JP2005047397A - Pneumatic tire - Google Patents

Pneumatic tire Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2005047397A
JP2005047397A JP2003282011A JP2003282011A JP2005047397A JP 2005047397 A JP2005047397 A JP 2005047397A JP 2003282011 A JP2003282011 A JP 2003282011A JP 2003282011 A JP2003282011 A JP 2003282011A JP 2005047397 A JP2005047397 A JP 2005047397A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
rib
groove
width
land portion
circumferential
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2003282011A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Toru Kawai
亨 河合
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd
Priority to JP2003282011A priority Critical patent/JP2005047397A/en
Publication of JP2005047397A publication Critical patent/JP2005047397A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To suppress deterioration of cornering performance on snow while exhibiting excellent on-ice performance. <P>SOLUTION: A rib width RW is partitioned in a plurality of rib-like land part 4 containing the rib-like land part 6 having the width of 0.1 to 0.3 times of the tread contact land width TW by a peripheral main groove 3 larger having a groove width W1 of larger than 4 mm. The wide width rib-like land part 6 is partitioned into narrow rib parts 6A, 6B at both sides by a peripheral narrow groove having the groove width W2 of 1.0 to 4.0 mm. The lug grooves 9 having a pitch interval P of 1.5 to 4.0 times of the rib width RW are provided on at least one narrow rib part. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

本発明は、スタッドレスタイヤとして好適であり、優れた氷上性能を維持しながら雪上性能を改善しうる空気入りタイヤに関する。   The present invention relates to a pneumatic tire that is suitable as a studless tire and that can improve performance on snow while maintaining excellent performance on ice.

スタッドレスタイヤは、従来、ブロックパターンに多数のサイピングを形成し、主にブロック面と氷面との接触による粘着摩擦力、および前記ブロックやサイピングのエッジによる路面掘りおこし摩擦力(エッジ効果)の作用によって、氷上性能を確保している。   Studless tires have conventionally formed a large number of sipings in the block pattern, mainly due to the action of adhesive frictional force caused by contact between the block surface and the ice surface, and road surface digging frictional force (edge effect) caused by the edge of the block or siping. , Ensuring on-ice performance.

これに対して、近年、氷上性能の一層の向上を図るため、一部のブロック列を巾の広い周方向リブに置き換えるとともに、該巾広の周方向リブに、多数のサイピングを形成する手法が採用されている。この手法では、接地面積が高まることによる粘着摩擦力の向上と、サイピングの総長さが高まることのよる路面掘りおこし摩擦力の向上との双方が発揮されるため、前記氷上性能の一層の向上が達成されるのである。   On the other hand, in recent years, in order to further improve the performance on ice, there is a method of replacing some block rows with wide circumferential ribs and forming a large number of sipings on the wide circumferential ribs. It has been adopted. In this method, both the improvement of the adhesion friction force due to the increase in the contact area and the improvement of the frictional force caused by the excavation of the road surface due to the increase in the total length of the siping are exhibited. It is done.

しかながら、このような巾広の周方向リブの採用では、パターン剛性が高くなりすぎ、リブに撓みや捻れが生じにくくなり、雪上でのコーナリング性能が悪化するという問題がある。
特開平6−199111号公報 特開平6−297918号公報 特開平8−183312号公報 特開2000−225814号公報
However, when such a wide circumferential rib is used, there is a problem that the pattern rigidity becomes too high, the rib is less likely to bend or twist, and the cornering performance on snow is deteriorated.
JP-A-6-199111 JP-A-6-297918 JP-A-8-1831312 JP 2000-225814 A

そこで本発明は、巾広の周方向リブを用いた前記手法とほぼ同等の優れた氷上性能を発揮しながら、雪上でのコーナリング性能の低下を抑制した空気入りタイヤの提供を目的としている。   SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a pneumatic tire that suppresses a decrease in cornering performance on snow while exhibiting excellent on-ice performance substantially equivalent to the above-described method using a wide circumferential rib.


前記目的を達成するために、本願請求項1の発明は、トレッド部を、溝巾W1が4.0mmより大な周方向主溝により複数のリブ状陸部に区分し、かつ各リブ状陸部に、このリブ状陸部を横切る向きのサイピングをタイヤ周方向に隔設した空気入りタイヤであって、
前記リブ状陸部は、リブ巾RWがトレッド接地巾TWの0.1〜0.3倍の巾広のリブ状陸部を含み、かつ該巾広のリブ状陸部は、溝巾W2が1.0〜4.0mmの周方向細溝により両側の細リブ部分に区分されるとともに、
少なくとも一方の細リブ部分に、周方向主溝から周方向細溝までのび、かつタイヤ周方向のピッチ間隔Pが前記リブ巾RWの1.5〜4.0倍のラグ溝を設けたことを特徴としている。

In order to achieve the above object, the invention of claim 1 of the present application divides the tread portion into a plurality of rib-like land portions by a circumferential main groove having a groove width W1 larger than 4.0 mm, and each rib-like land. A pneumatic tire in which a siping in a direction crossing the rib-like land portion is provided in the tire circumferential direction;
The rib-like land portion includes a rib-like land portion whose rib width RW is 0.1 to 0.3 times the tread grounding width TW, and the wide rib-like land portion has a groove width W2. It is divided into narrow ribs on both sides by circumferential narrow grooves of 1.0 to 4.0 mm,
A lug groove extending from the circumferential main groove to the circumferential narrow groove and having a pitch interval P in the tire circumferential direction of 1.5 to 4.0 times the rib width RW is provided in at least one narrow rib portion. It is a feature.

