EP3568243B1 - Verfahren für eine zugregelung - Google Patents
Verfahren für eine zugregelung Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3568243B1 EP3568243B1 EP18700485.8A EP18700485A EP3568243B1 EP 3568243 B1 EP3568243 B1 EP 3568243B1 EP 18700485 A EP18700485 A EP 18700485A EP 3568243 B1 EP3568243 B1 EP 3568243B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- speed
- tension
- strip
- variant
- shaped material
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 31
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 26
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 26
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 108010014172 Factor V Proteins 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 101100129500 Caenorhabditis elegans max-2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 45
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005097 cold rolling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005098 hot rolling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005461 lubrication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003746 surface roughness Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
- B21B37/00—Control devices or methods specially adapted for metal-rolling mills or the work produced thereby
- B21B37/48—Tension control; Compression control
- B21B37/52—Tension control; Compression control by drive motor control
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
- B21B2265/00—Forming parameters
- B21B2265/02—Tension
- B21B2265/06—Interstand tension
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
- B21B2275/00—Mill drive parameters
- B21B2275/02—Speed
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
- B21B2275/00—Mill drive parameters
- B21B2275/02—Speed
- B21B2275/06—Product speed
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
- B21B2275/00—Mill drive parameters
- B21B2275/02—Speed
- B21B2275/08—Coiler speed
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
- B21B37/00—Control devices or methods specially adapted for metal-rolling mills or the work produced thereby
- B21B37/46—Roll speed or drive motor control
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for tension control in the case of strip-shaped material, in particular in the case of a metal strip, between two clamping points, at least one of the clamping points having a rotary drive for influencing the tensile stress of the material.
- the clamping points can be, for example, two adjacent roll stands
- a decisive criterion for a rolling mill is the rolling stability.
- the rolling stability depends largely on the stability of the tension of the metal strip to be rolled.
- Tension regulators that is to say regulators which regulate the controlled variable train, are basically known in the prior art, e.g. B. from the EP 2 454 033 B1 or the generic DE 10 2006 048 421 A1 .
- the hydraulic adjustment in a roll stand for adjustment of the work rolls can serve as an actuator of the known tension controls.
- the work rolls are preferably position-controlled, since the position control acts faster on the train than a control of the train by adjusting the speed of the rotary drives of the rolls.
- Force control is often used on the last stands of a tandem mill in order to introduce a certain surface roughness onto the rolled metal strip.
- the rotary drive of the rolls of a rolling stand with variable speed setting serve as an actuator for the tension control.
- the invention is therefore based on the object of developing a known method for regulating the tension in the case of a strip-shaped material between two tensioning points in such a way that the tension control becomes more effective and faster.
- This object is achieved by the method claimed in claim 1.
- This method is characterized in that the controller output signal, as part of its conversion into the control signal, is varied at least temporarily as a function of a variable g (t) representing the speed of the metal strip.
- the term “at least temporarily” means that the inventive conversion of the controller output signal into the control signal does not always have to take place during tension control.
- the conversion according to the invention can be exposed to the tension control during individual phases, for example before the tension control has reached a steady state.
- a (physical) variable representing the speed of the strip-shaped material is to be interpreted broadly.
- the term means the speed of the metal belt itself.
- it also includes any other physical variable that allows an indication of the size of the speed of the metal strip between the two clamping points.
- it also includes the rotational speed or the circumferential speed of rolls in a roll stand if such a roll stand functions as a clamping point within the meaning of the invention.
- the size also does not necessarily have to be a measured value.
- metal strip is always used only as an example. It stands synonymously for strip-shaped material made of any material to which the invention relates in general.
- the present invention only relates to tension controls in which a rotary drive functions as an actuator and in which an actuating signal therefore specifies speeds or changes in speed for the rotary drive.
- the core idea of the invention is that the output signal of the tension regulator - unlike in the prior art - does not serve directly as a control signal for a rotary drive in a clamping point, for example in a roll stand, but is processed or converted beforehand.
- This conversion according to the invention advantageously has the effect that tension disturbances in the metal strip caused by changes in speed are pre-controlled.
- the inventive conversion of the controller output signal into the control signal for the rotary drive enables a previously very expensive and time-consuming commissioning of a tension controller to be significantly simplified and shortened. A large number of metal strips that were previously used for test purposes, in particular for jump tests, during commissioning, and the time required by specialist staff to set the tension controller dynamics for different speed ranges, can be significantly reduced when using the method according to the invention.
- a first variant and a second variant are described for the tension control according to the invention.
- Claims 2 to 5 relate to the first variant, while claims 6 and 7 relate to the second variant.
- the following dependent claims 8 to 20 each relate to both variants.
- the first variant of the tension control according to the invention described in claim 2 describes a feedforward control that does not have any speed-dependent influence on the line gain V (t) and nevertheless makes necessary changes to the tension controller output signal R (t) relative to the variable g (t) representing the speed of the metal strip .
- This first variant of the tension control according to the invention works with learning points. If the number of learning points is increased towards infinity, the tension correction is made directly dependent on the system speed and thus also on its line gain.
- V (t) is an amplification factor which represents the course of the variable g (t) representing the speed of the metal strip (200), preferably normalized to the predetermined constant g (t 0), over time.
- learning points t i are based on real interference, such as B. manual reference train changes, redistributions, general disruptions from the process, etc. generated. Because of these disruptive influences / events, as they are also shown in claim 3, the ambient conditions for the tension control change.
- the aforementioned learning points help to adapt the controller output immediately and precisely to the currently changed conditions of the mass flow.
- the first variant of the tension control according to the invention describes an adaptive feedforward control. The tension control becomes faster overall, the control signal S (t) probably only needs to make small, perhaps ideally even no more corrections if the system changes its speed after and during a fault.
- the dependent claim 4 describes different situations when the train control is operated according to the first variant, i. H.
- the output of the tension controller R (t) is increased or decreased directly with the gain factor V (t), which can change continuously with the system speed, and is thus converted into the control signal S (t).
- variant 2 offers the possibility of significantly reducing the effort involved in commissioning the tension control by changing the dynamics of the control by the factor V (t) analogous to the speed is changed automatically and this therefore does not have to be set by experiments or only to a lesser extent.
- the tension control can optionally be switched from the second variant to the first variant as soon as and as long as the variable representing the speed of the metal strip, in particular the speed of the metal strip itself, exceeds a predetermined positive speed limit.
- This speed limit is defined, for example, by the lower threshold value g min1 of variant 1 if this is greater than the upper threshold value g max2 of the second variant.
- the temporary switchover means that the speed correction continues to be changed according to the mass flow, but the tension controller keeps the gain constant at high speeds.
- the controller gain must z. B. can then be kept constant when the dynamics of the rotary drives is or becomes the limiting variable for the dynamics of the tension regulator.
- Both the first and the second variant are preferably operated when the tension control is in a steady state.
- the control signal S (t) or the gain factor V (t) is advantageously calculated in the first and / or in the second variant, taking into account the lead k of the metal strip, preferably by multiplication with a function f (k).
- the tension control according to the invention is preset or precontrolled even better for speed-changing disturbances and is therefore even more effective and even faster.
- the advance k itself can either depend on the variable g (t), which represents the speed of the metal strip, in the form k (g (t)), or it can be specified as a constant.
- control signal S (t) always specifies a speed or a change in speed for a rotary drive in the context of the present invention
- the controller output signal R (t) can either change the speed for the rotary drive or a change in the thickness of the metal strip in a roll stand pretend. In the latter case, the controller output signal must be converted into the control signal for the rotary drive.
- the two tensioning points between which the metal strip is clamped under tension can be two preferably adjacent rolling stands of a rolling train, at least one of the rolling stands having the rotary drive for driving one of its rollers in rotation.
- a thickness control then takes place on the first roll stand in the rolling direction and on the second roll stand downstream in the rolling direction the tension control according to the invention with a control of the rotary drive there as an actuator.
- the preceding speed control significantly relieves the downstream tension control, ie the control signal only needs to output minor changes in speed to the rotary drive.
- the controller output signal on the one hand represents the said change in the decrease in thickness of the metal strip for the thickness control on the first roll stand and in this respect acts as a control signal for the decrease in thickness on the first roll stand.
- the controller output signal R (t) can then, on the other hand, be converted into the control signal for the rotary drive according to the first or second variant of the tension control according to the invention, the conversion also including a conversion of the change in the decrease in thickness into a change in the speed for the rotary drive.
- the two tensioning points between which the tension of the metal strip is regulated with the method according to the invention can alternatively be a pair of rollers as the first tensioning point and a reel device downstream of the roller pair as the second tensioning point.
- the rotary drive required for the tension control according to the invention can then be present either in the pair of rollers for driving at least one of its rollers in rotation and / or in the reel device for driving the reel in rotation.
- the pair of rolls can be a pair of driver rolls or a pair of work rolls in a roll stand.
- Figure 100 shows a schematic 100 of a tension control according to the present invention.
- the basis of the invention is a control loop for a tension control, as shown in Figure 1 is generally shown.
- the control loop provides that the actual tension of a metal strip is measured or otherwise determined with the aid of a determination device 160 when the metal strip is clamped between two tensioning points under tension or passes through these tensioning points under tension.
- train is synonymous with tensile stress.
- the actual tension determined in this way is compared in a target / actual value comparator 110 with a specified target tension for the metal strip, and the result of this comparison, which is typically a difference, is used as a control deviation e ( t) is output to a regulator device 120.
- the regulator device generates a regulator output signal R (t) at its output.
- This controller output signal R (t) typically represents a change in speed for a rotary drive.
- the controller output signal R (t) is not used directly as a control signal for Control of an actuator 140 in the form of a rotary drive, but rather the present invention provides that the controller output signal is first converted into a control signal S (t) in a conversion device 130 in a suitable manner, as described below. Only the actuator S (t) is then actually used to control the rotary drive 140.
- the rotary drive 140 is controlled in such a way that the tension of the metal strip 200 is regulated to the specified target value when the metal strip runs through the controlled system 150, which essentially consists of two tensioning points consists.
- the regulation described works preferably continuously over time, so that the determination of the actual tension of the metal strip described in the introduction takes place continuously within the controlled system and the determined actual tension is continuously regulated to the specified target tension.
- Figure 2 shows the functional structure of the in Figure 3 conversion device 130 shown in detail.
- the conversion device 130 receives the controller output signal R (t) as an input variable and outputs the said control signal S (t) as an output variable to the rotary drive 140 as an actuator.
- the converter 130 also receives a variable g (t) representing the speed of the metal strip 200. This can be the specific speed of the metal strip itself; however, it can also be any other physical variable act, which allows an indication of the size of the speed of the metal strip between the two tensioning points.
- the derivative signal a (t) then enables an acceleration correction for the rotary drive.
- the tension control according to the invention and in particular the conversion device 130 can be operated in a first variant or, alternatively, in a second variant; Depending on the variant, the function blocks F1 and F2 are operated or designed differently within the conversion device 130. The respectively different design or mode of operation of the conversion device 130 for both variants is primarily described mathematically below.
- the block F2 provides within the conversion device 130 the generation of a gain factor V (t) in which the received input signal g (t) is preferably normalized to a predetermined constant g (t 0 ).
- Figure 3 illustrates the generation of the actuating signal S (t) as an output signal of the conversion device 130 according to the first variant on the basis of specific examples for the input signals g (t) and R (t).
- the gain factor V (t) is identical in its time curve to the input signal g (t), ie the normalization factor g (t 0 ) was set to 1 here as an example.
- various other intermediate signals A1 (t), Z (t) and A2 (t) are generated within the conversion device 130, from which the control signal S (t) is ultimately calculated.
- the calculation of the intermediate signals is shown mathematically above and, as said, in Figure 3 explained using an example.
- the feedforward control is immediately and precisely adapted to the current conditions, in particular to speed-related changes in the mass flow.
- the future controller output signal R (t) ie the controller output signal copied to the pilot control branch in the form of the signal Z (t) after the learning time set in each case; please refer Figure 2 so that the control signal S (t) does not change in total when the learning times are set.
- the newly learned mass flow disturbance is automatically precontrolled by the conversion device 130 in that the mass flow control is again changed linearly to the system speed by the actuating signal S (t).
- the controller output signal R (t) must make no or only very small corrections when the system changes its speed, i.e. when there is a change in g (t) .
- Fig. 3 shows exemplary signal curves for the input signals R (t) and g (t) and the control signal S (t) calculated therefrom according to formula 2 in the conversion device 130.
- a comparison of the controller output signal R (t), which is typically used directly in the prior art as a control signal for a downstream rotary drive, with the control signal S (t) calculated according to the invention shows, in particular between times t 0 and t 2 , that the controller output signal R ( t) was weighted or varied to calculate the control signal S (t) with the variable g (t) representing the speed of the metal strip or the gain factor V (t).
- FIG Figure 4 An example of such a calculation of the actuating signal S (t) according to the second variant is shown in FIG Figure 4 shown. Also in Figure 4 A comparison of the controller output signal R (t) with the control signal S (t) shows that the controller output signal is varied or weighted according to the invention as a function of the gain factor V (t) or as a function of the variable g (t) representing the speed of the metal strip. In contrast to the weighting according to the first variant, the weighting in the second variant takes effect much more directly; this is shown by the actually proportional gain of the local maxima and minima, in particular in the area ⁇ t. In the first variant, these are not amplified or only amplified to a lesser extent, as can be seen from the signal curve S (t) in FIG Figure 3 is recognizable.
- the second variant can not only be used when the tension control is in a steady state, but also before the steady state is reached, e.g. B. when threading metal strip into a system, in particular between the two tensioning points, or during a tension build-up sequence, etc.
- V t 1
- the tension control is in a steady state, it can be operated according to the invention either according to the first or the second variant.
- this steady state begins at the point in time t 0 with the speed g (t 0 ).
- the steady state it is also possible to switch between the first and the second variant.
- a switch to the second variant can take place if a more favorable control behavior can be achieved by changing the speed of the system, in that the dynamics of the tension regulator are also changed due to the speed change.
- the dynamics are adjusted at least partially automatically by converting the variable R (t) into S (t) according to the invention.
- the direct amplification of the controller signal R (t) during the conversion into the control signal S (t) has the advantage that the controller can be started up more quickly, since the dependence of the control dynamics on the speed is at least partially due to the conversion R according to the invention (t) is solved for S (t).
- the resulting continuous adaptation of the dynamics of the controller to the requirements during and after the change in speed can also be more precise than the conventional setting for different operating points.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Control Of Metal Rolling (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102017200560.2A DE102017200560A1 (de) | 2017-01-16 | 2017-01-16 | Verfahren für eine Zugregelung |
PCT/EP2018/050720 WO2018130636A1 (de) | 2017-01-16 | 2018-01-12 | Verfahren für eine zugregelung |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3568243A1 EP3568243A1 (de) | 2019-11-20 |
EP3568243B1 true EP3568243B1 (de) | 2021-03-10 |
Family
ID=60990811
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP18700485.8A Active EP3568243B1 (de) | 2017-01-16 | 2018-01-12 | Verfahren für eine zugregelung |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US11426778B2 (ru) |
EP (1) | EP3568243B1 (ru) |
DE (1) | DE102017200560A1 (ru) |
RU (1) | RU2732460C1 (ru) |
WO (1) | WO2018130636A1 (ru) |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CH353436A (de) | 1955-05-12 | 1961-04-15 | Bbc Brown Boveri & Cie | Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Konstanthaltung des Bandzuges bei Bandwalzwerken |
AU475854B2 (en) * | 1972-09-06 | 1976-09-02 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | System for controlling rolling mills |
US3848443A (en) * | 1973-05-31 | 1974-11-19 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Automatic control method and apparatus for a rolling mill |
US4132095A (en) * | 1977-08-04 | 1979-01-02 | United States Steel Corporation | Automatic gauge control method and apparatus for tandem strip mills |
US4307591A (en) * | 1980-03-31 | 1981-12-29 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Rolling mill looper control system |
US4662202A (en) * | 1985-07-23 | 1987-05-05 | Cargill, Incorporated | Low tension cascade mill speed control by current measurement with temperature compensation |
US4998427A (en) * | 1989-11-29 | 1991-03-12 | Aeg Westinghouse Industrial Automation Corporation | Method for rolling on-gauge head and tail ends of a workpiece |
US5012660A (en) * | 1989-11-29 | 1991-05-07 | Aeg Westinghouse Industrial Automation Corporation | Control system and method for compensating for speed effect in a tandem cold mill |
SU1738400A1 (ru) * | 1990-04-02 | 1992-06-07 | Кузнецкий металлургический комбинат им.В.И.Ленина | Способ регулировани межклетевого нат жени и устройство дл его осуществлени |
GB9007854D0 (en) | 1990-04-06 | 1990-06-06 | Emhart Ind | Take out device |
US5103662A (en) * | 1990-05-01 | 1992-04-14 | Allegheny Ludlum Corporation | Tandem rolling mill tension control with speed ratio error discrimination |
FR2735046B1 (fr) * | 1995-06-08 | 1997-07-11 | Lorraine Laminage | Procede de laminage a froid avec compensation d'ovalisation des cylindres de laminage. |
RU2268800C2 (ru) * | 2002-12-19 | 2006-01-27 | Закрытое акционерное общество "Ново-Краматорский машиностроительный завод" | Способ регулирования натяжения полосы в процессе прокатки между клетями многоклетьевого стана с печными моталками |
DE102006048421B4 (de) | 2006-10-12 | 2012-08-30 | Siemens Ag | Verfahren zum Regeln eines Istzuges auf einen Sollzug mittels eines mittels eines Modells der Zugregelstrecke adaptierten Zugreglers |
EP2277639A1 (de) | 2009-07-15 | 2011-01-26 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Bandzug- und Schlingenregelung |
RU147042U1 (ru) * | 2014-07-01 | 2014-10-27 | Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования "Магнитогорский государственный технический университет им. Г.И. Носова" | Устройство автоматического регулирования натяжения металла в двух межклетевых промежутках черновой группы стана горячей прокатки |
-
2017
- 2017-01-16 DE DE102017200560.2A patent/DE102017200560A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2018
- 2018-01-12 US US16/477,570 patent/US11426778B2/en active Active
- 2018-01-12 RU RU2019122255A patent/RU2732460C1/ru active
- 2018-01-12 WO PCT/EP2018/050720 patent/WO2018130636A1/de active Application Filing
- 2018-01-12 EP EP18700485.8A patent/EP3568243B1/de active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US11426778B2 (en) | 2022-08-30 |
US20190366403A1 (en) | 2019-12-05 |
RU2732460C1 (ru) | 2020-09-16 |
WO2018130636A1 (de) | 2018-07-19 |
DE102017200560A1 (de) | 2018-07-19 |
EP3568243A1 (de) | 2019-11-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE102010013387B4 (de) | Steuervorrichtung und -verfahren für ein Walzwerk | |
DE10133756A1 (de) | Kaltwalzwerk sowie Verfahren zum Kaltwalzen von metallischem Band | |
EP2195127A1 (de) | Betriebsverfahren zum einbringen eines walzguts in ein walzgerüst eines walzwerks, steuereinrichtung, datenträger und walzwerk zum walzen eines bandförmigen walzgutes | |
DE602004003734T2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Dickenregelung eines gewalzten Produktes | |
WO2016045847A1 (de) | VERFAHREN UND GIEß-WALZ-ANLAGE ZUM GIEßEN UND WALZEN EINES ENDLOSEN STRANGGUTES | |
EP2790846B1 (de) | Verfahren zur bearbeitung von walzgut in einem warmwalzwerk | |
EP3544751B1 (de) | Bandlageregelung mit kraftbegrenzter anstellung von seitenführungen an das metallband und korrektur der walzenanstellung | |
EP2125258B1 (de) | Regelanordnung für ein walzgerüst und hiermit korrespondierende gegenstände | |
EP2293889B1 (de) | Konti-walzstrasse mit ein- und/oder ausgliedern von walzgerüsten im laufenden betrieb | |
EP2621645B1 (de) | Verfahren zum ansteuern einer tandemwalzstrasse, steuer- und/oder regeleinrichtung für eine tandemwalzstrasse, maschinenlesbarer programmcode, speichermedium und tandemwalzstrasse | |
EP2741870B1 (de) | Walzanlage und verfahren zum walzen | |
WO2013167366A1 (de) | Verfahren zur bearbeitung von walzgut und walzwerk | |
EP3568243B1 (de) | Verfahren für eine zugregelung | |
WO2016041746A1 (de) | Breiteneinstellung bei einer fertigstrasse | |
EP1035928A1 (de) | Verfahren und einrichtung zum walzen eines walzbandes mit variierender dicke | |
EP3231522B1 (de) | Robuste bandzugregelung | |
AT518461A1 (de) | Gießspiegelregelung mit Störgrößenkompensation | |
EP3798750A1 (de) | Verfahren zum überwachen und steuern einer anlage zum walzen metallener produkte | |
DE2440235C2 (ru) | ||
EP3890900B1 (de) | Verfahren zum betreiben eines walzgerüstes zum stufenwalzen | |
EP3795267B1 (de) | Verfahren zum betreiben eines walzgerüstes | |
EP2861360B1 (de) | Verfahren zum bearbeiten von walzgut in einem walzwerk | |
WO2012072603A1 (de) | Konzept zum einstellen von prozessparametern eines walzprozesses mittels eines gemessenen lagerschlupfes | |
EP2354065B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Regelung eines Rollenwechslers sowie Rollenwechsler | |
DE19750094B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Steuerung eines Stellelements einer Antriebseinheit |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20190816 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20200828 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1369255 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210315 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502018004246 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210611 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210610 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210610 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20210310 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210710 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210712 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502018004246 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20211213 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210710 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20220112 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20220131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220112 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220112 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220131 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220131 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220112 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230707 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20240122 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240119 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20180112 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20240129 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210310 |