EP3173369A1 - Working platform with protection against sustained involuntary operation - Google Patents

Working platform with protection against sustained involuntary operation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3173369A1
EP3173369A1 EP16198347.3A EP16198347A EP3173369A1 EP 3173369 A1 EP3173369 A1 EP 3173369A1 EP 16198347 A EP16198347 A EP 16198347A EP 3173369 A1 EP3173369 A1 EP 3173369A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
platform
operator
control module
programmed
processor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP16198347.3A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3173369B1 (en
Inventor
David. W LOMBARDO
Ignacy Puszkiewicz
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JLG Industries Inc
Original Assignee
JLG Industries Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US14/950,845 external-priority patent/US10358331B2/en
Application filed by JLG Industries Inc filed Critical JLG Industries Inc
Priority to EP20176631.8A priority Critical patent/EP3725733A1/en
Publication of EP3173369A1 publication Critical patent/EP3173369A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3173369B1 publication Critical patent/EP3173369B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66FHOISTING, LIFTING, HAULING OR PUSHING, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, e.g. DEVICES WHICH APPLY A LIFTING OR PUSHING FORCE DIRECTLY TO THE SURFACE OF A LOAD
    • B66F11/00Lifting devices specially adapted for particular uses not otherwise provided for
    • B66F11/04Lifting devices specially adapted for particular uses not otherwise provided for for movable platforms or cabins, e.g. on vehicles, permitting workmen to place themselves in any desired position for carrying out required operations
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66FHOISTING, LIFTING, HAULING OR PUSHING, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, e.g. DEVICES WHICH APPLY A LIFTING OR PUSHING FORCE DIRECTLY TO THE SURFACE OF A LOAD
    • B66F17/00Safety devices, e.g. for limiting or indicating lifting force
    • B66F17/006Safety devices, e.g. for limiting or indicating lifting force for working platforms
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66FHOISTING, LIFTING, HAULING OR PUSHING, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, e.g. DEVICES WHICH APPLY A LIFTING OR PUSHING FORCE DIRECTLY TO THE SURFACE OF A LOAD
    • B66F11/00Lifting devices specially adapted for particular uses not otherwise provided for
    • B66F11/04Lifting devices specially adapted for particular uses not otherwise provided for for movable platforms or cabins, e.g. on vehicles, permitting workmen to place themselves in any desired position for carrying out required operations
    • B66F11/044Working platforms suspended from booms
    • B66F11/046Working platforms suspended from booms of the telescoping type

Definitions

  • the invention relates to work platforms and, more particularly, to a work platform including an obstruction sensing system to reduce the possibility of collision with an obstruction or structure.
  • Lift vehicles including aerial work platforms, telehandlers such as rough terrain telescoping fork trucks with work platform attachments, and truck mounted aerial lifts are known and typically include an extendible flexible configuration boom, which may be positioned at different angles relative to the ground, and a work platform at an end of the boom.
  • a control console including various control elements that may be manipulated by the operator to control such functions as boom angle, boom extension, rotation of the boom and/or platform on a vertical axis, engine or other type of power source, and where the lift vehicle is of the self-propelled type, there are also provided steering, drive speed and direction and braking controls.
  • a safety hazard can occur in a lift vehicle including a work platform when an operator is positioned between the platform and a structure that may be located overhead or behind the operator, among other places. Collision avoidance is also desirable with objects around the platform for example glass surfaces, aircraft structures, and other more fragile or delicate structures.
  • a camera sensor or the like may be mounted to the aerial work platform to observe the platform, the area around the platform, and the operator.
  • the system processes data from the sensor to determine whether the operator is present and if the operator is in a proper operating position and also to determine the proximity of objects above, behind and to the sides of and below the platform.
  • a control module permits, modifies or prevents operation and/or manipulation of the platform.
  • a work platform is combined with a system for detecting obstacles.
  • the work platform includes a control panel with operating components that control a position of the platform.
  • the combined work platform and system include a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform that monitors at least one of an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform, and a processor receiving a signal from the sensor that processes the signal to determine at least one of a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform.
  • a control module communicating with the processor and the operating components modifies control signals from the control panel based on communication with the processor.
  • the processor may determine that the operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position, and the control module may be programmed to prevent operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform.
  • An override switch may be connected with the control module, where the control module may be programmed to permit operation of the platform at very slow or creep speed based on activation of the override switch.
  • the processor may determine that the operator is leaning over the control panel, and the control module may be programmed to stop active functions and prevent further operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform.
  • the processor may determine that the operator is leaning over the control panel for a predetermined time, and the control module may be programmed to reverse a last operating function of the platform.
  • the processor may determine that the operator is present and in a proper operating position and that there are no objects in the area around the platform, and the control module may be programmed to permit normal operation of the platform.
  • the senor may be programmed to distinguish the area around the platform between a warning zone and a danger zone, where the danger zone is closer to the platform than the warning zone.
  • the processor may determine that an object is present in the warning zone, and the control module may be programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed based on the determination that the object is present in the warning zone.
  • the processor may determine that an object is present in the danger zone, and the control module may be programmed to prevent operation of the platform based on the determination that the object is present in the danger zone.
  • the sensor may be programmed to adjust a depth of at least one of the warning zone and the danger zone based on operating characteristics of the platform.
  • Exemplary operating characteristics may include a number of operators on the platform, a direction in which the platform is traveling, and a speed of the platform.
  • the control module may detect a speed of the platform, wherein the processor is programmed to process signals from the sensor relating to the platform speed toward one of the objects in the area of the platform.
  • the control module may be programmed to slow active functions at a rate relative to the speed at which the platform is approaching the one of the objects in the area of the platform.
  • the control module may be programmed to reduce a commanded operation speed based on a proximity to one of the objects in the area of the platform.
  • the sensor may include multiple sensing elements secured in the vicinity of the platform.
  • the platform may include a platform railing, where the sensor is mounted on the platform railing.
  • the sensor may be one of an optical sensor, a radar sensor, and an acoustic sensor.
  • the sensor may be attached to a manipulation device such as a pan and/or tilt mechanism or a mirror that displaces or rotates the sensor field of view.
  • an aerial work platform includes a control panel including operator controls for manipulating the platform, a control module communicating with the operator controls and controlling manipulation of the platform based on signals from the control panel, and an obstruction sensing system.
  • the obstruction sensing system includes a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform that monitors an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform, and a processor receiving a signal from the sensor that processes the signal to determine a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform.
  • the control module is in communication with the processor and is programmed to modify control signals from the operator controls based on communication with the processor.
  • a method of controlling an aerial work platform includes the steps of (a) monitoring with a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform; (b) detecting with a processor receiving a signal from the sensor a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform; and (c) a control module modifying control signals from an operator control panel based on communication with the processor and based on the detection in step (b). Step (c) may be practiced by preventing operation of the platform when an operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position.
  • Step (b) may be practiced to determine whether the operator is leaning over a control panel for a predetermined period of time, and step (c) may be practiced by preventing operation of the platform during the predetermined period of time and after the predetermined period of time, reversing a last operating function of the platform.
  • Step (c) may be practiced by permitting operation of the platform at creep speed when an object is detected in the warning zone, and by preventing operation of the platform when an object is detected in the danger zone.
  • a combined work platform and system for detecting proximate obstacles including a control panel with operating components that control a position of the platform, the combined work platform and system comprising:
  • the processor determines that the operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position, and the control module is programmed to prevent operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform.
  • the combined work platform and system comprises an override switch connected with the control module, wherein the control module is programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed based on activation of the override switch.
  • the processor determines that the operator is leaning over the control panel, and the control module is programmed to stop active functions and prevent further operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform.
  • the processor determines that the operator is leaning over the control panel for a predetermined time, and the control module is programmed to reverse a last operating function of the platform.
  • the processor determines that the operator is present and in a proper operating position and that there are no objects in the area around the platform, and the control module is programmed to permit normal operation of the platform.
  • the senor is programmed to distinguish the area around the platform between a warning zone and a danger zone, the danger zone being closer to the platform than the warning zone, and wherein the processor determines that an object is present in the warning zone, and the control module is programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed based on the determination that the object is present in the warning zone.
  • the processor determines that an object is present in the danger zone
  • the control module is programmed to stop active functions and prevent further operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform based on the determination that the object is present in the danger zone.
  • the combined work platform and system further comprises an override switch connected with the control module, wherein the control module is programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed based on activation of the override switch.
  • the senor is programmed to adjust a depth of at least one of the warning zone and the danger zone based on operating characteristics of the platform.
  • the operating characteristics comprise a number of operators on the platform, a direction in which the platform is traveling, and a speed of the platform.
  • control module detects a speed of the platform, and wherein the processor is programmed to process signals from the sensor relating to the platform speed toward one of the objects in the area of the platform, the control module being programmed to slow active functions at a rate relative to the speed at which the platform is approaching the one of the objects in the area of the platform.
  • control module is programmed to reduce a commanded operation speed based on a proximity to one of the objects in the area of the platform.
  • the sensor comprises multiple sensing elements secured in the vicinity of the platform.
  • the platform comprises a platform railing, and wherein the sensor is mounted on the platform railing.
  • the sensor comprises one of an optical sensor, a radar sensor, and an acoustic sensor.
  • the combined work platform and system further comprises a manipulation device to which the sensor is attached.
  • the manipulation device comprises a pan and/or a tilt mechanism.
  • the manipulation device comprises a mirror that displaces or rotates the sensor field of view.
  • the senor is programmed to distinguish the area around the platform between a warning zone and a danger zone, the danger zone being closer to the platform than the warning zone, and wherein the control module is programmed to control operation of the platform differently depending on whether objects are detected in the warning zone or the danger zone.
  • control module is programmed to prevent operation of the platform when the operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position and when an object is detected in the danger zone, wherein the control module is programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed when an object is detected in the warning zone, and wherein the control module is programmed to permit normal operation of the platform when no object is detected in the warning zone or the danger zone and when the operator is present and in the proper operating position.
  • the sensor comprises multiple sensing elements secured in the vicinity of the platform.
  • step (c) is practiced by preventing operation of the platform when an operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position.
  • step (b) is practiced to determine whether the operator is leaning over a control panel for a predetermined period of time, and wherein step (c) is practiced by preventing operation of the platform during the predetermined period of time and after the predetermined period of time, reversing a last operating function of the platform.
  • the area around the platform includes a warning zone and a danger zone, the danger zone being closer to the platform than the warning zone, and wherein step (c) is practiced by permitting operation of the platform at creep speed when an object is detected in the warning zone, and by preventing operation of the platform when an object is detected in the danger zone.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary typical aerial lift vehicle including a vehicle chassis 2 supported on vehicle wheels 4.
  • vehicle shown includes a telescoping boom, the invention is equally applicable to other vehicles including, for example, articulated booms without telescoping or extendable booms.
  • a turntable and counterweight 6 are secured for rotation on the chassis 2, and an extendible (flexible arrangement) boom assembly is pivotably attached at one end to the turntable 6.
  • An aerial work platform 10 is attached at an opposite end of the extendible boom 8.
  • the illustrated lift vehicle is of the self-propelled type and thus also includes a driving/control system (illustrated schematically in FIG.
  • control console 14 on the platform 10 with various control elements that may be manipulated by the operator to control such functions as boom angle, boom extension, rotation of the boom and/or platform on a vertical axis, and engine, steering, drive speed and direction and braking controls, etc.
  • FIG. 2 shows the combined work platform 10 and system 20 for detecting obstructions such as obstacles around the platform including overhead obstacles.
  • a sensor 22 is mounted in a vicinity of the platform and monitors at least one of an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform.
  • the sensor 22 may be a stereo camera sensor that provides a data stream consisting of pixel data (RGB value and range) to a computer or processor 24 mounted on the platform 10.
  • An exemplary stereo camera sensor is MultiSense S21 available from Carnegie Robotics.
  • Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate alternative sensors that may be suitable, and the invention is not meant to be limited to a specific sensor type.
  • the obstruction sensing system 20 may include multiple sensors 22 that are cooperable together and mounted in various areas in the vicinity of the platform 10.
  • the platform 10 includes a platform railing, and the sensor 22 is mounted on the platform railing. Mounting on the platform provides for a static view of the platform through the full range of boom articulation. Sensors may alternatively or additionally be mounted to boom structure to allow for a larger field of view of the platform and/or mounted to platform support structure other than the railing.
  • the sensor 22 may be mounted on a dedicated bracket 23 secured to the platform, or the sensor 22 may be secured adjacent the control panel 14.
  • the computer or processor 24 processes the pixel range data to determine at least one of a position of an operator on the platform 10 and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform 10.
  • a control module 26 in the control panel 14 forms part of the driving/control system 12 and communicates with the processor 24 to control operation of the platform based on a signal from the processor 24.
  • the control module 26 communicates with the driving/control system 12, which controls overall operation of the machine.
  • the control module 26 may gather input from control devices such as joysticks, switches, etc. and communicate operator commands to the driving/control system 12.
  • the processor 24 determines whether the operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position, and if so, the control module 26 is programmed to prevent operation of the platform 10. That is, if the operator is not detected, the computer 24 sends a data message to the control module 26 that prevents motion or operation, or stops all active functions of the work platform 10.
  • the system may also include an override button 28, where the platform 10 may be operated at creep speed if the override button 28 is activated.
  • the processor 24 may determine that the operator is leaning over the control panel 14, in which case, the control module 26 is programmed to prevent operation of the platform 10. If the processor 24 determines that the operator is leaning over the control panel for a predetermined time, the control module 26 is programmed to reverse a last operating function of the platform. In this instance, the system may also sound an alarm and turn on a warning beacon.
  • Indicator lamps 29 may be secured to the platform railing and around the control panel to communicate system status to the operator. Exemplary locations for the indicator lamps 29 are shown in FIG. 2 .
  • the control module 26 may cause the indicator lamps 29 to illuminate when the control module 26 is in any way affecting machine control.(e.g., when the sensors 22 indicate that the machine is getting too close to an obstacle).
  • FIGS. 3-8 show exemplary sensing areas for detecting the proximity of objects above, behind, below and to the sides of the platform 10.
  • the sensor 22 is programmed to distinguish the area around the platform between a warning zone (Zone A) 30 and a danger zone (Zones B and C) 32, where the danger zone 32 is closer to the platform 10 than the warning zone 30 as shown.
  • the control module 26 is programmed to permit operation of the platform 10 at creep speed. If the processor 24 determines that an object is present in the danger zone 32, the control module 26 is programmed to prevent operation of the platform 10 (i.e., stop all active functions and/or prevent the start or continuation of any operation).
  • control module 26 prevents operation of the platform 10 that would cause motion of the platform 10
  • activation of the override switch 28 will permit operation of the platform 10 at creep speed. If the processor 24 determines that the operator is present and in a proper operating position and that there are no objects in the area around the platform 10 (i.e., in proximity defined by proscribed zones), the control module 26 permits normal, unrestricted operation of the platform 10. If no operator is present, operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform is prevented unless overridden with the override switch 28.
  • the processor 24 can be programmed to estimate direction and speed of movement of the platform in relation to recognized obstacles.
  • the processor 24 can be programmed to take action even when those obstacles are outside of the warning zone 30.
  • the processor 24 can be programmed to signal the driving/control system 12 to slow down machine functions such as drive when the processor 24 recognizes that the operator is driving the machine at full speed in the direction of potential obstacle.
  • the boom functions (or drive function) can be slowed down more aggressively if the processor determines that the machine is moving fast toward a collision point.
  • the warning zone 30 and the danger zone 32 may be configured as adaptive zones, where based on the picture of the surrounding environment, the control module 26 can adjust the size and shape of the respective zones 30, 32.
  • Adaptive zones are calculated by the control module based on sensor system/controller ability to recognize, among other things, the number of people in the platform, or the combination of people and materials (tools, equipment) present in the platform.
  • FIGS. 7 and 8 illustrate results of the controller module calculation.
  • the zones 30, 32 are adapted according to a specific operator.
  • the zones 30, 32 are adapted according to the presence of two operators
  • the zones are adapted according to an operator and equipment on the platform.
  • Various methods may be used for reducing the platform speed based on detected object distance.
  • a limit for the maximum commandable speed is set based on the distance to the detected object (see, e.g., FIGS. 5-13 ).
  • the operator input is scaled down based on the distance to the detected obstacle (see, e.g., FIGS. 14-16 ).
  • the zones may be adapted to speed and direction of machine movement. Zones can be adjusted to become deeper if it is determined that the machine is moving faster than a threshold speed, or the zones can be "deeper” in the main direction of travel when activating the swing or other direction function.
  • the control module may adjust the sensors to penetrate deeper into the direction of the side of platform.
  • FIGS. 9-13 show variations in a depth of the warning zone and/or the danger zone based on platform speed and direction. More specifically, FIG. 9 shows the platform traveling to the right with each of the right side warning zone and danger zone having an increased depth.
  • FIG. 10 shows the platform descending with the warning and/or danger zones having an increased depth in the direction of platform movement.
  • the system may be programmed to adjust the depth of the zones based on the speed of the platform.
  • FIGS. 11-13 show a proportionally increased depth with increasing platform speed.
  • the adaptive zones may incorporate proportional speed reduction zones as shown in FIGS. 14-16 .
  • the percent of commanded speed is reduced according to the proximity of the potential obstacle to the platform.
  • the speed reduction zones are shown in discrete steps but may alternatively be continuous.
  • the proportional speed reduction zones are combined with the zones adapted for speed and direction.
  • the platform is traveling to the right, and the depth of the zones is modified accordingly.
  • an object is detected in the 60% zone with the platform traveling to the right.
  • the function speed is reduced to 60% of the commanded speed.
  • Communication between the sensor 22 and the processor 24 may be via digital packets (CANbus) or discrete signaling (digital or analog output). Other forms of digital communication may be used, allowing the sensor to provide information needed to evaluate environmental awareness. Examples include, without limitation, Ethernet, I2C, RS232/485, digital pulse width modulation (PWM), etc.
  • the control module 26 interprets the data to determine if and how the machine should react to the sensor data.
  • the processor 24 based on signals from the sensors 22 can determine if they need to be cleaned via a built-in test (BIT).
  • the sensing elements 22 can be based on optical, radar or acoustic (ultrasonic) sensing.
  • the sensing elements 22 can be a single device or multiple devices with the same or complementary technologies.
  • Sensors may be passive (stereo camera, single camera) or active (light detection and ranging (LiDAR), laser detection and ranging (LADAR), 3D vision sensor), radar or acoustic (ultrasonic). Any suitable type of sensor(s) may be used, and the invention is not meant to be limited to the described exemplary embodiments. Alternative sensor arrangements that achieve the same functionality are also contemplated including, for example, sensors that react to an emitter (via electromagnetic waves or other signals), reflective tape (on the machine and/or incorporated into the operator's protective gear), etc.
  • the sensor 22 can be manipulated either by mechanical rotation (pan/tilt) of the entire sensor using a suitable pan/tilt mechanism 34 (an exemplary pan/tilt mechanism is the Multisense S21 available from Carnegie Robotics), or by mechanical displacement/rotation of the field of view via a polygon reflector 36, single reflector 38, pair of reflectors 40 (optical mirror(s) for camera and LiDAR, metal plate(s) for radar and acoustic), etc.
  • the manipulation device can be controlled either by the processor 24, control module 26, sensor 22, or be self-contained in the manipulation device. Manipulating a sensor or sensor field of view allows each sensor to cover more of the surrounding area around the platform and/or boom structure.
  • the platform and obstruction sensing system endeavor to avoid collisions between the moving platform and obstacles in the vicinity of the platform.
  • the proactive system according to preferred embodiments is advantageous as compared to reactive systems that make adjustments after an obstacle has made contact with the operator and/or platform structure.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Forklifts And Lifting Vehicles (AREA)

Abstract

An aerial work platform (10) includes a control panel (14) with operator controls for manipulating the platform, a control module (26) communicating with the operator controls and controlling manipulation of the platform based on signals from the control panel, and an obstruction sensing system (20). The obstruction sensing system includes a sensor (22) mounted in a vicinity of the platform that monitors an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform. A processor (24) processes the signal to determine a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform. The control module is in communication with the processor and is programmed to control the manipulation of the platform or machine based on signals from the processor and input from the operator.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. Patent Application No. 13/885,720, filed May 16, 2013 , pending, which is the U.S. national phase of PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/066122 filed December 20, 2011 , which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/424,888, filed December 20, 2010 , and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/435,558, filed January 24, 2011 , the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in this application.
  • STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
  • (NOT APPLICABLE)
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to work platforms and, more particularly, to a work platform including an obstruction sensing system to reduce the possibility of collision with an obstruction or structure.
  • Lift vehicles including aerial work platforms, telehandlers such as rough terrain telescoping fork trucks with work platform attachments, and truck mounted aerial lifts are known and typically include an extendible flexible configuration boom, which may be positioned at different angles relative to the ground, and a work platform at an end of the boom. On or adjacent the platform, there is typically provided a control console including various control elements that may be manipulated by the operator to control such functions as boom angle, boom extension, rotation of the boom and/or platform on a vertical axis, engine or other type of power source, and where the lift vehicle is of the self-propelled type, there are also provided steering, drive speed and direction and braking controls.
  • A safety hazard can occur in a lift vehicle including a work platform when an operator is positioned between the platform and a structure that may be located overhead or behind the operator, among other places. Collision avoidance is also desirable with objects around the platform for example glass surfaces, aircraft structures, and other more fragile or delicate structures.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • A camera sensor or the like may be mounted to the aerial work platform to observe the platform, the area around the platform, and the operator. The system processes data from the sensor to determine whether the operator is present and if the operator is in a proper operating position and also to determine the proximity of objects above, behind and to the sides of and below the platform. Based on data from the sensor, a control module permits, modifies or prevents operation and/or manipulation of the platform.
  • In an exemplary embodiment, a work platform is combined with a system for detecting obstacles. The work platform includes a control panel with operating components that control a position of the platform. The combined work platform and system include a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform that monitors at least one of an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform, and a processor receiving a signal from the sensor that processes the signal to determine at least one of a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform. A control module communicating with the processor and the operating components modifies control signals from the control panel based on communication with the processor.
  • The processor may determine that the operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position, and the control module may be programmed to prevent operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform. An override switch may be connected with the control module, where the control module may be programmed to permit operation of the platform at very slow or creep speed based on activation of the override switch. The processor may determine that the operator is leaning over the control panel, and the control module may be programmed to stop active functions and prevent further operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform. The processor may determine that the operator is leaning over the control panel for a predetermined time, and the control module may be programmed to reverse a last operating function of the platform. The processor may determine that the operator is present and in a proper operating position and that there are no objects in the area around the platform, and the control module may be programmed to permit normal operation of the platform.
  • In one embodiment, the sensor may be programmed to distinguish the area around the platform between a warning zone and a danger zone, where the danger zone is closer to the platform than the warning zone. The processor may determine that an object is present in the warning zone, and the control module may be programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed based on the determination that the object is present in the warning zone. The processor may determine that an object is present in the danger zone, and the control module may be programmed to prevent operation of the platform based on the determination that the object is present in the danger zone. The sensor may be programmed to adjust a depth of at least one of the warning zone and the danger zone based on operating characteristics of the platform. Exemplary operating characteristics may include a number of operators on the platform, a direction in which the platform is traveling, and a speed of the platform. The control module may detect a speed of the platform, wherein the processor is programmed to process signals from the sensor relating to the platform speed toward one of the objects in the area of the platform. In this context, the control module may be programmed to slow active functions at a rate relative to the speed at which the platform is approaching the one of the objects in the area of the platform. The control module may be programmed to reduce a commanded operation speed based on a proximity to one of the objects in the area of the platform.
  • The sensor may include multiple sensing elements secured in the vicinity of the platform. In one arrangement, the platform may include a platform railing, where the sensor is mounted on the platform railing. The sensor may be one of an optical sensor, a radar sensor, and an acoustic sensor. The sensor may be attached to a manipulation device such as a pan and/or tilt mechanism or a mirror that displaces or rotates the sensor field of view.
  • In another exemplary embodiment, an aerial work platform includes a control panel including operator controls for manipulating the platform, a control module communicating with the operator controls and controlling manipulation of the platform based on signals from the control panel, and an obstruction sensing system. The obstruction sensing system includes a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform that monitors an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform, and a processor receiving a signal from the sensor that processes the signal to determine a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform. The control module is in communication with the processor and is programmed to modify control signals from the operator controls based on communication with the processor.
  • In yet another exemplary embodiment, a method of controlling an aerial work platform includes the steps of (a) monitoring with a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform; (b) detecting with a processor receiving a signal from the sensor a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform; and (c) a control module modifying control signals from an operator control panel based on communication with the processor and based on the detection in step (b). Step (c) may be practiced by preventing operation of the platform when an operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position. Step (b) may be practiced to determine whether the operator is leaning over a control panel for a predetermined period of time, and step (c) may be practiced by preventing operation of the platform during the predetermined period of time and after the predetermined period of time, reversing a last operating function of the platform. Step (c) may be practiced by permitting operation of the platform at creep speed when an object is detected in the warning zone, and by preventing operation of the platform when an object is detected in the danger zone.
  • In yet another embodiment there is provided a combined work platform and system for detecting proximate obstacles, the work platform including a control panel with operating components that control a position of the platform, the combined work platform and system comprising:
    • a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform, the sensor monitoring at least one of an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform;
    • a processor receiving a signal from the sensor, the processor processing the signal to determine at least one of a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform; and
    • a control module communicating with the processor and the operating components and modifying control signals from the control panel based on communication with the processor.
  • Aptly the processor determines that the operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position, and the control module is programmed to prevent operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform.
  • Aptly the combined work platform and system comprises an override switch connected with the control module, wherein the control module is programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed based on activation of the override switch.
  • Aptly the processor determines that the operator is leaning over the control panel, and the control module is programmed to stop active functions and prevent further operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform.
  • Aptly the processor determines that the operator is leaning over the control panel for a predetermined time, and the control module is programmed to reverse a last operating function of the platform.
  • Aptly the processor determines that the operator is present and in a proper operating position and that there are no objects in the area around the platform, and the control module is programmed to permit normal operation of the platform.
  • Aptly the sensor is programmed to distinguish the area around the platform between a warning zone and a danger zone, the danger zone being closer to the platform than the warning zone, and wherein the processor determines that an object is present in the warning zone, and the control module is programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed based on the determination that the object is present in the warning zone.
  • Aptly the processor determines that an object is present in the danger zone, and the control module is programmed to stop active functions and prevent further operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform based on the determination that the object is present in the danger zone.
  • Aptly the combined work platform and system further comprises an override switch connected with the control module, wherein the control module is programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed based on activation of the override switch.
  • Aptly the sensor is programmed to adjust a depth of at least one of the warning zone and the danger zone based on operating characteristics of the platform.
  • Aptly the operating characteristics comprise a number of operators on the platform, a direction in which the platform is traveling, and a speed of the platform.
  • Aptly the control module detects a speed of the platform, and wherein the processor is programmed to process signals from the sensor relating to the platform speed toward one of the objects in the area of the platform, the control module being programmed to slow active functions at a rate relative to the speed at which the platform is approaching the one of the objects in the area of the platform.
  • Aptly the control module is programmed to reduce a commanded operation speed based on a proximity to one of the objects in the area of the platform.
  • Aptly the sensor comprises multiple sensing elements secured in the vicinity of the platform.
  • Aptly the platform comprises a platform railing, and wherein the sensor is mounted on the platform railing.
  • Aptly the sensor comprises one of an optical sensor, a radar sensor, and an acoustic sensor.
  • Aptly the combined work platform and system further comprises a manipulation device to which the sensor is attached.
  • Aptly the manipulation device comprises a pan and/or a tilt mechanism.
  • Aptly the manipulation device comprises a mirror that displaces or rotates the sensor field of view.
  • In yet another embodiment there is provided an aerial work platform comprising:
    • a control panel including operator controls for manipulating the platform;
    • a control module communicating with the operator controls and controlling manipulation of the platform based on signals from the control panel; and
    • an obstruction sensing system comprising:
      • a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform, the sensor monitoring an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform, and
      • a processor receiving a signal from the sensor, the processor processing the signal to determine a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform,
    • wherein the control module is in communication with the processor and is programmed to modify control signals from the operator controls based on communication with the processor.
  • Aptly the sensor is programmed to distinguish the area around the platform between a warning zone and a danger zone, the danger zone being closer to the platform than the warning zone, and wherein the control module is programmed to control operation of the platform differently depending on whether objects are detected in the warning zone or the danger zone.
  • Aptly the control module is programmed to prevent operation of the platform when the operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position and when an object is detected in the danger zone, wherein the control module is programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed when an object is detected in the warning zone, and wherein the control module is programmed to permit normal operation of the platform when no object is detected in the warning zone or the danger zone and when the operator is present and in the proper operating position.
  • Aptly the sensor comprises multiple sensing elements secured in the vicinity of the platform.
  • In yet another embodiment there is provided a method of controlling an aerial work platform, the method comprising:
    1. (a) monitoring with a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform;
    2. (b) detecting with a processor receiving a signal from the sensor a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform; and
    3. (c) a control module modifying control signals from an operator control panel based on communication with the processor and based on the detection in step (b).
  • Aptly step (c) is practiced by preventing operation of the platform when an operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position.
  • Aptly step (b) is practiced to determine whether the operator is leaning over a control panel for a predetermined period of time, and wherein step (c) is practiced by preventing operation of the platform during the predetermined period of time and after the predetermined period of time, reversing a last operating function of the platform.
  • Aptly the area around the platform includes a warning zone and a danger zone, the danger zone being closer to the platform than the warning zone, and wherein step (c) is practiced by permitting operation of the platform at creep speed when an object is detected in the warning zone, and by preventing operation of the platform when an object is detected in the danger zone.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • These and other aspects and advantages will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
    • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary aerial lift vehicle including a work platform;
    • FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the work platform and obstruction sensing system according to preferred embodiments of the invention;
    • FIGS. 3-16 show the platform and the non-adaptive and adaptive areas monitored by the sensor; and
    • FIGS. 17-21 show an exemplary pan/tilt mechanism and functionality for the sensor unit.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary typical aerial lift vehicle including a vehicle chassis 2 supported on vehicle wheels 4. Although the vehicle shown includes a telescoping boom, the invention is equally applicable to other vehicles including, for example, articulated booms without telescoping or extendable booms. A turntable and counterweight 6 are secured for rotation on the chassis 2, and an extendible (flexible arrangement) boom assembly is pivotably attached at one end to the turntable 6. An aerial work platform 10 is attached at an opposite end of the extendible boom 8. The illustrated lift vehicle is of the self-propelled type and thus also includes a driving/control system (illustrated schematically in FIG. 1 at 12) and a control console 14 on the platform 10 with various control elements that may be manipulated by the operator to control such functions as boom angle, boom extension, rotation of the boom and/or platform on a vertical axis, and engine, steering, drive speed and direction and braking controls, etc.
  • FIG. 2 shows the combined work platform 10 and system 20 for detecting obstructions such as obstacles around the platform including overhead obstacles. A sensor 22 is mounted in a vicinity of the platform and monitors at least one of an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform. The sensor 22 may be a stereo camera sensor that provides a data stream consisting of pixel data (RGB value and range) to a computer or processor 24 mounted on the platform 10. An exemplary stereo camera sensor is MultiSense S21 available from Carnegie Robotics. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate alternative sensors that may be suitable, and the invention is not meant to be limited to a specific sensor type.
  • The obstruction sensing system 20 may include multiple sensors 22 that are cooperable together and mounted in various areas in the vicinity of the platform 10. In an exemplary construction, the platform 10 includes a platform railing, and the sensor 22 is mounted on the platform railing. Mounting on the platform provides for a static view of the platform through the full range of boom articulation. Sensors may alternatively or additionally be mounted to boom structure to allow for a larger field of view of the platform and/or mounted to platform support structure other than the railing. For example, as shown, the sensor 22 may be mounted on a dedicated bracket 23 secured to the platform, or the sensor 22 may be secured adjacent the control panel 14.
  • The computer or processor 24 processes the pixel range data to determine at least one of a position of an operator on the platform 10 and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform 10. A control module 26 in the control panel 14 forms part of the driving/control system 12 and communicates with the processor 24 to control operation of the platform based on a signal from the processor 24. In some arrangements, the control module 26 communicates with the driving/control system 12, which controls overall operation of the machine. In this arrangement, the control module 26 may gather input from control devices such as joysticks, switches, etc. and communicate operator commands to the driving/control system 12.
  • In some embodiments, the processor 24 determines whether the operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position, and if so, the control module 26 is programmed to prevent operation of the platform 10. That is, if the operator is not detected, the computer 24 sends a data message to the control module 26 that prevents motion or operation, or stops all active functions of the work platform 10. The system may also include an override button 28, where the platform 10 may be operated at creep speed if the override button 28 is activated.
  • The processor 24 may determine that the operator is leaning over the control panel 14, in which case, the control module 26 is programmed to prevent operation of the platform 10. If the processor 24 determines that the operator is leaning over the control panel for a predetermined time, the control module 26 is programmed to reverse a last operating function of the platform. In this instance, the system may also sound an alarm and turn on a warning beacon.
  • Indicator lamps 29 may be secured to the platform railing and around the control panel to communicate system status to the operator. Exemplary locations for the indicator lamps 29 are shown in FIG. 2. The control module 26 may cause the indicator lamps 29 to illuminate when the control module 26 is in any way affecting machine control.(e.g., when the sensors 22 indicate that the machine is getting too close to an obstacle).
  • FIGS. 3-8 show exemplary sensing areas for detecting the proximity of objects above, behind, below and to the sides of the platform 10. The sensor 22 is programmed to distinguish the area around the platform between a warning zone (Zone A) 30 and a danger zone (Zones B and C) 32, where the danger zone 32 is closer to the platform 10 than the warning zone 30 as shown. If the processor 24 determines that an object is present in the warning zone, the control module 26 is programmed to permit operation of the platform 10 at creep speed. If the processor 24 determines that an object is present in the danger zone 32, the control module 26 is programmed to prevent operation of the platform 10 (i.e., stop all active functions and/or prevent the start or continuation of any operation). At any time when the control module 26 prevents operation of the platform 10 that would cause motion of the platform 10, activation of the override switch 28 will permit operation of the platform 10 at creep speed. If the processor 24 determines that the operator is present and in a proper operating position and that there are no objects in the area around the platform 10 (i.e., in proximity defined by proscribed zones), the control module 26 permits normal, unrestricted operation of the platform 10. If no operator is present, operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform is prevented unless overridden with the override switch 28.
  • Because the processor 24 is interpreting shape and distance from an obstacle in real time, the processor 24 can be programmed to estimate direction and speed of movement of the platform in relation to recognized obstacles. The processor 24 can be programmed to take action even when those obstacles are outside of the warning zone 30. For example, the processor 24 can be programmed to signal the driving/control system 12 to slow down machine functions such as drive when the processor 24 recognizes that the operator is driving the machine at full speed in the direction of potential obstacle. As another example, the boom functions (or drive function) can be slowed down more aggressively if the processor determines that the machine is moving fast toward a collision point.
  • With reference to FIGS. 5-8, the warning zone 30 and the danger zone 32 may be configured as adaptive zones, where based on the picture of the surrounding environment, the control module 26 can adjust the size and shape of the respective zones 30, 32. Adaptive zones are calculated by the control module based on sensor system/controller ability to recognize, among other things, the number of people in the platform, or the combination of people and materials (tools, equipment) present in the platform. FIGS. 7 and 8 illustrate results of the controller module calculation. In FIGS. 5 and 6, the zones 30, 32 are adapted according to a specific operator. In FIG. 7, the zones 30, 32 are adapted according to the presence of two operators, and in FIG. 8, the zones are adapted according to an operator and equipment on the platform.
  • Various methods may be used for reducing the platform speed based on detected object distance. In a "speed limiting" method, a limit for the maximum commandable speed is set based on the distance to the detected object (see, e.g., FIGS. 5-13). In a "speed reducing" method, the operator input is scaled down based on the distance to the detected obstacle (see, e.g., FIGS. 14-16). These two methods may result in different machine behavior.
  • The zones may be adapted to speed and direction of machine movement. Zones can be adjusted to become deeper if it is determined that the machine is moving faster than a threshold speed, or the zones can be "deeper" in the main direction of travel when activating the swing or other direction function. The control module may adjust the sensors to penetrate deeper into the direction of the side of platform. FIGS. 9-13 show variations in a depth of the warning zone and/or the danger zone based on platform speed and direction. More specifically, FIG. 9 shows the platform traveling to the right with each of the right side warning zone and danger zone having an increased depth. FIG. 10 shows the platform descending with the warning and/or danger zones having an increased depth in the direction of platform movement. The system may be programmed to adjust the depth of the zones based on the speed of the platform. FIGS. 11-13 show a proportionally increased depth with increasing platform speed.
  • In a related context, the adaptive zones may incorporate proportional speed reduction zones as shown in FIGS. 14-16. In FIG. 14, the percent of commanded speed is reduced according to the proximity of the potential obstacle to the platform. The speed reduction zones are shown in discrete steps but may alternatively be continuous. In FIG. 15, the proportional speed reduction zones are combined with the zones adapted for speed and direction. In FIG. 15, the platform is traveling to the right, and the depth of the zones is modified accordingly. In FIG. 16, an object is detected in the 60% zone with the platform traveling to the right. The function speed is reduced to 60% of the commanded speed.
  • Communication between the sensor 22 and the processor 24 may be via digital packets (CANbus) or discrete signaling (digital or analog output). Other forms of digital communication may be used, allowing the sensor to provide information needed to evaluate environmental awareness. Examples include, without limitation, Ethernet, I2C, RS232/485, digital pulse width modulation (PWM), etc. The control module 26 interprets the data to determine if and how the machine should react to the sensor data. The processor 24 based on signals from the sensors 22 can determine if they need to be cleaned via a built-in test (BIT). The sensing elements 22 can be based on optical, radar or acoustic (ultrasonic) sensing. The sensing elements 22 can be a single device or multiple devices with the same or complementary technologies. This provides redundancy and tolerance to a range of environmental conditions, contamination on the sensors, and objects to be detected. Sensors may be passive (stereo camera, single camera) or active (light detection and ranging (LiDAR), laser detection and ranging (LADAR), 3D vision sensor), radar or acoustic (ultrasonic). Any suitable type of sensor(s) may be used, and the invention is not meant to be limited to the described exemplary embodiments. Alternative sensor arrangements that achieve the same functionality are also contemplated including, for example, sensors that react to an emitter (via electromagnetic waves or other signals), reflective tape (on the machine and/or incorporated into the operator's protective gear), etc.
  • With reference to FIGS. 17-21, the sensor 22 (camera, LiDAR, RADAR, etc.) can be manipulated either by mechanical rotation (pan/tilt) of the entire sensor using a suitable pan/tilt mechanism 34 (an exemplary pan/tilt mechanism is the Multisense S21 available from Carnegie Robotics), or by mechanical displacement/rotation of the field of view via a polygon reflector 36, single reflector 38, pair of reflectors 40 (optical mirror(s) for camera and LiDAR, metal plate(s) for radar and acoustic), etc. The manipulation device can be controlled either by the processor 24, control module 26, sensor 22, or be self-contained in the manipulation device. Manipulating a sensor or sensor field of view allows each sensor to cover more of the surrounding area around the platform and/or boom structure.
  • The platform and obstruction sensing system endeavor to avoid collisions between the moving platform and obstacles in the vicinity of the platform. The proactive system according to preferred embodiments is advantageous as compared to reactive systems that make adjustments after an obstacle has made contact with the operator and/or platform structure.
  • While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims (15)

  1. A combined work platform and system for detecting proximate obstacles, the work platform including a control panel with operating components that control a position of the platform, the combined work platform and system comprising:
    a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform, the sensor monitoring at least one of an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform;
    a processor receiving a signal from the sensor, the processor processing the signal to determine at least one of a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform; and
    a control module communicating with the processor and the operating components and modifying control signals from the control panel based on communication with the processor.
  2. A combined work platform and system according to claim 1,
    wherein the processor determines that the operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position, and the control module is programmed to prevent operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform.
  3. A combined work platform and system according to claim 2,
    wherein the processor determines that the operator is leaning over the control panel, and the control module is programmed to stop active functions and prevent further operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform.
  4. A combined work platform and system according to claim 3,
    wherein the processor determines that the operator is leaning over the control panel for a predetermined time, and the control module is programmed to reverse a last operating function of the platform.
  5. A combined work platform and system according to claim 1,
    wherein the sensor is programmed to distinguish the area around the platform between a warning zone and a danger zone, the danger zone being closer to the platform than the warning zone, and wherein the processor determines that an object is present in the warning zone, and the control module is programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed based on the determination that the object is present in the warning zone.
  6. A combined work platform and system according to claim 5,
    wherein the processor determines that an object is present in the danger zone, and the control module is programmed to stop active functions and prevent further operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform based on the determination that the object is present in the danger zone.
  7. A combined work platform and system according to claim 2 or claim 6, further comprising an override switch connected with the control module, wherein the control module is programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed based on activation of the override switch.
  8. A combined work platform and system according to claim 5,
    wherein the sensor is programmed to adjust a depth of at least one of the warning zone and the danger zone based on operating characteristics of the platform.
  9. A combined work platform and system according to claim 8,
    wherein the operating characteristics comprise a number of operators on the platform, a direction in which the platform is traveling, and a speed of the platform.
  10. A combined work platform and system according to claim 1,
    wherein the control module detects a speed of the platform, and wherein the processor is programmed to process signals from the sensor relating to the platform speed toward one of the objects in the area of the platform, the control module being programmed to slow active functions at a rate relative to the speed at which the platform is approaching the one of the objects in the area of the platform.
  11. A combined work platform and system according to claim 1,
    wherein the control module is programmed to reduce a commanded operation speed based on a proximity to one of the objects in the area of the platform.
  12. A method of controlling an aerial work platform, the method comprising:
    (a) monitoring with a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform;
    (b) detecting with a processor receiving a signal from the sensor a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform; and
    (c) a control module modifying control signals from an operator control panel based on communication with the processor and based on the detection in step (b).
  13. A method according to claim 12, wherein step (c) is practiced by preventing operation of the platform when an operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position.
  14. A method according to claim 13, wherein step (b) is practiced to determine whether the operator is leaning over a control panel for a predetermined period of time, and wherein step (c) is practiced by preventing operation of the platform during the predetermined period of time and after the predetermined period of time, reversing a last operating function of the platform.
  15. A method according to claim 13, wherein the area around the platform includes a warning zone and a danger zone, the danger zone being closer to the platform than the warning zone, and wherein step (c) is practiced by permitting operation of the platform at creep speed when an object is detected in the warning zone, and by preventing operation of the platform when an object is detected in the danger zone.
EP16198347.3A 2015-11-24 2016-11-11 Working platform with protection against sustained involuntary operation Active EP3173369B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20176631.8A EP3725733A1 (en) 2015-11-24 2016-11-11 Working platform with protection against sustained involuntary operation

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/950,845 US10358331B2 (en) 2010-12-20 2015-11-24 Work platform with protection against sustained involuntary operation

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20176631.8A Division EP3725733A1 (en) 2015-11-24 2016-11-11 Working platform with protection against sustained involuntary operation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3173369A1 true EP3173369A1 (en) 2017-05-31
EP3173369B1 EP3173369B1 (en) 2020-05-27

Family

ID=57286357

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16198347.3A Active EP3173369B1 (en) 2015-11-24 2016-11-11 Working platform with protection against sustained involuntary operation
EP20176631.8A Pending EP3725733A1 (en) 2015-11-24 2016-11-11 Working platform with protection against sustained involuntary operation

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20176631.8A Pending EP3725733A1 (en) 2015-11-24 2016-11-11 Working platform with protection against sustained involuntary operation

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (2) EP3173369B1 (en)
JP (2) JP6411434B2 (en)
CN (1) CN106744549B (en)
AU (1) AU2016256781B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2946013C (en)
ES (1) ES2802462T3 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020061322A1 (en) * 2018-09-20 2020-03-26 Oshkosh Corporation Systems and methods for restricting operation of a lift device
DE102019117455B3 (en) 2019-06-28 2020-08-06 Bär Management- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH Device and method for monitoring a tail lift for a vehicle
ES2802418A1 (en) * 2019-07-08 2021-01-19 Haro Jose Antonio Garcia Safety device for work at height (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)
CN112572819A (en) * 2019-09-27 2021-03-30 昕芙旎雅有限公司 Aircraft ground support vehicle
EP3835254A1 (en) * 2019-12-13 2021-06-16 MOBA Mobile Automation AG Distance measurement system for a vehicle
CN114212745A (en) * 2022-01-17 2022-03-22 徐工消防安全装备有限公司 Aerial work platform, control method and storage medium
WO2022155542A1 (en) * 2021-01-15 2022-07-21 Oshkosh Corporation Systems and methods for controlling equipment via a connectivity module
US11718470B2 (en) 2018-10-02 2023-08-08 Oshkosh Corporation Grabber for a refuse vehicle
WO2024105628A1 (en) * 2022-11-17 2024-05-23 Haulotte Group Method and system for protecting an operator of an aerial lift against crushing and aerial lift comprising this system

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ITUA20163670A1 (en) * 2016-05-23 2017-11-23 Iveco Magirus CONTROL CENTER FOR AN AERIAL DEVICE INCLUDING CONTROL LEVER
AU2018236866A1 (en) * 2017-10-02 2019-04-18 SpaceCo Business Solutions, Inc. System for reducing injury from pinch zones in adjustable height work surface assemblies
US11919756B2 (en) 2020-02-04 2024-03-05 Xtreme Manufacturing, Llc Aerial work vehicle boom auxiliary control panel

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05124800A (en) * 1991-10-31 1993-05-21 Japanic:Kk Safety mechanism for high lift work vehicle
FR2836468A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-08-29 Pinguely Haulotte Lift cage for working at height has radar or ultrasound detectors to measure distance from obstacles and linked to controls and/or alarm
JP2011063352A (en) * 2009-09-16 2011-03-31 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The High lift work bucket with other object approach monitoring function
CN202030492U (en) * 2011-03-14 2011-11-09 湖南星邦重工有限公司 Anticollision detection for operation platform of high-altitude work vehicle
GB2495158A (en) * 2011-12-15 2013-04-03 Paul Richards An aerial lift with proximity sensors having a sensing zone opposite a platform control panel
US20150027808A1 (en) * 2013-07-23 2015-01-29 Paul D. Baillargeon Warning and message delivery and logging system utilizable in a fall arresting and prevention device and method of same

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2520284B2 (en) * 1988-05-11 1996-07-31 株式会社イーステック Crane collision prevention method
JPH04116282U (en) * 1991-03-29 1992-10-16 いすゞ自動車株式会社 Emergency stop device for track running vehicles
US5740887A (en) * 1996-01-18 1998-04-21 Jlg Industries, Inc. Drive system for vertical mast personnel lift
JP4744838B2 (en) * 2004-03-10 2011-08-10 新明和工業株式会社 Operating range control device for operating device in container handling vehicle
CN201272676Y (en) * 2008-08-13 2009-07-15 徐州重型机械有限公司 Engineering machinery working aloft and its working table monitoring system
CN103380075B (en) * 2010-12-20 2016-03-30 Jlg工业公司 The job platform continuing involuntary operation can be protected
JP2013010589A (en) * 2011-06-28 2013-01-17 Tadano Ltd Vehicle for high lift work
JP5897270B2 (en) * 2011-06-28 2016-03-30 株式会社タダノ Aerial work platform
JP2013052948A (en) * 2011-09-02 2013-03-21 West Nippon Expressway Co Ltd Safety device for vehicle for high lift work

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05124800A (en) * 1991-10-31 1993-05-21 Japanic:Kk Safety mechanism for high lift work vehicle
FR2836468A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-08-29 Pinguely Haulotte Lift cage for working at height has radar or ultrasound detectors to measure distance from obstacles and linked to controls and/or alarm
JP2011063352A (en) * 2009-09-16 2011-03-31 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The High lift work bucket with other object approach monitoring function
CN202030492U (en) * 2011-03-14 2011-11-09 湖南星邦重工有限公司 Anticollision detection for operation platform of high-altitude work vehicle
GB2495158A (en) * 2011-12-15 2013-04-03 Paul Richards An aerial lift with proximity sensors having a sensing zone opposite a platform control panel
US20150027808A1 (en) * 2013-07-23 2015-01-29 Paul D. Baillargeon Warning and message delivery and logging system utilizable in a fall arresting and prevention device and method of same

Cited By (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20200095105A1 (en) * 2018-09-20 2020-03-26 Oshkosh Corporation Systems and methods for restricting operation of a lift device
WO2020061322A1 (en) * 2018-09-20 2020-03-26 Oshkosh Corporation Systems and methods for restricting operation of a lift device
US12103830B2 (en) * 2018-09-20 2024-10-01 Oshkosh Corporation Systems and methods for restricting operation of a lift device
US11840433B2 (en) 2018-09-20 2023-12-12 Oshkosh Corporation Systems and methods for restricting operation of a lift device
US11718470B2 (en) 2018-10-02 2023-08-08 Oshkosh Corporation Grabber for a refuse vehicle
DE102019117455B3 (en) 2019-06-28 2020-08-06 Bär Management- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH Device and method for monitoring a tail lift for a vehicle
ES2802418A1 (en) * 2019-07-08 2021-01-19 Haro Jose Antonio Garcia Safety device for work at height (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)
CN112572819A (en) * 2019-09-27 2021-03-30 昕芙旎雅有限公司 Aircraft ground support vehicle
EP3835254A1 (en) * 2019-12-13 2021-06-16 MOBA Mobile Automation AG Distance measurement system for a vehicle
US12032057B2 (en) 2019-12-13 2024-07-09 Moba Mobile Automation Ag Distance measurement system for a vehicle
US11678148B2 (en) 2021-01-15 2023-06-13 Oshkosh Corporation Equipment visual status indicator system and method
US11638125B2 (en) 2021-01-15 2023-04-25 Oshkosh Corporation System and method for automatic generation of work site equipment groupings
WO2022155542A1 (en) * 2021-01-15 2022-07-21 Oshkosh Corporation Systems and methods for controlling equipment via a connectivity module
US11924716B2 (en) 2021-01-15 2024-03-05 Oskhosh Corporation Automatic connection to work site equipment groupings
US12004051B2 (en) 2021-01-15 2024-06-04 Oshkosh Corporation Onboard documentation system and methods
US12047850B2 (en) 2021-01-15 2024-07-23 Oshkosh Corporation Elevation based machine localization system and method
US12096313B2 (en) 2021-01-15 2024-09-17 Oshkosh Corporation Equipment visual status indicator system and method
CN114212745A (en) * 2022-01-17 2022-03-22 徐工消防安全装备有限公司 Aerial work platform, control method and storage medium
CN114212745B (en) * 2022-01-17 2024-10-11 徐工消防安全装备有限公司 Aerial work platform, control method and storage medium
WO2024105628A1 (en) * 2022-11-17 2024-05-23 Haulotte Group Method and system for protecting an operator of an aerial lift against crushing and aerial lift comprising this system
FR3142183A1 (en) * 2022-11-17 2024-05-24 Haulotte Group method and system for anti-crush protection of an aerial platform operator and aerial platform comprising this system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2016256781A1 (en) 2017-06-08
CA2946013A1 (en) 2017-05-24
ES2802462T3 (en) 2021-01-19
EP3725733A1 (en) 2020-10-21
CA2946013C (en) 2019-10-01
JP2019034857A (en) 2019-03-07
JP7014692B2 (en) 2022-02-01
CN106744549A (en) 2017-05-31
JP6411434B2 (en) 2018-10-24
JP2017095093A (en) 2017-06-01
EP3173369B1 (en) 2020-05-27
AU2016256781B2 (en) 2018-07-19
CN106744549B (en) 2019-04-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10358331B2 (en) Work platform with protection against sustained involuntary operation
EP3173369B1 (en) Working platform with protection against sustained involuntary operation
CN108529516B (en) obstacle detection system for aerial work platform
US9568939B2 (en) Tactile feedback for joystick position/speed controls
KR102539678B1 (en) shovel
KR101638839B1 (en) Approach and shutdown control system for heavy equipment
WO2020189578A1 (en) Work machine
JP2013052948A (en) Safety device for vehicle for high lift work
US11027953B2 (en) Method for monitoring the road path of a truck and a floor conveyor
CN107265365A (en) Strengthen the electro-optical system of operator's control station protection
JP2013052949A (en) Safety device for vehicle for high lift work
JP7480089B2 (en) Safety device, self-propelled robot system, and control method
JP2006144349A (en) Safety device for construction equipment
JP2021126770A5 (en)
JP2003238077A (en) Safety device for mobile crane
JP2019031823A5 (en)
RU2800466C2 (en) Rotary tower with ballast
KR20230153549A (en) Smart automatic braking device for construction epuipment and method thereof
KR20230167195A (en) Anti-collision system and method for construction machinery
KR20230161814A (en) Anti-collision device and method for construction machinery
CA3213696A1 (en) Loading dock detection system
AU2018201310A1 (en) Obstacle detection system for an aerial work platform

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20161111

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20181018

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602016036954

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: B66F0009075000

Ipc: B66F0011040000

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B66F 11/04 20060101AFI20200108BHEP

Ipc: B66F 17/00 20060101ALI20200108BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200123

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1274365

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016036954

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200828

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200827

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200928

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200927

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200527

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200827

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1274365

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200527

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2802462

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20210119

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602016036954

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20210302

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201111

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20201130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201111

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230507

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231123

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231124

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231120

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231121

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20240129

Year of fee payment: 8