EP2423885A1 - Dispositif et procédé de surveillance de fonction d'un système de péage routier - Google Patents

Dispositif et procédé de surveillance de fonction d'un système de péage routier Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2423885A1
EP2423885A1 EP10450129A EP10450129A EP2423885A1 EP 2423885 A1 EP2423885 A1 EP 2423885A1 EP 10450129 A EP10450129 A EP 10450129A EP 10450129 A EP10450129 A EP 10450129A EP 2423885 A1 EP2423885 A1 EP 2423885A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
data
toll
processor element
signature
card
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP10450129A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2423885B1 (fr
Inventor
Jasja Tijink
Oliver Nagy
Jan Kersten
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kapsch TrafficCom AG
Original Assignee
Kapsch TrafficCom AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=43288032&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2423885(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority to EP10450129.1A priority Critical patent/EP2423885B1/fr
Priority to PT104501291T priority patent/PT2423885E/pt
Priority to SI201030489T priority patent/SI2423885T1/sl
Priority to PL10450129T priority patent/PL2423885T3/pl
Priority to ES10450129.1T priority patent/ES2441815T3/es
Application filed by Kapsch TrafficCom AG filed Critical Kapsch TrafficCom AG
Priority to DK10450129.1T priority patent/DK2423885T3/da
Publication of EP2423885A1 publication Critical patent/EP2423885A1/fr
Publication of EP2423885B1 publication Critical patent/EP2423885B1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B15/00—Arrangements or apparatus for collecting fares, tolls or entrance fees at one or more control points
    • G07B15/06—Arrangements for road pricing or congestion charging of vehicles or vehicle users, e.g. automatic toll systems
    • G07B15/063—Arrangements for road pricing or congestion charging of vehicles or vehicle users, e.g. automatic toll systems using wireless information transmission between the vehicle and a fixed station

