EP3013155A1 - Procédés et compositions pour améliorer la valeur nutritive d'une biomasse lignocellulosique - Google Patents

Procédés et compositions pour améliorer la valeur nutritive d'une biomasse lignocellulosique

Info

Publication number
EP3013155A1
EP3013155A1 EP14732167.3A EP14732167A EP3013155A1 EP 3013155 A1 EP3013155 A1 EP 3013155A1 EP 14732167 A EP14732167 A EP 14732167A EP 3013155 A1 EP3013155 A1 EP 3013155A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
activity
feed
enzyme
feed additive
additive composition
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP14732167.3A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Luis Fernando ROMERO MILLÁN
Shukun Yu
Maria Walsh
Suzanne Lantz
Colin Mitchinson
Ben BOWER
Susan ARENT
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS
Original Assignee
DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS filed Critical DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS
Publication of EP3013155A1 publication Critical patent/EP3013155A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K10/00—Animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K10/10—Animal feeding-stuffs obtained by microbiological or biochemical processes
    • A23K10/14—Pretreatment of feeding-stuffs with enzymes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K10/00—Animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K10/10—Animal feeding-stuffs obtained by microbiological or biochemical processes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K10/00—Animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K10/30—Animal feeding-stuffs from material of plant origin, e.g. roots, seeds or hay; from material of fungal origin, e.g. mushrooms
    • A23K10/32—Animal feeding-stuffs from material of plant origin, e.g. roots, seeds or hay; from material of fungal origin, e.g. mushrooms from hydrolysates of wood or straw
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Y—ENZYMES
    • C12Y302/00—Hydrolases acting on glycosyl compounds, i.e. glycosylases (3.2)
    • C12Y302/01—Glycosidases, i.e. enzymes hydrolysing O- and S-glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
    • C12Y302/01004—Cellulase (3.2.1.4), i.e. endo-1,4-beta-glucanase
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Y—ENZYMES
    • C12Y302/00—Hydrolases acting on glycosyl compounds, i.e. glycosylases (3.2)
    • C12Y302/01—Glycosidases, i.e. enzymes hydrolysing O- and S-glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
    • C12Y302/01008—Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (3.2.1.8)
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Y—ENZYMES
    • C12Y302/00—Hydrolases acting on glycosyl compounds, i.e. glycosylases (3.2)
    • C12Y302/01—Glycosidases, i.e. enzymes hydrolysing O- and S-glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
    • C12Y302/01021—Beta-glucosidase (3.2.1.21)
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P60/00—Technologies relating to agriculture, livestock or agroalimentary industries
    • Y02P60/80—Food processing, e.g. use of renewable energies or variable speed drives in handling, conveying or stacking
    • Y02P60/87—Re-use of by-products of food processing for fodder production

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods and compositions to improve the nutritional value of lignocellulosic biomass.
  • the present invention relates to methods and compositions which result in lignocellulosic biomass being a suitable replacement to conventionally used starch from grains in animal feed.
  • lignocellulosic biomass has not been sufficient to render it a viable alternative to high energy feedstuffs, such as grain.
  • Cellulose is an organic compound with the formula (C 6 H 10 O 5 ) n , a polysaccharide consisting of a linear chain of ⁇ (1 ⁇ 4) linked D-glucose units.
  • Hemicellulose is any of several heteropolymers (matrix polysaccharides) present along with cellulose in almost all plant cell walls. Hemicelluloses include xylan, glucuronoxylan, arabinoxylan, glucomannan, and xyloglucan. Hemicelluloses contain many different sugar monomers. For instance, besides glucose, sugar monomers in hemicellulose can include xylose, mannose, galactose, rhamnose, and arabinose. Hemicelluloses contain most of the D-pentose (C-5) sugars, and occasionally small amounts of L-sugars as well. Xylose is in most cases the sugar monomer present in the largest amount, although in softwoods mannose can be the most abundant sugar.
  • C-5 D-pentose
  • Schutte suggested that ileal and faecal digestibility of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), gross energy (GE), and nitrogen (N), as well as N retention, decreased significantly in pigs fed on very high dosages of D-xylose (e.g. 200g D-xylose/kg diet). Schutte (1991 ) also found that at 10% inclusion in pig diets, 50% of the xylose energy appeared in the urine. Verstegen et al (J. Animal. Physiol, a. Anim. Nutr. 77 (1997) 180-188) conducted a trial in pigs to evaluate xylose as an energy source for pigs.
  • Figure 1 shows the glucose and xylose yield obtained from treating DaCS (dilute ammonium pre-treated corn stover) with Cellulase SC.
  • Figure 2 shows the release of glucose and xylose from DaCS using Accellerase ⁇ TrioTM, Cellulase SC or Cellulase SC + endoxylanase.
  • Figure 3 shows the release of sugars from DaCS by Accellerase ® TrioTM, Cellulase SC118, Cellulase 151 and SC1 8 + xylanase.
  • Figure 4 shows hydrolysis of DaCS by Accellerase ® TrioTM, Cellulase SC and Cellulase SC + 4 different endoxylanases.
  • Figure 5 shows a HPLC chromatogram of DaCS hydrolyzate produced by Accellerase ® TrioTM, 30 ⁇ .
  • Figure 6 shows a HPLC chromatogram of DaCS hydrolyzate produced by Cellulase SC and Cellulase SC in combination with endoxylanase (SoloC1 18, 50 ⁇ !_.
  • Figure 7 shows hydrolysis of DaCS by Accellerase ® TrioTM, Cellulase SC and Cellulase SC + endoxylanases.
  • Figure 8 shows solubilization of DaCS (weight of DaCS residue, g) with or without cellulose SC1 18 and endoxylanase Danisco XylanaseTM (see EP1222256 which is incorporated herein by reference) at 50°C pH5.0 for 40h.
  • Figure 9 shows solubilization of DaCS (% solubilized material) with or without cellulose SC1 18 and endoxylanase Danisco XylanaseTM at 50°C pH5.0 for 40h.
  • Figure 10 shows release of monosugars from DaCS by Cellulase SC1 18 and the dose effect of xylanase Danisco XylanaseTM at 50°C pH5.0 for 40h.
  • Figure 11 shows release of sugars (monomeric+polymeric forms) from DaCS by Cellulase SC1 18 and the dose effect of xylanase Danisco XylanaseTM at 50°C pH5.0 for 40h.
  • Figure 12 shows feed intake and body weight gain in broilers fed xylose as an energy source.
  • Figure 13 shows body weight at day 21 in broilers fed xylose as an energy source.
  • Figure 14 shows feed conversion ratio dO-21 in broilers fed xylose as an energy source.
  • Figure 15 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 1 ) encoding an endoxylanase (FoxXyn6). The signal sequence is shown in bold (upper case).
  • Figure 16 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 2) encoding an endoxylanase (FoxXyn6).
  • Figure 17 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 3) of an endoxylanase (FoxXyn6). This is the active form of the enzyme (e.g. the mature form of the enzyme).
  • Figure 18 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 4) encoding an endoxylanase (FoxXyn4).
  • the signal sequence is shown bold (upper case).
  • Figure 19 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 5) encoding an endoxylanase (FoxXyn4).
  • Figure 20 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 6) of an endoxylanase (FoxXyn4). This is the active form of the enzyme (e.g. the mature form of the enzyme).
  • Figure 21 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 7) encoding an endoglucanase (EG1 ) from Aspergillus niger (CBS513.88).
  • Figure 22 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 8) of an endoglucanase (EG1 ) from Aspergillus niger (CBS513.88).
  • Figure 23 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 9) encoding an endoglucanase (EG2) from Aspergillus niger CBS513.88.
  • Figure 24 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 10) of an endoglucanase (EG2) from Aspergillus niger CBS513.88.
  • Figure 25 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 1 1) encoding an endoxylanase.
  • Figure 26 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 12) of an endoxylanase.
  • Figure 27 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 13) encoding a ⁇ -glucosidase from Aspergillus niger CBS513.88.
  • Figure 28 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 14) of a ⁇ -glucosidase from Aspergillus niger CBS513.88.
  • Figure 29 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 15) encoding a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase from Aspergillus n/o/er CBS513.88.
  • Figure 30 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 16) of a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase from Aspergillus niger CBS513.88.
  • Figure 31 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 17) encoding a CHB1A from Aspergillus niger (CBS513.88).
  • Figure 32 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 18) of a CHB1A from Aspergillus n/ger (CBS513.88).
  • Figure 33 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 19) encoding a CHB1 B from Aspergillus niger (CBS513.88).
  • Figure 34 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 20) of a CHB1 B from Aspergillus /?/ger (CBS513.88).
  • Figure 35 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 21 ) encoding a CHB1 from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 36 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 22) of a CHB1 from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 37 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 23) encoding a CHB2 from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 38 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 24) of a CHB2 from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 39 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 25) encoding an endoglucanase (EG1) from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 40 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 26) of an endoglucanase (EG1) from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 41 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 27) encoding an endoglucanase (EG2) from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 42 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 28) of an endoglucanase (EG2) from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 43 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 29) encoding an endoglucanase (EG3) from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 44 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 30) of an endoglucanase (EG3) from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 45 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 31) encoding a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 46 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 32) of a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 47 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 33) encoding an endoxylanase from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 48 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 34) of an endoxylanase from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 49 shows a nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 35) encoding a ⁇ -glucosidase from Trichoderma reesei.
  • Figure 50 shows a polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID No. 36) of a ⁇ -glucosidase from Trichoderma reesei.
  • the present invention provides a method of preparing a feed additive composition comprising:
  • the present invention provides a use of an enzyme composition, wherein the enzyme composition comprises at least the following activities: endoglucanase activity, ⁇ -glucosidase activity and endoxylanase activity and wherein the enzyme composition comprises no, or substantially no, ⁇ -xylosidase activity and/or a- L-arabinofuranosidase activity c, incubating same for at least about 3-120 hours, preferably 6-48 hours, d and optionally drying and/or optionally packaging
  • the present invention provides a use of an enzyme composition, wherein the enzyme composition comprises at least the following activities: endoglucanase activity, ⁇ - glucosidase activity and endoxylanase activity and wherein the enzyme composition comprises no, or substantially no, ⁇ -xylosidase activity and/
  • a further aspect of the present invention is a feed additive composition obtainable (e.g. obtained) by a method of the present invention.
  • a feed additive composition or a feed ingredient comprising a physically and/or chemically and/or biologically pre-treated lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysed with an enzyme composition, wherein the enzyme composition comprises at least the following: an endoglucanase, a ⁇ -glucosidase and an endoxylanase activity and no, or substantially no, ⁇ -xylosidase activity and/or a-L-arabinofuranosidase activity.
  • a further aspect of the present invention provides a feed or feedstuff comprising a feed additive composition or feed ingredient according to the present invention or a feed additive composition obtainable (preferably obtained) by a method or use of the present invention.
  • a premix comprising a feed additive composition or feed ingredient according to the present invention or a feed additive composition obtainable (preferably obtained) by a method or use of the present invention, and at least one mineral and/or at least one vitamin.
  • the present invention yet further provides a method of preparing a feedstuff comprising contacting a feed component with a feed additive composition or feed ingredient according to the present invention or a feed additive composition obtainable (preferably obtained) by a method or use of the present invention.
  • the present invention also provides a method for improving a biophysical characteristic of an animal which method comprises administering to an animal a feed additive composition obtainable (e.g. obtained) by a method of the present invention or a feed additive composition according to the present invention or a premix according to the present invention or a feedstuff according to the present invention or a feedstuff obtainable (e.g. obtained) by a method of the present invention.
  • a feed additive composition obtainable (e.g. obtained) by a method or use of the present invention or a feed additive composition according to the present invention or a premix according to the present invention or a feedstuff according to the present invention or a feedstuff obtainable (e.g. obtained) by a method of the present invention for improving a biophysical characteristic of an animal.
  • the enzyme composition comprises no, or substantially no, ⁇ - xylosidase activity and no, or substantially no, a-L-arabinofuranosidase activity.
  • the enzyme composition may further comprise one or more enzyme selected from the group consisting of: a cellobiohydrolase I and a cellobiohydrolase II.
  • the enzyme composition may further comprise a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase.
  • C-5 monomer sugars e.g. xylose
  • the inventors research has shown that high levels of C-5 monomer sugars (e.g. xylose) in feed can have negative consequences on the health of an animal ingesting the feed.
  • the inventors determined that the C-5 monomer sugars should preferably be removed from any lignocellulosic biomass prior to feeding to an animal.
  • the present inventors have now found a unique method for treatment of lignocellulosic biomass with an enzyme composition which can result in a feedstuff or a feed additive composition having a reduced level of C-5 monomer sugars (such as xylose) whilst maintaining high levels of C-6 oligomer and monomer sugars which are beneficial (e.g. nutritional) to the animals. It was surprising that if one removed the C-5 carbohydrate monomer forming activities that a significant formation of xylooligomers could be achieved without compromising the efficiency or time of conversion of cellulose to glucose. The resultant composition was much more beneficial in feed applications.
  • the present inventors have surprisingly found that the elimination of C5-monomer sugar production and promotion of C5-oligomer production together with cellulase activities (e.g. to produce C6-oligomer and C-6 monomer sugars) is an advantageous mix of activities.
  • Methods and uses comprising this enzyme composition will allow the inclusion of higher levels of lignocellulosic biomass into animal feed and into animal diets.
  • the present inventors have surprisingly found that the nutritional value of lignocellulosic biomass to animals (particularly monogastric animals) can be significantly improved by using an enzyme composition comprising at least the following activities: endoglucanase activity, ⁇ - glucosidase activity and endoxylanase activity; wherein one or both of the following enzyme activities are absent or substantially absent in the enzyme composition: ⁇ -xylosidase activity and/or a-L-arabinofuranosidase activity in the treatment of lignocellulosic biomass.
  • the present inventors surprisingly found methods using enzyme mixtures which breakdown cellulose and hemicellulose but which lack carbohydrate monomer forming activities or reduced monomer forming activities (particularly lacking C-5 carbohydrate monomer forming activities) can significantly improve the nutritional value of lignocellulosic biomass in animals (particularly monogastric animals).
  • the lignocellulosic biomass is physically and/or chemically and/or biologically treated and the physically and/or chemically and/or biologically pre-treated lignocellulosic biomass is subsequently treated with an enzyme composition comprising at least the following activities: endoglucanase activity, ⁇ -glucosidase activity and endoxylanase activity; wherein one or both of the following enzyme activities are absent or substantially absent in the enzyme composition: ⁇ -xylosidase activity and a-L- arabinofuranosidase activity.
  • the present invention means that lignocellulosic biomass can be used as a replacement to conventionally used starch (e.g. from grains) in animal feed.
  • conventionally used starch e.g. from grains
  • the present invention allows a reduction in the cost of preparing the animal feed.
  • the present invention eases the resource pressures in the supply chains that have been caused by increased human population size and constraints on the supply of fossil fuels.
  • the presently claimed invention is relevant for both monogastric animals and ruminants, but is most specifically relevant for monogastric animals.
  • feed supplements in accordance with the present invention or produced by the present invention can be used to replace the cereal grains that are used for intensive production of meat and milk in ruminants, and/or for increasing the efficiency of the system.
  • the present invention relates to a method of preparing a feed additive composition comprising:
  • absent or “no” as used herein means that the enzyme composition has no ⁇ - xylosidase activity and no a-arabinofuranosidase activity.
  • substantially absent and “substantially no” as used herein in reference to ⁇ - xylosidase activity and/or ⁇ -L-arabinofuranosidase activity mean an activity of less than 3000 unit/mg ⁇ -xylosidase activity (suitably less than 2000 units/mg, suitably less than 1500 units/mg) as determined using the "Beta-Xylosidase Activity Assay” taught herein and/or less than 1000 units/mg ⁇ -L-arabinofuranosidase activity (suitably less than 500 units/mg, suitably less than 450 units/mg) as determined using the "Alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase Activity Assay” taught herein.
  • the terms "substantially absent” and “substantially no” as used herein in reference to ⁇ -xylosidase activity and/or ⁇ -L-arabinofuranosidase activity mean an activity of less than 1500 units/mg ⁇ -xylosidase activity as determined using the "Beta-Xylosidase Activity Assay” taught herein and/or less than 450 units/mg ⁇ -L-arabinofuranosidase activity as determined using the "Alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase Activity Assay” taught herein.
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention has less than 3000 unit/mg ⁇ -xylosidase activity (suitably less than 2000 units/mg, suitably less than 1500 units/mg) as determined using the "Beta-Xylosidase Activity Assay” taught herein and less than 1000 units/mg ⁇ -L-arabinofuranosidase activity (suitably less than 500 units/mg, suitably less than 450 units/mg) as determined using the "Alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase Activity Assay" taught herein.
  • the terms "substantially absent” and “substantially no” as used herein in reference to ⁇ -xylosidase activity and/or ⁇ -L-arabinofuranosidase activity mean an activity of less than 1500 units/mg ⁇ -xylosidase activity as determined using the "Beta-Xylosidase Activity Assay” taught herein and less than 450 units/mg a-L-arabinofuranosidase activity as determined using the "Alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase Activity Assay” taught herein.
  • the enzyme composition may comprise no, or substantially no, ⁇ - xylosidase activity and no, or substantially no, ⁇ -L-arabinofuranosidase activity.
  • the enzyme composition may comprise no ⁇ -xylosidase activity and no ⁇ -L-arabinofuranosidase activity.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass for use in the present invention may be physically pre-treated, chemically pre-treated, biologically pre-treated, or combinations thereof lignocellulosic biomass.
  • the physically and/or chemically and/or biologically pre-treated lignocellulosic biomass may be incubated with the enzyme composition for at least about 6- 48 hours.
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may consist essentially of (or consists of) endoglucanase activity, ⁇ -glucosidase activity and endoxylanase activity.
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may further comprise one or both of the following enzyme activities: cellobiohydrolase I activity and cellobiohydrolase II activity.
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may further comprise lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase activity.
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may comprise endoglucanase activity, ⁇ -glucosidase activity and endoxylanase activity and one or more of the following enzyme activities: cellobiohydrolase I activity, cellobiohydrolase II activity or lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase activity.
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may consist essentially of (or consists of) endoglucanase activity, ⁇ -glucosidase activity and endoxylanase activity and one or more of the following enzyme activities: cellobiohydrolase I activity, cellobiohydrolase II activity or lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase activity.
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may comprise endoglucanase activity, ⁇ -glucosidase activity and endoxylanase activity and two or more (suitably three) of the following enzyme activities: cellobiohydrolase I activity, cellobiohydrolase II activity or lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase activity.
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may comprise (or consist essentially of, or consist of) endoglucanase activity, ⁇ -glucosidase activity and endoxylanase activity and two or more (suitably three) of the following enzyme activities: cellobiohydrolase I activity, cellobiohydrolase II activity or lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase activity.
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may be characterised by its enzyme activity.
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention comprises (or consists essentially of, or consists of) at least the following activities: endoglucanase activity as determined by the "Endoglucanase Activity Assay”, ⁇ -glucosidase activity as determined using the “Beta-glucosidase Activity Assay” and endoxylanase activity as determined using the “Endoxylanase Activity Assay”.
  • ⁇ -glucosidase activity 300-3000 pNPG U/g 2 (preferably 500-2500 pNPG U/g)
  • One CMC unit of activity liberates 1 ⁇ of reducing sugars (expressed as glucose equivalents) in one minute at 50°C and pH 4.8.
  • One pNPG unit denotes 1 mol of nitro-phenol liberated from para-nitrophenyl-B-D- glucopyranoside per minute at 50°C and pH 4.8.
  • One ABX unit is defined as the amount of enzyme required to generate 1 pmol of xylose reducing sugar equivalents per minute at 50°C and pH 5.3.
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may comprise at least 500 CMC U/g endoglucanase activity (suitably at least 1000 CMC U/g activity, suitably at least 2000 CMC U/g activity or suitably at least 3000 CMC U/g activity) as determined using the "Endoglucanase Activity Assay".
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may comprise at least 200 pNPG U/g ⁇ -glucosidase activity (suitably at least 1000 pNPG U/g activity, suitably at least 1500 pNPG U/g activity or suitably at least 2500 pNPG U/g activity) as determined using the "Beta-glucosidase Activity Assay".
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may comprise at least 1500 ABX U/g endoxylanase activity (suitably at least 3000 ABX U/g activity, suitably at least 4000 ABX U/g activity or suitably at least 4500 ABX U/g activity, suitably at least 5000 ABX U/g) as determined using the "Endoxylanase Activity Assay".
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may comprise (or consist essentially of or consist of) at least 500 CMC U/g endoglucanase activity (suitably at least 1000 CMC U/g activity, suitably at least 2000 CMC U/g activity or suitably at least 3000 CMC U/g activity) as determined using the "Endoglucanase Activity Assay", at least 200 pNPG U/g ⁇ -glucosidase activity (suitably at least 1000 pNPG U/g activity, suitably at least 1500 pNPG U/g activity or suitably at least 2500 pNPG U/g activity) as determined using the "Beta- glucosidase Activity Assay” and at least 1500 ABX U/g endoxylanase activity (suitably at least 3000 ABX U/g activity, suitably at least 4000 ABX U/g activity or suitably at least 4500 ABX U/g activity, suitably at least 5000 ABX U/g) as determined using the "En
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may comprise at least about 500 CMC U/g to about 4000 CMC U/g endoglucanase activity (suitably at least about 1000 CMC U/g to about 3500 CMC U/g activity, suitably at least about 1500 CMC U/g to about 3000 CMC U/g activity or suitably at least about 1500 CMC U/g to about 2500 CMC U/g activity) as determined using the "Endoglucanase Activity Assay".
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may comprise at least about 200 pNPG U/g to about 3500 pNPG U/g ⁇ -glucosidase activity (suitably at least about 300 pNPG U/g to about 3000 pNPG U/g activity, suitably at least about 500 pNPG U/g activity to about 2500 pNPG U/g activity or suitably at least about 1000 pNPG U/g to about 2000 pNPG U/g activity) as determined using the "Beta-glucosidase Activity Assay".
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may comprise at least about 1500 ABX U/g to about 6000 ABX U/g endoxylanase activity (suitably at least about 2000 ABX U/g to about 5000 ABX U/g activity, suitably at least about 2500 ABX U/g to about 4500 ABX U/g activity or suitably at least about 3000 ABX U/g to about 4000 ABX U/g activity) as determined using the "Endoxylanase Activity Assay".
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may comprise (or consist essentially of, or consist of) about 500 CMC U/g to about 4000 CMC U/g endoglucanase activity (suitably at least about 1000 CMC U/g to about 3500 CMC U/g activity, suitably at least about 1500 CMC U/g to about 3000 CMC U/g activity or suitably at least about 1500 CMC U/g to about 2500 CMC U/g activity) as determined using the "Endoglucanase Activity Assay", about 200 pNPG U/g to about 3500 pNPG U/g ⁇ -glucosidase activity (suitably at least about 300 pNPG U/g to about 3000 pNPG U/g activity, suitably at least about 500 pNPG U/g activity to about 2500 pNPG U/g activity or suitably at least about 1000 pNPG U/g to about 2000 pNPG U/g activity) as determined using the "Beta-glucosi
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may comprise (or consist essentially of, or consists of) about 1000 CMC U/g to about 3500 CMC U/g endoglucanase activity as determined using the "Endoglucanase Activity Assay", about 300 pNPG U/g to about 3000 pNPG U/g ⁇ -glucosidase activity as determined using the
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may further comprise one or more of the following enzyme activities: protease activity (e.g. serine protease activity (E.C. 3.4.21) and/or alkaline subtilisin protease activity (E.C. 3.4.21.62)), pectinase activity (E.C. 3.2.1.15), a-glucuronidase activity (E.C. 3.2.1.139), ⁇ -glucuronidase activity (E.C. 3.2.1.31) or esterase activity (E.C. 3.1.1.73).
  • protease activity e.g. serine protease activity (E.C. 3.4.21) and/or alkaline subtilisin protease activity (E.C. 3.4.21.62)
  • pectinase activity E.C. 3.2.1.15
  • a-glucuronidase activity E.C. 3.2.1.139
  • ⁇ -glucuronidase activity E.C. 3.2.1.31
  • esterase activity E
  • the esterase activity may be feruloyl esterase activity (E.C. 3.1.1.73).
  • Endoglucanase activity as referred to herein may be endo-1 ,4-p-D-glucanase activity.
  • An endoglucanase is one which catalyses the endohydrolysis of (1 ⁇ 4)-p-D-glucosidic linkages in cellulose, lichenin and cereal ⁇ -D glucans.
  • endoglucanase activity as defined herein means and enzyme which endohydrolyses (1 ⁇ 4)-p-D-glucosidic linkages in cellulose, lichenin and cereal ⁇ -D glucans.
  • Endoglucanase activity can be classified under E.C. classification E.C. 3.2.1.4. Another name for endoglucanase is ⁇ -glucanase.
  • An endoglucanase for use in the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may be one or more endoglucanase(s) encoded by a nucleic acid comprising (or consisting of, or consisting essentially of) one or more nucleotide sequence(s) selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID No. 29, SEQ ID No. 27, SEQ ID No. 25, SEQ ID No. 9 and SEQ ID No. 7.
  • An endoglucanase for use in the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may be one or more endoglucanase(s) comprising (or consisting of, or consisting essentially of) one or more of the polypeptide sequences selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID No. 30, SEQ ID No. 28, SEQ ID No. 26, SEQ ID No. 10 and SEQ ID No. 8.
  • a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase for use in the present invention may be one taught in Levasseur et al Biotechnology for Biofuels 2013, 6: 41 and Kittle et al Biotechnology for Biofuels 2012, 5: 79, these references are incorporated herein by reference.
  • a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase for use in the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may be one or more lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase(s) encoded by a nucleic acid comprising (or consisting of, or consisting essentially of) one or more nucleotide sequence(s) selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID No. 31 and SEQ ID No. 15.
  • a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase for use in the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may be one or more lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase(s) comprising (or consisting of, or consisting essentially of) one or more of the polypeptide sequences selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID No. 32 and SEQ ID No. 16.
  • the cellobiohydrolase (CBH) activity may be CBH class I (CBH I) or CBH class II (CBH II) activity or a combination of both CBH I and CBH II.
  • the cellobiohydrolase may hydrolyse (1 ⁇ 4) ⁇ -D-glucosidic linkages in cellulose and cellotetraose, releasing cellobiose from the non-reducing ends of the chains.
  • Another term for cellobiohydrolase activity may be exo-cellobiohydrolase activity or cellulose 1 ,4 ⁇ -cellobiosidase activity.
  • cellobiohydrolase II activity can be classified under E.C. classification EC. 3.2.1.91.
  • the cellobiohydrolase I activity can be classified under E.C. classification EC. 3.2.1.176.
  • a cellobiohydrolase (CBH) for use in the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may be one or more cellobiohydrolase(s) encoded by a nucleic acid comprising (or consisting of, or consisting essentially of) one or more nucleotide sequence(s) selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID No. 23, SEQ ID No. 21 , SEQ ID No. 19 and SEQ ID No. 17.
  • a cellobiohydrolase (CBH) for use in the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may be one or more cellobiohydrolase(s) comprising (or consisting of, or consisting essentially of) one or more of the polypeptide sequences selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID No. 24, SEQ ID No.
  • the endoxylanase activity - may be endo-1 ,4- -xylanase activity.
  • the endoxylanase endohydrolyses the (1 ⁇ 4)-p-D-xylosidic linkage in xylans.
  • the endoxylanase is classified as E.C. 3.2.1.8.
  • An endoxylanase for use in the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may be one or more endoxylanase(s) encoded by a nucleic acid comprising (or consisting of, or consisting essentially of) one or more nucleotide sequence(s) selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID No. 33, SEQ ID No. 1 1 , SEQ ID No. 5, SEQ ID No. 4, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 1.
  • An endoxylanase for use in the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may be one or more endoxylanase(s) comprising (or consisting of, or consisting essentially of) one or more of the polypeptide sequences selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID No. 34, SEQ ID No. 12, SEQ ID No. 6 and SEQ ID No. 3.
  • Pipette 1.8 ml of 1 % birchwood 4-0 methyl glucuronoxylan substrate solution into each test tube. Incubate for 10-15 minutes, allowing it to equilibrate at 50oC. Pipette 0.2 ml of enzyme dilution using positive displacement pipettes or equivalent. Vortex to mix. Incubate each sample at 50oC for exactly 5 minutes. Add 3 ml of 1 % 3,5 nitrosalicylic acid sodium salt (DNS) solution and mix. Cover the tops of the test tubes with caps to prevent evaporation. Place test tubes in a boiling bath for exactly 5 minutes. Cool test tubes for 10 minutes in ice/water bath. Incubate test tube for 10 minutes at room temperature.
  • DMS nitrosalicylic acid sodium salt
  • One ABX unit is defined as the amount of enzyme required to generate 1 ⁇ of xylose reducing sugar equivalents per minute at 50°C and pH 5.3.
  • ⁇ -glucosidase activity as defined herein is the hydrolysis of terminal, non-reducing ⁇ -D-glucosyl residues with the release of ⁇ -D-glucose.
  • ⁇ -glucosidase activity can be classified under E.C. classification E.C. 3.2.1.21.
  • a ⁇ -glucosidase for use in the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may be one or more ⁇ -glucosidase (s) encoded by a nucleic acid comprising (or consisting of, or consisting essentially of) one or more nucleotide sequence(s) selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID No. 35 and SEQ ID No. 3.
  • a ⁇ -glucosidase for use in the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may be one or more p-glucosidase(s) comprising (or consisting of, or consisting essentially of) one or more of the polypeptide sequences selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID No. 36 and SEQ ID No. 14.
  • One pNPG unit denotes 1 ⁇ of nitro-phenol liberated from para-nitrophenyl-B-D- glucopyranoside per minute at 50°C and pH 4.8.
  • ⁇ -xylosidase activity may hydrolyse successive xylose residues from the non-reducing termini of (1 ⁇ 3) ⁇ -D-xylans, e.g. the ⁇ -xylosidase may be a 1 ,3 ⁇ -D-xylosidase. 1 ,3 ⁇ -D- xylosidases may be classified under E.C. classification E.C. 3.2.1 .72 or may catalyse the hydrolysis of (1 ⁇ 4) ⁇ -D-xylans, to remove successive D-xylose residues from the non- reducing or reducing termini, e.g. the ⁇ -xylosidase may be a 1 ,4 ⁇ -xylosidase. 1 ,4 ⁇ - xylosidases may be classified under E.C. classification E.C. 3.2.1.37.
  • beta-xylosidase enzyme assay is similar to previously described (Ruttersmith, L.D., Daniel R.M. 1993. Thermostable ⁇ -glucosidase and ⁇ -xylosidase from Thermotoga sp. strain FjSS3-B.1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1156:167-172, the teaching of which is incorporated herein by reference) with some modifications.
  • beta-xylosidase activity assay in accordance with the present invention is carried out as follows: substrate for beta-xylosidase is p-nitropheny ⁇ -D-xylopyranoside ( ⁇ ) (Sigma - N2132). A dose response curve is created for each enzyme being tested. Each enzyme is tested at 7 doses (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.13, 1.56 ppm) with a no-enzyme control containing only substrate and assay buffer. All solutions are made in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer.
  • the standard reaction mixture contains 280 ⁇ of 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer pH 5.0 (final concentration 50 mM) and 80 ⁇ of substrate in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (final concentration 1 mM) and enzyme at various dose concentrations in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer are then added to bring the final volume of the reaction mixture to 400 ⁇ .
  • the reaction mixture buffer and substrate
  • the enzyme is added to start the reaction.
  • the sample mixture is incubated for 10 min, after which 0.8 ml of 0.1 MNa 2 C0 3 is added to end the reaction.
  • the protocol is similar to that previously described for a-L-arabinofuranosidase (Miyazaki, K. 2005).
  • Hyperthermophilic a-L-arabinofuranosidase from Thermotoga maritima MSB8 molecular cloning, gene expression, and characterization of the recombinant protein.
  • the alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase activity assay in accordance with the present invention is carried out as follows: substrate for ⁇ -L-arabinofuranosidase was p-nitrophenyl-a-L- arabinofuranoside (pNaLaf) (Sigma - N3641). A dose response curve is created for each enzyme being tested. Each enzyme is tested at 7 doses (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.13, 1.56 ppm) with a no-enzyme control containing only substrate and assay buffer. All solutions are made in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer.
  • the standard reaction mixture contains 280 ⁇ [_ of 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer pH 5.0 (final concentration 50 mM) and 80 ⁇ of substrate in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (final concentration 1 mM) and enzyme at various dose concentrations in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer are then added to bring the final volume of the reaction mixture to 400 ⁇ .
  • the reaction mixture buffer and substrate
  • the enzyme is added to start the reaction.
  • the reaction mixture is incubated for 10 min, after which it is ended by adding 0.8 ml of 0.1 M Na 2 C0 3 .
  • the control is subtracted from the enzyme-containing wells, and the absorbance values (A400) are converted to concentration as described in the protocol.
  • One unit of enzyme activity is defined as the formation of 1 pmol p-nitrophenol from the substrate per minute under assay conditions.
  • the term "consist essentially of or “consists essentially of” as used in the context of the activity of the enzyme composition for use in the present invention means that the enzyme composition has the activity or the activities characterised, but no other enzyme activity and/or no other enzyme activity which is capable of digesting lignocellulosic biomass.
  • Alpha-gal & beta-Glucanase Ingredients Biogalactosidase BL beta-Glucanase Le Saffre Safizyme G beta-Glucanase Lyven Feedlyve AGL endo-1 ,4- -xylanase Danisco Avizyme ® 1100 endo-1 ,4- -xylanase Danisco Axtra ® XB endo-1 ,4-p-xylanase Danisco Axtra ® XAP endo-1 ,4-p-xylanase DSM Biofeed PlusTM
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention may be a single enzyme or a combination of enzymes (e.g. an enzyme mix). In one preferred embodiment the enzyme composition according to the present invention is an enzyme mixture.
  • each of the different enzyme activities defined herein are preferably provided by a separate protein.
  • each enzyme activity is a different enzyme protein.
  • the defined enzyme activity is the primary (or sole) activity of the protein.
  • the defined activity is not a side activity of a protein.
  • lignocellulosic refers to a composition comprising both lignin and cellulose. Lignocellulosic material may also comprise hemicellulose.
  • the term “cellulosic” refers to a composition comprising cellulose and additional components, including hemicellulose.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass is any cellulosic or lignocellulosic material.
  • the term “lignocellulosic biomass” refers to any lignocellulosic material and includes materials comprising cellulose.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass may optionally further comprise hemicellulose, lignin, starch, oligosaccharides and/or monosaccharides.
  • Biomass may also comprise additional components, such as protein, lipid, ash, and/or extractives.
  • Biomass may be derived from a single source, or biomass can comprise a mixture derived from more than one source; for example, biomass could comprise a mixture of corn cobs and corn stover, or a mixture of grass and leaves.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass comprises at least 15% cellulose.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass comprises at least 20% cellulose.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass may be any cellulosic or lignocellulosic material such as agricultural residues, bioenergy crops, industrial solid waste, municipal solid waste, sludge from paper manufacture, yard waste, wood waste, forestry waste and combinations thereof.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass may be selected from the group consisting of corn cobs, crop residues such as corn husks, corn stover, grasses, beet pulp, wheat straw, wheat chaff, oat straw, wheat middlings, wheat shorts, rice bran, rice hulls, wheat bran, oat hulls, palm kernel, citrus pulp, cotton, lignin, barley straw, hay, rice straw, rice hulls, switchgrass, miscanthus, cord grass, reed canary grass, waste paper, sugar cane bagasse, sorghum bagasse, forage sorghum, sorghum stover, soybean stover, soy, components obtained from milling of trees, branches, roots, leaves, wood chips, sawdust, shrubs and bushes, vegetables, fruits, flowers.
  • crop residues such as corn husks, corn stover, grasses, beet pulp, wheat straw, wheat chaff, oat straw, wheat middlings, wheat shorts
  • the lignocellulosic biomass may be selected from the group consisting wet-cake, com fibre, corn germ meal, corn bran, Hominy feed, corn gluten feed, gluten meal, wheat shorts, wheat middlings, distillers dried grain (DDG) and distillers dried grain solubles (DDGS) based e.g. on corn, wheat, sorghum, or combinations thereof.
  • the lignoceliulosic biomass may be selected from the group consisting of corn stover, wheat straw, corn cobs, sugarcane bagasse, switchgrass, forage sorghum and rice straw.
  • the lignoceliulosic biomass may be selected from the group consisting of corn stover, wheat straw, corn cobs, sugarcane bagasse, switch grass, forage sorghum and rice straw.
  • biomass that is useful for the invention includes biomass that has a relatively high carbohydrate value, is relatively dense, and/or is relatively easy to collect, transport, store and/or handle.
  • the lignoceliulosic biomass may comprise less than 50% starch, preferably less than 40% starch.
  • the lignoceliulosic biomass may comprise less than 30% starch, preferably less than 10% starch.
  • the lignoceliulosic biomass may comprise less than 3% starch.
  • the lignoceliulosic biomass may comprise less than 1% starch.
  • the lignoceliulosic biomass does not comprise starch.
  • the lignoceliulosic biomass does not comprise a cereal grain.
  • the lignoceliulosic biomass is pre-treated by any pre-treatment process known in the art which is capable of disrupting the compact structure of lignoceliulosic biomass to expose cellulose fibers and/or which results in a decrease of the biomass crystallinity (e.g. cellulose crystallinity) and/or which increase accessible surface area for enzyme activity.
  • pre-treatment processes have been developed during the last few decades. Generally, these pre-treatments can be divided into mechanical/physical, physico-chemical, chemical, and biological pre-treatments or combinations thereof. An overview of the various pre-treatments can be found e.g.
  • the pre-treatment may be any treatment known in the art which results in either low cellulose crystallinity as measured by method the Segal Method (Segal et al. "An Emprical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-Ray Diffractometer", Textile Research Journal, Oct. 1959, Vol. 29, No. 10, 786-794) the teaching of which is incorporated herein by reference, or which increases accessible surface area for enzyme activity, or a combination of both.
  • the pre-treatment is a pre-treatment which reduces the crystallinity of cellulose in the lignocellulosic biomass.
  • the pre-treatment is a pre-treatment which reduces the crystallinity of cellulose in the lignocellulosic biomass by at least about 20% when measured using the Segal Method (supra). In one embodiment the pre-treatment is a pre-treatment which increases accessible surface area for enzyme activity in the lignocellulosic biomass.
  • the pre-treatment is a pre-treatment which increases accessible surface area by at least about 20%, suitably at least about 30%, suitably at least about 40% in the lignocellulosic biomass.
  • the accessible surface area may be determined by the BET (Brunauer, Emmett and Teller) as taught in Guo et al Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 6046-6053, which reference is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the available surface area of the lignocellulosic biomass may be measured using Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) analysis wherein said method comprises (i) weighing 0.5g of dry sample;(ii) de-gassing with high purity nitrogen (99.999%) at room temperature (e.g. 25°C) overnight; and (iii) performing BET analysis using a surface area analyser (Quantachrome NOVA2000).
  • BET Brunauer, Emmett and Teller
  • the lignocellulosic biomass may undergo (or undergoes) a physical and/or chemical and/or biological treatment. This may be referred to herein as a physical and/or chemical and/or biological pre-treatment.
  • the physical and/or chemical pre-treatment in accordance with the present invention may be a physical treatment or a chemical treatment or a physico-chemical treatment.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass may undergo (or undergoes) a physical and/or chemical pre-treatment. In one embodiment the lignocellulosic biomass may undergo (or undergoes) a physical pre- treatment.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass may undergo (or undergoes) a chemical pre- treatment.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass may undergo (or undergoes) a physicochemical pre-treatment.
  • the physical and/or chemical treatment and/or biological may be any physical and/or chemical and/or biological treatment (e.g. pre-treatment) known in the art.
  • Mechanical/physical pre-treatment refers to the process of mechanical comminution by a combination of chipping, grinding, dry milling, wet milling, vibratory ball milling, rotary ball milling.
  • the size of the feedstock is usually 10-30 mm after chipping and 0.2-2mm after milling or grinding, and the cellulose crystallinity is decreased and/or the accessible surface area is increased.
  • Pre-pre-treatment of the biomass solid with hot water, acids or sodium bisulfate to soften feedstock can make milling less energy-intensive.
  • the biomass is pre-treated with a process for mechanical decrystallisation.
  • the term physical pre-treatment is used herein interchangeably with mechanical pre- treatment.
  • Physico-chemical pre-treatments combine the chemical modification of the biomass compositions and physical fracture of the cell wall structure.
  • One useful physico-chemical pre-treatment is steam explosion.
  • this pre-treatment biomass is treated with high-pressure saturated steam (high pressure and high temperature), optionally including addition of acids, bases or other chemicals, and then the pressure is swiftly reduced, making the materials undergo an explosive decompression.
  • the physical and/or chemical treatment may be hydrothermolysis or wet oxidation and comprises: high pressure and/or high temperature with liquid water and/or steam, optionally including addition of acids, bases or other chemicals.
  • the pressure is in the range from 300 to 600, preferably 350 to 550, preferably 400 to 500 psi.
  • high temperature means temperatures in the range from about 100 to 300°C, preferably from about 140 to 240°C, such as from about 170 to 200°C.
  • the pre-treatment may be a physical treatment comprising steam explosion.
  • a further example of a physico-chemical pre-treatment is ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) where the lignocellulosic material is permeated with liquid ammonia followed by increasing temperature to about 90°C.
  • AFEX ammonia fiber explosion
  • the formed gas ammonia interacts with biomass under pressure (e.g. 17- 20 bar for 5-10 minutes) and the pressure is then rapidly released, which may result in cellulose de-crystallization, hemicellulose pre- hydrolysis and alteration of lignin structure and/or an increase in accessible surface area.
  • the crystallinity index (Crl) might be influenced by the conditions of AFEX pre-treatment, since slight differences in the pre-treatment conditions can result in the formation of different cellulose crystal structures.
  • Another useful physico-chemical pre-treatment process is liquid hot water pre-treatment which uses water as media to pre-treat biomass under pressure to maintain the water in the liquid state at elevated temperatures.
  • the pre-treatment is also usually termed as hydrothermolysis or hydrothermal pre-treatment. It may solubilise approximately 40-60% of the total biomass with 4-22% of the cellulose and nearly all of the hemicelluloses to form liquid soluble oligosaccharides. As a result, an increase in accessible surface area may be seen. In addition, or alternatively, a decrease in cellulose crystallinity, a lower association of cellulose with lignin and depolymerization of cellulose may be seen which contributes to the enhancement of cellulose accessibility.
  • the pre-treatment may be a physico-chemical pre-treatment comprising hydrothermolysis or a hydrothermal treatment.
  • the lignocelluosic biomass is wheat straw and the pre-treatment comprises the use of a hydrothermal treatment.
  • the pre-treatment in accordance with the present invention may suitably include hydrothermal treatment as taught in WO2011/125056 (IBICON) the teaching of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Radiation pre-treatments involve processes to pre-treat lignocellulosic biomass with ⁇ - irradiation, ultrasound, electron beam, or microwave. Radiation pre-treatments may also be coupled with other pre-treatments to further increase cellulose accessibility. Without wishing to be bound by theory, at a high irradiation dose the substrates become fragile owing to radiation degradation of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Cellulose crystallinity may be destroyed to a certain extent by ⁇ -radiation. Microwave pre-treatment is usually conducted in the presence of water, an organic solvent, alkali, or a dilute acid solution.
  • Chemical pre-treatments involve the processes using various chemicals to pre-treat biomass under various conditions. The mechanisms of these pre-treatments vary depending on the chemicals used and pre-treatment conditions. Examples of suitable chemical pre-treatment processes include but are in no way limited to: dilute acid pretreatment, alkali pre-treatment, sulfite pre-treatment, oxidative pre-treatment such as e.g. wet oxidation, cellulose solvent pre-treatment, ammonia percolation (APR), and organosolv pre-treatment.
  • suitable chemical pre-treatment processes include but are in no way limited to: dilute acid pretreatment, alkali pre-treatment, sulfite pre-treatment, oxidative pre-treatment such as e.g. wet oxidation, cellulose solvent pre-treatment, ammonia percolation (APR), and organosolv pre-treatment.
  • the pre-treatment may be a chemical treatment comprising the use of an acid or an alkaline treatment.
  • the physical and/or chemical treatment may be base catalyst addition, or other methods known in the art.
  • the lignocelluosic biomass is corn stover and the physical and/or chemical treatment comprises the use of an acid treatment.
  • the pre-treatment is a dilute acid pre-treatment.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass material may be mixed with dilute acid, typically H 2 S0 4 , and water to form a slurry, heated by steam to the desired temperature (usually between 160 and 220°C), and after a residence time flashed to atmospheric pressure.
  • the pre-treatment may comprise the steps of: a) impregnating the ligno-cellulosic biomass (e.g. wheat straw) with 0.2 % H 2 S0 4 , e.g. by soaking; b) pressing the material to a dry matter between 40-50% and c) steam pre-treating for 10 min at 190°C. Optionally, pressing the resultant slurry to filter off the liquid and optionally washing the solid residue 2-3 times and pressing to a final solids content of about 40-50%.
  • the pre-treatment may comprise the steps of a) impregnating the lignocellulosic biomass (e.g. wheat straw) with 1% acetic acid by soaking; b) pressing the material to a dry matter between 40-50% and c) steam pretreating for 10 min at 200°C. Optionally pressing the subsequent slurry filter off the liquid, and optionally washing the solid residue 2-3 times and pressing to a final solids content of about 40-50%.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass e.g. wheat straw
  • Alkaline pre-treatment may involve treating lignocellulosic biomass with various alkalis or bases such as NaOH, KOH, CaOH 2 , aqueous ammonia, peroxide, and lime (using CaOH 2 ) to pre-treat ligno-cellulosic biomass.
  • alkalis or bases such as NaOH, KOH, CaOH 2 , aqueous ammonia, peroxide, and lime (using CaOH 2 ) to pre-treat ligno-cellulosic biomass.
  • alkalis are suitable agents to swell cellulose and alter cellulose crystalline polymorphs which indicates an alteration of crystalline hydrogen bond network, thus affecting the digestibility of cellulose.
  • the physical and/or chemical treatment may be a chemical treatment comprising the use of an alkaline (e.g. ammonium) treatment.
  • an alkaline e.g. ammonium
  • the pre-treatment is anhydrous ammonia pre-treatment.
  • the pre-treatment may be an anhydrous ammonia pre-treatment comprising the steps of 1 ) placing lignocellulosic biomass material (e.g. corn stovers) in a vessel which is evacuated under pressure to allow better penetration of anhydrous ammonia; b) contacting of the biomass material with an aqueous solution comprising 12% ammonia is carried out at 140°C; c) pre-treating with ammonia can last up to 25 h but optimum release of glucose and xylose may be seen after a shorter time period (e.g. 15 minutes); d) removing additional ammonia solution by applying a vacuum to reach a final solids content of 50-60% dry matter.
  • lignocellulosic biomass material e.g. corn stovers
  • the physico-chemical treatment may alternatively be the pre-treatment method using ammonia (e.g. dilute ammonia) described in WO 2006/1 10891 , WO 2006/1 1899, WO 2006/11900, and WO2006/1 10901 (DuPont) the teaching of these documents being incorporated herein by reference.
  • ammonia e.g. dilute ammonia
  • the pre-treated biomass is dilute ammonium pre-treated corn stover (DaCS).
  • the pre-treatment is caustic delignifiction.
  • the pre-treatment may be a caustic delignification pre-treatment comprising the steps of 1 ) treating the biomass with between 0.5-3% nucleophilic base (e.g. sodium hydroxide (NaOH), lithium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, cesium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide or combinations thereof) for between 0.25 and 20 h between 25- 200°C at a pH in the range of 9-1 1 ; 2) recovering the pretreated biomass filtration and washing with deionised water to remove any excess alkali and dissolved byproducts.
  • nucleophilic base e.g. sodium hydroxide (NaOH), lithium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, cesium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide or combinations thereof
  • the pre-treatment may be a caustic delignification pre-treatment comprising the steps of 1 ) treating the biomass with between 0.5-3% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for between 0.25 and 1.5 h at about 121 °C at a pH in the range of 9-1 1 ; 2) recovering the pretreated biomass filtration and washing with deionised water to remove any excess alkali and dissolved byproducts.
  • a caustic delignification comprising the steps of 1 ) treating the biomass with between 0.5-3% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for between 0.25 and 1.5 h at about 121 °C at a pH in the range of 9-1 1 ; 2) recovering the pretreated biomass filtration and washing with deionised water to remove any excess alkali and dissolved byproducts.
  • the pretreated biomass may be a biomass treated by the caustic delignification process taught in Xu et al (201 1) supra.
  • the pre-treated biomass is caustic delignified corn stover (DLc
  • the pre-treated biomass is caustic delignified corn stover (DLcs) and/or caustic delignified switchgrass (DLswg).
  • DLcs caustic delignified corn stover
  • DLswg caustic delignified switchgrass
  • sulfite pre-treatment or sulfite pulping process comprises sulfite treatment of the biomass material under acidic conditions followed by mechanical size reduction using disk refining. Sulfite pre-treatment results in removal of considerable hemicellulose, a decrease of cellulose DP, and sulfonation of lignin with increased lignin hydrophilicity.
  • a further chemical pre-treatment may be an oxidative pre-treatment which refers to processes with oxidants used to remove lignin and reductive substance.
  • the oxidants usually employed for oxidative delignification comprise ozone, hydrogen peroxide, oxygen, and peracetic acids. This treatment may optionally be combined with other chemical or hydrothermal treatments.
  • the mechanisms of the oxidative degradation of lignin vary depending on the used oxidants and reaction condition such as pH. For ozonolysis, wet- oxidation and peracids delignification, degradation of aromatic and olefinic structures involves initial electrophilic attack by oxidants, while during alkaline-H 2 0 2 pre-treatment these structures are destroyed by nucleophilic attack of hydroperoxide anions.
  • the physical and/or chemical treatment is a wet oxidation.
  • the wet oxidation is one which involves high pressure and/or high temperature with liquid water and/or steam, optionally including addition of acids, bases or other chemicals.
  • High pressure may mean pressure in the range from 300 to 600, preferably 400 to 500, such as around 450 psi.
  • High temperature may mean temperatures in the range from about 100 to 300°C, preferably from about 180 to 200°C for 5 to 15 minutes (Schmidt and Thomsen, 1998, Bioresource Technol. 64: 139-151 , the teaching of which is incorporated herein by reference). In one embodiment the high temperature may be from about 140 to 235 °C.
  • wet explosion is a modification of the wet oxidation pre-treatment method where the wet oxidation and steam explosion, as described above, are combined.
  • the oxidizing agent is introduced during pre-treatment after a certain residence time. The treatment is then ended by flashing to atmospheric pressure (WO 2006/032282 which is incorporated herein by reference).
  • the physical and/or chemical pretreatment may involve high pressure and/or high temperature with liquid water, where water exists as a mixture of liquid and vapor, optionally including addition of acids, bases or other chemicals.
  • High pressure in this embodiment may be in the range from 50 to 300, suitably 100 to 200, for example about 150 psi.
  • High temperature in this embodiment may be in the range from about 100 to 300 °C, suitably from about 170 to 220 °C, such as from about 170 to 200 °C.
  • a further useful chemical pre-treatment is organosolv pre-treatment which delignifies cellulosic biomass material by extraction using aqueous ethanol (e.g. 40-60% ethanol) at 160-200 °C for 30-60 minutes. Sulphuric acid may be added as a catalyst. In organosolv pre- treatment, the majority of hemicellulose may be removed.
  • organosolv pre-treatment the majority of hemicellulose may be removed.
  • Cellulose-solvent-based pre-treatment is also a chemical pre-treatment for treatment of lignocellulosic biomass based on cellulose solvents such as phosphoric acid (CPA) and ionic liquids (IL).
  • CPA phosphoric acid
  • IL ionic liquids
  • the lignocellulosic biomass may undergo a biological treatment (e.g. biological pre-treatment).
  • a biological treatment may be any biological treatment known in the art.
  • microorganisms may be utilized for pre-treatment of biomass to increase the enzymatic digestibility of remaining solids.
  • the employed microorganisms are usually capable of degrading lignin and carbohydrate polymers.
  • some types of fungi can produce lignocellulolytic enzymes, which work synergistically to degrade plant cell wall, and other types can produce hydrogen peroxide.
  • the accessible surface area may be increased resulting in the enhancement of cellulose digestibility.
  • the biological pre-treatment may include treatment with a white rot fungus.
  • white rot fungi such as Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Ceriporiopsis subvermispora, Phlebia subse alis and Pleurotous ostreatus are known to efficiently metabolise lignin in a variety of lignocellulosic materials (see, for example, Singh D and Chen S. 2008.
  • the white-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium conditions for the production of lignin-degrading enzymes. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology 81 ,399-417, the teaching of which is incorporated herein by reference).
  • the cellulosic material can also be subjected to particle size reduction, pre-soaking, wetting, washing, or conditioning prior to pre-treatment (e.g. prior to physical and/or chemical and/or biological pre-treatment) using methods known in the art.
  • the method of the present invention may further comprise a step of contacting a feed component with the feed additive composition according to the present invention.
  • the present invention also relates to methods and uses for improving a biophysical characteristic of an animal.
  • an animal is fed a feed additive composition obtainable (e.g. obtained) by the method of the present invention or a feed additive composition according to the present invention or a premix according to the present invention or a feedstuff according to the present invention or a feedstuff obtainable (e.g. obtained) by a method of the present invention.
  • the biophysical characteristic may be selected from the group consisting of one or more of the following: performance of an animal, growth performance of an animal, feed conversion ratio (FCR), ability to digest a raw material (e.g.
  • nutrient digestibility including starch , fat, protein, fibre digestibility), nitrogen retention, carcass yield, growth rate, weight gain, body weight, mass, feed efficiency, body fat percentage, body fat distribution, growth, egg size, egg weight, egg mass, egg laying rate and environmental impact, e.g. manure output and/or nitrogen excretion.
  • the physically and/or chemically and/or biologically pre-treated lignocellulosic biomass is incubated with the enzyme composition.
  • the length of such incubation is 6-120 hours, preferably 10-60 hours, preferably 20- 50 hours, preferably 35-50 hours, preferably 40-48 hours.
  • the incubation may be from 4h to 72h. In one embodiment the incubation period is 6h to 48h. In one in embodiment the incubation period is at least about 6h. In another embodiment the incubation period is less than 72h.
  • the incubation period will be influenced by the dry matter inclusion rate and that as the dry matter inclusion rate is increased, the incubation time must be increased proportionally to achieve the same effect.
  • the incubation is such that about 5-20% (preferably about 10-13%) (w/w) of the pentoses (xylose and arabinose) and about 1-10% (preferably about 1-4%) (w/w) of the hexoses in the biomass are in oligo- and polymer form at the end of the incubation period.
  • the incubation is such that about 10-29% (preferably about 16-21%) (w/w)) of glucose and about 1-10% (preferably about 4-7%) of xylose are in monomeric units at the end of the incubation period.
  • the length of the incubation may be dependent on the enzymes used and/or the concentration of enzyme used.
  • the aim of the incubation period is to allow for the enzymes to degrade the biomass sufficiently.
  • sufficient degradation of biomass can be determined by one skilled in the art, for example by weight analysis to measure the reduction of insoluble biomass after enzyme treatment.
  • product and/or feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feedstuff in accordance with the present invention are dried.
  • drying means that the water content (wt %) of the product and/or feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feedstuff in accordance with the present invention is reduced to at less than 15%, preferably less than 10%. Therefore the present invention yet further provides a dried product or a substantially-dried product and/or feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feedstuff in accordance with the present invention the water content (wt %) of which is less than 30%, preferably less than 15%, preferably less than 10%, preferably less than 5%.
  • the present invention may provide a semi-liquid product or slurry product.
  • a semi-liquid product or slurry product in accordance with the present invention is a product the water content (wt%) of which is at less than 90%, preferably less than 80%, preferably less than 70% or more preferably less than 60%.
  • the product and/or feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feedstuff in accordance with the present invention are packaged and/or stored in a dry state or substantially dry state.
  • the terms “dried” or “dry state” as used herein means that the product and/or feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feedstuff in accordance with the present invention contain no or only a very low amount of water.
  • the term “dried” or “dry state” as used herein may mean that the product and/or feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feedstuff in accordance with the present invention comprises less than 5%, preferably less than 1%, water content (wt %).
  • substantially dry state means that the product and/or feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feedstuff in accordance with the present invention contains only a very low amount of water.
  • substantially dry state as used herein may mean that the and/or feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feedstuff in accordance with the present invention comprises less than 30%, preferably less than 15%, preferably less than 10%, water content (wt %).
  • the product and/or feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feedstuff in accordance with the present invention comprises less than 20 wt % moisture content.
  • the product on and/or feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feedstuff in accordance with the present invention comprises less than 15 wt % moisture content. In another embodiment the product and/or feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feedstuff in accordance with the present invention comprises less than 10 wt % moisture content, In another embodiment the product and/or feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feedstuff in accordance with the present invention comprises less than 5 wt % moisture content.
  • the product and/or feed additive composition in accordance with the present invention comprises at least 70%, preferably at least 60%, of the xylose units present in the material as oligomers or polymers.
  • the enzyme composition for use in the present invention preferably generates soluble oligomers and soluble polymers with sugar units including xylose, rhamnose, glucose, mannose, galactose, glucoronate, galacturonate (such as xylooligomers, arabinoxylan oligomers) in the product and/or feed additive composition in accordance with the present invention.
  • the enzyme composition does not release or does not generate or release significant amounts of C-5 sugars (e.g. xylose) in monomer form.
  • C-5 sugars e.g. xylose
  • the feed additive composition and/or feed ingredient Preferably less than 50% of the total C-5 sugars (e.g. xylose) in the feed additive composition and/or feed ingredient will be present in monomer form
  • C-5 sugars e.g. xylose and/or arabinose and/or arabinofuranose
  • an enzyme composition which is absent or substantially absent in ⁇ -xylosidase activity and/or a-arabinofuranosidase activity.
  • the method according to the present invention may further comprise feeding the feed additive composition to an animal.
  • the method of the present invention further comprise admixing a feed component with the feed additive composition, e.g. thus to provide a feed or feedstuff.
  • the present invention relates to uses and methods for improving the biophysical characteristics of an animal by administering to an animal an effective amount of a feed additive composition according to the present invention or a feed additive composition produced by a method of the present invention or a feedstuff comprising such a feed additive composition.
  • biophysical characteristics means one or more of the group selected from the following: performance of an animal, growth performance of an animal, feed conversion ratio (FCR), ability to digest a raw material (e.g. nutrient digestibility, including starch , fat, protein, fibre digestibility), nitrogen retention, carcass yield, growth rate, weight gain, body weight, mass, feed efficiency, body fat percentage, body fat distribution, growth, egg size, egg weight, egg mass, egg laying rate and environmental impact, e.g. manure output and/or nitrogen excretion.
  • FCR feed conversion ratio
  • the term "improving" as used herein means improved compared with feeding animal the lignocellulosic biomass which has not been treated in accordance with the present invention.
  • the enzyme(s) may be dosed in a suitable concentration in the biomass in order to ensure efficient degradation of the lignocellulosic biomass.
  • the enzyme may be in the range of approximately 2.5 g - 20 kg of active protein per tonne of pre-treated biomass, suitably approximately 5 g - 14 kg of active protein per tonne of pre-treated biomass.
  • the active protein per MT of feed would be 0.125 g -12 kg per MT of feed.
  • the amount of enzyme in the feed may be between about 0.125 g to about 12 kg (suitably about 500 g to about 10 kg, suitably about 1 kg to about 8 kg) per MT of feed.
  • the amount of treated biomass in the feedstuff can be varied.
  • the amount of treated biomass in the feed is less than 90% w/w of the total feedstuff, preferably less than 80%, suitably less than 70%, suitably less than 60%, suitably less than 50%, suitably less than 40%.
  • the amount of treated biomass in the feedstuff is less than 60%.
  • the amount of treated biomass in the feed is more than 30% w/w of the total feedstuff, preferably more than 5%, preferably more than 10%, preferably more than 20%, preferably more than 30%, preferably more than 40%, suitably more than 50%, suitably more than 60%.
  • the amount of treated biomass in the feedstuff is more than 5% or 10%.
  • the amount of treated biomass in the feed is in the range of about 5- 70%, suitably in the range of about 5-60%, suitably 5-50%, suitably 10-40% w/w of the total feedstuff.
  • the amount of treated biomass in the feed is in the range of 10-70%. In another embodiment the amount of treated biomass in the feed is in the range of 10-40%.
  • admixing includes any method for admixing, such as mixing, combining, spraying etc.).
  • the enzyme composition may be in a dry enzyme formulation (e.g. in the form of granules or on a carrier (such as a wheat carrier)) prior to admixing with the lignocellulosic biomass (such as the physically and/or chemically and/or biologically pre- treated lignocellulosic biomass).
  • the enzyme composition may be in a liquid formulation prior to admixing with the lignocellulosic biomass (such as the physically and/or chemically and/or biologically pre-treated lignocellulosic biomass).
  • the enzyme When the enzyme is in a liquid formulation prior to admixing with the lignocellulosic biomass (such as the physically and/or chemically and/or biologically pre-treated lignocellulosic biomass), the enzyme may be admixed by spraying the enzyme formulation or dipping the lignocellulosic biomass (such as the physically and/or chemically and/or biologically pre- treated lignocellulosic biomass) into the enzyme formulation for example.
  • the lignocellulosic biomass such as the physically and/or chemically and/or biologically pre- treated lignocellulosic biomass
  • the physically and/or chemically and/or biologically pre-treated biomass (before or after enzyme treatment) and/or the dried solid fraction may be milled and/or powdered and/or formed into a meal.
  • animal means an animal that is to be or has been administered with a feed additive composition according to the present invention or a feedstuff comprising said feed additive composition according to the present invention.
  • the animal is a mammal, bird, fish or crustacean including for example livestock or a domesticated animal (e.g. a pet).
  • livestock is livestock.
  • livestock refers to any farmed animal.
  • livestock is one or more of cows or bulls (including calves), pigs (including piglets, swine), poultry (including broilers, layers, chickens and turkeys), birds, fish (including freshwater fish, such as salmon, cod, trout and carp, e.g. koi carp, and marine fish, such as sea bass), crustaceans (such as shrimps, mussels and scallops), horses (including race horses), sheep (including lambs).
  • cows or bulls including calves
  • pigs including piglets, swine
  • poultry including broilers, layers, chickens and turkeys
  • fish including freshwater fish, such as salmon, cod, trout and carp, e.g. koi carp, and marine fish, such as sea bass
  • crustaceans such as shrimps, mussels and scallops
  • horses including race horses
  • sheep including lambs.
  • the "animal” is a domesticated animal or pet or an animal maintained in a zoological environment.
  • domesticated animal or pet or animal maintained in a zoological environment refers to any relevant animal including canines (e.g. dogs), felines (e.g. cats), rodents (e.g. guinea pigs, rats, mice), birds, fish (including freshwater fish and marine fish), and horses.
  • canines e.g. dogs
  • felines e.g. cats
  • rodents e.g. guinea pigs, rats, mice
  • birds including freshwater fish and marine fish
  • horses including freshwater fish and marine fish
  • the animal is a monogastric animal.
  • the monogastric animal may be poultry or pig (or a combination thereof).
  • the animal is a ruminant animal.
  • the enzyme composition and/or feed additive composition and/or feed ingredient and/or premix and/or feed or feedstuff according to the present invention is packaged.
  • the enzyme composition and/or feed additive composition and/or feed ingredient and/or premix and/or feed or feedstuff is packaged in a bag, such as a paper bag.
  • the enzyme composition and/or feed additive composition and/or feed ingredient and/or premix and/or feed or feedstuff may be sealed in a container. Any suitable container may be used.
  • the feed additive composition of the present invention may be used as - or in the preparation of - a feed.
  • feed is used synonymously herein with “feedstuff'.
  • the feed may be in the form of a solution or as a solid - depending on the use and/or the mode of application and/or the mode of administration.
  • composition of the present invention may be used in conjunction with one or more of: a nutritionally acceptable carrier, a nutritionally acceptable diluent, a nutritionally acceptable excipient, a nutritionally acceptable adjuvant, a nutritionally active ingredient.
  • the feed additive composition of the present invention is admixed with a feed component to form a feedstuff.
  • feed component means all or part of the feedstuff. Part of the feedstuff may mean one constituent of the feedstuff or more than one constituent of the feedstuff, e.g. 2 or 3 or 4. In one embodiment the term “feed component” encompasses a premix or premix constituents.
  • the feed may be a fodder, or a premix thereof, a compound feed, or a premix thereof.
  • the feed additive composition according to the present invention may be admixed with a compound feed, a compound feed component or to a premix of a compound feed or to a fodder, a fodder component, or a premix of a fodder.
  • fodder as used herein means any food which is provided to an animal (rather than the animal having to forage for it themselves). Fodder encompasses plants that have been cut.
  • fodder includes hay, straw, silage, compressed and pelleted feeds, oils and mixed rations, and also sprouted grains and legumes.
  • Fodder may be obtained from one or more of the plants selected from: alfalfa (Lucerne), barley, birdsfoot trefoil, brassicas, Chau moellier, kale, rapeseed (canola), rutabaga (swede), turnip, clover, alsike clover, red clover, subterranean clover, white clover, grass, false oat grass, fescue, Bermuda grass, brome, heath grass, meadow grasses (from naturally mixed grassland swards, orchard grass, rye grass, Timothy-grass, corn (maize), millet, oats, sorghum, soybeans, trees (pollard tree shoots for tree-hay), wheat, and legumes.
  • alfalfa (Lucerne), barley, birdsfoot trefoil, brassicas, Chau moellier, kale, rapeseed (canola), rutabaga (swede), turnip, clove
  • compound feed means a commercial feed in the form of a meal, a pellet, nuts, cake or a crumble.
  • Compound feeds may be blended from various raw materials and additives. These blends are formulated according to the specific requirements of the target animal.
  • Compound feeds can be complete feeds that provide all the daily required nutrients, concentrates that provide a part of the ration (protein, energy) or supplements that only provide additional micronutrients, such as minerals and vitamins.
  • the main ingredients used in compound feed are the feed grains, which include corn, soybeans, sorghum, oats, and barley.
  • a premix as referred to herein may be a composition composed of microingredients such as vitamins, minerals, chemical preservatives, antibiotics, fermentation products, and other essential ingredients. Premixes are usually compositions suitable for blending into commercial rations.
  • Any feedstuff of the present invention may comprise one or more feed materials selected from the group comprising a) cereals, such as small grains (e.g., wheat, barley, rye, oats and combinations thereof) and/or large grains such as maize or sorghum; b) by products from plants (e.g.
  • cereals such as wet-cake, distillers dried grain (DDG), and distillers dried grain solubles (DDGS), corn fibre, corn germ meal, corn bran, Hominy feed, corn gluten feed, wheat shorts, wheat middlings or combinations thereof (preferably by products of methods according to the present invention); c) protein obtained from sources such as soya, sunflower, peanut, lupin, peas, fava beans, cotton, canola, fish meal, dried plasma protein, meat and bone meal, potato protein, whey, copra, sesame; d) oils and fats obtained from vegetable and animal sources; e) minerals and vitamins.
  • sources such as soya, sunflower, peanut, lupin, peas, fava beans, cotton, canola, fish meal, dried plasma protein, meat and bone meal, potato protein, whey, copra, sesame
  • oils and fats obtained from vegetable and animal sources e) minerals and vitamins.
  • a feedstuff of the present invention may contain at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50% or at least 60% by weight corn and soybean meal or corn and full fat soy, or wheat meal or sunflower meal.
  • a feedstuff of the present invention may comprise at least one high fibre feed material and/or at least one by-product of the at least one high fibre feed material to provide a high fibre feedstuff.
  • high fibre feed materials include: wheat, barley, rye, oats, by products from plants (e.g. cereals), such as wet-cake, distillers dried grain (DDG), and distillers dried grain solubles (DDGS), corn fibre, corn germ meal, corn bran, Hominy feed, corn gluten feed, wheat shorts, wheat middlings or combinations thereof.
  • Some protein sources may also be regarded as high fibre: protein obtained from sources such as sunflower, lupin, fava beans and cotton.
  • the feed may be one or more of the following: a compound feed and premix, including pellets, nuts or (cattle) cake; a crop or crop residue: corn, soybeans, sorghum, oats, barley, corn stover, copra, straw, chaff, sugar beet waste; fish meal; freshly cut grass and other forage plants; meat and bone meal; molasses; oil cake and press cake; oligosaccharides; conserved forage plants: hay and silage; seaweed; seeds and grains, either whole or prepared by crushing, milling etc.; sprouted grains and legumes; yeast extract.
  • a compound feed and premix including pellets, nuts or (cattle) cake
  • a crop or crop residue corn, soybeans, sorghum, oats, barley, corn stover, copra, straw, chaff, sugar beet waste
  • fish meal freshly cut grass and other forage plants
  • meat and bone meal molasses
  • oil cake and press cake oligosaccharides
  • feed in the present invention also encompasses in some embodiments pet food.
  • a pet food is plant or animal material intended for consumption by pets, such as dog food or cat food.
  • Pet food, such as dog and cat food may be either in a dry form, such as kibble for dogs, or wet canned form.
  • Cat food may contain the amino acid taurine.
  • feed in the present invention also encompasses in some embodiments fish food.
  • a fish food normally contains macro nutrients, trace elements and vitamins necessary to keep captive fish in good health.
  • Fish food may be in the form of a flake, pellet or tablet. Pelleted forms, some of which sink rapidly, are often used for larger fish or bottom feeding species.
  • Some fish foods also contain additives, such as beta carotene or sex hormones, to artificially enhance the colour of ornamental fish.
  • feed in the present invention also encompasses in some embodiment bird food.
  • Bird food includes food that is used both in birdfeeders and to feed pet birds.
  • bird food comprises of a variety of seeds, but may also encompass suet (beef or mutton fat).
  • the term "contacting" refers to the indirect or direct application of the composition of the present invention to the product (e.g. the feed).
  • the application methods include, but are not limited to, treating the product in a material comprising the feed additive composition, direct application by mixing the feed additive composition with the product, spraying the feed additive composition onto the product surface or dipping the product into a preparation of the feed additive composition.
  • the feed additive composition of the present invention is preferably admixed with the product (e.g. feedstuff).
  • the feed additive composition may be included in the emulsion or raw ingredients of a feedstuff.
  • the composition is made available on or to the surface of a product to be affected/treated.
  • This allows the composition to impart one or more of the following favourable characteristics: biophysical characteristics, e.g. wherein the biophysical characteristic is selected from the group consisting of one or more of the following: performance of an animal, growth performance of an animal, feed conversion ratio (FCR), ability to digest a raw material (e.g. nutrient digestibility, including starch , fat, protein, fibre digestibility), nitrogen retention, carcass yield, growth rate, weight gain, body weight, mass, feed efficiency, body fat percentage, body fat distribution, growth, egg size, egg weight, egg mass, egg laying rate and environmental impact, e.g. manure output and/or nitrogen excretion.
  • the feed additive compositions of the present invention may be applied to intersperse, coat and/or impregnate a product (e.g. feedstuff or raw ingredients of a feedstuff) with a controlled amount of enzyme(s).
  • the enzyme composition and/or feed additive composition of the present invention will be thermally stable to heat treatment up to about 70°C; up to about 85°C; or up to about 95°C.
  • the heat treatment may be performed for up to about 1 minute; up to about 5 minutes; up to about 10 minutes; up to about 30 minutes; up to about 60 minutes.
  • thermally stable means that at least about 75% of the enzyme components that were present/active in the additive before heating to the specified temperature are still present/active after it cools to room temperature.
  • at least about 80% of the enzyme components that were present and active in the additive before heating to the specified temperature are still present and active after it cools to room temperature.
  • the enzyme composition and/or feed additive composition is homogenized to produce a powder.
  • the enzyme composition and/or feed additive composition is formulated to granules as described in WO2007/044968 (referred to as TPT granules) incorporated herein by reference.
  • the enzyme composition and/or feed additive composition is formulated into granules the granules comprise a hydrated barrier salt coated over the protein core.
  • the advantage of such salt coating is improved thermo-tolerance, improved storage stability and protection against other feed additives otherwise having adverse effect on the enzyme.
  • the salt used for the salt coating has a water activity greater than 0.25 or constant humidity greater than 60% at 20°C.
  • the salt coating comprises a Na 2 S0 4 .
  • the method of preparing a feed additive composition may also comprise the further step of pelleting the powder.
  • the powder may be mixed with other components known in the art.
  • the powder, or mixture comprising the powder may be forced through a die and the resulting strands are cut into suitable pellets of variable length.
  • the pelleting step may include a steam treatment, or conditioning stage, prior to formation of the pellets.
  • the mixture comprising the powder may be placed in a conditioner, e.g. a mixer with steam injection.
  • the mixture is heated in the conditioner up to a specified temperature, such as from 60-100°C, typical temperatures would be 70°C, 80°C, 85°C, 90°C or 95°C.
  • the residence time can be variable from seconds to minutes and even hours. Such as 5 seconds, 10 seconds, 15 seconds, 30 seconds, 1 minutes 2 minutes., 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes and 1 hour.
  • feed additive composition of the present invention is suitable for addition to any appropriate feed material.
  • feed material refers to the basic feed material to be consumed by an animal. It will be further understood that this may comprise, for example, at least one or more unprocessed grains, and/or processed plant and/or animal material such as soybean meal or bone meal.
  • feedstuff' refers to a feed material to which one or more feed additive compositions have been added. It will be understood by the skilled person that different animals require different feedstuffs, and even the same animal may require different feedstuffs, depending upon the purpose for which the animal is reared.
  • the feedstuff may comprise feed materials comprising maize or corn, wheat, barley, triticale, rye, rice, tapioca, sorghum, and/ or any of the by-products, as well as protein rich components like soybean mean, rape seed meal, canola meal, cotton seed meal, sunflower seed mean, animal-by-product meals and mixtures thereof. More preferably, the feedstuff may comprise animal fats and / or vegetable oils. Optionally, the feedstuff may also contain additional minerals such as, for example, calcium and/or additional vitamins.
  • the feedstuff is a corn soybean meal mix.
  • a method for producing a feedstuff is typically produced in feed mills in which raw materials are first ground to a suitable particle size and then mixed with appropriate additives.
  • the feedstuff may then be produced as a mash or pellets; the later typically involves a method by which the temperature is raised to a target level and then the feed is passed through a die to produce pellets of a particular size. The pellets are allowed to cool. Subsequently liquid additives such as fat and enzyme may be added.
  • Production of feedstuff may also involve an additional step that includes extrusion or expansion prior to pelleting - in particular by suitable techniques that may include at least the use of steam.
  • the feedstuff may be a feedstuff for a monogastric animal, such as poultry (for example, broiler, layer, broiler breeders, turkey, duck, geese, water fowl), swine (all age categories), a pet (for example dogs, cats) or fish, preferably the feedstuff is for poultry.
  • poultry for example, broiler, layer, broiler breeders, turkey, duck, geese, water fowl
  • swine all age categories
  • a pet for example dogs, cats
  • fish preferably the feedstuff is for poultry.
  • a feedstuff for chickens e.g. broiler chickens may be comprises of one or more of the ingredients listed in the table below, for example in the %ages given in the table below:
  • a feedstuff laying hens may be comprises of one or more of the ingredients listed in the table below, for example in the %ages given in the table below:
  • a feedstuff for turkeys may be comprises of one or more of the ingredients listed in the table below, for example in the %ages given in the table below:
  • a feedstuff for piglets may be comprises of one or more of the ingredients listed in the table below, for example in the %ages given in the table below: Ingredient Phase 1 (%) Phase 2 (%)
  • a feedstuff for grower/finisher pigs may be comprises of one or more of the ingredients listed in the table below, for example in the %ages given in the table below: Ingredient Grower/ Finisher (%)
  • the enzyme composition of the present invention and/or feed additive composition of the present invention and other components and/or the feedstuff comprising same may be used in any suitable form.
  • the enzyme composition of the present invention and/or feed additive composition of the present invention may be used in the form of solid or liquid preparations or alternatives thereof.
  • solid preparations include powders, pastes, boluses, capsules, pellets, tablets, dusts, and granules which may be wettable, spray-dried or freeze-dried.
  • liquid preparations include, but are not limited to, aqueous, organic or aqueous-organic solutions, suspensions and emulsions.
  • feed additive composition of the present invention may be mixed with feed or administered in the drinking water.
  • Suitable examples of forms include one or more of: powders, pastes, boluses, pellets, tablets, pills, capsules, ovules, solutions or suspensions, which may contain flavouring or colouring agents, for immediate-, delayed-, modified-, sustained-, pulsed- or controlled- release applications.
  • composition of the present invention may also contain one or more of: excipients such as microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, sodium citrate, calcium carbonate, dibasic calcium phosphate and glycine; disintegrants such as starch (preferably corn, potato or tapioca starch), sodium starch glycollate, croscarmellose sodium and certain complex silicates; granulation binders such as polyvinylpyrrolidone, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC), sucrose, gelatin and acacia; lubricating agents such as magnesium stearate, stearic acid, glyceryl behenate and talc may be included.
  • excipients such as microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, sodium citrate, calcium carbonate, dibasic calcium phosphate and glycine
  • disintegrants such as starch (preferably corn, potato or tapioca starch), sodium starch glycollate, croscarmellose sodium and certain complex si
  • Examples of nutritionally acceptable carriers for use in preparing the forms include, for example, water, salt solutions, alcohol, silicone, waxes, petroleum jelly, vegetable oils, polyethylene glycols, propylene glycol, liposomes, sugars, gelatin, lactose, amylose, magnesium stearate, talc, surfactants, silicic acid, viscous paraffin, perfume oil, fatty acid monoglycerides and diglycerides, petroethral fatty acid esters, hydroxymethyl-cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and the like.
  • Preferred excipients for the forms include lactose, starch, a cellulose, milk sugar or high molecular weight polyethylene glycols.
  • composition of the present invention may be combined with various sweetening or flavouring agents, colouring matter or dyes, with emulsifying and/or suspending agents and with diluents such as water, propylene glycol and glycerin, and combinations thereof.
  • the feed additive composition, or feed ingredient, or feed or feedstuff or premix of the present invention may be used in combination with other components.
  • the "another component" may be one or more enzymes.
  • Suitable additional enzymes for use in the present invention may be one or more of the enzymes selected from the group consisting of: endoglucanases (E.C. 3.2.1.4); celliobiohydrolases (E.C. 3.2.1.91), ⁇ -glucosidases (E.C. 3.2.1.21), cellulases (E.C. 3.2.1.74), lichenases (E.C. 3.1.1.73), lipases (E.C. 3.1.1.3), lipid acyltransferases (generally classified as E.C. 2.3.1.x), phospholipases (E.C. 3.1.1.4, E.C. 3.1.1.32 or E.C. 3.1.1.5), phytases (e.g.
  • 6-phytase E.C. 3.1.3.26 or a 3-phytase (E.C. 3.1.3.8), alpha-amylases (E.C. 3.2.1.1), xylanases (E.C. 3.2.1.8, E.C. 3.2.1.32, E.C. 3.2.1.37, E.C. 3.1.1.72, E.C. 3.1.1.73), glucoamylases (E.C. 3.2.1.3), proteases (e.g. subtilisin (E.C. 3.4.21.62) or a bacillolysin (E.C. 3.4.24.28) or an alkaline serine protease (E.C.
  • ком ⁇ онент 3.4.21.x or a keratinase (E.C. 3.4.x.x)) and/or mannanases (e.g. a ⁇ -mannanase (E.C. 3.2.1.78)).
  • the other component may be one or more of the enzymes selected from the group consisting of xylanases (E.C. 3.2.1.8, E.C. 3.2.1.32, E.C. 3.2.1.37, E.C. 3.1.1.72, E.C. 3.1.1.73), an amylase (including a-amylases (E.C. 3.2.1.1), G4-forming amylases (E.C. 3.2.1.60), ⁇ -amylases (E.C. 3.2.1.2) and ⁇ - amylases (E.C. 3.2.1.3); and/or a protease (e.g. subtilisin (E.C.).
  • xylanases E.C. 3.2.1.8, E.C. 3.2.1.32, E.C. 3.2.1.37, E.C. 3.1.1.72, E.C. 3.1.1.73
  • an amylase including a-amylases (E.C. 3.2.1.1), G4-forming amylases
  • the other component may be a combination of an amylase (e.g. a-amylases (E.C. 3.2.1.1)) and a protease (e.g. subtilisin (E.C. 3.4.21.62)).
  • an amylase e.g. a-amylases (E.C. 3.2.1.1)
  • a protease e.g. subtilisin (E.C. 3.4.21.62)
  • the other component may be a ⁇ - glucanase, e.g. an endo-1 ,3(4) ⁇ -glucanases (E.C. 3.2.1.6).
  • the other component may be a mannanases (e.g. a ⁇ -mannanase (E.C. 3.2.1.78)).
  • the other component may be a lipase (E.C. 3.1.1.3), a lipid acyltransferase (generally classified as E.C. 2.3.1.x), or a phospholipase (E.C. 3.1.1.4, E.C. 3.1.1.32 or E.C. 3.1.1.5), suitably a lipase (E.C. 3.1.1.3).
  • the other component may be a protease (e.g. subtilisin (E.C. 3.4.21.62) or a bacillolysin (E.C. 3.4.24.28) or an alkaline serine protease (E.C. 3.4.21.x) or a keratinase (E.C. 3.4.x.x)).
  • a protease e.g. subtilisin (E.C. 3.4.21.62) or a bacillolysin (E.C. 3.4.24.28) or an alkaline serine protease (E.C. 3.4.21.x) or a keratinase (E.C. 3.4.x.x)).
  • the additional component may be a stabiliser or an emulsifier or a binder or carrier or an excipient or a diluent or a disintegrant.
  • stabiliser as used here is defined as an ingredient or combination of ingredients that keeps a product (e.g. a feed product) from changing over time.
  • Emulsifier refers to an ingredient (e.g. a feed ingredient) that prevents the separation of emulsions.
  • Emulsions are two immiscible substances, one present in droplet form, contained within the other.
  • Emulsions can consist of oil-in-water, where the droplet or dispersed phase is oil and the continuous phase is water; or water-in-oil, where the water becomes the dispersed phase and the continuous phase is oil.
  • Foams, which are gas-in-liquid, and suspensions, which are solid-in-liquid, can also be stabilised through the use of emulsifiers.
  • binder refers to an ingredient (e.g. a feed ingredient) that binds the product together through a physical or chemical reaction. During “gelation” for instance, water is absorbed, providing a binding effect. However, binders can absorb other liquids, such as oils, holding them within the product. In the context of the present invention binders would typically be used in solid or low-moisture products for instance baking products: pastries, doughnuts, bread and others. Examples of granulation binders include one or more of: polyvinylpyrrolidone, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC), sucrose, maltose, gelatin and acacia.
  • Carriers mean materials suitable for administration of the enzyme and include any such material known in the art such as, for example, any liquid, gel, solvent, liquid diluent, solubilizer, or the like, which is non-toxic and which does not interact with any components of the composition in a deleterious manner.
  • the present invention provides a method for preparing a composition (e.g. a feed additive composition) comprising admixing feed additive of the present invention (and preferably corn or a corn by-product) with at least one physiologically acceptable carrier selected from at least one of maltodextrin, limestone (calcium carbonate), cyclodextrin, wheat or a wheat component, sucrose, starch, Na 2 S0 4 , Talc, PVA, sorbitol, benzoate, sorbiate, glycerol, sucrose, propylene glycol, 1 ,3-propane diol, glucose, parabens, sodium chloride, citrate, acetate, phosphate, calcium, metabisulfite, formate and mixtures thereof.
  • a physiologically acceptable carrier selected from at least one of maltodextrin, limestone (calcium carbonate), cyclodextrin, wheat or a wheat component, sucrose, starch, Na 2 S0 4 , Talc, PVA, sorb
  • excipients include one or more of: microcrystalline cellulose and other celluloses, lactose, sodium citrate, calcium carbonate, dibasic calcium phosphate, glycine, starch, milk sugar and high molecular weight polyethylene glycols.
  • disintegrants include one or more of: starch (preferably corn, potato or tapioca starch), sodium starch glycollate, croscarmellose sodium and certain complex silicates.
  • diols examples include one or more of: water, ethanol, propylene glycol and glycerin, and combinations thereof.
  • the other components may be used simultaneously (e.g. when they are in admixture together or even when they are delivered by different routes) or sequentially (e.g. they may be delivered by different routes) to the feed additive of the present invention.
  • the feed additive composition, or feed ingredient, or feed or feedstuff or premix according to the present invention does not comprise chromium or organic chromium. In one embodiment preferably the feed additive composition, or feed ingredient, or feed or feedstuff or premix according to the present invention does not contain sorbic acid.
  • biophysical characteristic means any biophysical property of an animal which improves its health and/or performance and/or output.
  • the biophysical characteristic of interest may be one or more of the group selected from: performance of the animal, growth performance of an animal, feed conversion ratio (FCR), ability to digest a raw material (e.g. nutrient digestibility, including starch , fat, protein, fibre digestibility), nitrogen retention, carcass yield, growth rate, weight gain, body weight, mass, feed efficiency, body fat percentage, body fat distribution, growth, egg size, egg weight, egg mass, egg laying rate and environmental impact, e.g. manure output and/or nitrogen excretion.
  • FCR feed conversion ratio
  • the biophysical characteristic arising from a method or use in accordance with the present invention may be selected from the group consisting of one or more of the following: performance of an animal, growth performance of an animal, feed conversion ratio (FCR), ability to digest a raw material (e.g. nutrient digestibility, including starch , fat, protein, fibre digestibility), nitrogen retention, carcass yield, growth rate, weight gain, body weight, mass, feed efficiency, body fat percentage, body fat distribution, growth, egg size, egg weight, egg mass, egg laying rate and environmental impact, e.g. manure output and/or nitrogen excretion.
  • FCR feed conversion ratio
  • biophysical characteristic of the animal means the performance of the animal.
  • performance of the animal may be determined by the feed efficiency and/or weight gain of the animal and/or by the feed conversion ratio and/or by the digestibility of a nutrient in a feed (e.g. amino acid digestibility) and/or digestible energy or metabolizable energy in a feed and/or by nitrogen retention.
  • a nutrient in a feed e.g. amino acid digestibility
  • digestible energy or metabolizable energy in a feed e.g. amino acid digestibility
  • performance of the animal is determined by feed efficiency and/or weight gain of the animal and/or by the feed conversion ratio.
  • improved performance of the animal it is meant that there is increased feed efficiency, and/or increased weight gain and/or reduced feed conversion ratio and/or improved digestibility of nutrients or energy in a feed and/or by improved nitrogen retention in the animal resulting from the use of feed additive composition of the present invention compared with feeding the animal the lignocellulosic biomass which has not been treated in accordance with the present invention.
  • improved animal performance it is meant that there is increased feed efficiency and/or increased weight gain and/or reduced feed conversion ratio.
  • feed efficiency refers to the amount of weight gain in an animal that occurs when the animal is fed ad-libitum or a specified amount of food during a period of time.
  • feed additive composition according the present invention in feed results in an increased weight gain per unit of feed intake compared with an animal fed with the lignocellulosic biomass which has not been treated in accordance with the present invention.
  • feed conversion ratio refers to the amount of feed fed to an animal to increase the weight of the animal by a specified amount.
  • An improved feed conversion ratio means a lower feed conversion ratio.
  • lower feed conversion ratio or “improved feed conversion ratio” it is meant that the use of a feed additive composition in feed results in a lower amount of feed being required to be fed to an animal to increase the weight of the animal by a specified amount compared to the amount of feed required to increase the weight of the animal by the same amount when the lignocellulosic biomass which has not been treated in accordance with the present invention is used in or as the feed.
  • Nutrient digestibility as used herein means the fraction of a nutrient that disappears from the gastro-intestinal tract or a specified segment of the gastro-intestinal tract, e.g. the small intestine. Nutrient digestibility may be measured as the difference between what is administered to the animal and what comes out in the faeces of the animal, or between what is administered to the animal and what remains in the digesta on a specified segment of the gastro intestinal tract, e.g. the ileum.
  • Nutrient digestibility as used herein may be measured by the difference between the intake of a nutrient and the excreted nutrient by means of the total collection of excreta during a period of time; or with the use of an inert marker that is not absorbed by the animal, and allows the researcher calculating the amount of nutrient that disappeared in the entire gastro- intestinal tract or a segment of the gastro-intestinal tract.
  • Such an inert marker may be titanium dioxide, chromic oxide or acid insoluble ash.
  • Digestibility may be expressed as a percentage of the nutrient in the feed, or as mass units of digestible nutrient per mass units of nutrient in the feed.
  • Nutrient digestibility as used herein encompasses starch digestibility, fat digestibility, protein digestibility, and amino acid digestibility.
  • Energy digestibility means the gross energy of the feed consumed minus the gross energy of the faeces or the gross energy of the feed consumed minus the gross energy of the remaining digesta on a specified segment of the gastro-intestinal tract of the animal, e.g. the ileum.
  • etabolizable energy refers to apparent metabolizable energy and means the gross energy of the feed consumed minus the gross energy contained in the faeces, urine, and gaseous products of digestion.
  • Energy digestibility and metabolizable energy may be measured as the difference between the intake of gross energy and the gross energy excreted in the faeces or the digesta present in specified segment of the gastro-intestinal tract using the same methods to measure the digestibility of nutrients, with appropriate corrections for nitrogen excretion to calculate metabolizable energy of feed.
  • Nitrogen retention as used herein means an animal's ability to retain nitrogen from the diet as body mass. A negative nitrogen balance occurs when the excretion of nitrogen exceeds the daily intake and is often seen when the muscle is being lost. A positive nitrogen balance is often associated with muscle growth, particularly in growing animals.
  • Nitrogen retention may be measured as the difference between the intake of nitrogen and the excreted nitrogen by means of the total collection of excreta and urine during a period of time. It is understood that excreted nitrogen includes undigested protein from the feed, endogenous proteinaceous secretions, microbial protein, and urinary nitrogen.
  • carcass yield means the amount of carcass as a proportion of the live body weight, after a commercial or experimental process of slaughter.
  • carcass means the body of an animal that has been slaughtered for food, with the head, entrails, part of the limbs, and feathers or skin removed.
  • meat yield as used herein means the amount of edible meat as a proportion of the live body weight, or the amount of a specified meat cut as a proportion of the live body weight.
  • the present invention further provides a method of increasing weight gain in an animal, e.g. poultry or swine, comprising feeding said animal a feedstuff comprising a feed additive composition according to the present invention.
  • An "increased weight gain” refers to an animal having increased body weight on being fed feed comprising a feed additive composition compared with an animal being fed a feed comprising or consisting of lignocellulosic biomass which has not been treated in accordance with the present invention.
  • Amino acids are referred to herein using the name of the amino acid, the three letter abbreviation or the single letter abbreviation.
  • protein includes proteins, polypeptides, and peptides.
  • amino acid sequence is synonymous with the term “polypeptide” and/or the term “protein”. In some instances, the term “amino acid sequence” is synonymous with the term “peptide”. In some instances, the term “amino acid sequence” is synonymous with the term “enzyme”.
  • polypeptide proteins and polypeptide are used interchangeably herein.
  • the conventional one-letter and three-letter codes for amino acid residues may be used.
  • the 3-letter code for amino acids as defined in conformity with the lUPACIUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN). It is also understood that a polypeptide may be coded for by more than one nucleotide sequence due to the degeneracy of the genetic code.
  • the present invention seeks to provide alternative feed ingredients for animal production.
  • the present inventors have surprisingly found that the elimination of C5-monomer sugar production and promotion of C5-oligomer production together with cellulase activities (e.g. to produce C6-oligomer and C-6 monomer sugars) is advantageous in the production of plant materials (e.g. lignocellulosic biomass) for use in or as feedstuffs.
  • plant materials e.g. lignocellulosic biomass
  • the enzymes tested were:
  • Cellulase SC is an enzyme composition comprising the following enzyme activities: endoglucanase activity, ⁇ -glucosidase activity and endoxylanase activity and which has no or substantially no ⁇ -xylosidase activity and a-L-arabinofuranosidase activity.
  • Cellulase SC was kept at -20°C and thawed before use.
  • Econase XTTM is a xylanase variant from the actinomycete Nonomuraea flexuosa (Leskinen et al. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2005) 67: 495-505).
  • AcceIlerase ® TrioTM is a comparative enzyme composition comprising an endoglucanase, ⁇ -glucosidase and endoxylanase activity as well as C-5 monomer forming enzyme activities such as ⁇ -xylosidase activity and a-L-arabinofuranosidase activity.
  • the recommended dosage for Accellerase ® TrioTM is 0.05 - 0.3 ml_ per gram cellulose or roughly 0.03 -0.16 ml_ per gram of biomass (depending on biomass composition). Accellerase ⁇ rioTM was kept at -20°C before use.
  • DaCS Dilute ammonium pre-treated corn stover
  • SAX SPE strong anion exchanger solid phase extraction column
  • the sugar standards used were: L(+) Arabinose (Merck 1488), D-Galactose (Merck 4058), D(+)-Xylose (Merck 8689), D(+)Glucose (Merck 8337), D(+)Mannose (Merck 5984).
  • Polymeric sugars (mg/l) total sugars after acid hydrolysis (mg/l) - free monosaccharides (mg/l).
  • EXAMPLE 1 Cellulase SC hydrolysis of dilute ammonium treated corn stover (DaCS).
  • Dilute ammonium treated corn stover (DaCS): to 50ml Falcon tube, add 15g DaCS, tap water, adjust the pH to 5.0 using 2N HCI. 1.33 ml of Cellulase SC (product lot no. 1 18, (protein concentration 76.6 g/L) referred to herein as Cellulase SC118) was added to start the reaction. The final concentration of biomass DaCS was 18.4% (w/v). Cellulase SC118: Biomass ratio (w/w) was 1.08:100.
  • DaCS Dilute ammonium treated corn stover
  • the reaction was performed at 50°C with shaking at 200rpm for 70h. Liquid samples were taken at 21.5h, 45.5h, 62.5h and at the end of the reaction 70.5h after short spin of the biomass in the Falcon tube. Sampling size at the time intervals was 60 ⁇ , which was then mixed 60 ⁇ water used to rinse the pipette tips used to suck the samples. The samples collected were kept at 5°C before HPLC analysis. Each of the samples was then further mixed with 120ul milliQ water, heated at 100°C for 5min and filtered. The filtrate 10 ⁇ was injected on HPLC for analysis of released sugars. To each of the 3 Falcon tubes 14ml milliQ water was added to wash the residual biomass obtained after centrifugation. The washed residual biomass was dried at 80°C for 20h and weighed. Their weights were used to compare the weights of the biomass treated in the absence of the enzyme composition.
  • Figure 1 shows the glucose and xylose yield obtained from treating DaCS with Cellulase SC.
  • Figure 1 is based on the data detailed in the table (Table 1) below. As can be seen from the table, xylose released is less than 1/3 of glucose released from DaCS at 50°C pH5.0 for up to 70.5 hours.
  • Cellulase SC plus an endoxylanase was found to promote the release of glucose and xylooligosaccharides. This was found to be highly beneficial for use in feedstuffs.
  • EXAMPLE 2 Cellulase SC hydrolysis of dilute ammonium treated corn stover (DaCS) and the effect of adding an endoxylanase.
  • DaCS dilute ammonium treated corn stover
  • Liquid samples 120 ⁇ were collected at a reaction time of 6h, 19h, and 40h, diluted with 120 ⁇ MilliQ water and saved at 5°C waiting for analysis.
  • 240 ⁇ milliQ water was further added to each of the collected samples, which were then heated at 100°C water bath for 5min, followed by centrifugation at 10000g for 10min. 250 ⁇ of supernatant was then filtered and the filtrate 10 ⁇ were injected for HPLC analysis.
  • Glucose and xylose standards at 1 % (w/v) were filtered and analyzed on HPLC at the same conditions with the same injection volume as the hydrolyzate samples collected.
  • Biomass weight reduction analysis For the residual biomass in the 9 tubes obtained after centrifugation, after removal of the supernatant, 4ml water was added and shaken to wash out anything soluble from the precipitate. The suspension was centrifuged again to get the washed biomass residue, which was then dried at 60°C for 48h.
  • EXAMPLE 3 A further study of Cellulase SC hydrolysis of dilute ammonium treated corn stover (DaCS) and the effect of adding various xylanases. Take 1g DaCS to each of the tubes listed in Table 3 with a volume of 12ml, add 4.6ml water and 0.15ml 1 N HCI, mix. The pH measured was pH 5.03-5.17. Then enzymes of Accellerase ® TrioTM, Cellulase SC 118 or Cellulase SC 118 plus 10-120ul of the 5 different xylanases were added to start the reaction at 50°C, shaking at 200rpm for 45h. Tubes 22-24 were controls as no enzymes were added. Tube 3k, 6k, 12k, 15k, 18k, and 21 k are blanks.
  • a typical HPLC chromatogram of DaCS hydrolyzate produced by Accellerase ⁇ TrioTM shows the monosaccharide peak of glucose, xylose and arabinose (see Figure 5) with quite flat peaks in the polymer area (Peak 2 with retention of 9.22min).
  • a typical HPLC chromatogram of DaCS hydrolyzate produced by Cellulase SC (lower trace) and Cellulase SC in combination with Danisco XylanaseTM (upper trace) shows glucose, xylose and arabinose peaks (see Figure 6), compared to the much higher and wider peaks of oligomers and polymers of Figure 5 with Accellerase ® TrioTM.
  • Figure 5 and Figure 6 show that Cellulase SC and Cellulase SC in combination with a xylanase generated a much reduced xylose peak and also a reduced glucose peak. On the other hand it has high contents of olio- or polymers in the region between retention time of 6.5 - 11.5min.
  • the inventors have surprisingly found that reduced amount of xylose (and even glucose) and increased amount of oligomers and polymers are advantageous when the hydrolyzate is used as a feed ingredient, particularly for monogastric animals.
  • xylose is not an efficient source of energy for monogastric animals as approximately 50% of consumed xylose is excreted in the urine.
  • Oligomers and polymers on the other hand can be fermented by microbiota occupying the large intestine to short chain fatty acids which can be absorbed into the blood stream and be used by the animals as an energy source.
  • EXAMPLE 4 A further study of Cellulase SC hydrolysis of dilute ammonium treated corn stover (DaCS) and the dose effect of Cellulase SC and endoxylanase (Danisco XylanaseTM).
  • the pooled supernatants (2ml) were placed at 100°C for 10min to inactivate the enzymes, then centrifuged and filtered. The filtrate was analyzed via HPLC with an injection volume of 10 ⁇ . The washed precipitates were dried at 80°C for 48h.
  • DaCS had a dry matter content of 63.3% (Column 1 from left). Incubation of the DaCS at 50°C for 40h in water with pH adjusted to pH5 using HCI, 16.0% of the dry matter became soluble (Column 2 from left of Figure 9). Addition of the endoxylanase at 10 ⁇ (93 units) further increased the solubility of DaCS to 26.9%. Addition of Cellulase SC1 18 cellulase alone increased the solubility to 41.7%. With a combination of 10 ⁇ of endoxylanase and 50 ⁇ of Cellulase SC118, the solubility reached around 51.7%, indicating that xylanase and Cellulase SC have an additive effect.
  • Figure 1 1 shows the total soluble sugar concentration in the 12 ml supernatant obtained after the enzyme hydrolysis of DaCS followed by centrifugation and washing. It can see seen that the major sugars are glucose, xylose, arabinose; the minor components are galactose and mannose. CONCLUSIONS
  • An enzyme composition comprising at least the following activities: endoglucanase activity, ⁇ -glucosidase activity and endoxylanase activity; wherein one or both of the following enzyme activities are absent or substantially absent in the enzyme composition: ⁇ -xylosidase activity and a-L-arabinofuranosidase activity was found to be the most effective composition for degrading lignocellulosic biomass whilst producing a product that was most suited for use as an animal feed composition or as a feedstuff.
  • a total of 240 male broiler chicks (1 day old) of the Ross 308 strain were used in this study.
  • the chicks were individually weighed at hatch and divided into 12 groups of 5 birds balanced for body weight. They were then group weighed and each group was housed in a cage in electrically heated Petersime battery brooders.
  • the brooder and room temperatures were set at 32 and 29°C, respectively, during the first week. Thereafter, heat supply in the brooder was switched off and room temperature was maintained at 29°C throughout the experiment.
  • the study duration was 21 days during which time birds were fed one of the following four treatments: 1 : basal diet (corn soybean meal based diet) + corn starch 25%, D-xylose 0%, 2: basal diet + corn starch 20%, D-xylose 5%, 3: basal diet + corn starch 10%, D-xylose 15%, and 4: basal diet + corn starch 0%, D-xylose 25%.
  • basal diet corn soybean meal based diet
  • 2 basal diet + corn starch 20%
  • 3 basal diet + corn starch 10%, D-xylose 15%
  • 4 basal diet + corn starch 0%, D-xylose 25%.
  • Fresh water and feed were made available to all chicks for ad libitum intake throughout the study.
  • the feed consumption and body weight of the birds was monitored weekly for calculation of body weight gain, voluntary feed intake, and feed conversion efficiency.
  • the study duration was 21 days, however, following 14 days of treatment birds on treatment 4 were removed due to high mortality rates and signs of illness.
  • the basal diet was a corn soybean meal diet.
  • During the first 14 days of the study there was a significant decrease in feed intake and weight gain in birds fed diets containing 25% xylose compared to birds fed all other treatments (P ⁇ 0.05) (see Figure 12).
  • At day 14 of the study all birds on treatment 4 were removed from the study. By this time, mortality in the treatment group (25% xylose) had reached 10% and many more birds were showing symptoms of disorientation, blindness and body tremors.
  • xylose replacing 25% of the energy source in the diet is detrimental to the health of broiler chickens. Broilers appear to tolerate up to 5% xylose in the diet before demonstrating significant adverse effects on growth performance however, even at 5% xylose inclusion in the diet, there is a numerical decrease in growth performance compared to the control diet.
  • EXAMPLE 6 Accellerase®1500TM and Econase®XTTM hydrolysis of dilute ammonium treated corn stover (DaCS) and caustic deli nified switch grass (DLswg) To each of 8 plastic tubes with a volume of 12ml, 1g of DaCS and 5ml MilliQ water are added and mixed. Likewise, 1g of DLswg and 5ml MilliQ water are added to another 8 plastic tubes with a volume of 12ml, and mixed. All tubes are let stand at 5°C overnight to ensure the DaCS and DLswg are well hydrated. The following day 150ul 1 HCI is added to adjust the pH to 4.6-5.1. Enzymes (listed in Table 5 below) are added to start the reaction.
  • DaCS dilute ammonium treated corn stover
  • DLswg caustic deli nified switch grass
  • the reaction is performed at 50°C with a shaking speed of 180 rpm for 40h.
  • Liquid samples 120 ⁇ are collected at a reaction time of 6h, diluted with 120 ⁇ MilliQ water and maintained at 5°C until analysis is performed.
  • 240 ⁇ milliQ water is further added to each of the collected samples, which are then heated at 100°C in a water bath for 5min, followed by centrifugation at 10000 xg for 10min. 250 ⁇ of supernatant is then filtered and the filtrate 10 ⁇ is injected for HPLC analysis.
  • Glucose and xylose standards at 1 % (w/v) are filtered and analyzed by HPLC at the same conditions with the same injection volume as described in the materials and methods section. Table 5.
  • Tube 1 1 — i g Accellerase ® Trio I M - 0.2 ml/g DM
  • Accellerase 1500 is a commercial enzyme available from Danisco (now part of DuPont) and contains certain cellulase activities such as endoglucanase activity, beta-glucosidase and certain hemi-cellulases activity such as endoxylanase activity.
  • Econase ® XT 5P is a commercial enzyme available from AB Vista and has endo1-4 Beta xylanase activity.
  • Results indicate that the addition of Accellerase® 1500TM and Econase®XT 5P to dilute ammonia pre-treated corn stover and caustic delignified switchgrass have a synergy in release of glucose as the glucose released by the combination of Accellerase®1500TM (0.3 ml/g) and Econase®XT 5P (1.4 mg/g DM) is greater than the glucose released by each enzyme alone (Table 6).
  • the combination of endoglucanase, endoxylanase and ⁇ - glucosidase activities as is provided in this example by the addition of Accellerase®1500TM and Econase®XT 5P resulted in substantial release of glucose similar to Accellerase®TrioTM.
  • Accellerase®1500TM and Econase®XT 5P resulted in significantly less xylose release due to the absence of significant amounts of a-L-arabinofuranosidase and ⁇ - xylosidase activity present in this enzyme combination compared to Accellerase®TrioTM.
  • Table 6 Release of xylose and glucose from dilute ammonia pretreated corn stover (DAcs) and caustic delignified switch grass (DLswg) using Accellerase ® TrioTM, Accellerase ® 1500TM
  • Example 7 Celluclast®, Danisco XylanaseTM and Accellerase®BGTM hydrolysis of dilute ammonium treated corn stover (DaCS) and caustic delignified switchgrass (DLswg)
  • Liquid samples (120 ⁇ ) are collected at a reaction time of 6h, , diluted with 120 ⁇ MilliQ water and maintained at 5°C until analysis is performed. At the end of the enzyme reaction, 240 ⁇ milliQ water is further added to each of the collected samples, which are then heated at 100°C in a water bath for 5min, followed by centrifugation at 10000 xg for 10min. 250 ⁇ of supernatant is then filtered and the filtrate 10 ⁇ is injected for HPLC analysis. Glucose and xylose standards at 1% (w/v) are filtered and analyzed by HPLC at the same conditions with the same injection volume as described in the materials and methods section.
  • XylanaseTM (3.5 ul/g DM)+Accellerase®BGTM (0.15 ml/g DM)
  • XylanaseTM (3.5 ul/g DM)+Accellerase®BGTM (0.15 ml/g DM)
  • Tube 14 ig Celluclast® (0.1 ml/g DM)
  • Tube 15 i g Danisco XylanaseTM (3.5 l/g DM)
  • Tube 16 ig Danisco XylanaseTM (3.5 ul/g DM)
  • Tube 17 ig Accellerase®BGTM (0.15 ml/g DM)
  • Tube 18 ig Accellerase®BGTM (0. 5 ml/g DM)
  • XylanaseTM (3.5 ul/g DM)+Accellerase®BGTM (0.15 ml/g DM)
  • XylanaseTM (3.5 ul/g DM)+Accellerase®BGTM (0.15 ml/g DM)
  • XylanaseTM (3.5 ul/g DM)+Accellerase®BGTM (0.15 ml/g DM)
  • Celluclast ® is a commercial enzyme available from Sigma-Aldrich (C2730) and contains certain cellulase activities such as endoglucanase activity, and beta-glucosidase.
  • Danisco XylanaseTM is a commercial enzyme available from Dansico (now part of DuPont) and has endoxylanase activity.
  • Accellerase®BGTM is a commercial enzyme available from Danisco (now part of DuPont) and has ⁇ -glucosidase activity.
  • Example 8 Cellulase from Aspergillus niger (Sigma C1184) and Accellerase®BGTM hydrolysis of dilute ammonium treated corn stover (DaCS) and caustic delignified switch grass (DLswg)
  • Liquid samples (120 ⁇ ) are collected at a reaction time of 6h, diluted with 120 ⁇ MilliQ water and maintained at 5°C until analysis is performed. At the end of the enzyme reaction, 240 ⁇ milliQ water is further added to each of the collected samples, which are then heated at 100°C in a water bath for 5min, followed by centrifugation at 10000 xg for 10min. 250 ⁇ of supernatant is then filtered and the filtrate 10 ⁇ is injected for HPLC analysis. Glucose and xylose standards at 1 % (w/v) are filtered and analyzed by HPLC at the same conditions with the same injection volume as described in the materials and methods section.
  • Tube 7 ig Cellulase from A. Niger (0.2 mg/g
  • Tube 10 ig Accellerase ® BGTM (0.15 ml/g)
  • Cellulase from Aspergillus niger is a commercial enzyme available from Sigma-Aldrich (C1 184) and contains certain cellulase activities such as endoglucanase activity as well as endoxylanase activity.
  • Accellerase®BGTM is a commercial enzyme available from Danisco (now part of DuPont) and has ⁇ -glucosidase activity.
  • Results indicate that the addition of Cellulase from A. niger and Accellerase®BGTM to dilute ammonia pretreated corn stover and caustic delignified switchgrass have a synergy in release of glucose as the glucose released by the combination of Cellulase from A. niger and Accellerase®BGTM is greater than the glucose released by each enzyme alone (Table 10).
  • the combination of endoglucanase, endoxylanase and b-glucosidase activities as is provided in this example by the addition of cellulase from A. niger and Accellerase®BGTM resulted in similar glucose release to Accellerase®TrioTM.
  • niger and Accellerase®BGTM resulted in significantly less xylose release due to the absence of significant amounts of a-L-arabinofuranosidase and ⁇ -xylosidase activity present in this enzyme combination compared to Accellerase®TrioTM.
  • Table 10 Release of xylose and glucose from dilute ammonia pretreated corn stover (DAcs) and caustic delignified switch grass (DLswg) using Accellerase ⁇ TrioTM, Cellulase from A. ni er and Accellerase®BGTM

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Mycology (AREA)
  • Fodder In General (AREA)
  • Enzymes And Modification Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé de préparation d'une composition additive alimentaire, ledit procédé consistant à : (a) prétraiter une biomasse lignocellulosique par voie physique et/ou chimique et/ou biologique, (b) mélanger la biomasse lignocellulosique prétraitée par voie physique et/ou chimique et/ou biologique à une composition enzymatique, ladite composition enzymatique présentant au moins les activités suivantes : l'activité endoglucanase, l'activité β-glucosidase et l'activité endoxylanase, ladite composition enzymatique ne présentant aucune ou sensiblement aucune activité β-xylosidase et/ou aucune ou sensiblement aucune activité α-L-arabinofuranosidase, (c) incuber le tout pendant au moins 3 à 120 heures, et (d) éventuellement sécher cette composition et/ou éventuellement la conditionner.
EP14732167.3A 2013-06-21 2014-06-19 Procédés et compositions pour améliorer la valeur nutritive d'une biomasse lignocellulosique Withdrawn EP3013155A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201361837748P 2013-06-21 2013-06-21
PCT/EP2014/062935 WO2014202716A1 (fr) 2013-06-21 2014-06-19 Procédés et compositions pour améliorer la valeur nutritive d'une biomasse lignocellulosique

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3013155A1 true EP3013155A1 (fr) 2016-05-04

Family

ID=50981516

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14732167.3A Withdrawn EP3013155A1 (fr) 2013-06-21 2014-06-19 Procédés et compositions pour améliorer la valeur nutritive d'une biomasse lignocellulosique

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3013155A1 (fr)
CN (1) CN105517450A (fr)
AR (1) AR096670A1 (fr)
AU (1) AU2014283210A1 (fr)
BR (1) BR112015031628B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2014202716A1 (fr)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11006658B2 (en) 2018-08-15 2021-05-18 Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd Compositions, their use, and methods for their formation
US11248247B2 (en) 2018-02-21 2022-02-15 Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd Methods and systems of producing oligosaccharides
US11297865B2 (en) 2019-08-16 2022-04-12 Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd Methods of treating biomass to produce oligosaccharides and related compositions
US11871763B2 (en) 2019-12-12 2024-01-16 Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd Low sugar multiphase foodstuffs

Families Citing this family (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10081802B2 (en) 2013-07-29 2018-09-25 Danisco Us Inc. Variant Enzymes
MX2017007127A (es) 2014-12-19 2017-08-18 Novozymes As Composiciones que comprenden polipeptidos que tienen actividad xilanasa y polipeptidos que tienen actividad arabinofuranosidasa.
ITMI20150557A1 (it) 2015-04-16 2016-10-16 Vomm Impianti E Processi S P A Procedimento per eseguire in continuo reazioni enzimatiche su un substrato organico
CN108368527B (zh) 2015-11-26 2023-07-18 诺维信公司 研磨方法
WO2017189949A1 (fr) * 2016-04-28 2017-11-02 Renew Biomass, LLC Comestible comprenant une fibre végétale de miscanthus
WO2017190188A1 (fr) * 2016-05-02 2017-11-09 Swinburne University Of Technology Procédé d'obtention de substance utile à partir de déchets de biomasse végétale
CN106360018A (zh) * 2016-11-04 2017-02-01 广州市畜宝动物营养有限公司 一种猪预混料及猪配合饲料
CN109641973B (zh) 2016-11-25 2022-03-08 诺维信公司 Gh10木聚糖酶、gh62阿拉伯呋喃糖苷酶、研磨方法以及其他应用
WO2018118815A1 (fr) 2016-12-21 2018-06-28 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Procédés d'utilisation de sérine-protéases thermostables
CN107594209A (zh) * 2017-11-01 2018-01-19 桂林市宏远能源科技服务有限公司 一种利用甘蔗渣生产鹅饲料的方法
CN108740300B (zh) * 2018-04-19 2021-12-21 河南农业大学 一种利用农作物秸秆制备单胃动物能量饲料的方法
CN111418738A (zh) * 2020-04-29 2020-07-17 浙江省淡水水产研究所 一种拟穴青蟹复合人工饲料
CN111919797A (zh) * 2020-08-20 2020-11-13 西南大学 一种提高拉萨裂腹鱼受精卵成活率的方法
CN112825961A (zh) * 2020-11-21 2021-05-25 中国林业科学研究院林产化学工业研究所 一种木质素饲料添加剂及其制备方法和应用
CN113966782A (zh) * 2021-10-26 2022-01-25 怀化学院 一种提高四棱豆豆荚营养成分含量的方法及应用
CN114874356B (zh) * 2022-05-09 2023-02-28 天津科技大学 一种以小麦麸皮为原料提取阿拉伯木聚糖的方法、阿拉伯木聚糖和应用

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19627505A1 (de) * 1996-07-08 1998-01-15 Eco Sys Ges Fuer Analytik Und Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Futtermittels
EP0976838A1 (fr) * 1998-05-06 2000-02-02 Rhone-Poulenc Nutrition Animale Mélange d'enzymes
MXPA04001615A (es) * 2001-08-20 2004-07-23 Leuven K U Res & Dev Polisacaridos sin almidon.
CN103005147B (zh) * 2012-10-29 2014-10-08 重庆百奥帝克微生态科技有限公司 基于酒糟的生物饲料

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ANNON: "Cellulase", WIKIPEDIA, 25 November 2016 (2016-11-25), Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellulase> [retrieved on 20170609] *
ANNON: "Xylanasen", WIKIPEDIA, 25 November 2016 (2016-11-25), Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xylanasen> [retrieved on 20170609] *
J. B. SCHUTTE: "Nutritional Implications and Metabolizable Energy Value of D-Xylose and L-Arabinose in Chicks", POULTRY SCIENCE, vol. 69, no. 10, 1 October 1990 (1990-10-01), Oxford, pages 1724 - 1730, XP055380167, ISSN: 0032-5791, DOI: 10.3382/ps.0691724 *
See also references of WO2014202716A1 *

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11248247B2 (en) 2018-02-21 2022-02-15 Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd Methods and systems of producing oligosaccharides
US11006658B2 (en) 2018-08-15 2021-05-18 Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd Compositions, their use, and methods for their formation
US11596165B2 (en) 2018-08-15 2023-03-07 Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd Compositions, their use, and methods for their formation
US11903399B2 (en) 2018-08-15 2024-02-20 Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd Compositions, their use, and methods for their formation
US11297865B2 (en) 2019-08-16 2022-04-12 Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd Methods of treating biomass to produce oligosaccharides and related compositions
US11771123B2 (en) 2019-08-16 2023-10-03 Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd Methods for treating biomass to produce oligosaccharides and related compositions
US11871763B2 (en) 2019-12-12 2024-01-16 Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd Low sugar multiphase foodstuffs

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BR112015031628A2 (pt) 2017-11-07
AR096670A1 (es) 2016-01-27
WO2014202716A1 (fr) 2014-12-24
CN105517450A (zh) 2016-04-20
AU2014283210A1 (en) 2015-12-24
BR112015031628B1 (pt) 2021-06-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3010352B1 (fr) Procédé de préparation d&#39;un additif alimentaire
WO2014202716A1 (fr) Procédés et compositions pour améliorer la valeur nutritive d&#39;une biomasse lignocellulosique
Fahey Jr et al. Postharvest treatment of fibrous feedstuffs to improve their nutritive value
US10227623B2 (en) High force and high stress destructuring of cellulosic biomass
Knob et al. Agro-residues as alternative for xylanase production by filamentous fungi.
CN104768391A (zh) 用于增加纤维素材料的消化率的方法和组合物
EP2793607B9 (fr) Ingrédients pour compositions d&#39;alimentation d&#39;animaux
Yang et al. Assessment of fibrolytic activities of 18 commercial enzyme products and their abilities to degrade the cell wall fraction of corn stalks in in vitro enzymatic and ruminal batch cultures
Rusli et al. The potential of pretreated oil palm frond in enhancing rumen degradability and growth performance: A review
Liu et al. Effects of feruloyl esterase, non-starch polysaccharide degrading enzymes, phytase, and their combinations on in vitro degradation of rice bran and nutrient digestibility of rice bran based diets in adult cockerels
Thammiah et al. Scope of exogenous enzymes in enhancing ruminant productivity
CN110140813A (zh) 一种利用棕榈粕同时制备甘露寡糖、饲用多肽和膳食纤维的方法
Stein Chapter 6 Multi vs single application of enzymes to degrade fibre in diets for pigs
US20230276828A1 (en) Animal feed compositions
Nunes Depolymerizating enzymes—cellulases
Sathitkowitchai et al. Optimization of mannanase hydrolysis of steamed palm kernel cake to improve nutritional quality
Azizi et al. Is Palm Kernel Cake a Suitable Alternative Feed Ingredient for Poultry? Animals 2021, 11, 338
WO2023118499A2 (fr) Aliment pour ruminants ou complément pour aliment pour ruminants et son procédé de préparation
Aboragah Sonication to Improve Date Palm Seed Degradability in the Rumen
Naidu et al. Improving nutritive value of poor quality roughages and agro-industrial by products
WO2018231565A1 (fr) Modification de biomasse verte
Hassan Yasseen Abdulsalam Husain Almaamory
Badhan et al. Research Article Improvement in Saccharification Yield of Mixed Rumen Enzymes by Identification of Recalcitrant Cell Wall Constituents Using Enzyme Fingerprinting
Saminathan et al. ORCID 27
Sundu Use of enzymes to improve the nutritional value of palm kernel meal and copra meal Burhanudin Sundu and J. Dingle I. Introduction

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20151222

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: DUPONT NUTRITION BIOSCIENCES APS

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: LANTZ, SUZANNE

Inventor name: WALSH, MARIA

Inventor name: ROMERO MILLAN, LUIS FERNANDO

Inventor name: ARENT, SUSAN

Inventor name: BOWER, BEN

Inventor name: YU, SHUKUN

Inventor name: MITCHINSON, COLIN

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20170629

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230530

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20230801