JP2008014751A - Membrane assay method using colored latex particle, and kit - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method capable of discriminating between positive and false positive, in a method for performing simplified inspection of a plurality of detection objects by a membrane assay method using colored latex particles as a labeling reagent. <P>SOLUTION: The first capturing materials to be bonded specifically to each detection object are solidified respectively on different positions on a membrane, and colored latex particles having each different color tone relative to each detection object are bonded to the second capturing materials, to thereby prepare two or more kinds of labeling reagents, and mixed liquid of specimen liquid and the labeling reagent is supplied onto the membrane and developed thereon, and determination is performed as follows by each determination part. When the color of the labeling reagent corresponding to each determination part is detected, the detection object is determined to be 'positive', and when the color of the labeling reagent corresponding to each determination part is not detected, the detection object is determined to be 'negative', and when the color tone (intermediate color) of a mixture of the labeling reagent is detected in some one of the determination parts, the detection object is determined to be 'invalid'. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a membrane assay method using colored latex particles as a labeling reagent and a kit used in this method.

  Recently, a simple test that uses antigen-antibody reaction or enzyme reaction to detect or quantify various measurement items such as infection with pathogens such as viruses and bacteria, presence of pregnancy, blood glucose level in a few minutes to tens of minutes. Reagents or kits are being researched and developed. Proteins of pathogens such as bacteria and viruses, human ciliary gonadotropin (hCG), cancer markers, blood glucose, and the like are targets for detection or quantification. Many of the simple test reagents are characterized by the fact that they do not require special equipment, are easy to operate, and are inexpensive. For example, simple test reagents for pregnancy diagnosis are sold as OTC at general pharmacies. Some of the simple test reagents for measuring infection with pathogens are widely used in general hospitals and clinics in addition to large hospitals and medical test centers, unlike other test reagents. These facilities are often the first medical institutions visited by patients, and if specimens collected from patients are found to be infected on the spot, symptoms can be treated as soon as possible. The importance of test reagents in medicine is increasing.

  Currently, immunoassay methods, that is, immunoaggregation methods and immunomembrane assay methods, particularly assay methods using membranes such as nitrocellulose and membranes, such as filters, are generally known as simple test methods. It is roughly classified into the formula membrane assay method. The former allows the solution containing the detection object to pass through the film coated with the detection substance for the detection object in the vertical direction, and the latter allows the solution to be developed in the horizontal direction. In either case, a membrane solid phase substance that specifically binds to the detected substance, a detected substance, and a complex of a labeled substance that specifically binds to the detected substance is formed on the film to detect or quantify the label. This is common in that detection or quantification of the detected substance is possible, but recently it is simpler and can be detected in a shorter period of time. Therefore, the lateral flow membrane assay method (also referred to as immunochromatography) is used. ) Has become mainstream.

  As a labeling reagent, an enzyme such as alkaline phosphatase or horseradish peroxidase, a metal colloid such as a gold colloid, and a substance obtained by chemically or physically binding a colored latex particle with a substance that specifically binds to an object to be detected are used. It is often done. When metal colloid particles or colored latex particles are used, coloration occurs due to aggregation of these labeling reagents, and this coloration is measured. When using an enzyme, an operation of adding a substrate and an operation of stopping the reaction between the enzyme and the substrate are necessary during the measurement step, whereas such an operation is required when using metal colloid particles or colored latex particles. do not need. In recent years, rapid measurement at clinical sites has been carried out for items such as influenza that require a large number of tests during epidemics. The simple test reagents used for this purpose are often handled by local doctors, nurses, clinical technologists, etc., so it is required to further simplify the measurement step. Often particles and colored latex particles are used. As the colored latex particles, those using polystyrene particles or the like are often used. In particular, in the case of colored latex particles, various types with different colors and particle diameters can be produced, and in fact, many types are commercially available, and suitable ones can be selected according to each purpose. The number of cases used recently is increasing. A method of detecting a plurality of objects to be detected using latex particles having a plurality of colors has also been proposed (see Patent Documents 1, 2, 3, and 4).

However, in these simple inspection methods, in the analysis of a sample actually collected from a patient, a so-called false positive may occur, in which a detected object is determined to be positive even though it is not present in the sample. Although the cause of false positives has not been fully elucidated, non-specific reactions due to the influence of tissue-derived components of patients present in specimens are considered. Therefore, false positives are likely to occur in assays using pharynx or nasal wipes, nasal aspirates, nasal lavage fluids and stool suspensions, especially in assays that exclude stool suspensions of the above. This is probably because these specimens contain a large amount of highly viscous components derived from living bodies.
In addition to the above-described phenomenon, when a plurality of inspection items in a specimen are inspected, and in particular, when a plurality of detection objects having similar structures are detected, there is actually one type in the specimen. In spite of the presence of only the detected substance, false positives may occur that are judged to be positive for other types of detected substances. This is also thought to be due to the increased probability of non-specific reactions. . If a false positive reaction occurs when measuring the infection of a pathogen, it will give incorrect information about the disease, so it will not only delay the cause identification but also take inappropriate measures, making the medical condition more serious, etc. It can have serious consequences. Therefore, suppressing false positives is an extremely important issue from the main purpose of use of the simple test method.
Conventionally, in order to solve this problem, a membrane is pretreated, a buffer containing a surfactant is used as a buffer for suspending or diluting the sample (see, for example, Patent Document 5), and the sample is filtered ( For example, Patent Literature 6) has been devised to reduce the generation ratio considerably, but it has not completely eliminated false positives. Therefore, when a false positive occurs, if it can be clearly shown that it is a false positive and not a specific reaction, it is possible to avoid misjudgment and take measures such as a retest. Therefore, there is a strong demand for an inspection method capable of such identification.

Japanese Patent No. 3304214 JP-A-8-5635 JP 2002-303629 A JP 2004-132892 A JP 2006-84351 A JP 2004-28875 A

  An object of the present invention is to provide a method for easily distinguishing between positive and false positives in a method for easily inspecting a plurality of detection objects in a sample by a membrane assay method using colored latex particles as a labeling reagent, and such a method. To provide a kit for use in

That is, the present invention is a membrane assay method for detecting two or more kinds of detection objects present in a sample liquid, and includes the following steps.
(1) A step of preparing two or more determination units by immobilizing a first capture substance that specifically binds to each object to be detected at different positions on the membrane,
(2) A step of preparing two or more types of labeling reagents by binding colored latex particles having different colors for each detection target to the second capture substance that specifically binds to each detection target;
(3) A step of mixing two or more kinds of labeling reagents prepared in step (2) at a constant ratio to prepare a mixture showing an intermediate color distinguishable from the color tone of each labeling reagent,
(4) A step of mixing the sample liquid or the sample liquid dilution with two or more kinds of labeling reagents prepared in step (2),
(5) In the step of supplying and developing the liquid mixture prepared in step (4) on the membrane prepared in step (1), and (6) Each determination unit prepared in step (1) corresponds to each determination unit. When the color of the labeling reagent is detected, the object to be detected is determined to be “positive”. When the color of the labeling reagent corresponding to each determination unit is not detected, the object to be detected is “negative”. And when the intermediate color produced in step (3) is detected in any one of the determination units, the detection method is determined to be “invalid”.

