[実施例1]
(工程1:鋳造)
高周波誘導溶解炉(ULVAC社製、FMI−I−20F)を用い、表1のA−1に示すように、Mg−1.2Al−0.3Ca−0.4Mn−0.3Znの組成の合金を溶解及び鋳型を用いて鋳造して鋳造固体を作製した。Mg以外の元素であるAl、Ca、Mn、Znの前に記載している数字は、各元素の質量%を示している。鋳造固体の厚みを概略10mmとした。
Next, examples of the present invention will be described. In addition, all alloy compositions are described in mass%.
[Example 1]
(Process 1: Casting)
An alloy having a composition of Mg-1.2Al-0.3Ca-0.4Mn-0.3Zn as shown in A-1 of Table 1 using a high-frequency induction melting furnace (manufactured by ULVAC, FMI-I-20F) Was melted and cast using a mold to produce a cast solid. The numbers described before Al, Ca, Mn, and Zn, which are elements other than Mg, indicate mass% of each element. The thickness of the cast solid was approximately 10 mm.

(工程2:均質化処理)
鋳造固体を300℃で4時間保持後、昇温速度10℃/hで500℃まで昇温し、その後6時間保持した後、室温まで水冷することで均質化処理を施し、均質化固体を作製した。この均質化処理では、鋳造時に形成されたMg−Zn相の初期溶融を抑制するために、まず300℃で熱処理し、その後500℃で熱処理することでZnの分布を均質化した。
(Process 2: Homogenization treatment)
The cast solid is held at 300 ° C. for 4 hours, then heated to 500 ° C. at a heating rate of 10 ° C./h, then held for 6 hours, and then water-cooled to room temperature to produce a homogenized solid. did. In this homogenization treatment, in order to suppress initial melting of the Mg—Zn phase formed at the time of casting, heat treatment was first performed at 300 ° C., and then heat treatment was performed at 500 ° C. to homogenize the Zn distribution.

(工程3:熱間または温間加工)
圧延装置(ウエノテックス株式会社製、H9132)を用いてロールにより加圧可能な圧延通路に均質化固体を通過させることで、粗圧延工程と最終圧延工程とに分けて圧延処理を行い、有形固体を作製した。粗圧延工程では、表1に示すように、ロールの周速が2m/minの圧延装置を用い、試料温度及びロール温度を300℃とし、圧下率15%で圧延通路を4回通過させて、厚み10mmの均質化固体を厚み5mmにまで圧延した。
(Process 3: Hot or warm processing)
By passing the homogenized solid through a rolling path that can be pressurized with a roll using a rolling device (manufactured by Unotex Co., Ltd., H9132), the rolling process is performed separately in the rough rolling process and the final rolling process, and a tangible solid Was made. In the rough rolling process, as shown in Table 1, using a rolling device with a roll peripheral speed of 2 m / min, the sample temperature and the roll temperature were set to 300 ° C., and the rolling passage was passed four times at a reduction rate of 15%. A homogenized solid having a thickness of 10 mm was rolled to a thickness of 5 mm.

粗圧延工程に引き続いて最終圧延工程を、表1に示すように、ロールの周速が2m/minの圧延装置を用い、中間熱処理を行いつつ実施した。最終圧延工程では、試料温度及びロール温度を100℃とし、圧下率23%で圧延通路を6回通過させた。圧延通路を通過させる毎に、試料再加熱温度500℃で5分間保持して空冷する中間熱処理を施しつつ最終圧延を行うことで、厚みを1mmまで圧延し、有形固体を作製した。   Subsequent to the rough rolling step, the final rolling step was carried out while performing an intermediate heat treatment using a rolling machine having a roll peripheral speed of 2 m / min as shown in Table 1. In the final rolling step, the sample temperature and the roll temperature were set to 100 ° C., and the rolling passage was passed six times at a rolling reduction of 23%. Each time the rolling passage is passed, the final rolling is performed while performing an intermediate heat treatment in which the sample is reheated at 500 ° C. for 5 minutes and air-cooled, whereby the thickness is rolled to 1 mm to produce a tangible solid.

(工程4:溶体化処理)
板状の有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製した。溶体化処理温度を450℃とし溶体化処理時間を1時間として加熱した。
得られた冷却固体の機械的強度を測定したところ、表2に示すように、エリクセン試験(試験器:エリクセン社製、111型)により評価した成形性(index Erichsen value)であるエリクセン値が7mm、ビッカース硬さが47VHN、0.2%耐力が127MPa、引張強さが223MPa、破断伸びが30%であった。
(Step 4: Solution treatment)
A cooling solid was produced by solution treatment of a plate-shaped tangible solid. The solution treatment temperature was 450 ° C., and the solution treatment time was 1 hour.
When the mechanical strength of the obtained cooling solid was measured, as shown in Table 2, the Erichsen value, which is the formability (index Erichsen value) evaluated by the Erichsen test (Tester: Model 111, manufactured by Eriksen), was 7 mm. The Vickers hardness was 47 VHN, the 0.2% proof stress was 127 MPa, the tensile strength was 223 MPa, and the elongation at break was 30%.

図1に冷却固体である溶体化処理材の光学顕微鏡像(ニコン社製、Eclipse LV−100)を示す。切片法により算出した結晶粒径は12.0μmであった。結晶粒径は、米国材料試験協会(ASTM)のlineal intercept method (E112-13)に則って算出した。また図2に溶体化処理材のX線回折より得た(0002)極点図を示す。(0002)極の集積度(maximum random distribution、m.r.d.又は集合組織強度とも呼ばれる)は3.6であった。ここで、集合組織強度は(0002)面集合組織の相対強度(ランダムに配向した時を1とする)を示す尺度である。   FIG. 1 shows an optical microscope image (Nikon Corporation, Eclipse LV-100) of a solution treatment material that is a cooling solid. The crystal grain size calculated by the intercept method was 12.0 μm. The crystal grain size was calculated according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) linear intercept method (E112-13). FIG. 2 shows a (0002) pole figure obtained by X-ray diffraction of the solution-treated material. The density of the (0002) pole (also referred to as maximum random distribution, mrd, or texture strength) was 3.6. Here, the texture strength is a scale indicating the relative strength of the (0002) plane texture (1 when randomly oriented).

(工程5:時効処理)
冷却固体に対し、表3に示すように、時効温度200℃として時効時間として0.5hとして時効処理を施した。得られた冷却固体の機械的強度を測定したところ、表3に示すように、ビッカース硬さが57VHN、0.2%耐力が187MPa、引張強さが248MPa、破断伸びが28%であった。
(Process 5: Aging treatment)
As shown in Table 3, the cooling solid was subjected to an aging treatment with an aging temperature of 200 ° C. and an aging time of 0.5 h. When the mechanical strength of the obtained cooling solid was measured, as shown in Table 3, the Vickers hardness was 57 VHN, the 0.2% proof stress was 187 MPa, the tensile strength was 248 MPa, and the elongation at break was 28%.