又請求項2の発明では、前記ラグ溝は、溝巾Wyが2.5〜8.0mmであって、かつ前記周方向細溝との交差部でのラグ溝の溝深さHycは、周方向主溝との交差部での溝深さHysより大であることを特徴としている。   In the invention of claim 2, the lug groove has a groove width Wy of 2.5 to 8.0 mm, and the groove depth Hyc of the lug groove at the intersection with the circumferential narrow groove is It is characterized by being larger than the groove depth Hys at the intersection with the direction main groove.

又請求項3の発明では、一方の前記細リブ部分に配されるラグ溝と、他方の前記細リブ部分に配されるラグ溝とは、周方向に交互に配されることを特徴としている。   Further, the invention of claim 3 is characterized in that the lug groove disposed in one of the thin rib portions and the lug groove disposed in the other thin rib portion are alternately disposed in the circumferential direction. .

又請求項4の発明では、前記リブ状陸部は、タイヤ赤道に最も近い内のリブ状陸部と、トレッド接地縁に沿う外のリブ状陸部と、その間に配される中のリブ状陸部とを含み、かつ該中のリブ状陸部を前記巾広のリブ状陸部で形成するとともに、
この巾広のリブ状陸部は、タイヤ赤道側の細リブ部分の剛性をトレッド接地縁側の細リブ部分の剛性よりも大としたことを特徴としている。
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, the rib-shaped land portion includes an inner rib-shaped land portion closest to the tire equator, an outer rib-shaped land portion along the tread grounding edge, and an intermediate rib-shaped land portion disposed therebetween. And forming a rib-like land portion in the wide rib-like land portion,
This wide rib-shaped land portion is characterized in that the rigidity of the thin rib portion on the tire equator side is larger than the rigidity of the thin rib portion on the tread ground edge side.

本発明は叙上の如く構成しているため、巾広の周方向リブを用いたものとほぼ同等の優れた氷上性能を発揮しながら、雪上でのコーナリング性能の低下を抑制できる。   Since the present invention is configured as described above, it is possible to suppress a decrease in cornering performance on snow while exhibiting excellent on-ice performance substantially equivalent to that using a wide circumferential rib.

以下、本発明の実施の一形態を、図示例とともに説明する。   Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

図1は、本発明の空気入りタイヤが乗用車用のスタッドレスタイヤとして形成された場合のトレッドパターンの展開図である。   FIG. 1 is a development view of a tread pattern when the pneumatic tire of the present invention is formed as a studless tire for a passenger car.

図1において、空気入りタイヤ1は、トレッド部2を、周方向主溝3により複数のリブ状陸部4に区分するとともに、各リブ状陸部4に、このリブ状陸部4を横切る向きの複数のサイピング5をタイヤ周方向に隔設している。   In FIG. 1, a pneumatic tire 1 divides a tread portion 2 into a plurality of rib-like land portions 4 by a circumferential main groove 3, and each rib-like land portion 4 has a direction across the rib-like land portion 4. A plurality of sipings 5 are spaced apart in the tire circumferential direction.

本例では、周方向主溝3が、タイヤ赤道C上をのびる内の周方向主溝3aと、その外側に配される中の周方向主溝3bと、さらにその外側に配される外の周方向主溝3cとの5本からなる場合を例示している。これによって、トレッド部2は、6本のリブ状陸部4、即ち周方向主溝3a、3b間の内のリブ状陸部4i、周方向主溝3b、3c間の中のリブ状陸部4m、及び外の周方向主溝3cよりタイヤ軸方向外側の外のリブ状陸部4oに区分される。   In this example, the circumferential main groove 3 has an inner circumferential main groove 3a extending on the tire equator C, an inner circumferential main groove 3b arranged on the outer side, and an outer outer arranged on the outer side. The case where it consists of five with the circumferential direction main groove 3c is illustrated. As a result, the tread portion 2 has six rib-like land portions 4, that is, rib-like land portions 4i between the circumferential main grooves 3a and 3b and rib-like land portions between the circumferential main grooves 3b and 3c. 4 m, and the outer circumferential main groove 3c and the outer rib-shaped land portion 4o outside the tire axial direction.

ここで、前記周方向主溝3とは、溝巾W1が4.0mmより大な周方向溝として定義しており、もし溝巾W1が、例えば中の周方向主溝3bの如く変化する場合には、最大の溝巾W1max と最小の溝巾W1min との平均値(W1max +溝巾W1min )/2として定義する。なお前記溝巾W1の上限は、接地面積確保の観点から、15mm以下とするのが好ましい。   Here, the circumferential main groove 3 is defined as a circumferential groove having a groove width W1 larger than 4.0 mm, and the groove width W1 changes, for example, like the inner circumferential main groove 3b. Is defined as an average value (W1max + groove width W1min) / 2 of the maximum groove width W1max and the minimum groove width W1min. The upper limit of the groove width W1 is preferably 15 mm or less from the viewpoint of securing a ground contact area.

又周方向主溝3の溝深さD1(図3に示す)は、本願では特に規制しないが、従来的なスタッドレスタイヤのものと同程度の深さ、例えば乗用車用タイヤでは、溝深さD1は8〜12mmの範囲のものが好適に採用できる。本例では、溝深さD1が10mmの場合を例示している。又周方向主溝3は、タイヤ周方向に直線状にのびるストレート溝であっても、又ジグザグ状にのびるジグザグ溝であっても良く、本例では、内の周方向主溝3aを直線溝で、又中、外の周方向主溝3b、3cをジグザグ溝でそれぞれ形成している。   The groove depth D1 (shown in FIG. 3) of the circumferential main groove 3 is not particularly limited in the present application, but is the same depth as that of a conventional studless tire, for example, a groove depth D1 in a passenger car tire. In the range of 8 to 12 mm, it can be suitably employed. In this example, the case where the groove depth D1 is 10 mm is illustrated. The circumferential main groove 3 may be a straight groove extending linearly in the tire circumferential direction or a zigzag groove extending in a zigzag shape. In this example, the circumferential main groove 3a is a straight groove. In addition, the inner and outer circumferential main grooves 3b and 3c are formed by zigzag grooves, respectively.