Further, another embodiment of the present invention is a membrane assay method for detecting two or more types of analytes present in a sample liquid, which includes the following steps.
(1) A step of preparing two or more determination units by immobilizing a first capture substance that specifically binds to each object to be detected at different positions on the membrane,
(2) A step of preparing two or more types of labeling reagents by binding colored latex particles having different colors for each detection target to the second capture substance that specifically binds to each detection target;
(3) A step of mixing two or more kinds of labeling reagents prepared in step (2) at a constant ratio to prepare a mixture showing an intermediate color distinguishable from the color tone of each labeling reagent,
(4 ′) Two or more kinds of labeling reagents prepared in step (2) are mixed, supplied to the membrane of (1) or the pad arranged in contact with the membrane of (1) and dried, and the labeling reagent A step of producing a part,
(5 ′) In the step of supplying the sample liquid or the sample liquid diluent to the labeling reagent unit prepared in the step (4 ′) and spreading, and (6) In each determination unit prepared in the step (1), each determination unit When the color of the labeling reagent corresponding to is detected, the detected object is determined to be “positive”, and when the color of the labeling reagent corresponding to each determination unit is not detected, the detected object Determining that the detection method is “invalid” when the intermediate color produced in step (3) is detected in any one of the determination units.
In addition, in the said process, the order of each process can be changed suitably. For example, step (3) may be performed after step (4) or (4 ′) or step (5) or (5 ′).

  According to the present invention, it is now possible to clearly show positive / false positive discrimination in a method of simply inspecting a plurality of objects to be detected in a sample by a membrane assay method using colored latex particles as a labeling reagent. . That is, according to the method of the present invention, it is determined as “invalid” in the case of false positive, so that erroneous determination can be prevented, and highly reliable information can be provided in the medical field.

The method of the present invention will be described in detail below.
<Measurement principle of membrane assay>
The measurement principle of the present invention will be briefly described. In the present invention, the “membrane assay method” refers to the presence or absence of an analyte contained in a sample sample in a short time using a membrane on which a first capture substance that specifically binds to the analyte is immobilized. It is a method to inspect. More specifically, a membrane provided with a determination unit in which a first capture substance that specifically binds to a detected substance in a sample is immobilized, and a colored latex on a second capture substance that specifically binds to the detected object Using a labeling reagent that binds to the target substance, a complex consisting of a capture substance / detected substance / labeling reagent is formed in the determination part on the membrane, and the detected substance in the sample is colored by coloring colored latex that binds to the labeling reagent. This is a so-called sandwich assay method.
Examples of the reaction between the detection target and the capture substance and the labeling reagent include antigen-antibody reaction, other receptor-receptor reaction, specific binding reaction between biotin and avidin, reaction between DNAs having complementary sequences, and the like. However, an antigen-antibody reaction is preferred.

The membrane assay method preferably uses two types of membrane immunochromatography methods, that is, a flow-through membrane assay method or a lateral flow membrane assay method because it is simple and rapid.
In the flow-through membrane assay method, a solution containing an object to be detected is passed in a direction perpendicular to a membrane coated with a capture reagent or a detection substance that specifically binds to the object to be detected. The labeling agent is formed by forming a complex of a labeling reagent in which colored latex particles are bound to a first capture substance that specifically binds to a target substance, a target substance, and a second capture substance that specifically binds to the target substance. By detecting or quantifying, the detected object is detected or quantified.
The lateral flow membrane assay method differs from the flow-through membrane assay method in that the same membrane is used to spread the solution containing the analyte on the membrane in the horizontal direction, but the detection principle of the analyte is the same. It is. Of the two methods, the lateral flow membrane assay method is preferred from the viewpoint of simplicity and short measurement time.

<First capture substance that specifically binds to the object to be detected>
The first capture substance for capturing the object to be detected is a substance that forms a complex by binding to the object to be detected by a specific reaction such as an antigen-antibody reaction. Therefore, it is natural that the capture substance to be used differs depending on the object to be detected. However, in general, when the object to be detected is bacteria, viruses, hormones, other clinical markers, etc., they specifically react to bind to them. Polyclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies and the like. In addition, when the substance to be detected is an antibody, virus antigens, virus hollow particles, recombinant E. coli expressed protein, recombinant yeast expressed protein, and the like that specifically react with and bind to them.
As a method for binding such a capturing substance to the above-described membrane surface, physical adsorption may be used, or chemical binding may be used. The membrane to which the capture substance is bound is prepared, for example, by adsorbing a solution obtained by diluting the capture substance in a buffer solution or the like and then drying the membrane.
In the present invention, in order to detect or quantify a plurality of types of objects to be detected, it is necessary to immobilize capture substances for each object on the membrane. It is necessary to be done.

<Membrane>
The membrane that can be used in the present invention may be any material that can immobilize or immobilize the first capture substance that specifically binds to each object to be detected. Examples of the membrane include a porous material such as paper and nitrocellulose, or a carrier such as a fibrous matrix, silica used for thin layer chromatography, fine granular cellulose, and nylon 6,6. Preferred porous materials for conducting a lateral flow membrane assay with high sensitivity and specificity include microporous cellulose esters, for example, cellulose esters with aliphatic carboxylic acids such as alkane carboxylic acids, particularly preferably nitro Examples include microporous materials made from cellulose. Moreover, the mixture of the said cellulose ester and nitrocellulose can also be used suitably. In many cases, the average pore diameter of the membrane is 0.3 to 15 μm.

<Labeling reagent>
In the present invention, the labeling reagent refers to a substance obtained by labeling a second capture substance that specifically binds to an object to be detected, that is, a substance that specifically binds to the object to be detected to form a complex with colored latex particles. Means. Examples of the second capture material include the same types of materials as those listed for the first capture material. However, the same substance as the first capturing substance may be used, or a different substance may be used. For example, when the detection target is an antigenic substance such as a virus, the second capture substance that specifically binds to the detection target may be an antibody against the virus. In addition, when the detection target is an antibody against an antigenic substance such as a virus, an antigen against the antibody can be mentioned.

Materials using polystyrene, polymethylene methacrylate (PMMA), polyvinyl toluene, silica, etc. are commercially available as materials used for the colored latex particles, and any of them can be used. In particular, polystyrene is most commonly used as a raw material for diagnostic latex particles, and is particularly preferable because it is commercially available in various particle sizes and colored ones. By mixing a material such as polystyrene and a substance having a functional group at the time of producing the particles, the dispersibility of the particles is increased, or carboxyl groups, sulfone groups or Those in which a functional group such as an amino group is introduced are also commercially available, and these can also be used. Colored latex particles into which surface functional groups are not introduced may be used.
In the present invention, colored latex particles having different color tones corresponding to two or more kinds of objects to be detected are used.