図3に工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材(T4)と工程5の時効処理材(T6)の引張応力−ひずみ曲線を示す。時効処理によって、降伏強度は187MPaまで著しく増加していた。   FIG. 3 shows tensile stress-strain curves of the solution treated material (T4), which is the cooling solid in Step 4, and the aging treated material (T6) in Step 5. With the aging treatment, the yield strength increased significantly to 187 MPa.

図4は、実施例1の時効処理材を透過型電子顕微鏡により観察した像を示し、(a)は明視野TEM像、(b)は[011(バー)0]、 [112(バー)0]方位から得た制限視野回折像、(c)は3次元アトムマップを示す図である。透過型電子顕微鏡としては、FEI社の走査透過電子顕微鏡(Titan、 G2 80−200)を用いた。
図4(a)の明視野TEM像中の線状のひずみコントラスト及び制限視野回折像のストリークによってG.P.Zoneの存在が確認できた。
3次元アトムプローブ(3 dimensional atom Probe, 3DAPとも呼ぶ)は、試料に高電圧を印加し、試料の表面から電界蒸発するイオンを、質量分析装置で検出して、個々に検出されたイオンを深さ方向へ連続的に検出し、検出された順番にイオンを並べることにより、3次元の原子分布を測定する方法である。3次元アトムプローブは、国立研究開発法人物質・材料研究機構の発明者(宝野和博)が自作し、イオン分析には、カメカ社製の質量分析装置(ADLD detector)を用いた。
図4(c)の3次元アトムマップから図4(a)で観察したG.P.Zoneが、Mg、Ca及びAlよりなることが確認できた。G.P.Zoneの典型的な元素組成式はMg(Ca,Al)で、Mgが67at%、Ca+Alが33at%との理論解析があるが、この理論と一致していることが分かった。
FIG. 4 shows an image obtained by observing the aging treatment material of Example 1 with a transmission electron microscope. (A) is a bright field TEM image, (b) is [011 (bar) 0], [112 (bar) 0. ] A limited field diffraction image obtained from the orientation, (c) is a diagram showing a three-dimensional atom map. As the transmission electron microscope, a scanning transmission electron microscope (Titan, G2 80-200) manufactured by FEI was used.
Due to the linear strain contrast in the bright field TEM image of FIG. P. The presence of Zone was confirmed.
A three-dimensional atom probe (also called 3DAP) applies a high voltage to a sample, detects ions evaporating from the surface of the sample with a mass spectrometer, and then detects each detected ion in depth. This is a method of measuring a three-dimensional atomic distribution by continuously detecting in the vertical direction and arranging ions in the detected order. The inventor of the National Institute for Materials Science (Kazuhiro Takano) made the three-dimensional atom probe, and a mass spectrometer (ADLD detector) manufactured by Kameka Corporation was used for ion analysis.
From the three-dimensional atom map of FIG. P. It was confirmed that the zone was composed of Mg, Ca, and Al. G. P. A typical element composition formula of Zone is Mg 2 (Ca, Al), and there is a theoretical analysis that Mg is 67 at% and Ca + Al is 33 at%, but it was found that this is in agreement with this theory.

図5は、実施例1の時効処理材を透過型電子顕微鏡により観察したもので、(a)は明視野TEM像、(b)はHAADF−STEM像(High-angle Annular Dark Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy、高角散乱環状暗視野走査透過電子顕微鏡像)、(c)は(b)のHAADF−STEM像の拡大図、(d)は(c)の矢印に沿った元素分析の結果を示す図である。元素分析は、FEI社の走査透過電子顕微鏡に付加したEDS(FEI社のEDS元素分析装置(Super X)を用いて行った。
図5(a)〜(c)に示すように、マグネシウム母相中には、図4で示したCaとAlよりなるG.P.Zone以外の析出物が観察された。この析出物は、元素分析の結果、図5(d)に示すように、AlとMnよりなることが確認できた。図5(d)に示すように、Mg:80〜90at%、Al:5〜10at%、Mn:5〜10at%で、ZnとCaは0.5at%〜1.0at%と読める。しかし、これはTEM−EDS元素分析では、試料の膜厚よりも析出物のサイズが小さいため、析出物周辺のマグネシウム母相からでる信号を含む為である。すなわち、析出物単体の元素分析信号に対して、マグネシウム母相がノイズとして影響を与える為である。
以上より明らかなように、常温付近の温度範囲における加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金を得ることができた。
FIG. 5 shows the aging treatment material of Example 1 observed with a transmission electron microscope. (A) is a bright field TEM image, (b) is a HAADF-STEM image (High-angle Annular Dark Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy). , High-angle scattering annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscope image), (c) is an enlarged view of the HAADF-STEM image of (b), and (d) is a diagram showing the results of elemental analysis along the arrow of (c). . The elemental analysis was performed using an EDS (EDI elemental analyzer (Super X) manufactured by FEI) attached to a scanning transmission electron microscope manufactured by FEI.
As shown in FIGS. 5A to 5C, in the magnesium matrix, G.M. P. Precipitates other than Zone were observed. As a result of elemental analysis, this precipitate was confirmed to be composed of Al and Mn as shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 5D, Mg: 80 to 90 at%, Al: 5 to 10 at%, Mn: 5 to 10 at%, and Zn and Ca can be read as 0.5 at% to 1.0 at%. However, this is because, in TEM-EDS elemental analysis, since the size of the precipitate is smaller than the film thickness of the sample, the signal generated from the magnesium matrix around the precipitate is included. That is, the magnesium matrix influences noise as an elemental analysis signal of the precipitate alone.
As is clear from the above, a magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength in a temperature range near room temperature could be obtained.

[実施例2]
工程4において有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製する際、表2に示すように、溶体化処理時間を2時間にした他は、実施例1と同様にして、マグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3に示す。表2及び表3から明らかなように、実施例1と同様に、常温付近の温度範囲における加工性が確保でき、加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金が得られていた。
実施例2の溶体化処理を行った試料について、実施例1で観察したAlとMnよりなる析出物(図5参照)の数密度を測定したところ、数密度は1020〜1021mm−3程度であった。AlとMnよりなる析出物の数密度は、G.P.Zoneの数密度である1020〜1024/mmよりも10〜10mm−3程度低いことが判った。これにより、AlとMnよりなる析出物は、G.P.Zoneと比較すると、マグネシウム合金の強度には大きく影響しないことが判明した。
[Example 2]
When producing a cooling solid by solution treatment of a tangible solid in step 4, a magnesium alloy is produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the solution treatment time is 2 hours as shown in Table 2. did.
Tables 2 and 3 show the production conditions and mechanical characteristics of the obtained solid and the characteristics of the microstructure. As is clear from Tables 2 and 3, as in Example 1, a magnesium alloy capable of ensuring workability in the temperature range near room temperature and achieving both workability and strength was obtained.
About the sample which performed the solution treatment of Example 2, when the number density of the deposit (refer FIG. 5) which consists of Al and Mn observed in Example 1 was measured, number density was 10 < 20 > -10 < 21 > mm <-3>. It was about. The number density of precipitates made of Al and Mn was found to be about 10 3 to 10 4 mm −3 lower than 10 20 to 10 24 / mm 3, which is the number density of GP Zone. As a result, it has been found that precipitates made of Al and Mn do not significantly affect the strength of the magnesium alloy as compared with GP Zone.

[実施例3]
工程4において有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製する際、表2に示すように、溶体化処理時間を4時間にした他は、実施例1と同様にして、マグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3に示す。表2及び表3から明らかなように、実施例1と同様に、常温付近の温度範囲における加工性が確保でき、加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金が得られていた。
[Example 3]
When producing a cooling solid by solution treatment of a tangible solid in Step 4, as shown in Table 2, a magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the solution treatment time was 4 hours. did.
Tables 2 and 3 show the production conditions and mechanical characteristics of the obtained solid and the characteristics of the microstructure. As is clear from Tables 2 and 3, as in Example 1, a magnesium alloy capable of ensuring workability in the temperature range near room temperature and achieving both workability and strength was obtained.

[実施例4]
工程1において、表1のA−2に示すように、Mg−1.2Al−0.3Ca−0.4Mn−0.3Znの組成の合金を溶解及び鋳型で鋳造して鋳造固体を作製し、最終圧延工程におけるロール温度を200℃とした。また工程5において、表3に示すように時効温度を450℃とし時効時間を2時間とした。その他は実施例1と同様にして、マグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3に示す。表2及び表3から明らかなように、圧延処理条件と時効処理条件とを変化させても、加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金が得られていた。
[Example 4]
In step 1, as shown in A-2 of Table 1, an alloy having a composition of Mg-1.2Al-0.3Ca-0.4Mn-0.3Zn is melted and cast with a mold to produce a cast solid, The roll temperature in the final rolling process was 200 ° C. In step 5, as shown in Table 3, the aging temperature was 450 ° C. and the aging time was 2 hours. Otherwise, a magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 1.
Tables 2 and 3 show the production conditions and mechanical characteristics of the obtained solid and the characteristics of the microstructure. As is apparent from Tables 2 and 3, a magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength was obtained even when the rolling treatment conditions and the aging treatment conditions were changed.

[実施例5]
工程3において均質化固体を圧延処理することで有形固体を作製する際、表1のA−2に示すように、最終圧延工程における試料温度及びロール温度を200℃とし、表2に示すように、工程4において有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製する際、溶体化処理時間を2時間にした他は、実施例1と同様にして、マグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3に示す。表2及び表3から明らかなように、圧延処理条件と溶体化処理条件とを変化させても、加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金が得られていた。
[Example 5]
When producing a tangible solid by rolling the homogenized solid in the step 3, the sample temperature and the roll temperature in the final rolling step are set to 200 ° C. as shown in A-2 of Table 1, and as shown in Table 2. A magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except that when the cooling solid was produced by solution treatment of the tangible solid in Step 4, the solution treatment time was changed to 2 hours.
Tables 2 and 3 show the production conditions and mechanical characteristics of the obtained solid and the characteristics of the microstructure. As is apparent from Tables 2 and 3, a magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength was obtained even when the rolling treatment conditions and the solution treatment conditions were changed.

[実施例6]
工程1において、表1のB−1に示すようにMg−1.2Al−0.5Ca−0.4Mn−0.3Znの組成の合金を溶解及び鋳型で鋳造して鋳造固体を作製し、工程2において鋳造固体を300℃で4時間保持後、昇温速度7.5℃/hで450℃まで昇温し、その後6時間保持した後、室温まで水冷することで均質化処理を施し、均質化固体を作製した。
工程3において最終圧延工程の試料再加熱温度を450℃とし、また工程5において、表3に示すように時効温度を350℃とし時効時間を4時間とした。その他は実施例1と同様にしてマグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び3に示す。表2及び表3から明らかなように、組成、均質化条件、圧延処理条件、時効処理条件を変化させても、加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金が得られていた。
[Example 6]
In step 1, as shown in B-1 of Table 1, an alloy having a composition of Mg-1.2Al-0.5Ca-0.4Mn-0.3Zn is melted and cast with a mold to produce a cast solid, In No. 2, the cast solid was held at 300 ° C. for 4 hours, heated to 450 ° C. at a heating rate of 7.5 ° C./h, then held for 6 hours, and then water-cooled to room temperature for homogenization. Solidified solids were prepared.
In step 3, the sample reheating temperature in the final rolling step was 450 ° C., and in step 5, the aging temperature was 350 ° C. and the aging time was 4 hours as shown in Table 3. Otherwise, a magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 1.
Tables 2 and 3 show the production conditions, mechanical properties, and microstructure characteristics of the obtained solid. As is clear from Tables 2 and 3, a magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength was obtained even when the composition, homogenization conditions, rolling treatment conditions, and aging treatment conditions were changed.

[実施例7]
工程1において、表1のB−1に示すようにMg−1.2Al−0.5Ca−0.4Mn−0.3Znの組成の合金を溶解及び鋳型により鋳造して鋳造固体を作製し、工程2において鋳造固体を300℃で4時間保持後、昇温速度7.5℃/hで450℃まで昇温し、その後6時間保持した後、室温まで水冷することで均質化処理を施し、均質化固体を作製した。
工程3において最終圧延工程の試料再加熱温度を450℃とし、また工程5において、表3に示すように時効時間を0.25hにした。その他は実施例1と同様にしてマグネシウム合金を製造した。
[Example 7]
In step 1, as shown in B-1 of Table 1, an alloy having a composition of Mg-1.2Al-0.5Ca-0.4Mn-0.3Zn is melted and cast with a mold to produce a cast solid. In No. 2, the cast solid was held at 300 ° C. for 4 hours, heated to 450 ° C. at a heating rate of 7.5 ° C./h, then held for 6 hours, and then water-cooled to room temperature for homogenization. Solidified solids were prepared.
In step 3, the sample reheating temperature in the final rolling step was 450 ° C., and in step 5, the aging time was 0.25 h as shown in Table 3. Otherwise, a magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 1.

得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3並びに図6〜図8に示す。
図6に冷却固体である溶体化処理材の光学顕微鏡像を示す。切片法により算出した結晶粒径は9.7μmであった。また図7に溶体化処理材のX線回折より得た(0002)極点図を示す。(0002)極の集積度は3.7であり、圧延方向に傾斜していた。
図8に工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材(T4)と工程5の時効処理材(T6)の引張応力−ひずみ曲線を示す。また応力−ひずみ曲線から得た0.2%耐力、引張強さ及び伸び(E)を表3に示す。
溶体化処理材の降伏強度は142MPaであり、エリクセン値が7.5mmの優れた常温成形性を有していた。その後の時効により、降伏強度は201MPaまで著しく増加していた。
以上より明らかなように、常温付近の温度範囲における加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金を得ることができた。
Tables 2 and 3 and FIGS. 6 to 8 show the production conditions, mechanical properties, and microstructure characteristics of the obtained solid.
FIG. 6 shows an optical microscope image of the solution treatment material that is a cooling solid. The crystal grain size calculated by the intercept method was 9.7 μm. FIG. 7 shows a (0002) pole figure obtained by X-ray diffraction of the solution-treated material. The degree of integration of the (0002) pole was 3.7 and inclined in the rolling direction.
FIG. 8 shows tensile stress-strain curves of the solution treated material (T4) which is the cooling solid in Step 4 and the aging treated material (T6) in Step 5. Table 3 shows 0.2% yield strength, tensile strength and elongation (E f ) obtained from the stress-strain curve.
The yield strength of the solution-treated material was 142 MPa, and it had excellent room temperature formability with an Erichsen value of 7.5 mm. With subsequent aging, the yield strength increased significantly to 201 MPa.
As is clear from the above, a magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength in a temperature range near room temperature could be obtained.

[実施例8]
工程1において、表1のB−2に示すように、最終圧延工程における試料温度及びロール温度を200℃とする他は、実施例7と同様にしてマグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3に示す。表2及び表3から明らかなように、実施例7と同様に、常温付近の温度範囲における加工性が確保でき、加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金が得られていた。
[Example 8]
In Step 1, as shown in B-2 of Table 1, a magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 7 except that the sample temperature and the roll temperature in the final rolling step were set to 200 ° C.
Tables 2 and 3 show the production conditions and mechanical characteristics of the obtained solid and the characteristics of the microstructure. As is clear from Tables 2 and 3, as in Example 7, a magnesium alloy capable of ensuring workability in the temperature range near room temperature and achieving both workability and strength was obtained.

[実施例9]
工程1において、表1のC−1に示すようにMg−1.2Al−0.5Ca−0.4Mn−0.8Znの組成の合金を溶解及び鋳型で鋳造して鋳造固体を作製し、工程2において鋳造固体を300℃で4時間保持後、昇温速度7.5℃/hで450℃まで昇温し、その後6時間保持した後、室温まで水冷することで均質化処理を施し、均質化固体を作製した。
工程3において試料再加熱温度を450℃とし、表2に示すように、工程4において有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製する際、溶体化処理温度を350℃として溶体化処理時間を4時間にし、また工程5において、表3に示すように時効温度を200℃とし時効時間を2時間とした。
その他は実施例1と同様にしてマグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3に示す。表2及び表3から明らかなように、組成、均質化条件、圧延処理条件、時効処理条件を変化させても、加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金が得られていた。
[Example 9]
In step 1, an alloy having a composition of Mg-1.2Al-0.5Ca-0.4Mn-0.8Zn is melted and cast with a mold as shown in C-1 of Table 1, to produce a cast solid, In No. 2, the cast solid was held at 300 ° C. for 4 hours, heated to 450 ° C. at a heating rate of 7.5 ° C./h, then held for 6 hours, and then water-cooled to room temperature for homogenization. Solidified solids were prepared.
In step 3, the sample reheating temperature is set to 450 ° C., and as shown in Table 2, when forming a cooling solid by solution treatment of the tangible solid in step 4, the solution treatment temperature is set to 350 ° C. Was set to 4 hours, and in step 5, as shown in Table 3, the aging temperature was 200 ° C. and the aging time was 2 hours.
Otherwise, a magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 1.
Tables 2 and 3 show the production conditions and mechanical characteristics of the obtained solid and the characteristics of the microstructure. As is clear from Tables 2 and 3, a magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength was obtained even when the composition, homogenization conditions, rolling treatment conditions, and aging treatment conditions were changed.

[実施例10]
工程1において、表1のC−1に示すようにMg−1.2Al−0.5Ca−0.4Mn−0.8Znの組成の合金を溶解及び鋳型で鋳造して鋳造固体を作製し、工程2において鋳造固体を300℃で4時間保持後、昇温速度7.5℃/hで450℃まで昇温し、その後6時間保持した後、室温まで水冷することで均質化処理を施し、均質化固体を作製した。また工程3において、最終圧延工程の試料再加熱温度を450℃とし、工程5において、表3に示すように時効時間を1hにした。その他は実施例1と同様にしてマグネシウム合金を製造した。
[Example 10]
In step 1, an alloy having a composition of Mg-1.2Al-0.5Ca-0.4Mn-0.8Zn is melted and cast with a mold as shown in C-1 of Table 1, to produce a cast solid, In No. 2, the cast solid was held at 300 ° C. for 4 hours, heated to 450 ° C. at a heating rate of 7.5 ° C./h, then held for 6 hours, and then water-cooled to room temperature for homogenization. Solidified solids were prepared. In step 3, the sample reheating temperature in the final rolling step was 450 ° C., and in step 5, the aging time was 1 h as shown in Table 3. Otherwise, a magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 1.

得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3並びに図9〜図11に示す。
図9に冷却固体である溶体化処理材の光学顕微鏡像を示す。切片法により算出した結晶粒径は10.7μmであった。また図10に溶体化処理材のX線回折より得た(0002)極点図を示す。(0002)極の集積度は3.5であった。
図11に工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材(T4)と工程5の時効処理材(T6)の引張応力−ひずみ曲線を示す。また応力−ひずみ曲線から得た0.2%耐力、引張強さ、伸び及びエリクセン値を表3に示す。溶体化処理材の降伏強度は144MPaであり、エリクセン値が7.7mmの優れた常温成形性を有していた。その後の時効処理によって、降伏強度は204MPaまで著しく増加した。
以上より明らかなように、常温付近の温度範囲における加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金を得ることができた。
The production conditions and mechanical characteristics of the obtained solid and the characteristics of the microstructure are shown in Tables 2 and 3 and FIGS.
FIG. 9 shows an optical microscope image of the solution treatment material that is a cooling solid. The crystal grain size calculated by the intercept method was 10.7 μm. FIG. 10 shows a (0002) pole figure obtained by X-ray diffraction of the solution treatment material. The integration degree of the (0002) pole was 3.5.
FIG. 11 shows tensile stress-strain curves of the solution treated material (T4), which is the cooling solid in Step 4, and the aging treated material (T6) in Step 5. Table 3 shows the 0.2% yield strength, tensile strength, elongation, and Erichsen value obtained from the stress-strain curve. The yield strength of the solution-treated material was 144 MPa, and it had excellent room temperature formability with an Erichsen value of 7.7 mm. Subsequent aging treatment significantly increased the yield strength to 204 MPa.
As is clear from the above, a magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength in a temperature range near room temperature could be obtained.

[実施例11]
工程1において、表1のC−2に示すように、最終圧延工程における試料温度及びロール温度を200℃とする他は、実施例10と同様にしてマグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3に示す。表2及び表3から明らかなように、実施例10と同様に、常温付近の温度範囲における加工性が確保でき、加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金が得られていた。
[Example 11]
In step 1, as shown in C-2 of Table 1, a magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 10 except that the sample temperature and the roll temperature in the final rolling step were set to 200 ° C.
Tables 2 and 3 show the production conditions and mechanical characteristics of the obtained solid and the characteristics of the microstructure. As is clear from Tables 2 and 3, as in Example 10, a workability in a temperature range near room temperature can be secured, and a magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength was obtained.

[実施例12]
工程1において、表1のD−1に示すようにMg−1.2Al−0.5Ca−0.4Mn−1.6Znの組成の合金を溶解及び鋳型で鋳造して鋳造固体を作製し、工程2において鋳造固体を300℃で4時間保持後、昇温速度7.5℃/hで450℃まで昇温し、その後6時間保持した後、室温まで水冷することで均質化処理を施し、均質化固体を作製した。また、第3工程において、最終圧延工程の試料再加熱温度を450℃とし、工程4において有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製する際、表2に示すように、溶体化処理温度を350℃とし、溶体化処理時間を4時間にし、工程5において、表3に示すように時効時間を1hにした。その他は実施例1と同様にしてマグネシウム合金を製造した。
[Example 12]
In step 1, as shown in D-1 of Table 1, an alloy having a composition of Mg-1.2Al-0.5Ca-0.4Mn-1.6Zn is melted and cast with a mold to produce a cast solid, In No. 2, the cast solid was held at 300 ° C. for 4 hours, heated to 450 ° C. at a heating rate of 7.5 ° C./h, then held for 6 hours, and then water-cooled to room temperature for homogenization. Solidified solids were prepared. Further, in the third step, the sample reheating temperature in the final rolling step is set to 450 ° C., and when the cooling solid is produced by solution treatment of the tangible solid in step 4, the solution treatment temperature is as shown in Table 2. Was 350 ° C., the solution treatment time was 4 hours, and in step 5, the aging time was 1 h as shown in Table 3. Otherwise, a magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 1.

得られた固体の物性の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3並びに図12〜図14に示す。図12に冷却固体である溶体化処理材の光学顕微鏡像を示す。切片法により算出した結晶粒径は8.5μmであった。また図13に溶体化処理材のX線回折より得た(0002)極点図を示す。(0002)極の集積度は3.7であった。
図14に工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材(T4)と工程5の時効処理材(T6)の引張応力−ひずみ曲線を示す。また応力−ひずみ曲線から得た0.2%耐力、引張強さ、伸び及びエリクセン値を表3に示す。
溶体化処理材の降伏強度は160MPaであり、エリクセン値が値8.3mmの優れた常温成形性を有していた。時効処理を行っても降伏強度はあまり増加しなかった。
以上より明らかなように、常温付近の温度範囲における加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金を得ることができた。
Tables 2 and 3 and FIGS. 12 to 14 show the manufacturing conditions, mechanical properties, and microstructure of the obtained solid physical properties. FIG. 12 shows an optical microscope image of the solution treatment material that is a cooling solid. The crystal grain size calculated by the intercept method was 8.5 μm. FIG. 13 shows a (0002) pole figure obtained by X-ray diffraction of the solution-treated material. The integration degree of the (0002) pole was 3.7.
FIG. 14 shows tensile stress-strain curves of the solution treated material (T4), which is the cooling solid in Step 4, and the aging treated material (T6) in Step 5. Table 3 shows the 0.2% yield strength, tensile strength, elongation, and Erichsen value obtained from the stress-strain curve.
The yield strength of the solution treatment material was 160 MPa, and the Erichsen value had excellent room temperature moldability with a value of 8.3 mm. Yield strength did not increase much even after aging treatment.
As is clear from the above, a magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength in a temperature range near room temperature could be obtained.

[実施例13]
工程4において有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製する際、表2に示すように、溶体化処理温度を450℃にし、工程5において、表3に示すように時効時間を0.5hにした他は、実施例12と同様にして、マグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3に示す。表2及び表3から明らかなように、実施例12と同様に、常温付近の温度範囲における加工性が確保でき、加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金が得られていた。
[Example 13]
When the cooling solid is produced by solution treatment of the tangible solid in step 4, the solution treatment temperature is set to 450 ° C. as shown in Table 2, and the aging time is set to 0. 5 as shown in Table 3 in step 5. A magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 12 except that the duration was changed to 5 h.
Tables 2 and 3 show the production conditions and mechanical characteristics of the obtained solid and the characteristics of the microstructure. As is clear from Table 2 and Table 3, as in Example 12, a workability in the temperature range near room temperature can be secured, and a magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength was obtained.

[実施例14]
工程1において、表1のD−2に示すように、最終圧延工程における試料温度及びロール温度を200℃とし、表2に示すように、溶体化処理時間を1時間にした他は、実施例12と同様にしてマグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3に示す。表2及び表3から明らかなように、実施例12と同様に、常温付近の温度範囲における加工性が確保でき、加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金が得られていた。
[Example 14]
In Example 1, as shown in D-2 of Table 1, the sample temperature and roll temperature in the final rolling process were set to 200 ° C., and as shown in Table 2, the solution treatment time was set to 1 hour. In the same manner as in No. 12, a magnesium alloy was produced.
Tables 2 and 3 show the production conditions and mechanical characteristics of the obtained solid and the characteristics of the microstructure. As is clear from Table 2 and Table 3, as in Example 12, a workability in the temperature range near room temperature can be secured, and a magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength was obtained.

[実施例15]
工程4において有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製する際、表2に示すように、溶体化処理温度を450℃にし、工程5において、表3に示すように時効時間を0.25hにした他は、実施例12と同様にして、マグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2及び表3に示す。表2及び表3から明らかなように、実施例12と同様に、常温付近の温度範囲における加工性が確保でき、加工性と強度とを両立できるマグネシウム合金が得られていた。
[Example 15]
When the cooling solid is produced by solution treatment of the tangible solid in step 4, the solution treatment temperature is set to 450 ° C. as shown in Table 2, and the aging time is set to 0. 5 as shown in Table 3 in step 5. A magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 12 except that the duration was 25 hours.
Tables 2 and 3 show the production conditions and mechanical characteristics of the obtained solid and the characteristics of the microstructure. As is clear from Table 2 and Table 3, as in Example 12, a workability in the temperature range near room temperature can be secured, and a magnesium alloy capable of achieving both workability and strength was obtained.

[比較例1]
工程4において有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製する際、表2に示すように、溶体化処理温度を350℃にして溶体化処理時間を4hにし、工程5において時効処理を行わない他は、実施例1と同様にしてマグネシウム合金を製造した。
[Comparative Example 1]
When producing a cooling solid by solution treatment of a tangible solid in step 4, as shown in Table 2, the solution treatment temperature is set to 350 ° C., the solution treatment time is set to 4 hours, and the aging treatment is performed in step 5. A magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except for the above.

