EP2983960A2 - Method for releasing overlaps in a railway signalling system - Google Patents

Method for releasing overlaps in a railway signalling system

Info

Publication number
EP2983960A2
EP2983960A2 EP14718033.5A EP14718033A EP2983960A2 EP 2983960 A2 EP2983960 A2 EP 2983960A2 EP 14718033 A EP14718033 A EP 14718033A EP 2983960 A2 EP2983960 A2 EP 2983960A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
overlap
train
signal
interlocking
route
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP14718033.5A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2983960B1 (en
Inventor
Raymond Clifton
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Mobility Ltd
Original Assignee
Siemens Rail Automation Holdings Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=48483714&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2983960(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Siemens Rail Automation Holdings Ltd filed Critical Siemens Rail Automation Holdings Ltd
Publication of EP2983960A2 publication Critical patent/EP2983960A2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2983960B1 publication Critical patent/EP2983960B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L21/00—Station blocking between signal boxes in one yard
    • B61L21/06—Vehicle-on-line indication; Monitoring locking and release of the route
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/20—Trackside control of safe travel of vehicle or train, e.g. braking curve calculation
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/20—Trackside control of safe travel of vehicle or train, e.g. braking curve calculation
    • B61L2027/202—Trackside control of safe travel of vehicle or train, e.g. braking curve calculation using European Train Control System [ETCS]

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method for releasing an overlap in a railway signalling system, and swinging an overlap to an alternative overlap in a railway signalling system.
  • Fig. 1 shows a simplified generic track layout, in which trains may approach from the right side as shown, along either of the two parallel track lines, with the intention, say, of stopping at Platform A on the upper line, or Platform B on the lower line.
  • points PI are selectively operable to pass a train on the lower line to join the upper line.
  • the presence of a train on a particular section of track is determined through the use of track circuits as is well-known in the art, with the track circuits being labelled Tl to T6 on the upper line, and Til to T14 on the lower line.
  • Fig. 1 shows three sets of trackside signals: Sll and S21 located before the platforms and relaying signalling information to trains on the upper and lower lines respectively, S13 and S23 located at the exit end of the platforms and relaying signalling information to trains on the upper and lower lines respectively, and S15, located on the upper line some distance past the platform. If all trains are using communication-based signalling, the presence of these signals is not strictly necessary, but the general concept of operation is sufficiently similar for the purposes of describing the present invention.
  • a movement authority is sent to a train by trackside processing equipment (TPE, i.e. a radio block centre (RBC) in the case of ETCS) which is consistent with the routes that are set and the proceed indications provided by a signal interlocking.
  • TPE trackside processing equipment
  • RBC radio block centre
  • the TPE is configured with track data which provides details of signal positions, track circuits, routes, overlaps, etc. It is expected that the interlocking would provide a proceed indication to the TPE for each route from a route entry point (i.e. a signal) when it is safe for an approaching train to enter the route. Conventionally each route would be from one signal to the next. In the example of Fig. 1 there is only one route from each signal shown to the next signal, but in more complex layouts there could be several possible routes from one signal.
  • a movement authority will typically define a position beyond which the train should not travel (i.e. an "end of authority” (EoA) in ETCS) and a safety limit beyond which the train must be prevented from going (i.e. a "supervised location” in ETCS, the position of which can be specified in the movement authority by defining a danger point) . Because of the cautious (i.e. safety critical) nature of the train protection system it will not allow the train to approach closely to the supervised location because it must always be possible to stop the train even if it makes an unexpected move.
  • EoA end of authority
  • a safety limit beyond which the train must be prevented from going i.e. a "supervised location” in ETCS, the position of which can be specified in the movement authority by defining a danger point
  • a movement authority up to a red signal may typically define an EoA at the signal and a danger point (DP) at the end of the overlap, giving the train the longest available safety margin.
  • EoA EoA
  • DP danger point
  • a train would be expected to stop on the approach to the signal and not go right up to the EoA.
  • the required stopping position in a platform, Platform A as shown for example, would not normally require the driver to drive up to the EoA.
  • ETCS it is known that a facility exists where overlap information can be sent to a train with the MA which defines a temporary overlap limit, an overlap timer and the position of the train where timing should start, e.g. the start of the relevant track circuit.
  • This overlap information can be sent with a shorter danger point, for example placed at the fouling point (FP) , i.e. the point on the track beyond which a train would physically impede the movement of another train on another track, for converging tracks .
  • the train protection system will initially use a supervised location at the end of the overlap. When the timer expires, the protection system on the train will shorten the supervised location to the danger point. This should only happen once the train is stationary because the timer will be similar to that used by the trackside.
  • the trackside interlocking will also run a timer and allow the overlap to release when it expires. This arrangement is schematically shown in Fig. 3.
  • the movement authority In normal operation, as routes are set ahead of a train, the movement authority is replaced with a new extended authority allowing the train to proceed further along the railway. For example, and as shown schematically in Fig. 4, MAI is replaced by MA2, with new associated end of authority EoA2 and danger point DP2, when a proceed authority is given by the interlocking for signal Sll.
  • a proceed authority which has been given to a train is subsequently removed (for example the signaller may decide to allow another train to go first) then the route (s) beyond that signal are maintained in a locked state for that train until it is proved that the train will not use them.
  • This form of locking is often referred to as 'Approach Locking'.
  • this proving can be performed in different ways.
  • a timer is again used which allows sufficient time for a driver to observe that the authority for the train has changed and for the train to be brought to a stand without entering the route from the replaced signal. This timer may typically be of the order of 3 or 4 minutes.
  • ETCS provides a facility where the trackside equipment can send a message to a train to request a shortening of the MA.
  • the train protection system will calculate new braking profiles to determine if the train can stop before the shorter MA limit and respond to the trackside to either accept or reject the shortening request. If the shortening request is accepted by the train, this allows the trackside protection equipment to inform the interlocking that the route (s) beyond the replaced signal no longer need to be held for the train.
  • An example is shown schematically in Fig. 5, where a movement authority MAI might be shortened from S5 to SI (i.e. MA2) in order to allow another train to proceed from S3.
  • EP1752355 describes a typical system architecture with a bi-directional interface between a signalling interlocking and trackside processing equipment.
  • a second requirement is the capability to swing an overlap to an alternative section of track. This operation would for example be carried out when a train is not immediately approaching the signal at danger, the overlap currently set is blocking a path for another train and an alternative overlap is available.
  • a method for releasing an overlap in a railway signalling system comprising a signalling interlocking, trackside processing equipment and at least one signal, the overlap being a section of railway located past the signal in the direction of train movement, the method comprising :
  • a method for swinging an overlap to an alternative overlap in a railway signalling system comprising the steps of:
  • Fig. 1 schematically shows a simplified generic track layout
  • Fig. 2 schematically shows a movement authority granted for the layout of Fig. 1;
  • Fig. 3 schematically shows an overlap for the layout of Fig. 1;
  • Fig. 4 schematically shows a new movement authority for the layout of Fig. 1;
  • Fig. 5 schematically shows an example of co-operative movement authority shortening for a modified layout, so that overlaps do not conflict with other moves
  • Fig. 6 schematically shows a track layout exemplifying an overlap releasing method in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 7 schematically shows a track layout exemplifying an overlap swinging method in accordance with the present invention .
  • FIG. 6 A first embodiment of the present invention is schematically shown in Fig. 6, using for convenience the same track layout as Fig. 1.
  • the signalling interlocking is configured with the following:
  • the TPE is configured with the following:
  • the TPE When the interlocking provides a proceed indication to the TPE for the route leading up to S13 (i.e. from signal Sll) the TPE sends a movement authority (MAI) to the train with EoAl at the signal and a danger point DPI a short distance beyond, at the fouling point FP .
  • the TPE sends a new movement authority (MA2) with a similar EoA2 as EoAl, but with a danger point DP2 at the end of the overlap.
  • a request to release the overlap When a request to release the overlap is received by the interlocking, it removes the 'proceed' indication for the overlap from the TPE.
  • the TPE then sends a request to shorten the movement authority to the approaching train which specifies the end of authority and danger point of MAI again (i.e. EoAl and DPI) . If the train accepts the shorten request (for example because it has already stopped) , then the TPE can indicate to the interlocking that the overlap can be released. If the train rejects the shorten request then the overlap is not released until, for example, a longer conventional timeout has expired. If the train is stationary when the request is received, then the reduction in movement authority should not cause a problem for the train and the request would be accepted.
  • the train should also be able to adjust its profile in order to accept the reduction in movement authority. It is possible however that as the train approaches the stopping position the sudden rearwards movement of the danger point would cause a potential infringement of the emergency braking profile and the request to shorten would be rejected by the train.
  • the TPE will provide an approach locking override to the interlocking allowing the release of the overlap route.
  • the request to release an overlap could come from the signaller and used only when required. However it would also be possible for the overlap release to be requested automatically using a timer in the interlocking, based on the occupancy of the track circuit leading up to signal S13. The difference in this case is that the timer only needs to be set for long enough such that the train is likely to have stopped, and not that it has definitely stopped as was the case in the prior art, i.e. it is no longer safety critical. This is expected to reduce the timer used to trigger the overlap release by more than 10 seconds, which is significant in terms of railway operation.
  • FIG. 7 A further embodiment of the present invention, relating to a method of swinging overlaps, is set out in more detail with reference to Fig. 7.
  • the swinging of an overlap is a common feature of conventional signalling (at least in the United Kingdom) and, if the signalling has been configured to provide such a feature, will be permitted under certain conditions - primarily that the approaching train is far enough away from the signal such that it could not enter the overlap during the time that the relevant points (shown as P2A and P2B) are moving, as described below.
  • the possibility of swinging an overlap can be viewed as an extension to the capability of releasing an overlap. If the interlocking considers that conditions are suitable for an overlap to swing, i.e. the train is not immediately approaching the signal, then it can request release of the currently set overlap. This should not cause any problem for any ETCS train, which should accept the small reduction in its movement authority.
  • the TPE then provides an approach locking override to the interlocking which can then select an alternative overlap.
  • the TPE would indicate to the interlocking that the next train to approach a signal is an ETCS-controlled train.
  • the involvement of the TPE in releasing and swinging an overlap can therefore be conditional within the interlocking on the next train being indicated as an ETCS train. If the next train is not indicated as an ETCS train, either because the next train is not an ETCS train or its movement authority has not yet reached that signal, then the interlocking can swing the overlap according to conventional rules.
  • the signaller sets the route for a first train up to signal S13, including the overlap beyond points PI, referred to as "Overlap 1";
  • the RBC issues a movement authority MAI initially up to the signal, which includes EoAl and DPI.
  • DPI in this case is configured to be at the point of divergence for the alternative paths through points P2A;
  • the interlocking provides a proceed indication to the RBC for Overlap 1 and the RBC extends the movement authority for the first train by sending MA2, which includes EoA2 and DP2;
  • the signaller then, for example, may wish to allow a second train to proceed from signal S23. If "Overlap 2" from signal S13 is available and does not conflict with any other moves, then the signaller may request that the overlap be moved, or 'swung', away from the path of the second train from S23;
  • the interlocking can provide a proceed indication for Overlap 2 to the RBC. This allows the RBC to again extend the movement authority of the first train this time by sending MA3, including EoA3 and DP3.
  • EoA3 can be configured at the same location as EoA2; and
  • step 6 the locking of Overlap 1 is maintained by the interlocking until the RBC indicates that it can be released. If for whatever reason the train decides that it cannot accept the shortened movement authority request, or fails to respond, then Overlap 1 will remain locked for the first train and swinging will not be permitted. In this case it is expected that the interlocking will wait for a defined time for a release from the RBC, after which the interlocking will cancel the request to swing the overlap and re-establish the proceed indication for Overlap 1 to the RBC.
  • the above-described embodiments are exemplary only, and othe possibilities and alternatives within the scope of the inven tion will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)

Abstract

A method for releasing an overlap in a railway signalling system, the system comprising a signalling interlocking, trackside processing equipment and at least one signal, the overlap being a section of railway located past the signal in the direction of train movement, comprises: configuring both the interlocking and the trackside processing equipment to treat the overlap as an individual overlap route, such that a train would require a movement authority to be granted to proceed into that route.

Description

Description
Method for releasing overlaps in a railway signalling system This invention relates to a method for releasing an overlap in a railway signalling system, and swinging an overlap to an alternative overlap in a railway signalling system.
Background
Fig. 1 shows a simplified generic track layout, in which trains may approach from the right side as shown, along either of the two parallel track lines, with the intention, say, of stopping at Platform A on the upper line, or Platform B on the lower line. Past the platforms, points PI are selectively operable to pass a train on the lower line to join the upper line. The presence of a train on a particular section of track is determined through the use of track circuits as is well-known in the art, with the track circuits being labelled Tl to T6 on the upper line, and Til to T14 on the lower line.
As will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, rail system architectures may be broadly divided into two types: "conventional signalling", which relies upon information being passed to the train via trackside signals, and "communication-based signalling" such as "ETCS" (European Train Control System) , itself part of ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System) , and these will be discussed separately below. Fig. 1 shows three sets of trackside signals: Sll and S21 located before the platforms and relaying signalling information to trains on the upper and lower lines respectively, S13 and S23 located at the exit end of the platforms and relaying signalling information to trains on the upper and lower lines respectively, and S15, located on the upper line some distance past the platform. If all trains are using communication-based signalling, the presence of these signals is not strictly necessary, but the general concept of operation is sufficiently similar for the purposes of describing the present invention.
In conventional signalling (i.e. without ETCS) if a train is given authority by a lineside signal to proceed up to the next signal which is at red, then a safety margin beyond the red signal is normally set and locked for the train in case the train overruns the red signal. This safety margin is often called an "overlap". No other train is allowed to use the overlap section of track until it is proved that the train for which it has been set no longer needs the overlap. This is often achieved by timing the occupancy of the track circuit leading up to the red signal (the "berth track circuit") such that sufficient time is allowed for the train, for which the overlap has been set, to come to a stand (and it has not gone past the red signal into the overlap) . The timer is calculated based on the length of the track circuit and could typically be of the order of 30 to 60 seconds.
In the case of communication-based signalling (e.g. ETCS Level 2) a movement authority (MA) is sent to a train by trackside processing equipment (TPE, i.e. a radio block centre (RBC) in the case of ETCS) which is consistent with the routes that are set and the proceed indications provided by a signal interlocking. The TPE is configured with track data which provides details of signal positions, track circuits, routes, overlaps, etc. It is expected that the interlocking would provide a proceed indication to the TPE for each route from a route entry point (i.e. a signal) when it is safe for an approaching train to enter the route. Conventionally each route would be from one signal to the next. In the example of Fig. 1 there is only one route from each signal shown to the next signal, but in more complex layouts there could be several possible routes from one signal.
A movement authority will typically define a position beyond which the train should not travel (i.e. an "end of authority" (EoA) in ETCS) and a safety limit beyond which the train must be prevented from going (i.e. a "supervised location" in ETCS, the position of which can be specified in the movement authority by defining a danger point) . Because of the cautious (i.e. safety critical) nature of the train protection system it will not allow the train to approach closely to the supervised location because it must always be possible to stop the train even if it makes an unexpected move.
A movement authority up to a red signal may typically define an EoA at the signal and a danger point (DP) at the end of the overlap, giving the train the longest available safety margin. This is schematically shown in Fig. 2. Here, a train would be expected to stop on the approach to the signal and not go right up to the EoA. The required stopping position in a platform, Platform A as shown for example, would not normally require the driver to drive up to the EoA.
In ETCS it is known that a facility exists where overlap information can be sent to a train with the MA which defines a temporary overlap limit, an overlap timer and the position of the train where timing should start, e.g. the start of the relevant track circuit. This overlap information can be sent with a shorter danger point, for example placed at the fouling point (FP) , i.e. the point on the track beyond which a train would physically impede the movement of another train on another track, for converging tracks . The train protection system will initially use a supervised location at the end of the overlap. When the timer expires, the protection system on the train will shorten the supervised location to the danger point. This should only happen once the train is stationary because the timer will be similar to that used by the trackside. The trackside interlocking will also run a timer and allow the overlap to release when it expires. This arrangement is schematically shown in Fig. 3.
In normal operation, as routes are set ahead of a train, the movement authority is replaced with a new extended authority allowing the train to proceed further along the railway. For example, and as shown schematically in Fig. 4, MAI is replaced by MA2, with new associated end of authority EoA2 and danger point DP2, when a proceed authority is given by the interlocking for signal Sll.
For any signalling system, if a proceed authority which has been given to a train is subsequently removed (for example the signaller may decide to allow another train to go first) then the route (s) beyond that signal are maintained in a locked state for that train until it is proved that the train will not use them. This form of locking is often referred to as 'Approach Locking'. Depending on the signalling system and the operating requirements, this proving can be performed in different ways. However one common feature is that a timer is again used which allows sufficient time for a driver to observe that the authority for the train has changed and for the train to be brought to a stand without entering the route from the replaced signal. This timer may typically be of the order of 3 or 4 minutes.
A facility which is known to exist in ETCS is what is called ^co-operative shortening of a movement authority' . ETCS provides a facility where the trackside equipment can send a message to a train to request a shortening of the MA. The train protection system will calculate new braking profiles to determine if the train can stop before the shorter MA limit and respond to the trackside to either accept or reject the shortening request. If the shortening request is accepted by the train, this allows the trackside protection equipment to inform the interlocking that the route (s) beyond the replaced signal no longer need to be held for the train. An example is shown schematically in Fig. 5, where a movement authority MAI might be shortened from S5 to SI (i.e. MA2) in order to allow another train to proceed from S3.
As general prior art may be mentioned EP1752355, which describes a typical system architecture with a bi-directional interface between a signalling interlocking and trackside processing equipment.
However, in certain circumstances it may be desirable to implement the capability to release a signalling overlap when no forward route is set from the corresponding signal and the overlap is no longer required for an approaching train. As set out above, this can be achieved using a conventional timer based on the occupancy of the signal berth track, however it is desirable to provide improved performance for an ETCS fitted train by releasing the overlap, when no longer required, without waiting for the timer to expire. It has been suggested for the TPE (an RBC in this case) to inform the interlocking when a train is stationary in the berth track and the movement authority has been withdrawn. However, the functionality for an RBC to inform an interlocking of a stationary train is not standard ETCS functionality and not known to exist.
It is an aim of the present invention to provide an alternative method by which the operation of overlap release could be achieved using existing TPE functionality. This aim is achieved by effectively treating the overlap as a single route .
A second requirement is the capability to swing an overlap to an alternative section of track. This operation would for example be carried out when a train is not immediately approaching the signal at danger, the overlap currently set is blocking a path for another train and an alternative overlap is available.
It is a further aim of the present invention, solved in a similar manner, to provide a method to enable this capability.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for releasing an overlap in a railway signalling system, the system comprising a signalling interlocking, trackside processing equipment and at least one signal, the overlap being a section of railway located past the signal in the direction of train movement, the method comprising :
configuring both the interlocking and the trackside processing equipment to treat the overlap as an individual overlap route, such that a train would require a movement authority to be granted to proceed into that route .
In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for swinging an overlap to an alternative overlap in a railway signalling system, the system comprising a signalling interlocking and trackside equipment, comprising the steps of:
a) requesting the use of the alternative overlap;
b) determining, at the interlocking, if conditions are suitable for the overlap to swing,
c) if so, using the trackside processing equipment to provide an override to the interlocking, and releasing the overlap using a method in accordance with the first aspect, and d) swinging the overlap to the alternative overlap.
The invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 schematically shows a simplified generic track layout; Fig. 2 schematically shows a movement authority granted for the layout of Fig. 1;
Fig. 3 schematically shows an overlap for the layout of Fig. 1;
Fig. 4 schematically shows a new movement authority for the layout of Fig. 1;
Fig. 5 schematically shows an example of co-operative movement authority shortening for a modified layout, so that overlaps do not conflict with other moves; Fig. 6 schematically shows a track layout exemplifying an overlap releasing method in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and
Fig. 7 schematically shows a track layout exemplifying an overlap swinging method in accordance with the present invention .
A first embodiment of the present invention is schematically shown in Fig. 6, using for convenience the same track layout as Fig. 1.
The signalling interlocking is configured with the following:
- A route without an overlap up to each signal where the overlap is to be released, i.e. up to S13 and also up to S23;
- A ^oute' from these signals (i.e. from S13 and from
S23) up to the end of the overlap to be released (in addition to any normal routes configured from that signal) ;
- A ^proceed' indication for the overlap which is provided to the TPE whenever the overlap is available for use by an approaching train, and the route up to the associated signal is set but no other forward route from that signal is set.
The TPE is configured with the following:
- A route leading up to each signal where the overlap is to be released (i.e. S13 and S23) with an EoA at, or proximate, the signal and a danger point at the fouling point, a short distance beyond the signal. It should be noted that even though there is no overlap for this route there will, for this particular layout, be a short section of railway up to the fouling point which will not be required by any other train.
- A Λroute' from these signals (S13 and S23) which includes only the overlap with an EoA at or proximate to the signal, i.e. as short a distance as possible (for example around lm) beyond it, and a danger point at the end of the overlap. It should be noted that it may be system dependent as to whether the EoA can be in the same place or not as the previous route. The train should accept either.
- An indication to the interlocking which indicates
whether the overlap can be released or not.
When the interlocking provides a proceed indication to the TPE for the route leading up to S13 (i.e. from signal Sll) the TPE sends a movement authority (MAI) to the train with EoAl at the signal and a danger point DPI a short distance beyond, at the fouling point FP . When the interlocking provides a 'proceed' indication for the overlap, the TPE sends a new movement authority (MA2) with a similar EoA2 as EoAl, but with a danger point DP2 at the end of the overlap.
It can be seen therefore that the overlap is configured both in the interlocking and TPE as a separate "route" with con- ventional interaction between them in order to establish a "proceed" for the TPE.
When a request to release the overlap is received by the interlocking, it removes the 'proceed' indication for the overlap from the TPE. The TPE then sends a request to shorten the movement authority to the approaching train which specifies the end of authority and danger point of MAI again (i.e. EoAl and DPI) . If the train accepts the shorten request (for example because it has already stopped) , then the TPE can indicate to the interlocking that the overlap can be released. If the train rejects the shorten request then the overlap is not released until, for example, a longer conventional timeout has expired. If the train is stationary when the request is received, then the reduction in movement authority should not cause a problem for the train and the request would be accepted. If the train is not on its final approach profile to the stopping position then the train should also be able to adjust its profile in order to accept the reduction in movement authority. It is possible however that as the train approaches the stopping position the sudden rearwards movement of the danger point would cause a potential infringement of the emergency braking profile and the request to shorten would be rejected by the train.
Assuming the train accepts the shorten request then the TPE will provide an approach locking override to the interlocking allowing the release of the overlap route.
The request to release an overlap could come from the signaller and used only when required. However it would also be possible for the overlap release to be requested automatically using a timer in the interlocking, based on the occupancy of the track circuit leading up to signal S13. The difference in this case is that the timer only needs to be set for long enough such that the train is likely to have stopped, and not that it has definitely stopped as was the case in the prior art, i.e. it is no longer safety critical. This is expected to reduce the timer used to trigger the overlap release by more than 10 seconds, which is significant in terms of railway operation.
A further embodiment of the present invention, relating to a method of swinging overlaps, is set out in more detail with reference to Fig. 7.
The swinging of an overlap is a common feature of conventional signalling (at least in the United Kingdom) and, if the signalling has been configured to provide such a feature, will be permitted under certain conditions - primarily that the approaching train is far enough away from the signal such that it could not enter the overlap during the time that the relevant points (shown as P2A and P2B) are moving, as described below. The possibility of swinging an overlap can be viewed as an extension to the capability of releasing an overlap. If the interlocking considers that conditions are suitable for an overlap to swing, i.e. the train is not immediately approaching the signal, then it can request release of the currently set overlap. This should not cause any problem for any ETCS train, which should accept the small reduction in its movement authority. The TPE then provides an approach locking override to the interlocking which can then select an alternative overlap.
From the prior art it is expected that the TPE would indicate to the interlocking that the next train to approach a signal is an ETCS-controlled train. The involvement of the TPE in releasing and swinging an overlap can therefore be conditional within the interlocking on the next train being indicated as an ETCS train. If the next train is not indicated as an ETCS train, either because the next train is not an ETCS train or its movement authority has not yet reached that signal, then the interlocking can swing the overlap according to conventional rules.
A possible sequence of events in accordance with this embodiment might be :
1) The signaller sets the route for a first train up to signal S13, including the overlap beyond points PI, referred to as "Overlap 1";
2) As described earlier, the RBC issues a movement authority MAI initially up to the signal, which includes EoAl and DPI. It should be noted that DPI in this case is configured to be at the point of divergence for the alternative paths through points P2A;
3) The interlocking provides a proceed indication to the RBC for Overlap 1 and the RBC extends the movement authority for the first train by sending MA2, which includes EoA2 and DP2;
4) The signaller then, for example, may wish to allow a second train to proceed from signal S23. If "Overlap 2" from signal S13 is available and does not conflict with any other moves, then the signaller may request that the overlap be moved, or 'swung', away from the path of the second train from S23;
5) The interlocking checks that the approaching train is not too close to the signal then, as described previously, the interlocking removes the proceed indication for Overlap 1 from the RBC. This causes the RBC to issue a request to shorten the movement authority back to EoAl and DPI (i.e. essentially back to MAI) ;
6) Because the first train is known to be some distance from signal S13, it is expected that the train will accept the shorten request allowing the RBC to indicate to the interlocking that Overlap 1 may be released;
7) The interlocking releases Overlap 1 and moves the points P2A and P2B to the reverse position. (A note on terminology: conventionally points P2A and P2B are so numbered, i.e. 'A' and 'B', because they are always moved together and cannot be controlled independently; additionally, points have a 'normal' position and a 'reverse' position, with diagrams usually showing them in the normal position) ;
8) Once the points P2A and P2B have been locked and detected in their required reverse position, the interlocking can provide a proceed indication for Overlap 2 to the RBC. This allows the RBC to again extend the movement authority of the first train this time by sending MA3, including EoA3 and DP3. EoA3 can be configured at the same location as EoA2; and
9) Having completed the process of swinging the overlap, the interlocking will then allow the signaller to set the route for the second train from signal S23.
It should be noted that in step 6, the locking of Overlap 1 is maintained by the interlocking until the RBC indicates that it can be released. If for whatever reason the train decides that it cannot accept the shortened movement authority request, or fails to respond, then Overlap 1 will remain locked for the first train and swinging will not be permitted. In this case it is expected that the interlocking will wait for a defined time for a release from the RBC, after which the interlocking will cancel the request to swing the overlap and re-establish the proceed indication for Overlap 1 to the RBC. The above-described embodiments are exemplary only, and othe possibilities and alternatives within the scope of the inven tion will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

Claims

Claims
1. A method for releasing an overlap in a railway signalling system, the system comprising a signalling interlocking, trackside processing equipment and at least one signal, the overlap being a section of railway located past the signal in the direction of train movement, the method comprising:
configuring both the interlocking and the trackside processing equipment to treat the overlap as an individual overlap route, such that a train would require a movement authority to be granted to proceed into that route .
2. A method according to claim 1, comprising the step of configuring the interlocking with:
a route without an overlap up to the signal, and
the overlap route being from the signal up to the end of the overlap .
3. A method according to either of claims 1 and 2, wherein the method comprises the step of configuring the trackside processing equipment with:
a first route leading up to the signal, having an end of au¬ thority proximate the signal and a danger point beyond the signal, and
the overlap route including only the overlap section with an end of authority at or proximate to the signal and a danger point at the end of the overlap.
4. A method according to any preceding claim, comprising the step of configuring the interlocking with:
a proceed indication for the overlap route, and
providing the proceed indication to the trackside processing equipment if the overlap is available for use by an approaching train.
5. A method according to claim 4, wherein if a request to release the overlap is received by the inter- locking, the interloeking removes the proceed indication for the overlap from the trackside processing equipment.
6. A method according to claim 5 when dependent on claim 3, wherein, following removal of the proceed indication, the trackside processing equipment sends a request to shorten the movement authority to an approaching train which specifies the end of authority and danger point associated with the first route.
7. A method according to claim 6, wherein, following sending of the request, if the train accepts the shorten request, then the trackside processing equipment indicates to the interlocking that the overlap can be released.
A method according to any of claims 5 to 7, wherein
request to release the overlap is sent by a signaller
9. A method according to any of claims 5 to 7, wherein the request to release the overlap is generated automatically by the interlocking, based on the time of occupancy of the track circuit in a section of railway track leading up to the signal .
10. A method for swinging an overlap to an alternative overlap in a railway signalling system, the system comprising a signalling interlocking and trackside equipment, comprising the steps of :
a) requesting the use of the alternative overlap;
b) determining, at the interlocking, if conditions are suitable for the overlap to swing,
c) if so, using the trackside processing equipment to provide an override to the interlocking, and releasing the overlap using a method in accordance with any preceding claim, and d) swinging the overlap to the alternative overlap.
A method according to claim 10, wherein in step a), the request is sent by a signaller.
12. A method according to either of claims 10 and 11, wherein in step d) , an authorisation is provided to the trackside processing equipment to use the alternative overlap.
EP14718033.5A 2013-04-10 2014-04-10 Method for releasing overlaps in a railway signalling system Active EP2983960B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1306544.6A GB2512901A (en) 2013-04-10 2013-04-10 Method for releasing overlaps
PCT/EP2014/057301 WO2014167067A2 (en) 2013-04-10 2014-04-10 Method for releasing overlaps in a railway signalling system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2983960A2 true EP2983960A2 (en) 2016-02-17
EP2983960B1 EP2983960B1 (en) 2021-02-24

Family

ID=48483714

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14718033.5A Active EP2983960B1 (en) 2013-04-10 2014-04-10 Method for releasing overlaps in a railway signalling system

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2983960B1 (en)
AU (1) AU2014253069B2 (en)
ES (1) ES2870530T3 (en)
GB (1) GB2512901A (en)
WO (1) WO2014167067A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3109127A1 (en) * 2015-06-23 2016-12-28 Siemens Schweiz AG Method for signalling an expansion of a movement authority from a route control station to a positioning body
US10836413B2 (en) 2015-06-25 2020-11-17 Technological Resources Pty. Limited Control arrangement for a railroad level crossing
ES2749899T3 (en) * 2016-12-22 2020-03-24 Siemens Rail Automation S A U System and procedure to activate the sending of a movement authorization to a guided vehicle
CN110271583B (en) * 2018-03-13 2021-01-19 比亚迪股份有限公司 Method, device and system for configuring protection section of train
CN109159802B (en) * 2018-09-18 2020-10-27 交控科技股份有限公司 Unlocking method for protecting section based on improvement of safe operation
CN110949455B (en) * 2019-12-13 2022-02-08 交控科技股份有限公司 Heavy haul railway protection section processing method and device based on mobile block
CN114394136B (en) * 2021-12-30 2024-01-23 卡斯柯信号有限公司 Train control method for city railway C2+ATO

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB479206A (en) 1936-08-15 1938-02-02 Samuel Lear Glenn Improvements in systems for the remote control of railway track switches and signals
GB689093A (en) 1949-08-08 1953-03-18 Standard Telephones Cables Ltd Improvements in or relating to railway signalling systems
US4181278A (en) * 1978-07-28 1980-01-01 Westinghouse Air Brake Company Railroad interlocking signal system with insulated joint failure and overrun protection
DE4423787C1 (en) * 1994-07-01 1995-11-30 Elpro Ag Process and device for train-controlled changes of direction in single-track operation
DE4429403C2 (en) * 1994-08-09 2000-05-18 Siemens Ag Process for treating overlapping slipping paths
US5950966A (en) * 1997-09-17 1999-09-14 Westinghouse Airbrake Company Distributed positive train control system
GB2429101B (en) * 2005-08-13 2009-06-03 Westinghouse Brake & Signal Train control system
GB2430528A (en) * 2005-09-22 2007-03-28 Westinghouse Brake & Signal Transmitting movement authorities to trains independently of the interlocking controlling lineside signals.
US8565945B2 (en) * 2008-01-17 2013-10-22 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method for managing vital train movements
WO2009139927A2 (en) * 2008-05-15 2009-11-19 Ghaly Nabil N Method & apparatus for a hybrid train control device
EP2216230A1 (en) * 2009-02-04 2010-08-11 Thales Deutschland Holding GmbH Method for releasing a route after cancellation of the route by an interlocking
CN101934807B (en) * 2010-08-24 2011-09-28 北京交大资产经营有限公司 Train control system-based mobile authorization calculating method
EP2607199B1 (en) * 2011-12-23 2018-07-25 Siemens S.A.S. Decentralized interlocking

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2014167067A3 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB201306544D0 (en) 2013-05-22
WO2014167067A3 (en) 2015-04-09
EP2983960B1 (en) 2021-02-24
AU2014253069A1 (en) 2015-10-29
WO2014167067A2 (en) 2014-10-16
GB2512901A (en) 2014-10-15
AU2014253069B2 (en) 2019-05-02
ES2870530T3 (en) 2021-10-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2014253069B2 (en) Method for releasing overlaps in a railway signalling system
JP5885654B2 (en) Train control system
US20150225003A1 (en) Control of a rail vehicle
US20220185350A1 (en) Quasi-moving block system of train control
CN109715472B (en) System and method for track occupancy determination
CN105197070A (en) Method and system for handling guarded sections
EP2836412B1 (en) Method for interlocking logic and interlocking
CN106494464A (en) A kind of main track signal display method of communication-based train control system
CA3067800C (en) Line section for mixed operation with and without a train protection system, and operating method
WO2017010245A1 (en) Train and signal security system
US20200307663A1 (en) Method for mixed operation of a section of railroad line with switch, and section of line and switch
RU2584040C2 (en) European train control system level 2 system (etcs l2) - automatic cab signalling with autostop
Takashige Signalling systems for safe railway transport
US9475511B2 (en) Parallel tracks design description
JP6041847B2 (en) Integrated interlocking device and integrated interlocking system
RU2693992C1 (en) Device for centralized automatic interlocking with welded track circuits of tone frequency
JP2017177982A (en) Integral interlocking device
RU2760055C1 (en) Apparatus for centralised automatic block signalling with jointless voice-frequency rail circuits
KR100877531B1 (en) Train route controll system for closed-loof type, method for train toute control and train traveling management using the same
TWI715987B (en) Train operation management system
JP2022124241A (en) Train control system and control method
CN107444432B (en) Control method for improving train cross-line route access efficiency
Diemunsch Track circuit failures: Their impact on conventional signaling in CBTC projects
RU2817647C1 (en) Device for centralized automatic blocking with continuous rail circuits of tone frequency
RU2679795C1 (en) Device for train traffic regulation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20151006

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20181029

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20201113

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1364090

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210315

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602014075100

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602014075100

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: DEFFNER, ROLF, DR., DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602014075100

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED, GB

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED, FRIMLEY, SURREY, GB

RAP4 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20210224

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210524

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210524

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210624

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210525

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1364090

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210224

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210624

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2870530

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20211027

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602014075100

Country of ref document: DE

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: ALSTOM TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES

Effective date: 20211124

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210410

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20210430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210430

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210430

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210410

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210624

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20140410

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

PLAY Examination report in opposition despatched + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE2

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230421

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20220620

Year of fee payment: 10

PLBC Reply to examination report in opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE3

RAP4 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230504

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20230724

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210224

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO