EP2834039B1 - Procédé de peinture de pièces automobiles en matière plastique, en particulier de pare-chocs de véhicules automobiles - Google Patents

Procédé de peinture de pièces automobiles en matière plastique, en particulier de pare-chocs de véhicules automobiles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2834039B1
EP2834039B1 EP13718106.1A EP13718106A EP2834039B1 EP 2834039 B1 EP2834039 B1 EP 2834039B1 EP 13718106 A EP13718106 A EP 13718106A EP 2834039 B1 EP2834039 B1 EP 2834039B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
cleaning
cleaning device
test body
painting
plastic parts
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP13718106.1A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2834039A1 (fr
Inventor
Heinz Vogl
Stephan ZÜFLE
Uwe Trillitzsch
Bocar Biro Barry
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rehau Automotive SE and Co KG
Original Assignee
Rehau AG and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rehau AG and Co filed Critical Rehau AG and Co
Publication of EP2834039A1 publication Critical patent/EP2834039A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2834039B1 publication Critical patent/EP2834039B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24CABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C1/00Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
    • B24C1/08Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods for polishing surfaces, e.g. smoothing a surface by making use of liquid-borne abrasives
    • B24C1/086Descaling; Removing coating films

Definitions

  • the cleaning effect of the carbon dioxide is based inter alia on its abrasive action against the plastic component to be cleaned.
  • carbon dioxide is applied to a commercial scale by means of the cleaning device with specified parameters and the force is displayed in the form of grams / kilogram.
  • the force is displayed in the form of grams / kilogram.
  • the balance test only cumulative values of the nozzles can be displayed, since several nozzles are installed in each unit and these are operated together with a drive. That is, only the individual arrays (i.e., 3 pieces) and the total cleaning area can be considered, not the individual nozzles. Further, with a defective nozzle, the results of pressure and weight measurements are the same (consequently, a single defective nozzle can not be identified) because in this case the amount of material passed through is evenly distributed among the remaining nozzles.
  • the invention has for its object to provide a method with the features described above, which allows a test of the proper functional state of the cleaning device without this production must be interrupted.
  • the invention is based on the recognition that preferably the time intervals between the cleaning of two motor vehicle plastic components can be used to automatically move the cleaning device into a different test position from the cleaning position during this time.
  • a test position preferably fixed in a cleaning cabin (in which the method is interrupt insomnia carried out) installed test body with carbon dioxide from the cleaning device acted upon, which is immediately moved back to a cleaning position, so that the production process is not interrupted by the described test process or stopped.
  • the loading of the test body with the carbon dioxide is preferably likewise carried out automatically and allows a check of the functional state of the cleaning device at predetermined time intervals (eg after a predefined number of cleaned automotive plastic components or during existing process gaps), without the production process being impaired as a result.
  • the inspection is repetitively performed according to preset cycle times, e.g. each after a certain number of cleaned automotive plastic components.
  • the cleaning device is arranged on a robot arm.
  • the method of the cleaning device from a cleaning position to the test position can be done by a linear movement or by a pivoting movement, which of course both types of movement combined with each other, so can be superimposed.
  • the test body has sensors, in particular for pressure and / or temperature and / or force, at a plurality of test positions spaced apart from one another. These sensors are expediently in operative connection with an electronic data processing device which compares the measured values of the sensors with predetermined desired values.
  • the above-described arrangement of mutually spaced sensors allows a local evaluation of the functional state of the cleaning device, so that correspondingly also individual defective nozzles can be identified by means of this very precise test method.
  • the setpoint values can be determined, for example, by means of a calibration method, in which a corresponding loading of the test element takes place by means of a proven properly functioning cleaning device and the measured values of the measuring sensors determined here are used to determine the corresponding setpoint values.
  • the electronic data processing device expediently also determines a maximum permissible deviation of the actual values from the desired values. If a perfect functional state of the cleaning device is determined by the method according to the invention, the production process can be continued without any restriction. If an emerging tolerance violation is detected, it is expedient to use an upcoming time window, in which the production is interrupted anyway, for cleaning or repair / repair of the cleaning device. If the detected fault can be remedied by means of a method which can be carried out very quickly, the fault can be rectified even immediately after a test procedure, so that the cleaning device is already available for the next arriving motor vehicle component in good time and according to the Production process is not disturbed.
  • test body is plate-shaped.
  • the test body is preferably arranged on a device permanently installed in the cleaning cabin.
  • the exposure of the test body is evaluated photo-optically.
  • the spray pattern generated during the test process is preferably aligned with reference beam images. Based on a target-actual comparison, a conclusion is then drawn on the functional state of the cleaning device.
  • the test body consists e.g. made of metal or plastic, e.g. a rigid foam, wherein in particular the use of polystyrene rigid foam is within the scope of the invention.
  • a rigid foam wherein in particular the use of polystyrene rigid foam is within the scope of the invention.
  • the abrasive effect of the carbon dioxide cleaning agent is very good and consequently the perfect functional state of the cleaning device is very well detected by a spray pattern on a corresponding polystyrene foam test body.
  • the inspection process takes place between the cleaning of two consecutive motor vehicle plastic components and consequently the cleaning process for a single motor vehicle plastic component does not have to be interrupted for this purpose. Rather, the already existing time intervals between two cleaning operations are used to run in this time the testing process.
  • the cleaning device expediently has a plurality of, preferably differently oriented, nozzles for uniform application of the CO 2 to the motor vehicle plastic component.
  • the cleaning device has several, for example 3, so-called.
  • Arrays each containing a plurality, eg 6, nozzles. Consequently, the cleaning device in this case has 18 nozzles.
  • the number of test positions at which sensors are provided on the test body is expediently identical to the number of nozzles of the cleaning device. Consequently, in this case, exactly one nozzle is associated with each test position of the test body.
  • the nozzles of an array are supplied with CO 2 via a common supply line.
  • the Fig. 1 and 2 show a cleaning device 1, which is used in a method for painting automotive bumpers 2 are used.
  • a cleaning device 1 for this purpose a plurality of differently aligned nozzles 6 for uniform application of the CO 2 snow 5 on the vehicle bumper 2.
  • the cleaning device 1 is arranged on a robot arm 7, which is part of a corresponding cleaning robot 8.
  • the cleaning device 1 is also connected to an unillustrated supply system for providing the CO 2 .
  • the motor vehicle bumpers 2 enter a painting area 9, which is not shown in detail, and are provided there with at least one layer of paint by means of an automated painting process.
  • FIG. 2 is between the cleaning of two successive the cleaning area 4 continuous vehicle bumper 2 which is located in a cleaning cabin 10 cleaning device 1 for the purpose of checking the functional state of the same at predetermined intervals from a cleaning position 11 moved to a test position 12.
  • the cleaning device 1 then acts in the test position 12 as part of a test procedure, a test body 13 with carbon dioxide. Following this, the cleaning device 1 is moved back into its cleaning position 11 and is available for the cleaning of the next incoming vehicle bumper 2 in good time again.
  • An automated evaluation of the loading of the test body 12 with CO 2 is followed by a conclusion as to the functional state of the cleaning device 1.
  • test body 13 is in Fig. 3 shown in more detail. It can be seen that the test body 13 has at several, spaced-apart test positions 14 sensors 15, which serve to determine the pressure and the temperature at the respective test position 14.
  • the measuring sensors 15 are in operative connection with an electronic data processing device, not shown, which compares the measured values of the measuring sensors 15 with predetermined desired values.
  • the test body 13 is plate-shaped.
  • the test body 13 has 18 spaced-apart test positions 14.
  • the cleaning device 1 has three so-called. Arrays, each having six nozzles. Consequently, the cleaning device 1 has 18 nozzles. Accordingly, each nozzle 6 of the cleaning device 1 is assigned a test position 14 on the test body 13, which is equipped with corresponding sensors 15. Thus, it can be done for each nozzle 6 a detection of their proper functional condition.
  • the test body 13 is plate-shaped.
  • the test body 13 may be made of metal, but also of rigid foam.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Application Of Or Painting With Fluid Materials (AREA)
  • Cleaning In General (AREA)

Claims (9)

  1. Procédé pour la mise en peinture de pièces de construction en matière ^ plastique pour automobiles, en particulier de pare-chocs d'automobiles,
    - dans lequel, pour la préparation de la mise en peinture, des pièces de construction en matière plastique pour automobiles traversent en continu une zone de nettoyage et y sont nettoyées au moyen d'un dispositif de nettoyage actionné automatiquement, dans une opération de nettoyage avec du CO2, de préférence de la neige de CO2 ou des granules de CO2 et
    - après l'opération de nettoyage les pièces de construction en matière plastique pour automobiles passant en continu arrivent dans une zone de peinturage et y sont munies d'au moins une couche de peinture au moyen d'une opération de peinture automatisée,
    caractérisé en ce qu'à intervalles de temps préétablis le dispositif de nettoyage est basculé d'une position de nettoyage en une position de contrôle,
    le dispositif de nettoyage charge ensuite, dans le cadre d'une opération de contrôle, un corps d'essai avec du CO2
    à la suite de cela le dispositif de nettoyage est de nouveau rebasculé en une position de nettoyage et
    une conclusion sur l'état de fonctionnement du dispositif de nettoyage s'effectue via une évaluation, de préférence automatisée, de la charge du corps d'essai avec du CO2, de sorte que globalement le nettoyage automatisé des pièces de construction en matière plastique pour automobiles qui passent en continu dans la zone de nettoyage reste au moins essentiellement inaffecté par l'opération de contrôle.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de nettoyage est placé sur un bras de robot.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que le corps d'essai comporte en plusieurs positions d'essai distantes les unes des autres des capteurs, en particulier pour la mesure de la pression et/ou de la température et/ou de la force.
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 3, caractérisé en ce que les capteurs sont en liaison opérationnelle avec un dispositif électronique de traitement de données qui compare les valeurs mesurées des capteurs avec des valeurs nominales fixées au préalable.
  5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisé en ce que le corps d'essai est en forme de plaque.
  6. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 5, caractérisé en ce que la charge du corps d'essai est évaluée photo-optiquement.
  7. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6, caractérisé en ce que le corps d'essai est constitué de métal ou d'une mousse rigide, de préférence d'une mousse rigide en polystyrène.
  8. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7, caractérisé en ce que l'opération d'essai s'effectue entre le nettoyage de deux pièces de construction successives en matière plastique pour automobiles.
  9. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 8, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de nettoyage comporte plusieurs buses, de préférence orientées différemment, pour l'application uniforme du CO2 sur la pièce de construction en matière plastique pour automobiles.
EP13718106.1A 2012-04-05 2013-03-27 Procédé de peinture de pièces automobiles en matière plastique, en particulier de pare-chocs de véhicules automobiles Active EP2834039B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102012102984A DE102012102984A1 (de) 2012-04-05 2012-04-05 Verfahren zur Lackierung von Kfz-Kunststoffbauteilen, insbesondere Kfz-Stoßfängern
PCT/EP2013/000927 WO2013149713A1 (fr) 2012-04-05 2013-03-27 Procédé de peinture de pièces automobiles en matière plastique, en particulier de pare-chocs de véhicules automobiles

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2834039A1 EP2834039A1 (fr) 2015-02-11
EP2834039B1 true EP2834039B1 (fr) 2015-10-28

Family

ID=48170405

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13718106.1A Active EP2834039B1 (fr) 2012-04-05 2013-03-27 Procédé de peinture de pièces automobiles en matière plastique, en particulier de pare-chocs de véhicules automobiles

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2834039B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102012102984A1 (fr)
HU (1) HUE027414T2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2013149713A1 (fr)
ZA (1) ZA201406043B (fr)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102015219430A1 (de) 2015-10-07 2017-04-13 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Vorrichtung zum Reinigen von Klebeflächen
DE102015219429A1 (de) 2015-10-07 2017-04-13 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Reinigen mithilfe von festem Kohlenstoffdioxid
DE102016100243A1 (de) 2016-01-08 2017-07-13 Rehau Ag + Co. Verfahren zur Lackierung von Kfz-Kunststoffbauteilen
DE102021113119B3 (de) 2021-05-20 2022-07-21 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zur automatisierten Prüfung zumindest einer Waschlanze

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3244919A1 (de) * 1982-12-04 1984-06-07 Dürr Anlagenbau GmbH, 7000 Stuttgart Verfahren und vorrichtung zur ueberpruefung der funktionsfaehigkeit einer reinigungsvorrichtung
DE102007027618A1 (de) 2007-06-12 2008-12-18 Rehau Ag + Co Verfahren zur Vorbehandlung von zu lackierenden polymeren Oberflächen

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2834039A1 (fr) 2015-02-11
WO2013149713A1 (fr) 2013-10-10
HUE027414T2 (hu) 2016-10-28
DE102012102984A1 (de) 2013-10-10
ZA201406043B (en) 2015-10-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3429771B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de décalaminage d'une pièce
DE102007018877B4 (de) Verfahren und Materialauftragseinrichtung mit einer Prüfvorrichtung zur Gütemessung des Auftragsbildes einer Sprühdüse sowie Verwendung eines Testfelds
EP3890895B1 (fr) Appareil de nettoyage pour appareil d'enduction
EP2834039B1 (fr) Procédé de peinture de pièces automobiles en matière plastique, en particulier de pare-chocs de véhicules automobiles
DE19730885A1 (de) Verfahren zur automatischen Erkennung von Oberflächenfehlern an Rohkarosserien und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
WO2001010570A2 (fr) Procede et dispositif de fabrication d'une couche protectrice amovible pour des surfaces, en particulier des surfaces vernies de vehicules motorises
DE102007013883A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erfassung und Auswertung von Hagelschäden
DE102008032259B4 (de) Verfahren und System zur Applikation eines Beschichtungsmaterials mit einem programmierbaren Roboter und Programmiergestell
DE3130119C2 (de) Verfahren zum kantengeregelten Aufbringen einer Farblinie auf langgestrecktem Walzgut
WO2019025169A1 (fr) Procédé de test et dispositif de test pour tester une couche de surface
DE10036741A1 (de) Verfahren und Kontrollsystem zur Kontrolle der Beschichtungsqualität von Werkstücken
WO2015169492A1 (fr) Procédé d'assemblage de plusieurs parties d'une pièce et outil d'assemblage
DE202017106874U1 (de) Äusseres Motorhaubenprüfvorrichtungsmerkmal
DE102007021106B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Kalibrieren eines Kamerasystems
EP2609421B1 (fr) Réglage automatique de l'angle d'incidence d'une tête de contrôle à ultrasons, en fonction de sa position
DE102010000470A1 (de) Prüfvorrichtung und Prüfverfahren zum Prüfen der Funktionsfähigkeit einer Zerstäubereinrichtung zum Aufbringen eines Beschichtungsmittels
WO2004010124A1 (fr) Procede pour le controle de qualite de surfaces
DE102013101496A1 (de) Verfahren zur Oberflächenbehandlung eines formstabilen Körpers sowie Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
DE102019113441A1 (de) Verfahren zur Zuordnung des intrinsischen Koordinatensystems eines ersten Aggregats eines Fahrzeuges zur Erfassung des Raumes seitlich des Fahrzeuges relativ zu einem fahrzeugbezogenen Koordinatensystem und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
DE102019119730A1 (de) Applikator zum Drucken von Mustern und Verfahren hierfür
DE102009019532A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Erfassung von Luftgeräuschen an einem Fahrzeug
EP3189905B1 (fr) Procédé de mise en peinture de composants en matière plastique de véhicule automobile et dispositif de nettoyage
DE112015005049T5 (de) Aufprallsensor
DE102016012031B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Befetten von Werkstückoberflächen
EP2261634A2 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de nettoyage d'un flux de gaz d'échappement d'un moteur à combustion interne chargé de gaz d'échappement

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140930

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: BARRY, BOCAR, BIRO

Inventor name: ZUEFLE, STEPHAN

Inventor name: VOGL, HEINZ

Inventor name: TRILLITZSCH, UWE

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150810

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 757661

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20151115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502013001419

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20151028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160228

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160128

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160129

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160229

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502013001419

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160331

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160729

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E027414

Country of ref document: HU

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160327

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160331

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160327

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 757661

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180327

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180327

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20200304

Year of fee payment: 8

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20210327

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210327

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502013001419

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: REHAU AUTOMOTIVE SE & CO. KG, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: REHAU AG & CO, 95111 REHAU, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: GB9C

Owner name: REHAU AUTOMOTIVE SE & CO.KG, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER(S): REHAU AG + CO, DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230313

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20230222

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: HC9C

Owner name: REHAU AUTOMOTIVE SE & CO.KG, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER(S): REHAU AG + CO, DE; REHAU AUTOMOTIVE SE & CO.KG, DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20230310

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230331

Year of fee payment: 11