得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表1乃至表3並びに図15〜図17に示す。図15に冷却固体である溶体化処理材の光学顕微鏡像を示す。切片法により算出した結晶粒径は9.9μmであった。また図16に溶体化処理材のX線回折より得た(0002)極点図を示す。(0002)極の集積度は4.0であった。
図17に工程4の冷却固体である溶体化処理材(T4)と工程5の時効処理材(T6)の引張応力−ひずみ曲線を示す。また応力−ひずみ曲線から得た0.2%耐力、引張強さ、伸び及びエリクセン値を表3に示す。溶体化処理材の降伏強度は149MPaであり、エリクセン値が6.4mmであった。そのため表2から明らかなように加工性が不足していた。
Tables 1 to 3 and FIGS. 15 to 17 show the production conditions, mechanical properties, and microstructure of the obtained solid. FIG. 15 shows an optical microscope image of the solution treatment material that is a cooling solid. The crystal grain size calculated by the intercept method was 9.9 μm. FIG. 16 shows a (0002) pole figure obtained by X-ray diffraction of the solution-treated material. The integration degree of the (0002) pole was 4.0.
FIG. 17 shows tensile stress-strain curves of the solution treated material (T4), which is the cooling solid in Step 4, and the aging treated material (T6) in Step 5. Table 3 shows the 0.2% yield strength, tensile strength, elongation, and Erichsen value obtained from the stress-strain curve. The yield strength of the solution treatment material was 149 MPa, and the Erichsen value was 6.4 mm. Therefore, as apparent from Table 2, the workability was insufficient.

[比較例2]
工程4において有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製する際、表2に示すように、溶体化処理温度を450℃にして溶体化処理時間を0.17hとする他は、比較例1と同様にしてマグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2に示す。表2に示すように、比較例2の溶体化処理材のエリクセン値は6.2mmであり、明らかに加工性が不足していた。
[Comparative Example 2]
When producing a cooling solid by solution treatment of a tangible solid in step 4, as shown in Table 2, the solution treatment temperature was set to 450 ° C. and the solution treatment time was set to 0.17 h. In the same manner as in No. 1, a magnesium alloy was produced.
Table 2 shows the production conditions, mechanical properties, and microstructure characteristics of the obtained solid. As shown in Table 2, the Erichsen value of the solution-treated material of Comparative Example 2 was 6.2 mm, and the workability was clearly insufficient.

[比較例3]
工程4において有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製する際、表2に示すように、溶体化処理温度を500℃にして溶体化処理時間を1hとする他は、比較例1と同様にしてマグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2に示す。表2に示すように、比較例3の溶体化処理材のエリクセン値は5.6mmであり、明らかに加工性が不足していた。
[Comparative Example 3]
When preparing a cooling solid by solution treatment of a tangible solid in Step 4, as shown in Table 2, the solution treatment temperature was set to 500 ° C. and the solution treatment time was set to 1 h, as compared with Comparative Example 1. A magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner.
Table 2 shows the production conditions, mechanical properties, and microstructure characteristics of the obtained solid. As shown in Table 2, the Erichsen value of the solution-treated material of Comparative Example 3 was 5.6 mm, and the workability was clearly insufficient.

[比較例4]
工程4において有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製する際、表2に示すように、溶体化処理温度を500℃にして溶体化処理時間を24hとする他は、比較例1と同様にしてマグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2に示す。表2から明らかなように結晶粒径が過剰に大きく、0.2%耐力が不足していた。
[Comparative Example 4]
When preparing a cooling solid by solution treatment of a tangible solid in step 4, as shown in Table 2, the solution treatment temperature was set to 500 ° C. and the solution treatment time was set to 24 h. A magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner.
Table 2 shows the production conditions, mechanical properties, and microstructure characteristics of the obtained solid. As apparent from Table 2, the crystal grain size was excessively large and the 0.2% proof stress was insufficient.

[比較例5]
工程3において均質化固体を圧延処理することで有形固体を作製する際、表1のA−2に示すように、最終圧延工程における試料温度及びロール温度を200℃とし、表2に示すように、工程4において溶体化処理温度を450℃にして溶体化処理時間を4hにする他は、比較例1と同様にして、マグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2に示す。表2に示すように、比較例4の溶体化処理材のエリクセン値は4mmであり、明らかに加工性が不足していた。
[Comparative Example 5]
When producing a tangible solid by rolling the homogenized solid in the step 3, the sample temperature and the roll temperature in the final rolling step are set to 200 ° C. as shown in A-2 of Table 1, and as shown in Table 2. A magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1 except that the solution treatment temperature was 450 ° C. and the solution treatment time was 4 h in Step 4.
Table 2 shows the production conditions, mechanical properties, and microstructure characteristics of the obtained solid. As shown in Table 2, the Erichsen value of the solution-treated material of Comparative Example 4 was 4 mm, and the workability was clearly insufficient.

[比較例6、比較例7、比較例8]
工程3において均質化固体を圧延処理することで有形固体を作製する際、表1のA−3に示すように、最終圧延工程における試料温度及びロール温度を300℃とし、表2に示すように、工程4において溶体化処理温度を450℃にし、溶体化処理時間を1h(比較例6)、2h(比較例7)、4h(比較例8)にする他は、比較例1と同様にして、マグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2に示す。表2から明らかなように、比較例6、比較例7、比較例8において、エリクセン値はそれぞれ、6.3mm、5.4mm、5.3mmと何れも小さく、結晶粒径が大きいため、加工性が不足していた。
[Comparative Example 6, Comparative Example 7, Comparative Example 8]
When producing a tangible solid by rolling the homogenized solid in step 3, the sample temperature and roll temperature in the final rolling step are set to 300 ° C. as shown in A-3 of Table 1, and as shown in Table 2. In the same manner as in Comparative Example 1, except that the solution treatment temperature in Step 4 is 450 ° C. and the solution treatment time is 1 h (Comparative Example 6), 2 h (Comparative Example 7), and 4 h (Comparative Example 8). A magnesium alloy was produced.
Table 2 shows the production conditions, mechanical properties, and microstructure characteristics of the obtained solid. As is clear from Table 2, in Comparative Example 6, Comparative Example 7, and Comparative Example 8, the Erichsen values were small as 6.3 mm, 5.4 mm, and 5.3 mm, respectively, and the crystal grain size was large. Sex was lacking.

[比較例9、比較例10、比較例11]
工程3において均質化固体を圧延処理することで有形固体を作製する際、表1のA−4に示すように、最終圧延工程における試料温度及びロール温度を300℃とし、試料の再加熱を行わないで熱間または温間加工を行い、表2に示すように、工程4において溶体化処理温度を450℃にし、溶体化処理時間を1h(比較例9)、2h(比較例10)、4h(比較例11)にする他は、比較例1と同様にして、マグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2に示す。表2から明らかなように、比較例9、比較例10、比較例11において、エリクセン値はそれぞれ、5.3mm、6.2mm、5.9mmと何れも小さく、結晶粒径が大きいため、加工性が不足していた。
[Comparative Example 9, Comparative Example 10, Comparative Example 11]
When a tangible solid is produced by rolling the homogenized solid in step 3, the sample temperature and roll temperature in the final rolling step are set to 300 ° C. as shown in A-4 of Table 1, and the sample is reheated. As shown in Table 2, the solution treatment temperature is set to 450 ° C., and the solution treatment time is set to 1 h (Comparative Example 9), 2 h (Comparative Example 10), and 4 h. A magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1 except that (Comparative Example 11) was used.
Table 2 shows the production conditions, mechanical properties, and microstructure characteristics of the obtained solid. As is clear from Table 2, in Comparative Example 9, Comparative Example 10, and Comparative Example 11, the Erichsen values were small, such as 5.3 mm, 6.2 mm, and 5.9 mm, respectively, and the crystal grain size was large. Sex was lacking.

