JP2000273587A - Stainless steel for cutting tool, excellent in corrosion resistance, durability of cutting quality, and workability - Google Patents

Stainless steel for cutting tool, excellent in corrosion resistance, durability of cutting quality, and workability

Info

Publication number
JP2000273587A
JP2000273587A JP11077215A JP7721599A JP2000273587A JP 2000273587 A JP2000273587 A JP 2000273587A JP 11077215 A JP11077215 A JP 11077215A JP 7721599 A JP7721599 A JP 7721599A JP 2000273587 A JP2000273587 A JP 2000273587A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
sharpness
workability
cutting
corrosion resistance
less
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP11077215A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3587719B2 (en
Inventor
Hiroshi Yokota
博史 横田
Yoshihiro Nakajima
義弘 中嶋
Mankei Goto
万慶 後藤
Hirotaka Fukami
大隆 深海
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
SHINKAI KINZOKU KK
Aichi Steel Corp
Original Assignee
SHINKAI KINZOKU KK
Aichi Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by SHINKAI KINZOKU KK, Aichi Steel Corp filed Critical SHINKAI KINZOKU KK
Priority to JP07721599A priority Critical patent/JP3587719B2/en
Publication of JP2000273587A publication Critical patent/JP2000273587A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3587719B2 publication Critical patent/JP3587719B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a stainless steel for cutting tool, excellent in corrosion resistance, durability of cutting quality, and workability. SOLUTION: The stainless steel has a composition consisting of, by weight, 0.70-1.10% C, <=1.00% Si, <=1.00% Mn, 16.00-19.00% Cr, 1.00-2.50% Mo, 0.05-0.50% V, and the balance Fe with inevitable impurities. By forming hard and fine <=5 μm carbides composed essentially of Cr, Mo, and V, the edge line roughness of a cutting tool can be maintained at about 10 μm, that is, in a state of the edge of an unused cutting tool, without causing edge breakage, nicks in the edge, etc. In this way, deterioration in the durability of cutting quality can be prevented and the state of excellent cutting quality can be maintained.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、例えば庖丁、はさ
み、かみそり、ナイフ、カッター等家庭用、工業用、医
療用の各種刃物などに利用可能な耐食性と切れ味持続性
および加工性に優れた刃物用ステンレス鋼に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a knife having excellent corrosion resistance, sharpness persistence and workability, which can be used for various household, industrial and medical knives such as knives, scissors, razors, knives and cutters. For stainless steel.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】刃物用として、従来より、高い硬度およ
び優れた耐摩耗性が要求されるものについては、Cおよ
びCrの含有量が高いSUS440系を始めとする高炭
素含有マルテンサイト系ステンレス鋼が使用されてい
る。
2. Description of the Related Art Higher carbon content martensitic stainless steels such as SUS440, which have a higher C and Cr content, are required for cutting tools which require higher hardness and excellent wear resistance. Is used.

【0003】しかしながら、これらの従来鋼には、次の
問題がある。これらの従来鋼は、Crの含有量が高いた
め、比較的腐食性の弱い環境中では、不動態化して良好
な耐食性を有している。しかし、例えば海塩粒子を含む
様な、比較的腐食性の強い環境中では、孔食を発生する
などして耐食性が劣る。また、SUS440Cに代表さ
れる様に、Cが高くなるにつれて熱間加工性に劣り、特
に熱間圧延において割れなどを生じやすい。
[0003] However, these conventional steels have the following problems. Since these conventional steels have a high Cr content, they are passivated in a relatively weakly corrosive environment and have good corrosion resistance. However, in an environment having relatively strong corrosiveness such as, for example, containing sea salt particles, pitting occurs and the corrosion resistance is poor. Further, as represented by SUS440C, as C becomes higher, the hot workability becomes poorer, and cracks and the like tend to occur particularly in hot rolling.

【0004】一方、刃物の性能の一評価方法として、刃
物の切れ味なるものがある。しかし、料理を始めとし、
人の感覚に頼る評価が主で、定量的評価の難しいものの
一つである。
On the other hand, as one method of evaluating the performance of a blade, there is a method of sharpening the blade. However, starting with cooking,
Evaluation mainly depends on human senses, which is one of the difficulties of quantitative evaluation.

【0005】刃物の切れ味の定量的評価として、多くの
評価方法のうち、主に本多式切れ味試験がなされてい
る。一般に、本多式では、ほぼ一定湿度で、所定寸法の
紙束を用い、所定の荷重および切削速度下で、刃物の一
往復あるいは一通過によって切断した紙の枚数によって
刃物の切れ味を定量的評価する。
[0005] As a quantitative evaluation of the sharpness of the blade, the present multi-type sharpness test is mainly performed among many evaluation methods. In general, the polynomial uses a paper bundle of a predetermined size at a substantially constant humidity, under a predetermined load and a cutting speed, and quantitatively evaluates the sharpness of the blade by the number of papers cut by one reciprocation or one pass. I do.

【0006】しかしながら、従来から存在する刃物用鋼
においては、次の問題がある。こういった切れ味試験で
は、一般に、第1回目の切断枚数(初回切れ味)から切
断回数が約20回目くらいまでは、回数の増加につれて
切断枚数すなわち切れ味は急激に低下する。その後は、
緩やかに低下し、約80回目以降はほとんど一定の切断
枚数(収束切れ味)になる。
[0006] However, the following problems exist in the conventional steel for cutting tools. In such a sharpness test, in general, the number of cuts, that is, sharpness sharply decreases as the number of cuts increases from the first number of cuts (initial sharpness) to about 20 cuts. After that,
The number of cuts gradually decreases, and the number of cuts (convergent sharpness) becomes almost constant after about 80 times.

【0007】従来、切れ味性に優れた刃物用鋼として
は、例えば、特開平10−1703号公報に示されたも
のがある。この従来鋼は、鋼粉を熱間静水圧処理により
焼結および緻密化させて成る刃物用合金鋼であるが、刃
物として十分な切れ味性を得るには、焼入れ硬さが主要
因と考え、HRC62以上の高い焼入れ硬さが不可欠と
の事が記載されている。
[0007] Conventionally, as steel for cutting tools excellent in sharpness, for example, there is one disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 10-1703. This conventional steel is an alloy steel for blades obtained by sintering and densifying steel powder by hot isostatic pressure treatment.To obtain sufficient sharpness as a blade, quenching hardness is considered to be a main factor, It is described that a high quench hardness of HRC 62 or more is essential.

【0008】[0008]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】一般に、刃物の切れ味
は、硬さが高いほど切れ味に優れる事が知られている
が、この場合の切れ味とは、主に収束切れ味の事を指し
ており、初回切れ味との関連については考慮されていな
かった。上記の特開平10−1703号公報に示された
ものについても、第40回目の切断枚数をもって材料の
切れ味としており、この評価方法では切れ味の持続性の
良否の判断ができない。したがって、初回切れ味から収
束切れ味をいつまでも持続できるような、切れ味持続性
に優れた刃物が、今のところ提案されていなかった。
In general, it is known that the sharpness of a blade is higher as the hardness is higher, but the sharpness in this case mainly refers to convergent sharpness. The relationship with the initial sharpness was not considered. Also in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 10-1703, the sharpness of the material is determined by the number of cuts for the 40th time, and it is not possible to judge whether the sustainability of the sharpness is good or bad by this evaluation method. Therefore, there has not been proposed any knife having excellent sharpness persistence that can maintain the sharpness from the initial sharpness forever.

【0009】本発明は、かかる従来の問題点に鑑みてな
されたもので、切れ味持続性に優れると共に、耐食性に
優れ、かつ加工性も良好な、耐食性と切れ味持続性およ
び加工性に優れた刃物用ステンレス鋼を提供しようとす
るものである。
The present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned conventional problems, and has excellent cutting durability, corrosion resistance, and good workability, and is excellent in corrosion resistance, sharpness persistence, and workability. It is intended to provide stainless steel for use.

【0010】[0010]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記課題を解決すべく、
本発明者らは、特に切れ味持続性に及ぼす要因を鋭意研
究した結果、焼入れ硬さが主要因ではなく、C、Cr、
Mo、Vの含有量および母相中のCr、Mo、Vを主体
とする硬質で微細な炭化物の大きさが、特には刃物の切
れ味持続性に大きく影響していることを新たに知見し、
本発明をなすに至った。
In order to solve the above problems,
The present inventors have conducted intensive studies particularly on the factors affecting the sharpness persistence. As a result, quenching hardness is not the main factor, and C, Cr,
It was newly found that the content of Mo and V and the size of hard and fine carbides mainly composed of Cr, Mo and V in the matrix greatly affected the sharpness persistence of the cutting tool, in particular,
The present invention has been made.

【0011】即ち、本発明の請求項1に記載した刃物用
ステンレス鋼は、重量%において、C:0.70〜1.
10%、Si:1.00%以下、Mn:1.00%以
下、Cr:16.00〜19.00%、Mo:1.00
〜2.50%、V:0.05〜0.50%を含有してい
ると共に、残部はFeおよび不可避不純物からなり、か
つ、母相中の炭化物の大きさを5μm以下にする事を特
徴としている。
That is, the stainless steel for cutting tools described in claim 1 of the present invention has a C: 0.70 to 1.
10%, Si: 1.00% or less, Mn: 1.00% or less, Cr: 16.00 to 19.00%, Mo: 1.00
-2.50%, V: 0.05-0.50%, and the balance consists of Fe and unavoidable impurities, and the size of carbides in the parent phase is 5 μm or less. And

【0012】Cr、Mo、Vを複合添加させて、これら
を主体とする硬質で、かつ、5μm以下の微細な炭化物
を生成させる事により、切れ味持続性に優れる刃物用ス
テンレス鋼が得られる。また、Moの含有量を1.00
〜2.50%と比較的多くすると、基地組織へ固溶する
Moの含有量が増加するため、孔食の発生が抑制され、
耐食性が改善される。さらに、C、Mo、Vの含有量を
過度に高めない事により、熱間加工性を良好にし、ま
た、冷間圧延後の歪取り焼鈍にて、製品形状の打ち抜き
時の硬さを下げる事により、打ち抜き加工性をも良好に
する。
[0012] Cr, Mo, and V are added in combination to form a hard and fine carbide of 5 µm or less mainly composed of Cr, Mo, and V, thereby obtaining a stainless steel for blades having excellent sharpness persistence. Further, the content of Mo is set to 1.00.
When the content is relatively large, such as ~ 2.50%, the content of Mo dissolved in the base tissue increases, so that the occurrence of pitting corrosion is suppressed,
Corrosion resistance is improved. Furthermore, the hot workability is improved by not excessively increasing the contents of C, Mo, and V, and the hardness at the time of punching of the product shape is reduced by strain relief annealing after cold rolling. Thereby, the punching workability is also improved.

【0013】つまり、刃物用ステンレス鋼の合金成分お
よび含有量を上記のように設定し、かつ、母相中の炭化
物の大きさを5μm以下にする事により、刃物の切れ味
持続性が向上するとともに、優れた耐食性かつ加工性を
有する。したがって、このような合金鋼からなる刃物で
は、長期間使用しても刃欠けや刃こぼれが生じ難く、耐
食性と切れ味持続性および加工性に優れた刃物として提
供する事が可能である。
[0013] That is, by setting the alloying component and content of the stainless steel for the cutting tool as described above and setting the size of the carbide in the parent phase to 5 µm or less, the cutting performance of the cutting tool is improved and It has excellent corrosion resistance and workability. Therefore, a blade made of such an alloy steel hardly causes chipping or spilling even when used for a long period of time, and can be provided as a blade excellent in corrosion resistance, durability of sharpness, and workability.

【0014】[0014]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明の一実施形態につい
て説明する。本実施形態の刃物用ステンレス鋼は、重量
%において、C:0.70〜1.10%、Si:1.0
0%以下、Mn:1.00%以下、Cr:16.00〜
19.00%、Mo:1.00〜2.50%、V:0.
05〜0.50%を含有していると共に、残部はFeお
よび不可避不純物からなり、かつ、母相中の炭化物の大
きさを5μm以下とする刃物用ステンレス鋼である。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS One embodiment of the present invention will be described below. The stainless steel for a cutting tool of the present embodiment has, in terms of% by weight, C: 0.70 to 1.10%, and Si: 1.0%.
0% or less, Mn: 1.00% or less, Cr: 16.00 to
19.00%, Mo: 1.00 to 2.50%, V: 0.
It is a stainless steel for blades containing 0.55% to 0.50%, with the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities and having a carbide size of 5 μm or less in the parent phase.

【0015】本発明において最も注目すべき事は、C
r、Mo、Vを複合添加させて、これらを主体とする硬
質で、かつ、5μm以下の微細な炭化物を生成させる事
である。
The most notable aspect of the present invention is that C
The purpose is to add a complex of r, Mo, and V to form a hard, fine carbide of 5 μm or less mainly composed of these.

【0016】上記のCr、Mo、Vを主体とする微細な
炭化物は、母相中に均一に分散しており、後述する実施
例に示すように、刃物としての優れた切れ味持続性を実
現する事ができる。
The fine carbides mainly composed of Cr, Mo and V are uniformly dispersed in the matrix, and realize excellent cutting durability as a blade as shown in Examples described later. Can do things.

【0017】これらの合金成分および含有量は、請求項
1、2の発明の様に、刃物用ステンレス鋼として、耐食
性と切れ味持続性および加工性に優れるように設定した
ものであり、次に、上記化学成分の限定理由について説
明する。
These alloy components and contents are set so as to be excellent in corrosion resistance, sharpness persistence and workability as stainless steel for cutting tools as in the inventions of claims 1 and 2. The reasons for limiting the chemical components will be described.

【0018】C:0.70〜1.10%;Cは、焼入れ
焼もどし後の硬さを高める元素であり、Cr、Mo、V
と結合してM236型、M73型等の高硬度炭化物を形
成して、硬さを確保する。その添加量が多すぎると炭化
物の粗大化、鏡面性の低下、熱間加工性の低下、耐食性
の劣化等を招くため、1.10%以下、好ましくは0.
95%以下とする。一方、添加量が少なすぎると焼入れ
焼もどし後の強度、硬度が得られないため、0.70%
以上、好ましくは0.80%以上とする。
C: 0.70 to 1.10%; C is an element for increasing the hardness after quenching and tempering, and is Cr, Mo, V
To form high hardness carbides such as M 23 C 6 type and M 7 C 3 type to secure hardness. If the addition amount is too large, coarsening of carbides, reduction of specularity, reduction of hot workability, deterioration of corrosion resistance, and the like are caused. Therefore, 1.10% or less, preferably 0.1% or less.
95% or less. On the other hand, if the addition amount is too small, the strength and hardness after quenching and tempering cannot be obtained, so that 0.70%
Or more, preferably 0.80% or more.

【0019】Si:1.00%以下;Siは、焼もどし
軟化抵抗性を向上させ、かつ脱酸剤としても有効な元素
であるため添加する。ただし、添加量が多すぎてもその
効果が飽和しコストアップに繋がるため、その添加量は
1.00%以下、好ましくは0.50%以下とする。
Si: 1.00% or less; Si is added because it is an element that improves the resistance to tempering and softening and is also effective as a deoxidizing agent. However, if the addition amount is too large, the effect is saturated and the cost is increased. Therefore, the addition amount is set to 1.00% or less, preferably 0.50% or less.

【0020】Mn:1.00%以下;Mnは、焼入れ性
を向上させ、かつ脱酸剤としても有効な元素であるため
添加する。ただし、添加量が多すぎてもその効果が飽和
しコストアップに繋がるため、その添加量は1.00%
以下、好ましくは0.50%以下とする。
Mn: 1.00% or less; Mn is added because it is an element that improves hardenability and is also effective as a deoxidizing agent. However, if the addition amount is too large, the effect is saturated and the cost is increased, so the addition amount is 1.00%.
Or less, preferably 0.50% or less.

【0021】Cr:16.00〜19.00%;Cr
は、基地組織および炭化物中に存在して、耐食性、焼入
れ性を改善し、焼もどし硬さ、高温硬さおよび耐摩耗性
を付与する元素である。その含有量が16%未満では、
十分な耐食性が得られないため、16%を下限とした。
一方、含有量が多すぎると、これらの効果が飽和しコス
トアップに繋がると共に、焼なまし硬さが増大して、機
械加工性が劣化するため、含有量を19%以下、好まし
くは、18%以下とした。
Cr: 16.0 to 19.00%; Cr
Is an element that is present in the base structure and carbides to improve corrosion resistance and hardenability, and to impart temper hardness, high temperature hardness and wear resistance. If its content is less than 16%,
Since sufficient corrosion resistance cannot be obtained, the lower limit was set to 16%.
On the other hand, if the content is too large, these effects are saturated, leading to an increase in cost, as well as an increase in annealing hardness and deterioration in machinability, so that the content is 19% or less, preferably 18% or less. % Or less.

【0022】Mo:1.00〜2.50%;Moは、基
地組織および炭化物中に存在して、孔食の発生を抑制
し、耐食性を改善すると共に、焼もどし後の硬さを増加
させる元素である。また、焼入れ性、耐摩耗性、靭性、
焼もどし軟化抵抗性等を向上させるため、1.00%以
上添加する必要がある。一方、添加量が2.50%を超
える場合には、熱間加工性低下、靭性低下、コストアッ
プ等の問題があり、その添加量は2.50%以下、好ま
しくは1.50%以下とする。
Mo: 1.00 to 2.50%; Mo is present in the base structure and carbide to suppress the occurrence of pitting corrosion, improve the corrosion resistance, and increase the hardness after tempering. Element. In addition, hardenability, wear resistance, toughness,
In order to improve tempering softening resistance and the like, it is necessary to add 1.00% or more. On the other hand, when the addition amount exceeds 2.50%, there are problems such as a decrease in hot workability, a decrease in toughness, and an increase in cost, and the addition amount is 2.50% or less, preferably 1.50% or less. I do.

【0023】V:0.05〜0.50%;Vは、基地組
織および炭化物中に存在して、焼入れ性、耐摩耗性、靭
性、焼もどし軟化抵抗性等を向上させるため、0.05
%以上添加する必要がある。一方、添加量が0.50%
を超える場合には、熱間加工性低下、靭性低下、コスト
アップ、冷間加工性低下等の問題があり、その添加量は
0.50%以下、好ましくは0.25%以下とする。
V: 0.05 to 0.50%; V is present in the base structure and carbide to improve hardenability, wear resistance, toughness, temper softening resistance and the like.
% Must be added. On the other hand, the addition amount is 0.50%
If the ratio exceeds 1, there are problems such as a decrease in hot workability, a decrease in toughness, an increase in cost, and a decrease in cold workability.

【0024】そして、前記刃物用ステンレス鋼は、以上
の合金成分のほか、残部がFeおよび不可避的に混入し
た不純物からなる。この不純物としては、P、Sが含ま
れる事がある。しかし、これらの元素は材質を脆くする
ので少ない程好ましく、いずれも0.10%以下に止め
ておく。なお、原料よりNi、Cuが不可避的に混入す
る事がある。これらの元素は、耐食性の向上に寄与する
ものの、多量に含有されると焼入れ硬さを低下させるた
め、各々上限を1%とする。
The stainless steel for the cutting tool comprises the above-mentioned alloy components and the balance of Fe and impurities unavoidably mixed. The impurities may include P and S. However, since these elements make the material brittle, the smaller the number, the better. The content of each element is set to 0.10% or less. In some cases, Ni and Cu are inevitably mixed from the raw material. These elements contribute to the improvement of corrosion resistance, but when contained in large amounts, the quenching hardness is reduced, so the upper limit is set to 1%.

【0025】次に、本発明の作用につき説明する。本発
明の刃物用ステンレス鋼は、Cr、Mo、Vの複合添加
により、母相中において上記のCr、Mo、Vを主体と
する硬質で、かつ、5μm以下の微細な炭化物を分散さ
せてある。そのため、後述する実施例に示すように、刃
物としての優れた切れ味持続性を実現する事ができる。
Next, the operation of the present invention will be described. In the stainless steel for blades of the present invention, the above-mentioned hard, mainly composed of Cr, Mo, and V, and fine carbide of 5 μm or less are dispersed in the matrix by composite addition of Cr, Mo, and V. . Therefore, as shown in Examples described later, it is possible to realize excellent sharpness persistence as a blade.

【0026】また、本発明鋼は、Cを0.70〜1.1
0%、Crを16.00〜19.00%、Moを1.0
0〜2.50%、Vを0.05〜0.50%に限定する
事により、後述する実施例に示す様に、優れた耐食性お
よび加工性を発揮する事ができる。
In the steel of the present invention, C is set to 0.70 to 1.1.
0%, Cr: 16.00 to 19.00%, Mo: 1.0
By limiting 0 to 2.50% and V to 0.05 to 0.50%, excellent corrosion resistance and workability can be exhibited as shown in Examples described later.

【0027】この様に、本発明によれば、切れ味持続性
に優れ、かつ、耐食性、加工性に優れた刃物用ステンレ
ス鋼を提供する事ができる。
As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to provide a stainless steel for cutting tools which is excellent in sustainability of sharpness, corrosion resistance and workability.

【0028】次に、請求項3の発明のように、上記刃物
用ステンレス鋼は、さらに、W:0.02〜1.50
%、Ti:0.02〜0.50%、Nb:0.02〜
0.50%、Zr:0.02〜0.50%のうちの1種
または2種以上を含有している事が好ましい。以下、こ
れらの成分の限定理由について説明する。
Next, as in the third aspect of the present invention, the stainless steel for a cutting tool further comprises W: 0.02 to 1.50.
%, Ti: 0.02 to 0.50%, Nb: 0.02 to
It is preferable to contain one or more of 0.50% and Zr: 0.02 to 0.50%. Hereinafter, the reasons for limiting these components will be described.

【0029】W:0.02〜1.50%;Wは、更なる
耐摩耗性の向上のためには、0.02%以上添加する事
を要する。一方、添加量が1.50%を超える場合に
は、熱間加工性低下、コストアップ、靭性低下等の問題
がある。
W: 0.02 to 1.50%; W must be added in an amount of 0.02% or more in order to further improve the wear resistance. On the other hand, when the addition amount exceeds 1.50%, there are problems such as a decrease in hot workability, an increase in cost, and a decrease in toughness.

【0030】Ti:0.02〜0.50%;Tiは、更
なる耐摩耗性の向上のためには、0.02%以上添加す
る事を要する。一方、添加量が0.50%を超える場合
には、熱間加工性を阻害するという問題がある。
Ti: 0.02 to 0.50%; To further improve the wear resistance, it is necessary to add 0.02% or more of Ti. On the other hand, when the addition amount exceeds 0.50%, there is a problem that hot workability is impaired.

【0031】Nb:0.02〜0.50%;Nbは、更
に結晶粒を細かくし靭性を向上させるためには、0.0
2%以上添加する事を要する。一方、添加量が0.50
%を超える場合には、上記効果が飽和し、却ってその効
果が低下してくるという問題がある。
Nb: 0.02 to 0.50%; Nb is used in an amount of 0.02% to further refine crystal grains and improve toughness.
It is necessary to add 2% or more. On the other hand, the addition amount is 0.50
%, There is a problem that the effect is saturated and the effect is rather reduced.

【0032】Zr:0.02〜0.50%;Zrは、更
に結晶粒を微細化させ靭性を向上させるためには、0.
02%以上添加する事を要する。一方、添加量が0.5
0%を超える場合には、上記効果が飽和し、却ってその
効果が低下してくるという問題がある。
Zr: 0.02 to 0.50%; In order to further refine crystal grains and improve toughness, Zr is used in an amount of 0.1 to 0.5%.
It is necessary to add at least 02%. On the other hand, when the addition amount is 0.5
If it exceeds 0%, there is a problem that the above effect is saturated and the effect is rather reduced.

【0033】[0033]

【実施例】ここで、上記で述べた刃物用ステンレス鋼の
材質特性を評価するため、以下に示す条件で加工性、耐
食性の評価および庖丁の切れ味試験を行った。
EXAMPLES Here, in order to evaluate the material properties of the stainless steel for cutting tools described above, evaluation of workability and corrosion resistance and a sharpness test of a knife were performed under the following conditions.

【0034】本例の刃物用ステンレス鋼を製造するに当
たっては、1.6ton溶解炉で溶解した約41cm×
41cm×126cm鋼塊を作製し、これを素材とす
る。次いで、この素材を熱間圧延し、22mm厚みの熱
延鋼板を作製する。さらに、4.0mm厚みの熱延鋼板
を作製し、840℃で90分間加熱保持後、徐冷により
完全焼鈍を行う。さらに、2.5mm厚みの冷延鋼板を
作製し、780℃で15分間加熱保持後、空冷により歪
取り焼鈍を行う。その後、この鋼板は、製品形状に打ち
抜かれ、1050℃で20分間加熱保持後、空冷により
焼入れし、150〜200℃で60分間加熱保持後、空
冷により焼もどしを行うものとした。この様にして得ら
れた本発明鋼(E1〜E8)の優れた特性を定量的に評
価すべく、比較鋼(C9〜C13)、従来鋼(C14〜
C16)と共に種々の試験を行った。まず、準備した鋼
の組成等を表1に示す。
In producing the stainless steel for cutting tools of this example, about 41 cm × melted in a 1.6 ton melting furnace.
A 41 cm × 126 cm steel ingot is prepared and used as a material. Next, this material is hot-rolled to produce a hot-rolled steel sheet having a thickness of 22 mm. Further, a hot-rolled steel sheet having a thickness of 4.0 mm is produced, and after heating and holding at 840 ° C. for 90 minutes, complete annealing is performed by slow cooling. Further, a cold-rolled steel sheet having a thickness of 2.5 mm is prepared, heated and held at 780 ° C. for 15 minutes, and then subjected to strain relief annealing by air cooling. Thereafter, the steel sheet was punched into a product shape, heated and held at 1050 ° C. for 20 minutes, quenched by air cooling, heated and held at 150 to 200 ° C. for 60 minutes, and then tempered by air cooling. In order to quantitatively evaluate the excellent properties of the steels of the present invention (E1 to E8) thus obtained, comparative steels (C9 to C13) and conventional steels (C14 to
Various tests were performed together with C16). First, the composition and the like of the prepared steel are shown in Table 1.

【0035】[0035]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0036】本発明鋼(E1〜E8)は、すべて本発明
の組成範囲内の組成を有すると共に、母相中の炭化物の
大きさが5μm以下にあるものである。また、本発明鋼
のうちE4〜E8については、W、Ti、Nb、Zrを
1種または2種以上添加したものである。
The steels of the present invention (E1 to E8) all have compositions within the composition range of the present invention, and the size of carbides in the parent phase is 5 μm or less. Further, among the steels of the present invention, E4 to E8 are steels to which one or more of W, Ti, Nb, and Zr are added.

【0037】比較鋼(C9〜C13)のうち、C9は個
々の化学成分は本発明範囲内にあるが、母相中の炭化物
の大きさが5μm以下にないものである。また、C10
からC13は、いずれかの化学成分が本発明範囲内から
外れるものである。従来鋼(C14〜C16)は、刃物
用鋼板として使用されているSUS440A、SUS4
40B、SUS440Cであって、特にMo、Vの含有
量が、本発明範囲から外れるものである。
Among the comparative steels (C9 to C13), C9 is one in which the individual chemical components are within the scope of the present invention, but the size of carbide in the matrix is not less than 5 μm. Also, C10
To C13 are those in which any of the chemical components fall outside the scope of the present invention. Conventional steels (C14 to C16) are SUS440A and SUS4 which are used as steel plates for cutting tools.
40B and SUS440C, in particular, the contents of Mo and V are out of the range of the present invention.

【0038】また、これらの各鋼(E1〜E8、C9〜
C16)は、すべて上記と同様にして熱間圧延、完全焼
鈍を行った後、冷間圧延、歪取り焼鈍を行った。そし
て、この鋼板から硬さ試験片と塩水噴霧試験片とを切り
出した。硬さ試験片のサイズは厚み2.5mmの50m
m角、塩水噴霧試験片のサイズは厚み2.5mmの50
×100mmとした。次に、塩水噴霧試験片に対して、
1050℃で20分間加熱保持後、空冷により焼入れ
し、200℃で60分間加熱保持後、空冷により焼もど
しを行った。硬さ試験および塩水噴霧試験に際しては、
予め各試験片のスケールを落とすと共に、#600の仕
上げ研磨を行った。その後、硬さ試験による打ち抜き加
工性、塩水噴霧試験による耐食性について評価した。ま
た、切れ味持続性の評価については、後述する様に、庖
丁を試作して評価した。評価結果につき表2に示す。
Each of these steels (E1-E8, C9-
C16) was subjected to hot rolling and complete annealing in the same manner as above, followed by cold rolling and strain relief annealing. Then, a hardness test piece and a salt water spray test piece were cut out from the steel sheet. The size of the hardness test piece is 50 mm with a thickness of 2.5 mm
m square, salt spray test specimen size is 2.5mm
× 100 mm. Next, for the salt spray test piece,
After heating and holding at 1050 ° C. for 20 minutes, quenching was performed by air cooling. After heating and holding at 200 ° C. for 60 minutes, tempering was performed by air cooling. For hardness test and salt spray test,
The scale of each test piece was dropped in advance, and # 600 finish polishing was performed. Thereafter, punchability by a hardness test and corrosion resistance by a salt spray test were evaluated. As for the evaluation of the sustainability of sharpness, a knife was trial-produced and evaluated as described later. Table 2 shows the evaluation results.

【0039】[0039]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0040】熱間加工性の評価は、素材を22mm厚み
に熱間圧延した鋼板の割れ等の発生の有無により評価し
た。割れ等が全く見られなかったものを○、若干のコバ
割れ等が見られたものを△、有害なコバ割れ、先端割れ
等が見られたものを×として評価した。本発明鋼におけ
る熱間圧延は、割れ等を伴う事なくスムーズに行う事が
できた。表2より知られるごとく、熱間加工性の評価
は、C11、C16を除き、割れ等が全く見られる事な
く、良好であった。C11、C16の熱間加工性が劣っ
た理由は、Cの含有量が高いためであると考えられる。
The hot workability was evaluated by the presence or absence of cracks or the like in a steel sheet obtained by hot rolling a material to a thickness of 22 mm. When no cracks or the like were observed, it was evaluated as ○, when slight edge cracks, etc. were observed, as Δ, and when harmful edge cracks, tip cracks, etc., were evaluated as x. The hot rolling in the steel of the present invention could be performed smoothly without cracking or the like. As can be seen from Table 2, the hot workability evaluation was good without any cracks or the like except for C11 and C16. It is considered that the reason why the hot workability of C11 and C16 was inferior was that the content of C was high.

【0041】打ち抜き加工性の評価は、硬さ試験により
評価した。鋼板の製品形状への打ち抜き時の硬さは、ロ
ックウェル硬さ試験機を用いて測定した。硬さがHRB
100以下のものを○、100から105のものを△、
106以上のものを×として評価した。本発明鋼におけ
る製品形状への打ち抜き加工は、すべて硬さがHRB1
00以下であり、容易に打ち抜く事ができた。表2より
知られるごとく、打ち抜き加工性の評価は、C9、C1
1、C16を除き、良好であった。C9、C11、C1
6の冷間加工性が劣った理由は、特にC、Vの含有量が
高いためであると考えられる。
The punching workability was evaluated by a hardness test. The hardness at the time of punching the steel sheet into the product shape was measured using a Rockwell hardness tester. Hardness is HRB
○: 100 or less, △: 100 to 105
106 or more were evaluated as x. All the punching processes to the product shape in the steel of the present invention have hardness of HRB1.
It was less than 00 and could be easily punched. As is known from Table 2, the evaluation of the punching workability was C9, C1.
1, except for C16. C9, C11, C1
It is considered that the cold workability of No. 6 was inferior due to the particularly high contents of C and V.

【0042】耐食性の評価は、塩水噴霧試験により評価
した。塩水噴霧試験は、塩濃度1%、試験時間24時間
にて行った。試験の評価は、JIS Z 2371に基
づきレイティングナンバ法により評価した。レイティン
グナンバが10のものを○、9のものを△、8以下のも
のを×として評価した。本発明鋼における塩水噴霧試験
での発錆状況は、肉眼で識別できる発錆はなく、優れた
耐食性を示した。これは、Cの含有量に対して、基地組
織に十分な量のCr、Moが固溶しているため、孔食の
発生が抑制されたためであると考えられる。表2より知
られるごとく、耐食性の評価は、C11、C12、C1
4〜C16において劣っていた。これは、Cの含有量に
対して、Cr、Moの含有量が不足しているためである
と考えられる。
The corrosion resistance was evaluated by a salt spray test. The salt spray test was performed at a salt concentration of 1% and a test time of 24 hours. The test was evaluated by the rating number method based on JIS Z2371. A rating number of 10 was evaluated as ○, a rating number of 9 was evaluated as Δ, and a rating number of 8 or less was evaluated as x. The rusting state of the steel of the present invention in the salt spray test showed that there was no rusting that could be discerned with the naked eye, and that the steel exhibited excellent corrosion resistance. This is considered to be due to the fact that a sufficient amount of Cr and Mo are dissolved in the base structure with respect to the C content, thereby suppressing the occurrence of pitting corrosion. As known from Table 2, the evaluation of the corrosion resistance was C11, C12, C1.
4-C16 was inferior. It is considered that this is because the contents of Cr and Mo are insufficient with respect to the content of C.

【0043】切れ味持続性の評価は、本多式切れ味試験
により評価した。供試材より庖丁を試作し、本多式切れ
味試験機にて切れ味の評価を行った。つまり、ほぼ一定
湿度で、所定寸法の紙束を用い、所定の荷重および切削
速度下で、刃物の一通過によって切断した紙の枚数によ
って刃物の切れ味を定量的評価した。本試験では、切断
荷重を3267gf、切断方法を一通過による引き切
り、切断ストロークを50mm、被切断材料をPPC用
紙(厚み0.1mmの15×60mm)にて試験を実施
し、1回の裁断毎に紙束を交換して、同一条件下で裁断
を100回繰り返した。ただし、庖丁の硬さが切断枚数
に及ぼす影響を取り除くために、庖丁の硬さは、焼もど
し温度を変化させる事により、HRC59に揃えてあ
る。一般に、第1回目の切断枚数(初回切れ味)から切
断回数が約20回目くらいまでは、回数の増加につれて
切断枚数すなわち切れ味は急激に低下する。その後は、
緩やかに低下し、約80回目以降はほとんど一定の切断
枚数(収束切れ味)になる。そこで、切れ味持続性の評
価は、第1回目と第100回目の切断枚数の比、即ち
(第100回目の切断枚数)/(第1回目の切断枚数)
の値にて評価した。第一回目の切断枚数は、本発明鋼、
比較鋼、従来鋼いずれも、44〜46枚の間であり、初
回切れ味は同等である。切断枚数の比が0.90以上の
ものを○、0.80から0.90のものを△、0.80
以下のものを×として評価した。
The evaluation of the sustainability of sharpness was evaluated by the present polymorphic sharpness test. A knife was prototyped from the test materials, and the sharpness was evaluated using the multi-type sharpness tester. That is, the sharpness of the blade was quantitatively evaluated based on the number of sheets cut by one passage of the blade under a predetermined load and a cutting speed under a predetermined load at a substantially constant humidity. In this test, the cutting load was 3267 gf, the cutting method was cut through one pass, the cutting stroke was 50 mm, and the material to be cut was tested on PPC paper (15 mm × 60 mm with a thickness of 0.1 mm). The paper bundle was replaced every time, and the cutting was repeated 100 times under the same conditions. However, in order to remove the influence of the hardness of the knife on the number of cut pieces, the hardness of the knife is adjusted to the HRC 59 by changing the tempering temperature. Generally, from the first number of cuts (initial sharpness) to about 20 cuts, the number of cuts, that is, sharpness sharply decreases as the number of cuts increases. After that,
The number of cuts gradually decreases, and the number of cuts (convergent sharpness) becomes almost constant after about 80 times. Therefore, the evaluation of the sharpness persistence is based on the ratio of the number of cuts of the first and 100th times, that is, (100th cut number) / (first cut number).
Was evaluated. The first cutting number is the steel of the present invention,
Both the comparative steel and the conventional steel are between 44 and 46 sheets, and the initial sharpness is equivalent.比, 0.80 to 0.90, Δ, 0.80
The following were evaluated as x.

【0044】本発明鋼における庖丁での切れ味持続性
は、切断回数の増加につれて、終始、切れ味がほとんど
低下する事なく、優れた切れ味持続性を示した。これ
は、Cの含有量が適量なため、粗大な一次炭化物が見ら
れず良好であり、母相中に占める炭化物の割合も十分に
多い。さらに、Cr、Mo、Vを主体とする硬質で、か
つ、5μm以下の微細な炭化物を生成させる事により、
刃欠けや刃こぼれ等を生じる事なく、刃物の刃先線粗さ
(刃先稜線の最大線粗さ値)を、10μm程度の刃物未
使用の刃先の状態にて維持する事ができるため、切れ味
持続性が低下せず、切れ味の良好な状態を維持する事が
できたものと考えられる。
The sharpness persistence of the knife of the steel of the present invention showed excellent sharpness persistence with almost no decrease in the sharpness from start to finish as the number of cuts increased. This is good because the content of C is appropriate and coarse primary carbides are not seen, and the ratio of carbides in the matrix is sufficiently large. Furthermore, by forming a hard and fine carbide of 5 μm or less mainly composed of Cr, Mo, and V,
The cutting edge roughness (maximum line roughness value of the cutting edge line) of the cutting edge can be maintained in the state of a cutting edge of about 10 μm without using the cutting edge without causing chipping or spilling of the cutting edge. It is considered that the sharpness was maintained without deterioration in the sharpness.

【0045】表2より知られるごとく、切れ味持続性の
評価は、本発明鋼を除いては良好なものはなかった。こ
の原因として、まず、C9は個々の化学成分は本発明範
囲内にあるが、母相中の炭化物の大きさが5μm以下に
なく、若干大きいため、刃物の刃先近傍にて露出した炭
化物が、切断中の機械的作用により幾分脱落し、切れ味
が低下したものと考えられる。また、従来鋼のC14で
は、Cの含有量が比較的少ないため、粗大な一次炭化物
も見られず良好であるが、母相中に占める炭化物の割合
が少なく、さらにCrを主体とする炭化物のため、炭化
物の硬さが低くなり、切断中において刃先が摩耗し、切
れ味持続性が低下したものと考えられる。また、従来鋼
のC16では、Cの含有量が比較的高いため、母相中に
占める炭化物の割合も多く良好であるが、C14と同様
に、Crを主体とする炭化物のため、炭化物の硬さが低
くなり、さらに粗大な一次炭化物が幾分見られるため、
刃こぼれ等を生じ、切れ味持続性が低下したものと考え
られる。即ち、C10〜C16の結果からわかるように
C、Cr、Mo、Vの個々の化学成分のいずれか1元素
でも本発明範囲内より外れたり、5μmより大きな炭化
物を生成すると、切れ味は低下していき、優れた切れ味
持続性は得られない。
As can be seen from Table 2, there was no favorable evaluation of sharpness persistence except for the steel of the present invention. As a cause of this, first, although the individual chemical components of C9 are within the scope of the present invention, the size of the carbide in the mother phase is not less than 5 μm and is slightly large, so the carbide exposed near the cutting edge of the blade is It is considered that some of the particles fell off due to the mechanical action during cutting, and the sharpness was reduced. Further, C14 of the conventional steel has a relatively low C content, and thus is good without showing coarse primary carbides. However, the proportion of carbides in the parent phase is small, and furthermore, the carbides mainly composed of Cr Therefore, it is considered that the hardness of the carbide was reduced, the cutting edge was worn during cutting, and the sharpness persistence was reduced. Further, in the conventional steel C16, since the content of C is relatively high, the ratio of carbide in the matrix is good and good. However, similarly to C14, since the carbide mainly contains Cr, the hardness of the carbide is high. Lower, and some coarse primary carbides are seen,
It is considered that blade spillage and the like occurred, and the sharpness persistence was reduced. That is, as can be seen from the results of C10 to C16, if any one of the individual chemical components of C, Cr, Mo, and V deviates from the range of the present invention or generates a carbide larger than 5 μm, the sharpness decreases. Good sharpness persistence cannot be obtained.

【0046】[0046]

【発明の効果】上述のごとく、本発明によれば、組成範
囲を上記特定の範囲に限定し、かつ、母相中の炭化物の
大きさを5μm以下にする事により、切れ味持続性に優
れると共に、耐食性に優れ、かつ加工性も良好な、耐食
性と切れ味持続性および加工性に優れた刃物用ステンレ
ス鋼を提供する事ができる。
As described above, according to the present invention, the composition range is limited to the above-mentioned specific range, and the size of the carbide in the mother phase is set to 5 μm or less, whereby the sharpness is maintained and the sharpness is maintained. It is possible to provide stainless steel for cutting tools excellent in corrosion resistance, good workability, excellent in corrosion resistance, sharpness persistence, and workability.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 後藤 万慶 愛知県東海市荒尾町ワノ割1番地 愛知製 鋼株式会社内 (72)発明者 深海 大隆 新潟県西蒲原郡吉田町大字下中野1483番地 深海金属株式会社内 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continued on the front page (72) Inventor Mankei Goto 1 Wanowari, Arao-cho, Tokai-shi, Aichi Prefecture Inside Aichi Steel Co., Ltd. Deep Sea Metal Co., Ltd.

Claims (3)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 重量%において、C:0.70〜1.
10%、Si:1.00%以下、Mn:1.00%以
下、Cr:16.00〜19.00%、Mo:1.00
〜2.50%、V:0.05〜0.50%を含有してい
ると共に、残部はFeおよび不可避不純物からなり、か
つ、母相中の炭化物の大きさを5μm以下にする事を特
徴とする、耐食性と切れ味持続性および加工性に優れた
刃物用ステンレス鋼。
C. 0.70 to 1.1% by weight.
10%, Si: 1.00% or less, Mn: 1.00% or less, Cr: 16.00 to 19.00%, Mo: 1.00
-2.50%, V: 0.05-0.50%, and the balance consists of Fe and unavoidable impurities, and the size of carbides in the parent phase is 5 μm or less. Stainless steel for cutting tools with excellent corrosion resistance, sharpness persistence and workability.
【請求項2】 重量%において、C:0.80〜0.
95%、Si:0.50%以下、Mn:0.50%以
下、Cr:17.00〜18.00%、Mo:1.00
〜1.50%、V:0.05〜0.25%を含有してい
ると共に、残部はFeおよび不可避不純物からなり、か
つ、母相中の炭化物の大きさを5μm以下にする事を特
徴とする、耐食性と切れ味持続性および加工性に優れた
刃物用ステンレス鋼。
2. C: 0.80 to 0.1% by weight.
95%, Si: 0.50% or less, Mn: 0.50% or less, Cr: 17.00 to 18.00%, Mo: 1.00
-1.50%, V: 0.05-0.25%, and the balance consists of Fe and unavoidable impurities, and the size of carbides in the parent phase is 5 μm or less. Stainless steel for cutting tools with excellent corrosion resistance, sharpness persistence and workability.
【請求項3】 請求項1及び2において、さらに、
W:0.02〜1.50%、Ti:0.02〜0.50
%、Nb:0.02〜0.50%、Zr:0.02〜
0.50%のうちの1種または2種以上を含有している
事を特徴とする、耐食性と切れ味持続性および加工性に
優れた刃物用ステンレス鋼。
3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
W: 0.02 to 1.50%, Ti: 0.02 to 0.50
%, Nb: 0.02-0.50%, Zr: 0.02-
A stainless steel for cutting tools excellent in corrosion resistance, durability of sharpness and workability, characterized by containing one or more of 0.50%.
JP07721599A 1999-03-23 1999-03-23 Stainless steel for cutting tools with excellent corrosion resistance, sharpness persistence and workability Expired - Fee Related JP3587719B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP07721599A JP3587719B2 (en) 1999-03-23 1999-03-23 Stainless steel for cutting tools with excellent corrosion resistance, sharpness persistence and workability

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP07721599A JP3587719B2 (en) 1999-03-23 1999-03-23 Stainless steel for cutting tools with excellent corrosion resistance, sharpness persistence and workability

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2000273587A true JP2000273587A (en) 2000-10-03
JP3587719B2 JP3587719B2 (en) 2004-11-10

Family

ID=13627627

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP07721599A Expired - Fee Related JP3587719B2 (en) 1999-03-23 1999-03-23 Stainless steel for cutting tools with excellent corrosion resistance, sharpness persistence and workability

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3587719B2 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007530784A (en) * 2004-03-26 2007-11-01 サンドビック インテレクチュアル プロパティー アクティエボラーグ Steel for fine cutting
CN103820723A (en) * 2014-01-09 2014-05-28 马鞍山市恒毅机械制造有限公司 Cutlery stainless steel material and preparation method thereof
CN104593693A (en) * 2013-10-31 2015-05-06 精工爱普生株式会社 Metal powder for powder metallurgy, compound, granulated powder, and sintered body
KR20190034252A (en) 2016-09-16 2019-04-01 히다찌긴조꾸가부시끼가이사 Material for blades
JP2020045511A (en) * 2018-09-17 2020-03-26 愛知製鋼株式会社 Martensitic stainless steel for cutting tool
WO2022153790A1 (en) 2021-01-13 2022-07-21 日鉄ステンレス株式会社 Martensite-based stainless steel material and method for producing same

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS62116755A (en) * 1985-11-15 1987-05-28 Daido Steel Co Ltd Steel for stainless razor blade
JPS63250440A (en) * 1987-04-08 1988-10-18 Daido Steel Co Ltd Steel for cutting tool
JPH03150346A (en) * 1989-11-08 1991-06-26 Matsushita Electric Works Ltd Production of cutting tool
JPH05209252A (en) * 1991-03-14 1993-08-20 Nippon Steel Corp Manufacture of high carbon-containing stainless steel having uniformly fine carbide structure
JPH0665639A (en) * 1992-08-19 1994-03-08 Nippon Steel Corp Production of high carbon stainless steel strip having uniform fine carbite structure and excellent impact toughness

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS62116755A (en) * 1985-11-15 1987-05-28 Daido Steel Co Ltd Steel for stainless razor blade
JPS63250440A (en) * 1987-04-08 1988-10-18 Daido Steel Co Ltd Steel for cutting tool
JPH03150346A (en) * 1989-11-08 1991-06-26 Matsushita Electric Works Ltd Production of cutting tool
JPH05209252A (en) * 1991-03-14 1993-08-20 Nippon Steel Corp Manufacture of high carbon-containing stainless steel having uniformly fine carbide structure
JPH0665639A (en) * 1992-08-19 1994-03-08 Nippon Steel Corp Production of high carbon stainless steel strip having uniform fine carbite structure and excellent impact toughness

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007530784A (en) * 2004-03-26 2007-11-01 サンドビック インテレクチュアル プロパティー アクティエボラーグ Steel for fine cutting
CN104593693A (en) * 2013-10-31 2015-05-06 精工爱普生株式会社 Metal powder for powder metallurgy, compound, granulated powder, and sintered body
CN103820723A (en) * 2014-01-09 2014-05-28 马鞍山市恒毅机械制造有限公司 Cutlery stainless steel material and preparation method thereof
KR20190034252A (en) 2016-09-16 2019-04-01 히다찌긴조꾸가부시끼가이사 Material for blades
US11306370B2 (en) 2016-09-16 2022-04-19 Hitachi Metals, Ltd. Blade material
JP2020045511A (en) * 2018-09-17 2020-03-26 愛知製鋼株式会社 Martensitic stainless steel for cutting tool
WO2022153790A1 (en) 2021-01-13 2022-07-21 日鉄ステンレス株式会社 Martensite-based stainless steel material and method for producing same
KR20230069179A (en) 2021-01-13 2023-05-18 닛테츠 스테인레스 가부시키가이샤 Martensitic stainless steel and manufacturing method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3587719B2 (en) 2004-11-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7758707B2 (en) Martensitic stainless steel and method of the manufacture
KR101289518B1 (en) Austenite stainless steel sheet and method for producing same
JP5328331B2 (en) Steel materials for wear-resistant quenched and tempered parts and manufacturing method
EP2439304A1 (en) Steel sheet for brake disc, and brake disc
JP5484103B2 (en) Steel plate for high-strength machine parts, method for producing the same, and method for producing high-strength machine parts
US20140294662A1 (en) Stainless steel for cutlery and method of manufacturing the same
JP2014009396A (en) Cold tool steel having high hardness and high toughness
JP5010819B2 (en) Stainless steel strip
JP5660417B1 (en) Manufacturing method of steel for blades
JP5660416B1 (en) Cutlery steel and manufacturing method thereof
US20070137050A1 (en) Razor blades and compositions and processes for the production of razor blades
JP3587719B2 (en) Stainless steel for cutting tools with excellent corrosion resistance, sharpness persistence and workability
JP2008231517A (en) Stainless steel material for cutting tool and its manufacturing method
JP6894166B2 (en) Pre-hardened hot tool steel with excellent machinability
JP5207743B2 (en) Steel for blades with excellent wear resistance and toughness
EP0499969B1 (en) A procedure for manufacturing cutting material of superior toughness
JP6798508B2 (en) Steel strip for cutlery
EP1024208B1 (en) Blade material of a metallic band saw and metallic band saw made therefrom
WO2022153790A1 (en) Martensite-based stainless steel material and method for producing same
JP6044870B2 (en) Manufacturing method of steel strip for blades
EP2803745A1 (en) Hot-rolled steel sheet and manufacturing method for same
JP2001123247A (en) Cold tool steel excellent in machinability
JPH101703A (en) Alloy steel for cutting tool, excellent in corrosion resistance and cutting quality
JPH09217147A (en) Hot tool steel
JPS62250154A (en) Alloy tool steel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20040323

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20040521

A911 Transfer of reconsideration by examiner before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20040607

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20040622

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20040705

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20040803

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20040810

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20070820

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080820

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080820

Year of fee payment: 4

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090820

Year of fee payment: 5

R360 Written notification for declining of transfer of rights

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R360

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090820

Year of fee payment: 5

R370 Written measure of declining of transfer procedure

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R370

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090820

Year of fee payment: 5

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313532

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090820

Year of fee payment: 5

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100820

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110820

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120820

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120820

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130820

Year of fee payment: 9

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees