EP3092321B1 - Method and probe for determining the material distribution in a blast furnace - Google Patents

Method and probe for determining the material distribution in a blast furnace Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3092321B1
EP3092321B1 EP15700646.1A EP15700646A EP3092321B1 EP 3092321 B1 EP3092321 B1 EP 3092321B1 EP 15700646 A EP15700646 A EP 15700646A EP 3092321 B1 EP3092321 B1 EP 3092321B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
burden
blast furnace
magnetic field
measuring probe
alternating magnetic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP15700646.1A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3092321A1 (en
Inventor
Jean-François STUMPER
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
TMT Tapping Measuring Technology SARL
Original Assignee
TMT Tapping Measuring Technology SARL
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by TMT Tapping Measuring Technology SARL filed Critical TMT Tapping Measuring Technology SARL
Publication of EP3092321A1 publication Critical patent/EP3092321A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3092321B1 publication Critical patent/EP3092321B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21B—MANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B7/00—Blast furnaces
    • C21B7/24—Test rods or other checking devices
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
    • F27B—FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS, OR RETORTS IN GENERAL; OPEN SINTERING OR LIKE APPARATUS
    • F27B1/00—Shaft or like vertical or substantially vertical furnaces
    • F27B1/10—Details, accessories, or equipment peculiar to furnaces of these types
    • F27B1/28—Arrangements of monitoring devices, of indicators, of alarm devices

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to a device and a method for determining the material distribution in the burden inside a blast furnace.
  • the present invention more specifically relates to a device and a method for determining the material distribution in the burden of a blast furnace based on its electrical conductivity without direct contact to the measuring device.
  • the determining of the material distribution in a blast furnace is a quantitative analysis of the radial distribution of various burden materials, e.g. coke and iron-ore materials.
  • burden materials e.g. coke and iron-ore materials.
  • the gas permeability is important for the process. To influence it, not a homogeneous mix of the burden is charged, but a well-defined scheme of different layers of coke and iron-ore materials. Thanks to the material distribution determinations, the shape and thickness of the material layers in a blast furnace can be determined and if necessary adjusted and optimized to improve the blast furnace performance.
  • JP2007-155570 proposes to determine the relative quantities of the charging material during the charging of the material from the hopper into the blast furnace.
  • the measurement method is characterized by placing the mixture of substances that differ by electromagnetic properties at the inner side of a hollow coil that is applied with alternating current, or by causing the mixture to pass through the axial direction of the coil.
  • the output voltage generated by the coil is measured and the mixture rate of the substances within the mixture is determined based on that output voltage.
  • An excitation coil and a measurement coil are disposed in the same axial direction, the mixture is then placed at the inner side of the coils or causing it to pass through the axial direction of the coils, the output voltage generated by the measurement coil is measured.
  • a calibration curve is obtained by measuring in advance the relationship between the mass of the substances and the output voltage generated by the coil, the mixture rate of the substances within the mixture is computed based on the calibration curve.
  • a more appropriate solution to determine the structure of layers in a blast furnace has been proposed in EP 1 029 085 .
  • a probe is repeatedly inserted horizontally and into the blast furnace below the burden surface.
  • a material detection sensor arranged at the tip of the probe indicates the presence of either coke or iron-ore materials. With the combination of the fast horizontal movement of the probe, and the slower vertical burden descent speed, an image of the material distribution is obtained.
  • the material detection sensor indicates the type of the burden material based on a measurable physical property of the burden material.
  • a first example is the magnetic permeability.
  • the magnetic permeability of ore-like material is high, whereas coke has a low magnetic permeability similar to the magnetic permeability of air.
  • Several methods have been developed to determine the magnetic permeability of the material in the blast furnace to draw conclusions on the material distribution.
  • a single coil is moved through a tube inside the blast furnace to measure the magnetic permeability of the material.
  • the auto-inductance of the coil is measured in the sensor coil. This value increases under the presence of magnetically permeable material within the magnetic field lines of said coil and, if this value is increased, ore is detected.
  • DE 26 55 297 a permanent magnet is aligned to a magnetic field sensor and installed into a blast furnace. The magnetic flux increases if a magnetically permeable material is within the field lines of the permanent magnet. If the magnetic field sensor indicates this increase of the magnetic flux, ore is detected.
  • the problem with the magnetic permeability in a material distribution measurement such as DE 26 55 297 is that a large temperature range is present, normally ranging from 100°C near the blast furnace wall to 900°C or more in the blast furnace center. At this temperature, the magnetic permeability of iron ore disappears as the material temperature is beyond the Curie-Point. For Iron-ore III (Fe 2 O 3 ) the Curie-Point is at 675°C and for Iron-ore II-III (Fe 3 O 4 ) the Curie-Point is at 585°C. The property to distinguish the materials is therefore disappearing.
  • the magnetic permeability cannot be used for measuring the material distribution in blast furnaces in a temperature range around the Curie-Point and in particular above the Curie-Point.
  • a second example of a property to determine the burden type is the remaining magnetism of iron ores.
  • a strong magnetic field is generated to excite the self-magnetism of ores. This field is then switched off and a sensing device can detect ore via the remaining magnetic field.
  • a third example is the radar wave absorption of ore, as proposed in EP 0 101 219 .
  • the radar wave absorption of ores is higher than that of coke.
  • Radar wave antennas for emitting and receiving radar waves are arranged inside the blast furnace.
  • the material situated between the radar wave antennas is identified based on the reflection and absorption of the radar waves.
  • the disadvantage of the radar based measurement is that radar devices are rather fragile, especially the waveguide and antenna components, and an installation in a below-burden probe is technically very problematic.
  • a fourth example is based on the electrical conductivity of coke and iron ore as described in EP 1 029 085 and in DE 31 05 380 .
  • the electrical conductivity is the preferable method as the conductivity of coke is known to persist to temperatures of 1300°C and more.
  • the material distribution is measured by inserting a probe horizontally into the blast furnace as described in EP 1 029 085 .
  • Two electrodes are arranged on or near the tip of the probe, separated from each other by an isolator and connected to each other by means of an electric measuring circuit.
  • the electric measuring circuit determines the signal quantity of the electric circuit when the tip of the sensor is inserted into the blast furnace.
  • the signal quantity depends on the electric conductivity of the burden material around the sensor in the blast furnace.
  • the electric circuit closes when the electrodes connect through a layer of conductive materials.