[比較例12]
工程1において、表1のB−2に示すようにMg−1.2Al−0.5Ca−0.4Mn−0.3Znの組成の合金を溶解及び鋳型で鋳造して鋳造固体を作製し、工程2において鋳造固体を300℃で4時間保持後、昇温速度7.5℃/hで450℃まで昇温し、その後6時間保持した後、室温まで水冷することで均質化処理を施し、均質化固体を作製した。工程3において、最終圧延工程の試料温度及びロール温度を200℃とし、表2に示すように、工程4において有形固体を溶体化処理することで冷却固体を作製する際、溶体化処理温度を350℃として溶体化処理時間を1時間にした他は、比較例1と同様にして、マグネシウム合金を製造した。
得られた固体の製造条件及び機械的特性と微細組織の特徴を表2に示す。表2に示すように、比較例12の溶体化処理材のエリクセン値は5.8mmであり、明らかに加工性が不足していた。
[Comparative Example 12]
In step 1, as shown in B-2 of Table 1, an alloy having a composition of Mg-1.2Al-0.5Ca-0.4Mn-0.3Zn is melted and cast with a mold to produce a cast solid, In No. 2, the cast solid was held at 300 ° C. for 4 hours, heated to 450 ° C. at a heating rate of 7.5 ° C./h, then held for 6 hours, and then water-cooled to room temperature for homogenization. Solidified solids were prepared. In step 3, the sample temperature and the roll temperature in the final rolling step are set to 200 ° C., and as shown in Table 2, the solution treatment temperature is set to 350 when the tangible solid is solution treated in step 4 to form a cooling solid. A magnesium alloy was produced in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1 except that the solution treatment time was 1 hour at 0 ° C.
Table 2 shows the production conditions, mechanical properties, and microstructure characteristics of the obtained solid. As shown in Table 2, the Erichsen value of the solution-treated material of Comparative Example 12 was 5.8 mm, and the workability was clearly insufficient.

上記実施例1〜15と比較例1〜12から、実施例1〜15は、優れた常温加工性、つまり大きなエリクセン値と共に、強度が高いことが判明した。   From Examples 1 to 15 and Comparative Examples 1 to 12, it was found that Examples 1 to 15 had high room temperature workability, that is, high strength together with a large Erichsen value.

本発明は、上記実施の形態に限定されるものではなく、特許請求の範囲に記載した発明の範囲内で種々の変形が可能であり、それらも本発明の範囲内に含まれることはいうまでもない。
The present invention is not limited to the above embodiment, and various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention described in the claims, and it goes without saying that these are also included in the scope of the present invention. Nor.

Claims (13)

0.2〜2質量%のAlと、
0.2〜1質量%のMnと、
0.2〜2質量%のZnと、
少なくとも0.2〜1質量%のCaと、を含有し、
残部がMg及び不可避不純物からなり、
Mg、Ca及びAlよりなる析出物がマグネシウム母相の(0001)面上に分散している、マグネシウム合金。
0.2-2 mass% Al,
0.2-1 mass% Mn,
0.2-2 mass% Zn,
Containing at least 0.2 to 1% by mass of Ca,
The balance consists of Mg and inevitable impurities,
A magnesium alloy in which precipitates made of Mg, Ca and Al are dispersed on the (0001) plane of a magnesium matrix.
さらにAl及びMnよりなる析出物を含有している、請求項1に記載のマグネシウム合金。   Furthermore, the magnesium alloy of Claim 1 containing the precipitate which consists of Al and Mn. 前記Mg、Ca及びAlよりなる析出物の形状が板状であって、当該板状の長辺が3〜6nmの範囲にあり、当該析出物の数密度は1020〜1024/mmである、請求項1又は2に記載のマグネシウム合金。 The shape of the precipitate made of Mg, Ca and Al is plate-like, the plate-like long side is in the range of 3 to 6 nm, and the number density of the precipitate is 10 20 to 10 24 / mm 3 . The magnesium alloy according to claim 1 or 2. 前記マグネシウム母相の結晶粒径の平均は20μm以下である、請求項1〜3の何れかに記載のマグネシウム合金。   The magnesium alloy according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein an average crystal grain size of the magnesium matrix is 20 µm or less. X線回折により測定した(0002)極点図の正規化したRD−TD面の板厚中央部における(0002)面の集積度が5.0以下である、請求項1〜4の何れかに記載のマグネシウム合金。   The degree of integration of the (0002) plane at the central portion of the thickness of the normalized RD-TD plane of the (0002) pole figure measured by X-ray diffraction is 5.0 or less. Magnesium alloy. 室温におけるエリクセン値が6.5mm以上である、請求項1〜5の何れかに記載のマグネシウム合金。   The magnesium alloy according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the Erichsen value at room temperature is 6.5 mm or more. 溶体化処理材の0.2%耐力が120MPa以上である、請求項1〜6の何れかに記載のマグネシウム合金。   The magnesium alloy in any one of Claims 1-6 whose 0.2% yield strength of a solution treatment material is 120 Mpa or more. 時効処理材の0.2%耐力が160MPa以上である、請求項7に記載のマグネシウム合金。   The magnesium alloy according to claim 7, wherein the aging treatment material has a 0.2% yield strength of 160 MPa or more. 破断伸びが20%以上である、請求項1〜8の何れかに記載のマグネシウム合金。   The magnesium alloy according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the elongation at break is 20% or more. Mg、Al、Mn、Zn及びCaを溶解して鋳造固体を得る工程1と、
前記鋳造固体を均質化処理して均質化固体を得る工程2と、
前記均質化固体を熱間または温間で加工して有形固体を得る工程3と、
前記有形固体を溶体化処理して冷却固体を得る工程4と、
前記冷却固体を時効処理してマグネシウム合金を得る工程5と、
を含み、
前記工程2において、400℃以上500℃以下で所定時間の均質化処理を行い、前記均質化固体を得、
前記工程5において、140〜250℃の温度で所定時間の時効処理をすることでマグネシウム合金を得る、マグネシウム合金の製造方法。
Step 1 of dissolving Mg, Al, Mn, Zn and Ca to obtain a cast solid;
Step 2 of homogenizing the cast solid to obtain a homogenized solid;
Processing the homogenized solid hot or warm to obtain a tangible solid; and
Step 4 of solution treatment of the tangible solid to obtain a cooled solid;
Aging the cooled solid to obtain a magnesium alloy 5;
Including
In the step 2, a homogenization treatment is performed for a predetermined time at 400 ° C. or more and 500 ° C. or less to obtain the homogenized solid,
In the said process 5, the manufacturing method of a magnesium alloy which obtains a magnesium alloy by performing the aging treatment for the predetermined time at the temperature of 140-250 degreeC.
前記工程4と前記工程5との間に、前記冷却固体を二次加工する二次加工工程を含んでいる、請求項10に記載のマグネシウム合金の製造方法。   The manufacturing method of the magnesium alloy of Claim 10 including the secondary processing process of secondary-processing the said cooling solid between the said process 4 and the said process 5. FIG. 0.2%耐力が120MPa以上の前記冷却固体を二次加工し、前記工程5により0.2%耐力を160MPa以上にする、請求項11に記載のマグネシウム合金の製造方法。   The method for producing a magnesium alloy according to claim 11, wherein the cooling solid having a 0.2% proof stress of 120 MPa or more is secondarily processed, and the 0.2% proof stress is set to 160 MPa or more in the step 5. 前記工程5において、前記マグネシウム合金の硬さが増大する時間時効処理する、請求項11に記載のマグネシウム合金の製造方法。
The manufacturing method of the magnesium alloy of Claim 11 which performs the time aging treatment in which the hardness of the said magnesium alloy increases in the said process 5.
JP2018027358A 2017-02-28 2018-02-19 Magnesium alloy and method for producing magnesium alloy Active JP7116394B2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2018/006088 WO2018159394A1 (en) 2017-02-28 2018-02-20 Magnesium alloy and method for manufacturing magnesium alloy
EP18761653.7A EP3572542B1 (en) 2017-02-28 2018-02-20 Magnesium alloy and method for manufacturing the same
US16/488,050 US20200239992A1 (en) 2017-02-28 2018-02-20 Magnesium alloy and method for manufacturing the same