次に、周方向主溝3により区分された前記6本のリブ状陸部4i、4m、4oのうち、本例では、中のリブ状陸部4mを、そのリブ巾RWがトレッド接地巾TWの0.1〜0.3倍の巾広のリブ状陸部6として形成している。それ以外のリブ状陸部4i、4oのリブ巾RWは、当然ではあるが、トレッド接地巾TWの0.1倍未満である。   Next, out of the six rib-like land portions 4i, 4m, and 4o divided by the circumferential main groove 3, in this example, the rib-like land portion 4m of the inner rib-like land portion 4m has a tread grounding width TW. It is formed as a rib-like land portion 6 that is 0.1 to 0.3 times as wide as. The rib width RW of the other rib-like land portions 4i, 4o is naturally less than 0.1 times the tread ground contact width TW.

なお、前記「リブ巾RW」は、本願では、図2の如く、リブ状陸部4の一方の側縁e1と他方の側縁e2との間のタイヤ軸方向の最大の距離(トレッド面上で測定する)として定義している。従って、例えば側縁e1、e2が実質的に直線の場合には、側縁e1、e2間のタイヤ軸方向の距離であり、ジグザグ状をなす場合(リブ状陸部4mの場合)には、一方の側縁e1のジグザグ出隅と、他方の側縁e2のジグザグ出隅との間のタイヤ軸方向の距離である。   In the present application, the “rib width RW” is the maximum distance in the tire axial direction (on the tread surface) between one side edge e1 and the other side edge e2 of the rib-like land portion 4 as shown in FIG. Measured in). Therefore, for example, when the side edges e1 and e2 are substantially straight, it is the distance in the tire axial direction between the side edges e1 and e2, and in the case of a zigzag shape (in the case of the rib-like land portion 4m), This is the distance in the tire axial direction between the zigzag protruding corner of one side edge e1 and the zigzag protruding corner of the other side edge e2.

又前記「トレッド接地巾TW」とは、タイヤを、JATMA、TRA、ETRTO等の規格で定まる正規リムにリム組みしかつ正規内圧を充填するとともに、正規荷重を負荷したときに接地するトレッド接地面のタイヤ軸方向の最大巾を意味する。なお正規リムは、JATMAであれば標準リム、TRAであれば "Design Rim" 、ETRTOであれば "Measuring Rim"を意味する。又正規内圧は、JATMAであれば最高空気圧、TRAであれば表 "TIRE LOAD LIMITS AT VARIOUS COLD INFLATION PRESSURES" に記載の最大値、ETRTOであれば "INFLATION PRESSURE" であるが、乗用車用タイヤである場合には180KPaとする。また正規荷重は、JATMAであれば最大負荷能力、TRAであれば表 "TIRE LOAD LIMITS AT VARIOUS COLD INFLATION PRESSURES" に記載の最大値、ETRTOであれば "LOAD CAPACITY"を意味し、乗用車用タイヤである場合には、その88%に相当する荷重をいう。   The “tread grounding width TW” is a tread grounding surface where the tire is assembled to a normal rim determined by standards such as JATMA, TRA, ETRTO, etc. Means the maximum width in the tire axial direction. The regular rim means a standard rim for JATMA, “Design Rim” for TRA, and “Measuring Rim” for ETRTO. The regular internal pressure is the maximum air pressure for JATMA, the maximum value described in the table "TIRE LOAD LIMITS AT VARIOUS COLD INFLATION PRESSURES" for TRA, and "INFLATION PRESSURE" for ETRTO, but it is a tire for passenger cars. In this case, it is set to 180 KPa. The regular load means the maximum load capacity for JATMA, the maximum value listed in the table “TIRE LOAD LIMITS AT VARIOUS COLD INFLATION PRESSURES” for TRA, and “LOAD CAPACITY” for ETRTO. In some cases, the load is equivalent to 88%.

そして本実施形態では、図2に示すように、前記巾広のリブ状陸部6を、周方向細溝7により、タイヤ軸方向両側の細リブ部分6A、6Bに区分するとともに、少なくとも一方、好ましくは双方の細リブ部分6A、6Bに、前記周方向主溝3から周方向細溝7までのびるラグ溝9を形成している。   And in this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, while the said wide rib-shaped land part 6 is divided into the thin rib part 6A, 6B of a tire axial direction both sides by the circumferential direction fine groove 7, and at least one, Preferably, a lug groove 9 extending from the circumferential main groove 3 to the circumferential narrow groove 7 is formed in both the thin rib portions 6A and 6B.

この時、重要なことは、
・ 前記周方向細溝7の溝巾W2を、1.0〜4.0mmとする、
・ 前記ラグ溝9のタイヤ周方向のピッチ間隔Pを、前記リブ巾RWの1.5〜4.0倍と相対的に長く確保することである。
At this time, the important thing is
The groove width W2 of the circumferential narrow groove 7 is 1.0 to 4.0 mm.
-The pitch interval P in the tire circumferential direction of the lug grooves 9 is secured relatively long to 1.5 to 4.0 times the rib width RW.

これによって、前記巾広のリブ状陸部6が、周方向に連続する周方向リブである場合と略同等の氷上性能を確保しながら、剛性を適度に緩和し、雪上でのコーナリング性能の悪化を抑制しうるのである。   As a result, while the wide rib-like land portion 6 has substantially the same on-ice performance as the circumferential rib that is continuous in the circumferential direction, the rigidity is moderately moderated and the cornering performance on the snow is deteriorated. Can be suppressed.

即ち、前記リブ状陸部6を巾広とすることにより、接地面積が高まり粘着摩擦力が向上する。又リブ状陸部6に設けるサイピング5の総長さも増すため、エッジによる路面掘りおこし摩擦力も向上でき、氷上性能の一層の向上が達成される。   That is, by making the rib-like land portion 6 wide, the contact area is increased and the adhesive frictional force is improved. Further, since the total length of the siping 5 provided on the rib-like land portion 6 is also increased, the road surface excavation frictional force by the edge can be improved, and further improvement in performance on ice can be achieved.

又前記周方向細溝7は、接地面積を確保しながら、前記リブ状陸部6の横剛性を緩和する役割を果たすものであり、前記溝巾W2が4.0mmを越えると、接地面積が確保できず、前記リブ状陸部6を巾広としたメリット、即ち氷上性能の向上効果が維持されなくなる。又溝巾W2が1.0mm未満であると、接地時に周方向細溝7が閉じてしまい、横剛性の緩和効果が発揮されなくなる。従って、溝巾W2は、2.0〜3.5mmの範囲がより好ましい。なお周方向細溝7刃、直線溝であってもジグザグ溝であっても良い。   The circumferential narrow groove 7 plays a role of relaxing the lateral rigidity of the rib-like land portion 6 while ensuring a ground contact area. When the groove width W2 exceeds 4.0 mm, the ground contact area is reduced. It cannot be ensured, and the merit of widening the rib-like land portion 6, that is, the effect of improving the performance on ice cannot be maintained. On the other hand, if the groove width W2 is less than 1.0 mm, the circumferential narrow groove 7 is closed at the time of grounding, and the effect of reducing the lateral rigidity is not exhibited. Therefore, the groove width W2 is more preferably in the range of 2.0 to 3.5 mm. In addition, it may be a circumferential narrow groove 7 blade, a straight groove or a zigzag groove.

又前記ラグ溝9は、リブ状陸部6を実質的に縦長のブロックに区分するものであり、接地面積を確保しながら、前記リブ状陸部6の周方向剛性、及び捻り剛性を緩和する役割を果たす。なおピッチ間隔Pが、リブ巾RWの1.5倍未満であると、ラグ溝9の占める割合が増加するなど接地面積が確保できず、氷上性能の向上効果が維持されなくなる。逆にピッチ間隔Pが、リブ巾RWの4.0倍を越えると、リブ状陸部6の周方向剛性、及び捻り剛性が依然大であり、雪上でのコーナリング性能の悪化抑制効果が発揮されなくなる。従って、ピッチ間隔Pは、リブ巾RWの1.8〜3.0倍がより好ましい。   The lug groove 9 divides the rib-like land portion 6 into substantially vertically long blocks, and relaxes the circumferential rigidity and torsional rigidity of the rib-like land portion 6 while ensuring a ground contact area. Play a role. If the pitch interval P is less than 1.5 times the rib width RW, the ratio of the lug grooves 9 increases, and the contact area cannot be secured, and the effect of improving the performance on ice cannot be maintained. On the contrary, when the pitch interval P exceeds 4.0 times the rib width RW, the circumferential rigidity and torsional rigidity of the rib-like land portion 6 are still large, and the effect of suppressing deterioration of cornering performance on snow is exhibited. Disappear. Therefore, the pitch interval P is more preferably 1.8 to 3.0 times the rib width RW.

又ラグ溝9は、その溝巾Wy(溝巾が変化する場合は平均値とする)を2.5〜8.0mmの範囲とするのが好ましく、8.0mmを越えると接地面積が低減し、氷上性能の向上効果が維持されなくなる。逆に2.5mm未満では、雪上でのコーナリング性能が悪化傾向となる。従って溝巾Wyは、4.0〜6.0mmの範囲がより好ましい。   Further, the lug groove 9 preferably has a groove width Wy (average value when the groove width changes) in the range of 2.5 to 8.0 mm, and if it exceeds 8.0 mm, the ground contact area is reduced. As a result, the performance improvement effect on ice is not maintained. Conversely, if it is less than 2.5 mm, the cornering performance on snow tends to deteriorate. Therefore, the groove width Wy is more preferably in the range of 4.0 to 6.0 mm.

又本例では、図3に示すように、前記ラグ溝9が周方向細溝7と交差する交差部Qcにおけるラグ溝9の溝深さHycを、周方向主溝3と交差する交差部Qsにおける溝深さHysより大としている。なお本例では、周方向細溝7の溝深さD2は、周方向主溝3の前記溝深さD1よりも浅く、又前記溝深さHycと溝深さD2とはほぼ同深さである場合が例示されている。   In this example, as shown in FIG. 3, the groove depth Hyc of the lug groove 9 at the intersection Qc where the lug groove 9 intersects the circumferential thin groove 7 is set to the intersection Qs where the lug groove 9 intersects the circumferential main groove 3. The groove depth is greater than Hys. In this example, the groove depth D2 of the circumferential narrow groove 7 is shallower than the groove depth D1 of the circumferential main groove 3, and the groove depth Hyc and the groove depth D2 are substantially the same depth. One case is illustrated.

このように、ラグ溝9の溝深さに変化を設けることにより、より均一で適切な剛性が確保できるようになる。もし剛性が不均一、即ち剛性が高い部分が存在する場合、摩擦係数が低い例えば鏡面状の路面では、リブ状陸部6全体が滑って氷上性能が損なわれる恐れを生じるが、このような問題を防止できる。   Thus, by providing a change in the groove depth of the lug groove 9, more uniform and appropriate rigidity can be secured. If the rigidity is non-uniform, i.e., there is a portion with high rigidity, for example, on a mirror-like road surface with a low friction coefficient, there is a possibility that the entire rib-like land portion 6 may slip and impair the performance on ice. Can be prevented.

又同じ目的で、本例では、一方の前記細リブ部分6Aに配されるラグ溝9Aと、他方の前記細リブ部分6Bに配されるラグ溝9Bとを、周方向に交互に配している。これによって、剛性の均一化をさらに発揮することができる。なおラグ溝9は、タイヤ軸方向に対して30度以下の角度で形成することが好ましく、又ラグ溝9Aとラグ溝9Bとでその傾斜の向きを異ならせても良い。   For the same purpose, in this example, lug grooves 9A arranged in one of the thin rib portions 6A and lug grooves 9B arranged in the other thin rib portion 6B are alternately arranged in the circumferential direction. Yes. As a result, uniform rigidity can be further exhibited. The lug grooves 9 are preferably formed at an angle of 30 degrees or less with respect to the tire axial direction, and the inclination directions of the lug grooves 9A and the lug grooves 9B may be different.

次に、図4に、巾広のリブ状陸部6の他の例を示している。本例では、周方向細溝7をトレッド接地縁TE側に偏位して配することにより、タイヤ赤道側の細リブ部分6Aの巾を、トレッド接地縁TE側の細リブ部分6Bの巾よりも大に設定している。これによって、細リブ部分6Aの剛性を、細リブ部分6Bの剛性に比して高めている。   Next, FIG. 4 shows another example of the wide rib-like land portion 6. In this example, the circumferential narrow groove 7 is offset to the tread grounding edge TE side, so that the width of the thin rib part 6A on the tire equator side is larger than the width of the thin rib part 6B on the tread grounding edge TE side. Also set to large. Thereby, the rigidity of the thin rib portion 6A is increased as compared with the rigidity of the thin rib portion 6B.

これは、タイヤ赤道側は接地圧が高いため、比較的大きな摩擦力が期待できるためである。そこで、このタイヤ赤道側の細リブ部分6Aの剛性をトレッド接地縁TE側の細リブ部分6Bの剛性に比して大きくしてやることにより、最適な剛性分布が生まれ、最大の摩擦力を発揮することが期待できる。   This is because a relatively large frictional force can be expected because the ground contact pressure is high on the tire equator side. Therefore, by making the rigidity of the thin rib portion 6A on the tire equator side larger than the rigidity of the thin rib portion 6B on the tread grounding edge TE side, an optimal rigidity distribution is created and the maximum frictional force is exhibited. Can be expected.

なお細リブ部分6A、6Bの間に剛性差を設ける手段として、他に、
・ラグ溝9Aの溝深さをラグ溝9Bよりも浅くする、
・細リブ部分6Aに配するサイピング5を、細リブ部分6Bに配するサイピング5よりも浅くする、或いは本数を少なくする;
・細リブ部分6Bのみにラグ溝9Bを形成する
等を挙げることができ、これらを組み合わせて実施することもできる。
In addition, as means for providing a rigidity difference between the thin rib portions 6A and 6B,
-The depth of the lug groove 9A is shallower than the lug groove 9B.
The siping 5 disposed in the thin rib portion 6A is shallower than the siping 5 disposed in the thin rib portion 6B or the number thereof is reduced;
-The lug groove 9B can be formed only in the thin rib portion 6B, and these can be combined.

又前記サイピング5は、従来と同様、1.0mm以下(本例では0.3mm程度)の巾を有する切込み状をなし、周方向に対して略直角に形成することが好ましい。本例では、エッジ効果を高めるために、サイピング5の中間位置に、タイヤ軸方向にジグザグ状にのびる蛇行部分を形成したものを例示しており、これによってサイピング1本当たりのエッジ成分長さを増大している。なお蛇行部分の形状に関しては、鋸刃状、矩形凹凸状、波状等種々な形状が採用できる。   In addition, the siping 5 is preferably formed in a cut shape having a width of 1.0 mm or less (in this example, about 0.3 mm) and substantially perpendicular to the circumferential direction as in the prior art. In this example, in order to enhance the edge effect, an example in which a meandering portion extending zigzag in the tire axial direction is formed at an intermediate position of the siping 5 is used, and thereby the edge component length per siping is increased. It is increasing. As for the shape of the meandering portion, various shapes such as a saw blade shape, a rectangular uneven shape, and a wave shape can be adopted.

又サイピング5の深さは、一般に、周方向細溝7の前記溝深さD2以下かつ周方向主溝3の前記溝深さD1の0.5倍以上とする。   Further, the depth of the siping 5 is generally not more than the groove depth D2 of the circumferential narrow groove 7 and not less than 0.5 times the groove depth D1 of the circumferential main groove 3.

次に、前記巾広のリブ状陸部6以外となるリブ状陸部4i、4oについて説明する。本例では、内のリブ状陸部4iは、前記ラグ溝9と略同構成のラグ溝10によって、縦長のブロックの列に形成される。なお本例では、ラグ溝10は、その溝深さが、周方向主溝3の前記溝深さD1と実質的に同深さという点で前記ラグ溝9と相違している。   Next, the rib-like land portions 4i and 4o other than the wide rib-like land portion 6 will be described. In this example, the inner rib-shaped land portion 4 i is formed in a row of vertically long blocks by the lug groove 10 having substantially the same configuration as the lug groove 9. In this example, the lug groove 10 is different from the lug groove 9 in that the groove depth is substantially the same as the groove depth D1 of the circumferential main groove 3.

又外のリブ状陸部4oは、前記ラグ溝10によって、本例では、横長のブロックの列に形成しており、これによってコーナリングフォースを高めている。   Further, the outer rib-like land portion 4o is formed in a row of horizontally long blocks in this example by the lug groove 10, thereby enhancing the cornering force.

なお本発明においては、前述の巾広のリブ状陸部6が少なくとも1本配されていれば良く、この時、他のリブ状陸部3を周方向リブとして形成することもできる。   In the present invention, it is sufficient that at least one wide rib-like land portion 6 described above is provided, and at this time, another rib-like land portion 3 can be formed as a circumferential rib.

以上、本発明の特に好ましい実施形態について詳述したが、本発明は図示の実施形態に限定されることなく、種々の態様に変形して実施しうる。   As mentioned above, although especially preferable embodiment of this invention was explained in full detail, this invention is not limited to embodiment of illustration, It can deform | transform and implement in a various aspect.

(テスト1)
図5(A)のトレッドパターンを基本とし、周方向細溝7の溝巾W2のみを変化させた表1の仕様のタイヤ(サイズ195/65R15)を試作し、その氷上性能と雪上コーナリング性能とをテストした。なお他の仕様は、以下の通り同一である。周方向主溝3の溝巾W1(7.0mm)及び溝深さD1(10mm)、周方向細溝7の溝深さD2(9mm)、巾広のリブ状陸部6のリブ巾RW(34mm;比RW/TW=0.20)、サイピング5の深さ(8mm)及びピッチ間隔(3.0mm)。
(Test 1)
A tire (size 195 / 65R15) having the specifications shown in Table 1 in which only the groove width W2 of the circumferential narrow groove 7 is changed based on the tread pattern of FIG. 5 (A) was prototyped, and its on-ice performance and on-snow cornering performance Tested. Other specifications are the same as follows. The groove width W1 (7.0 mm) and groove depth D1 (10 mm) of the circumferential main groove 3, the groove depth D2 (9 mm) of the circumferential narrow groove 7, and the rib width RW of the wide rib-like land portion 6 ( 34 mm; ratio RW / TW = 0.20), depth of siping 5 (8 mm) and pitch interval (3.0 mm).

氷上性能:
試供タイヤを、内圧(200kpa)、リム(15x6JJ)の基で、乗用車(FR車:2000cc)の四輪に装着し、気温0゜Cの環境下で氷盤路を走行し、ドライバーの官能評価により比較例1を7とする10点法で評価した。数値が大きいほど、氷上性能に優れている。
On-ice performance:
A sample tire is mounted on the four wheels of a passenger car (FR vehicle: 2000cc) under the internal pressure (200kpa) and rim (15x6JJ), and runs on an icy road in an environment with a temperature of 0 ° C. Thus, evaluation was carried out by a 10-point method in which Comparative Example 1 was 7. The larger the value, the better the performance on ice.

雪上コーナリング性能:
前記(1)の車両を用い、気温0゜Cの環境下で積雪の周回路を走行し、ドライバーの官能評価により比較例1を4とする10点法で評価した。数値が大きいほど、雪上コーナリング性能に優れている。
Snow cornering performance:
Using the vehicle (1), the vehicle was run on a snowy circuit in an environment with a temperature of 0 ° C., and evaluation was performed by a ten-point method with Comparative Example 1 being set to 4 by sensory evaluation of the driver. The larger the value, the better the snow cornering performance.

Figure 2005047397
表1の如く、溝巾W2が4.0mm以下の範囲で、周方向細溝7がない比較例1の場合と実質的に同レベルの優れた氷上性能が確保でき、又溝巾W2が1.0mm以上の範囲で、雪上コーナリング性能の低下の抑制効果が発生するのが確認できる。
Figure 2005047397
As shown in Table 1, in the range where the groove width W2 is 4.0 mm or less, excellent on-ice performance substantially the same level as in the case of Comparative Example 1 without the circumferential narrow groove 7 can be secured, and the groove width W2 is 1 It can be confirmed that the effect of suppressing the decrease in cornering performance on snow occurs within a range of 0.0 mm or more.

(テスト2)
次に、図5(A)にラグ溝9をさらに形成した図5(B)のトレッドパターンを基本とし、ラグ溝9のピッチ間隔Pのみを変化させた表2の仕様のタイヤを試作し、その氷上性能と雪上コーナリング性能とをテストした。なお周方向細溝7の溝巾W2(2mm)、ラグ溝9の溝巾Wy(5.0mm)及び溝深さHy(8.5mm)であり、他の仕様は、テスト1と同一である。
(Test 2)
Next, on the basis of the tread pattern of FIG. 5 (B) in which the lug grooves 9 are further formed in FIG. 5 (A), a tire having the specifications shown in Table 2 in which only the pitch interval P of the lug grooves 9 is changed is prototyped, The on-ice performance and on-snow cornering performance were tested. Note that the groove width W2 (2 mm) of the circumferential narrow groove 7, the groove width Wy (5.0 mm) and the groove depth Hy (8.5 mm) of the lug groove 9, and other specifications are the same as those in Test 1. .

Figure 2005047397
表2の如く、ピッチ間隔Pとリブ巾RWとの比P/RWが1.5以上で、前記比較例1の場合と実質的に同レベルの優れた氷上性能が確保できる。しかも比P/RWが4.0以下の範囲では、表1の比較例6、7と実質的に同レベルまで雪上コーナリング性能を引き上げうることが確認できる。
Figure 2005047397
As shown in Table 2, the ratio P / RW between the pitch interval P and the rib width RW is 1.5 or more, and excellent on-ice performance substantially the same level as in the case of the comparative example 1 can be secured. Moreover, in the range where the ratio P / RW is 4.0 or less, it can be confirmed that the on-snow cornering performance can be increased to substantially the same level as Comparative Examples 6 and 7 in Table 1.

(テスト3)
次に、図5(B)のトレッドパターンを基本とし、ラグ溝9の溝巾Wyのみを変化させた表3の仕様のタイヤを試作し、その氷上性能と雪上コーナリング性能とをテストした。なお周方向細溝7の溝巾W2(2mm)、ラグ溝9のピッチ間隔P(2.0×RW)であり、他の仕様は、テスト1と同一である。
(Test 3)
Next, a tire having the specifications shown in Table 3 in which only the groove width Wy of the lug groove 9 was changed based on the tread pattern of FIG. 5B was prototyped, and its on-ice performance and on-snow cornering performance were tested. Note that the groove width W2 (2 mm) of the circumferential narrow groove 7 and the pitch interval P (2.0 × RW) of the lug groove 9 are the same as in Test 1.

Figure 2005047397
表3の如く、溝巾Wyが2.5〜8.0mmの範囲において、氷上性能と雪上コーナリング性能とを高いレベルでバランス良く発揮しうるのがわかる。
Figure 2005047397
As shown in Table 3, when the groove width Wy is in the range of 2.5 to 8.0 mm, it can be seen that the performance on ice and the cornering performance on snow can be exhibited at a high level with a good balance.

(テスト4)
又図6(A)の如く、両側のラグ溝9Aを同位相で形成したもの、及び図6(B)の如く、細リブ部分6Aにおいてラグ溝9Aを排除し剛性を高めたものを試作し、その氷上性能と雪上コーナリング性能とをテストした。なお周方向細溝7の溝巾W2(2mm)、ラグ溝9の溝巾Wy(5.0mm)およびピッチ間隔P(2.0×RW)であり、他の仕様は、テスト1と同一である。
(Test 4)
Also, as shown in FIG. 6 (A), both the lug grooves 9A on both sides are formed in the same phase, and as shown in FIG. 6 (B), the thin rib portions 6A are eliminated to eliminate the lug grooves 9A and increase the rigidity. The on-ice performance and on-snow cornering performance were tested. The circumferential narrow groove 7 has a groove width W2 (2 mm), a lug groove 9 has a groove width Wy (5.0 mm), and a pitch interval P (2.0 × RW). The other specifications are the same as those in Test 1. is there.

Figure 2005047397
表4の如く、ラグ溝9Aを同位相としたものでは、剛性のかたよりが生じ、特に摩耗係数の低い氷上性能が若干悪化している。一方、タイヤ赤道側のラグ溝9Aを排除したものは、接地圧力の高い赤道側の剛性が高いため、摩擦力の均一化により氷上性能と雪上性能がともにバランス良く向上しているのがわかる。
Figure 2005047397
As shown in Table 4, when the lug grooves 9A have the same phase, rigidity is produced, and the performance on ice with a particularly low wear coefficient is slightly deteriorated. On the other hand, since the equatorial side with high contact pressure has high rigidity, the lug groove 9A on the tire equator side has high rigidity, and it can be seen that both the performance on ice and the performance on snow are improved in a well-balanced manner by making the frictional force uniform.

本発明の一実施例のタイヤのトレッドパターンを示す展開図である。It is an expanded view which shows the tread pattern of the tire of one Example of this invention. 巾広のリブ状陸部を拡大して示す線図である。It is a diagram which expands and shows a wide rib-like land part. 巾広のリブ状陸部の断面図である。It is sectional drawing of a wide rib-like land part. 巾広のリブ状陸部6の他の例を示す線図である。It is a diagram which shows the other example of the wide rib-shaped land part 6. FIG. (A)、(B)は、テスト1〜3で用いたトレッドパターンを例示する線図である。(A), (B) is a diagram which illustrates the tread pattern used in tests 1-3. (A)、(B)は、テスト4で用いたトレッドパターンを例示する線図である。(A), (B) is a diagram which illustrates the tread pattern used in Test 4. FIG.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

2 トレッド部
3、3a、3b、3c 周方向主溝
4、4i、4m、4o リブ状陸部
5 サイピング
6 巾広のリブ状陸部
6A、6B 細リブ部分
7 周方向細溝
9 ラグ溝
Qc、Qs 交差部
2 Tread parts 3, 3a, 3b, 3c Circumferential main grooves 4, 4i, 4m, 4o Rib-like land part 5 Siping 6 Wide rib-like land parts 6A, 6B Narrow rib part 7 Circumferential narrow groove 9 Lug groove Qc , Qs intersection

Claims (4)

トレッド部を、溝巾W1が4.0mmより大な周方向主溝により複数のリブ状陸部に区分し、かつ各リブ状陸部に、このリブ状陸部を横切る向きのサイピングをタイヤ周方向に隔設した空気入りタイヤであって、
前記リブ状陸部は、リブ巾RWがトレッド接地巾TWの0.1〜0.3倍の巾広のリブ状陸部を含み、かつ該巾広のリブ状陸部は、溝巾W2が1.0〜4.0mmの周方向細溝により両側の細リブ部分に区分されるとともに、
少なくとも一方の細リブ部分に、周方向主溝から周方向細溝までのび、かつタイヤ周方向のピッチ間隔Pが前記リブ巾RWの1.5〜4.0倍のラグ溝を設けたことを特徴とする空気入りタイヤ。
The tread portion is divided into a plurality of rib-like land portions by circumferential main grooves having a groove width W1 larger than 4.0 mm, and siping in a direction crossing the rib-like land portions is arranged on the tire circumference. A pneumatic tire spaced in a direction,
The rib-shaped land portion includes a rib-shaped land portion whose rib width RW is 0.1 to 0.3 times the tread grounding width TW, and the wide rib-shaped land portion has a groove width W2. It is divided into narrow ribs on both sides by circumferential narrow grooves of 1.0 to 4.0 mm,
A lug groove extending from the circumferential main groove to the circumferential narrow groove and having a pitch interval P in the tire circumferential direction of 1.5 to 4.0 times the rib width RW is provided in at least one narrow rib portion. A featured pneumatic tire.
前記ラグ溝は、溝巾Wyが2.5〜8.0mmであって、かつ前記周方向細溝との交差部でのラグ溝の溝深さHycは、周方向主溝との交差部での溝深さHysより大であることを特徴とする請求項1記載の空気入りタイヤ。   The lug groove has a groove width Wy of 2.5 to 8.0 mm, and the groove depth Hyc at the intersection with the circumferential thin groove is at the intersection with the circumferential main groove. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein the groove depth is greater than Hys. 一方の前記細リブ部分に配されるラグ溝と、他方の前記細リブ部分に配されるラグ溝とは、周方向に交互に配されることを特徴とする請求項1、2記載の空気入りタイヤ。   The air according to claim 1, wherein the lug groove disposed in one of the thin rib portions and the lug groove disposed in the other thin rib portion are alternately disposed in the circumferential direction. Enter tire. 前記リブ状陸部は、タイヤ赤道に最も近い内のリブ状陸部と、トレッド接地縁に沿う外のリブ状陸部と、その間に配される中のリブ状陸部とを含み、かつ該中のリブ状陸部を前記巾広のリブ状陸部で形成するとともに、
この巾広のリブ状陸部は、タイヤ赤道側の細リブ部分の剛性をトレッド接地縁側の細リブ部分の剛性よりも大としたことを特徴とする請求項1〜3の何れかにの記載の空気入りタイヤ。
The rib-shaped land portion includes an inner rib-shaped land portion closest to the tire equator, an outer rib-shaped land portion along the tread grounding edge, and an intermediate rib-shaped land portion disposed therebetween, and While forming the rib-like land portion in the wide rib-like land portion,
4. The wide rib-like land portion according to claim 1, wherein the rigidity of the thin rib portion on the tire equator side is larger than the rigidity of the thin rib portion on the tread grounding edge side. Pneumatic tires.
JP2003282011A 2003-07-29 2003-07-29 Pneumatic tire Pending JP2005047397A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003282011A JP2005047397A (en) 2003-07-29 2003-07-29 Pneumatic tire

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003282011A JP2005047397A (en) 2003-07-29 2003-07-29 Pneumatic tire

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005047397A true JP2005047397A (en) 2005-02-24

Family

ID=34267353

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2003282011A Pending JP2005047397A (en) 2003-07-29 2003-07-29 Pneumatic tire

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2005047397A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010149761A (en) * 2008-12-25 2010-07-08 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire
JP2011042281A (en) * 2009-08-21 2011-03-03 Bridgestone Corp Tire
US7942177B2 (en) 2008-06-04 2011-05-17 The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. Pneumatic tire with tread having lug grooves, sipes, and fine groove
WO2017090715A1 (en) 2015-11-27 2017-06-01 横浜ゴム株式会社 Pneumatic tire
CN109414963A (en) * 2016-07-12 2019-03-01 横滨橡胶株式会社 Pneumatic tire
DE102018221505A1 (en) 2017-12-13 2019-06-13 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. Pneumatic tire

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7942177B2 (en) 2008-06-04 2011-05-17 The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. Pneumatic tire with tread having lug grooves, sipes, and fine groove
JP2010149761A (en) * 2008-12-25 2010-07-08 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire
JP2011042281A (en) * 2009-08-21 2011-03-03 Bridgestone Corp Tire
WO2017090715A1 (en) 2015-11-27 2017-06-01 横浜ゴム株式会社 Pneumatic tire
CN108349328A (en) * 2015-11-27 2018-07-31 横滨橡胶株式会社 Pneumatic tire
CN108349328B (en) * 2015-11-27 2020-06-16 横滨橡胶株式会社 Pneumatic tire
US11241917B2 (en) 2015-11-27 2022-02-08 The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. Pneumatic tire
CN109414963A (en) * 2016-07-12 2019-03-01 横滨橡胶株式会社 Pneumatic tire
CN109414963B (en) * 2016-07-12 2021-01-22 横滨橡胶株式会社 Pneumatic tire
DE102018221505A1 (en) 2017-12-13 2019-06-13 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. Pneumatic tire
US11052709B2 (en) 2017-12-13 2021-07-06 Toyo Tire Corporation Pneumatic tire
DE102018221505B4 (en) 2017-12-13 2022-09-08 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. Pneumatic tire

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4830005B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP4469399B2 (en) studless tire
RU2441765C2 (en) Non-studded tire
EP2130691B1 (en) Pneumatic Tire
EP2077193B1 (en) Pneumatic tire
CN106183645B (en) Winter tire
US11027579B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP6558297B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2008307918A (en) Pneumatic tire
EP3115229B1 (en) Heavy duty pneumatic tire
JP2010143532A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP4769540B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP5993400B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP4715890B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2006143040A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP6926679B2 (en) tire
JP2009241882A (en) Heavy-duty pneumatic tire
US11312182B2 (en) Tyre
JP2005047397A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2013103567A (en) Pneumatic tire
JPH11342706A (en) Pneumatic tire for show-icy road
JP4765406B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2017105467A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2005349970A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2006082632A (en) Pneumatic tire