EP2617672A1 - Speed governor for elevator - Google Patents

Speed governor for elevator Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2617672A1
EP2617672A1 EP10857275.1A EP10857275A EP2617672A1 EP 2617672 A1 EP2617672 A1 EP 2617672A1 EP 10857275 A EP10857275 A EP 10857275A EP 2617672 A1 EP2617672 A1 EP 2617672A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sheave
stopper
fly
speed
weight
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP10857275.1A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2617672B1 (en
EP2617672A4 (en
Inventor
Akihide Shiratsuki
Takeshi Niikawa
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Publication of EP2617672A1 publication Critical patent/EP2617672A1/en
Publication of EP2617672A4 publication Critical patent/EP2617672A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2617672B1 publication Critical patent/EP2617672B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66BELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B5/00Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
    • B66B5/02Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions
    • B66B5/04Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions for detecting excessive speed
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66BELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B5/00Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
    • B66B5/02Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions
    • B66B5/04Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions for detecting excessive speed
    • B66B5/044Mechanical overspeed governors

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an elevator governor.
  • an overspeed detection mechanism set so as to be adapted to the descent speed of the car operates also during the ascent of the car. For this reason, it is impossible to perform overspeed detection adapted to each of the ascent speed and the descent speed of the car.
  • Patent Document 1 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2000-327241
  • the present invention was made to solve the problems described above, and the object of the invention is to provide an elevator governor capable of achieving, with a simple configuration, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.
  • An elevator governor of the present invention includes a sheave on which a rope moving in response to the movement of an ascending and descending body of an elevator is wound, and which changes the rotation speed in one direction in response to the ascent speed of the ascending and descending body and changes the rotation speed in the other direction in response to the descent speed of the ascending and descending body; a fly-weight which is provided on a side surface of the sheave and increases and decreases a moving quantity to a radial outer side of the sheave in response to an increase and decrease in the rotation speed of the sheave; a detector which performs overspeed detection of the sheave when the fly-weight has moved to the radial outer side by a predetermined quantity; a stopper which is provided in the sheave and performs a rotational movement with respect to the sheave so as to be arranged to the radial outer side of the fly-weight in the case where the sheave rotates in a predetermined direction which is either of the two rotational directions, thereby preventing the
  • the shaft of an elevator is formed from a space extending in the vertical direction through the floors of a building.
  • a machine room is provided in the upper part of the haft.
  • a traction machine is provided in the machine room.
  • a hoisting rope is wound on the traction machine.
  • a car of the elevator is suspended at an end of the hoisting rope.
  • a weight is suspended at the other end of the hoisting rope.
  • the rotation of the traction machine is controlled by a controller. The car and the weight ascend and descend at a set speed by responding to the rotation of the traction machine.
  • a safety gear device is provided in the lower part of the car.
  • An endless governor rope is connected to the safety gear device via an arm.
  • a curved portion at the lower end of the governor rope is wound on a tension pulley.
  • a curved portion at the upper end of the governor rope is wound on a sheave of the governor provided in the machine room and the like.
  • FIG 1 is a front view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is a sectional view taken along line A-A of Figure 1 .
  • reference numeral 1 denotes a governor.
  • the governor 1 is provided with a sheave 2.
  • the sheave 2 is pivotally supported on a main shaft 3.
  • a governor rope 4 is wound on the sheave 2.
  • the governor rope 4 is attached to a car in an endless manner.
  • the governor rope 4 moves in response to the movement of the car.
  • the governor rope 4 rotates the sheave 2 in response to the ascent and descent of the car. That is, the sheave 2 changes the rotation speed in one direction according to the ascent speed of the car and changes the rotation speed in the other direction according to the descent speed of the car.
  • a pair of disk type fly-weights 5 is rotatably provided on a side surface of the sheave 2 via a pin 6. Both of the fly-weights 5 increase and decrease the moving quantity to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 along the side surface of the sheave 2 as a result of an increase and decrease in the rotation speed of the sheave 2. Both of the fly-weights 5 are connected by a link 7. As a result of this, the two fly-weights 5 have the same rotational angle.
  • a balance spring 9 is provided at an end of one of the fly-weights 5 via a link 8. This balance spring 9 constantly urges either of the fly-weights 5 to the center side of the sheave 2.
  • a spring force adjusting nut 10 is provided in the link 8. The spring force adjusting nut 10 adjusts the urging force of the balance spring 9.
  • a dog 11 is provided at an end of the other fly-weight 5 in such a manner as to be directed to the radial outer side of the sheave 2.
  • An actuating cam 12 is provided in proximity to the side of one side portion of the sheave 2.
  • the actuating cam 12 is provided in a governor switch 13.
  • the governor switch 13 comes into action when the actuating cam 12 moves up and down.
  • a rope catch 14 is provided in proximity to the governor rope 4 on the side where the car is mounted.
  • the rope catch 14 is suspended by being caught by the lower end of a hook 15.
  • This hook 15 is pivotally supported in the center via a pin 16.
  • a fixed shoe 17 is provided on a side opposed to the rope catch 14. As a result of this, the governor rope 4 is surrounded by the rope catch 14 and the fixed shoe 17 below one side portion of the sheave 2.
  • a stopper 18 is provided.
  • the main body of this stopper 18 is rotatably provided in the main shaft 3.
  • a pair of locking notched portions 19 is provided in the main body of the stopper 18.
  • the end portions of the locking notched portions 19 on the center side of the sheave 2 are connected by a connecting notched portion 20.
  • the connecting notched portion 20 is formed in the shape of a circular arc, with the main shaft 3 serving as the center.
  • One end 22 of a lever 21 is inserted in such a manner as to be freely movable along the connecting notched portion 20.
  • the other end 23 of the lever 21 is pivotally supported by the sheave 2.
  • a pin 24 is provided in the sheave 2 in such a manner as to protrude to the stopper 18 side. Also in the lever 21, a pin 25 is provided in such a manner as to protrude to the sheave 2 side. Between the pins 24 and 25, there is provided a helical tension spring 26. The helical tension spring 26 constantly urges the lever 21 to the center side of the sheave 2.
  • Figures 3 to 5 are front views showing the essential parts of the elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
  • the dog 11 at the forward end of the fly-weight 5 abuts against the actuating cam 12.
  • This abutment causes the governor switch 13 to operate. That is, the actuating cam 12 and the governor switch 13 function as a detector which performs the overspeed detection of the sheave 2 when the fly-weight 5 has moved to the outer side by a predetermined quantity regardless of the ascent and descent of the car.
  • the power to the traction machine and brake of the elevator is interrupted by the operation of the governor switch 13. Usually, the car stops due to this interruption.
  • the mass of the lever 21 and the spring constant of the helical tension spring 26 are determined so that the lever 21 moves to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 when the rotation speed of the sheave 2 has exceeded a predetermined threshold value.
  • the stopper 18 is pressed against one end 22 of the lever 21 in the rotational direction of the sheave 2. As a result of this, the stopper 18 rotates together with the sheave 2.
  • the ascent direction exceeds the rated speed and the fly-wheel 2 is almost about to move to the radial outer side of the sheave 5.
  • a protruding end of the stopper 18 is arranged on the radial outer side of the sheave 2 with respect to the fly-weight 5. For this reason, the fly-weight 5 interferes with the protruding end of the stopper 18 when the fly-weight 5 moves outside more than the predetermined quantity.
  • the fly-weight 5 can scarcely move to the radial outer side of the sheave 2. That is, even when the ascent speed of the car has reached a first overspeed detection speed, the dog 11 at the forward end of the fly-weight 5 does not abut against the actuating cam 12. For this reason, the governor switch 13 does not operate, either.
  • the stopper 18 is almost about to rotate at an almost constant speed by the law of inertia even when the sheave 2 has decelerated. For this reason, as shown in Figure 4 , the stopper 18 rotates relatively with respect to the sheave 2. Subsequently, when the car has accelerated in the descent direction, the stopper 18 is pressed by one end 22 of the lever 21. As a result of this, the stopper 18 rotates together with the sheave 2.
  • Figure 6 is a block diagram of a malfunction detection device which is used in the elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
  • an encoder 27 is provided in the vicinity of the main shaft 3 of the governor 1.
  • the encoder 27 functions as rotational position detection means which outputs a pulse signal responding to the rotational direction of the sheave 2 when the sheave 2 has moved to a prescribed rotational position.
  • the pulse signal is inputted to a malfunction detection device 28.
  • the malfunction detection device 28 is provided with a proximity sensor 29 and a stopper position detection part 30.
  • the proximity sensor 29 is arranged just above the sheave 2.
  • the proximity sensor 29 is formed from a distance sensor of the eddy current type, the optical type, and the electrostatic capacity type and the like.
  • an area in a prescribed range below the proximity sensor 29 is the detection region.
  • the proximity sensor 29 functions as object detection means which outputs a detection signal in the case where an object is present in the detection region.
  • Angular position information of the stopper 18 during the rotation of the governor 1 in the ascent direction is stored beforehand in the stopper position detection part 30.
  • Angular position information of the stopper 18 during the rotation of the governor 1 in the descent direction is stored beforehand in the stopper position detection part 30.
  • the stopper position detection part 30 functions as determination means which makes a determination as to whether or not the stopper 18 is in a prescribed position on the basis of the rotational position of the sheave 2 during the detection of the stopper 18 by the proximity sensor 29.
  • the stopper 18 prevents the fly-weight 5 from moving to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 more than the predetermined quantity while the sheave 2 is rotating in a predetermined direction which is either of the two rotational directions. For this reason, it is possible to provide an elevator governor capable of achievineg, with a simple configuration, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.
  • the main body of the stopper 18 is held by the lever 21. on the radial outer side of the sheave 2 with respect to the fly-weight 5.
  • the main body of the stopper 18 is held by the lever 21 on the radial outer side of the sheave 2 with respect to the fly-weight 5.
  • the threshold value of the rotation speed of the sheave 2 for which one end 22 of the lever 21 moves to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 be set beforehand to the order of a half of the rated speed of the ascent and descent speeds of the car, whichever is lower. In this case, it is possible to effectively prevent unintended overspeed detection. Performing overspeed detection only when the car is running in the ascent direction of the car, can be accomplished by configuring the stopper 18 so that the movement of the fly-weight 5 is not prevented while the sheave 2 is rotating in the ascent direction of the car.
  • the malfunction detection device 28 makes a determination on the position of the stopper 18. For this reason, it is possible to detect malfunctions of the stopper 18.
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a malfunction detection device used in an elevator governor in Embodiment 2 of the present invention. Incidentally, parts which are the same as in Embodiment 1 or similar to those of Embodiment 1 bear the same reference characters and descriptions of such parts are omitted.
  • a disk of the sheave 2 of Embodiment 2 is provided with reference plates 31a, 31b.
  • the reference plates 31a, 31b are arranged in positions shifted 180 degrees from the center of the sheave 2 as the standard.
  • a stopper 18a which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 30 degrees from the reference plate 31a (in a position shifted 150 degrees form the reference plate 3 1b), with the center of the sheave 2 serving as the standard.
  • a stopper 18b which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 30 degrees from the reference plate 31b (in a position shifted 150 degrees form the reference plate 31a), with the center of the sheave 2 serving as the standard
  • the stopper 18a which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 60 degrees from the reference plate 31a (in a position shifted 120 degrees form the reference plate 31 b), with the center of the sheave 2 serving as the standard.
  • the stopper 18b which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 60 degrees from the reference plate 3 1b (in a position shifted 120 degrees form the reference plate 31a), with the center of the sheave 2 serving as the standard.
  • a malfunction detection device 32 of Embodiment 2 is provided with a proximity sensor part 33, a stopper position detection part 34, and a stopper position determination part 35.
  • the proximity sensor part 33 detects the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31 a, 31 b.
  • the stopper position detection part 34 detects the positions of the stoppers 18a, 18b with respect to the sheave 2.
  • the stopper position determination part 35 makes a determination on the rotational direction of the sheave 2.
  • the stopper position determination part 35 makes a determination as to whether or not the stoppers 18a, 18b are in correct positions with respect to the rotational direction of the sheave 2.
  • Figure 8 is a diagram to explain an example of signal output of the encoder 27 used in the elevator governor in Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
  • the abscissa of Figure 8 indicates time.
  • the ordinate of Figure 8 indicates the output of the proximity sensor part 33.
  • Figure 8 shows the case where the sheave 2 is rotating in the decent direction.
  • the reference plate 31a is detected.
  • the time interval at this time is denoted by t0.
  • the stopper 18b is detected.
  • the time interval at this time is denoted by t1.
  • the sheave 2 has rotated 60 degrees by taking time t0
  • the reference plate 31 b is detected.
  • the stopper 18a is detected again.
  • Embodiment 2 a determination is made as to whether or not the stoppers 18a, 18b are in correct positions on the basis of the rotational position and rotational direction of the sheave 2 during the detection of the stoppers 18a, 18b. For this reason, it is possible to positively detect malfunctions of the stoppers 18a, 18b.
  • the number of times of object detection by the proximity sensor part 33 during one rotation of the sheave 2 is uniquely determined by the installed number of the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31a, 31b. Using this fact, it is possible to provide signal output means which outputs a malfunction signal in the case where the number of times of object detection by the proximity sensor part 33 during one rotation of the sheave 2 is different from a total number of the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31a, 31b. It is possible to make a determination, from a malfunction signal, that a malfunction, of the proximity sensor part 33 and an abnormal operation of the governor 1 occurred.
  • prohibition means which prohibits a determination on the positions of the stoppers 18a, 18b in the case where the rotation speed of the sheave 2 is lower than the speed at which the fly-weight 5 is moved to the radial outer side by a prescribed quantity. In this case, it is possible to suppress an unnecessary detection action.
  • signal output means which outputs a malfunction signal in the case where the rotation speed of the sheave 2 is higher than the speed at which the fly-weight 5 is moved to the radial outer side by a prescribed quantity and the stoppers 18a, 18b are not in correct positions. It is possible to make a determination, from a malfunction signal, that a malfunction of the stoppers 18a, 18b and a wrong detection of the malfunction detection device 32 occurred.
  • a malfunction signal may include information for bringing a brake installed in the traction machine driving the elevator into action. If a control device of the elevator brings the brake into action on the basis of a malfunction signal, it is possible to stop the elevator. As a result of this, it is possible to improve the safety of the elevator.
  • Figure 9 is a front view showing the essential part of an elevator governor in Embodiment 3 of the present invention. Incidentally, parts which are the same as in Embodiment 1 or corresponding pats bear like numerals and descriptions of these parts are omitted.
  • Embodiment 1 all of the locking notched portion 19 of the stopper 18, the connecting notched 20, the lever 21, the pins 24, 25, and the helical tension spring 26 are provided in a quantity of one.
  • Embodiment 3 all of the locking notched portion 19 of the stopper 18, the connecting notched 20, the lever 21, the pins 24, 25, and the helical tension spring 26 are provided symmetrically with respect to the main shaft 3 in a plurality of numbers.
  • Figure 10 is a front view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 4 of the present invention.
  • Figure 11 is a sectional view taken along line B-B of Figure 10 .
  • parts which are the same as in Embodiment 1 or similar to those of Embodiment 1 bear the same reference characters and descriptions of such parts are omitted.
  • the governor 1 of Embodiment 4 differs from the governor of Embodiment 1 in the configuration of the fly-weight, the shape of the stopper 18 and the like.
  • the governor 1 of Embodiment 4 will be described below.
  • reference numeral 36 denotes a pair of linear motion bearings.
  • the linear motion bearings 36 are each attached to a side surface of the sheave 2 via a fixed portion 37.
  • a fly-weight 38 is inserted into the linear motion bearing 36.
  • the linear motion bearing 36 may be a sliding bearing using sliding friction or a ball and roller bearing using the frictions of balls and rollers.
  • a spring force adjusting nut 39 is provided in the fly-weight 38.
  • a balance spring 40 is provided between the spring force adjusting nut 39 and the fixed portion 37. The balance spring 40 constantly urges the fly-weight 38 to the center side of the sheave 2.
  • the fly-weight 38 receives a centrifugal force responding to the rotation speed of the sheave 2. While the car is ascending and descending within a rated speed, the force by the balance spring 40 is larger than the centrifugal force applied to the fly-weight 38. For this reason, the relative position of the fly-weight 38 and the sheave 2 does not change from the initial set state.
  • the forward end of the fly-weight 38 abuts against the actuating cam 12.
  • This abutment causes the governor switch 13 to operate. That is, the actuating cam 12 and the governor switch 13 function as a detector which performs the overspeed detection of the sheave 2 when the fly-weight 38 has moved to the outer side by a predetermined quantity regardless of the ascent and descent of the car.
  • the power to the traction machine and brake of the elevator is interrupted by the operation of the governor switch 13. Usually, the car stops due to this interruption.
  • Embodiment 4 described above it is possible to achieve an overspeed detection mechanism having the same effect as in Embodiment 1 to which rotation dependence is added even when the disk type fly-weights 5 are not used.
  • Figure 12 is a view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 5 of the present invention, which is equivalent to Figure 11 .
  • parts which are the same as in Embodiment 4 or corresponding pats bear like numerals and descriptions of these parts are omitted.
  • Embodiment 4 one overspeed detection mechanism is provided, whereas in Embodiment 5 two overspeed detection mechanisms are provided.
  • the overspeed detection mechanisms operate independently from each other.
  • the governor 1 of Embodiment 5 will be described with the aid of Figure 9 .
  • reference numeral 41 denotes a rotary body.
  • the rotary body 41 is fixed to one side surface of the sheave 2. That is, the rotary body has the function of rotating together with the sheave 2.
  • One overspeed detection mechanism is provided on the other side surface.
  • One overspeed detection mechanism is provided with a stopper 18 similar to that of Embodiment 3.
  • the other overspeed detection mechanism is provided on one side surface of the rotary body 41.
  • the other overspeed detection mechanism is not provided with a stopper 18.
  • One overspeed detection mechanism is set to match a rated speed in the descent direction of the car.
  • One overspeed detection mechanism is such that the operation thereof is limited by the stopper 18 during the ascent of the car before the speed becomes higher than the rated speed in the descent direction of the car.
  • the other overspeed detection mechanism is set to match a rated speed in the ascent direction of the car.
  • This governor 1 is provided in an elevator in which the ascent direction of the car is higher than the descent speed.
  • Embodiment 5 in an elevator in which the ascent direction of the car is higher than the descent speed, it is possible to perform overspeed detection adapted to each of the ascent speed and the descent speed.
  • the detection speed of the overspeed detection mechanism whose operation is limited by the stopper 18 is set to match a rated speed in the ascent direction of the car, and the governor 1 whose operation is not limited by the stopper 18 is set to be adaptable to a rated speed in the descent direction of the car.
  • Embodiments 1 to 5 the description was given of the configurations in which the stopper 18 is provided in the car-side governor 1. However, the same effect as in Embodiments 1 to 5 is obtained even when the stopper 18 is provided in the weight-side governor 1.
  • the elevator governor of the present invention can be used in an elevator in which, with a simple configuration, is achieved an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)

Abstract

Provided is an elevator governor capable of realizing, with a simple configuration, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts. For this purpose, the elevator governor includes: a sheave which changes the rotation speed in one direction in response to the ascent speed of an ascending and descending body and changes the rotation speed in the other direction in response to the descent speed of the ascending and descending body; a fly-weight which increases and decreases an outward moving quantity to a radial outer side of the sheave in response to an increase and decrease in the rotation speed of the sheave; a detector which performs overspeed detection of the sheave when the fly-weight has moved to the radial outer side by a predetermined quantity; a stopper which prevents the fly-weight from moving to the radial outer side more than the predetermined quantity in the case where the sheave rotates in a predetermined direction; rotational position detection means which detects a rotational position of the sheave; object detection means which detects the stopper in the case where the stopper has approached the object detection means; and determination means which determines a position of the stopper with respect to the sheave on the basis of the rotational position of the sheave during the detection of the stopper by the object detection means.

Description

    Technical Field
  • The present invention relates to an elevator governor.
  • Background Art
  • There are a disk type governor and a fly ball type governor as elevator governors which have hitherto been widely used. Overspeed detection mechanisms of conventional governors have no rotation speed dependence. For this reason, overspeed detection is performed at the same speed in all rotational directions.
  • However, for example, in a car-side governor of an elevator in which the ascent speed of a car is higher than the decent speed, an overspeed detection mechanism set so as to be adapted to the descent speed of the car operates also during the ascent of the car. For this reason, it is impossible to perform overspeed detection adapted to each of the ascent speed and the descent speed of the car.
  • In contrast to this, there have been proposed governors which are such that one governor is provided with two independent overspeed detection mechanisms having different detection operation speeds. In such governors, the rotation of a sheave is transmitted to an overspeed detection mechanism having a low detection operation speed via a ratchet. On the other hand, the rotation of a sheave is not transmitted to the other overspeed detection mechanism having a high detection operation speed via a ratchet, because the ratchet becomes free. As a result of this, in the car-side governor of an elevator in which the ascent speed of a car is higher than the descent speed, it is possible to carry out overspeed detection adapted to each of the ascent speed and the descent speed (refer to Patent Document 1, for example).
  • Citation List Patent Literature
  • Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2000-327241
  • Summary of Invention Technical Problem
  • However, in the governor disclosed in Patent Document 1, vibrations and noises are generated from the ratchet while rotating is performed in the direction in which the ratchet becomes free, and besides the reliability of the governor decreases due to the wear of parts of the ratchet.
  • The present invention was made to solve the problems described above, and the object of the invention is to provide an elevator governor capable of achieving, with a simple configuration, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.
  • Means for Solving the Problems
  • An elevator governor of the present invention includes a sheave on which a rope moving in response to the movement of an ascending and descending body of an elevator is wound, and which changes the rotation speed in one direction in response to the ascent speed of the ascending and descending body and changes the rotation speed in the other direction in response to the descent speed of the ascending and descending body; a fly-weight which is provided on a side surface of the sheave and increases and decreases a moving quantity to a radial outer side of the sheave in response to an increase and decrease in the rotation speed of the sheave; a detector which performs overspeed detection of the sheave when the fly-weight has moved to the radial outer side by a predetermined quantity; a stopper which is provided in the sheave and performs a rotational movement with respect to the sheave so as to be arranged to the radial outer side of the fly-weight in the case where the sheave rotates in a predetermined direction which is either of the two rotational directions, thereby preventing the fly-weight from moving to the radial outer side more than the predetermined quantity; rotational position detection means which detects a rotational position of the sheave; object detection means which is provided in proximity to the sheave and detects the stopper in the case where the stopper has approached the object detection means; and determination means which determines a position of the stopper with respect to the sheave on the basis of the rotational position of the sheave during the detection of the stopper by the object detection means.
  • Advantageous Effect of Invention
  • According to the present invention, it is possible to achieve, with a simple configuration, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.
  • Brief Description of the Drawings
    • Figure 1 is a front view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
    • Figure 2 is a sectional view taken along line A-A of Figure 1.
    • Figure 3 is a front view showing the essential parts of the elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
    • Figure 4 is a front view showing the essential parts of the elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
    • Figure 5 is a front view showing the essential parts of the elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
    • Figure 6 is a block diagram of a malfunction detection device which is used in the elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
    • Figure 7 is a block diagram of a malfunction detection device used in an elevator governor in Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
    • Figure 8 is a diagram to explain an example of signal output of the encoder used in the elevator governor in Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
    • Figure 9 is a front view showing the essential part of an elevator governor in Embodiment 3 of the present invention.
    • Figure 10 is a front view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 4 of the present invention.
    • Figure 11 is a sectional view taken along line B-B of Figure 10.
    • Figure 12 is a view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 5 of the present invention, which is equivalent to Figure 11.
    Description of Embodiments
  • Embodiments for carrying out the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In each of the drawings, the same reference symbols refer to the same or corresponding parts and overlaps of descriptions of such parts are correctly simplified or omitted.
  • Embodiment 1
  • In general, the shaft of an elevator is formed from a space extending in the vertical direction through the floors of a building. A machine room is provided in the upper part of the haft. A traction machine is provided in the machine room. A hoisting rope is wound on the traction machine. A car of the elevator is suspended at an end of the hoisting rope. On the other hand, a weight is suspended at the other end of the hoisting rope. And the rotation of the traction machine is controlled by a controller. The car and the weight ascend and descend at a set speed by responding to the rotation of the traction machine.
  • Furthermore, a safety gear device is provided in the lower part of the car. An endless governor rope is connected to the safety gear device via an arm. A curved portion at the lower end of the governor rope is wound on a tension pulley. On the other hand, a curved portion at the upper end of the governor rope is wound on a sheave of the governor provided in the machine room and the like. Hereinafter, the governor of this embodiment will be described in more detail with the aid of Figures 1 to 6.
  • Figure 1 is a front view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention. Figure 2 is a sectional view taken along line A-A of Figure 1.
    In Figures 1 and 2, reference numeral 1 denotes a governor. The governor 1 is provided with a sheave 2. The sheave 2 is pivotally supported on a main shaft 3. A governor rope 4 is wound on the sheave 2.
  • The governor rope 4 is attached to a car in an endless manner. The governor rope 4 moves in response to the movement of the car. The governor rope 4 rotates the sheave 2 in response to the ascent and descent of the car. That is, the sheave 2 changes the rotation speed in one direction according to the ascent speed of the car and changes the rotation speed in the other direction according to the descent speed of the car.
  • A pair of disk type fly-weights 5 is rotatably provided on a side surface of the sheave 2 via a pin 6. Both of the fly-weights 5 increase and decrease the moving quantity to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 along the side surface of the sheave 2 as a result of an increase and decrease in the rotation speed of the sheave 2. Both of the fly-weights 5 are connected by a link 7. As a result of this, the two fly-weights 5 have the same rotational angle.
  • A balance spring 9 is provided at an end of one of the fly-weights 5 via a link 8. This balance spring 9 constantly urges either of the fly-weights 5 to the center side of the sheave 2. A spring force adjusting nut 10 is provided in the link 8. The spring force adjusting nut 10 adjusts the urging force of the balance spring 9. A dog 11 is provided at an end of the other fly-weight 5 in such a manner as to be directed to the radial outer side of the sheave 2.
  • An actuating cam 12 is provided in proximity to the side of one side portion of the sheave 2. The actuating cam 12 is provided in a governor switch 13. The governor switch 13 comes into action when the actuating cam 12 moves up and down. Below one side portion of the sheave 2, a rope catch 14 is provided in proximity to the governor rope 4 on the side where the car is mounted.
  • The rope catch 14 is suspended by being caught by the lower end of a hook 15. This hook 15 is pivotally supported in the center via a pin 16. A fixed shoe 17 is provided on a side opposed to the rope catch 14. As a result of this, the governor rope 4 is surrounded by the rope catch 14 and the fixed shoe 17 below one side portion of the sheave 2.
  • In this embodiment, a stopper 18 is provided. The main body of this stopper 18 is rotatably provided in the main shaft 3. A pair of locking notched portions 19 is provided in the main body of the stopper 18. The end portions of the locking notched portions 19 on the center side of the sheave 2 are connected by a connecting notched portion 20. The connecting notched portion 20 is formed in the shape of a circular arc, with the main shaft 3 serving as the center. One end 22 of a lever 21 is inserted in such a manner as to be freely movable along the connecting notched portion 20. The other end 23 of the lever 21 is pivotally supported by the sheave 2.
  • On the side near the main shaft 3 rather than near the lever 21, a pin 24 is provided in the sheave 2 in such a manner as to protrude to the stopper 18 side. Also in the lever 21, a pin 25 is provided in such a manner as to protrude to the sheave 2 side. Between the pins 24 and 25, there is provided a helical tension spring 26. The helical tension spring 26 constantly urges the lever 21 to the center side of the sheave 2.
  • Next, the operation of the governor 1 will be described with the aid of Figures 3 to 5.
    Figures 3 to 5 are front views showing the essential parts of the elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
  • A description will be given of the operation of the governor 1 expected when the stopper 18 is not provided.
    When the sheave 2 rotates in synchronization with the ascent and descent of a car, the fly-weight 5 receives a centrifugal force responding to the rotation speed of the sheave 2. While the car is ascending and descending within a rated speed, the force by the balance spring 9 is larger than the centrifugal force applied to the fly-weight 5. For this reason, the relative positions of the fly-weight 5 and the sheave 2 do not change from the initial set condition.
  • When the ascending and descent speed of the car exceeds the rated speed, the centrifugal force applied to the fly-weight 5 overcomes the force of the balance spring 9. For this reason, the fly-weight 5 begins to move to the radial outer side of the sheave 2.
  • When the ascending and descent speed of the car has reached a first overspeed detection speed, the dog 11 at the forward end of the fly-weight 5 abuts against the actuating cam 12. This abutment causes the governor switch 13 to operate. That is, the actuating cam 12 and the governor switch 13 function as a detector which performs the overspeed detection of the sheave 2 when the fly-weight 5 has moved to the outer side by a predetermined quantity regardless of the ascent and descent of the car. The power to the traction machine and brake of the elevator is interrupted by the operation of the governor switch 13. Usually, the car stops due to this interruption.
  • When the car does not stop and the descent speed of the car has exceeded a first overspeed detection speed and has reached a second overspeed detection speed, the fly-weight 5 moves further to the radial outer side of the sheave 2. This movement causes the dog 11 to abut against the upper end of the hook 15 from the actuating cam 12 side. This abutment causes the hook 15 to rotate around the pin 16. This rotation of the hook 15 causes the lower end of the hook 15 to be disengaged from the rope catch 14.
  • And the rope catch 14 falls under gravity and sandwiches the governor rope 4 between itself and the fixed shoe 17. As a result of this, the governor rope 4 is braked. In synchronization with the braking of this governor rope 4, the safety gear device provided in the car operates. The operation of this safety gear device causes the car to stop.
  • Next, a description will be given of the operation of the governor 1 expected when the stopper 18 exists. In this embodiment, the mass of the lever 21 and the spring constant of the helical tension spring 26 are determined so that the lever 21 moves to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 when the rotation speed of the sheave 2 has exceeded a predetermined threshold value. When the car is accelerated in the ascent direction, the stopper 18 is pressed against one end 22 of the lever 21 in the rotational direction of the sheave 2. As a result of this, the stopper 18 rotates together with the sheave 2.
  • And as shown in Figure 3, when the ascent speed of the car exceeds the threshold value, one end 22 of the lever 21 moves to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 due to a centrifugal force and is housed in either of the locking notched portions 19. As a result of this, the stopper 18 is held in a condition in which the stopper 18 cannot rotate relatively with respect to the sheave 2. That is, the stopper 18 rotates together with the sheave 2.
  • At this time, the ascent direction exceeds the rated speed and the fly-wheel 2 is almost about to move to the radial outer side of the sheave 5. However, a protruding end of the stopper 18 is arranged on the radial outer side of the sheave 2 with respect to the fly-weight 5. For this reason, the fly-weight 5 interferes with the protruding end of the stopper 18 when the fly-weight 5 moves outside more than the predetermined quantity.
  • Therefore, the fly-weight 5 can scarcely move to the radial outer side of the sheave 2. That is, even when the ascent speed of the car has reached a first overspeed detection speed, the dog 11 at the forward end of the fly-weight 5 does not abut against the actuating cam 12. For this reason, the governor switch 13 does not operate, either.
  • On the other hand, when the ascent speed of the car decelerates and has lowered to the order of the threshold value, one end 22 of the lever 21 moves to the radial inner side of the sheave 2, i.e., the connecting notched portion 20. For this reason, the stopper 18 becomes able to rotate relatively with respect to the sheave 2 by an amount corresponding to the length of the connecting notched portion 20.
  • At this time, the stopper 18 is almost about to rotate at an almost constant speed by the law of inertia even when the sheave 2 has decelerated. For this reason, as shown in Figure 4, the stopper 18 rotates relatively with respect to the sheave 2. Subsequently, when the car has accelerated in the descent direction, the stopper 18 is pressed by one end 22 of the lever 21. As a result of this, the stopper 18 rotates together with the sheave 2.
  • And when the decent speed of the car has exceeded the threshold value, as shown in Figure 5, one end 22 of the lever 21 moves due to the centrifugal force to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 and is housed in the other locking notched portion 19. As a result of this, the protruding end of the stopper 18 is held at a position away from the outer side of the fly-weight 5. That is, there is no object which limits the movement of the fly-weight 5. For this reason, when the descent speed of the car has reached a first overspeed detection speed and a second overspeed detection speed, overspeed detection operations responding to each of the speeds are performed.
  • Next, a method of detecting malfunctions will be described with the aid of Figure 6.
    Figure 6 is a block diagram of a malfunction detection device which is used in the elevator governor in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
  • As shown in Figure 6, an encoder 27 is provided in the vicinity of the main shaft 3 of the governor 1. The encoder 27 functions as rotational position detection means which outputs a pulse signal responding to the rotational direction of the sheave 2 when the sheave 2 has moved to a prescribed rotational position. The pulse signal is inputted to a malfunction detection device 28.
  • The malfunction detection device 28 is provided with a proximity sensor 29 and a stopper position detection part 30. The proximity sensor 29 is arranged just above the sheave 2. The proximity sensor 29 is formed from a distance sensor of the eddy current type, the optical type, and the electrostatic capacity type and the like. For the proximity sensor 29, an area in a prescribed range below the proximity sensor 29 is the detection region. The proximity sensor 29 functions as object detection means which outputs a detection signal in the case where an object is present in the detection region.
  • Angular position information of the stopper 18 during the rotation of the governor 1 in the ascent direction is stored beforehand in the stopper position detection part 30. Angular position information of the stopper 18 during the rotation of the governor 1 in the descent direction is stored beforehand in the stopper position detection part 30. The stopper position detection part 30 functions as determination means which makes a determination as to whether or not the stopper 18 is in a prescribed position on the basis of the rotational position of the sheave 2 during the detection of the stopper 18 by the proximity sensor 29.
  • According to Embodiment 1 described above, the stopper 18 prevents the fly-weight 5 from moving to the radial outer side of the sheave 2 more than the predetermined quantity while the sheave 2 is rotating in a predetermined direction which is either of the two rotational directions. For this reason, it is possible to provide an elevator governor capable of achievineg, with a simple configuration, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.
  • Furthermore, while the sheave 2 is rotating in a predetermined direction, the main body of the stopper 18 is held by the lever 21. on the radial outer side of the sheave 2 with respect to the fly-weight 5. On the other hand, while the sheave 2 is rotating in a direction reverse to the predetermined direction, the main body of the stopper 18 is held by the lever 21 on the radial outer side of the sheave 2 with respect to the fly-weight 5. For this reason, it is possible to achieve, in a more stable manner, an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added.
  • Incidentally, it is preferred that the threshold value of the rotation speed of the sheave 2 for which one end 22 of the lever 21 moves to the radial outer side of the sheave 2, be set beforehand to the order of a half of the rated speed of the ascent and descent speeds of the car, whichever is lower. In this case, it is possible to effectively prevent unintended overspeed detection. Performing overspeed detection only when the car is running in the ascent direction of the car, can be accomplished by configuring the stopper 18 so that the movement of the fly-weight 5 is not prevented while the sheave 2 is rotating in the ascent direction of the car.
  • In addition, in this embodiment the malfunction detection device 28 makes a determination on the position of the stopper 18. For this reason, it is possible to detect malfunctions of the stopper 18.
  • Embodiment 2
  • Figure 7 is a block diagram of a malfunction detection device used in an elevator governor in Embodiment 2 of the present invention. Incidentally, parts which are the same as in Embodiment 1 or similar to those of Embodiment 1 bear the same reference characters and descriptions of such parts are omitted.
  • A disk of the sheave 2 of Embodiment 2 is provided with reference plates 31a, 31b. The reference plates 31a, 31b are arranged in positions shifted 180 degrees from the center of the sheave 2 as the standard. In the case where the sheave 2 is rotating in the ascent direction, a stopper 18a which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 30 degrees from the reference plate 31a (in a position shifted 150 degrees form the reference plate 3 1b), with the center of the sheave 2 serving as the standard. And a stopper 18b which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 30 degrees from the reference plate 31b (in a position shifted 150 degrees form the reference plate 31a), with the center of the sheave 2 serving as the standard, In contrast to this, in the case where the sheave 2 is rotating in the descent direction, the stopper 18a which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 60 degrees from the reference plate 31a (in a position shifted 120 degrees form the reference plate 31 b), with the center of the sheave 2 serving as the standard. And the stopper 18b which operated correctly is arranged in a position shifted 60 degrees from the reference plate 3 1b (in a position shifted 120 degrees form the reference plate 31a), with the center of the sheave 2 serving as the standard.
  • A malfunction detection device 32 of Embodiment 2 is provided with a proximity sensor part 33, a stopper position detection part 34, and a stopper position determination part 35. In the case where the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31a, 31b have approached the proximity sensor part 33, the proximity sensor part 33 detects the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31 a, 31 b. On the basis of a difference in detection timing between the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31a, 31b, the stopper position detection part 34 detects the positions of the stoppers 18a, 18b with respect to the sheave 2. On the basis of a pulse output of the encoder 27, the stopper position determination part 35 makes a determination on the rotational direction of the sheave 2. The stopper position determination part 35 makes a determination as to whether or not the stoppers 18a, 18b are in correct positions with respect to the rotational direction of the sheave 2.
  • Next, with the aid of Figure 8 a description will be given of a method of position detection by the stopper 18 in the stopper position detection part 34.
    Figure 8 is a diagram to explain an example of signal output of the encoder 27 used in the elevator governor in Embodiment 2 of the present invention. The abscissa of Figure 8 indicates time. The ordinate of Figure 8 indicates the output of the proximity sensor part 33.
  • Figure 8 shows the case where the sheave 2 is rotating in the decent direction. When the sheave 2 has rotated 60 degrees from the detection position of the stopper 18a, the reference plate 31a is detected. The time interval at this time is denoted by t0. Furthermore, when the sheave 2 has rotated 120 degrees, the stopper 18b is detected. The time interval at this time is denoted by t1. Furthermore, when the sheave 2 has rotated 60 degrees by taking time t0, the reference plate 31 b is detected. Furthermore, when the sheave 2 has rotated 120 degrees by taking time t1, the stopper 18a is detected again. The ratio of these time intervals is expressed by the ratio of rotational angles of the sheave 2. That is, t0: t1 = 60:120 = 1: 2. In this case, it is determined that the stoppers 18a, 18b are in correct positions with respect to the sheave 2 which is rotating in the descent direction.
  • In contrast to this, in the case where the sheave 2 is rotating in the ascent direction, when the sheave 2 has rotated 30 degrees from the detection position of the reference plate 31 a, the stopper 18a is detected. The time interval at this time is denoted by T0. Furthermore, when the sheave 2 has rotated 150 degrees, the reference plate 31b is detected. The time interval at this time is denoted by T1. Furthermore, when the sheave 2 has rotated 30 degrees by taking time T0, the stopper 18b is detected. Furthermore, when the sheave 2 has rotated 150 degrees by taking time T1, the reference plate 31a is detected again. The ratio of these time intervals is expressed by the ratio of rotational angles of the sheave 2. That is, T0: T1 = 30: 150 =1: 5. In this case, it is determined that the stoppers 18a, 18b are in correct positions with respect to the sheave 2 which is rotating in the ascent direction.
  • According to Embodiment 2 described above, a determination is made as to whether or not the stoppers 18a, 18b are in correct positions on the basis of the rotational position and rotational direction of the sheave 2 during the detection of the stoppers 18a, 18b. For this reason, it is possible to positively detect malfunctions of the stoppers 18a, 18b.
  • Specifically, a determination is made on the positions of the stoppers 18a, 18b with respect to the sheave 2 on the basis of a difference in detection timing between the reference plates 31a, 31b and the stoppers 18a, 18b. For this reason, it is possible to positively detect malfunctions of the stoppers 18a, 18b with a simple configuration.
  • It is unnecessary to limit the positional relationship between the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31a, 31b to the relationship of Embodiment 2. That is, it is necessary only that the positional relationship between the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31a, 31b change depending on the rotational direction of the sheave 2. Also in this case, it is possible to positively detect malfunctions of the stoppers 18a, 18b.
  • Incidentally, the number of times of object detection by the proximity sensor part 33 during one rotation of the sheave 2 is uniquely determined by the installed number of the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31a, 31b. Using this fact, it is possible to provide signal output means which outputs a malfunction signal in the case where the number of times of object detection by the proximity sensor part 33 during one rotation of the sheave 2 is different from a total number of the stoppers 18a, 18b and the reference plates 31a, 31b. It is possible to make a determination, from a malfunction signal, that a malfunction, of the proximity sensor part 33 and an abnormal operation of the governor 1 occurred.
  • Furthermore it is possible to provide prohibition means which prohibits a determination on the positions of the stoppers 18a, 18b in the case where the rotation speed of the sheave 2 is lower than the speed at which the fly-weight 5 is moved to the radial outer side by a prescribed quantity. In this case, it is possible to suppress an unnecessary detection action.
  • In addition, it is possible to provide signal output means which outputs a malfunction signal in the case where the rotation speed of the sheave 2 is higher than the speed at which the fly-weight 5 is moved to the radial outer side by a prescribed quantity and the stoppers 18a, 18b are not in correct positions. It is possible to make a determination, from a malfunction signal, that a malfunction of the stoppers 18a, 18b and a wrong detection of the malfunction detection device 32 occurred.
  • A malfunction signal may include information for bringing a brake installed in the traction machine driving the elevator into action. If a control device of the elevator brings the brake into action on the basis of a malfunction signal, it is possible to stop the elevator. As a result of this, it is possible to improve the safety of the elevator.
  • Embodiment 3
  • Figure 9 is a front view showing the essential part of an elevator governor in Embodiment 3 of the present invention. Incidentally, parts which are the same as in Embodiment 1 or corresponding pats bear like numerals and descriptions of these parts are omitted.
  • In Embodiment 1, all of the locking notched portion 19 of the stopper 18, the connecting notched 20, the lever 21, the pins 24, 25, and the helical tension spring 26 are provided in a quantity of one. On the other hand, in Embodiment 3, all of the locking notched portion 19 of the stopper 18, the connecting notched 20, the lever 21, the pins 24, 25, and the helical tension spring 26 are provided symmetrically with respect to the main shaft 3 in a plurality of numbers.
  • According to Embodiment 3 described above, the load applied to the lever 21 decreases. For this reason, it is possible to improve the reliability of the governor 1.
  • Embodiment 4
  • Figure 10 is a front view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 4 of the present invention. Figure 11 is a sectional view taken along line B-B of Figure 10. Incidentally, parts which are the same as in Embodiment 1 or similar to those of Embodiment 1 bear the same reference characters and descriptions of such parts are omitted.
  • The governor 1 of Embodiment 4 differs from the governor of Embodiment 1 in the configuration of the fly-weight, the shape of the stopper 18 and the like. The governor 1 of Embodiment 4 will be described below.
  • In Figures 10 and 11, reference numeral 36 denotes a pair of linear motion bearings. The linear motion bearings 36 are each attached to a side surface of the sheave 2 via a fixed portion 37. A fly-weight 38 is inserted into the linear motion bearing 36. The linear motion bearing 36 may be a sliding bearing using sliding friction or a ball and roller bearing using the frictions of balls and rollers.
  • A spring force adjusting nut 39 is provided in the fly-weight 38. A balance spring 40 is provided between the spring force adjusting nut 39 and the fixed portion 37. The balance spring 40 constantly urges the fly-weight 38 to the center side of the sheave 2.
  • Next, the operation of the governor 1 in the case where the stopper 18 does not exist will be described.
    When the sheave 2 rotates in synchronization with the ascent and descent of the car, the fly-weight 38 receives a centrifugal force responding to the rotation speed of the sheave 2. While the car is ascending and descending within a rated speed, the force by the balance spring 40 is larger than the centrifugal force applied to the fly-weight 38.
    For this reason, the relative position of the fly-weight 38 and the sheave 2 does not change from the initial set state.
  • When the ascent and descent speed of the car exceeds the rated speed, the centrifugal force applied to the fly-weight 38 overcomes the centrifugal force by the balance spring 40. For this reason, the fly-weight 38 starts to move to the radial outer side of the sheave 2.
  • When the ascending and descent speed of the car has reached a first overspeed detection speed, the forward end of the fly-weight 38 abuts against the actuating cam 12. This abutment causes the governor switch 13 to operate. That is, the actuating cam 12 and the governor switch 13 function as a detector which performs the overspeed detection of the sheave 2 when the fly-weight 38 has moved to the outer side by a predetermined quantity regardless of the ascent and descent of the car. The power to the traction machine and brake of the elevator is interrupted by the operation of the governor switch 13. Usually, the car stops due to this interruption.
  • When the car does not stop and the descent speed of the car has exceeded a first overspeed detection speed and has reached a second overspeed detection speed, the fly-weight 38 moves further to the radial outer side of the sheave 2. This movement causes the forward end of the fly-weight 38 to abut against the upper end of the hook 15 from the actuating cam 12 side. This abutment causes the hook 15 to rotate around the pin 16. The lower end of the hook 15 becomes disengaged from the rope catch 14. As a result of this rotation, the rope catch 14 falls under gravity.
  • And the rope catch 14 falls under gravity and sandwiches the governor rope 4 between itself and the fixed shoe 17. As a result of this, the governor rope 4 is braked. In synchronization with the braking of this governor rope 4, the safety gear device provided in the car operates. As a result of this, the car stops.
  • Incidentally, because the operation in the case where the stopper 18 exists is the same as in Embodiment 1, a description of this operation is omitted.
  • According to Embodiment 4 described above, it is possible to achieve an overspeed detection mechanism having the same effect as in Embodiment 1 to which rotation dependence is added even when the disk type fly-weights 5 are not used.
  • Embodiment 5
  • Figure 12 is a view of an elevator governor in Embodiment 5 of the present invention, which is equivalent to Figure 11. Incidentally, parts which are the same as in Embodiment 4 or corresponding pats bear like numerals and descriptions of these parts are omitted.
  • In Embodiment 4 one overspeed detection mechanism is provided, whereas in Embodiment 5 two overspeed detection mechanisms are provided. The overspeed detection mechanisms operate independently from each other. The governor 1 of Embodiment 5 will be described with the aid of Figure 9.
  • In Figure 12, reference numeral 41 denotes a rotary body. The rotary body 41 is fixed to one side surface of the sheave 2. That is, the rotary body has the function of rotating together with the sheave 2. One overspeed detection mechanism is provided on the other side surface. One overspeed detection mechanism is provided with a stopper 18 similar to that of Embodiment 3. The other overspeed detection mechanism is provided on one side surface of the rotary body 41. The other overspeed detection mechanism is not provided with a stopper 18.
  • One overspeed detection mechanism is set to match a rated speed in the descent direction of the car. One overspeed detection mechanism is such that the operation thereof is limited by the stopper 18 during the ascent of the car before the speed becomes higher than the rated speed in the descent direction of the car. In contrast to this, the other overspeed detection mechanism is set to match a rated speed in the ascent direction of the car. This governor 1 is provided in an elevator in which the ascent direction of the car is higher than the descent speed.
  • According to Embodiment 5 described above, in an elevator in which the ascent direction of the car is higher than the descent speed, it is possible to perform overspeed detection adapted to each of the ascent speed and the descent speed.
  • In an elevator in which the ascent speed of the car is lower than the descent speed, the detection speed of the overspeed detection mechanism whose operation is limited by the stopper 18 is set to match a rated speed in the ascent direction of the car, and the governor 1 whose operation is not limited by the stopper 18 is set to be adaptable to a rated speed in the descent direction of the car.
  • In Embodiments 1 to 5 above, the description was given of the configurations in which the stopper 18 is provided in the car-side governor 1. However, the same effect as in Embodiments 1 to 5 is obtained even when the stopper 18 is provided in the weight-side governor 1.
  • Industrial Applicability
  • As described above, the elevator governor of the present invention can be used in an elevator in which, with a simple configuration, is achieved an overspeed detection mechanism to which rotation dependence is added while preventing a decrease in reliability due to the generation of vibrations and noises and the wear of parts.
  • Description of symbols
  • 1 governor, 2 sheave, 3 main shaft, 4 governor rope, 5 fly-weight, 6 pin, 7 link, 8 link, 9 balance spring, 10 spring force adjusting nut, 11 dog, 12 actuating cam, 13 governor switch, 14 rope catch, 15 hook, 16 pin, 17 fixed shoe, 18 stopper, 18, 18a, 18b stopper, 19 locking notched portion, 20 connecting notched portion, 21 lever, 22 one end, 23 other end, 24 pin, 25 pin, 26 helical tension spring, 27 encoder, 28 malfunction detection device, 29 proximity sensor, 30 stopper position detection part, 31, 31 a, 31 b reference plate, 32 malfunction detection device, 33 proximity sensor part, 34 stopper position detection part, 35 stopper position determination part, 36 linear motion bearing, 37 fixed portion, 38 fly-weight, 39 spring force adjusting nut, 40 balance spring, 41 rotary body

Claims (7)

  1. An elevator governor comprising:
    a sheave on which a rope moving in response to the movement of an ascending and descending body of an elevator is wound, and which changes the rotation speed in one direction in response to the ascent speed of the ascending and descending body and changes the rotation speed in the other direction in response to the descent speed of the ascending and descending body;
    a fly-weight which is provided on a side surface of the sheave and increases and decreases a moving quantity to a radial outer side of the sheave in response to an increase and decrease in the rotation speed of the sheave;
    a detector which performs overspeed detection of the sheave when the fly-weight has moved to the radial outer side by a predetermined quantity;
    a stopper which is provided in the sheave and performs a rotational movement with respect to the sheave so as to be arranged to the radial outer side of the fly-weight in the case where the sheave rotates in a predetermined direction which is either of the two rotational directions, thereby preventing the fly-weight from moving to the radial outer side more than the predetermined quantity;
    rotational position detection means which detects a rotational position of the sheave;
    object detection means which is provided in proximity to the sheave and detects the stopper in the case where the stopper has approached the object detection means; and
    determination means which determines a position of the stopper with respect to the sheave on the basis of the rotational position of the sheave during the detection of the stopper by the object detection means.
  2. The elevator governor according to claim 1, wherein the rotational position detection means outputs a pulse responding to the rotational direction of the sheave, and
    wherein the determination means determines the rotational direction of the sheave on the basis of the pulse, and makes a determination as to whether or not the stopper is in a correct position on the basis of the rotational position and rotational direction of the sheave during the detection of the stopper by the object detection means.
  3. The elevator governor according to claim 2, further comprising:
    a reference plate provided in the sheave;
    wherein the object detection means detects the reference plate when the reference plate has approached the object detection means, and
    wherein the determination means makes a determination on a position of the stopper with respect to the sheave on the basis of a difference in detection timing between the reference plate and the stopper and makes a determination as to whether or not the stopper is present in a correct position.
  4. The elevator governor according to claim 3, further comprising:
    signal output means which outputs a malfunction signal in the case where a determination is made on one rotation of the sheave on the basis of a change in the rotational position of the sheave, and the number of times of object detection by the object detection means during one rotation of the sheave is different from a total number of the stopper and the reference plate.
  5. The elevator governor according to any of claims 1 to 4, further comprising:
    prohibition means which prohibits a determination on the position of the stopper by the determination means in the case where a determination is made on the rotation speed of the sheave on the basis of the rotational position of the sheave, and the rotation speed of the sheave is lower than the speed at which the fly-weight is moved to the radial outer side by the prescribed quantity.
  6. The elevator governor according to claim 5, further comprising:
    signal output means which outputs a malfunction signal when the stopper is not in a correct position.
  7. The elevator governor according to claim 4 or 6, wherein the signal output means outputs, as the malfunction signal, a signal including information to cause a brake provided on a traction machine which drives the elevator to operate.
EP10857275.1A 2010-09-17 2010-09-17 Speed governor for elevator Active EP2617672B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2010/066126 WO2012035641A1 (en) 2010-09-17 2010-09-17 Speed governor for elevator

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2617672A1 true EP2617672A1 (en) 2013-07-24
EP2617672A4 EP2617672A4 (en) 2018-01-24
EP2617672B1 EP2617672B1 (en) 2018-11-28

Family

ID=45831141

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10857275.1A Active EP2617672B1 (en) 2010-09-17 2010-09-17 Speed governor for elevator

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2617672B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5472473B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101398725B1 (en)
CN (1) CN103118965B (en)
WO (1) WO2012035641A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11034546B2 (en) 2018-06-28 2021-06-15 Otis Elevator Company Elevator governor
JP2021187574A (en) * 2020-05-26 2021-12-13 株式会社日立製作所 Governor for elevator and elevator

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106132860B (en) * 2014-04-16 2018-08-03 株式会社日立制作所 Lift appliance
JP6092344B1 (en) * 2015-11-02 2017-03-08 東芝エレベータ株式会社 Elevator governor equipment
JP6552954B2 (en) * 2015-12-10 2019-07-31 株式会社日立製作所 Elevator equipment
CN114961371A (en) * 2022-06-11 2022-08-30 北京首嘉钢结构有限公司 Speed limiting device of vertical lifting type stereo garage
CN115140627B (en) * 2022-07-27 2024-01-19 苏州富士精工电梯有限公司 Elevator overspeed governor measuring device
CN115285810A (en) * 2022-09-30 2022-11-04 江苏顺捷机电工程有限公司 Elevator operation early warning method and human body intercommunication elevator system applying same

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4306014B2 (en) 1999-05-17 2009-07-29 三菱電機株式会社 Governor
WO2006038300A1 (en) * 2004-10-07 2006-04-13 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Elevator apparatus
JP4836437B2 (en) * 2004-11-19 2011-12-14 東芝エレベータ株式会社 Elevator governor.
EP1852383A4 (en) * 2005-02-24 2012-11-14 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Governor for elevator
EP2020396A4 (en) * 2006-05-22 2013-10-02 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Speed governor for elevator
JP4985649B2 (en) * 2006-10-18 2012-07-25 三菱電機株式会社 Elevator speed control device and elevator device
WO2010023745A1 (en) * 2008-08-28 2010-03-04 三菱電機株式会社 Elevator speed governor

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2012035641A1 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11034546B2 (en) 2018-06-28 2021-06-15 Otis Elevator Company Elevator governor
JP2021187574A (en) * 2020-05-26 2021-12-13 株式会社日立製作所 Governor for elevator and elevator

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2617672B1 (en) 2018-11-28
CN103118965B (en) 2015-03-25
CN103118965A (en) 2013-05-22
JP5472473B2 (en) 2014-04-16
JPWO2012035641A1 (en) 2014-01-20
EP2617672A4 (en) 2018-01-24
KR101398725B1 (en) 2014-05-27
KR20130103533A (en) 2013-09-23
WO2012035641A1 (en) 2012-03-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8950554B2 (en) Elevator governor
EP2617672B1 (en) Speed governor for elevator
JP4306014B2 (en) Governor
JP5287859B2 (en) Elevator governor
EP2456702B1 (en) Elevator governor system
US9359173B2 (en) Elevator governor having two tripping mechanisms on separate sheaves
JP2009154984A (en) Elevator governor
KR20130054336A (en) Elevator speed governor
EP3150537B1 (en) Elevator overspeed governor
JP4292215B2 (en) Elevator governor device
EP1798183B1 (en) Elevator apparatus
EP2490971B1 (en) Unintended movement governor and elevator
JP5577736B2 (en) Elevator governor
JP5944056B2 (en) Elevator governor and elevator apparatus using the same
JP5845317B2 (en) Elevator governor
KR100816172B1 (en) Elevator apparatus
KR100881503B1 (en) Speed governor device of elevator

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130214

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RA4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected)

Effective date: 20180102

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B66B 5/04 20060101AFI20171219BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20180619

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1069995

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20181215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602010055531

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20181128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1069995

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20181128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190228

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190328

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190228

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190328

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190301

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010055531

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20190829

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190930

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190917

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190917

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20190930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190930

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20190917

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190917

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20100917

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 602010055531

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181128

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230512

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240730

Year of fee payment: 15