EP2922983B1 - Chromium-chromium oxide coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications and a method for producing said coatings - Google Patents

Chromium-chromium oxide coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications and a method for producing said coatings Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2922983B1
EP2922983B1 EP13794902.0A EP13794902A EP2922983B1 EP 2922983 B1 EP2922983 B1 EP 2922983B1 EP 13794902 A EP13794902 A EP 13794902A EP 2922983 B1 EP2922983 B1 EP 2922983B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
chromium
coating
layer
thermoplastic
resins
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP13794902.0A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2922983A1 (en
Inventor
Jacques Hubert Olga Joseph Wijenberg
Michiel STEEGH
Jan Paul Penning
Ilja Portegies Zwart
Arnoud Cornelis Adriaan De Vooys
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tata Steel Ijmuiden BV
Original Assignee
Tata Steel Ijmuiden BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tata Steel Ijmuiden BV filed Critical Tata Steel Ijmuiden BV
Priority to EP13794902.0A priority Critical patent/EP2922983B1/en
Priority to RS20190375A priority patent/RS58504B1/en
Publication of EP2922983A1 publication Critical patent/EP2922983A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2922983B1 publication Critical patent/EP2922983B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D3/00Electroplating: Baths therefor
    • C25D3/02Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions
    • C25D3/04Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of chromium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D3/00Electroplating: Baths therefor
    • C25D3/02Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions
    • C25D3/04Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of chromium
    • C25D3/06Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of chromium from solutions of trivalent chromium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D11/00Electrolytic coating by surface reaction, i.e. forming conversion layers
    • C25D11/38Chromatising
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D5/00Electroplating characterised by the process; Pretreatment or after-treatment of workpieces
    • C25D5/34Pretreatment of metallic surfaces to be electroplated
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D5/00Electroplating characterised by the process; Pretreatment or after-treatment of workpieces
    • C25D5/34Pretreatment of metallic surfaces to be electroplated
    • C25D5/36Pretreatment of metallic surfaces to be electroplated of iron or steel
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D5/00Electroplating characterised by the process; Pretreatment or after-treatment of workpieces
    • C25D5/48After-treatment of electroplated surfaces
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D7/00Electroplating characterised by the article coated
    • C25D7/06Wires; Strips; Foils
    • C25D7/0614Strips or foils
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D9/00Electrolytic coating other than with metals
    • C25D9/04Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials
    • C25D9/08Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials by cathodic processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D9/00Electrolytic coating other than with metals
    • C25D9/04Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials
    • C25D9/08Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials by cathodic processes
    • C25D9/10Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials by cathodic processes on iron or steel
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/12All metal or with adjacent metals
    • Y10T428/12493Composite; i.e., plural, adjacent, spatially distinct metal components [e.g., layers, joint, etc.]
    • Y10T428/12535Composite; i.e., plural, adjacent, spatially distinct metal components [e.g., layers, joint, etc.] with additional, spatially distinct nonmetal component
    • Y10T428/12556Organic component
    • Y10T428/12569Synthetic resin

Definitions

  • This invention relates to chromium-chromium oxide (Cr-CrOx) coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications and to a method for producing said coatings.
  • Tin mill products include tinplate, Electrolytic Chromium Coated Steel (ECCS, also referred to as tin free steel or TFS), and blackplate, the uncoated steel.
  • Packaging steels are normally provided as tinplate, or as ECCS onto which an organic coating can be applied. In case of tinplate this organic coating is usually a lacquer, whereas in case of ECCS increasingly polymer coatings such as PET or PP are used, such as in the case of Protact®.
  • Tinplate is characterised by its excellent corrosion resistance and weldability. Tinplate is supplied within a range of coating weights, normally between 1.0 and 11.2 g/m 2 , which are usually applied by electrolytic deposition. At present, most tinplate is post-treated with fluids containing hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), using a dip or electrolytically assisted application process. Aim of this post-treatment is to passivate the tin surface to stop or reduce the growth of tin oxides, because too thick oxide layers can eventually lead to problems with respect to adhesion of organic coatings, like lacquers. It is important that the passivation treatment should not only suppress or eliminate tin oxide growth, but should also be able to retain or improve organic coating adhesion levels.
  • the passivated outer surface of tinplate is extremely thin (less than 1 micron thick) and consists of a mixture of tin and chromium oxides.
  • ECCS consists of a blackplate product which has been coated with a metallic chromium layer overlaid with a film of chromium oxide, both applied by electrolytic deposition.
  • ECCS excels in adhesion to organic coatings and retention of coating integrity at temperatures exceeding the melting point of tin (232°C). In those cases tinplated material cannot be used. This is important for producing polymer coated packaging steel because during the thermoplastic coating application process the steel substrate may be heated to temperatures exceeding 232°C, with the actual maximum temperature values used being dependent on the type of thermoplastic coating applied. This heat cycle is required to enable initial heat sealing/bonding of the thermoplastic to the substrate (pre-heat treatment) and is often followed by a post-heat treatment to modify the properties of the polymer.
  • the chromium oxide layer is believed to be responsible for the excellent adhesion properties of thermoplastic coatings such as polypropylene (PP) or polyester terephthalate (PET) to ECCS.
  • ECCS can also be supplied within a range of coating weights for both the Cr and CrOx coating, typically ranging between 20 - 110 and 2 - 20 mg/m 2 respectively.
  • ECCS can be delivered with equal coating specification for both sides of the steel strip, or with different coating weights per side, the latter being referred to as differentially coated strip.
  • the production of ECCS currently involves the use of solutions on the basis of chromium in its hexavalent state, also known as hexavalent chromium or Cr(VI).
  • Hexavalent chromium is nowadays considered a hazardous substance that is potentially harmful to the environment and constitutes a risk in terms of worker safety. There is therefore an incentive to develop alternative metal coatings that are able to replace conventional tinplate and ECCS, without the need to resort to the use of hexavalent chromium during manufacturing.
  • US4169022 discloses the deposition of a chromite conversion coating, which is a non-metallic layer of Cr(III)-oxide (i.e. Cr2O3). US4169022 specifically discloses that the deposition of chromium metal must be suppressed.
  • US3679554 and US3785940 disclose the deposition of a thin layer consisting of an inner portion of metallic chromium and an outer portion of hydrated chromium oxide, deposited from an electrolyte based on a hexavalent chromium compound such as chromium trioxide or sodium dichromate.
  • the packaging steel substrate is preferably provided in the form of a strip.
  • ECCS For the production of ECCS generally three types of chromium plating processes are in use throughout the world. The three processes are “one step vertical process” (V-1), “two step vertical process” (V-2), and the “one step horizontal high current density process” (HCD) and based on Cr(VI) electrolytes.
  • V-1 "one step vertical process”
  • V-2 "two step vertical process”
  • HCD high current density process
  • the specifications of ECCS are standardized under Euronorm EN 10202:2001.
  • the two-step vertical process uses a sulphuric acid free Cr(VI) electrolyte for applying the chrome oxide layer in the second step. Sulphuric acid is needed for a good efficiency in applying chrome metal and is therefore always used for the chrome metal plating step in these processes.
  • the "one step vertical” and the “one step horizontal high current density (HCD) process” always have sulphate in the oxide layer because the chromium metal and chromium oxide are produced simultaneously in the same electrolyte ( Boelen, thesis TU Delft 2009, page 8-9, ISBN 978-90-805661-5-6 ). In all cases the ECCS consists of a chromium oxide layer on top of the chromium metal.
  • a coating layer comprising chromium metal and chromium oxide is deposited, and not by first depositing a chromium metal layer, and then providing a chromium oxide layer on top as a conversion layer.
  • the Cr-CrOx layer should consist of a mixture of Cr-oxide and Cr-metal and the Cr-oxide should not be present as a distinct layer on the outermost surface, but mixed through the whole layer Cr-CrOx.
  • the phrase single plating step is therefore not limited to mean that only one of these single plating steps is used.
  • the packaging steel substrate is usually provided in the form of a strip of low carbon (LC), extra low carbon (ELC) or ultra low carbon (ULC) with a carbon content, expressed as weight percent, of between 0.05 and 0.15 (LC), between 0.02 and 0.05 (ELC) or below 0.02 (ULC) respectively. Alloying elements like manganese, aluminium, nitrogen, but sometimes also elements like boron, are added to improve the mechanical properties (see also e.g. EN 10 202, 10 205 and 10 239).
  • the substrate consists of an interstitial-free low, extra-low or ultra-low carbon steel, such as a titanium stabilised, niobium stabilised or titanium-niobium stabilised interstitial-free steel.
  • a chromium metal - chromium oxide (Cr-CrOx) coating produced from a trivalent chromium based electroplating process provides excellent adhesion to organic coatings.
  • the chromium metal - chromium oxide (Cr-CrOx) coating produced from a trivalent chromium electrodeposition process has very similar adhesion properties compared to conventional ECCS produced via a hexavalent chromium electrodeposition process. By increasing the thickness of the Cr-CrOx coating layer the porosity of the coating is reduced and its corrosion resistance properties improve.
  • the Cr-CrOx coating can be applied onto conventional, non-passivated, electrolytic, and optionally flowmelted, tinplate (ETP, Electrolytic Tinplate).
  • ETP Electrolytic Tinplate
  • the Cr-CrOx layer ensures that the growth of tin oxides is suppressed, i.e. it has a passivation function.
  • the wet adhesion performance i.e. the organic coating adhesion after sterilisation, outperforms conventional hexavalent chromium passivated tinplate.
  • the resistance to so-called sulphur staining i.e.
  • the brown discolouration of tinplate due to contact with sulphur containing fill-goods can be fully suppressed by applying a sufficiently thick Cr-CrOx coating.
  • the material according to the invention is therefore very suitable for replacement of hexavalent chromium passivated tinplate, optionally exceeding the technical performance limits of standard tinplate. From a process point of view, the fact that the Cr-CrOx coating layer is applied in a single process step means that two process steps are combined, which is beneficial in terms of process economy and in terms of environmental impact.
  • the Cr-CrOx coating is applied directly onto the blackplate packaging steel substrate, without prior application of a tin coating, i.e. directly applied onto the bare steel surface.
  • a tin coating i.e. directly applied onto the bare steel surface.
  • Merriam Webster blackplate is defined as sheet steel that has not yet been made into tin plate by being coated with tin or that is used uncoated where the protection afforded by tin is unnecessary. It was found that the dry adhesion levels to organic coatings for both thermoset lacquers and thermoplastic coatings, of this material can approach those normally associated with the use of ECCS.
  • the material according to the invention can be used to directly replace ECCS for applications that require a moderate corrosion resistance.
  • the Cr-CrOx coating layer applied onto blackplate is at least 40 and more preferably at least 60 mg Cr/m 2 .
  • the maximum thickness is 140 mg Cr/m 2 .
  • the Cr-CrOx coating layer applied onto blackplate contains at least 40 to 140 mg Cr/m 2 , more preferably at least 60 mg Cr/m 2 . In an embodiment a suitable maximum is 110 mg Cr/m 2 .
  • the Cr-CrOx coated blackplate aims to replace ECCS.
  • the major advantage besides the elimination of hexavalent chromium from manufacturing is the potential to create a product for applications for which the superior corrosion resistance properties of tinplate are not required.
  • the fact that the Cr-CrOx coating layer is applied in a single process step means that two process steps are combined, which is beneficial in terms of process economy and in terms of environmental impact.
  • the Cr-CrOx coating can also be applied to a cold-rolled and recovery annealed blackplate, or to a cold-rolled and recovery annealed electrolytic, and optionally flowmelted, tinplate. These substrates have a recovery annealed substrate, rather than the recystallised single reduced ETP or blackplate or the double reduced blackplate. The difference in microstructure of the substrate was not found to materially affect the Cr-CrOx coating.
  • thermoplastic coatings can be used in combination with thermoplastic coatings, but also for applications where traditionally ECCS is used in combination with lacquers (i.e. for bakeware such as baking tins, or products with moderate corrosion resistance requirements) or as a substitute for conventional tinplate for applications where requirements in terms of corrosion resistance are moderate.
  • lacquers i.e. for bakeware such as baking tins, or products with moderate corrosion resistance requirements
  • the coated substrate is further provided with an organic coating, consisting of either a thermoset organic coating, or a thermoplastic single layer polymer coating, or a thermoplastic multi-layer polymer coating.
  • an organic coating consisting of either a thermoset organic coating, or a thermoplastic single layer polymer coating, or a thermoplastic multi-layer polymer coating.
  • the Cr-CrOx layer provides excellent adhesion to the organic coating similar to that achieved by using conventional ECCS.
  • thermoplastic polymer coating is a polymer coating system comprising one or more layers comprising the use of thermoplastic resins such as polyesters or polyolefins, but can also include acrylic resins, polyamides, polyvinyl chloride, fluorocarbon resins, polycarbonates, styrene type resins, ABS resins, chlorinated polyethers, ionomers, urethane resins and functionalised polymers.
  • thermoplastic resins such as polyesters or polyolefins, but can also include acrylic resins, polyamides, polyvinyl chloride, fluorocarbon resins, polycarbonates, styrene type resins, ABS resins, chlorinated polyethers, ionomers, urethane resins and functionalised polymers.
  • Polyester is a polymer composed of dicarboxylic acid and glycol.
  • suitable dicarboxylic acids include therephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, naphthalene dicarboxylic acid and cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid.
  • suitable glycols include ethylene glycol, propane diol, butane diol, hexane diol, cyclohexane diol, cyclohexane dimethanol, neopentyl glycol etc. More than two kinds of dicarboxylic acid or glycol may be used together.
  • Polyolefins include for example polymers or copolymers of ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene or 1-octene.
  • Acrylic resins include for example polymers or copolymers of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, acrylic acid ester, methacrylic acid ester or acrylamide.
  • Polyamide resins include for example so-called Nylon 6, Nylon 66, Nylon 46, Nylon 610 and Nylon 11.
  • Polyvinyl chloride includes homopolymers and copolymers, for example with ethylene or vinyl acetate.
  • Fluorocarbon resins include for example tetrafluorinated polyethylene, trifluorinated monochlorinated polyethylene, hexafluorinated ethylenepropylene resin, polyvinyl fluoride and polyvinylidene fluoride.
  • Functionalised polymers for instance by maleic anhydride grafting include for example modified polyethylenes, modified polypropylenes, modified ethylene acrylate copolymers and modified ethylene vinyl acetates.
  • thermoplastic polymer coating systems have shown to provide excellent performance in can-making and use of the can, such as shelf-life.
  • the invention is embodied in a process for producing a coated steel substrate for packaging applications, the process comprising the electro-deposition of a chromium metal - chromium oxide coating on the substrate with the electrolytic deposition on said substrate of said chromium metal - chromium oxide coating occurring in a single plating step from a plating solution comprising a trivalent chromium compound, an optional chelating agent, an optional conductivity enhancing salt, an optional depolarizer, an optional surfactant and to which an acid or base can be added to adjust the pH.
  • the electro-deposition of the Cr-CrOx coating is achieved by using an electrolyte in which the chelating agent comprises a formic acid anion, the conductivity enhancing salt contains an alkali metal cation and the depolarizer comprises a bromide containing salt.
  • the cationic species in the chelating agent, the conductivity enhancing salt and the depolarizer is potassium.
  • the benefit of using potassium is that its presence in the electrolyte greatly enhances the electrical conductivity of the solution, more than any other alkali metal cation, thus delivering a maximum contribution to lowering of the cell voltage required to drive the electro-deposition process.
  • the composition of the electrolyte used for the Cr-CrOx deposition was: 120 g/l basic chromium sulphate, 250 g/l potassium chloride, 15 g/l potassium bromide and 51.2 g/l potassium formate.
  • the pH was adjusted to values between 2.3 and 2.8 measured at 25°C by the addition of sulphuric acid.
  • the chromium containing coating is preferably deposited from the trivalent chromium based electrolyte at a bath temperature of between 40 and 70°C, preferably of at least 45°C and/or at most 60°C.
  • XPS depth profiles were measured and the peaks that are measured are Fe2p, Cr2p, O1s, Sn3d, C1s. It was observed that the Cr-layer consists of a mixture of Cr-oxide and Cr-metal and that the Cr-oxide is not present as a distinct layer on the outermost surface, but is mixed through the whole layer. This is also indicated by the O-peak that is present in the whole Cr-layer. In all cases the Cr-CrOx layer has a shiny metallic appearance.
  • the formation of Cr(IV) can be prevented by using one, more or only hydrogen gas diffusion anodes at which hydrogen gas (H 2 (g)) is oxidised.
  • H + protons
  • H 3 O + hydronium ions
  • the oxidation of H 2 (g) to H + (aq) prevents the occurrence of undesirable oxidation reactions, such as the formation of Cr(IV), which occur at a higher anodic overpotential when using an anode at which water (H 2 O) is oxidised to oxygen (O 2 (g)).
  • the reaction H 2 (g) ⁇ 2H + (aq) + 2e - occurs at an anode potential of 0.00 V (SHE).
  • the reaction 2H 2 O ⁇ 4H + (aq) + O 2 (g) + 4e - occurs at an anode potential of 1.23 V (SHE).
  • H 2 (g) is oxidised at the gas diffusion anode to H + (aq) with a current efficiency of at least 99%, preferably of 100%.
  • the electrode potential is measured against the standard hydrogen electrode.
  • the standard hydrogen electrode (abbreviated SHE), is a redox electrode which forms the basis of the thermodynamic scale of oxidation-reduction potentials. Its absolute electrode potential is estimated to be 4.44 ⁇ 0.02 V at 25 °C, but to form a basis for comparison with all other electrode reactions, hydrogen's standard electrode potential (E 0 ) is declared to be zero at all temperatures. Potentials of any other electrodes are compared with that of the standard hydrogen electrode at the same temperature.
  • the prevailing equilibrium (zero current) potential can be calculated from the Nernst equation by filling in the appropriate temperature, pressure and activities of the electro-active species.
  • the anode operating (non-zero current) potential needed to generate a specific anodic current is determined by the activation overpotential (i.e. the potential difference required for driving the electrode reaction) and the concentration overpotential (i.e. the potential difference required to compensate for concentration gradients of electro-active species at the electrode).
  • no depolariser is added to the electrolyte.
  • a hydrogen gas diffusion anode is used then the addition of a depolariser to the electrolyte is no longer needed.
  • the use of a hydrogen gas diffusion anode has the added advantage that the use of a chloride containing electrolyte becomes possible without the risk of chlorine formation. This chlorine gas is potentially harmful to the environment and to the workers and is therefore undesirable. This means that in the case of a Cr(III) electrolyte the electrolyte could be partly or entirely based on chlorides.
  • the advantage of using a chloride based electrolyte is that the conductivity of the electrolyte is much higher compared to a sulphate only based electrolyte, which leads to a lower cell voltage that is required to run the electrodeposition, which results in a lower energy consumption.
  • a hydrogen gas diffusion anode is a porous anode containing a three-phase interface of hydrogen gas, the electrolyte fluid and a solid electrocatalyst (e.g. platinum) that has been applied to the electrically conducting porous matrix (e.g. porous carbon or a porous metal foam).
  • the main advantage of using such a porous electrode is that it provides a very large internal surface area for reaction contained in a small volume combined with a greatly reduced diffusion path length from the gas-liquid interface to the reactive sites.
  • This design the mass transfer rate of hydrogen is greatly enhanced, while the true local current density is reduced at a given overall electrode current density, resulting in a lower electrode potential.
  • a gas diffusion anode assembly to be used in the proposed electrodeposition method typically comprises the use of the following functional components (see Fig. 5 ): a gas feeding chamber 1, a current collector 2 and a gas diffusion anode, which consists of an hydrophobic porous gas diffusion transport layer 3 combined with an hydrophilic reaction layer 4 (see Fig. 5 ).
  • the latter is made up of a network of micropores that are (partly) drowned with liquid electrolyte.
  • the reaction layer is provided with a proton exchange membrane on the outside 5, like a Nafion® membrane, to prevent the diffusion of chemical species (like anions or large neutral molecules) present in the bulk liquid electrolyte inside the gas diffusion anode, as these compounds can potentially poison the electrocatalyst sites, causing degradation in electrocatalytic activity.
  • a proton exchange membrane on the outside 5, like a Nafion® membrane, to prevent the diffusion of chemical species (like anions or large neutral molecules) present in the bulk liquid electrolyte inside the gas diffusion anode, as these compounds can potentially poison the electrocatalyst sites, causing degradation in electrocatalytic activity.
  • the main function of the gas feeding chamber is to supply hydrogen gas evenly to the hydrophobic backside of the hydrogen gas diffusion anode.
  • the gas feeding chamber needs two connections: one to feed hydrogen gas and one to enable purging of a small amount of hydrogen gas to prevent the build-up of gas phase contaminations potentially present in trace amounts in the hydrogen gas supplied.
  • the gas feeding chamber often contains a channel type structure to ensure that hydrogen gas is distributed evenly over the hydrophobic backside.
  • the electrical current collector 2 is (usually) attached to the hydrophobic backside 3 of the hydrogen gas diffusion anode to enable the transport of the electrical current generated inside the anode to a rectifier (not shown in Fig. 5 ).
  • This current collector plate must be designed in such a way to enable the hydrogen gas to contact the backside of the hydrogen gas diffusion anode so it can be transported to the reactive side inside the gas diffusion anode. Usually this is accomplished by using an electrically conductive plate with a large number of holes, a mesh or an expanded metal sheet made from e.g. titanium.
  • gas feeding channels and electrical current collector can also be combined into a single component, which is then pressed against the hydrophobic back-side of the gas diffusion anode.
  • the hydrogen gas diffuses through the hydrophobic backside of the hydrogen gas diffusion anode it comes into contact with the electrolyte, which is present in the hydrophilic part of the anode, i.e. the reaction layer (see Fig. 5 , right hand side).
  • the hydrogen gas dissolves into the electrolyte and is transported by diffusion to the electrocatalytic active sites of the hydrogen gas diffusion anode.
  • platinum is used as electrocatalyst, but also other materials like platinum-ruthenium or platinum-molybdenum alloys can be used.
  • the dissolved hydrogen is oxidised: the electrons that are generated are transported through the conductive matrix of the gas diffusion anode (usually a carbon matrix) to the current collector 2, while the hydronium ions (H + ) diffuse through the proton exchange membrane into the electrolyte.
  • the coated substrate is further provided on one or both sides with an organic coating, consisting of a thermosetting organic coating by a lacquering step, or a thermoplastic single layer, or a thermoplastic multi-layer polymer by a film lamination step or a direct extrusion step.
  • an organic coating consisting of a thermosetting organic coating by a lacquering step, or a thermoplastic single layer, or a thermoplastic multi-layer polymer by a film lamination step or a direct extrusion step.
  • thermoplastic polymer coating is a polymer coating system comprising one or more layers comprising the use of thermoplastic resins such as polyesters or polyolefins, but can also include acrylic resins, polyamides, polyvinyl chloride, fluorocarbon resins, polycarbonates, styrene type resins, ABS resins, chlorinated polyethers, ionomers, urethane resins and functionalised polymers; and/or copolymers thereof; and/or blends thereof.
  • thermoplastic resins such as polyesters or polyolefins
  • acrylic resins such as polyesters or polyolefins
  • fluorocarbon resins fluorocarbon resins
  • polycarbonates polycarbonates
  • styrene type resins polystyrene type resins
  • ABS resins chlorinated polyethers
  • ionomers ionomers
  • urethane resins and functionalised polymers and/or copolymers thereof; and/or blends thereof.
  • the substrate is cleaned prior to Cr-CrOx electrodeposition by dipping the substrate in a sodium carbonate solution containing between 1 to 50 g/l of Na 2 CO 3 at a temperature of between 35 and 65°C, and wherein the cathodic current density of between 0.5 and 2 A/dm 2 is applied for a period of between 0.5 and 5 seconds.
  • a sodium carbonate solution containing between 1 to 50 g/l of Na 2 CO 3 at a temperature of between 35 and 65°C, and wherein the cathodic current density of between 0.5 and 2 A/dm 2 is applied for a period of between 0.5 and 5 seconds.
  • the sodium carbonate solution containing at least 2 and/or at most 5 g/l of Na 2 CO 3 .
  • Example 1 and 2 are not part of the invention.
  • Example 1 Sheets of conventional, non-passivated, flow melted tinplate (common steel grade and temper), with a tin coating weight of 2.8 g Sn/m 2 on both sides, were first given an electrolytic pre-treatment to minimise the tin oxide layer thickness. This was done by dipping the sheets into a sodium carbonate solution (3.1 g/l of Na 2 CO 3 , temperature of 50°C) and applying a cathodic current density of 0.8 A/dm 2 for 2 seconds.
  • a sodium carbonate solution 3.1 g/l of Na 2 CO 3 , temperature of 50°C
  • the samples were dipped into a trivalent chromium electrolyte kept at 50°C composed of: 120 g/l of basic chromium sulphate, 250 g/l of potassium chloride, 15 g/l of potassium bromide and 51.2 g/l of potassium formate.
  • the pH of this solution was adjusted to 2.3 measured at 25°C by adding sulphuric acid.
  • a Cr-CrOx coating containing between 21 - 25 mg Cr/m 2 was deposited on the surface by applying a cathodic current density of 10 A/dm 2 for approximately 1 second, using a platinised titanium anode as counter electrode. The samples so produced showed a shiny metallic appearance.
  • the tin oxide layer is reduced by a controlled small cathodic current in a 0.1% solution of hydrobromic acid (HBr) that is freed from oxygen by scrubbing with nitrogen.
  • HBr hydrobromic acid
  • the progress of the reduction of the oxide is followed by potential measurement and the charge passed for the complete reduction (expressed as Coulomb/m 2 or C/m 2 ) serves as a measure of the tin oxide layer thickness.
  • the results for the sample according to Example 1 are presented in Table 1, including the performance of the reference material, which is the same tinplate material that was passivated using hexavalent chromium, i.e. so-called 311 passivated tinplate.
  • Table 1 Tin oxide layer thickness (in C/m 2 ) Storage at 40°C, 80% RH ETP-311 (ref) ETP - Cr-CrOx according to Example 1 (25 mg/m 2 Cr) 0 weeks 12 11 2 weeks 12 12 4 weeks 13 11
  • Example 2 Sheets of conventional, non-passivated, flow melted tinplate (common steel grade and temper), with a tin coating weight of 2.8 g Sn/m 2 on both sides, were first given an electrolytic pre-treatment to minimise the tin oxide layer thickness. This was done by dipping the sheets into a sodium carbonate solution (3.1 g/l of Na 2 CO 3 , temperature of 50 °C) and applying a cathodic current density of 0.8 A/dm 2 for 2 seconds.
  • a sodium carbonate solution 3.1 g/l of Na 2 CO 3 , temperature of 50 °C
  • the sheets were subsequently lacquered, applying a commercially available epoxy-anhydride lacquer system (VitalureTM 120 supplied by AkzoNobel). Subsequently, the lacquered sheets were locally deformed by Erichsen cupping.
  • VitalureTM 120 supplied by AkzoNobel.
  • the tinplate variant manufactured according to the invention performed consistently equal or better compared to the standard tinplate that is passivated using hexavalent chromium (i.e. the reference). Striking is the fact that no sulphur staining was found for the material according to the invention, which is difficult to achieve with conventional passivated tinplate and notoriously difficult to achieve with alternative passivations for tinplate that are free of hexavalent chromium.
  • Example 3 A coil of blackplate (common steel grade and temper), not containing any metal coating, was treated in a processing line running at a line speed of 20 m/min.
  • the processing sequence started with alkaline cleaning of the steel by running the strip for approximately 10 seconds through a solution containing 30 ml/l of a commercial cleaner (Percy P3) and 40 g/l of NaOH, which was kept at 60 °C. During cleaning of the strip an anodic current density of 1.3 A/dm 2 was applied. After rinsing with de-ionised water, the steel strip was passed through an acid solution for approximately 10 seconds, to activate the surface.
  • the acid solution consisted of 50 g/l H 2 SO 4 , which was kept at 25 °C.
  • the steel strip was passed into an electroplating tank containing the trivalent chromium based electrolyte kept at 50°C.
  • This electrolyte consisted of: 120 g/l of basic chromium sulphate, 250 g/l of potassium chloride, 15 g/l of potassium bromide and 51.2 g/l of potassium formate.
  • the pH of this solution was adjusted to 2.3 measured at 25 °C by adding sulphuric acid.
  • the electroplating tank contained a set of anodes consisting of platinised titanium.
  • the material so produced was passed through a coating line to apply a commercially available 20 micrometer thick PET film, through heat sealing. After film lamination, the coated strip was post-heated to temperatures above the melting point of PET, and subsequently quenched in water at room temperature, as per a usual processing method for the PET lamination of metals. The same procedure was followed for the manufacturing of reference material, using a commercially produced coil of ECCS.
  • the laminated materials were used to produce standard food DRD cans (211 x 400). In all cases the dry adhesion of the PET film to the can wall was excellent. This was confirmed by measuring the T-peel forces of the PET film on the can wall, which showed similar values for the PET film applied to both the material according to the invention and commercial ECCS ( ⁇ 7 N/15 mm).
  • the DRD cans were subsequently filled with different media, closed and exposed to a sterilisation treatment. Some cans were processed that contained a scratch made on the can wall, to simulate and observe the effect of incidental coating damage.
  • the DRD cans were cooled to room temperature, emptied, rinsed and dried for one day. The bottom and can wall were judged visually on the presence of corrosion spots and blisters.
  • Table 5 show that the sterilisation performance of the material according to the invention is in general somewhat less compared to the ECCS reference. The material seems especially more susceptible to corrosion/coating delamination after coating damage. However, these sterilisation tests are quite severe, so in practice the material according to the invention can be used in specifically selected applications involving sterilisation.
  • the performance ranking is on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 being an excellent performance and 5 a very bad performance.
  • Table 5 - Results of sterilisation tests Sterilisation type ECCS (ref) BP + Cr-CrOx Saline 1 (1)* 1 (4)* Acetic acid 1 3 Cysteine 0 0 * Symbol in brackets relates to DRD cans with a scratch on the can wall.
  • Example 4 A coil of blackplate (common steel grade and temper), not containing any metal coating, was treated in a processing line identical to that described in the previous example to apply a Cr-CrOx coating.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Electroplating Methods And Accessories (AREA)
  • Electroplating And Plating Baths Therefor (AREA)
  • Other Surface Treatments For Metallic Materials (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)
  • Details Of Rigid Or Semi-Rigid Containers (AREA)

Description

  • This invention relates to chromium-chromium oxide (Cr-CrOx) coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications and to a method for producing said coatings.
  • Tin mill products include tinplate, Electrolytic Chromium Coated Steel (ECCS, also referred to as tin free steel or TFS), and blackplate, the uncoated steel. Packaging steels are normally provided as tinplate, or as ECCS onto which an organic coating can be applied. In case of tinplate this organic coating is usually a lacquer, whereas in case of ECCS increasingly polymer coatings such as PET or PP are used, such as in the case of Protact®.
  • Tinplate is characterised by its excellent corrosion resistance and weldability. Tinplate is supplied within a range of coating weights, normally between 1.0 and 11.2 g/m2, which are usually applied by electrolytic deposition. At present, most tinplate is post-treated with fluids containing hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), using a dip or electrolytically assisted application process. Aim of this post-treatment is to passivate the tin surface to stop or reduce the growth of tin oxides, because too thick oxide layers can eventually lead to problems with respect to adhesion of organic coatings, like lacquers. It is important that the passivation treatment should not only suppress or eliminate tin oxide growth, but should also be able to retain or improve organic coating adhesion levels. The passivated outer surface of tinplate is extremely thin (less than 1 micron thick) and consists of a mixture of tin and chromium oxides.
  • ECCS consists of a blackplate product which has been coated with a metallic chromium layer overlaid with a film of chromium oxide, both applied by electrolytic deposition. ECCS excels in adhesion to organic coatings and retention of coating integrity at temperatures exceeding the melting point of tin (232°C). In those cases tinplated material cannot be used. This is important for producing polymer coated packaging steel because during the thermoplastic coating application process the steel substrate may be heated to temperatures exceeding 232°C, with the actual maximum temperature values used being dependent on the type of thermoplastic coating applied. This heat cycle is required to enable initial heat sealing/bonding of the thermoplastic to the substrate (pre-heat treatment) and is often followed by a post-heat treatment to modify the properties of the polymer. The chromium oxide layer is believed to be responsible for the excellent adhesion properties of thermoplastic coatings such as polypropylene (PP) or polyester terephthalate (PET) to ECCS. ECCS can also be supplied within a range of coating weights for both the Cr and CrOx coating, typically ranging between 20 - 110 and 2 - 20 mg/m2 respectively. ECCS can be delivered with equal coating specification for both sides of the steel strip, or with different coating weights per side, the latter being referred to as differentially coated strip. The production of ECCS currently involves the use of solutions on the basis of chromium in its hexavalent state, also known as hexavalent chromium or Cr(VI).
  • Hexavalent chromium is nowadays considered a hazardous substance that is potentially harmful to the environment and constitutes a risk in terms of worker safety. There is therefore an incentive to develop alternative metal coatings that are able to replace conventional tinplate and ECCS, without the need to resort to the use of hexavalent chromium during manufacturing.
  • US4169022 discloses the deposition of a chromite conversion coating, which is a non-metallic layer of Cr(III)-oxide (i.e. Cr2O3). US4169022 specifically discloses that the deposition of chromium metal must be suppressed. US3679554 and US3785940 disclose the deposition of a thin layer consisting of an inner portion of metallic chromium and an outer portion of hydrated chromium oxide, deposited from an electrolyte based on a hexavalent chromium compound such as chromium trioxide or sodium dichromate.
  • It is an objective of the invention to provide an alternative to the use of hexavalent chromium for the passivation of tinplate.
  • It is an objective of the invention to provide an alternative to conventional tinplate to improve the product properties e.g. in terms of corrosion performance and sulphur staining resistance.
  • It is also an objective of the invention to provide an alternative substrate to tinplate and ECCS which provides excellent dry adhesion to organic coatings in combination with corrosion protection that does not rely on the use of hexavalent chromium during manufacturing.
  • One or more of these objects are reached by providing a packaging steel substrate as set out in the appended claims, the substrate containing:
    1. 1. a recrystallisation annealed single or double reduced packaging steel blackplate, or
    2. 2. a cold-rolled and recovery annealed blackplate,
    wherein one or both sides of the substrate is coated with a chromium metal - chromium oxide (Cr-CrOx) coating layer produced in a single plating step by using a trivalent chromium electroplating process.
  • The packaging steel substrate is preferably provided in the form of a strip.
  • For the production of ECCS generally three types of chromium plating processes are in use throughout the world. The three processes are "one step vertical process" (V-1), "two step vertical process" (V-2), and the "one step horizontal high current density process" (HCD) and based on Cr(VI) electrolytes. The specifications of ECCS are standardized under Euronorm EN 10202:2001. The two-step vertical process uses a sulphuric acid free Cr(VI) electrolyte for applying the chrome oxide layer in the second step. Sulphuric acid is needed for a good efficiency in applying chrome metal and is therefore always used for the chrome metal plating step in these processes. The "one step vertical" and the "one step horizontal high current density (HCD) process" always have sulphate in the oxide layer because the chromium metal and chromium oxide are produced simultaneously in the same electrolyte (Boelen, thesis TU Delft 2009, page 8-9, ISBN 978-90-805661-5-6). In all cases the ECCS consists of a chromium oxide layer on top of the chromium metal.
  • In the process according to the invention a coating layer comprising chromium metal and chromium oxide is deposited, and not by first depositing a chromium metal layer, and then providing a chromium oxide layer on top as a conversion layer. The Cr-CrOx layer should consist of a mixture of Cr-oxide and Cr-metal and the Cr-oxide should not be present as a distinct layer on the outermost surface, but mixed through the whole layer Cr-CrOx. Of course there may be more than one of these single plating steps one after the other if, for instance, a thicker coating layer comprising chromium metal and chromium oxide layer is to be deposited. The phrase single plating step is therefore not limited to mean that only one of these single plating steps is used.
  • The packaging steel substrate is usually provided in the form of a strip of low carbon (LC), extra low carbon (ELC) or ultra low carbon (ULC) with a carbon content, expressed as weight percent, of between 0.05 and 0.15 (LC), between 0.02 and 0.05 (ELC) or below 0.02 (ULC) respectively. Alloying elements like manganese, aluminium, nitrogen, but sometimes also elements like boron, are added to improve the mechanical properties (see also e.g. EN 10 202, 10 205 and 10 239). In an embodiment of the invention the substrate consists of an interstitial-free low, extra-low or ultra-low carbon steel, such as a titanium stabilised, niobium stabilised or titanium-niobium stabilised interstitial-free steel.
  • It was found that a chromium metal - chromium oxide (Cr-CrOx) coating produced from a trivalent chromium based electroplating process provides excellent adhesion to organic coatings. In this aspect, the chromium metal - chromium oxide (Cr-CrOx) coating produced from a trivalent chromium electrodeposition process has very similar adhesion properties compared to conventional ECCS produced via a hexavalent chromium electrodeposition process. By increasing the thickness of the Cr-CrOx coating layer the porosity of the coating is reduced and its corrosion resistance properties improve.
  • In an embodiment not being part of the invention, the Cr-CrOx coating can be applied onto conventional, non-passivated, electrolytic, and optionally flowmelted, tinplate (ETP, Electrolytic Tinplate). The Cr-CrOx layer ensures that the growth of tin oxides is suppressed, i.e. it has a passivation function. With increasing Cr-CrOx thickness it was unexpectedly found that the wet adhesion performance, i.e. the organic coating adhesion after sterilisation, outperforms conventional hexavalent chromium passivated tinplate. In addition, the resistance to so-called sulphur staining, i.e. the brown discolouration of tinplate due to contact with sulphur containing fill-goods, can be fully suppressed by applying a sufficiently thick Cr-CrOx coating. The material according to the invention is therefore very suitable for replacement of hexavalent chromium passivated tinplate, optionally exceeding the technical performance limits of standard tinplate. From a process point of view, the fact that the Cr-CrOx coating layer is applied in a single process step means that two process steps are combined, which is beneficial in terms of process economy and in terms of environmental impact.
  • The Cr-CrOx coating is applied directly onto the blackplate packaging steel substrate, without prior application of a tin coating, i.e. directly applied onto the bare steel surface. According to Merriam Webster blackplate is defined as sheet steel that has not yet been made into tin plate by being coated with tin or that is used uncoated where the protection afforded by tin is unnecessary. It was found that the dry adhesion levels to organic coatings for both thermoset lacquers and thermoplastic coatings, of this material can approach those normally associated with the use of ECCS. The material according to the invention can be used to directly replace ECCS for applications that require a moderate corrosion resistance.
  • The big advantage, both in terms of environmental impact and health and safety is the fact that with this invention the use of hexavalent chromium chemistry is prevented, while it is possible to retain the product performance properties normally attributed to ECCS and tinplate.
  • These embodiments aim to replace hexavalent chromium passivated tinplate. The major advantage besides the elimination of hexavalent chromium from manufacturing is the potential to create a product with superior sulphur staining resistance and improved corrosion resistance.
  • It was found that the colour of the material changes with increasing Cr-CrOx layer thickness, with the product becoming darker (i.e. lower L-value) with increasing coating thickness. As the optical properties of packaging steels are very important to create an attractive aesthetic appearance of metal containers, like aerosol cans, this could be considered a drawback of the invention for specific applications. However, one way to circumvent these issues would be to use a differential coating, e.g. to use a low Cr-CrOx coating weight on one side of the material, while applying a thicker Cr-CrOx coating weight at the other side. The surface containing a thicker Cr-CrOx coating weight should be used for the inside of the container, to make use of the benefits of the improved corrosion resistance properties. In that case, the surface with the lower Cr-CrOx coating weight is on the outside of the container, for which the corrosion resistance requirements are usually less severe, ensuring optimal optical properties.
  • The Cr-CrOx coating layer applied onto blackplate is at least 40 and more preferably at least 60 mg Cr/m2. The maximum thickness is 140 mg Cr/m2. The Cr-CrOx coating layer applied onto blackplate contains at least 40 to 140 mg Cr/m2, more preferably at least 60 mg Cr/m2. In an embodiment a suitable maximum is 110 mg Cr/m2.
  • The Cr-CrOx coated blackplate aims to replace ECCS. The major advantage besides the elimination of hexavalent chromium from manufacturing is the potential to create a product for applications for which the superior corrosion resistance properties of tinplate are not required. From a process point of view, the fact that the Cr-CrOx coating layer is applied in a single process step means that two process steps are combined, which is beneficial in terms of process economy and in terms of environmental impact.
  • The Cr-CrOx coating can also be applied to a cold-rolled and recovery annealed blackplate, or to a cold-rolled and recovery annealed electrolytic, and optionally flowmelted, tinplate. These substrates have a recovery annealed substrate, rather than the recystallised single reduced ETP or blackplate or the double reduced blackplate. The difference in microstructure of the substrate was not found to materially affect the Cr-CrOx coating.
  • It was found that the material according to the invention can be used in combination with thermoplastic coatings, but also for applications where traditionally ECCS is used in combination with lacquers (i.e. for bakeware such as baking tins, or products with moderate corrosion resistance requirements) or as a substitute for conventional tinplate for applications where requirements in terms of corrosion resistance are moderate.
  • In an embodiment the coated substrate is further provided with an organic coating, consisting of either a thermoset organic coating, or a thermoplastic single layer polymer coating, or a thermoplastic multi-layer polymer coating. The Cr-CrOx layer provides excellent adhesion to the organic coating similar to that achieved by using conventional ECCS.
  • In a preferred embodiment the thermoplastic polymer coating is a polymer coating system comprising one or more layers comprising the use of thermoplastic resins such as polyesters or polyolefins, but can also include acrylic resins, polyamides, polyvinyl chloride, fluorocarbon resins, polycarbonates, styrene type resins, ABS resins, chlorinated polyethers, ionomers, urethane resins and functionalised polymers. For clarification:
  • Polyester is a polymer composed of dicarboxylic acid and glycol. Examples of suitable dicarboxylic acids include therephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, naphthalene dicarboxylic acid and cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid. Examples of suitable glycols include ethylene glycol, propane diol, butane diol, hexane diol, cyclohexane diol, cyclohexane dimethanol, neopentyl glycol etc. More than two kinds of dicarboxylic acid or glycol may be used together.
  • Polyolefins include for example polymers or copolymers of ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene or 1-octene.
  • Acrylic resins include for example polymers or copolymers of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, acrylic acid ester, methacrylic acid ester or acrylamide.
  • Polyamide resins include for example so-called Nylon 6, Nylon 66, Nylon 46, Nylon 610 and Nylon 11.
  • Polyvinyl chloride includes homopolymers and copolymers, for example with ethylene or vinyl acetate.
  • Fluorocarbon resins include for example tetrafluorinated polyethylene, trifluorinated monochlorinated polyethylene, hexafluorinated ethylenepropylene resin, polyvinyl fluoride and polyvinylidene fluoride.
  • Functionalised polymers for instance by maleic anhydride grafting, include for example modified polyethylenes, modified polypropylenes, modified ethylene acrylate copolymers and modified ethylene vinyl acetates.
  • Mixtures of two or more resins can be used. Further, the resin may be mixed with anti-oxidant, heat stabiliser, UV absorbent, plasticiser, pigment, nucleating agent, antistatic agent, release agent, anti-blocking agent, etc. The use of such thermoplastic polymer coating systems have shown to provide excellent performance in can-making and use of the can, such as shelf-life.
  • According to a second aspect, the invention is embodied in a process for producing a coated steel substrate for packaging applications, the process comprising the electro-deposition of a chromium metal - chromium oxide coating on the substrate with the electrolytic deposition on said substrate of said chromium metal - chromium oxide coating occurring in a single plating step from a plating solution comprising a trivalent chromium compound, an optional chelating agent, an optional conductivity enhancing salt, an optional depolarizer, an optional surfactant and to which an acid or base can be added to adjust the pH.
  • In an embodiment the electro-deposition of the Cr-CrOx coating is achieved by using an electrolyte in which the chelating agent comprises a formic acid anion, the conductivity enhancing salt contains an alkali metal cation and the depolarizer comprises a bromide containing salt.
  • In an embodiment the cationic species in the chelating agent, the conductivity enhancing salt and the depolarizer is potassium. The benefit of using potassium is that its presence in the electrolyte greatly enhances the electrical conductivity of the solution, more than any other alkali metal cation, thus delivering a maximum contribution to lowering of the cell voltage required to drive the electro-deposition process.
  • In an embodiment of the invention the composition of the electrolyte used for the Cr-CrOx deposition was: 120 g/l basic chromium sulphate, 250 g/l potassium chloride, 15 g/l potassium bromide and 51.2 g/l potassium formate. The pH was adjusted to values between 2.3 and 2.8 measured at 25°C by the addition of sulphuric acid.
  • According to the invention the chromium containing coating is preferably deposited from the trivalent chromium based electrolyte at a bath temperature of between 40 and 70°C, preferably of at least 45°C and/or at most 60°C.
  • Surprisingly, it was found that it is possible to electro-deposit a chromium metal - chromium oxide coating layer from this electrolyte in a single process step. From prior art, it follows that addition of a buffering agent to the electrolyte, like e.g. boric acid, is strictly required to enable the electro-deposition of chromium metal to take place. In addition, it has been reported that it is not possible to deposit chromium metal and chromium oxide from the same electrolyte, due to this buffering effect (with a buffering agent being required for the electro-deposition of the chromium metal but excluding the formation of chromium oxides and vice versa). However, it was found that no such addition of a buffering agent was required to deposit chromium metal, provided that a sufficiently high cathodic current density is being applied.
  • XPS depth profiles were measured and the peaks that are measured are Fe2p, Cr2p, O1s, Sn3d, C1s. It was observed that the Cr-layer consists of a mixture of Cr-oxide and Cr-metal and that the Cr-oxide is not present as a distinct layer on the outermost surface, but is mixed through the whole layer. This is also indicated by the O-peak that is present in the whole Cr-layer. In all cases the Cr-CrOx layer has a shiny metallic appearance.
  • It is believed that a certain threshold value for the current density must be exceeded for the electro-deposition of chromium metal to occur, which is closely linked to pH at the strip surface reaching certain values as a result of the evolution of hydrogen gas and the equilibration of various (chelated) poly chromium hydroxide complexes. It was found that after crossing this threshold value for the current density that the electro-deposition of the chromium metal - chromium oxide coating layer increases virtually linearly with increasing current density, as observed with conventional electro-deposition of metals, following Faraday's law. The actual value for the threshold current density seems to be closely linked to the mass transfer conditions at the strip surface: it was observed that this threshold value increases with increasing mass transfer rates. This phenomenon can be explained by changes in pH values at the strip surface: at increasing mass transfer rates the supply of hydronium ions to the strip surface is increased, necessitating an increase in cathodic current density to maintain a specific pH level (obviously higher than the bulk pH) at the strip surface under steady-state process conditions. The validity of this hypothesis is supported by results obtained from experiments in which the pH of the bulk electrolyte was varied between a value of 2.5 and 2.8: the threshold value for the current density decreases with increasing pH value.
  • Concerning the electro-deposition process of Cr-CrOx coatings from trivalent chromium based electrolytes, it is important to prevent/minimise the oxidation of trivalent chromium to its hexavalent state at the anode and a suitable anode or anode material must be selected. By using a hydrogen gas diffusion anode as described below and in copending application EP12193623 , the formation of Cr(IV) can be prevented.
  • In an embodiment of the invention the formation of Cr(IV) can be prevented by using one, more or only hydrogen gas diffusion anodes at which hydrogen gas (H2(g)) is oxidised. H+ (protons) in an aqueous solution bind to one or more water molecules, e.g. as hydronium ions (H3O+). The oxidation of H2(g) to H+(aq) prevents the occurrence of undesirable oxidation reactions, such as the formation of Cr(IV), which occur at a higher anodic overpotential when using an anode at which water (H2O) is oxidised to oxygen (O2(g)).
  • The reaction H2(g) → 2H+(aq) + 2e- occurs at an anode potential of 0.00 V (SHE). The reaction 2H2O → 4H+(aq) + O2(g) + 4e- occurs at an anode potential of 1.23 V (SHE). When an anode at which water is oxidised to oxygen is used, then reactions are possible which would not have been possible when using an anode at which hydrogen gas is oxidised.
  • One of such undesirable oxidation reactions is the oxidation of Cr(III) to Cr(VI) and this oxidation reaction can be completely excluded by using a hydrogen gas diffusion anode (GDA) at which H2(g) is oxidised to H+.
  • In an embodiment of the method H2(g) is oxidised at the gas diffusion anode to H+(aq) with a current efficiency of at least 99%, preferably of 100%. The higher the current efficiency, the smaller the likelihood of undesirable side reactions. It is therefore preferable that the current efficiency is at least 99%, and preferably 100%. Based on thermodynamic and kinetic considerations it can be argued that using a hydrogen gas diffusion anode completely eliminates the risk of Cr(III) oxidation as the anode operating potential is much too low for Cr(III) oxidation to occur.
  • Thermodynamically, under standard conditions (i.e. a temperature of 25 °C and a pressure of 1 atm) an electrode potential of > 0 V is already sufficient for oxidising H2(g) to H+(aq), whereas an electrode potential of > 1.23 V is required for oxidising H2O to O2(g). Cr(III) can only be oxidised to Cr(VI) when the electrode potential is > 1.35 V.
  • The electrode potential is measured against the standard hydrogen electrode. The standard hydrogen electrode (abbreviated SHE), is a redox electrode which forms the basis of the thermodynamic scale of oxidation-reduction potentials. Its absolute electrode potential is estimated to be 4.44 ± 0.02 V at 25 °C, but to form a basis for comparison with all other electrode reactions, hydrogen's standard electrode potential (E0) is declared to be zero at all temperatures. Potentials of any other electrodes are compared with that of the standard hydrogen electrode at the same temperature.
  • The prevailing equilibrium (zero current) potential can be calculated from the Nernst equation by filling in the appropriate temperature, pressure and activities of the electro-active species. The anode operating (non-zero current) potential needed to generate a specific anodic current is determined by the activation overpotential (i.e. the potential difference required for driving the electrode reaction) and the concentration overpotential (i.e. the potential difference required to compensate for concentration gradients of electro-active species at the electrode).
  • Due to the low anode overpotential required for the oxidation of H2(g) to H+(aq), the anode operating potential will always stay far below the value at which Cr(III) oxidation can take place (see Fig. 4 where the current is plotted against the anode potential in SHE). Firstly this results in a lower energy consumption of the electrodeposition process. Secondly, at an anode potential below about 1.35 V oxidation of Cr(III) to Cr(VI) is not possible (indicated with the crossed through arrow).
  • In an embodiment no depolariser is added to the electrolyte. When a hydrogen gas diffusion anode is used then the addition of a depolariser to the electrolyte is no longer needed.
  • The use of a hydrogen gas diffusion anode has the added advantage that the use of a chloride containing electrolyte becomes possible without the risk of chlorine formation. This chlorine gas is potentially harmful to the environment and to the workers and is therefore undesirable. This means that in the case of a Cr(III) electrolyte the electrolyte could be partly or entirely based on chlorides. The advantage of using a chloride based electrolyte is that the conductivity of the electrolyte is much higher compared to a sulphate only based electrolyte, which leads to a lower cell voltage that is required to run the electrodeposition, which results in a lower energy consumption.
  • The oxidation reaction of dissolved hydrogen on an active electrocatalyst surface is a very fast process. As the solubility of hydrogen in a liquid electrolyte is often low, this oxidation reaction can easily become controlled by mass transfer limitations. Porous electrodes have been specifically designed to overcome mass transfer limitations. A hydrogen gas diffusion anode is a porous anode containing a three-phase interface of hydrogen gas, the electrolyte fluid and a solid electrocatalyst (e.g. platinum) that has been applied to the electrically conducting porous matrix (e.g. porous carbon or a porous metal foam). The main advantage of using such a porous electrode is that it provides a very large internal surface area for reaction contained in a small volume combined with a greatly reduced diffusion path length from the gas-liquid interface to the reactive sites. Through this design the mass transfer rate of hydrogen is greatly enhanced, while the true local current density is reduced at a given overall electrode current density, resulting in a lower electrode potential.
  • A gas diffusion anode assembly to be used in the proposed electrodeposition method, typically comprises the use of the following functional components (see Fig. 5): a gas feeding chamber 1, a current collector 2 and a gas diffusion anode, which consists of an hydrophobic porous gas diffusion transport layer 3 combined with an hydrophilic reaction layer 4 (see Fig. 5). The latter is made up of a network of micropores that are (partly) drowned with liquid electrolyte. Optionally, the reaction layer is provided with a proton exchange membrane on the outside 5, like a Nafion® membrane, to prevent the diffusion of chemical species (like anions or large neutral molecules) present in the bulk liquid electrolyte inside the gas diffusion anode, as these compounds can potentially poison the electrocatalyst sites, causing degradation in electrocatalytic activity.
  • The main function of the gas feeding chamber is to supply hydrogen gas evenly to the hydrophobic backside of the hydrogen gas diffusion anode. The gas feeding chamber needs two connections: one to feed hydrogen gas and one to enable purging of a small amount of hydrogen gas to prevent the build-up of gas phase contaminations potentially present in trace amounts in the hydrogen gas supplied. The gas feeding chamber often contains a channel type structure to ensure that hydrogen gas is distributed evenly over the hydrophobic backside.
  • The electrical current collector 2 is (usually) attached to the hydrophobic backside 3 of the hydrogen gas diffusion anode to enable the transport of the electrical current generated inside the anode to a rectifier (not shown in Fig. 5). This current collector plate must be designed in such a way to enable the hydrogen gas to contact the backside of the hydrogen gas diffusion anode so it can be transported to the reactive side inside the gas diffusion anode. Usually this is accomplished by using an electrically conductive plate with a large number of holes, a mesh or an expanded metal sheet made from e.g. titanium.
  • The functionality of gas feeding channels and electrical current collector can also be combined into a single component, which is then pressed against the hydrophobic back-side of the gas diffusion anode.
  • Once the hydrogen gas diffuses through the hydrophobic backside of the hydrogen gas diffusion anode it comes into contact with the electrolyte, which is present in the hydrophilic part of the anode, i.e. the reaction layer (see Fig. 5, right hand side). At the gas-liquid interface (between 3 and 4) the hydrogen gas dissolves into the electrolyte and is transported by diffusion to the electrocatalytic active sites of the hydrogen gas diffusion anode. Usually platinum is used as electrocatalyst, but also other materials like platinum-ruthenium or platinum-molybdenum alloys can be used. At the electrocatalytic sites the dissolved hydrogen is oxidised: the electrons that are generated are transported through the conductive matrix of the gas diffusion anode (usually a carbon matrix) to the current collector 2, while the hydronium ions (H+) diffuse through the proton exchange membrane into the electrolyte.
  • In an embodiment the coated substrate is further provided on one or both sides with an organic coating, consisting of a thermosetting organic coating by a lacquering step, or a thermoplastic single layer, or a thermoplastic multi-layer polymer by a film lamination step or a direct extrusion step.
  • In an embodiment the thermoplastic polymer coating is a polymer coating system comprising one or more layers comprising the use of thermoplastic resins such as polyesters or polyolefins, but can also include acrylic resins, polyamides, polyvinyl chloride, fluorocarbon resins, polycarbonates, styrene type resins, ABS resins, chlorinated polyethers, ionomers, urethane resins and functionalised polymers; and/or copolymers thereof; and/or blends thereof.
  • Preferably the substrate is cleaned prior to Cr-CrOx electrodeposition by dipping the substrate in a sodium carbonate solution containing between 1 to 50 g/l of Na2CO3 at a temperature of between 35 and 65°C, and wherein the cathodic current density of between 0.5 and 2 A/dm2 is applied for a period of between 0.5 and 5 seconds.
  • Preferably the sodium carbonate solution containing at least 2 and/or at most 5 g/l of Na2CO3.
  • The invention is now further explained by means of the following, nonlimiting examples and figures. Example 1 and 2 are not part of the invention.
  • Example 1: Sheets of conventional, non-passivated, flow melted tinplate (common steel grade and temper), with a tin coating weight of 2.8 g Sn/m2 on both sides, were first given an electrolytic pre-treatment to minimise the tin oxide layer thickness. This was done by dipping the sheets into a sodium carbonate solution (3.1 g/l of Na2CO3, temperature of 50°C) and applying a cathodic current density of 0.8 A/dm2 for 2 seconds. After rinsing with de-ionised water, the samples were dipped into a trivalent chromium electrolyte kept at 50°C composed of: 120 g/l of basic chromium sulphate, 250 g/l of potassium chloride, 15 g/l of potassium bromide and 51.2 g/l of potassium formate. The pH of this solution was adjusted to 2.3 measured at 25°C by adding sulphuric acid. A Cr-CrOx coating containing between 21 - 25 mg Cr/m2 (measured by XRF) was deposited on the surface by applying a cathodic current density of 10 A/dm2 for approximately 1 second, using a platinised titanium anode as counter electrode. The samples so produced showed a shiny metallic appearance.
  • The study the passivating action of the thin Cr-CrOx coating on tinplate, the samples were subjected to a long-term storage test at 40°C at a static humidity level of 80% RH. The amount of tin oxide developed on the tinplate surface during storage is then measured after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks of exposure, and compared to the amount of tin oxide present on the sample before the storage test (denoted as '0 weeks'). Determination of tin oxide layer thickness is done using a coulometric method, as described in S. C. Britton, "Tin vs corrosion", ITRI Publication No. 510 (1975), . The tin oxide layer is reduced by a controlled small cathodic current in a 0.1% solution of hydrobromic acid (HBr) that is freed from oxygen by scrubbing with nitrogen. The progress of the reduction of the oxide is followed by potential measurement and the charge passed for the complete reduction (expressed as Coulomb/m2 or C/m2) serves as a measure of the tin oxide layer thickness. The results for the sample according to Example 1 are presented in Table 1, including the performance of the reference material, which is the same tinplate material that was passivated using hexavalent chromium, i.e. so-called 311 passivated tinplate. Table 1 - Tin oxide layer thickness (in C/m2)
    Storage at 40°C, 80% RH ETP-311 (ref) ETP - Cr-CrOx according to Example 1 (25 mg/m2 Cr)
    0 weeks 12 11
    2 weeks 12 12
    4 weeks 13 11
  • The results show that non-passivated tinplate treated according to the present invention to obtain a light Cr-CrOx coating shows perfect stability in tin oxide growth and is fully comparable in performance to traditional 311 passivated tinplate.
  • Example 2: Sheets of conventional, non-passivated, flow melted tinplate (common steel grade and temper), with a tin coating weight of 2.8 g Sn/m2 on both sides, were first given an electrolytic pre-treatment to minimise the tin oxide layer thickness. This was done by dipping the sheets into a sodium carbonate solution (3.1 g/l of Na2CO3, temperature of 50 °C) and applying a cathodic current density of 0.8 A/dm2 for 2 seconds. After rinsing with de-ionised water, the samples were dipped into a trivalent chromium electrolyte kept at 50°C composed of: 120 g/l of basic chromium sulphate, 250 g/l of potassium chloride, 15 g/l of potassium bromide and 51.2 g/l of potassium formate. The pH of this solution was adjusted to 2.3 measured at 25 °C by adding sulphuric acid. A Cr-CrOx coating containing between 65 - 75 mg Cr/m2 (measured by XRF) was deposited on the surface by applying a cathodic current density of 15 A/dm2 for approximately 1 second, using a platinised titanium anode as counter electrode. All samples so produced showed a shiny metallic appearance. A typical SEM image is shown in Figure 1 & 2, which shows the deposition of very fine grains of chromium metal - chromium oxide on the tin surface.
  • The sheets were subsequently lacquered, applying a commercially available epoxy-anhydride lacquer system (Vitalure™ 120 supplied by AkzoNobel). Subsequently, the lacquered sheets were locally deformed by Erichsen cupping.
  • To analyse the performance of the chromium - chromium oxide coated tinplate several sterilisation tests were done to assess the wet adhesion performance on flat and deformed material. In total 5 different sterilisation media were used during these tests, as shown in Table 2. Table 2 - Conditions of sterilisation tests
    Type Sterilisation medium Temperature [°C] Time [min]
    Saline 3.6 wt% NaCl 121 90
    Acetic acid 1 wt% CH3COOH 121 90
    Cysteine 3.56 g/l KH2PO4 + 7.22 g/l Na2HPO4.2H2O + 0.5 g/l C3H7NO2S.HCl.H2O (in buffer solution, pH=7) 121 90
    Salt-Acid 18.7 g/l NaCl + 30 g/l CH3COOH 121 60
    Lactic acid 22.5 g/l C3H6O3 121 60
  • After sterilisation the level of lacquer adhesion of the panels was evaluated (by the Cross-cut and tape test (ISO 2409:1992(E)), blister formation (size and number of blisters) and visual discolouration. The overall results are presented in Table 3, including the performance of the reference material, which is the same tinplate material that was passivated using hexavalent chromium, i.e. so-called 311 passivated tinplate. The performance ranking is on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 being an excellent performance and 5 a very bad performance. The results are averaged over a number of observations, leading to scores with a decimal value. Table 3 - Results of lacquer adhesion tests
    Sterilisation type ETP-311 (ref) ETP - Cr-CrOx
    Flat Saline
    2 1.5
    Acetic acid 4 1.5
    Cysteine 1 1
    Salt-Acid 5 1
    Lactic acid 3 2
    Dome Saline 2 1
    Acetic acid 3.5 1.5
    Cysteine 4.5 0.5
    Salt-Acid 4 0.5
    Lactic acid 3 2.5
  • The inventors found that the tinplate variant manufactured according to the invention performed consistently equal or better compared to the standard tinplate that is passivated using hexavalent chromium (i.e. the reference). Striking is the fact that no sulphur staining was found for the material according to the invention, which is difficult to achieve with conventional passivated tinplate and notoriously difficult to achieve with alternative passivations for tinplate that are free of hexavalent chromium.
  • Example 3: A coil of blackplate (common steel grade and temper), not containing any metal coating, was treated in a processing line running at a line speed of 20 m/min. The processing sequence started with alkaline cleaning of the steel by running the strip for approximately 10 seconds through a solution containing 30 ml/l of a commercial cleaner (Percy P3) and 40 g/l of NaOH, which was kept at 60 °C. During cleaning of the strip an anodic current density of 1.3 A/dm2 was applied. After rinsing with de-ionised water, the steel strip was passed through an acid solution for approximately 10 seconds, to activate the surface. The acid solution consisted of 50 g/l H2SO4, which was kept at 25 °C. After rinsing with de-ionised water, the steel strip was passed into an electroplating tank containing the trivalent chromium based electrolyte kept at 50°C. This electrolyte consisted of: 120 g/l of basic chromium sulphate, 250 g/l of potassium chloride, 15 g/l of potassium bromide and 51.2 g/l of potassium formate. The pH of this solution was adjusted to 2.3 measured at 25 °C by adding sulphuric acid. The electroplating tank contained a set of anodes consisting of platinised titanium. During processing of the strip a cathodic current density of approximately 17 A/dm2 was applied for just over 1 second to electro-deposit a chromium-chromium oxide coating of 60 - 70 mg Cr/m2 (measured by XRF) onto the blackplate surface. All samples so produced showed a shiny metallic appearance. A typical SEM image is shown in Figure 1 and 2, which shows the deposition of very fine grains of chromium metal - chromium oxide on the steel surface.
  • The material so produced, was passed through a coating line to apply a commercially available 20 micrometer thick PET film, through heat sealing. After film lamination, the coated strip was post-heated to temperatures above the melting point of PET, and subsequently quenched in water at room temperature, as per a usual processing method for the PET lamination of metals. The same procedure was followed for the manufacturing of reference material, using a commercially produced coil of ECCS.
  • The laminated materials were used to produce standard food DRD cans (211 x 400). In all cases the dry adhesion of the PET film to the can wall was excellent. This was confirmed by measuring the T-peel forces of the PET film on the can wall, which showed similar values for the PET film applied to both the material according to the invention and commercial ECCS (∼ 7 N/15 mm).
  • The DRD cans were subsequently filled with different media, closed and exposed to a sterilisation treatment. Some cans were processed that contained a scratch made on the can wall, to simulate and observe the effect of incidental coating damage. An overview of the type of sterilisation tests done is presented in Table 4. Table 4 - Conditions of sterilisation tests
    Type Sterilisation medium Temperature [°C] Time [min]
    Saline 3.6 wt% NaCl 121 60
    Acetic acid 1 wt% CH3COOH 121 60
    Cysteine 3.56 g/l KH2PO4 + 7.22 g/l Na2HPO4.2H2O + 0.5 g/l C3H7NO2S.HCl.H2O (in buffer solution, pH=7) 130 60
  • After the sterilisation treatment the DRD cans were cooled to room temperature, emptied, rinsed and dried for one day. The bottom and can wall were judged visually on the presence of corrosion spots and blisters. The results, as presented in Table 5, show that the sterilisation performance of the material according to the invention is in general somewhat less compared to the ECCS reference. The material seems especially more susceptible to corrosion/coating delamination after coating damage. However, these sterilisation tests are quite severe, so in practice the material according to the invention can be used in specifically selected applications involving sterilisation.
  • The performance ranking is on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 being an excellent performance and 5 a very bad performance. Table 5 - Results of sterilisation tests
    Sterilisation type ECCS (ref) BP + Cr-CrOx
    Saline 1 (1)* 1 (4)*
    Acetic acid 1 3
    Cysteine 0 0
    * Symbol in brackets relates to DRD cans with a scratch on the can wall.
  • Example 4: A coil of blackplate (common steel grade and temper), not containing any metal coating, was treated in a processing line identical to that described in the previous example to apply a Cr-CrOx coating.
  • The sheets cut from this coil were subsequently lacquered, applying a commercially available epoxy-phenol lacquer system (VitalureTM 345 supplied by AkzoNobel). Subsequently, the lacquered sheets were locally deformed by Erichsen cupping.
  • To analyse the performance of the chromium - chromium oxide coated blackplate several sterilisation tests were done to assess the wet adhesion performance on flat and deformed material. In total 5 different sterilisation media were used during these tests, as shown in Table 6. Table 6 - Conditions of sterilisation tests
    Type Sterilisation medium Temperature [°C] Time [min]
    Saline 3.6 wt% NaCl 121 60
    Acetic acid 1 wt% CH3COOH 121 60
    Cysteine 3.56 g/l KH2PO4 + 7.22 g/l Na2HPO4.2H2O + 0.5 g/l C3H7NO2S.HCl.H2O (in buffer solution, pH=7) 130 60
    Salt-Acid 18.7 g/l NaCl + 30 g/l CH3COOH 121 60
    Lactic acid 22.5 g/l C3H6O3 100 30
  • After sterilisation the panels were evaluated with respect to the level of lacquer adhesion (by the Cross-cut and tape test (ISO 2409:1992(E))), blister formation (size and number of blisters) and visual discolouration. The overall results are presented in Table 7, including the performance of the reference material, for which commercially available ECCS was used. The performance ranking is on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 being an excellent performance and 5 a very bad performance. Table 7 - Results of sterilisation tests
    Sterilisation type ECCS (ref) BP + Cr-CrOx
    Flat Saline
    0 0
    Acetic acid 0 0
    Cysteine 0 0
    Salt-Acid 0 0
    Lactic acid 0 0
    Dome Saline 0 0
    Acetic acid 5 4
    Cysteine 0 0
    Salt-Acid 0 0
    Lactic acid 0 0
  • The inventors found that the Cr-CrOx coated blackplate material manufactured according to the invention performed consistently similar to conventional ECCS.
  • Brief description of drawings:
    • Fig. 1 and 2 show typical SEM images, which show the deposition of very fine grains of chromium metal-chromium oxide onto the surface. Figure 1 relates to a tinplate substrate and figure 2 relates to a blackplate substrate.
    • Figure 3 shows an overview of various packaging applications. On the X-axis are packaging steel grades, and on the Y-axis a typical thickness range is shown for these applications for which the packaging steel substrate according to the invention could be used.
    • Figure 4 shows where the current is plotted against the anode potential in SHE and Figure 5 shows a schematic drawing of a gas diffusion anode.

Claims (15)

  1. Process for producing a coated steel substrate for packaging applications by depositing a chromium metal - chromium oxide coating on the substrate for packaging applications containing
    1. a recrystallisation annealed single or double reduced packaging steel blackplate, or
    2. a cold-rolled and recovery annealed blackplate,
    comprising electrolytically depositing on said substrate said chromium metal - chromium oxide coating in a single process step from a plating solution comprising a mixture of a trivalent chromium compound, a chelating agent, an optional conductivity enhancing salt, an optional depolarizer, an optional surfactant, to which an acid or base is optionally added to adjust the pH, wherein the plating solution does not contain a buffering agent, and wherein a sufficiently high cathodic current density is being applied to deposit chromium metal.
  2. Process according to claim 1 wherein the chelating agent comprises a formic acid anion, the conductivity enhancing salt contains an alkali metal cation and the depolarizer comprises a bromide containing salt.
  3. Process according to any one of claims 1 to 2 wherein the cationic species in the chelating agent, the conductivity enhancing salt and the depolarizer is potassium.
  4. Process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the electrolytic deposition deposits a chromium metal - chromium oxide layer on the blackplate containing a total chromium content of at least 20 mg/m2, preferably at least 40 mg/m2 and more preferably at least 60 mg/m2.
  5. Process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the electrolytic deposition deposits a chromium metal - chromium oxide layer on the blackplate containing a total chromium content of at least 20 mg/m2 and at most 140 mg/m2, preferably at most 110 mg/m2.
  6. Process according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the coated substrate is further provided on one or both sides with an organic coating, consisting of a thermosetting organic coating by a lacquering step, or a thermoplastic single layer, or a thermoplastic multi-layer polymer by a film lamination step or a direct extrusion step, preferably wherein the thermoplastic polymer coating is a polymer coating system comprising one or more layers comprising thermoplastic resins such as polyesters or polyolefins, acrylic resins, polyamides, polyvinyl chloride, fluorocarbon resins, polycarbonates, styrene type resins, ABS resins, chlorinated polyethers, ionomers, urethane resins and functionalised polymers; and/or copolymers thereof; and/or blends thereof.
  7. Process according to any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the organic coating consists of a thermoplastic single or multi-layer polymer coating, wherein the thermoplastic polymer coating is a polymer coating system comprising one or more layers comprising polyester and/or copolymers thereof and/or blends thereof.
  8. Process according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the coated substrate is further provided with an organic coating, consisting of a thermoset organic coating.
  9. Process according to any one of the claims 1 to 8 wherein an anode is chosen that reduces or eliminates the oxidation of Cr(III) ions to Cr(VI) ions during the plating step, such as a hydrogen gas diffusion anode.
  10. Coated steel substrate for packaging applications containing
    1. a recrystallisation annealed single or double reduced packaging steel blackplate, or
    2. a cold-rolled and recovery annealed blackplate,
    wherein one or both sides of the substrate is coated with a chromium metal - chromium oxide coating layer produced in a single process step from a trivalent chromium electroplating process from a plating solution comprising a mixture of a trivalent chromium compound, a chelating agent, an optional conductivity enhancing salt, an optional depolarizer, an optional surfactant, to which an acid or base is optionally added to adjust the pH, wherein the plating solution does not contain a buffering agent, wherein a sufficiently high cathodic current density is being applied to deposit chromium metal,
    wherein the chromium metal - chromium oxide layer contains a chromium content of at least 40 mg/m2, and a total chromium content of at most 140 mg/m2, wherein the Cr-CrOx layer consists of a mixture of Cr-oxide and Cr-metal and wherein the Cr-oxide is not present as a distinct layer on the outermost surface, but mixed through the Cr-CrOx layer, and wherein the Cr-CrOx coating is applied directly onto the blackplate packaging steel substrate.
  11. Coated substrate for packaging applications according to claim 10 wherein the chromium metal - chromium oxide layer contains a chromium content of at least 60 mg/m2.
  12. Coated substrate for packaging applications according to claim 10 or 11, wherein the coated substrate is further provided with an organic coating consisting of a thermoplastic single layer coating, or of a thermoplastic multi-layer polymer coating, preferably wherein the thermoplastic polymer coating is a polymer coating system comprising one or more layers comprising thermoplastic resins such as polyesters or polyolefins, acrylic resins, polyamides, polyvinyl chloride, fluorocarbon resins, polycarbonates, styrene type resins, ABS resins, chlorinated polyethers, ionomers, urethane resins and functionalised polymers.
  13. Coated substrate for packaging applications according to any one of claims 10 to 12 wherein the organic coating consists of a thermoplastic single or multi-layer polymer coating, wherein the thermoplastic polymer coating is a polymer coating system comprising one or more layers comprising polyester and/or copolymers thereof and/or blends thereof.
  14. Coated substrate for packaging applications according to claim 10 or 11 wherein the coated substrate is further provided with an organic coating, consisting of a thermoset organic coating.
  15. Coated substrate for packaging applications according to any one of claims 10 to 14 wherein the chromium metal - chromium oxide layer contains a total chromium content of at most 110 mg/m2.
EP13794902.0A 2012-11-21 2013-11-21 Chromium-chromium oxide coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications and a method for producing said coatings Active EP2922983B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP13794902.0A EP2922983B1 (en) 2012-11-21 2013-11-21 Chromium-chromium oxide coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications and a method for producing said coatings
RS20190375A RS58504B1 (en) 2012-11-21 2013-11-21 Chromium-chromium oxide coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications and a method for producing said coatings

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP12193623 2012-11-21
EP12195261 2012-12-03
EP13794902.0A EP2922983B1 (en) 2012-11-21 2013-11-21 Chromium-chromium oxide coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications and a method for producing said coatings
PCT/EP2013/074339 WO2014079910A1 (en) 2012-11-21 2013-11-21 Chromium-chromium oxide coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications and a method for producing said coatings

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2922983A1 EP2922983A1 (en) 2015-09-30
EP2922983B1 true EP2922983B1 (en) 2019-02-20

Family

ID=49622838

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13798613.9A Active EP2922984B1 (en) 2012-11-21 2013-11-21 Method for producing chromium-chromium oxide coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications
EP13794902.0A Active EP2922983B1 (en) 2012-11-21 2013-11-21 Chromium-chromium oxide coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications and a method for producing said coatings

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13798613.9A Active EP2922984B1 (en) 2012-11-21 2013-11-21 Method for producing chromium-chromium oxide coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications

Country Status (13)

Country Link
US (2) US20150337448A1 (en)
EP (2) EP2922984B1 (en)
JP (2) JP6407880B2 (en)
KR (2) KR20150085038A (en)
CN (2) CN104919091A (en)
BR (2) BR112015011731B1 (en)
CA (2) CA2892114C (en)
ES (2) ES2716565T3 (en)
MX (2) MX2015006287A (en)
RS (2) RS58504B1 (en)
RU (2) RU2655405C2 (en)
WO (3) WO2014079909A1 (en)
ZA (2) ZA201503508B (en)

Families Citing this family (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
MX350889B (en) 2012-03-30 2017-09-25 Tata Steel Ijmuiden Bv Coated substrate for packaging applications and a method for producing said coated substrate.
RU2692538C2 (en) * 2013-06-20 2019-06-25 Тата Стил Эймейден Б.В. Method for manufacturing chromium - chromium oxide coated substrates
JP2017001312A (en) * 2015-06-11 2017-01-05 吉田 英夫 Film-forming structure for workpiece and film-forming method for workpiece
EP3439869B1 (en) 2016-04-04 2023-09-06 Tata Steel IJmuiden B.V. Process for producing a polymer-coated metal strip and a polymer-coated metal strip produced thereby
CN110062819B (en) * 2016-11-14 2021-07-23 塔塔钢铁艾默伊登有限责任公司 Method for electroplating uncoated steel strip with a coating
WO2019156245A1 (en) 2018-02-09 2019-08-15 日本製鉄株式会社 Steel sheet for containers and method for producing steel sheet for containers
WO2020079215A1 (en) 2018-10-19 2020-04-23 Atotech Deutschland Gmbh A method for electrolytically passivating a surface of silver, silver alloy, gold, or gold alloy
DE102018132075A1 (en) 2018-12-13 2020-06-18 thysenkrupp AG Process for producing a metal strip coated with a coating of chromium and chromium oxide based on an electrolyte solution with a trivalent chromium compound
DE102018132074A1 (en) 2018-12-13 2020-06-18 thysenkrupp AG Process for producing a metal strip coated with a coating of chromium and chromium oxide based on an electrolyte solution with a trivalent chromium compound
MX2021010225A (en) * 2019-02-25 2021-09-21 Tata Steel Ijmuiden Bv Method for electrolytically depositing a chromium oxide layer.
JP2022521963A (en) * 2019-02-25 2022-04-13 タタ、スティール、アイモイデン、ベスローテン、フェンノートシャップ Manufacturing method of chrome oxide coated tinplate
DE102019109356A1 (en) * 2019-04-09 2020-10-15 Thyssenkrupp Rasselstein Gmbh Process for the production of a metal strip coated with a coating of chromium and chromium oxide based on an electrolyte solution with a trivalent chromium compound and an electrolysis system for carrying out the process
DE102019109354A1 (en) * 2019-04-09 2020-10-15 Thyssenkrupp Rasselstein Gmbh Process for passivating the surface of a black plate or a tin plate and an electrolysis system for carrying out the process
CN110339205B (en) * 2019-08-19 2021-08-24 山东德信生物科技有限公司 Application of hydrogen-rich water composition in inhibiting hexavalent chromium-induced DF-1 endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy
US11906203B2 (en) * 2019-09-27 2024-02-20 Ademco Inc. Water heater control system with powered anode rod
CN112446130A (en) * 2020-10-15 2021-03-05 宝钢日铁汽车板有限公司 Strip steel deviation simulation system of continuous hot galvanizing unit annealing furnace and control method
KR20230093036A (en) 2020-12-21 2023-06-26 제이에프이 스틸 가부시키가이샤 Surface-treated steel sheet and its manufacturing method
EP4219795A4 (en) 2020-12-21 2024-01-31 JFE Steel Corporation Surface-treated steel sheet and production method therefor
DE102021125696A1 (en) * 2021-10-04 2023-04-06 Thyssenkrupp Rasselstein Gmbh Process for passivating the surface of a tinplate and an electrolysis system for carrying out the process
JP7401033B1 (en) 2022-07-19 2023-12-19 Jfeスチール株式会社 Surface treated steel sheet and its manufacturing method

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3679554A (en) * 1969-01-13 1972-07-25 Nippon Kokan Kk Method for electrolytic treatment of steel surface in a chromate solution
US3785940A (en) * 1972-01-14 1974-01-15 Nippon Kokan Kk Method for electrolytically treating the surface of a steel plate with a chromate solution

Family Cites Families (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1129959A (en) * 1914-04-06 1915-03-02 Western Electric Co System for amplifying electric waves.
US2206131A (en) * 1937-02-02 1940-07-02 E J Lavino & Co Process for making corrected magnesia refractories
US3232854A (en) * 1959-06-05 1966-02-01 Diamond Alkali Co Chromium plating
US3567599A (en) * 1967-06-21 1971-03-02 Inland Steel Co Electrochemical treatment of ferrous metal
AU2348470A (en) 1969-12-29 1972-07-06 International Lead Zinc Research Organization Aqueous chromium plating baths
US3642586A (en) * 1970-05-12 1972-02-15 Republic Steel Corp Anodic treatment for stainless steel
JPS4893550A (en) * 1972-03-10 1973-12-04
GB1455580A (en) * 1973-12-13 1976-11-17 Albright & Wilson Electrodeposition of chromium
GB1580137A (en) * 1977-05-24 1980-11-26 Bnf Metals Tech Centre Electrolytic deposition of protective chromite-containing coatings
US4167460A (en) * 1978-04-03 1979-09-11 Oxy Metal Industries Corporation Trivalent chromium plating bath composition and process
GB1602404A (en) 1978-04-06 1981-11-11 Ibm Electroplating of chromium
FR2465011A1 (en) * 1979-09-06 1981-03-20 Carnaud Sa MATERIAL CONSISTING OF A PROTECTED STEEL SHEET, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF, IN PARTICULAR TO PRESERVE BOXES
US4461680A (en) 1983-12-30 1984-07-24 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce Process and bath for electroplating nickel-chromium alloys
JPS60208494A (en) * 1984-03-31 1985-10-21 Kawasaki Steel Corp Surface-treated steel sheet for seam welding can having excellent weldability
JPS60258499A (en) * 1984-06-04 1985-12-20 Kawasaki Steel Corp Manufacture of surface-treated steel plate for resistance welding
US4690735A (en) * 1986-02-04 1987-09-01 University Of Florida Electrolytic bath compositions and method for electrodeposition of amorphous chromium
IT1216808B (en) * 1987-05-13 1990-03-14 Sviluppo Materiali Spa CONTINUOUS ELECTRODEPOSITION PROCESS OF METALLIC CHROME AND CHROMIUM OXIDE ON METAL SURFACES
NL8801511A (en) * 1988-06-14 1990-01-02 Hoogovens Groep Bv METHOD FOR ELECTROLYTICALLY COATING A METAL SUBSTRATE WITH A METAL COATING COAT.
SU1652380A1 (en) * 1988-11-04 1991-05-30 Центральный научно-исследовательский институт черной металлургии им.И.П.Бардина Method of treatment of tin-plate for can containers
JPH03202489A (en) * 1989-12-29 1991-09-04 Nkk Corp Manganese and manganese alloy plating method
SU1816808A1 (en) * 1990-05-31 1993-05-23 Tsnii Chernoj Metallurg Method of sheet iron working
JP2606451B2 (en) * 1990-12-28 1997-05-07 東洋製罐株式会社 Deep drawn can and method for producing the same
NL9100353A (en) * 1991-02-27 1992-09-16 Hoogovens Groep Bv PROCESS FOR ELECTROLYTICALLY COATING STEEL BELT WITH A SINK-CONTAINING USE USING AN INSOLUBLE ANODE.
JPH089795B2 (en) * 1991-08-13 1996-01-31 新日本製鐵株式会社 Thin chromium-plated steel sheet with excellent lubricity
US5294326A (en) * 1991-12-30 1994-03-15 Elf Atochem North America, Inc. Functional plating from solutions containing trivalent chromium ion
JPH07173695A (en) * 1993-12-17 1995-07-11 Nkk Corp Electroplating device using gas diffusion electrode
US6004448A (en) * 1995-06-06 1999-12-21 Atotech Usa, Inc. Deposition of chromium oxides from a trivalent chromium solution containing a complexing agent for a buffer
JPH1136099A (en) * 1997-07-16 1999-02-09 Kizai Kk Plating device and plating method thereby
JP2001070921A (en) 1999-06-29 2001-03-21 Sanyo Electric Co Ltd Garbage disposer
CN1141420C (en) * 2001-02-27 2004-03-10 中山中粤马口铁工业有限公司 Process for electroplating Cr onto surface of thin steel sheet
JP2005029809A (en) * 2003-07-07 2005-02-03 Nippon Steel Corp Surface-treated steel sheet for vessel superior in weldability and resistance to content
JP2005213580A (en) * 2004-01-29 2005-08-11 Jfe Steel Kk Production method of tin plated steel plate
US20060116285A1 (en) * 2004-11-29 2006-06-01 De Nora Elettrodi S.P.A. Platinum alloy carbon-supported catalysts
KR100716016B1 (en) * 2006-05-19 2007-05-11 하가전자 주식회사 Power Supply Circuit for the Wall mounted Electronic Switch
US20080169199A1 (en) * 2007-01-17 2008-07-17 Chang Gung University Trivalent chromium electroplating solution and an electroplating process with the solution
RU2406790C2 (en) * 2008-08-28 2010-12-20 Федеральное Государственное Унитарное Предприятие "Центральный научно-исследовательский институт черной металлургии им. И.П. Бардина" (ФГУП "ЦНИИчермет им. И.П. Бардина") Procedure for treatment of electrical leaded rolled metal
US7780840B2 (en) 2008-10-30 2010-08-24 Trevor Pearson Process for plating chromium from a trivalent chromium plating bath
CN101643924B (en) * 2009-08-28 2011-07-27 广州市二轻工业科学技术研究所 Full-sulfate trivalent-chromium solution for plating thick chromium and plating method
CN101781781A (en) * 2010-01-19 2010-07-21 上海应用技术学院 Method of pulse chromium plating with trivalent chromium
ES2774265T3 (en) * 2011-05-03 2020-07-20 Atotech Deutschland Gmbh Electroplating bath and method for producing dark chrome layers

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3679554A (en) * 1969-01-13 1972-07-25 Nippon Kokan Kk Method for electrolytic treatment of steel surface in a chromate solution
US3785940A (en) * 1972-01-14 1974-01-15 Nippon Kokan Kk Method for electrolytically treating the surface of a steel plate with a chromate solution

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ZA201503508B (en) 2016-11-30
JP6407880B2 (en) 2018-10-17
ZA201504168B (en) 2016-09-28
CN104919091A (en) 2015-09-16
JP6407879B2 (en) 2018-10-17
ES2716565T3 (en) 2019-06-13
CN105102685A (en) 2015-11-25
WO2014079910A1 (en) 2014-05-30
RU2660478C2 (en) 2018-07-06
ES2703595T3 (en) 2019-03-11
EP2922983A1 (en) 2015-09-30
EP2922984B1 (en) 2018-11-14
BR112015011731A2 (en) 2017-07-11
CA2891605C (en) 2017-01-03
MX2015006372A (en) 2016-03-11
BR112015011731B1 (en) 2021-10-19
JP2016501985A (en) 2016-01-21
CA2892114C (en) 2017-02-28
BR112015011731A8 (en) 2019-10-08
MX2015006287A (en) 2015-12-08
US20150337448A1 (en) 2015-11-26
RS58266B1 (en) 2019-03-29
BR112015011465A2 (en) 2017-07-11
JP2016505708A (en) 2016-02-25
KR20150085038A (en) 2015-07-22
RU2655405C2 (en) 2018-05-28
WO2014079911A2 (en) 2014-05-30
CA2892114A1 (en) 2014-05-30
RU2015123743A (en) 2017-01-10
RU2015123743A3 (en) 2018-04-27
RS58504B1 (en) 2019-04-30
WO2014079909A1 (en) 2014-05-30
BR112015011465B1 (en) 2021-07-27
RU2015124017A (en) 2017-01-10
WO2014079911A3 (en) 2015-04-02
RU2015124017A3 (en) 2018-05-29
US20150329981A1 (en) 2015-11-19
CA2891605A1 (en) 2014-05-30
KR20150088288A (en) 2015-07-31
EP2922984A1 (en) 2015-09-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2922983B1 (en) Chromium-chromium oxide coatings applied to steel substrates for packaging applications and a method for producing said coatings
EP2831314B1 (en) Coated substrate for packaging applications and a method for producing said coated substrate
JP5692080B2 (en) Manufacturing method of steel plate for container material with less environmental impact
KR20120125547A (en) Steel sheet for container and method for producing same
JP2022521962A (en) Method of electrolytically precipitating the chromium oxide layer
CA3130835A1 (en) Method for manufacturing chromium oxide coated tinplate

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20150622

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20170915

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C25D 7/06 20060101ALI20180705BHEP

Ipc: C25D 3/06 20060101AFI20180705BHEP

Ipc: C25D 5/36 20060101ALI20180705BHEP

Ipc: C25D 5/48 20060101ALI20180705BHEP

Ipc: C25D 9/10 20060101ALI20180705BHEP

Ipc: C25D 9/08 20060101ALI20180705BHEP

Ipc: C25D 5/34 20060101ALI20180705BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20180912

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)
INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20181030

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602013051048

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1098305

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190315

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2716565

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20190613

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190520

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190620

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190521

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190620

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190520

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1098305

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190220

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602013051048

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20191121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191130

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191121

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20131121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190220

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230517

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20231126

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Payment date: 20231031

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231127

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20231201

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20231108

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: RS

Payment date: 20231101

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231122

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231127

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231129

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20231127

Year of fee payment: 11