EP2617672A1 - Speed governor for elevator - Google Patents
Speed governor for elevator Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2617672A1 EP2617672A1 EP10857275.1A EP10857275A EP2617672A1 EP 2617672 A1 EP2617672 A1 EP 2617672A1 EP 10857275 A EP10857275 A EP 10857275A EP 2617672 A1 EP2617672 A1 EP 2617672A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sheave
- stopper
- fly
- speed
- weight
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 107
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 230000001174 ascending effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 claims description 27
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 abstract description 23
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/02—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions
- B66B5/04—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions for detecting excessive speed
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/02—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions
- B66B5/04—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions for detecting excessive speed
- B66B5/044—Mechanical overspeed governors
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an elevator governor.
- an overspeed detection mechanism set so as to be adapted to the descent speed of the car operates also during the ascent of the car. For this reason, it is impossible to perform overspeed detection adapted to each of the ascent speed and the descent speed of the car.
- Patent Document 1 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2000-327241
- the present invention was made to solve the problems described above, and the object of the invention is to provide an elevator governor capable of achieving, with a simple configuration, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.
- An elevator governor of the present invention includes a sheave on which a rope moving in response to the movement of an ascending and descending body of an elevator is wound, and which changes the rotation speed in one direction in response to the ascent speed of the ascending and descending body and changes the rotation speed in the other direction in response to the descent speed of the ascending and descending body; a fly-weight which is provided on a side surface of the sheave and increases and decreases a moving quantity to a radial outer side of the sheave in response to an increase and decrease in the rotation speed of the sheave; a detector which performs overspeed detection of the sheave when the fly-weight has moved to the radial outer side by a predetermined quantity; a stopper which is provided in the sheave and performs a rotational movement with respect to the sheave so as to be arranged to the radial outer side of the fly-weight in the case where the sheave rotates in a predetermined direction which is either of the two rotational directions, thereby preventing the
- the shaft of an elevator is formed from a space extending in the vertical direction through the floors of a building.
- a machine room is provided in the upper part of the haft.
- a traction machine is provided in the machine room.
- a hoisting rope is wound on the traction machine.
- a car of the elevator is suspended at an end of the hoisting rope.
- a weight is suspended at the other end of the hoisting rope.
- the rotation of the traction machine is controlled by a controller. The car and the weight ascend and descend at a set speed by responding to the rotation of the traction machine.
- a safety gear device is provided in the lower part of the car.
- An endless governor rope is connected to the safety gear device via an arm.
- a curved portion at the lower end of the governor rope is wound on a tension pulley.
- a curved portion at the upper end of the governor rope is wound on a sheave of the governor provided in the machine room and the like.
- FIG 1 is a front view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
- Figure 2 is a sectional view taken along line A-A of Figure 1 .
- reference numeral 1 denotes a governor.
- the governor 1 is provided with a sheave 2.
- the sheave 2 is pivotally supported on a main shaft 3.
- a governor rope 4 is wound on the sheave 2.
- the governor rope 4 is attached to a car in an endless manner.
- the governor rope 4 moves in response to the movement of the car.
- the governor rope 4 rotates the sheave 2 in response to the ascent and descent of the car. That is, the sheave 2 changes the rotation speed in one direction according to the ascent speed of the car and changes the rotation speed in the other direction according to the descent speed of the car.
- a pair of disk type fly-weights 5 is rotatably provided on a side surface of the sheave 2 via a pin 6. Both of the fly-weights 5 increase and decrease the moving quantity to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 along the side surface of the sheave 2 as a result of an increase and decrease in the rotation speed of the sheave 2. Both of the fly-weights 5 are connected by a link 7. As a result of this, the two fly-weights 5 have the same rotational angle.
- a balance spring 9 is provided at an end of one of the fly-weights 5 via a link 8. This balance spring 9 constantly urges either of the fly-weights 5 to the center side of the sheave 2.
- a spring force adjusting nut 10 is provided in the link 8. The spring force adjusting nut 10 adjusts the urging force of the balance spring 9.
- a dog 11 is provided at an end of the other fly-weight 5 in such a manner as to be directed to the radial outer side of the sheave 2.
- An actuating cam 12 is provided in proximity to the side of one side portion of the sheave 2.
- the actuating cam 12 is provided in a governor switch 13.
- the governor switch 13 comes into action when the actuating cam 12 moves up and down.
- a rope catch 14 is provided in proximity to the governor rope 4 on the side where the car is mounted.
- the rope catch 14 is suspended by being caught by the lower end of a hook 15.
- This hook 15 is pivotally supported in the center via a pin 16.
- a fixed shoe 17 is provided on a side opposed to the rope catch 14. As a result of this, the governor rope 4 is surrounded by the rope catch 14 and the fixed shoe 17 below one side portion of the sheave 2.
- a stopper 18 is provided.
- the main body of this stopper 18 is rotatably provided in the main shaft 3.
- a pair of locking notched portions 19 is provided in the main body of the stopper 18.
- the end portions of the locking notched portions 19 on the center side of the sheave 2 are connected by a connecting notched portion 20.
- the connecting notched portion 20 is formed in the shape of a circular arc, with the main shaft 3 serving as the center.
- One end 22 of a lever 21 is inserted in such a manner as to be freely movable along the connecting notched portion 20.
- the other end 23 of the lever 21 is pivotally supported by the sheave 2.
- a pin 24 is provided in the sheave 2 in such a manner as to protrude to the stopper 18 side. Also in the lever 21, a pin 25 is provided in such a manner as to protrude to the sheave 2 side. Between the pins 24 and 25, there is provided a helical tension spring 26. The helical tension spring 26 constantly urges the lever 21 to the center side of the sheave 2.
- Figures 3 to 5 are front views showing the essential parts of the elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
- the dog 11 at the forward end of the fly-weight 5 abuts against the actuating cam 12.
- This abutment causes the governor switch 13 to operate. That is, the actuating cam 12 and the governor switch 13 function as a detector which performs the overspeed detection of the sheave 2 when the fly-weight 5 has moved to the outer side by a predetermined quantity regardless of the ascent and descent of the car.
- the power to the traction machine and brake of the elevator is interrupted by the operation of the governor switch 13. Usually, the car stops due to this interruption.
- the mass of the lever 21 and the spring constant of the helical tension spring 26 are determined so that the lever 21 moves to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 when the rotation speed of the sheave 2 has exceeded a predetermined threshold value.
- the stopper 18 is pressed against one end 22 of the lever 21 in the rotational direction of the sheave 2. As a result of this, the stopper 18 rotates together with the sheave 2.
- the ascent direction exceeds the rated speed and the fly-wheel 2 is almost about to move to the radial outer side of the sheave 5.
- a protruding end of the stopper 18 is arranged on the radial outer side of the sheave 2 with respect to the fly-weight 5. For this reason, the fly-weight 5 interferes with the protruding end of the stopper 18 when the fly-weight 5 moves outside more than the predetermined quantity.
- the fly-weight 5 can scarcely move to the radial outer side of the sheave 2. That is, even when the ascent speed of the car has reached a first overspeed detection speed, the dog 11 at the forward end of the fly-weight 5 does not abut against the actuating cam 12. For this reason, the governor switch 13 does not operate, either.
- the stopper 18 is almost about to rotate at an almost constant speed by the law of inertia even when the sheave 2 has decelerated. For this reason, as shown in Figure 4 , the stopper 18 rotates relatively with respect to the sheave 2. Subsequently, when the car has accelerated in the descent direction, the stopper 18 is pressed by one end 22 of the lever 21. As a result of this, the stopper 18 rotates together with the sheave 2.
- Figure 6 is a block diagram of a malfunction detection device which is used in the elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
- an encoder 27 is provided in the vicinity of the main shaft 3 of the governor 1.
- the encoder 27 functions as rotational position detection means which outputs a pulse signal responding to the rotational direction of the sheave 2 when the sheave 2 has moved to a prescribed rotational position.
- the pulse signal is inputted to a malfunction detection device 28.
- the malfunction detection device 28 is provided with a proximity sensor 29 and a stopper position detection part 30.
- the proximity sensor 29 is arranged just above the sheave 2.
- the proximity sensor 29 is formed from a distance sensor of the eddy current type, the optical type, and the electrostatic capacity type and the like.
- an area in a prescribed range below the proximity sensor 29 is the detection region.
- the proximity sensor 29 functions as object detection means which outputs a detection signal in the case where an object is present in the detection region.
- Angular position information of the stopper 18 during the rotation of the governor 1 in the ascent direction is stored beforehand in the stopper position detection part 30.
- Angular position information of the stopper 18 during the rotation of the governor 1 in the descent direction is stored beforehand in the stopper position detection part 30.
- the stopper position detection part 30 functions as determination means which makes a determination as to whether or not the stopper 18 is in a prescribed position on the basis of the rotational position of the sheave 2 during the detection of the stopper 18 by the proximity sensor 29.
- the stopper 18 prevents the fly-weight 5 from moving to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 more than the predetermined quantity while the sheave 2 is rotating in a predetermined direction which is either of the two rotational directions. For this reason, it is possible to provide an elevator governor capable of achievineg, with a simple configuration, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.
- the main body of the stopper 18 is held by the lever 21. on the radial outer side of the sheave 2 with respect to the fly-weight 5.
- the main body of the stopper 18 is held by the lever 21 on the radial outer side of the sheave 2 with respect to the fly-weight 5.
- the threshold value of the rotation speed of the sheave 2 for which one end 22 of the lever 21 moves to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 be set beforehand to the order of a half of the rated speed of the ascent and descent speeds of the car, whichever is lower. In this case, it is possible to effectively prevent unintended overspeed detection. Performing overspeed detection only when the car is running in the ascent direction of the car, can be accomplished by configuring the stopper 18 so that the movement of the fly-weight 5 is not prevented while the sheave 2 is rotating in the ascent direction of the car.
- the malfunction detection device 28 makes a determination on the position of the stopper 18. For this reason, it is possible to detect malfunctions of the stopper 18.
- FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a malfunction detection device used in an elevator governor in Embodiment 2 of the present invention. Incidentally, parts which are the same as in Embodiment 1 or similar to those of Embodiment 1 bear the same reference characters and descriptions of such parts are omitted.
- a disk of the sheave 2 of Embodiment 2 is provided with reference plates 31a, 31b.
- the reference plates 31a, 31b are arranged in positions shifted 180 degrees from the center of the sheave 2 as the standard.
- a stopper 18a which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 30 degrees from the reference plate 31a (in a position shifted 150 degrees form the reference plate 3 1b), with the center of the sheave 2 serving as the standard.
- a stopper 18b which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 30 degrees from the reference plate 31b (in a position shifted 150 degrees form the reference plate 31a), with the center of the sheave 2 serving as the standard
- the stopper 18a which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 60 degrees from the reference plate 31a (in a position shifted 120 degrees form the reference plate 31 b), with the center of the sheave 2 serving as the standard.
- the stopper 18b which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 60 degrees from the reference plate 3 1b (in a position shifted 120 degrees form the reference plate 31a), with the center of the sheave 2 serving as the standard.
- a malfunction detection device 32 of Embodiment 2 is provided with a proximity sensor part 33, a stopper position detection part 34, and a stopper position determination part 35.
- the proximity sensor part 33 detects the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31 a, 31 b.
- the stopper position detection part 34 detects the positions of the stoppers 18a, 18b with respect to the sheave 2.
- the stopper position determination part 35 makes a determination on the rotational direction of the sheave 2.
- the stopper position determination part 35 makes a determination as to whether or not the stoppers 18a, 18b are in correct positions with respect to the rotational direction of the sheave 2.
- Figure 8 is a diagram to explain an example of signal output of the encoder 27 used in the elevator governor in Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
- the abscissa of Figure 8 indicates time.
- the ordinate of Figure 8 indicates the output of the proximity sensor part 33.
- Figure 8 shows the case where the sheave 2 is rotating in the decent direction.
- the reference plate 31a is detected.
- the time interval at this time is denoted by t0.
- the stopper 18b is detected.
- the time interval at this time is denoted by t1.
- the sheave 2 has rotated 60 degrees by taking time t0
- the reference plate 31 b is detected.
- the stopper 18a is detected again.
- Embodiment 2 a determination is made as to whether or not the stoppers 18a, 18b are in correct positions on the basis of the rotational position and rotational direction of the sheave 2 during the detection of the stoppers 18a, 18b. For this reason, it is possible to positively detect malfunctions of the stoppers 18a, 18b.
- the number of times of object detection by the proximity sensor part 33 during one rotation of the sheave 2 is uniquely determined by the installed number of the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31a, 31b. Using this fact, it is possible to provide signal output means which outputs a malfunction signal in the case where the number of times of object detection by the proximity sensor part 33 during one rotation of the sheave 2 is different from a total number of the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31a, 31b. It is possible to make a determination, from a malfunction signal, that a malfunction, of the proximity sensor part 33 and an abnormal operation of the governor 1 occurred.
- prohibition means which prohibits a determination on the positions of the stoppers 18a, 18b in the case where the rotation speed of the sheave 2 is lower than the speed at which the fly-weight 5 is moved to the radial outer side by a prescribed quantity. In this case, it is possible to suppress an unnecessary detection action.
- signal output means which outputs a malfunction signal in the case where the rotation speed of the sheave 2 is higher than the speed at which the fly-weight 5 is moved to the radial outer side by a prescribed quantity and the stoppers 18a, 18b are not in correct positions. It is possible to make a determination, from a malfunction signal, that a malfunction of the stoppers 18a, 18b and a wrong detection of the malfunction detection device 32 occurred.
- a malfunction signal may include information for bringing a brake installed in the traction machine driving the elevator into action. If a control device of the elevator brings the brake into action on the basis of a malfunction signal, it is possible to stop the elevator. As a result of this, it is possible to improve the safety of the elevator.
- Figure 9 is a front view showing the essential part of an elevator governor in Embodiment 3 of the present invention. Incidentally, parts which are the same as in Embodiment 1 or corresponding pats bear like numerals and descriptions of these parts are omitted.
- Embodiment 1 all of the locking notched portion 19 of the stopper 18, the connecting notched 20, the lever 21, the pins 24, 25, and the helical tension spring 26 are provided in a quantity of one.
- Embodiment 3 all of the locking notched portion 19 of the stopper 18, the connecting notched 20, the lever 21, the pins 24, 25, and the helical tension spring 26 are provided symmetrically with respect to the main shaft 3 in a plurality of numbers.
- Figure 10 is a front view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 4 of the present invention.
- Figure 11 is a sectional view taken along line B-B of Figure 10 .
- parts which are the same as in Embodiment 1 or similar to those of Embodiment 1 bear the same reference characters and descriptions of such parts are omitted.
- the governor 1 of Embodiment 4 differs from the governor of Embodiment 1 in the configuration of the fly-weight, the shape of the stopper 18 and the like.
- the governor 1 of Embodiment 4 will be described below.
- reference numeral 36 denotes a pair of linear motion bearings.
- the linear motion bearings 36 are each attached to a side surface of the sheave 2 via a fixed portion 37.
- a fly-weight 38 is inserted into the linear motion bearing 36.
- the linear motion bearing 36 may be a sliding bearing using sliding friction or a ball and roller bearing using the frictions of balls and rollers.
- a spring force adjusting nut 39 is provided in the fly-weight 38.
- a balance spring 40 is provided between the spring force adjusting nut 39 and the fixed portion 37. The balance spring 40 constantly urges the fly-weight 38 to the center side of the sheave 2.
- the fly-weight 38 receives a centrifugal force responding to the rotation speed of the sheave 2. While the car is ascending and descending within a rated speed, the force by the balance spring 40 is larger than the centrifugal force applied to the fly-weight 38. For this reason, the relative position of the fly-weight 38 and the sheave 2 does not change from the initial set state.
- the forward end of the fly-weight 38 abuts against the actuating cam 12.
- This abutment causes the governor switch 13 to operate. That is, the actuating cam 12 and the governor switch 13 function as a detector which performs the overspeed detection of the sheave 2 when the fly-weight 38 has moved to the outer side by a predetermined quantity regardless of the ascent and descent of the car.
- the power to the traction machine and brake of the elevator is interrupted by the operation of the governor switch 13. Usually, the car stops due to this interruption.
- Embodiment 4 described above it is possible to achieve an overspeed detection mechanism having the same effect as in Embodiment 1 to which rotation dependence is added even when the disk type fly-weights 5 are not used.
- Figure 12 is a view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 5 of the present invention, which is equivalent to Figure 11 .
- parts which are the same as in Embodiment 4 or corresponding pats bear like numerals and descriptions of these parts are omitted.
- Embodiment 4 one overspeed detection mechanism is provided, whereas in Embodiment 5 two overspeed detection mechanisms are provided.
- the overspeed detection mechanisms operate independently from each other.
- the governor 1 of Embodiment 5 will be described with the aid of Figure 9 .
- reference numeral 41 denotes a rotary body.
- the rotary body 41 is fixed to one side surface of the sheave 2. That is, the rotary body has the function of rotating together with the sheave 2.
- One overspeed detection mechanism is provided on the other side surface.
- One overspeed detection mechanism is provided with a stopper 18 similar to that of Embodiment 3.
- the other overspeed detection mechanism is provided on one side surface of the rotary body 41.
- the other overspeed detection mechanism is not provided with a stopper 18.
- One overspeed detection mechanism is set to match a rated speed in the descent direction of the car.
- One overspeed detection mechanism is such that the operation thereof is limited by the stopper 18 during the ascent of the car before the speed becomes higher than the rated speed in the descent direction of the car.
- the other overspeed detection mechanism is set to match a rated speed in the ascent direction of the car.
- This governor 1 is provided in an elevator in which the ascent direction of the car is higher than the descent speed.
- Embodiment 5 in an elevator in which the ascent direction of the car is higher than the descent speed, it is possible to perform overspeed detection adapted to each of the ascent speed and the descent speed.
- the detection speed of the overspeed detection mechanism whose operation is limited by the stopper 18 is set to match a rated speed in the ascent direction of the car, and the governor 1 whose operation is not limited by the stopper 18 is set to be adaptable to a rated speed in the descent direction of the car.
- Embodiments 1 to 5 the description was given of the configurations in which the stopper 18 is provided in the car-side governor 1. However, the same effect as in Embodiments 1 to 5 is obtained even when the stopper 18 is provided in the weight-side governor 1.
- the elevator governor of the present invention can be used in an elevator in which, with a simple configuration, is achieved an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to an elevator governor.
- There are a disk type governor and a fly ball type governor as elevator governors which have hitherto been widely used. Overspeed detection mechanisms of conventional governors have no rotation speed dependence. For this reason, overspeed detection is performed at the same speed in all rotational directions.
- However, for example, in a car-side governor of an elevator in which the ascent speed of a car is higher than the decent speed, an overspeed detection mechanism set so as to be adapted to the descent speed of the car operates also during the ascent of the car. For this reason, it is impossible to perform overspeed detection adapted to each of the ascent speed and the descent speed of the car.
- In contrast to this, there have been proposed governors which are such that one governor is provided with two independent overspeed detection mechanisms having different detection operation speeds. In such governors, the rotation of a sheave is transmitted to an overspeed detection mechanism having a low detection operation speed via a ratchet. On the other hand, the rotation of a sheave is not transmitted to the other overspeed detection mechanism having a high detection operation speed via a ratchet, because the ratchet becomes free. As a result of this, in the car-side governor of an elevator in which the ascent speed of a car is higher than the descent speed, it is possible to carry out overspeed detection adapted to each of the ascent speed and the descent speed (refer to
Patent Document 1, for example). - Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.
2000-327241 - However, in the governor disclosed in
Patent Document 1, vibrations and noises are generated from the ratchet while rotating is performed in the direction in which the ratchet becomes free, and besides the reliability of the governor decreases due to the wear of parts of the ratchet. - The present invention was made to solve the problems described above, and the object of the invention is to provide an elevator governor capable of achieving, with a simple configuration, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.
- An elevator governor of the present invention includes a sheave on which a rope moving in response to the movement of an ascending and descending body of an elevator is wound, and which changes the rotation speed in one direction in response to the ascent speed of the ascending and descending body and changes the rotation speed in the other direction in response to the descent speed of the ascending and descending body; a fly-weight which is provided on a side surface of the sheave and increases and decreases a moving quantity to a radial outer side of the sheave in response to an increase and decrease in the rotation speed of the sheave; a detector which performs overspeed detection of the sheave when the fly-weight has moved to the radial outer side by a predetermined quantity; a stopper which is provided in the sheave and performs a rotational movement with respect to the sheave so as to be arranged to the radial outer side of the fly-weight in the case where the sheave rotates in a predetermined direction which is either of the two rotational directions, thereby preventing the fly-weight from moving to the radial outer side more than the predetermined quantity; rotational position detection means which detects a rotational position of the sheave; object detection means which is provided in proximity to the sheave and detects the stopper in the case where the stopper has approached the object detection means; and determination means which determines a position of the stopper with respect to the sheave on the basis of the rotational position of the sheave during the detection of the stopper by the object detection means.
- According to the present invention, it is possible to achieve, with a simple configuration, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.
-
-
Figure 1 is a front view of an elevator governor inEmbodiment 1 of the present invention. -
Figure 2 is a sectional view taken along line A-A ofFigure 1 . -
Figure 3 is a front view showing the essential parts of the elevator governor inEmbodiment 1 of the present invention. -
Figure 4 is a front view showing the essential parts of the elevator governor inEmbodiment 1 of the present invention. -
Figure 5 is a front view showing the essential parts of the elevator governor inEmbodiment 1 of the present invention. -
Figure 6 is a block diagram of a malfunction detection device which is used in the elevator governor inEmbodiment 1 of the present invention. -
Figure 7 is a block diagram of a malfunction detection device used in an elevator governor inEmbodiment 2 of the present invention. -
Figure 8 is a diagram to explain an example of signal output of the encoder used in the elevator governor inEmbodiment 2 of the present invention. -
Figure 9 is a front view showing the essential part of an elevator governor inEmbodiment 3 of the present invention. -
Figure 10 is a front view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 4 of the present invention. -
Figure 11 is a sectional view taken along line B-B ofFigure 10 . -
Figure 12 is a view of an elevator governor inEmbodiment 5 of the present invention, which is equivalent toFigure 11 . - Embodiments for carrying out the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In each of the drawings, the same reference symbols refer to the same or corresponding parts and overlaps of descriptions of such parts are correctly simplified or omitted.
- In general, the shaft of an elevator is formed from a space extending in the vertical direction through the floors of a building. A machine room is provided in the upper part of the haft. A traction machine is provided in the machine room. A hoisting rope is wound on the traction machine. A car of the elevator is suspended at an end of the hoisting rope. On the other hand, a weight is suspended at the other end of the hoisting rope. And the rotation of the traction machine is controlled by a controller. The car and the weight ascend and descend at a set speed by responding to the rotation of the traction machine.
- Furthermore, a safety gear device is provided in the lower part of the car. An endless governor rope is connected to the safety gear device via an arm. A curved portion at the lower end of the governor rope is wound on a tension pulley. On the other hand, a curved portion at the upper end of the governor rope is wound on a sheave of the governor provided in the machine room and the like. Hereinafter, the governor of this embodiment will be described in more detail with the aid of
Figures 1 to 6 . -
Figure 1 is a front view of an elevator governor inEmbodiment 1 of the present invention.Figure 2 is a sectional view taken along line A-A ofFigure 1 .
InFigures 1 and2 ,reference numeral 1 denotes a governor. The governor 1 is provided with asheave 2. Thesheave 2 is pivotally supported on amain shaft 3. Agovernor rope 4 is wound on thesheave 2. - The
governor rope 4 is attached to a car in an endless manner. The governor rope 4 moves in response to the movement of the car. The governor rope 4 rotates thesheave 2 in response to the ascent and descent of the car. That is, thesheave 2 changes the rotation speed in one direction according to the ascent speed of the car and changes the rotation speed in the other direction according to the descent speed of the car. - A pair of disk type fly-
weights 5 is rotatably provided on a side surface of thesheave 2 via apin 6. Both of the fly-weights 5 increase and decrease the moving quantity to the radial outer side of thesheave 2 along the side surface of thesheave 2 as a result of an increase and decrease in the rotation speed of thesheave 2. Both of the fly-weights 5 are connected by alink 7. As a result of this, the two fly-weights 5 have the same rotational angle. - A balance spring 9 is provided at an end of one of the fly-
weights 5 via alink 8. This balance spring 9 constantly urges either of the fly-weights 5 to the center side of thesheave 2. A springforce adjusting nut 10 is provided in thelink 8. The springforce adjusting nut 10 adjusts the urging force of the balance spring 9. Adog 11 is provided at an end of the other fly-weight 5 in such a manner as to be directed to the radial outer side of thesheave 2. - An
actuating cam 12 is provided in proximity to the side of one side portion of thesheave 2. Theactuating cam 12 is provided in agovernor switch 13. Thegovernor switch 13 comes into action when theactuating cam 12 moves up and down. Below one side portion of thesheave 2, arope catch 14 is provided in proximity to thegovernor rope 4 on the side where the car is mounted. - The
rope catch 14 is suspended by being caught by the lower end of ahook 15. Thishook 15 is pivotally supported in the center via apin 16. A fixedshoe 17 is provided on a side opposed to therope catch 14. As a result of this, thegovernor rope 4 is surrounded by therope catch 14 and the fixedshoe 17 below one side portion of thesheave 2. - In this embodiment, a
stopper 18 is provided. The main body of thisstopper 18 is rotatably provided in themain shaft 3. A pair of locking notchedportions 19 is provided in the main body of thestopper 18. The end portions of the locking notchedportions 19 on the center side of thesheave 2 are connected by a connecting notchedportion 20. The connecting notchedportion 20 is formed in the shape of a circular arc, with themain shaft 3 serving as the center. Oneend 22 of alever 21 is inserted in such a manner as to be freely movable along the connecting notchedportion 20. Theother end 23 of thelever 21 is pivotally supported by thesheave 2. - On the side near the
main shaft 3 rather than near thelever 21, apin 24 is provided in thesheave 2 in such a manner as to protrude to thestopper 18 side. Also in thelever 21, apin 25 is provided in such a manner as to protrude to thesheave 2 side. Between thepins helical tension spring 26. Thehelical tension spring 26 constantly urges thelever 21 to the center side of thesheave 2. - Next, the operation of the
governor 1 will be described with the aid ofFigures 3 to 5 .
Figures 3 to 5 are front views showing the essential parts of the elevator governor inEmbodiment 1 of the present invention. - A description will be given of the operation of the
governor 1 expected when thestopper 18 is not provided.
When thesheave 2 rotates in synchronization with the ascent and descent of a car, the fly-weight 5 receives a centrifugal force responding to the rotation speed of thesheave 2. While the car is ascending and descending within a rated speed, the force by the balance spring 9 is larger than the centrifugal force applied to the fly-weight 5. For this reason, the relative positions of the fly-weight 5 and thesheave 2 do not change from the initial set condition. - When the ascending and descent speed of the car exceeds the rated speed, the centrifugal force applied to the fly-
weight 5 overcomes the force of the balance spring 9. For this reason, the fly-weight 5 begins to move to the radial outer side of thesheave 2. - When the ascending and descent speed of the car has reached a first overspeed detection speed, the
dog 11 at the forward end of the fly-weight 5 abuts against theactuating cam 12. This abutment causes thegovernor switch 13 to operate. That is, theactuating cam 12 and thegovernor switch 13 function as a detector which performs the overspeed detection of thesheave 2 when the fly-weight 5 has moved to the outer side by a predetermined quantity regardless of the ascent and descent of the car. The power to the traction machine and brake of the elevator is interrupted by the operation of thegovernor switch 13. Usually, the car stops due to this interruption. - When the car does not stop and the descent speed of the car has exceeded a first overspeed detection speed and has reached a second overspeed detection speed, the fly-
weight 5 moves further to the radial outer side of thesheave 2. This movement causes thedog 11 to abut against the upper end of thehook 15 from theactuating cam 12 side. This abutment causes thehook 15 to rotate around thepin 16. This rotation of thehook 15 causes the lower end of thehook 15 to be disengaged from therope catch 14. - And the
rope catch 14 falls under gravity and sandwiches thegovernor rope 4 between itself and the fixedshoe 17. As a result of this, thegovernor rope 4 is braked. In synchronization with the braking of thisgovernor rope 4, the safety gear device provided in the car operates. The operation of this safety gear device causes the car to stop. - Next, a description will be given of the operation of the
governor 1 expected when thestopper 18 exists. In this embodiment, the mass of thelever 21 and the spring constant of thehelical tension spring 26 are determined so that thelever 21 moves to the radial outer side of thesheave 2 when the rotation speed of thesheave 2 has exceeded a predetermined threshold value. When the car is accelerated in the ascent direction, thestopper 18 is pressed against oneend 22 of thelever 21 in the rotational direction of thesheave 2. As a result of this, thestopper 18 rotates together with thesheave 2. - And as shown in
Figure 3 , when the ascent speed of the car exceeds the threshold value, oneend 22 of thelever 21 moves to the radial outer side of thesheave 2 due to a centrifugal force and is housed in either of the locking notchedportions 19. As a result of this, thestopper 18 is held in a condition in which thestopper 18 cannot rotate relatively with respect to thesheave 2. That is, thestopper 18 rotates together with thesheave 2. - At this time, the ascent direction exceeds the rated speed and the fly-
wheel 2 is almost about to move to the radial outer side of thesheave 5. However, a protruding end of thestopper 18 is arranged on the radial outer side of thesheave 2 with respect to the fly-weight 5. For this reason, the fly-weight 5 interferes with the protruding end of thestopper 18 when the fly-weight 5 moves outside more than the predetermined quantity. - Therefore, the fly-
weight 5 can scarcely move to the radial outer side of thesheave 2. That is, even when the ascent speed of the car has reached a first overspeed detection speed, thedog 11 at the forward end of the fly-weight 5 does not abut against theactuating cam 12. For this reason, thegovernor switch 13 does not operate, either. - On the other hand, when the ascent speed of the car decelerates and has lowered to the order of the threshold value, one
end 22 of thelever 21 moves to the radial inner side of thesheave 2, i.e., the connecting notchedportion 20. For this reason, thestopper 18 becomes able to rotate relatively with respect to thesheave 2 by an amount corresponding to the length of the connecting notchedportion 20. - At this time, the
stopper 18 is almost about to rotate at an almost constant speed by the law of inertia even when thesheave 2 has decelerated. For this reason, as shown inFigure 4 , thestopper 18 rotates relatively with respect to thesheave 2. Subsequently, when the car has accelerated in the descent direction, thestopper 18 is pressed by oneend 22 of thelever 21. As a result of this, thestopper 18 rotates together with thesheave 2. - And when the decent speed of the car has exceeded the threshold value, as shown in
Figure 5 , oneend 22 of thelever 21 moves due to the centrifugal force to the radial outer side of thesheave 2 and is housed in the other locking notchedportion 19. As a result of this, the protruding end of thestopper 18 is held at a position away from the outer side of the fly-weight 5. That is, there is no object which limits the movement of the fly-weight 5. For this reason, when the descent speed of the car has reached a first overspeed detection speed and a second overspeed detection speed, overspeed detection operations responding to each of the speeds are performed. - Next, a method of detecting malfunctions will be described with the aid of
Figure 6 .
Figure 6 is a block diagram of a malfunction detection device which is used in the elevator governor inEmbodiment 1 of the present invention. - As shown in
Figure 6 , anencoder 27 is provided in the vicinity of themain shaft 3 of thegovernor 1. Theencoder 27 functions as rotational position detection means which outputs a pulse signal responding to the rotational direction of thesheave 2 when thesheave 2 has moved to a prescribed rotational position. The pulse signal is inputted to amalfunction detection device 28. - The
malfunction detection device 28 is provided with aproximity sensor 29 and a stopperposition detection part 30. Theproximity sensor 29 is arranged just above thesheave 2. Theproximity sensor 29 is formed from a distance sensor of the eddy current type, the optical type, and the electrostatic capacity type and the like. For theproximity sensor 29, an area in a prescribed range below theproximity sensor 29 is the detection region. Theproximity sensor 29 functions as object detection means which outputs a detection signal in the case where an object is present in the detection region. - Angular position information of the
stopper 18 during the rotation of thegovernor 1 in the ascent direction is stored beforehand in the stopperposition detection part 30. Angular position information of thestopper 18 during the rotation of thegovernor 1 in the descent direction is stored beforehand in the stopperposition detection part 30. The stopperposition detection part 30 functions as determination means which makes a determination as to whether or not thestopper 18 is in a prescribed position on the basis of the rotational position of thesheave 2 during the detection of thestopper 18 by theproximity sensor 29. - According to
Embodiment 1 described above, thestopper 18 prevents the fly-weight 5 from moving to the radial outer side of thesheave 2 more than the predetermined quantity while thesheave 2 is rotating in a predetermined direction which is either of the two rotational directions. For this reason, it is possible to provide an elevator governor capable of achievineg, with a simple configuration, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts. - Furthermore, while the
sheave 2 is rotating in a predetermined direction, the main body of thestopper 18 is held by thelever 21. on the radial outer side of thesheave 2 with respect to the fly-weight 5. On the other hand, while thesheave 2 is rotating in a direction reverse to the predetermined direction, the main body of thestopper 18 is held by thelever 21 on the radial outer side of thesheave 2 with respect to the fly-weight 5. For this reason, it is possible to achieve, in a more stable manner, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added. - Incidentally, it is preferred that the threshold value of the rotation speed of the
sheave 2 for which oneend 22 of thelever 21 moves to the radial outer side of thesheave 2, be set beforehand to the order of a half of the rated speed of the ascent and descent speeds of the car, whichever is lower. In this case, it is possible to effectively prevent unintended overspeed detection. Performing overspeed detection only when the car is running in the ascent direction of the car, can be accomplished by configuring thestopper 18 so that the movement of the fly-weight 5 is not prevented while thesheave 2 is rotating in the ascent direction of the car. - In addition, in this embodiment the
malfunction detection device 28 makes a determination on the position of thestopper 18. For this reason, it is possible to detect malfunctions of thestopper 18. -
Figure 7 is a block diagram of a malfunction detection device used in an elevator governor inEmbodiment 2 of the present invention. Incidentally, parts which are the same as inEmbodiment 1 or similar to those ofEmbodiment 1 bear the same reference characters and descriptions of such parts are omitted. - A disk of the
sheave 2 ofEmbodiment 2 is provided withreference plates reference plates sheave 2 as the standard. In the case where thesheave 2 is rotating in the ascent direction, astopper 18a which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 30 degrees from thereference plate 31a (in a position shifted 150 degrees form thereference plate 3 1b), with the center of thesheave 2 serving as the standard. And astopper 18b which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 30 degrees from thereference plate 31b (in a position shifted 150 degrees form thereference plate 31a), with the center of thesheave 2 serving as the standard, In contrast to this, in the case where thesheave 2 is rotating in the descent direction, thestopper 18a which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 60 degrees from thereference plate 31a (in a position shifted 120 degrees form thereference plate 31 b), with the center of thesheave 2 serving as the standard. And thestopper 18b which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 60 degrees from thereference plate 3 1b (in a position shifted 120 degrees form thereference plate 31a), with the center of thesheave 2 serving as the standard. - A
malfunction detection device 32 ofEmbodiment 2 is provided with aproximity sensor part 33, a stopperposition detection part 34, and a stopperposition determination part 35. In the case where thestoppers reference plates proximity sensor part 33, theproximity sensor part 33 detects thestoppers reference plates stoppers reference plates position detection part 34 detects the positions of thestoppers sheave 2. On the basis of a pulse output of theencoder 27, the stopperposition determination part 35 makes a determination on the rotational direction of thesheave 2. The stopperposition determination part 35 makes a determination as to whether or not thestoppers sheave 2. - Next, with the aid of
Figure 8 a description will be given of a method of position detection by thestopper 18 in the stopperposition detection part 34.
Figure 8 is a diagram to explain an example of signal output of theencoder 27 used in the elevator governor inEmbodiment 2 of the present invention. The abscissa ofFigure 8 indicates time. The ordinate ofFigure 8 indicates the output of theproximity sensor part 33. -
Figure 8 shows the case where thesheave 2 is rotating in the decent direction. When thesheave 2 has rotated 60 degrees from the detection position of thestopper 18a, thereference plate 31a is detected. The time interval at this time is denoted by t0. Furthermore, when thesheave 2 has rotated 120 degrees, thestopper 18b is detected. The time interval at this time is denoted by t1. Furthermore, when thesheave 2 has rotated 60 degrees by taking time t0, thereference plate 31 b is detected. Furthermore, when thesheave 2 has rotated 120 degrees by taking time t1, thestopper 18a is detected again. The ratio of these time intervals is expressed by the ratio of rotational angles of thesheave 2. That is, t0: t1 = 60:120 = 1: 2. In this case, it is determined that thestoppers sheave 2 which is rotating in the descent direction. - In contrast to this, in the case where the
sheave 2 is rotating in the ascent direction, when thesheave 2 has rotated 30 degrees from the detection position of thereference plate 31 a, thestopper 18a is detected. The time interval at this time is denoted by T0. Furthermore, when thesheave 2 has rotated 150 degrees, thereference plate 31b is detected. The time interval at this time is denoted by T1. Furthermore, when thesheave 2 has rotated 30 degrees by taking time T0, thestopper 18b is detected. Furthermore, when thesheave 2 has rotated 150 degrees by taking time T1, thereference plate 31a is detected again. The ratio of these time intervals is expressed by the ratio of rotational angles of thesheave 2. That is, T0: T1 = 30: 150 =1: 5. In this case, it is determined that thestoppers sheave 2 which is rotating in the ascent direction. - According to
Embodiment 2 described above, a determination is made as to whether or not thestoppers sheave 2 during the detection of thestoppers stoppers - Specifically, a determination is made on the positions of the
stoppers sheave 2 on the basis of a difference in detection timing between thereference plates stoppers stoppers - It is unnecessary to limit the positional relationship between the
stoppers reference plates Embodiment 2. That is, it is necessary only that the positional relationship between thestoppers reference plates sheave 2. Also in this case, it is possible to positively detect malfunctions of thestoppers - Incidentally, the number of times of object detection by the
proximity sensor part 33 during one rotation of thesheave 2 is uniquely determined by the installed number of thestoppers reference plates proximity sensor part 33 during one rotation of thesheave 2 is different from a total number of thestoppers reference plates proximity sensor part 33 and an abnormal operation of thegovernor 1 occurred. - Furthermore it is possible to provide prohibition means which prohibits a determination on the positions of the
stoppers sheave 2 is lower than the speed at which the fly-weight 5 is moved to the radial outer side by a prescribed quantity. In this case, it is possible to suppress an unnecessary detection action. - In addition, it is possible to provide signal output means which outputs a malfunction signal in the case where the rotation speed of the
sheave 2 is higher than the speed at which the fly-weight 5 is moved to the radial outer side by a prescribed quantity and thestoppers stoppers malfunction detection device 32 occurred. - A malfunction signal may include information for bringing a brake installed in the traction machine driving the elevator into action. If a control device of the elevator brings the brake into action on the basis of a malfunction signal, it is possible to stop the elevator. As a result of this, it is possible to improve the safety of the elevator.
-
Figure 9 is a front view showing the essential part of an elevator governor inEmbodiment 3 of the present invention. Incidentally, parts which are the same as inEmbodiment 1 or corresponding pats bear like numerals and descriptions of these parts are omitted. - In
Embodiment 1, all of the locking notchedportion 19 of thestopper 18, the connecting notched 20, thelever 21, thepins helical tension spring 26 are provided in a quantity of one. On the other hand, inEmbodiment 3, all of the locking notchedportion 19 of thestopper 18, the connecting notched 20, thelever 21, thepins helical tension spring 26 are provided symmetrically with respect to themain shaft 3 in a plurality of numbers. - According to
Embodiment 3 described above, the load applied to thelever 21 decreases. For this reason, it is possible to improve the reliability of thegovernor 1. -
Figure 10 is a front view of an elevator governor inEmbodiment 4 of the present invention.Figure 11 is a sectional view taken along line B-B ofFigure 10 . Incidentally, parts which are the same as inEmbodiment 1 or similar to those ofEmbodiment 1 bear the same reference characters and descriptions of such parts are omitted. - The
governor 1 ofEmbodiment 4 differs from the governor ofEmbodiment 1 in the configuration of the fly-weight, the shape of thestopper 18 and the like. Thegovernor 1 ofEmbodiment 4 will be described below. - In
Figures 10 and11 ,reference numeral 36 denotes a pair of linear motion bearings. Thelinear motion bearings 36 are each attached to a side surface of thesheave 2 via a fixedportion 37. A fly-weight 38 is inserted into thelinear motion bearing 36. The linear motion bearing 36 may be a sliding bearing using sliding friction or a ball and roller bearing using the frictions of balls and rollers. - A spring
force adjusting nut 39 is provided in the fly-weight 38. Abalance spring 40 is provided between the springforce adjusting nut 39 and the fixedportion 37. Thebalance spring 40 constantly urges the fly-weight 38 to the center side of thesheave 2. - Next, the operation of the
governor 1 in the case where thestopper 18 does not exist will be described.
When thesheave 2 rotates in synchronization with the ascent and descent of the car, the fly-weight 38 receives a centrifugal force responding to the rotation speed of thesheave 2. While the car is ascending and descending within a rated speed, the force by thebalance spring 40 is larger than the centrifugal force applied to the fly-weight 38.
For this reason, the relative position of the fly-weight 38 and thesheave 2 does not change from the initial set state. - When the ascent and descent speed of the car exceeds the rated speed, the centrifugal force applied to the fly-
weight 38 overcomes the centrifugal force by thebalance spring 40. For this reason, the fly-weight 38 starts to move to the radial outer side of thesheave 2. - When the ascending and descent speed of the car has reached a first overspeed detection speed, the forward end of the fly-
weight 38 abuts against theactuating cam 12. This abutment causes thegovernor switch 13 to operate. That is, theactuating cam 12 and thegovernor switch 13 function as a detector which performs the overspeed detection of thesheave 2 when the fly-weight 38 has moved to the outer side by a predetermined quantity regardless of the ascent and descent of the car. The power to the traction machine and brake of the elevator is interrupted by the operation of thegovernor switch 13. Usually, the car stops due to this interruption. - When the car does not stop and the descent speed of the car has exceeded a first overspeed detection speed and has reached a second overspeed detection speed, the fly-
weight 38 moves further to the radial outer side of thesheave 2. This movement causes the forward end of the fly-weight 38 to abut against the upper end of thehook 15 from theactuating cam 12 side. This abutment causes thehook 15 to rotate around thepin 16. The lower end of thehook 15 becomes disengaged from therope catch 14. As a result of this rotation, therope catch 14 falls under gravity. - And the
rope catch 14 falls under gravity and sandwiches thegovernor rope 4 between itself and the fixedshoe 17. As a result of this, thegovernor rope 4 is braked. In synchronization with the braking of thisgovernor rope 4, the safety gear device provided in the car operates. As a result of this, the car stops. - Incidentally, because the operation in the case where the
stopper 18 exists is the same as inEmbodiment 1, a description of this operation is omitted. - According to
Embodiment 4 described above, it is possible to achieve an overspeed detection mechanism having the same effect as inEmbodiment 1 to which rotation dependence is added even when the disk type fly-weights 5 are not used. -
Figure 12 is a view of an elevator governor inEmbodiment 5 of the present invention, which is equivalent toFigure 11 . Incidentally, parts which are the same as inEmbodiment 4 or corresponding pats bear like numerals and descriptions of these parts are omitted. - In
Embodiment 4 one overspeed detection mechanism is provided, whereas inEmbodiment 5 two overspeed detection mechanisms are provided. The overspeed detection mechanisms operate independently from each other. Thegovernor 1 ofEmbodiment 5 will be described with the aid ofFigure 9 . - In
Figure 12 ,reference numeral 41 denotes a rotary body. Therotary body 41 is fixed to one side surface of thesheave 2. That is, the rotary body has the function of rotating together with thesheave 2. One overspeed detection mechanism is provided on the other side surface. One overspeed detection mechanism is provided with astopper 18 similar to that ofEmbodiment 3. The other overspeed detection mechanism is provided on one side surface of therotary body 41. The other overspeed detection mechanism is not provided with astopper 18. - One overspeed detection mechanism is set to match a rated speed in the descent direction of the car. One overspeed detection mechanism is such that the operation thereof is limited by the
stopper 18 during the ascent of the car before the speed becomes higher than the rated speed in the descent direction of the car. In contrast to this, the other overspeed detection mechanism is set to match a rated speed in the ascent direction of the car. Thisgovernor 1 is provided in an elevator in which the ascent direction of the car is higher than the descent speed. - According to
Embodiment 5 described above, in an elevator in which the ascent direction of the car is higher than the descent speed, it is possible to perform overspeed detection adapted to each of the ascent speed and the descent speed. - In an elevator in which the ascent speed of the car is lower than the descent speed, the detection speed of the overspeed detection mechanism whose operation is limited by the
stopper 18 is set to match a rated speed in the ascent direction of the car, and thegovernor 1 whose operation is not limited by thestopper 18 is set to be adaptable to a rated speed in the descent direction of the car. - In
Embodiments 1 to 5 above, the description was given of the configurations in which thestopper 18 is provided in the car-side governor 1. However, the same effect as inEmbodiments 1 to 5 is obtained even when thestopper 18 is provided in the weight-side governor 1. - As described above, the elevator governor of the present invention can be used in an elevator in which, with a simple configuration, is achieved an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.
- 1 governor, 2 sheave, 3 main shaft, 4 governor rope, 5 fly-weight, 6 pin, 7 link, 8 link, 9 balance spring, 10 spring force adjusting nut, 11 dog, 12 actuating cam, 13 governor switch, 14 rope catch, 15 hook, 16 pin, 17 fixed shoe, 18 stopper, 18, 18a, 18b stopper, 19 locking notched portion, 20 connecting notched portion, 21 lever, 22 one end, 23 other end, 24 pin, 25 pin, 26 helical tension spring, 27 encoder, 28 malfunction detection device, 29 proximity sensor, 30 stopper position detection part, 31, 31 a, 31 b reference plate, 32 malfunction detection device, 33 proximity sensor part, 34 stopper position detection part, 35 stopper position determination part, 36 linear motion bearing, 37 fixed portion, 38 fly-weight, 39 spring force adjusting nut, 40 balance spring, 41 rotary body
Claims (7)
- An elevator governor comprising:a sheave on which a rope moving in response to the movement of an ascending and descending body of an elevator is wound, and which changes the rotation speed in one direction in response to the ascent speed of the ascending and descending body and changes the rotation speed in the other direction in response to the descent speed of the ascending and descending body;a fly-weight which is provided on a side surface of the sheave and increases and decreases a moving quantity to a radial outer side of the sheave in response to an increase and decrease in the rotation speed of the sheave;a detector which performs overspeed detection of the sheave when the fly-weight has moved to the radial outer side by a predetermined quantity;a stopper which is provided in the sheave and performs a rotational movement with respect to the sheave so as to be arranged to the radial outer side of the fly-weight in the case where the sheave rotates in a predetermined direction which is either of the two rotational directions, thereby preventing the fly-weight from moving to the radial outer side more than the predetermined quantity;rotational position detection means which detects a rotational position of the sheave;object detection means which is provided in proximity to the sheave and detects the stopper in the case where the stopper has approached the object detection means; anddetermination means which determines a position of the stopper with respect to the sheave on the basis of the rotational position of the sheave during the detection of the stopper by the object detection means.
- The elevator governor according to claim 1, wherein the rotational position detection means outputs a pulse responding to the rotational direction of the sheave, and
wherein the determination means determines the rotational direction of the sheave on the basis of the pulse, and makes a determination as to whether or not the stopper is in a correct position on the basis of the rotational position and rotational direction of the sheave during the detection of the stopper by the object detection means. - The elevator governor according to claim 2, further comprising:a reference plate provided in the sheave;wherein the object detection means detects the reference plate when the reference plate has approached the object detection means, andwherein the determination means makes a determination on a position of the stopper with respect to the sheave on the basis of a difference in detection timing between the reference plate and the stopper and makes a determination as to whether or not the stopper is present in a correct position.
- The elevator governor according to claim 3, further comprising:signal output means which outputs a malfunction signal in the case where a determination is made on one rotation of the sheave on the basis of a change in the rotational position of the sheave, and the number of times of object detection by the object detection means during one rotation of the sheave is different from a total number of the stopper and the reference plate.
- The elevator governor according to any of claims 1 to 4, further comprising:prohibition means which prohibits a determination on the position of the stopper by the determination means in the case where a determination is made on the rotation speed of the sheave on the basis of the rotational position of the sheave, and the rotation speed of the sheave is lower than the speed at which the fly-weight is moved to the radial outer side by the prescribed quantity.
- The elevator governor according to claim 5, further comprising:signal output means which outputs a malfunction signal when the stopper is not in a correct position.
- The elevator governor according to claim 4 or 6, wherein the signal output means outputs, as the malfunction signal, a signal including information to cause a brake provided on a traction machine which drives the elevator to operate.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2010/066126 WO2012035641A1 (en) | 2010-09-17 | 2010-09-17 | Speed governor for elevator |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2617672A1 true EP2617672A1 (en) | 2013-07-24 |
EP2617672A4 EP2617672A4 (en) | 2018-01-24 |
EP2617672B1 EP2617672B1 (en) | 2018-11-28 |
Family
ID=45831141
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10857275.1A Active EP2617672B1 (en) | 2010-09-17 | 2010-09-17 | Speed governor for elevator |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2617672B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5472473B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101398725B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN103118965B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012035641A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11034546B2 (en) | 2018-06-28 | 2021-06-15 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator governor |
JP2021187574A (en) * | 2020-05-26 | 2021-12-13 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Governor for elevator and elevator |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106132860B (en) * | 2014-04-16 | 2018-08-03 | 株式会社日立制作所 | Lift appliance |
JP6092344B1 (en) * | 2015-11-02 | 2017-03-08 | 東芝エレベータ株式会社 | Elevator governor equipment |
JP6552954B2 (en) * | 2015-12-10 | 2019-07-31 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Elevator equipment |
CN114961371A (en) * | 2022-06-11 | 2022-08-30 | 北京首嘉钢结构有限公司 | Speed limiting device of vertical lifting type stereo garage |
CN115140627B (en) * | 2022-07-27 | 2024-01-19 | 苏州富士精工电梯有限公司 | Elevator overspeed governor measuring device |
CN115285810A (en) * | 2022-09-30 | 2022-11-04 | 江苏顺捷机电工程有限公司 | Elevator operation early warning method and human body intercommunication elevator system applying same |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP4306014B2 (en) | 1999-05-17 | 2009-07-29 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Governor |
WO2006038300A1 (en) * | 2004-10-07 | 2006-04-13 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Elevator apparatus |
JP4836437B2 (en) * | 2004-11-19 | 2011-12-14 | 東芝エレベータ株式会社 | Elevator governor. |
EP1852383A4 (en) * | 2005-02-24 | 2012-11-14 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Governor for elevator |
EP2020396A4 (en) * | 2006-05-22 | 2013-10-02 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Speed governor for elevator |
JP4985649B2 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2012-07-25 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Elevator speed control device and elevator device |
WO2010023745A1 (en) * | 2008-08-28 | 2010-03-04 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Elevator speed governor |
-
2010
- 2010-09-17 JP JP2012533795A patent/JP5472473B2/en active Active
- 2010-09-17 WO PCT/JP2010/066126 patent/WO2012035641A1/en active Application Filing
- 2010-09-17 EP EP10857275.1A patent/EP2617672B1/en active Active
- 2010-09-17 KR KR1020137009709A patent/KR101398725B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2010-09-17 CN CN201080069067.0A patent/CN103118965B/en active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2012035641A1 * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11034546B2 (en) | 2018-06-28 | 2021-06-15 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator governor |
JP2021187574A (en) * | 2020-05-26 | 2021-12-13 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Governor for elevator and elevator |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2617672B1 (en) | 2018-11-28 |
CN103118965B (en) | 2015-03-25 |
CN103118965A (en) | 2013-05-22 |
JP5472473B2 (en) | 2014-04-16 |
JPWO2012035641A1 (en) | 2014-01-20 |
EP2617672A4 (en) | 2018-01-24 |
KR101398725B1 (en) | 2014-05-27 |
KR20130103533A (en) | 2013-09-23 |
WO2012035641A1 (en) | 2012-03-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8950554B2 (en) | Elevator governor | |
EP2617672B1 (en) | Speed governor for elevator | |
JP4306014B2 (en) | Governor | |
JP5287859B2 (en) | Elevator governor | |
EP2456702B1 (en) | Elevator governor system | |
US9359173B2 (en) | Elevator governor having two tripping mechanisms on separate sheaves | |
JP2009154984A (en) | Elevator governor | |
KR20130054336A (en) | Elevator speed governor | |
EP3150537B1 (en) | Elevator overspeed governor | |
JP4292215B2 (en) | Elevator governor device | |
EP1798183B1 (en) | Elevator apparatus | |
EP2490971B1 (en) | Unintended movement governor and elevator | |
JP5577736B2 (en) | Elevator governor | |
JP5944056B2 (en) | Elevator governor and elevator apparatus using the same | |
JP5845317B2 (en) | Elevator governor | |
KR100816172B1 (en) | Elevator apparatus | |
KR100881503B1 (en) | Speed governor device of elevator |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130214 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RA4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected) |
Effective date: 20180102 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B66B 5/04 20060101AFI20171219BHEP |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20180619 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1069995 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20181215 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602010055531 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20181128 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1069995 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20181128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190228 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190328 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190228 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190328 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190301 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602010055531 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190829 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190917 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190917 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20190930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20190917 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190917 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20100917 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R084 Ref document number: 602010055531 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181128 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230512 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240730 Year of fee payment: 15 |