EP4238066A1 - Procédé pour analyser un environnement d'un véhicule automobile - Google Patents

Procédé pour analyser un environnement d'un véhicule automobile

Info

Publication number
EP4238066A1
EP4238066A1 EP21798014.3A EP21798014A EP4238066A1 EP 4238066 A1 EP4238066 A1 EP 4238066A1 EP 21798014 A EP21798014 A EP 21798014A EP 4238066 A1 EP4238066 A1 EP 4238066A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
environment
motor vehicle
surroundings
analysis
sensors
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP21798014.3A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Stefan Nordbruch
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Robert Bosch GmbH
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Robert Bosch GmbH filed Critical Robert Bosch GmbH
Publication of EP4238066A1 publication Critical patent/EP4238066A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00—Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/50—Context or environment of the image
    • G06V20/56—Context or environment of the image exterior to a vehicle by using sensors mounted on the vehicle
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00—Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/50—Context or environment of the image
    • G06V20/52—Surveillance or monitoring of activities, e.g. for recognising suspicious objects
    • G06V20/54—Surveillance or monitoring of activities, e.g. for recognising suspicious objects of traffic, e.g. cars on the road, trains or boats
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V10/00—Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding
    • G06V10/70—Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding using pattern recognition or machine learning
    • G06V10/77—Processing image or video features in feature spaces; using data integration or data reduction, e.g. principal component analysis [PCA] or independent component analysis [ICA] or self-organising maps [SOM]; Blind source separation
    • G06V10/80—Fusion, i.e. combining data from various sources at the sensor level, preprocessing level, feature extraction level or classification level
    • G06V10/809—Fusion, i.e. combining data from various sources at the sensor level, preprocessing level, feature extraction level or classification level of classification results, e.g. where the classifiers operate on the same input data
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00—Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/50—Context or environment of the image
    • G06V20/56—Context or environment of the image exterior to a vehicle by using sensors mounted on the vehicle
    • G06V20/58—Recognition of moving objects or obstacles, e.g. vehicles or pedestrians; Recognition of traffic objects, e.g. traffic signs, traffic lights or roads
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00—Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/60—Type of objects
    • G06V20/64—Three-dimensional objects

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for analyzing the surroundings of a motor vehicle.
  • the invention further relates to a device, a system for analyzing the surroundings of a motor vehicle, a computer program and a machine-readable storage medium.
  • the published application DE 10 2017212 227 A1 discloses a method or a system for vehicle data collection and vehicle control in road traffic.
  • the object on which the invention is based is to be seen as providing a concept for efficiently analyzing the surroundings of a motor vehicle.
  • a method for analyzing the surroundings of a motor vehicle is provided, with the surroundings being analyzed several times in order to produce a number of results, which in particular are individual results can be referred to, each of the multiple results indicating at least whether there is an object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle or not, it being determined as the overall result that there is an object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle if a majority of the multiple results indicate that there is an object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle, with the overall result being that there is no object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle if a majority of the multiple results indicate that there is no object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle.
  • a device which is set up to carry out all the steps of the method according to the first aspect.
  • a system for analyzing the surroundings of a motor vehicle comprising a plurality of surroundings sensors which are set up to record the surroundings of a motor vehicle, the system comprising the device according to the second aspect.
  • a computer program which comprises instructions which, when the computer program is executed by a computer, for example by the device according to the second aspect and/or by the system according to the third aspect, cause this to carry out a method according to the first aspect to execute.
  • a machine-readable storage medium on which the computer program according to the fourth aspect is stored.
  • the invention is based on and includes the knowledge that the area surrounding a motor vehicle is analyzed several times, in particular analyzed several times in parallel, with the individual results at least indicating whether there is an object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle or not, with these individual results being Be taken as a basis for determining an overall result, which indicates whether there is an object in the vicinity of the motor vehicle or not. It is therefore intended that the majority decides. So if the majority of the individual results indicate that in If there is no object in the field of the motor vehicle, the overall result is that there is no object in the field of the motor vehicle. If a majority of the individual results indicate that there is an object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle, then the overall result is determined that there is an object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle.
  • the multiple analysis of the environment is carried out using at least one of the following analysis means: different computer architectures, different programming languages, different analysis methods, in particular different developers of the analysis methods.
  • the multiple analysis of the environment is performed using environment sensor data from different environment sensors detecting an environment of the motor vehicle, in particular environment sensors from different manufacturers and/or environment sensors based on different sensor technologies. This brings about the technical advantage, for example, that redundancy and/or diversity can be brought about efficiently.
  • the multiple analysis of the environment is carried out using environment sensor data from environment sensors that detect an environment of the motor vehicle under different framework conditions.
  • this brings about the technical advantage that there is a high probability that optimal framework conditions exist for capturing the environment, so that there is an increased probability that the corresponding result is a correct result.
  • the framework conditions include one or more elements of the following group of framework conditions: respective position of the surroundings sensors, respective viewing angle of the surroundings sensors, lighting conditions.
  • Lighting conditions indicate, for example, whether additional light was available to illuminate the area.
  • here means in particular that, for example, artificial light was available.
  • the multiple analysis of the environment is performed using environment sensor data from environment sensors detecting the environment of the motor vehicle, a first analysis of the multiple analysis of the environment being performed using a first analysis method and a second analysis of the multiple Analyzing the environment is carried out using a second analysis method, the first analysis method comprising a comparison of the respective environment sensor data with reference environment sensor data in order to detect a change in the environment of the motor vehicle, it being determined that there is an object in the environment when a change was detected, the second being Analysis method is free from a comparison of the respective environment sensor data with reference environment sensor data.
  • the first analysis method is therefore based on so-called free space or free space monitoring.
  • the reference surroundings sensor data therefore indicate in particular a reference which is therefore known. Changes or deviations from this reference mean that there must be an object in the vicinity of the motor vehicle.
  • An area that has been classified or defined as free according to the reference surroundings sensor data must include an object if a change has been determined here based on the surroundings sensor data. It can thus be efficiently recognized whether there is an object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle.
  • the second analysis method is based on a direct object detection based on the surroundings sensor data without a comparison with reference surroundings sensor data.
  • the second analysis method includes, for example, calculating an optical flow.
  • the method according to the first aspect is a computer-implemented method.
  • the method according to the first aspect is carried out by means of the device according to the second aspect and/or by means of the system according to the third aspect.
  • system according to the third aspect is set up to carry out all steps of the method according to the first aspect.
  • Process features result analogously from corresponding device and/or system features and vice versa.
  • the method according to the first aspect includes a respective detection of an area surrounding the motor vehicle using the area sensors.
  • Environment sensor data in the sense of the description characterize or describe the environment of the motor vehicle.
  • the multiple analysis of the environment is carried out using environment sensor data from environment sensors detecting an environment of the motor vehicle.
  • An environment sensor within the meaning of the description is, for example, one of the following environment sensors: radar sensor, lidar sensor, ultrasonic sensor, magnetic field sensor, infrared sensor and video sensor.
  • an environment sensor is encompassed by a motion detector.
  • the multiple environment sensors are distributed within an infrastructure, for example within a parking lot.
  • the multiple environment sensors are arranged in a spatially distributed manner, in particular arranged in a spatially distributed manner within the infrastructure, in particular arranged within the parking lot.
  • the infrastructure includes, for example, one or more of the following infrastructures: parking lot, road junction, in particular intersection, roundabout and/or junction, freeway entrance, freeway exit, generally an entrance, generally an exit, motorway, country road, construction site, toll station and tunnel.
  • control signals for at least partially automated control of a lateral and/or longitudinal guidance of the motor vehicle are generated in order to guide the motor vehicle at least partially automatically based on the output control signals.
  • the generated output control signals are generated.
  • a lateral and/or longitudinal guidance of the motor vehicle is controlled at least partially automatically based on the output control signals in order to guide the motor vehicle at least partially automatically.
  • the phrase "at least partially automated driving” includes one or more of the following cases: assisted driving, partially automated driving, highly automated driving, fully automated driving.
  • Assisted driving means that a driver of the motor vehicle continuously carries out either the lateral or the longitudinal guidance of the motor vehicle.
  • the respective other driving task (that is, controlling the longitudinal or lateral guidance of the motor vehicle) is carried out automatically. This means that when driving the motor vehicle with assistance, either the lateral or the longitudinal guidance is controlled automatically.
  • Partially automated driving means that in a specific situation (for example: driving on a motorway, driving within a parking lot, overtaking an object, driving within a lane defined by lane markings) and/or for a certain period of time, a longitudinal and a Lateral guidance of the motor vehicle are controlled automatically.
  • a driver of the motor vehicle does not have to manually control the longitudinal and lateral guidance of the motor vehicle.
  • the driver must constantly monitor the automatic control of the longitudinal and lateral guidance in order to to intervene manually if necessary. The driver must be ready to take full control of the vehicle at any time.
  • Highly automated driving means that for a certain period of time in a specific situation (for example: driving on a freeway, driving in a parking lot, overtaking an object, driving in a lane defined by lane markings), longitudinal and lateral guidance of the motor vehicle be controlled automatically.
  • a driver of the motor vehicle does not have to manually control the longitudinal and lateral guidance of the motor vehicle.
  • the driver does not have to constantly monitor the automatic control of the longitudinal and lateral guidance in order to be able to intervene manually if necessary.
  • a takeover request is automatically issued to the driver to take over control of the longitudinal and lateral guidance, in particular with a sufficient time reserve.
  • the driver must therefore potentially be able to take over control of the longitudinal and lateral guidance.
  • Limits of the automatic control of the lateral and longitudinal guidance are recognized automatically. With highly automated guidance, it is not possible to automatically bring about a risk-minimum state in every initial situation.
  • Fully automated driving means that in a specific situation (for example: driving on a freeway, driving within a parking lot, overtaking an object, driving within a lane defined by lane markings), longitudinal and lateral guidance of the motor vehicle are automatically controlled.
  • a driver of the motor vehicle does not have to manually control the longitudinal and lateral guidance of the motor vehicle.
  • the driver does not have to monitor the automatic control of the longitudinal and lateral guidance in order to be able to intervene manually if necessary.
  • the driver is automatically prompted to take over the driving task (controlling the lateral and longitudinal guidance of the motor vehicle), in particular with a sufficient time reserve. If the driver does not take over the task of driving, the system automatically returns to a risk-minimum state. Limits of the automatic control of the lateral and longitudinal guidance automatically detected. In all situations it is possible to automatically return to a risk-minimum system state.
  • some or all of the surroundings sensors are included in a motor vehicle.
  • Environment sensors that are included in a motor vehicle can be referred to in particular as motor vehicle environment sensors.
  • Environment sensors that are included in an infrastructure or are spatially distributed within an infrastructure, in particular arranged in a spatially distributed manner, can be referred to as infrastructure environment sensors, for example.
  • a device according to the second aspect and/or a system according to the third aspect is comprised by a motor vehicle or by an infrastructure. In one embodiment, both the motor vehicle and the infrastructure each comprise a device according to the second aspect and/or a system according to the third aspect.
  • the method according to the first aspect is carried out by means of a motor vehicle.
  • a communication message is generated which includes the overall result.
  • the communication message is sent via a communication network, in particular via a wireless communication network, in particular to the motor vehicle.
  • the plurality of results each specify one or more object properties of the object if the respective result specifies that there is an object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle.
  • an object property includes, for example, one of the following Object properties: length, size, width, weight, speed, acceleration, type, especially pedestrian, motor vehicle, cyclist, motorcycle, animal.
  • corresponding overall object properties are determined based on the respective object properties of the corresponding results, with the overall result also indicating the determined overall object properties if it indicates that there is an object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle. For example, it is provided that a respective mean value based on the respective object properties is determined as the respective overall object properties.
  • a number of unique outcomes is an odd number. This brings about the technical advantage in particular that the corresponding majority can be determined efficiently.
  • FIG. 1 shows a flow chart of a method for analyzing the surroundings of a motor vehicle
  • FIG. 3 shows a system for analyzing the surroundings of a motor vehicle
  • FIG. 5 shows a road on which a motor vehicle is driving, the surroundings of which are monitored by means of three surroundings sensors,
  • 6 shows a motor vehicle which is driving on a road and whose surroundings are monitored or recorded by means of six surroundings sensors
  • 7 and 8 each show a different view of a motor vehicle in front of an entry into a tunnel, the surroundings of the motor vehicle being detected or monitored by means of six surroundings sensors.
  • FIG. 1 shows a flow chart of a method for analyzing the surroundings of a motor vehicle.
  • a step 101 it is provided that the environment is analyzed several times in order to determine a number of results according to a step 103 in each case.
  • the respective results of the multiple analyzes can in particular be referred to as individual results.
  • Each of the multiple results or individual results indicates at least whether there is an object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle or not.
  • a first number is determined, which indicates how many individual results indicate whether there is an object in the vicinity of the motor vehicle.
  • a second number is determined, which indicates how many individual results indicate whether there is no object in the vicinity of the motor vehicle.
  • the first number is compared to the second number. If the first number is greater than the second number, according to a step 109 the overall result is determined that there is an object in the vicinity of the motor vehicle. If the second number is greater than the first number, according to a step 107 the overall result is determined that there is no object in the vicinity of the motor vehicle. If the first number is equal to the second number, according to an embodiment that is not shown, it is provided that the method continues at step 101 . This means in particular that in this case the multiple analyzes are repeated.
  • FIG. 2 shows a device 201 that is set up to carry out all the steps of the method according to the first aspect.
  • the system 301 includes a number of surroundings sensors 303, 305, 307, which are each set up to detect the surroundings of a motor vehicle.
  • the system 301 also includes the device 201 of Fig. 2.
  • the plurality of surroundings sensors 303, 305, 307 detect surroundings of the motor vehicle and provide surroundings sensor data corresponding to the detection to device 201. Based on the surroundings sensor data, one specific embodiment provides for the surroundings of the motor vehicle to be analyzed several times.
  • one or more or all of the multiple analyzes of the environment are carried out using one or more or all of the environment sensors 303, 305, 307.
  • one or more or all of the multiple analyzes of the environment are carried out in downstream calculation units or analysis units, ie in particular separate from the environment sensors.
  • the computer program 403 comprises instructions which, when the computer program 403 is executed by a computer, cause it to carry out a method according to the first aspect.
  • FIG. 5 shows a two-lane road 501 comprising a first lane 503 and a second lane 505.
  • a motor vehicle 507 is driving in the first lane 503.
  • the direction of travel of motor vehicle 507 is identified by an arrow with reference number 509.
  • the surroundings of motor vehicle 507 are monitored or recorded using a first surroundings sensor 513 , a second surroundings sensor 515 and a third surroundings sensor 517 .
  • the three environment sensors 513, 515, 517 are arranged on an infrastructure element 511.
  • the infrastructure element 511 is arranged above the road 501, for example.
  • the three environment sensors 513, 515, 517 are different.
  • the first environment sensor 513 is a radar sensor and, for example, the second environment sensor 515 is a video sensor and, for example, the third environment sensor 517 is an infrared sensor.
  • the surroundings sensor data of the first surroundings sensor 513 are analyzed using a first analysis method and the surroundings sensor data of the second surroundings sensor 515 are analyzed using a second analysis method, for example, and the surroundings sensor data 517 are analyzed using a third analysis method, with the three analysis methods each being different, for example to each other.
  • the three surroundings sensors 513, 515, 517 are identical, although the respective surroundings sensor data are analyzed or evaluated using different analysis methods.
  • the respective surroundings sensor data of the three surroundings sensors 513, 515, 517 are evaluated or analyzed using the same analysis method, with the three surroundings sensors 513, 515, 517 being different.
  • the surroundings sensor data of the three surroundings sensors 513, 515, 517 are analyzed or evaluated on different computer architectures.
  • the analysis methods used to analyze the surroundings sensor data of the three surroundings sensors 513, 515, 517 come from different developers.
  • the analysis methods are written in different programming languages.
  • FIG. 6 shows a road 601 on which a motor vehicle 603 is driving.
  • a direction of travel of motor vehicle 603 is identified by an arrow with reference number 604 .
  • a first surroundings sensor 605 a second surroundings sensor 607, a third surroundings sensor 609, a fourth surroundings sensor 611, a fifth surroundings sensor 613 and a sixth surroundings sensor 615.
  • the three surroundings sensors 605, 607, 609 form a first group of surroundings sensors.
  • Surroundings sensors 611, 613, 615 form a second group of surrounding sensors.
  • the six surroundings sensors 605 to 615 monitor or record the surroundings of motor vehicle 603.
  • the respective surroundings sensor data from surroundings sensors 605 to 609 in the first group are compared with reference surroundings sensor data, and when a change in the surroundings of the motor vehicle is detected, it is determined on the basis of the comparison that there is an object in the surroundings of the motor vehicle . If no change is detected, it is determined that there is no object in the area surrounding the motor vehicle.
  • the surroundings sensor data of surroundings sensors 611 to 615 of the second group are analyzed or evaluated using one analysis method or several analysis methods, these analysis methods being free from a comparison of the respective surroundings sensor data with reference surroundings sensor data.
  • the analysis of the environmental sensor data of the first group is based, among other things, on the fact that a known open space is monitored in a known world.
  • a change from the known open space means that something must be present that was not there before, so it is assumed that an object must now be within the open space.
  • a lidar system or a video sensor of a video camera detects a floor or a wall, with a change to the known wall or floor being used to detect that something, in particular an object, must have entered or driven into this area.
  • the change can, for example, include a pattern and/or a changed distance from the floor or from the wall.
  • analysis methods for analyzing the environmental sensor data of the second group are based on the fact that objects are searched for in an unknown world, for example over contiguous areas.
  • the combination of the two approaches described above has the effect, in particular in an advantageous manner, that advantages of both approaches can be combined with one another, it being possible, for example, in an advantageous manner, for the respective disadvantages of the two approaches to be efficiently compensated for.
  • One advantage of the first approach is, for example, that changes can be detected efficiently, so that it can be determined efficiently that there must be an object in the vicinity of a motor vehicle.
  • a disadvantage is, for example, that it is difficult to classify the object, ie whether it is, for example, a motor vehicle, a person or a bicycle.
  • An advantage of the second approach is, for example, that a recognized object can be classified efficiently, so that the disadvantage of the first approach can be efficiently compensated.
  • a disadvantage of the second approach is, for example, that the corresponding environment sensor can have an error, so that it is difficult to determine whether a detected object also corresponds to a real object.
  • this disadvantage can be efficiently compensated for by the first approach in an advantageous manner.
  • the surroundings sensors of the first group capture the surroundings of the motor vehicle 603 from a different perspective than the surroundings sensors of the second group.
  • a respective viewing angle is the same.
  • FIG. 7 shows a side view of a comparable scene compared to FIG.
  • Fig. 8 shows a corresponding plan view of the scene according to Fig. 7.
  • the concept described here provides in particular an environment analysis approach that is "safe”. This means in particular that the overall result can be trusted with a very high probability.
  • the method is used to support at least partially automated motor vehicles.
  • at least partially automated motor vehicles are supported during an at least partially automated journey within an infrastructure. This means, for example, that a scene in the infrastructure is analyzed using the method according to the first aspect and the overall result is provided to the motor vehicle, for example, so that the motor vehicle can plan and carry out its driving task based on the overall result.
  • the infrastructure includes, for example, a tunnel, a freeway entrance, a freeway exit, an intersection, a construction site, a roundabout, generally a junction, a parking lot.
  • a tunnel a freeway entrance, a freeway exit, an intersection, a construction site, a roundabout, generally a junction, a parking lot.
  • the method according to the first aspect is carried out in the motor vehicle itself.
  • the surroundings sensors can be included in the motor vehicle.
  • the concept described here is based in particular on the fact that an analysis using several different sensor technologies (lidar, video, radar, ultrasound, motion detectors, etc.) and/or evaluation approaches or analysis methods (open space surveillance, object recognition, optical flow, etc.) and/ or different framework conditions (for example positions and/or viewing angles of the surroundings sensors) and/or by different implementations of the surroundings sensors and/or by different implementations of the analysis methods.
  • a greater than 50% decision is taken from the individual results, in particular taking into account deviations.
  • surroundings sensor data from a surroundings sensor are analyzed using three or an odd number of different analysis methods, for example object recognition, free space monitoring, optical flow.
  • an odd number of different sensor technologies for example radar, video, lidar, infrared, magnetic field
  • one or two or three different analysis methods for example object recognition, optical flow, free space surveillance
  • sensor technology for example video, to be provided, with the corresponding surroundings sensor data being evaluated using three different evaluation methods or analysis methods.
  • One embodiment provides for two sensor technologies, for example radar and video, to be provided, with the corresponding environmental sensor data being used with three different evaluation methods, for example one evaluation method for the environmental sensor data from the radar sensor and two evaluation methods for the environmental sensor data from the video sensor, so that a number of the individual results is three (different calculation) with additional diversity due to the diverse sensors or hardware.
  • a further increase in trustworthiness, more diversity means in particular increased security, is advantageously achieved, for example, if the evaluation methods or algorithms are implemented differently, for example by different developers, in different programming languages, which is provided according to one embodiment .
  • the respective analyzes are carried out on different computer hardware or computer architectures.
  • a further increase in trustworthiness can be achieved, for example, if the same surroundings sensors or sensor technologies from different manufacturers are used, which is provided according to one embodiment.
  • a further increase in trustworthiness is advantageously achieved when a scene or an environment is captured from different positions or viewing angles, for example from the front, from the side, from above or from behind, which is provided according to one embodiment.
  • One particular advantage of the concept described here is that there is a very high probability that the overall result is "safe", i.e. safe in the sense of being trustworthy. This is a prerequisite or basis if the overall result is to be used for a safety-relevant action, for example at least partially automated control of a lateral and/or longitudinal guide of a motor vehicle.
  • the individual results are obtained using different sensor technologies (redundancy and/or diversity) and/or different evaluation methods (redundancy and/or diversity) and/or different implementations of the environment sensors (e.g. video sensors from different manufacturers). and/or from different implementations of the evaluation methods or analysis methods (for example different developers, different computer architectures, different programming languages) and/or from different framework conditions (for example position, viewing angle, additional light).

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé pour analyser un environnement d'un véhicule automobile, cet environnement étant analysé à plusieurs reprises pour déterminer plusieurs résultats respectifs, chacun de ces résultats indiquant au moins si un objet se trouve ou non dans l'environnement du véhicule automobile, le résultat global déterminé étant qu'un objet se trouve dans l'environnement du véhicule automobile si une pluralité de résultats indiquent qu'un objet se trouve dans l'environnement du véhicule automobile, et le résultat global déterminé étant qu'aucun objet ne se trouve dans l'environnement du véhicule automobile si une pluralité de résultats indiquent qu'aucun objet ne se trouve dans l'environnement du véhicule automobile. L'invention concerne en outre un dispositif, un système, un programme informatique et un support d'enregistrement lisible par machine.
EP21798014.3A 2020-10-30 2021-10-20 Procédé pour analyser un environnement d'un véhicule automobile Pending EP4238066A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102020213661.0A DE102020213661A1 (de) 2020-10-30 2020-10-30 Verfahren zum Analysieren eines Umfelds eines Kraftfahrzeugs
PCT/EP2021/079043 WO2022090015A1 (fr) 2020-10-30 2021-10-20 Procédé pour analyser un environnement d'un véhicule automobile

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4238066A1 true EP4238066A1 (fr) 2023-09-06

Family

ID=78332794

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP21798014.3A Pending EP4238066A1 (fr) 2020-10-30 2021-10-20 Procédé pour analyser un environnement d'un véhicule automobile

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20230394841A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP4238066A1 (fr)
CN (1) CN116368052A (fr)
DE (1) DE102020213661A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2022090015A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102022128787A1 (de) 2022-10-28 2024-05-08 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren und Assistenzsystem zum Detektieren von statischen Hindernissen und entsprechend eingerichtetes Kraftfahrzeug

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10259455B2 (en) 2017-01-25 2019-04-16 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Collision avoidance systems and methods
DE102017212227A1 (de) 2017-07-18 2019-01-24 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Verfahren und System zur Fahrzeugdatensammlung und Fahrzeugsteuerung im Straßenverkehr
DE102017215552A1 (de) 2017-09-05 2019-03-07 Robert Bosch Gmbh Plausibilisierung der Objekterkennung für Fahrassistenzsysteme
DE102017218438A1 (de) 2017-10-16 2019-04-18 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und System zum Betreiben eines Fahrzeugs
DE102019207344A1 (de) 2019-05-20 2020-11-26 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren zum Überwachen einer Infrastruktur
DE102019209154A1 (de) 2019-06-25 2020-12-31 Siemens Mobility GmbH Infrastrukturseitige Umfelderfassung beim autonomen Fahren

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN116368052A (zh) 2023-06-30
WO2022090015A1 (fr) 2022-05-05
DE102020213661A1 (de) 2022-05-05
US20230394841A1 (en) 2023-12-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE102017203838B4 (de) Verfahren und System zur Umfelderfassung
EP3271231B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour surveiller une trajectoire de consigne à parcourir par un véhicule au sujet de l'absence de collision
DE102012204948A1 (de) Verfahren zur Unterstützung eines Fahrers
DE102011010864A1 (de) Verfahren und System zur Vorhersage von Kollisionen
EP3373268A1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'un système d'aide à la conduite pour un véhicule sur une chaussée et système d'aide à la conduite
EP3663719A1 (fr) Procédé de fourniture de données de carte dans un véhicule automobile, véhicule automobile et dispositif central de traitement des données
DE102021201130A1 (de) Verfahren zum infrastrukturgestützten Assistieren mehrerer Kraftfahrzeuge
WO2018188846A1 (fr) Système d'assistance au conducteur pour un véhicule
WO2020135991A1 (fr) Procédé d'assistance d'un véhicule à moteur
DE102007021580B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Ermitteln der fahrzeugrelevanten Verkehrszeichen
EP4238066A1 (fr) Procédé pour analyser un environnement d'un véhicule automobile
DE102020211649A1 (de) Verfahren und System zum Erstellen eines Straßenmodells
DE102014110175A1 (de) Verfahren zum Unterstützen eines Fahrers beim Einparken eines Kraftfahrzeugs, Fahrerassistenzsystem sowie Kraftfahrzeug
DE102019217144A1 (de) Ampelspurzuordnung aus Schwarmdaten
DE102019209050A1 (de) Verfahren zum zumindest teilautomatisierten Führen eines Kraftfahrzeugs
DE102018126295A1 (de) Verfahren zum zumindest teilautomatisierten Führen eines Kraftfahrzeugs
DE102009021765A1 (de) Verfahren zum automatischen Erkennen einer Situationsänderung
DE102021212492A1 (de) Verfahren zum infrastrukturgestützten Assistieren eines Kraftfahrzeugs
DE102014110173A1 (de) Verfahren zum Unterstützen eines Fahrers beim Einparken eines Kraftfahrzeugs, Fahrerassistenzsystem sowie Kraftfahrzeug
DE102019129263A1 (de) Verfahren zur Überwachung einer momentanen Fahrzeugumgebung eines Fahrzeuges sowie Überwachungssystem
DE102018010042A1 (de) Verfahren zum Erkennen wenigstens eines sich in einer Umgebung eines Kraftfahrzeugs befindenden Objekts
DE102016223144A1 (de) Verfahren und System zum Detektieren eines sich innerhalb eines Parkplatzes befindenden erhabenen Objekts
DE102022201084A1 (de) Verfahren zum infrastrukturgestützten Assistieren eines Kraftfahrzeugs
EP4211910A1 (fr) Procédé pour guider un véhicule automobile
WO2022053207A1 (fr) Procédé de guidage d'un véhicule automobile de manière partiellement automatisée

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20230530

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)