JP2005216324A - Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice - Google Patents

Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2005216324A
JP2005216324A JP2005107975A JP2005107975A JP2005216324A JP 2005216324 A JP2005216324 A JP 2005216324A JP 2005107975 A JP2005107975 A JP 2005107975A JP 2005107975 A JP2005107975 A JP 2005107975A JP 2005216324 A JP2005216324 A JP 2005216324A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
cpu
user
advice
program
evaluation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2005107975A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Teiji Shono
禎二 庄野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to JP2005107975A priority Critical patent/JP2005216324A/en
Publication of JP2005216324A publication Critical patent/JP2005216324A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a program for functioning a CPU to give a piece of advice to a user in accordance with his mental condition when the user makes a decision and to execute feedback of evaluation by the user about effect of the advice to next decision (to reflect on decisions next time and after). <P>SOLUTION: In the program provided, the mental condition is determined from total point of answer of the user to a plurality of questions and a piece of advice allocated to the determination is selected and displayed on a display by the CPU (from a step 1 to a step 8). Thus, the piece of advice suited for the mental condition of the user can be given. In addition, in the program, the CPU executes feedback of the evaluation for the advice by the user. The mental condition determination is corrected by CPU correcting criterion in a predetermined point range predetermined for the evaluation and the CPU can select a piece of advice more appropriate for the user (the step 8 to a step 14). <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

本発明は、コンピューター(CPU)を、使用者の(うつ度やストレス状況などの)精神状態にあったアドバイスを提示し意思決定を支援し、またアドバイスに対する評価を使用者がCPUに入力することにより、その評価を次の判定とアドバイス提示に反映すること(フィードバック)ができるように機能させるプログラムに関するものである。  In the present invention, the computer (CPU) presents advice suitable for the mental state (such as depression or stress) of the user, supports decision making, and the user inputs an evaluation for the advice to the CPU. Thus, the program relates to a program that allows the evaluation to be reflected (feedback) in the next determination and advice presentation.

従来、占いやストレス度診断などのプログラムは存在し、また質問もハミルトンのうつ病評価法Hamilton,M:A rating acale for depression.J.Neurol.Neurosurg Psychiat.,23:56,1960や、ツングのSelf−rating Depression Scale(SDS)Zung,W.W.K:Aself−rating depression scale.Arch.Gen.Psychiat.,12:63,1965などを参考にして任意に作成できるし、判定基準も任意に作成できるが、使用者の意思決定に際し、複数の質問に対する回答の点数と判定基準をもとにアドバイスを提示し、さらにアドバイスに対する使用者の評価をフィードバックしてCPUが判定基準を修正できるプログラムに関する文献は見当たらない。  Conventionally, there are programs such as fortune-telling and stress level diagnosis, and the question is Hamilton's depression evaluation method Hamilton, M: A rating scale for depression. J. et al. Neurol. Neurosurg Psychiat. 23:56, 1960, and Tung's Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) Zung, W. et al. W. K: Aself-rating depression scale. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. , 12:63, 1965, etc., can be created arbitrarily, and judgment criteria can also be created arbitrarily, but when users make decisions, advice is presented based on the scores and judgment criteria of answers to multiple questions However, there is no literature on a program that allows the CPU to correct the judgment criteria by feeding back the user's evaluation of the advice.

従って、本発明が解決しようとする課題は、コンピューター(CPU)を、使用者の意思決定に際し、その精神状態に合わせたアドバイスを提示し意思決定を支援し、またアドバイスの効果に対する使用者の評価を次の判定にフィードバックすることができるように機能させるプログラムを提供することにある。  Therefore, the problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a computer (CPU) with advice according to the mental state at the time of decision making by the user, to support the decision making, and to evaluate the effect of the advice by the user. It is an object to provide a program that functions so as to be fed back to the next determination.

この課題を解決するための請求項1の発明は、複数の質問と、質問に対する回答に対して与えられる点数の部分合計点数または総合点数からなる使用者の精神状態の判定基準と、その判定基準に合わせて作成されたアドバイスをHDDに保存する。使用者が出した回答の合計点からCPUが判定し選択したアドバイスを出力装置(ディスプレイ)に表示するプログラムである。これによって、使用者の精神状態に合わせたアドバイスを与えることができる。The invention of claim 1 for solving this problem includes a judgment standard for a user's mental state comprising a plurality of questions and a partial total score or a total score given to the answer to the question, and the judgment standard. The advice created according to is stored in the HDD. This is a program for displaying on the output device (display) the advice determined and selected by the CPU from the total number of answers given by the user. Thereby, advice tailored to the mental state of the user can be given.

また、請求項2の発明は、アドバイスに対する使用者の評価を問う質問をCPUが出力装置(ディスプレイ)に表示し、使用者が入力装置(キーボードまたはマウス)から入力した回答をCPUがフィードバック(次からの判定に反映)するようなプログラムにした。つまり、入力された回答に対して定められた点数の範囲でCPUが判定基準を修正する。これに従って使用者の精神状態の判定も修正され、次の判定から提示されるアドバイスも修正される。  In the invention of claim 2, the CPU displays a question asking the user's evaluation of the advice on the output device (display), and the CPU feeds back the answer input by the user from the input device (keyboard or mouse) (next The program is reflected in the judgment from In other words, the CPU corrects the determination criteria within a range of points determined for the input answer. Accordingly, the determination of the mental state of the user is also corrected, and the advice presented from the next determination is also corrected.

本発明により、使用者は意思決定に際し、その時の精神状態に合わせたアドバイスを得られ、また本発明のプログラムの使用を繰り返すほど、より使用者に合ったアドバイスを得ることができるようになる。  According to the present invention, when making a decision, the user can obtain advice according to the mental state at that time, and the more the user uses the program of the present invention, the more suitable advice can be obtained for the user.

第2図は、本発明によって実行される処理のフローである。まず、使用者が、希望する質問の回数を入力装置からCPUに入力する。すると、ハードディスク(HDD)に保存された質問の中からコンピューター(CPU)が無作為に質問を選択し、選択した質問をディスプレイに文字等の画像または音声にて表示する。使用者が質問への回答を文字等の画像または音声にて入力すると、CPUが使用者の回答を採点する。この過程を複数回くりかえす。CPUは各回答の点数を加算し、部分合計点数と総合点数を計算する。次に、HDDに記憶されている判定基準に照らして、CPUが部分合計点数と総合点数から使用者の精神状態を判定し、判定結果に割り当てられたアドバイスを選択し、ディスプレイに文字等の画像または音声にて表示する。ここで、一端、終了する。後に、アドバイスの効果が判明してから、使用者がそのアドバイスに対する評価を入力するためにCPUからプログラムを呼び出すと、CPUはアドバイスの結果を問う質問を文字等の画像または音声にてディスプレイに表示し、使用者がその質問に対する回答を文字等の画像または音声にて入力する。すると、CPUはその入力結果をフィードバックする(次の判定に反映する)。すなわち、入力結果に対し定められた点数の範囲でCPUが判定基準を修正し、修正された基準に基づいて次の判定がなされる。この過程を繰り返すことによって、さらに使用者に合わせた判定が可能になる。  FIG. 2 is a flow of processing executed by the present invention. First, the user inputs the desired number of questions from the input device to the CPU. Then, the computer (CPU) randomly selects a question from the questions stored in the hard disk (HDD), and displays the selected question as an image such as text or sound on the display. When the user inputs an answer to the question with an image or sound such as characters, the CPU scores the answer of the user. Repeat this process multiple times. The CPU adds the scores of each answer and calculates the partial total score and the total score. Next, the CPU determines the mental state of the user from the partial total score and the total score in accordance with the determination criteria stored in the HDD, selects the advice assigned to the determination result, and displays an image such as a character on the display. Or display by voice. Here, the process ends. Later, after the effectiveness of the advice is found, when the user calls a program from the CPU to input an evaluation for the advice, the CPU displays a question asking the result of the advice on the display in the form of images or sounds such as letters. Then, the user inputs an answer to the question with an image such as text or sound. Then, the CPU feeds back the input result (reflects on the next determination). That is, the CPU corrects the determination criterion within the range of the score determined for the input result, and the next determination is made based on the corrected criterion. By repeating this process, it is possible to make a determination according to the user.

判定基準とは、例えば、使用者のうつ気分やストレスの強さを点数で表したもので、点数が高いほどうつ気分やストレスが強いことを意味し、100点満点等に換算して表す。例えばうつ気分またはストレス度を、極低(0〜24点)、低(25〜50点)、中(51〜75点)、高(76〜100点)の4ランクに点数で分類し、これに使用者の得点数を当てはめて判定する。そして、点数の低い方から順番に、「油断に注意&再考してGO(進め)!」、「GO!」、「もし延期できるなら少し落ち着くまで延期がベター。延期できないなら慎重に、慎重に進め」、「延期したほうがよい」などのアドバイスを各々ディスプレイに表示する。  The criterion is, for example, a user's feelings of depression and stress expressed in points, and the higher the score, the stronger the feeling of depression and stress, which is expressed in terms of 100 points. For example, the mood or stress level is classified into 4 ranks of extremely low (0 to 24 points), low (25 to 50 points), medium (51 to 75 points), and high (76 to 100 points). Judgment is made by assigning the score of the user. And, in order from the lowest score, “Caution & rethink carefully and go ahead!”, “GO!”, “If it can be postponed, the postponement will be better until it settles down a little. Advice such as “Proceed” and “Prefer to postpone” is displayed on the display.

