EP2573500B1 - Unité d'entraînement de corps volant - Google Patents
Unité d'entraînement de corps volant Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2573500B1 EP2573500B1 EP12006229.4A EP12006229A EP2573500B1 EP 2573500 B1 EP2573500 B1 EP 2573500B1 EP 12006229 A EP12006229 A EP 12006229A EP 2573500 B1 EP2573500 B1 EP 2573500B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- missile
- training
- error
- computer
- weapon
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 title claims description 117
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241001136792 Alle Species 0.000 description 1
- 101100382264 Mus musculus Ca14 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100112373 Mus musculus Ctsm gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100094962 Salmo salar salarin gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010006 flight Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011990 functional testing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100001261 hazardous Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000008676 import Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011017 operating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013024 troubleshooting Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B35/00—Testing or checking of ammunition
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G7/00—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
- F41G7/001—Devices or systems for testing or checking
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G7/00—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
- F41G7/006—Guided missiles training or simulation devices
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a missile training unit according to claim 1.
- the invention relates to a missile training unit with a training missile forming unmanned missile and connectable to the missile configuration device for the training missile, the training missile has at least one fault memory.
- the invention relates to such a missile training unit with a weapon control computer having a carrier aircraft, to which the training missile can be coupled.
- Missile training units are needed and used to train the operation, handling and maintenance of a missile by the personnel involved in the mission of the missile.
- Such training In order to be effective, such training must be oriented as closely as possible to the respective real deployment situation.
- the ideal training from the point of view of learning efficiency would of course be the training on a sharp missile, which corresponds to 100% to a mission missile.
- this type of training is prohibited for safety reasons. It is therefore necessary to use special training missiles for training purposes, which have hitherto often been adapted to specific training tasks.
- such an adaptation of the missile to training tasks inevitably entails that such a missile clearly differs from a "real" missile.
- the EP 2 253 537 A2 and their priority-giving DE 10 2009 022 007 B4 show and describe an unmanned missile intended for operational use.
- This missile is equipped with an on-board computer running operational software stored in a program memory of the missile.
- a test software for checking the functionality of the missile and / or its components may be stored.
- This software is also designed to run on the on-board computer of the missile.
- the missile can be connected to an external service device, which is responsible for checking Has required test hardware and which is controllable by running on the onboard computer of the missile test software.
- training software for simulating errors in the missile, which is configured to run on the onboard computer of the missile and which should make it possible to train maintenance personnel on each provided with the test software unmanned missiles.
- Object of the present invention is therefore to provide a generic missile training unit, with the different training tasks in conjunction with unmanned missiles can be trained as realistic as possible.
- This missile training unit is provided with a training missile forming unmanned missile and connectable to the missile configuration device for the training missile, the training missile has at least one fault memory.
- the missile training unit according to the invention is characterized in that the configuration device is designed such that simulated fault data and / or simulated fault images can be inserted into the at least one fault memory.
- a particularly preferred development is characterized in that the training missile has a data memory and that the configuration device is designed so that a training mission software can be loaded into the data memory with it.
- the use of training mission software makes it possible, for example, to train the effects of erroneous mission planning and the detection and correction of mission planning errors.
- the training mission software preferably contains a check program which, when starting the training mission software, checks on the basis of the hardware present in the missile whether the missile is a training missile. This will prevent inadvertent loading of training mission software into a rogue mission vehicle, potentially triggering safety-related actions.
- the training missile is a series-produced missile which has been disarmed in accordance with the abovementioned hardware features.
- a likewise particularly advantageous variant of the missile training unit according to the invention additionally comprises a training aircraft having a weapon control computer to which the training missile can be coupled.
- This missile training unit is characterized in that the training missile coupled in the state coupled to the carrier aircraft, an identification signal to the weapon control computer of the carrier aircraft, which identifies the missile as a training missile, and that the weapon control computer is designed so that a drop of the training missile prevented even then if an operational release signal (emergency emergency signal: emergency jettison) is generated during the execution of a training flight.
- an operational release signal emergency emergency signal: emergency jettison
- Fig. 1 is shown schematically a simplest version of a missile training unit according to the invention.
- the dashed line symbolizes an unmanned training missile 1, which is provided on its upper side with a Umbilical Strecker 10 for electrical connection to a carrier aircraft and further comprising a Test and Load Panel (TLP) 11 with a TLP connector 12, to which in the application example shown a configuration device 2 for the training missile 1 is connected for data exchange.
- TLP Test and Load Panel
- the training missile 1 is equipped with a central weapon computer 14 (Central Weapon Computer CWC) and with a power supply unit 16 (PS1).
- the power supply unit 16 is supplied via the umbilical plug 10 and / or the TLP plug 12 with electrical energy from the outside and in turn supplies the central weapon computer 14 with electrical energy.
- the central weapon computer 14 is connected to both the umbilical connector 10 and the TLP connector 12 by data lines.
- the central weapon computer 14 is associated with a fault memory 13.
- simulated error data and simulated error images can be imported into the error memory 13 and stored there.
- the in Fig. 1 is represented symbolically and the alternative to the configuration device 2 is connected to the TLP connector, carried out for training purposes tests or operating operations, the missile will respond as if the simulated and stored in the error memory 13 errors actually exist, so that the operator team their skills in terms can train on detecting and fixing simulated errors.
- the configuration device 2 may also be provided in the service and test device 3.
- the missile training unit shown by way of example is based on a so-called ground trainer of a missile (Ground Trainer Missile GTM or Fuel Training Missile FTM), which is usually provided without the power supply (PS1) and without the central weapons computer (CWC) to the ground personnel with respect to the purely mechanical Handling a missile to train.
- GTM Ground Trainer Missile GTM or Fuel Training Missile FTM
- PS1 power supply
- CWC central weapons computer
- the training missile 1 for the missile training unit such a ground training device GTM with the central weapon computer 14 and the power supply unit 16 and the corresponding wiring for making the electrical connections between these two units with each other and between them and the Umbilical connector 10 and the TLP connector 12 equipped.
- the central weapon computer 14 is recorded with adapted software, the training mission software as a complete interaction of this training missile 1 via Umbilical interface 10 with a carrier aircraft and the TLP interface 12 with the configuration device and provided for ground operation external service - and Aircraft Weapon Readiness Set (AWRS) allowed, as for example from the DE 10 2009 040 304 A1 known is.
- the training mission software uses operational mission software software objects such that the training missile at the umbilical interface 10 and at the TLP interface 12 behaves essentially like an operational serial missile.
- this exemplary training missile It is advantageous in this exemplary training missile that existing and only training the handling of a missile ground training devices GTM can be upgraded to low acquisition and low follow-up costs by series parts from the production of operational missile to the intelligent training missile 1.
- intelligent training missile 1 Captive Air Trainer Missile CATM
- this intelligent training missile 1 not only the handling of the missile on the ground trainable, but it can also perform operating and test procedures on the missile, including troubleshooting, the import of mission plans and the handling be trained with the external service and testing device AWRS.
- a simulated error message can be programmed into the memory 13 of the central weapon computer 14 by means of the configuration device via the TLP connector.
- a faulty module and the time of the occurrence of the error and the appearance of the error are recorded in the memory 13 of the central weapon computer 14.
- These data are then interpreted by the training mission software when training is performed, and corresponding error signals are output to the carrier aircraft via the umbilical interface 10 during training or to the service and testing device AWRS via the TLP interface 12.
- the training staff can then Train the handling of this error and its detection on the basis of the corresponding output, for example a display in the cockpit of the carrier aircraft or an indicator on the screen of the service and test device.
- a separate fault memory may be provided in addition to the memory 13, in which simulated fault patterns can be recorded and assigned to the central weapon computer, in which possibly during the Training flights occurring real flaws are detected in the missile. In this way, it is possible to distinguish between simulated errors and possibly occurring real errors, so that a quick and easy repair of a defective training missile after performing a training mission is possible.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
Claims (6)
- Unité d'exercice de missile, comportant :un missile sans pilote formant un missile d'exercice (1) présentant un ordinateur central d'armes (14) comportant une mémoire de données, une mémoire d'erreurs (13) associée à l'ordinateur central d'armes (14), et une interface d'unité d'essai et de programmation, l'interface TLP (12), reliée par le biais de lignes de données à l'ordinateur central d'armes (14) ; etun moyen de configuration (2) raccordable à l'interface TLP (12) pour le missile d'exercice (1), qui est configuré de telle sorte que des données d'erreurs simulées et/ou images d'erreurs simulées avec celui-ci peuvent être enregistrées dans l'au moins une mémoire d'erreurs (13) et un logiciel de mission d'exercice dans la mémoire de données ;dans lequel le logiciel de mission d'exercice est configuré de manière à interpréter les données d'erreurs simulées et/ou images d'erreurs simulées enregistrées dans la mémoire d'erreurs (13) et à ordonner à l'ordinateur central d'armes (14) d'émettre un signal d'erreur correspondant vers l'interface TLP (12).
- Unité d'exercice de missile selon la revendication 1, caractérisée en ce que
le logiciel de mission d'exercice comprend un programme de vérification qui vérifie, au démarrage du logiciel de mission d'exercice, à l'aide du matériel prévu dans le missile, si le missile est un missile d'exercice. - Unité d'exercice de missile selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisée en ce que
le missile d'exercice (1) se distingue d'un missile de série armé au moins par les caractéristiques matérielles suivantes :- tous les composants pyrotechniques d'un missile de série sont désactivés ou non présents ;- le moyen de démarrage du réacteur du missile de série est désactivé ou non présent ; et- l'alimentation autonome en courant du missile de série est désactivée ou non présente. - Unité d'exercice de missile selon la revendication 3, caractérisée en ce que
le missile d'exercice est un missile de série qui est désarmé conformément aux caractéristiques matérielles selon la revendication 3. - Unité d'exercice de missile selon une des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle le missile présente en outre un connecteur ombilical (10) pour la liaison électrique avec un avion porteur, le connecteur ombilical (10) étant relié à l'ordinateur central d'armes (14) par le biais de lignes de données.
- Système, comportant :une unité d'exercice de missile selon une des revendications précédentes ; etun avion porteur présentant un ordinateur de commande d'armes auquel le missile d'exercice peut être accouplé ; caractérisé en ce quele missile d'exercice transmet, dans l'état accouplé à l'avion porteur, un signal d'identification à l'ordinateur de commande d'armes de l'avion porteur qui identifie le missile en tant que missile d'exercice, eten ce que l'ordinateur de commande d'armes est configuré de telle sorte qu'un lancement du missile d'exercice est également empêché lorsque, lors de la mise en oeuvre d'un vol d'exercice, un signal de lancement opérationnel est généré.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE201110114225 DE102011114225B3 (de) | 2011-09-23 | 2011-09-23 | Flugkörper-Trainingseinheit |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2573500A1 EP2573500A1 (fr) | 2013-03-27 |
EP2573500B1 true EP2573500B1 (fr) | 2018-11-07 |
EP2573500B8 EP2573500B8 (fr) | 2019-01-09 |
Family
ID=46144965
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP12006229.4A Active EP2573500B8 (fr) | 2011-09-23 | 2012-09-04 | Unité d'entraînement de corps volant |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2573500B8 (fr) |
DE (1) | DE102011114225B3 (fr) |
ES (1) | ES2705753T3 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102011115963B3 (de) | 2011-10-13 | 2012-10-25 | Lfk-Lenkflugkörpersysteme Gmbh | Unbemannter Trainings- und Testflugkörper |
DE102012012044A1 (de) | 2012-06-19 | 2013-12-19 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Simulieren eines komplexen Systems |
DE102015002563B3 (de) * | 2015-02-27 | 2016-02-11 | Mbda Deutschland Gmbh | Flugkörper-Startvorrichtung |
DE102015006799B4 (de) * | 2015-05-27 | 2022-11-17 | Mbda Deutschland Gmbh | Testeinrichtung für eine Flugkörper-Startvorrichtung |
DE102015012971A1 (de) * | 2015-10-07 | 2017-04-13 | Mbda Deutschland Gmbh | Einsatzcomputersystem |
CN111504142B (zh) * | 2019-12-15 | 2022-08-19 | 湖北航天飞行器研究所 | 一种通用导弹模拟器及模拟方法 |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5624264A (en) * | 1995-09-29 | 1997-04-29 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Missile launch simulator |
DE102004042990B4 (de) * | 2004-09-06 | 2008-11-20 | Michael Grabmeier | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Test eines operationellen Marschflugkörpers in verschiedenen Prüfzenarien mittels Betriebsart Wartung |
DE102008054264B4 (de) * | 2008-10-31 | 2012-09-13 | Lfk-Lenkflugkörpersysteme Gmbh | Multifunktionale Service- und Testeinrichtung für unbemannte Flugkörper |
DE102009022007B4 (de) * | 2009-05-19 | 2011-09-22 | Lfk-Lenkflugkörpersysteme Gmbh | Unbemannter Flugkörper |
DE102009040304B4 (de) * | 2009-09-05 | 2012-10-04 | Lfk-Lenkflugkörpersysteme Gmbh | Vorrichtung zur Steuerung von Funktionstests und/oder Serviceprozeduren für von Luftfahrzeugen absetzbare unbemannte Flugkörper |
-
2011
- 2011-09-23 DE DE201110114225 patent/DE102011114225B3/de active Active
-
2012
- 2012-09-04 ES ES12006229T patent/ES2705753T3/es active Active
- 2012-09-04 EP EP12006229.4A patent/EP2573500B8/fr active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2705753T3 (es) | 2019-03-26 |
DE102011114225B3 (de) | 2012-06-14 |
EP2573500A1 (fr) | 2013-03-27 |
EP2573500B8 (fr) | 2019-01-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2573500B1 (fr) | Unité d'entraînement de corps volant | |
EP2293008B1 (fr) | Dispositif de commande de tests fonctionnels et/ou de procédures de service pour aéronefs sans conducteur pouvant être déposés par des avions | |
DE102006041140B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Überprüfung der Funktionsfähigkeit von unbemannten, bewaffneten Flugkörpern | |
DE102008054264B4 (de) | Multifunktionale Service- und Testeinrichtung für unbemannte Flugkörper | |
DE102012223933A1 (de) | Datenladevorrichtung und Datenladeverfahren | |
EP1923658B1 (fr) | Procédé de vérification de la capacité d'interaction entre un aéronef et un corps volant non habité armé pouvant être couplé avec celui-ci | |
EP3270092B1 (fr) | Véhicule d'opération militaire avec système d'affichage et de commande multifonctions | |
EP2381206B1 (fr) | Procédé de détection d'erreur d'un véhicule volant non habité accouplé à un avion porteur en vol et véhicule volant non habité | |
EP2381205B1 (fr) | Procédé de simulation d'une mission d'un véhicule volant non habité armé | |
DE102009022007B4 (de) | Unbemannter Flugkörper | |
DE102013002717A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Betrieb eines ruhenden Flugkörpers | |
DE102004042990B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Test eines operationellen Marschflugkörpers in verschiedenen Prüfzenarien mittels Betriebsart Wartung | |
EP2390615B1 (fr) | Procédé de demande de données de mesure et/ou d'état à partir d'un enregistreur de données d'un corps volant inhabité armé et dispositif destiné à l'exécution du procédé | |
DE102012017891B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Testen der korrekten Kommunikation zwischen einem Flugkörper und einem Trägerflugzeug und Flugkörpertestvorrichtung | |
DE102006001189A1 (de) | Vorrichtung für das automatische Abstoßen von Waffen von einer Ausziehplattform nach Fallschirm-Extraktion | |
DE102013020436A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Testen eines Brennstoffzellensystems für ein Kraftfahrzeug und Teststand | |
DE102011115963B3 (de) | Unbemannter Trainings- und Testflugkörper | |
DE102014005300A1 (de) | Waffenträger zur Anbringung von zumindest einem unbemannten Flugkörper an einem Trägerluftfahrzeug, Waffensystem und Luftfahrzeug | |
DE102015002563B3 (de) | Flugkörper-Startvorrichtung | |
EP3190378B1 (fr) | Dispositif d'essai multifonctionnel pour l'armement | |
DE202021104039U1 (de) | Prüfgerät für eine Selbstschutzanlage eines Luftfahrzeugs | |
DE102016001192A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Betrieb eines unbemannten Luftfahrzeugs | |
DE102022002703A1 (de) | Effektordatenverbinder zur Datenverbindung eines Effektors mit einer Verschussplattform | |
DE202015004074U1 (de) | Flugkörper-Startvorrichtung |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130615 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: MBDA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20171128 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20180801 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1062569 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20181115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502012013754 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PK Free format text: BERICHTIGUNG B8 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R108 Ref document number: 502012013754 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R107 Ref document number: 502012013754 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20181107 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2705753 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20190326 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190207 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190207 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190307 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190208 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190307 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190808 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190904 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190904 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20190930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 1062569 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20190904 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190904 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20120904 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181107 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230509 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20230920 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230928 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20231124 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20230927 Year of fee payment: 12 |