  Either the physical adsorption or the chemical bond can be used as the binding mode of the second capture substance that specifically binds to the object to be detected and the colored latex particles. The physical adsorption method is mainly a hydrophobic bond method, and the chemical bond method is a linker such as EDAC (N- (3-dimethylaminopropyl) -N'-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride) or glutaraldehyde. Via a covalent bond. See TechNote 205, Rev.003, Active: 30 / Mar / 02 “Covalent Coupling”, Bangs Laboratories Inc.

Two or more kinds of labeling reagents are mixed at a certain ratio to prepare a mixture showing an intermediate color distinguishable from the color tone of each labeling reagent. The ratio depends on the color tone of each labeling reagent, but if the ratio of one kind of labeling reagent is too high, it may be impossible to distinguish the color tone of the mixture. The labeling reagent is preferably within 3 times, more preferably within 2 times, based on the smallest difference between the highest mixing ratio and the lowest mixing reagent.
Further, as the color tone of the labeling reagent, for example, in the case of two types, red and blue, green and red, blue and pink, yellow and red are listed as combinations of color tones in which intermediate colors are relatively easy to distinguish. And in the case of three types, the combination of red, blue, and green is mentioned, for example.

Substances derived from specimens that cause false positives in the assay (false positive causative substances) often physically bind nonspecifically to the labeling reagent. Therefore, it is preferable that the physical properties of the surfaces of the labeling reagents are as equal as possible. For example, it is preferable that the difference in the particle size of the colored latex particles is smaller. Specifically, the difference between the minimum value and the maximum value is preferably within 10% based on the minimum value. Moreover, it is preferable that the raw materials of the colored latex particles constituting the labeling reagent are equal to each other. The types of surface functional groups of the colored latex particles are preferably the same. Further, the charge density on the surface of the colored latex particles is preferably within 10% on the basis of the smallest difference between the smallest and the largest.
When the capture substance that specifically binds to the detection target is an antibody, the antibody class of each antibody is preferably the same. In particular, the antibody class is preferably IgG.
The average particle size of the colored latex particles is preferably about 0.05 to 5 μm. If the particle size is smaller than this range, the sensitivity is remarkably lowered, and if it is larger than this range, the dispersibility of the particles is deteriorated, making it difficult to use in the assay. In addition, the average particle diameter here can be calculated | required by the general method by an electron micrograph. Either the physical adsorption or the chemical bond can be used as the binding mode of the second capture substance that specifically binds to the object to be detected and the colored latex particles.

  In addition, in order to prevent the surface state of latex particles from changing greatly due to coloring, an emulsion of an oil-soluble dye is prepared in an aqueous solvent in the presence of a surfactant and the like, and mixed with the emulsion of latex particles and colored. It is preferable to use colored latex particles prepared by the method, or colored latex particles prepared by a method of coloring by mixing oil-soluble dye and latex particles in an organic solvent.

<Detection object>
Examples of detected substances in the present invention include pathogenic microorganisms such as influenza virus antigens, antibodies against pathogenic microorganisms, peptide hormones, steroids, bioactive amines, vitamins, prostaglandins, antibiotics such as tetracycline, bacteria, and the like. Examples include nucleotides complementary to nucleic acid components derived from toxins to be produced, various tumor markers, agricultural chemicals, and pathogenic microorganisms. In particular, it is extremely useful for diagnosis of pathogens that are pandemic and need to be identified in a very short time, such as influenza virus and RS (Respiratory Syncytial) virus.
In addition, the assay method of the present invention is particularly effective for a detection object that is likely to cause false positives. When two or more types of detected objects are two or more types selected from influenza A virus, influenza B virus and RS virus, false positives can be particularly effectively prevented.
Samples to be analyzed by the assay method of the present invention include pharyngeal or nasal wipes, nasal aspirate, stool suspension, plasma, serum, urine, saliva, amniotic fluid, spinal fluid, pus, organ extracts, various tissue extracts A biological sample such as liquid, food extract, culture supernatant, clean water, sewage, lake water, river water, seawater, soil extract, and sludge extract can be used, but are not limited thereto. In particular, the pharyngeal or nasal wipe, nasal aspirate, nasal wash and stool suspension contain a large amount of high-viscosity biological components as described above, and false positives are likely to occur. It is effective in the evaluation of these specimens. Furthermore, among the above-mentioned specimens, it is more effective in assays of pharyngeal or nasal wipes, nasal aspirates, or nasal lavage fluids.

<Sample collection>
In the present invention, an object to be detected is collected from a nasal cavity or pharynx of a human or an animal, or from other contaminants using a collection tool such as a cotton swab. The specimen to be assayed by the assay method of the present invention is, for example, a pharyngeal wipe, a nasal wipe, a nasal aspirate, or a nasal wash.
A specimen that may contain an object to be detected collected from a patient or the environment is usually suspended or suspended in a specimen suspension. A suspended liquid in which a specimen is suspended or suspended is dropped on a membrane or an assay device including the membrane and used for an assay.
The collected specimen contains various substances in addition to the object to be detected. For example, when collecting specimens from humans for pathogen infection measurement, they are often collected from a nasal cavity or throat with a cotton swab etc. In this specimen, in addition to patient-derived tissue fragments and secretions, the object to be detected May contain pathogen tissue. Some of these exist as aggregates in the sample suspension, and some exist in a dissolved state in the sample suspension. If the specimen suspension is dripped into the assay device in a state containing these, false positives may occur due to non-specific reactions. In order to remove aggregates, a method of filtering through a filtration membrane (filtration filter) before dropping to the assay device is effective, but in the case of lysates, it cannot be removed by filtration. It is necessary to devise the composition of the liquid.

<Sample suspension>
The specimen suspension usually contains a salt and a buffer for keeping the pH constant. Furthermore, a surfactant can be contained in the specimen suspension for the purpose of reducing nonspecific reactions within a range that does not inhibit specific agglutination reactions.
Examples of specimen suspensions include saline, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), gelatin-added PBS, bovine serum albumin (BSA) -added PBS, Good's buffer, calf infusion broth (VIB), heart Examples include, but are not limited to, infusion broth, Eagle's minimum essential medium (EMEM), and BMEM-added EMEM. Moreover, you may use the said buffers in combination of 2 or more types. The inclusion of proteins such as bovine serum albumin, immunoglobulin and casein, serum from rabbits and mice, etc. is preferable because nonspecific reactions can be reduced.
Further, in addition to the above composition, basic amino acids, inorganic salts and / or surfactants may be added. By using a sample suspension containing at least two types of basic amino acids, inorganic salts, and surfactants, components other than the analyte in the sample can be bound to the membrane itself or captured on the membrane. This is preferable because it can reduce non-specific binding.

