EP2678668A1 - Système et procédé d'inspection par rayons x - Google Patents

Système et procédé d'inspection par rayons x

Info

Publication number
EP2678668A1
EP2678668A1 EP11859314.4A EP11859314A EP2678668A1 EP 2678668 A1 EP2678668 A1 EP 2678668A1 EP 11859314 A EP11859314 A EP 11859314A EP 2678668 A1 EP2678668 A1 EP 2678668A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
energy
kev
detector
ray
ray system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP11859314.4A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2678668A4 (fr
Inventor
Edward James Morton
Francis Baldwin
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rapiscan Systems Inc
Original Assignee
Rapiscan Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rapiscan Systems Inc filed Critical Rapiscan Systems Inc
Publication of EP2678668A1 publication Critical patent/EP2678668A1/fr
Publication of EP2678668A4 publication Critical patent/EP2678668A4/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
    • G01N23/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material
    • G01N23/06—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and measuring the absorption
    • G01N23/083—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and measuring the absorption the radiation being X-rays
    • G01N23/087—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and measuring the absorption the radiation being X-rays using polyenergetic X-rays
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
    • G01N23/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material
    • G01N23/06—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and measuring the absorption
    • G01N23/10—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and measuring the absorption the material being confined in a container, e.g. in a luggage X-ray scanners
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2223/00—Investigating materials by wave or particle radiation
    • G01N2223/40—Imaging
    • G01N2223/419—Imaging computed tomograph
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2223/00—Investigating materials by wave or particle radiation
    • G01N2223/40—Imaging
    • G01N2223/423—Imaging multispectral imaging-multiple energy imaging
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2223/00—Investigating materials by wave or particle radiation
    • G01N2223/50—Detectors
    • G01N2223/501—Detectors array
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2223/00—Investigating materials by wave or particle radiation
    • G01N2223/50—Detectors
    • G01N2223/505—Detectors scintillation

