EP2829619A1 - Method for adjusting precursor powder for sintering, and precursor powder for sintering - Google Patents

Method for adjusting precursor powder for sintering, and precursor powder for sintering Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2829619A1
EP2829619A1 EP13764065.2A EP13764065A EP2829619A1 EP 2829619 A1 EP2829619 A1 EP 2829619A1 EP 13764065 A EP13764065 A EP 13764065A EP 2829619 A1 EP2829619 A1 EP 2829619A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
precursor powder
ore
raw material
particle size
sintered ore
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP13764065.2A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2829619A4 (en
EP2829619B1 (en
Inventor
Kenji Oya
Takahide Higuchi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Publication of EP2829619A1 publication Critical patent/EP2829619A1/en
Publication of EP2829619A4 publication Critical patent/EP2829619A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2829619B1 publication Critical patent/EP2829619B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B1/00Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
    • C22B1/14Agglomerating; Briquetting; Binding; Granulating
    • C22B1/16Sintering; Agglomerating

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for adjusting a precursor powder for sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace, and to a precursor powder for sintered ore produced by the method.
  • Sintered ore is generally produced as follows.
  • coke which is a condensation material, a CaO-containing auxiliary raw material such as limestone, a SiO 2 -containing auxiliary raw material such as nickel slag, and the like are added to and mixed with iron ore having particles with a particle size of about 10 mm or less, and the mixture is mixed and granulated in a drum mixer or the like with the addition of a proper amount of water.
  • the granular raw materials for sintered ore thus obtained are charged, along with coke breeze, to a pallet of a sintering machine and a raw material layer for sintered ore is formed on the pallet.
  • the raw material layer for sintered ore is ignited with solid fuels on the surface layer part thereof.
  • sintered ore results from agglomeration of iron ore in response to the iron ore being fused by reaction with fluxes, or slag components, such as CaO and SiO 2 .
  • air permeability is generally divided into two categories: air permeability under cold condition before sintering, which is determined by the particle size of iron ore and the like; and air permeability under hot condition during and/or after sintering, which is determined by the size of pores in sinter cake that are air passages formed by the flow of a melt.
  • the former which is determined by the particle size of iron ore and the like, is susceptible to the aforementioned variations in the quality of iron ore raw materials, which has posed, in particular, a major challenge to recent efforts to improve productivity.
  • the present invention has been made in view of the above situations, and an object thereof is to provide a method for adjusting a precursor powder for sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace and a precursor powder for sintered ore that are excellent in sintered ore production efficiency, despite variations in the particle size of iron ore raw materials.
  • the inventors of the present invention have made intensive studies on solutions to the aforementioned problem. As a result, the inventors discovered that for improved sintered ore production efficiency it is effective to adjust, in a precursor powder for sintered ore, the mixing ratio of the mass of particles of a predetermined shape in coke breeze to the mass of particles of a predetermined shape in an iron ore raw material within a certain range.
  • air permeability under cold condition before sintering may be provided by changing the properties of the coke breeze depending on the quality of the iron ore raw material (with variations in particle size), to provide excellent air permeability (JPU index) in a precursor powder for sintered ore (a raw material for sintered ore after granulation and pseudo-granulation) in a sintering pallet, thereby offering improved sintered ore production efficiency.
  • JPU index air permeability
  • the present invention is based on the above discoveries and the primary features thereof are as follows.
  • the present invention involves: mixing an iron ore raw material, coke breeze, and an auxiliary raw material in a drum mixer to obtain a precursor powder for sintered ore; and then charging the precursor powder to a sintering machine for sintering the precursor powder to thereby produce sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace.
  • a sintering machine for sintering the precursor powder to thereby produce sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace.
  • JPU air flow rate m 3 / min / sintering area m 2 ⁇ layer thickness mm / negative pressure mmAq 0.6
  • particle size is measured by a sieve classification method (JIS R6001 (1998)).
  • iron ore raw material used in the present invention examples include hematite ore from South America, magnetite ore from North America, magnetite ore from South America, pisolite ore and Marra Mamba ore from Australia, and the like.
  • a mixing ratio [(C/F) ⁇ 100] of a mass (C) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze to a mass (F) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore raw material is adjusted in the range of 2 % to 3 %. It should be noted that to determine F, the mass of the iron ore raw material is calculated excluding the mass of return ore.
  • a good JPU may be obtained by controlling the aforementioned mixing ratio [(C/F) ⁇ 100] via the following mechanism.
  • the aforementioned mixing ratio is small, i.e., less than 2, the particle size of the iron ore is considered to be larger than that of the coke breeze.
  • the particle size of the coke breeze is too small, sintering rate increases, yet a sintering molten zone becomes wider, thereby deteriorating the air permeability under hot condition.
  • the mixing ratio is large, i.e., more than 3
  • the particle size of the coke breeze is coarsened so much that formation of pseudoparticles for which the coke breeze serves as nuclear particles becomes apparent during the granulation process.
  • the auxiliary raw material is not particularly limited to a CaO-containing auxiliary raw material such as limestone, a SiO 2 -containing auxiliary raw material such as nickel slag, and the like, and may include other general, well-known auxiliary raw materials used in precursor powders for sintered ore and inevitably-incorporated impurities.
  • the drum mixer used in the present invention may be a normal drum mixer that is commonly utilized in the production of a precursor powder for sintered ore, such as a drum mixer with a cylindrical cone.
  • the sintering machine used in the present invention is preferably a bottom-suction Dwight Lloyd type sintering machine.
  • Other well-known sintering machines may also be used for producing a precursor powder for sintered ore.
  • a precursor powder for sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace that comprises an iron ore raw material, coke breeze, and an auxiliary raw material and is excellent in production efficiency.
  • a precursor powder for sintered ore may be obtained, with a mixing ratio [(C/F) ⁇ 100] of a mass (C) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze to a mass (F) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore raw material, excluding return ore, being in the range of 2 % to 3 %, and preferably in the range of 2.2 % to 2.8 %.
  • Precursor powders for sintered ore were adjusted under the following conditions. Then, the resulting precursor powders were fully charged to a bottom-suction Dwight Lloyd type sintering machine to produce sintered ore. The inventors examined JPU during sintering of the precursor powders to identify the effect of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 shows a relationship between the JPU and the mixing ratio [(C/F) ⁇ 100] of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze to particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore raw material. It can be seen from the figure that each precursor powder for sintered ore that was produced with a mixing ratio [(C/F) ⁇ 100] satisfying the conditions of the present invention exhibited a good result in terms of JPU, which was determined to be about 22 or more.
  • each precursor powder for sintered ore produced with a mixing ratio [(C/F) ⁇ 100] not satisfying the conditions of the present invention yielded a poor result in terms of JPU, which was determined to be about 19 to 21, i.e., not more than 21, as shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the milling was performed in a rod mill, a cage mill, a ball mill, and the like. Then, samples were collected from the pulverized coke breeze by a sampler provided at a belt conveyor transfer point, and dried in a dryer. A Ro-tap type sieve shaker was used to measure the particle size distribution of each sample.
  • the milling conditions for the coke breeze were adjusted to change the presence ratio of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze depending on the particle size composition of the received iron ore, i.e., the presence ratio of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore.
  • Table 1 shows the measurements of JPU and the mixing ratio [(C/F) ⁇ 100] of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze to particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore raw material (ore).
  • the mixing ratio C/F as specified in the method of the present invention may be obtained by adjusting the milling conditions for not only coke breeze, but also for coarse particles in iron ore.
  • a precursor powder for sintered ore that offers excellent sintered ore production efficiency may be obtained.
  • the present invention may also improve productivity and maintain air permeability in a blast furnace, and consequently increase sintered ore yield and sintered ore strength, thereby allowing for stable and highly efficient operation of the blast furnace.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Abstract

According to the present invention, a precursor powder for sintered ore, which offers excellent sintered ore production efficiency, can be adjusted independently of the quality of iron ore, by setting a mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] of a mass (C) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in coke breeze to a mass (F) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in an iron ore raw material in the range of 2 % to 3 %.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to a method for adjusting a precursor powder for sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace, and to a precursor powder for sintered ore produced by the method.
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • For stable and highly efficient operation of a blast furnace, it is important to use high-quality sintered ore with excellent properties, such as cold strength, reducibility, and anti-reduction-disintegration properties. However, such sintered ore has many control requirements to be met in production, which presents difficulties in improving the yield and productivity of products.
  • Sintered ore is generally produced as follows.
  • Firstly, coke which is a condensation material, a CaO-containing auxiliary raw material such as limestone, a SiO2-containing auxiliary raw material such as nickel slag, and the like are added to and mixed with iron ore having particles with a particle size of about 10 mm or less, and the mixture is mixed and granulated in a drum mixer or the like with the addition of a proper amount of water. Thereafter, the granular raw materials for sintered ore thus obtained are charged, along with coke breeze, to a pallet of a sintering machine and a raw material layer for sintered ore is formed on the pallet. Then, the raw material layer for sintered ore is ignited with solid fuels on the surface layer part thereof. Then, under the influence of air, solid fuels in the raw material layer for sintered ore are sequentially combusted and sintered to form a sinter cake. The sinter cake is crushed to more uniformly-sized particles and those particles having a particle size above a certain level are fed to a blast furnace as sintered ore.
  • That is, sintered ore results from agglomeration of iron ore in response to the iron ore being fused by reaction with fluxes, or slag components, such as CaO and SiO2.
  • Here, recent years have seen a tremendous growth in demand for steel materials, particularly, in emerging markets such as in Asia. As the demand for steel materials grows, there is an increasing need for sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace and for iron ore as the raw material thereof.
  • The increase in demand for iron ore is presenting a new challenge that has not been faced before. That is, it is becoming more difficult to freely choose the quality of iron ore to be supplied. In particular, for example, more iron ore supplied to the industry show considerable variations in particle size distribution.
  • Additionally, as mentioned above, conventional problems of improving product yield, productivity, and the like still remain unsolved. This means that there is an increasing demand for higher sintered ore production efficiency, despite large variations in particle size distribution of iron ore.
  • In producing sintered ore, coke breeze contained in a raw material is combusted with air passing through a raw material layer for sintered ore. This means that the productivity of sintered ore can be determined by the air flow rate (air permeability) through the raw material layer for sintered ore. In addition, air permeability is generally divided into two categories: air permeability under cold condition before sintering, which is determined by the particle size of iron ore and the like; and air permeability under hot condition during and/or after sintering, which is determined by the size of pores in sinter cake that are air passages formed by the flow of a melt. The former, which is determined by the particle size of iron ore and the like, is susceptible to the aforementioned variations in the quality of iron ore raw materials, which has posed, in particular, a major challenge to recent efforts to improve productivity.
  • SUMMARY OF INVENTION (Technical Problem)
  • The solutions that have been proposed to date, however, are not necessarily effective for solving the aforementioned problems.
  • The present invention has been made in view of the above situations, and an object thereof is to provide a method for adjusting a precursor powder for sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace and a precursor powder for sintered ore that are excellent in sintered ore production efficiency, despite variations in the particle size of iron ore raw materials.
  • (Solution to Problem)
  • The inventors of the present invention have made intensive studies on solutions to the aforementioned problem. As a result, the inventors discovered that for improved sintered ore production efficiency it is effective to adjust, in a precursor powder for sintered ore, the mixing ratio of the mass of particles of a predetermined shape in coke breeze to the mass of particles of a predetermined shape in an iron ore raw material within a certain range. That is, according to the present invention, in particular, air permeability under cold condition before sintering may be provided by changing the properties of the coke breeze depending on the quality of the iron ore raw material (with variations in particle size), to provide excellent air permeability (JPU index) in a precursor powder for sintered ore (a raw material for sintered ore after granulation and pseudo-granulation) in a sintering pallet, thereby offering improved sintered ore production efficiency.
  • The present invention is based on the above discoveries and the primary features thereof are as follows.
    1. [1] A method for adjusting a precursor powder for sintered ore, comprising:
      • mixing and granulating an iron ore raw material, coke breeze, and an auxiliary raw material in a drum mixer to obtain a precursor powder for sintered ore; and
      • charging the precursor powder to a sintering machine where the precursor powder is sintered to produce sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace,
      • wherein the mixing and the granulating are performed with a mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] of a mass (C) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze to a mass (F) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore raw material being adjusted in the range of 2 % to 3 %.
    2. [2] The method for adjusting a precursor powder for sintered ore according to the aspect [1], wherein the mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] is set in the range of 2.2 % to 2.8 %.
    3. [3] A precursor powder for sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace, the precursor powder comprising:
      • an iron ore raw material;
      • coke breeze; and
      • an auxiliary raw material,
      • wherein a mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] of a mass (C) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze to a mass (F) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore raw material is set in the range of 2 % to 3 %.
    4. [4] The precursor powder for sintered ore according to the aspect [3], wherein the mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] is set in the range of 2.2 % to 2.8 %.
    (Advantageous Effect of Invention)
  • According to the present invention, even if there are variations in the quality (particle size distribution) of iron ore raw materials, it is possible to reliably obtain excellent air permeability (JPU index) in a precursor powder for sintered ore in a sintering pallet, thereby effectively improving sintered ore production efficiency.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
  • The present invention will be further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
    • FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relationship between the JPU and the mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] of coke breeze to iron ore raw material.
    DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
  • The present invention will now be described in detail below.
  • The present invention involves: mixing an iron ore raw material, coke breeze, and an auxiliary raw material in a drum mixer to obtain a precursor powder for sintered ore; and then charging the precursor powder to a sintering machine for sintering the precursor powder to thereby produce sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace. In this case, in particular, an appropriate combination of the iron ore raw material and the coke breeze with a particular focus on the respective particle sizes, as described later, ensures high productivity at the time of sintering, namely, high air permeability (JPU index, which will be simply referred to as "JPU") of a precursor powder for sintered ore in a sintering pallet, which is given by Equation (1) below. Note that a larger JPU represents better air permeability; a JPU of about 22 or more is a particularly good result in terms of the productivity of producing sintered ore. JPU = air flow rate m 3 / min / sintering area m 2 layer thickness mm / negative pressure mmAq 0.6
    Figure imgb0001
    • where "air flow rate" is an air flow rate through a precursor powder for sintered ore for a certain sintering area;
    • "sintering area" is a loading area of the precursor powder for which the aforementioned air flow rate is measured;
    • "layer thickness" is a layer thickness of the precursor powder where the air flow rate is measured; and
    • "negative pressure" is an atmospheric pressure in a wind box below the precursor powder.
    Note that 1 mmAq = 9806.38 Pa.
  • In the present invention, particle size is measured by a sieve classification method (JIS R6001 (1998)).
  • Note that examples of the iron ore raw material used in the present invention include hematite ore from South America, magnetite ore from North America, magnetite ore from South America, pisolite ore and Marra Mamba ore from Australia, and the like.
  • In the present invention, a mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] of a mass (C) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze to a mass (F) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore raw material is adjusted in the range of 2 % to 3 %. It should be noted that to determine F, the mass of the iron ore raw material is calculated excluding the mass of return ore.
  • It is believed that a good JPU may be obtained by controlling the aforementioned mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] via the following mechanism. When the aforementioned mixing ratio is small, i.e., less than 2, the particle size of the iron ore is considered to be larger than that of the coke breeze. Thus, when the particle size of the coke breeze is too small, sintering rate increases, yet a sintering molten zone becomes wider, thereby deteriorating the air permeability under hot condition. On the other hand, when the mixing ratio is large, i.e., more than 3, the particle size of the coke breeze is coarsened so much that formation of pseudoparticles for which the coke breeze serves as nuclear particles becomes apparent during the granulation process. Such pseudoparticles for which the coke breeze serves as nuclear particles cannot gain proper strength due to low wettability of the coke breeze and tend to collapse during the handling process before charged to a sintering pallet, with the result that more refined pseudoparticles are charged to the sintering pallet to deteriorate air permeability.
  • It is thus apparent that there is an appropriate ratio of the particle size of the coke breeze to that of the ore, which can be expressed by C/F × 100 and is, as mentioned earlier, in the range of 2 % to 3 %. Note that a preferred range of the aforementioned C/F × 100 is from 2.2 % to 2.8 %.
  • In the present invention, the auxiliary raw material is not particularly limited to a CaO-containing auxiliary raw material such as limestone, a SiO2-containing auxiliary raw material such as nickel slag, and the like, and may include other general, well-known auxiliary raw materials used in precursor powders for sintered ore and inevitably-incorporated impurities.
  • In addition, the mixing ratio thereof is defined so that CaO/SiO2 (= basicity) is around 2.0 in the resulting sintered ore.
  • The drum mixer used in the present invention may be a normal drum mixer that is commonly utilized in the production of a precursor powder for sintered ore, such as a drum mixer with a cylindrical cone.
  • In addition, the sintering machine used in the present invention is preferably a bottom-suction Dwight Lloyd type sintering machine. Other well-known sintering machines may also be used for producing a precursor powder for sintered ore.
  • As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to provide a precursor powder for sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace that comprises an iron ore raw material, coke breeze, and an auxiliary raw material and is excellent in production efficiency.
  • That is, a precursor powder for sintered ore may be obtained, with a mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] of a mass (C) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze to a mass (F) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore raw material, excluding return ore, being in the range of 2 % to 3 %, and preferably in the range of 2.2 % to 2.8 %.
  • No particular limitation is placed on the conditions other than those specified above, such as the material of the precursor powder, the facility and its operational conditions use, and the precursor powder may be produced according to the conventional methods.
  • EXAMPLES [Example 1]
  • Precursor powders for sintered ore were adjusted under the following conditions. Then, the resulting precursor powders were fully charged to a bottom-suction Dwight Lloyd type sintering machine to produce sintered ore. The inventors examined JPU during sintering of the precursor powders to identify the effect of the present invention.
  • Iron ore raw material
    • Basic unit of iron ore raw material: 1100 to 1200 (kg/t-sr)
    • Percentage of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in iron ore raw material: 30 % to 40 % (of the charged raw material)
    Coke breeze
    • Basic unit of coke breeze: 45 to 50 (kg/t-sr)
    • Percentage of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in coke breeze: 5 % to 20 % (of the coke breeze)
    • Mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100]: 1.2 % to 3.5 %
    • Auxiliary raw material (limestone): 6 % to 10 % (of the charged raw material)
  • FIG. 1 shows a relationship between the JPU and the mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze to particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore raw material. It can be seen from the figure that each precursor powder for sintered ore that was produced with a mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] satisfying the conditions of the present invention exhibited a good result in terms of JPU, which was determined to be about 22 or more.
  • In contrast, each precursor powder for sintered ore produced with a mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] not satisfying the conditions of the present invention yielded a poor result in terms of JPU, which was determined to be about 19 to 21, i.e., not more than 21, as shown in FIG. 1.
  • [Example 2]
  • An example in which the present invention was implemented in an actual machine will be described below.
  • As usual, an iron ore raw material to be used in a sintering process was subjected to automatic sampling in a raw material yard, and then measurements were made of the particle size distribution of the obtained samples in accordance with the Japanese Industrial Standards, JIS 8706.
  • For coke breeze, as usual, undersized lump coke, which had been produced in a coke plant, and the purchased anthracite were sent to a sintering plant, where they were milled to have a suitable particle size distribution for operation. The resulting products thus obtained were used in the sintering process.
  • The milling was performed in a rod mill, a cage mill, a ball mill, and the like. Then, samples were collected from the pulverized coke breeze by a sampler provided at a belt conveyor transfer point, and dried in a dryer. A Ro-tap type sieve shaker was used to measure the particle size distribution of each sample.
  • According to the present invention, the milling conditions for the coke breeze were adjusted to change the presence ratio of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze depending on the particle size composition of the received iron ore, i.e., the presence ratio of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore.
  • Table 1 shows the measurements of JPU and the mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze to particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore raw material (ore). Here, let X (kg/t) be coke component, Y (kg/t) be ore I component, and Z (kg/t) be ore II component, and let x (%) be the percentage of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke component, y (%) be the percentage of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the ore I component, and z (%) be the percentage of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the ore II component, then C = X x x, and F = Y × y + Z × z.
  • [Table 1] Table 1
    Test No. Coke Component (kg/t) Ore I Component (kg/t) Ore II Component (kg/t) Percentage of Coke Particles with Particle Size of 3 mm or more (%) Percentage of Ore I Particles with Particle Size of 3 mm or more (%) Percentage of Ore II Particles with Particle Size of 3 mm or more (%) (C/F)*100 JPU
    1 49.7 678 86 18.2 44.3 34.0 2.75 24.7
    2 49.2 683 96 20.3 44.3 34.0 2.98 24.0
    3 47.4 710 107 22.1 44.3 34.0 2.99 23.5
    4 50.0 686 80 17.3 43.4 42.0 2.61 25.1
    5 45.2 805 37 24.1 43.4 42.0 2.98 23.9
    6 49.9 676 86 16.0 43.4 42.0 2.42 24.5
    7 45.9 797 46 23.6 43.4 42.0 2.97 23.7
    8 46.8 788 0 14.0 38.5 - 2.16 22.5
    9 45.8 779 40 20.6 38.5 42.0 2.98 24.1
    10 45.9 688 153 21.5 38.5 42.0 3.00 23.3
  • It can be seen from Table 1 that those precursor powders for sintered ore that were produced with a mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] satisfying the conditions of the present invention exhibited good results in terms of JPU, which was determined to be about 22 or more.
  • In contrast, other precursor powders for sintered ore produced with a mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] not satisfying the conditions of the present invention yielded poor results in terms of JPU, which was determined to be about 19 to 21, i.e., not more than 21, as shown in Table 1.
  • In addition, when lines capable of classification and milling of iron ore are available, the mixing ratio C/F as specified in the method of the present invention may be obtained by adjusting the milling conditions for not only coke breeze, but also for coarse particles in iron ore.
  • INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
  • According to the present invention, a precursor powder for sintered ore that offers excellent sintered ore production efficiency may be obtained. The present invention may also improve productivity and maintain air permeability in a blast furnace, and consequently increase sintered ore yield and sintered ore strength, thereby allowing for stable and highly efficient operation of the blast furnace.

Claims (4)

  1. A method for adjusting a precursor powder for sintered ore, comprising:
    mixing and granulating an iron ore raw material, coke breeze, and an auxiliary raw material in a drum mixer to obtain a precursor powder for sintered ore; and
    charging the precursor powder to a sintering machine where the precursor powder is sintered to produce sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace,
    wherein the mixing and the granulating are performed with a mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] of a mass (C) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze to a mass (F) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore raw material being adjusted in the range of 2 % to 3 %.
  2. The method for adjusting a precursor powder for sintered ore according to claim 1, wherein the mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] is set in the range of 2.2 % to 2.8 %.
  3. A precursor powder for sintered ore to be used in a blast furnace, the precursor powder comprising:
    an iron ore raw material;
    coke breeze; and
    an auxiliary raw material,
    wherein a mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] of a mass (C) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the coke breeze to a mass (F) of particles having a particle size of 3 mm or more in the iron ore raw material is set in the range of 2 % to 3 %.
  4. The precursor powder for sintered ore according to claim 3, wherein the mixing ratio [(C/F) × 100] is set in the range of 2.2 % to 2.8 %.
EP13764065.2A 2012-03-22 2013-03-21 Method for adjusting precursor powder for sintering, and precursor powder for sintering Active EP2829619B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012066244 2012-03-22
PCT/JP2013/001933 WO2013140809A1 (en) 2012-03-22 2013-03-21 Method for adjusting precursor powder for sintering, and precursor powder for sintering

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2829619A1 true EP2829619A1 (en) 2015-01-28
EP2829619A4 EP2829619A4 (en) 2015-05-27
EP2829619B1 EP2829619B1 (en) 2017-03-01

Family

ID=49222282

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13764065.2A Active EP2829619B1 (en) 2012-03-22 2013-03-21 Method for adjusting precursor powder for sintering, and precursor powder for sintering

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US20150047466A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2829619B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5505579B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101525067B1 (en)
CN (1) CN104204242B (en)
AU (1) AU2013236699B2 (en)
BR (1) BR112014023430B1 (en)
PH (1) PH12014502031B1 (en)
TW (1) TWI471419B (en)
WO (1) WO2013140809A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1770688A (en) * 1929-04-08 1930-07-15 Witt Clyde C De Molding material
JPS53118215A (en) * 1977-03-26 1978-10-16 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Sintering method
JPS6237325A (en) * 1985-06-27 1987-02-18 Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> Calcined lump ore and its production
JPS63149333A (en) * 1986-12-15 1988-06-22 Nkk Corp Coating method for powdery coke on green pellet for burnt agglomerated ore
JPH089739B2 (en) * 1989-08-23 1996-01-31 日本鋼管株式会社 Method for producing calcined agglomerated ore
JPH08120350A (en) * 1994-10-25 1996-05-14 Nippon Steel Corp Production of sintered ore excellent in high temperature reduction and softening/melting properties
JP3731361B2 (en) * 1998-12-25 2006-01-05 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for producing sintered ore
CN1696318A (en) * 2000-05-29 2005-11-16 杰富意钢铁株式会社 Raw material for sintering in form of pseudo grain and method for producing the same
JP3879408B2 (en) * 2001-01-31 2007-02-14 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for producing sintered ore and sintered ore
KR100587709B1 (en) * 2003-03-20 2006-06-08 가부시키가이샤 고베 세이코쇼 manufacturing process for sintered ore
JP5004421B2 (en) * 2004-09-17 2012-08-22 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for producing sintered ore
JP4661154B2 (en) * 2004-10-01 2011-03-30 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for producing sintered ore
JP2008019455A (en) * 2006-07-10 2008-01-31 Jfe Steel Kk Method for producing half-reduced sintered ore
JP5063978B2 (en) * 2006-10-20 2012-10-31 新日本製鐵株式会社 Granulation method of sintering raw material
CN101928824B (en) * 2009-06-22 2013-05-01 鞍钢股份有限公司 Sinter production method for reducing sintering solid burnup and enhancing intensity
CN102206744B (en) * 2010-03-29 2013-04-10 攀钢集团钢铁钒钛股份有限公司 Method for granulating sinter mixture

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BR112014023430B1 (en) 2019-05-14
CN104204242A (en) 2014-12-10
EP2829619A4 (en) 2015-05-27
JPWO2013140809A1 (en) 2015-08-03
AU2013236699A1 (en) 2014-10-09
AU2013236699B2 (en) 2015-04-09
KR101525067B1 (en) 2015-06-02
JP5505579B2 (en) 2014-05-28
KR20140134326A (en) 2014-11-21
CN104204242B (en) 2016-08-24
WO2013140809A8 (en) 2014-10-16
TWI471419B (en) 2015-02-01
US20150047466A1 (en) 2015-02-19
TW201339313A (en) 2013-10-01
EP2829619B1 (en) 2017-03-01
PH12014502031A1 (en) 2014-11-24
WO2013140809A1 (en) 2013-09-26
PH12014502031B1 (en) 2014-11-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2013236700B2 (en) Method for adjusting precursor powder for sintered ore, and precursor powder for sintered ore
EP2098601B1 (en) Method for pretreating granular iron ore materials for sintering
EP2239344B1 (en) Self-fluxing pellets for use in a blast furnace and process for the production of the same
CN107614710B (en) The manufacturing method of reduced iron
US10125413B2 (en) Method for producing manganese containing ferroalloy
JP2015193930A (en) Method for producing sintered ore
US20160168654A1 (en) Method for manufacturing agglomerate and reduced iron
JP5224917B6 (en) Manufacturing method of sintered raw material
EP2829619B1 (en) Method for adjusting precursor powder for sintering, and precursor powder for sintering
KR102458931B1 (en) Method for manufacturing sintered ore
JP5011637B2 (en) Processing method of ore for sintering
KR20210079990A (en) Method for manufacturing sintered ore
EP3580362A1 (en) Method of operating a pelletizing plant
JP2020117767A (en) Method for manufacturing sinter
JP2020015964A (en) Granulation method of raw material for sintering
JP2005290489A (en) Method for producing sintered ore for blast furnace

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140916

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RA4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected)

Effective date: 20150430

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C22B 1/16 20060101AFI20150423BHEP

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20160309

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20161025

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 871427

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170315

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602013018025

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170301

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 871427

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170602

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170601

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170701

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170703

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602013018025

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170321

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20171204

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170321

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170331

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170331

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170321

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20130321

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170301

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20220316

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20220209

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230331

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240130

Year of fee payment: 12