EP2581741A1 - Transfert de méthodes en geleant un paramètre initialement non contrôlé - Google Patents

Transfert de méthodes en geleant un paramètre initialement non contrôlé Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2581741A1
EP2581741A1 EP11184943.6A EP11184943A EP2581741A1 EP 2581741 A1 EP2581741 A1 EP 2581741A1 EP 11184943 A EP11184943 A EP 11184943A EP 2581741 A1 EP2581741 A1 EP 2581741A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
parameter
sample
scouting
controlled
separation apparatus
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP11184943.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2581741B1 (fr
Inventor
Klaus Witt
Konstantin Choikhet
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Agilent Technologies Inc
Original Assignee
Agilent Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Agilent Technologies Inc filed Critical Agilent Technologies Inc
Priority to EP11184943.6A priority Critical patent/EP2581741B1/fr
Publication of EP2581741A1 publication Critical patent/EP2581741A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2581741B1 publication Critical patent/EP2581741B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N30/00—Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
    • G01N30/02—Column chromatography
    • G01N30/86—Signal analysis
    • G01N30/8693—Models, e.g. prediction of retention times, method development and validation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N30/00—Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
    • G01N30/02—Column chromatography
    • G01N30/26—Conditioning of the fluid carrier; Flow patterns
    • G01N30/28—Control of physical parameters of the fluid carrier
    • G01N30/32—Control of physical parameters of the fluid carrier of pressure or speed
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N30/00—Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
    • G01N30/02—Column chromatography
    • G01N30/26—Conditioning of the fluid carrier; Flow patterns
    • G01N30/28—Control of physical parameters of the fluid carrier
    • G01N30/34—Control of physical parameters of the fluid carrier of fluid composition, e.g. gradient

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods for operating sample separation systems and relates to the development of such methods.
  • a fluidic sample and an eluent may be pumped through conduits and a column in which separation of sample components takes place.
  • the column may comprise a material which is capable of separating different components of the fluidic analyte.
  • a packing material so-called beads which may comprise silica gel, may be filled into a column tube which may be connected to other elements (like a control unit, containers including sample and/or buffers) by conduits.
  • US 2003/116195 A1 and WO 2007/092798 A2 are examples for chromatographic separating systems.
  • the composition of the mobile phase can be adjusted by composing the mobile phase from different fluidic components with variable contributions, so called gradient mode.
  • HPLC systems often are operated in such a gradient mode, wherein for instance for reversed phase chromatography the organic content is ramped overtime, or for ion exchange chromatography the salt content is ramped over time.
  • An analytical protocol for running a defined analytical process is called the "method".
  • the gradient is usually defined as a composition change program over time, while the flow rate is kept constant over the major part of such a method.
  • the so-called retention time is a time required for transport of a certain fraction of a fluidic sample to be separated throughout a separation column during a gradient run.
  • WO 2011/108401 discloses a high-speed liquid chromatography device with which it is possible to achieve a separation effect similar to that of constant velocity gradient elution, and with which it is possible to reduce measurement time.
  • a data processing device to convert a constant flow rate gradient program into a constant pressure gradient program on the basis of previously recorded pressure trace run with constant flow
  • a pressure value trace file stored in a pressure trace storage unit is selected and displayed on a display
  • pressure values are set.
  • a constant velocity gradient program stored on a constant velocity gradient program storage unit is converted into a constant pressure gradient program by means of a constant pressure gradient program conversion unit, and numbers are displayed by the converted constant pressure gradient program.
  • Liquid supply units of a liquid supply pump are controlled by a flow rate instruction unit and a mix ratio instruction unit in accordance with the constant pressure gradient program displayed on the screen.
  • WO 2009/062538 A1 discloses in a high performance liquid chromatography system, wherein a mobile phase is driven through a stationary phase for separating components of a fluidic sample comprised in the mobile phase, a flow rate of the mobile phase is controlled in dependence on a variation in a control value in the system.
  • WO 2009/062538 A1 comprises determining (for instance by an adequate analysis unit, which considers predicted, measured or elsewise derived flow information) a value of a retention volume representing such volume of the mobile phase required to elute a respective compound of the fluidic sample at least through the separating device.
  • the mobile phase drive is then operated (for instance by an adequate control unit) based on the determined value of the retention volume. This makes use of the concept of retention volumes, rather than retention times.
  • a process for developing a method of operating a sample separation apparatus for separating a fluidic sample using a mobile phase comprises executing a scouting method for separating a fluidic sample by controlling a set of controlled parameters (wherein the set of controlled parameters may be exactly one controlled parameter or a plurality of controlled parameters) during the execution of the scouting method, wherein non-controlled parameters are allowed to freely vary during the execution of the scouting method, registering a course of at least one non-controlled parameter during the execution of the scouting method, defining a modified method for separating a fluidic sample derived from the scouting method by changing the set of controlled parameters, i.e.
  • a chromatographic method of operating a chromatographic sample separation apparatus for separating a fluidic sample by chromatography comprises a sequence of instructions to the chromatographic sample separation apparatus which results from a process having the above mentioned features.
  • a chromatographic method of operating a chromatographic sample separation apparatus for separating a fluidic sample by chromatography comprises a numeric table or mathematical function or expression defining or describing the operation program for the chromatographic sample separation apparatus.
  • Such a method may be derived by the above described process.
  • an apparatus for developing a method of operating a sample separation apparatus for separating a fluidic sample using a mobile phase comprising an execution unit configured for executing a scouting method for separating a fluidic sample by controlling a set of controlled parameters during the execution of the scouting method, wherein non-controlled parameters are allowed to freely vary during the execution of the scouting method, a registering unit configured for registering a course of at least one non-controlled parameter during the execution of the scouting method, a defining unit configured for defining a modified method for separating a fluidic sample derived from the scouting method by changing the set of controlled parameters, declaring the previously registered non-controlled parameter as a new controlled parameter in the modified method and optionally excluding an originally controlled parameter from the set of controlled parameters, and a further execution unit (wherein the execution unit and the further execution unit may be either a common entity such as one and the same processor, or may be separate entities) configured for
  • a sample separation apparatus for separating components of a fluidic sample in a mobile phase
  • the sample separation apparatus comprises a mobile phase drive, particularly a pumping system, configured to drive the mobile phase through the sample separation apparatus, a separation unit, particularly a chromatographic column, configured for separating components of the fluidic sample in the mobile phase, and a method execution unit configured for executing a method of operating the sample separation apparatus for separating the fluidic sample, wherein the method results from a process having the above mentioned features.
  • a software program or product is provided, preferably stored on a data carrier, for controlling or executing the process having the above mentioned features, when run on a data processing system such as a computer.
  • an embedded software program or a user interface which enables controlling or executing the process having the above mentioned features either directly on a chromatographic apparatus or using a hardware controller or control interface such as a hand-held controller or hand-held computer or similar device.
  • Embodiments of the invention can be partly or entirely embodied or supported by one or more suitable software programs, which can be stored on or otherwise provided by any kind of data carrier, and which might be executed in or by any suitable data processing unit.
  • Software programs or routines can be preferably applied in the context of method transfer and method development.
  • the method transfer and method development scheme according to an embodiment of the invention can be performed or assisted by a computer program, i.e. by software, or by using one or more special electronic optimization circuits, i.e. in hardware, or in hybrid form, i.e. by means of software components and hardware components.
  • fluid sample may particularly denote any liquid and/or gaseous medium, optionally including also solid particles, which is to be analyzed.
  • a fluidic sample may comprise a plurality of fractions of molecules or particles which shall be separated, for instance biomolecules such as proteins.
  • sample separation apparatus may particularly denote any apparatus which is capable of separating different fractions of a fluidic sample by applying a certain separation technique.
  • a separation unit may be provided in such a sample separation apparatus. This means that the sample can be separated in accordance with a certain separation criterion.
  • separation unit may particularly denote a fluidic member through which a fluidic sample is transferred and which is configured so that, upon conducting the fluidic sample through the separation unit, the fluidic sample will be separated into different groups of molecules or particles (called fractions or sub-fractions, respectively).
  • An example for a separation unit is a liquid chromatography column which is capable of trapping and selectively releasing different fractions of the fluidic sample.
  • sample separation method may be defined by a specification of the sample separation involving a set of parameters" and may particularly denote a workflow, an algorithm or a set of operation parameters defining as to how a sample separation apparatus is to be operated, controlled or run.
  • the sample separation method may include a complete set of data which, when provided to the sample separation apparatus, defines a dedicated operation of this sample separation apparatus.
  • the sample separation method may define a procedure of separating different components of fluids by the sample separation apparatus (for example a recipe as to how to run a liquid chromatography, gas chromatography or gel electrophoresis experiment) or a procedure requiring official approval (for instance an approval procedure before the FDA, Food and Drug Administration, in the United States), a procedure of flushing the device (for example an algorithm according to which a rinse solution is supplied for removing traces of fluids from a previous investigation, thereby suppressing undesired crosstalk or contamination), a selection of a solvent for the sample separation apparatus (for instance selecting multiple constituents of such a solvent, their relative concentrations, etc.), a procedure of applying a concentration gradient to the sample separation apparatus (for example to perform a liquid chromatography analysis using a chromatographic column) and/or a selection of an operation temperature (and/or other physical parameters such as pressure) for the sample separation apparatus.
  • the operation mode may define a sequence of instructions providable to the sample separation apparatus for operating the sample separation apparatus.
  • the term "parameter” may particularly denote any physical variable having an impact on a sample separation procedure, particularly a chromatographic sample separation procedure. Examples are pressure, flow rate, temperature, composition of a mobile phase and/or a fluidic sample and/or of a fluidic member of the sample separation apparatus.
  • controlled parameter may particularly denote at least one parameter which is actively controlled, regulated, steered or adjusted during the execution of the scouting method so that the parameter value of the controlled parameter can be changed in a determined way.
  • a controlled parameter may be a solvent composition which can be changed over time during a gradient mode.
  • non-controlled parameter may particularly denote a parameter which is not directly or actively brought to a certain value, i.e. does not serve as a parameter being adjusted by a user or the method or by the apparatus in course of the method execution.
  • the non-controlled parameter may change its value only indirectly as a consequence of the processes taking place in the apparatus or in the system actively controlled in accordance with controlled parameters, i.e. may float. Therefore, the non-controlled parameter may also be denoted as a resulting or floating parameter, which is free to vary.
  • An example for such a parameter which may be non-controlled during execution of the scouting method is the flow rate of the mobile phase or fluid in the case pressure is used as a controlled parameter.
  • the term "registering a course of the non-controlled parameter” may particularly denote that the time dependence or development of the value of the non-controlled parameter is detected and its value over time may be stored.
  • the term "modified method” may particularly denote a method which has been changed as compared to the scouting method to thereby change a characteristic of the separation procedure.
  • the controlled parameters and the non-controlled parameters may differ between the modified method and the scouting method.
  • this does not necessarily mean that the values of parameters are different between the modified method and the scouting method.
  • the course of an uncontrolled parameter resulting from an execution of the modified method might substantially follow or be the same as the programmed course of that parameter during the scouting method execution, when that parameter was a controlled parameter.
  • the term "executing the modified method under application of the registered course of the parameter as execution program” may particularly denote that the measured and recorded course (for instance development over time) of this previously non-controlled or floating parameter is converted into an operation instruction or set or sequence of instructions for the separation apparatus.
  • this course may be input to the system as a target behaviour of the parameter during execution of the modified method.
  • the scheme of adjusting the previously non-controlled and now controlled parameter may be performed actively in such a manner so that the floating previously non-controlled parameter will exactly follow the course which it took when carrying out the scouting method.
  • the now controlled parameter is adjusted so that the course of this previously non-controlled parameter is exactly mapped onto the modified (or transferred) method.
  • a system which initially carries out a scouting method such as a chromatographic method based on adjusting at least one controlled parameter, such as a fluid pressure, during executing the method.
  • the scouting method can be a run in the volume based mode, i.e. a mobile phase drive may be operated based on a determined value of the delivered volume (as disclosed in WO 2009/062538 ).
  • another non-controlled parameter may freely float.
  • Such a non-controlled parameter can be the flow rate of fluids, for example.
  • the course of this initially non-controlled parameter may then be saved as a data set and may be fixed or frozen for future execution of a modified method.
  • Frozen means in this context that no changes and that no deviations of this course of the flow rate will be allowed in the modified method, or that the frozen course is defined as a target behaviour of the corresponding parameter in the modified method.
  • the previously floating non-controlled parameter the flow rate in the present example
  • the saved course is defined as a target dependency for the modified method.
  • one or more other parameters such as the course of pressure, the temperature of fluid and/or fluidic members, etc.
  • the flow rate may be allowed to vary as an initially non-controlled parameter, whereas the pressure may be controlled or adjusted in a desired way (for instance, the machine can be operated close to its limit, i.e. at or close to a maximum pressure value).
  • the course of the flow rate (as detected for example during a gradient run) or the like can be frozen in accordance with its registered behaviour. In this example not only the course of the flow rate will be frozen, but also the course of fluid composition.
  • the fluid composition will remain a controlled parameter in the modified method, however its course over time needs to be registered in order to be used as controlled parameter in the case a volume based operation mode of the scouting method needs to be transformed into time based operation of the modified method.
  • the freezing of the course of this non-controlled parameter can then ensure that the development of this parameter over the gradient run can be maintained on another sample separation apparatus on which the correspondingly modified method is executed.
  • an appropriate method for this other sample separation apparatus is generated using a highly sophisticated apparatus and then directly deployed to an apparatus with limited functionality with low effort. Even if this other sample separation apparatus has lower or other functionality that the initially used sample separation apparatus, the functionality of the initially used sample separation apparatus can be emulated by the other sample separation apparatus.
  • the defining further comprises excluding an originally controlled parameter from the set of controlled parameters.
  • the number of controlled parameters may be kept small in the modified method.
  • the scouting method is executed with the flow rate being part of the set of originally non-controlled parameters (in the scouting method).
  • the flow rate may be the new controlled parameter (in the modified method).
  • flow rate may freely float in the scouting method, and may be correspondingly controlled in the modified method.
  • the initially non-controlled parameter is the flow rate of the mobile phase, its recorded time dependency can be made an execution program for the modified method.
  • other non-controlled parameters may be considered such as a time dependence of the temperature on a separation column or the like.
  • the registering of the course of the at least one non-controlled parameter and/or the executing of the modified method is performed during a chromatographic gradient run.
  • the course of the corresponding parameter (particularly the flow rate) over a chromatographic run may be frozen or fixed.
  • the scouting method is executed in accordance with a volume-based control scheme, particularly by controlling any parameters different from a flow rate of the mobile phase as controlled parameter.
  • the scouting method can be a retention volume-based method, i.e. a mobile phase drive may be operated based on a determined value of the retention volume (as disclosed in WO 2009/062538 ; particularly, explicit reference is made herewith to paragraphs [0048] to [0066] of WO 2009/062538 ).
  • an initially controlled parameter is a pressure course of a mobile phase conducted by a mobile phase drive and the initially non-controlled parameter is a flow rate of the mobile phase. While executing the scouting method, pressure may be used as an originally controlled parameter.
  • pressure of mobile phase components constituting a composition may be programmed, adjusted, controlled or regulated in the original method.
  • retention volume based may be replaced by “run volume-based” or “delivered volume-based” or “volume-based”
  • retention time-based may be replaced by “time-based”
  • time and volume are here considered as physical variables in expressions “volume-based” or “time-based”.
  • the course of pressure of the mobile phase or a part thereof may be adjusted as controlled parameter in the scouting method. Therefore, a volume-based control of a liquid chromatography system may be implemented in the execution of the scouting method. In other words, the actually flown volume may be determined and the system can then be controlled based on such volume values. For this purpose, the pressure of the mobile phase may be adjusted which may result in a time-dependent flow rate. Additionally or alternatively, other controlled parameters are possible such as the time dependence of the temperature of a separation column. Therefore, while executing the scouting method, temperature, particularly chromatographic separation column outlet temperature, may be measured and may be used as an originally controlled parameter.
  • the recorded course of the initially non-controlled parameter is frozen and stored as a data set which is directly used for the adjusting of the course of the subsequently controlled parameter.
  • the direct use of the stored recorded course of the non-controlled parameter means that the parameter set or data set stored will not be changed before it is used for the modified method in the described embodiment. Therefore, the obtained course of the non-controlled parameter (during executing the scouting method) may be taken without manipulating it in any way.
  • the storage of this data may be performed on a memory device such as a semiconductor mass storage device. Therefore, the registered course may be stored as a data set which is used as program for direct control of the new controlled parameter.
  • the registered course of the parameter is used for construction of an execution program for the new controlled parameter by processing the data describing the registered course of the parameter such that the processed data set can be used for adjusting the course of the new controlled parameter during any of following executions resulting in a close or the same course of the new controlled parameter as the course of the parameter.
  • the processing of the registered course of may comprise data format change, data decimation, noise reduction, resampling, fitting to a mathematical function, error correction, interpolation, extrapolation, smoothing and/or data filtering.
  • the program may also be generated by data manipulation, for instance for more convenient processing, storage, suppression of artifacts, etc. Hence, it is not necessary that the trace itself is used directly. However, the goal to maintain the original course sufficiently close should be served.
  • the recorded course of the initially non-controlled parameter is frozen and stored as a data set which is used as source for the execution program to control the course of the subsequently controlled parameter.
  • the use of the stored recorded course of the non-controlled parameter as a source for the execution program means that the data set may be processed prior, during or after the recording or alternatively in the process of the generation of the program.
  • the processing may include data decimation, filtering, smoothing, error correction, format change, fitting to a formula, etc. However, this may be performed without changing the course of the recorded parameter, which means that during execution of the modified method the course of the subsequently controlled parameter may by intention be close to the course recorded during scouting method execution.
  • the modified method is executed on another sample separation apparatus than the sample separation apparatus on which the scouting method is executed.
  • the transfer from the scouting method to the modified method on a level of instructions may be accompanied by a transfer on a hardware level (i.e. executing the scouting method and the modified method on different sample separation apparatuses). Therefore, the method transfer may consider a different functionality of the sample separation apparatus as compared to the other sample separation apparatus. While the sample separation apparatus may be capable of executing a method by actively varying a controlled parameter over time, this capability may be lacking in the other sample separation apparatus.
  • the functionality may be virtually mapped from one apparatus to the other one.
  • the other sample separation apparatus comprises a fluidic system component, particularly a mobile phase drive, being incapable of executing a method for separating a fluidic sample by controlling the controlled parameter but being capable of executing a method for separating a fluidic sample by controlling the other controlled parameter.
  • the other sample separation apparatus may not be capable to perform a conventional volume-based control of liquid chromatography gradient run involving a time dependence of pressure.
  • this functionality may be mimicked or emulated on the lower functionality sample separation apparatus.
  • the modified method is stored to be executed on a liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry device (LC/MSD) as the sample separation apparatus, i.e. a coupled liquid chromatography and mass spectroscopy device (for instance of the 1200 Series LC/MSD of Agilent Technologies).
  • a liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry device i.e. a coupled liquid chromatography and mass spectroscopy device (for instance of the 1200 Series LC/MSD of Agilent Technologies).
  • a liquid chromatography apparatus for separating different components of a fluidic sample
  • mass spectroscopy device arranged downstream of the liquid chromatography apparatus so as to identify the various peaks or fractions separated by the liquid chromatography apparatus.
  • mass spectroscopy device may not be capable of being operated under a condition in which the flow rate is freely floating because the sensor results will depend on the actual flow rate.
  • a calibrated or reproducible course of the flow rate can be followed which allows the implementation of a mass spectroscopy device with a chromatographic method in which the flow rate changes over time.
  • the efficiency of the interface between separation column and mass spectroscopy device often is flow-dependent so that it is important for operation of a mass spectrometry device that the conditions are reproducible.
  • standardized conditions may be present which allows such an execution even when carrying out the chromatographic method in a volume-based way with variable flow rate.
  • a calibration of a detector sensitivity for different substances separated on the sample separation unit for a detector which can be influenced by the flow rate, such as LC (liquid chromatography) -coupled mass spectrometer may be accomplished during the scouting method execution.
  • the scouting method may be executed using a calibrated standard as a sample for separation and the calibration factors are determined for sample components of interest.
  • a calibration factor for each sample component will automatically consider for the momentary value of the flow rate corresponding to the separation stage, when the sample component is detected by the detector.
  • the modified method (which may be run according to the flow rate program provided by freezing the flow rate course of the scouting method) is executed the calibration factors will still be valid because the separation progress stage and thus the momentary flow rate during elution of a sample component will be the same as in the calibration run.
  • defining the modified method comprises adding at least one instruction to the scouting method, excluding at least one instruction from the scouting method and/or modifying at least one instruction of the scouting method.
  • the transfer from the method to the modified method may maintain the instructions and parameters of the scouting method, however adding an additional set of instructions and/or parameters to the modified method reflecting the necessity that the recorded time dependency of the course of the non-controlled parameter is also observable when executing the modified method. Therefore, the newly designed method may be used as a master for many subsequent chromatographic runs, i.e. may serve as a new standard method for the other sample separation apparatus. Removal or amendment of instructions is however possible as well during the method transfer.
  • the modified method is stored to be executed for multiple sample separation procedures on a sample separation apparatus.
  • Data being indicative for the modified method may be permanently stored on a corresponding data carrier of the respective sample separation apparatus.
  • the modified method may be stored to be adjusted for following execution.
  • the modified method is stored in a format that all controlled parameters are now defined as a function of recorded time.
  • the modified method may be configured as a time based method.
  • a volume based method is transformed onto a system without volume based capabilities, not only the flow rate may be converted from a non-controlled parameter to a controlled parameter and its course is frozen, but the course of all controlled parameters (such as composition, a controlled temperature being programmed to be not constant over time, etc.) changing over time may be frozen.
  • These frozen courses may be used in the modified method as programs, since the programs itself do not change, but the variable against which the programs are processed are changed from "Delivered Volume” to "Real Time". This may render the freezing of the courses of all influenced controlled parameters necessary.
  • the exchange of the process coordinate from volume to time requires this additional freezing of the courses of all initially controlled parameters.
  • the set of originally controlled parameters comprises a pressure course (which may be constant or may vary over time) of a mobile phase drive, and the new controlled parameter is a flow rate of the mobile phase.
  • pressure of fluidic sample and/or mobile phase components constituting a composition may be adjusted in the original scouting method (for instance, pressure may be set to a fixed value or may be controlled to vary over time).
  • the controlled parameter may be the flow rate of such a fluidic sample and/or mobile phase components or the entire mobile phase.
  • the actually flown volume of the mobile phase can be determined and the system can be controlled in a volume-based way. This may allow to operate the liquid chromatography system faster, since a control in the volume domain allows the flow of the mobile phase to vary. Hence, a variable flow may be allowed and the system may be enabled to adjust the pressure in such a way that a high chromatographic performance and a high separation accuracy are obtained, even if the flow rate changes.
  • the separation unit may be filled with a separating material.
  • a separating material which may also be denoted as a stationary phase may be any material which allows an interaction with a sample so as to be capable of separating different components of such a sample.
  • the separating material may be a liquid chromatography column filling material or packing material comprising at least one of the group consisting of polystyrene, zeolite, polyvinylalcohol, polytetrafluorethylene, glass, polymeric powder, silicon dioxide, and silica gel, or any of above with chemically modified (coated, capped etc) surface.
  • any packing material can be used which has material properties allowing an analyte passing through this material to be separated into different components, for instance due to different kinds of interactions or affinities between the packing material and fractions of the analyte.
  • At least a part of the first and/or second separation unit may be filled with a fluid separating material, wherein the fluid separating material may comprise beads having a size in the range of essentially 0.1 ⁇ m to essentially 50 ⁇ m.
  • the beads may be small particles which may be filled inside the separation section of the microfluidic device.
  • the beads may have pores having a size in the range of essentially 0.01 ⁇ m to essentially 0.2 ⁇ m.
  • the fluidic sample may be passed through the pores, wherein an interaction may occur between the fluidic sample and the surface of the pores.
  • the separating material may be a so-called porous monolith filling the separation unit, or the separation unit may comprise an open tube wherein the sample interacts with the tube wall.
  • the sample separation apparatus may be configured as a fluid separation system for separating components of the sample.
  • a mobile phase including a fluidic sample passes through the fluidic device, for instance by applying a high pressure, the interaction between a filling of the column and the fluidic sample may allow for separating different components of the sample, as performed in a liquid chromatography device.
  • the sample separation apparatus may also be configured as a fluid purification system for purifying the fluidic sample.
  • a fluid purification system for purifying the fluidic sample.
  • the sample separation apparatus may be implemented in different technical environments, like a sensor device, a test device, a device for chemical, biological and/or pharmaceutical analysis, a capillary electrophoresis device, a capillary electrochromatography device, a liquid chromatography device, a gas chromatography device, an electronic measurement device, or a mass spectroscopy device.
  • the fluidic device may be a High Performance Liquid device (HPLC) device by which different fractions of an analyte may be separated, examined and/or analyzed.
  • HPLC High Performance Liquid device
  • the sample separation unit element may be a chromatographic column for separating components of the fluidic sample. Therefore, exemplary embodiments may be particularly implemented in the context of a liquid chromatography apparatus.
  • the sample separation apparatus may be configured to conduct the mobile phase through the system with a high pressure, particularly of 1 to 600 bar or at least 600 bar, or more particularly of at least 1200 bar.
  • the sample separation apparatus may be configured as a microfluidic device.
  • microfluidic device may particularly denote a fluidic device as described herein which allows to convey fluid through microchannels having a dimension in the order of magnitude of less than 500 ⁇ m, particularly less than 200 ⁇ m, more particularly less than 100 ⁇ m or less than 50 ⁇ m or less.
  • the sample separation apparatus may also be configured as a nanofluidic device.
  • nanofluidic device may particularly denote a fluidic device as described herein which allows to convey fluid through nanochannels having even smaller dimensions than the microchannels.
  • a process for developing a method of operating a sample separation apparatus for separating a fluidic sample using a mobile phase comprises executing (for instance on a first sample separation apparatus) a scouting method for separating a fluidic sample by controlling a set of controlled parameters during the execution of the scouting method, wherein non-controlled parameters are allowed to vary freely during the execution of the scouting method, and wherein the scouting method is executed based on a scouting program being based on an independent scouting process variable (such as volume in a volume-based scouting method), registering a course of at least one, particularly all, of the controlled parameters during the execution of the scouting method, defining a modified method for separating a fluidic sample derived from the scouting method by changing the independent scouting process variable into another independent modified process variable (such as time in a time-based modified method) while maintaining the set of controlled parameters unchanged,
  • a correspondingly developed chromatographic method having an executing unit, a registering unit, a defining unit, and a further execution unit
  • a sample separation apparatus being operable with a correspondingly developed chromatographic method
  • a corresponding software program or product having a correspondingly developed chromatographic method.
  • a scouting run may be performed in a volume based manner.
  • a gradient run may be performed as a scouting run in accordance with a certain flow rate program (during which the flow rate may change).
  • Such a scouting method may then be transformed into the modified method by being applied to a system without volume based capabilities, for instance operating in the time domain as independent process variable.
  • the set of controlled parameters remains unchanged, whereas the independent process variable changes from volume to time.
  • all controlled signals may be registered.
  • Fig. 1 shows a liquid chromatography device coupled to a connected mass spectrometry device (LC/MSD) being operable according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • LC/MSD mass spectrometry device
  • Fig. 2 illustrates an apparatus according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention for transferring a chromatographic method of operating a liquid chromatography apparatus to another liquid chromatography apparatus with connected mass spectrometry device.
  • Fig. 3 is a flowchart of a process for developing a method of operating a sample separation apparatus for separating a fluidic sample using a mobile phase according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 4 is a scheme illustrating as to how controlled and non-controlled parameters of a chromatographic method are exchanged during a method transfer according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • Running gradients in HPLC in the form of a composition being a function of volume rather than of time allows variety of operation modes for better throughput or efficiency, as for instance constant pressure operation mode. It is readily applicable in combination with purely concentration sensitive detectors and with purely mass sensitive detectors. However, detectors with pronounced dependency of the response factors versus flow rate (mixed sensitivity detectors, as for instance mass spectrometry (MS) detectors with most liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) interfaces) would provide decreased quantitation reproducibility due to possible flow rate variation from run to run (caused by possible variations of the system flow resistance) when maintaining constant pressure.
  • Embodiments of the invention may combine advantages of constant pressure or generally variable flow approach with advantages of fixed flow rate operation.
  • a so-called Master Run may be executed, which may be run in variable flow (for instance constant pressure) mode.
  • the flow over time profile for this run may be recorded and may be used for the following series of runs as so-called Master; this means that analysis runs are executed in programmed flow mode, whereas the flow program exactly repeats the recorded profile.
  • the Master Run is used to generate flow and composition over time profiles; in this case the analysis runs can be executed in the time based mode.
  • This workflow may provide nearly the same pressure profile as the Master Run (the possible deviation being caused by eventual variations of the system flow resistance), thus the major optimization of the run conditions would already have taken place during the Master Run.
  • the flow rate corresponding to any time or volume element in the gradient, and consequently to any eluted peak can be the same throughout a series of analyses and thus the similar reproducibility over multiple runs as in conventional fixed flow mode may be achieved.
  • Exemplary embodiments may be a combination of two or more or all of the following elements: step over to variable flow mode, so that the system executes the run freely running in optimized regime; freezing this regime as Master; running a number of analyses with the flow rate and composition profile following the Master in order to provide enhanced reproducibility of flow rate sensitive detectors.
  • the Master Run corresponds to executing a Scouting Method as described previously.
  • Fig. 1 depicts a general schematic of a liquid separation system 10.
  • a pump 20 receives a mobile phase from a solvent supply 74, 76, typically via a degasser 27, which degases and thus reduces the amount of dissolved gases in the mobile phase.
  • the mobile phase received from the solvent supply 74, 76 is composed of a first solvent contained in a first solvent container 74 and of a second solvent contained in a second solvent container 76.
  • the pump 20 - as a mobile phase drive - drives the mobile phase through a separating device 30 (such as a chromatographic column) comprising a stationary phase.
  • a sampling unit 40 can be provided between the pump 20 and the separating device 30 in order to subject or add (often referred to as sample introduction) a sample fluid into the mobile phase using a switchable fluid valve 90.
  • the stationary phase of the separating device 30 is configured for separating compounds of the sample fluid.
  • a detector 50 (such as a UV or a fluorescence detector) may optionally be provided for detecting separated compounds of the sample fluid.
  • a mass spectrometry device 60 can be provided for more sensitive detection and / or better identification of separated compounds of sample fluid. Mass spectrometry device 60 is connected at the outlet of the liquid chromatography apparatus 10, i.e. is used as additional detector of various fractions or peaks to improve reliability and / or sensitivity of the separation results , whereas the mentioned peaks are resulting from the before mentioned executed liquid chromatography separation.
  • the mobile phase can be comprised of one solvent only, it may also be mixed from plural solvents. Such mixing might be a low pressure mixing and provided upstream of the pump 20, so that the pump 20 already receives and pumps the mixed solvents as the mobile phase.
  • the pump 20 might be comprised of plural individual pumping units, with plural of the pumping units each receiving and pumping a different solvent or mixture, so that the mixing of the mobile phase (as received by the separating device 30) occurs at high pressure und downstream of the pump 20 (or as part thereof).
  • the composition (mixture) of the mobile phase may be kept constant over time, the so called isocratic mode, or varied over time, the so called gradient mode.
  • a data processing unit 70 which can be a conventional PC or workstation, might be coupled (as indicated by the dotted arrows) to one or more of the devices in the liquid separation system 10 in order to receive information and/or control operation.
  • the data processing unit 70 might control operation of the pump 20 (for instance setting control parameters) and receive therefrom information regarding the actual working conditions (such as output pressure, flow rate, etc. at an outlet of the pump).
  • the data processing unit 70 might also control operation of the solvent supply 74, 76 (for instance setting the solvent/s or solvent mixture to be supplied) and/or the degasser 27 (for instance setting control parameters such as vacuum level) and might receive therefrom information regarding the actual working conditions (such as solvent composition supplied over time, flow rate, vacuum level, etc.).
  • the data processing unit 70 might further control operation of the sampling unit 40 (for instance controlling sample injection or synchronization sample injection with operating conditions of the pump 20).
  • the separating device 30 might also be controlled by the data processing unit 70 (for instance selecting a specific flow path or column, setting operation temperature, etc.), and send - in return - information (for instance operating conditions) to the data processing unit 70.
  • the detector 50 might be controlled by the data processing unit 70 (for instance with respect to spectral or wavelength settings, setting time constants, start/stop data acquisition), and send information (for instance about the detected sample compounds) to the data processing unit 70.
  • the data processing unit 70 might also control operation of the mass spectrometry device 60 (for instance in conjunction with data received from the detector 50) and provides data back.
  • a set of instructions and parameter values may be used for executing a chromatographic separation experiment on the liquid chromatography apparatus 10.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates an arrangement 280 comprising an apparatus 210 for developing a chromatographic method for operating a liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry apparatus 250 for separating a fluidic sample using a mobile phase according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • arrangement 280 comprises a liquid chromatography apparatus 10 as well as the combined liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry apparatus 250 which is in turn constituted of a liquid chromatography apparatus 10' and a connected mass spectrometry device 60'.
  • the liquid chromatography apparatus 10 can be constituted as shown in Fig. 1 and may have or may not have the mass spectrometry device 60. Moreover, this liquid chromatography apparatus 10 comprises a first flow sensor 200 capable of detecting a first flow rate of a first component of the mobile phase and comprises a second flow sensor 202 capable of detecting a second flow rate of a second component of the mobile phase.
  • flow sensors 200, 202 are only exemplary and that other embodiments may either omit any such sensors or may use other sensors. Thus, the implementation of one or more flow sensors is merely optional.
  • the first flow sensor 200 may be located between reference numerals 74 and 20 in Fig. 1 .
  • the second flow sensor 202 may be located between reference numerals 76 and 20 in Fig. 1 .
  • a larger or smaller number of flow sensors may be foreseen in the liquid chromatography device 10 as well.
  • a method execution unit 220 is provided in the liquid chromatography apparatus 10. A chromatographic method to be executed on the liquid chromatography device 10 and including a set of instructions and parameter values can be supplied to the method execution unit 220. The method execution unit 220 will carry out the chromatographic method on the liquid chromatography device 10 and will then separate a fluidic sample accordingly. Alternatively, the method execution unit 220 may also form part of the apparatus 210.
  • a method execution unit 240 of the combined liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry apparatus 250 is capable of performing a liquid chromatography separation within the liquid chromatography system 10' and may also operate the connected mass spectrometry device 60' in accordance with a certain method.
  • the method execution unit 240 may also form part of the apparatus 210.
  • Method execution units 220 and 240 may also be integrally formed as one common processor rather than as two separate processors.
  • Apparatus 210 has an interface to an input/output unit 206 via which a user can input control commands to the apparatus 210 or may be supplied with information.
  • a database 204 of the apparatus 210 which may be realized as a memory device is capable of storing data such as instructions and/or parameter sets relating to one or more different liquid chromatography methods. Any other information or software may be stored on the database 204 as well.
  • the apparatus 210 comprises an execution unit 212 which is configured for executing a scouting method for separating a fluidic sample on the liquid chromatography system 10 by controlling a set of controlled parameters during the execution of the scouting method.
  • Execution unit 212 may alternatively be integrally formed with method execution unit(s) 220 and/or 240. Another set of non-controlled parameters is allowed to freely vary during the execution of the scouting method.
  • the scouting method is an initial or already present method defined by a data set stored in the database 204.
  • several controlled parameters may be actively controlled by the execution unit 212. In an embodiment, this control involves the adjustment of pressure values of the fluids propagating through the liquid chromatography system 10.
  • the volume of the components of the mobile phase may be controlled, wherein the flow rate of the components of the mobile phase and of the entire mobile phase will not be actively controlled but will freely vary or float during the method execution.
  • a registering unit 214 is configured for registering a course of one or more of the non-controlled parameters, particularly of the flow rates, during the execution of the scouting method by the execution unit 212.
  • the flow sensors 200, 202 are capable and configured for detecting the course of the respective flow rate during execution of the chromatographic method.
  • the recording or registering unit 214 performs this recording of the course of the flow rates during the execution of the initial chromatographic method. It is possible to store the corresponding time dependency of the flow rates as measured by the flow sensors 200, 202, for example in database 204.
  • a defining unit 216 is supplied with the flow rate course as registered by the registering unit 214 and is configured for defining a modified method for separating a fluidic sample derived from the scouting method. This method transfer is performed by changing the set of controlled parameters, declaring the previously registered non-controlled parameters (the flow rates) as new controlled parameters in the modified method and excluding an originally controlled parameter (such as the fluid pressure) from the set of controlled parameters.
  • the modified chromatographic method to be executed by the combined liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry apparatus 250 can hence be developed.
  • the course of the flow rate as determined by the sensors 200, 202 is frozen.
  • the defining unit 216 is hence configured for defining the modified chromatographic method for separating a fluidic sample in the combined liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry apparatus 250 based on the scouting method by freezing the recorded course of the flow rate for the modified method.
  • a further execution unit 218 is supplied with output data from the defining unit 216, can also access the database 204 for reading and writing data, and is configured for executing the modified method under application of the registered course of the flow rate as execution program for the flow rate in the role of a new controlled parameter (in the context of the modified method).
  • the further execution unit 218 is hence configured for adjusting a course of parameters in the modified method so that, by executing the modified method in accordance with the adjusted parameters, the flow rate in the combined liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry apparatus 250 will follow the course of the flow rate recorded during the execution of the scouting method.
  • the scouting method can be been transferred from the liquid chromatography device 10 to the liquid chromatography device 10'/mass spectrometry device 60'.
  • the freezing of the flow rate for the execution of the modified method allows to mimic such a performance. Therefore, even if for instance the pump of the combined liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry apparatus 250 does not support such a volume-based control, it will nevertheless indirectly allow to make use of the advantages of such a volume-based operation.
  • Fig. 3 is a flowchart of a process 300 for developing a method of operating sample separation apparatuses (such as apparatuses 10, 250) for separating fluidic samples using a mobile phase according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 4 is a corresponding scheme illustrating as to how controlled and non-controlled parameters of such chromatographic methods are exchanged during such a method transfer.
  • the process 300 is performed for transferring a scouting method 400 of operating a sample separation apparatus 10 (for separating a fluidic sample using a mobile phase) to a modified method 410 of operating another sample separation apparatus 250 (for separating another fluidic sample using another mobile phase).
  • the process 300 comprises executing, see block 302, the scouting method 400 for separating the fluidic sample by controlling a set of controlled parameters C during the execution of the scouting method 400.
  • Non-controlled parameters Q are allowed to freely vary during the execution of the scouting method 400.
  • a course of at least one non-controlled parameter Q i is registered, see block 304, during the execution of the scouting method 400.
  • the modified method 410 derived from the scouting method 400 is defined, see block 308. This defining is performed by changing, see block 320, the set of controlled parameters C.
  • the previously registered non-controlled parameter Q i is declared and used as a new controlled parameter in the modified method 410, see block 330.
  • An originally controlled parameter C j is excluded, see block 340, from the set of controlled parameters.
  • the modified method 410 is executed under application of the registered course of the parameter Q i as execution program for this parameter Q i in the role of new controlled parameter.
  • the registered parameter Q i is a flow rate of a component of the mobile phase which is initially non-controlled and then declared and used as a controlled parameter.
  • the initially controlled parameters C include a parameter C j relating to a pressure applied to the mobile phase. This initially controlled parameter C j is then excluded from the set of controlled parameters and is declared and treated as a non-controlled parameter (see Fig. 4 ).
  • Embodiments of the invention intend to allow to transfer an improved method applicable to advanced machines into another method which then can be run on a less complex machine but will provide all or most of the benefits of the improved method.
  • Embodiments of the invention are not restricted to only a volume-based initial method.
  • Embodiments of the invention also cover a manual interaction, recorded and reproduced. Constant pressure operation in the scouting method is a preferred option, but is not mandatory.
  • An embodiment of the invention can use a measurement signal to be recorded, but this does not necessarily has to be a traditional analytical signal.
  • the registered course may relate to a signal or parameter that is recorded and is related to the operation of the machine or to the separation process, but may then serve as a controlled parameter during execution.
  • Embodiments of the invention are not limited to the production of such a modified method using a volume-based equipment, but include the reproductive execution on any machine.
  • Embodiments of the invention may even be applied on instrumentation which has no volume-based capabilities or features.
  • Embodiments of the invention may include a quantitative work using a mass-sensitive or mix-mode sensitive detector (like MS or ELSD).

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Liquids With Adsorbents In General (AREA)
  • Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
EP11184943.6A 2011-10-12 2011-10-12 Transfert de méthodes en gelant un paramètre initialement non contrôlé Active EP2581741B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP11184943.6A EP2581741B1 (fr) 2011-10-12 2011-10-12 Transfert de méthodes en gelant un paramètre initialement non contrôlé

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP11184943.6A EP2581741B1 (fr) 2011-10-12 2011-10-12 Transfert de méthodes en gelant un paramètre initialement non contrôlé

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2581741A1 true EP2581741A1 (fr) 2013-04-17
EP2581741B1 EP2581741B1 (fr) 2019-09-18

Family

ID=44905485

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11184943.6A Active EP2581741B1 (fr) 2011-10-12 2011-10-12 Transfert de méthodes en gelant un paramètre initialement non contrôlé

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2581741B1 (fr)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019007948A3 (fr) * 2017-07-04 2019-04-25 Ge Healthcare Bio-Sciences Ab Procédé dans un système de purification de bioprocédé
WO2020079732A1 (fr) * 2018-10-15 2020-04-23 株式会社島津製作所 Dispositif de commande chromatographique, système chromatographique, procédé de commande chromatographique, et programme de commande chromatographique
WO2020084785A1 (fr) * 2018-10-26 2020-04-30 株式会社島津製作所 Dispositif de commande, système, procédé de commande et programme de commande de véhicule chromatographe
JPWO2020230284A1 (fr) * 2019-05-15 2020-11-19
US11808742B2 (en) 2020-08-26 2023-11-07 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Multi-dimensional liquid chromatography with second dimension having a variable flow rate

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1996008718A1 (fr) * 1994-09-16 1996-03-21 Fisons Instruments S.P.A. Procede et dispositif permettant de moduler le debit d'un gaz vecteur dans un chromatographe en phase gazeuse
US5670707A (en) * 1996-11-01 1997-09-23 Varian Associates, Inc. Calibration method for a chromatography column
EP0872732A1 (fr) * 1997-04-15 1998-10-21 The Perkin-Elmer Corporation Procédé et appareil pour la compensation de la perméabilité d'une colonne de chromatographie en phase gazeuse
EP1041382A2 (fr) * 1999-02-25 2000-10-04 THERMOQUEST ITALIA S.p.A. Procédé et dispositif de realignement des piques en analyses de chromatographie an phase gazeuse
US20030116195A1 (en) 2001-12-21 2003-06-26 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Method for the provision of fluid volume streams
US6634211B1 (en) * 2001-05-16 2003-10-21 Leonid M. Blumberg Method translation in gas chromatography
WO2007092798A2 (fr) 2006-02-08 2007-08-16 Waters Investments Limited Procédé et appareil de génération de gradients de solvants en chromatographie liquide
WO2009062538A1 (fr) 2007-11-12 2009-05-22 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Système de hplc à débit variable
EP2124047A1 (fr) * 2008-05-23 2009-11-25 Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation Transfert de paramètres de procédé pour chromatographe liquide et système de chromatographie liquide
WO2011108401A1 (fr) 2010-03-01 2011-09-09 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ Dispositif de chromatographie liquide à grande vitesse et procédé de fourniture de liquide à un dispositif de chromatographie liquide à grande vitesse

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1996008718A1 (fr) * 1994-09-16 1996-03-21 Fisons Instruments S.P.A. Procede et dispositif permettant de moduler le debit d'un gaz vecteur dans un chromatographe en phase gazeuse
US5670707A (en) * 1996-11-01 1997-09-23 Varian Associates, Inc. Calibration method for a chromatography column
EP0872732A1 (fr) * 1997-04-15 1998-10-21 The Perkin-Elmer Corporation Procédé et appareil pour la compensation de la perméabilité d'une colonne de chromatographie en phase gazeuse
EP1041382A2 (fr) * 1999-02-25 2000-10-04 THERMOQUEST ITALIA S.p.A. Procédé et dispositif de realignement des piques en analyses de chromatographie an phase gazeuse
US6634211B1 (en) * 2001-05-16 2003-10-21 Leonid M. Blumberg Method translation in gas chromatography
US20030116195A1 (en) 2001-12-21 2003-06-26 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Method for the provision of fluid volume streams
WO2007092798A2 (fr) 2006-02-08 2007-08-16 Waters Investments Limited Procédé et appareil de génération de gradients de solvants en chromatographie liquide
WO2009062538A1 (fr) 2007-11-12 2009-05-22 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Système de hplc à débit variable
EP2124047A1 (fr) * 2008-05-23 2009-11-25 Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation Transfert de paramètres de procédé pour chromatographe liquide et système de chromatographie liquide
WO2011108401A1 (fr) 2010-03-01 2011-09-09 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ Dispositif de chromatographie liquide à grande vitesse et procédé de fourniture de liquide à un dispositif de chromatographie liquide à grande vitesse

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
GE HEALTHCARE: "ÄKTAexplorer chromatography systems", 5 November 2007 (2007-11-05), pages 1 - 11, XP002671460, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.gelifesciences.com/aptrix/upp00919.nsf/Content/7338A0A4BC4686FDC1257628001CD50D/$file/18112409AG.pdf> [retrieved on 20120314] *
POOLE C F ET AL: "Foundations of retention in partition chromatography", JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHERS B.V, NL, vol. 1216, no. 10, 6 March 2009 (2009-03-06), pages 1530 - 1550, XP025940486, ISSN: 0021-9673, [retrieved on 20081031], DOI: 10.1016/J.CHROMA.2008.10.092 *
SONG J Z ET AL: "Rapid optimization of dual-mode gradient high performance liquid chromatographic separation of Radix et Rhizoma Salviae Miltiorrhizae by response surface methodology", JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHERS B.V, NL, vol. 1216, no. 42, 16 October 2009 (2009-10-16), pages 7007 - 7012, XP026640841, ISSN: 0021-9673, [retrieved on 20090827], DOI: 10.1016/J.CHROMA.2009.08.059 *

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019007948A3 (fr) * 2017-07-04 2019-04-25 Ge Healthcare Bio-Sciences Ab Procédé dans un système de purification de bioprocédé
CN110809714A (zh) * 2017-07-04 2020-02-18 通用电气健康护理生物科学股份公司 生物过程纯化系统中的方法
CN110809714B (zh) * 2017-07-04 2024-03-22 思拓凡瑞典有限公司 生物过程纯化系统中的方法
WO2020079732A1 (fr) * 2018-10-15 2020-04-23 株式会社島津製作所 Dispositif de commande chromatographique, système chromatographique, procédé de commande chromatographique, et programme de commande chromatographique
JPWO2020079732A1 (ja) * 2018-10-15 2021-09-02 株式会社島津製作所 液体クロマトグラフ制御装置、液体クロマトグラフシステム、液体クロマトグラフ制御方法および液体クロマトグラフ制御プログラム
JP6992908B2 (ja) 2018-10-15 2022-01-13 株式会社島津製作所 液体クロマトグラフ制御装置、液体クロマトグラフシステム、液体クロマトグラフ制御方法および液体クロマトグラフ制御プログラム
WO2020084785A1 (fr) * 2018-10-26 2020-04-30 株式会社島津製作所 Dispositif de commande, système, procédé de commande et programme de commande de véhicule chromatographe
JPWO2020084785A1 (ja) * 2018-10-26 2021-09-02 株式会社島津製作所 クロマトグラフ制御装置、クロマトグラフシステム、クロマトグラフ制御方法およびクロマトグラフ制御プログラム
JPWO2020230284A1 (fr) * 2019-05-15 2020-11-19
WO2020230284A1 (fr) * 2019-05-15 2020-11-19 株式会社島津製作所 Chromatographe en phase liquide
US11808742B2 (en) 2020-08-26 2023-11-07 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Multi-dimensional liquid chromatography with second dimension having a variable flow rate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2581741B1 (fr) 2019-09-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2449372B1 (fr) Ajustement d&#39;un dispositif de chromatographie en phase liquide pour compenser les écarts par rapport à un comportement idéal tout en restant conforme au procédé
US8716025B2 (en) Drifting two-dimensional separation with adaption of second dimension gradient to actual first dimension condition
US9694301B2 (en) Two-dimensional fluid separation with controlled pressure
Dimartino et al. A validated model for the simulation of protein purification through affinity membrane chromatography
EP2581741A1 (fr) Transfert de méthodes en geleant un paramètre initialement non contrôlé
US20090150087A1 (en) Chromatography using multiple detectors
Pawliszyn Solid-phase microextraction in perspective
JP2012530918A (ja) 質量分析における機能点検および変動補償
JP6437005B2 (ja) 多次元液体分析システムにおける体積フローの調整
JP6653140B2 (ja) 液体クロマトグラフの制御装置、液体クロマトグラフィの実行方法及び液体クロマトグラフの制御プログラム
US12085545B2 (en) Adjusting separation method using sensor data and numerical analysis
JPH01126544A (ja) 生化学分析方法及び装置
Quinto et al. Microextraction by packed sorbent coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: A comparison between “draw-eject” and “extract-discard” methods under equilibrium conditions for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water
Hurst Automation in the Laboratory
Stoll et al. Where Has My Efficiency Gone? Impacts of Extracolumn Peak Broadening on Performance, Part 2: Sample Injection
EP4067898A1 (fr) Utilisation d&#39;un échantillon d&#39;essai à plusieurs composants pour déterminer la valeur de paramètre réel de la séparation des échantillons
NAGY et al. Separation methods
US20230384269A1 (en) Column device
Catani et al. Separation techniques
Ahmed High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): Principles, Applications, Versatality, Efficiency, Innovation and Comparative Analysis in Modern Analytical Chemistry and In Pharmaceutical Sciences
US20240288408A1 (en) Adjusting separation method for other sample separation device using sample properties and numerical analysis
Thorat et al. CHROMATOGRAPHIC MASTERY: HPLC TECHNIQUES AND INNOVATIONS IN PHARMACEUTICAL ANALYSIS
Jagtap et al. EXPLORING CHROMATOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUE: PRINCIPLE, INSTRUMENTATION AND ITS APPLICATION
Stoll Essentials of LC Troubleshooting, Part 2: Misbehaving Retention Times
Fornstedt et al. Modeling of preparative liquid chromatography

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20131016

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20180115

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190417

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011062113

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1181938

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20191015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20190918

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191218

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191218

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191219

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1181938

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190918

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200120

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200224

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011062113

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG2D Information on lapse in contracting state deleted

Ref country code: IS

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191031

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191031

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191012

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200119

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20191031

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20200619

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191031

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191012

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20111012

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190918

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20220908

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230926

Year of fee payment: 13

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231031

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240829

Year of fee payment: 14