EP2529270B1 - Lentille à gradation de puissance continue - Google Patents

Lentille à gradation de puissance continue Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2529270B1
EP2529270B1 EP10763288.7A EP10763288A EP2529270B1 EP 2529270 B1 EP2529270 B1 EP 2529270B1 EP 10763288 A EP10763288 A EP 10763288A EP 2529270 B1 EP2529270 B1 EP 2529270B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
lens
power
optical power
viewing
gradation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP10763288.7A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2529270A1 (fr
Inventor
Thomas A. Balch
Nancy L. S. Yamasaki
Jose Alonso Fernandez
Daniel Crespo Vazquez
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Indizen Optical Technologies SL
Original Assignee
Indizen Optical Technologies SL
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Indizen Optical Technologies SL filed Critical Indizen Optical Technologies SL
Publication of EP2529270A1 publication Critical patent/EP2529270A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2529270B1 publication Critical patent/EP2529270B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G02—OPTICS
    • G02C—SPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
    • G02C7/00—Optical parts
    • G02C7/02—Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses
    • G02C7/06—Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses bifocal; multifocal ; progressive
    • G02C7/061—Spectacle lenses with progressively varying focal power
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G02—OPTICS
    • G02C—SPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
    • G02C7/00—Optical parts
    • G02C7/02—Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses
    • G02C7/06—Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses bifocal; multifocal ; progressive
    • G02C7/061—Spectacle lenses with progressively varying focal power
    • G02C7/063—Shape of the progressive surface
    • G02C7/065—Properties on the principal line
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G02—OPTICS
    • G02C—SPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
    • G02C7/00—Optical parts
    • G02C7/02—Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses
    • G02C7/06—Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses bifocal; multifocal ; progressive
    • G02C7/061—Spectacle lenses with progressively varying focal power
    • G02C7/068—Special properties achieved by the combination of the front and back surfaces

Definitions

  • the power must change at least as much as the difference between the distance and near viewing powers. Since the increased optical power or "add power" for the near-viewing zone is typically in the range of ⁇ 0.5 diopters to about 4 diopters, this means that most people will note blurriness as the eye crosses over the blended region. This can be quite annoying to users, even if the blended area is not visible to others looking at the lens wearer. This led to further developments designed to minimize the area of such off-power regions, make the power changes more gradual so they could be tolerated, or push them toward locations on the lens that are less often used (such as the periphery).
  • patents such as US patent numbers 2109474 and 2475275 have described lenses with one surface having gradually increasing power (changing radius of curvature) to give the user a range of focal lengths across this lens.
  • These lenses may include spherical regions of constant power on the surface with the gradual power increase, like the bifocals and blended bifocals mentioned above.
  • the other side of the lens is described as being ground to prescription, which typically means the distance-viewing correction, and at the time these patents were granted, the grinding expertise would be effectively limited to spherical and cylindrical shaping of the other surface. This means much of the lens could suffer from the same limitations as the blended bifocals, namely blurred vision due to the continuous increase of power.
  • the corrective power of the wearer's lens will be 2 diopters.
  • the wearer is an emerging presbyope, and needs a slight reading power assistance of 1 diopter, sometimes referred to as an add power of 1 diopter. Therefore, in the second, near viewing area of the lens, the stabilized power will be 3 diopters (2 diopters for overall vision correction, plus 1 diopter for near-vision additional correction).
  • the near viewing area is typically positioned near the bottom of the lens, and often slightly toward the nose; this is consistent with a wearer looking downward toward a book or hand work, and the slightly inward positioning accommodates the binocular tracking of the eyes for a near vision area.
  • the distance-viewing area and near-viewing area typically be as large as possible, so the user has "plateaus" of nearly constant, stabilized power for their distance and near eyesight corrections.
  • the distance viewing area should be large because of the width of viewing angle one may use.
  • the near-viewing area may be smaller, but still must accommodate at least the width of the pupil for clearest reading vision, and preferably subtends a small angle for some eye rotation while reading; thus it is common to make the near-viewing area of stabilized add power at least a few millimeters wide. Between these upper and lower areas, the optical power must change rapidly to the higher, near-viewing value. In this example, that is a change from 2 diopters to 3 diopters.
  • This progressive region or corridor will be characterized by an inflection point and is typically kept relatively narrow and short, because it is neither the desired distance nor near power, and because of physical necessity, as will be explained below.
  • U. S. patent number 4950057 describes the combination of stepped Fresnel optics with refractive lens surfaces to create different optical power regions. This is a distinctly different approach than using only the refractive capabilities of lens materials, and can encounter limitations due to the Fresnel discontinuous multi-step patterns. For example, there can be increased light scattering off the Fresnel steps, which can be annoying for the wearer and unaesthetic in appearance. There may also be distortion or lack of optical clarity in crossing over the multiple stepped structures.
  • progressive designs can be incorporated on either the outer lens surface (the surface farthest away from the wearer, or the "front” of the lens) or the inner surface (nearest the eye, or the “back” surface) of an eyeglass lens.
  • This is often accomplished via "progressive semi-finished lens blanks” that incorporate on one surface a relatively large, effective stabilized distance-viewing area, another near-viewing area with a known, stabilized power that is greater than the distance power, and a relatively narrow, short corridor running between these two zones (the intermediate section) that is characterized by a progressive increase in optical power and an inflection point.
  • the individual's wearer prescription is then "finished” by cutting and smoothing the other, opposite surface of the semi-finished blank to the specific optical power requirements of the user.
  • this typically means finishing the other lens surface for the distance-viewing correction and using the progressive surface to supply all the near-viewing correction.
  • both surfaces may incorporate progressive designs, as described, for example, in US patent numbers 4946270 , 6935744 and 7399080 .
  • Another alternative but related approach is described in patents such as US patent numbers 6139148 and 7159983 , in which one surface is a progressive design and the other surface is a "regressive" surface, that is, a surface where power decreases between the distance-viewing area and the near-viewing area.
  • These regressive surfaces may be placed on either the inner or the outer surface of the lens.
  • Placing the add power on the inner surface of the lens, or sharing the prescription power between both surfaces allows more freedom in optical design and may have advantages for cosmetic appearances. These options have been further assisted in the marketplace by the growth of digital surfacing equipment, based on CNC machinery, which has the potential for more complicated and controlled shaping of one or both optical surfaces.
  • the back or inner surface of even a single vision lens is much flatter than for a high minus powered lens. If one then adds the near-vision power to the inside bottom section of a plus lens (as in a standard back-side progressive design), the inner surface of the lens becomes even flatter, and may contact the cheeks or eyelashes of the user.
  • One way to avoid or minimize this problem is to use a lens with a steeper front curvature, so there is more space to create the add power on the inner surface of the lens.
  • the steeper curve will require more lens material to create the same add power as a combination of flatter curves, and the result can be an overall heavier or thicker lens.
  • using a more curved lens negates the advantage that was being sought: to reduce the bulbous appearance of the front-side progressive.
  • High minus lenses have thicker edges, because the inner lens surface's radius of curve is typically steeper than that of the outer surface, to create the correct lensing effect. If a lens with a steeper base curve is used for the front (outer) surface to accommodate a back-side progressive design, the lenses will be driven to even greater and undesired thicknesses, and will appear more bulbous than a normal minus prescription.
  • Sharing the power between the two surfaces can obviously offer more options for distributions of thickness and power profiles, but significantly increases the complexity of design, and thus may require higher costs, time and resources to prepare the final lens.
  • one may still have problems such as increased thickness on the inner surface (leading to contact with the face or eyelashes of the wearer), excess curvature on the front surface, and increased weight of the lenses.
  • the present invention provides a different option for ophthalmic lenses and their design, which is particularly suitable for lenses requiring different powers in different areas of the lens. This is accomplished by creating an innovative surface that is then combined with surfacing of the second surface to meet the optical requirements of an individual's prescription.
  • the combination lens may also take into account other factors of cosmetic or practical design.
  • This invention can advantageously use digital lens surfacing capabilities that have now reached a level of maturity such that they are accessible and practical for much of the lens industry.
  • the present invention resides in an ophthalmic lens in accordance with claim 1.
  • the gradual power increase on the first surface proceeds from the top of the lens to the bottom of the lens. In another preferred embodiment, the gradual power increase proceeds laterally across the lens.
  • the shape and nature of the continuous power gradation of the first surface may take various preferred forms.
  • the power may increase in a linear or non-linear fashion, and if non-linear, may follow the form of exponential, logarithmic, logarithmic spiral, parabolic and positive power equations. These continuous power gradations may or may not follow an umbilical line.
  • the gradual power increase can constitutes an increase in spherical power, or in both spherical and cylindrical power.
  • the power gradation surface may be the outer surface of the lens, farthest from the wearer, or the inner surface, closest to the face of the lens wearer.
  • the continuous power gradation surface and the opposite lens surface may cooperate to provide a single vision correction for the desired prescription.
  • the two lens surfaces cooperate to provide an area for distance-viewing and an area for near-viewing for the desired prescription.
  • these two areas have different optical powers.
  • an ophthalmic lens is produced for a prescription having distance-viewing and near-viewing values.
  • This lens comprises a first surface having a continuous, gradual change in optical power across substantially its entire optically useable surface from one edge to substantially the opposite edge, the change in optical power increasing across the surface without inflection points or discontinuities, and an opposite surface of the lens configured to cooperate with the first surface to provide at least two stabilized areas of optical power for the desired prescription, one for distance-viewing and one for near-viewing.
  • these two areas of stabilized optical power comprise two different optical powers.
  • the continuous, gradual change in power of the first surface used in these preferred embodiments may comprise linear or non-linear increases in power, and may further contain an umbilical line.
  • the cooperation of the first and second surfaces further includes optimization for user preferences.
  • the present invention is embodied in ophthalmic lenses having one surface that is described by a continuous, gradual increase in optical power, and its combination with the opposite surface of the lens to create one or more effective areas of stabilized optical power.
  • a surface with continuous, gradual power increase is in contrast to normal progressive lens surfaces, which typically embody at least one lens surface having an effective area of approximately constant or stabilized optical power for distance-viewing, another effective area of the same lens surface with a different, approximately constant or stabilized optical power for near-distance viewing, and a narrow, intermediate region between these two defined optical power areas where the power "progresses" from one to the other value.
  • the stabilized power "plateaus” are joined by a transitional zone characterized by the rapid power increase and an inflection point.
  • the present invention instead provides a continuous power gradation that proceeds without inflection points or discontinuities and extends over substantially the entire useable optical surface of the lens, rather than being constrained into a narrow corridor on the lens surface. This gradual power increase over substantially the entire lens surface is possible precisely because the invention's power gradation surface does not contain large areas of approximately constant or stabilized optical power.
  • an effective area of stabilized power is defined as a stabilized optical power area of at least 28.27 sq. mm, with no dimension defining the area being less than about 6 mm wide. This size and extent of area corresponds to a 6 mm circle, which would contain a typical area of gaze on the lens surface plus a minimal allowance for eye movement.
  • the pupil size ranges from about 3-4 mm diameter to about 5-9 mm diameter maximum, depending on lighting conditions and age.
  • stabilized optical power can be described as an area in which the optical power does not vary by more than ⁇ 0.12 diopters from its average value. If a single surface is being described, a stabilized optical power area would be an area on that specific surface with less than ⁇ 0.12 diopters variation from the average value of that area. More preferably, the stabilized optical power area has at most ⁇ 0.06 diopters of variation from the average value for that area. Stabilized areas have the appearance of plateaus of power, typically with much more limited change in power than adjacent regions.
  • the invention creates an ophthalmic lens, where one side of the lens is the surface with the continuous gradual power increase, and the other, opposite surface of the lens cooperates with the first surface's gradual power increases to provide in the final lens at least one effective area of stabilized optical power for the desired prescription. It is uniquely the combination of the two surfaces that create the stabilized power area, not just one surface providing an effective stabilized area, nor the combination of two stabilized areas (as in double-sided progressives) overlapping to give a final effective stabilized result.
  • the second surface must be created to cooperate with the gradual increase of the first surface and to add or subtract optical power across the lens to achieve the effective stabilized result for the prescription.
  • the combination of changing power on both sides of the lens can create new areas of selected optical power at specific positions or over defined areas on the lens. This provided significant additional freedom in optical design.
  • the second surface of the lens cooperates with the continuous, gradual power increase of the first surface to create at least two effective stabilized optical power areas. More preferably, the two areas comprise one area of stabilized optical power for distance-viewing, and another area of stabilized power for near-viewing.
  • the stabilized areas may have the same optical power, but more preferably, may have two different optical powers, as required by the given prescription for near- and distance-viewing correction.
  • FIG.1 shows an exemplary continuous gradation of the surface power on one side of a lens of the present invention.
  • the surface power is defined as the optical power that can arise due to the given surface's curvature and curvature change, assuming no optical power contribution from the other side of the lens.
  • the continuous power gradation surface may be either the outer or the inner surface of the lens.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a surface according to the invention that would preferably and typically be used on the outer or front surface of the lens. The distance along a vertical profile across this surface is plotted on the x-axis. For convenience, the topmost edge of this exemplary 60 mm diameter lens surface is defined as 30 mm, the 0-180 line across the middle of the lens is 0 and the bottom-most edge is shown as -30 mm.
  • the y-axis shows the power gradation of this exemplary surface from 3 diopters surface power at the top of the lens to 5 diopters surface power at the bottom of the lens, corresponding in this illustration to a linear power increase down the surface of 2 diopters.
  • Preferred ranges include continuous gradations from about 0.5D increase across the lens surface to about 15 diopters of power increase across the surface.
  • More preferred ranges include continuous power gradations to increase the power by about 0.5D across the lens surface, to gradations that increase the surface power by about 8D across the surface. (These ranges assume a 60 mm lens diameter, and would scale accordingly for larger or smaller lenses).
  • the surface shows no plateaus of approximately constant or stabilized power.
  • the surface power increases without any discontinuities or inflection points.
  • FIG. 2 For comparison, a power profile plot down a typical line of sight for presbyopic viewing on a standard, front-side progressive lens surface (prior art) is shown in FIG. 2 .
  • the topmost edge of this prior art lens is defined as 30 mm.
  • the line of sight crosses the 0-180 axis of the lens at the distance marked as 0, and reaches the bottom of the lens at -30 mm.
  • the y-axis of this plot shows the optical power progression on this typical progressive lens from about 6.5 D near the top of the lens to approximately 8.5D near the bottom of the lens surface, giving a nominal 2D add power.
  • the power gradation of FIG. 1 can be embodied on lenses with various starting curvatures.
  • a continuous power gradation increasing by 2 diopters can be realized on a lens surface according to this invention with a nominal spherical curvature of 1 diopters at the top of the lens, and 3 diopters at the bottom of the lens.
  • a continuous power gradation of 2 diopters can also be realized on a lens with a nominal spherical curvature of 6 diopters at the top of the lens, and 8 diopters at the bottom of the lens.
  • the first example may be more suitable for prescriptions with a high minus distance correction, while the second example provides a lens that may be better suited for high plus prescriptions.
  • FIG. 1 a linear increase in dioptric power is shown.
  • other relationships for the continuous power gradation across the lens surface For instance, one could use exponential, logarithmic, logarithmic spiral, quadratic, positive power or other non-linearly increasing relationships, to name but a few.
  • An example of a non-linear relationship with a power gradation from the top to the bottom of the lens surface is shown in FIG. 3 .
  • This power profile plot clearly shows a more rapid increase in power in the lower portion of the lens (i.e., a faster increase in power with less distance change across the surface) than in the upper portion, but the curve of the surface is smooth and continuous, and not indicative of a plateau as seen in stabilized optical areas.
  • a power gradation surface embodying non-linear relationships that have a more rapid increase in curvature toward the bottom of the lens may be particularly advantageous for presbyopic prescriptions.
  • the continuous power gradation surface may be configured as a lenticular surface, with a surrounding margin that is not optically useful. Similarly, it may be configured with a portion of the lens or a partial margin that is not optically useful. Such portions or margins could be included, for example, for thinning the edges of lenses, or as an aid to hold or align the lens during subsequent processing (such as finishing the other lens surface, coating, tinting or otherwise modifying the lens' physical properties).
  • the invention recognizes that the continuous power gradation is an essential element of the optical design of this lens and describes the useable optical area of the lens surface, in whatever manner that surface is configured.
  • FIG. 4 is a two-dimensional view of the exemplary lens surface of FIG. 1 , but shown as a surface power map, with contour lines marked at the distances where the power has gradually changed by a given fraction of dioptric power from the previous value.
  • Spherical power changes in 0.25D increments are shown by light lines, and changes in cylinder power (0.5D increments) are shown as heavy solid lines.
  • the power change associated with each contour is marked on its line.
  • Spherical power values are expressed relative to a base lens curvature power of 3D at the top of this exemplary lens surface, increasing to 5D at the bottom of the lens.
  • Cylinder power is designed in this exemplary surface to be low along a central line of the main power gradation, and to increase only slightly in the x-direction across the lens; therefore, the first contours in the plus and minus x-axis directions are shown at 0.5D. Since the surface embodies a continual gradation of power as shown in FIG. 1 , remember that these lines do not represent stepped changes in power, but merely where the gradual increase has crossed over a stated value.
  • the power contours extend across large areas of the lens' surface diameter. These contours illustrate a broad, gradual increase in spherical power by 2 diopters over the lens surface, while cylinder power minimally increases toward the sides of the lens.
  • digital processing of the second surface will play an integral role in defining the wearer's prescription, such broad, continuous power gradations on one surface are quite adaptable to a range of prescriptions and can be used effectively to create the final Rx.
  • FIG.s 1 and 4 One of skill in the art can see from FIG.s 1 and 4 that the continuous power gradation surface of this invention is distinct from prior patents such as U. S. patent 2878721 and from other progressive lens patents and designs, where varying changes in power are constrained to limited, controlled areas of the lens, and stabilized power areas (for distance-viewing and near-viewing) are maximized, as illustrated in the prior art example of FIG. 2 .
  • This continual power gradation approach offers significantly greater freedom in customizing a lens for the user.
  • the near-viewing and distance-viewing areas have not been pre-defined by the invention's lens surface, they may be moved or adjusted in size and location to suit the wearer. This is a significant advantage over standard progressive surface semi-finished lens blanks, where offset of the design on the other surface may significantly decrease the size of the near- or distance-viewing areas.
  • the continuous power gradation of the invention does not constrain certain areas to maintain a stabilized power, there is less unwanted astigmatism caused by designed contortion of the lens surface; the invention's gradual design produces less relative astigmatism in any given region, because the changes between any adjacent increases are more uniformly distributed.
  • this continuous power gradation invention offers greater freedom of design in comparison to the use of spherical lens blanks, or point-rotationally or axial-rotationally symmetrical aspheric single vision lens blanks that are often used in combination with back-side progressive surfacing.
  • the continuous power gradation lens surface actively contributes to the add requirements of the lens offers a design engineering advantage over the spherical or aspheric single vision lens blanks.
  • Exemplary design advantages that may be achieved due to the power contributions of the power gradation surface include improvements such as thinner (and therefore lighter) lenses, better distribution of the lens thickness in front and behind the lens frame, accommodation of a broader prescription range (due to less limitation by base curve constraints), easier custom design to individual preferences such as eye tracking and use characteristics, and optimization of both prescription power positioning across the lens and of the actual lens configuration (its dimensional properties) for frame wrap, frame angle or tilt.
  • lenses with the same continuous power gradation surface may be used to create a range of add powers, depending on the design requirements and user preferences. This may be beneficial to optical labs or prescription manufacturers, because they will not need as large or diverse an inventory of starting lens blanks.
  • a lens of the present invention is used having a power increase of 2 diopters across the outer surface of the lens, and a final lens with 3 diopters of add power is desired, one can design the inner surface such that it contributes toward the total 3 diopters, but achieve two advantages with this invention: 1) the outer surface is not as bulbous as a typical front surface 3 add lens, and 2) the inner surface is not as flat as a typical inner surface 3 add lens, providing better clearance to the cheeks.
  • the same lens surface according to the invention could be used to produce a final lens with a 1 diopter add power region.
  • the lens will be regressive on a portion of the inner surface, which may be advantageous for some face shapes (such as prominent cheekbones) or with a closely wrapped eyeglass frame.
  • 2 diopters of add power are needed for the final lens, most of this add power is already present on the lens surface with the continuous power gradation.
  • the other surface only needs to augment the power slightly near the chosen, final add area, and can be used primarily for other factors in the optical corrections, such as stabilizing different power areas, or for cosmetic considerations of the lens.
  • the invention's power gradation surface it is possible to use different portions of the invention's power gradation surface to accommodate different prescriptions or user preferences. For instance, consider another linear power gradation surface having a base curvature of 2D at the top of the lens and 6D at the bottom of the lens, thus giving a total power increase over the surface of 4 diopters, or an increase of 2D over 30 mm travel. Many small frames have a height dimension in the range of 20-30 mm. Thus, one could move the position of the frame up or down relative to the lens surface such that it spans different base curve portions. This may be helpful to preferentially match the lens curvature to the prescription needs, and maintain as flat or aesthetically balanced a lens as possible.
  • lens surfaces with different power gradation ranges or different relationships describing the continuous power gradation can be selected for different add power requirements, and used in combination with the other surface of the lens to optimize performance or cosmetics.
  • Such freedoms in design are particularly useful when attempting to keep the final lens as thin as possible.
  • a thinner lens will be both more comfortable to wear (less mass) and more attractive in appearance.
  • the invention allows a distinct advantage in thickness balance. With the use of the continuous power gradation surface and the second lens surface cooperating with it, less astigmatism is pushed toward the edges than on a standard progressive design. In addition, because the add power will be shared between the two surfaces, neither surface should protrude as markedly as in a one-sided design. Similarly, in the preferred case of an outer surface with continuous power increases toward the bottom of the lens, the increased effective base curve lower on the lens will automatically begin to balance the lens thickness between the inner and outer surfaces.
  • Another practical advantage occurs for presbyopic prescriptions when the continuous power gradation invention is embodied as a continuous increase in power down substantially the whole area of the lens surface. Due to the continuously increasing curvature down the lens surface, foveal viewing through the lens is mainly obtained perpendicular to the surface, rather than at more oblique angles as would be found, for example, for back-surface progressive designs. This means that equations that are more accurate can be used to calculate and design optimized prescription designs, with less error caused by highly variable oblique viewing. In addition, because of the perpendicular positioning, there is less difference between the measured prescription on standard lensometers and the actual prescription in use. This is an extremely important consideration for the optical dispenser, because they want to ensure that the prescription dispensed is correct for their patient.
  • the continuous power gradation surfaces described so far, and illustrated in the preceding Figures, are particularly suitable for use as front (outer) surfaces of lenses where one desires a higher optical power near the bottom of the finished lens. This positions the power gradation surface in the standard configuration for treatment of presbyopia. It will be obvious to those of skill in the art that the continuous power gradation surface could also be configured with a gradual increase in power from the bottom to the top of the lens for situations where that configuration is useful, such as for airline pilots or mechanics who need to read overhead displays.
  • the continuous power gradation surface can be positioned on the inner surface of the lens, closest to the user's eye.
  • the power gradation surface preferably has a shorter radius of curvature at the top of the lens that at the bottom of the inner surface, and because it is the inner (negative) surface, this provide more power at the bottom of this lens surface, in the area of standard use with presbyopic prescriptions.
  • the continuous power gradation profile might be used for single vision corrections to improve cosmetic appearance (such as lens edge thickness), increase the zone of clearest vision, or lessen off-axis errors.
  • cosmetic appearance such as lens edge thickness