In addition, for example, when the detection target has a cell wall like bacteria and the binding site of the labeling reagent or capture substance to the detection target is inside the bacteria, the sample is suspended in the sample suspension. Only the binding sites are not easily exposed to the outside, and detection / quantification may not be possible. In that case, pre-treatment such as addition and neutralization of alkali or the like, or heat treatment may be necessary.
Although the above-mentioned device can reduce the occurrence of false positives, it cannot be completely prevented.

<Membrane assay kit>
The membrane assay kit to which the present invention is applicable is a kit used in the above-described membrane assay method of the present invention. The membrane assay kit of the present invention includes at least the following.
(A) Membranes having two or more determination units, each of which is prepared by immobilizing a first capture substance that specifically binds to each detection object at different positions,
(B) two or more kinds of labeling reagents in which colored latex particles of different colors are bound to each detection object to the second capture substance that specifically binds to each detection object; and (c) (b) A mixture in which two or more kinds of labeling reagents are mixed at a constant ratio and exhibit an intermediate color distinguishable from the color tone of each labeling reagent.

Moreover, the membrane assay kit of the present invention may further contain at least one of (d) to (i).
(D) specimen suspension,
(E) filtration filter,
(F) a cleaning liquid composition,
(G) negative control (h) positive control,
(I) Sample collection device.
(E) The filtration filter is used, for example, for filtering the collected specimen itself or for filtering insoluble matter after the specimen is suspended in the specimen suspension.
(F) The washing liquid composition is used to wash away non-specifically attached labeling reagents and other substances on the membrane. For example, various buffers or buffer solutions containing salts, basic amino acids, surfactants, bovine A composition to which a protein such as serum albumin, immunoglobulin, casein or serum such as rabbit or mouse is added can be used.
(G) A negative control is used for confirming the accuracy and specificity of a kit or technique. For example, a composition obtained by adding various buffer solutions or antigens that are not cross-reactive with a detection target to the buffer solutions. Can be used.
(H) The positive control is used for confirming the accuracy of a kit or a method or a positive image. For example, a composition obtained by adding a detected substance or an antigen cross-reactive with a detected substance to a buffer solution. Can be used.
(I) The sample collection device can be appropriately selected according to the properties of the sample, and examples thereof include a sterile cotton swab.

In the following, the method of the present invention is exemplified by a lathe flow membrane assay, a more specific procedure is shown and the present invention is described. However, the applicable range of the present invention is not limited to this.
The assay method of the present invention using the lateral flow membrane assay can be performed using, for example, an apparatus as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 (hereinafter also referred to as a membrane assay apparatus).
FIG. 1 is a plan view of the membrane assay device, and FIG. 2 is a cut end surface taken along the line II ′ of FIG. In FIGS. 1 and 2, a is a sample dropping pad installed to drop the prepared specimen sample. The labeling reagent may be dried and held in this pad. b is a sample absorption pad for absorbing the dropped solution. c is a membrane to which a first capture substance that specifically binds to the detected substance is bound, and d, e, and f are three kinds of first capture substances that specifically bind to the three kinds of detected objects, respectively. The position (determination part) connected in the shape of a line is shown above. g is a plastic backing sheet for fixing members and increasing strength. h is a transparent plastic laminate covering a part of the sample dropping pad, the sample absorbing pad and the membrane.

Specific procedures are exemplified below.
(1) Collect a sample from the pharynx or nasal cavity of a patient infected with a virus or bacteria. When collecting the wiping liquid, it is convenient to use a sterilized cotton swab or the like. In addition, a suction catheter is often used for the nasal aspirate.
(2) Float or dilute the collected specimen in the specimen suspension. The specimen suspension is conveniently placed in a dropping tube made of a flexible material such as polyethylene or polyethylene terephthalate (PET). In addition, a pretreatment such as alkali treatment / neutralization or heating may be performed before dropping to the assay device as necessary.
(3) The suspended liquid is mixed with a labeling reagent that specifically binds to the detection object to form a capture reagent / detection object complex. Next, the suspension containing the complex is dropped onto a sample dropping pad a in an assay device having a membrane in which a capture reagent that specifically binds to the detection target and captures the detection target is bound in a line. .
Alternatively, the labeling reagent may be kept dry in the labeling reagent part on the membrane or in the sample dropping pad a arranged in contact with the membrane. In that case, when the suspended liquid is dropped on the sample dropping pad a The labeling reagent dissolves in the suspension and forms a complex of the analyte / labeling reagent.
In either case, the suspension liquid containing the complex of the detection target / labeling reagent spreads horizontally on the membrane and reaches the determination part (first capture reagent binding line) (c, d, e). A complex of the first capture reagent / detected substance / labeling reagent is formed on the line.
In order to remove aggregates and the like contained in the sample liquid, a filtration filter may be attached to the tip of the dropping tube or the like and filtered before dropping onto the membrane. In that case, when the pad holding the labeling reagent in a dry state is attached to the position of the filtration filter, the labeling reagent can be dropped while being dissolved in the suspension.
(4) The presence or absence of an object to be detected in the sample liquid is measured by detecting the presence of the complex in the determination unit on the membrane by coloring with the labeling reagent in the complex.

<Judgment method>
When the color tone of the labeling reagent corresponding to the determination part (c, d, e) to which the first capture substance on the membrane is bound is determined, the object to be measured is determined to be “positive”, and the membrane When the color tone is the same, it is determined as “negative”.
Further, when an intermediate color that can be distinguished from the color tone of the corresponding labeling reagent is shown at any one of the determination units, it is regarded as “false positive” due to a non-specific reaction and is determined to be “invalid”. The intermediate color can be confirmed by preparing a mixture by mixing each labeling reagent at a certain ratio. It can also be confirmed by a color sample prepared by mixing the colors indicated by the labeling reagents. If it is determined to be “invalid”, it is possible to take a measure such as collecting a sample again and performing a reexamination, or inspecting by another method, so that an erroneous determination can be avoided.

[Example 1, Comparative Example 1]
Detection of influenza virus by lateral flow immunochromatographic assay [Example 1]
1. Preparation of monoclonal antibody (1) Preparation of anti-influenza A virus NP (Nucleoprotein; nucleoprotein) monoclonal antibody (mouse) Immunized with purified influenza A virus antigen and excised spleen from BALB / c mice maintained for a certain period of time, It was fused with mouse myeloma cells (P3 × 63) by the method of Keller et al. (Kohler et al., Nature, vol, 256, p495-497 (1975)).
The obtained fused cells (hybridomas) are maintained in a 37 ° C. incubator, and purification of the cells (monocloning) is performed while confirming the antibody activity of the supernatant by ELISA using an influenza A virus NP antigen solid phase plate. went.
The obtained two cell lines were each intraperitoneally administered to pristane-treated BALB / c mice, and about 2 weeks later, antibody-containing ascites was collected. IgG was purified from the obtained ascites by affinity purification using Protein A column chromatography (Amersham) to obtain two types of purified anti-influenza A virus NP monoclonal antibodies.

