JP2003217990A - Method for screening laminated ceramic capacitor - Google Patents

Method for screening laminated ceramic capacitor

Info

Publication number
JP2003217990A
JP2003217990A JP2002018118A JP2002018118A JP2003217990A JP 2003217990 A JP2003217990 A JP 2003217990A JP 2002018118 A JP2002018118 A JP 2002018118A JP 2002018118 A JP2002018118 A JP 2002018118A JP 2003217990 A JP2003217990 A JP 2003217990A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
insulation resistance
lot
ceramic capacitor
threshold value
screening
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2002018118A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4085640B2 (en
Inventor
Osami Yamada
修身 山田
Kiyoshi Nakagawa
潔 中川
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd filed Critical Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd
Priority to JP2002018118A priority Critical patent/JP4085640B2/en
Publication of JP2003217990A publication Critical patent/JP2003217990A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4085640B2 publication Critical patent/JP4085640B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method for screening a laminated ceramic capacitor, in which the number of lamination is relatively high, with few wrong distinguishing between a non-defective product and a defective product. <P>SOLUTION: A laminated ceramic capacitor is sampled in each lot to measure the insulation resistance. From the average value in each lot of the measured insulation resistance, a threshold which determines the quality of the insulation resistance of the laminated ceramic capacitor is decided in each lot. From the threshold determined in each lot, the quality of the insulation resistance of the laminated ceramic capacitor is determined in each lot. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2003,JPO

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】この発明は積層セラミックコ
ンデンサのスクリーニング方法に関し、特に誘電体層の
積層枚数が比較的多いたとえば200枚を超える積層セ
ラミックコンデンサの良否を判定する、積層セラミック
コンデンサのスクリーニング方法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for screening a monolithic ceramic capacitor, and more particularly to a method for screening a monolithic ceramic capacitor which determines the quality of a monolithic ceramic capacitor having a relatively large number of dielectric layers, for example, more than 200 dielectric layers. .

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】積層セラミックコンデンサの電気的な特
性に基づくスクリーニング方法は、通常、試料となる積
層セラミックコンデンサに定格電圧の3倍以上の耐電圧
を印加して、欠陥を有する試料を破壊しまたは絶縁抵抗
の劣化を起こさせ、その後、絶縁抵抗を測定し、絶縁抵
抗の大きさにより良品と不良品とを選別している。この
場合、絶縁抵抗の大きさがある特定の値以下のものを不
良品として除去している。この絶縁抵抗の良否を判定す
るしきい値は、同一品名たとえば同一アイテムまたは構
造設計および取得容量が同じものであれば、通常は全て
所定値に固定している。積層セラミックコンデンサにお
いて上述の欠陥を有する試料とは、誘電体層の複数層に
わたって絶縁抵抗が低いものや、点状または面状に欠陥
を有する数層の誘電体層の絶縁抵抗が低いものがある。
このような欠陥を有する試料の中でスクリーニングが最
も難しいものは、特定の1層だけが正常層に比べて絶縁
抵抗が低いモードのものである。また、我々の調査で
は、積層セラミックコンデンサの信頼性を阻害する不良
は、このモードのものが最も多いことが分かっている。
ところで、積層セラミックコンデンサにおいて誘電体層
の積層枚数が比較的少ない場合は、上述のように1層だ
けに欠陥を有する積層セラミックコンデンサが存在して
いても、良品と不良品との絶縁抵抗は大きく異なるの
で、スクリーニングは容易である。積層セラミックコン
デンサの良品および不良品について誘電体層の積層枚数
と絶縁抵抗との関係の一例を図1のグラフに示す。図1
のグラフより、積層枚数がたとえば200層以下と比較
的少ない場合には、良品と不良品との絶縁抵抗の差は非
常に大きいので、複数の製造ロットで製造された積層セ
ラミックコンデンサに対して、各ロットの平均的な絶縁
抵抗が変動しても、良否を判定するためのしきい値を変
える必要はないことが分かる。また、積層セラミックコ
ンデンサにおいて欠陥を有する試料は、耐電圧時に全て
絶縁破壊されるわけではなく、正常な試料の分布に対し
て外れ値となる場合がある。しかし、積層セラミックコ
ンデンサの誘電体層の積層枚数が少ない場合は、良品と
不良品との絶縁抵抗の差が非常に大きく異なるので、規
格値をしきい値として良品と不良品とを選別していれば
十分である。
2. Description of the Related Art A screening method based on the electrical characteristics of a monolithic ceramic capacitor usually applies a withstand voltage three times or more the rated voltage to a monolithic ceramic capacitor as a sample to destroy a sample having a defect or The insulation resistance is deteriorated, then the insulation resistance is measured, and the good product and the defective product are sorted according to the magnitude of the insulation resistance. In this case, those having a magnitude of insulation resistance equal to or smaller than a specific value are removed as defective products. The threshold values for determining the quality of the insulation resistance are normally fixed to predetermined values as long as they have the same product name, for example, the same item or the same structural design and acquired capacity. The samples having the above-mentioned defects in the monolithic ceramic capacitor include those having a low insulation resistance over a plurality of dielectric layers and those having a few dots or plane defects having a low insulation resistance. .
The most difficult sample to be screened from among those having such defects is a mode in which only one specific layer has a lower insulation resistance than the normal layer. In addition, in our research, it has been found that the defects that hinder the reliability of the monolithic ceramic capacitor are most often in this mode.
By the way, when the number of laminated dielectric layers is relatively small in the monolithic ceramic capacitor, even if there is a monolithic ceramic capacitor having a defect in only one layer as described above, the insulation resistance between the good product and the defective product is large. Since they are different, screening is easy. An example of the relationship between the number of laminated dielectric layers and the insulation resistance is shown in the graph of FIG. 1 for the good and defective monolithic ceramic capacitors. Figure 1
From the graph of (1), when the number of laminated layers is relatively small, for example, 200 layers or less, the difference in insulation resistance between the good product and the defective product is very large. Therefore, for the laminated ceramic capacitors manufactured in a plurality of manufacturing lots, It can be seen that even if the average insulation resistance of each lot fluctuates, it is not necessary to change the threshold value for judging the quality. Further, the samples having defects in the monolithic ceramic capacitor are not all subject to dielectric breakdown at the time of withstanding voltage, and may have outliers with respect to the normal sample distribution. However, when the number of laminated dielectric layers of a monolithic ceramic capacitor is small, the difference in insulation resistance between a good product and a defective product is very different.Therefore, the standard value is used as a threshold value to select the good product and the defective product. It is enough.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】ところが、近年の大容
量化に伴い、積層セラミックコンデンサの誘電体層の積
層枚数は増加し続けている。積層枚数の増加に伴い、同
じ信頼性に問題がある不良層が存在しても、全体の絶縁
抵抗は良品層と不良層との全体の並列接続で決まるの
で、たとえば図1のグラフに示すように、良品と不良品
との絶縁抵抗の差がだんだん小さくなる。また、積層セ
ラミックコンデンサの誘電体層の積層枚数が同じ場合で
も、良品層の絶縁抵抗が変化すれば、良品および不良品
の絶縁抵抗は変化する。たとえば、積層枚数が300枚
程度で、不良層を1層内在した積層セラミックコンデン
サを考えると、良品層の絶縁抵抗がたとえば10%変動
した場合、全体の絶縁抵抗も良品層の絶縁抵抗の変動に
伴い変動する。もともと、良品と不良品との絶縁抵抗の
差が大きければ、この変動は問題とならないが、積層枚
数がたとえば500枚と多い場合は、図2のグラフに示
すように、しきい値に対して無視できない大きさとな
る。図2は積層枚数が500枚の積層セラミックコンデ
ンサの良品および不良品についてロット間の絶縁抵抗が
変動した場合のロットの平均的な絶縁抵抗としきい値と
の関係の一例を示すグラフである。図2のグラフより、
絶縁抵抗の変化率が−20%であるロットにおける良品
の絶縁抵抗と不良品の絶縁抵抗との中間値をしきい値
とした場合には、絶縁抵抗の変化率が+20%であるロ
ットの不良品の絶縁抵抗がしきい値より大きくなり、
逆に、絶縁抵抗の変化率が+20%であるロットにおけ
る良品の絶縁抵抗と不良品の絶縁抵抗との中間値をしき
い値とした場合には、絶縁抵抗の変化率が−20%で
あるロットの良品の絶縁抵抗がしきい値より小さくな
ることが分かる。このため、積層枚数が多く良品と不良
品との絶縁抵抗の差が小さい積層セラミックコンデンサ
を同一のしきい値で選別していると、製造ロット間の絶
縁抵抗が変動した場合、ロットによっては不良品が良品
と間違えられて良品に混入する誤りやその逆に良品が不
良品に混入する誤りが発生する可能性が高く、正確なス
クリーニングができない場合がある。
However, with the recent increase in capacity, the number of laminated dielectric layers of the monolithic ceramic capacitor continues to increase. Even if there is a defective layer having the same reliability problem as the number of stacked layers increases, the overall insulation resistance is determined by the parallel connection of the non-defective layer and the defective layer. For example, as shown in the graph of FIG. In addition, the difference in insulation resistance between the good product and the defective product becomes smaller and smaller. Further, even when the number of laminated dielectric layers of the monolithic ceramic capacitor is the same, if the insulation resistance of the non-defective layer changes, the insulation resistance of the non-defective product and that of the non-defective product change. For example, when considering a laminated ceramic capacitor in which the number of laminated layers is about 300 and one defective layer is included, when the insulation resistance of the non-defective layer changes by 10%, for example, the overall insulation resistance also changes to the variation of the insulation resistance of the non-defective layer. Fluctuates with it. Originally, if the difference in insulation resistance between the non-defective product and the defective product is large, this fluctuation does not matter, but if the number of stacked layers is as large as 500, as shown in the graph of FIG. It will be a size that cannot be ignored. FIG. 2 is a graph showing an example of the relationship between the average insulation resistance of a lot and the threshold value when the insulation resistance between lots varies for a good product and a defective product of a multilayer ceramic capacitor having 500 laminated layers. From the graph in Figure 2,
If the threshold value is an intermediate value between the insulation resistance of a good product and the insulation resistance of a defective product in the lot with a change rate of insulation resistance of -20%, the difference between the lots with a change rate of insulation resistance of + 20% Insulation resistance of non-defective product becomes larger than the threshold,
On the contrary, when the threshold value is an intermediate value between the insulation resistance of the good product and the insulation resistance of the defective product in the lot in which the insulation resistance change rate is + 20%, the insulation resistance change rate is -20%. It can be seen that the insulation resistance of non-defective products in the lot is smaller than the threshold value. Therefore, if monolithic ceramic capacitors with a large number of laminated layers and a small difference in insulation resistance between good products and defective products are selected with the same threshold value, if the insulation resistance between manufacturing lots fluctuates, it may be different depending on the lot. There is a high possibility that an error occurs when a good product is mistaken for a good product and mixes with a good product, and conversely, an error that a good product mixes with a defective product occurs, and accurate screening may not be possible.