Definitions

  • Patent Application No. 10/554,570 filed on October 25, 2005, and now issued U.S. Patent Number 7,684,538, which is a 371 national stage application of PCT/GB2004/001747, filed on April 23, 2004, and which, in turn, relies on Great Britain Patent Application Number 0309379.6, filed on April 25, 2003, for priority;
  • the present invention relates to X-ray inspection systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a source-detector configuration, whereby the energy transmitted through an object being inspected is measured at a wide range of substantially mono -energetic energies.
  • X-ray computed tomography for the screening of baggage has become fairly common in recent times, since the cross-sectional image data that such imaging systems produce is generally of high quality and of reasonable quantitative accuracy.
  • Known tomographic imaging systems tend to be based on a rotating gantry which carries, as a minimum, an X-ray source with a large stationary array of detectors and more commonly an X-ray source and an opposing array of X-ray detectors which rotate together around the object under inspection.
  • the information collected is reconstructed using known algorithms, such as a filtered backprojection algorithm or an iterative algorithm to produce a two-dimensional image.
  • the object is able to move continuously through the imaging plane during data acquisition and, through the use of a cone-shaped X-ray beam with a two dimensional array of detectors, a three-dimensional reconstructed image is produced using filtered backprojection or iterative reconstruction methods.
  • a stationary gantry system may be envisaged with a complete ring of rapidly switchable X-ray sources and a sensor array comprising one or more rings of X-ray detectors which may be used to form a three-dimensional image as the item under inspection passes through the imaging plane.
  • Such images are capable of being reconstructed into an image that is substantially determined by the mass attenuation coefficient of the material under inspection.
  • the mass attenuation coefficient is determined through the combination or probabilities of X-ray interaction in the object through the photoelectric effect (absorption), Compton effect (inelastic scattering), Rayleigh effect (elastic scattering) and the density of the material.
  • the individual detector thus sees an intensity of radiation at any point in time which is due to both those primary X-rays which have passed through the object unimpeded (i.e. without being absorbed and without being scattered) and those which have arrived at the detector due to one or more scattering interactions.
  • the mass attenuation coefficient is equal to the linear attenuation coefficient divided by density.
  • the linear attenuation coefficient is a quantity that characterizes how easily a material or medium can be penetrated by a beam of light, sound particles, or other energy or matter.
  • a large attenuation coefficient means that the beam is quickly "attenuated” or weakened as is passes through the medium, and a small attenuation coefficient means that the medium is relatively transparent to the beam. Therefore, the atomic number of the material under inspection plays a dominant role in determining the effective linear attenuation coefficient through its impact on the probability of photoelectric effect interactions while the density of the material plays a significant role in determining the mass attenuation coefficient of the material.
  • the present specification discloses a method for processing X-ray data to determine an identity of an object under inspection, comprising: transmitting a plurality of X-rays, wherein said X-rays have a range of energies, through the object; detecting said transmitted X-rays at a detector array, wherein each detector in said detector array outputs a signal proportional to an amount of energy deposited at said detector by a detected X-ray; reconstructing an image from said signal, wherein each pixel within the image represents an associated mass attenuation coefficient of the object under inspection at a specific point in space and for a specific energy level; fitting each of said pixels to a function to determine the mass attenuation coefficient of the object under inspection at the point in space; and using said function to determine the identity of the object under inspection.
  • the function yields a relationship between mass attenuation coefficients and logarithmic values of energy.
  • the function relates the energy response of the detector array at each energy within the range of energies multiplied by a function of the object's linear attenuation coefficient and density. Determining the identity of the object under inspection is performed by comparing the object's linear attenuation coefficient function to data comprising linear attenuation coefficient functions of predefined materials. The comparison yields a fit comparing the relationship between mass attenuation coefficients and logarithmic values of energy obtained from the object under inspection to pre-computed material data for known materials. Based on said comparison, pixels which are determined to qualify as potential threat materials are highlighted within said image.
  • the energies are substantially mono -energetic energies.
  • the mono -energetic energies are within a range of 20 keV to 250 keV.
  • the detectors output the signal proportional to the amount of energy deposited at said detector by the detected X-ray to an amplifier.
  • the amplifier amplifies said signal and outputs said amplified signal to a multi -channel analyzer.
  • the reconstruction is performed by processing said signal in accordance with at least one of a filtered back projection algorithm or an iterative reconstruction method. At least one image is reconstructed for each energy level detected by the detector array.
  • the detector array has a resolution of lOkeV and wherein said energy source has a peak electron energy of at least 200 keV. A set of at least twenty images are reconstructed.
  • Twenty images are derived from signals corresponding to X-rays having energies of at least lOkeV, 20 keV, 30keV, 40 keV, 50keV, 60 keV, 70keV, 80 keV, 90keV, 100 keV, HOkeV, 120 keV, 130keV, 140keV, 150keV, 160 keV, 170keV, 180keV, 190keV, and 200 keV. At least one image is reconstructed for each energy bin defined by the detector array. Energy bins are defined by 50 keV increments. Based on said energy bins, four images are reconstructed.
  • an X-ray system for processing X-ray data to determine an identity of an object under inspection, comprising: an X- ray source for transmitting a plurality of X-rays, wherein said X-rays have a range of energies, through the object; a detector array for detecting said transmitted X-rays, wherein each detector in said detector array outputs a signal proportional to an amount of energy deposited at said detector by a detected X-ray; and at least one processor having access to a memory for storing programmatic instructions, wherein when said programmatic instructions are executed, said processor: a) reconstructs an image from said signal, wherein each pixel within the image represents an associated mass attenuation coefficient of the object under inspection at a specific point in space and for a specific energy level; b) fits each of said pixels to a function to determine the mass attenuation coefficient of the object under inspection at the point in space; and c) uses said function to determine the identity of the object under inspection.
  • the function yields a relationship between mass attenuation coefficients and logarithmic values of energy.
  • the function relates the energy response of the detector array at each energy within the range of energies multiplied by a function of the object's linear attenuation coefficient and density. Determining the identity of the object under inspection is performed by comparing the object's linear attenuation coefficient function to data comprising linear attenuation coefficient functions of predefined materials. The comparison yields a fit comparing the relationship between mass attenuation coefficients and logarithmic values of energy obtained from the object under inspection to pre-computed material data for known materials. Based on said comparison, pixels which are determined to qualify as potential threat materials are highlighted within said image.
  • the energies are substantially mono -energetic energies. The mono -energetic energies are within a range of 20 keV to 250 keV.
  • the X-ray system further comprises an amplifier for receiving and amplifying the signal proportional to the amount of energy deposited at said detector.
  • the amplifier outputs said amplified signal to a multi-channel analyzer. At least one image is reconstructed for each energy bin defined by the detector array.
  • the detector array has a resolution of lOkeV and wherein said energy source has a peak electron energy of at least 200 keV. A set of at least twenty images are reconstructed.
  • Twenty images are derived from signals corresponding to X-rays having energies of at least lOkeV, 20 keV, 30keV, 40 keV, 50keV, 60 keV, 70keV, 80 keV, 90keV, 100 keV, HOkeV, 120 keV, 130keV, 140keV, 150keV, 160 keV, 170keV, 180keV, 190keV, and 200 keV. At least one image is reconstructed for each energy bin defined by the detector array. The energy bins are defined by 50 keV increments. Based on said energy bins, four images are reconstructed.
  • the present specification discloses an X-ray system for processing X-ray data to determine an identity of an object under inspection, comprising an X- ray source for transmitting a plurality of X-rays, wherein said X-rays have a range of energies, through the object; and a detector array for detecting said transmitted X-rays, wherein said detector array comprises a first detector disposed in front of a second detector, and wherein said detector array is configured relative to the transmitted X-rays such that the transmitted X-rays pass through the first detector before passing through the second detector.
  • the first detector is thinner than the second detector.
  • the first detector has a scintillator thickness in a range of 0.2mm to 1.0mm.
  • the second detector has a scintillator thickness in a range of 2.0 mm to 4.0mm.
  • an X-ray system for processing X-ray data to determine an identity of an object under inspection, comprising an X- ray source for transmitting a plurality of X-rays, wherein said X-rays have a range of energies, through the object; and a detector array for detecting said transmitted X-rays, wherein said detector array comprises a first set of detectors and a second set of detectors, wherein each of said first set of detectors comprise scintillator material and a filter configured relative to the scintillator material such that the transmitted X-rays pass through the filter before passing through the scintillator material, and wherein each of said second set of detectors comprise scintillator material and do not comprise a filter.
  • 25% to 50% of the detector array comprises the first set of detectors and wherein 75% to 50% of the detector array comprises the second set of detectors.
  • the filter comprises copper with a thickness ranging from 0.2 to 0.5mm.
  • the first set of detectors detect a higher net energy X-ray spectrum than the second set of detectors.
  • the first set of detectors and the second set of detectors are arranged in a tessellated pattern in the detector array.
  • the first set of detectors and the second set of detectors are arranged in alternating rows in the detector array.
  • 1% to 4% of the detector array comprises the first set of detectors and wherein 99% to 96%) of the detector array comprises the second set of detectors.
  • Output signals from the first set of detectors are used to generate a first image and wherein output signals from said second set of detectors are used to generate a second image.
  • the first image has a lower resolution than said second image.
  • the first image has a higher energy than said second image.
  • the first image and second image are used in combination to generate a dual energy analysis of said object.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an X-ray system, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 illustrates the broad energy spectrum of an X-ray source, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method for identifying predefined threat materials present in an object being inspected
  • FIG. 4 illustrates the reconstructed image pixels fitted into a curve, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of the method for identifying predefined threat materials present in an object being inspected, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 6A illustrates a two-dimensional detector array configuration
  • FIG. 6B illustrates a two-dimensional sensor array configuration
  • FIG. 6C illustrates an alternative filter configuration in a tessellated pattern
  • FIG. 6D illustrates a detector array structure where the filter material is applied on alternating rows of the detector
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a detector array configuration for producing high resolution images, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
  • the present invention relates to a source -detector configuration for use in an X-ray inspection system being used to inspect an object, whereby the energy transmitted through the object from the source to the detector is measured at a wide range of substantially mono- energetic energies. The measured energy is used to identify predefined threat material(s) in the object, if present.
  • X-ray sources that are typically used in screening of baggage, cargo and other similar items generally use a source that accelerates electrons in vacuum towards a target with a final kinetic energy at the target in the range of 50 keV to 200 keV depending on the intended application. Once these energetic electrons hit the target, they decelerate rapidly, liberating their energy though the Bremsstrahlung (scattering) effect or the photoelectric (absorption) effect which results in X-rays. The result is a Bremsstrahlung spectrum, a broad continuum of X-ray energies from the maximum accelerated electron energy down to zero, upon which a sharply peaked fluorescence spectrum is superimposed.
  • the linear attenuation coefficient varies rapidly with energy in the region below 500 keV
  • the wide range of energies that are contained within the X-ray beam can be used as a multi- energy probe of the linear attenuation coefficient of the material under inspection, thereby enabling a tight fit to the particular linear attenuation coefficient, and density, of the materials under inspection.
  • the shape of the linear attenuation curve of a material is determined primarily by the atomic number of the material under inspection whereas the effective baseline of the curve is determined through the density of the material.
  • a gaseous material such as Xenon, has a characteristic set of linear attenuation coefficients as a function of energy. When compressed from the gaseous state into a liquefied state, because of varying density of the states, the mass attenuation coefficient increases markedly, while the linear attenuation coefficient remains the same.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an X-ray system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
  • the system 100 is used to inspect objects for identifying the presence of predefined threat material.
  • the system 100 comprises an X-ray source 102 capable of emanating X-rays 104 having a broad energy spectrum, an object 106 requiring inspection, a detector array 108 comprising a plurality of detectors 110, a plurality of amplifiers 112, each of which is in data communication with at least one detector, a plurality of multi -channel analyzers 114, each of which is in data communication with at least one amplifier, an image reconstruction processor 116 in data communication with at least one multi-channel analyzer and a display unit 118 in data communication with the image reconstruction processor 116.
  • Figure 2 illustrates the energy spectrum of an X-ray source, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the curve 200 illustrated in Figure 2 represents a typical Bremsstrahlung energy spectrum.
  • the x-axis and the y-axis represent logarithmic values of energy and intensity, respectively.
  • the spectrum comprises a slowly varying signal which trends toward zero 202 at higher energies and drops to zero 204 at low energies, and also displays one or more sharp peaks 206 at medium energies.
  • the slowly varying signal is caused due to electron interactions in the target within an X-ray tube, and is known as Bremsstrahlung radiation.
  • the energy spectrum drops to zero 204 at low energies due to self-absorption of X-rays in the target and a vacuum window through which X-rays leave the X-ray tube.
  • the peaked X- ray spectrum 206 is due to electron interactions in the target which result in fluorescence radiation.
  • the spectrum peaks when all the energy of an electron which hits the target is converted to an X-ray.
  • the X-ray tubes as described in this disclosure tend to be operated with a tube voltage in the range 100 kVp to 200 kVp, and are capable of generating X-rays with energies up to 100 to 200 keV, respectively.
  • the X-rays 104 emanating from the X-ray source 102 pass through the object 106 and the transmitted X-rays are detected by detectors 110 in the detector array 108.
  • Each detector 110 in the detector array 108 is configured to, and capable of, outputting a signal that is proportional to the amount of energy deposited in the detector 110.
  • detector materials comprising narrow bandgap semiconductors such as Ge and Si are used in the detectors 110.
  • wider bandgap semiconductors such as CdZnTe, CdTe and Hgl are used in the detector 110.
  • scintillation detectors with an opto-electronic readout such as, but not limited to, a Nal(Tl) scintillator with a photomultiplier tube are used in the detector array 108.
  • Each detector 110 is in data communication with an amplifier 112, which, in turn, is in data communication with a multi-channel analyzer 114.
  • the signal output by each detector 110 is amplified to a pre-defined degree by the amplifier 112 and transmitted to the multi- channel analyzer 114, which accumulates the transmitted X-ray spectrum for subsequent analysis and image reconstruction via image reconstruction processor 116.
  • the reconstructed image is displayed via the display unit 118 which may be a computer screen.
  • the circuit illustrated in Figure 1 is designed to detect the maximum output voltage from the amplifier 112 for each interacting X-ray and to convert this to a digital value. These digital values, one value per detected X-ray, are transmitted through a suitable digital interface to subsequent processing electronics such as the multi-channel analyzer 114.
  • the electronics arrangement described above results in a detected X-ray spectrum of the form shown in Figure 2, the shape of the detected spectrum being strongly affected by the type of material which is present between the X-ray source 102 and the X-ray detector 110.
  • the amplifier 112 converts the liberated electrons to a voltage of IV. Hence, a gain in the range of lxlO 14 to lxlO 17 V/C is required. In an embodiment, the amplifier 112 is designed to provide a linear response, so the voltage output by the amplifier 112 increases with an increase in the amount of energy deposited therein. Also, in an embodiment, a saturation point of the amplifier 112 is set such that it corresponds to an absorbed energy in the detector 110 which is greater than the maximum energy that can be generated by the combination of X- ray source 102 and detector 110.
  • a plurality of suitable amplifier 112 configurations such as, in one embodiment, an integrator with a reset switch which results in a step voltage output and integrator with resistive feedback which results in a smoothly varying pulsed output voltage, may be employed.
  • At least one amplifier 112 and at least one multi -channel analyzer 114 is in data communication with each detector 110 in the detector array 108, resulting in a system with hundreds to thousands of individual energy sensitive detectors.
  • the plurality of detectors 110 enable measurement of the energy spectrum transmitted through the object 106, rather than just the total energy deposited. Since, the energy spectrum is characteristic of the specific material of the object 106, measurement of the spectrum energy may be used to identify the presence of threat materials.
  • a plurality of image reconstruction algorithms is used to analyze the accumulated X-ray spectrum for identifying the presence of predefined threat materials in the object 106.
  • the energy spectrum data from each of the multi-channel analyzers 114 is transmitted to an image reconstruction processor 116 in parallel for reconstructing a set of images by using one or more image reconstruction algorithms, each reconstructed image being characteristic of a particular energy in the detected spectrum.
  • Figure 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method for identifying materials present in an object being inspected using the system arrangement described above.
  • the object is placed between a broad spectrum X-ray source and an array of detectors.
  • X-rays transmitted through the object are measured at each detector.
  • the energy transmitted through the object from the X-ray source to the detector array is measured at a wide range of substantially mono -energetic energies. The range varies from the lowest energy generated (typically 20 keV and above), to the highest energy that is capable of being generated by the X-ray source (typically 250 keV and below).
  • the array of detectors comprises a plurality of detectors and each detector outputs a signal that is proportional to the amount of energy deposited in the detector by the impinging X rays, transmits to an amplifier and then to a multi-channel analyzer.
  • an image reconstruction algorithm is used to reconstruct a set of images, one image for each energy bin that is created by the detector array.
  • reconstructive algorithms like a filtered back projection algorithm and iterative reconstruction methods are used to reconstruct the set of images at step 306.
  • a set of 20 different images are reconstructed, at energies of 10 keV, 20 keV, 30 keV and so on up to 200 keV.
  • typical energies are in the range 100 kVp to 250 kVp and the width of an energy bin is 10 keV to 50 keV a minimum of five images at 50 keV energy intervals and a maximum of 25 images at 10 keV intervals are generated.
  • the underlying detector resolution lies in the range 1 keV (for a semiconductor detector) to 50 keV (for a typical scintillation detector).
  • each pixel in each reconstructed image represents the mass attenuation coefficient of the material within that volume element of the object being inspected, at that particular energy.
  • each pixel in each reconstructed image is fitted to a curve to obtain a description of the mass attenuation coefficient at the point in space.
  • Figure 4 illustrates the reconstructed image pixels fitted in a curve, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the vertical axis 402 represents mass attenuation coefficient which may be represented as ( ⁇ / ⁇ ) (linear attenuation coefficient/density) whereas the horizontal axis 404 represents logarithmic values of Energy.
  • the curve 406 illustrates the variation of mass attenuation coefficient as a function of X-ray energy.
  • the measurement points 408 on the curve 406 indicate the reconstructed pixel values that are reconstructed for each of the energy bins.
  • the resulting measured curve is a convolution of the energy response of the detector array (at each energy within the X-ray source output spectrum) multiplied by a function of linear attenuation coefficient and density.
  • the function of linear attenuation coefficient is evaluated with respect to a library of data defining linear attenuation coefficient functions of predefined materials. In an embodiment, the functions are evaluated experimentally. In another embodiment, the functions are calculated from known linear attenuation and density data for the materials.
  • the known liner attenuation coefficient functions are stored in a data library which is stored, and accessed, either local to, or remote from, the system in a memory, such as a RAID array, hard disk, or any other form of memory.
  • a fit is made between the empirical data measured during the X-ray imaging process (obtained at step 312) and the pre-computed material data for identifying threat materials.
  • the fit is made to determine the effective mass attenuation coefficient of a given material in the object under inspection.
  • the mass attenuation coefficient is specific to each material in the pre-computed material data and is used to identify threat materials from benign materials.
  • a least squares fitting method is used to provide a known statistical fit between sets of data to produce the most accurate analysis of material type.
  • the pixels which are determined to fall into the category of threat material are highlighted to an image inspector, for example through the use of color or image annotation.
  • the processor may be local to, or remote from, the X-ray source and detector array.
  • the memory and programmatic instructions may be local to, or remote from, the X-ray source and detector array.
  • FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of the method for identifying predefined materials present in an object being inspected, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the graph 500 represents a fitted curve between the empirical data measured during the X-ray imaging process and the pre-computed material data for identifying predefined materials as described with reference to Figure 3.
  • the curve 502 represents the experimentally measured mass coefficient data with respect to a material having a high atomic number.
  • the curve 504 represents the experimentally measured mass coefficient data with respect to a material having a low atomic number.
  • Data generated from the empirical data measured during the X-ray imaging process is fitted to the curves 502, 504, and 506, as represented by data points 508.
  • Curves 502 and 504 represent a poor fit.
  • the curve 506 represents the experimentally measured mass coefficient data with respect to a material having an atomic number lying between the high and the low atomic numbers corresponding to curves 502 and 504 respectively.
  • the curve 506 demonstrates a good fit. Accordingly, in operation, the pixels corresponding to data points 508 would be deemed to correlate with, and potentially represent, medium atomic number materials. In the display unit, the pixels would be graphically highlighted as being medium atomic number materials, either by color, by intensity, or by any other visual means.
  • Figure 6 A illustrates a two-dimensional detector array comprising a front detector 602 and a rear detector 604. Some X-rays pass through the front detector 602 to the rear detector 604, such that the rear detector 604 sees a higher average energy spectrum than the front detector 602.
  • the front detector 602 is typically thin (0.2 mm to 1.0 mm scintillator material) compared to the rear detector 604 (typically 2.0 to 4.0 mm scintillator material).
  • Figure 6B illustrates a two-dimensional sensor array in which a portion, such as a third or a half, of the rings 606 of a detector array are covered in a filter material while the other portion of the rings 608 are not.
  • the filter material is a metal, such as copper with a thickness ranging between 0.2 to 0.5 mm.
  • the detectors 606 covered with the filter material experience a higher net energy X-ray spectrum than the uncovered detectors 608, and this difference is used to determine material type.
  • Figure 6C illustrates an alternative filter configuration in a tessellated pattern in which the filter material covers detectors 610 while detectors 612 remain uncovered. Hence, the filter material is spread at even intervals over the detector array.
  • Figure 6D shows a detector array structure where the filter material is applied on alternating rows of the detector. Rows 614 are covered with a detector material while rows 616 remain uncovered.
  • a large fraction of the imaging detector is dedicated to both filtered and non-filtered detectors, and this may compromise the quality of each of the reconstructed images produced by using the detector arrays in conjunction with the X-ray system illustrated in Figure 1. It is preferred that the reconstructed image is of the highest quality in order to provide the best possible representation of the object under inspection.
  • a system with a stationary gantry may be configured with approximately 10,000 individual X-ray detectors and hundreds of individual X-ray source points resulting in a reconstructed image with a spatial resolution of approximately one millimeter and a mass attenuation coefficient resolution of better than one percent.
  • an improvised explosive device may contain a sizeable volume of explosive material, a detonating device, a trigger device, an energy source to supply the trigger and detonator devices, and/or some interconnecting wires.
  • the intrinsic image resolution will ideally be able to provide good visualization of most, if not all, components of such a device, but the material type is only necessary to be estimated for the sizeable explosive component.
  • an image inspector processing unit is used to analyze intrinsically high resolution images having a high signal-to-noise ratio with a much lower resolution material type analysis that can be applied over larger contiguous volumes.
  • signal-to-noise ratio As is known in the art, at an individual pixel level, there is a degree of noise which leads to uncertainty in the absolute value of detected mass attenuation coefficient, the uncertainty being described as signal-to-noise ratio.
  • the signal-to-noise ratio is directly related back to the number of X-rays that interact in each detector. In order to improve signal-to-noise ratio, and hence the ability to discriminate between materials with similar mass attenuation coefficient, the signals are required to be averaged over a larger region.
  • the system of the present invention enables analysis of data at multiple resolution levels, each with varying signal-to-noise ratio, in order to parameterize the measurement. Analysis at a high resolution level results in a higher degree of noise but better visualization of structure, whereas analysis at a low resolution level results in poor visualization of structure but leads to a closer identification of material type.
  • the present invention provides a detector array configuration for use in conjunction with the X-ray system illustrated in Figure 1 to produce high resolution images.
  • Figure 7 illustrates a detector array configuration for producing high resolution images, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the figure illustrates a multi -element pixel array 700.
  • the pixel array 700 is one commonly known in the art, such as those used in contemporary tomographic X-ray scanners.
  • the pixel array has 128 pixels arranged in a 16 x 8 pixel matrix.
  • One of the pixels 702 of the pixel array 700 is covered with a filter material such as 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm of copper or aluminium. The effect of covering one pixel with the filter material has a minimal impact on the whole reconstructed image.
  • the exact numbers of filtered detectors depend on detailed system designs, but typically lie in the range of 1% to 4% of the total number of detector channels.
  • a complete detector array comprises approximately 50 to 200 pixel arrays such as the one illustrated in Figure 7, thereby providing over one hundred filtered pixel values that are more or less equally dispersed over the entire imaging volume.
  • the values from just these sparsely located pixels may then be reconstructed using either a filtered backprojection or iterative reconstruction method to generate a low resolution but net high energy image which can then be fitted to the high resolution but lower average energy image to create materials specific data.
  • the system can generate a primary image which is reconstructed from the detector elements which are not filtered, i.e. 96% to 99% of all detector elements.
  • the primary image is acquired by integrating over all X-ray energies, including the lowest X-ray energies, at a high spatial resolution.
  • a secondary image which has a lower resolution but higher mean X-ray energy, can also be generated using the filtered detector elements, i.e. 1% to 4% of the detector array.
  • the two images namely the high resolution, lower energy primary image and lower resolution, higher energy secondary image, can be used in combination to generate, engage in, or otherwise conduct a dual energy materials analysis of materials under inspection.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention porte sur un système à rayons X pour traiter des données de rayons X afin de déterminer l'identité d'un objet qui est inspecté. Le système à rayons X comprend une source de rayons X pour transmettre des rayons X, les rayons X ayant une certaine plage d'énergies, à travers l'objet, un réseau de détecteurs pour détecter les rayons X transmis, chaque détecteur émettant un signal proportionnel à une quantité d'énergie déposée sur le détecteur par un rayon X détecté, et au moins un processeur qui reconstruit une image à partir du signal, chaque pixel dans l'image représentant un coefficient d'atténuation de masse associé de l'objet qui est inspecté en un point précis dans l'espace et pour un niveau d'énergie précis, attribuant chacun des pixels à une fonction afin de déterminer le coefficient d'atténuation de masse de l'objet qui est inspecté au point dans l'espace, et utilisant la fonction pour déterminer l'identité de l'objet qui est inspecté.
EP11859314.4A 2011-02-22 2011-02-22 Système et procédé d'inspection par rayons x Withdrawn EP2678668A4 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2011/025777 WO2012115629A1 (fr) 2011-02-22 2011-02-22 Système et procédé d'inspection par rayons x

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2678668A1 true EP2678668A1 (fr) 2014-01-01
EP2678668A4 EP2678668A4 (fr) 2017-04-05

Family

ID=46721149

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11859314.4A Withdrawn EP2678668A4 (fr) 2011-02-22 2011-02-22 Système et procédé d'inspection par rayons x

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2678668A4 (fr)
GB (1) GB2501661B (fr)
WO (1) WO2012115629A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10901112B2 (en) 2003-04-25 2021-01-26 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. X-ray scanning system with stationary x-ray sources
US10976271B2 (en) 2005-12-16 2021-04-13 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Stationary tomographic X-ray imaging systems for automatically sorting objects based on generated tomographic images

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8223919B2 (en) 2003-04-25 2012-07-17 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. X-ray tomographic inspection systems for the identification of specific target items
US7949101B2 (en) 2005-12-16 2011-05-24 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. X-ray scanners and X-ray sources therefor
US8451974B2 (en) 2003-04-25 2013-05-28 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. X-ray tomographic inspection system for the identification of specific target items
US9113839B2 (en) 2003-04-25 2015-08-25 Rapiscon Systems, Inc. X-ray inspection system and method
US8837669B2 (en) 2003-04-25 2014-09-16 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. X-ray scanning system
DE102012017872A1 (de) * 2012-09-06 2014-05-15 Technische Universität Dresden Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur bildgebenden Prüfung von Objekten mit Röntgenstrahlung
DE102018133525A1 (de) * 2018-12-21 2020-06-25 Smiths Heimann Gmbh Dual-Energie-Detektor sowie Verfahren zur Verbesserung damit erzeugter Bilder
CN117109494B (zh) * 2023-10-23 2024-01-23 北京华力兴科技发展有限责任公司 一种x射线测厚仪智能标定方法

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5841832A (en) * 1991-02-13 1998-11-24 Lunar Corporation Dual-energy x-ray detector providing spatial and temporal interpolation
US6018562A (en) * 1995-11-13 2000-01-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Apparatus and method for automatic recognition of concealed objects using multiple energy computed tomography
EP1063538A2 (fr) * 1999-06-23 2000-12-27 The Nottingham Trent University Réseau linéaire de détecteurs de scintillations
WO2003052397A1 (fr) * 2001-12-19 2003-06-26 Agresearch Limited Fantome
US20070003003A1 (en) * 2002-07-24 2007-01-04 Seppi Edward J Radiation scanning of objects for contraband
WO2009130491A1 (fr) * 2008-04-24 2009-10-29 Durham Scientific Crystals Limited Procédé et appareil pour l’inspection de matériaux
US20100020934A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2010-01-28 Edward James Morton X-Ray Scanners and X-Ray Sources Therefor
US20100220835A1 (en) * 2007-08-17 2010-09-02 Durham Scientific Crystals Ltd Method and apparatus for inspection of materials
US20100278296A1 (en) * 2009-04-29 2010-11-04 General Electric Company Method for energy sensitive computed tomography using checkerboard filtering
WO2010145016A1 (fr) * 2009-06-15 2010-12-23 Optosecurity Inc. Procédé et appareil d'évaluation du niveau de menace de bagages

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5319547A (en) * 1990-08-10 1994-06-07 Vivid Technologies, Inc. Device and method for inspection of baggage and other objects
US6816571B2 (en) * 2002-02-06 2004-11-09 L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems Corporation Delaware Method and apparatus for transmitting information about a target object between a prescanner and a CT scanner
US7868665B2 (en) * 2002-03-05 2011-01-11 Nova R&D, Inc. Integrated circuit and sensor for imaging
GB0309374D0 (en) 2003-04-25 2003-06-04 Cxr Ltd X-ray sources
WO2005092187A1 (fr) * 2004-03-29 2005-10-06 Cmt Medical Technologies Ltd. Dispositif et procede d'imagerie angiographique amelioree
US7224763B2 (en) * 2004-07-27 2007-05-29 Analogic Corporation Method of and system for X-ray spectral correction in multi-energy computed tomography
US7372934B2 (en) * 2005-12-22 2008-05-13 General Electric Company Method for performing image reconstruction using hybrid computed tomography detectors
US9256713B2 (en) * 2007-08-30 2016-02-09 Exelis Inc. Library generation for detection and identification of shielded radioisotopes
US7636638B2 (en) * 2007-11-27 2009-12-22 Canberra Industries, Inc. Hybrid radiation detection system
CN101960296B (zh) * 2007-12-27 2012-12-12 欧姆龙株式会社 X射线检查装置及x射线检查方法
US7835495B2 (en) * 2008-10-31 2010-11-16 Morpho Detection, Inc. System and method for X-ray diffraction imaging

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5841832A (en) * 1991-02-13 1998-11-24 Lunar Corporation Dual-energy x-ray detector providing spatial and temporal interpolation
US6018562A (en) * 1995-11-13 2000-01-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Apparatus and method for automatic recognition of concealed objects using multiple energy computed tomography
EP1063538A2 (fr) * 1999-06-23 2000-12-27 The Nottingham Trent University Réseau linéaire de détecteurs de scintillations
WO2003052397A1 (fr) * 2001-12-19 2003-06-26 Agresearch Limited Fantome
US20070003003A1 (en) * 2002-07-24 2007-01-04 Seppi Edward J Radiation scanning of objects for contraband
US20100020934A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2010-01-28 Edward James Morton X-Ray Scanners and X-Ray Sources Therefor
US20100220835A1 (en) * 2007-08-17 2010-09-02 Durham Scientific Crystals Ltd Method and apparatus for inspection of materials
WO2009130491A1 (fr) * 2008-04-24 2009-10-29 Durham Scientific Crystals Limited Procédé et appareil pour l’inspection de matériaux
US20100278296A1 (en) * 2009-04-29 2010-11-04 General Electric Company Method for energy sensitive computed tomography using checkerboard filtering
WO2010145016A1 (fr) * 2009-06-15 2010-12-23 Optosecurity Inc. Procédé et appareil d'évaluation du niveau de menace de bagages

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO2012115629A1 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10901112B2 (en) 2003-04-25 2021-01-26 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. X-ray scanning system with stationary x-ray sources
US11796711B2 (en) 2003-04-25 2023-10-24 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Modular CT scanning system
US10976271B2 (en) 2005-12-16 2021-04-13 Rapiscan Systems, Inc. Stationary tomographic X-ray imaging systems for automatically sorting objects based on generated tomographic images

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2501661B (en) 2017-04-12
EP2678668A4 (fr) 2017-04-05
GB2501661A (en) 2013-10-30
GB201315125D0 (en) 2013-10-09
WO2012115629A1 (fr) 2012-08-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9442082B2 (en) X-ray inspection system and method
WO2012115629A1 (fr) Système et procédé d'inspection par rayons x
US5930314A (en) Coded aperture imaging
JP5885661B2 (ja) 特定の対象物品の識別のためのｘ線断層撮影検査システム
US8885794B2 (en) X-ray tomographic inspection system for the identification of specific target items
US5181234A (en) X-ray backscatter detection system
WO1997045755A9 (fr) Imagerie ouverture codee
Whitney et al. Gamma–neutron imaging system utilizing pulse shape discrimination with CLYC
WO2008142448A4 (fr) Procédé et appareil pour l'inspection de matériaux
US8660239B2 (en) Detector apparatus and method
WO2005084351A2 (fr) Examen d'objets par balayage au moyen de rayons a double energie et detection des neutrons retardes
CN110678125A (zh) 能量鉴别光子计数检测器及其用途
JP6596414B2 (ja) Ｘ線検出器におけるｘ線線量パラメータを測定するための装置、及び放射線学的情報を取り扱うためのコンピュータネットワーク
JP2016131884A (ja) Ｘ線ｃｔ装置、光子計数型検出装置及び二重積層光子計数型検出器
Shikhaliev Megavoltage cargo radiography with dual energy material decomposition
JP2015501928A (ja) 検出器装置及び検出方法
Gilbert et al. Advanced algorithms for radiographic material discrimination and inspection system design
JP6357479B2 (ja) 材料の識別方法
Ryzhikov et al. A multi-energy method of nondestructive testing by determination of the effective atomic number of different materials
US10107766B2 (en) Photon counting imaging modes
GB2544687A (en) X-ray inspection system
WO2008099334A2 (fr) Examen de tomodensitométrie
Eilbert X-ray technologies
JP2008518226A (ja) コンピュータ断層撮影装置及びコンピュータ断層撮影装置により対象オブジェクトを検査する方法
US9841390B2 (en) Identification of materials from a hydrogen to electron ratio

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130823

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G01N 23/087 20060101AFI20161201BHEP

RA4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected)

Effective date: 20170308

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G01N 23/087 20060101AFI20170302BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20181221

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20210407