  • the tip of the sensor passes through a layer of non-conductive material the electrodes do not connect. Due to the difference between the measurement of a conductive material and a non-conductive material, the probe is capable of determining which materials are present nearby.
  • a more efficient method or device is thus required for measuring the material distribution inside the burden of a blast furnace, after the materials have been charged into the blast furnace.
  • the present invention proposes a measuring probe for determining a material distribution in a burden in a blast furnace without direct contact by inserting the probe into the burden inside the blast furnace.
  • the measuring probe comprises:
  • the probe can determine, in real-time so to say, the material distribution inside the burden of the blast furnace at any temperature of the material above, beneath or at the Curie-Point. Contrary to the magnetic permeability of the material, the electrical conductivity is a suitable characteristic that is reliable throughout the range of temperatures in the blast furnace.
  • the senor can determine the material distribution without directly contacting the burden. Since the sensor is placed inside a protective shell, it is protected against heat and abrasion. The sensor is thus not directly submitted to the harsh blast furnace conditions and thus lasts longer.
  • the main factors that affect lifetime are massive dust, a chemically reactive and corrosive atmosphere, extreme heat, and forces from the burden leading to abrasion or destruction. The lifetime of the measuring probe is thus increased compared to the prior art sensors as described i.e. in EP 1 029 085 .
  • the measuring probe according to the invention is insensitive to dust, especially towards dust deposits on the protective shell in front of the sensor. Dust particles cause only a very weak, hardly detectable eddy current, which does not perturb the measurement results.
  • the solution of abrasion to remove dust deposits, necessary to put EP 1 029 085 in practice, is not required anymore.
  • the material does not pass through the inner side of a hollow coil.
  • the sensor can be applied directly onto the inside of the protective shell.
  • the sensor can be applied on a support or a supporting layer, which is applied onto the inner side of the protective shell.
  • the sensor is arranged between the protective shell and the supporting layer.
  • the support has to be temperature resistant and has to be non-conductive such as e.g. soapstone or Mica.
  • said protective shell comprises a ceramic material that is not electrically conductive.
  • the sensor is thereby sufficiently well protected against the heat and abrasion inside the blast furnace. Good measurement results are obtained with a protective shell with a thickness in the range between 10 to 25 mm.
  • the shell is preferably an annular cylinder.
  • the transmitter coil and the receiver coil are preferably arranged such, that the magnetic flux of the transmitter coil is concentric with the magnetic flux of the receiver coil.
  • the coils are designed such that their magnetic fields interfere only marginally.
  • Several independent sensors can then be arranged at the tip of the probe inside the same protective shell. This considerably increases the resolution of the material distribution determination. Furthermore, such an arrangement of multiple sensors decreases the requirements of the fast horizontal speed of the probe as is required in the prior art.
  • the contacting electrodes as used in EP 1 029 085 have to be sufficiently strong to support the blast furnace burden forces. Consequently, the electrodes on the probe are massive steel rings, which are exposed to the hot burden. Only one measuring sensor can be placed at the probe tip. As only one measurement signal is available, this leads to a limitation of the measurement resolution and the requirement for a high horizontal speed of the probe.
  • the transmitter coil has a transmitting surface in the range of 1 to 20 cm 2 .
  • the size of the transmitting surface determines the measuring spot by shaping the magnetic field that shall excite the eddy current in the burden. The larger the transmitting surface, the larger will be the measuring spot.
  • the receiver coil has a receiver surface in the range of 5 to 50 cm 2 .
  • a larger size will increase the signal strength, as the received signal is influenced less by the primary magnetic field, but more by the secondary magnetic field from the eddy currents.
  • an alternating current with a frequency between 0.5 to 5 MHz and a magnitude between 1 to 10 mA is applied to the transmitter coil.
  • the frequency is selected high enough such that sufficient eddy currents are created in the coke, which is known to have a resistivity of 2-6 ⁇ cm at 300°C, and of 0.5-2 ⁇ m at 1300°C.
  • rather long cables can be used to transmit the signal of the transmitter coil to the control unit. For frequencies higher than 5 MHz, the signal generated by the transmitter coil may not be reliably transmitted to the electronic control unit through the rather long cables.
  • the magnitude is selected high enough for a reasonable signal-to-noise ratio. A magnitude higher than 10 mA could be seen as a safety risk as it might theoretically cause electric sparks in case of a sensor malfunction.
  • the transmitter coil and the receiver coil are preferably of a circular or rectangular shape.
  • the skilled person is however capable of shaping the transmitter coil and the receiver coil according to his needs.
  • the probe can be arranged movably in a horizontal direction with regard to the blast furnace shell, such that the probe is inserted into the blast furnace for determining the material distribution therein. Due to the movable arrangement, the material distribution can be determined at different horizontal locations in the blast furnace by changing the position of the probe arranged therein, as described in EP 1 029 085 .
  • the horizontal traveling speed is preferably superior to the burden descent speed so that the composition of the burden (i.e. the radial material distribution) can be measured by collecting the data during the repeated movements.
  • the probe is arranged fixedly inside the blast furnace on the blast furnace shell, below the top surface of the burden.
  • the probe is preferably in short distance from the blast furnace wall, and the probe setup can be similar as in the "citoblock" system described in DE 31 05 380 .
  • Such a probe can then measure the timely evolution of the material at a fixed radius inside the blast furnace. The goal is to obtain the quantity and the material type (i.e. the material distribution) at one radial location as a function of time.
  • the present invention also concerns a method for determining a material distribution inside a burden in a blast furnace.
  • the method comprises the following steps:
  • the evaluation of the electrical current is used for controlling a distributor chute of the blast furnace.
  • the charging of the material may be adapted based on the measurements carried out by a method or device according to the invention.
  • the probe and the method allows thus to determine the radial material distribution and/or the shape, the size and the composition of the burden layers.
  • the signal i.e. the electrical current generated by the primary alternating magnetic field and the secondary alternating magnetic field with a receiver coil
  • the signal is preferably processed using a model.
  • the burden distribution in the sense of the material positioning inside the burden column.
  • the model result such as described below in more detail is used to understand and optimize the blast furnace process and, if necessary, to adjust the material distribution program of the charging chute.
  • a schematic arrangement of a measuring probe 2 according to a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention is represented in fig. 1 .
  • the measuring probe 2 can measure the material type of the burden material in a blast furnace via its electrical conductivity without direct contact between the sensor i.e. the transmitter coil 4 and the receiver coil 6 and the burden material 14.
  • a number of measurements in a horizontal and / or vertical dimension allows to determine the material distribution in the burden of a blast furnace.
  • the protective shell 8 is made of a ceramic material that withstands extreme conditions, especially the temperature variations and the forces from the burden and friction in the blast furnace.
  • the protective shell 8 has a thickness in the range between 10 and 25 mm. As the ceramic material is harder than the blast furnace burden, it can withstand abrasion during a long operation time. As the measurements are carried out while the blast furnace is operated, the ceramic protective shell 8 protects the transmitter coil 4 and the receiver coil 6 from being damaged when the probe is inserted into or moved through the burden.
  • the measuring probe 2 comprises a transmitter coil 4 and a receiver coil 6.
  • the transmitter coil 4 generates a primary alternating magnetic field and the receiver coil 6 receives an alternating magnetic field.
  • the transmitter coil 4 and the receiver coil 6 are directly arranged on the protective shell 8.
  • the probe has a length of about 5 m in the case of a movable probe, and a length of about 1 m in the case of a fixed probe.
  • the sensor is arranged near the tip of the probe, such that the sensor can be inserted into the blast furnace.
  • the transmitter coil 4 and the receiver coil 6 are electrically connected to the evaluation and control unit 10, which is situated outside of the blast furnace by electrically conductive wires (not shown).
  • the transmitter coil 4 and the receiver coil 6 When the measuring probe 2 in fig. 1 is viewed from above, the transmitter coil 4 and the receiver coil 6 have a circular shape and are separated from the burden material 14 by the protective shell 8.
  • the transmitter coil 4 and the receiver coil 6 are arranged such that their magnetic fields are concentric.
  • the surface of the transmitter coil 4 is between 1 to 20 cm 2 and the surface of the receiver coil 6 is between 5 to 50 cm 2 .
  • the ratio of the surfaces of the two coils is thus between 1:1 and 1:50 (transmitter surface: receiver surface).
  • the measurement range i.e. the volume of the material to be measured can be adapted by changing some of the parameters for generating and receiving the alternating magnetic fields.
  • the frequency of the signal applied to the transmitter coil 4 can be increased or reduced and/or the surface of the transmitter coil 4 and/or the receiver coil 6 can be increased or reduced.
  • the measurement volume of the alternating magnetic fields can be reduced, enlarged or shaped accordingly. In this particular preferred embodiment of the invention, the volume to be measured roughly corresponds to an elliptical hemisphere.
  • the surface of the receiver coil 6 is chosen such that it is possible to determine the material distribution of the burden through the protective shell arranged between the burden material 14 and the measurement sensor.
  • the minimal distance between the burden material 14 and the coils 4, 6 is determined by the thickness of the protective shell. If the sensitivity is not satisfactory, the surface of the receiver coil 6 has to be enlarged or the shell thickness reduced.
  • the protective shell 108 is an annular cylinder, in which four sensors are arranged. The measuring volume of each individual sensor covers about one quarter of the cylinder circumference.
  • the annular cylinder is installed on the tip of a horizontal probe, there is one measuring spot on the top, two in the center, and one at the bottom.
  • the material type is detected at three different vertical positions, contributing to a three times higher vertical resolution of the measurement compared to a probe with only one measuring sensor.
  • the transmitter coils 104a, 104b, 104c and 104d in fig. 2 and the transmitter coil 4 in fig. 1 are operatively connected to an alternating current power source 12 as illustrated in fig. 1 .
  • an alternating current applied to the transmitter coil as shown in figs. 3 and 4 emits the primary alternating magnetic field 16.
  • alternating currents with a frequency of about 2MHz and a magnitude of 5mA are applied.
  • no conductive material is brought in the range of the primary alternating magnetic field 16
  • no eddy currents are induced in the conductive material and no secondary alternating magnetic field is generated.
  • the conductive object Before the resistance of a conductive material can be measured, the conductive object has to be in range of the primary alternating magnetic field 16.
  • the primary alternating magnetic field 16 is limited amongst others by the size and shape of the transmitter coil 4.
  • the burden material 14 is brought into the primary alternating magnetic field 16.
  • the primary alternating magnetic field 16 in fig. 5 induces eddy currents 18 in the burden material 14.
  • the induced eddy currents 18 generate a secondary alternating magnetic field 20.
  • the control and evaluation unit 10 evaluates the measurements based on the primary alternating magnetic field 16 and the secondary alternating magnetic field 20 measured by the receiver coil 6.
  • the magnitude of the electrical current in the receiver coil 6 is indicative of the electrical resistance of the burden material 14.
  • an electrical current output of a receiver coil is represented. If the burden material 14 is ore, or if there is no burden material, the measured electrical current in the receiver coil 6 is higher than or equal to 5 mA. When coke is within the primary alternating magnetic field, the electrical current in the receiver coil is inferior to 5 mA, typically about 10% lower than the value if there is no material, thereby as low as 4.5 mA.
  • the current of the receiver coil is compared to a threshold value 24.
  • the threshold value 24 is set to 4.9 mA.
  • the person skilled in the art is capable of adjusting the threshold value 24 according to his needs. This is usually done during calibration. For calibrating the measuring probe, an AC current is applied to the alternating transmitter coil 4 when no conductive object but coke dust is in the primary alternating magnetic field 16. This leads to the calibration value 22.
  • the threshold value 24 is defined a bit lower to account for measurement noise and to prevent dust influence. Each change in electrical current in the receiver coil below the threshold value 24 is indicative of the presence of electrically conductive burden material 14 in the primary alternating magnetic field 16.
  • the current of the receiver coil 6 is amongst others a function of electrical conductivity of the burden material 14.
  • the electrical conductivity is a characteristic that is reliable throughout the entire range of temperatures in the blast furnace. It is therefore suitable as a characteristic for determining the material distribution.
  • the system is designed to have a good response towards conductivity.
  • the secondary alternating magnetic field 20 depends on the magnetic permeability of the burden material 14 at temperatures below the Curie-Point.
  • the influence of magnetic permeability is approximately equal to or less than +2% different from the calibration value 22. This influence is not relevant as the measurement signal for the presence of coke is between 0 to - 10% different from the calibration value 22. Changes in temperature or a constant magnetic flux do not influence the measurement. Small coke and dust particles do not have a notable influence on the measurement.
  • the probe as illustrated in fig. 6 is inserted into the blast furnace.
  • a movable probe as well as a fixed probe are used in this blast furnace for determining the material distribution therein.
  • At least one sensor 2 is arranged near the tip of a horizontally movable measuring probe.
  • the probe is inserted into a blast furnace that has a diameter of approximately 10 m.
  • the measurements are taken at about 4 m beneath the surface of the burden, typically in a region before the material starts to soften.
  • a travel from the blast furnace shell to the blast furnace center and back to the blast furnace shell takes about 50 seconds. This fast horizontal movement is repeated sequentially. Simultaneously, the burden is descending slowly but constantly with a speed of approximately 12 cm/min.
  • the measurement signal is recorded continuously at every point and compared to the threshold value 24. In this way, an image of the material distribution as illustrated in fig. 7 is obtained.
  • the data received from the sensor 2 is arranged in a x-y plot, with the x-axis representing the radius of the blast furnace and the y-axis representing the height of the blast furnace.
  • the pixels in fig. 7 correspond to the measured material distribution in the blast furnace. Each pixel represents about 10 cm x 10 cm of burden.
  • the process gas can basically pass upwards through the coke 26 along this central chimney, but hardly through the layers of ore-like burden 28. This is the central chimney for the process gas that escapes upwards.
  • the layers are arranged such that the process gas can get in contact with the bottom parts of the ore-like material layers.
  • the temperature at which the material distribution is measured according to this particularly preferred embodiment of the invention ranges from about 100°C near the blast furnace wall to 900°C or more in the blast furnace center. Especially in the central chimney of the blast furnace, which is the inner radius up to 1 m, the temperature reaches extreme peaks. On the other hand, the size of this chimney is one of the major information that should result from the measurement. For the typical iron ores used in blast furnaces, the Curie-Point is well below these temperatures. The magnetic properties that differ ore-like material from coke disappear. However, as the measurement is based on the electrical conductivity, and as the conductivity of coke remains intact at the present temperatures, the material distribution is determined at a temperature above, at or beneath the Curie-Point and beneath the melting point of the material.
  • the material distribution program of the charging chute of the blast furnace is adjusted according to the desired material distribution. If an undesired material distribution is determined, the material distribution program of the charging chute is corrected.
  • the target is to improve the efficiency, the productivity and the lifetime of the blast furnace by optimizing the charging.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Magnetic Means (AREA)
  • Blast Furnaces (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Iron (AREA)
EP15700646.1A 2014-01-09 2015-01-08 Method and probe for determining the material distribution in a blast furnace Active EP3092321B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
LU92351A LU92351B1 (en) 2014-01-09 2014-01-09 Method and probe for determining the material distribution in a blast furnace
PCT/EP2015/050191 WO2015104306A1 (en) 2014-01-09 2015-01-08 Method and probe for determining the material distribution in a blast furnace

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3092321A1 EP3092321A1 (en) 2016-11-16
EP3092321B1 true EP3092321B1 (en) 2017-10-04

Family

ID=49943444

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15700646.1A Active EP3092321B1 (en) 2014-01-09 2015-01-08 Method and probe for determining the material distribution in a blast furnace

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3092321B1 (ru)
JP (1) JP6298166B2 (ru)
CN (1) CN105899688B (ru)
LU (1) LU92351B1 (ru)
RU (1) RU2663015C2 (ru)
WO (1) WO2015104306A1 (ru)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108143262A (zh) * 2016-12-02 2018-06-12 佛山市顺德区美的电热电器制造有限公司 分体式电压力锅
CN108143264A (zh) * 2016-12-02 2018-06-12 佛山市顺德区美的电热电器制造有限公司 分体式电压力锅
CN108143256A (zh) * 2016-12-02 2018-06-12 佛山市顺德区美的电热电器制造有限公司 分体式电压力锅
CN108143263A (zh) * 2016-12-02 2018-06-12 佛山市顺德区美的电热电器制造有限公司 分体式电压力锅
CN113465660B (zh) * 2021-05-25 2022-07-05 湖南大学 基于电导率的非接触式测温及物料成分检测装置与方法
CN113219150B (zh) * 2021-06-23 2022-09-27 重庆钢铁股份有限公司 小焦炉实验装置及小焦炉两用方法

Family Cites Families (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU511223B2 (en) 1975-08-20 1980-08-07 Mishima Kosan Co. Ltd. Metal refining method and apparatus
IT1068013B (it) 1976-03-15 1985-03-21 Nippon Steel Corp Apparato per la condotta di un forno
DE3105380A1 (de) * 1981-02-14 1982-10-21 Neue Technik Entwicklung und Vertrieb F. Block, 5106 Roetgen "messverfahren"
EP0101219B1 (en) * 1982-08-03 1986-05-14 Nippon Steel Corporation Method and apparatus for supervising charges in blast furnace
JPS6223913A (ja) * 1985-07-24 1987-01-31 Nippon Steel Corp 高炉操業法
US4776884A (en) * 1987-05-19 1988-10-11 China Steel Corporation Process for determining the arrangement of the layered charges in a blast furnace prior to smelting
GB2205162B (en) * 1987-05-29 1991-03-06 China Steel Corp Process for determining the arrangement of the layered charges in a blast furnace prior to smelting
DE3722795A1 (de) * 1987-07-10 1989-01-19 Amepa Vorrichtung zum detektieren von in einem fluss einer metallschmelze mitfliessender schlacke
JP2635844B2 (ja) * 1991-04-12 1997-07-30 古河電気工業株式会社 導電膜検査方法およびその装置
US5552704A (en) * 1993-06-25 1996-09-03 Tencor Instruments Eddy current test method and apparatus for measuring conductance by determining intersection of lift-off and selected curves
US5911020A (en) * 1995-01-17 1999-06-08 Remote Source Lighting International Inc. Bi-planar multiport illuminator optic design for light guides
NL1005160C2 (nl) * 1997-01-31 1998-08-03 Roentgen Tech Dienst Bv Inrichting voor het bepalen van eigenschappen van een elektrisch geleidend voorwerp.
DE69834515D1 (de) 1997-08-20 2006-06-14 Moscow State Inst Of Steel And Sensor zum Bestimmen der Verteilung von Einsatzgut in einem metallurgischen Ofen
RU2243266C1 (ru) * 2003-10-15 2004-12-27 Открытое акционерное общество "Северсталь" Способ определения давления шихты в шахтной печи
RU2277588C1 (ru) * 2005-05-05 2006-06-10 ЗАО "Научно-производственный и коммерческий центр "ТОТЕМ" Устройство для измерения уровня и профиля засыпи шихты в шахтной печи
JP4826239B2 (ja) * 2005-12-07 2011-11-30 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 混合物の混合率計測方法および計測装置
CN101492750B (zh) * 2008-12-30 2010-12-29 北京科技大学 基于工业相控阵雷达的高炉料面测量与控制系统
CN102816883B (zh) * 2012-06-18 2013-12-11 北京科技大学 一种雷达、视频、激光系统组合的测量高炉料面的装置
CN102912054B (zh) * 2012-11-13 2014-07-23 北京航空航天大学 一种基于mimo的高炉雷达测量料面的装置

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6298166B2 (ja) 2018-03-20
JP2017503075A (ja) 2017-01-26
CN105899688B (zh) 2017-10-13
CN105899688A (zh) 2016-08-24
RU2663015C2 (ru) 2018-08-01
RU2016132588A (ru) 2018-02-14
EP3092321A1 (en) 2016-11-16
WO2015104306A1 (en) 2015-07-16
LU92351B1 (en) 2015-07-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3092321B1 (en) Method and probe for determining the material distribution in a blast furnace
KR101787140B1 (ko) 야금 용기들에서의 측정
US20100315080A1 (en) metal detector
CA2737969C (en) Method and apparatus for a non contact metal sensing device
CN108291831A (zh) 在冶金容器或炉中将铁转化为钢的过程中测量液体和固体材料的方法和系统
JPH0671642B2 (ja) 溶融金属浴の表面レベルの制御方法
CN112649587A (zh) 一种结合电磁传感器和光电传感器的金属分类装置及方法
RU2356684C2 (ru) Устройство для обнаружения содержания шлака в потоке жидкого металла
CN103797339B (zh) 冶金容器中的水准测量
EP3814728B1 (en) A detection system for detecting the level of metal in a melting furnace
JP4826239B2 (ja) 混合物の混合率計測方法および計測装置
US3123712A (en) spooner
US4718644A (en) Slag sensor taphole assembly
KR101134620B1 (ko) 고로의 용탕 탐지 장치
JPS6360801B2 (ru)
GB1574834A (en) Monitoring a blast furnace during operation and controlling operation of the furnace accordingly
JP2006234535A (ja) 渦流探傷試験用プローブ
JPS59104407A (ja) 高炉の装入物分布検出装置
KR20010063081A (ko) 용철의 탕면 측정방법 및 측정프로브
Huo et al. Theoretical Analysis and Experiment on Slag Detection System Based on Eddy Current Effect in Continuous Casting
JPS61153221A (ja) 装入物流動化検知方法およびその装置
JP2011195955A (ja) 高炉操業方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160608

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170620

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 934096

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20171015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602015005188

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: RO

Ref legal event code: EPE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180104

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Payment date: 20171220

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180105

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180104

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180204

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602015005188

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180705

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180131

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20150108

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20200103

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: UEP

Ref document number: 934096

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20171004

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20231115

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20231113

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231114

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231114

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20231113

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20231115

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231113

Year of fee payment: 10