  • the improved viewing angle inherent to the power gradation lens design which causes all viewing angles to more closely approximate a perpendicular intercept with the lens, will maximize the field of view and create a more comfortable visual perception for even single vision wearers.
  • This also allows more accurate modeling of lens performance and therefore better optimization of the final lens. This may be particularly advantageous where oblique angle viewing errors become more pronounced, for example, in higher-powered corrections, or for prescriptions in wrap-style frames.
  • U. S. Patent 6364481 focuses on varying prismatic power and specifically decreasing the horizontal component of the prism across a lens from an optical zone into a peripheral zone toward the temples. This is designed to increase the clear optical area by including additional optical corrections in an extension zone toward the periphery.
  • U. S. Patent 6454408 also describes improvements in lens designs for wrap-style frames, employing "co-varying surfaces" such that both surfaces' curvature changes are nearly equal at corresponding points on each surface. Preferred surfaces are radially symmetric, and the curvature changes preferably vary the power horizontally across the lens. Similar to U. S. Patent 6364481 a central viewing zone, called the visual fixation field in U. S. Patent 6454408 , is optimized and an extension zone toward the temple is described.
  • the present invention can be configured in yet another manner that may be useful.
  • the continuous power gradation increases across the width of the lens, rather than from the top to the bottom of the lens.
  • the power gradation increase can address additional conditions besides prism. For example, the increased curvature toward the outer edge of the lens might be useful for tightly wrapped frames, especially with higher-powered prescriptions.
  • the other surface of the lens would then be surfaced to compensate for the power gradation, such that at least one effective stabilized optical power area is created (for example, for single vision prescriptions), or one or more effective stabilized areas for distance-viewing or near-viewing are created for multifocal prescriptions. Due to the uniqueness of the continuous power gradation design, the corresponding changes on the other surface to achieve the given prescription would require changes different from "co-varying surfaces".
  • the continuous power gradation increase can comprise an increase in cylinder power instead of, or in addition to, an increase in spherical power.
  • a small gradual increase in cylinder has been seen in the previous examples of the power gradation surfaces in FIG.s 4 and 5 . In some instances, this may occur in connection with a planned spherical power gradation, due to constraints of a lens' surface. However, one may also choose to design this surface of the invention primarily for cylindrical power gradations, or for a controlled amount of cylinder increase. This may be particularly advantageous for single vision prescriptions, and again may be useful for wrap style frames, especially those with a pronounced bend near the temporal side. A preferred embodiment of this cylinder power gradation would be a linear increase with a vertical axis.
  • the surface with the continuous power gradation may or may not be designed with an umbilical line. That is, the invention can be embodied such that, at any given point along a chosen line, the horizontal and vertical curvature are equal, forming a controlled umbilical progression.
  • this umbilical does not join two effective areas of stabilized power (as in many progressive lens surfaces), but instead extends from one edge of the useable optical area of lens to the other, along a line of gradually, continuously increasing power.
  • This embodiment provides decreased unwanted cylinder along the umbilical and to each side of it due to the designedly spherical nature of an umbilical line. However, this will be accompanied by increased unwanted cylinder away from the umbilical.
  • a long umbilical line for the power gradation would be positioned according to the user's reading gaze movement, and therefore is likely to angle toward the nose.
  • the umbilical can aim in other directions than a traditional progressive lens.
  • a power gradation increase along an umbilical could be aligned with the 0-180 axis (horizontal) on the lens. This embodiment may be particularly useful for wrap frames. Power gradations with umbilical lines could be positioned at other angles across the lens surface, to adapt to various frame shapes or individual prescriptions.
  • Another preferred embodiment uses continuous power gradation surfaces without an umbilical line.
  • a continuous line with equal curvature in perpendicular orientations is not defined. Therefore, at any given point, the surface may have different curvatures in the horizontal and vertical directions.
  • cylindrical or toroidal surfaces for single vision lenses are common, and progressive lenses with different powers in the perpendicular axes are known (see, for examples, U. S. Patents 6935744 and 7399080 ), but these approaches have not incorporated a continuous gradual increase in power over the entire optically useable lens surface.
  • Both the progressive lens designs and the single vision lenses embody large areas of stabilized optical power, in distinction from the present invention.
  • a continuous power gradation surface without an umbilical line will have lower maximum unwanted cylinder than a similar surface with an umbilical line, because no line is constrained to be purely spherical. This means less correction of unwanted cylinder will be required by the other surface to achieve the same optical performance as a surface with an umbilical, or alternatively, better optimization can be made because smaller corrections are needed.
  • without a defined line of performance there is again more freedom in orientation, lateral positioning and optimization between the two surfaces.
  • the option of no umbilical line is an advantageous embodiment of the power gradation surface.
  • Embodiments of the power gradation surface are then combined with the other surface of the lens to create the desired prescription and provide the final lens with at least one effective area of stabilized optical power.
  • the invention's combination of lens surfaces will provide at least two areas of stabilized optical power. More preferably, one of two areas will be created for distance-viewing and one for near-viewing. More preferably, the two areas of stabilized optical power created will be effective areas.
  • the combination of the two surfaces may take into account other factors, such as cosmetic appearance, individual user's preferences or practices, ease of manufacture, and optimization of optical performance.
  • User preferences include, for example, such factors as physical distance on the lens between the distance-viewing and near-viewing areas, the size of the distance-viewing and near-viewing areas, the amount of cylinder (astigmatism) tolerated in and around the viewing areas, the preferred angle of gaze between the distance and near-viewing area, and other factors based on the activities and habits of the wearer. These and similar factors can be allotted differing degrees of importance in design or optimization routines.
  • a continuous power gradation surface can be selected a priori to complete the lens, or additional information may be gathered on how the lens will be used.
  • Another advantage of the invention is that one has increased freedom to adapt any power gradation surface to a wide variety of prescriptions. For example, consider a linear power gradation increase of 2 diopters down the surface of a lens. There are numerous ways this surface can be used in combination with unique mathematical designs of the other surface to create lenses with +2 diopters of add, lenses with +1 diopters of add (some power subtracted by the other surface), lenses with +3 diopters of add (some additional add power contributed by the other surface), as well as intermediate add powers, while incorporating a range of distance-viewing corrections. Similarly, since the power gradation surface is not constrained by small regions of distance and add power, the other surface can be designed to broaden, offset horizontally or reposition vertically the resultant distance and near-viewing areas of the final prescription.
  • the other surface would then be adapted to either create an add region, if needed for the prescription, or to combine with the power gradation to provide a single vision correction.
  • the power gradation across the lens it may be easier to design the other surface to create larger areas of clear vision even for a wrap style. This optimized visual area is aided by the power gradation increase, which may be selected to better fit the wrap curvature and keep the lens surface more perpendicular to any viewing direction.
  • the power gradation increase could be aligned with that angle (rather than just positioned vertically) for more complete use of the surface's increasing power.
  • Other applications will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art.
  • a different power gradation increase, a different mathematical relationship describing the power gradation, or a different base curvature for the surface may be chosen depending on frame design and fit factors, such as, among others, the pantoscopic tilt, face form or wrap angle, pupillary distance and corneal vertex distance.
  • a continuous power gradation surface with an umbilical line may be preferred for persons who are extremely sensitive to unwanted cylinder, while a power gradation surface without an umbilical line (and therefore lower overall unwanted cylinder that is more distributed across the surface) may be preferred for an emerging presbyope with a limited add requirement. Manufacturing factors may also be taken into consideration, such as how much extra material needs to be removed from the other surface to create the final prescription, or how difficult it is to create the necessary features of the final lens.
  • the other surface is calculated such that its combination with the first surface will yield the desired prescription, and create at least one effective stabilized optical power area for the final lens.
  • the continuous power gradation surface will be expressed by a known equation or equations, or will be described by a unique set of xyz coordinates.
  • the equation(s) or values for the power gradation surface, along with the final prescription and any other factors that will be taken into account, are then entered into calculation routines to define and optimize the other surface, and the combination of the two surfaces. This can be accomplished by many known techniques, including ray tracing, wavefront propagation analysis, curvature calculation, or combinations of these or other techniques.
  • the computations are then used to program or direct the operation of a surfacing instrument, such as a CNC machine, to shape the surfaces to the desired values.
  • the continuous power gradation surface has been described like a semi-finished blank, in which one surface of the lens blank, either the inner or the outer surface, embodies the power gradation design and is not further altered for optical power.
  • Many state of the art digital surfacing machines most easily accommodate a semi-finished lens blank where the outer surface requires no further work, and the inner surface is cut or "finished” by the machine to final shape and surface quality. While this is a very practical and preferred embodiment, one will recognize that the invention can be accomplished by surfacing both sides of a blank, cutting one surface according to the equation(s) or xyz coordinates of the desired continuous power gradation surface, and cutting the other surface to combine with the power gradation surface to create the final prescription. This approach does require an extra set of cutting steps, but provides the option that no stock of semi-finished power gradation blanks needs to be maintained. All these options are within the scope of this invention.
  • Some of these examples describe embodiments of the invention to create prescription corrections for both distance-viewing and near-viewing, with lenses that exhibit an effective add power.
  • add power regions including (nominal add power - 0.125D), (nominal add power - 0.25D), at least 75% of the add power, and at least 85% of the add power.
  • the goal was to design a lens according to the present invention with a zero diopters of distance-viewing correction and an add power of +2 diopters.
  • this lens was designed with distance correction in the upper portion of the lens, and the add power near the bottom of the lens, similar to the layout of a standard progressive lens.
  • the following standard fitting parameters were used in the calculations: distance from the cornea of the eye to the lens' back surface vertex (corneal vertex distance): 13 mm; displacement of near-viewing region: 2 mm toward the nose; distance to full add value from 0-180 line of lens: 16 mm; pantoscopic tilt: 8 degrees; wrap angle: 5 degrees.
  • the surface shown in FIG.s 1 and 4 was used as the continuous power gradation surface on the front of the final lens.
  • This surface was modeled mathematically as a sum of 150 orthogonal Zernike polynomials, ordered according to the Wyant-Creath scheme, and the coefficients of this surface representation became the input for the prescribed lens calculations. Calculations were performed via exact ray tracing to combine the information on the power gradation surface and the fitting parameters, and determine the other lens surface's needed characteristics to satisfy the prescription requirements. For these calculations, the other lens surface (in these Examples, the back lens surface) was represented by a separate expansion of 150 Zerenike polynomials.
  • the coefficients of the back lens surface's expansions were found by minimization of a merit function that compares the actual power map at any stage of the computation with a theoretical power map.
  • the optimization was carried out using the BFGS (Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno) optimization algorithm.
  • FIG. 6 show a surface contour map of the back surface that was calculated for combination with the lens surface illustrated in FIG. 4 to meet this prescription requirement.
  • FIG. 6 was designed to be the inner surface of the lens. Note that this inner surface shows a significant amount of cylinder and rapid cylinder change across the lower surface (heavy line contours), while the spherical power (light line contours) changes much less.