アドバイスに対する評価を問う質問に対して使用者が回答を入力するが、その入力結果をフィードバックする(入力結果を次の判定に反映する)とは、以下の過程を意味する。例えばストレス度低で「GO!」とアドバイスした場合、アドバイスに対する使用者の評価を、例えば「すごく良かった」「良かった」「普通」「良くなかった」の中から選択してもらう。評価が「良くなかった」であった場合、CPUがストレス度中ランクの点数幅を下方に広げ(例えば、48〜75点にする)、ストレス度低ランクの点数幅を狭くする(例えば、25〜47点にする)ことによって、「GO!」のアドバイスを出す基準を厳しくし、より低いストレス度でないと「GO!」が出ないようにする。逆に、使用者の評価が「すごく良かった」であれば、CPUがストレス度低ランクの点数幅を上方に広げる(例えば、25〜53点にする)ことによって、「GO!」のアドバイスを出す基準を緩め、前より少し高めのストレス度でも「GO!」が出るようにする。これらの一連の過程がこのプログラムのフィードバック機能(入力結果を次の判定に反映する)の一例である。  The user inputs an answer to a question asking about evaluation of advice, and feeding back the input result (reflecting the input result in the next determination) means the following process. For example, when the advice is “GO!” With a low degree of stress, the user's evaluation of the advice is selected from, for example, “very good”, “good”, “normal”, and “not good”. When the evaluation is “not good”, the CPU widens the score width of the middle rank of stress level (for example, 48 to 75 points) and narrows the score width of the lower rank of stress level (for example, 25). -47 points), the standard for giving advice on "GO!" Is tightened so that "GO!" Does not appear unless the stress level is lower. On the other hand, if the user's evaluation is “very good”, the CPU gives the advice of “GO!” By expanding the score range of low rank of stress degree upward (for example, 25 to 53 points). Loosen the standard to issue so that “GO!” Appears even at a slightly higher stress level than before. A series of these processes is an example of the feedback function (the input result is reflected in the next determination) of this program.

本発明で行われる処理の各ステップのフローである。It is a flow of each step of processing performed in the present invention.

Claims (2)

使用者の意思決定に際し、▲1▼使用者が希望する質問の回数を入力装置(キーボードまたはマウス)からCPUに入力するステップ、▲2▼CPUが記憶装置(HDD)に保存された質問の中から無作為に質問を呼び出すステップ、▲3▼呼び出された質問を出力装置(ディスプレイ)に出力するステップ、▲4▼使用者が回答を入力装置(キーボードまたはマウス)からCPUに入力するステップ、▲5▼CPUが回答を採点し加点してゆくステップ、▲6▼▲2▼から▲5▼をCPUが複数回繰り返すステップ、▲7▼CPUが部分合計点数と総合点数を計算するステップ、▲8▼CPUが、HDDに保存されている(点数などからなる)判定基準に使用者の部分合計点数または総合点数を当てはめ使用者の精神状態を判定し、判定結果に割り当てられたアドバイスを選択するステップ、▲9▼CPUが選択したアドバイスを出力装置(ディスプレイ)に出力するステップ、をコンピュータ(CPU)に実行させるプログラム。  (1) Step of inputting the number of questions desired by the user to the CPU from the input device (keyboard or mouse), and (2) Among the questions stored in the storage device (HDD) by the user. (3) Steps for randomly calling questions from (3) Steps for outputting the called questions to an output device (display) (4) Steps for a user to input an answer from the input device (keyboard or mouse) to the CPU 5) Step of CPU scoring and adding answers, Step of repeating (6) (2) to (5) multiple times, (7) Step of CPU calculating partial total score and total score, (8) ▼ CPU determines the mental state of the user by applying the user's partial total score or total score to the criteria (consisting of points etc.) stored in the HDD, and determines the result. The step of selecting an advice allocated, ▲ 9 ▼ CPU output device the selected advice program for executing the step of outputting the (display), to a computer (CPU). 前期プログラムは、次に、▲10▼アドバイスの効果が判明してから、使用者がその評価をCPUに入力するためにCPUからプログラムを呼び出すステップ、▲11▼CPUはアドバイスの評価を問う質問をHDDから呼び出し出力装置(ディスプレイ)に出力するステップ、▲12▼使用者が質問に対する回答を入力装置(キーボードまたはマウス)からCPUに入力するステップ、▲13▼CPUが入力された回答をプログラムにフィードバック(次からの判定に反映)する。すなわち、入力された回答によって、定められた点数の範囲でCPUが判定基準を修正するステップ。▲14▼この▲10▼から▲13▼、そして修正された判定基準で再び▲8▼から▲9▼へ、そして▲10▼へのステップを繰り返すことにより、さらに使用者に合わせた判定とアドバイス提示が可能になるステップ、をコンピュータ(CPU)に実行させるプログラム。  In the first half of the program, (10) after the effectiveness of the advice is found, the user calls the program from the CPU to input the evaluation into the CPU. (11) The CPU asks a question asking for advice evaluation. Step for outputting from HDD to call output device (display), (12) Step for user to input answer to question to CPU from input device (keyboard or mouse), (13) Feedback input by CPU to program (Reflect in the next judgment). That is, a step in which the CPU corrects the determination criterion within a predetermined score range based on the input answer. (14) By repeating the steps from (10) to (13), and from (8) to (9) and (10) again with the revised criteria, judgment and advice tailored to the user. A program that causes a computer (CPU) to execute a step that allows presentation.
JP2005107975A 2005-03-07 2005-03-07 Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice Pending JP2005216324A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005107975A JP2005216324A (en) 2005-03-07 2005-03-07 Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005107975A JP2005216324A (en) 2005-03-07 2005-03-07 Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005216324A true JP2005216324A (en) 2005-08-11

