JP2008165568A - System for automatically forming operation slip in service interruption operation - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a system for automatically forming an operation slip in service interruption operation, capable of performing an efficient predetermined service interruption operation by eliminating duplicated operations of each control station. <P>SOLUTION: In the system for automatically forming an operation slip in service interruption operation in each of CC and DD substations mutually connected through a transmission line, electric equipment of the CC and DD substations being controlled by a plurality of A and B control stations, respectively, an operation slip formed by the control station A is received through a communication means, for an operation by only the control station A, the content of a procedure 32 corresponding to a title 31 is deleted while leaving only the title 31, and for an operation needing cooperation of the control stations A and B, each operation object and each content in a procedure 52 thereof are reversed and automatically converted to an operation for the control station B. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to an operation sheet automatic creation system at the time of a power outage operation, and is particularly useful when applied to a power outage operation at each substation across a plurality of control stations.

  When a power failure operation is performed on various electrical devices at a substation, in order to prevent an accident, an operation sheet that describes the operation procedure of the electrical device is created, and operations are arranged and performed. Here, the operation slip is created for each control station that supervises each substation in which the electrical equipment is installed. For this reason, when a plurality of substations connected to the same power transmission line are installed over a plurality of control stations, the operation slip is created for each control station, and then the parties After meeting with each other at the control stations based on the operation slip and approving the operation procedure at each control station, the operation at each control station is performed. Here, the operation slip created for each control station must consider not only the own site but also the operation procedures of other sites to be linked.

  Therefore, conventionally, operation sheets for meetings including duplicate contents have been created at each control station. That is, operation sheets that overlap in content are created separately at a plurality of control stations. For this reason, the power outage operation over a plurality of control stations has become inefficient.

  Patent Document 1 exists as a monitoring control system that can capture the status of a monitoring target of a power system and quickly determine a countermeasure.

JP 2006-037697 A

  An object of the present invention is to provide an automatic operation slip creation system at the time of a power failure operation capable of eliminating a redundant work for each control station and performing an efficient predetermined power failure operation. .

In order to achieve the above object, the first aspect of the present invention provides:
A system for automatically creating operation slips for power outage operations at each substation when each electrical equipment of a plurality of substations connected via a power transmission line has jurisdiction at a plurality of control stations.
An operation slip representing a power outage operation at a substation that is under its control is an operation only for the own site but must be linked in a procedural manner to an operation at another location. It is classified into operations that need to be linked to the operations in a procedural manner and operations that need to be performed in cooperation between the own place and other places, and a title that represents each operation is attached to each operation, while only the own place Procedures that are specific contents of the operations and the operations that need to be carried out in cooperation with the operation and the other place are created following the respective titles, and are operations only at other places, but the operations and procedures of the own place The operation that needs to be linked to is created only as the title, and one control station that transmits the operation slip thus created to other places via communication means,
The operation slip created at the one control station is received via communication means, and the contents of the procedure corresponding to the title are deleted while leaving only the title of the operation only at the own station. Operation of power outage operation characterized by having another control station having conversion means for reversing the contents of each operation in an operation procedure that needs to be performed in cooperation with another place and converting it to the operation at its own place It is in an automatic vote creation system.

The second aspect of the present invention is:
In the automatic creation system for an operation sheet for a power failure operation described in the first aspect,
The other control station is an operation of only the other place, but as an operation that needs to be linked in a procedural manner with the operation of its own place, the one control station, to the title that has created only the title There is provided an automatic power cut operation operation form creation system characterized by further including an additional means for adding a procedure which is a specific content of a corresponding operation and completing an operation form at the place.

The third aspect of the present invention is:
In the automatic creation system for an operation sheet for a power failure operation described in the first aspect,
Among the procedures that are specific contents of the operation that need to be performed in cooperation between the own place and the other place, a link operation in which the operation procedure is determined by linking in relation to the other place, and the own place or the other place. It can be classified and identified as a parallel operation that can be performed in parallel, and with respect to the parallel operation, the individual operation at the own place or the other place is allowed and only the end is transmitted to the other party. There is an automatic creation system for an operation sheet for a power outage operation characterized by constituting an operation sheet.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to automatically convert the contents of the operation slip created at another place into the contents of the own place. Therefore, the operation slip of the own place can also be created based on the operation slip created at the other place. Not only can you reduce the labor that was spent on the creation of the votes redundantly at your own place and other places to streamline the operation form creation work, but you can also perform operations by linking both your place and the other place. Such an erroneous operation can be prevented in advance.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram conceptually showing the relationship between two control stations and an object to be controlled including the embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the figure, the A control station has jurisdiction over the control of the area on the left side of the figure (CC substation in the figure) divided by the jurisdiction demarcation line (indicated by the dotted line in the figure) L. , B control is responsible for the control of the right area (DD substation in the figure) delimited by the jurisdiction dividing line L. Here, the CC substation and the DD substation are connected by the power transmission line PL1 through the circuit breakers 101 and 201, and are also connected by the power transmission line PL2 through the circuit breakers 102 and 202. In this example, there is a jurisdiction dividing line L between the power transmission lines PL1 and PL2.

  Each electrical device such as a transformer of the CC substation including the circuit breakers 101 and 102 is controlled via the operation control unit 103 of the A control station including the power failure operation. Similarly, each electric device such as a transformer of the DD substation including the circuit breakers 201 and 202 is controlled via the operation control unit 203 of the B control station including the power failure operation.

  The automatic operation slip creation systems 100 and 200 at the time of a power failure operation according to the present embodiment are arranged in each of the A control station and the B control station. Here, each automatic creation system 100, 200 includes input devices 10, 20, output devices 11, 21, display devices 12, 22, transmission / reception devices 13, 23, simulated operation units 14, 24, arithmetic processing units 15, 25, and conversion. The processing units 16 and 26 are included.

  A method for creating an operation slip for a power failure operation using the automatic creation systems 100 and 200 will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG.

1) An operation slip for one control station (A control station in this example) is created (see step S1). This is performed by an operator using the input device 10. The specific contents of the operation slip created here will be described in detail later.

2) Perform a simulated operation of the electrical equipment at the A control station (see step S2). Specifically, the simulation operation unit 14 is operated to verify the suitability of each operation by simulating the operation based on the operation slip created in step S1.

3) If “NG” is determined in step S2, the process returns to step S1, the operation slip is corrected, and the same simulation operation is repeated. Incidentally, “NG” is issued when an unscheduled power failure occurs due to a certain operation or when a predetermined procedure is not followed.

4) If “OK” is determined in step S2, the automatic creation system 100 is set in a “waiting for approval” mode (see step S3).

5) The operation slip is transferred to the other control station (B control station in this example) (see step S4). This is performed through the transmission / reception devices 13 and 23 using, for example, DX (Data Exchanger).

6) The conversion processing unit 26 of the B control station performs a predetermined conversion process of the operation slip (see step S5). This is a process of converting each operation content of the operation sheet of the A control station transferred to the operation content of its own site (B control station). The detailed content of the process is a specific example after the conversion process. It will be explained in detail later along with the operation slip.

7) The procedure of the converted operation slip is confirmed (see step S6). Specifically, the operator confirms the contents of the converted operation slip by visualizing the contents with the output device 21 to the display device 22. This operation can of course be automated.

8) If “NG” is determined in step S6, the control station A is notified that the operation of “NG” is included (see step S7). This notification is performed via the transmission / reception devices 23 and 13.

As a result, the process returns to step 1 to correct the operation slip, and the similar simulation operation is repeated.
9) If “OK” is determined in step S6, the control station A is notified that the operation slip is approved. This notification is also made through the transmission / reception devices 23 and 13.

  In the A control station, predetermined approval processing is performed from the “waiting for approval” mode (see step S12) (see step S8), and the “operation waiting” mode until the actual operation is set (see step S9).

10) If “OK” is determined in step S6, the operation for the single operation of the B control center is added to the converted operation slip at the same time (see step S10). This is because the operation slip created at the A control station does not describe an operation specific to the B control station. The detailed contents of the addition process will be described later together with a specific operation sheet after the addition process.

  Such additional work is performed by an operator using the input device 20. This additional work completes the operation slip at the B control station.

11) Perform a simulation operation of the electrical equipment at the B control station (see step S11). This is the same operation as in step 2, and the appropriateness of each operation is verified by simulating the operation based on the operation slip added / completed in step S10 by the simulation operation unit 24.

  As a result, when it becomes “NG”, the process returns to step 10 to correct the operation slip, and the similar simulation operation is repeated.

12) If “OK” is determined in step S11, the automatic creation system is set in the “waiting for approval” mode (see step S3), and then a predetermined approval process is performed (see step S13). Until “operation waiting” mode (see step S14).

13) After both the A control station and the B control station enter the “waiting for operation” mode, the electric devices of the CC substation and the DD substation are designated via the operation control units 103 and 203 based on the operation slips. The predetermined power failure operation is performed by operating in the specified order (see step S15).

  FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing a specific example of the operation slip, where (a) is an operation slip created at the A control station (see step 1), and (b) is an operation slip converted at the B control station (see step S5). (C) is an operation slip for the B control station completed by performing additional processing at the B control station (see step S10). The operation sheet creation, conversion, and addition processing will be specifically described with reference to FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 3A, titles 31, 41, and 51 representing operation contents are described in time series on the operation slip. Here, the title 31 indicates that it is related to “a power failure operation of the transformer of the CC substation”. Since this is a single operation at the A control station, information to that effect (A control station single operation) is also described. The specific procedure 32 regarding the power failure operation of the transformer in the CC substation is described below the title 31 and below.

  The title 41 indicates that it is related to “DD transformer power failure operation” and that this operation is a single operation at the B control station. This is an operation at another place (in this case, the B control station) that is not related to its own place (in this case, the A control station), but this operation cannot proceed to the next operation unless it is terminated at the B control station. , Only the title 41 is described, and a specific procedure for an operation in which the user's place is unauthorized is not described. In addition, although it is an operation in another place, an operation that cannot be advanced to the next unless this operation is finished elsewhere is hereinafter referred to as an “operation that requires linking in a procedural manner”.

  The title 51 indicates that it relates to “CCDD line power failure operation”. This is a power failure operation of the transmission lines PL1 and PL2. Since this operation relates to both the A control station and the B control station, information to that effect (operation between AB control stations) is also described. A specific procedure 52 regarding the CCDD line power failure operation is described below the title 51 and below. Here, in the procedure 52, the circuit breaker 201 and the circuit breaker 101 must be disconnected in this order by linking the operations at the AB control station. It can be performed as a parallel independent operation without waiting for the completion of the operation of the side control station. As a result, when the predetermined processing is completed first, it is only necessary to wait until the other party becomes “parallel end”.

  The operation slip shown in FIG. 3A is transmitted to the B control station and then converted as shown in FIG. 3B. That is, as shown in FIG. 3B, although the operation of the title 31 is a single operation at another place (in this case, the A control station), since it is an operation that requires linking in a procedure, only the title 31 is selected. The procedure 32 is deleted.

  Since the next operation of the title 41 is the operation of the own place (in this case, the B control station), a procedure 42 necessary for the “addition” process of FIG.

  Since the title 51 relates to “CCDD line power failure operation”, necessary conversion of each operation content is performed. That is, the contents of the operation slip viewed from the A control station side are converted into those viewed from the B control station side. Specifically, it is converted to (control) indicating that it is an operation at another place (control of other place).

  The operation slip converted for the B control station in this way is completed by adding a unique operation to the B control station as shown in FIG. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3C, a specific procedure 42 for the operation of the title 41, which is an operation unique to the site, is added. In this way, an operation slip for the B control station that is paired with the operation slip created on the A control station side is created.

  FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the conversion process performed at the B control station in order to obtain the operation slip shown in FIG. The operation slip conversion process will be described with reference to FIG.

1) The conversion process is started (see step S21).

2) The title is determined (see step S22). Specifically, the contents of the operation slip, for example, the contents of the title 31 are determined, and it is determined whether the operation needs to be linked in a procedural manner. Since the title 31 is “an operation that needs to be linked in a procedural manner”, the determination result is “necessary”.

3) When the determination result of step S22 is “necessary”, it is determined whether or not there is a local procedure (see step S23). Since the content of the title 31 is a single operation of the A control station, the determination result is “none”.

4) If the determination result in step S23 is “None”, it is not an operation of the own place, so “Paste as a link title” is performed (see step S24). Here, the “link title” refers to a title indicating an operation that does not require an operation at its own place but needs to be linked in a procedural manner, for example, a title 31 at the B operation place. Incidentally, in the case of this example, since the CC substation is on the power supply side (power plant side), it is necessary to complete the power failure operation prior to the power failure operation of the DD substation. “Pasting link title” refers to a process of leaving only the title 31 and deleting the procedure 32. The processing of this procedure 32 is exclusively related to equipment under the control of the A control station, and does not relate to the B control station.

5) If the determination result in step S23 is “Yes”, position pasting is started (see step S25). Here, the “position” is information regarding a specific operation in each procedure, for example, the procedure 52, and includes information indicating whether the operation is performed at the own place or the operation performed at another place.

6) It is determined whether or not the position pasted in step S25 is a local operation (see step S26). That is, it is determined at which control station each operation described in the procedure 52 of the operation slip is performed. This determination is made based on an operation slip created at another place (in this case, the A control place). Therefore, the display indicating that the operation is related to the operation at the own place (control) and the display indicating the operation related to the operation at the other place (control elsewhere) are reversed. Therefore, it is determined that an operation with a display of (control) is an operation at another place, and an operation with an display of (control at another place) is an operation at an own place.

7) If the result of the determination in step S26 is not an operation at the own place, it is an operation at another place, so that it is pasted to the controlled position (see step S27). That is, the display of the controlled position is (remote control). Thus, the operation sheet created at the A control station that was (control) is converted to (other site control) in the operation sheet at the B control station.

8) As a result of the determination in step S26, if the operation is a local operation, it is pasted to the control position (see step S28). That is, the control position display is (control). In this way, the operation slip created at the A control station that was (remote control) is converted to (control) in the operation slip at the B control station.

  Note that the processing in steps 27 and 28 is performed with reference to the data in the database conversion database 300 in another place (in this case, the A control place). This database conversion database 300 stores data for changing data transmitted from another place (in this case, the A control place) to its own position.

9) After the processing of step S27 to step S28 is completed, it is determined whether or not there is a procedure next to the procedure, for example, the operation for which procedure 52 has been completed (see step S29). As a result, if there is a next operation, the process returns to step S26, and the same process is repeated until there is no next operation.

10) If there is no next operation in the next procedure, for example, procedure 52 in the determination in step S29, it is determined whether there is a next title (see step S30). As a result, if there is a next title, the process returns to step S22, and the same process is repeated until there is no next title.

  The determination in step S30 is similarly performed when the determination result in step S22 is “No” and when the process in step S24 is completed. Here, the case where the determination result in step S22 is “No” is a case where there is no need for a procedure link, for example, a case where the title 41 represents an operation at the own place (in this case, the B control place).

11) The conversion is completed when there is no next title in the determination in step S30 (see step S31).

  The operation slip is created by the procedure as described above. The power failure operation at the control station A is based on the operation slip shown in FIG. 3A, and the circuit breakers 101 and 102 and the CC substation via the operation control unit 103 shown in FIG. The power failure operation at the control station B is performed by controlling each electrical device at the station, and the circuit breakers 201 and 202 and the DD via the operation control unit 203 shown in FIG. 1 based on the operation slip shown in FIG. This is done by controlling each electrical device in the substation. Here, when all operations of the title 31 are completed, information indicating the completion is transmitted from the A control station to the B control station via the transmission / reception device 13. At the B control station that has received the end information via the transmission / reception device 23, each operation of the title 41 is performed thereafter, and information indicating this end is sent from the B control station to the A control station when all operations are completed. Transmitted through.

  Since the operation of the title 52 is an operation between AB control stations, among the operations described in the procedure 52, those that need to be linked in both procedures are determined while confirming the completion of the operations in both. Operate in the order of. In other words, in the case of this embodiment, the circuit breaker 201 and the subsequent circuit breaker 101 are operated, and the operation described after each operation is completed (parallel operation) is performed. Here, each operation from (parallel operation) to (parallel end) can be performed in parallel without waiting for completion of the other party's operation. Thus, in the order described in the operation slip, the power outage operation is performed on each electrical device in the CC substation and the DD substation while exchanging necessary information.

  In addition, although the said embodiment demonstrated the case where it straddled two control stations, of course, it does not matter even if it is two or more. What is necessary is just to repeat the process similar to the process performed in the case of two control stations to other control stations as many times as necessary.

  The present invention can be used in the industrial field where maintenance and inspection of electric power equipment is performed.

It is explanatory drawing which shows notionally the relationship between the two control stations containing embodiment of this invention, and a control object. It is a flowchart which shows the process sequence of the automatic creation system of the operation slip which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows the specific example of an operation slip, (a) The operation slip created in A control center, (b) The operation slip converted in B control center, (c) Additional processing in B control center This is an operation slip completed. It is a flowchart which shows the procedure of a conversion process.

Explanation of symbols

13, 23 Transceiver 14, 24 Simulated operation unit 15, 25 Arithmetic processing unit 16, 26 Conversion processing unit 100, 200 Automatic creation system 101, 102, 201, 202 Breaker L Jurisdiction line

Claims (3)

A system for automatically creating operation slips for power outage operations at each substation when each electrical equipment of a plurality of substations connected via a power transmission line has jurisdiction at a plurality of control stations.
An operation slip representing a power outage operation at a substation that is under its control is an operation only for the own site but must be linked in a procedural manner to an operation at another location. It is classified into operations that need to be linked to the operations in a procedural manner and operations that need to be performed in cooperation between the own place and other places, and a title that represents each operation is attached to each operation, while only the own place Procedures that are specific contents of the operations and the operations that need to be carried out in cooperation with the operation and the other place are created following the respective titles, and are operations only at other places, but the operations and procedures of the own place The operation that needs to be linked to is created only as the title, and one control station that transmits the operation slip thus created to other places via communication means,
The operation slip created at the one control station is received via communication means, and the contents of the procedure corresponding to the title are deleted while leaving only the title of the operation only at the own station. Operation of power outage operation characterized by having another control station having conversion means for reversing the contents of each operation in the operation procedure that needs to be performed in cooperation with another place and converting it to the operation of the own place Automatic vote creation system. In the automatic creation system of the operation sheet for power failure operation described in claim 1,
The other control station is an operation of only the other place, but as an operation that needs to be linked in a procedural manner with the operation of its own place, the one control station, to the title that has created only the title A system for automatically creating operation slips for power outage operation, further comprising an additional means for adding a procedure which is a specific content of a corresponding operation to complete an operation slip at the site. In the automatic creation system of the operation sheet for power failure operation described in claim 1,
Among the procedures that are specific contents of the operation that need to be performed in cooperation between the own place and the other place, a link operation in which the operation procedure is determined by linking in relation to the other place, and the own place or the other place. It can be classified and identified as a parallel operation that can be performed in parallel, and with respect to the parallel operation, the individual operation at the own place or the other place is allowed and only the end is transmitted to the other party. A system for automatically creating operation sheets for power outages, characterized by configuring operation sheets.