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017037769 2017-02-28
JP2017037769 2017-02-28

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2018141234A true JP2018141234A (en) 2018-09-13
JP7116394B2 JP7116394B2 (en) 2022-08-10

Family

ID=63527722

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2018027358A Active JP7116394B2 (en) 2017-02-28 2018-02-19 Magnesium alloy and method for producing magnesium alloy

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20200239992A1 (en)
EP (1) EP3572542B1 (en)
JP (1) JP7116394B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2021508002A (en) * 2017-12-26 2021-02-25 ポスコPosco Magnesium alloy plate material and its manufacturing method

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108570583B (en) * 2018-06-08 2020-06-09 哈尔滨工业大学 Rare earth-free low-alloy magnesium alloy with ultrahigh strength and toughness and preparation method thereof
CN111607728A (en) * 2020-05-21 2020-09-01 东北大学 Low-cost wrought magnesium alloy reinforced by light rare earth elements Ce and Sm and preparation method thereof

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3146096A (en) * 1962-11-23 1964-08-25 Dow Chemical Co Weldable high strength magnesium base alloy
JP2009120883A (en) * 2007-11-13 2009-06-04 Mitsubishi Alum Co Ltd Magnesium alloy foil and its manufacturing method
CN101629260A (en) * 2008-07-18 2010-01-20 中国科学院金属研究所 Medical absorbable Mg-Zn-Mn-Ca magnesium alloy
WO2012049990A1 (en) * 2010-10-12 2012-04-19 住友電気工業株式会社 Magnesium alloy filament, and bolt, nut, and washer

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002173730A (en) * 2000-12-01 2002-06-21 Sumitomo Light Metal Ind Ltd Wrought magnesium alloy
AU2007202131A1 (en) * 2007-05-14 2008-12-04 Joka Buha Method of heat treating magnesium alloys
CN104284992B (en) * 2012-06-26 2018-10-16 百多力股份公司 Magnesium alloy, its production method and application thereof
US9593397B2 (en) * 2013-03-14 2017-03-14 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Magnesium alloy with adjustable degradation rate
CN110114486B (en) * 2016-12-22 2022-05-13 株式会社Posco Magnesium alloy sheet material and method for producing same

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3146096A (en) * 1962-11-23 1964-08-25 Dow Chemical Co Weldable high strength magnesium base alloy
JP2009120883A (en) * 2007-11-13 2009-06-04 Mitsubishi Alum Co Ltd Magnesium alloy foil and its manufacturing method
CN101629260A (en) * 2008-07-18 2010-01-20 中国科学院金属研究所 Medical absorbable Mg-Zn-Mn-Ca magnesium alloy
WO2012049990A1 (en) * 2010-10-12 2012-04-19 住友電気工業株式会社 Magnesium alloy filament, and bolt, nut, and washer

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2021508002A (en) * 2017-12-26 2021-02-25 ポスコPosco Magnesium alloy plate material and its manufacturing method
JP7157158B2 (en) 2017-12-26 2022-10-19 ポスコ Magnesium alloy plate and manufacturing method thereof
US11773472B2 (en) 2017-12-26 2023-10-03 Posco Co., Ltd Magnesium alloy sheet and method for producing same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20200239992A1 (en) 2020-07-30
EP3572542A4 (en) 2020-10-28
JP7116394B2 (en) 2022-08-10
EP3572542A1 (en) 2019-11-27
EP3572542B1 (en) 2023-10-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR102268303B1 (en) Highly formable automotive aluminum sheet with reduced or no surface roping and a method of preparation
JP4285916B2 (en) Manufacturing method of aluminum alloy plate for structural use with high strength and high corrosion resistance
JP6433380B2 (en) Aluminum alloy rolled material
WO2013073575A1 (en) Aluminum alloy wire for use in bolts, bolt, and manufacturing method of these.
JP6380855B2 (en) Copper alloy manufacturing method and copper alloy
JP6810508B2 (en) High-strength aluminum alloy plate
JP2017125240A (en) Aluminum alloy structural member, manufacturing method thereof, and aluminum alloy sheet
JP2016222958A (en) High strength aluminum alloy sheet
JP2024020484A (en) Magnesium alloy aging treated material and its manufacturing method
JP7116394B2 (en) Magnesium alloy and method for producing magnesium alloy
WO2013180122A1 (en) Magnesium alloy, magnesium alloy member and method for manufacturing same, and method for using magnesium alloy
JP2017078211A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet having high moldability
JP7076731B2 (en) Magnesium alloy and manufacturing method of magnesium alloy
WO2018159394A1 (en) Magnesium alloy and method for manufacturing magnesium alloy
JP6843353B2 (en) Mg alloy and its manufacturing method
JP2004124213A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for panel forming, and its manufacturing method
JP4996854B2 (en) Aluminum alloy material for high temperature and high speed forming, method for manufacturing the same, and method for manufacturing aluminum alloy formed product
JP2018154869A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet excellent in press moldability, ridging mark property and bh property
JP2017210673A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for press molding small in anisotropy of r value and manufacturing method therefor
JP6085473B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate with excellent press formability
JP2017078220A (en) Magnesium alloy rolled material and production method therefor, and press-formed article
WO2021111989A1 (en) Magnesium alloy aging treatment material, method for producing same, oa device using same, transport device and component thereof
JP2011042857A (en) Aluminum alloy having excellent fatigue strength, toughness and brightness, and method for producing the same
JP6120380B6 (en) Magnesium alloy, magnesium alloy member and method for producing the same, and method of using magnesium alloy
JP2009068025A (en) Titanium alloy bar for machine components or decorative components suitable to manufacture cold-worked components, and its manufacturing method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AA64 Notification of invalidation of claim of internal priority (with term)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A241764

Effective date: 20180327

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20180424

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20201226

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20220201

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220326

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20220621

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20220715

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7116394

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150