EP3378616B2 - Verarbeitung von lebensmittelprodukten - Google Patents
Verarbeitung von lebensmittelproduktenInfo
- Publication number
- EP3378616B2 EP3378616B2 EP18154776.1A EP18154776A EP3378616B2 EP 3378616 B2 EP3378616 B2 EP 3378616B2 EP 18154776 A EP18154776 A EP 18154776A EP 3378616 B2 EP3378616 B2 EP 3378616B2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- product
- portions
- slicing
- stream
- streams
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26D—CUTTING; DETAILS COMMON TO MACHINES FOR PERFORATING, PUNCHING, CUTTING-OUT, STAMPING-OUT OR SEVERING
- B26D7/00—Details of apparatus for cutting, cutting-out, stamping-out, punching, perforating, or severing by means other than cutting
- B26D7/27—Means for performing other operations combined with cutting
- B26D7/32—Means for performing other operations combined with cutting for conveying or stacking cut product
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26D—CUTTING; DETAILS COMMON TO MACHINES FOR PERFORATING, PUNCHING, CUTTING-OUT, STAMPING-OUT OR SEVERING
- B26D5/00—Arrangements for operating and controlling machines or devices for cutting, cutting-out, stamping-out, punching, perforating, or severing by means other than cutting
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26D—CUTTING; DETAILS COMMON TO MACHINES FOR PERFORATING, PUNCHING, CUTTING-OUT, STAMPING-OUT OR SEVERING
- B26D7/00—Details of apparatus for cutting, cutting-out, stamping-out, punching, perforating, or severing by means other than cutting
- B26D7/06—Arrangements for feeding or delivering work of other than sheet, web, or filamentary form
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26D—CUTTING; DETAILS COMMON TO MACHINES FOR PERFORATING, PUNCHING, CUTTING-OUT, STAMPING-OUT OR SEVERING
- B26D2210/00—Machines or methods used for cutting special materials
- B26D2210/02—Machines or methods used for cutting special materials for cutting food products, e.g. food slicers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26D—CUTTING; DETAILS COMMON TO MACHINES FOR PERFORATING, PUNCHING, CUTTING-OUT, STAMPING-OUT OR SEVERING
- B26D2210/00—Machines or methods used for cutting special materials
- B26D2210/02—Machines or methods used for cutting special materials for cutting food products, e.g. food slicers
- B26D2210/08—Idle cutting
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26D—CUTTING; DETAILS COMMON TO MACHINES FOR PERFORATING, PUNCHING, CUTTING-OUT, STAMPING-OUT OR SEVERING
- B26D7/00—Details of apparatus for cutting, cutting-out, stamping-out, punching, perforating, or severing by means other than cutting
- B26D7/27—Means for performing other operations combined with cutting
- B26D7/30—Means for performing other operations combined with cutting for weighing cut product
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for generating multiple streams of portions, each comprising one or more slices obtained by slicing food products using a slicing device, in particular a high-speed slicer.
- the invention also relates to a device comprising, among other things, a control unit configured to control the device according to a method according to the invention.
- EP 2 468 466 A1 A process in which food products are fed in multiple lanes to a slicing device and sliced by it.
- EP 3 120 981 A2 and EP 2 439 029 A1 This section describes methods for slicing food products.
- the slicing device In the slicing of food products, i.e., in the operation of systems also referred to as production lines, which include one or more slicing devices, particularly high-performance slicers, the slicing device has traditionally been the "heart" of the system, as its operation determines the processes of all other system components. In practice, this leads to problems that are either accepted or addressed with significant design and control engineering effort.
- a continuous flow of portions towards a unit downstream of the slicing device (hereinafter also simply called the slicer), particularly a packaging machine, cannot be achieved if pauses or interruptions occur in the portion flow.
- Such interruptions inevitably occur, for example, when the slicer is loaded with new products.
- buffer devices between the slicer and the packaging machine which, among other things, has the disadvantage that such devices increase the overall size of the system.
- the object of the invention is to remedy this situation and provide possibilities, particularly when using multi-lane slicing devices, to ensure the simplest and most continuous handling possible of the portions produced by the slicing device on their way to a downstream unit, especially a packaging machine, without unacceptable losses in cutting speed and weight accuracy.
- it should ensure that gaps in a portion stream, incomplete portion lines, and incomplete format sets do not occur in the first place, or at least that their number is minimized.
- the general inventive idea with which this problem is solved consists in an intelligent operation of the cutting device or of a system containing one or more cutting devices, in which circumstances such as, in particular, special operating situations or special operating conditions are taken into account, which until now have played no or only a subordinate role, at least for the operation of the cutting device.
- occupancy of a portion flow refers to the number of portions contained within that flow, either per unit length of the transport path along which the portions flow, or per unit time within which portions enter the flow.
- the occupancy of a flow can therefore also be described as the fill level of the respective facility or system under consideration.
- This concept of the invention presents a way to control the slicing process—that is, the operation of the slicing device—depending on a situation at one or more components of the overall system that are downstream of the slicing device.
- this aspect of the invention involves controlling the slicer by the downstream transport system or a part thereof.
- a so-called feeder which forms part of the transport system, can control the product feed that forms part of the slicer.
- a feeder is designed to successively transfer multiple portion-containing format sets to a downstream unit, in particular a packaging machine.
