EP2821573A2 - Closure for a double-wing French window without central mullion - Google Patents
Closure for a double-wing French window without central mullion Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2821573A2 EP2821573A2 EP20140172898 EP14172898A EP2821573A2 EP 2821573 A2 EP2821573 A2 EP 2821573A2 EP 20140172898 EP20140172898 EP 20140172898 EP 14172898 A EP14172898 A EP 14172898A EP 2821573 A2 EP2821573 A2 EP 2821573A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- leaf
- latch
- closure according
- catch
- bolt
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05C—BOLTS OR FASTENING DEVICES FOR WINGS, SPECIALLY FOR DOORS OR WINDOWS
- E05C7/00—Fastening devices specially adapted for two wings
- E05C7/04—Fastening devices specially adapted for two wings for wings which abut when closed
- E05C7/06—Fastening devices specially adapted for two wings for wings which abut when closed a fastening device for one wing being actuated or controlled by closing another wing
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05C—BOLTS OR FASTENING DEVICES FOR WINGS, SPECIALLY FOR DOORS OR WINDOWS
- E05C19/00—Other devices specially designed for securing wings, e.g. with suction cups
- E05C19/02—Automatic catches, i.e. released by pull or pressure on the wing
Definitions
- the invention relates to a closure for a double-leaf French windows without mullion, wherein the French door has a frame, a moving wing and a passive leaf, with a guided in the passive wing between a locking position and an unlocking movable latch for locking the passive leaf in the frame and with a in the inactive leaf arranged catch for holding the inactive leaf in a closed position in the frame.
- Such a closure is from the EP 1 405 972 B1 known.
- the bolt is biased by a spring element in the locking position and has a trailing edge.
- the latch snaps into the frame and holds the inactive leaf in the closed position.
- the bolt can be manually removed again after a movement of the active leaf in the open position against the spring force from the frame.
- a disadvantage of the closure is that the functions of locking and snapping are coupled together. The movement of the bolt in the locked position can not be deactivated.
- the invention is based on the problem to form a closure of the type mentioned so on that it ensures reliable locking of the inactive leaf with the active leaf closed and allows the open leaf a comfortable operation of the inactive leaf.
- the bolt has a movement of the active wing sensing probe element and on the moving leaf cooperating with the probe element, the bolt when closing the active leaf in the locking position displacing guide element is arranged and that the catch for non-positive mounting of the inactive leaf is formed on the frame.
- the latch and the latch are two separate components, wherein the latch is controlled by the position of the active leaf.
- the inactive leaf is reliably locked to the frame when the active leaf is closed.
- the catch holds the stationary leaf in a force-fitting manner on the frame. This allows the inactive leaf to be easily moved to the open position and closed again. Since arranged on the inactive leaf latch cooperates with the frame and thus its function is independent of the position of the active leaf, the inactive leaf can be particularly comfortable open and close in befindlichem in unlocking position latch.
- the structural complexity for moving the bolt when closing the active leaf can be kept particularly low according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, when the probe element has a protruding, arranged on the bolt pin and the guide element has a ramp for displacing the pin.
- the bolt could, for example, remain permanently in the locking position after the first closing of the active leaf and, if necessary, be moved manually into the unlocked position.
- the inactive leaf can be locked and unlocked particularly comfortably with the opening and closing of the active leaf when the guide element has two mutually opposite ramps producing a linkage for the peg for moving the peg in two directions.
- the closure allows according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, the optional use of the guide element in right and left-hinged walking wings, when the ramps are arranged in a plan view of the guide element mirror images of each other.
- the number of components to be assembled of the closure can be kept particularly low according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, when the catch and the bolt are arranged in a common housing. In the simplest case, this makes it easy to use the housing with the catch and the bolt in a frequently existing profile groove.
- the catch is designed according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention is particularly compact when the catch axially displaceable in a guide the housing is arranged and biased by a spring element in a protruding position.
- the catch as the bolt has the elongated dimensions for easy placement in the usually existing profile groove of the inactive leaf.
- the protruding from the housing end of the latch can optionally have a rolling body or a slider.
- the latch and the catch can be mounted easily according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, when the housing is designed in cross-section U-shaped and when legs of the housing form the guides for the latch and the latch. Furthermore, the U-shaped design of the housing allows a reduction in material usage compared to a closed design.
- the space required for receiving the components of the closure can be kept particularly low according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, when the catch and the latch are sandwiched in the housing over each other and when the catch is disposed near the free ends of the legs.
- the inactive leaf is reliably held in the frame according to another advantageous development of the invention and locks when in the context of the latch and the bolt opposite a strike plate is arranged and when the strike plate has at least one recess for holding the latch and the bolt.
- the strike plate has a ramp for the catch.
- the strike plate can be used very versatile according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, when the strike plate is symmetrical and has two recesses.
- the strike plate can be used in right- and left-hinged stationary wings and also allows the locking of the active leaf in the unused by the inactive leaf recess.
- FIG. 1 shows a double-leaf French windows without mullion with a frame 1, with a moving wing 2 and
- the active leaf 2 has a handle 4 for driving an espagnolette fitting 5.
- the espagnolette fitting 5 can be the active leaf 2 in the frame 1 optionally lock and unlock.
- the inactive leaf 3 has a closure 6 with which it is held independent of the position of the espagnolette fitting 5 in the frame 1.
- the shutter 6 off FIG. 1 is enlarged in FIG. 2 shown.
- the closure 6 has a fixed in the frame 1 strike plate 7, arranged on the inactive leaf 2 housing 8 with a latch 9 and a latch 10 and arranged on the active leaf 2 guide member 11.
- the strike plate 7 is shown cut and has two recesses 12, 13, one of which serves to receive the free end of the bolt 9 and to hold the catch 10.
- From the housing 8 protrudes a probe element 14, which is movable by the guide member 11.
- the arranged on the inactive leaf 3 probe element 14 detects the position of the active leaf 2.
- the latch 9 is positively and the catch 10 held frictionally against the strike plate 7.
- FIG. 3 shows greatly enlarged a longitudinal section through the shutter 6 FIG. 2 , It can be seen here that the bolt 9 and the catch 10 are sandwiched in guides 15, 16 of the housing 8 one above the other.
- the feeler element 14 has a protruding, integrally made with the bolt 9 pin 17, which projects into a slide guide 18 of the guide member 11.
- the catch 10 is of a spring element 19 against the in FIG. 2 prestressed strike plate 7 shown.
- FIG. 4 shows in a sectional view through the shutter 6 FIG. 3 along the line IV - IV, that the slide guide 18 is designed mirror-inverted for use in right and left hinged French doors. Furthermore, the slide guide 18 has two opposing ramps 20, 21 for guiding the pin 17 of the bolt 9 in response to the movement of the active leaf 2.
- the ramps 20, 21 move the pin 17 such that the bolt 9 from the in FIG. 2 shown recess 12 of the striking plate 7 is moved out into the unlocked position.
- the active leaf 2 of the inactive leaf 3 is held exclusively by a force fit by the catch 10 in its position.
- FIG. 5 shows in a sectional view through the shutter 6 FIG. 3 along the line VV, that the housing 8 is designed in cross-section U-shaped.
- Legs 22, 23 of the housing 8 form the guides 15, 16 for the latch 9 and the latch 10.
- the free ends of the legs 22, 23 have latching hooks 24, 25 for engaging behind the latch 10.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Operating, Guiding And Securing Of Roll- Type Closing Members (AREA)
- Closures For Containers (AREA)
- Closing And Opening Devices For Wings, And Checks For Wings (AREA)
Abstract
Ein Verschluss (6) für eine zweiflügelige Fenstertür ohne Mittelpfosten, hat einen Riegel (9) zur Verriegelung eines Standflügels (3) und einen sandwichartig über dem Riegel (9) liegenden Schnäpper (10) zur kraftschlüssigen Halterung des Standflügels (3) an einem Rahmen (1). Der Riegel (9) ist einstückig mit einem von der Bewegung eines Gangflügels (2) verschiebbaren Tastelement (14) gefertigt. Hierdurch ist bei geschlossenem Gangflügel (2) der Standflügel (3) zuverlässig verriegelt. Bei geöffneten Gangflügel (2) ist der Standflügel (3) entriegelt und kraftschlüssig in der geschlossenen Stellung gehalten.A shutter (6) for a double-leaf French window without mullion, has a latch (9) for locking a passive leaf (3) and a snap-over (10) sandwiched over the latch (9) for frictionally supporting the inactive leaf (3) on a frame (1). The bolt (9) is made in one piece with a movable by the movement of a power wing (2) feeler element (14). As a result, the inactive leaf (2) of the inactive leaf (3) is reliably locked. When the active leaf (2) is open, the inactive leaf (3) is unlocked and held in the closed position in a force-fitting manner.
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft einen Verschluss für eine zweiflügelige Fenstertür ohne Mittelpfosten, wobei die Fenstertür einen Rahmen, einen Gangflügel und einen Standflügel hat, mit einem in dem Standflügel geführten zwischen einer Verriegelungsstellung und einer Entriegelungsstellung verschieblichen Riegel zur Verriegelung des Standflügels in dem Rahmen und mit einem in dem Standflügel angeordneten Schnäpper zur Halterung des Standflügels in einer im Rahmen liegenden Schließstellung.The invention relates to a closure for a double-leaf French windows without mullion, wherein the French door has a frame, a moving wing and a passive leaf, with a guided in the passive wing between a locking position and an unlocking movable latch for locking the passive leaf in the frame and with a in the inactive leaf arranged catch for holding the inactive leaf in a closed position in the frame.
Ein solcher Verschluss ist aus der
Weiterhin ist aus der
Der Erfindung liegt das Problem zugrunde, einen Verschluss der eingangs genannten Art so weiter zu bilden, dass er eine zuverlässige Verriegelung des Standflügels bei geschlossenem Gangflügel sicherstellt und bei geöffnetem Gangflügel eine komfortable Bedienung des Standflügels ermöglicht.The invention is based on the problem to form a closure of the type mentioned so on that it ensures reliable locking of the inactive leaf with the active leaf closed and allows the open leaf a comfortable operation of the inactive leaf.
Dieses Problem wird erfindungsgemäß dadurch gelöst, dass der Riegel ein die Bewegung des Gangflügels erfassendes Tastelement hat und an dem Gangflügel ein mit dem Tastelement zusammenwirkendes, den Riegel beim Schließen des Gangflügels in die Verriegelungsstellung verschiebendes Führungselement angeordnet ist und dass der Schnäpper zur kraftschlüssigen Halterung des Standflügels an dem Rahmen ausgebildet ist.This problem is inventively achieved in that the bolt has a movement of the active wing sensing probe element and on the moving leaf cooperating with the probe element, the bolt when closing the active leaf in the locking position displacing guide element is arranged and that the catch for non-positive mounting of the inactive leaf is formed on the frame.
Durch diese Gestaltung sind der Riegel und der Schnäpper zwei voneinander getrennte Bauteile, wobei der Riegel von der Stellung des Gangflügels gesteuert wird. Der Standflügel wird beim Schließen des Gangflügels zuverlässig mit dem Rahmen verriegelt. Der Schnäpper haltert jedoch unabhängig von der Stellung des Gangflügels den Standflügel kraftschlüssig an dem Rahmen. Damit lässt sich der Standflügel besonders komfortabel in die Offenstellung bewegen und wieder schließen. Da der am Standflügel angeordnete Schnäpper mit dem Rahmen zusammenwirkt und damit dessen Funktion unabhängig von der Stellung des Gangflügels ist, lässt sich der Standflügel bei in Entriegelungsstellung befindlichem Riegel besonders komfortabel öffnen und schließen.By this design, the latch and the latch are two separate components, wherein the latch is controlled by the position of the active leaf. The inactive leaf is reliably locked to the frame when the active leaf is closed. However, regardless of the position of the active leaf, the catch holds the stationary leaf in a force-fitting manner on the frame. This allows the inactive leaf to be easily moved to the open position and closed again. Since arranged on the inactive leaf latch cooperates with the frame and thus its function is independent of the position of the active leaf, the inactive leaf can be particularly comfortable open and close in befindlichem in unlocking position latch.
Der bauliche Aufwand zur Bewegung des Riegels beim Schließen des Gangflügels lässt sich gemäß einer anderen vorteilhaften Weiterbildung der Erfindung besonders gering halten, wenn das Tastelement einen hervorstehenden, auf dem Riegel angeordneten Zapfen und das Führungselement eine Rampe zur Verschiebung des Zapfens hat.The structural complexity for moving the bolt when closing the active leaf can be kept particularly low according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, when the probe element has a protruding, arranged on the bolt pin and the guide element has a ramp for displacing the pin.
Der Riegel könnte beispielsweise nach dem erstmaligen Schließen des Gangflügels in der Verriegelungsstellung dauerhaft verbleiben und bei Bedarf manuell in die Entriegelungsstellung bewegt werden. Der Standflügel lässt sich jedoch besonders komfortabel mit dem Öffnen und Schließen des Gangflügels verriegeln und Entriegeln, wenn das Führungselement zwei einander gegenüberstehende, eine Kulissenführung für den Zapfen erzeugende Rampen zur Bewegung des Zapfens in zwei Richtungen hat.The bolt could, for example, remain permanently in the locking position after the first closing of the active leaf and, if necessary, be moved manually into the unlocked position. The inactive leaf, however, can be locked and unlocked particularly comfortably with the opening and closing of the active leaf when the guide element has two mutually opposite ramps producing a linkage for the peg for moving the peg in two directions.
Der Verschluss ermöglicht gemäß einer anderen vorteilhaften Weiterbildung der Erfindung den wahlweisen Einsatz des Führungselementes in rechts- und linksanschlagenden Gangflügeln, wenn die Rampen in einer Draufsicht auf das Führungselement spiegelbildlich zueinander angeordnet sind.The closure allows according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, the optional use of the guide element in right and left-hinged walking wings, when the ramps are arranged in a plan view of the guide element mirror images of each other.
Die Anzahl von zu montierenden Bauteilen des Verschlusses lässt sich gemäß einer anderen vorteilhaften Weiterbildung der Erfindung besonders gering halten, wenn der Schnäpper und der Riegel in einem gemeinsamen Gehäuse angeordnet sind. Im einfachsten Fall lässt sich hierdurch das Gehäuse mit dem Schnäpper und dem Riegel einfach in eine häufig ohnehin vorhandene Profilnut einsetzen.The number of components to be assembled of the closure can be kept particularly low according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, when the catch and the bolt are arranged in a common housing. In the simplest case, this makes it easy to use the housing with the catch and the bolt in a frequently existing profile groove.
Der Schnäpper gestaltet sich gemäß einer anderen vorteilhaften Weiterbildung der Erfindung besonders kompakt, wenn der Schnäpper axial verschieblich in einer Führung des Gehäuses angeordnet und von einem Federelement in eine hervorstehende Position vorgespannt ist. Durch diese Gestaltung hat der Schnäpper wie der Riegel die länglichen Abmessungen zur einfachen Anordnung in der meist ohnehin vorhandenen Profilnut des Standflügels. Das aus dem Gehäuse herausragende Ende des Schnäppers kann wahlweise einen Rollkörper oder einen Gleitkörper aufweisen.The catch is designed according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention is particularly compact when the catch axially displaceable in a guide the housing is arranged and biased by a spring element in a protruding position. By this design, the catch as the bolt has the elongated dimensions for easy placement in the usually existing profile groove of the inactive leaf. The protruding from the housing end of the latch can optionally have a rolling body or a slider.
Der Riegel und der Schnäpper lassen sich gemäß einer anderen vorteilhaften Weiterbildung der Erfindung einfach montieren, wenn das Gehäuse im Querschnitt U-förmig gestaltet ist und wenn Schenkel des Gehäuses die Führungen für den Riegel und den Schnäpper bilden. Weiterhin ermöglicht die U-förmige Gestaltung des Gehäuses eine Verringerung des Materialeinsatzes im Vergleich zu einer geschlossenen Bauweise.The latch and the catch can be mounted easily according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, when the housing is designed in cross-section U-shaped and when legs of the housing form the guides for the latch and the latch. Furthermore, the U-shaped design of the housing allows a reduction in material usage compared to a closed design.
Der erforderliche Bauraum zur Aufnahme der Bauteile des Verschlusses lässt sich gemäß einer anderen vorteilhaften Weiterbildung der Erfindung besonders gering halten, wenn der Schnäpper und der Riegel sandwichartig in dem Gehäuse übereinander liegen und wenn der Schnäpper nahe der freien Enden der Schenkel angeordnet ist.The space required for receiving the components of the closure can be kept particularly low according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, when the catch and the latch are sandwiched in the housing over each other and when the catch is disposed near the free ends of the legs.
Die Führung der sandwichartig übereinander liegenden Bauteile des Riegels und des Schnäppers gestaltet sich gemäß einer anderen vorteilhaften Weiterbildung der Erfindung konstruktiv besonders einfach, wenn die freien Enden der Schenkel als Rasthaken zur Hintergreifung des Schnäppers ausgebildet sind. Hierdurch ist der Schnäpper mittels eines Rasthakens geführt und damit bei der Montage gegen ein Herausfallen gesichert.The leadership of the sandwich-like superimposed components of the bolt and the latch designed according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention structurally particularly simple when the free ends of the legs are designed as latching hooks for engaging behind the Schnäppers. As a result, the catch is guided by means of a latching hook and thus secured against falling out during assembly.
Der Standflügel ist gemäß einer anderen vorteilhaften Weiterbildung der Erfindung zuverlässig in dem Rahmen gehalten und verriegelt, wenn im Rahmen dem Schnäpper und dem Riegel gegenüberstehend ein Schließblech angeordnet ist und wenn das Schließblech zumindest eine Ausnehmung zur Halterung des Schnäppers und des Riegels hat. Vorzugsweise hat das Schließblech eine Auflauframpe für den Schnäpper.The inactive leaf is reliably held in the frame according to another advantageous development of the invention and locks when in the context of the latch and the bolt opposite a strike plate is arranged and when the strike plate has at least one recess for holding the latch and the bolt. Preferably, the strike plate has a ramp for the catch.
Das Schließblech lässt sich gemäß einer anderen vorteilhaften Weiterbildung der Erfindung besonders vielseitig einsetzen, wenn das Schließblech symmetrisch gestaltet ist und zwei Ausnehmungen hat. Durch diese Gestaltung kann das Schließblech bei rechts- und linksanschlagenden Standflügeln eingesetzt werden und ermöglicht zudem die Verriegelung des Gangflügels in der vom Standflügel ungenutzten Ausnehmung.The strike plate can be used very versatile according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, when the strike plate is symmetrical and has two recesses. By this design, the strike plate can be used in right- and left-hinged stationary wings and also allows the locking of the active leaf in the unused by the inactive leaf recess.
Die Erfindung lässt zahlreiche Ausführungsformen zu. Zur weiteren Verdeutlichung ihres Grundprinzips ist eine davon in der Zeichnung dargestellt und wird nachfolgend beschrieben. Diese zeigt in
- Fig. 1
- eine zweiflügelige Fenstertür mit einem Verschluss
- Fig. 2
- vergrößert die Bauteile des Verschlusses aus
Figur 1 - Fig. 3
- einen Längsschnitt durch den Verschluss aus
Figur 2 - Fig. 4
- eine Schnittdarstellung durch den Verschluss aus
entlang der Linie IV-IVFigur 3 - Fig. 5
- eine Schnittdarstellung durch den Verschluss aus
entlang der Linie V - VFigur 3
- Fig. 1
- a double-leaf French window with a lock
- Fig. 2
- enlarges the components of the closure
FIG. 1 - Fig. 3
- a longitudinal section through the closure
FIG. 2 - Fig. 4
- a sectional view through the closure
FIG. 3 along the line IV-IV - Fig. 5
- a sectional view through the closure
FIG. 3 along the line V - V
Der Verschluss 6 aus
Claims (11)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE201310212923 DE102013212923A1 (en) | 2013-07-03 | 2013-07-03 | Closure for a double-leaf French window without center post |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2821573A2 true EP2821573A2 (en) | 2015-01-07 |
EP2821573A3 EP2821573A3 (en) | 2015-08-12 |
EP2821573B1 EP2821573B1 (en) | 2017-05-31 |
Family
ID=50943212
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP14172898.0A Active EP2821573B1 (en) | 2013-07-03 | 2014-06-18 | Closure for a double-wing French window without central mullion |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2821573B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102013212923A1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2635439T3 (en) |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1471196B1 (en) | 2003-04-10 | 2009-12-23 | Ferco International Ferrures et Serrures de Bâtiment Société par actions simplifiée | Lock bolt for door wing or window wing |
EP1405972B1 (en) | 2002-09-24 | 2011-02-16 | HÖRMANN KG Freisen | Locking device, semi-fixed wing of a double door with such a device and a method of mounting |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB683245A (en) * | 1950-09-06 | 1952-11-26 | Jabez Ash | Improvements in fastenings for double doors |
DE9209894U1 (en) * | 1992-07-23 | 1992-10-01 | Friedrich Wilhelm Und Gustav Kettling Gmbh, 5880 Luedenscheid, De | |
DE29618178U1 (en) * | 1996-10-19 | 1996-12-12 | Lauterbach Heinrich | Automatic locking latch |
JP3581129B2 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2004-10-27 | 株式会社松田製作所 | Locking device for double doors |
FR2981107B1 (en) * | 2011-10-10 | 2013-11-29 | Grosfillex Sas | RETENTION DEVICE FOR SEMI-FIXED VANTAIL |
-
2013
- 2013-07-03 DE DE201310212923 patent/DE102013212923A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2014
- 2014-06-18 EP EP14172898.0A patent/EP2821573B1/en active Active
- 2014-06-18 ES ES14172898.0T patent/ES2635439T3/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1405972B1 (en) | 2002-09-24 | 2011-02-16 | HÖRMANN KG Freisen | Locking device, semi-fixed wing of a double door with such a device and a method of mounting |
EP1471196B1 (en) | 2003-04-10 | 2009-12-23 | Ferco International Ferrures et Serrures de Bâtiment Société par actions simplifiée | Lock bolt for door wing or window wing |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2635439T3 (en) | 2017-10-03 |
EP2821573A3 (en) | 2015-08-12 |
DE102013212923A1 (en) | 2015-01-08 |
EP2821573B1 (en) | 2017-05-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1908900B1 (en) | Lock with swivel trigger | |
DE202006003304U1 (en) | Handle with closure insert | |
DE102013101294B4 (en) | Magnetic locking device | |
DE202015008146U1 (en) | Opening limiting device | |
EP2078812A2 (en) | Covering element for a glide rail | |
EP2821573B1 (en) | Closure for a double-wing French window without central mullion | |
EP3183408B1 (en) | Control element for a fitting arrangement | |
EP2754804B1 (en) | Fastener for an espagnolette fitting | |
EP3034728B1 (en) | Opening limiter device | |
EP2607583B1 (en) | Fitting part for an espagnolette fitting | |
DE102004060717B4 (en) | Lock for locking a wing in a frame of a window | |
WO2017093268A1 (en) | Fitting assembly | |
EP3088639B1 (en) | Device for aligning fitting parts opposite from each other | |
EP1970513B1 (en) | Semi-fixed wing of a double door and a lock for the semi-fixed wing | |
EP1798360A2 (en) | Fitting component for an espagnolette fitting | |
EP2642051A2 (en) | Fastener released upon closing a door | |
EP4215704B1 (en) | Locking device, fitting and wing-frame assembly | |
AT11976U1 (en) | DEVICE FOR LOCKING A SLIDING DOOR EQUIPPED WITH A WING DOOR IN ITS POSITION | |
EP3279419B1 (en) | Stay arm for a fitting | |
DE202010003496U1 (en) | closure device | |
EP3655605B1 (en) | Lock | |
DE202017001681U1 (en) | lock | |
DE1653951A1 (en) | Mechanical lock on glass doors | |
DE102004049068A1 (en) | Safety catch for patio doors etc has rotatable forked element and pressure member pretensioned against one of several detent forces of same to hold element in position corresponding to detent face | |
DE102021206636A1 (en) | Largely sash-independent, unlockable rotary opening limitation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20140618 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: E05C 7/06 20060101AFI20150703BHEP |
|
R17P | Request for examination filed (corrected) |
Effective date: 20160112 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170118 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 897633 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170615 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502014003983 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2635439 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20171003 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20170531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170901 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170831 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170831 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170930 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502014003983 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170618 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170630 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170618 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20170630 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180301 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20180618 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180618 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20140618 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 897633 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20190618 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190618 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230515 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230621 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230620 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20230630 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20230719 Year of fee payment: 10 |