EP2625673A2 - Procédé pour contrôler un signe de sécurité optique d'un document de valeur - Google Patents

Procédé pour contrôler un signe de sécurité optique d'un document de valeur

Info

Publication number
EP2625673A2
EP2625673A2 EP11769788.8A EP11769788A EP2625673A2 EP 2625673 A2 EP2625673 A2 EP 2625673A2 EP 11769788 A EP11769788 A EP 11769788A EP 2625673 A2 EP2625673 A2 EP 2625673A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pixel data
value
security feature
pixels
value document
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP11769788.8A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2625673B1 (fr
Inventor
Shanchuan Su
Norbert Holl
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Giesecke and Devrient Currency Technology GmbH
Original Assignee
Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Giesecke and Devrient GmbH filed Critical Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Publication of EP2625673A2 publication Critical patent/EP2625673A2/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2625673B1 publication Critical patent/EP2625673B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/20—Testing patterns thereon
    • G07D7/202—Testing patterns thereon using pattern matching
    • G07D7/2041—Matching statistical distributions, e.g. of particle sizes orientations
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/06—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using wave or particle radiation
    • G07D7/12—Visible light, infrared or ultraviolet radiation
    • G07D7/1205—Testing spectral properties
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/20—Testing patterns thereon
    • G07D7/202—Testing patterns thereon using pattern matching
    • G07D7/205—Matching spectral properties

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for checking an optical security feature in or on a portion of a value document on the basis of pixel data of an image of the portion, a method for checking an optical security feature of a value document and an apparatus for checking an optical security feature of a value document.
  • value documents are understood to mean card-shaped and preferably sheet-shaped objects which, for example, represent a monetary value or an authorization and should therefore not be able to be produced arbitrarily by unauthorized persons. They therefore have security features which are not easy to manufacture, in particular to be copied, whose existence is an indication of the authenticity, i. production by an authorized agency is Important examples of such value documents are identity documents, chip cards, coupons, vouchers, checks and in particular banknotes.
  • optical security features which in the context of the present invention are understood to be security features of a value document which exhibit characteristic optical properties when interacting with optical radiation, i. electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, ultraviolet or visible spectral range show.
  • optical radiation i. electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, ultraviolet or visible spectral range show.
  • the optical properties may in particular be remission and / or transmission and / or luminescence properties.
  • Certain types of security features hereinafter also referred to as human feature, are intended to be tested for authenticity without technical aids.
  • security features are in particular so-called OVD features, among which The following security features are understood that show viewing angle-dependent visual effects or their optical properties, such as color, depend on the viewing angle.
  • Such security features can impart a different image impression to a viewer at different viewing angles and, for example, show a different color or brightness impression and / or another graphic motif depending on the viewing angle.
  • the present invention is therefore based on the object of specifying methods for testing optical security features, preferably OVD security features of value documents, which permit a precise examination, and to provide means for carrying out the method.
  • the object is firstly achieved by a method for checking, preferably computer-aided, testing of a predetermined optical security feature in or on a predetermined portion of a value document based on pixel data of pixels of a spatially resolved image of the given section, respectively locations in and on associated with the section and reflect optical properties of the value document at the locations.
  • the method it is checked whether a first number of those pixels or a first portion of the pixels on the pixels of the image, whose pixel data according to a first criterion specified for the security feature lies within a first reference range for the pixel data predetermined for the security feature, exceeds a first hit minimum predefined for the security feature, and if a scattering of the pixel data of those pixels follows the first criterion within the first reference range lie, exceeds a predetermined minimum value for the security feature predetermined value, and depending on the result of the test, an authenticity signal is formed, which represents a EchmeitsRIC only if the authenticity criterion, ie after the first criterion, the first number or the first share the first minimum hit value and the spread exceed the first minimum scatter value.
  • the object is achieved by a method for checking a predetermined optical security feature in or on a predefined section of a value document, in which the value document is illuminated with optical radiation of an optical radiation source to acquire an image of the predetermined section and radiation originating from the document of value is detected by a detection device is detected, depending on the detected radiation pixel data of pixels of the image, which are respectively assigned to locations in or on the section and reproducing optical properties of the document of value at the locations formed and wherein a method according to any one of the preceding claims is performed in which the pixel data formed is used as pixel data.
  • pixel data of pixels of an image of the predetermined portion of a value document is used in or on which the security feature is formed in a true value document.
  • the location and shape of the section can therefore be based on the location of the security feature on a real value document or the shape of the security feature.
  • the section can be predefined in particular for a specific type of value document to be checked, for banknotes, in particular a currency and denomination or denomination of the banknotes, and the predetermined security feature to be checked.
  • the section may for example be given by the surface of the security feature or only a given part of the area occupied by the security feature.
  • the image may be a partial image of an overall image of the entire value document.
  • the pixel data of a respective pixel represent optical properties at a location associated with the respective pixel in the portion of the value document.
  • the pixel data for a respective pixel may generally have multiple components representing different optical properties.
  • Two partial checks are used to check the security feature: On the one hand, it is checked whether the pixel data lies within the first reference range that is specified for the security feature.
  • the predetermined first criterion for the pixel data is used, by means of which the position of the pixel data with respect to the first reference region can be determined. This checks whether the optical properties of the examined section of the value document are within predefined limits specified for the security feature. On the other hand, it is checked whether the scattering of the pixel data within the first reference range exceeds the first scatter minimum value specified for the security feature. This means checking that the pixel data is in the first reference area are concentrated only in a part of the first reference range or rather are distributed in this wider scattered.
  • the authenticity signal is then formed. This indicates, for example by its shape or its level, in a data signal, in particular its content, again or represents whether the test has given an indication of authenticity or not. In particular, it represents an echo indication only if the first number or the first proportion exceeds the first minimum hit value and the scattering exceeds the first minimum scatter value.
  • the authentication signal can be used for immediate further processing or for storing an authenticity indication or for its absence in a memory device.
  • the authenticity indication can be used in the further examination of the security feature or value document alone as a criterion for the authenticity, so that the security feature or value document is classified as genuine if the authenticity information is present.
  • the authenticity signal is merged with other authenticity signals in an overall criterion; then, if necessary, the authenticity information is used only as a necessary criterion or necessary condition for the authenticity or its absence as a condition for the presence of a forgery
  • the number of pixels of the image need only be greater than 5, it is preferably greater than 48, so that the proportion or number of pixels in the first reference region and their scattering therein are also meaningful. This makes it possible to test optical security features characterized by a dispersion of optical properties within a predetermined range which is characteristic of the security feature and not falsified, for example by copying with a color copier or printing with a laser printer.
  • the security feature may be an OVD security feature, i. H.
  • the method can be used to test OVD security features.
  • the security feature may be an OVD security feature which can be obtained by printing with a printing ink with pigments whose remission properties are influenced by the direction of incidence of optical radiation on a respective pigment particle.
  • printing inks are also referred to as “optically variable inks”, hereinafter also referred to as “optically variable printing inks.”
  • a security feature with optically variable inks also referred to as an OVI feature, is understood to mean, in particular, a security feature a printing ink is printed containing pigments whose color depends on the direction of the illumination and the direction of detection or observation
  • the security feature may be a surface structure formed in the value document, in particular an embossed structure, with a pressure formed on specific flanks of the surface structure or embossed structure, which has an optically variable effect.
  • an optically variable effect is understood to mean an effect in which given optical properties of a structure or security feature are considered from the direction in which the latter is viewed and / or the direction from which the structure or security feature is determined
  • Security feature for consideration tet depend;
  • the optical properties can be colors.
  • the surface structure, preferably embossed structure, in the section has bent or angled embossed structural elements which bring about a distribution of the optical properties which is difficult to falsify.
  • the test is performed using a suitable device, preferably computerized; "Computer-aided testing" in the context of the present invention means any test with a computer.
  • a computer is generally understood to mean a data processing device which processes the pixel data.
  • the data processing device may comprise an FPGA, a microcontroller or microprocessor, in particular also a DSP, or a combination of these components or may have only one of these components.
  • it can comprise a memory in which a program is stored, in whose execution on the computer the first method according to the invention is carried out.
  • the invention therefore also relates to a computer program with program code means for carrying out the first method according to the invention when the program is executed on a computer.
  • the invention also relates to a computer program product with program code means which are stored on a computer-readable data carrier in order to carry out the first method according to the invention, when the computer program product is running on a computer.
  • the authenticity signal can then be formed in such a way that it represents the echo indication only in addition, if the scatter of the pixel data in the second reference area exceeds the second minimum scatter value.
  • the pixel data can in principle reproduce any optical properties and for this purpose have a corresponding number of components for each location, which represent the optical properties.
  • the number of components is not limited in principle, it is preferably less than six.
  • the pixel data for each one pixel or a location components that reflect reflectance or transmission properties in at least two, preferably three different wavelength ranges, preferably within the visible spectral range, or at least two, preferably three colors.
  • the illumination with optical radiation and the detection of radiation can take place in such a way that the pixel data for each one pixel or one location have the said components.
  • color components preferably at least two, better three, color components are used, although color representations in higher-dimensional color spaces are also possible.
  • the pixel data need have no further components. This allows a quick execution of the test.
  • the pixel data for a respective pixel or location have components which have remission and / or transmission properties in at least two, preferably at least three different wavelength ranges within the visible spectral range or at least two, preferably at least three colors and remissions and / or trans-emission properties in a further wavelength range at least partially outside the visible spectral range, preferably in the infrared spectral range.
  • the illumination with optical radiation and the detection of radiation can be carried out so that the pixel data for each one pixel or a location have said components.
  • the use of such pixel data allows security features to be tested as well characterized by characteristic properties in the non-visible optical spectral range.
  • the at least two, or better three, color components are preferably also used here.
  • the pixel data need not have any further components. This allows a quick execution of the test.
  • color values in an arbitrary color space can in principle be used as color data.
  • an RGB or HSI color space can be used as the color space.
  • those pixel data representing properties in the visible spectral range or color values are transformed prior to testing into a device-independent color space, preferably a Lab or Luv color space, particularly preferably a CIE Lab or CIE Luv color space. if they are not already present in such a color space, or pixel data in a device-independent color space, preferably a Lab or Luv color space, are used as pixel data representing properties in the visible spectral range or color values.
  • a particularly simple adaptation of the method to different sensors, by means of which the pixel data is detected in each case, is made possible; on the other hand, the first and second criteria can be determined more easily.
  • a hit dimension which is the number of pixels of the image or the proportion of those pixels of the image which, after the criterion specified for the security feature, lie in at least one reference region for the pixel data predetermined for the security feature.
  • the measure of hit can be given by the proportion or the number or one in the range of the expected values of the proportion or the number of monotonous functions of the proportion or the number. In particular, for a given resolution of the image, the proportion will be proportional to the number. Which of the alternatives is used depends, among other things, on the dimension of the reference range determined by the security feature and the type of check.
  • a respective scattering measure can be determined which represents a scattering of the pixel data in the respective reference range or components of the pixel data in the respective reference range. It therefore indicates whether the pixel data or components are concentrated in a part of the reference area or rather are spread out more widely in this area.
  • a measure is a monotonically decreasing function of the component or the number or of the scatter, it can be checked, for example, if the measure falls below a limit value corresponding to the minimum value. If the first number of hits is used, for example, the reciprocal of the first number, the authenticity criterion is satisfied if the hit measure falls below a reciprocal of the minimum value that would have to be exceeded if the number was used as a hit measure. '
  • the authenticity signal is then formed so that it additionally represents whether the second number represented by the second hit measure or the second proportion represented by the second meeting a predetermined second minimum score and, if used, the predetermined by the second scattering measure scattering a predetermined exceed second scatter minimum value.
  • the authenticity signal can then be formed such that it additionally represents a proof of authenticity only if, in addition, the second number or the second proportion exceeds the second minimum hit value and, if used, the scattering exceeds the second minimum scatter value.
  • the first and optionally second reference region and the first or second criterion, by means of which it is checked whether pixel data lie within the respective reference region, can be dependent on one another.
  • the reference range can be implicitly given by the respective criterion.
  • the first and / or, if used, the second criterion for determining whether pixel data is within the first and / or second reference range, if used, may for example provide that for pixel data with n components, the reference range is also n-dimensional and accordingly - hend the pixel data of a pixel in the reference area Hegen, if the point given by the n components in the reference area. In this case, n is a natural number greater than 1.
  • the first and / or, if used, the second criterion for determining whether pixel data within the first and / or second reference range, if used, is, for example, also able to provide That is, if at least two predetermined components of the available components lie within a correspondingly low-dimensional reference range, then pixel data is in a reference range.
  • the first reference area an area extending at least in one plane of a color space or in a plane of the color space parallel to two axes of the color space, the different colors correspond.
  • the area can thus be given by an area in the plane, ie extend only in the plane, or at least be three-dimensional and intersect the plane, where the intersection in the plane is an area.
  • the area of the area in the plane is endHch and greater than 0.
  • the plane may be the down or uv plane. This embodiment allows testing of security features that exhibit a viewing angle dependent color shift effect, preferably OVD security features, in particular.
  • a region extending at least in a plane parallel to an axis which is one of the first and second reference regions may be used Luminance or brightness in one or the color space corresponds, and an axis which corresponds to a brightness or intensity in the further wavelength range at least partially outside the visible spectral range runs.
  • extends is understood here analogously to the term “extends” in the previous paragraph. Under luminance or brightness, for example, when using a lab or Luv color space, the L component is understood.
  • a scattering of those components of the pixel data is used, which are also used to test whether pixel data in the respective reference range and lie within the respective reference range.
  • the scattering of all these components is used.
  • a variance and / or a covariance of the pixel data or components lying in the first and second reference regions may be used as first and / or second scattering measure or first and / or second scattering Pixel data or a monotone function of variance or covariance can be used.
  • scattering of the projection of the pixel data or pixel data components in the reference region to a predefined direction of the reference region is used as scattering.
  • the variance of this projected data can be used as the scatter measure be used.
  • the direction in the reference range is given as the direction along which the greatest scattering is to be expected for true value documents. This direction can be determined by examining real value documents as a reference. For example, if the reference area is in the shape of an ellipse or an ellipsoid, the longest major axis of the ellipse or ellipsoid can be used.
  • Value documents can become dirty during their use. The contamination can then hinder the testing of optical security features.
  • edge pixel data of pixels of a frame portion each associated with locations within a predetermined margin along at least a portion of an edge of the security feature portion are used, the margin pixel data becomes a local state value representing the status of the value document in the portion determined, and the local state value is used in checking the first / or second portion or the first and / or second number and / or the first and / or second scattering.
  • boundary pixel data which respectively correspond to locations in the edge area and reflect optical properties of the document of value at these locations are preferably formed when the radiation emanating from the document of value is detected.
  • the border area which adjoins the section can, in principle, be predetermined in any way, but is always smaller than the value document. For example, edge pixel data of pixels associated with locations within a given distance from an edge of the section can be used. The border area is then a strip more constant Width along the section of the value document. The distance may be selected depending on the properties, in particular the resolution, of the sensor used to form the edge image pixel data.
  • the edge of the portion may also be within a security feature if the portion has "holes".
  • the edge region can be given by the edge section having a predetermined shape and position and the image section being located within the edge section.
  • the border area is smaller than the overall image of the value document.
  • the edge image portion could be given by the area between an outer rectangle surrounding the image portion used to test the security feature and the edge of the image portion. Insofar as pixels are also used outside the marginal section to determine the state value, their proportion is preferably less than 10% of the pixels used to determine the state value, particularly preferably less than 1%. However, it is very particularly preferred to use only pixels from the edge image section.
  • the state is also understood to mean an optical state which reflects to what extent at least one predetermined optical property in the edge area of the value document to be checked differs from the same optical property in the corresponding edge area of one or more predetermined, typically print-fresh, reference-value documents.
  • the local state value formed from the edge image pixel data can in principle be formed by means of an arbitrary function, but preferably the determination is made so that only a few discrete values are used. In determining the local state value can For example, methods for detecting stains can be used, by means of which the state can be determined in the edge region corresponding to the border area; Based on this result, the local state or local state value for the section with the safety feature can then be estimated using predefined methods.
  • the estimation is given by transmitting the state in the edge area to the section.
  • the status value determination only needs to be carried out before the criterion is checked as to whether pixel data of a pixel lies in the reference range, but otherwise it can be carried out in any suitable phase of the method.
  • it is here checked how the state is in the area of the security feature.
  • a value document in which only a small security feature is contaminated, can easily have an overall state which, according to known methods, is substantially better than that in the area of the security feature. The use of only a local state value for the authenticity check of the security feature therefore enables a considerably sharper and more accurate check of the security feature.
  • the subject of the present invention is therefore also a method for computer-aided checking of a given security feature in or on a predetermined section of a value document, depending on properties of the value document at locations within a predetermined edge area along at least part of an edge of the section or security feature , preferably within a predetermined interval Stands from the edge of the section or security feature, a local state value for the section is determined, and depending on properties of the value document at locations in the section and from the local state value, an authenticity or forgery criterion for the presence of a true security feature or a forgery. Depending on the result of the test, a corresponding signal can then be formed or a value can be stored in a memory. Also for this subject apply the remarks on the state value and the border area above, especially in the previous two paragraphs.
  • the pixels of the edge image portion or the locations on which properties are used for determining the state value are distributed uniformly along the edge of the section.
  • the use of the local state value in the checking can basically be arbitrary.
  • the pixel data may be corrected before checking the number and the spread.
  • a correction can be made by a transformation of the pixel data, which depends on the local state value
  • the first criterion and / or the first reference region and / or the second criterion and / or the second reference region can be changed or predefined in dependence on the local state value.
  • the second possibility with sufficient storage space and only a small number of local state values, can allow the method to be carried out more quickly if parameters intended for the respective criterion and / or the reference range are used. dependence on the possible local state values are stored.
  • the invention also provides a testing device for testing a given security feature of a value document by means of the method according to the invention with an optical sensor for capturing an image with pixels whose pixel data are respectively associated with locations in or on the section and reflect optical properties of the value document at the locations a memory in which a computer program according to the invention is stored, and a computer for executing the computer program with images captured by the sensor.
  • the optical sensor can in particular for spatially resolved detection of remission and / or transmission properties or remission or transmission images in at least two, preferably three different wavelength ranges, preferably formed within the visible spectral range, or at least two, preferably three colors and forming these properties of reproducing pixel data be.
  • the senor is designed, spatially resolved, for the remission and / or transmission properties or reflectance and / or transmittance images in at least two, preferably at least three different wavelength ranges within the visible spectral range or at least two, preferably at least three colors and remission and / or or to detect transmission properties in a further wavelength range at least partially outside the visible spectral range, preferably in the infrared spectral range, and to form pixel data representing these characteristics.
  • the method according to the invention has the advantage that no complicated optical sensors are necessary to acquire the pixel data.
  • a spatially resolving sensor for detecting a color image can preferably be used.
  • the value document can be transported past an illumination source which emits optical radiation which strikes the document of value as at least one beam of rays converging with respect to a plane of convergence.
  • a bundle of optical radiation convergent with respect to a convergent plane is understood to mean a bundle of rays whose rays, projected onto the plane designated as convergence plane, result in a convergent bundle of rays in the plane.
  • the convergence plane can run parallel to the transport direction and orthogonal to the plane of the value document.
  • the beam emanating from the illumination device can also be split into at least two sub-beams, which are then again at least partially directed to the same area of the value document.
  • the illumination device generates an illumination strip extending transversely to the transport direction on the value document, wherein the optical radiation does not coincide geometrically with the value document in a plane transverse to the transport direction and orthogonally projected onto a plane of the value document.
  • the document of value can also be illuminated by the lighting device with a bundle of optical radiation converging with respect to a convergent plane from only one illumination direction, and the radiation emanating from a respective illuminated location can be detected only from one detection direction. Under the direction of illumination, the averaging understood direction obtained by all the rays of the bundle.
  • the illumination direction and / or the detection direction and / or the convergence plane with an ordinal preferably enclose an angle of less than 5 ° with respect to a plane of the value document. This is especially true when testing OVT security features.
  • the illumination direction and / or the detection direction make an angle between 0 °, preferably 5, with a normal to one plane of the value document °, and 15 °.
  • the elements which cause the dispersion of the optical properties in OVD security features or security features which have a surface structure, preferably embossed structure with a pressure formed on certain flanks of the embossed structure, are generally very small. Nevertheless, in order to be able to detect the scattering well, the resolution of the image in the methods is preferably better than 0.4 mm ⁇ 0.4 mm, particularly preferably better than 0.3 mm ⁇ 0.3 mm.
  • FIG. 2a and b schematic representations of an optical sensor of the value document processing device in Fig. 1 transversely to a transport direction in which value documents are transported and from above to a transport level in which value documents are transported,
  • FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of an example of a value document to be examined in the form of a banknote
  • FIG. 5 is a simplified flow diagram for a first embodiment of a method for checking an optical security feature in or on a section of a value document that is included in the value dictionary.
  • FIG. 1 with the sensor in FIGS. 2a and 2b a simplified flow chart for a second embodiment of a method for testing an optical security feature in or on a portion of a value document
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic representation of distributions of FIG Pixel data in an RB plane and a G-IR plane for the security feature in FIG. 4,
  • 8 is a simplified flowchart for a third embodiment of a method for checking an optical security feature in or on a portion of a value document
  • 10 is a schematic diagram of distributions of pixel data in an HS plane and an I-IR plane for the security feature in FIG 4,
  • FIG. 11 is a simplified flowchart for another embodiment of a method for testing an optical security feature in or on a portion of a value document.
  • FIG. 12 is a simplified flowchart for yet another embodiment of a method of inspecting an optical security feature in or on a portion of a value document;
  • FIG. 13 is a simplified flowchart for another embodiment of a method for testing an optical security feature in or on a portion of a value document.
  • a device 10 for processing value documents in the example a bank note processing device, in FIG. 1 serves inter alia for checking the authenticity of value documents 12 in the form of banknotes and for sorting depending on the result of the authenticity check.
  • the device 10 has an input pocket 14 for inputting to be processed.
  • a control device 30 is connected at least to the sensor arrangement 24 and the points 20 and 20 'via signal connections and serves for the evaluation of sensor signals of the sensor arrangement 24, in particular for checking the authenticity, and activation of at least the points 20 and 20 'depending on the result the evaluation of the sensor signals.
  • the sensor arrangement 24 comprises at least one sensor for this purpose; In this exemplary embodiment, only one optical sensor 32 for spatially resolved detection of color properties and of IR properties is provided, which detects optical-radiation remitted from the value document. In other embodiments, still other sensors, e.g. for other than optical properties, be provided.
  • the sensor 32 detects an overall image of the value document in four spectral ranges corresponding to the three color channels red, green and blue and in the infrared spectral range (IR channel), which is represented by corresponding sensor signals. From the analog and / or digital sensor signals of the sensor 32, pixel data of pixels of the overall image which are relevant for checking the banknotes with respect to their authenticity are determined by the control device 30 during a sensor signal evaluation.
  • the control device 30 has an evaluation device 31, which in the example is integrated into the control device 30, but in other exemplary embodiments can also be part of the sensor arrangement 24, preferably of the sensor 32.
  • the control device 30 has a processor 34 and a memory 36 connected to the processor 34 in which at least one computer program with program code is stored, in the execution of which the processor 34 in a first function as the evaluation device 31 Evaluates sensor signals, in particular for checking the authenticity and / or the determination of a Baczu- state of a tested value document, while doing inter alia, a method described below using the sensor signals and the pixel data executes in a second function, the processor or the device according to the evaluation, the transport device 18 at.
  • the evaluation device 31 therefore forms a computer in the sense of the present invention.
  • the control device 30 further has a data interface 37.
  • the evaluation device 31 more precisely the processor 34 therein, after determining pixel data, can check a given criterion for the authenticity of the value document into which at least some of the detected properties and reference data are received.
  • the control device 30, controls the transport device 18, exactly he the points, so that the tested value document is transported according to its ascertained authenticity for storage in appropriate output compartments.
  • documents of value 12 are separated into the input tray 14 as a stack or individually inserted value documents 12 of the verzeier 16 and occasionally fed to the transport device 18, which supplies the isolated value documents 12 of the sensor assembly 24.
  • This detects optical properties of the value documents 12, in the example the color image with additional IR channel, wherein sensor signals are formed, which reflect the corresponding properties of the value document.
  • the control device 30 detects the sensor signals, determined in dependence on these a state and the authenticity of the respective value document and controls depending on the result, the switches so that the examined value documents are fed according to their detected authenticity of the output compartments.
  • the sensor 32 is designed to acquire images for three colors and IR radiation.
  • it is designed as a line sensor which, during the transport of a value document past the sensor 32, comprises a sequence of line images which produce an image of the value document in a direction transverse to the direction of the line, ie in the transport direction.
  • It comprises in the present example, in FIGS. 2a and 2b only extremely simplified schematic representation, a lighting device 38 for illuminating a transversely to the transport direction T extending strip, ie for generating a lighting strip in a transport plane E (in Fig.
  • the senor 32 comprises a detection device 40 arranged in the radiation beam emitted by the illumination device 38, which shadows a portion of the radiation of the illumination device 38.
  • the illumination device 38 has a plurality of transversely to the transport direction T linearly arranged radiation sources 39 for visible light and IR radiation and two deflecting elements 41 for bundling the radiation
  • the illumination device 38 generates a projection onto an orthogonal plane to the transport plane E (in FIG. 2 a, the plane of the drawing) and to the transport direction T parallel convergence plane convergent beam.
  • the emitted beam is first divided by the detection device 40 into two sub-beams, which are brought together by the Urrueenk wornen 41 back to a convergent beam.
  • the maximum opening angle ⁇ between a perpendicular to the transport plane or the detection direction D and the outermost beam of the bundle in the plane is at most 40 °, preferably the highest 30 °.
  • the rays are not strongly focused; rather, the radiation is diffuse.
  • the illumination direction B results as a mean over the directions of all the beams of the bundle and, because of the symmetrical course of the subbeams, is substantially parallel to the detection direction D.
  • line scan cameras 42, 42 ', 42 ", 42"' serve as detection device 40 with red, not shown, arranged in the beam path in front of them.
  • Green-blue and IR filters for detecting red, green or blue or IR portions of the reflected from the value document optical radiation of the illumination device 38.
  • Each of the line scan cameras each has a detector array with line-arranged photodetection elements, in front of which in each case the filter is arranged, which corresponds to the color of the remitted optical radiation to be detected by the respective line scan camera.
  • the sensor 32 may include further optical elements, in particular for imaging or focusing, which are not shown here.
  • the detector lines of photodetection elements are arranged parallel to each other.
  • the sensor 32 is therefore constructed and arranged such that the value document from a direction B orthogonal to the plane of the value document or parallel to a normal to the transport plane in which the document of value is transported, illuminated with optical radiation and outgoing from the document of value 12th , Remitted optical radiation is detected from a direction D orthogonal to the plane of the value document or parallel to the illumination direction.
  • the intensity data represent pixel data describing the properties of pixels 44 of a line image which reproduces the line-shaped area of the value document 12 detected by the sensor 32.
  • An image captured by the sensor 32 is therefore composed of pixels arranged in a rectangular matrix and is described by the pixel data.
  • the resolution of the sensor 32 is at least so great that a pixel corresponds to an area of at most 0.3 mm ⁇ 0.3 mm on the value document.
  • Each of the pixels is assigned as pixel data next to a number i representing the position in the image, color values ri, gi, bi and IRi for red, green and blue and IR remission.
  • the signal processing device 44 can generate and generate RGB color values after calibration from detection signals of the detector lines 42, 42 ', 42 "and 42'".
  • an optical security feature 46 is checked in the example, which in this example is indicated by the value "100" in OVI pressure, i. as a security feature with optically variable ink, is given. If a viewer tilts the value document in a suitable direction, he recognizes a change in the color of the print or the value.
  • the actual security feature 46 is located in a section 48 of the value document, which is indicated by hatching in FIGS. 4 and 5.
  • the pixels are shown in a higher resolution than in Fig. 4, However, they represent non-real relationships because of the schematic representation.
  • an edge-frame section 50 which is frame-like in the example, is shown, which contains pixels which indicate the locations in a border area, in the example by a distance from the edge of the section 48 a distance of less than 2.5 mm, preferably a distance corresponding to less than 8 pixels in the image, in the example of 5 pixels; In the schematic illustration of FIG. 4, only pixels are shown at a distance of 2 pixels.
  • the edge region thus also represents an area given by position and shape, rectangular in the example, in which section 48 is located.
  • a program is stored in the memory 36 in a section serving as part of the evaluation device 31, and thus in this example in the control device 30, which program is executed by the evaluation device 31, i.
  • the processor 34 performs the following steps of a method for checking value documents.
  • step S10 the evaluation device 31 detects an overall image of the value document to be checked by means of the sensor 32.
  • the sensor 32 captures entire images of the value documents, more specifically the pixel or image data representing the overall images, in the example full-area images with three color channels, namely red, green and blue (RGB channels) and an IR reflectance value;
  • the type of pixel data has already been described above.
  • the pixel data thus indicate optical properties of the value document as a function of the location on the value document.
  • the pixel data are transmitted to the evaluation device 31 and detected by this.
  • a preprocessing of the detected data in the sensor 32 or the evaluation unit may be performed in this step. 31 are performed, in which the Büd stylist transformed, for example, to compensate for background noise, in particular filtered.
  • the evaluation device 31 or the processor 34 determines the type, ie the currency and the denomination, of a value document to be checked in step S12 as a function of the pixel data acquired by means of the sensor 32. Different types are given.
  • the value document can then, if possible, be assigned to one of the predefined types. In the example, value documents whose format depends on the type are to be checked.
  • the evaluation device 31 can therefore first perform a search or recognition of edges of the banknote in the image. From the recognized borders, the format of the value document can be used to determine the denomination or denomination and thus the type from the set of possible value document types specified.
  • the processor 34 or the evaluation device 31 determines in step S14, depending on the type of the value document, the position of the portion of the value document in which the optical security feature must be found in a genuine value document.
  • the section or image of the section is indicated in FIG. 4 by hatching.
  • the evaluation device 31 determines an evaluation range 48 or ROI (region of interest) corresponding to the security feature in the image, which is derived from the known position of the security feature on genuine value documents of the given type relative to the contours of the Value documents and an ascertained in the image outline of the value document results.
  • the evaluation device 31 can in particular first perform a search or recognition of edges of the value document in the overall image or on results of the step S12 and then, depending on the position of the edges in the overall image, to position the ROI in the overall image, ie to select corresponding pixel data. From the overall image, the processor 34 then determines the pixel data of the pixels of the overall image, the locations in this section, in step S16 correspond; this corresponds to a determination of an image with the security element. In step S20, the evaluation device 31 then determines a local state value for the security feature 46 from edge pixel data of the edge image section 50.
  • edge image data of a boundary image section 50 which in each case corresponds to locations within the predetermined distance, which in the example corresponds to 5 pixels in the image, are assigned from an edge of the section 48 outside the section 48 and when acquiring the radiation emanating from the value document reflect optical properties of the value document at these locations have been formed.
  • the edge image portion or its pixel is marked by puncturing.
  • edge image pixel data of pixels of this edge image portion 50 are then used by the processor 34 to determine from the edge pixel data a local state value representing the state of the value document in the section. to estimate in the example. This can be done by comparing the edge pixel data with reference pixel data for a print fresh value document of the same type according to a predetermined condition criterion.
  • Procedure here- are basically known and described, for example, in WO 2008/058742 Al the applicant, but there in contrast to the present application for the entire document of value; the content WO 2008/058742 A1 is hereby incorporated by reference into the description.
  • a predetermined state criterion can be used for a sufficiently good state, which depends on pixel data for the edge image section.
  • the calculation of the value of the check function is understood to mean that the value is determined from the vector and the parameters by means of steps predetermined by the test function.
  • the check is performed in such a way that only two discrete values are provided as local state values, one of which is assigned to the security feature 46 or the section 48 as local state value depending on the state in the edge image section 50.
  • the first of the possible local state values identifies a state that, according to the predetermined state criterion, matches the security feature or the edge image section of a fresh-print value document.
  • the second of the possible local state values corresponds to a soiled state which corresponds only to a change in the luminance of the color values but not to the color.
  • other soiling states can also be taken into account, for example those which show discoloration.
  • step S22 the pixel data is then transformed or corrected in dependence on the local state value. If the first state value has been determined, the pixel data is left unchanged, otherwise the luminance value of the pixel data and the IR component are multiplied by a predetermined factor.
  • step S24 to S30 the evaluation device 31 then carries out steps for the actual checking of the security feature.
  • the first reference region lies in the R-B plane of the RGB color space (see Fig. 6a), the second in a plane spanned by the G color values and the IR reflectance axis (see Fig. 6b).
  • the reference ranges and parameters for the criteria have been determined prior to performing the method by detecting the pixel data for those pixels, including the test, for a given set of other true-to-print, true value documents of the type as reference documents be used.
  • the mean values of the RB components or G-IR values are then used to determine the respective reference range and the respective criterion for which pixel data within the respective reference range are based. Components and their variances and covariances determined assuming a normal distribution.
  • the first reference area and the first criterion are then given by checking, for the Mahalanobis distance in the RB plane, for the pixel data of a pixel relevant for the first criterion, the R and B components, and checking whether the Mahalano - bis distance is less than a predetermined first maximum distance value
  • the parameters for calculating the Mahalanobis distance depend in a known manner on the previously determined averages, variances and the covariances. Accordingly, the maximum distance value was determined on the basis of the reference documents.
  • the second reference range and the second criterion are given by the fact that for pixel data of one pixel, here the G and IR components, the Mahalanobis dependent on the corresponding mean values, variances and covariances G-IR level distance is determined and checked to determine if the Mahalanobis distance is smaller than a given second maximum distance value determined for the reference value documents.
  • the portion itself is used as a measure of the proportion of the pixel data that lie within the respective reference range.
  • a minimum hit value is determined, which must be exceeded by the hit, here the proportion of pixel data in the respective reference range and which is characteristic of a real security feature or a true value document such a hit minimum value by examining the reference value documents and, if already known, forged value documents with the forged security feature are determined.
  • the scattering of the pixel data that lies within the first reference range is determined and compared with a scatter minimum value.
  • the total variance ie the sum of the variances of the R component and the B component
  • the minimum scattering value is used as scattering or scattering measure.
  • the total variance ie the sum of the variances of the R component and the B component
  • a scattering average value al is then determined. must be exceeded by a determined for a security feature to be tested first scattering measure, so that the security feature can be considered genuine. In this determination, the results for the dispersion of forged documents of value can also be used, if any.
  • the evaluation device 31 determines in step S24 what proportion of the pixel data for pixels corresponding to locations in the section 48 within the first reference area Hegen by calculating for each pixel the Mahalanobis distance in the RB plane and is compared to the maximum distance value. If the Mahalanobis distance is less than or equal to the maximum distance value, the pixel data is in the first reference range, otherwise outside. After the share has been determined, the share will have the predetermined first minimum hit value.
  • step S26 the evaluation device 31 or the processor 34 checks whether a first scattering of the pixel data that is within the first reference range is greater than a predetermined scattering minimum value. This sum will compare to the given first minimum scatter value.
  • step S28 the evaluation device 31 or the processor 34 then determines, in accordance with step S24, the proportion of that pixel data of the pixel used for checking the security feature, ie the pixels in the section 48 which are within the second reference range, by the pixel data of a respective one of the pixel Pixel is checked in each case whether the Mahalano-bis distance in the G-IR plane is smaller than the corresponding second maximum distance value. If the proportion is determined, the processor 34 checks whether it exceeds the corresponding second hit minimum value.
  • step S30 the evaluation device 31 or the processor 34 forms an authenticity signal depending on the tests in steps S24 to S28, which reproduces an authenticity indication, for example by its level or its shape, i. whether the security feature is considered genuine or not.
  • an authenticity indication for example by its level or its shape, i. whether the security feature is considered genuine or not.
  • a corresponding value is stored in the memory 36.
  • the authenticity signal is formed such that it represents an authenticity only if the first number or the first proportion exceeds the first match, the first scatter exceeds the first scatter minimum and the second share exceeds the second hit minimum.
  • a second embodiment in Fig. 6 differs from the first embodiment in that the step S22 is omitted and instead the steps S24 to S28 are replaced by step S24 1 to S28 1 .
  • steps S24 'to S28 1 differ from the steps S24 and S28 only in that the parameters for the first and second criteria and the first and second reference ranges are set in dependence on the local state value.
  • the parameters for Mood of the Maholanobis distance ie in particular the mean values, variances and covariances functions of the local state value.
  • the local state value can assume only two values, so that only one corresponding parameter set needs to be stored for each of the state values; depending on the local state value determined for the section, the respective parameter set is then used.
  • a typical for the OVI element or the security feature with optically variable ink scattering of the pixel data which lie within an elliptic curve representing a curve equal Mahalanobis distances. If a normal copier color were used to forge the security feature, pixel data could possibly result that had the same average in the R-B plane, but not the characteristic scatter. The same applies in the example for the pixel data in the G-IR plane.
  • a third exemplary embodiment in FIG. 8 differs from the first exemplary embodiment in that the evaluation device 31, as an additional step S32, carries out a check as to whether the scattering of the pixel data within the second reference region exceeds a second scatter minimum value specified for the security feature.
  • the second minimum scatter value was previously set analogous to the first minimum scatter value.
  • the scattering measure used here is the total variance in the G-IR plane, ie the sum of the variances of the G components and of the IR components of those pixel data which are included in the second reference. lying in the area.
  • the second scattering minimum value can be determined analogously to the first exemplary embodiment.
  • the evaluation device 31 executes the step S30 'instead of the step S30.
  • step S30 differs from step S30 solely in that the authenticity signal is formed in such a way that it represents an authenticity indication only if, in addition to the conditions in the first exemplary embodiment, the scattering of the pixel data within the second reference range also exceeds the predetermined second scattering minimum value. This leads to a further increased accuracy of the test for optical security features, which also have a typical scattering in the G-IR properties.
  • FIG. 9 shows a corresponding variant of the first embodiment
  • FIG 10 shows a representation corresponding to FIG.
  • the steps S22 to S30 are adapted to the other color space; In particular, the reference ranges and the corresponding criteria are adapted accordingly. For them, therefore, the same reference numerals are used in Fig. 9, as in the first embodiment.
  • the chrominance (hue) H, the saturation S and the intensity I are now used as pixel data in the color space HSI.
  • the method steps S22 to S30 formally correspond to those of the corresponding steps of the first embodiment, wherein a and b are replaced by H and S and the reference ranges For example, according to Fig. 10 may be selected.
  • the embodiments corresponding to the second and third exemplary embodiments result for the HSI color space. Further exemplary embodiments in FIGS.
  • step S18 ' is provided after step S16 of the method, in which the pixel data are transformed into a device-independent color space, in the example another CIE color space, so that the following steps in a corresponding manner, in particular by a different indication Reference ranges and the criteria are adapted.
  • the computer 34 transforms at least the pixel data for the section into a device-independent color space, in the example the CIE Lab color space. In the example, all pixel data of the overall image are transformed. In other exemplary embodiments, this step can also be carried out together with one of the preceding steps.
  • the pixel data in the CIE Lab color space is then used for the following process steps. These steps are indicated in the figures by the use of a "T” instead of an "S" but are different from the steps of those previously described except for the use of corresponding matched reference areas and criteria for pixel data to be in the respective reference area embodiments.
  • T a "T”
  • S a "S”
  • two reference areas are used in which pixel data should be located.
  • the first reference region lies in the ab plane of the CIE Lab color space (see Fig. 14a), the second in a plane spanned by the luminance axis of the CIE Lab color values and the IR remission axis (cf. 14b). In Figs.
  • the reference ranges and the parameters for the criteria have been determined prior to the execution of the method by detecting the pixel data for those pixels which are also used in the test for fresh-print value documents as reference documents. For this pixel data, the mean values of the ab components or L-IR components and their variances and covariances are then determined assuming a normal distribution to determine the respective reference range and the respective criterion, according to the pixel data within the respective reference range Hegen.
  • the first reference range and the first criterion are then given by the fact that for the pixel data of a pixel relevant for the first criterion, the a- and b-components, the Mahalanobis distance in the Level is determined and it is checked whether the Mahalanobis distance is smaller than a predetermined first maximum distance value
  • the parameters for calculating the Mahalanobis distance depend in a known manner on the previously determined averages, variances and covariances.
  • the maximum distance value was determined on the basis of the reference documents.
  • the second reference range and the second criterion are given by the fact that for pixel data of a pixel, in this case the L and IR components, the Mahalanobis distance in the L-IR plane which is dependent on the corresponding mean values, variances and covariances is determined and checked whether the Mahalanobis distance is less than a predetermined second maximum distance value determined for the reference documents.
  • the portion itself is used as a measure of the proportion of the pixel data that lie within the respective reference range.
  • a minimum Tref- minimum value is set, which must be exceeded by the Hitmped, here the proportion of pixel data in the respective reference range and which is characteristic of a real security feature or a real value document
  • a minimum score can be determined by examining the Reference value documents and, if already known, falsified value documents are determined with the fake security feature.
  • the scattering of the pixel data which lies within the first reference range is additionally determined and compared with a scattering minimum value.
  • the total variance ie the sum of the variances of the a component and the b component
  • the minimum scattering value is used as scattering or scattering measure.
  • the total variance ie the sum of the variances of the a component and the b component
  • the minimum scattering value is determined for each of the reference value documents for the pixel data within the first reference range as the first scattering measure.
  • a scattering mean al scattering minimum value which must be exceeded by a determined for a security feature to be tested first scattering measure, so that the security feature can be considered genuine.
  • the results for the dispersion of forged documents of value can also be used, if available.
  • the evaluation device 31 determines in step T24 which portion of the pixel data for pixels corresponding to locations in the section 48 lie within the first reference area by calculating the Mahalanobis distance in the ab plane for each pixel and is compared with the maximum distance value. If the Mahalanobis distance is less than or equal to the maximum distance value, the pixel data will be in the first reference range, otherwise outside. After determining the share, the share is compared with the predetermined first minimum hit value.
  • step T26 the evaluation device 31 or the processor 34 checks whether a first scatter of the pixel data lying within the first reference range is greater than a predetermined minimum scatter value. This sum is compared with the predetermined first minimum scatter value.
  • step T28 the evaluation device 31 or the processor 34 then determines, in accordance with step S24, the proportion of that pixel data of the pixel used for checking the security feature, ie the pixels in the section 48 that lie within the second reference region Hegen, for the pixel data each of the pixels is checked to see if the Mahalanobis distance in the L-IR plane is smaller than the corresponding second maximum distance value. If the proportion is determined, the processor 34 checks whether it exceeds the corresponding second minimum hit value. In step T30, the evaluation device 31 or the processor 34 forms an authenticity signal as a function of the tests in steps T24 to T28, as in the first exemplary embodiment.
  • a second embodiment in Fig. 12 differs from the embodiment in Fig. 11 in that the step T22 is omitted and instead the steps T24 to T28 are replaced by the steps T24 1 to T28 '.
  • These steps T24 'to T28' differ from steps T24 and T28 analogously to the second embodiment only in that the parameters for the first and second criteria and the first and second reference ranges are set in dependence on the local state value.
  • the parameters for determining the Maholanobis distance ie in particular the mean values, variances and covariances, can be functions of the local state value.
  • the local state value can assume only two values, so that only one corresponding parameter set needs to be stored for each of the state values; depending on the local state value determined for the section, the respective parameter set is then used.
  • a further exemplary embodiment in FIG. 12 differs from the first exemplary embodiment in that the evaluation device 31, as an additional step T32, performs a check as to whether the scattering of the pixel data within the second reference range exceeds a second scatter minimum value specified for the security feature.
  • the second minimum scatter value was previously set analogous to the first minimum scatter value.
  • the scattering measure used here is the total variance in the L-IR plane, ie the sum of the variances of the L-IR plane. Components and the IR components of those pixel data that are in the second reference range.
  • the second scattering minimum value can be determined analogously to the first exemplary embodiment.
  • the evaluation device 31 executes the step T30 'instead of the step T30.
  • step T30 This is different from the third embodiment of the step T30 solely in that the authenticity signal is formed so that it represents a Echmeits treat only if in addition to the conditions in the first embodiment, the scattering of the pixel data within the second reference range, the predetermined second scatter minimum value exceeds.
  • the authenticity signal is formed so that it represents a Echmeits treat only if in addition to the conditions in the first embodiment, the scattering of the pixel data within the second reference range, the predetermined second scatter minimum value exceeds.
  • the section is only a rectangle in a center of the security feature, but not the smallest rectangle surrounding the security feature.
  • pixel data that only reproduces colors is used.
  • the second criterion and the second reference range can then be given by the fact that the L-component must be within a predetermined value range, so that the pixel data are within the second reference range.
  • Still further exemplary embodiments differ from the described exemplary embodiments in that an embossed structure with a pressure formed on certain flanks of the embossed structure, which has an optically variable effect, is used as the optical security feature.
  • embossed structures are described in the applications WO 97/17211 AI, WO 02/20280 AI, WO 2004/022355 A2, WO 2006/018232 AI the applicant.
  • Still further exemplary embodiments differ from the described exemplary embodiments only in that a sensor is used as the sensor, as described in WO 96/36021 A1, the contents of which are incorporated by reference into the description. Other embodiments differ from those described
  • Embodiments in which the HSI or the CIE Lab color space are used in that only the first reference range is used, so that the steps S28 and T28 can be omitted and the steps S30 and T30 are changed accordingly, so that the Only if the number of pixel data in the first reference region exceeds the minimum component value and the dispersion of the pixel data within the first reference region exceeds the first minimum dispersion value.
  • Still further examples differ from those described above in that no IR component is present.
  • the second reference range is then one-dimensional and the second criterion adapted accordingly.
  • the evaluation device can be integrated into the sensor.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé pour contrôler un signe de sécurité optique prédéfini dans ou sur une partie prédéfinie d'un document de valeur sur la base de données de pixels d'une image de ladite partie prédéfinie qui sont associées respectivement à des emplacements dans ou sur ladite partie et qui reproduisent des propriétés optiques du document de valeur auxdits emplacements. Ce procédé consiste à contrôler si un premier nombre des pixels ou une première proportion des pixels de l'image, dont les données de pixels se situent, selon un premier critère prédéfini, à l'intérieur d'une première plage de référence prédéfinie pour le signe de sécurité, dépasse une première valeur minimale de coïncidence prédéfinie pour le signe de sécurité et si une première dispersion des données des pixels, qui se situent, selon le premier critère, à l'intérieur de la première plage de référence pour les données de pixels, dépasse une première valeur minimale de dispersion prédéfinie pour le signe de sécurité. Ledit procédé consiste également à générer, en fonction du résultat du contrôle, un signal d'authenticité qui représente une indication d'authenticité uniquement lorsque le premier nombre ou la première proportion dépassent la première valeur minimale de coïncidence et la dispersion dépasse la première valeur minimale de dispersion.
EP11769788.8A 2010-10-08 2011-10-07 Procédé pour contrôler un signe de sécurité optique d'un document de valeur Active EP2625673B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102010047948A DE102010047948A1 (de) 2010-10-08 2010-10-08 Verfahren zum Prüfen eines optischen Sicherheitsmerkmals eines Wertdokuments
PCT/EP2011/005025 WO2012045472A2 (fr) 2010-10-08 2011-10-07 Procédé pour contrôler un signe de sécurité optique d'un document de valeur

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2625673A2 true EP2625673A2 (fr) 2013-08-14
EP2625673B1 EP2625673B1 (fr) 2020-12-09

Family

ID=44799981

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11769788.8A Active EP2625673B1 (fr) 2010-10-08 2011-10-07 Procédé pour contrôler un signe de sécurité optique d'un document de valeur

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US9147108B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP2625673B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN103155008B (fr)
DE (1) DE102010047948A1 (fr)
RU (1) RU2598296C2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2012045472A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102011114410A1 (de) * 2011-09-26 2013-03-28 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren zum Prüfen der Herstellungsqualität eines optischen Sicherheitsmerkmals eines Wertdokuments
DE102012016828A1 (de) * 2012-08-24 2014-02-27 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung von Wertdokumenten
CN103280016B (zh) * 2013-06-09 2015-04-15 北京印钞有限公司 小张清分机上ovmi光彩油墨、珠光油墨和全息膜的检测方法
CN103645143B (zh) * 2013-12-09 2016-07-06 广州广电运通金融电子股份有限公司 一种多光谱券类质量检测方法和系统
CN104537756B (zh) * 2015-01-22 2018-04-20 广州广电运通金融电子股份有限公司 一种基于Lab色彩空间的钞票分类鉴别方法和装置
CN104574642B (zh) * 2015-01-30 2017-04-26 广州广电运通金融电子股份有限公司 一种基于Lab色彩空间的人民币变色油墨检测方法和装置
FR3053126B1 (fr) * 2016-06-27 2019-07-26 Saint-Gobain Glass France Procede et dispositif de localisation de l'origine d'un defaut affectant un empilement de couches minces deposees sur un substrat
CN106373255B (zh) * 2016-09-20 2019-04-26 深圳怡化电脑股份有限公司 一种纸币鉴伪方法及装置
CN108629887B (zh) * 2017-03-17 2021-02-02 深圳怡化电脑股份有限公司 纸币识别方法和装置
EP3503046B1 (fr) * 2017-12-22 2020-10-14 CI Tech Sensors AG Système de détection d'une caractéristique de sécurité lisible par machine d'un document de valeur, ledit système comportant un dispositif de traitement et une caméra connectée audit dispositif ainsi que procédé de remplacement d'une caméra d'un tel système

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4A (en) * 1836-08-10 Stock
US4618257A (en) 1984-01-06 1986-10-21 Standard Change-Makers, Inc. Color-sensitive currency verifier
US5931277A (en) 1995-05-09 1999-08-03 Mars, Incorporated Money validation system using acceptance criteria
DE19517194A1 (de) 1995-05-11 1996-11-14 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Prüfung von Blattgut, wie z.B. Banknoten oder Wertpapiere
DE19541064A1 (de) 1995-11-03 1997-05-07 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Datenträger mit einem optisch variablen Element
US6516078B1 (en) * 1999-07-29 2003-02-04 Hewlett-Packard Company Multi-level detection and deterrence of counterfeiting of documents with reduced false detection
US6621916B1 (en) * 1999-09-02 2003-09-16 West Virginia University Method and apparatus for determining document authenticity
DE10044465A1 (de) 2000-09-08 2002-03-21 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Datenträger mit einem optisch variablen Element
EP1217589B1 (fr) * 2000-12-15 2007-02-21 MEI, Inc. Dispositif de validation de monnaie
GB0106817D0 (en) * 2001-03-19 2001-05-09 Rue De Int Ltd Monitoring method
CA2496829C (fr) 2002-08-13 2011-06-28 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Support de donnees avec element a variabilite optique
AU2003902810A0 (en) * 2003-06-04 2003-06-26 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Method of encoding a latent image
US20050100204A1 (en) * 2003-11-06 2005-05-12 Spectra Systems Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting fluorescent particles contained in a substrate
DE102004024620A1 (de) * 2004-05-18 2005-12-08 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Prüfung von Banknoten
DE102005011612A1 (de) 2004-08-13 2006-02-23 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Datenträger mit einer optisch variablen Struktur
DE102006053788A1 (de) 2006-11-15 2008-05-21 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren zur Erkennung von Verschmutzungen im Bereich von Farbübergängen auf Wertdokumenten und Mittel zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
US20090008925A1 (en) * 2007-05-07 2009-01-08 Centre Suisse D'electronique Et De Microtechnique Sa Security device for the identification or authentication of goods and method for securing goods using such a security device
US8263948B2 (en) * 2009-11-23 2012-09-11 Honeywell International Inc. Authentication apparatus for moving value documents

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2012045472A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
RU2013120913A (ru) 2014-11-20
WO2012045472A3 (fr) 2012-07-05
DE102010047948A1 (de) 2012-04-12
CN103155008A (zh) 2013-06-12
WO2012045472A2 (fr) 2012-04-12
EP2625673B1 (fr) 2020-12-09
CN103155008B (zh) 2016-09-28
RU2598296C2 (ru) 2016-09-20
US20130170747A1 (en) 2013-07-04
US9147108B2 (en) 2015-09-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2625673B1 (fr) Procédé pour contrôler un signe de sécurité optique d'un document de valeur
EP2095341B1 (fr) Procédé de détection des encrassements et/ou l'usure de l'encre dans la zone des transitions de couleur sur des documents de valeur et moyens en vue de mettre en oeuvre le procédé
EP2761604B1 (fr) Procédé de contrôle de la qualité de fabrication d'une caractéristique de sécurité d'un document de valeur
DE2824849C2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Feststellung des Zustandes und/oder der Echtheit von Blattgut
EP1625936A2 (fr) Procédé d'évaluation qualitative d'un matériau portant au moins une caractéristique d'identification
DE10234431A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Bearbeitung von Wertdokumenten
EP2795589B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de contrôle d'un élément de sécurité d'un document de valeur
WO2012084145A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détermination d'un ensemble de données de référence de classe, pour la classification de documents de valeur
DE69821445T2 (de) Vorrichtung zum Unterscheiden von Blättern
DE69416098T2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Kennzeichnung und Unterscheidung von legalen Banknoten und Dokumenten
WO2011082792A1 (fr) Procédé pour vérifier des documents de valeur
WO2017178111A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de vérification de documents de valeur, en particulier des billets de banque, et système de traitement de documents de valeur
EP2394250B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour vérifier des documents par utilisation d'une transformation en ondelettes
EP3210195B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de vérification de documents de valeur, en particulier des billets de banque, et système de traitement de documents de valeur
EP2656327A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour l'examen de l'état optique de documents de valeur
WO2011082793A1 (fr) Procédé pour vérifier des documents de valeur
WO2014029476A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de contrôle de documents fiduciaires
DE102020004284A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Prüfen von Wertdokumenten und Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Erzeugen von Prüfparametern zur Verwendung bei einem Verfahren zum Prüfen von Wertdokumenten
WO2024012634A1 (fr) Capteur et procédé de vérification de documents de valeur comprenant au moins un élément de sécurité réfléchissant
EP4256538A1 (fr) Capteur et procédé pour vérifier des documents de valeurs

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130508

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20170406

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200305

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)
INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200728

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1344190

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20201215

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502011017006

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210309

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210310

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210309

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20201209

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210409

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502011017006

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210409

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20210910

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20211021

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20211022

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210409

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20211031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211007

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 502011017006

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20111007

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221031

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221031

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221031

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231025

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231031

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20231019

Year of fee payment: 13

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209