(2) Anti-influenza B virus NP monoclonal antibody (mouse)
The spleen was excised from BALB / c mice immunized with purified influenza B virus antigen and maintained for a certain period of time, and mouse myeloma was prepared by the method of Keller et al. (Nature, vol. 256, p495-497 (1975)). Fused with cells (P3x63). The obtained fused cells (hybridomas) were maintained in an incubator at 37 ° C., and cell purification was performed while confirming the antibody activity of the supernatant by ELISA using a influenza B virus NP antigen solid phase plate (monoclonal clone). ). The obtained two cell lines were each intraperitoneally administered to pristane-treated BALB / c mice, and about 2 weeks later, antibody-containing ascites was collected. From the obtained ascites, IgG was purified by Protein A column chromatography (manufactured by Amersham) to obtain two types of purified anti-type B influenza virus NP monoclonal antibodies.

2. Preparation of labeled anti-influenza virus antibody (labeling reagent) (The following labeled antibody was prepared with reference to TechNote 205, Rev.003, Active: 30 / Mar / 02 “Covalent Coupling”, Bangs Laboratories Inc.)
(1) Preparation of latex particle-labeled anti-influenza A virus antibody One type of anti-influenza A virus NP monoclonal antibody was treated with 50 mM MES (2-Morpholinoethanesulfonic acid, monohydrate) buffer (pH 6.0) solution. After dialysis, the reaction mixture was mixed with red polystyrene latex particles (particle size 0.45 μm, surface functional group was carboxyl group, functional group density 65 ² / COOH group; Magsphere) and reacted. Next, EDAC (N- (3-dimethylaminopropyl) -N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride; Sigma) was added to a final concentration of 0.1%, followed by reaction for 2 hours. After washing, the suspension was suspended in a final suspension (5 mM Tris, 0.04 (W / V)% BSA (bovine serum albumin)), and applied to an ultrasonic dispersion device (Olympus) to disperse latex particles.

(2) Preparation of latex particle-labeled anti-influenza B virus antibody One type of anti-influenza B virus NP monoclonal antibody was dialyzed with 50 mM MES buffer (pH 6.0) solution, and then blue polystyrene latex particles (particle size 0.45 μm). The surface functional group was mixed with a carboxyl group and a functional group density of 65 ² / COOH group (Magsphere) and reacted. Next, EDAC was added to a final concentration of 0.1%, and then reacted for 2 hours. After washing, the suspension was suspended in a final suspension (5 mM Tris, 0.04 (W / V)% BSA (bovine serum albumin)), and applied to an ultrasonic dispersion device (Olympus) to disperse latex particles.

3. 1. Drying of latex particle labeled antibody (1) Mixing of latex particle labeled antibody 1. The latex particle labeled anti-influenza A virus antibody and latex particle labeled anti-B influenza virus antibody prepared in (1) and (2) (1) After diluting with the final suspension as described, the mixture was stirred at 150 rpm for 5 minutes at room temperature and mixed in equal amounts.
(2) Preparation of latex particle-labeled antibody pad The latex particle-labeled antibody prepared in (1) was sprayed on the whole surface of a cellulose nonwoven fabric having a width of 15 mm wound in a reel shape using a positive pressure spraying device (BioJet; BioDot). After spraying, warm air at 50 ° C. was blown for 1 minute to dry, thereby preparing a latex particle-labeled antibody pad.

4). Preparation of antibody for membrane solid phase (1) Preparation of anti-influenza A virus antibody for solid phase The purified anti-influenza A virus NP monoclonal antibody prepared in (1), which was not used for labeling, was dialyzed against a solid phase solution (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)), and 0.22 μm filtered after dialysis. And diluted with a solid phase solution to prepare an anti-influenza A virus antibody for solid phase.
(2) Preparation of anti-influenza B virus antibody for solid phase The purified anti-influenza B virus NP monoclonal antibody prepared in (2), which was not used for labeling, was dialyzed against a solid phase solution (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)), and 0.22 μm filtered after dialysis. And diluted with a solid phase solution to prepare an anti-influenza B virus antibody for solid phase.

5. Production of Lateral Flow Membrane Assay Device for Detection of Influenza Virus A lateral flow membrane assay device for detection of influenza virus was used having the same configuration as that shown in FIGS.
As the membrane, a nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore) sheet (white) having a width of 3 cm x a length of 10 cm was used. A positive pressure spray device (BioJet; BioDot) for solid phase anti-influenza A virus antibody was placed at a position 8 mm away from one end of the long axis (this end is the upstream end and the opposite side is the downstream end). Using a positive pressure spray device (BioJet; BioDot), the solid-phase anti-influenza B virus antibody was applied linearly at a position e of 12 mm away. After coating, warm air of 45 ° C. was blown for 10 minutes to dry. Nothing was applied to the position of f.
Next, in order to fix the member and increase the strength, a plastic backing sheet (manufactured by BioDot) is bonded to the opposite side (this surface is the lower surface) of the antibody application surface (this surface is the upper surface) of the membrane. did.

Next, the latex particle-labeled antibody pad prepared in 3. (2) is cut to a width of 15 mm x a length of 10 cm, and placed on the upper surface of the membrane so that the upstream end of the membrane overlaps by 2 mm, and is attached to the sample dropping pad. It was.
Next, a cellulose filter paper (Whatman) having a width of 30 mm x a length of 10 cm was placed on the upper surface of the membrane so as to overlap the downstream end of the membrane by 5 mm, and used as a sample absorption pad.
Next, the entire upper surface was covered with a transparent plastic laminate (Adhesive Research) except for a width of 7 mm at the upstream end of the sample dropping pad.
Finally, the membrane assay apparatus shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 was produced by cutting along the long axis direction by 5 mm.

6). Preparation of sample filtration filter Prepare the nozzle for filtration as shown in Fig. 3, punch the glass filter paper for filtration (Advantech Toyo Co., Ltd.) into a circular shape (0.7cm in diameter) and load it on the bottom of the nozzle to make the sample filtration filter did.

7). Detection of influenza virus (1) Detection by membrane assay method Three nasal aspirates were collected from 244 patients suspected of having influenza virus clinically, and three sterilized aspirates were collected from the nasal aspirate collected from one patient. Samples were collected and one of them was dispensed into a tube as shown in FIG. 4 (20 mM MES buffer (pH 6.0), 1 (W / V)% Triton X-100, 2 (W / V)% arginine hydrochloride, 1.0 (W / V)% bovine serum albumin) was suspended in 0.4 mL to prepare a test sample. 5. At the tip of the tube The sample filtration filter prepared in step 1 was attached.
4. Collect the filtrate obtained by passing the entire amount of the test sample through a filtration nozzle and collect in a tube; The sample dropping pad side of the lateral flow membrane assay device for detecting influenza virus prepared in 1 was immersed in the liquid. Ten minutes later, the assay apparatus was observed, and if a colored color of the colored latex particles used for labeling (red in this case) was observed at the position d in FIG. 1 or 2, positive influenza A virus (“ Positive for type A), if colored color of colored latex particles (blue in this case) is observed at position e, type B influenza virus positive ("type B positive"), colored latex particles at position d Color development (in this case, red), and coloration of the colored latex particles (in this case, blue) is recognized at position e, positive for type A and type B influenza viruses (“type B” “Type positive”), when no color was observed at both positions, it was determined as “negative”. In addition, both colored latex particles are placed at positions d and / or e. When color development (in this case, purple) was observed when mixing according to (1), it was determined as “invalid”.

(2) Detection by RT-PCR method From nasal aspirate of 244 patients clinically suspected of influenza virus infection. One of the specimens collected in (1) was suspended in 2 mL of a virus isolation medium, and it was confirmed whether the influenza virus gene was present in the specimen by RT-PCR using this suspension. The RT-PCR method was performed by the method of Shimizu (Infectious Diseases Journal, Vol. 71, No. 6, p522-526).

[Comparative Example 1]
1. Preparation of monoclonal antibody The antibody prepared in Example 1 was used.
2. Preparation of labeled anti-influenza virus antibody (labeling reagent) (1) Preparation of latex particle-labeled anti-influenza A virus antibody The antibody prepared in Example 1 was used.
(2) Preparation of latex particle-labeled anti-influenza B virus antibody The antibody used in the preparation of the latex particle-labeled anti-influenza B virus antibody of Example 1 was dialyzed with a 50 mM MES buffer (pH 6.0) solution, then (1 ) And the same red latex particles (particle size: 0.45 μm, surface functional groups are carboxyl groups, functional group density: 65 ² / COOH groups; Magsphere) and reacted. Next, EDAC was added to a final concentration of 0.1% and then reacted. After washing, the suspension was suspended in a final suspension (5 mM Tris, 0.04 (W / V)% BSA (bovine serum albumin)), and applied to an ultrasonic dispersion device (Olympus) to disperse latex particles.

3. 1. Drying of latex particle labeled antibody (1) Mixing of latex particle labeled antibody The latex particle labeled anti-influenza A virus antibody prepared in (1) and (2) and the latex particle labeled anti-type B influenza virus antibody were mixed in the same manner as in Example 1.
(2) Preparation of latex particle-labeled antibody pad Using the latex particle-labeled antibody prepared in (1), the antibody was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1.

4). Preparation of antibody for membrane solid phase The same one as in Example 1 was used.
5. 2. Production of Lateral Flow Membrane Assay Device for Detection of Influenza Virus The lateral flow membrane assay device for detection of influenza virus has the same configuration as that shown in FIGS. It was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the latex particle labeled pad produced in (2) was used.
6). Preparation of sample filtration filter The same filter as that prepared in Example 1 was used.

7). Detection of Influenza Virus (1) Detection by Membrane Assay Method A sample suspension (20 mM MES) obtained by dispensing the remaining sample from the sample collected in Example 1 using a sterile cotton swab into a tube as shown in FIG. Float in 0.4 mL of buffer (pH 6.0), 1 (W / V)% Triton X-100, 2 (W / V)% arginine hydrochloride, 1.0 (W / V)% bovine serum albumin) A test sample was prepared. 5. At the tip of the tube The sample filtration filter prepared in step 1 was attached.
4. Collect the filtrate obtained by passing the entire amount of the test sample through a filtration nozzle and collect in a tube; The sample dropping pad side of the lateral flow membrane assay device for detecting influenza virus prepared in 1 was immersed in the liquid. Ten minutes later, the assay device was observed, and if red coloration was observed at position d in FIG. 1 or 2, positive influenza A virus (“type A positive”), red coloration at position e If recognized, influenza B virus is positive ("B-type positive"). If red coloration is observed in both positions, it is positive for type A and B influenza viruses ("type A-B positive"). When no color development was observed at both positions, it was judged as “negative”.
(2) Detection by RT-PCR method The results of Example 1 were used.

Table 1 and Table 2 show a comparison between the results of the membrane assay method of Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 and the results of the RT-PCR method, respectively. Table 3 shows a comparison of the results of Example 1 and Comparative Example 1.

Results Of the 11 samples determined as “invalid” in Example 1, 9 samples were determined as “negative” by the RT-PCR method (Table 1). In Comparative Example 1, these samples were determined as “A type positive” and 5 samples as “A type B positive” (Table 3).
Of the 11 samples determined to be “invalid” in Example 1, two samples were determined to be “A type positive” and the other sample “B type positive” by the RT-PCR method (Table 1). These specimens were all determined to be “type A and type B positive” in Comparative Example 1 (Table 3).
80 samples determined as “A type positive” in Example 1 and Comparative Example 1, 41 samples determined as “B type positive” in Example 1 and Comparative Example 1, both in Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 Both specimens determined to be “type A positive” were consistent with the RT-PCR determination results (Tables 1 and 2).
Of the 111 samples determined to be “negative” in Example 1 and Comparative Example 1, 5 samples were determined as “A type positive” by RT-PCR and 3 samples were determined as “B type positive” by RT-PCR method. (Tables 1 and 2). Such a difference in the judgment results seems to be derived from the difference in sensitivity between the membrane assay method and the RT-PCR method, which is a gene amplification method. The other 103 specimens were also determined as “negative” by the RT-PCR method.
As described above, the method of Example 1 was able to distinguish a false positive from a true positive (that is, determine “invalid”). In the method of Example 1, each specimen determined as “type A positive” or “type B positive” by the RT-PCR method was determined as “invalid”. However, these specimens were diluted and retested. As a result, it was determined as “type A positive” and “type B positive”, respectively.

[Example 2]
1. Preparation of monoclonal antibody The same antibody as in Example 1 was used.
2. Production of labeled anti-influenza virus antibody (labeling reagent) (1) Combination of colored latex particles for labeling Colored latex particles shown in Table 4 were used in combination with the labeling shown in Table 5. Table 5 also shows the color tone of each combination when mixing latex particles.

(2) Preparation of labeled anti-influenza virus antibody (labeling reagent)
(i) Sensitization method by chemical binding of anti-influenza virus antibody to colored latex particles having a carboxyl group introduced as a surface functional group The same as in Example 1.
(ii) Sensitization method by chemical binding of anti-influenza virus antibody to colored latex particles having an amino group introduced as a surface functional group Anti-A-type or anti-B-type influenza virus NP monoclonal antibody was added to 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5). ) And then mixed with colored polystyrene latex particles and allowed to react. Next, EDAC was added to a final concentration of 0.1%, and then reacted for 2 hours. After washing, the suspension was suspended in a final suspension (5 mM Tris, 0.04 (W / V)% BSA (bovine serum albumin)) and applied to an ultrasonic dispersion apparatus (Olympus) to disperse latex particles.
(iii) Sensitization method by physical adsorption of anti-influenza virus antibody to colored latex particles having no surface functional group introduced Anti-A-type or anti-B-type influenza virus NP monoclonal antibody in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) And then mixed with colored polystyrene latex particles and allowed to react for 2 hours. After washing, the suspension was suspended in a final suspension (5 mM Tris, 0.04 (W / V)% BSA (bovine serum albumin)) and applied to an ultrasonic dispersion device (Olympus) to disperse latex particles.

3. 1. Drying of latex particle-labeled antibody The same procedure as in Example 1 was performed using the labeled anti-influenza virus antibody prepared in 1.
4). Preparation of antibody for membrane solid phase The same one as in Example 1 was used.
5. Production of Lateral Flow Membrane Assay Device for Influenza Virus Detection The same one as in Example 1 was used.
6). Preparation of sample filtration filter The same filter as in Example 1 was used.

7). Detection of Influenza Virus (1) Detection by Membrane Assay Method Nine persons determined to be “invalid” by the membrane assay method of Example 1 and “negative” by the RT-PCR method, and the membrane assay method of Example 1 Five persons determined as “type A positive” by the RT-PCR method, five persons determined as “type B positive” by the membrane assay method and the RT-PCR method of Example 1, and the membrane assay method of Example 1 Samples were collected with sterilized cotton swabs from five nasal aspirates determined as “negative” by the RT-PCR method, and assayed and determined in the same manner as in Example 1. However, the color tone of color development at positions d and e in FIG. 1 or 2 differs depending on the color tone of the latex used for the label.
Table 6 shows a comparison of determination results between the combinations of the labeling reagents ((A) to (E)) and the membrane assay of Example 1. Each numerical value in Table 6 means the number of samples in which the determination results of the membrane assay method by the combination of each labeling reagent of Example 2 and the membrane assay method of Example 1 coincided. For example, in the determination by the combination (A), among the 9 samples determined as “invalid” in Example 1, 8 samples are determined as “invalid”, and “A type positive”, “B type positive”, and “negative” The determination was consistent with the determination by the membrane assay method of Example 1.

  Even when the combinations (A) to (E) of colored latex particles shown in Table 4 were used, it was shown that there was an effect of discriminating false positives due to non-specificity as in Example 1.

[Example 3]
1. Preparation of monoclonal antibody (1) Preparation of anti-influenza A virus NP monoclonal antibody (mouse) The same one as in Example 1 was used.
(2) Preparation of anti-influenza B virus NP monoclonal antibody (mouse) The same one as in Example 1 was used.

(3) RS virus FP monoclonal antibody (mouse)
A spleen was excised from a BALB / c mouse immunized with a polypeptide obtained by synthesizing a part of the amino acid sequence of human RS virus FP (Fusion Protein), and the method of Keller et al., Nature, vol, 256, p495-497 (1975)) and fused with mouse myeloma cells (P3 × 63).
The obtained fused cells (hybridomas) are maintained in a 37 ° C. incubator, and purification of the cells (monocloning) is performed while confirming the antibody activity of the supernatant by ELISA using an influenza A virus NP antigen solid phase plate. went.
The obtained two cell lines were each intraperitoneally administered to pristane-treated BALB / c mice, and about 2 weeks later, antibody-containing ascites was collected. IgG was purified from the obtained ascites by affinity purification using Protein A column chromatography (Amersham) to obtain two types of purified anti-RS virus FP monoclonal antibodies.

2. Preparation of labeled anti-influenza virus antibody (labeling reagent) (1) Preparation of latex particle-labeled anti-influenza A virus antibody The same one as in Example 1 was used.
(2) Preparation of latex particle-labeled anti-B influenza virus antibody The same one as in Example 1 was used. (3) Preparation of latex particle-labeled anti-RS virus antibody One type of anti-RS virus FP monoclonal antibody was treated with 50 mM MES buffer. After dialysis with a (pH 6.0) solution, the mixture was mixed with green polystyrene latex particles (particle size 0.49 μm, surface functional group was carboxyl group, functional group density 69 ² / COOH group; Merck) and reacted. Next, EDAC was added to a final concentration of 0.1%, and then reacted for 2 hours. After washing, the suspension was suspended in a final suspension (5 mM Tris, 0.04 (W / V)% BSA (bovine serum albumin)), and applied to an ultrasonic dispersion device (Olympus) to disperse latex particles.

3. 1. Drying of latex particle labeled antibody (1) Mixing of latex particle labeled antibody 1. The latex particle-labeled anti-A influenza virus antibody, latex particle-labeled anti-B influenza virus antibody and latex particle-labeled anti-RS virus antibody prepared in (1), (2), (3) (1) After diluting with the final suspension as described, the mixture was stirred at 150 rpm for 5 minutes at room temperature and mixed in equal amounts.
(2) Preparation of latex particle-labeled antibody pad The latex particle-labeled antibody prepared in (1) was sprayed on the whole surface of a cellulose nonwoven fabric having a width of 15 mm wound in a reel shape using a positive pressure spraying device (BioJet; BioDot). After spraying, warm air at 50 ° C. was blown for 1 minute to dry, thereby preparing a latex particle-labeled antibody pad.

4). Preparation of antibody for membrane solid phase (1) Preparation of anti-influenza A virus antibody for solid phase The same one as in Example 1 was used.
(2) Preparation of anti-influenza B virus antibody for solid phase The same as in Example 1 was used.
(3) Preparation of anti-RS virus antibody for solid phase The purified anti-RS virus FP monoclonal antibody prepared in (3), which was not used for labeling, was dialyzed against a solid phase solution (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)), and 0.22 μm filtered after dialysis, Anti-RS virus antibody for solid phase was prepared by diluting with solid phase solution.

5. Production of Lateral Flow Membrane Assay Device for Detection of Influenza and RS Virus A lateral flow membrane assay device for detection of influenza and RS virus was used having the same configuration as that shown in FIGS.
As the membrane, a nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore) sheet (white) having a width of 3 cm x a length of 10 cm was used. A positive pressure spray device (BioJet; BioDot) for solid phase anti-influenza A virus antibody was placed at a position 8 mm away from one end of the long axis (this end is the upstream end and the opposite side is the downstream end). Using a positive pressure spray device (BioJet; BioDot), the solid-phase anti-influenza B virus antibody was applied linearly at a position e of 12 mm away, and at a position f of 16 mm away. The anti-RS virus antibody for solid phase was applied in a linear form using a positive pressure spray device (BioJet; BioDot). After coating, warm air of 45 ° C. was blown for 10 minutes to dry.

Next, in order to fix the member and increase the strength, a plastic backing sheet (manufactured by BioDot) is bonded to the opposite side (this surface is the lower surface) of the antibody application surface (this surface is the upper surface) of the membrane. did.
Next, the latex particle-labeled antibody pad prepared in 3. (2) is cut to a width of 15 mm x a length of 10 cm, and placed on the upper surface of the membrane so that the upstream end of the membrane overlaps by 2 mm, and is attached to the sample dropping pad. It was.
Next, a cellulose filter paper (Whatman) having a width of 30 mm x a length of 10 cm was placed on the upper surface of the membrane so as to overlap the downstream end of the membrane by 5 mm, and used as a sample absorption pad.

Next, the entire upper surface was covered with a transparent plastic laminate (Adhesive Research) except for a width of 7 mm at the upstream end of the sample dropping pad.
Finally, the membrane assay apparatus shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 was produced by cutting along the long axis direction by 5 mm.

6). Preparation of sample filtration filter The same filter as in Example 1 was used.
7). Detection of influenza virus and RS virus (1) Membrane assay detection Nasal aspirate from 74 patients clinically suspected of influenza virus or RS virus infection, and sterile swab from nasal aspirate collected from one patient Two specimens were collected using a specimen suspension, one of which was dispensed into a tube as shown in FIG. 4 (20 mM MES buffer (pH 6.0), 1 (W / V)% TritonX -100, 2 (W / V)% arginine hydrochloride, 1.0 (W / V)% bovine serum albumin) was suspended in 0.4 mL to prepare a test sample. 5. At the tip of the tube The sample filtration filter prepared in step 1 was attached.

  4. Collect the filtrate obtained by passing the entire amount of the test sample through a filtration nozzle and collect in a tube; The sample dropping pad side of the lateral flow membrane assay device for detecting influenza and RS virus prepared in 1 was immersed in the liquid. After 10 minutes, the assay device is observed, and if color development (in this case, red) of the color latex used for the labeling is observed at the position d in FIG. 1 or 2, “type A positive”, e If color development of colored latex (blue in this case) is recognized at the position, “B type positive”, and color development of colored latex (green in this case) is recognized at position f, RS If the virus was positive (“RS positive”) and no color development was observed at any position, it was determined as “negative”. In addition, three kinds of colored latexes are added to at least one position of d, e and f. When color development (in this case, gray) of the color tone when mixing according to (1) was recognized, it was determined as “invalid”.

(2) Detection by RT-PCR method From nasal aspirate of 74 patients clinically suspected of influenza virus infection. One of the specimens collected in (1) was suspended in 2 mL of a virus isolation medium, and it was confirmed whether the influenza virus gene was present in the specimen by RT-PCR using this suspension. The RT-PCR method for detecting influenza virus genes was performed by the method of Shimizu (Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 71, No. 6, p522-526). The RT-PCR method for RS virus gene detection was carried out by the method of Stockton et al. (Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Vol. 36, p2990-2995, 1998).
Table 7 shows a comparison of the results of the membrane assay method and the RT-PCR method. The numbers in the table indicate the number of corresponding samples.

  Two specimens determined to be “invalid” by the membrane assay were confirmed to be “negative” by the RT-PCR method. The configuration of Example 3 also confirmed the effect of identifying false positives caused by non-specific reactions.

It is a top view of the lateral flow type membrane assay apparatus which is one embodiment of this invention. FIG. 2 is an end view taken along the line I-I ′ of FIG. 1. It is the structure of the sample filtration filter which is one embodiment of this invention. 1 is a structural diagram of a sample tube that is one embodiment of the present invention. FIG.

Explanation of symbols

a: sample dropping pad b: sample absorption pad c: membrane d: determination unit e: determination unit f: determination unit g: backing sheet h: laminate i: filtration nozzle j: glass filter paper for filtration k: specimen suspension tube

Claims (7)

A membrane assay method for detecting two or more types of analytes present in a sample liquid, comprising the following steps:
(1) A step of preparing two or more determination units by immobilizing a first capture substance that specifically binds to each object to be detected at different positions on the membrane,
(2) A step of preparing two or more types of labeling reagents by binding colored latex particles having different colors for each detection target to the second capture substance that specifically binds to each detection target;
(3) A step of mixing two or more kinds of labeling reagents prepared in step (2) at a constant ratio to prepare a mixture showing an intermediate color distinguishable from the color tone of each labeling reagent,
(4) A step of mixing the sample liquid and two or more kinds of labeling reagents prepared in step (2),
(5) In the step of supplying and developing the liquid mixture prepared in step (4) on the membrane prepared in step (1), and (6) Each determination unit prepared in step (1) corresponds to each determination unit. When the color of the labeling reagent is detected, the object to be detected is determined to be “positive”. When the color of the labeling reagent corresponding to each determination unit is not detected, the object to be detected is “negative”. And when the intermediate color produced in step (3) is detected in any one of the determination units, the detection method is determined to be “invalid”. A membrane assay method for detecting two or more types of analytes present in a sample liquid, comprising the following steps:
(1) A step of preparing two or more determination units by immobilizing a first capture substance that specifically binds to each object to be detected at different positions on the membrane,
(2) A step of preparing two or more types of labeling reagents by binding colored latex particles having different colors for each detection target to the second capture substance that specifically binds to each detection target;
(3) A step of mixing two or more kinds of labeling reagents prepared in step (2) at a constant ratio to prepare a mixture showing an intermediate color distinguishable from the color tone of each labeling reagent,
(4 ′) Two or more kinds of labeling reagents prepared in step (2) are mixed, supplied to the membrane of (1) or the pad arranged in contact with the membrane of (1) and dried, and the labeling reagent A step of producing a part,
(5 ′) a step of supplying the sample liquid to the labeling reagent unit prepared in the step (4 ′) and developing it; and (6) a labeling reagent corresponding to each determination unit in each determination unit prepared in the step (1). When the color of the labeling reagent is detected, it is determined that the detected object is “positive”, and when the color of the labeling reagent corresponding to each determination unit is not detected, the detected object is “negative”. A step of determining that the detection method is “invalid” when the intermediate color produced in step (3) is detected by any one of the determination units.   The membrane assay method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the detection target is an antigen, and the first capture substance and the second capture substance are antibodies.   The membrane assay method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the two or more types of detection objects are two or more types selected from influenza A virus, influenza B virus, and RS virus.   The membrane assay method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, which is a flow-through type or a lateral flow type. Membrane assay kit for detecting two or more analytes present in the sample fluid, including:
(A) Membranes having two or more determination units, each of which is prepared by immobilizing a first capture substance that specifically binds to each detection object at different positions,
(B) two or more kinds of labeling reagents in which colored latex particles of different colors are bound to each detection object to the second capture substance that specifically binds to each detection object; and (c) (b) A color sample showing an intermediate color distinguishable from the color tone of each labeling reagent, in which two or more kinds of labeling reagent colors are mixed. The kit according to claim 6, further comprising at least one of (d) to (i):
(D) specimen suspension,
(E) filtration filter,
(F) a cleaning liquid composition,
(G) negative control (h) positive control,
(I) Sample collection device.

Images