EP3415339A1 - Procédé d'identification univoque d'un document ainsi que document de sécurité ou de valeur - Google Patents

Procédé d'identification univoque d'un document ainsi que document de sécurité ou de valeur Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3415339A1
EP3415339A1 EP18177266.6A EP18177266A EP3415339A1 EP 3415339 A1 EP3415339 A1 EP 3415339A1 EP 18177266 A EP18177266 A EP 18177266A EP 3415339 A1 EP3415339 A1 EP 3415339A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
document
parameter
comparison
determined
security
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP18177266.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3415339B1 (fr
Inventor
Andreas Wilke
Olaf Dressel
Ilya Komarov
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bundesdruckerei GmbH
Original Assignee
Bundesdruckerei GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bundesdruckerei GmbH filed Critical Bundesdruckerei GmbH
Publication of EP3415339A1 publication Critical patent/EP3415339A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3415339B1 publication Critical patent/EP3415339B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B42—BOOKBINDING; ALBUMS; FILES; SPECIAL PRINTED MATTER
    • B42D—BOOKS; BOOK COVERS; LOOSE LEAVES; PRINTED MATTER CHARACTERISED BY IDENTIFICATION OR SECURITY FEATURES; PRINTED MATTER OF SPECIAL FORMAT OR STYLE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; DEVICES FOR USE THEREWITH AND NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; MOVABLE-STRIP WRITING OR READING APPARATUS
    • B42D25/00—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof
    • B42D25/20—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof characterised by a particular use or purpose
    • B42D25/23—Identity cards
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B42—BOOKBINDING; ALBUMS; FILES; SPECIAL PRINTED MATTER
    • B42D—BOOKS; BOOK COVERS; LOOSE LEAVES; PRINTED MATTER CHARACTERISED BY IDENTIFICATION OR SECURITY FEATURES; PRINTED MATTER OF SPECIAL FORMAT OR STYLE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; DEVICES FOR USE THEREWITH AND NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; MOVABLE-STRIP WRITING OR READING APPARATUS
    • B42D25/00—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof
    • B42D25/20—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof characterised by a particular use or purpose
    • B42D25/24—Passports
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B42—BOOKBINDING; ALBUMS; FILES; SPECIAL PRINTED MATTER
    • B42D—BOOKS; BOOK COVERS; LOOSE LEAVES; PRINTED MATTER CHARACTERISED BY IDENTIFICATION OR SECURITY FEATURES; PRINTED MATTER OF SPECIAL FORMAT OR STYLE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; DEVICES FOR USE THEREWITH AND NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; MOVABLE-STRIP WRITING OR READING APPARATUS
    • B42D25/00—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof
    • B42D25/30—Identification or security features, e.g. for preventing forgery
    • B42D25/305—Associated digital information
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B42—BOOKBINDING; ALBUMS; FILES; SPECIAL PRINTED MATTER
    • B42D—BOOKS; BOOK COVERS; LOOSE LEAVES; PRINTED MATTER CHARACTERISED BY IDENTIFICATION OR SECURITY FEATURES; PRINTED MATTER OF SPECIAL FORMAT OR STYLE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; DEVICES FOR USE THEREWITH AND NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; MOVABLE-STRIP WRITING OR READING APPARATUS
    • B42D25/00—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof
    • B42D25/40—Manufacture
    • B42D25/45—Associating two or more layers
    • B42D25/455—Associating two or more layers using heat
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B42—BOOKBINDING; ALBUMS; FILES; SPECIAL PRINTED MATTER
    • B42D—BOOKS; BOOK COVERS; LOOSE LEAVES; PRINTED MATTER CHARACTERISED BY IDENTIFICATION OR SECURITY FEATURES; PRINTED MATTER OF SPECIAL FORMAT OR STYLE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; DEVICES FOR USE THEREWITH AND NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; MOVABLE-STRIP WRITING OR READING APPARATUS
    • B42D25/00—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof
    • B42D25/40—Manufacture
    • B42D25/45—Associating two or more layers
    • B42D25/46—Associating two or more layers using pressure
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/06—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using wave or particle radiation
    • G07D7/12—Visible light, infrared or ultraviolet radiation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/20—Testing patterns thereon
    • G07D7/202—Testing patterns thereon using pattern matching
    • G07D7/205—Matching spectral properties

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for a one-to-one identification of a document, which is designed as a security or a value document, as well as a security or value document.
  • Such documents are known in various embodiments as such. These include, for example, security documents such as identity cards, passports or identity cards, as well as value documents such as credit cards or banknotes.
  • security documents such as identity cards, passports or identity cards
  • value documents such as credit cards or banknotes.
  • the document may, for example, be in book or fit with a document cover and document insert or as a plastic card, with or without a chip module.
  • Such security or value documents have one or more security features.
  • Optical security features are as such, for example, in the document DE 10 2007 015 934 A1 called.
  • the object of the invention is to provide a method for unambiguously identifying a document executed as security or value document as well as a security or value document, with which a unambiguous document identification is made possible in a simplified manner.
  • a method of uniquely identifying a document executed as a security or value document which provides the document made of one or more materials.
  • a material comparison parameter for a material property in at least one material section of the document is determined.
  • In a local memory of the document and / or a central Database stores comparison data indicating or displaying the material comparison parameter.
  • the document is determined, wherein the following is provided: a material inspection parameter is determined for the at least one material section and / or a further material section of the document which is different from the at least one material section; the comparison data is read from the local memory of the document and / or the central database and compared with test data indicating the material test parameter; and the document is determined to be unique if, in comparing the test data and the comparative data, it is determined that the material test parameter corresponds to the material comparison parameter within predetermined parameter limits.
  • a security or value document uniquely identifiable by the method, wherein comparison data is stored in a local data store of the security or value document indicating a material comparison parameter for at least one material portion of the document.
  • a material property that can be uniquely assigned to the document is used as a material signature ("material fingerprint") for identifying the security or value document. It may be any material property of the document that is provided by the manufacturing process when creating the document or not due to production, be it targeted or random. Thus, a material property of the material or materials used for the document, which is inherent to the materials and is not changed by the production process, can also be used for the material signature, be it as a single or supplementary signature feature.
  • uniqueness means that each security or value document has exactly one material signature (a material property or combination of material properties) that distinguishes it from other documents, and each material signature includes exactly one security or value document.
  • a match or correspondence can be determined if the parameters are within predefined test tolerances.
  • the material test parameter and the material comparison parameter can be determined by means of an optical measuring method.
  • the security or value document can be unambiguously identified on the basis of an optically tunable material signature.
  • the material signature is optically determinable.
  • the material test parameter and the material comparison parameter can be determined in the optical measurement method as a parameter for an optical property from the following group: transmission, absorption, reflection and emission.
  • One or more optical properties of the material of the document may be used for the comparison of the material comparison parameter and the material test parameter.
  • the material test parameter and the material comparison parameter may form a spectrally resolved material signature in which the material test parameter and the material comparison parameter relate to a spectrally resolved material property.
  • material test parameters and material comparison parameters that can relate to any optical property are assigned to a specific wavelength or a wavelength range. For example, these may be absorption or transmission values at a given wavelength or a predetermined wavelength range.
  • the emission for example in the form of fluorescence, can also be determined for a wavelength or a wavelength range.
  • the material comparison parameter and the material test parameter can each be determined in the same local area of the at least one material section of the document.
  • the material test parameter and the material comparison parameter can be determined in different local material sections of the document if the material property used for unambiguous identification is formed in the different local material sections.
  • these electronic data may be read out to subsequently determine the material inspection parameter for the material portion (s) of the document identified from the electronic data.
  • the electronic data can in this case specify the material section in which the material comparison parameter was determined.
  • the electronic data can specify a local material section in which the material test parameter is to be determined.
  • the local material portion of the document may be given in relative relation to and spaced from a reference point on the document, for example, a photo or other image on the document.
  • the material comparison parameter and the material inspection parameter can be determined in a material section of the document which has a production-related change or anomaly of the material properties.
  • material sections for the material signature which differ from other material sections of the document with regard to at least one material property, in particular other material sections outside a security feature. In this way, local changes of one or more material properties by means of the material comparison parameter and the material test parameter can be used to uniquely identify the document.
  • the material comparison parameter and the material inspection parameter can be determined in a material section of the document which is formed with regard to the material property equal to other material sections of the document.
  • one or more material properties of the material of the document can be used, which are characteristic not only for a local material portion of the document, but also for other material portions of the document. For example, an unambiguously attributable to the document absorption or a transmission behavior in the different material sections may be substantially the same.
  • the material comparison parameter and the material inspection parameter may be determined in the at least one material section of the document which has a unique material characteristic for the document, and additionally in a material section of the document which does not have a unique material characteristic for the document.
  • This embodiment is intended to include several material properties in the comparison of material comparison parameters and material inspection parameters.
  • a non-ambiguous material property can serve to assign the security or value document to be identified to a given class or group (classification), for example the class "company card” or "identity card”, in order then to place within the class or group
  • classification for example the class "company card” or "identity card”
  • the document may have a security feature evaluable to uniquely identify the document, and the material property indicated by the material comparison parameter may not be associated with the security feature, which may mean that the one-to-one material property is not caused or affected by the manufacturing of the security feature.
  • Several security features can be provided.
  • One or more security features may be optically determinable security features, as they are known as such in various designs.
  • the at least one material section of the document can be arranged outside a material section of the document captured by the security feature.
  • the at least one material section of the document is then free of the at least one security feature.
  • the material portion of the document which does not have a material property unique to the document may be located outside the security feature.
  • the material comparison parameter is determined for one or more material sections which are formed outside and separate from the at least one security feature. This may in particular mean that the material section under investigation is not influenced by the formation and the production of the security feature (s) in the document with regard to its material properties.
  • the determining of the document may further comprise: evaluating the security feature to identify the document and uniquely identifying the document if the material inspection parameter corresponds to the material comparison parameter and the document is additionally identified by the security feature. In this case, it is envisaged to further secure the one-to-one identification of the document by evaluating the material signature and security feature.
  • the testing of security features is known as such in various designs.
  • the material comparison parameter and the material inspection parameter can be determined in at least one further material section of the document.
  • it can be provided that in each case the same material property is tested in the material section and the further material section, for example an optical property such as absorption or transmission of the material.
  • the further material section may be arranged outside or inside the security feature.
  • the material comparison parameter and the material inspection parameter may be determined in a plurality of different material portions of the document, which are selectively spaced or juxtaposed, distributed over an entire surface or portion thereof of the document.
  • the method for identifying the document can be further refined and secured.
  • the same or different material properties can be checked over much of the area or the total area of the document.
  • a further material comparison parameter and an assigned further material test parameter can be determined and included in the determination of the document corresponding to the evaluation of the material comparison parameter and the material test parameter.
  • groups of material signatures can be used for the one-to-one identification document.
  • the material signatures may refer to material properties that are not associated with the one or more security features of the document, and thus, in particular, are not conditioned, influenced, or caused by the production of the one or more security features in the security or value document are caused.
  • Fig. 1 shows a schematic representation of an arrangement with a running as a smart card 1 security document, a test device 2 and a central database 3. Between the test device 2 and the central database 3 electronic data can be exchanged, the data communication include a wireless and / or a wired data transmission can.
  • a material test parameter is determined with the aid of the test device 2.
  • the material test parameter indicates a material property for at least one local material section 4 on the chip card 1.
  • it can be an optically determinable material test parameter, for example regarding absorption, Transmission, reflection and / or emission.
  • the material test parameter may relate to a refraction, the refractive index and / or the light scattering of the material.
  • Non-optical material properties for example a material density, can also be derived from optical measured variables.
  • the material test parameter can be determined spectrally resolved, for example, by determining the position and / or intensity of absorption, emission, reflection and / or transmission bands depending on the wave. As such, determining optical material testing parameters is well known in various embodiments and will be explained in more detail below for exemplary embodiments.
  • test data in the form of electronic data are generated by means of the test device 2 in order to compare the test data with comparative data which specifies a material comparison parameter which was previously determined and for which the comparison data was stored in the central database 3.
  • the material comparison parameter, which the comparison data indicate uniquely identifies the chip card 1 and can thus be used for the comparison with the check data in order to identify the chip card 1.
  • the comparison data can be stored in a local data memory of a chip module 1 integrated in the chip card 1.
  • the local data memory is part of the chip module 5 in the chip card 1, with which electronic data can be exchanged in the usual way.
  • the test device 2 is set up to determine the material comparison parameter and the material test parameter and to exchange electronic data with the chip module 5.
  • a plastic card without chip module can be provided.
  • the chip module 5 can be set up for contact-type and / or contactless data communication, for example using RFID technology.
  • test data and comparison data can take place in the test device 2 itself and / or in a server device 6, which can be set up to exchange data with the test device 2 and optionally with the central database 3.
  • the examination of the unambiguous material signature in the local material section 4 takes place outside the area of the chip card 1 detected by the security feature 7.
  • determining and checking may optionally also capture the area of security feature 7. Alternatively, it is checked only outside the security feature 7.
  • a material characteristic that unambiguously characterizes the chip card 1 can be used, which is the result of a process fluctuation during the production of the chip card 1.
  • the smart card 1 can be manufactured by laminating plastic films, as is known per se in various embodiments. It is known that this or other production processes have a natural range of variation, which leads to a characteristic variation of material properties. If the process fluctuation is stable over time, this leads to a determinable (measurable) and a one-to-one attributable material property, which can therefore be regarded as an "engraved” process fluctuation.
  • the process variations may, for example, lead to unambiguous optical properties, such as optical transmission properties in a certain wavelength range or fluctuating material concentrations / densities in different volume or area elements in / on the smart card 1 or the quality and distribution of material interfaces within the smart card. Also, so while manufacturing due of process variations one-to-one identifiable dielectric functions of the plastic body of the smart card.
  • one or more one-to-one material modifications for the card body of the chip card 1 can be generated, for example during the manufacturing process and / or subsequently.
  • material modifications may introduce a one-to-one spectral material signature into the security document, particularly the smart card 1.
  • a one-to-one spectral material signature may be, for example, a new optically detectable band (absorption / transmission / emission) in a spectral region. This spectral band can be located, for example, in the THz spectral range.
  • the one-to-one spectral material signature could also be integrated by specific transmission characteristics given over a particular wavelength range.
  • One possibility of creating a new spectral material signature in the spectral IR range by means of material modification of polycarbonate is, for example, in the document EP 3 059 713 A1 described.
  • a method for verifying the authenticity of a value or security document in which the presence in the plastic material of a first and a second polymer is optically determined by infrared spectral analysis.
  • the material property or the material properties, which uniquely identify the chip card 1 can be determined (measured or tested) on the basis of one or more material comparison parameters. These form a material signature of the chip card 1 or another security or value document, for example an optically determinable material signature, which can be determined spectrally resolved.
  • material comparison parameter or electronic comparison data are generated and stored in the central database 3 and / or the local data memory, so that the comparison data can be evaluated if the security or value document to be identified.
  • raw measurement data is determined, for example, by means of an optical analyzer such as spectrometer for measuring absorption and transmission. These are measurement data measured in determining the smart card 1 or other security or value document for the one or more material properties.
  • one or more characteristic material properties can be determined from the raw measurement data, for example optical properties, optionally spectrally resolved.
  • This can be, for example, an intensity I at a fixed wavelength ⁇ (I ( ⁇ )), an area integral under the absorption or transmission curve over a spectral range between two wavelengths ⁇ 1 and ⁇ 2 or other mathematical functions resulting from the spectral Derive the course of the raw measurement data.
  • step 12 it is determined whether the one or more characteristic material properties are unique, that is, suitable for one-to-one identification based solely on the material property (s).
  • the one or more characteristic material properties can be compared with all stored in the central database 3 material signatures to check the uniqueness. If the one or more characteristic material properties were identified as unique (one-to-one), a material signature for the workpiece (for example chip card 1) of the security or value document is stored in step 14 and stored in the central database 3 and / or the local data memory , Thus, a later check (identification) in step 15 on the basis of the material signature is possible if the same measuring method and the same test method are carried out again.
  • a material signature for the workpiece for example chip card 1 of the security or value document
  • Characteristic material properties can be determined for only a single local area, for example only a local area of the chip card 1, or for a plurality of local areas 8 and then used for identification. For example, one or more volume or area elements or certain points of the body of the security or value document may be evaluated.
  • a body for the chip card 1 is produced as a stack of plastic films by means of lamination.
  • One or more material properties (material signature) can be determined for the laminated stack, in particular optically.
  • Fig. 3 shows a schematic representation in which a layer assembly 20 is supplied with stacked plastic film layers 21 in the non-laminated state of a workstation 22 to a laminated assembly 23 of the plastic film layers 21 in the laminated Condition.
  • the laminated structure 23 thus produced with the plastic film layers 21 in the laminated state is then fed to an optical measuring device 24, with which the layer arrangement 23 with the plastic film layers 21 in the laminated state is optically determined as a test object.
  • the lamination of the plastic film layers 21 takes place, for example, in a hot pressing process known in the production of security documents, in which thermoplastics are pressed together at elevated temperatures, so that a monobloc is formed.
  • the joining of the layers can also take place by means of the use of adhesive or by means of plastic welding.
  • layer arrangement 23 of the plastic film layers 21 may be substantially free of internal interfaces.
  • measuring light beams 26 generated by a measuring light source 25 are irradiated onto the layer arrangement 23.
  • a first and second detector device 27, 28 reflected measuring light beams 30 and transmitted measuring light beams 31 are detected.
  • Associated measurement signals are supplied to an evaluation device 32, which is set up to determine at least one optical measurement parameter from the measurement signals, for example a transmittance and / or a reflectance for the examined test object (card body).
  • different layer arrangements can each be determined optically, in order then to determine with the aid of the evaluation device 32 one or more optically determinable material properties for the investigated layer arrangements, which can potentially be used for the one-to-one identification.
  • a transmittance T and a reflectance R are determined as absolute and / or relative quantities for the layer arrangement serving as a reference.
  • I R + T, where I indicates the light intensity of the incident measuring light beams 26. This equation is based on the assumption that no absorption of the measurement light beams 26 takes place in the examined sample. This measurement situation is schematic in Fig. 4 shown.
  • a changed optical behavior results due to the local defects 40, which is indicative of the lamination quality within the investigated layer arrangement.
  • One or more local imperfections that may form some kind of (production-related) anomaly may be used as a material signature. Anomalies of optically or non-optically determinable properties can alternatively also be generated selectively during production.
  • the layer assembly 23 may optionally be qualified as scrap.
  • the deviating, outside the tolerance limits lying transmission behavior can be used as a material signature, especially if it is within a predetermined fluctuation (for example, greater than tolerance limit regarding rejects) of the optical transmission.
  • the corresponding test result can be output in the evaluation device 32 via a display.
  • the optical measurement parameters in particular reflection and / or transmission, can be determined for a layer arrangement of the plastic film layers 21 in the non-laminated state.
  • Each of the plastic film layers 21 contributes to the reflected light, and in general: Tn ⁇ T ' ⁇ T.
  • the degree of auto-adhesion of the laminated plastic film layers can be determined non-destructively, which can further be used as a measure of the interfacial strength in the stack of the plastic film layers 21.
  • one or more reference values can be stored for the optical measurement parameters to be measured, in particular in an electronic storage medium, before testing the layer arrangement 23 with the stacked plastic film layers 21 in the laminated state.
  • one of the reference values can be selected, for example as a function of the structure of the layer arrangement (number and thickness of the plastic film layers).
  • the plastic film layers 21 may be formed, for example, as polycarbonate films. Before the lamination process, these and other plastic films have a natural surface roughness, which is why such plastic films appear to be "hazy" when viewed.
  • the turbidity of a plastic film layer at a light wavelength is described, for example, by its haze value, which can be determined, for example, according to ASTM D 1003.
  • the interfaces between the plastic films disappear from the polycarbonate chains across interfaces due to plastic deformation of the surfaces and auto-adhesion during lamination.
  • An ideally laminated layer arrangement therefore essentially has no physical boundary surfaces.
  • the source of diffuse light scattering (surface roughness) is at least reduced by the lamination.
  • the light transmission is significantly increased at wavelengths at which the layer arrangement has substantially no absorption, which reduces the haze value.
  • Characteristic values for the haze value in one or more local areas that are distributed over the surface can be used as a material signature and thus a plastic card body in a one-to-one individualizing manner.
  • Fig. 7 shows a schematic representation of another device for non-destructive determination of a layer arrangement 23 of the plastic film layers 21 in the laminated state.
  • Further light sources 50, 51 are provided, which are arranged on opposite sides of the layer arrangement 23.
  • the measuring light beams 30, 31 are received in common by the detector device 27.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Credit Cards Or The Like (AREA)
EP18177266.6A 2017-06-13 2018-06-12 Procédé d'identification univoque d'un document Active EP3415339B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102017112954.5A DE102017112954A1 (de) 2017-06-13 2017-06-13 Verfahren zum eineindeutigen Identifizieren eines Dokuments sowie Sicherheits- oder Wertdokument

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3415339A1 true EP3415339A1 (fr) 2018-12-19
EP3415339B1 EP3415339B1 (fr) 2021-10-20

Family

ID=62620745

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18177266.6A Active EP3415339B1 (fr) 2017-06-13 2018-06-12 Procédé d'identification univoque d'un document

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3415339B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102017112954A1 (fr)

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001027587A1 (fr) * 1999-10-07 2001-04-19 Cubic Corporation Machine de test/codage pour carte a puce sans contact
DE102007015934A1 (de) 2007-04-02 2008-10-09 Bundesdruckerei Gmbh Dokument mit einem Sicherheitsmerkmal, Lesegerät und Verfahren zum Lesen eines Sicherheitsmerkmals
WO2010118897A1 (fr) * 2009-04-14 2010-10-21 Bundesdruckerei Gmbh Dispositif de vérification et procédé pour vérifier des caractéristiques de sécurité diffringentes et/ou réfléchissantes de documents de sécurité
WO2014060362A1 (fr) * 2012-10-15 2014-04-24 Innovia Films Limited Appareil et procédé d'authentification
US20160078707A1 (en) * 2013-05-10 2016-03-17 Innovia Films Limited Authentication apparatus and method
EP3059713A1 (fr) 2010-10-05 2016-08-24 Bundesdruckerei GmbH Procede de verification de l'authenticite d'un document de securite et/ou de valeur
DE102016112672A1 (de) * 2016-07-11 2017-03-09 Bundesdruckerei Gmbh Verfahren zum Herstellen einer Schichtanordnung für ein Sicherheitsdokument und Sicherheitsdokument

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001027587A1 (fr) * 1999-10-07 2001-04-19 Cubic Corporation Machine de test/codage pour carte a puce sans contact
DE102007015934A1 (de) 2007-04-02 2008-10-09 Bundesdruckerei Gmbh Dokument mit einem Sicherheitsmerkmal, Lesegerät und Verfahren zum Lesen eines Sicherheitsmerkmals
WO2010118897A1 (fr) * 2009-04-14 2010-10-21 Bundesdruckerei Gmbh Dispositif de vérification et procédé pour vérifier des caractéristiques de sécurité diffringentes et/ou réfléchissantes de documents de sécurité
EP3059713A1 (fr) 2010-10-05 2016-08-24 Bundesdruckerei GmbH Procede de verification de l'authenticite d'un document de securite et/ou de valeur
WO2014060362A1 (fr) * 2012-10-15 2014-04-24 Innovia Films Limited Appareil et procédé d'authentification
US20160078707A1 (en) * 2013-05-10 2016-03-17 Innovia Films Limited Authentication apparatus and method
DE102016112672A1 (de) * 2016-07-11 2017-03-09 Bundesdruckerei Gmbh Verfahren zum Herstellen einer Schichtanordnung für ein Sicherheitsdokument und Sicherheitsdokument

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102017112954A1 (de) 2018-12-13
EP3415339B1 (fr) 2021-10-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2018109035A2 (fr) Procédé de vérification d'un document de sécurité et document de sécurité, dispositif et élément de sécurité
EP0899119B1 (fr) Marquage de sécurité non-discernable par l'oeil, détectable par une machine, fabrication du marquage de sécurité et système de sécurité comprenant ce marquage
WO2006053685A2 (fr) Documents de valeur, production et verification de documents de valeur
WO2011147575A1 (fr) Dispositif de contrôle de l'authenticité de documents de valeur
EP1815444B1 (fr) Dispositif et procede pour la representation visuelle de valeurs mesurees
EP3415339B1 (fr) Procédé d'identification univoque d'un document
DE102017102556A1 (de) Verfahren zur Verifizierung eines Sicherheitsdokuments sowie ein Sicherheitsdokument, eine Vorrichtung und ein Sicherheitselement
EP3296721B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détermination de manière non destructive d'un état de stratification d'un ensemble de feuilles en matière plastique stratifiées pour un corps de cartes en matière plastique
AT517776A2 (de) Sicherheitsdokument, umfassend eine Folie mit Interferenzeffekten, Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Echtheit eines solchen Dokuments und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung eines solchen Verfahrens
EP3984762B1 (fr) Procédé de fabrication d'un élément de sécurité
EP2724323B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de création d'un ensemble de données de référence d'un document à partir d'un document
EP4215378A2 (fr) Vérification d'un document de sécurité sur la base de morphologies de gouttelettes
DE102009007588A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Verifizieren von Dokumenten unter Verwendung einer Wavelet-Transformation
EP2710564B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de vérification de documents de sécurité à l'aide d'une interférométrie à lumière blanche
DE102008041113A1 (de) Verfahren zur Prüfung der Echtheit eines Dokuments, Computerprogrammprodukt, Prüfgerät und Datenverarbeitungssystem
EP2138322B1 (fr) Document de valeur ou de sécurité doté d'une caractéristique de sécurité
EP1954508B9 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'élaboration d'un document de sécurité
WO2015135871A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de contrôle d'au moins un élément de sécurité d'un document de sécurité
EP3481643B1 (fr) Procédé de production d'un ensemble de couches pour un document de sécurité et document de sécurité correspondant
DE10335138A1 (de) Verfahren für die Spezifikation des Drucks und die Kontrolle der Druckqualität von Wertpapieren
EP3275684A1 (fr) Empreinte d'un document de securite
WO2022233458A1 (fr) Code 3d
DE102018103643A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur elektrischen Prüfung und Schließen eines Sicherheitsdokuments, insbesondere eines Passbuches

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190618

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210607

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502018007486

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1439637

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20211115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20211020

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220120

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220220

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220221

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220120

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220121

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502018007486

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20220721

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220612

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220630

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220612

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220630

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230526

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230621

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230620

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230622

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20180612

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211020