- the slicer can be controlled such that it increases the portion output in a product feed lane corresponding to a relatively under-occupied stream, or reduces the portion output in a product feed lane corresponding to a relatively over-occupied stream.
- the occupancy levels of the streams, or a value derived from them therefore constitute the controlled variable.
- continuous portion flows towards the downstream unit can be achieved, at least on average.
- those components of the transport line between the slicer and the packaging machine that serve to buffer portions and form format sets from the portions can be operated optimally with continuous portion flows, especially with regard to throughput and accuracy, while simultaneously requiring minimal space.
- inserter the process of inserting the portions or format sets into packaging or transferring the portions or format sets to a packaging machine by a so-called inserter.
- the cutting is carried out individually for each lane, depending on differences in the current loads of the individual currents. Differences in the current loads can therefore be taken into account during the operation of the cutting device.
- the cutting process is carried out in such a way as to minimize differences in the occupancy levels of the individual streams.
- control can therefore be implemented such that the individual recorded occupancy levels, or a value derived therefrom, constitute the actual value and thus serve as the controlled variable, while the intended minimization of differences in occupancy levels represents the setpoint and thus serves as the reference variable for the control system.
- the invention does not specify a particular method for detecting the current occupancy.
- the current occupancy can be detected by identifying gaps between the portions of a respective current.
- the current occupancy can be detected by determining the portion throughput in a respective current.
- One advantage of the invention is that it can be integrated into the control system of existing plants purely via software. Data already collected during the conventional operation of a plant can be used to determine a measure of the portion occupancy of the flows. Detecting gaps and determining the number of portions entering a flow per unit of time is known in itself, but has so far been used for other purposes. For example, detection devices are known that are arranged at one or more points along the transport path between the slicer and the packaging machine and are capable of distinguishing between the presence and absence of a portion at the respective point along the transport path. Consequently, it is possible not only to determine the presence of gaps themselves, but also, if necessary, how many gaps are detected per unit of time at a specific point or in a specific flow.
- the portion throughput can be determined, for example, by counting the portions that pass one or more measuring points per unit of time.
- the method according to the invention can use this existing data to carry out the slicing or the operation of the slicing device in the manner according to the invention.
- the occupancy in a given stream is changed by altering the portion output in a corresponding track of the cutting device.
- the portion output is the number of portions produced per unit of time. Consequently, increasing the portion output increases the occupancy of the respective stream, and vice versa.
- the occupancy in a respective stream can be changed by modifying at least one property of at least one portion in an assigned track of the cutting device.
- the occupancy in a respective stream is changed by altering the portion yield per product in an associated track of the cutting device.
- Portion yield is the number of portions produced per product, i.e., the number produced without any loading interruptions that would reduce capacity. Therefore, increasing the portion yield increases the capacity of the relevant stream, and vice versa.
- the occupancy in a respective stream is changed by changing the number of loading interruptions in an associated track of the cutting device.
- the occupancy in a respective stream is changed by altering a setpoint value for the portion weight in an associated track of the cutting device.
- At least one predetermined tolerance can be utilized here, in particular a tolerance for the portion weight and/or a tolerance for the total weight of a batch comprising a plurality of portions.
- overweight or underweight portions are deliberately produced within a range permitted by one or more tolerances, which may be specified in particular by a regulation – e.g., a FPV (explained in more detail elsewhere).
- a regulation – e.g., a FPV expressed in more detail elsewhere.
- the occupancy in a respective stream can be changed by altering the product sequence in an associated track of the cutting device, taking into account one or more product criteria.
- a product criterion can be, for example, the product weight, product density, product contour, product structure, and/or product length.
- the products to be sliced are deliberately arranged in a specific sequence on the loading and/or feeding side, which, based on the recorded occupancy levels, leads to either more or less frequent loading interruptions. This can be achieved, for example, by combining, sorting, and rearranging the products. If, for instance, relatively heavy and/or relatively long products are sliced consecutively, this reduces the number of loading interruptions, which increases the occupancy in the respective stream, and vice versa.
- the load in a given stream is changed by altering the product length in an associated track of the cutting device, in particular by combining, sorting, rearranging, cutting, and/or joining products.
- the product length can also be changed by interrupting the cutting process and then restarting it, whereby the remaining product portion present at the time of the interruption remains on the product holder.
- this necessitates an additional loading interruption, which would not have occurred without the product being cut.
- the combination of two separate products can be achieved, for instance, by joining them together using suitable means, whether by force, form, or material bonding.
- a device for generating multiple streams of portions, each comprising one or more slices, comprises a slicing device, in particular a high-speed slicer, for generating the slices by slicing food products, at least one transport device for transporting the portions in multiple streams to a downstream unit, in particular a packaging machine, a detection device for detecting the occupancy of the streams, and a control device configured to control the device according to a method as explained above.
- a significant advantage of the invention is that incomplete format sets and gaps in the portion flow, particularly at the inserter or buffer, can be avoided or at least minimized in terms of their frequency of occurrence, which is particularly advantageous in multi-lane slicing devices with lane-specific product feed.
- the invention makes it easy and quick to create format sets and close gaps with minimal equipment effort, even when slicing is done in two or more lanes and a two or more lane transport path for the produced portions is located downstream of the slicing device, i.e., when the portions are fed to the downstream unit, which is in particular a packaging machine, in two or more streams.
- the invention allows for significant technical savings, particularly for the units downstream of a slicer used for formatting and buffering, as well as for inserting portions into packaging or transferring them to a packaging machine. Furthermore, downtime can be reduced. This eliminates issues that would otherwise arise, for example, from manual adjustments to portion flows or format sets. Furthermore, a high degree of flexibility can generally be achieved for the entire system.
- the invention can eliminate the need for a large number of cross-distributions of portions. Without the invention, gaps might occur in one of the streams, potentially leading to empty packs, at least when there are relatively large differences in occupancy between the individual streams in a buffer device, either due to under- or over-occupancy (in at least one of the streams). Without the invention, corresponding automation might avoid such negative phenomena. However, this would either involve very high technical costs or negatively impact the speed at which format sets can be formed.
- the advantages of the invention therefore come into play particularly when multi-track, especially three- or four-track, cutting is required, or when a particularly variable format set formation is desired.
- the invention can relieve the load on downstream processing units for portion streams following a slicing device and also ensure manageable technical effort for these downstream units.
- the invention allows for particularly efficient multi-lane slicing and multi-lane formatting.
- the invention can drastically reduce the probability of gaps forming in the portion stream, so that from an economic point of view, manual correction is significantly cheaper than the manual or equipment-based effort required without the invention to eliminate or avoid negative phenomena such as gaps in a portion stream.
- the system includes a slicer 15 with two lanes in this example, which includes a loading device 39 and a product feed 37.
- the loading device 39 is used to place food products to be sliced, such as sausage bars, cheese bars, ham or pieces of meat, into the slicer 15.
- a product holder 38 also referred to as a product gripper, is schematically shown for each of the two lanes of the product feeder 37.
- This gripper is designed to engage with a rear end of the product in order to feed the product 13 towards a cutting plane 19 in which a cutting blade of the slicer 15 moves.
- the design and operation of a high-speed slicer will not be discussed in detail here, as this is generally known to those skilled in the art.
- the slicer 15 and the downstream equipment which will be discussed in more detail below, are each designed with multiple lanes, here with two lanes. This is indicated in the figure by the dashed line.
- the system can additionally include upstream devices for the slicer 15, which are not shown in the figure.
- Such an upstream device can, in particular, be a so-called product scanner, with which the outer product contour and/or the internal product structure can be determined.
- This product data can be used by a central control unit 35 to control the product feed 37 in such a way that the portions 11 produced by slicing the products 13 have a specific portion weight, optionally within a predetermined tolerance. Since the products 13 fed to the two tracks can be different, the product holders 38 are movable independently of each other in the feed direction, at least within certain limits. In this context, those skilled in the art refer to a track-specific product feed 37.
- the portions 11 are produced from the separated product slices on a portioning device 27 directly adjacent to the cutting plane 19.
- one or more empty cuts are performed after the last slice of a portion has been separated. This is achieved by stopping the product feed 37 in the relevant lane while the cutting blade continues to move at the specified cutting rate. These empty cuts are therefore regular empty cuts within the context of portioned slicing.
- the other components of the system shown in the figure are a grouping device 29, two buffer devices 31, and a feeder 33. These components are not required at this point. This point will not be discussed in more detail, as the structure, purpose and function of such facilities are known to experts.
- the purpose of the entire system is ultimately to produce format sets consisting of several portions 11, which have a predetermined arrangement and orientation of the portions 11 relative to each other (in the figure, a 2 x 3 matrix) and which are fed to a packaging machine 21 by means of the inserter 33.
- This can be achieved, for example, by the inserter 33 successively placing individual format sets into packaging, which is, for example, in the form of plastic trays and which in practice are usually produced on-site in the packaging machine 21, for example, from a film using a thermoforming process.
- the dots between the portioning unit 27 and the grouping unit 29, as well as between the two buffer units 31, indicate that further system components may be provided at these points.
- a portion scale can be connected to the portioning unit 27, which informs the control unit 35 of the actual portion weight of each portion 11 produced.
- One or more additional buffer units 31 may be located between the two buffer units 31 shown.
- one aspect of the invention is to detect the contents of the individual portion streams and to slice the products 13 using the slicer 15 depending on the detected contents.
- the details of the invention presented in the introduction will not be discussed again here. Reference is made to the explanations in the introduction.
- the occupancy of the individual streams or the differences in the occupancy of the individual streams can be detected using a detection device 25, which is shown schematically in the figure.
- the detection device 25 can either be configured to determine the number of portions 11 passing the relevant measuring point per unit of time or to distinguish the presence of a portion 11 on the grouping device 29 shown here as an example of the detection from the absence of a portion 11 – i.e., from a gap 23.
- the detection device 25, as well as the other system components downstream of the slicer 15 and the packaging machine 21, is connected to the aforementioned central control unit 35 of the system.
- Conventional food processing plants 13 are often already equipped with the hardware required to carry out the methods according to the invention, meaning that the invention can be integrated into existing plants without additional equipment.
- Such a conversion or retrofit requires programming the plant control system to implement the methods according to the invention, in order to utilize the data already collected during plant operation for the invention.
- targeted underweight or overweight cutting for a portion stream can be achieved by utilizing one or more predefined weight tolerances.
