JP2010210471A - Proposal system for optimizing traffic-related facility - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To optimize facilities for use of traffic for passengers (referred to as traffic-related facilities hereinafter). <P>SOLUTION: Position information of each passenger from which information is to be acquired is acquired by a position information acquisition part 331, and traffic history information of each passenger is acquired by a traffic history information acquisition part 333 based on accumulation results of the acquired position information. The traffic history information of passengers with the same traffic range among a plurality of passengers whose traffic history information is acquired is compared and collated with one another by a collation part 334. Whether or not the traffic-related facilities necessary to optimize are present is determined by a facility determination part 336 based on results of the comparison and collation. When determination is made that the traffic-related facilities necessary to optimize are present, an optimization proposing part 337 proposes optimization contents. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a passer-related facility optimization proposal system that makes a proposal for optimizing the passage of a pass-through facility or the like (hereinafter referred to as a passer-related facility) used for the use of a passerby such as a pedestrian. .

  2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, a passer-by-passenger navigation device that guides a passerby such as a pedestrian from a current location to a destination is known. At this time, for example, it is difficult for a person who passes by using a wheelchair or the like to pass through a road with a step, so that an auxiliary member such as a stroller or a cane is used in addition to the wheelchair. A passerby who can pass only on his / her feet without using a wheelchair, walking stick, stroller, etc. (hereinafter referred to as this passerby). Such a passerby is referred to as a non-auxiliary passer), and it may be very difficult for an auxiliary passer to pass. Therefore, a navigation device for a passerby is provided that guides an optimal route according to the attribute of the passer (for example, identifying whether it is an auxiliary passer or a non-auxiliary passer) (see, for example, Patent Document 1). ).

  In this conventional navigation device for passers-by, for each element that is used for road use, such as roads and intersections, the degree to which the element can correspond to the attribute of the passer is quantified and the cumulative value is minimized. By searching for the route, it is possible to guide the route corresponding to the attribute of the passerby.

JP 2003-21535 A

  In the above-described conventional navigation device for passers-by, it is possible to guide a passage according to the attributes of the passer-by. Therefore, for example, in the above-described example, it may be possible to guide the auxiliary passer-by who uses the wheelchair while avoiding the passer-related facilities such as steps. However, in such a navigation device for passers-by, a passer-by using a wheelchair is merely guided by avoiding a passer-related facility that makes passing difficult. For example, it does not take into account the ease of avoidance of passer-related facilities that make it difficult to pass through or the optimization of passer-related facilities that make it difficult for passers to pass, The inconvenience for auxiliary passers-by was not completely eliminated.

  The problem to be solved by the present invention includes the above-described problem as an example.

  In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the invention described in claim 1 is a passer-by who proposes to optimize the pass-through of a pass-through facility (hereinafter referred to as passer-related facility) used for pass-through to passers-by. In the related facility optimization proposing system, a location information acquisition unit that acquires the location information of the passer and a pass history information acquisition unit that acquires the pass history information of the passer based on a cumulative result of the acquired location information. Determining whether there is a passer-related facility that needs to be optimized based on the result of the comparison and collation, and collation means for comparing and collating the pass history information of a plurality of passers-by with the same pass range And an optimization proposing unit that proposes optimization contents when it is determined that there is a passer-related facility that requires the optimization.

1 is a system configuration diagram conceptually showing an example of an overall configuration of a passer-related facility optimization proposal system of the present embodiment. It is a functional block diagram showing the functional structural example of a portable terminal. It is a functional block diagram showing the functional structural example of a server. It is a functional block diagram showing the functional structural example of a control part. It is a flowchart showing an example of the control content performed by the control part of a server. It is a figure showing the condition of a 1st example. It is a figure showing an example of the optimization content proposed in a 1st example. It is a figure showing the condition of a 2nd example. It is a figure showing an example of the optimization content proposed in a 2nd example. It is a figure showing the condition of the 3rd example. It is a figure showing an example of the optimization content proposed in a 3rd example. It is a figure showing the condition of a 4th example. It is a figure showing an example of the optimization content proposed in a 4th example. It is a figure showing the condition of a 5th example. It is a figure showing an example of the optimization content proposed in a 5th example. It is a figure showing the condition of a 6th example. It is a figure showing an example of the optimization content proposed in a 6th example. It is a functional block diagram showing the functional structural example of the control part of the server in the modification which determines the attribute of a passer automatically. It is a flowchart showing an example of the control content performed by the control part of the server in the modification which determines the attribute of a passer automatically. It is a functional block diagram showing the functional structural example of the control part of the server in the modification which performs automatic update of map information.

  Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram conceptually showing an example of the overall configuration of a passer-related facility optimization proposing system TS of the present embodiment.

  Passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS is used for passers who do not have sufficient ability to walk with their feet alone, for example, passers using wheelchairs or passers using strollers, auxiliary members such as their feet and canes. A proposal for optimizing a traffic facility used for passing a person who walks on the road (hereinafter, such passers are collectively referred to as auxiliary passers). As used herein, a “passerby” refers to a person who passes through a sidewalk area of a road or other area that is accessible by walking (mainly humans, not other animals), wheelchairs, walking sticks, It includes a passerby (hereinafter referred to as a non-assistant passerby) HP who has sufficient ability to walk only with his / her feet without using a baby stroller or the like, and an auxiliary passerby SP. In addition, the “passage facility” used for the passage of the auxiliary passer SP and the non-auxiliary passer HP refers to all the facilities used for the pass that exist on the passage where the passerby passes. It refers to steps, stairs, traffic lights, pedestrian crossings, lanes, curbs, or the passages that pass by. In the following description, the passage facility used for this passage is appropriately referred to as “passer-related facility”.

  As shown in FIG. 1, a passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS is carried by passers including auxiliary passers HP and non-auxiliary passers SP, and has a function of acquiring position information of each passer. A terminal 100, a base station 200 capable of receiving the location information of each passerby transmitted from each mobile terminal 100, and the base station 200 connected to the base station 200 via a network NW (such as the Internet) and transmitted from each mobile terminal 100 And a server 300 that receives various information (position information and attribute information described later).

  As the mobile terminal 100, for example, a mobile phone is used. In addition, for example, a navigation device for passers-by that guides each passer-by from the current location to the destination or an information terminal such as a PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) may be used. The portable terminal 100 includes a display unit 110 such as a liquid crystal display that performs various displays, and an operation unit 120 that includes numeric keys and operation buttons for a passer-by to perform various operation inputs. The portable terminal 100 or the position information acquisition unit 331 of the control unit 330 of the server 300 described later corresponds to the position information acquisition unit described in the claims.

  Each passer-by can input his / her attribute information using the operation unit 120. Here, the “attribute information” is information indicating whether the passer is an auxiliary passer SP or a non-passer passer HP, for example, personal attribute information such as address, age, sex, height, weight, It includes information on whether or not a wheelchair, stroller, crutch, etc. are used, its type, etc., and ID information indicating a passerby (individual). The inputted attribute information is transmitted from the portable terminal 100 to the server 300 together with the position information or separately from the position information.

  FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram illustrating a functional configuration example of the mobile terminal 100.

  The mobile terminal 100 operates with each component controlled by a control unit 130 including a CPU (not shown).

  The GPS antenna 131 receives navigation radio waves from a plurality of GPS satellites and supplies the received navigation radio waves to the GPS receiver 132. The GPS receiving unit 132 obtains latitude / longitude data indicating the current position of the mobile terminal 100 using the navigation radio wave supplied from the GPS antenna 131 and supplies the obtained latitude / longitude data to the control unit 130 as position information. In addition, when supplying position information, ID information which shows a passerby (individual) is attached and supplied. This ID information and the ID information included in the attribute information described above are the same ID information for the same passerby (individual).

  Data transmitted to the server 300 via the base station 200 and the network NW is processed by the antenna 133 and the wireless transmission / reception unit 134. That is, position information (including ID information) and attribute information transmitted to the server 300 are transmitted from the control unit 130 to the wireless transmission / reception unit 134, modulated into a radio wave signal by the wireless transmission / reception unit 134, and supplied to the antenna 133. Then, the modulated radio signal is transmitted from the antenna 133 to the base station 200 and then transmitted to the server 300 via the network NW. The attribute information is transmitted to the server 300 via the base station 200 and the network NW when, for example, each passer inputs and an operation instruction for transmission is given. Each time the latitude / longitude data is supplied by the GPS receiving unit 132, it is automatically transmitted to the server 300 via the base station 200 and the network NW every predetermined time. In the server 300, ID information included in each information is collated, and attribute information and position information of the same ID information are stored in association with each other.

  Furthermore, the control unit 130 is connected to the memory 135, the storage unit 136, the display unit 110, and the operation unit 120 described above. The memory 135 is used for temporarily storing data in various processes. The storage unit 136 stores programs for performing various types of processing in the control unit 130. By starting this program, for example, display processing on the display unit 110, attribute information input by the operation unit 120, transmission processing of the position information acquired from the GPS reception unit 132 to the server 300, and the like are performed.

  FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram illustrating a functional configuration example of the server 300.

  Although not shown in FIG. 1, the server 300 includes a display unit 310 such as a liquid crystal display that displays various kinds of optimization proposal contents of passer-related facilities, and a manager (for example, a manager who manages the server 300). Are connected to an operation unit 320 including a keyboard and a mouse for performing various operation inputs.

  Position information and attribute information received from the mobile terminal 100 via the base station 200 and the network NW are received by the network communication control unit 341. The received attribute information and position information are supplied to the control unit 330 and are information transmitted from the portable terminal 100 carried by the non-auxiliary passer HP based on the supplementary information indicated in the attribute information, or the auxiliary passer-by It is determined whether the information is transmitted from the portable terminal 100 carried by the SP. In the case of the former, the received position information and attribute information are stored in the non-auxiliary passer-by database 342. In the latter case, the received position information and attribute information are stored in the auxiliary passer-by database. Stored in H.343.

  When the position information is received separately from the attribute information, the ID information included in the previously stored attribute information is compared with the ID information attached to the position information, and a non-assistant passerby It is determined whether the position information is transmitted from the portable terminal 100 carried by the HP or the position information transmitted from the portable terminal 100 carried by the auxiliary passer SP, and the non-passerby database 342 or the passerby is determined. Stored in one of the databases 343 for use.

  The non-auxiliary passer-by database 342 is composed of, for example, a hard disk or a large-capacity memory, and sequentially stores position information received from the portable terminal 100 of the non-auxiliary passer-by HP every predetermined time. It is possible to acquire the travel history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP created based on the accumulated result of the stored position information. Similarly, the auxiliary passer-by database 343 sequentially stores position information received from the portable terminal 100 of the auxiliary passer SP every predetermined time. It is possible to acquire the travel history information of the auxiliary passerby SP created based on the accumulated result of the stored position information. This traffic history information includes information such as a traffic range indicated by two points of each passer, a traffic route within the traffic range, a stopover, a moving speed, and a moving time. The travel speed is determined for each section from the travel time for each section by dividing the travel route for each predetermined distance section. By doing so, for example, there is no change in the moving speed of the non-auxiliary passer HP in the same passage route, and there is a change in the moving speed of the auxiliary passer SP (for example, the same position information is received multiple times by getting stuck) For example, when there is a section in which the movement speed is slowed down), it can be determined that there are passer-related facilities that make it difficult for the auxiliary passer SP such as steps and slopes to pass. Also, if there is a section where the passage route of the non-auxiliary passer HP and the passage route of the auxiliary passer SP are different on the way in the same passage range, auxiliary passages such as stairs It can be determined that there are passer-related facilities that make it impossible for the passer to pass.

  Further, a map information database 344 and a memory 345 are respectively connected to the control unit 330. The memory 345 is used for temporarily storing data in various processes. Further, the map information database 344 includes map data including latitude and longitude data corresponding to a plurality of scales, road data for constructing the map data (sidewalk data, road data that can be accessed by walking, stairs, etc. Landmark data indicating each facility, image data used for intersection guidance, enlarged map data, and data such as detailed information indicating the contents of each facility are stored. ing.

  FIG. 4 is a functional block diagram illustrating a functional configuration example of the control unit 330 illustrated in FIG. 3.

  The control unit 330 includes a position information acquisition unit 331 (corresponding to the position information acquisition unit), an attribute information acquisition unit 332 (corresponding to the attribute information acquisition unit), and a traffic history information acquisition unit 333 (corresponding to the traffic history information acquisition unit). A collation unit 334 (corresponding to collation unit), a map information acquisition unit 335 (corresponding to map information acquisition unit), a facility determination unit 336 (corresponding to facility determination unit), and an optimization proposal unit 337 (optimization proposal) Equivalent to the means).

  The location information acquisition unit 331 acquires location information of each passer-by received from the mobile terminal 100 via the base station 200 and the network NW. Similarly, the attribute information acquisition unit 332 acquires passer-by attribute information received from the mobile terminal 100, and the passer-by information about the position information acquired by the position information acquisition unit 331 is obtained based on the acquired attribute information. When it is a non-auxiliary passer HP, it is stored in the non-auxiliary passer-by database 342, and when the passer is an auxiliary passer-by SP, it is stored in the auxiliary passer-by database 343. Each of the non-auxiliary passer-by database 342 and the auxiliary passer-by database 343 sequentially stores location information in association with the attribute information, and travel history information created based on the accumulated result of the location information. Is stored as traffic history information corresponding to the attribute information. The attribute information and the traffic history information are grouped for each traffic range indicated by the traffic history information.

  The passage history information acquisition unit 333 acquires the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP from the non-auxiliary passer-by database 342 and also acquires the passage history information of the corresponding auxiliary passer-by SP from the auxiliary passer-by database 343. . For example, the traffic history information having the same traffic range is acquired from each of the databases 342 and 343. The collation unit 334 compares and collates each traffic history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP and the auxiliary passer SP that are acquired by the traffic history information acquisition unit 333 and have the same traffic range. At this time, the map information acquisition unit 335 acquires, from the map information database 344, surrounding map data including the traffic range indicated by the traffic history information that is compared and verified by the verification unit 334.

  The facility determination unit 336 determines whether or not there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the pass of the auxiliary passer-by SP based on the comparison and collation result by the collation unit 334 and the map data acquired by the map information acquisition unit 335. Determine. For example, the movement speed of the non-auxiliary passer HP on the same passage is relatively smooth (the movement speed variation is small), while the movement speed of the auxiliary passer SP has moved so far. It is determined that there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the passage of the auxiliary passer-by SP in the section where the speed is extremely slow (or faster) as compared with the speed. This determination is not only based on, for example, a comparison between the moving speed for one auxiliary passer SP and the moving speed for one non-auxiliary passer HP, but also the moving speed and plural non-auxiliary passes for a plurality of auxiliary passers SP. It can also be determined by comparison with the movement speed for the person HP. For example, when there is an identical section in which the moving speed of five auxiliary passers SP is slow in the same passage route, it is assumed that the moving speed of five persons in the section becomes slow and the degree of variation varies. Is done. In other words, even in the case of five auxiliary passers SP, the speed of movement is slow for those who use crutches, those who use wheelchairs, and those who push strollers. It is assumed that the condition is different. That is, in the case where the moving speed for a plurality of auxiliary passers-by SP is slow in the same section, the moving speed at which the moving speed is slowed and the condition appears most notably is used as a comparison target.

  On the other hand, although the moving speeds of the five non-auxiliary passers HP on the same passage route are different depending on the age, weight, etc. of the non-auxiliary passers HP, it is unlikely that each of them is extremely slow. For example, among the five non-auxiliary passers-by HP, even if there is a person whose movement speed is extremely slow in the same section, if there is only one person, the passer-related facilities It is unlikely that it was extremely slow due to factors. In addition, when the passer-related facilities are steps, it is thought that the moving speed has become extremely slow because of falling over the step, but there is only one person who has slowed down. It can be judged that this factor is rare. That is, in the case where the movement speeds of a plurality of non-auxiliary passers HP are used, when the ratio of the number of non-auxiliary passers HP whose movement speed has become extremely slow is small, the non-auxiliary passers-by HP smoothly It is determined that the section is passable.

  In addition, the travel route of the non-auxiliary passer HP and the pass route of the auxiliary passer SP in the same travel range are compared with the travel speed or separately, and the route in which the travel route is different is assisted. It is determined that there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the pass of the passer-by SP. In this case as well, not only by comparing the passage route for one non-assistant passer HP and the passage route for one auxiliary passer SP, but also for the passage routes for plural auxiliary passers SP and the plurality of non-assistant passers HP. Judgment can also be made by comparison with the route. In this case, if the proportion of the number of auxiliary passers SP that have become different routes is extremely small, different passes due to the existence of passer-related facilities that cause inconvenience for the pass of the auxiliary passer SP. It is not determined that the route has been reached, and it is not determined that the passer-related facility exists in the section that has become the different route. On the other hand, even when the ratio of the number of persons is extremely small, it may be determined that the passer-related facility exists according to the type of auxiliary information of the auxiliary passer-by SP that has become a different pass route.

  In this way, it is determined that there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the pass of the auxiliary passer SP in the same pass range. In addition, for example, a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for a passer-by of a passer-by who uses a wheelchair by referring to the type of incidental information corresponding to the pass-through history information to be compared. Can be determined to exist. Next, position information (latitude / longitude data) indicating a section in which the movement speed in the traffic range where the passer-related facility is determined to exist is extremely slow, or position information indicating a section where the passage section is different. (Latitude / longitude data) and the latitude / longitude data included in the map data acquired by the map information acquisition unit 335 are collated to identify a section where the passer-related facility exists on the map represented by the map data. .

  When the facility determination unit 336 determines that there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience, the optimization proposal unit 337 proposes optimization contents for eliminating the inconvenience. The content proposed by the optimization proposal unit 337 is displayed on the display unit 310 connected to the server 300. The content of the proposal may be output to a printer (not shown) and printed. A specific example of this optimization content will be described later.

  By submitting the optimization content proposed in this way to, for example, a predetermined organization (such as the civil engineering section of the municipal office), the corresponding construction measures are performed and the passer-related facilities are improved. It is possible to optimize traffic.

  FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an example of control content executed by the control unit 330 of the server 300.

  First, in step S1, the location information acquisition unit 331 of the control unit 330 acquires location information of each passer-by received from the mobile terminal 100 via the base station 200 and the network NW.

  Next, in step S <b> 2, the attribute information acquisition unit 332 of the control unit 330 acquires attribute information of each passer-by received from the mobile terminal 100 via the base station 200 and the network NW.

  Next, in step S3, the attribute information acquisition unit 332 of the control unit 330 determines whether the passerby carrying the mobile terminal 100 that transmitted the attribute information is a non-assistant passer HP based on the acquired attribute information. It is determined whether it is a person SP. If it is determined that it is attribute information of the non-auxiliary passer HP (step S3: YES), the attribute information is stored in the non-auxiliary passer-by database 342 in step S4. On the other hand, if it is determined that the attribute information is the auxiliary passer-by SP (step S3: NO), the attribute information is stored in the auxiliary passer-by database 343 in step S5.

  In step S3, when the position information acquired by the position information acquisition unit 331 in step S1 is acquired together with the attribute information acquired by the attribute information acquisition unit 332, a non-assistant passer-by is based on the attribute information. It is determined whether the position information is HP position information or auxiliary passer SP position information. If the position information is non-auxiliary passer HP position information (step S3: YES), the attribute information is associated with the attribute information in step S4. The position information is stored in the non-auxiliary passer-by database 342 together with the attribute information. If the position information is the position information of the auxiliary passer-by SP (step S3: NO), the attribute information is associated with the attribute information in step S5. The position information is stored in the auxiliary passer-by database 343 together with the attribute information.

  On the other hand, when the position information acquired by the position information acquisition unit 331 in Step S1 is acquired alone, the attribute information including the same ID information as the ID information attached to the position information is not displayed. Search is made from the auxiliary passerby database 342 and the auxiliary passerby database 343. If the attribute information including the ID information does not exist, the acquired position information is stored in the memory 135. On the other hand, if there is attribute information including the ID information, in step S4 or S5, the position information is associated with the attribute information and the position information is for a non-assistant passerby. It is stored in either the database 342 or the auxiliary passerby database 343.

  The position information is sequentially stored corresponding to the attribute information of the non-auxiliary passerby database 342 and the auxiliary passerby database 343, and the passage route, the moving speed, the movement created by accumulating the sequentially stored position information. The traffic history information including time and the like is stored in association with the attribute information, and the history information and the traffic history information are grouped for each traffic range indicated by the stored traffic history information.

  Next, in step S <b> 6, the traffic history information acquisition unit 333 of the control unit 330 determines whether the traffic history information in the same traffic range exists in each of the non-auxiliary passer-by database 342 and the auxiliary passer-by database 343. . If it is determined that it exists (step S6: YES), in step S7, the non-auxiliary passer's HP pass history information and the auxiliary passer's SP pass history information in the same pass range are stored in both databases 342, respectively. 343. On the other hand, if it is determined in step S6 that there is no traffic history information in the same traffic range (step S6: NO), the process ends.

  Next, in step S8, the collation unit 334 of the control unit 330 compares and collates the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP and the auxiliary passer-by SP acquired by the pass history information acquisition unit 333 in step S7.

  Next, in step S9, the map information acquisition unit 335 of the control unit 330 acquires, from the map information database 344, surrounding map data including the traffic range indicated by the traffic history information compared and collated by the collation unit 334 in step S8. To do.

  Next, in step S10, the facility determination unit 336 of the control unit 330 performs optimization based on the comparison / collation result by the collation unit 334 in step S8 and the map data acquired by the map information acquisition unit 335 in step S9. Determine whether there is a required passer-related facility, that is, a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the auxiliary passer SP, and identify the section where the relevant pass-related facility exists on the map represented by the map data To do. If it is determined that there is no passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the auxiliary passer-by SP (step S10: NO), the determination is not satisfied and the process ends. On the other hand, when it is determined that there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the auxiliary passer-by SP (step S10: YES), the process proceeds to the next step S11.

  In step S11, the optimization proposing unit 337 of the control unit 330 proposes optimization contents for eliminating the inconvenience of the passer-related facility specified in step 10. Thus, the process ends.

  Next, a specific example of optimization contents of a passer-related facility proposed by the passer-related facility optimization proposing system TS having the above-described configuration will be sequentially described based on a plurality of cases.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating the situation of the first case, and FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of optimization content proposed in the first case.

  As shown in FIG. 6, in the first case, in the traffic range to the use facility W, the verification unit 334 compares and compares the traffic history information between the non-auxiliary passer HP and the auxiliary passer SP corresponding to the pass range. As a result, the passage route to the use facility W of the non-auxiliary passer HP and the passage route to the use facility W of the auxiliary passer SP are different from the point A. Therefore, it is determined that there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the passage of the auxiliary passer SP in the section including the point A, and the section including the point A is specified using the map data.

  In addition, as a specific example of the use facility W, for example, a toilet for a wheelchair that can be used by a passerby using a wheelchair can be cited. In addition, for example, various use facilities such as a station, a bus stop, a taxi stand, a vehicle depot, a store such as a restaurant or a department store, a playground, a leisure facility, an amusement park, and the like.

  In this case, as a result of specifying the section including the point A on the map, the facility determination unit 336 searches the section using the map data, and as shown in FIG. It is determined that there is a step 401 (or a staircase) 401 that causes inconvenience for SP traffic. Then, the optimization proposal unit 337 receives the determination result of the facility determination unit 336 and uses the attribute information and the traffic history information corresponding to the traffic range to the use facility W stored in the auxiliary passer-by database 343 as auxiliary traffic. The travel route and travel time from the point A of the user SP to the use facility W, and data related to the step 401 stored in the map information database 344 (for example, the number of steps, height difference, inclination angle), and Information on the land environment around the position where the step 401 exists (near point A) is acquired. Then, a condition for optimizing the passage of the auxiliary passerby SP is derived from the acquired data and information.

  FIG. 7B is a conceptual diagram showing one of the optimization contents proposed according to the derived conditions. As shown in FIG. 7B, the optimization content is to change the step that causes inconvenience to the passage of the auxiliary passer SP to the slope 402. In this case, if the slope 402 becomes steep, no optimization is possible. Moreover, even if it becomes longer than the passage route from the point A of the auxiliary passer SP indicated by the passage history information to the use facility W, the optimization is not achieved. Therefore, the optimization proposing unit 337 extracts an area necessary for constructing the slope 402 with a gentle slope from the information on the land environment around the step 401, and the auxiliary passer SP passes relatively easily. Various data such as the shape, gradient, and distance of the slope 402 that can be constructed are constructed, and optimization contents are proposed.

  As a result of the treatment according to the content of the proposal, the auxiliary passer SP can use the use facility W by passing the same route as the non-auxiliary passer HP.

  FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the situation of the second case, and FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of optimization content proposed in the second case.

  As shown in FIG. 8, in the second case, in the traffic range to the use facility W, the verification unit 334 compares and compares the traffic history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP and the auxiliary passer SP corresponding to the pass range. As a result, like FIG. 7 described above, the passage route to the use facility W of the non-auxiliary passer HP and the passage route to the use facility W of the auxiliary passer SP are different from the point A. Therefore, it is determined that the section including the point A has some cause of inconvenience for the passage of the auxiliary passer SP, and the section including the point A is specified using the map data.

  In this case, as a result of specifying the section including the point A on the map, the facility determination unit 336 searches the section using the map data, so that from the point A as shown in FIG. It is determined that the distance L of the route to the use facility W is such a long distance that it is difficult for the auxiliary passer SP to pass. This determination is made, for example, by comparison with a distance threshold value based on an objective viewpoint obtained assuming a certain case. For example, it can be determined that it is difficult from an objective point of view that an auxiliary passer-by SP who is an elderly woman using a wheelchair passes 5 km continuously. Then, the optimization proposal unit 337 receives the determination result of the facility determination unit 336 and uses the attribute information and the traffic history information corresponding to the traffic range to the use facility W stored in the auxiliary passer-by database 343 as auxiliary traffic. Data on the user facility W (for example, installation year, size, weight, availability of movement, etc.) stored in the map information database 344; In addition, information on the location of the use facility W and the land environment around the point A is acquired. Then, a condition for optimizing the passage of the auxiliary passerby SP is derived from the acquired data and information.

  FIG. 9B is a conceptual diagram showing one of the optimization contents proposed based on the derived conditions. As shown in FIG. 9 (b), the optimization content is a route from the point A to the use facility W that causes inconvenience to the pass of the auxiliary passerby SP by moving the use facility W to the vicinity of the point A. Is to shorten the distance. Accordingly, the optimization proposing unit 337 sets the use facility W that the auxiliary passer SP can easily travel from the information on the route and travel time to the point A of the auxiliary passer SP and the land environment around the point A. To extract the optimal area and propose the optimization content.

  As a result of the treatment in accordance with the contents of the proposal, the auxiliary passerby SP can use the use facility W within the movable range.

  In addition, when there is a circumstance (such as a large-scale facility) where the use facility W cannot be relocated in the above, a proposal that newly installs means for transporting an auxiliary passerby SP such as a moving sidewalk, etc. Alternatively, it may be proposed to newly install a use facility W for the auxiliary passer SP in an area where the auxiliary passer SP can move.

  FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating the situation of the third case, and FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of optimization content proposed in the third case.

  As shown in FIG. 10, in the third case, the comparison unit 334 compares and collates the passage history information between the non-auxiliary passer HP and the auxiliary passer-by SP corresponding to the pass range. As a result, the movement of the non-auxiliary passer HP While the speed does not change between the point A and other places, the moving speed of the auxiliary passer SP at the point A is faster than the moving speed other than the point A (for example, at a speed equal to or higher than that of the non-auxiliary passer HP). It has become. Therefore, it is determined that there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the passage of the auxiliary passer SP, in which the auxiliary passer SP must increase the moving speed in the section including the point A, and the map data The section including the point A is specified using.

  In this case, the facility determination unit 336 determines that the point A is an intersection by searching the section using the map data as a result of specifying the section including the point A on the map. Further, by acquiring data related to the intersection stored in the map information database 344 (for example, road width, presence / absence of traffic lights, lighting time of green and red lights when there are traffic lights, etc.), FIG. As shown to a), it determines with the length of the lighting time of the green light of the traffic signal 403 for the pedestrians of the said intersection not being enough for auxiliary passerby SP. Then, the optimization proposal unit 337 receives the determination result of the facility determination unit 336 and uses the attribute information and the traffic history information corresponding to the traffic range to the use facility W stored in the auxiliary passer-by database 343 as auxiliary traffic. The travel time at the point A of the person SP is acquired, and data related to the intersection and the roads in the vicinity thereof stored in the map information database 344 are acquired. Then, a condition for optimizing the passage of the auxiliary passerby SP is derived from the acquired data and information.

  FIG. 11B is a conceptual diagram showing one of the optimization contents proposed according to the derived conditions. As shown in FIG. 11B, the optimization content is to increase the lighting time of the green light of the pedestrian traffic light 403. In this case, the optimization proposing unit 337 comprehensively determines the data regarding the acquired intersection and its neighboring roads so that the traffic situation around the intersection is not disturbed by the change in the lighting time, and the green signal of the traffic light 403 The lighting time of is calculated.

  As a result of the treatment according to the content of the proposal, the auxiliary passerby SP does not have to rush urgently at the intersection, and can use the intersection without inconvenience.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating the situation of the fourth case, and FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of optimization content proposed in the fourth case.

  As shown in FIG. 12, in the fourth case, in the traffic range to the use facility W, the verification unit 334 compares and compares the traffic history information between the non-auxiliary passer HP and the auxiliary passer SP corresponding to the pass range. As a result, the passage route to the use facility W of the non-auxiliary passer HP and the passage route to the use facility W of the auxiliary passer SP are different in the whole passage range, and the non-auxiliary passer HP is a point to the use facility W. The auxiliary passer SP passes through point B, while passing through A. Therefore, it is determined that there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the pass of the auxiliary passer SP in the section including the point A.

  In this case, as a result of specifying the section including the point A and the point B on the map, the facility determination unit 336 searches the point A by using the altitude data for each point included in the map data. It is determined that the route via the road is maintained (for example, paved) but the slope is tight for the auxiliary passer SP, and the route via point B is not maintained but the slope is just right for the auxiliary passer SP. Then, the optimization proposal unit 337 receives the determination result of the facility determination unit 336, and the data (for example, course, maintenance state, etc.) related to the route stored in the map information database 344, and the route ( Information on the land environment around point A and point B) is acquired. Then, a condition for optimizing the passage of the auxiliary passerby SP is derived from the acquired data and information.

  FIG. 13B is a conceptual diagram showing one of the optimization contents proposed based on the derived conditions. As shown in FIG. 13 (b), the optimization content is to prepare a passage route via point B (for example, pavement). In this case, if the gradient of the traffic route via the point B becomes tight, no optimization is possible. Therefore, the optimization proposing unit 337 extracts an area necessary for preparing a passage with a gentle slope from the information on the land environment around the point B, and the auxiliary passer SP passes relatively easily. Various data such as courses, gradients, distances, etc. of the traffic route via point B can be constructed, and optimization contents are proposed.

  As a result of the treatment according to the proposal contents, the auxiliary passerby SP can comfortably move to the use facility W via the point B.

  FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating the situation of the fifth case, and FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of optimization content proposed in the fifth case.

  As shown in FIG. 14, in the fifth example, in the traffic range to the use facility W, the verification unit 334 compares and compares the traffic history information between the non-auxiliary passer HP and the auxiliary passer SP corresponding to the pass range. As a result, the passage route of the non-auxiliary passer HP and the passage route of the auxiliary passer SP are the same up to the front of the use facility W, but the auxiliary passer SP does not enter the use facility W and takes different routes. ing. Therefore, it is determined that there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the pass of the auxiliary passer SP at the entrance of the use facility W, and the use facility W included in the map data is specified.

  In this case, as a result of specifying the use facility W on the map, the facility determination unit 336 searches the inside of the facility using data related to the use facility W (for example, the aspect of the facility entrance, the presence / absence of lifting equipment, etc.) As a result, it is determined that a staircase 404 that causes inconvenience for the passage of the auxiliary passer SP exists at the entrance of the use facility W as shown in FIG. Then, the optimization proposal unit 337 receives the determination result of the facility determination unit 336 and uses the attribute information and the traffic history information corresponding to the traffic range to the use facility W stored in the auxiliary passer-by database 343 as auxiliary traffic. The travel route and travel time to the user facility W of the user SP are acquired, and data relating to the user facility W stored in the map information database 344 is acquired. Then, a condition for optimizing the passage of the auxiliary passerby SP is derived from the acquired data and information.

  FIG. 15B is a conceptual diagram showing one of the optimization contents proposed according to the derived conditions. As shown in FIG. 15B, the optimization content is to change the entrance stairs 404 of the use facility W that causes inconvenience to the passage of the auxiliary passer SP to the slope 405. In this case, if the slope of the slope 405 becomes tight, no optimization can be performed. Therefore, the optimization proposing unit 337 extracts an area necessary for constructing the slope 405 having a gentle slope from the information on the use facility W, and the auxiliary passer SP can pass relatively easily. Various data such as the shape, slope, and distance of the slope 405 are constructed and the optimization content is proposed.

  As a result of the treatment in accordance with the content of the proposal, the auxiliary passerby SP can use the use facility W. In the above description, the slope 405 is provided at the facility entrance. However, in addition, for example, a proposal may be made in which an elevator or the like such as an elevator is installed in the use facility W. In addition to the above, for example, the entrance door of the use facility W is small or is a manual opening / closing door, etc., also causes the auxiliary passerby SP to change the route in front of the use facility W. In such a case, the entrance door may be replaced with a large door, or a manual opening / closing door may be proposed as an automatic opening / closing door.

  FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating the situation of the sixth case, and FIG. 17 is a diagram illustrating an example of optimization content proposed in the sixth case.

  As shown in FIG. 16, in the sixth case, in the same traffic range to the use facilities W1, W2, the verification history of the non-auxiliary passer HP and the auxiliary passer SP corresponding to the pass range by the matching unit 334 is shown. As a result of comparing and collating the information, the non-auxiliary passer HP uses the first use facility W1, while the auxiliary passer SP uses the second use facility W2 without going to the first use facility W1.

  In this case, as a result of specifying the section including the use facilities W1 and W2 on the map, the facility determination unit 336 searches the section using the map data, as shown in FIG. The traffic route to the first use facility W1 is determined to be difficult to move for the auxiliary passerby SP because of the heavy traffic (for example, due to the presence in a downtown area). Then, the optimization proposal unit 337 receives the determination result of the facility determination unit 336, from the attribute information corresponding to the traffic range to the use facilities W1 and W2 stored in the auxiliary passerby database 343 and the traffic history information. The travel route and travel time to the use facility W2 of the auxiliary passer SP are acquired, and the data related to the travel route to each use facility W1, W2 stored in the map information database 344, and the vicinity of the travel route Obtain information about the land environment. Then, a condition for optimizing the passage of the auxiliary passerby SP is derived from the acquired data and information.

  FIG. 17B is a conceptual diagram showing one of the optimization contents proposed according to the derived conditions. As shown in FIG. 17 (b), the optimization content is provided with a guide plate 406 (corresponding to a guide means) for guiding the auxiliary passerby SP to the second use facility W2 in the passage route to the first use facility W1. It is to do. The guide plate 406 displays, for example, “Please use the facility W2 because there are many predecessors”. As a result of the treatment according to the content of this proposal, the auxiliary passerby SP can smoothly move to the second use facility W2 without following the guidance of the guide plate 406 without accidentally heading to the first use facility W1. Become.

  As described above, the passer-related facility optimization proposing system TS in the above embodiment is a proposal for optimizing the pass for a pass-by facility (hereinafter referred to as a passer-related facility) used for passers-by. A passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS that performs pass-by based on a location information acquisition unit 331 (corresponding to location information acquisition means) that acquires location information of a passer-by and a cumulative result of the acquired location information The traffic history information acquiring unit 333 (corresponding to the traffic history information acquiring unit) that acquires the traffic history information of the user and the verification unit 334 (corresponding to the verification unit) for comparing and collating the traffic history information of a plurality of passers with the same traffic range ) And a facility determination unit 336 (corresponding to facility determination means) for determining whether there is a passer-related facility that needs to be optimized based on the comparison result, and there is a passer-related facility that needs to be optimized If it is determined that that includes an optimization proposal 337 proposing an optimized content (corresponding to the optimization proposals means), a.

  In the passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS having such a configuration, the location information acquisition unit 331 acquires location information of each passer who is an information acquisition target, and based on the accumulated result of the acquired location information, The passage history information of the passerby is acquired by the passage history information acquisition unit 333. Then, among the plurality of passers who have acquired the pass history information, the pass history information of passers who have the same pass range is compared and checked by the check unit 334, and the passer related information that needs to be optimized based on the comparison check result The facility determination unit 336 determines whether or not a facility exists. If it is determined that there is a passer-related facility that requires optimization, the optimization proposal unit 337 proposes the optimization content.

  As a result, by submitting the proposed optimization content to, for example, a predetermined organization (such as the civil engineering section of the municipal office), it is possible to improve passer-related facilities and optimize traffic Become. As a result, it is possible to fundamentally eliminate the inconvenience of the passerby due to the fact that the passer-related facilities are not optimized.

  The passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS in the above embodiment includes an attribute information acquisition unit 332 (corresponding to attribute information acquisition means) that acquires passer attribute information, and the collation unit 334 has attribute information content. Passage history information of the passer corresponding to the non-auxiliary passer HP and the pass history information of the passerby whose attribute information corresponds to the auxiliary passer SP are compared and collated, and the facility determination unit 336 displays the comparison check result. Based on this, it is determined whether there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the auxiliary passer-by SP, and the optimization proposing unit 337 determines that there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience. We propose optimization content to eliminate the problem.

  In this way, the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP and the passage route of the auxiliary passer SP are identified by comparing and comparing the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP and the passage history information of the auxiliary passer SP. If there is a difference from the location, it can be assumed that there is a passer-related facility that makes it difficult for the auxiliary passer-by SP to move in the specific location. The optimization proposal can be made.

  In the passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS in the above embodiment, the map information acquisition unit 335 (in the map information acquisition unit) acquires map data around the traffic route corresponding to the traffic history information compared and verified by the verification unit 334. The facility determination unit 336 determines whether there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the auxiliary passer SP based on the comparison result and the map data, and the optimization proposal unit 337 When it is determined that there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience, an optimization content for eliminating the inconvenience is proposed.

  Accordingly, when the facility determination unit 336 determines whether there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the auxiliary passer SP, the traffic included in the map data is referred to and searched by referring to the map data. It is possible to refer to information related to person-related facilities and information related to the land environment, and it is possible to suppress erroneous proposals and to make more accurate optimization proposals.

  In the passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS in the above embodiment, the collation unit 334 compares and collates the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP with the passage history information of the auxiliary passer SP. When the passage between the HP and the auxiliary passer SP is different from the point A, the facility determination unit 336 determines the step 401 as a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience at the point A based on the comparison result and the map information. It is determined that there is a passage facility or a passer-related facility, and the optimization proposal unit 337 makes an optimization proposal whose content is to improve the step 401.

  As a result, if there are passer-related facilities such as steps and stairs that make it difficult for the auxiliary passer-by to move, the auxiliary passer-by SP can use the facilities by improving the steps and stairs by using a slope. W can be used, and the passer-related facilities can be optimized.

  In the passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS in the above embodiment, the collation unit 334 compares and collates the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP with the passage history information of the auxiliary passer SP. When the HP traffic route and the auxiliary traffic SP's traffic route are different from the point A, the facility determination unit 336 uses the facility that the passer wants to use from the point A based on the comparison result and the map information. It is determined that the distance L to W is such a long distance that it is difficult for the auxiliary passerby to move, and the optimization proposing unit 337 makes an optimization proposal that includes changing the installation location of the use facility W. .

  Accordingly, when the distance from the point A to the use facility W is a long distance that is difficult for the auxiliary passer SP to move on the route to the use facility W, the use facility W is moved to a closer location. This makes it possible for the auxiliary passer-by SP to use and optimize the passer-related facilities.

  In the passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS in the above embodiment, the collation unit 334 compares the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP with the passage history information of the auxiliary passer SP. If the movement speed of the auxiliary passer SP is slower than that of the non-auxiliary passer HP but the movement speed of the auxiliary passer SP is equal to or higher than that of the non-auxiliary passer HP at the point A, the facility determination Based on the comparison result and the map information, the unit 336 determines that the point A is an intersection, and the lighting time of the green light of the pedestrian progress period 403 at the intersection is not long enough for the auxiliary passerby SP, The optimization proposal unit 337 makes an optimization proposal whose content is to increase the lighting time of the green light of the traffic light 403.

  Thereby, when the lighting speed of the green light of the pedestrian traffic light 403 is not sufficient for the auxiliary passer SP, the moving speed of the auxiliary passer SP at the intersection is equal to or higher than that of the non-auxiliary passer HP. By increasing the lighting time of the green light of the traffic light 403, it is not necessary for the auxiliary passer SP to rush forcibly at the intersection, thereby improving the convenience of passing the auxiliary passer SP and optimizing the passer-related facilities. be able to.

  In the passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS in the above embodiment, the collation unit 334 compares and collates the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP with the passage history information of the auxiliary passer SP. When the HP passage and the auxiliary passage SP's passage are different in the entire passage range, the facility determination unit 336 determines that the passage of the auxiliary passage SP has not been developed based on the comparison result and the map information. If it is determined that there is, the optimization proposing unit 337 makes an optimization proposal whose content is to prepare the undeveloped route.

  As a result, there is a route that is more convenient for the auxiliary passer SP than the route used by the non-auxiliary passer HP, but when the route is undeveloped, the auxiliary passerby can improve the route. It is possible to improve the convenience of SP traffic and to optimize passer-related facilities.

  In the passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS in the above embodiment, the collation unit 334 compares and collates the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP with the passage history information of the auxiliary passer SP. The passage of the HP and the auxiliary passer SP is the same up to the front of the use facility W. However, when the pass of the auxiliary passer SP does not enter the use facility W and takes a different route, the facility determination unit 336 Based on the comparison result and the map information, it is determined that there is an entrance stairs 404 (corresponding to a passer-related facility) as a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience in the use facility W, and the optimization proposal unit 337 An optimization proposal is made to improve the entrance stairs 404 in the use facility W.

  As a result, when there are passage facilities that are difficult to move for the auxiliary passer-by SP such as a manual opening / closing door and an entrance staircase 404 provided at the entrance of the facility, the use facility W itself used by the passerby automatically By improving the passage facility of the use facility W by using an opening / closing door or by making the entrance into a slope, it is possible to improve the convenience of passage of the auxiliary passer SP and to optimize the passage of the use facility W.

  In the passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS in the above embodiment, the collation unit 334 compares and collates the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer HP with the passage history information of the auxiliary passer SP. When the HP uses the first use facility W1, while the auxiliary passerby uses the second use facility W2 different from the first use facility W1, the facility determination unit 336 calculates the comparison result and the map information. Based on the above, it is determined that the route to the first use facility W1 is busy for the auxiliary passer SP, and the optimization proposing unit 337 sets the second passer SP on the pass route. An optimization proposal is made with the content of installing a guide plate 406 (corresponding to guide means) for guiding to the use facility W2.

  Thereby, after the installation of the guide plate 406, the auxiliary passer-by SP can be smoothly guided to the second use facility W2, the convenience of the auxiliary passer-by SP is improved, and the passer-related facilities are optimized. Can be achieved.

  In addition, this embodiment is not restricted above, A various deformation | transformation is possible within the range which does not deviate from the meaning and technical idea. Hereinafter, such modifications will be described in order. In addition, while using the same code | symbol about the structure and procedure same as embodiment mentioned above, the description is abbreviate | omitted suitably and it demonstrates centering on a different point from embodiment mentioned above.

(1) When automatically determining passer attributes In this modification, it is automatically determined whether a passer is a non-auxiliary passer HP or an auxiliary passer SP based on pass history information. It is a thing.

  FIG. 18 is a functional block diagram illustrating a functional configuration example of the control unit 330 of the server 300 in the present modification. In the example shown in FIG. 18, the server 300 uses the location information acquired by the location information acquisition unit 331 instead of the non-auxiliary passer-by database 342 and the auxiliary passer-by database 343, and the information is a non-assistant passer-by. Regardless of whether it is the HP or the auxiliary passer SP, it has a database 346 for storing everything. Then, instead of the attribute information acquisition unit 332, the control unit 330 determines whether the passer is a non-auxiliary passer HP or an auxiliary passer SP based on the pass history information (attribute determination unit 338). Equivalent).

  As an example of the determination criterion by the attribute determination unit 338, for example, the following can be cited. That is, the moving speed (including the average speed, the maximum speed, and the minimum speed) is small or large (if the speed is high, the non-auxiliary passer HP, and if the speed is low, the auxiliary passer SP), the type of route (not using a variety of routes) Auxiliary passer HP, Auxiliary passer SP when using a walking path exclusively), Diversity of behavior patterns (Non-Auxiliary passer HP when behavior patterns are diverse, Auxiliary passer SP when behavior patterns are constant) Etc.

  With this configuration, each component of the control unit 330 operates as follows. That is, the position information acquisition unit 331 acquires the position information of a passerby received from the mobile terminal 100 via the base station 200 and the network NW, and stores it in the database 346. In this database 346, position information is sequentially stored, and traffic history information created based on the accumulated result of the position information is stored as traffic history information. Then, the pass history information acquisition unit 333 acquires pass history information of passers with the same pass range (including non-auxiliary passers HP and auxiliary passers SP) from the database 346. The attribute determination unit 338 determines whether the passer is a non-auxiliary passer HP or an auxiliary passer SP, and the matching unit 334 uses the attribute determination unit 338 to determine whether the passer is a non-auxiliary passer HP. The pass history information of the passerby determined to be compared with the pass history information of the passerby determined to be the auxiliary passer SP. Thereafter, the facility determination unit 336 determines whether there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the auxiliary passer SP based on the comparison result and the map information. The optimization proposing unit 337 proposes optimization contents for eliminating inconvenience.

  FIG. 19 is a flowchart illustrating an example of control content executed by the control unit 330 of the server 300 in the present modification.

  Step S11 is the same as step S1 of FIG. 5 described above, and the position information acquisition unit 331 of the control unit 330 acquires the position information of the passerby received from the mobile terminal 100 via the base station 200 and the network NW. . In the next step S <b> 12, the position information acquisition unit 331 stores the acquired position information in the database 346. Thereafter, in step S <b> 13, the traffic history information acquisition unit 333 of the control unit 330 determines whether traffic history information in the same traffic range exists in the database 346. Then, when it is determined that it exists (step S13: YES), in step S14, the pass history information acquisition unit 333 of the control unit 330 searches the database 346 for passers of the same pass range (non-auxiliary passers HP and auxiliary Passage history information of the passerby SP) is acquired.

  Next, in step S15, the attribute determination unit 338 of the control unit 330 determines whether the passer is a non-auxiliary passer HP or an auxiliary passer SP based on the pass history information acquired in step S14.

  Next, in step S16, the collation unit 334 of the control unit 330 is the pass history information of passers who are determined to be non-auxiliary passers HP by the attribute determination unit 338 in step S15, and the auxiliary passer SP. The checked passer's traffic history information is compared and collated. The subsequent steps are the same as those in FIG.

  According to the passer-related facility optimization proposal system TS in the above modification, the same effect as that of the above-described embodiment can be obtained, and the attribute determination unit 338 determines whether the passer is a non-auxiliary passer HP or the auxiliary passer SP. Therefore, the attribute information of the passerby becomes unnecessary. Thereby, since the time for the passer-by to input his / her attribute information is saved, the convenience of the passer-by can be improved.

(2) When automatic updating of map information In this modification, it is determined that the passerby is taking an undeveloped route based on the traffic history information as in the case shown in FIGS. 12 and 13 described above. In this case, when the traffic route is not registered in the map data, the traffic route is automatically added to the map data.

  FIG. 20 is a functional block diagram illustrating a functional configuration example of the control unit 330 of the server 300 in the present modification. In the example shown in FIG. 20, when the control unit 330 determines that the passerby is taking an undeveloped passage route based on the passage history information, as in the case shown in FIGS. 12 and 13 described above, A map information update unit 339 (corresponding to a map information update unit) that updates the map information database 344 to add an unregistered route to the map data when the route is not registered in the map data; ing. Other configurations are the same as those in the above-described embodiment.

  According to the passer-related facility optimization proposing system TS in the above modification, when it is determined that there is a convenient route that is not registered in the map information but is convenient for the auxiliary passer SP, the route is selected. By additionally registering the map data, the map data can be updated to the latest information corresponding to the local situation. Further, according to this modification, for example, when a passerby carries a passer-by-passenger navigation device as a mobile terminal, by supplying map data from the updated map information database 344 to the navigation device, It is possible to provide accurate route guidance according to the local situation.

  In the above, the flowcharts shown in FIG. 5 and FIG. 19 do not limit the present invention to the procedure shown in the above flow, and the addition / deletion of the procedure or the order of the steps are within the scope not departing from the gist and technical idea of the invention. Changes may be made.

  In addition to those already described above, the methods according to the above-described embodiments and modifications may be used in appropriate combination.

  In addition, although not illustrated one by one, the present invention is implemented with various modifications within a range not departing from the gist thereof.

331 position information acquisition unit (corresponding to position information acquisition means)
332 attribute information acquisition unit (equivalent to attribute information acquisition means)
333 traffic history information acquisition unit (equivalent to traffic history information acquisition means)
334 Verification unit (equivalent to verification means)
335 Map information acquisition unit (equivalent to map information acquisition means)
336 Facility determination unit (equivalent to facility determination means)
337 Optimization Proposal Unit (equivalent to optimization proposal means)
338 attribute determination unit (equivalent to attribute determination means)
339 Map information update unit (equivalent to map information update means)
401 steps (equivalent to a traffic facility or a passer-related facility)
403 Traffic light (equivalent to a traffic facility or a passer-related facility)
404 entrance stairs (equivalent to passer-related facilities)
406 Guide plate (equivalent to guide means)
HP Non-assistant passers (equivalent to passers-by)
SP Auxiliary passers-by (equivalent to passers-by)
TS Passenger-related facility optimization proposal system W Use facility (equivalent to passer-related facility)
W1 first use facility (equivalent to passer-related facilities)
W2 Second use facility (equivalent to passer-related facilities)

Claims (11)

A passer-related facility optimization proposal system for making a proposal for optimizing a pass-through facility (hereinafter referred to as a passer-related facility) to be used for passers-by,
Position information acquisition means for acquiring position information of the passers;
Based on the accumulated result of the acquired position information, the travel history information acquisition means for acquiring the pass history information of the passer,
Collating means for comparing and collating the traffic history information of a plurality of the passers with the same traffic range;
Facility determination means for determining whether or not the passer-related facility requiring optimization exists based on the comparison result;
When it is determined that there is a passer-related facility that requires the optimization, optimization proposal means for proposing optimization content;
Passenger-related facility optimization proposal system characterized by having Attribute information acquisition means for acquiring attribute information of the passer-by,
The collating means compares and collates the traffic history information corresponding to a non-assistant passer with the attribute information and the traffic history information corresponding to an auxiliary passer and the attribute information.
The facility determination means determines whether or not the passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the auxiliary passer exists based on the comparison result.
The said optimization proposal means proposes the optimization content for eliminating the said inconvenience, when it determines with the passer-related facility where the said inconvenience arises. Passer-related facility optimization proposal system. Attribute determination means for determining whether the passer is a non-auxiliary passer or an auxiliary passer based on the pass history information;
The collation means compares and collates the pass history information of the passer determined to be a non-auxiliary passer and the pass history information of the passer determined to be an auxiliary passer,
The facility determination means determines whether or not the passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the auxiliary passer exists based on the comparison result.
The said optimization proposal means proposes the optimization content for eliminating the said inconvenience, when it determines with the passer-related facility where the said inconvenience arises. Passer-related facility optimization proposal system. Map information acquisition means for acquiring map information around the traffic route corresponding to the traffic history information compared and verified by the verification means;
The facility determination means determines whether or not there is a passer-related facility that causes inconvenience for the auxiliary passer, based on the comparison result and the map information.
The said optimization proposal means proposes the optimization content for eliminating the said inconvenience, when it determines with the passer-related facility where the said inconvenience arises. Passenger-related facility optimization proposal system described in any of the above. As a result of comparing and comparing the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer and the passage history information of the auxiliary passer by the collating means, the passage route of the non-auxiliary passer and the passage route of the auxiliary passer Is different from a specific location,
The facility determination means determines that there is a passer-related facility in which the inconvenience occurs in the specific place based on the comparison result and the map information,
5. The passer-related facility optimization proposal system according to claim 4, wherein the optimization proposal means performs an optimization proposal whose content is to improve the passer-related facility. As a result of comparing and comparing the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer and the passage history information of the auxiliary passer by the collating means, the passage route of the non-auxiliary passer and the passage route of the auxiliary passer Is different from a specific location,
The facility determination means, based on the comparison result and the map information, that the distance from the specific location to the use facility that the passer wants to use is a distance that is difficult for an auxiliary passer to move. Judgment,
5. The passer-related facility optimization proposal system according to claim 4, wherein the optimization proposal unit performs an optimization proposal whose content is to change the installation location of the use facility. As a result of comparing and comparing the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer and the passage history information of the auxiliary passer by the collating means, the movement speed of the auxiliary passer is determined to be the non-auxiliary passer except in a specific place. However, when the moving speed of the auxiliary passerby is equal to or higher than that of the non-auxiliary passerby in the specific place,
The facility determination means determines that the specific place is an intersection based on the comparison result and the map information, and the lighting time of the green light of the traffic light is not long enough for the auxiliary passerby,
5. The passer-related facility optimization proposal system according to claim 4, wherein the optimization proposal means makes an optimization proposal whose content is to increase a lighting time of a green light of the traffic light. As a result of comparing and comparing the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer and the passage history information of the auxiliary passer by the collating means, the passage route of the non-auxiliary passer and the passage route of the auxiliary passer Is different in the entire traffic range,
The facility determination means determines that the auxiliary passer's passage route is incomplete based on the comparison result and the map information,
5. The passer-related facility optimization proposal system according to claim 4, wherein the optimization proposal means makes an optimization proposal whose content is to prepare the undeveloped passage route. Map information updating means for updating the map information so as to add the undeveloped passage route to the map information when the facility determination means determines that the undeveloped passage route exists. The passer-related facility optimization proposal system according to claim 8, wherein the system is a passer-related facility optimization proposal system. As a result of comparing and comparing the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer and the passage history information of the auxiliary passer by the collating means, the passage route of the non-auxiliary passer and the auxiliary passer is in front of the use facility. However, if the auxiliary passer's passage route is different from the entrance facility,
The facility determination means determines that there is a passer-related facility in which the inconvenience occurs in the use facility based on the comparison result and the map information,
5. The passer-related facility optimization proposal system according to claim 4, wherein the optimization proposal means performs an optimization proposal that includes improving a passer-related facility in the use facility. As a result of comparing and comparing the passage history information of the non-auxiliary passer and the passage history information of the auxiliary passer by the checking means, the non-auxiliary passer uses the first use facility, whereas When an auxiliary passerby uses a second use facility different from the first use facility,
The facility determination means determines, based on the comparison and collation result and the map information, that the passage route to the first user facility is busy and difficult for the auxiliary passer-by,
5. The optimization proposal unit according to claim 4, wherein the optimization proposal unit performs an optimization proposal including setting a guide unit for guiding the auxiliary passerby to the second use facility on the traffic route. Passer-related facility optimization proposal system.

Images