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a device and a method for monitoring the operation of a road toll system comprising at least one vehicle device recording its position in the form of raw position data and a stationary proxy computer which receives the raw position data from the vehicle device and generates toll-related toll data by toll map matching.
  • Such road toll systems are also referred to as thin-client systems.
  • the vehicle device also called on-board unit or OBU, can be carried out cost-effectively with low computing power ("thin-client"), because the compute-intensive toll card matching, i. the comparison of the position data with the toll collection relevant geographical elements, e.g. on a suitably prepared or suitable digital road map, is outsourced to powerful stationary proxy computer of the road toll system.
  • Thin-client OBUs determine their position, for example, by means of satellite navigation or radio localization in terrestrial radio beacon or mobile networks.
  • thin-client toll systems bring significant benefits to the individual user due to the low cost of a thin-client OBU, they have the disadvantage for the operator of the road toll toll system that a continuous secure function check ("secure monitoring") is not possible is: For example the reliability of toll card matching in the proxy computer for the toll operator unverifiable and therefore difficult or impossible for system suppliers.
  • Thick-client toll systems possible: In these toll systems costly thick-client OBUs are used, which over have their own toll card material and high computing power to carry out their own toll card reconciliation and send the card-adjusted toll data to a central system. For such systems, concept considerations are known to provide the toll data calculated by the thick-client OBUs with a signature issued by the toll operator and installed in the OBU to ensure the authenticity of the data to the toll collection operator's central system. This solution requires high-performance OBUs that can perform the authentication functions required by the toll operator and is not suitable for traditional thin-client systems.
  • the invention has as its object to provide a secure monitoring solution for thin-client road toll systems, which combines the advantages of operator security of signing thick-client systems with the cost advantages of thin-client systems.
  • a device of the type mentioned which is characterized according to the invention by at least a first equipped with a signature and cryptographically access secured processor element, on the one hand, the raw position data or extracted therefrom route data from the vehicle unit and on the other hand the toll card data is received from the proxy computer and configured to plausibilize the card-compensated toll data against the raw item data or the route data extracted therefrom and output it with a signature if successful.
  • the invention thus provides a continuous certification solution for toll data generated by thin-client OBUs.
  • An equipped with a signature and cryptographically access secured processor element is set "Trusted element" for the toll operator, which can be equipped with a trusted signature, such as a certificate of a trusted issuing office, and secured for its sole access.
  • Trusted element for the toll operator, which can be equipped with a trusted signature, such as a certificate of a trusted issuing office, and secured for its sole access.
  • Processor elements of this type can be inexpensively manufactured as single-chip modules, as they are widely used in SIM cards, smart cards, etc.
  • the plausibility check according to the invention of the card-compensated toll data compared to the position or route data requires only a low computing power of the trusted element, as readily available from commercially available SIM or chip card processor elements can be applied.
  • the term "plausibility check” is understood to mean a rough check or an approximate comparison as to whether the toll data generated by the proxy computer can originate from the position data or from the route data extracted therefrom, ie are plausible : For example, area-related toll data can be made plausible by a check is made as to whether the underlying position data lies in the area of the toll data. If the toll data is based on a distance traveled or a travel time, the plausibility can be checked, for example, by means of a rough accumulation of the distances lying between individual positions of the position data.
  • the first processor element is arranged in the proxy computer of the toll operator.
  • the processor element can be directly in the control of the operator (or a trusted third party) and can also be executed operator-specifically.
  • An alternative preferred embodiment of the invention for a road toll system the proxy computer, the card-balanced Toll data sent back to the vehicle unit, characterized in that the first processor element is arranged in the vehicle unit.
  • This solution has the advantage that the processor element can work together with different proxy computers of different toll operators. It also certifies the toll data submitted by a thin-client OBU in the same manner as that obtainable from a traditional certified thick-client OBU.
  • the first processor element is inserted into the vehicle device in a modularly exchangeable manner, for example in the manner of a SIM card.
  • third-party manufactured thin-client OBUs are equipped by the operator with processor elements of his confidence.
  • the processor element may either match the raw position data or route data extracted therefrom with the toll data.
  • route data extracted from the position data is used, i. the vehicle device is designed to extract route data from the raw position data and to send it to the first processor element, which makes the card-adjusted toll data plausible with respect to the extracted route data.
  • the processor element serving the certification for the toll operator thus does not experience the position position of the OBU but only excerpts or generalizations of the same, as far as the movement history of the user is concerned Data abuse protects.
  • the extracted route data from the raw position data are preferably accumulated travel distances or travel times, from which no direct conclusions can be drawn about the individual movements of the user with his vehicle device.
  • a further preferred embodiment of the invention is characterized by at least a second equipped with a signature and cryptographically access secured processor element which is arranged in the vehicle unit and adapted to generate said extracted route data from the raw position data and with its signature Provided.
  • a signature and cryptographically access secured processor element which is arranged in the vehicle unit and adapted to generate said extracted route data from the raw position data and with its signature Provided.
  • the second processor element is used in the vehicle unit modular interchangeable, and particularly preferably, the first and the second processor element may even be ident.
  • a further particularly advantageous embodiment of the invention is characterized in that the vehicle device is designed to provide the extracted route data provided with the signature on an interface for interrogation by a roadside infrastructure.
  • the processor element or "trusted element” simultaneously also enables a "secure freezing service” for the position data or path data continuously extracted therefrom in the vehicle device.
  • Roadside infrastructure such as toll bills, control vehicles, etc., can in this way obtain trusted control data from passing vehicle equipment.
  • the invention provides a method for monitoring the operation of a road toll system of the type mentioned, which is plausibilized in a equipped with a signature and cryptographically secured processor element, the card-adjusted toll data of the proxy computer against the raw position data of the vehicle unit or extracted therefrom route data and be issued with a successful plausibility with the signature provided.
  • said plausibility check preferably takes place in a processor element of the vehicle unit.
  • the route data is extracted from the raw position data and the plausibility of the map-matched toll data in the processor element with respect to the extracted route data.
  • the extracted route data is preferably distances or travel times which are accumulated from the position data.
  • the extracted route data is generated from the raw position data and provided with the signature in the same or another processor element equipped with a signature and secured cryptographically.
  • the extracted route data provided with the signature is provided in the vehicle device for interrogation by a roadside infrastructure.
  • Fig. 1 shows a device and a method for secure function monitoring ("secure monitoring") in the context of a schematically illustrated road toll system 1.
  • the road toll system 1 comprises a plurality of vehicle devices or O-BUs 2 (only one OBU representatively shown) in the form of thin clients which continuously determine their own geographical position in a manner known per se, eg by means of satellite navigation or radio localization in a network of radio beacons, mobile radio stations, etc.
  • the positions determined by an OBU 2 are referred to as "raw" position data ( "position fix tracks”) 3 recorded in a memory of the OBU.
  • the position data 3 can be supplemented or improved by the combination of the sensor data of various sensors of the vehicle in which the OBU 2 is installed, such as speedometer, compass or acceleration measurement data, as known to those skilled in the art.
  • the OBUs 2 can be connected via a radio interface 4 e.g. dedicated short range communication (DSRC) standard associated with roadside equipment (RSE) 5, such as DSRC radio beacons, wireless local aerea network (WNA), wireless access in a vehicle (WAVE) base stations environment) etc., which they pass on their way and to which they can transmit a copy of the position data 3 for control purposes.
  • DSRC dedicated short range communication
  • RSE roadside equipment
  • WNA wireless local aerea network
  • WAVE wireless access in a vehicle
  • the OBUs 2 are also connected to (at least) a proxy computer 7 of the road toll system 1, to which they - continuously or in batches, eg periodically or in case of need - their Transmit position data 3.
  • the proxy computer 7 has a high computing power, eg in the form of a server farm, and extensive land or toll card material to perform a map matching between the raw position data 3 on the one hand and given geographical positions such as road progressions, virtual toll collection points, etc.
  • the accuracy of the position determination of the OBU 2 is improved because scattering or position fixes can each be assigned to correct positions in a road network.
  • the accuracy of the raw position data 3 with respect to the distance traveled ("driven distance") in conventional GPS determination could be about ⁇ 5%, whereas it could have an accuracy of ⁇ 1% after the map matching in the proxy computer 7.
  • the card-adjusted, improved position data of this type are used in the proxy computer 7 as the basis for card-adjusted toll data 8.
  • these toll data do not permit any individual conclusions to be drawn about the individual positions of the position data 3, since they represent a summarizing or "abstract-anonymous" evaluation of the same, for example in the form of the traveled sections of a road network, depending on the principle and embodiment of the toll system or the distance traveled ("driven distance") or travel time.
  • the latter can e.g. for toll-related charging of toll roads ("pay as you drive”) or time-dependent charging of paid parking lots, etc.
  • the card-adjusted toll data 8 can optionally be provided in the proxy computer 7 with such toll information.
  • the card-matched, location-anonymized toll data 8 are from the proxy computer 7 in the embodiment of Fig. 1 sent back to the OBU 2, see arrow 8 '.
  • anonymity for the sensitive position data 3 and thus the path of the vehicle can be ensured in this way.
  • the OBU 2 generates independently of the proxy computer 7 - without toll card matching and only with simple calculation means, u.zw. preferably with a processor element 13 to be described later in detail - a rough estimate of the toll data, subsequently referred to as route data 9 extracted from the position data 3.
  • the route data 9 serve to be able to carry out a plausibility check of the toll data 8 generated by the proxy computer 7.
  • the route data are accordingly comparable to the toll data 8, albeit far less accurately because they are based on the unrefined, raw position data 3. If the toll data 8 reproduces, for example, the distance traveled ("driven distance") or travel time, then the route data 9 extracted from the OBU 2 from the position data 3 is likewise a distance traveled or travel time calculated therefrom.
  • the accuracy of the route data 9 is, for example, ⁇ 5% and that of the toll data 8 is, for example, ⁇ 1%.
  • the toll data 8 can not be directly compared with the route data 9 due to these differences in accuracy, however, it can be made plausible, ie it can be checked whether the toll data 8 is plausible on the basis of the route data 9.
  • a specially protected processor element 10 is provided in the OBU 2, e.g. can be used by the toll operator itself in the OBU 2, for example in the form of a SIM or smart card.
  • the processor element 10 is cryptographically secured at hardware level, so that, for example, only the toll operator has access to the data and programs contained therein.
  • the processor element 10 thus represents a trusted element for the toll operator and satisfies similarly high security requirements, such as those imposed on the SIM cards, credit cards, bank cards, etc., integrated single-chip processors.
  • the cryptographically secured processor element 10 is further provided in a manner known per se with a cryptographic signature 10 ', e.g. a cryptographic certificate, i. e. a cryptographic data element 10 ', which can be added by the processor element 10 all its data outputs to their authenticity to the issuing authority of the signature or certificate, e.g. the toll operator to prove.
  • a cryptographic signature 10 ' e.g. a cryptographic certificate
  • i. e. a cryptographic data element 10 ' which can be added by the processor element 10 all its data outputs to their authenticity to the issuing authority of the signature or certificate, e.g. the toll operator to prove.
  • the described plausibility comparison of the toll data 8 with the route data 9 is performed.
  • high computing power is not necessary, as is required, for example, for the toll card matching in the proxy computer 7, because here only e.g. a rough estimation calculation between a precisely in the toll data 8 and in the route data 9 inaccurately specified distance must be performed.
  • the plausibility check in the processor element 10 can therefore be carried out with the computing power available in a simple trusted element single-chip processor.
  • the processor element 10 Upon successful plausibility of the toll data 8, the processor element 10 provides it with its signature 10 '. and outputs it as signed toll data 11, see path 11 '.
  • the signed toll data 11 can be sent back by the processor element 10 of the OBU 2, for example via the radio interface 6 to the proxy computer 7 and forwarded by the latter to a central computer 12 of the road toll system 1, see path 11 '.
  • they can also be sent directly from the OBU 2 to the central computer 12, u.zw. both "online” eg via the radio interface 4 or 6 as well as “offline” via a data carrier.
  • the processor element 10 plausibility checks and signs or certifies the toll data 8 arriving in a continuous stream individually or continuously in sections.
  • the OBU 2 could dispense with the extraction of the route data 9 from the position data 3 and the position data 3 could be fed directly to the processor element 10.
  • the processor element 10 plausibility checks the toll data 8 directly relative to the position data 3, the processor element 10 then having to perform increased computation steps or perform a more simplified plausibility check, e.g. only checks whether individual positions from the position data 3 fall in a specified in the toll data 8 area toll, USW.
  • a second cryptographically access-secured processor element (“trusted element”) 13 is provided in the OBU 2 in order to extract the route data 9 from the position data 3.
  • the processor element 13 is provided with its own signature 13 ', with which it provides the track data 9 generated by it (signed).
  • the route data 9 signed by the processor element 13 can be queried by the infrastructure in the OBU 2 5 are provided via the interface 4.
  • the processor element (“trusted element”) 13 provides a "secure freezing service” for the position data 3 or the route data 9 extracted therefrom.
  • the signing or certification of the route data 9 ensures that the data queried via the interface 4 Route data 9 from a correspondingly trustworthy computing element, u.zw. Processor element ("trusted element") 13, generated and signed.
  • the first and second processor elements 10, 13 may also be one and the same physical processor element Fig. 2 is this not possible.
  • like reference characters designate like elements as in FIG Fig. 1 and it is only compared to the differences Fig. 1 received.
  • the first processor element 10 is therefore arranged in the proxy computer 7 or connected thereto, and the OBU 2 sends here in addition to the raw position data 3 and the extracted route data 9 to the proxy computer 7, see arrow 9 '.
  • the route data 9 can optionally be generated again from the second, arranged in the OBU 2 processor element 13 from the raw position data 3 and signed with the signature 13 ', so that the proxy computer 7 and the first processor element 10 can be sure that the route data 9 were correctly extracted in the OBU 2.
  • the signed route data 9 can be provided again from the OBU 2 via the interface 4 for control queries.
  • the first processor element 10 in the proxy computer 7 now again plausibility checks the toll card data 8, which have been card-matched in the proxy computer 7, with respect to the (optionally signed) route data 9 and provides them in the case of plausibility with his signature 10 'to issue signed toll data 11 (arrow 11 ").

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Devices For Checking Fares Or Tickets At Control Points (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
EP10450129.1A 2010-08-06 2010-08-06 Dispositif et procédé de surveillance de fonction d'un système de péage routier Not-in-force EP2423885B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PT104501291T PT2423885E (pt) 2010-08-06 2010-08-06 Dispositivo e método para a monitorização funcional de um sistema de portagem de estradas
SI201030489T SI2423885T1 (sl) 2010-08-06 2010-08-06 Naprava in postopek za nadzor funkcionalnosti cestninskega sistema
PL10450129T PL2423885T3 (pl) 2010-08-06 2010-08-06 Urządzenie i sposób kontroli funkcjonowania systemu opłat drogowych
ES10450129.1T ES2441815T3 (es) 2010-08-06 2010-08-06 Dispositivo y método para monitorizar el funcionamiento de un sistema de peaje viario
EP10450129.1A EP2423885B1 (fr) 2010-08-06 2010-08-06 Dispositif et procédé de surveillance de fonction d'un système de péage routier
DK10450129.1T DK2423885T3 (da) 2010-08-06 2010-08-06 Apparat og fremgangsmåde til funktionsovervågning af et vejafgiftssystem

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP10450129.1A EP2423885B1 (fr) 2010-08-06 2010-08-06 Dispositif et procédé de surveillance de fonction d'un système de péage routier

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2423885A1 true EP2423885A1 (fr) 2012-02-29
EP2423885B1 EP2423885B1 (fr) 2013-10-16

Family

ID=43288032

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10450129.1A Not-in-force EP2423885B1 (fr) 2010-08-06 2010-08-06 Dispositif et procédé de surveillance de fonction d'un système de péage routier

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2423885B1 (fr)
DK (1) DK2423885T3 (fr)
ES (1) ES2441815T3 (fr)
PL (1) PL2423885T3 (fr)
PT (1) PT2423885E (fr)
SI (1) SI2423885T1 (fr)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2665044A1 (fr) * 2012-05-16 2013-11-20 Kapsch TrafficCom AG Procédé de mesure de la capacité de puissance d'un système de péage routier
EP2752821A2 (fr) 2013-01-02 2014-07-09 Albert Kuiper Amélioration de la mise en oeuvre de la tarification routière
EP2814003A1 (fr) * 2013-06-03 2014-12-17 Continental Automotive GmbH Procédé de fonctionnement d'un système de péage de véhicule et système de péage de véhicule
EP2811467A3 (fr) * 2013-06-04 2014-12-31 Toll Collect GmbH Procédé et dispositifs de détection des erreurs dans un système de péage
EP2922031A1 (fr) * 2014-12-09 2015-09-23 Toll Collect GmbH Procédé et dispositifs de détection des erreurs dans un système de péage
WO2015121410A3 (fr) * 2014-02-13 2015-11-05 Continental Automotive Gmbh Système de péage automatique pour prélever le péage d'un véhicule automobile
WO2020259933A1 (fr) * 2019-06-26 2020-12-30 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Procédé, programme d'ordinateur et dispositif pour traiter des données acquises par un véhicule à moteur
EP2757533B1 (fr) * 2013-01-18 2021-02-24 Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi Système et procédé de suivi en ligne des heures de conduite avec signature électronique
US11290885B2 (en) 2018-12-19 2022-03-29 Rohde & Schwarz Gmbh & Co. Kg Communication system and method
US12026282B2 (en) 2019-07-02 2024-07-02 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Method, computer program, and device for processing data recorded by a motor vehicle, and for providing parameters for such processing

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ES2930015T3 (es) 2014-11-17 2022-12-05 Kapsch Trafficcom Ag Método y aparato para el registro confiable en un sistema de peaje de carretera

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006015792A1 (fr) * 2004-08-06 2006-02-16 Daimlerchrysler Ag Systeme, terminal embarque et centrale exterieure a un vehicule pour le prelevement de droits de peage routier
WO2009001303A1 (fr) * 2007-06-26 2008-12-31 Nxp B.V. Système de péage routier
EP2017790A2 (fr) * 2007-07-16 2009-01-21 Charles Graham Palmer Chargement selon la position

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006015792A1 (fr) * 2004-08-06 2006-02-16 Daimlerchrysler Ag Systeme, terminal embarque et centrale exterieure a un vehicule pour le prelevement de droits de peage routier
WO2009001303A1 (fr) * 2007-06-26 2008-12-31 Nxp B.V. Système de péage routier
EP2017790A2 (fr) * 2007-07-16 2009-01-21 Charles Graham Palmer Chargement selon la position

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Electronic fee collection - Application interface definition for autonomous systems - Part 1 : Changing", ISO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION,, no. ISO/TS 17575-1, 15 June 2010 (2010-06-15), pages I - VIII,1, XP008130463 *
EXPERT GROUP 12: "Security aspects of the EETS", EG 12 FINAL REPORT V1.0 5APR07,, no. v1.0, 5 April 2007 (2007-04-05), pages 1 - 86, XP007916364 *
VIS J: "An example of a view on EETS trust and privacy in GNSS based toll systems", REPORT MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT, PUBLIC WORKS AND WATER MANAGEMENT THE NETHERLANDS,, 15 December 2009 (2009-12-15), pages 1 - 28, XP007916365 *

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2665044A1 (fr) * 2012-05-16 2013-11-20 Kapsch TrafficCom AG Procédé de mesure de la capacité de puissance d'un système de péage routier
EP2752821A2 (fr) 2013-01-02 2014-07-09 Albert Kuiper Amélioration de la mise en oeuvre de la tarification routière
EP2757533B1 (fr) * 2013-01-18 2021-02-24 Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi Système et procédé de suivi en ligne des heures de conduite avec signature électronique
EP2814003A1 (fr) * 2013-06-03 2014-12-17 Continental Automotive GmbH Procédé de fonctionnement d'un système de péage de véhicule et système de péage de véhicule
EP2811467A3 (fr) * 2013-06-04 2014-12-31 Toll Collect GmbH Procédé et dispositifs de détection des erreurs dans un système de péage
EP2811468A3 (fr) * 2013-06-04 2015-04-29 Toll Collect GmbH Procédé et dispositif de reconnaissance d'erreurs dans un système de péage
EP2811466A3 (fr) * 2013-06-04 2015-04-15 Toll Collect GmbH Procédé et dispositifs de détection des erreurs dans un système de péage
WO2015121410A3 (fr) * 2014-02-13 2015-11-05 Continental Automotive Gmbh Système de péage automatique pour prélever le péage d'un véhicule automobile
EP2922031A1 (fr) * 2014-12-09 2015-09-23 Toll Collect GmbH Procédé et dispositifs de détection des erreurs dans un système de péage
US11290885B2 (en) 2018-12-19 2022-03-29 Rohde & Schwarz Gmbh & Co. Kg Communication system and method
WO2020259933A1 (fr) * 2019-06-26 2020-12-30 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Procédé, programme d'ordinateur et dispositif pour traiter des données acquises par un véhicule à moteur
CN113994397A (zh) * 2019-06-26 2022-01-28 大众汽车股份公司 用于处理通过机动车辆检测的数据的方法、计算机程序和装置
CN113994397B (zh) * 2019-06-26 2024-04-02 大众汽车股份公司 用于处理通过机动车辆检测的数据的方法、计算机可读介质和装置
US12026282B2 (en) 2019-07-02 2024-07-02 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Method, computer program, and device for processing data recorded by a motor vehicle, and for providing parameters for such processing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
SI2423885T1 (sl) 2014-02-28
EP2423885B1 (fr) 2013-10-16
DK2423885T3 (da) 2014-01-20
ES2441815T3 (es) 2014-02-06
PL2423885T3 (pl) 2014-03-31
PT2423885E (pt) 2014-01-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2423885B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de surveillance de fonction d'un système de péage routier
AT507031B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum einheben von maut
EP0741891B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif permettant de determiner les droits de peage a encaisser pour des voies et/ou des zones de circulation empruntees par des vehicules
EP2860703B1 (fr) Procédé de vérification de transactions de péage et composants associés
DE102008012660A1 (de) Serverbasierte Warnung vor Gefahren
EP1395957B1 (fr) Systeme de peage duel
EP2624231A1 (fr) Dispositifs et procédé de contrôle d'un système de péage routier
DE102004013807A1 (de) Elektronisches Mautsystem für Verkehrswege und Verfahren zu dessen Betrieb
WO2015193453A2 (fr) Procédé pour plausibiliser des signaux de position gnss
EP2038849A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour garantir la protection des données lors de la détection de télépéage
EP1630747A2 (fr) Système et méthode de perception des droits de péage
EP2994890B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de fourniture de données pour la perception de péage et système de péage
EP1442432A1 (fr) Dispositif permettant de surmonter temporairement la perte d'un signal de navigation par satellite, destine a des systemes de peage alternes fondes sur la navigation par satellite
EP1655700A2 (fr) Procédé et système pour la détermination d'une taxe de route
DE19744419A1 (de) Einrichtung an Kraftfahrzeugen zur Erfassung und Auswertung von Straßen- und Fahrzeugdaten
EP3210194A1 (fr) Procédé et unité embarquée (obu) pour la détermination de taxes de péage
EP3355249B1 (fr) Procédé d'attribution d'un véhicule à un lieu de stationnement, installation de traitement de données et véhicule
DE102014116756A1 (de) Vorrichtung zum Erheben einer Fahrzeugmaut
EP3279870A1 (fr) Dispositif de traitement de donnees, systeme et procede de controle de realisation de la fonction conforme d'un dispositif de determination de position
EP1920411B1 (fr) Procede de controle pour detecter des divergences au niveau de geo-objets
WO2007073748A1 (fr) Systeme et procede de determination des redevances d'utilisation de voies et/ou de zones a peage
EP2665044B1 (fr) Procédé de mesure de la capacité de puissance d'un système de péage routier
DE102009042470A1 (de) Anordnung und Verfahren zur Erfassung von Gebühren auf mautpflichtigen Straßen
DE102005059284A1 (de) Verfahren zur Ermittlung von berichtigten aktuellen Positionsdaten insbesondere zur Bestimmung von aktuellen Fahrzeugpositionen
EP3113119B1 (fr) Procede de suivi de vehicules soumis a peage dans un systeme de peage

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110607

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME RS

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 502010005060

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G07B0015000000

Ipc: G07B0015060000

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G07B 15/06 20110101AFI20130211BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20130513

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 636812

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20131115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502010005060

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: PATWIL AG, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20140106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20140113

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2441815

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20140206

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20131016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SK

Ref legal event code: T3

Ref document number: E 15489

Country of ref document: SK

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140216

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502010005060

Country of ref document: DE

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Effective date: 20140715

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502010005060

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E020796

Country of ref document: HU

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140806

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R100

Ref document number: 502010005060

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140117

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20160819

Year of fee payment: 7

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20160819

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20160819

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20160825

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20160819

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20160824

Year of fee payment: 7

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20160625

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20160805

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: SI

Payment date: 20160725

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: SK

Payment date: 20160805

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20160729

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20160804

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20160823

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20160819

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20170928

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20170822

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20170822

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20170822

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20170821

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20170831

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: MMEP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170901

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170806

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170806

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170831

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170831

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170807

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SK

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Ref document number: E 15489

Country of ref document: SK

Effective date: 20170806

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170806

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180206

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170807

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SI

Ref legal event code: KO00

Effective date: 20180410

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170901

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170806

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170831

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170806

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170806

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502010005060

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 636812

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180806

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180806

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180807

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20190918

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180807