- FPV Prepackaged Goods Ordinance
- the portions 11 can then be cut slightly heavier or slightly lighter for completion in the individual streams using the slicer 15.
- a proportion of portions 11 deviating from a predefined portion weight of, for example, 2% within a batch is permissible, depending on the relevant regulations.
- portions 11 for comparatively empty streams which therefore have a "shortage" of portions 11, tend to be cut more easily, i.e., more portions 11 are obtained from one product 13. and a respective underweight of the respective portions 11 is accepted.
- such over- or underweight slicing is carried out in combination with already known settings and parameters for portion formation on the slicer 15.
- these include, for example, portion completion, where missing slices from the last portion of a product are replaced by slices taken from the following product, or slice thickness control, particularly when a predetermined target number and thickness of slices cannot be maintained for certain reasons, and thus one or more slices are added to the portion or the portion is formed with one or more fewer slices. This can occur, for example, when slicing cheese if a predetermined number of slices or slice thickness cannot be maintained due to a relatively high number of holes in the cheese product.
- the invention therefore makes it possible to "balance" the individual flows over time, particularly in the area of the buffer devices 31, and still comply with the framework conditions of the Prepackaged Goods Ordinance (FPV) when producing a batch of portions.
- FV Prepackaged Goods Ordinance
- differences in the occupancy of the individual streams can be compensated for by intelligent pre-sorting of the products to be cut before loading and cutting and/or intelligent pre-division or division of the products in a cutting program running in the control system before cutting.
- This concept can utilize various auxiliary devices, such as a loading buffer, a loading magazine, or an operator display, for example, a traffic light system that provides recommendations to the operator regarding manual loading, removal, replenishment, or reordering, particularly following a product scanner.
- auxiliary devices such as a loading buffer, a loading magazine, or an operator display, for example, a traffic light system that provides recommendations to the operator regarding manual loading, removal, replenishment, or reordering, particularly following a product scanner.
- a product scale can also be included as a further aid.
- feeders At least in some areas, in such a way that the products can change lanes.
- the product data obtained through measurement can be used for regular, lane-specific product feeding in the slicer. An additional product scanner is then not required.
- All relevant product characteristics can generally serve as the basis for this use of product data, in particular product weight, product density, product contour (external shape), product length, and internal product structure.
- Product structure is generally determined by the distribution of the individual product components. Even holes in a cheese product can be considered a product component in this sense, since the number, size, and distribution of the holes determine how the product can be sliced and portioned, which must meet predefined conditions such as slice thickness, slice weight, number of slices per portion, and portion weight.
- Other relevant product components include fat and other additives, the proportion and distribution of which in the product are determined and can be used to control product feed.
- the inserter 33 controls the slicer and the device for slicing the products. This means that the slicing of the products in the feeding area can already take into account the requirements in the individual lanes or streams with regard to potentially thicker or thinner slices.
- the total occupancy with portions downstream of the cutting device can be considered without differentiating between individual flows, differences between individual flows, or individual downstream devices.
- the portion output and/or the format set output and/or the occupancy of an insert can be considered as an operating condition.
- results of a product measurement are taken into account, which is carried out in the product feed path before the cutting device or at least before the cutting plane.
- operating conditions are changed when portioning is interrupted.
- changes to the operating conditions can therefore be postponed until after a whole product has been completely sliced.
- foreseeable or planned changes to the operating conditions that is, changes not necessitated by random events—can be implemented specifically during an inevitable interruption in portioning (between two whole products) or a planned interruption (between two sections of a product).
- such a compensating disc can also be removed after an unforeseen interruption. Due to the aforementioned effects of the product's compression and relaxation, there is a high probability that the first disc after an interruption will not meet the desired quality. Therefore, consistent cutting quality can be achieved by using such compensating discs, which are subsequently removed from the process.
- the operation of the cutting device is carried out depending on the occupancy of the portion streams.
- the inventive method for generating multiple portion streams described at the outset can be used.
- the method described at the outset for generating multiple streams of portions, in which the occupancy of the streams is detected and the cutting is carried out depending on the detected occupancy, can therefore be considered a further development or supplement, particularly in the sense of a "refinement,” of the general idea of the invention concept presented here, namely to make uninterrupted cutting—apart from regular empty cuts—generally dependent on an operating state.
- This operating state can be either differences in occupancy between the individual portion streams or an overall occupancy of the downstream system components that is independent of occupancy differences.
- a general advantage of this invention concept is that the time between production and processing, particularly packaging, of the portions is minimized, since an entire product or a predefined product part is continuously cut open. This ultimately guarantees that the resulting sequence of consecutively formed portions can be immediately processed further by the downstream system components. In other words, this ensures that the produced portions are not exposed for as long as can be the case with prior art methods.
- the continuous production of portions can reach its limits, depending on the design and control system of the respective machine.
- the products can be divided into several sections from a control perspective. These product sections are then treated as if they were separate, whole products in terms of the cutting process. Potentially uneven slices can be sorted out as compensation slices, as described above.
- the invention also relates to a plant for processing food products, comprising a device for slicing the products, in particular a high-speed slicer, one or more devices downstream of the slicing device for handling portions, each of which has one or comprising several slices obtained by cutting, and comprising a control device designed to operate the plant according to one of the inventive methods described above for operating a plant for processing food products.
- a significant advantage of the invention is that incomplete format sets and gaps in the portion flow, particularly at the inserter or buffer, can be avoided or at least minimized in terms of their frequency of occurrence, which is particularly advantageous in multi-lane slicing devices with lane-specific product feed.
- the invention makes it easy and quick to create format sets and close gaps with minimal equipment effort, even when slicing is done in two or more lanes and a two or more lane transport path for the produced portions is located downstream of the slicing device, i.e., when the portions are fed to the downstream unit, which is in particular a packaging machine, in two or more streams.
- the invention significantly reduces technical complexity, particularly for the units downstream of a slicer used for format formation and buffering, as well as for inserting portions into packaging or transferring them to a packaging machine. Furthermore, it minimizes downtime that would otherwise result from manual adjustments to portion flows or format sets. Finally, it enables a high degree of flexibility for the entire system.
- the invention can eliminate the need for a large number of cross-distributions of portions. Without the invention, gaps might occur in one of the streams, at least with relatively large differences in occupancy between the individual streams in a buffer device, i.e., due to either under- or over-occupancy (in at least one of the streams), potentially leading to empty packs. Without the invention, corresponding automation might avoid such negative phenomena. However, this would either involve very high technical costs or negatively impact the speed at which format sets can be formed.
- the advantages of the invention therefore come into play particularly when multi-track, especially three- or four-track, cutting is required, or when a particularly variable format set formation is desired.
- the invention can relieve the load on downstream processing units for portion streams following a slicing device and also ensure manageable technical effort for these downstream units.
- the invention allows for particularly efficient multi-lane slicing and multi-lane formatting.
- the invention can drastically reduce the probability of gaps forming in the portion stream, so that from an economic point of view, manual correction is significantly cheaper than the manual or equipment-based effort required without the invention to eliminate or avoid negative phenomena such as gaps in a portion stream.
- the system according to the invention comprises a slicer 15, in this example having two lanes, which includes a loading device 39 and a product feed 37.
- the loading device 39 is used to place food products to be sliced, such as sausage bars, cheese bars, ham or pieces of meat, into the slicer 15.
- a product holder 38 also referred to as a product gripper, is schematically shown for each of the two lanes of the product feeder 37.
- This gripper is designed to engage with a rear end of the product in order to feed the product 13 towards a cutting plane 19 in which a cutting blade of the slicer 15 moves.
- the design and operation of a high-speed slicer will not be discussed in detail here, as this is generally known to those skilled in the art.
- the slicer 15 and the downstream equipment which will be discussed in more detail below, are each designed with multiple lanes, here with two lanes. This is indicated in the figure by the dashed line.
- the system according to the invention can additionally comprise devices upstream of the slicer 15, which are not shown in the figure.
- Such an upstream device can in particular be a so-called The product scanner can determine the outer product contour and/or the internal product structure.
- This product data can be used by a central control unit 35 to control the product feed 37 such that the portions 11 produced by separating slices from the products 13 have a specific portion weight, optionally within a predetermined tolerance. Since the products 13 fed to the two lanes can be different, the product holders 38 are movable independently of each other in the feed direction, at least within certain limits. In this context, the person skilled in the art refers to a lane-specific product feed 37.
- the portions 11 are produced from the separated product slices on a portioning device 27 directly adjacent to the cutting plane 19.
- one or more empty cuts are performed after the last slice of a portion has been separated. This is achieved by stopping the product feed 37 in the relevant lane while the cutting blade continues to move at the specified cutting rate. These empty cuts are therefore regular empty cuts within the context of portioned slicing.
- the other components of the system shown in the figure are a grouping device 29, two buffer devices 31 and a feeder 33. These components need not be discussed in more detail here, as the structure, purpose and function of such devices are known to those skilled in the art.
- the purpose of the entire system is ultimately to produce format sets consisting of several portions 11, which have a predetermined arrangement and orientation of the portions 11 relative to each other (in the figure, a 2 x 3 matrix) and which are fed to a packaging machine 21 by means of the inserter 33.
- This can be achieved, for example, by the inserter 33 successively placing individual format sets into packaging, which is, for example, in the form of plastic trays and which in practice are usually produced on-site in the packaging machine 21, for example, from a film using a thermoforming process.
- the dots between the portioning unit 27 and the grouping unit 29, as well as between the two buffer units 31, indicate that further system components may be provided at these points.
- a portion scale can be connected to the portioning unit 27, which informs the control unit 35 of the actual portion weight of each portion 11 produced.
- One or more additional buffer units 31 may be located between the two buffer units 31 shown.
- one aspect of the invention is to detect the contents of the individual portion streams and to slice the products 13 using the slicer 15 depending on the detected contents.
- the occupancy of the individual streams or the differences in the occupancy of the individual streams can be detected using a detection device 25, which is shown schematically in the figure.
- the detection device 25 can either be configured to determine the number of portions 11 passing the relevant measuring point per unit of time or to distinguish the presence of a portion 11 on the grouping device 29 shown here as an example of the detection from the absence of a portion 11 – i.e., from a gap 23.
- the detection device 25 like the other system components downstream of the slicer 15 and the packaging machine 21, is connected to the aforementioned central control unit 35 of the system.
- Conventional food processing plants 13 are often already equipped with the hardware required to carry out the methods according to the invention, i.e., the invention can be integrated into existing plants without additional equipment.
- programming of the plant control system is required to implement the methods according to the invention, in order to use the data already determined during the operation of the plant for the invention.
- targeted underweight or overweight cutting for a portion stream can be achieved by utilizing one or more predefined weight tolerances.
- FPV Prepackaged Goods Ordinance
- the portions 11 can then be cut slightly heavier or slightly lighter for completion in the individual streams using the slicer 15.
- a proportion of portions 11 deviating from a predefined portion weight of, for example, 2% within a batch is permissible, depending on the relevant regulations.
- portions 11 for comparatively empty streams which therefore have a "shortage" of portions 11, tend to be cut more easily, i.e., more portions 11 are obtained from a product 13 and a respective underweight of the portions 11 in question is accepted.
- such over- or underweight slicing is carried out in combination with already known settings and parameters for portion formation on the slicer 15.
- these include, for example, portion completion, where missing slices from the last portion of a product are replaced by slices taken from the following product, or slice thickness control, particularly when a predetermined target number and thickness of slices cannot be maintained for certain reasons, and thus one or more slices are added to the portion or the portion is formed with one or more fewer slices. This can occur, for example, when slicing cheese if a predetermined number of slices or slice thickness cannot be maintained due to a relatively high number of holes in the cheese product.
- the invention therefore makes it possible to "balance" the individual flows over time, particularly in the area of the buffer devices 31, and still comply with the framework conditions of the Prepackaged Goods Ordinance (FPV) when producing a batch of portions.
- FV Prepackaged Goods Ordinance
- differences in the occupancy of the individual streams can be compensated for by intelligent pre-sorting of the products to be cut before loading and cutting and/or intelligent pre-division or division of the products in a cutting program running in the control system before cutting.
- This concept can utilize various auxiliary devices, such as a loading buffer, a loading magazine, or an operator display, for example, a traffic light system that provides recommendations for manual loading, removal, replenishment, or reordering, particularly following product scanning.
- auxiliary devices such as a loading buffer, a loading magazine, or an operator display, for example, a traffic light system that provides recommendations for manual loading, removal, replenishment, or reordering, particularly following product scanning.
- a product scale can also be included as a further aid.
- feeders At least in some areas, in such a way that the products can change lanes.
- the product data obtained through measurement can be used for regular, lane-specific product feeding in the slicer. An additional product scanner is then not required.
- All relevant product characteristics can generally serve as the basis for this use of product data, in particular product weight, product density, product contour (external shape), product length, and internal product structure.
- Product structure is generally determined by the distribution of the individual product components. Even holes in a cheese product can be considered a product component in this sense, since the number, size, and distribution of the holes determine how the product can be sliced and portioned, which must meet predefined conditions such as slice thickness, slice weight, number of slices per portion, and portion weight.
- Other relevant product components include fat and other additives, the proportion and distribution of which in the product are determined and can be used to control product feed.
- the inserter 33 controls the slicer and the device for slicing the products. This means that the slicing of the products in the feeding area can already take into account the requirements in the individual lanes or streams with regard to potentially thicker or thinner slices.
- Pre-cutting products is, in itself, state of the art.
- the devices used for pre-cutting are currently inflexible, meaning they operate with a fixed setting. Consequently, product scanning has so far only been performed after the products have been pre-cut, meaning that the data obtained from product scanning could not be used to influence the pre-cutting process.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Forests & Forestry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Processing Of Meat And Fish (AREA)
- Auxiliary Devices For And Details Of Packaging Control (AREA)
- Meat, Egg Or Seafood Products (AREA)
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP21157918.0A EP3848168A1 (de) | 2017-03-20 | 2018-02-01 | Verarbeitung von lebensmittelprodukten |
| PL18154776T PL3378616T3 (pl) | 2017-03-20 | 2018-02-01 | Przetwarzanie produktów spożywczych |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE102017105919.9A DE102017105919A1 (de) | 2017-03-20 | 2017-03-20 | Verarbeitung von Lebensmittelprodukten |
Related Child Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP21157918.0A Division EP3848168A1 (de) | 2017-03-20 | 2018-02-01 | Verarbeitung von lebensmittelprodukten |
| EP21157918.0A Division-Into EP3848168A1 (de) | 2017-03-20 | 2018-02-01 | Verarbeitung von lebensmittelprodukten |
Publications (4)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP3378616A2 EP3378616A2 (de) | 2018-09-26 |
| EP3378616A3 EP3378616A3 (de) | 2018-12-12 |
| EP3378616B1 EP3378616B1 (de) | 2021-06-30 |
| EP3378616B2 true EP3378616B2 (de) | 2026-06-10 |
Family
ID=61132348
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP18154776.1A Active EP3378616B2 (de) | 2017-03-20 | 2018-02-01 | Verarbeitung von lebensmittelprodukten |
| EP21157918.0A Pending EP3848168A1 (de) | 2017-03-20 | 2018-02-01 | Verarbeitung von lebensmittelprodukten |
Family Applications After (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP21157918.0A Pending EP3848168A1 (de) | 2017-03-20 | 2018-02-01 | Verarbeitung von lebensmittelprodukten |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (2) | EP3378616B2 (pl) |
| DE (1) | DE102017105919A1 (pl) |
| ES (1) | ES2886954T5 (pl) |
| PL (1) | PL3378616T3 (pl) |
Families Citing this family (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102017116317B4 (de) | 2017-07-19 | 2023-01-12 | Holger Müller | Verfahren zur Steuerung von Formmaschinen |
| DE102019123953A1 (de) * | 2019-09-06 | 2021-03-11 | Weber Maschinenbau Gmbh Breidenbach | Verfahren zum mehrspurigen Erzeugen und Transportieren von Portionen |
| DE102020112863A1 (de) | 2020-05-12 | 2021-11-18 | Tvi Entwicklung Und Produktion Gmbh | Gewichts-Variations-Verfahren sowie Aufschneidemaschine zu seinem Betrieb |
| DE102022111651B3 (de) * | 2022-05-10 | 2023-08-24 | Provisur Technologies, Inc. | Fördereinrichtung für Nahrungsmittelprodukte und zugehöriges Betriebsverfahren |
| DE102022130350A1 (de) * | 2022-11-16 | 2024-05-16 | Multivac Sepp Haggenmüller Se & Co. Kg | Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Verpackungslinie sowie hierfür geeignete Verpackungslinie |
| DE102022132750A1 (de) | 2022-12-09 | 2024-06-20 | Multivac Sepp Haggenmüller Se & Co. Kg | Zuführsystem und Verfahren zum Bilden und Transportieren von aus Produkten zusammengefasster Gruppen |
| DE102023100127A1 (de) * | 2023-01-04 | 2024-07-04 | Multivac Sepp Haggenmüller Se & Co. Kg | Steuern einer Verpackungsmaschine basierend auf einem Durchsatz eines vorgeordneten Slicers |
| DE102023100131A1 (de) * | 2023-01-04 | 2024-07-04 | Multivac Sepp Haggenmüller Se & Co. Kg | Steuern eines Slicers basierend auf einem Durchsatz einer nachgeordneten Verpackungsmaschine |
| DE102024131475A1 (de) | 2024-10-29 | 2026-04-30 | Multivac Marking & Inspection Gmbh & Co. Kg | Wiegevorrichtung und Verfahren zum Wiegen von Produkten |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE2229867A1 (de) † | 1971-06-28 | 1973-01-11 | Kraftco Corp | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum ablegen von artikeln auf einem foerderer, insbesondere von kaesescheiben, die von mindestens zwei tandemartig an einem foerderer angeordneten schneidemaschinen abgelegt werden |
| DE102010034675A1 (de) † | 2010-08-18 | 2012-02-23 | Weber Maschinenbau Gmbh Breidenbach | Portionsbildung beim mehrspurigen Aufschneiden |
| EP3120981A2 (de) † | 2015-07-17 | 2017-01-25 | Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach | Verfahren zum erzeugen eines mehrspurigen portionsstroms nach einer aufschneideinheit |
Family Cites Families (18)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT1280839B1 (it) | 1995-04-04 | 1998-02-11 | Hitech Systems Srl | Macchina affettatrice industriale perfezionata, particolarmente per prodotti alimentari. |
| DE19713813C1 (de) | 1997-04-03 | 1998-10-08 | Biforce Anstalt | Vorrichtung zur Stapelbildung |
| JP4768643B2 (ja) | 2007-01-17 | 2011-09-07 | アサヒ技研株式会社 | ハム原木等のスライス装置 |
| GB2448360B (en) | 2007-04-13 | 2009-02-25 | Aew Delford Systems Ltd | Food slicing system and operation thereof |
| US8424430B2 (en) | 2007-08-09 | 2013-04-23 | Kraft Foods Group Brands Llc | Food product conveyor and handling systems |
| US8931240B2 (en) | 2008-10-27 | 2015-01-13 | Formax, Inc. | Shuttle system and method for moving food products into packaging |
| EP2452168A4 (en) | 2009-07-07 | 2013-12-18 | Formax Inc | LASER DISPLAY SYSTEM |
| EP2493667A4 (en) | 2009-10-26 | 2014-08-20 | Formax Inc | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR WEIGHING FOOD PRODUCTS SLICED IN SLICES |
| DE102010047623A1 (de) * | 2010-10-06 | 2012-04-12 | Weber Maschinenbau Gmbh Breidenbach | Verfahren zum Aufschneiden von Lebensmitteln |
| DE102010055394A1 (de) | 2010-12-21 | 2012-06-21 | Weber Maschinenbau Gmbh Breidenbach | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Aufschneiden mehrerer Lebensmittelprodukte |
| DE102011119719A1 (de) * | 2011-11-30 | 2013-06-06 | GEA CFS Bühl GmbH | Verfahren zum Aufschneiden eines Lebensmittelriegels unter Verwendung eines Schwingungssensors |
| EP3539739B1 (de) * | 2012-01-26 | 2024-04-17 | GEA Food Solutions Germany GmbH | Maschine zum slicen in die packung |
| DE102012210703A1 (de) | 2012-06-25 | 2014-01-02 | Weber Maschinenbau Gmbh Breidenbach | Handhabung von Portionen |
| DE102012108700A1 (de) | 2012-09-17 | 2014-03-20 | Gea Food Solutions Germany Gmbh | Verfahren zur Korrektur von Portionen in Verpackungsmulden |
| DE102012219594A1 (de) * | 2012-10-25 | 2014-04-30 | Textor Maschinenbau GmbH | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Aufschneiden von Lebensmittelprodukten |
| DE102013205043A1 (de) | 2013-03-21 | 2014-09-25 | Gea Food Solutions Germany Gmbh | Linie ohne Kontrollwaage zwischen Aufschneide- und Verpackungsmaschine |
| DE102015118202A1 (de) | 2015-10-26 | 2017-04-27 | Textor Maschinenbau GmbH | Vorrichtung und verfahren zum aufschneiden von lebensmittelprodukten |
| DE102015121546A1 (de) | 2015-12-10 | 2017-06-14 | Weber Maschinenbau Gmbh Breidenbach | Verfahren zur erzeugung eines satzes verschiedener verpackter lebensmittelproduktportionen mit variabel vorgebbarer sortenverteilung |
-
2017
- 2017-03-20 DE DE102017105919.9A patent/DE102017105919A1/de active Pending
-
2018
- 2018-02-01 ES ES18154776T patent/ES2886954T5/es active Active
- 2018-02-01 PL PL18154776T patent/PL3378616T3/pl unknown
- 2018-02-01 EP EP18154776.1A patent/EP3378616B2/de active Active
- 2018-02-01 EP EP21157918.0A patent/EP3848168A1/de active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE2229867A1 (de) † | 1971-06-28 | 1973-01-11 | Kraftco Corp | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum ablegen von artikeln auf einem foerderer, insbesondere von kaesescheiben, die von mindestens zwei tandemartig an einem foerderer angeordneten schneidemaschinen abgelegt werden |
| DE102010034675A1 (de) † | 2010-08-18 | 2012-02-23 | Weber Maschinenbau Gmbh Breidenbach | Portionsbildung beim mehrspurigen Aufschneiden |
| EP3120981A2 (de) † | 2015-07-17 | 2017-01-25 | Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach | Verfahren zum erzeugen eines mehrspurigen portionsstroms nach einer aufschneideinheit |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP3848168A1 (de) | 2021-07-14 |
| EP3378616A3 (de) | 2018-12-12 |
| PL3378616T3 (pl) | 2021-12-20 |
| ES2886954T5 (en) | 2026-07-08 |
| EP3378616A2 (de) | 2018-09-26 |
| DE102017105919A1 (de) | 2018-09-20 |
| EP3378616B1 (de) | 2021-06-30 |
| ES2886954T3 (es) | 2021-12-21 |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B26D 7/06 20060101ALI20181108BHEP Ipc: B26D 7/30 20060101ALN20181108BHEP Ipc: B26D 5/00 20060101ALI20181108BHEP Ipc: B26D 7/32 20060101AFI20181108BHEP |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20190611 |
|
| RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20200528 |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B26D 7/06 20060101ALI20201209BHEP Ipc: B26D 7/30 20060101ALN20201209BHEP Ipc: B26D 7/32 20060101AFI20201209BHEP Ipc: B26D 5/00 20060101ALI20201209BHEP |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20210115 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1405931 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210715 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502018005871 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210930 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210930 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211001 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2886954 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20211221 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211102 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502018005871 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
| PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 |
|
| 26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: GEA FOOD SOLUTIONS GERMANY GMBH Effective date: 20220330 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 |
|
| PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20220228 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220201 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220228 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220201 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220228 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220228 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 |
|
| P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230522 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: HC Owner name: WEBER FOOD TECHNOLOGY GMBH; DE Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), CHANGE OF OWNER(S) NAME; FORMER OWNER NAME: WEBER MASCHINENBAU GMBH BREIDENBACH Effective date: 20240206 |
|
| RAP4 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: WEBER FOOD TECHNOLOGY GMBH |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20180201 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 1405931 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20230201 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502018005871 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: WEBER FOOD TECHNOLOGY SE & CO. KG, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: WEBER MASCHINENBAU GMBH BREIDENBACH, 35236 BREIDENBACH, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502018005871 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: WEBER FOOD TECHNOLOGY GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: WEBER MASCHINENBAU GMBH BREIDENBACH, 35236 BREIDENBACH, DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230201 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230201 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502018005871 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: WEBER FOOD TECHNOLOGY SE & CO. KG, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: WEBER FOOD TECHNOLOGY GMBH, 35236 BREIDENBACH, DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: PD Owner name: WEBER FOOD TECHNOLOGY SE & CO. KG; DE Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), CHANGE OF LEGAL ENTITY; FORMER OWNER NAME: WEBER FOOD TECHNOLOGY GMBH Effective date: 20250210 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20250206 AND 20250212 |
|
| RAP4 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: WEBER FOOD TECHNOLOGY SE & CO. KG |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20260218 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20260219 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20260319 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20260217 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20260410 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20260227 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20260219 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20260116 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| PUAH | Patent maintained in amended form |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: M12 Free format text: ST27 STATUS EVENT CODE: U-0-0-M10-M12 (AS PROVIDED BY THE NATIONAL OFFICE) Effective date: 20260518 |
|
| 27A | Patent maintained in amended form |
Effective date: 20260610 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R102 Ref document number: 502018005871 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: DC2A Ref document number: 2886954 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T5 Effective date: 20260708 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |