JP2011127181A - Plate spring steel having excellent strength and toughness, and plate spring part - Google Patents

Plate spring steel having excellent strength and toughness, and plate spring part Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2011127181A
JP2011127181A JP2009287174A JP2009287174A JP2011127181A JP 2011127181 A JP2011127181 A JP 2011127181A JP 2009287174 A JP2009287174 A JP 2009287174A JP 2009287174 A JP2009287174 A JP 2009287174A JP 2011127181 A JP2011127181 A JP 2011127181A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
steel
toughness
plate spring
hardness
content
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2009287174A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5418199B2 (en
Inventor
Atsushi Sugimoto
淳 杉本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Aichi Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Aichi Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Aichi Steel Corp filed Critical Aichi Steel Corp
Priority to JP2009287174A priority Critical patent/JP5418199B2/en
Publication of JP2011127181A publication Critical patent/JP2011127181A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5418199B2 publication Critical patent/JP5418199B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Springs (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a plate spring steel in which decarburization can be suppressed, and further, which has excellent strength and toughness, and plate spring parts. <P>SOLUTION: The plate spring steel has a composition comprising, by mass, 0.40 to &lt;0.50% C, 0.40 to 0.85% Si, 0.55 to 1.20% Mn, 0.70 to 1.50% Cr, 0.010 to &lt;0.070% Ti and 0.0005 to 0.0050% B, and the balance Fe with impurity elements. The plate spring parts can be obtained by performing forming using the plate spring steel. The plate spring steel is preferably used for a plate spring having Vickers hardness of &ge;500. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2011,JPO&amp;INPIT

Description

本発明は、脱炭を抑制できると共に、強度と靱性に優れた板ばね用鋼及び板ばね部品に関する。   The present invention relates to a steel for leaf springs and a leaf spring component that can suppress decarburization and are excellent in strength and toughness.

自動車用の懸架ばねとしては、板ばねや、丸棒を素材としたばねでねじり応力が負荷されるばね(トーションバー、スタビライザ、(太径)コイルばね等。以下、適宜、丸棒ばねという。)が使用されている。コイルばねは一般的に乗用車に多く使用されており、板ばねはトラックに多く使用されている。この板ばねや丸棒ばねは、自動車の足廻り部品の中では重量的に大きい部品の中の1つであり、従来から軽量化のために高強度化の検討が継続して続けられている部品である。
この高強度化においては疲労強度の向上が特に重要であり、そのための対策の一つとして、材料の高硬度化がある。
As suspension springs for automobiles, springs (torsion bars, stabilizers, (large diameter) coil springs, etc.) torsional stress are applied by leaf springs or springs made of round bars. ) Is used. Coil springs are generally used in many passenger cars, and leaf springs are often used in trucks. These leaf springs and round bar springs are one of the heavy parts of automobile undercarriage parts, and the study of increasing strength has been continued for weight reduction. It is a part.
In increasing the strength, it is particularly important to improve the fatigue strength, and one of the countermeasures is to increase the hardness of the material.

ところが、丸棒ばねでも板ばねでも、高硬度化により引張強さを高めると通常環境では疲労強度向上に効果があるが、硬度の上昇に伴い靱性が低下するため、腐食環境下においてばね表面に腐食ピットを生じたり、何らかの原因によって表面傷等の欠陥を生じた場合には、硬度が低い場合に比較してその影響が大きくなり、疲労強度が大きく低下してしまうという問題があった。そのため、高硬度化しても靱性が低下しない強度及び靱性に優れた板ばね用鋼の開発が強く望まれていた。   However, in both round bar springs and leaf springs, increasing the tensile strength by increasing the hardness is effective in improving the fatigue strength in a normal environment, but the toughness decreases as the hardness increases. When corrosion pits are generated or defects such as surface flaws are caused for some reason, the effect is greater than when the hardness is low, and the fatigue strength is greatly reduced. Therefore, there has been a strong demand for the development of a steel for leaf springs having excellent strength and toughness that does not decrease toughness even when the hardness is increased.

高硬度化しても高強度と高靱性を両立するための対策については、従来から様々な研究が行われており、例えば特許文献1に示されるような技術が報告されている。   Various studies have been conducted on measures for achieving both high strength and high toughness even when the hardness is increased. For example, a technique as disclosed in Patent Document 1 has been reported.

特開平11−29839号公報JP-A-11-29839

しかしながら、高強度と高靱性を両立させるために提案されている従来のばね鋼は、上記した特許文献等のように、弁ばねや懸架ばね等のコイルばね、スタビライザーやトーションバー等の丸棒を素材とした丸棒ばねへの適用を前提としたものが多く、板ばねへの適用を前提とするばね鋼の開発は丸棒ばね用の開発に比べると少なかった。
そして、従来の丸棒ばねを前提に提案された鋼材は、丸棒ばねでは顕著に生じないが板ばねでは顕著に生じる板ばね特有の問題を解決できる最適な成分系とはなっていなかった。
However, conventional spring steels that have been proposed to achieve both high strength and high toughness include coil springs such as valve springs and suspension springs, and round bars such as stabilizers and torsion bars, as described in the above patent documents. Many of them were premised on application to the round bar spring as a material, and the development of spring steel premised on application to leaf springs was less than that for round bar springs.
And the steel material proposed on the assumption of the conventional round bar spring was not the optimal component system which can solve the problem peculiar to the leaf spring which does not occur notably in the round bar spring but remarkably occurs in the leaf spring.

具体的には、板ばねにおいては、丸棒ばねの素材と比較して最終製品の断面積がかなり大きいため、棒鋼や線材等からなる丸棒ばねに比較して圧延後の冷却速度が小さくなると共に、圧延による断面積の減少率も小さいため、脱炭が最終製品に残りやすいという点を考慮する必要がある。
また、鋼の靱性の向上には、C含有率を低くすることが有効であるが、例えばHV500以上にまで硬度を高くすると低温焼き戻しとなり、従来の板ばね用鋼においては低温焼き戻し脆性域に入ってしまう。そのため、従来鋼においては優れた硬度と靱性とを両立させることが困難であった。
Specifically, in a leaf spring, the cross-sectional area of the final product is considerably larger than the material of the round bar spring, so that the cooling rate after rolling is lower than that of a round bar spring made of steel bars or wire rods. In addition, since the rate of reduction of the cross-sectional area due to rolling is small, it is necessary to consider that decarburization tends to remain in the final product.
In order to improve the toughness of the steel, it is effective to reduce the C content. For example, if the hardness is increased to HV500 or higher, low temperature tempering occurs. I will enter. For this reason, it has been difficult to achieve both excellent hardness and toughness in conventional steels.