Family

ID=34909799

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005107975A Pending JP2005216324A (en) 2005-03-07 2005-03-07 Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2005216324A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020256108A1 (en) * 2019-06-20 2020-12-24 株式会社Kakeai Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on optimal way of communicating with each individual partner
JP2021002316A (en) * 2020-01-09 2021-01-07 株式会社Kakeai Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on how to best communicate with each person
US11461724B2 (en) 2018-06-13 2022-10-04 Kakeai, Inc. Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on communication

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11461724B2 (en) 2018-06-13 2022-10-04 Kakeai, Inc. Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on communication
WO2020256108A1 (en) * 2019-06-20 2020-12-24 株式会社Kakeai Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on optimal way of communicating with each individual partner
JP2021002156A (en) * 2019-06-20 2021-01-07 株式会社Kakeai Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on how to best communicate with each person
JP2021002316A (en) * 2020-01-09 2021-01-07 株式会社Kakeai Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on how to best communicate with each person

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8586849B1 (en) Media system and method of progressive instruction in the playing of a guitar based on user proficiency
US20150317911A1 (en) Musical piece evaluation device, musical piece evaluation method, musical piece evaluation program, and information storage medium having the program stored thereon
JP4695853B2 (en) Music search device
US8766078B2 (en) Music piece order determination device, music piece order determination method, and music piece order determination program
JP2021530342A (en) Systems and methods for dynamically generating and integrating interactive textual video game content
JP2005216324A (en) Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice
JP5222772B2 (en) Game system, game data difficulty correction method, and game data difficulty correction program
EP1426873A1 (en) Sentence creation apparatus and creation method
US20130312587A1 (en) Enhancement to the Private Study of Musical Performance
JP2013154072A (en) Exercise support device, exercise support method and program
JP6781780B2 (en) Game programs and game equipment
JP2014133071A (en) Game point managing device and program
JP2008003485A (en) Karaoke device
WO2022190453A1 (en) Fingering presentation device, training device, fingering presentation method, and training method
JP2016140727A (en) Program and game apparatus
JP5980613B2 (en) Screening support system and screening support program
KR20240038271A (en) Electronic terminal apparatus that supports to perform dictation practice based on the sentence for dictation practice and the operating method thereof
JP6552065B2 (en) Performance equipment
JP7069493B2 (en) Game programs and game equipment
KR102375572B1 (en) Electronic terminal device which automatically creates the training sentences to be used for creating the machine translation model and the operating method thereof
JP6620437B2 (en) Learning support apparatus and program
JP2011115420A (en) Game machine and game program
Lundberg TOWARDS GENRE TAILORED HEURISTICS FOR VISUAL NOVELS: What problems present in visual novels does existing heuristics fail to address?
Akiba et al. Learning to Read Music by Differences in Perception of Information
KR20240105672A (en) Apparatus For Providing User-customized Contents For Improving Cognitive Ability And Method Thereof