JP2008201405A - Train inter-car structure for lower noise - Google Patents

Train inter-car structure for lower noise Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2008201405A
JP2008201405A JP2008011913A JP2008011913A JP2008201405A JP 2008201405 A JP2008201405 A JP 2008201405A JP 2008011913 A JP2008011913 A JP 2008011913A JP 2008011913 A JP2008011913 A JP 2008011913A JP 2008201405 A JP2008201405 A JP 2008201405A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
vehicle
holo
inter
roof
noise
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2008011913A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4929497B2 (en
Inventor
Makoto Toyooka
誠 豊岡
Hidemi Yatsuno
英美 八野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
West Japan Railway Co
Original Assignee
West Japan Railway Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by West Japan Railway Co filed Critical West Japan Railway Co
Priority to JP2008011913A priority Critical patent/JP4929497B2/en
Publication of JP2008201405A publication Critical patent/JP2008201405A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4929497B2 publication Critical patent/JP4929497B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a train structure in which the inter-car part is closed with an exterior tarpaulin member for reducing noise, capable of reducing the noise generated from the exterior tarpaulin member and lowering the installation height of electric appliances installed on the roof. <P>SOLUTION: The train inter-car structure for reducing noise is configured so that the outer surface position X of tarpaulin segments 3 to be installed between the facing car end faces 1a of railroad cars 1 is set inside the car surface Y and that the ridge edge part of each car end face is formed in a curved surface 2. For the current conditions with the Shinkansen train in which the inter-car part distance D is 300 to 500 mm and the running speed is approximately 300 km/h, the distance H from the car surface to the outer surface position of the tarpaulin segment 3 is set to H=30 to 90 mm and the radius of curvature R of the vertical section of the curved surface 2 is set to R=100 to 200 mm. In the case the exterior tarpaulin member has flat shape, in the roof region, the outer surface position of this flat tarpaulin is set inside (below) the car surface and the ridge edge part of the roof region of the car end face is formed in a curved surface. In the left and the right side-face region, the outer surface of the flat tarpaulin is put identical to the car surface. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、列車の車間部から発生する走行騒音を低減化するための技術に関し、特に、時速300km前後の高速走行車両へ適用する場合を想定する。   The present invention relates to a technique for reducing traveling noise generated from an inter-train portion of a train, and particularly assumes a case where the present invention is applied to a high-speed traveling vehicle having a speed of about 300 km / h.

[定義事項]
なお本願において「前・後・左・右」とは、特に断りのない限り、それぞれ車両の進行方向に対する前・後・左・右を指すものとする。
[Definition Items]
In the present application, “front / rear / left / right” refer to front / rear / left / right with respect to the traveling direction of the vehicle, respectively, unless otherwise specified.

複数車両を連結して構成される列車にあっては、車両と車両との間の車間部に存在する空隙(キャビティ)が、列車走行時の騒音の発生源となっていることが知られている。例えば図13(A)に示すような列車10にあっては、車両11,11間の車間部20に、車両表面から通路40を被覆する内ホロ30までの深さを持つキャビティが形成されており、同キャビティの大きさは、新幹線の場合、同図(B)において、左右側面11a領域の深さT1=約1075mm、屋根11b領域の深さT2=約300mm、同図(C)において、車両11,11端面間の車間部距離D=約500mmである。   In trains that are configured by connecting multiple vehicles, it is known that the air gaps (cavities) that exist in the space between the vehicles are the source of noise during train travel. Yes. For example, in the train 10 as shown in FIG. 13A, a cavity having a depth from the vehicle surface to the inner holo 30 covering the passage 40 is formed in the inter-vehicle portion 20 between the vehicles 11 and 11. In the case of the Shinkansen, the size of the cavity is the depth T1 of the left and right side surface 11a region is about 1075 mm, the depth T2 of the roof 11b region is about 300 mm, and in FIG. The inter-vehicle distance D between the end surfaces of the vehicles 11 and 11 is about 500 mm.

車間部から発生する騒音を低減化させる手段として、従来、次のような技術が提案されている。すなわち、図14(A)に示す如く、車間部20を表面が平滑な一体型の平滑ホロ50で閉塞する技術、同図(B)に示す如く、剛性と追従性とを向上させるため一体型ホロ部材をジャバラ状のホロ51に構成した技術、及び、同図(C)に示す如く、対向する車両端面11c,11cそれぞれに弾性を有する中空の分割ホロ52,52を装着し、この分割ホロ52,52の先端部を突き合わせることにより、車間部20のキャビティを閉塞する技術である。前記平滑ホロ50に属するものとしては特許文献1,2があり、ジャバラホロ51に関するものとしては特許文献3が在り、分割ホロ52に属するものとしては特許文献4が存在する。
特開2001−171517号公報 特開2004−268604号公報 特開平11−198805号公報 特開平08−133077号公報
Conventionally, the following techniques have been proposed as means for reducing noise generated from the inter-vehicle space. That is, as shown in FIG. 14 (A), a technique for closing the inter-vehicle portion 20 with an integrated smoothing holo 50 having a smooth surface, and as shown in FIG. 14 (B), an integrated type for improving rigidity and followability. As shown in FIG. 5C, the hollow member holo 52, 52 having elasticity is mounted on each of the vehicle end faces 11c, 11c facing each other as shown in FIG. This is a technique for closing the cavity of the inter-vehicle portion 20 by abutting the tip portions of 52 and 52. Patent Documents 1 and 2 relate to the smooth holo 50, Patent Document 3 relates to the bellows holo 51, and Patent Document 4 relates to the split holo 52.
JP 2001-171517 A JP 2004-268604 A JP-A-11-198805 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 08-133077

特許文献1又は2に記載の平滑ホロ(図14(A)参照)は、騒音抑制機能は優れているが、列車点検時に車両を分割する際、車両から取り外すか又は切断しなくてはならず、点検作業終了後に再び装着作業を行う必要がある。従って、メンテナンス性が悪いという欠点を持つ。また、屋根領域に電力供給用のケーブルヘッド等の電気機器が設置されている場合、この電気機器と平滑ホロとの間に所定の絶縁離隔を設ける必要がある。しかるに平滑ホロは、原則として、その外表面位置が車両表面と同一に設定されているため、ケーブルヘッド等の電気機器を屋根から高い位置に設置しなくてはならず、その結果、車両の断面積が大きくなるため、走行騒音を増大させる原因となっていた。   The smooth holo described in Patent Document 1 or 2 (see FIG. 14A) has an excellent noise suppression function, but must be removed from the vehicle or disconnected when dividing the vehicle during train inspection. It is necessary to perform the mounting work again after the inspection work is completed. Therefore, there is a drawback that the maintainability is poor. In addition, when an electrical device such as a power supply cable head is installed in the roof region, it is necessary to provide a predetermined insulation separation between the electrical device and the smooth holo. However, the smooth holo, as a rule, has the same outer surface as the vehicle surface, so electrical equipment such as cable heads must be installed at a high position from the roof. Since the area becomes large, it has been a cause of increasing running noise.

特許文献3に記載のジャバラホロ(図14(B)参照)は、前記平滑ホロに比して、剛性と追従性とを向上させたとされているが、表面が非平滑なため、平滑ホロより走行騒音が大きいという欠点を有している。   The bellows holo described in Patent Document 3 (see FIG. 14 (B)) is said to have improved rigidity and followability compared to the smooth holo, but the surface is non-smooth and therefore travels more than smooth holo. It has the disadvantage of loud noise.

他方、特許文献4に記載の分割ホロ(図14(C)参照)は、取り外すことなく列車点検時に車両分割を行えるが、突き合わせ部分に凹凸が形成され、この凹凸が列車走行時の騒音発生源となるという問題点を有している。   On the other hand, the divided holo described in Patent Document 4 (see FIG. 14C) can divide the vehicle at the time of train inspection without removing it, but the butt portion is uneven, and this unevenness is a noise generation source during train running. Has the problem of becoming.

本発明は、車間部間隙を閉塞する外側ホロ部材として、分割ホロ又はジャバラホロ等の表面が非平滑なホロを採用した場合に、その騒音レベルを平滑ホロと同レベル程度まで低減化することを第1の目的とする。また、屋根上の電気機器の設置高さを低くして、騒音レベルの低減化を図ることを第2の目的とする。   The present invention reduces the noise level to the same level as that of a smooth holo when a holo having a non-smooth surface such as a split holo or a bellows holo is adopted as an outer holo member that closes the gap between the vehicles. 1 purpose. A second object is to reduce the noise level by lowering the installation height of the electrical equipment on the roof.

前記第1の目的達成のために本発明が採用した車間部の低騒音化構造の特徴とするところは、請求項1に記載するとおり、列車における連結された車両と車両との対向する車両端面間に外側ホロ部材を装着して、連結車両間に形成される車間部の少なくとも左右側面領域を閉塞する構造であって、前記外側ホロ部材の外表面位置が車両表面よりも内方となるように設定し、且つ、車両端面の稜縁部を湾曲面に形成したことである。なお請求項1は、主として外側ホロ部材が、分割ホロやジャバラホロ等の表面が非平滑である場合を想定したものであるが、平滑ホロの場合にも適用することを妨げない。また、外側ホロ部材が閉塞する車間部の領域は、左右側面領域及び屋根領域全体とするのが望ましいが、左右側面領域と屋根領域の一部、又は、左右側面領域のみでも可能である。   According to the first aspect of the present invention, the low-noise structure of the inter-vehicle space adopted by the present invention is characterized in that, as described in claim 1, the vehicle end surfaces facing each other between the connected vehicles in the train An outer holo member is mounted in between, and at least the left and right side regions of the inter-vehicle portion formed between the connected vehicles are closed, and the outer surface position of the outer holo member is inward of the vehicle surface. And the ridge edge portion of the vehicle end surface is formed on a curved surface. Although claim 1 mainly assumes the case where the outer holo member has a non-smooth surface such as a divided holo or a bellows holo, it does not preclude application to a smooth holo. Further, it is desirable that the inter-vehicle region where the outer holo member is closed is the entire left and right side regions and the entire roof region, but the left and right side regions and part of the roof region or only the left and right side regions are also possible.

前記車両端面の稜縁部に形成する湾曲面については、時速300km前後で走行する現行新幹線車両を本発明の適用対象とする場合、請求項2に記載する如く、その垂直断面が曲率半径100〜200mmの円弧となる形態に形成すると、優れた効果が得られる。   As for the curved surface formed at the ridge edge portion of the vehicle end surface, when the present Shinkansen vehicle that travels at a speed of about 300 km / h is applied to the present invention, the vertical cross section has a radius of curvature of 100 to 100 as described in claim 2. When formed into a 200 mm arc shape, an excellent effect is obtained.

また実施の条件によっては、請求項3に記載する如く、前記車両の屋根領域と左右側面領域とで、稜縁部に形成する湾曲面の垂直断面形状を異ならせることも可能である。   Further, depending on the implementation conditions, as described in claim 3, the vertical cross-sectional shape of the curved surface formed at the ridge edge portion may be different between the roof region and the left and right side regions of the vehicle.

前記外側ホロ部材は、請求項4に記載するように、対向する車両端面にそれぞれ装着され、先端部を突き合わせるように構成された分割ホロとすることができる。あるいは、請求項5に記載するように、ジャバラホロとすることができる。   According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, the outer holo member may be a divided holo that is mounted on each of the opposing vehicle end faces and configured to abut on the tip. Alternatively, a bellows holo can be used as described in claim 5.

さらに、外側ホロ部材が分割ホロ又はジャバラホロのように表面が非平滑な場合は、請求項6に記載する如く、車間部距離が300〜500mmであるとき、外側ホロ部材の外表面位置を車両表面から30〜90mm内方に設定するのが望ましい。但し、車間部距離が300〜500mm以外の列車に本発明を適用する場合には、前記外側ホロ部材の外表面位置の設定範囲を、必要に応じ適宜変更することができる。また、左右領域と屋根領域とで、外側ホロ部材と車両表面との距離を変えることも妨げない。   Furthermore, when the outer holo member has a non-smooth surface such as a divided holo or a bellows holo, the outer surface position of the outer holo member is set to the vehicle surface when the inter-vehicle distance is 300 to 500 mm as described in claim 6. It is desirable to set 30 to 90 mm inward. However, when the present invention is applied to a train whose inter-vehicle distance is other than 300 to 500 mm, the setting range of the outer surface position of the outer holo member can be appropriately changed as necessary. Further, changing the distance between the outer holo member and the vehicle surface between the left and right regions and the roof region is not prevented.

なお、列車における連結された車両と車両との対向する車両端面間に外側ホロ部材を装着し、連結車両間に形成される車間部の屋根領域及び左右側面領域を外側ホロ部材で閉塞する構造において、前記外側ホロ部材を、車間部の屋根領域及び左右側面領域にわたり一体的に連続する平滑ホロとする場合は、請求項7に記載するように、当該平滑ホロの外表面位置を、屋根領域では車両表面よりも内方とし、側面領域では車両表面とほぼ一致するように設定し、且つ、屋根領域における車両端面の稜縁部を湾曲面に形成するのがよい。   In addition, in the structure where the outer holo member is mounted between the vehicle end surfaces facing each other in the train between the connected vehicles, and the roof region and the left and right side regions of the inter-vehicle portion formed between the connected vehicles are closed with the outer holo member. In the case where the outer holo member is a smooth holo that is integrally continuous over the roof area and the left and right side areas in the inter-vehicle area, the outer surface position of the smooth holo is defined in the roof area as described in claim 7. It is preferable to set the inner side of the vehicle surface to be substantially coincident with the vehicle surface in the side surface region, and to form the ridge edge portion of the vehicle end surface in the roof region on the curved surface.

本発明が、前記第2の目的達成のために採用した車間部の低騒音化構造の特徴とするところは、請求項8に記載するとおり、屋根領域における外側ホロ部材の外表面位置を車両表面よりも内方とすることにより、屋根上に設置される電気機器に対する絶縁離隔の基準位置が低下した分だけ、当該電気機器の最大高さを低減させたことである。   The present invention is characterized by the low-noise structure of the inter-vehicle space adopted to achieve the second object, as described in claim 8, wherein the outer surface position of the outer holo member in the roof region is the vehicle surface. By making the inner side more inward, the maximum height of the electric device is reduced by the amount by which the reference position of the insulation separation with respect to the electric device installed on the roof is lowered.

請求項1に記載した本発明に係る車間部の低騒音化構造は、基本的な機能として、車間部のキャビティを外側ホロ部材で閉塞するから、列車走行時に、キャビティの共鳴によって発生する騒音を防止する作用効果を持つ。本発明では、車両の少なくとも左右側面領域を閉塞するように設けた外側ホロ部材の外表面位置を、車両表面よりも内方となるように設定したので、車両走行時に生じる空気流(走行風)が、外側ホロ部材表面に対して影響を及ぼすことが少なくなる。つまり、外側ホロ部材をジャバラホロや分割ホロとした場合に、ジャバラホロの表面の凹凸や、分割ホロ先端部どうしの突き合わせ部分に形成される凹凸に衝突する空気流が少なくなる(あるいは、衝突速度が低下する)と考えられる。しかも、車両端面の稜縁部を湾曲面に形成したので、当該稜縁部における空気の剥離が抑えられる。これらの相乗作用の結果、ジャバラホロや分割ホロ等の表面が非平滑な外側ホロ部材を用いたときでも、列車走行時の騒音レベルを、平滑ホロを用いたのと同程度まで低下させることができる。なお、外側ホロ部材の外表面位置を車両表面よりも内方とすると同時に、車両端面の稜縁部を湾曲面に形成するという特徴的構成を採用する本発明は、分割ホロやジャバラホロに限定されず、これら以外の表面が非平滑な外側ホロ部材に対しても、また平滑ホロを採用する場合でも、有効に作用し得るものである。   As the basic function of the low-noise structure of the inter-vehicle section according to the first aspect of the present invention is to close the cavity of the inter-vehicle section with the outer holo member, noise generated by resonance of the cavity during train traveling is reduced. Has the effect of preventing. In the present invention, since the outer surface position of the outer holo member provided so as to close at least the left and right side regions of the vehicle is set to be inward of the vehicle surface, air flow (running wind) generated during vehicle travel However, it has less influence on the outer holo member surface. In other words, when the outer holo member is a bellows holo or a split holo, the airflow that collides with the unevenness on the surface of the bellows holo and the unevenness formed at the abutting part between the tip ends of the split holo decreases (or the collision speed decreases) Is considered). And since the ridge edge part of the vehicle end surface was formed in the curved surface, peeling of the air in the said ridge edge part is suppressed. As a result of these synergistic effects, even when using an outer holo member with a non-smooth surface such as bellows or split holo, the noise level during train travel can be reduced to the same level as when using a smooth holo. . The present invention that adopts a characteristic configuration in which the outer surface position of the outer holo member is inward of the vehicle surface and at the same time the ridge edge portion of the vehicle end surface is formed on a curved surface is limited to the divided holo and the bellows holo. In addition, it can effectively act on the outer holo member whose surface other than these is non-smooth and also when the smooth holo is adopted.

請求項2に記載する如く、車両端面の稜縁部に形成する湾曲面の形態を、その垂直断面が曲率半径100〜200mmの円弧となる形状に形成すれば、本発明の適用対象が現行新幹線の如く時速300km前後で走行する列車の場合、優れた騒音低減化効果を得ることができる。曲率半径が100mm未満では、空気流の剥離を抑えて騒音低減化効果を十分に発揮させるのが難しくなる。また曲率半径が200mmを越えると、空気流がキャビティ内方へ入り込んで外側ホロ部材表面との衝突量が増大し、ジャバラホロの表面凹凸や分割ホロの突き合わせ部凹凸等から騒音を発生させるおそれがある。なお、列車走行速度が時速300kmを越える場合等、本発明の適用条件が異なる場合は、採用される曲率半径の範囲も適宜変更することを妨げない。   If the shape of the curved surface formed on the ridge edge portion of the vehicle end surface is formed into a shape in which the vertical cross section is an arc having a curvature radius of 100 to 200 mm, the application target of the present invention is the current Shinkansen In the case of a train that travels at a speed of about 300 km / h as described above, an excellent noise reduction effect can be obtained. If the curvature radius is less than 100 mm, it is difficult to sufficiently exhibit the noise reduction effect by suppressing separation of the air flow. If the radius of curvature exceeds 200 mm, the air flow enters the inside of the cavity and the amount of collision with the surface of the outer holo member increases, and there is a risk of generating noise from the surface irregularities of the bellows holo or the concavities and convexities of the buttocks of the divided holo. . In addition, when the application conditions of this invention differ, such as when a train travel speed exceeds 300 km / h, it does not prevent changing the range of the curvature radius employ | adopted suitably.

本発明を実施するに際し、車両屋根部には集電装置等の様々な機器が設置されること、及び、屋根領域の稜線部から発生する騒音は、側面領域の騒音に比較して、沿線環境に及ぼす影響が小さいことを考慮すると、請求項3に記載の如く、車両の屋根領域と左右側面領域とで、稜縁部に形成する湾曲面の垂直断面形状を異ならせてもよい。これにより、本発明の適用条件が緩やかになるから、各種車両への実施が容易になる。例えば、屋根領域については、絶縁離隔の確保を優先させるため、断面形状を、側面領域とは曲率半径が異なる円弧としたり、あるいは、滑らかに連接された複数の円弧から形成された形態とすることが考えられる。   When carrying out the present invention, various devices such as current collectors are installed on the vehicle roof, and the noise generated from the ridgeline of the roof area is compared to the noise in the side area. Considering that the influence on the vehicle is small, the vertical cross-sectional shape of the curved surface formed at the ridge edge may be different between the roof region and the left and right side regions of the vehicle. Thereby, since the application condition of this invention becomes loose, implementation to various vehicles becomes easy. For example, for the roof area, in order to prioritize the securing of the insulation separation, the cross-sectional shape is an arc having a different radius of curvature from the side area, or a form formed from a plurality of smoothly connected arcs. Can be considered.

請求項4に記載する如く、外側ホロ部材を分割ホロとした場合は、容易に車両分割・連結ができ、メンテナンス性に優れる効果を発揮する。あるいは請求項5に記載する如く、外側ホロ部材をジャバラホロとした場合は、追従性と剛性とを向上させることができる。   As described in claim 4, when the outer holo member is a divided holo, the vehicle can be easily divided and connected, and the effect of excellent maintainability is exhibited. Alternatively, as described in claim 5, when the outer holo member is a bellows holo, followability and rigidity can be improved.

外側ホロ部材に、分割ホロやジャバラホロなどの非平滑ホロを用いた場合、請求項6に記載に記載するとおり、車間部距離が300〜500mmであるとき、前記外側ホロ部材の外表面位置を、車両表面から30〜90mm内方に設定する構成とすれば、現行新幹線の如く時速300kmで高速走行する列車に対し、きわめて効果の高い低騒音化構造を提供できる。車両表面から外側ホロ部材の外表面位置までの距離が30mm未満の場合は、列車走行時に空気流が非平滑な外側ホロ部材表面に衝突する割合が大きくなり、十分な騒音低減化効果が得られない可能性が有る。そこで上記距離は30mm以上とする。上記距離を90mm以内とすれば、車間部キャビティが比較的浅いから、共鳴音を発生させるおそれはない。なお、外側ホロ部材の外表面位置を車両表面から90mm以内の比較的浅い位置とすることにより、外側ホロ部材に転落防止機能を併せ持たせることができる。   When a non-smooth holo such as a divided holo or a bellows holo is used for the outer holo member, as described in claim 6, when the inter-vehicle distance is 300 to 500 mm, the outer surface position of the outer holo member is If the configuration is set to be 30 to 90 mm inward from the vehicle surface, it is possible to provide an extremely effective noise reduction structure for a train that travels at a high speed of 300 km / h like the current Shinkansen. When the distance from the vehicle surface to the outer surface position of the outer holo member is less than 30 mm, the ratio of the air flow colliding with the non-smooth outer holo member surface during train traveling increases, and a sufficient noise reduction effect is obtained. There is no possibility. Therefore, the distance is set to 30 mm or more. If the distance is within 90 mm, the inter-space cavity is relatively shallow, so there is no possibility of generating resonance. In addition, the outer holo member can be provided with a fall prevention function by setting the outer surface position of the outer holo member to a relatively shallow position within 90 mm from the vehicle surface.

請求項7に記載する如く、外側ホロ部材を車間部の屋根領域及び左右側面領域にわたり一体的に連続する平滑ホロとする場合において、側面領域については、当該平滑ホロの外表面位置を車両表面とほぼ一致するように設定すれば、車両表面より内方に設置する場合に比べて、優れた騒音低減化効果を発揮する。   According to a seventh aspect of the present invention, when the outer holo member is a smooth holo that is integrally continuous over the roof area and the left and right side areas of the inter-vehicle area, the outer surface position of the smooth holo is the vehicle surface. If they are set so as to be approximately the same, an excellent noise reduction effect can be achieved as compared with the case where they are installed inward from the vehicle surface.

さらに本発明に係る車間部構造は、外側ホロ部材が分割ホロやジャバラホロなどの非平滑ホロの場合でも平滑ホロの場合であっても、請求項8に記載する如く、屋根領域における外側ホロ部材の外表面位置を車両表面よりも内方とすることにより、屋根上に設置される電気機器に対する絶縁離隔の基準位置が低下した分だけ、当該電気機器の最大高さを低減させることを可能にした。その結果、ケーブルヘッド等電気機器の断面積が縮小されるので、ケーブルヘッド等電気機器に由来する空力音が低下し、列車走行時の騒音低減化及び沿線環境に及ぼす悪影響の緩和に寄与する。   Further, the inter-vehicle structure according to the present invention is such that the outer holo member is a non-smooth holo such as a divided holo or a bellows holo or a smooth holo, as described in claim 8. By making the outer surface position inward from the vehicle surface, it is possible to reduce the maximum height of the electric device by the amount that the reference position of the insulation separation with respect to the electric device installed on the roof is lowered. . As a result, since the cross-sectional area of the electric device such as the cable head is reduced, the aerodynamic noise derived from the electric device such as the cable head is reduced, which contributes to noise reduction during traveling of the train and mitigation of an adverse effect on the railroad environment.

[第1の実施形態]
図1は、新幹線車両の車間部に本発明に係る低騒音化構造を適用した一実施形態を示すものであって、外側ホロ部材を分割ホロ3,3とした場合であり、同図(A)は車間部Gの要部の構造を概略的に示す平面断面図、同図(B)は、一方の車両端面1aを示す概略正面図である。図示の如く、連結された車両1,1それぞれの前後に対向している車両端面1a,1aにおける、車両1の台車部分及び底面部を除く、少なくとも左右側面領域1b及び屋根領域1cの稜縁部に沿って、車両表面Yよりも内方に分割ホロ3,3を装着する。また、車両端面1a,1aそれぞれの稜縁部における、少なくとも左右側面領域1b及び屋根領域1cには、その垂直断面が円弧状となる湾曲面2,2を形成する。
[First Embodiment]
FIG. 1 shows an embodiment in which the noise reduction structure according to the present invention is applied to an inter-vehicle portion of a Shinkansen vehicle, and the outer holo member is divided into holo members 3 and 3. ) Is a plan sectional view schematically showing the structure of the main part of the inter-vehicle part G, and FIG. 5B is a schematic front view showing one vehicle end face 1a. As shown in the drawing, at the vehicle end surfaces 1a and 1a facing the front and rear of the connected vehicles 1 and 1, respectively, at least the left and right side surface regions 1b and the ridge edges of the roof region 1c excluding the carriage portion and the bottom surface portion. Are attached to the inner side of the vehicle surface Y. Further, at least the left and right side surface regions 1b and the roof region 1c at the ridge edges of the vehicle end surfaces 1a and 1a are formed with curved surfaces 2 and 2 whose vertical sections are arcuate.

前記湾曲面2は、車両1の表面から滑らかに連続するように形成する。また、適用対象が新幹線であり、車間部Gの間隔Dが500mmの場合、湾曲面2の曲率半径R=100〜200mmの範囲で設定するのが望ましい。ところで、湾曲面2の形成可能な車両端面1aからの距離範囲Sは、車両1に設けられる扉4等の構造物との関係で制限される。例えば700系新幹線の場合、車両端面1aに最も近い側引き戸の位置は、車両端面1aから160mmであるから、これがSの最大値となる。S=160mmで、後述するように湾曲面2の末端位置(図1(A)に破線で図示)の車両表面からの距離h=30mmとする場合に、湾曲面2の曲率半径Rが最大となり、設計上はR=約280mmまで可能である。つまり現行車両では、湾曲面2の曲率半径Rを原則として100〜200mmとするが、車間部間隔Dの値や車体構成に変化が有った場合には、採用し得る曲率半径Rの数値範囲をR=280mmまでの範囲で変更することを妨げない。さらに、扉4等の車端からの距離Sが変われば、それに応じて、採用可能な曲率半径の最大値も変化する。このような設計上の条件を考慮して、最適な曲率半径を採用すればよい。   The curved surface 2 is formed so as to continue smoothly from the surface of the vehicle 1. In addition, when the application target is a Shinkansen and the distance D between the inter-vehicle portions G is 500 mm, it is desirable to set the curvature radius R of the curved surface 2 in the range of 100 to 200 mm. By the way, the distance range S from the vehicle end surface 1a in which the curved surface 2 can be formed is limited by the relationship with a structure such as the door 4 provided in the vehicle 1. For example, in the case of the 700 series Shinkansen, the position of the side sliding door closest to the vehicle end surface 1a is 160 mm from the vehicle end surface 1a, so this is the maximum value of S. When S = 160 mm and the distance h from the vehicle surface of the end surface of the curved surface 2 (shown by a broken line in FIG. 1A) is 30 mm as will be described later, the radius of curvature R of the curved surface 2 becomes the maximum. In design, R = about 280 mm is possible. That is, in the current vehicle, the curvature radius R of the curved surface 2 is set to 100 to 200 mm in principle. However, if there is a change in the inter-vehicle distance D or the vehicle body configuration, the numerical range of the curvature radius R that can be adopted. Can be changed within a range up to R = 280 mm. Further, if the distance S from the vehicle end such as the door 4 changes, the maximum value of the radius of curvature that can be adopted also changes accordingly. In consideration of such design conditions, an optimal radius of curvature may be employed.

ところで、湾曲面2の形態は、車両1の左右側面領域1bと屋根領域1cとで異ならせることもできる。具体的には、異なる曲率半径Rを採用したり、あるいは、図2に例示する如く、異なる曲率半径R1,R2を有する2つの円弧2a,2b、又は、それ以上の個数の曲率半径の異なる円弧を滑らかに連接した形態の湾曲面2を採用することが考えられる。   By the way, the form of the curved surface 2 can also be made different between the left and right side surface regions 1b and the roof region 1c of the vehicle 1. Specifically, different curvature radii R are adopted, or, as illustrated in FIG. 2, two arcs 2a, 2b having different curvature radii R1, R2 or more arcs having different curvature radii. It is conceivable to adopt the curved surface 2 in a form in which the two are smoothly connected.

分割ホロ3の形態及び材質については、従来と共通のものを使用することができる。すなわち、ゴム・合成ゴム・プラスチック等の弾性と耐摩耗性とを有し経年変化の少ない材質から成り、その断面は図示するような概略U字状の中空体である。車両端面1aにはボルト等で装着される。本発明では、図1(A)に示すように、分割ホロ3の装着位置を、その外表面位置Xが、車両表面位置Yよりも内方となるように設定したところを特色としている。車両表面から分割ホロ3の外表面までの距離Hは、現行新幹線の場合、H=30〜90mmとする。30mm未満では、分割ホロ3,3に走行風が衝突して突き合わせ部3aの凹凸から発生する騒音レベルが高くなる可能性があるので、h≧30mmとする。他方、H≦90mmに設定することにより、キャビティの共鳴音を抑えられると共に、分割ホロ3,3に車間部Gへの転落防止機能を持たせることができる。なお、湾曲面2の曲率半径R=100〜200mmである場合において、分割ホロ3の外表面位置を上記のとおり車両表面からH=30〜90mmとすると、分割ホロ3の取付位置は湾曲面2の円弧途中となる。つまり、湾曲面2の垂直断面は、4分の1円に満たない円弧となっている。   About the form and material of the division | segmentation holo 3, the same thing as before can be used. That is, it is made of a material having elasticity and wear resistance, such as rubber, synthetic rubber, plastic, and the like, and its cross section is a substantially U-shaped hollow body as shown in the drawing. The vehicle end surface 1a is attached with a bolt or the like. As shown in FIG. 1A, the present invention is characterized in that the mounting position of the divided holo 3 is set so that the outer surface position X is inward of the vehicle surface position Y. The distance H from the vehicle surface to the outer surface of the divided holo 3 is H = 30 to 90 mm in the case of the current Shinkansen. If it is less than 30 mm, the traveling wind may collide with the divided holos 3 and 3 and the noise level generated from the unevenness of the butted portion 3a may increase, so h ≧ 30 mm. On the other hand, by setting H ≦ 90 mm, the resonance sound of the cavity can be suppressed, and the divided holographic hogs 3 and 3 can be provided with a function of preventing falling to the inter-vehicle space G. When the radius of curvature R of the curved surface 2 is 100 to 200 mm and the outer surface position of the divided holo 3 is H = 30 to 90 mm from the vehicle surface as described above, the mounting position of the divided holo 3 is the curved surface 2. In the middle of the arc. That is, the vertical cross section of the curved surface 2 is an arc less than a quarter circle.

また、列車が線路曲線部を通過する際やポイントを通過する際に車間偏倚が生じるが、分割ホロ3,3の装着位置が車両表面から90mm以内であれば、突き合わせ部3aにおいて偏倚により生じる凹凸段差は30mm以下であり、許容範囲と考えられる。   In addition, when the train passes through the track curve part or when passing through the point, an inter-vehicle deviation occurs. If the mounting position of the divided horo 3 and 3 is within 90 mm from the vehicle surface, the unevenness caused by the deviation in the abutting part 3a. The level difference is 30 mm or less, which is considered to be an allowable range.

上記のように、本発明によれば、分割ホロ3,3の装着位置を車両表面よりも内方とする結果、図3に例示する如く、車両屋根1cに電力供給用のケーブルヘッド5,5等の電気機器が設けられている場合に、絶縁離隔を確保するのに必要なケーブルヘッド5,5の最大高さを、従来と比較して低くすることが可能である。すなわち従来、平滑ホロを使用する場合、その外表面が車両表面と面一となるように装着されるため、それだけケーブルヘッド5,5を高くする必要があった。これに対し本発明は、分割ホロ3,3の装着位置が従来より低くなるから、それだけケーブルヘッド5,5の高さを低くでき、その結果、ケーブルヘッド5,5の断面積が縮小するから、ケーブルヘッド5,5に由来する騒音の低減化がもたらされるという効果を発揮する。   As described above, according to the present invention, as a result of setting the mounting position of the divided horo 3 and 3 inward from the vehicle surface, as illustrated in FIG. 3, the cable heads 5 and 5 for supplying power to the vehicle roof 1c When the electrical equipment such as the above is provided, the maximum height of the cable heads 5 and 5 necessary for securing the insulation separation can be reduced as compared with the conventional case. That is, conventionally, when a smooth holo is used, it is necessary to make the cable heads 5 and 5 higher because the outer surface is mounted so as to be flush with the vehicle surface. On the other hand, according to the present invention, since the mounting position of the divided holo 3 and 3 is lower than the conventional position, the height of the cable heads 5 and 5 can be reduced accordingly, and as a result, the cross-sectional area of the cable heads 5 and 5 is reduced. The effect of reducing noise derived from the cable heads 5 and 5 is exhibited.

なお本例は、外側ホロ部材として分割ホロ3,3を用いた場合について述べたものであるが、ジャバラホロによる低騒音化構造に本発明を適用しても、同様の効果を得ることが可能である。すなわち本発明は、非平滑な表面形態を有する外側ホロ部材に対し、有効に機能する。   In this example, the case where the divided horo 3 and 3 are used as the outer holo member is described. However, even if the present invention is applied to the noise reduction structure by the bellows holo, the same effect can be obtained. is there. That is, the present invention functions effectively for the outer holo member having a non-smooth surface form.

[第2の実施形態]
図4は、外側ホロ部材を平滑ホロ6とした場合の本発明に係る車間部の低騒音化構造の一実施形態を示すものであり、図(A)は要部の側面図、図(B)は車端部の正面図である。車間部Gを閉塞する平滑ホロ6は、従来、車間部の左右領域及び屋根領域を一体的且つ連続的に閉塞するものであって、その外表面位置が全周にわたり車両1表面と一致するよう設定されている。これに対し本例は、図(B)に示す如く、車両1の屋根領域1cについて、平滑ホロ6の外表面位置を車両表面(屋根)よりも内方となるように設定すると共に、車両端面1aの稜縁部を湾曲面2に形成したところを特色とする。なお、車両1の左右側面領域1b、1bについては、従来と同様に、平滑ホロ6の外表面を車両表面に一致させるものとする。
[Second Embodiment]
FIG. 4 shows an embodiment of a noise reduction structure for an inter-vehicle portion according to the present invention when the outer holo member is a smooth holo 6, and FIG. 4 (A) is a side view of the main part, FIG. ) Is a front view of the vehicle end. The smooth holo 6 that closes the inter-vehicle portion G conventionally closes the left and right regions and the roof region of the inter-vehicle portion integrally and continuously, and the outer surface position coincides with the surface of the vehicle 1 over the entire circumference. Is set. On the other hand, in this example, as shown in FIG. (B), for the roof region 1c of the vehicle 1, the outer surface position of the smooth holo 6 is set to be inward of the vehicle surface (roof), and the vehicle end surface The feature is that the ridge edge 1a is formed on the curved surface 2. In addition, about the left-right side surface area | region 1b, 1b of the vehicle 1, the outer surface of the smooth holo 6 shall be made to correspond with the vehicle surface similarly to the past.

本実施形態を現行新幹線へ適用することを想定した場合、車間部距離D=500mmに対し、車両表面(屋根)から外表面までの距離H=100〜200mm、湾曲面2の曲率半径R=100〜200mmの範囲で設定することが望ましい。但し、これらの数値は、車体構成等の変化に応じて、適宜変更することを妨げるものではない。   Assuming that the present embodiment is applied to the current Shinkansen, the distance H from the vehicle surface (roof) to the outer surface H = 100 to 200 mm and the curvature radius R = 100 of the curved surface 2 with respect to the inter-vehicle distance D = 500 mm. It is desirable to set in the range of ~ 200 mm. However, these numerical values do not preclude changing as appropriate according to changes in the vehicle body configuration or the like.

図4(A)に示す如く、屋根上にケーブルヘッド5,5等の電気機器が設置されている場合、本例の如く、屋根領域1cにおける平滑ホロ6の外表面位置を車両表面よりも内方に設定することによって、すなわち平滑ホロ6の高さ位置を従来よりも低くすることにより、絶縁離隔を確保するうえで必要とされるケーブルヘッド5等電気機器の最大高さを従来より引き下げることが可能となる。その結果、ケーブルヘッド5等電気機器が縮小されるので、ケーブルヘッド5等電気機器に由来する空力音が低下し、列車走行時の騒音が低減化し、沿線環境に及ぼす悪影響を緩和できる効果が発揮される。   As shown in FIG. 4 (A), when an electrical device such as cable heads 5 and 5 is installed on the roof, the outer surface position of the smooth holo 6 in the roof region 1c is located on the inside of the vehicle surface as in this example. By lowering the height position of the smooth holo 6 from the conventional level, the maximum height of the electrical equipment such as the cable head 5 required for securing the insulation separation can be lowered. Is possible. As a result, since the electrical equipment such as the cable head 5 is reduced, the aerodynamic sound derived from the electrical equipment such as the cable head 5 is reduced, the noise during traveling of the train is reduced, and the adverse effect on the railway environment can be reduced. Is done.

(試験1)
本発明の効果を確認するため、8分の1縮尺模型を用いて、風洞試験を行った。本試験1は、前記第1の実施形態に対応し、外側ホロ部材として分割ホロを用いた場合のものである。模型の外形寸法、模型の設置状況、外側ホロ部材(分割ホロ)の装着位置、及び、騒音測定用の無指向性マイクロフォンM1の配置は、図5の(A)〜(C)に示す通りである(図中の数値の単位はmm)。すなわち、模型は全長4445mm幅420mm高さ435mmであって、先端から3585mmの位置に、間隔寸法が62.5mmの車間部を形成してある。車間部に設ける外側ホロ部材の車両表面からの距離Hは、屋根領域及び左右側面領域では0〜11.25mmの範囲で変化させ、底部領域では116.25mmとした。模型と風洞との距離は700mmとし、風速は時速300kmである。そして、無指向性マイクロフォンM1を、車両先端から3750mm、車両を幅方向に二分割する中心線から側方へ3125mm、且つ、車体底面と同じ高さに配置した。
(Test 1)
In order to confirm the effect of the present invention, a wind tunnel test was conducted using an 1/8 scale model. The test 1 corresponds to the first embodiment and uses a split holo as the outer holo member. The external dimensions of the model, the installation status of the model, the mounting position of the outer holo member (divided holo), and the arrangement of the omnidirectional microphone M1 for noise measurement are as shown in FIGS. 5 (A) to (C). Yes (the unit of numerical values in the figure is mm) That is, the model has a total length of 4445 mm, a width of 420 mm, and a height of 435 mm, and an inter-vehicle portion having a spacing dimension of 62.5 mm is formed at a position 3585 mm from the tip. The distance H from the vehicle surface of the outer holo member provided in the space between the vehicles was changed in the range of 0 to 11.25 mm in the roof region and the left and right side regions, and was 116.25 mm in the bottom region. The distance between the model and the wind tunnel is 700 mm, and the wind speed is 300 km / h. The omnidirectional microphone M1 was arranged 3750 mm from the front end of the vehicle, 3125 mm laterally from the center line dividing the vehicle in the width direction, and at the same height as the bottom of the vehicle body.

試験は、図6(A)〜(C)に示す如く、車両1表面から分割ホロ3までの距離H(単位mm)を変化させた場合、及び、同図(D)〜(F)に示す如く、車両1の稜縁部に形成する湾曲面2の曲率半径R(単位mm)を変化させた場合とを適宜組み合わせて、それぞれの騒音レベル(単位dB)を測定した。測定結果の実車換算した数値を図7に示す。   As shown in FIGS. 6 (A) to 6 (C), the test is performed when the distance H (unit: mm) from the surface of the vehicle 1 to the divided holo 3 is changed, and as shown in FIGS. 6 (D) to (F). Thus, each noise level (unit dB) was measured by appropriately combining the case where the curvature radius R (unit mm) of the curved surface 2 formed on the ridge edge of the vehicle 1 was changed. FIG. 7 shows numerical values obtained by converting the measurement results into actual vehicles.

図7の表より、分割ホロを車両表面と一致するように装着した従来の状態(H=0,R=0)と比較して、距離H=30〜90mm、曲率半径R=100〜200mmの範囲に設定すると、有意な騒音低減化効果がもたらされることが分かる。   From the table of FIG. 7, the distance H = 30 to 90 mm and the radius of curvature R = 100 to 200 mm compared with the conventional state (H = 0, R = 0) in which the divided holo is mounted so as to coincide with the vehicle surface. It can be seen that when the range is set, a significant noise reduction effect is brought about.

(試験2)
本試験は、前記第2の実施形態に対応するものである、すなわち、外側ホロ部材として一体型の平滑ホロを使用し、屋根領域についてのみ平滑ホロの外表面位置を車両表面(屋根)よりも内方となるように設定し、左右側面領域については、平滑ホロの外表面を車両表面に一致させる場合について、試験1と同じ8分の1縮尺模型を用い、同じ条件下で風洞試験を行った。測定結果の実車換算した数値を図8に示す(単位dB)。なお、図8の表中、H=1075mmは、車間部のキャビティを外側ホロ部材で覆わない状態に相当する。
(Test 2)
This test corresponds to the second embodiment, that is, using an integrated smoothing holo as an outer holo member, and the outer surface position of the smoothing holo is set to be higher than the vehicle surface (roof) only for the roof region. In the case where the outer surface of the smooth holo is made to coincide with the vehicle surface, the wind tunnel test was performed under the same conditions using the same 1/8 scale model as in Test 1. It was. Numerical values of the measurement results converted into actual vehicles are shown in FIG. 8 (unit dB). In the table of FIG. 8, H = 1075 mm corresponds to a state in which the cavity in the inter-vehicle portion is not covered with the outer holo member.

図8の表より、平滑ホロの場合、その外表面を車両表面と一致するように装着した状態(H=0,R=0)の時、最も優れた騒音低減化効果を発揮すると考えられるが、距離H=100〜200mm、曲率半径R=100〜200mmの範囲に設定することにより、車両表面と一致させた状態(H=0,R=0)のときと比べて全く遜色のない騒音低減化効果が得られることが分かる。従って、本発明を採用することにより、外側ホロ部材として平滑ホロを用いる場合において、車両屋根領域について、平滑ホロの高さ位置を車両表面(屋根)より低く設定しても、騒音の増大を抑制できることが理解される。   From the table of FIG. 8, in the case of the smooth holo, it is considered that the most excellent noise reduction effect is exhibited when the outer surface is mounted so as to coincide with the vehicle surface (H = 0, R = 0). By setting the distance H = 100 to 200 mm and the radius of curvature R = 100 to 200 mm, the noise reduction is completely inferior to that in the state of matching with the vehicle surface (H = 0, R = 0). It can be seen that the effect is achieved. Therefore, by adopting the present invention, when a smooth holo is used as the outer holo member, an increase in noise is suppressed even if the height position of the smooth holo is set lower than the vehicle surface (roof) for the vehicle roof region. It is understood that it can be done.

(試験3)
外側ホロ部材として一体型のジャバラホロを使用した場合について、試験1と同じ8分の1縮尺模型を用い、同じ試験条件下で風洞試験を行った。測定結果の実車換算した数値を図9に示す(単位dB)。図9の表より、ジャバラホロの如く表面が非平滑な外側ホロ部材についても、本発明を適用して、外表面を車両内方に設定し、且つ、車両端面の稜縁部に湾曲面を形成することにより(H=60mm、R=100mm)、外表面を車両表面と一致するように装着した状態(H=0,R=0)と比べて優れた騒音低減化効果を発揮することが理解される。
(Test 3)
When an integrated bellows holo was used as the outer holo member, a wind tunnel test was performed under the same test conditions using the same 1/8 scale model as in Test 1. The numerical value of the measurement result converted into an actual vehicle is shown in FIG. 9 (unit dB). From the table of FIG. 9, the present invention is applied to the outer holo member having a non-smooth surface such as a bellows holo, the outer surface is set inward of the vehicle, and a curved surface is formed at the edge of the vehicle end surface. (H = 60mm, R = 100mm), it is understood that the noise reduction effect that is superior to the state (H = 0, R = 0) in which the outer surface is matched with the vehicle surface is demonstrated. Is done.

(試験4)
本発明を実車(新幹線車両)に適用して、走行時に車間部から発生する騒音レベルを測定する試験を行った。この試験は、外側ホロ部材を平滑ホロとし、その外表面位置を車両表面より内方に設定すると共に、車両稜縁部に湾曲面を形成したものである。本例では、車間部の左右領域及び屋根領域の両方において、平滑ホロの外表面を車両表面より内側に設定した。また湾曲面は、車両端面の稜縁部に断面円弧状のアタッチメントを取着することにより形成した。車両表面から分割ホロまでの距離H=90mm、湾曲面の曲率半径R=100mmである。なお車間部距離はアタッチメント間の間隙距離となり、車間距離D=300mmである。比較対象は、外表面位置を車両表面に一致させて装着した分割ホロである。騒音測定は、異なる3個所で行い、レールの幅方向中間位置から側方へ25mに配置した超指向性マイクにより行い、騒音レベルのピーク値を検出することとした。測定結果を図10に示す。
(Test 4)
The present invention was applied to an actual vehicle (Shinkansen vehicle), and a test was performed to measure the noise level generated from the inter-vehicle area during traveling. In this test, the outer holo member is a smooth holo, its outer surface position is set inward from the vehicle surface, and a curved surface is formed at the ridge edge of the vehicle. In this example, the outer surface of the smooth holo is set on the inner side of the vehicle surface in both the left and right regions and the roof region of the inter-vehicle space. The curved surface was formed by attaching an attachment having an arc cross section to the ridge edge of the vehicle end surface. The distance H from the vehicle surface to the divided holo is 90 mm, and the curvature radius of the curved surface is R = 100 mm. The inter-vehicle distance is the gap distance between attachments, and the inter-vehicle distance D = 300 mm. The comparison target is a divided holo mounted with its outer surface position aligned with the vehicle surface. The noise measurement was performed at three different locations, and was performed with a super-directional microphone arranged 25 m laterally from the intermediate position in the width direction of the rail, and the peak value of the noise level was detected. The measurement results are shown in FIG.

図10の表から、平滑ホロを車両表面より内方に設置すると共に、車両稜縁部に湾曲面を形成した本発明構造は、騒音レベルのピーク値を低くできることが分かる。すなわち騒音低減化に有効である。なお本発明構造は、屋根領域で外側ホロ部材の高さ位置が低くなるから、電気機器の設置高さを低減できる利点を有している。   From the table of FIG. 10, it can be seen that the structure of the present invention in which the smooth holo is installed inward from the vehicle surface and the curved surface is formed at the ridge edge of the vehicle can reduce the peak value of the noise level. That is, it is effective for noise reduction. In addition, since the height position of an outer side holo member becomes low in a roof area | region, this invention structure has the advantage which can reduce the installation height of an electric equipment.

(試験5)
次に、試験4の平滑ホロに代え、外側ホロ部材を分割ホロとした本発明構造を実車(新幹線車両)に適用して、走行時の騒音レベルを測定する試験を行った。分割ホロの外表面位置は、車間部の左右領域及び屋根領域において、車両表面より内方に設定する。また当試験でも、車両稜縁部の湾曲面は、車両端面の稜縁部に断面円弧状のアタッチメントを取着することにより形成した。車両表面から分割ホロまでの距離H=90mm、車両の稜縁部に形成する湾曲面の曲率半径R=100mm、車間距離(アタッチメントの間隙距離)D=300mmである。比較対象は、外表面位置を車両表面に一致させて装着した平滑ホロである。騒音測定は、試験4と同様に、異なる3個所で行い、線路の幅方向中間位置から側方へ25mに配置した超指向性マイクにより、騒音レベルのピーク値を検出することとした。測定結果を図11に示す。
(Test 5)
Next, in place of the smooth holo in Test 4, the structure of the present invention in which the outer holo member was a divided holo was applied to an actual vehicle (Shinkansen vehicle), and a test for measuring the noise level during running was performed. The outer surface position of the divided holo is set inward from the vehicle surface in the left and right regions and the roof region of the inter-vehicle space. Also in this test, the curved surface of the ridge edge of the vehicle was formed by attaching an attachment having an arc cross section to the ridge edge of the vehicle end surface. The distance H from the vehicle surface to the divided holo is 90 mm, the radius of curvature R of the curved surface formed at the ridge edge of the vehicle is 100 mm, and the inter-vehicle distance (attachment gap distance) is D = 300 mm. The comparison object is a smooth holo mounted with its outer surface position matched to the vehicle surface. As in Test 4, noise measurement was performed at three different locations, and the peak value of the noise level was detected by a super-directional microphone arranged 25 m laterally from the intermediate position in the width direction of the line. The measurement results are shown in FIG.

図11の表より、比較例と本発明例とは、測定値に大差のないことが分かる。平滑ホロを車両表面と一致するように装着した比較例は、騒音レベルの低減化に非常に有効と考えられているので、本発明例もまた低騒音化に有効な構造であると認められる。しかも本発明は、分割ホロであるから車両のメンテナンスが容易である。さらに、屋根領域では分割ホロの高さ位置が低くなるから、電気機器の設置高さを低減できるという利点を有している。   From the table of FIG. 11, it can be seen that there is no great difference in measured values between the comparative example and the inventive example. Since the comparative example in which the smooth holo is mounted so as to coincide with the vehicle surface is considered to be very effective in reducing the noise level, the example of the present invention is also recognized as an effective structure for reducing noise. Moreover, since the present invention is a divided holo, maintenance of the vehicle is easy. Furthermore, since the height position of the divided holo is lowered in the roof region, there is an advantage that the installation height of the electric device can be reduced.

(試験6)
本試験は、試験1に掲げる8分の1車両模型を用い、外側ホロ部材として分割ホロを使用し、分割ホロの外表面位置を車両表面よりも内方に設定すると共に、車両の稜縁部に湾曲面を形成し、さらにケーブルヘッドの最大高さを、分割ホロの車両表面から内方への変位距離に合わせて低くするという条件で風洞試験を行い、騒音レベルを測定したものである。具体的には、図12(A)において、(1)分割ホロの外表面の車両表面からの距離H=6.25mm(実車換算で50mm)、車両稜縁部の湾曲面の曲率半径R=6.25mm(実車換算で50mm)としたとき、ケーブルヘッドCHの高さを標準位置からL=6.25mm(実車換算で50mm)だけ降下させた場合、及び、(2)分割ホロの外表面の車両表面からの距離H=12.5mm(実車換算で100mm)、車両稜縁部の湾曲面の曲率半径R=12.5mm(実車換算で100mm)としたとき、ケーブルヘッドCHの高さを標準位置からL=12.5mm(実車換算で100mm)だけ降下させた場合それぞれについて騒音レベルを測定した。
(Test 6)
This test uses the 1/8 vehicle model listed in Test 1, uses a split holo as the outer holo member, sets the outer surface position of the split holo inward from the vehicle surface, and the ridge edge of the vehicle. A wind tunnel test was conducted under the condition that the curved surface was formed and the maximum height of the cable head was lowered in accordance with the displacement distance from the vehicle surface of the split holo to the inside, and the noise level was measured. Specifically, in FIG. 12A, (1) the distance H = 6.25 mm from the vehicle surface of the outer surface of the divided holo (50 mm in terms of actual vehicle), the radius of curvature R of the curved surface of the vehicle ridge edge = When the height of the cable head CH is lowered by L = 6.25 mm (50 mm in terms of actual vehicle) from the standard position when it is 6.25 mm (50 mm in terms of actual vehicle), and (2) the outer surface of the divided holo When the distance H from the vehicle surface is 12.5 mm (100 mm in terms of actual vehicle) and the curvature radius R of the curved surface of the vehicle ridge edge is 12.5 mm (100 mm in terms of actual vehicle), the height of the cable head CH is When it was lowered by L = 12.5 mm (100 mm in terms of actual vehicle) from the standard position, the noise level was measured for each.

ところで、ケーブルヘッドCH高さをL=12.5mm(実車換算で100mm)だけ低下させた後者の場合、車両の湾曲面上にケーブルヘッドの絶縁離隔と干渉する領域が生じる。そこで本例では、図12(B)(C)に示す如く、湾曲面に切欠部Kを形成した。すなわち、湾曲面の中央部を、当該湾曲面の上端から下端にかけて幅108.75mm(実車換算で870mm)の範囲を切除して切欠部Kとなした。   By the way, in the latter case where the height of the cable head CH is lowered by L = 12.5 mm (100 mm in terms of an actual vehicle), an area that interferes with the insulation separation of the cable head occurs on the curved surface of the vehicle. Therefore, in this example, as shown in FIGS. 12B and 12C, a notch K is formed on the curved surface. That is, a cutout portion K was formed by cutting out a range of 108.75 mm in width (870 mm in terms of an actual vehicle) from the upper end to the lower end of the curved surface at the center of the curved surface.

比較対象は、外表面を車両表面と一致させた平滑ホロを、車間部に設けたものである。なお比較例は、平滑ホロの長さが62.5mm(実車換算500mm)であるのに対し、本発明例では、対向する車両端面における湾曲面それぞれの起点部間隔D=62,5mm(実車換算500mm)となるように設定した。風洞による騒音測定条件は、試験1と同じである。測定結果を実車換算した数値を図12に示す。   The comparison object is provided with a smooth holo with an outer surface coinciding with the vehicle surface in the inter-vehicle space. In the comparative example, the length of the smooth holo is 62.5 mm (500 mm in actual vehicle conversion), whereas in the present invention example, the distance between the starting points D of the curved surfaces on the opposite end surfaces of the vehicle is 62.5 mm (in actual vehicle conversion). 500 mm). The noise measurement conditions by the wind tunnel are the same as in Test 1. The numerical values obtained by converting the measurement results into actual vehicles are shown in FIG.

図12の表から理解されるとおり、本発明を採用することによって、ケーブルヘッド等の電気機器の高さを低くでき、その結果、分割ホロを採用しても、車両表面と一致するように平滑ホロを装着した従来構造よりも優れた効果を発揮する低騒音化構造の提供が可能である。   As understood from the table of FIG. 12, by adopting the present invention, the height of electrical equipment such as a cable head can be reduced, and as a result, even if a divided holo is employed, it is smooth so as to coincide with the vehicle surface. It is possible to provide a noise reduction structure that exhibits an effect superior to that of a conventional structure equipped with a holo.

本発明の第1の実施形態に関するものであり、図(A)は車間部の要部を概略的に示す平面断面図、図(B)は車両端面の概略構成を示す正面図である。FIG. 1A relates to a first embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 1A is a plan sectional view schematically showing a main part of an inter-vehicle space, and FIG. 1B is a front view showing a schematic configuration of a vehicle end surface. 本発明の第1の実施形態に関する異なる態様に関するものであって、車間部の要部を概略的に示す平面断面図である。FIG. 5 is a plan sectional view schematically showing a main part of the inter-vehicle part, which is related to a different aspect related to the first embodiment of the present invention. 本発明に基づく効果を説明するためのものであって、車間部の要部を概略的に示す一部断面した側面図である。BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a partially cross-sectional side view schematically illustrating a main part of an inter-vehicle space for explaining an effect based on the present invention. 本発明の第2の実施形態に関するものであり、図(A)は車間部の要部を概略的に示す側面図、図(B)は車両端面の概略構成を示す正面図である。FIG. 4A is a side view schematically showing the main part of the inter-vehicle space, and FIG. 2B is a front view showing the schematic configuration of the vehicle end surface. 8分の1模型を用いた風洞試験の実施要領を説明するためのものであって、図(A)は模型設置状況を示す平面図、図(B)は模型設置状況を示す側面図、図(C)は図(A)のc−c線で断面した車両端面を示す正面図である。It is for demonstrating the point of implementation of the wind tunnel test using 1/8 model, Comprising: FIG. (A) is a top view which shows a model installation condition, FIG. (B) is a side view which shows a model installation condition, FIG. (C) is a front view which shows the vehicle end surface cut in the cc line of FIG. (A). 風洞試験要領を説明するための車間部の要部を示す平面断面図であって、図(A)〜(C)は分割ホロの装着位置を変化させる場合を示すもの、図(D)〜(F)は湾曲面の曲率半径を変化させる場合を示すものである。It is plane sectional drawing which shows the principal part of the space part for demonstrating a wind tunnel test procedure, Comprising: FIG. (A)-(C) shows the case where the mounting position of a division | segmentation holo is changed, FIG. (D)-( F) shows a case where the curvature radius of the curved surface is changed. 試験1の測定結果(実車換算)を示す表と、試験における変化因子を表示するための車間部構造の要部を示す平面断面図である。It is a plane sectional view showing the important section of the table structure which shows the measurement result (actual vehicle conversion) of test 1, and the change factor in a test for displaying the change factor in a test. 試験2の測定結果(実車換算)を示す表と、試験における変化因子を表示するための車間部構造の要部を示す平面断面図である。It is a table | surface sectional drawing which shows the principal part of the table | surface which shows the measurement result (real vehicle conversion) of Test 2, and the change factor in a test for displaying the change factor. 試験3の測定結果(実車換算)を示す表と、試験における変化因子を表示するための車間部構造の要部を示す平面断面図である。It is a plane sectional view which shows the principal part of the table | surface which shows the measurement result (actual vehicle conversion) of Test 3, and the inter-vehicle part structure for displaying the change factor in a test. 試験4の測定結果を示す表と、試験に用いた車間部構造の要部を概略的に示す平面断面図である。It is the table | surface which shows the measurement result of Test 4, and a plane sectional view which shows roughly the principal part of the inter-vehicle part structure used for the test. 試験5の測定結果を示す表と、試験に用いた車間部構造の要部を概略的に示す平面断面図である。It is the table | surface which shows the measurement result of Test 5, and the plane sectional view which shows roughly the principal part of the inter-vehicle part structure used for the test. 試験6に関するものであって、図(A)は試験に用いた車間部構造の要部を概略的に示す側面図、図(B)は湾曲面に切欠部を形成した車両稜縁部の側面図、図(C)は湾曲面に切欠部を形成した車両両縁部部の正面図であり、図(D)は測定結果を示す表である。FIG. (A) is a side view schematically showing the main part of the inter-vehicle space structure used in the test, and FIG. (B) is a side view of a vehicle ridge edge portion where a notch is formed on a curved surface. The figure and figure (C) are the front views of the vehicle both edge part which formed the notch part in the curved surface, and figure (D) is a table | surface which shows a measurement result. 図(A)は現行の新幹線の一部を示す側面図、図(B)は車間部に面する車両端面を概略的に示す正面図、図(C)は車間部の要部を示す側面図である。Fig. (A) is a side view showing a part of the current Shinkansen, Fig. (B) is a front view schematically showing the end surface of the vehicle facing the inter-vehicle portion, and Fig. (C) is a side view showing the main part of the inter-vehicle portion. It is. 車間部の低騒音化構造に関する従来例を概略的に示す平面断面図であり、図(A)は平滑ホロに関するもの、図(B)はジャバラホロに関するもの、図(C)は分割ホロに関するものである。It is a plane sectional view schematically showing a conventional example related to a noise reduction structure in an inter-vehicle space. FIG. (A) relates to a smooth holo, FIG. (B) relates to a bellows holo, and FIG. (C) relates to a divided holo. is there.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

D…車間部距離 G…車間部 H…車両表面から外側ホロ部材までの距離 R…曲率半径 1…車両 1a…車両端面 1b…車両の側面領域 1c…車両の屋根領域 2…湾曲面 3…分割ホロ 5…ケーブルヘッド 6…平滑ホロ D: Distance between the vehicles G: Distance between the vehicles H: Distance from the vehicle surface to the outer holo member R ... Radius of curvature 1 ... Vehicle 1a ... Vehicle end surface 1b ... Vehicle side region 1c ... Vehicle roof region 2 ... Curved surface 3 ... Division Holo 5 ... Cable head 6 ... Smooth holo

Claims (8)

列車における連結された車両と車両との対向する車両端面間に外側ホロ部材を装着して、連結車両間に形成される車間部の少なくとも左右側面領域を閉塞する構造であって、前記外側ホロ部材の外表面位置が車両表面よりも内方となるように設定し、且つ、車両端面の稜縁部を湾曲面に形成したことを特徴とする車間部の低騒音化構造。 A structure in which an outer holo member is mounted between the vehicle end faces of the train that are connected to each other in the train to close at least the left and right side regions of the inter-vehicle space formed between the connected vehicles. A noise reduction structure for an inter-vehicle portion, wherein the outer surface position of the vehicle is set to be inward of the vehicle surface, and the ridge edge portion of the vehicle end surface is formed as a curved surface. 前記車両端面の稜縁部に形成する湾曲面は、その垂直断面が、曲率半径100〜200mmの円弧である請求項1に記載する車間部の低騒音化構造。 The structure for reducing noise in the inter-vehicle portion according to claim 1, wherein the curved surface formed at the ridge edge portion of the vehicle end surface is an arc having a vertical cross section of a curvature radius of 100 to 200 mm. 前記車両端面の屋根領域と左右側面領域との稜縁部に湾曲面を設け、屋根領域と左右側面領域とで湾曲面の垂直断面形状が異なっている請求項1又は2に記載する車間部の低騒音化構造。 3. The inter-vehicle portion according to claim 1, wherein a curved surface is provided at a ridge edge between the roof region and the left and right side regions of the vehicle end surface, and the vertical cross-sectional shape of the curved surface is different between the roof region and the left and right side regions. Low noise structure. 前記外側ホロ部材は、対向する車両端面にそれぞれ装着され、先端部を突き合わせるように構成された分割ホロである請求項1乃至3のいずれかに記載する車間部の低騒音化構造。 4. The low-noise structure for an inter-vehicle portion according to claim 1, wherein the outer holo member is a divided holo that is mounted on each end face of the vehicle and is configured to abut the tip portion. 5. 前記外側ホロ部材はジャバラホロである請求項1乃至3のいずれかに記載する車間部の低騒音化構造。 The noise reduction structure for an inter-vehicle section according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the outer holo member is a bellows holo. 車間部の間隙距離が300〜500mmであるときにおいて、前記外側ホロ部材の外表面位置を車両表面から30〜90mm内方とした請求項4又は5に記載する車間部の低騒音化構造。 The structure for reducing noise in the inter-vehicle portion according to claim 4 or 5, wherein when the gap distance between the inter-vehicle portions is 300 to 500 mm, the outer surface position of the outer holo member is 30 to 90 mm inward from the vehicle surface. 列車における連結された車両と車両との対向する車両端面間に外側ホロ部材を装着して、連結車両間に形成される車間部の屋根領域及び左右側面領域を外側ホロ部材で閉塞する構造であって、前記外側ホロ部材が車間部の屋根領域及び左右側面領域にわたり一体的に連続する平滑ホロであり、当該平滑ホロの外表面位置を、屋根領域では車両表面よりも内方とし、側面領域では車両表面とほぼ一致するように設定し、且つ、屋根領域における車両端面の稜縁部を湾曲面に形成したことを特徴とする車間部の低騒音化構造。 This is a structure in which an outer holo member is mounted between the opposite end surfaces of the connected vehicles in the train and the roof region and the left and right side regions of the inter-vehicle space formed between the connected vehicles are closed by the outer holo member. The outer holo member is a smooth holo that is integrally continuous over the roof area and the left and right side areas of the inter-vehicle area, and the outer surface position of the smooth holo is inward of the vehicle surface in the roof area, and in the side area A low-noise structure for an inter-vehicle portion, which is set so as to substantially coincide with a vehicle surface, and a ridge edge portion of a vehicle end surface in a roof region is formed as a curved surface. 屋根領域における外側ホロ部材の外表面位置を車両表面よりも内方とすることにより、屋根上に設置される電気機器に対する絶縁離隔の基準位置が低下した分だけ、当該電気機器の最大高さを低減させたことを特徴とする請求項1乃至7のいずれかに記載する車間部の低騒音化構造。 By making the outer surface position of the outer holo member in the roof area inward from the vehicle surface, the maximum height of the electric device is increased by the amount that the reference position of the insulation separation with respect to the electric device installed on the roof is lowered. The structure for reducing noise in an inter-vehicle section according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the structure is reduced.
JP2008011913A 2007-01-24 2008-01-22 Noise reduction structure in the inter-vehicle space Active JP4929497B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008011913A JP4929497B2 (en) 2007-01-24 2008-01-22 Noise reduction structure in the inter-vehicle space

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007013972 2007-01-24
JP2007013972 2007-01-24
JP2008011913A JP4929497B2 (en) 2007-01-24 2008-01-22 Noise reduction structure in the inter-vehicle space

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008201405A true JP2008201405A (en) 2008-09-04
JP4929497B2 JP4929497B2 (en) 2012-05-09

Family

ID=39779318

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008011913A Active JP4929497B2 (en) 2007-01-24 2008-01-22 Noise reduction structure in the inter-vehicle space

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4929497B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008238890A (en) * 2007-03-26 2008-10-09 Railway Technical Res Inst Vehicular hood structure
JP2010143539A (en) * 2008-12-22 2010-07-01 West Japan Railway Co Outer hood structure for railroad vehicle
CN115092192A (en) * 2022-07-26 2022-09-23 中南大学 Device and method for adjusting natural frequency of windshield of folding shed type train

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110435691A (en) * 2019-08-30 2019-11-12 株洲时代新材料科技股份有限公司 A kind of method and rail vehicle outer hood improving rail vehicle outer hood air-tightness

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5236408A (en) * 1975-09-18 1977-03-19 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Handwriting transmitter
JPH11291902A (en) * 1998-04-09 1999-10-26 Bridgestone Corp External bellows for rolling stock corridor connection
JP2001058568A (en) * 1999-08-20 2001-03-06 Nippon Sharyo Seizo Kaisha Ltd Stagger shape in side surface of car body of high-speed vehicle
JP2001171517A (en) * 1999-12-17 2001-06-26 Hitachi Ltd Vehicular outer bellows
JP2002173022A (en) * 2000-12-07 2002-06-18 Nippon Sharyo Seizo Kaisha Ltd Car body end structure of rolling stock
JP2003127857A (en) * 2001-10-29 2003-05-08 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Structure of connection part of full arc bellows railway vehicle
JP2004268604A (en) * 2003-03-04 2004-09-30 Central Japan Railway Co Outer bellows for railway rolling stock
JP2006182059A (en) * 2004-12-24 2006-07-13 Nippon Sharyo Seizo Kaisha Ltd Straightening cover

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5236408A (en) * 1975-09-18 1977-03-19 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Handwriting transmitter
JPH11291902A (en) * 1998-04-09 1999-10-26 Bridgestone Corp External bellows for rolling stock corridor connection
JP2001058568A (en) * 1999-08-20 2001-03-06 Nippon Sharyo Seizo Kaisha Ltd Stagger shape in side surface of car body of high-speed vehicle
JP2001171517A (en) * 1999-12-17 2001-06-26 Hitachi Ltd Vehicular outer bellows
JP2002173022A (en) * 2000-12-07 2002-06-18 Nippon Sharyo Seizo Kaisha Ltd Car body end structure of rolling stock
JP2003127857A (en) * 2001-10-29 2003-05-08 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Structure of connection part of full arc bellows railway vehicle
JP2004268604A (en) * 2003-03-04 2004-09-30 Central Japan Railway Co Outer bellows for railway rolling stock
JP2006182059A (en) * 2004-12-24 2006-07-13 Nippon Sharyo Seizo Kaisha Ltd Straightening cover

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008238890A (en) * 2007-03-26 2008-10-09 Railway Technical Res Inst Vehicular hood structure
JP2010143539A (en) * 2008-12-22 2010-07-01 West Japan Railway Co Outer hood structure for railroad vehicle
CN115092192A (en) * 2022-07-26 2022-09-23 中南大学 Device and method for adjusting natural frequency of windshield of folding shed type train
CN115092192B (en) * 2022-07-26 2023-10-03 中南大学 Device and method for adjusting natural frequency of bellows type train windshield

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4929497B2 (en) 2012-05-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20180312178A1 (en) Railcar Coupler System and Method
JP4929497B2 (en) Noise reduction structure in the inter-vehicle space
CN111071272B (en) Obstacle deflector with pit arranged at rear end of bottom and application thereof
JP6677309B2 (en) Bogies for railway vehicles, railway vehicles and trains
CN102717809B (en) Protecting cover of vehicular roof equipment and carriage of railway vehicle
Martens et al. High speed train noise-sound source localization at fast passing trains
JP6824683B2 (en) Rail car
EP3272615B1 (en) Vehicle body structure for a railroad vehicle
JP6615598B2 (en) High speed train
JP7075903B2 (en) Railroad vehicle aerodynamic noise reduction structure
JP2008238890A (en) Vehicular hood structure
EP3628562B1 (en) Railway vehicle
JP4430880B2 (en) Projection for electrostatic antenna of high-speed traveling vehicle
JP4486490B2 (en) Rectifying cover
JP2005153755A (en) Railroad vehicle
JP2007176192A (en) Sound insulation wall of railroad vehicle
JP7389325B2 (en) Railway vehicles and trains
JP4997296B2 (en) Rectifying cover
JP6030742B1 (en) Noise and side wind pressure prevention device when traveling on high-speed railway vehicles
JPH0898306A (en) Windbreaking cover of current collector
JP2020185859A (en) Railway vehicle
CN211571456U (en) Sound absorption short barrier beside high-speed railway track
JP2018065414A (en) Railway vehicle
JP7456839B2 (en) Elastic sealing member for sliding door devices and door ends
JP7033827B2 (en) Head structure of moving body

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20090730

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110527

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20110531

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110721

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120120

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

RD02 Notification of acceptance of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422

Effective date: 20120131

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120124

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4929497

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150224

Year of fee payment: 3

RD03 Notification of appointment of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R3D03

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250