  • FIG. 7 shows the calculated through-power contour plot that results when the surface of FIG. 6 is combined with the power gradation surface of FIG. 4 .
  • This plot shows the effective optical power that will be perceived when looking through the lens.
  • Heavy lines mark cylinder values and light lines indicate spherical power contours.
  • the add region is indicated by the spherical power contour of 1.8D, corresponding to the region with optical power of at least 90% of the desired add power.
  • FIG. 7 shows that the combination of the two surfaces creates a lens with a large, stabilized optical power area for distance-viewing with zero correction (plano power), an intermediate corridor with rapid change in optical power, and another area of stabilized optical power of about +2 diopters for the add area.
  • FIG. 8 shows the calculated power along a profile following a typical presbyopic line of sight from the top of the lens to the bottom of the lens and passing through the resultant intermediate corridor and the add area of the lens of this Example.
  • the dashed line traces this positional profile along the back surface of this lens with the associated surface power values shown on the right-hand axis.
  • the solid line traces the same positional profile on the final lens, with the through-power values calculated for this lens shown on the left-hand axis.
  • the solid line profile of FIG. 8 tracing through-power for the final lens shows that two stabilized areas of optical power have been created for the final lens by the combination of the front lens surface illustrated by FIG.s 1 and 4 , and the back lens surface illustrated in FIG.s 6 and 8 (dashed line plot).
  • the solid line through-power shows one area having a value of approximately 0 diopters as required for the distance-viewing prescription extending from about 30 mm to near 0 mm, and another area extending from about -15 mm to -30 mm with a power of nearly 2D. Both areas appear as plateaus of power. These areas comply with even the most demanding preferred definition of a stabilized area with average power ⁇ 0.06D.
  • Re-examining the contour plot of FIG. 7 in these two regions confirms that the areas created with stabilized optical power by these two lens surfaces have sufficient extent across the lens surface to be effective.
  • the Example has achieved the result of creating effective stabilized area of optical power by the combination of these lens surfaces.
  • dashed line profile of FIG. 8 shows the surprising power variations required of the back surface to cooperate with the power gradation front surface to supply the prescription desired. This is an unusual and non-intuitive form for a lens surface, with multiple changes in power, and such changes occurring in both locally negative and positive directions.
  • EXAMPLES 2 and 3 demonstrate how one can use the surface described above and illustrated FIG.s 1 and 4 as an exemplary front surface, and design and combine various other surfaces to create lenses with the same Rx, but with different optical or user-desired characteristics.
  • the method of mathematically expressing the surfaces, and the optimization technique for these EXAMPLES is the same approach as used for EXAMPLE 1.
  • the goal was to design a lens according to the present invention with zero diopters of distance-viewing correction and an add power of +2 diopters.
  • the calculation had the additional constraint that the lens should have a shorter vertical distance between the distance and the near viewing areas than the lens in EXAMPLE 1. This constraint may be desired, for example, by a person selecting smaller eyeglass frames, or who exhibits less downward eye movement to accommodate the reading position.
  • the fitting parameters were the same at those used in EXAMPLE 1, except the distance to the full add was set at 13 mm below the 0-180 line instead of 16 mm.
  • FIG. 9 in a manner similar to FIG. 8 , shows calculated power profiles following a typical presbyopic line of sight from the top of the lens to the bottom, and traces the optical power values across the back lens surface (dashed line and right-hand axis) and the calculated through-power values of the final lens of EXAMPLE 2 (solid line and left-hand axis).
  • the through-power of the final lens in this Example shows the two stabilized optical power areas as desired for the prescription.
  • comparison of the through-power profiles of FIG.s 8 and 9 shows that the stabilized area with approximately +2D add power has been reached at a shorter distance down the profile of the lens illustrated by FIG. 9 .
  • FIG. 10 shows the calculated power contour plot for expected through-power readings of this exemplary lens.
  • the region enclosed by the 1.8 D spherical power contour is definitely extended further toward the middle of the lens, in comparison with the lens of EXAMPLE 1, showing that the shorter distance to an effective stabilized add power area has been achieved by this combination of surfaces.
  • both the 0.5D sphere and cylinder contours appear higher in the positive y direction for the through-power reading contour plot of FIG. 10 than seen on FIG. 7 ; this effect is often seen on progressive lenses with a short distance to the add, too, and can be even more pronounced than in EXAMPLE 2.
  • the goal was to design another lens according to the present invention with zero diopters of distance-viewing correction and an add power of +2 diopters.
  • the fitting parameters were the same at those used in EXAMPLE 1. However, in this instance, the calculation had the separate requirement to create a lens with a wider near-viewing area than EXAMPLE 1.
  • FIG. 11 shows the surface power profile for the back lens surface (dashed line and right-hand axis) and the calculated through-power of the final lens (solid line and left-hand axis) along a typical line of sight for presbyopic viewing from the top of this lens (30 mm) to the bottom of the lens (-30 mm).
  • the through-power plot shows the desired stabilized optical power areas for both zero diopters distance-viewing correction and +2D add power.
  • the shape of this back surface profile is similar to those in the previous Examples, but has a surface power value of about -3.15D at -10 mm, in comparison to the smaller values observed in the previous examples.
  • the back surface power changes slightly more across this lens' add area than the back surface used in EXAMPLE 1.
  • the calculated through-power contour plot associated with this lens ( FIG. 12 ) clearly shows as in previous Examples a large effective area of stabilized power for the distance-viewing value, and in addition, a wider effective near-viewing stabilized area (bounded by the 1.8D contour) than the corresponding area on the lens of EXAMPLE 1.
  • the 0.5D sphere (light lines) and cylinder contours (heavy lines) extend farther up the lens than for EXAMPLE 1, and the areas with higher cylinder readings, such as unwanted cylinder of 2D, are larger.
  • design tradeoffs may be acceptable since a broader, larger near-distance viewing area is gained for EXAMPLE 3.
  • the surfaces to be combined with the power gradation surface in EXAMPLES 1-3 appear different from either standard single vision or progressive surfaces.
  • the unusual power variations and multiple changes across the lens of increasing or decreasing power were noted above.
  • Most progressive surfaces try to limit any cylinder in the distance-viewing region of the lens, but this limitation was not required for the surfaces used in EXAMPLES 1-3.
  • the back surface power map plotted in FIG. 6 shows a narrowed corridor bounded by the 0.5D cylinder contour (heavy lines), and a large area in the top half of the lens with cylinder values of 0.5-1.0D.
  • a surface such as shown in FIG.
  • cylinder on the opposite lens surface can be used to advantage to broaden the resultant distance-viewing area of the final lens, as illustrated in FIG. 7 .
  • the opposite surfaces that combine with a continuous power gradation surface according to this invention have another advantage. Since their cylinder components can be more extensive over the lens surface (in contrast to progressive lens surfaces), the power changes can be more gradual and therefore easier to create by either conventional or digital surfacing. In a preferred embodiment, gradual changes over substantially the entire other surface cooperate with the continuous power gradation surface to create the final prescription. Thus, it is clear that for the invention, both surfaces often must take on innovative configurations to create the desired combination.
  • the following example illustrates how the same continuous power gradation surface can be used to create a different prescription.
  • FIG. 13 shows the surface contour power plot for the back surface that combines with the power gradation surface to achieve these prescription requirements.
  • This back lens surface shows high and rapidly varying spherical power (light contour lines) in addition to more cylinder power changes (heavy contour lines) than in the previous examples.
  • FIG. 14 shows the calculated power contour plot of expected through-power readings for the exemplary lens created by this combination of surfaces.
  • a large effective stabilized distance-viewing region has been created by this combination of surfaces in the upper half of the lens, bounded by the -1.5D sphere contour and the 0.5D cylinder limit. This large area will have an optical power near the prescribed -2D value.
  • the power profiles for this lens are shown in FIG. 15 .
  • the profile starts at the top of lens (30 mm) and runs along a presbyopic line of sight from the distance-viewing area through the near-viewing area to the bottom of the lens (-30 mm).
  • the solid line of calculated through-power for this lens clearly shows a plateau of stabilized power at -2D for the distance-viewing correction, and another plateau of stabilized power at about 1 D in the near-viewing area corresponding to the +3D add requirement.
  • the back surface combined with the surface of FIG. 4 to create this lens shows an unusual undulating power profile similar to the previous Examples, but with different surface power values and larger relative changes (dashed line and right-hand axis in FIG. 15 ).
  • the back surface must provide significantly more power than in the previous Examples, and change more quickly to cooperate with the power gradation increase of the front surface.
  • the back surface power changes more along its profile from -10 mm to - 30 mm than in the previous Examples, and in this cooperative manner, the two surfaces creates a higher, stabilized add area for the final lens without either surface showing an effective stabilized area of their own.
  • the following example illustrates the use of a continuous power gradation surface for single vision lenses.
  • the goal in this Example was to design a lens according to the present invention with a spherical power of -4.25 D, a cylinder power of +1D and a cylinder axis of 180°.
  • a prescription is fairly common, but can be particularly challenging to adapt into wrap frames that often require higher base curves normally associated with plus prescriptions.
  • One advantage of the continuous power gradation design is that the spherical curvature of the lens surface can be chosen to increase across the lens. This feature may be used to advantage, for example, in fitting the lens into a wrapped frame.
  • the continuous power gradation surface as illustrated in FIG. 5 was used in this Example as the outer surface of the lens. Note that the power increase proceeds laterally across the lens from side to side for this surface of the invention, rather than from the top to the bottom of the lens.
  • the power gradation increase as can be seen by the spherical power contours (light lines) in FIG. 5 , was aligned such that power increased along the 0-180 axis toward the temples (-30 mm).
  • FIG. 16 which traces this surface's power profile plot along the 0-180 axis, confirms that the surface shown in FIG. 5 comprises no discontinuities or inflection points.
  • FIG. 17 shows the surface power contour plot for the back lens surface that is combined with the continuous power gradation surface of FIG. 5 to create the specified single vision prescription.
  • This back surface shows a different distribution of cylinder power than the previous examples, consistent with the 180° cylinder axis of the specified prescription.
  • the spherical power contours (light lines) on this surface describe a much higher minus (highly concave) surface, which is appropriate to accommodate the -4.25D spherical power of the desired Rx.
  • FIG. 18 shows the power contour plot corresponding to the calculated through-power values of the exemplary lens created by the combined surfaces of FIG. 5 and FIG. 17 .
  • a very extensive area with both the correct spherical and cylinder prescription values is created by the cooperation of these two surfaces, and this area extends well toward the temporal portion of the lens (-y values).
  • FIG. 19 traces the surface power profile of the back surface (dashed line and right-hand y-axis values) and the calculated through-power of the lens (solid line and left-hand y-axis values).
  • the through-power profile shows good agreement with the desired prescription value across the lens, illustrating that a very large effective area of stabilized optical power has been created by this combination of lens surfaces.
  • the back surface power profile (dashed line in FIG. 19 ) resembles an alternative continuous power gradation surface, and its corresponding contour map illustrated in FIG. 17 shows this surface includes significant changes in cylinder values as well as spherical power.
  • the extensive effective area with correct prescription on this exemplary lens is particularly worthy of note and an advantageous design for wrap-style frames that otherwise present a large portion of the lens to the wearer at oblique angles.
  • the designed additional curvature of the continuous power gradation surface means more of the lens surface is presented perpendicular to the eye, and this allows better correction of the vision and less angular distortion.
  • the use of the power gradation surface provides a very successful optical solution.
  • this well-optimized prescription lens has been achieved with a front base curve that ranges from only 3-5D, instead of the steeper, more bulbous base curves typically used for wrap-style lenses.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Eyeglasses (AREA)

