EP3227061A1 - Procédé de simulation de mouvement pour un manipulateur - Google Patents

Procédé de simulation de mouvement pour un manipulateur

Info

Publication number
EP3227061A1
EP3227061A1 EP15805157.3A EP15805157A EP3227061A1 EP 3227061 A1 EP3227061 A1 EP 3227061A1 EP 15805157 A EP15805157 A EP 15805157A EP 3227061 A1 EP3227061 A1 EP 3227061A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
manipulator
model
path planning
control device
kinematic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP15805157.3A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Dirk Eickhorst
Marcel Meyer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Broetje Automation GmbH
Original Assignee
Broetje Automation GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Broetje Automation GmbH filed Critical Broetje Automation GmbH
Publication of EP3227061A1 publication Critical patent/EP3227061A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16—Programme controls
    • B25J9/1656—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators
    • B25J9/1664—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators characterised by motion, path, trajectory planning
    • B25J9/1666—Avoiding collision or forbidden zones
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16—Programme controls
    • B25J9/1656—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators
    • B25J9/1671—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators characterised by simulation, either to verify existing program or to create and verify new program, CAD/CAM oriented, graphic oriented programming systems
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16—Programme controls
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16—Programme controls
    • B25J9/1674—Programme controls characterised by safety, monitoring, diagnostic
    • B25J9/1676—Avoiding collision or forbidden zones
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16—Programme controls
    • B25J9/1694—Programme controls characterised by use of sensors other than normal servo-feedback from position, speed or acceleration sensors, perception control, multi-sensor controlled systems, sensor fusion
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/35—Nc in input of data, input till input file format
    • G05B2219/35308—Update simulator with actual machine, control parameters before start simulation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/40—Robotics, robotics mapping to robotics vision
    • G05B2219/40311—Real time simulation

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for motion simulation of a manipulator in a processing environment having the features of the preamble of claim 1, a computer program with program code having the features of the preamble of claim 17 and a system for simulating the motion of a manipulator in a processing environment having the features of the preamble of claim 18th
  • manipulator In robotics, the movable part of a robot assembly or an industrial robot is referred to as a manipulator.
  • manipulators are regularly used today in automated production, for example for the manufacture of aircraft structural components. These are, for example, multi-axis articulated robots that are used in corresponding production cells.
  • the axis position of such a manipulator determines the reference position, including the orientation, for the tool or the end effector of the robot, which reference position is also referred to as Tool Center Point.
  • a motion sequence determined in this way is also referred to as path planning and such a control device also as a numerical control (NC) or as a computer-aided numerical control (CNC).
  • NC numerical control
  • CNC computer-aided numerical control
  • the need for such an intervention may be due to the fact that a proximity sensor of the manipulator perceives that the minimum distance between the manipulator, in particular its end effector, and the workpiece or another obstacle contour is undershot. Especially if, in such a state, further movement of the manipulator according to the path planning would then further reduce the distance to the obstacle contour concerned, the movement of the manipulator according to the path planning is regularly interrupted because of the risk of collision associated therewith. Such a deviation of the measured distance from the distance previously simulated according to the offline programming can not be precluded in practice. The deviation may occur due to thermal effects or other irregularities on the workpiece or parts of the manufacturing cell.
  • the problem underlying the invention is thus to further develop a known from the prior art method for motion simulation of a manipulator in a processing environment so that the elimination of collision risk situations, which occur when processing a path planning by the manipulator is facilitated.
  • the proposed method is used for simulating the motion of a manipulator in a processing environment, wherein the manipulator is moved in a working operation by a control device and wherein the processing environment is depicted in an environment model.
  • the term "manipulator” is to be interpreted broadly: it does not only include the manipulator in the narrower sense, but also includes an arbitrary end effector and other components arranged on it, which move along with a movement of the manipulator.
  • a "control device” in the sense of the proposal which in the present case may consist of one or more, possibly distributed individual devices, it is a device for controlling and regulating machine tools - including manipulators as just defined - in the sense of a numerical
  • the control device can not only control the manipulator via its axes according to a path planning determined by the control device by calculation, but also other components of the manipulator such as the end effector and here Accordingly, the movement of the manipulator by the control device, in addition to the actual movement of the manipulator, also includes any movement or activity only performed by the end effector perform computer-based tasks.
  • machining environment includes not only the manufacturing cell with its components, but also the workpiece itself and all other objects which are located in the space that can be accessed by the manipulator In this sense, an overlap for the purposes relevant here is expressly not excluded.
  • the term “environment model” again refers to a data-technical calculation model for at least parts of the processing environment in the above sense, which calculation model can serve as a basis for modeling in the course of a path planning and for a collision check Partial mapping of the editing environment in the environment model may be that only the essential elements and not necessarily every detail of the editing environment is mapped in the environment model. It is preferred that the editing environment be fully mapped in the environment model.
  • a path planning by the control device from a target movement of the manipulator starting from a starting position and based on a kinematics model of Manipulator is calculated. Furthermore, a kinematic collision check based on the path planning, the kinematics model and the environment model is performed and a prediction result is generated based on the kinematic collision check.
  • the "target movement" of the manipulator means any specification, in particular by the operator, of a movement to be carried out by the manipulator Such a predefinition can be from a specific target point or a specific target coordinate of the manipulator and especially its Tool Center Point (TCP ) or from specifying a desired direction of movement of the manipulator or the tool center point with or without simultaneous determination of the length or the duration of the movement or of the desired end point
  • TCP Tool Center Point
  • the target movement may also comprise a plurality of movement sections with respective intermediate positions.
  • initial position in the present case means any mechanical or electrical state property of the manipulator which this manipulator can assume, for example its geometric position, the configuration of the axes, the position of each actuator on the manipulator or on the end effector etc. instead “Initial situation” could thus also be formulated in more detail "starting position of the manipulator”.
  • kinematics model designates a kinematic manipulator model with data which are suitable for an electronic mapping of the kinematic of the manipulator and its starting position in the above sense, in particular for the purpose of calculating the motion of the manipulator For example, the future course of movement generated by the control device for all parts of the manipulator that can be controlled by the control device, including the end effector, and in particular comprising the axes of the manipulator.
  • the term "kinematic collision check” is to be understood as a calculation which provides information as to whether and to what extent, when executing the path planning by the manipulator, a collision of the manipulator or one of its components with a part of the processing environment, insofar as this is in the environment model
  • the result of a such a collision check can be both binary, ie affirm or deny only a collision or a certain risk of collision, as well as a percentage or otherwise described probability for the path planning as a whole or for each section or point of the movement path according to the path planning provide another yardstick for the occurrence of a collision.
  • the collision check can also include checking for the occurrence of singularities.
  • the prediction result based on this kinematic collision check provides information as to whether the desired movement of the manipulator is permitted or not.
  • the prediction result may also include the statement that the target movement is only under certain circumstances, e.g. with a simultaneous movement of the component carrier is allowed. In other words, the result of the possibly complex kinematic collision check generates the prediction result.
  • the starting position corresponds to the current manipulator state.
  • the starting position underlying the calculation of the path planning from the target movement does not correspond to a fictitious or projected, past or future situation or situation or to such a state of the manipulator, but rather to the actual situation and situation and the situation actual state of the manipulator.
  • the determination of the actual state can in principle be based both on sensory detection of the nipulators as well as based on a calculation of the actual state of the manipulator according to a known previous state and a known executed movement or on a combination of both approaches.
  • the prediction result is based on a collision check, which is based on the current, actual state of the manipulator and a path planning based on this actual state.
  • a collision check which is based on the current, actual state of the manipulator and a path planning based on this actual state.
  • the prediction result is also output, so that the operator can be informed thereof.
  • a particularly clear output can be achieved through visualization.
  • the desired movement of the manipulator can be described in any manner, such as by data in a computer file.
  • the claim 5 relates to an ergonomically particularly interesting input of the desired movement by an operating device, such as a control stick or the like.
  • a particularly suitable tool for collision checking is to map the path planning of the manipulator and the environment model into a virtual state, as proposed by claim 6 and further developed by claims 7 and 8.
  • virtual states of the manipulator projected into the future in accordance with the path planning can also be presented to the operator in a particularly meaningful manner.
  • the preferred embodiment according to claim 9, in turn, also provides for a repeated provision of the actual starting position by the checking device, so that the kinematic interference check is always based on the actual manipulator state with a possibly negligible time delay.
  • the preferred embodiment according to claim 10 makes use of the possibility of running a computer program on a computing device separate from the control device, which computer program maps the path planning of the control device completely and identically. In this way, the kinematic interference test can be carried out independently but simultaneously with the path planning of the control device. It is precisely this, the conventional way of thinking contradictory approach, which provides the parallel and thus seemingly redundant flow of two identical path planning, facilitates the realization of a Kollisions tenudiktion in real time.
  • the preferred embodiment according to claim 11 proposes a prevention of the activation of the manipulator if this activation leads to a collision or to an unacceptable one according to the prediction result high risk of collision would result. In this way, even unconscious operating errors can be prevented.
  • the preferred embodiment according to claim 12 enables a particularly accurate kinematics model or environmental model, namely, by being based on model data in electronic form, such as those provided by design programs.
  • claims 13 to 15 relate to the possibility of making an adaptation of the kinematic model during path planning in order to compensate environmental influences such as temperature effects, which may justify a deviation between a desired position and an actual position of the manipulator , Such compensation is then preferably also taken into account in the kinematic collision check and in the generation of the prediction result.
  • Fig. 1 is an overall view of an arrangement of a manufacturing cell with
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of components of the control device from the arrangement of FIG. 1, FIG.
  • the presently described embodiments relate to a manipulator 1 a, b in a manufacturing cell, in which manufacturing cell parts of the aircraft structural components rivet are set by a riveting machine.
  • the manipulator la, b is NC-controlled.
  • the exemplary embodiment is an integrated section assembly cell for processing 360 ° aircraft fuselage sections.
  • the riveting machine forms the end effector 2a of the manipulator la, which in the present case is a 12-axis positioner.
  • the manufacturing cell of both embodiments with all their associated components each forms a processing environment 3a, b in the sense of the above definition of the term.
  • the end effector 2a can be moved on the inner surface of a production sheet 5 which can be displaced along floor rails 4, and consequently the floor rails 4 and the production sheet 5 each form both a part of the processing environment 3a and of the manipulator 1a.
  • a movable component carrier 6 the workpiece 7a is fixed, which is an aircraft structural component here.
  • an access frame 8 for personnel is provided in the production cell. According to the definition of definition already described, the component carrier 6, the workpiece 7a and the access frame 8 also belong to the processing environment 3a.
  • a control device 10th belongs to the manufacturing cell, a control device 10th
  • FIGS. 3a-c which will also be referred to below, illustrate a second, simplified embodiment with a six-axis manipulator 1b with end effector 2b, whose processing environment 3b comprises a workpiece 7b with two projections 9.
  • the initial state of the second embodiment is shown in FIG. 3a.
  • the proposed method is, as already stated, the motion simulation of a manipulator la, b in a processing environment 3a, b.
  • the manipulator 1a.b is moved in a working mode by a control device 10 (not shown for the embodiment of FIGS. 3a-c), wherein the processing environment 3a, b is at least partially depicted in an environment model.
  • working mode is understood to mean a mode of operation for the purpose of processing of workpieces by the manipulator as intended: a calibration or trial operation is not included.
  • the proposed method comprises calculating a path planning 12a, b by the control device 10 from a desired movement of the manipulator 1 a, b starting from a starting position 11 a, b of the manipulator 1 a, b and based on a kinematics model of the manipulator model 1 a b.
  • path plans 12a, b are shown only for the second exemplary embodiment.
  • FIGS. 3b and 3c relate to a respective path planning 12a, b, both of which start from the starting position 11b of the manipulator 1b according to FIG. 3a.
  • the proposed method comprises performing a kinematic collision check based on the path planning 12a, b, the kinematics model and the environment model and generating a prediction result based on the kinematic collision check.
  • the proposed method is characterized in that the starting position 11 a, b corresponds to the current manipulator state.
  • the generated prediction result provides a statement as to whether and to what extent an actual execution of a movement of the manipulator 1a, b along the path planning 12a, b determined by the control device 10 constitutes a collision risk.
  • the method comprises the output of the prediction result by an output device 13 in which it is preferred and, as in the present case, is a visualization device 13a, b.
  • a visualization device 13a is formed by the screen 14 of a computer arrangement 15 having a computing device 16 and an operating device 17 in the form of a keyboard.
  • the computer arrangement 15 as a whole and in particular the computing device 16 are connected to the control device 10 via a communication network 18.
  • the control device 10 is the modular system SINUMERIK® 840D sl 19, which includes a SINAMICS® S 120 as the drive system 20 and an NCU 720.3ON as the numerical control unit 21 and a PCU 50.5-P as computer unit 22 summarized.
  • a SINUMERIK® Operator Panel OP 019 23 can also form a visualization device 13b for outputting the prediction result.
  • the SINUMERIK® Operator Panel OP 019 23 can also have a user interface 24 in the form of a touchpad.
  • the operator is to be given a feedback about his input, which is perceived as quasi-immediate, ie the desired movement required by him.
  • This is preferably achieved by carrying out the kinematic collision check and generating the prediction result within a predetermined computing time after a change and / or input of the desired movement.
  • a real-time output of the prediction result is to be provided by the output device 13, in the present case specifically by the visualization device 13a, b.
  • real-time output is to be understood in a first, general sense as described above, that is, a maximum computing time is predetermined, within which the prediction result is provided by the output device 13 or the visualization device 13a, b an output responsive to an input is perceived subjectively as occurring in real time if the output occurs within 50 milliseconds of the input, and this perceived response in real time is particularly noticeable if the output is even within 10 milliseconds of the input Consequently, it is particularly preferred for the output of the prediction result to be output by the output device 13 or by the visualization device 13a, b within 50 milliseconds and in particular within 10 milliseconds after a change and / or input of the desired movement.
  • the prediction result can be used by the control device 10 itself as a release signal for a moving control of the manipulator 1a, b. Accordingly, such a control preferably takes place only when the prediction result for a control in accordance with the path planning does not predict a collision. In other words, the prediction result is preferably generated before the manipulator 1a, b is moved by the control device 10 in accordance with the path planning 12a, b.
  • the method comprises the acceptance of an input - and in particular an input by manual operation - of the desired movement by an operating device 17.
  • the operating device 17 is the aforementioned keyboard of the computer arrangement 19, but also the user interface 24 of the SINUMERIK® operator panel OP 019 23 or a control stick of the computer arrangement 15 or not shown here the control device 10.
  • the proposed method comprises the output of a virtual state 25a, b based on the path planning 12a, b and the environment model.
  • the concept of the virtual state 25a, b is the electronic mapping on the one hand of the manipulator 1a, b based on the kinematics model after execution of the path planning 12a, b starting from the starting position 11a, b and on the other hand the processing environment 3a, b based on the environment - Model, also after execution of the movement of the manipulator la, b to understand.
  • the virtual state 25a, b designates a comprehensive mathematical model of the manipulator 1a, b and the processing environment 3a, b after a movement of the manipulator 1a, b along the path planning 12a, b.
  • the virtual state 25a, b can also take into account any movement of the processing environment 3a, b in its entirety or individual parts of it that takes place during the relevant time. Such a movement could, for example in the embodiment of FIG. 1, consist of a rotation of the component carrier 6 with the workpiece 7a.
  • the output of the virtual state 25a, b comprises the output of a view 26a, b of an SD model of the manipulator 1a, b and the processing environment 3a, b.
  • This 3D model is representative of the representation of the virtual state 25a, b and thus of the state of the manipulator 1a, b and of the processing environment 3a, b after movement according to the path planning 12a, b.
  • the view 26a, b is again the two-dimensional representation, which is made up of this 3D model and the angle of an - imaginary Observer and which is thus suitable for reproduction on a conventional visualization device 13a, b.
  • FIGS. 3b and 3c respectively exemplify such a view 26a, b, which could possibly also be reproduced on the screen 14 of the computer arrangement 15 of FIG. 1, wherein for the sake of simplicity of illustration in FIGS. 3b and 3c a distinction is not made graphically between the view 26a, b and the virtual state 25a, b on which the view is based.
  • the viewing angle on which the representation is based is adjustable so that the view 26a, b of the 3D model of the manipulator 1a, b and the processing environment 3a, b is based on an adjustable viewing angle. This allows the operator to choose a perspective for the view 26a, b which is particularly suitable for detecting the present collision situation.
  • the output of the virtual state 25a, b can also be designed in such a way that it is particularly graphically easily identifiable whether the prediction result indicates a collision situation or a collision risk or whether it indicates the absence of such a collision situation or collision risk ,
  • the view 26a shows a virus state 25a, in which - according to the prediction result - the path planning 12a has led to a projected collision of the manipulator 1b with a projection 9 of the workpiece 7b from the view 26a for the operator through the collision icon 27 is made clear. The operator is thus warned clearly that this path planning 12a should not be executed.
  • the view 26a could also be colored in a warning color, for example in red, for the purpose of warning.
  • a movement according to the path planning 12b can be carried out without a collision risk.
  • this is done by a representation of the path planning 12b without a collision icon, wherein also here a reproduction of the view 26a in a release color - may be provided - as in green.
  • a real-time output in the sense already defined above is also advantageous for the operator when outputting the virtual state 25a, b.
  • the output of the virtual state 25a, b by the visualization device 13a, b takes place within a predetermined visualization time after a change and / or input of the desired movement, so that a real-time output of the virtual state 25a, b the visualization device 13a, b is provided.
  • the real-time output is particularly perceived as being "in real time” if the predetermined visualization time is 50 milliseconds or even 10 milliseconds In the case of the preferred output of the view 26a, b of the 3D model of the manipulator 1a , b as just described, this applies accordingly to this output of the view 26a, b.
  • the initial position 1 ia, b updated within the predetermined updating interval is preferably also based on the virtual state 25 a, b and also the view 26 a, b, so that these can always be updated in a timely manner to the operator. It is also useful to update the environment model accordingly within the predetermined update interval.
  • the possibility of the external simulation of the path planning 12a, b by the control device 10 can be usefully employed in that, according to a preferred embodiment, calculating a further path planning by a computing device 16 from the desired movement of the manipulator Ia, b starting from a starting position 1 la, b and based on the kinematic model of the manipulator la, b is performed, wherein the computing device 16 by means of a communication network 18 is in communication with the control device 10 and wherein the performing of the kinematic collision check and the generation of the prediction result in the computing device 16 is performed.
  • the target movement is thus either input directly to the computing device 16, for example by the operating device 17, or input to the control device 10 and transmitted via the communication network 18 to the computing device 16 which controls the desired movement of the manipulator 1a , b maps into the further path planning and thus simulates the path planning 12a, b of the control device 10 in the sense of a replication or replica.
  • the corresponding functionality of the control device 10 - including the processing of the environment model and the kinematics model - can be completely simulated as software code on the computing device 16. Accordingly, the kinematic collision check and the generation of the prediction result are performed either in addition to the respective operation on the control device 10 in the computing device 16 or take place exclusively on the computing device 16.
  • the kinematics model and the environment model can also be transmitted from the control device 10 to the computing device 16 via the communication network 18.
  • a particularly suitable interface between the control device 10 and the computing device 16 can be provided by selecting an Ethernet connection as the communication network 18 on which TCP / IP (Transmission Control Protocol / Internet Protocol) as the protocol stack or part of the protocol stack is used.
  • TCP / IP Transmission Control Protocol / Internet Protocol
  • COM Component Object Model
  • DCOM Distributed Component Object Model
  • RPC Remote Procedure Call
  • OCX Object Linking and Embedding Control eXtension
  • the creation of the kinematics model and the environment model is simplified if, as is preferred, the kinematics model and / or the environment model are based on model data in electronic form. This can also be model data. These can come from corresponding computer programs such as CATIA® or from the files generated by these computer programs.
  • This adaptation preferably takes place before the kinematic interference test is carried out. In that regard, it is then taken into account both when performing the kinematic collision check and when generating the prediction result.
  • the adaptation can also be carried out before the path planning 12a, b is calculated and then preferably taken into account in the calculation of the path planning I2a, b.
  • the starting position 11 a, b of the manipulator 1 a, b can either be determined by a known previous position of the manipulator 1 a, b and known subsequent movements or, as is preferred, be detected by a sensor device 28.
  • the processing environment 3a, b for imaging in the environment model may also be detected by a sensor device 28.
  • Such a sensor device 28 may comprise a multiplicity of separate sensors which also function according to different physical principles and, if necessary, communicate with one another as well as with the control device 10 and the computing device 16, for example via the communication network 18.
  • the proposed computer program comprises program code for carrying out the following steps for simulating the movement of a manipulator 1a, b when the computer program is executed in a computer: calculating a path planning 12a, b from a desired movement of the manipulator 1a, b in one Processing environment 3a, b, which is at least partially imaged in an environment model, starting from a starting position 1 la, b and based on a kinematic model of the manipulator la, b, performing a kinematic collision check based on the path planning 12a, b , the kinematics model and the environment model, and generating a prediction result based on the kinematic collision check.
  • the proposed computer program is characterized in that the initial position 1 la, b corresponds to the current manipulator state.
  • a corresponding computer program product that can be loaded directly into the internal memory of a digital computer and includes software code sections that perform the following steps when the product is running on a computer: calculating a path planning 12a, b from a target Movement of the manipulator 1a, b in a working environment 3a, b, which is at least partially imaged in an environment model, starting from a starting position 11a, b and based on a kinematics model of the manipulator 1a, b, performing a kinematic collision check based on the path planning 12a, b, the kinematics model and the environment model and generating a prediction result based on the kinematic collision check.
  • This proposed computer program product is characterized in that the starting position 1 la, b corresponds to the current manipulator state
  • Preferred embodiments of the proposed computer program and the proposed system for motion simulation arise in each case from the preferred embodiments of the proposed method.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Robotics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Manipulator (AREA)
  • Numerical Control (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé de simulation de mouvement pour un manipulateur (1a,b), de préférence pour un manipulateur (1a,b) à commande numérique, dans un environnement d'usinage (3a,b), le manipulateur (1a,b) étant déplacé, en mode de travail, par un dispositif de commande (10), et l'environnement de travail (3a,b) étant représenté au moins partiellement dans un modèle d'environnement. Ledit procédé comprend le calcul de planification d'une trajectoire (12a,b) par le dispositif de commande (10) sur la base d'un mouvement de consigne du manipulateur (1a,b) à partir d'une position de départ (11a,b) et sur la base d'un modèle cinématique du manipulateur (1a,b), la réalisation d'une vérification de collision cinématique sur la base de la planification de trajectoire (12a,b), du modèle cinématique et du modèle d'environnement, et la production d'un résultat de prédication sur la base de la vérification de collision cinématique. Ledit procédé est caractérisé en ce que la position de départ (11a,b) correspond à l'état sur le moment du manipulateur. La présent invention concerne en outre un programme informatique correspondant pourvu d'un code de programme, ainsi qu'un système correspondant de simulation de mouvement d'un manipulateur (1a,b).
EP15805157.3A 2014-12-05 2015-12-03 Procédé de simulation de mouvement pour un manipulateur Pending EP3227061A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102014118001.1A DE102014118001A1 (de) 2014-12-05 2014-12-05 Verfahren zur Bewegungssimulation eines Manipulators
PCT/EP2015/078533 WO2016087590A1 (fr) 2014-12-05 2015-12-03 Procédé de simulation de mouvement pour un manipulateur

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3227061A1 true EP3227061A1 (fr) 2017-10-11

Family

ID=54783592

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15805157.3A Pending EP3227061A1 (fr) 2014-12-05 2015-12-03 Procédé de simulation de mouvement pour un manipulateur

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US11292130B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3227061A1 (fr)
CN (1) CN107206591A (fr)
DE (1) DE102014118001A1 (fr)
RU (1) RU2727136C2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2016087590A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7087316B2 (ja) * 2017-09-27 2022-06-21 オムロン株式会社 情報処理装置、情報処理方法およびプログラム
CN109956240B (zh) * 2017-12-26 2021-11-30 河南森源重工有限公司 环卫车吊耳与滑槽的定位方法及定位工装
CN108945677A (zh) * 2018-06-22 2018-12-07 苏州朵唯智能科技有限公司 一种采用机器人的标签埋入方法
JP7384575B2 (ja) * 2018-08-10 2023-11-21 川崎重工業株式会社 情報処理装置、仲介装置、シミュレートシステム、情報処理方法及びプログラム
JP6508691B1 (ja) * 2018-10-15 2019-05-08 株式会社Ｍｕｊｉｎ 制御装置、作業ロボット、プログラム、及び、制御方法
WO2021058527A1 (fr) * 2019-09-27 2021-04-01 Saint-Gobain Glass France Procédé de fabrication automatisé, et système de fabrication pour cintrer des carreaux de verre en utilisant une image numérique intégrée
CN112955834A (zh) * 2019-09-27 2021-06-11 法国圣戈班玻璃厂 用于利用集成的数字映像弯曲玻璃板的自动化的生产工艺和生产系统
CN111409076B (zh) * 2020-04-28 2021-11-05 珠海格力智能装备有限公司 机械手运动状态的确定方法及装置
CN113696185A (zh) * 2021-09-17 2021-11-26 南京师范大学 一种机械手控制程序的自动生成方法
DE102021124215A1 (de) 2021-09-20 2023-03-23 linrob GmbH Verfahren zur Kompensation von Positionierungsungenauigkeiten eines Linearroboters und Linearroboter

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2418555A2 (fr) * 2010-07-30 2012-02-15 Brötje-Automation GmbH Procédé de programmation hors ligne d'un manipulateur à commande NC
DE102011014299A1 (de) * 2011-03-17 2012-09-20 Kuka Roboter Gmbh Verfahren und Mittel zum Steuern einer Automatisierungseinrichtung, insbesodere eines Roboters

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8004229B2 (en) * 2005-05-19 2011-08-23 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Software center and highly configurable robotic systems for surgery and other uses
US9510911B2 (en) * 1999-09-17 2016-12-06 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. System and methods for managing multiple null-space objectives and SLI behaviors
US10188471B2 (en) * 1999-09-17 2019-01-29 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Tele-operative surgical systems and methods of control at joint limits using inverse kinematics
ATE257941T1 (de) * 2000-03-29 2004-01-15 Tms Produktionssysteme Gmbh Weitgehend selbsttätige kalibrierung eines betätigungsarmes eines roboters
GB0130986D0 (en) * 2001-12-27 2002-02-13 Prophet Control Systems Ltd Programming robots with offline design
US8971597B2 (en) * 2005-05-16 2015-03-03 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Efficient vision and kinematic data fusion for robotic surgical instruments and other applications
DE102005047543A1 (de) * 2005-09-30 2007-04-05 Siemens Ag Verfahren zur Simulation eines Steuerungs- und/oder Maschinenverhaltens einer Werkzeugmaschine oder einer Produktionsmaschine
DE102006005344A1 (de) * 2006-02-07 2007-08-09 Daimlerchrysler Ag Verfahren zur Simulation eines Montagevorgangs für ein Anbauteil
CN101122791A (zh) * 2007-09-13 2008-02-13 上海交通大学 数控机床定位误差实时补偿装置
DE102008027475A1 (de) * 2008-06-09 2009-12-10 Kuka Roboter Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur rechnergestützten Generierung einer Manipulatorbahn
WO2010017835A1 (fr) 2008-08-12 2010-02-18 Abb Technology Ab Système et procédé de programmation hors-ligne d’un robot industriel
DE102009007932A1 (de) * 2009-02-06 2010-08-12 Battenberg, Günther Qualitätsgesteuertes Produktions- und Prüfverfahren
WO2011056633A1 (fr) * 2009-10-27 2011-05-12 Battelle Memorial Institute Système robotisé polyvalent semi-autonome et procédé de fonctionnement
CN103213125B (zh) * 2011-11-04 2016-05-18 范努克机器人技术美国有限公司 具有3d显示的机器人教学装置
JP6066041B2 (ja) 2012-07-17 2017-01-25 三菱日立パワーシステムズ株式会社 加工支援装置および加工支援システム
KR102214811B1 (ko) * 2013-03-15 2021-02-10 인튜어티브 서지컬 오퍼레이션즈 인코포레이티드 매니퓰레이터 조인트 운동을 비등방적으로 증폭시키기 위해 영공간을 이용하는 시스템 및 방법
JP6535653B2 (ja) * 2013-03-15 2019-06-26 インテュイティブ サージカル オペレーションズ， インコーポレイテッド ゼロ空間を使用してデカルト座標空間の端へのアクセスを容易にするためのシステム及び方法
KR102217573B1 (ko) * 2013-03-15 2021-02-19 인튜어티브 서지컬 오퍼레이션즈 인코포레이티드 영공간을 이용하여 경로를 추적하기 위한 시스템 및 방법
CN106470266B (zh) 2015-08-19 2021-01-22 中兴通讯股份有限公司 一种终端内设备功耗数据获取方法及装置
TW202146189A (zh) * 2020-01-22 2021-12-16 美商即時機器人股份有限公司 於多機器人操作環境中之機器人之建置

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2418555A2 (fr) * 2010-07-30 2012-02-15 Brötje-Automation GmbH Procédé de programmation hors ligne d'un manipulateur à commande NC
DE102011014299A1 (de) * 2011-03-17 2012-09-20 Kuka Roboter Gmbh Verfahren und Mittel zum Steuern einer Automatisierungseinrichtung, insbesodere eines Roboters

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO2016087590A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102014118001A1 (de) 2016-06-09
RU2017123529A3 (fr) 2019-06-10
RU2727136C2 (ru) 2020-07-20
RU2017123529A (ru) 2019-01-09
WO2016087590A1 (fr) 2016-06-09
CN107206591A (zh) 2017-09-26
US11292130B2 (en) 2022-04-05
US20180126554A1 (en) 2018-05-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3227061A1 (fr) Procédé de simulation de mouvement pour un manipulateur
EP3165978B1 (fr) Procédé pour la première mise en service d'une installation
DE102015107436B4 (de) Lernfähige Bahnsteuerung
DE112016002013T5 (de) Systeme und Verfahren zur Steuerung einer Robotermanipulation
EP2418555B1 (fr) Procédé de programmation hors ligne d'un manipulateur à commande NC
EP1366867B1 (fr) Méthode et dispositif pour éviter les collisions entre des robots industriels et d'autres objects
DE102018205015B4 (de) Einstellvorrichtung und Einstellverfahren
EP2285537B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de génération assistée par ordinateur d' une bande de manipulateur
DE102015010124B4 (de) Roboterprogramm-Erzeugungsvorrichtung, die Roboterprogramm zum Reduzieren von Stössen der Gelenke des Roboters erzeugt
DE10352815B4 (de) Simulationsverfahren für eine Bearbeitung eines Werkstücks durch eine Werkzeugmaschine und korrespondierender Rechner
DE102015015093B4 (de) Roboterprogrammiervorrichtung zum Instruieren eines Roboters für eine Bearbeitung
DE102017001298B4 (de) Robotersimulationsvorrichtung, die einen überstrichenen Raum berechnet
DE102013113165A1 (de) Kalibrierungsverfahren für Robotersystem
DE102011108282A1 (de) Numerische Steuerung für eine Mehrachsenmaschine zum Bearbeiten einer geneigten Bearbeitungsebene
DE102015223258A1 (de) Verfahren zum Bearbeiten der Oberfläche eines dreidimensionalen Objekts
EP3434424A1 (fr) Programmation efficace des robots permettant d'usiner des pièces à plusieurs variantes
DE102017001131A1 (de) Verfahren und System zum Betreiben eines Roboters
DE102011014299A1 (de) Verfahren und Mittel zum Steuern einer Automatisierungseinrichtung, insbesodere eines Roboters
DE10393527T5 (de) Systeme und Verfahren zur Darstellung komplexer n-Kurven für die Direktsteuerung einer Werkzeugbewegung
DE102015001741A1 (de) Verfahren und System zum Betreiben einer mehrachsigen Maschine, insbesondere eines Roboters
EP3037219B1 (fr) Robot sur ayant des variables de progression de glissiere
DE102020130520A1 (de) Verfahren zum steuern eines roboters in gegenwart menschlicher bediener
DE102019205651B3 (de) Verfahren und System zum Ausführen von Roboterapplikationen
DE112019007579B4 (de) Numerische-Steuerung-Vorrichtung und Maschinelles-Lernen-Gerät
DE102006036490A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Steuern eines Handhabungsgeräts

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20170519

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20210317

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS