JP2005216324A - Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice - Google Patents
Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2005216324A JP2005216324A JP2005107975A JP2005107975A JP2005216324A JP 2005216324 A JP2005216324 A JP 2005216324A JP 2005107975 A JP2005107975 A JP 2005107975A JP 2005107975 A JP2005107975 A JP 2005107975A JP 2005216324 A JP2005216324 A JP 2005216324A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- cpu
- user
- advice
- program
- evaluation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 16
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 title 1
- 230000006996 mental state Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000003340 mental effect Effects 0.000 abstract 4
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 240000002834 Paulownia tomentosa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010678 Paulownia tomentosa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- VREFGVBLTWBCJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N alprazolam Chemical compound C12=CC(Cl)=CC=C2N2C(C)=NN=C2CN=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 VREFGVBLTWBCJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036651 mood Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明は、コンピューター(CPU)を、使用者の(うつ度やストレス状況などの)精神状態にあったアドバイスを提示し意思決定を支援し、またアドバイスに対する評価を使用者がCPUに入力することにより、その評価を次の判定とアドバイス提示に反映すること(フィードバック)ができるように機能させるプログラムに関するものである。 In the present invention, the computer (CPU) presents advice suitable for the mental state (such as depression or stress) of the user, supports decision making, and the user inputs an evaluation for the advice to the CPU. Thus, the program relates to a program that allows the evaluation to be reflected (feedback) in the next determination and advice presentation.
従来、占いやストレス度診断などのプログラムは存在し、また質問もハミルトンのうつ病評価法Hamilton,M:A rating acale for depression.J.Neurol.Neurosurg Psychiat.,23:56,1960や、ツングのSelf−rating Depression Scale(SDS)Zung,W.W.K:Aself−rating depression scale.Arch.Gen.Psychiat.,12:63,1965などを参考にして任意に作成できるし、判定基準も任意に作成できるが、使用者の意思決定に際し、複数の質問に対する回答の点数と判定基準をもとにアドバイスを提示し、さらにアドバイスに対する使用者の評価をフィードバックしてCPUが判定基準を修正できるプログラムに関する文献は見当たらない。 Conventionally, there are programs such as fortune-telling and stress level diagnosis, and the question is Hamilton's depression evaluation method Hamilton, M: A rating scale for depression. J. et al. Neurol. Neurosurg Psychiat. 23:56, 1960, and Tung's Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) Zung, W. et al. W. K: Aself-rating depression scale. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. , 12:63, 1965, etc., can be created arbitrarily, and judgment criteria can also be created arbitrarily, but when users make decisions, advice is presented based on the scores and judgment criteria of answers to multiple questions However, there is no literature on a program that allows the CPU to correct the judgment criteria by feeding back the user's evaluation of the advice.
従って、本発明が解決しようとする課題は、コンピューター(CPU)を、使用者の意思決定に際し、その精神状態に合わせたアドバイスを提示し意思決定を支援し、またアドバイスの効果に対する使用者の評価を次の判定にフィードバックすることができるように機能させるプログラムを提供することにある。 Therefore, the problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a computer (CPU) with advice according to the mental state at the time of decision making by the user, to support the decision making, and to evaluate the effect of the advice by the user. It is an object to provide a program that functions so as to be fed back to the next determination.
この課題を解決するための請求項1の発明は、複数の質問と、質問に対する回答に対して与えられる点数の部分合計点数または総合点数からなる使用者の精神状態の判定基準と、その判定基準に合わせて作成されたアドバイスをHDDに保存する。使用者が出した回答の合計点からCPUが判定し選択したアドバイスを出力装置(ディスプレイ)に表示するプログラムである。これによって、使用者の精神状態に合わせたアドバイスを与えることができる。The invention of claim 1 for solving this problem includes a judgment standard for a user's mental state comprising a plurality of questions and a partial total score or a total score given to the answer to the question, and the judgment standard. The advice created according to is stored in the HDD. This is a program for displaying on the output device (display) the advice determined and selected by the CPU from the total number of answers given by the user. Thereby, advice tailored to the mental state of the user can be given.
また、請求項2の発明は、アドバイスに対する使用者の評価を問う質問をCPUが出力装置(ディスプレイ)に表示し、使用者が入力装置(キーボードまたはマウス)から入力した回答をCPUがフィードバック(次からの判定に反映)するようなプログラムにした。つまり、入力された回答に対して定められた点数の範囲でCPUが判定基準を修正する。これに従って使用者の精神状態の判定も修正され、次の判定から提示されるアドバイスも修正される。 In the invention of claim 2, the CPU displays a question asking the user's evaluation of the advice on the output device (display), and the CPU feeds back the answer input by the user from the input device (keyboard or mouse) (next The program is reflected in the judgment from In other words, the CPU corrects the determination criteria within a range of points determined for the input answer. Accordingly, the determination of the mental state of the user is also corrected, and the advice presented from the next determination is also corrected.
本発明により、使用者は意思決定に際し、その時の精神状態に合わせたアドバイスを得られ、また本発明のプログラムの使用を繰り返すほど、より使用者に合ったアドバイスを得ることができるようになる。 According to the present invention, when making a decision, the user can obtain advice according to the mental state at that time, and the more the user uses the program of the present invention, the more suitable advice can be obtained for the user.
第2図は、本発明によって実行される処理のフローである。まず、使用者が、希望する質問の回数を入力装置からCPUに入力する。すると、ハードディスク(HDD)に保存された質問の中からコンピューター(CPU)が無作為に質問を選択し、選択した質問をディスプレイに文字等の画像または音声にて表示する。使用者が質問への回答を文字等の画像または音声にて入力すると、CPUが使用者の回答を採点する。この過程を複数回くりかえす。CPUは各回答の点数を加算し、部分合計点数と総合点数を計算する。次に、HDDに記憶されている判定基準に照らして、CPUが部分合計点数と総合点数から使用者の精神状態を判定し、判定結果に割り当てられたアドバイスを選択し、ディスプレイに文字等の画像または音声にて表示する。ここで、一端、終了する。後に、アドバイスの効果が判明してから、使用者がそのアドバイスに対する評価を入力するためにCPUからプログラムを呼び出すと、CPUはアドバイスの結果を問う質問を文字等の画像または音声にてディスプレイに表示し、使用者がその質問に対する回答を文字等の画像または音声にて入力する。すると、CPUはその入力結果をフィードバックする(次の判定に反映する)。すなわち、入力結果に対し定められた点数の範囲でCPUが判定基準を修正し、修正された基準に基づいて次の判定がなされる。この過程を繰り返すことによって、さらに使用者に合わせた判定が可能になる。 FIG. 2 is a flow of processing executed by the present invention. First, the user inputs the desired number of questions from the input device to the CPU. Then, the computer (CPU) randomly selects a question from the questions stored in the hard disk (HDD), and displays the selected question as an image such as text or sound on the display. When the user inputs an answer to the question with an image or sound such as characters, the CPU scores the answer of the user. Repeat this process multiple times. The CPU adds the scores of each answer and calculates the partial total score and the total score. Next, the CPU determines the mental state of the user from the partial total score and the total score in accordance with the determination criteria stored in the HDD, selects the advice assigned to the determination result, and displays an image such as a character on the display. Or display by voice. Here, the process ends. Later, after the effectiveness of the advice is found, when the user calls a program from the CPU to input an evaluation for the advice, the CPU displays a question asking the result of the advice on the display in the form of images or sounds such as letters. Then, the user inputs an answer to the question with an image such as text or sound. Then, the CPU feeds back the input result (reflects on the next determination). That is, the CPU corrects the determination criterion within the range of the score determined for the input result, and the next determination is made based on the corrected criterion. By repeating this process, it is possible to make a determination according to the user.
判定基準とは、例えば、使用者のうつ気分やストレスの強さを点数で表したもので、点数が高いほどうつ気分やストレスが強いことを意味し、100点満点等に換算して表す。例えばうつ気分またはストレス度を、極低(0〜24点)、低(25〜50点)、中(51〜75点)、高(76〜100点)の4ランクに点数で分類し、これに使用者の得点数を当てはめて判定する。そして、点数の低い方から順番に、「油断に注意&再考してGO(進め)!」、「GO!」、「もし延期できるなら少し落ち着くまで延期がベター。延期できないなら慎重に、慎重に進め」、「延期したほうがよい」などのアドバイスを各々ディスプレイに表示する。 The criterion is, for example, a user's feelings of depression and stress expressed in points, and the higher the score, the stronger the feeling of depression and stress, which is expressed in terms of 100 points. For example, the mood or stress level is classified into 4 ranks of extremely low (0 to 24 points), low (25 to 50 points), medium (51 to 75 points), and high (76 to 100 points). Judgment is made by assigning the score of the user. And, in order from the lowest score, “Caution & rethink carefully and go ahead!”, “GO!”, “If it can be postponed, the postponement will be better until it settles down a little. Advice such as “Proceed” and “Prefer to postpone” is displayed on the display.
アドバイスに対する評価を問う質問に対して使用者が回答を入力するが、その入力結果をフィードバックする(入力結果を次の判定に反映する)とは、以下の過程を意味する。例えばストレス度低で「GO!」とアドバイスした場合、アドバイスに対する使用者の評価を、例えば「すごく良かった」「良かった」「普通」「良くなかった」の中から選択してもらう。評価が「良くなかった」であった場合、CPUがストレス度中ランクの点数幅を下方に広げ(例えば、48〜75点にする)、ストレス度低ランクの点数幅を狭くする(例えば、25〜47点にする)ことによって、「GO!」のアドバイスを出す基準を厳しくし、より低いストレス度でないと「GO!」が出ないようにする。逆に、使用者の評価が「すごく良かった」であれば、CPUがストレス度低ランクの点数幅を上方に広げる(例えば、25〜53点にする)ことによって、「GO!」のアドバイスを出す基準を緩め、前より少し高めのストレス度でも「GO!」が出るようにする。これらの一連の過程がこのプログラムのフィードバック機能(入力結果を次の判定に反映する)の一例である。 The user inputs an answer to a question asking about evaluation of advice, and feeding back the input result (reflecting the input result in the next determination) means the following process. For example, when the advice is “GO!” With a low degree of stress, the user's evaluation of the advice is selected from, for example, “very good”, “good”, “normal”, and “not good”. When the evaluation is “not good”, the CPU widens the score width of the middle rank of stress level (for example, 48 to 75 points) and narrows the score width of the lower rank of stress level (for example, 25). -47 points), the standard for giving advice on "GO!" Is tightened so that "GO!" Does not appear unless the stress level is lower. On the other hand, if the user's evaluation is “very good”, the CPU gives the advice of “GO!” By expanding the score range of low rank of stress degree upward (for example, 25 to 53 points). Loosen the standard to issue so that “GO!” Appears even at a slightly higher stress level than before. A series of these processes is an example of the feedback function (the input result is reflected in the next determination) of this program.
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2005107975A JP2005216324A (en) | 2005-03-07 | 2005-03-07 | Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2005107975A JP2005216324A (en) | 2005-03-07 | 2005-03-07 | Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2005216324A true JP2005216324A (en) | 2005-08-11 |
Family
ID=34909799
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2005107975A Pending JP2005216324A (en) | 2005-03-07 | 2005-03-07 | Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP2005216324A (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2020256108A1 (en) * | 2019-06-20 | 2020-12-24 | 株式会社Kakeai | Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on optimal way of communicating with each individual partner |
JP2021002316A (en) * | 2020-01-09 | 2021-01-07 | 株式会社Kakeai | Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on how to best communicate with each person |
US11461724B2 (en) | 2018-06-13 | 2022-10-04 | Kakeai, Inc. | Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on communication |
-
2005
- 2005-03-07 JP JP2005107975A patent/JP2005216324A/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11461724B2 (en) | 2018-06-13 | 2022-10-04 | Kakeai, Inc. | Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on communication |
WO2020256108A1 (en) * | 2019-06-20 | 2020-12-24 | 株式会社Kakeai | Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on optimal way of communicating with each individual partner |
JP2021002156A (en) * | 2019-06-20 | 2021-01-07 | 株式会社Kakeai | Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on how to best communicate with each person |
JP2021002316A (en) * | 2020-01-09 | 2021-01-07 | 株式会社Kakeai | Computer system, program, and method for providing advice on how to best communicate with each person |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8586849B1 (en) | Media system and method of progressive instruction in the playing of a guitar based on user proficiency | |
US20150317911A1 (en) | Musical piece evaluation device, musical piece evaluation method, musical piece evaluation program, and information storage medium having the program stored thereon | |
JP4695853B2 (en) | Music search device | |
US8766078B2 (en) | Music piece order determination device, music piece order determination method, and music piece order determination program | |
JP2021530342A (en) | Systems and methods for dynamically generating and integrating interactive textual video game content | |
JP2005216324A (en) | Computer program capable of giving advice to user for decision making and executing cpu feedback of evaluation for advice | |
JP5222772B2 (en) | Game system, game data difficulty correction method, and game data difficulty correction program | |
EP1426873A1 (en) | Sentence creation apparatus and creation method | |
US20130312587A1 (en) | Enhancement to the Private Study of Musical Performance | |
JP2013154072A (en) | Exercise support device, exercise support method and program | |
JP6781780B2 (en) | Game programs and game equipment | |
JP2014133071A (en) | Game point managing device and program | |
JP2008003485A (en) | Karaoke device | |
WO2022190453A1 (en) | Fingering presentation device, training device, fingering presentation method, and training method | |
JP2016140727A (en) | Program and game apparatus | |
JP5980613B2 (en) | Screening support system and screening support program | |
KR20240038271A (en) | Electronic terminal apparatus that supports to perform dictation practice based on the sentence for dictation practice and the operating method thereof | |
JP6552065B2 (en) | Performance equipment | |
JP7069493B2 (en) | Game programs and game equipment | |
KR102375572B1 (en) | Electronic terminal device which automatically creates the training sentences to be used for creating the machine translation model and the operating method thereof | |
JP6620437B2 (en) | Learning support apparatus and program | |
JP2011115420A (en) | Game machine and game program | |
Lundberg | TOWARDS GENRE TAILORED HEURISTICS FOR VISUAL NOVELS: What problems present in visual novels does existing heuristics fail to address? | |
Akiba et al. | Learning to Read Music by Differences in Perception of Information | |
KR20240105672A (en) | Apparatus For Providing User-customized Contents For Improving Cognitive Ability And Method Thereof |