Claims (13)

  1. Verre ophtalmique conférant une prescription souhaitée, ledit verre comprenant :
    une première surface de verre et une seconde surface de verre sur le côté opposé du verre par rapport à la première surface de verre, la première surface de verre comprenant une augmentation progressive continue de puissance optique sensiblement sur sa surface entière utilisable optiquement depuis un bord jusque sensiblement au bord opposé, l'augmentation progressive continue de puissance optique comprenant un changement de puissance sphérique et la puissance optique augmentant sans points d'inflexion ni discontinuité depuis un bord de la surface utilisable optiquement jusque sensiblement au bord opposé de la surface utilisable optiquement ;
    et dans lequel la seconde surface de verre est calculée en combinaison avec l'augmentation de puissance optique de la première surface de verre et la seconde surface de verre est formée de sorte que le verre fournisse au moins une première aire utile de puissance optique stabilisée d'au moins 6 mm dans son diamètre minimal, la puissance optique stabilisée ne variant pas de +/- 0,12 D de la puissance de prescription souhaitée.
  2. Verre ophtalmique selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le verre a un bord nasal et un bord temporal et des surfaces avant et arrière, le verre étant configuré pour être utilisé comme un verre de lunettes de sorte qu'avec le bord nasal adjacent au nez du porteur et la surface arrière la plus proche de l'oeil du porteur, l'augmentation de puissance optique de la première surface de verre augmente depuis le haut du verre jusqu'au bas du verre.
  3. Verre ophtalmique selon la revendication 1 ou la revendication 2, dans lequel la première surface de verre est la surface de verre avant la plus éloignée du porteur.
  4. Verre ophtalmique selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la première surface de verre est la surface de verre arrière la plus proche de l'oeil du porteur.
  5. Verre ophtalmique selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4 inclues, dans lequel le verre fournit en outre une seconde aire utile de puissance optique stabilisée d'au moins 6 mm dans son diamètre minimal, la puissance optique stabilisée de la seconde aire utile ne variant pas de +/- 0,12 D d'une valeur de la puissance de prescription souhaitée.
  6. Verre ophtalmique selon la revendication 5, dans lequel les première et seconde aires utiles de puissance optique stabilisée comprennent deux puissances optiques différentes pour la prescription souhaitée.
  7. Verre ophtalmique selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'augmentation progressive continue de puissance optique sur la première surface de verre contient une ligne ombilicale.
  8. Verre ophtalmique selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'augmentation progressive continue de puissance optique sur la première surface de verre comprend en outre un changement de puissance cylindrique.
  9. Verre ophtalmique selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'augmentation progressive continue de puissance optique sur la première surface de verre comprend une augmentation de puissance linéaire.
  10. Verre ophtalmique selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'augmentation progressive continue de puissance optique sur la première surface de verre comprend une augmentation de puissance non linéaire.
  11. Verre ophtalmique selon la revendication 10, dans lequel l'augmentation de puissance non linéaire est décrite par une équation choisie dans le groupe constitué par des équations de fonction exponentielle, logarithmique, de spirale logarithmique, de puissance parabolique et positive.
  12. Verre ophtalmique selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le verre a un bord nasal et un bord temporal et des surfaces avant et arrière, le verre étant configuré pour être utilisé comme un verre de lunettes de sorte qu'avec le bord nasal adjacent au nez du porteur et la surface arrière la plus proche du nez du porteur, l'augmentation de puissance optique de la première surface de verre augmente depuis le bord nasal jusqu'au bord temporal du verre.
  13. Verre ophtalmique selon la revendication 6, dans lequel la première aire utile de puissance optique stabilisée confère une puissance de prescription pour une vision à distance et la seconde aire utile de puissance optique stabilisée confère une puissance de prescription pour une vision de près.
EP10763288.7A 2010-01-29 2010-09-30 Lentille à gradation de puissance continue Active EP2529270B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/697,060 US8042941B2 (en) 2010-01-29 2010-01-29 Lens with continuous power gradation
PCT/US2010/050986 WO2011093929A1 (fr) 2010-01-29 2010-09-30 Lentille à gradation de puissance continue

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2529270A1 EP2529270A1 (fr) 2012-12-05
EP2529270B1 true EP2529270B1 (fr) 2016-06-08

Family

ID=43033251

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10763288.7A Active EP2529270B1 (fr) 2010-01-29 2010-09-30 Lentille à gradation de puissance continue

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US8042941B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP2529270B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP5856080B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN102741735B (fr)
BR (1) BR112012018978B1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2785885C (fr)
ES (1) ES2582452T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2011093929A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5789108B2 (ja) * 2011-03-08 2015-10-07 イーエイチエス レンズ フィリピン インク 累進屈折力レンズおよびその設計方法
JP6095271B2 (ja) * 2012-03-05 2017-03-15 イーエイチエス レンズ フィリピン インク レンズセット、レンズ設計方法及びレンズ製造方法
CN102830503A (zh) * 2012-07-26 2012-12-19 苏州苏大明世光学有限公司 一种通用型渐进多焦点镜片与模具
US9265458B2 (en) 2012-12-04 2016-02-23 Sync-Think, Inc. Application of smooth pursuit cognitive testing paradigms to clinical drug development
EP2752703A1 (fr) * 2013-01-07 2014-07-09 ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL (Compagnie Générale d'Optique) Lentille ophtalmique présentant au moins une zone stable
US9380976B2 (en) 2013-03-11 2016-07-05 Sync-Think, Inc. Optical neuroinformatics
ES2576489T3 (es) * 2013-08-02 2016-07-07 Essilor International (Compagnie Générale d'Optique) Un método para controlar un dispositivo de lente oftálmica programable
US9618774B2 (en) 2014-02-10 2017-04-11 Shamir Optical Industry Ltd. Quasi progressive lenses for eyewear
US9995948B2 (en) 2014-05-11 2018-06-12 AddOn Optics Ltd. Adhesive optical film to convert an eyeglass lens to a progressive lens
EP3241064A1 (fr) * 2014-12-31 2017-11-08 Essilor International (Compagnie Générale D'Optique) Lentille ophtalmique de lunettes destinée à être montée sur une monture de lunettes
WO2017081065A1 (fr) * 2015-11-13 2017-05-18 Essilor International (Compagnie Generale D'optique) Verres présentant une meilleure gestion de la distorsion
PT3352001T (pt) 2017-01-20 2023-06-16 Zeiss Carl Vision Int Gmbh Lente de óculos progressiva com índice de refração variável e método para a sua conceção e produção
US10330950B2 (en) * 2017-02-23 2019-06-25 Indizen Optical Technologies of America, LLC Progressive lenses with reduced peripheral mean sphere
EP3740814B1 (fr) * 2018-01-19 2024-02-14 Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH Verre de lunette à foyer progressif ayant un indice de réfraction variable et son procédé de conception et de fabrication
EP3683618A1 (fr) * 2019-01-21 2020-07-22 Essilor International (Compagnie Generale D'optique) Système et procédé de présentation d'un trouble optique
JP7203190B2 (ja) * 2019-02-27 2023-01-12 株式会社ニコン・エシロール 計算方法、画像生成方法、眼鏡レンズの設計方法、眼鏡レンズの製造方法、眼鏡レンズの販売方法、計算装置およびプログラム
US11378821B2 (en) 2019-09-26 2022-07-05 AddOn Optics Ltd. Progressive lens and method of manufacture thereof
US11668932B2 (en) 2020-01-06 2023-06-06 Meta Platforms Technologies, Llc Switchable Pancharatnam-Berry phase grating stack
US11448803B1 (en) 2020-01-06 2022-09-20 Facebook Technologies, Llc Pancake lens including diffuser
US11294184B2 (en) * 2020-01-06 2022-04-05 Facebook Technologies, Llc Foveated display system
US11249312B2 (en) * 2020-05-01 2022-02-15 Google Llc Color-corrected curved optical see-through thin lightguide with large field of view in eyewear formfactor
US11520308B2 (en) 2020-07-29 2022-12-06 Indizen Optical Technologies of America, LLC Progressive lenses with variable reduced peripheral mean sphere
US11126012B1 (en) 2020-10-01 2021-09-21 Michael Walach Broadview natural addition lens
TWI741902B (zh) * 2020-12-07 2021-10-01 春秋光學股份有限公司 用於減緩或預防近視進展之鏡片
CN116679465B (zh) * 2023-08-03 2023-10-13 苏州派视光学有限公司 一种双面渐进多焦点镜片及其设计方法

Family Cites Families (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2109474A (en) 1931-12-07 1938-03-01 Evans Charles Ernest Spectacle lens
US2475275A (en) 1945-01-19 1949-07-05 Birchall Henry James Lens of variable focal power having surfaces of involute form
US2878721A (en) 1954-02-03 1959-03-24 Farrand Optical Co Inc Multifocal ophthalmic lenses
BE755907A (fr) * 1969-09-11 1971-02-15 Lunetiers Lentilles a puissance focale progressive
US3711191A (en) 1971-09-16 1973-01-16 L Tagnon Aberration corrected ophthalmic progressive power lenses
US3797922A (en) 1973-05-10 1974-03-19 Polaroid Corp Azygous ophthalmic lens and spectacles for correcting presbyopia
FR2425653A1 (fr) 1978-05-12 1979-12-07 Essilor Int Procede pour elaborer une surface de refraction d'une lentille ophtalmique a puissance focale progressivement variable
JPS56144414A (en) 1980-04-12 1981-11-10 Hoya Corp Progressive multifocal lens
US4580882A (en) 1983-04-21 1986-04-08 Benjamin Nuchman Continuously variable contact lens
US4538887A (en) 1984-03-08 1985-09-03 Bristol Alexander C Aspheric spectacle lens blank
US4861153A (en) 1986-12-19 1989-08-29 American Optical Corporation Progressive addition spectacle lens
DE3716201C2 (de) 1987-05-14 2001-02-15 Rodenstock Optik G Progressives Brillenglas
JP2756670B2 (ja) 1987-11-30 1998-05-25 旭光学工業株式会社 累進多焦点眼鏡レンズ
US5327181A (en) 1993-01-12 1994-07-05 Gentex Optics, Inc. Progressive lens for specialty and occupational use
EP0809127B9 (fr) 1995-11-24 2010-06-23 Seiko Epson Corporation Lentilles multifocales pour lunettes et verre de lunettes
DE69626797T2 (de) 1995-11-24 2003-10-23 Seiko Epson Corp Gleitsichtglas mit progressiver fläche und astigmatismuskorrektur auf der rückseite
US5726734A (en) 1996-01-19 1998-03-10 American Optical Corporation Hard/soft superposition progressive lens design
US5847803A (en) 1996-09-17 1998-12-08 Innotech, Inc. Optic incorporating a power gradient
AUPO625797A0 (en) * 1997-04-17 1997-05-15 Sola International Holdings Ltd Spectacles bearing sunglass lenses
WO1999004307A1 (fr) 1997-07-18 1999-01-28 Sola International Holdings Ltd. Lentille a correction de surface
AUPP016197A0 (en) 1997-11-03 1997-11-27 Sola International Holdings Ltd Improved ophthalmic lens
WO1999063392A1 (fr) 1998-06-04 1999-12-09 Sola International Holdings Ltd. Verres ophtalmiques façonnes
US6149271A (en) 1998-10-23 2000-11-21 Innotech, Inc. Progressive addition lenses
US6139148A (en) 1999-02-04 2000-10-31 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Progressive addition lenses having regressive surfaces
MXPA01012204A (es) * 1999-05-25 2003-06-30 Johnson & Johnson Lentes de adiccion progresiva con perfiles de energia de canal modificados.
US6935744B2 (en) 2002-05-28 2005-08-30 Hoya Corporation Bi-aspherical type progressive-power lens
US6874887B2 (en) 2003-04-09 2005-04-05 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Multifocal contact lens
US6956682B2 (en) 2003-06-26 2005-10-18 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Method for designing progressive addition lenses
JP4437482B2 (ja) * 2003-11-27 2010-03-24 Ｈｏｙａ株式会社 両面非球面型累進屈折力レンズおよびその設計方法
EP1691232B1 (fr) 2003-11-27 2009-08-12 Hoya Corporation Lentille de lunettes a deux faces progressives
JP4530207B2 (ja) * 2004-07-08 2010-08-25 Ｈｏｙａ株式会社 ベンディング角を有するフレームに用いる眼鏡レンズの設計方法及びベンディング角を有するフレームに用いる眼鏡レンズ
US7159983B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2007-01-09 Essilor International (Compagnie Generale D'optique) Multifocal lenses for pre-presbyopic individuals
FR2880428B1 (fr) * 2005-01-04 2007-10-26 Essilor Int Verre ophtalmique progressif et procede de fabrication d'un tel verre
FR2888344B1 (fr) * 2005-07-11 2007-09-14 Essilor Int Lentille ophtalmique
FR2894038B1 (fr) * 2005-11-29 2008-03-07 Essilor Int Lentille ophtalmique.
DE102008022010B4 (de) 2008-05-02 2014-10-09 Michael Penczek Asphärische optische Linse sowie Brille mit wenigstens einer derartigen Linse

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BR112012018978B1 (pt) 2020-02-04
JP5856080B2 (ja) 2016-02-09
JP2013518309A (ja) 2013-05-20
CN102741735A (zh) 2012-10-17
ES2582452T3 (es) 2016-09-13
BR112012018978A2 (pt) 2018-03-27
US8042941B2 (en) 2011-10-25
CA2785885C (fr) 2016-07-05
EP2529270A1 (fr) 2012-12-05
WO2011093929A1 (fr) 2011-08-04
CA2785885A1 (fr) 2011-08-04
US20110187993A1 (en) 2011-08-04
CN102741735B (zh) 2015-04-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2529270B1 (fr) Lentille à gradation de puissance continue
US7883206B2 (en) Multifocal lens having a progressive optical power region and a discontinuity
US8092016B2 (en) Multifocal lens having a progressive optical power region and a discontinuity
US8042940B2 (en) Opthalmic lenses having reduced base out prism
AU2015213612B2 (en) Quasi progressive lenses for eyewear
US20030086055A1 (en) Shaped ophthalmic lenses
CA2680870C (fr) Lentille multifocale ayant une region de puissance optique progressive et une discontinuite
EP3699675B1 (fr) Procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur permettant de déterminer une courbe de base d'un verre de lunettes et procédé de fabrication d'un verre de lunettes
JP2010513985A5 (fr)
JP2010513985A (ja) 改良された単一視力眼鏡
EP2365380A2 (fr) Lentille composite multifocale à couche multiple

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120601

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20150708

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602010033951

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G02C0007020000

Ipc: G02C0007060000

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G02C 7/02 20060101ALI20160111BHEP

Ipc: G02C 7/06 20060101AFI20160111BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160308

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: YAMASAKI, NANCY, L. S.

Inventor name: CRESPO VAZQUEZ, DANIEL

Inventor name: BALCH, THOMAS, A.

Inventor name: ALONSO FERNANDEZ, JOSE

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 805645

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602010033951

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2582452

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20160913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20160608

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160908

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 805645

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160608

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160909

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161008

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161010

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010033951

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20170309

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160930

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20100930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160608

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230920

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20231114

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240927

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240927

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240925

Year of fee payment: 15