【0004】それゆえに、この発明の主たる目的は、積
層枚数が比較的多い積層セラミックコンデンサの良品と
不良品との判別の誤りが少ない、積層セラミックコンデ
ンサのスクリーニング方法を提供することである。
Therefore, a main object of the present invention is to provide a method for screening a multilayer ceramic capacitor in which misidentification of a good product and a bad product of a multilayer ceramic capacitor having a relatively large number of stacked layers is small.

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】この発明にかかる積層セ
ラミックコンデンサのスクリーニング方法は、絶縁抵抗
の大小によって積層セラミックコンデンサの良否を判定
する積層セラミックコンデンサのスクリーニング方法で
あって、積層セラミックコンデンサをロットごとにサン
プリングする工程と、サンプリングしたセラミックコン
デンサの絶縁抵抗を測定する工程と、測定した絶縁抵抗
から積層セラミックコンデンサの絶縁抵抗の良否を判定
するしきい値をロットごとに決定する工程と、ロットご
とに決定したしきい値から積層セラミックコンデンサの
絶縁抵抗の良否をロットごとに判定する工程とを含む、
積層セラミックコンデンサのスクリーニング方法であ
る。この発明にかかる積層セラミックコンデンサのスク
リーニング方法では、しきい値をロットごとに決定する
工程は、たとえば、測定した絶縁抵抗のロットごとの平
均値からしきい値をロットごとに決定する工程を含む。
A method for screening a laminated ceramic capacitor according to the present invention is a method for screening a laminated ceramic capacitor in which the quality of the laminated ceramic capacitor is judged according to the size of the insulation resistance. For each lot, the step of measuring the insulation resistance of the sampled ceramic capacitor, the step of determining the threshold value for judging the insulation resistance of the laminated ceramic capacitor from the measured insulation resistance for each lot, and Including the step of determining the quality of the insulation resistance of the multilayer ceramic capacitor for each lot from the determined threshold value,
This is a screening method for a laminated ceramic capacitor. In the multilayer ceramic capacitor screening method according to the present invention, the step of determining the threshold value for each lot includes, for example, the step of determining the threshold value for each lot from the measured average value of the insulation resistance for each lot.

【0006】この発明にかかる積層セラミックコンデン
サのスクリーニング方法では、積層セラミックコンデン
サをロットごとにサンプリングして絶縁抵抗を測定し
て、それぞれのロットに適したしきい値をロットごとに
決めているので、誤りの少ない正確な絶縁抵抗のスクリ
ーニングが可能となる。
In the multilayer ceramic capacitor screening method according to the present invention, the multilayer ceramic capacitors are sampled for each lot, the insulation resistance is measured, and the threshold value suitable for each lot is determined for each lot. It enables accurate screening of insulation resistance with few errors.

【0007】この発明の上述の目的、その他の目的、特
徴および利点は、図面を参照して行う以下の発明の実施
の形態の詳細な説明から一層明らかとなろう。
The above objects, other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of the embodiments of the invention with reference to the drawings.

【0008】[0008]

【発明の実施の形態】(実施例)積層セラミックコンデ
ンサについて、ある期間の量産での製造ロットの絶縁抵
抗の代表例を図3に示す。図3は、積層セラミックコン
デンサのサンプリングを行った期間中で絶縁抵抗が大き
いグループの代表ロットと絶縁抵抗が小さいグループ
の代表ロットとの絶縁抵抗の分布を示す図である。サ
ンプリングの対象は、同一品名であり、製造時期が異な
る以外は同一条件で生産された製品である。この製品の
誘電体層の積層枚数は350枚であり、誘電体層の厚み
は3μmで、取得静電容量は10μFである。また、こ
の製品の絶縁抵抗(IR)の規格値は、100MΩであ
り、図3ではグラフの縦軸(logIR)の下限の8.
0に当たる。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION (Example) FIG. 3 shows a typical example of the insulation resistance of a manufacturing lot of a monolithic ceramic capacitor in mass production for a certain period. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the distribution of the insulation resistance between the representative lot of the group having a large insulation resistance and the representative lot of the group having a small insulation resistance during the sampling period of the monolithic ceramic capacitor. The objects to be sampled are products having the same product name and manufactured under the same conditions except that the manufacturing time is different. The number of laminated dielectric layers of this product is 350, the thickness of the dielectric layers is 3 μm, and the acquired capacitance is 10 μF. The standard value of the insulation resistance (IR) of this product is 100 MΩ, and in FIG. 3, the lower limit of the vertical axis (logIR) of the graph is 8.
Hit 0.

【0009】この実施例では、積層セラミックコンデン
サの絶縁抵抗によるスクリーニング前に、図3に示す絶
縁抵抗のデータを取得し、絶縁抵抗の平均値やばらつき
の統計量をロットごとに求めている。なお、図3では、
絶縁抵抗を常用対数で示している。
In this embodiment, the data of the insulation resistance shown in FIG. 3 is acquired before the screening by the insulation resistance of the monolithic ceramic capacitor, and the average value of the insulation resistance and the statistical amount of the variation are obtained for each lot. In addition, in FIG.
Insulation resistance is shown in common logarithm.

【0010】次に、ロットの場合には、しきい値を常
用対数で8.25として、絶縁抵抗によるスクリーニン
グを行い、しきい値以上のものとしきい値未満のものと
に製品を2分割した。また、ロットの場合には、しき
い値を常用対数で8.10として、絶縁抵抗によるスク
リーニングを行い、同じくしきい値以上のものとしきい
値未満のものとに製品を2分割した。なお、ロットの
場合には、ロットのしきい値以上の製品に対して、ロ
ットのしきい値以上のものとそうでないものとに2分
割した。
Next, in the case of a lot, the threshold value was set to 8.25 in common logarithm, and screening was performed by insulation resistance, and the product was divided into two parts, one above the threshold and one below the threshold. . In the case of a lot, the threshold value was set to 8.10 in common logarithm, and screening was performed by insulation resistance, and the product was similarly divided into two that were above the threshold value and below the threshold value. In the case of a lot, a product having a lot threshold value or more was divided into two, one having a lot threshold value or more and the other having a lot threshold value or more.

【0011】さらに、分割されたしきい値より低い製品
に対して、再度絶縁抵抗を測定し直して、ロットの場
合は、8.10以上8.25未満のものと、8.00以
上8.10未満のものと、8.00未満のものとに分類
し、ロットの場合は、8.00以上8.10未満のも
のと、8.00未満のものとに分類した。
Further, the insulation resistance is measured again for the products having a divided value lower than the threshold value, and in the case of a lot, those having a value of 8.10 or more and less than 8.25 and 8.00 or more and 8. Less than 10 and less than 8.00 were classified, and in the case of lots, it was classified into 8.00 to less than 8.10 and less than 8.00.

【0012】上述の操作を絶縁抵抗が低いロットのグ
ループと高いロットのグループとでそれぞれ数ロット
繰り返した。このように分類して得られた製品の数を、
表1に分数の分母で示した。
The above operation was repeated for several lots in each of the low-insulation lot group and the high-insulation lot group. The number of products obtained by classifying in this way,
The denominator of the fraction is shown in Table 1.

【0013】[0013]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0014】上述のように絶縁抵抗によって分類された
製品に対して、125℃で定格電圧の2倍の電圧を印加
する高温負荷試験を実施し、2000時間のデータを取
得した。その結果を表1に示す。表1に示す分数の分母
は、上述した絶縁抵抗により分類された製品の数で、高
温負荷試験に投入した製品の個数を表す。表1に示す分
数の分子は、高温負荷試験の2000時間までに不良と
なった製品の数である。
The products classified by the insulation resistance as described above were subjected to a high temperature load test in which a voltage twice the rated voltage was applied at 125 ° C., and data for 2000 hours were acquired. The results are shown in Table 1. The denominator of the fraction shown in Table 1 is the number of products classified by the above-mentioned insulation resistance and represents the number of products put into the high temperature load test. The fractional numerator shown in Table 1 is the number of defective products by 2000 hours in the high temperature load test.

【0015】表1から明らかなように、どちらのロット
のグループも最初のスクリーニングのしきい値以上の絶
縁抵抗であると判断された製品からの不良は発生なかっ
た。しかし、絶縁抵抗が8.10以上8.25未満の製
品は、ロットの場合に不良が発生しているのに対し
て、ロットの場合には不良が発生していない。絶縁抵
抗がこの範囲の製品は、ロットの場合にはそのロット
の主分布に含まれるのに対して、ロットの場合には外
れ値であるという違いがある。すなわち、製品の信頼性
は、絶対的な絶縁抵抗で決まっているのではないことを
示している。
As is clear from Table 1, neither of the lot groups had defects from the products judged to have the insulation resistance equal to or higher than the threshold value of the first screening. However, in the case of the product having the insulation resistance of 8.10 or more and less than 8.25, the defect occurs in the lot, whereas the defect does not occur in the lot. Products with insulation resistance in this range are included in the main distribution of the lot in the case of a lot, but are outliers in the case of a lot. That is, it indicates that the reliability of the product is not determined by the absolute insulation resistance.

【0016】そのため、積層枚数が比較的多い積層セラ
ミックコンデンサを絶縁抵抗で選別する場合、ロット
のしきい値で全てのロットを選別すると、ロットに対
しては過剰な選別をしていることになる。逆に、ロット
のしきい値で選別していると、ロットに対しては信
頼性に対して不良を良品に混入するという誤りを犯すこ
とになる。
Therefore, when a multilayer ceramic capacitor having a relatively large number of laminated layers is sorted by insulation resistance, if all lots are sorted by the threshold value of lots, it means that lots are excessively sorted. . On the other hand, if the lots are selected according to the threshold value, an error of mixing defects into non-defective products will be made to the lots in terms of reliability.

【0017】すなわち、積層枚数が比較的多い積層セラ
ミックコンデンサを絶縁抵抗で選別する場合には、選別
の対象となるロットの絶縁抵抗に対する統計量を予め求
めておいて、その統計量より、妥当と思われるしきい値
を計算し、選別に取りかかることにより、誤り率の少な
いスクリーニングが可能となる。この妥当なしきい値
は、予め求めた統計量より、近似式を作り簡単に求める
ことができる。また、適切なしきい値は、対象ロットの
平均値やばらつきより、正規性などの仮定を入れること
により、理論的に求めることもできる。いずれにして
も、予め求めたロットごとの統計量により絶縁抵抗のし
きい値をロットごとに個別に変更すれば、不良を良品に
混入したりその逆の誤りを最小限に抑えたスクリーニン
グが可能となる。
That is, when a multilayer ceramic capacitor having a relatively large number of laminated layers is selected by insulation resistance, a statistical amount for the insulation resistance of a lot to be selected is obtained in advance, and the statistical value is regarded as appropriate. By calculating a possible threshold value and starting selection, screening with a low error rate becomes possible. This reasonable threshold value can be easily obtained by forming an approximate expression from the statistical amount obtained in advance. Further, the appropriate threshold value can be theoretically obtained by making assumptions such as normality based on the average value and variation of the target lot. In any case, if the threshold value of the insulation resistance is changed individually for each lot based on the previously obtained statistics for each lot, it is possible to carry out screening that minimizes the number of defective products and the reverse errors. Becomes

【0018】したがって、上述の実施例によれば、絶縁
抵抗によるスクリーニングにおいて、不良品を良品に混
入する誤りを最小限に抑えることが可能となる。また、
不良品に良品を混入するという過剰選別も減らすことが
できるので、歩留りを高く維持したスクリーニングが可
能となる。さらに、上述の実施例によれば、1台の設備
で統計量を求め、しきい値を設定しスクリーニングを行
うシステムとすることにより、設備間での絶縁抵抗の誤
差を排除できるため、上記の誤り率をさらに抑えた安定
したスクリーニングが可能となる。
Therefore, according to the above-described embodiment, it is possible to minimize the error of mixing a defective product into a good product in the screening by the insulation resistance. Also,
Since it is possible to reduce the excessive selection in which a defective product is mixed with a defective product, it is possible to perform screening while maintaining a high yield. Further, according to the above-described embodiment, since the system is such that the statistical amount is obtained by one piece of equipment, the threshold value is set, and the screening is performed, the error of the insulation resistance between the pieces of equipment can be eliminated. It enables stable screening with a further reduced error rate.

【0019】なお、上述の実施例のロットごとのしきい
値は例示であって、この発明では、スクリーニングされ
る積層セラミックコンデンサの絶縁抵抗の規格値などが
変われば、ロットごとのしきい値も他の値に変わること
もあり得る。
The threshold value for each lot in the above embodiment is an example, and in the present invention, if the standard value of the insulation resistance of the laminated ceramic capacitor to be screened is changed, the threshold value for each lot is also changed. It may change to another value.

【0020】また、上述の実施例ではしきい値以上のも
のを良品とし、しきい値未満ものものを不良品として判
別するようにしているが、この発明では、しきい値を超
えるものを良品とし、しきい値以下ものものを不良品と
して判別するようにしてもよい。
Further, in the above-described embodiment, the product having the threshold value or more is determined as a good product, and the product having the threshold value or less is determined as a defective product. Then, those below the threshold value may be determined as defective products.

【0021】[0021]

【発明の効果】この発明によれば、積層枚数が比較的多
い積層セラミックコンデンサの良品と不良品との判別の
誤りが少ない、積層セラミックコンデンサのスクリーニ
ング方法が得られる。
According to the present invention, it is possible to obtain a method for screening a laminated ceramic capacitor in which there is little error in distinguishing between a good product and a defective product of a laminated ceramic capacitor having a relatively large number of laminated layers.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】積層セラミックコンデンサの良品および不良品
について誘電体層の積層枚数と絶縁抵抗との関係の一例
を示すグラフである。
FIG. 1 is a graph showing an example of the relationship between the number of laminated dielectric layers and the insulation resistance for good and defective multilayer ceramic capacitors.

【図2】積層枚数が500枚の積層セラミックコンデン
サの良品および不良品についてロット間の絶縁抵抗が変
動した場合のロットの平均的な絶縁抵抗としきい値との
関係の一例を示すグラフである。
FIG. 2 is a graph showing an example of the relationship between the average insulation resistance of a lot and the threshold value when the insulation resistance between lots varies for a good product and a defective product of a multilayer ceramic capacitor having 500 laminated sheets.

【図3】積層セラミックコンデンサのサンプリングを行
った期間中で絶縁抵抗が大きいグループの代表ロット
と絶縁抵抗が小さいグループの代表ロットとの絶縁抵
抗の分布を示す図である。
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a distribution of insulation resistance between a representative lot of a group having a large insulation resistance and a representative lot of a group having a small insulation resistance during a sampling period of a laminated ceramic capacitor.

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 絶縁抵抗の大小によって積層セラミック
コンデンサの良否を判定する積層セラミックコンデンサ
のスクリーニング方法であって、 積層セラミックコンデンサをロットごとにサンプリング
する工程、 前記サンプリングしたセラミックコンデンサの絶縁抵抗
を測定する工程、および前記測定した絶縁抵抗から前記
積層セラミックコンデンサの絶縁抵抗の良否を判定する
しきい値を前記ロットごとに決定する工程、および前記
ロットごとに決定したしきい値から前記積層セラミック
コンデンサの絶縁抵抗の良否を前記ロットごとに判定す
る工程を含む、積層セラミックコンデンサのスクリーニ
ング方法。
1. A method of screening a laminated ceramic capacitor for judging the quality of the laminated ceramic capacitor according to the magnitude of the insulation resistance, the method comprising sampling the laminated ceramic capacitor for each lot, and measuring the insulation resistance of the sampled ceramic capacitor. And a step of determining a threshold value for judging whether the insulation resistance of the multilayer ceramic capacitor is good or bad from the measured insulation resistance for each lot, and an insulation of the multilayer ceramic capacitor from the threshold value determined for each lot. A method for screening a multilayer ceramic capacitor, comprising the step of judging the quality of resistance for each lot.
【請求項2】 前記しきい値を前記ロットごとに決定す
る工程は、前記測定した絶縁抵抗の前記ロットごとの平
均値から前記しきい値を前記ロットごとに決定する工程
を含む、請求項1に記載の積層セラミックコンデンサの
スクリーニング方法。
2. The step of determining the threshold value for each lot includes the step of determining the threshold value for each lot from an average value of the measured insulation resistance for each lot. A method for screening a monolithic ceramic capacitor as described in.
JP2002018118A 2002-01-28 2002-01-28 Screening method for multilayer ceramic capacitors Expired - Lifetime JP4085640B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002018118A JP4085640B2 (en) 2002-01-28 2002-01-28 Screening method for multilayer ceramic capacitors

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002018118A JP4085640B2 (en) 2002-01-28 2002-01-28 Screening method for multilayer ceramic capacitors

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2003217990A true JP2003217990A (en) 2003-07-31
JP4085640B2 JP4085640B2 (en) 2008-05-14

Family

ID=27653580

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2002018118A Expired - Lifetime JP4085640B2 (en) 2002-01-28 2002-01-28 Screening method for multilayer ceramic capacitors

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4085640B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2019212843A (en) * 2018-06-07 2019-12-12 株式会社村田製作所 Quality determination method of multilayer ceramic capacitor

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2019212843A (en) * 2018-06-07 2019-12-12 株式会社村田製作所 Quality determination method of multilayer ceramic capacitor
JP7127369B2 (en) 2018-06-07 2022-08-30 株式会社村田製作所 Determination method for quality of multilayer ceramic capacitors

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4085640B2 (en) 2008-05-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1479025B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for semiconductor testing
KR100742544B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for data analysis
JP2760263B2 (en) Screening method for early failure products of ceramic capacitors
CN102326248B (en) Capacitor fabrication method, capacitor fabricating device, capacitor fabricating program, and recording medium
JP2003217990A (en) Method for screening laminated ceramic capacitor
US7359813B2 (en) Outlier screening technique
JP3620636B2 (en) Selection method of multilayer ceramic capacitors
JP4158408B2 (en) Measuring method of electrode resistance and dielectric loss in equivalent series resistance of ceramic capacitor
CN112946412B (en) Selection method of screening stress of capacitor
JPH11345738A (en) Method for selecting defective insulation resistance of electronic component
JP2009295606A (en) Method for testing multilayer ceramic capacitor and method for manufacturing the multilayer ceramic capacitor
CN106093819B (en) Method for manufacturing full-waveband contrast crystal grains and method for correcting chip tester
JP3807649B2 (en) Selection method of multilayer ceramic capacitors
KR100350181B1 (en) Sorting method of monolithic ceramic capacitors
US6469517B1 (en) Sorting method of monolithic ceramic capacitors based on insulation resistance
JP2003059784A (en) Method for sorting multilayer ceramic capacitor
JP3144224B2 (en) Screening method for ceramic capacitors
JP2937541B2 (en) Quality level verification method for electronic components
CN117907712A (en) Method and device for testing and screening small-sized high-capacity multilayer chip ceramic capacitor
JP2003249424A (en) Selecting method of laminated capacitor
JP2003302436A (en) Quality control method of electronic parts
JP2000208580A (en) Method and device for predicting dielectric breakdown over aging
US7470291B2 (en) Production process of ceramic electronic component
CN113552419A (en) Method for indirectly detecting MLCC medium ceramic lattice defect
JP2000150327A (en) Screening method for laminating ceramics capacitor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20041220

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20070608

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20070626

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20070827

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20080129

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20080211

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110228

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Ref document number: 4085640

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110228

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120229

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130228

Year of fee payment: 5

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term