JP2002132862A - Method for controlling quality of building construction - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To actualize control and improvement by allowing a constructor which holds multiple construction sites to unify and grasp the qualities of the construction at the respective sites by check items over a network. SOLUTION: The quantities by the check items of building construction are evaluated by the operation sites by using check lists containing the check items and the check lists after the evaluation are registered on a server S from terminal machines A1, A2 and A3 at the operation sites through a communication line; and the server S computes and stores fraction defectives by the check items according to the check lists of the respective operation sites, and the fraction defectives by the check items are browsed through a terminal machine A of the constructor through a communication line and used to improve the construction corresponding to the respective check items.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a construction in which a plurality of work sites and a constructor are connected to a network, and the quality of work at each work site is grasped by the constructor for each check item, thereby contributing to management and improvement. It relates to the quality control method of construction in construction.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art In a construction work, there is a work schedule, and each contractor carries out the work in accordance with a work procedure manual of each work type according to the process, and the quality of each work is determined only at each site.

[0003]

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention makes it possible to grasp the quality of each of the above-mentioned works at each work site for each check item, and at the same time, allows a constructor who is in charge of a plurality of sites to carry out each work at each site. The purpose of the present invention is to provide a quality control method for construction in construction work in which quality can be grasped centrally for each check item and contribute to management and improvement.

[0004]

According to the above-mentioned construction quality control method, the quality of each check item is evaluated for each work site using a check list listing check items in the construction work.

[0005] The above-mentioned evaluated check list is registered in a server from a terminal at the work site via a communication line, and the server calculates and stores a defect rate for each check item based on the check list at each work site.

The defect rate for each check item is browsed by the terminal of the constructor via a communication line, and the defect rate contributes to the improvement of the construction corresponding to each check item.

[0007] For example, the check list categorizes each type of work and presents check items. The server calculates and stores the defect rate of the check items in each type of work, and provides the same to the installer.

[0008]

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS. A in FIG. 1 denotes a terminal of a builder, for example, a terminal of a construction company, and A1, A2, A
Reference numeral 3 denotes a terminal at each work site constructed by the builder, and a terminal A of the construction company and terminals A1, A2, A at each work site.
3 is connected to the server S via a communication line, for example, the Internet.

[0009] As shown in FIG. 3, the builder selects the main check item 2 in the construction work and checks the checklist C.
Prepare This checklist C is published on one or more sheets.

[0010] Preferably, a checklist C listing check items 2 is prepared for each type of work 1 such as plumbing work, wiring work, and fixture mounting work. The checklist C is posted on one sheet separately for each type of construction 1 or, as shown in FIG. 3, posted on another sheet for each type of construction.

The checklist C is a list posted on a hard paper or an electronic list that can be displayed as electronic information on a screen of a portable terminal.

As shown in FIG. 4, each work site evaluates the acceptability of each check item 2 for each work site using a checklist C listing check items 2 in the construction work.

As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the evaluated checklist C 'is stored in the terminal A1, A at the work site.
2 and A3 register with the server S via a communication line, for example, the Internet.

As shown in FIG. 2, the server S calculates a defect rate for each check item 2 based on the check list C 'of each work site and stores it as a database.
The defect rate for each check item 2 is browsed by the terminal A of the constructor via the communication line, and the defect rate contributes to the improvement of the construction corresponding to each check item 2.

Preferably, the server S calculates and stores the defect rate of the check item 2 of each work type 1 based on the check list C 'classified for each work type 1 of each work site, and stores the defect rate of each check item 2 The construction type 1 is browsed by the terminal A of the constructor via the communication line, and the defect rate contributes to the improvement of the construction corresponding to each check item 2.

FIG. 2 assumes that the work site of the installer is six places, and the total of the evaluation results of the first check item is 5 for good.
In the same manner, the total of the evaluation results of the second check item indicates that there are 6 good cases and the defect is 0, and the total of the evaluation results of the third check item indicates that there is a good case. Indicates that there are 6 cases and 0 cases are defective, and the total of the evaluation results of the fourth check item indicates that 1 case is good and 5 cases are defective. Is stored as the detection record 15 of the defect check item of the above. Alternatively, in the detection record 15 of these check items, the above-mentioned failure rate is classified and stored for each work type 1.

As shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, for example, check item 2 in plumbing work is whether pipe material is appropriate, storage method is appropriate, quantity is sufficient, accessories are appropriate, tools are appropriate. , Proper construction, proper pipe support, proper pipe connection, etc.

Check item 2 in the wiring work is
For example, whether the electric wire is appropriate, whether the color of the electric wire is appropriate, whether or not the wiring is damaged, whether the connection is appropriate, whether the excess length is appropriate, and the like.

The check item 2 in the fixture installation work includes, for example, whether the fixture is appropriate, the storage method is appropriate, the quantity is sufficient, the installation is appropriate, the connection of the wiring is appropriate, and the presence or absence of dirt. is there.

The check list C in which the check items 2 are listed for each type of work 1 has a pass / fail entry column 3 in which pass / fail is entered for each check item 2 by a check mark or a symbol. Fill out and evaluate.

In the checklist C, in addition to the entry column 4 for the type of construction 1, the entry column 6 for the recorder 5, the entry column 8 for the worker 7, the entry column 10 for the work execution date 9, and the entry for the recording date 11 Column 1
2 and an entry field 14 for a work site name 13.

Therefore, these items 1, 5, 7, 9, 11,
By registering and storing 13 etc. in the server S together with the check item 2, the installer can use the terminal device A to determine which check item in the check item 2 at what work site, in what month and on what date. It is possible to grasp whether defective construction has occurred, and it is also possible to grasp which worker performed these defective constructions in what month and on what day. Therefore, it is possible to accurately grasp the responsibilities after the completion of the construction work, thereby ensuring reliability and improving user service.

At each of the above work sites, each check item 2
After the evaluation, the site supervisor requests the worker corresponding to the check item determined to be defective to correct the defect, and enters this in the corrective action column 17 of the checklist C '.

Similarly, the presence / absence of the correction is registered in the server S from the terminals A1, A2, A3 at each work site, and the installer checks the terminal A for the check item 2 which is regarded as defective.
And whether corrective actions have been taken.

[0025]

According to the present invention, at each work site, the quality of each of the above-mentioned works can be grasped for each check item, and at the same time, a worker who controls a plurality of sites checks the quality of each of the works at each site. It is possible to collectively grasp each item, contribute to management and improvement, improve the quality of construction work, and is useful as a quality control method for construction work.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a network diagram of a work site, a constructor, and a server.

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a state in which the quality of check items is counted and calculated in a server.

FIG. 3 is a plan view illustrating a checklist.

FIG. 4 is a plan view illustrating an evaluated check list.

[Explanation of symbols]

 A Contractor's terminal A1, A2, A3 Work site terminal S Server C Checklist C 'Evaluated checklist 1 Construction type 2 Check item 3 Pass / fail entry field 4 Construction entry field 5 Recorder 6 Recorder entry field 7 Work Person 8 Worker entry field 9 Work construction date 10 Work construction date entry field 11 Record date 12 Record date entry field 13 Work site name 14 Work site name entry field 15 Detection record of defect check items 16 Aggregation of defect check items 17 Corrective action Column

 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continued on the front page F term (reference) 5B049 BB05 CC02 CC23 DD01 EE02 FF03 FF04 GG04 GG07 GG09

Claims (2)

[Claims] An evaluation of pass / fail of each check item is performed for each work site using a check list listing check items in construction work, and the evaluated check list is transmitted from a terminal at the work site to a communication line. Via the server, calculate and save the defect rate for each check item based on the checklist at each work site, and store the defect rate for each check item by the installer's terminal via a communication line. A quality control method for construction work in which construction works are inspected and the defect rate is used to improve the work corresponding to each check item. 2. A pass / fail evaluation of each check item for each work site using a check list that lists check items for each type of construction in construction work, and the evaluated check list is sent from a terminal at the work site. Register to the server via the communication line, calculate and save the defect rate of the check item in each type of work based on the checklist of each work site in the server, and store the defect rate and the type of work for each check item in the communication line. A quality control method for construction in construction work, wherein the defect rate is browsed by a terminal of a constructor through the terminal and the defect rate is contributed to improvement of a construction type corresponding to each check item.