本発明は、かかる問題点を解決するためになされたものであって、脱炭を抑制できると共に、強度と靱性に優れた板ばね用鋼及び板ばね部品を提供しようとするものである。   The present invention has been made to solve such problems, and is intended to provide a steel for leaf springs and a leaf spring component that can suppress decarburization and are excellent in strength and toughness.

第1の発明は、質量%で、C:0.40〜0.50%未満、Si:0.40〜0.85%、Mn:0.55〜1.20%、Cr:0.70〜1.50%、Ti:0.010〜0.070%未満、B:0.0005〜0.0050%を含有し、残部がFe及び不純物元素からなることを特徴とする板ばね用鋼にある(請求項1)。   1st invention is the mass%, C: Less than 0.40-0.50%, Si: 0.40-0.85%, Mn: 0.55-1.20%, Cr: 0.70 1.50%, Ti: less than 0.010 to 0.070%, B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%, the balance is in a steel for leaf springs characterized by comprising Fe and impurity elements (Claim 1).

第2の発明は、質量%で、C:0.40〜0.50%未満、Si:0.40〜0.85%、Mn:0.55〜1.20%、Cr:0.70〜1.50%、Ti:0.010〜0.070%未満、B:0.0005〜0.0050%を含有し、
さらに質量%で、Cu:0.20〜0.50%、Ni:0.20〜1.00%、及びV:0.05〜0.30%から選ばれる1種以上を含有し、
残部がFe及び不純物元素からなることを特徴とする強度及び靱性に優れた板ばね用鋼にある(請求項2)。
2nd invention is the mass%, C: Less than 0.40-0.50%, Si: 0.40-0.85%, Mn: 0.55-1.20%, Cr: 0.70 1.50%, Ti: 0.010 to less than 0.070%, B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
Furthermore, it contains at least one kind selected from Cu: 0.20 to 0.50%, Ni: 0.20 to 1.00%, and V: 0.05 to 0.30% in mass%,
The balance is made of steel for leaf springs, which is excellent in strength and toughness, characterized by comprising Fe and impurity elements (claim 2).

第3の発明は、第1又は第2の発明の板ばね用鋼を用いて成形されたことを特徴とする板ばね部品にある(請求項3)。   According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a leaf spring component formed by using the leaf spring steel according to the first or second aspect of the invention (claim 3).

第1及び第2の発明の板ばね用鋼は、上記特定組成を有している。
具体的には、上記板ばね用鋼は、C含有率を比較的低くしながら脱炭量の増加に問題が生じない範囲でSiを上記特定含有率で含有している。そのため、焼き戻し軟化抵抗を高め、より高い温度での焼き戻しを可能にするとともに、低温焼き戻し脆性域の温度域を高温側にシフトさせることができる。さらに、Ti及びBを必須元素として添加してあるため、粒界強度の向上を図ることができる。
その結果、例えばHV500以上という高硬度域においても、優れた靱性を示すことができる。
The steel for leaf springs of the first and second inventions has the specific composition.
Specifically, the leaf spring steel contains Si at the specific content within a range that does not cause a problem in increasing the amount of decarburization while the C content is relatively low. Therefore, the temper softening resistance can be increased, tempering at a higher temperature can be performed, and the temperature range of the low temperature temper brittle region can be shifted to the high temperature side. Furthermore, since Ti and B are added as essential elements, the grain boundary strength can be improved.
As a result, excellent toughness can be exhibited even in a high hardness range of, for example, HV500 or higher.

このように、本発明によれば、脱炭を抑制できると共に、強度と靱性に優れた板ばね用鋼を提供することができる。   Thus, according to this invention, while being able to suppress decarburization, the steel for leaf springs excellent in intensity | strength and toughness can be provided.

次に、第3の発明の板ばね部品は、上記第1又は第2の発明の板ばね用鋼を用いて成形されたものである。具体的には、上記板ばね部品は、上記板ばね用鋼をばね形状に成形し、焼入及び焼戻しを行って作製することができる。
このように、本発明の板ばね部品は、上記第1又は第2の発明の板ばね用鋼を用いているため、優れた強度及び靱性を兼ね備えると共に、脱炭を抑制することができる。
Next, the leaf spring component of the third invention is formed using the steel for leaf springs of the first or second invention. Specifically, the plate spring component can be manufactured by forming the plate spring steel into a spring shape and performing quenching and tempering.
Thus, since the leaf spring component of the present invention uses the leaf spring steel of the first or second aspect of the present invention, it has excellent strength and toughness and can suppress decarburization.

実施例にかかる、炭素(C)量と衝撃値との関係を示す説明図。Explanatory drawing which shows the relationship between the amount of carbon (C) and an impact value concerning an Example. 実施例にかかる、ケイ素(Si)量と衝撃値との関係を示す説明図。Explanatory drawing which shows the relationship between the amount of silicon (Si) and an impact value concerning an Example. 実施例にかかる、ケイ素(Si)量と脱炭深さとの関係を示す説明図。Explanatory drawing which shows the relationship between the amount of silicon (Si) and the decarburization depth concerning an Example. 実施例にかかる、硬さと衝撃値との関係を示す説明図。Explanatory drawing which shows the relationship between hardness and an impact value concerning an Example.

本発明の板ばね用鋼は、上記のごとく、C、Si、Mn、Cr、Ti、及びBを上記特定の組成範囲で含有する。
以下、各成分毎に含有率の範囲を限定した理由について説明する。
As described above, the steel for leaf springs of the present invention contains C, Si, Mn, Cr, Ti, and B in the specific composition range.
Hereinafter, the reason which limited the range of content rate for every component is demonstrated.

C:0.40〜0.50%未満
Cは、焼入焼戻し処理後に十分に優れた強度及び硬さを確保するために不可欠な元素である。
Cの含有率が0.40%未満の場合には、板ばねとして十分な強度を確保することができなくなるおそれがある。
一方、0.50%以上の場合には、高硬度域で十分な靱性を確保することが困難になるおそれがある。
C: Less than 0.40 to 0.50% C is an element indispensable for securing sufficiently excellent strength and hardness after quenching and tempering treatment.
If the C content is less than 0.40%, sufficient strength as a leaf spring may not be ensured.
On the other hand, if it is 0.50% or more, it may be difficult to ensure sufficient toughness in a high hardness region.

また、本願発明においては、C含有率を上記特定範囲に制限しつつ、Ti及びBを含有している。そのため、上記ばね用鋼は、硬度と靱性をより高いレベルで兼ね備えることができる。
即ち、通常、低硬度域においてはC含有率が低い方が靱性は大きくなるが、例えばHV500以上の高硬度域においては焼き戻し温度が低くなって低温焼き戻し脆性域になってしまうため、Cの含有率が低い方がかえって靱性が低下するという結果となる。しかし、本願発明のように、上記特定量のTi及びBの添加と後述の特定量のSiの添加との組合せの効果によって、C含有率を低くした状態でも高硬度域における靱性が大きく向上し、C含有率が高い場合よりもさらに靱性を向上させることができる。
Moreover, in this invention, Ti and B are contained, restrict | limiting a C content rate to the said specific range. Therefore, the spring steel can have a higher level of hardness and toughness.
That is, in general, the toughness is increased when the C content is low in the low hardness region, but the tempering temperature is lowered and becomes a low temperature tempering brittle region in the high hardness region of HV500 or higher, for example. The result is that the toughness is lowered when the content ratio is lower. However, as in the present invention, the toughness in the high hardness region is greatly improved even when the C content is lowered by the effect of the combination of the addition of the specific amounts of Ti and B and the addition of the specific amount of Si described later. The toughness can be further improved as compared with the case where the C content is high.

Si:0.40〜0.85%
Siは、低C含有率の鋼において、優れた強度及び硬さを確保するために必要な元素である。また、低温焼き戻し脆性域の温度範囲を高温側に変化させる効果があるため、高硬度化のために低温で焼もどした場合の靱性を大きく高めることのできる元素である。
Siの含有率が0.40%未満の場合には、上記効果が十分に得られず、低温での焼き戻しにより十分な靱性を確保させることが困難になる。その結果、優れた強度及び硬さを両立させることが困難になる。一方、0.85%を超える場合には、丸棒を素材とするばねに比べて断面積が大きく、圧延後の冷却速度が小さくなる板ばね用鋼においてはフェライト脱炭を助長させ、疲労強度の低下の原因となる。
また、靱性をより向上できるという観点から、Si含有率は0.50%を超えて含有させることが好ましい。
Si: 0.40 to 0.85%
Si is an element necessary for securing excellent strength and hardness in a steel having a low C content. In addition, since it has the effect of changing the temperature range of the low-temperature tempering brittle region to the high-temperature side, it is an element that can greatly increase the toughness when tempering at a low temperature for high hardness.
When the Si content is less than 0.40%, the above effect cannot be obtained sufficiently, and it becomes difficult to ensure sufficient toughness by tempering at a low temperature. As a result, it becomes difficult to achieve both excellent strength and hardness. On the other hand, if it exceeds 0.85%, the steel for springs with a larger cross-sectional area and a lower cooling rate after rolling will promote ferrite decarburization and fatigue strength when compared with springs made of round bars. Cause a drop in
Moreover, it is preferable to contain Si content exceeding 0.50% from a viewpoint that toughness can be improved more.

Mn:0.55〜1.20%
Mnは、板ばね用鋼として必要な焼入性を確保するために必要不可欠な元素である。
Mnの含有率が0.55%未満の場合には、焼入性を確保することが困難になるおそれがある。一方、1.20%を超える場合には、焼入性が過剰になり、焼割れが発生し易くなるおそれがある。
Mn: 0.55 to 1.20%
Mn is an indispensable element in order to ensure the hardenability required as a steel for leaf springs.
If the Mn content is less than 0.55%, it may be difficult to ensure hardenability. On the other hand, if it exceeds 1.20%, the hardenability becomes excessive, and there is a possibility that quench cracks are likely to occur.

Cr:0.70〜1.50%
Crは、板ばね用鋼として必要な焼入性を確保するために必要不可欠な元素である。
Crの含有率が0.70%未満の場合には、焼入性を確保することが困難になるおそれがある。一方、1.50%を超える場合には、焼入性が過剰になり、焼割れが発生し易くなるおそれがある。
Cr: 0.70 to 1.50%
Cr is an indispensable element in order to ensure the hardenability required for steel for leaf springs.
If the Cr content is less than 0.70%, it may be difficult to ensure hardenability. On the other hand, if it exceeds 1.50%, the hardenability becomes excessive, and there is a possibility that quench cracks are likely to occur.

Ti:0.010〜0.070%未満
鋼は、含有が避けられない不純物元素として微量のNを含有しているが、Tiは、Nの存在下でTiNの形成を促すことによりBNの生成を抑制し、B添加による後述の効果が損なわれることを防止する効果がある。
Tiの含有率が0.010%未満の場合には、BN生成の抑制効果が十分に得られなくなるおそれがある。一方、Tiを0.070%以上添加してもTi添加による上述の効果が飽和するため、経済的な観点からTi含有率の上限は上述のごとく0.070%未満がよい。
Ti: 0.010 to less than 0.070% Steel contains a trace amount of N as an inevitable impurity element, but Ti generates BN by promoting the formation of TiN in the presence of N Is suppressed, and the effects described below due to the addition of B are prevented from being impaired.
When the Ti content is less than 0.010%, the effect of suppressing the generation of BN may not be sufficiently obtained. On the other hand, even if 0.070% or more of Ti is added, the above-mentioned effect is saturated by addition of Ti. Therefore, the upper limit of the Ti content is preferably less than 0.070% as described above from the economical viewpoint.

B:0.0005〜0.0050%
Bは、板ばね用鋼として必要な焼入性を確保するために必要不可欠な元素であり、さらに粒界強度の向上にも効果がある。また、上記した通り、Tiとの複合添加により高硬度域での靱性向上に大きな効果を有する。
Bの含有率が0.0005%未満の場合には、上述の効果を十分に得ることができなくなるおそれがある。また、Bは、極めて少量の含有で効果を得られる元素であり、多量に含有させてもその効果が飽和する。よって、B含有率の上限は上述のごとく0.0050%とすることがよい。
B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%
B is an indispensable element for ensuring the hardenability required for the steel for leaf springs, and is also effective in improving the grain boundary strength. Further, as described above, the combined addition with Ti has a great effect on improving toughness in a high hardness region.
When the B content is less than 0.0005%, the above effects may not be sufficiently obtained. Moreover, B is an element which can obtain an effect even when contained in a very small amount, and the effect is saturated even if contained in a large amount. Therefore, the upper limit of the B content is preferably 0.0050% as described above.

上記第1の発明の板ばね用鋼は、上記のごとくC、Si、Mn、Cr、Ti、及びBを上記特定の組成範囲で含有し、残部がFe及び不純物元素からなる。
一方、上記第2の発明の板ばね用鋼は、上記第1の発明と同様にC、Si、Mn、Cr、Ti、及びBを上記特定量含有し、さらに質量%で、Cu:0.20〜0.50%、Ni:0.20〜1.00%、及びV:0.05〜0.30%から選ばれる1種以上を含有し、残部がFe及び不純物元素からなる。

このようにCu、Ni、及びVから選ばれる1種以上を上記特定の含有率で含有する場合には、硬度、靱性、及び耐食性をより向上させることができる。
以下、Cu、Ni、及びVの各成分毎に含有率の範囲を限定した理由について説明する。
The plate spring steel of the first invention contains C, Si, Mn, Cr, Ti, and B in the specific composition range as described above, with the balance being Fe and impurity elements.
On the other hand, the leaf spring steel of the second invention contains the specific amount of C, Si, Mn, Cr, Ti, and B, as in the first invention, and Cu: 0. It contains one or more selected from 20 to 0.50%, Ni: 0.20 to 1.00%, and V: 0.05 to 0.30%, with the balance being Fe and impurity elements.

Thus, when 1 or more types chosen from Cu, Ni, and V are contained with the said specific content rate, hardness, toughness, and corrosion resistance can be improved more.
Hereinafter, the reason which limited the range of content rate for each component of Cu, Ni, and V is demonstrated.

Cu:0.20〜0.50%
Cuは、腐食環境において生成する腐食ピットの成長を抑制し、耐食性を向上させる効果がある。
Cu含有率が0.20%未満の場合には、Cuによる耐食性の向上効果が十分に得られなくなるおそれがある。一方、0.50%を超えて添加してもCu添加による耐食性の向上効果が飽和すると共に、熱間加工性が悪くなるおそれがある。
Cu: 0.20 to 0.50%
Cu has the effect of suppressing the growth of corrosion pits generated in a corrosive environment and improving the corrosion resistance.
When the Cu content is less than 0.20%, the effect of improving the corrosion resistance by Cu may not be sufficiently obtained. On the other hand, even if added over 0.50%, the effect of improving corrosion resistance due to the addition of Cu is saturated and hot workability may be deteriorated.

Ni:0.20〜1.00%
Niも、Cuと同様に、腐食環境において生成する腐食ピットの成長を抑制し、耐食性を向上させる効果がある。
Ni含有率が0.20%未満の場合には、Niによる耐食性の向上効果が十分に得られなくなるおそれがある。一方、1.00%を超えて添加してもNi添加による耐食性の向上効果が飽和するおそれがあり、経済的な観点からNi含有率の上限は1.00%がよい。
Ni: 0.20 to 1.00%
Ni, like Cu, has the effect of suppressing the growth of corrosion pits generated in a corrosive environment and improving the corrosion resistance.
When the Ni content is less than 0.20%, the effect of improving the corrosion resistance by Ni may not be sufficiently obtained. On the other hand, even if added over 1.00%, the effect of improving the corrosion resistance by adding Ni may be saturated, and the upper limit of the Ni content is preferably 1.00% from an economical viewpoint.

V:0.05〜0.30%
Vは、Vは、焼入焼戻し組織を微細化させ、強度及び靱性をバランス良く向上させる効果がある。
Vの含有率が0.05%未満の場合には、V添加による結晶粒の微細化効果が十分に得られなくなるおそれがある。一方、0.30%を超えて添加してもV添加による作用効果が飽和するおそれがあり、経済的な観点からV含有率の上限は0.30%がよい。
V: 0.05-0.30%
V has the effect of making the quenched and tempered structure finer and improving the strength and toughness in a well-balanced manner.
If the V content is less than 0.05%, the effect of crystal grain refinement due to the addition of V may not be sufficiently obtained. On the other hand, even if added over 0.30%, the effect of addition of V may be saturated, and the upper limit of the V content is preferably 0.30% from an economical viewpoint.

なお、上記板ばね用鋼は、鋼の製造時に必須の工程である脱酸処理に必要な量のAl(0.040%以下程度)を不純物として含有してもよい。   In addition, the said steel for leaf | plate springs may contain the quantity of Al (about 0.040% or less) required for the deoxidation process which is an essential process at the time of manufacture of steel as an impurity.

上記板ばね部品は、上記板ばね用鋼を成形し、焼入及び焼戻しを施すことにより作製することができる。これにより焼戻しマルテンサイト組織とすることができる。
また、既に説明した通り、上記板ばね用鋼は、特に高硬度域にて従来鋼と比べて優れた特性(高強度及び高靱性の両立)が得られるため、ビッカース硬さ500以上の硬さにて使用することが好ましい。
ビッカース硬さは、焼入後に行う焼戻し温度の適切な調整により、上述のごとく500以上に調整することができる。
The plate spring component can be produced by forming the plate spring steel and subjecting it to quenching and tempering. Thereby, a tempered martensite structure can be obtained.
In addition, as already explained, the above-mentioned steel for leaf springs has excellent characteristics (coexistence of both high strength and high toughness) in comparison with conventional steels, particularly in the high hardness region, so that the hardness of the Vickers hardness is 500 or more. Is preferably used.
The Vickers hardness can be adjusted to 500 or more as described above by appropriately adjusting the tempering temperature after quenching.

(実施例1)
本例は、本発明の板ばね用鋼にかかる実施例及び比較例について説明する。
まず、表1に示す化学成分を有する板ばね用鋼(試料E1〜試料E13、及び試料C1〜試料C10)を複数種類用意した。なお、表1に記載の成分のうちCu、Niについては、これらの一部は不純物としての含有率を示してある。
表1に示す板ばね用鋼のうち、上記試料E1〜試料E10は本発明鋼であり、上記試料C1〜試料C5はC、Si、及びB等の一部成分含有率が本発明鋼とは異なる比較鋼であり、試料C6は従来鋼であるSUP10、試料C7は従来鋼であるSUP11A、試料C8は従来鋼であるSUP6である。
Example 1
In this example, examples and comparative examples according to the steel for leaf springs of the present invention will be described.
First, a plurality of types of steel for leaf springs (samples E1 to E13 and samples C1 to C10) having chemical components shown in Table 1 were prepared. In addition, about the Cu and Ni among the components of Table 1, some of these have shown the content rate as an impurity.
Among the steels for leaf springs shown in Table 1, the samples E1 to E10 are steels of the present invention, and the samples C1 to C5 are the steels of the present invention that have partial component contents such as C, Si, and B. Samples C6 are SUP10 which is a conventional steel, sample C7 is SUP11A which is a conventional steel, and sample C8 is SUP6 which is a conventional steel.

Figure 2011127181
Figure 2011127181

表1に示す成分の鋼材は、真空誘導溶解炉を用いて溶製し、得られた鋼塊からφ18mmの丸棒に鍛伸加工した後、焼きならし処理を施すことにより丸棒に加工し、後述する試験用の供試材とした。また、実際の板ばねと同一形状で行う試験については、上記鋼塊を鋼片に圧延し、さらに幅70mm、厚さ20mmに熱間圧延した後、焼ならし処理を施すことにより試験片を準備した。
このようにして得られた丸棒及び板材を用いて、後述の各種評価試験に用いる試験片(丸棒試験片又は板材試験片)を作製し、各種評価を行った。具体的には、丸棒については、後述の衝撃試験、及び脱炭試験を実施し、板材については、後述の圧延材脱炭試験、耐久試験、及び耐食性評価を実施した。
Steel materials having the components shown in Table 1 were melted using a vacuum induction melting furnace, and after forging into a 18 mm round bar from the resulting steel ingot, it was processed into a round bar by subjecting it to normalization. The test material for testing described later was used. Moreover, about the test performed with the same shape as an actual leaf | plate spring, the said steel ingot is rolled to a steel piece, Furthermore, after carrying out the hot rolling to width 70mm and thickness 20mm, a test piece is given by performing a normalization process. Got ready.
Using the round bar and plate material thus obtained, test pieces (round bar test piece or plate material test piece) used for various evaluation tests described later were prepared and subjected to various evaluations. Specifically, the impact test and decarburization test described later were performed on the round bar, and the rolling material decarburization test, durability test, and corrosion resistance evaluation described below were performed on the plate material.

次に、評価方法について説明する。
<衝撃試験>
上述の丸棒からUノッチ試験片を作製し、ねらい硬さHV540(ビッカース硬さ)になるように成分の違いによる焼き戻し軟化抵抗の違いを考慮し、焼き戻し温度を調整して焼入及び焼戻しを施し、組織を焼戻しマルテンサイト組織とした。その後、室温にて衝撃試験を実施した。
Next, the evaluation method will be described.
<Impact test>
A U-notch test piece is prepared from the round bar described above, and the tempering temperature is adjusted in consideration of the difference in temper softening resistance due to the difference in the components so that the target hardness is HV540 (Vickers hardness). Tempering was performed to make the structure a tempered martensite structure. Thereafter, an impact test was performed at room temperature.

このようにして各試料(試料E1〜試料E10、及び試料C1〜試料C8)の衝撃値を測定した。その結果を表2に示す。
また、炭素(C)含有率と衝撃値、及びケイ素(Si)含有率と衝撃値との関係をグラフにプロットした。C含有率と衝撃値との関係を図1に示し、Si含有率と衝撃値との関係を図2に示す。
Thus, the impact value of each sample (sample E1-sample E10 and sample C1-sample C8) was measured. The results are shown in Table 2.
Moreover, the relationship between a carbon (C) content rate and an impact value, and a silicon (Si) content rate and an impact value was plotted on a graph. The relationship between C content and impact value is shown in FIG. 1, and the relationship between Si content and impact value is shown in FIG.

<脱炭試験>
まず、φ18mmの丸棒から切削により直径φ8mm、高さ12mmの円柱型試験片を作製(試験前の脱炭量は0)した。次いで、円柱型試験片を真空中で昇温速度900℃/分で加熱し、温度900℃で5分間加熱した。その後、大気雰囲気にて、予め測定しておいた上述の板材作製時における熱間圧延後の冷却曲線と同等の冷却速度で冷却した。次いで、試験片を切断し、研磨した後、ナイタールによりエッチングした。その後、光学顕微鏡により表層の脱炭深さ(DM−F)を測定した。その結果を表2に示す。
また、ケイ素(Si)含有率と脱炭深さとの関係をグラフにプロットした。これを図3に示す。
<Decarburization test>
First, a cylindrical test piece having a diameter of 8 mm and a height of 12 mm was prepared by cutting from a round bar having a diameter of 18 mm (the amount of decarburization before the test was 0). Next, the cylindrical specimen was heated in vacuum at a heating rate of 900 ° C./min, and heated at a temperature of 900 ° C. for 5 minutes. Then, it cooled in the air | atmosphere at the cooling rate equivalent to the cooling curve after the hot rolling at the time of the above-mentioned board | plate material preparation measured beforehand. Next, the test piece was cut and polished, and then etched with nital. Then, the decarburization depth (DM-F) of the surface layer was measured with an optical microscope. The results are shown in Table 2.
The relationship between the silicon (Si) content and the decarburization depth was plotted on a graph. This is shown in FIG.

<圧延材脱炭試験>
圧延により作製した幅70mm×厚さ20mmの圧延材を長手方向に垂直な断面で切断し、光学顕微鏡により脱炭深さ(DM−F)を測定した。その結果を表2に示す。また、板材との形状・断面積等の違いによる脱炭深さへの影響を明確するため、板材製造に用いた鋼塊と同じ鋼塊を圧延してφ12mmの丸棒を作製し、同様に断面を切断して脱炭深さ(DM−F)を測定した。その結果を表2に示す。
<Rolling material decarburization test>
A rolled material having a width of 70 mm and a thickness of 20 mm produced by rolling was cut in a cross section perpendicular to the longitudinal direction, and the decarburization depth (DM-F) was measured by an optical microscope. The results are shown in Table 2. In addition, in order to clarify the influence on the decarburization depth due to the difference in shape, cross-sectional area, etc. from the plate material, the same steel ingot as the plate material was rolled to produce a φ12 mm round bar. The cross section was cut and the decarburization depth (DM-F) was measured. The results are shown in Table 2.

<耐久試験>
熱間圧延により作製した幅70mm×厚さ20mmの圧延材を板ばね形状に成形加工した。次いで、ねらい硬さHV540(ビッカース硬さ)になるように焼入及び焼戻しを施し、焼戻しマルテンサイト組織とした後、ショットピーニング処理を施した。このようにして得られたショットピーニング処理を施した板ばね部品について、680±500MPaの応力で破断するまで耐久試験を実施し、各試料から得られた板ばね部品の破断寿命を測定した。
破断寿命は、破断が生じるまでの回数を測定し、40万回を超える場合を「○」として評価し、40万回以下の場合を「×」として評価した。その結果を表2に示す。
<Durability test>
A rolled material having a width of 70 mm and a thickness of 20 mm produced by hot rolling was formed into a leaf spring shape. Next, quenching and tempering were performed so that the target hardness was HV540 (Vickers hardness) to obtain a tempered martensite structure, and then a shot peening treatment was performed. The plate spring component subjected to the shot peening treatment thus obtained was subjected to a durability test until it was broken at a stress of 680 ± 500 MPa, and the fracture life of the leaf spring component obtained from each sample was measured.
The number of times until the rupture occurred was measured as the rupture life, and the case where it exceeded 400,000 times was evaluated as “◯”, and the case where it was 400,000 times or less was evaluated as “x”. The results are shown in Table 2.

<耐食性評価>
圧延により作製した幅70mm×厚さ20mmの圧延材に焼入及び焼戻しを施してマルテンサイト組織とした後、切削により幅30mm×厚さ8mm×長さ100mmの板状試験片を作製した。次いで、板状試験片に、濃度5wt%、温度35℃の塩化ナトリウム水溶液(塩水)を2時間噴霧し(塩水噴霧処理)、温度60℃の熱風で4時間乾燥させ(乾燥処理)、さらに温度50℃、湿度95%以上の条件で2時間湿潤させた(湿潤処理)。これらの塩水噴霧処理、乾燥処理、及び湿潤処理を1サイクルとし、これを合計60サイクル繰り返し行った。その後、試験片表面に生成した腐食生成物を除去し、腐食部の断面に現れる最大の腐食ピット深さを光学顕微鏡を用いて測定した。その結果を表2に示す。
<Corrosion resistance evaluation>
A rolled material having a width of 70 mm and a thickness of 20 mm produced by rolling was quenched and tempered to obtain a martensite structure, and then a plate-shaped test piece having a width of 30 mm, a thickness of 8 mm, and a length of 100 mm was produced by cutting. Then, a sodium chloride aqueous solution (salt water) having a concentration of 5 wt% and a temperature of 35 ° C. is sprayed on the plate-shaped test piece for 2 hours (salt water spray treatment), and dried with hot air at a temperature of 60 ° C. for 4 hours (drying treatment). It was moistened for 2 hours under conditions of 50 ° C. and humidity of 95% or more (wetting treatment). These salt spray treatment, drying treatment, and wetting treatment were defined as one cycle, and this was repeated for a total of 60 cycles. Then, the corrosion product produced | generated on the test piece surface was removed, and the maximum corrosion pit depth which appears in the cross section of a corrosion part was measured using the optical microscope. The results are shown in Table 2.

Figure 2011127181
Figure 2011127181

表2及び図1〜図3より知られるごとく、Cの含有率が低すぎる試料C1は、狙い硬さを得るための焼き戻し温度が著しく低くなり、疲労寿命(破断寿命)が低下していた。
また、Cの含有率が高すぎる試料C2及びSiの含有率が低すぎる試料C3は、高硬度としたときの衝撃値が低く、靱性が不十分であった。
As can be seen from Table 2 and FIGS. 1 to 3, in the sample C1 in which the C content is too low, the tempering temperature for obtaining the target hardness is remarkably lowered, and the fatigue life (fracture life) is reduced. .
Further, the sample C2 having a too high C content and the sample C3 having a too low Si content had a low impact value when the hardness was high, and the toughness was insufficient.

また、Siの含有率が高すぎる試料C4は、フェライト脱炭量が増加し、疲労寿命が低下していた。ここで、試料C4においては、比較のため、自動車のコイルばねの形状及び寸法に相当するφ12mmの棒鋼についての脱炭深さも同時に示したが、Si含有量が高いにもかかわらず、フェライト脱炭は確認できなかった。この結果より、φ10〜φ20mm程度で用いられる自動車等のコイルばねやさらに細い弁ばね等では問題のない高Si材も板ばね用としては使用時に脱炭による疲労強度低下の可能性が高いことがわかる。
Sample C4 having an excessively high Si content had an increased ferrite decarburization amount and a reduced fatigue life. Here, in the sample C4, for comparison, the decarburization depth of a steel bar having a diameter of 12 mm corresponding to the shape and dimensions of a coil spring of an automobile is also shown. However, although the Si content is high, the ferrite decarburization is performed. Could not be confirmed. From this result, high Si materials that do not have problems with coil springs such as automobiles used at φ10 to φ20 mm or thinner valve springs, etc., have a high possibility of reduction in fatigue strength due to decarburization when used for leaf springs. Recognize.
.

また、Bを含有していない試料C5は、粒界強度が低いため、高硬度域での衝撃値及び疲労寿命が低下していた。   Moreover, since the sample C5 which does not contain B has low grain boundary strength, the impact value and fatigue life in the high hardness region were reduced.

また、従来鋼である試料C6及び試料C7は、ねらい硬さを得る焼き戻し温度が低温焼き戻し脆性域となるため、本例のように硬度を高くした場合の衝撃値が低く、靱性が悪い。さらに、疲労寿命も低下していた。
また、従来鋼である試料C8は、フェライト脱炭量が多くなっていた。
In addition, the conventional steel samples C6 and C7 have a low tempering embrittlement temperature at a low temperature tempering brittle region, so that the desired hardness is low. . Furthermore, the fatigue life was also reduced.
Moreover, the sample C8 which is conventional steel had a large amount of ferrite decarburization.

これに対し、本願発明の試料E1〜試料E12は、低炭素含有率でも、優れた強度及び靱性を兼ね備えると共に、フェライト脱炭が生じにくいため、耐久性にも優れていることがわかる。そのため、例えばトラック等の自動車用の板ばね等に好適に用いることができる。
また、図2より知られるごとく、衝撃値を高くして靱性をより向上させるためには、Si含有率を高めることが効果的であり、特に0.50%を超える量まで高めるとより好ましいことがわかる。
On the other hand, it can be seen that Samples E1 to E12 of the present invention have excellent strength and toughness even at a low carbon content and are also excellent in durability because ferrite decarburization is difficult to occur. Therefore, it can be suitably used for a leaf spring for automobiles such as trucks.
In addition, as is known from FIG. 2, in order to increase the impact value and improve the toughness, it is effective to increase the Si content, and it is more preferable to increase it to an amount exceeding 0.50%. I understand.

以上のように、質量%で、C:0.40〜0.50%未満、Si:0.40%〜0.85%、Mn:0.55〜1.20%、Cr:0.70〜1.50%、Ti:0.010〜0.070%未満、B:0.0005〜0.0050%を含有する板ばね用鋼(試料E1〜試料E10)が好適であることがわかる。かかる板ばね用鋼を採用することにより、脱炭を抑制できると共に、強度と靱性に優れた板ばね部品の実現が可能になる。   As described above, by mass%, C: less than 0.40 to 0.50%, Si: 0.40% to 0.85%, Mn: 0.55 to 1.20%, Cr: 0.70 It turns out that the steel for plate springs (sample E1-sample E10) containing 1.50%, Ti: 0.010-0.070%, B: 0.0005-0.0050% is suitable. By adopting such steel for leaf springs, decarburization can be suppressed, and a leaf spring component having excellent strength and toughness can be realized.

(実施例2)
実施例1においては、HV540を狙い硬さとしたが、本例においては、狙い硬さを変更した試験片について衝撃試験を行い、硬さと衝撃値との関係を調べた。
即ち、実施例1の試料E1、試料E7、試料C3、及び試料C6について、狙い硬さを変えて焼入及び焼戻しを施して試験片を作製し、実施例1と同様に衝撃試験を行った。その結果を表3及び図4に示す。図4は、横軸に各試料のビッカース硬さ(HV)をとり、縦軸に各試料の衝撃値をとり、硬さと衝撃値との関係を示すものである。
(Example 2)
In Example 1, the hardness was aimed at HV540, but in this example, an impact test was performed on a test piece whose aim hardness was changed, and the relationship between the hardness and the impact value was examined.
That is, with respect to Sample E1, Sample E7, Sample C3, and Sample C6 of Example 1, test specimens were produced by changing the target hardness and quenching and tempering, and the impact test was performed in the same manner as in Example 1. . The results are shown in Table 3 and FIG. FIG. 4 shows the relationship between hardness and impact value, with the horizontal axis representing the Vickers hardness (HV) of each sample and the vertical axis representing the impact value of each sample.

Figure 2011127181
Figure 2011127181

表3及び図4より知られるごとく、試料C3及び試料C6は、硬さを高くすると、衝撃値が低下し、靱性が劣化することがわかる。
これに対し、本願発明の組成範囲にある試料E1及び試料E2は、硬さを高くしても、高い衝撃値を維持しており、優れた強度と靱性を兼ね備えることがわかる。
As can be seen from Table 3 and FIG. 4, when the hardness of sample C3 and sample C6 is increased, the impact value decreases and the toughness deteriorates.
On the other hand, it can be seen that Sample E1 and Sample E2 within the composition range of the present invention maintain a high impact value even when the hardness is increased, and have both excellent strength and toughness.

Claims (3)

質量%で、C:0.40〜0.50%未満、Si:0.40〜0.85%、Mn:0.55〜1.20%、Cr:0.70〜1.50%、Ti:0.010〜0.070%未満、B:0.0005〜0.0050%を含有し、残部がFe及び不純物元素からなることを特徴とする強度及び靱性に優れた板ばね用鋼。   In mass%, C: 0.40 to less than 0.50%, Si: 0.40 to 0.85%, Mn: 0.55 to 1.20%, Cr: 0.70 to 1.50%, Ti : Steel for leaf springs with excellent strength and toughness, characterized by containing 0.010 to less than 0.070%, B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%, the balance being Fe and impurity elements. 質量%で、C:0.40〜0.50%未満、Si:0.40〜0.85%、Mn:0.55〜1.20%、Cr:0.70〜1.50%、Ti:0.010〜0.070%未満、B:0.0005〜0.0050%を含有し、
さらに質量%で、Cu:0.20〜0.50%、Ni:0.20〜1.00%、及びV:0.05〜0.30%から選ばれる1種以上を含有し、
残部がFe及び不純物元素からなることを特徴とする強度及び靱性に優れた板ばね用鋼。
In mass%, C: 0.40 to less than 0.50%, Si: 0.40 to 0.85%, Mn: 0.55 to 1.20%, Cr: 0.70 to 1.50%, Ti : 0.010 to less than 0.070%, B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
Furthermore, it contains at least one kind selected from Cu: 0.20 to 0.50%, Ni: 0.20 to 1.00%, and V: 0.05 to 0.30% in mass%,
A leaf spring steel excellent in strength and toughness, wherein the balance is made of Fe and impurity elements.
請求項1又は2に記載の板ばね用鋼を用いて成形されたことを特徴とする板ばね部品。   A leaf spring component formed by using the leaf spring steel according to claim 1 or 2.
JP2009287174A 2009-12-18 2009-12-18 Steel and leaf spring parts for leaf springs with excellent strength and toughness Active JP5418199B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009287174A JP5418199B2 (en) 2009-12-18 2009-12-18 Steel and leaf spring parts for leaf springs with excellent strength and toughness

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009287174A JP5418199B2 (en) 2009-12-18 2009-12-18 Steel and leaf spring parts for leaf springs with excellent strength and toughness

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2011127181A true JP2011127181A (en) 2011-06-30
JP5418199B2 JP5418199B2 (en) 2014-02-19

Family

ID=44290082

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2009287174A Active JP5418199B2 (en) 2009-12-18 2009-12-18 Steel and leaf spring parts for leaf springs with excellent strength and toughness

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5418199B2 (en)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01319650A (en) * 1988-06-20 1989-12-25 Daido Steel Co Ltd Low-decarburization spring steel
JPH1129839A (en) * 1997-05-12 1999-02-02 Nippon Steel Corp Spring steel with high toughness
JP2002097551A (en) * 2000-09-25 2002-04-02 Nippon Steel Corp High strength steel superior in resistance to hydrogen fatigue, and manufacturing method
JP2002180204A (en) * 2000-12-18 2002-06-26 Nisshin Steel Co Ltd Spring steel having excellent warm settling resistance
JP2008266782A (en) * 2007-03-23 2008-11-06 Aichi Steel Works Ltd Steel for spring excellent in hydrogen embrittlement resistance and corrosion fatigue strength and high strength spring part using the same
JP2011127182A (en) * 2009-12-18 2011-06-30 Aichi Steel Works Ltd High fatigue strength plate spring steel and plate spring part

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01319650A (en) * 1988-06-20 1989-12-25 Daido Steel Co Ltd Low-decarburization spring steel
JPH1129839A (en) * 1997-05-12 1999-02-02 Nippon Steel Corp Spring steel with high toughness
JP2002097551A (en) * 2000-09-25 2002-04-02 Nippon Steel Corp High strength steel superior in resistance to hydrogen fatigue, and manufacturing method
JP2002180204A (en) * 2000-12-18 2002-06-26 Nisshin Steel Co Ltd Spring steel having excellent warm settling resistance
JP2008266782A (en) * 2007-03-23 2008-11-06 Aichi Steel Works Ltd Steel for spring excellent in hydrogen embrittlement resistance and corrosion fatigue strength and high strength spring part using the same
JP2011127182A (en) * 2009-12-18 2011-06-30 Aichi Steel Works Ltd High fatigue strength plate spring steel and plate spring part

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5418199B2 (en) 2014-02-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5520591B2 (en) Steel and leaf spring parts for high fatigue strength leaf springs
JP5973903B2 (en) High strength spring steel wire excellent in hydrogen embrittlement resistance, method for producing the same, and high strength spring
US8328169B2 (en) Spring steel and spring having superior corrosion fatigue strength
KR101867689B1 (en) Steel wire rod having excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance for high strength spring, and method for manufacturing the same
JP6027302B2 (en) High strength tempered spring steel
JP5816391B2 (en) Spring steel and spring manufacturing method
WO2006022009A1 (en) Steel for high strength spring, and high strength spring and method for manufacture thereof
MX2014008499A (en) Steel for bolts, bolt, and method for producing bolt.
WO2013132829A1 (en) Spring steel
KR20140033235A (en) Spring steel and spring
JP5679455B2 (en) Spring steel, spring steel wire and spring
JP4773106B2 (en) Steel parts with excellent balance between strength and torsional characteristics, manufacturing method thereof, and steel materials for steel parts
JP5146063B2 (en) High strength steel with excellent internal fatigue damage resistance and method for producing the same
JP4867638B2 (en) High-strength bolts with excellent delayed fracture resistance and corrosion resistance
JP2011074429A (en) Spring steel and spring having superior corrosion fatigue strength
JP5214292B2 (en) Spring steel with excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance and corrosion fatigue strength, and high-strength spring parts using the same
JP4044460B2 (en) Cold forming spring steel
JP5418199B2 (en) Steel and leaf spring parts for leaf springs with excellent strength and toughness
JP4952708B2 (en) Martensitic stainless steel and method for producing the same
JP5439735B2 (en) Machine structural parts having excellent rolling fatigue characteristics and manufacturing method thereof
JP2005350736A (en) High-strength steel having superior corrosion resistance and fatigue characteristics for spring, and manufacturing method therefor
JP4332446B2 (en) High strength steel with excellent cold workability and delayed fracture resistance, and high strength steel parts with excellent delayed fracture resistance
JP2009007644A (en) Method for designing component in alternative steel for chromium-molybdenum steel
JP5653021B2 (en) Spring steel and spring with excellent corrosion fatigue strength

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20120820

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20131022

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20131104

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5418199

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250