EP2367975B1 - Device for comminuting a cellulose-containing feedstock - Google Patents
Device for comminuting a cellulose-containing feedstock Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2367975B1 EP2367975B1 EP09807591A EP09807591A EP2367975B1 EP 2367975 B1 EP2367975 B1 EP 2367975B1 EP 09807591 A EP09807591 A EP 09807591A EP 09807591 A EP09807591 A EP 09807591A EP 2367975 B1 EP2367975 B1 EP 2367975B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- grinding
- layer
- discs
- top layer
- disc
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21D—TREATMENT OF THE MATERIALS BEFORE PASSING TO THE PAPER-MAKING MACHINE
- D21D1/00—Methods of beating or refining; Beaters of the Hollander type
- D21D1/20—Methods of refining
- D21D1/30—Disc mills
- D21D1/306—Discs
Definitions
- the invention relates to a device for the reduction of a cellulose-containing feed material in the wood processing, especially in the pulp, paper and wood board production, using relatively small spaced rotating grinding discs, and a screw conveyor for the transport of the feed material to the grinding discs carrying the refining plates , according to the preamble of claim 1.
- the feed material can be present in various forms, such as wood chips, veneer residues, sawdust, fibers and the like.
- Roundwood is first processed into wood chips, which can be subsequently fed as a feedstock for further crushing a generic device.
- the generic device serves to produce wood fibers, which are further processed into pulp, paper, or wood fiber boards, such as "MDF boards” (medium density wood fiber boards).
- Pulp is the chemical pulping of plant fibers, mostly wood fibers, resulting mass, which consists mainly of cellulose.
- the wood fibers produced in the generic device are further processed into a pulp, which is also referred to as "pulp".
- the generic devices are also known as "shredders"("refiner”).
- shredders In these devices, two grooved grinding discs rotate at a slight distance relative to each other, distinguishing between single-disc refiners with only one rotating disc, and double-disc refiners in which both discs rotate.
- the feed material is thrown by a screw conveyor between the two grinding discs, where it is ground up.
- the shredded feed material is subsequently blown out of the refiner through a blow pipe.
- the steam forms the means of transport for the wood fibers, for example on their way through the blowpipe into a subsequent dryer.
- the grinding discs carry mutually facing refining plates.
- the rotating refining plate is on a rotating grinding disc, and the static grinding plate is on a stator.
- the refining plates may be flat, conical, cylindrical, or even a combination of these different geometries.
- the grinding discs are in the. Usually made of steel, because the two grinding discs have high mechanical loads.
- the rotating grinding disk for the grinding process must transmit high axial forces from the shaft of the grinding disk to the grinding plate, and on the other hand, it must also transmit high torques from the shaft to the grinding plate.
- the gap between the two grinding plates should namely be kept sufficiently constant to ensure a perfect grinding process.
- the forces acting on the grinding discs cause deformation of the grinding discs, thus affecting the grinding process. In known refiners according to the state of the art, there are thus again and again impairments of the grinding quality due to deformations of the grinding disks.
- Claim 1 refers to a device for the comminution of a cellulose-containing feed material in the wood processing, in particular in the pulp, paper and wood board production, by means of relatively small spaced rotating grinding discs.
- the relative rotation of the grinding discs can be given by rotation of a grinding disc relative to a stationary grinding disc, or both grinding discs.
- at least one of the grinding disks has a layer structure in the axial direction with at least one cover layer and at least one carrier layer, wherein the at least one cover layer has a higher modulus of elasticity and a higher density than the at least one carrier layer. Due to the layered structure, a targeted optimization with regard to the loading situation of the grinding disks can take place.
- the at least one cover layer has a high modulus of elasticity, that is to say a high flexural rigidity for a given area moment of inertia of the geometrically given cross section, so that the high axial loads and the high torques can be absorbed.
- the bending stiffness can be optimized so that hardly deformations of the grinding discs occur, so that a uniform grinding quality can be ensured.
- the carrier of the grinding disc is made of a material of lower density, which reduces the total weight of the grinding disc accordingly. As a result, higher rotational speeds can be achieved, which not only reduces the load on the shaft bearings, but also allows a higher material throughput.
- the shaft bearing can therefore be constructed simpler, which reduces the cost. Furthermore, the structure proposed according to the invention also proves more cost-effective than conventional grinding disks, since cheaper materials can be used. In addition, since the centrifugal forces are reduced due to the lower total weight, there is a reduced risk potential if the grinding disk breaks.
- the at least one carrier layer has a greater total thickness than the at least one cover layer in order to take account of the lower density of the carrier layer.
- the carrier layer transmits primarily shear forces, and serves as a carrier for the at least one cover layer.
- the at least one cover layer is made of glass-fiber-reinforced or carbon fiber-reinforced laminates.
- the at least one carrier layer may be made of a foamed or honeycomb material, for example.
- Fig. 1 schematically a representation of a shredder (refiner) with a rotating grinding disc 1 and a stator 2 is shown.
- Both grinding disk 1 and stator 2 each carry grinding plates 4, which are generally circular in shape with up to 20 segments and are slightly spaced apart in the axial direction, usually about 0.3 to 0.7 mm.
- the rotating grinding disc 1 is arranged on a shaft 3.
- a housing 5 is further arranged within which a screw conveyor 8 is rotatably mounted.
- the feed 6 for the feed material. Supplied feed material is thus transported by the screw conveyor 8 in the direction of the rotating grinding disk 1, where it passes between the two grinding plates 4.
- the ground feed leaves the shredder on the opposite side of the housing 5 of the grinding disc 1, ie with respect to the Fig. 1 on the right side of the device.
- conventional grinding discs 1 are made of steel. Instead, it is provided according to the invention that at least one of the grinding disks 1 has a layer structure in the axial direction with at least one cover layer 10 and at least one carrier layer 11, wherein the at least one cover layer 10 has a higher modulus of elasticity and a higher density than the at least one support layer 11 Fig. 2a
- an embodiment is shown in which an inner carrier layer 11 is encased with an outer cover layer 10.
- a carrier layer 11 "sandwiched" between two outer cover layers 10 is arranged.
- the at least one cover layer 10 Due to the higher modulus of elasticity, as well as the higher density, the at least one cover layer 10 thus has a high flexural rigidity, so that the high axial loads and the high torques can be accommodated.
- the carrier layer 11 of the grinding disc 1 is made of a material of lower density, which reduces the total weight of the grinding disc 1 accordingly. As a result, higher rotational speeds can be achieved, which not only reduces the load on the shaft bearings, but also allows a higher material throughput.
- the at least one cover layer 10 may be made of, for example, glass fiber reinforced or carbon fiber reinforced laminates, or made using a so-called "prepreg," which is a prefabricated combination of resin and fibers.
- prepreg a prefabricated combination of resin and fibers.
- the latter offer the advantage that a more accurate distribution between resin and fiber volume can be achieved, so that ultimately more uniform material values can be achieved.
- resin systems epoxy resins, cyanester resins, bismaleimides (BMI) and polyurethane can be used.
- the at least one carrier layer may be made of a foamed or honeycomb material. On the one hand, composites of this type have a high flexural strength and tensile strength, but on the other hand also a low weight, and are also cheaper to produce than the currently used grinding discs made of steel.
- the bending stiffness is caused primarily by the cover layer 10 with a high modulus of elasticity, as from Fig. 3b is apparent.
- the Fig. 3b in this case shows the bending stress curve along a cross section of a grinding disk 1 according to the invention, as in the embodiments of the Fig. 2 is shown schematically, and is the bending stress curve in a conventional, made of steel grinding disk according to Fig. 3a to face.
- Bending stresses are the stresses acting in the axial direction of the grinding disc 1. While the entire cross section of a grinding disc made of steel absorbs bending stresses, this is the case in a grinding disk 1 according to the invention only in the cover layer 10.
- the tensile stress profile is due to radial centrifugal load in a conventional, made of steel grinding disc the tensile stress profile along a cross section of a grinding disc 1 according to the invention according to Fig. 3d opposite posed.
- the tensile stresses in a grinding disk 1 according to the invention are lower due to the lower weight than in conventional grinding disks made of steel.
- larger tensile stresses are absorbed in the cover layer 10 than in the inner carrier layer 11 3e and 3f show mixed load situations for conventional steel grinding discs ( Fig. 3e ) and for a grinding disk 1 according to the invention ( Fig. 3f ).
Landscapes
- Paper (AREA)
- Crushing And Pulverization Processes (AREA)
- Laminated Bodies (AREA)
- Debarking, Splitting, And Disintegration Of Timber (AREA)
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft eine Vorrichtung für die Verkleinerung eines zellulosehältigen Aufgabegutes in der Holzverarbeitung, insbesondere in der Zellstoff-, Papier- und Holzplattenherstellung, mithilfe von relativ zueinander in geringfügigem Abstand rotierenden Mahlscheiben, sowie einer Förderschnecke für den Transport des Aufgabegutes zu den Mahlscheiben die Mahlplatten tragen, gemäß dem Oberbegriff von Anspruch 1.The invention relates to a device for the reduction of a cellulose-containing feed material in the wood processing, especially in the pulp, paper and wood board production, using relatively small spaced rotating grinding discs, and a screw conveyor for the transport of the feed material to the grinding discs carrying the refining plates , according to the preamble of
Das Aufgabegut kann dabei in unterschiedlicher Form vorliegen, etwa als Hackschnitzel, Furnierreste, Sägespäne, Fasern und dergleichen. Rundholz wird zunächst zu Hackschnitzel verarbeitet, die in weiterer Folge zur weiteren Zerkleinerung einer gattungsgemäßen Vorrichtung als Aufgabegut zugeführt werden können. Die gattungsgemäße Vorrichtung dient dabei der Herstellung von Holzfasern, die etwa zu Zellstoff, Papier, oder zu Holzfaserplatten, etwa zu "MDF-Platten" (mitteldichte Holzfaserplatten) weiter verarbeitet werden. Als Zellstoff bezeichnet man dabei die beim chemischen Aufschluss von Pflanzenfasern, zumeist Holzfasern, entstehende Masse, die vorwiegend aus Zellulose besteht. Im Rahmen der Papierherstellung werden die in der gattungsgemäßen Vorrichtung erzeugten Holzfasern zu einem Faserbrei weiter verarbeitet, der auch als "Pulpe" bezeichnet wird.The feed material can be present in various forms, such as wood chips, veneer residues, sawdust, fibers and the like. Roundwood is first processed into wood chips, which can be subsequently fed as a feedstock for further crushing a generic device. The generic device serves to produce wood fibers, which are further processed into pulp, paper, or wood fiber boards, such as "MDF boards" (medium density wood fiber boards). Pulp is the chemical pulping of plant fibers, mostly wood fibers, resulting mass, which consists mainly of cellulose. As part of papermaking the wood fibers produced in the generic device are further processed into a pulp, which is also referred to as "pulp".
Die gattungsgemäßen Vorrichtungen sind auch als "Zerfaserer" ("Refiner") bekannt. In diesen Vorrichtungen rotieren relativ zueinander zwei gerillte Mahlscheiben in geringfügigem Abstand, wobei zwischen Einscheibenrefinern mit nur einer drehenden Scheibe, und Doppelscheibenrefinern, bei denen sich beide Scheiben drehen, unterschieden wird. Das Aufgabegut wird durch eine Förderschnecke zwischen die beiden Mahlscheiben geschleudert, wo es aufgemahlen wird. Das zerfaserte Aufgabegut wird in weiterer Folge aus dem Refiner durch eine Blasleitung ausgeblasen. Im Refiner entstehen dabei aufgrund der im Aufgabegut enthaltenen Feuchtigkeit und der hohen Reibungswärme üblicher Weise etwa sechs bis zehn bar Dampfdruck. Der Dampf bildet das Transportmittel für die Holzfasern, etwa auf ihrem Weg durch die Blasleitung in einen anschließenden Trockner.The generic devices are also known as "shredders"("refiner"). In these devices, two grooved grinding discs rotate at a slight distance relative to each other, distinguishing between single-disc refiners with only one rotating disc, and double-disc refiners in which both discs rotate. The feed material is thrown by a screw conveyor between the two grinding discs, where it is ground up. The shredded feed material is subsequently blown out of the refiner through a blow pipe. In the refiner arise due to The moisture contained in the feed and the high frictional heat usually way about six to ten bar steam pressure. The steam forms the means of transport for the wood fibers, for example on their way through the blowpipe into a subsequent dryer.
Die Mahlscheiben tragen einander zugewandte Mahlplatten ("refining plates"). Im Falle eines Einscheibenrefiners befindet sich die rotierende Mahlplatte auf einer rotierenden Mahlscheibe, und die statische Mahlplatte auf einem Stator. Die Mahlplatten können flach, konisch, zylindrisch, oder auch als Kombination dieser verschiedenen Geometrien ausgeführt sein. Die Mahlscheiben werden in der . Regel aus Stahl gefertigt, da auf die beiden Mahlscheiben große mechanische Belastungen wirken. Einerseits muss etwa die rotierende Mahlscheibe für den Mahlvorgang hohe axiale Kräfte von der Welle der Mahlscheibe auf die Mahlplatte übertragen, und andererseits muss sie auch hohe Drehmomente von der Welle auf die Mahlplatte übertragen. Diese hohen mechanischen Belastungen führen in der Praxis zu erheblichen Schwierigkeiten. Der Spalt zwischen den beiden Mahlplatten sollte nämlich hinreichend konstant gehalten werden, um einen einwandfreien Mahlvorgang sicher zu stellen. Die auf die Mahlscheiben wirkenden Kräfte verursachen aber Verformungen der Mahlscheiben, die somit den Mahlvorgang beeinträchtigen. In bekannten Refinern gemäß dem Stand der Technik kommt es somit immer wieder zu Beeinträchtigungen der Mahlqualität aufgrund von Verformungen der Mahlscheiben.The grinding discs carry mutually facing refining plates. In the case of a single-disc refiner, the rotating refining plate is on a rotating grinding disc, and the static grinding plate is on a stator. The refining plates may be flat, conical, cylindrical, or even a combination of these different geometries. The grinding discs are in the. Usually made of steel, because the two grinding discs have high mechanical loads. On the one hand, for example, the rotating grinding disk for the grinding process must transmit high axial forces from the shaft of the grinding disk to the grinding plate, and on the other hand, it must also transmit high torques from the shaft to the grinding plate. These high mechanical loads lead to considerable difficulties in practice. The gap between the two grinding plates should namely be kept sufficiently constant to ensure a perfect grinding process. However, the forces acting on the grinding discs cause deformation of the grinding discs, thus affecting the grinding process. In known refiners according to the state of the art, there are thus again and again impairments of the grinding quality due to deformations of the grinding disks.
Da die Rotationsgeschwindigkeit der Mahlscheiben überdies bis zu 3000 Umdrehungen pro Minute betragen kann, sind die rotierenden Mahlscheiben und die Mahlplatten auch hohen Zentrifugalkräften ausgesetzt. Daher sind auch der maximalen Rotationsgeschwindigkeit Grenzen gesetzt, da ansonsten die Zentrifugalbelastungen auf die Mahlscheibe selbst, sowie auf die Wellenlager zu groß werden würden. Außerdem würde sich bei einem Bruch der Mahlscheibe bei sehr hohen Umdrehungsgeschwindigkeiten ein zu hohes Gefährdungspotential ergeben.Moreover, since the rotational speed of the grinding discs can be up to 3000 revolutions per minute, the rotating grinding discs and the grinding plates are also exposed to high centrifugal forces. Therefore, the maximum rotational speed limits, otherwise the centrifugal loads on the grinding disk itself, as well as on the shaft bearings would be too large. In addition, would be at a fraction of the grinding disc at very high Turning speeds give too high potential hazard.
Im Stand der Technik gibt es Dokumente, wie z.H. die
Es ist somit das Ziel der Erfindung, die Nachteile bekannter Vorrichtungen für die Zerkleinerung eines zellulosehältigen Aufgabegutes zu vermeiden. Insbesondere soll trotz der hohen mechanischen Belastungen eine einwandfreie Mahlqualität sicher gestellt werden. Des Weiteren sollen bekannte Vorrichtungen so optimiert werden, dass höhere Rotationsgeschwindigkeiten, und somit höherer Materialdurchsatz, ermöglicht werden. Diese Vorteile sollen dabei bei niedrigeren Kosten und höherer Betriebssicherheit erzielt werden.It is therefore the object of the invention to avoid the disadvantages of known devices for the comminution of a cellulosic feedstock. In particular, a perfect grinding quality should be ensured despite the high mechanical loads. Furthermore, known devices are to be optimized so that higher rotational speeds, and thus higher material throughput, are made possible. These advantages are to be achieved at a lower cost and higher reliability.
Diese Ziele werden durch die Merkmale von Anspruch 1 verwirklicht. Anspruch 1 bezieht sich dabei auf eine Vorrichtung für die Zerkleinerung eines zellulosehältigen Aufgabegutes in der Holzverarbeitung, insbesondere in der Zellstoff-, Papier- und Holzplattenherstellung, mithilfe von relativ zueinander in geringfügigem Abstand rotierenden Mahlscheiben. Die relative Rotation der Mahlscheiben kann dabei durch Rotation einer Mahlscheibe gegenüber einer ruhenden Mahlscheibe, oder auch beider Mahlscheiben gegeben sein. Erfindungsgemäß ist hierbei vorgesehen, dass zumindest eine der Mahlscheiben in axialer Richtung eine Schichtaufbau mit zumindest einer Deckschicht und zumindest einer Trägerschicht aufweist, wobei die zumindest eine Deckschicht einen höheren Elastizitätsmodul, sowie eine höhere Dichte aufweist, als die zumindest eine Trägerschicht. Durch den schichtförmigen Aufbau kann eine gezielte Optimierung hinsichtlich der Belastungssituation der Mahlscheiben erfolgen. So weist erfindungsgemäß die zumindest eine Deckschicht einen hohen Elastizitätsmodul auf, also bei vorgegebenem Flächenträgheitsmoment des geometrisch gegebenen Querschnitts eine hohe Biegesteifigkeit, sodass die hohen axialen Belastungen, sowie die hohen Drehmomente aufgenommen werden können. Insbesondere kann die Biegesteifigkeit so optimiert werden, dass kaum Verformungen der Mahlscheiben auftreten, sodass eine gleichmäßige Mahlqualität sicher gestellt werden kann. Andererseits wird der Träger der Mahlscheibe aus einem Werkstoff niedrigerer Dichte gefertigt, was das Gesamtgewicht der Mahlscheibe entsprechend reduziert. Dadurch können höhere Rotationsgeschwindigkeiten erzielt werden, was nicht nur die Belastungen auf die Wellenlager verringert, sondern auch einen höheren Materialdurchsatz erlaubt. Das Wellenlager kann daher auch einfacher aufgebaut sein, was die Kosten verringert. Des Weiteren erweist sich der erfindungsgemäß vorgeschlagene Aufbau auch kostengünstiger als konventionelle Mahlscheiben, da billigere Werkstoffe verwendet werden können. Da außerdem durch das geringere Gesamtgewicht die Zentrifugalkräfte reduziert werden, ergibt sich ein verringertes Gefährdungspotential bei einem Bruch der Mahlscheibe.These objects are achieved by the features of
Dabei ist es vorteilhaft, wenn die zumindest eine Trägerschicht insgesamt eine größere Dicke aufweist, als die zumindest eine Deckschicht, um der geringeren Dichte der Trägerschicht Rechnung zu tragen. Die Trägerschicht überträgt dabei in erster Linie Scherkräfte, und dient als Träger für die zumindest eine Deckschicht.It is advantageous if the at least one carrier layer has a greater total thickness than the at least one cover layer in order to take account of the lower density of the carrier layer. The carrier layer transmits primarily shear forces, and serves as a carrier for the at least one cover layer.
Gemäß einer vorteilhaften Weiterbildung der Erfindung ist die zumindest eine Deckschicht aus glasfaserverstärkten, oder kohlenstofffaserverstärkten Laminaten gefertigt. Die zumindest eine Trägerschicht kann etwa aus einem geschäumten oder wabenförmigen Werkstoff gefertigt sein.According to an advantageous development of the invention, the at least one cover layer is made of glass-fiber-reinforced or carbon fiber-reinforced laminates. The at least one carrier layer may be made of a foamed or honeycomb material, for example.
Die Erfindung wird im Folgenden anhand eines Ausführungsbeispiels mithilfe der beiliegenden Zeichnungen näher erläutert. Es zeigen dabei die
-
Fig. 1 eine schematische Darstellung eines Zerfaserers, -
Fig. 2a einen Querschnitt durch eine Hälfte einer ersten Ausführungsform einer erfindungsgemäßen Mahlscheibe mit Schichtaufbau, -
Fig. 2b einen Querschnitt durch eine Hälfte einer ersten Ausführungsform einer erfindungsgemäßen Mahlscheibe mit Schichtaufbau, und die -
Fig. 3a-f den Verlauf der Biege- und Zugspannungen in Mahlscheiben mit konventionellem Aufbau und mit erfindungsgemäßem Aufbau.
-
Fig. 1 a schematic representation of a shredder, -
Fig. 2a a cross section through one half of a first embodiment of a grinding disk according to the invention with layer structure, -
Fig. 2b a cross-section through one half of a first embodiment of a grinding disk according to the invention with layer structure, and the -
Fig. 3a-f the course of the bending and tensile stresses in grinding wheels with conventional design and with inventive design.
In der
Im Zuge des Transports des Aufgabegutes und des Mahlvorgangs wird große Reibungswärme frei, sodass aufgrund der im Aufgabegut enthaltenen Feuchtigkeit Dampfdruck von bis zu 23 bar, üblicher Weise ca. 6-10 bar, entsteht. Dieser Dampf wird einerseits als Transportmittel für die Holzfasern, etwa auf ihrem Weg durch die Blasleitung in einen anschließenden Trockner oder Zyklon, verwendet, ein Teil des Dampfes wird aber auch durch die Förderschnecke 8 über den Dampfablass 7 aus dem Zerfaserer abgeführt.In the course of transport of the feed material and the grinding process, large frictional heat is released, so that due to the moisture contained in the feed material vapor pressure of up to 23 bar, usually about 6-10 bar, is formed. This steam is on the one hand used as a transport for the wood fibers, such as on their way through the blowpipe in a subsequent dryer or cyclone, but part of the steam is also removed by the
Wie bereits erwähnt wurde, sind herkömmliche Mahlscheiben 1 aus Stahl gefertigt. Erfindungsgemäß ist stattdessen vorgesehen, dass zumindest eine der Mahlscheiben 1 in axialer Richtung einen Schichtaufbau mit zumindest einer Deckschicht 10 und zumindest einer Trägerschicht 11 aufweist, wobei die zumindest eine Deckschicht 10 einen höheren Elastizitätsmodul, sowie eine höhere Dichte aufweist, als die zumindest eine Trägerschicht 11. In der
Aufgrund des höheren Elastizitätsmodul, sowie der höheren Dichte weist die zumindest eine Deckschicht 10 somit eine hohe Biegesteifigkeit auf, sodass die hohen axialen Belastungen und die hohen Drehmomente aufgenommen werden können. Andererseits wird die Trägerschicht 11 der Mahlscheibe 1 aus einem Werkstoff niedrigerer Dichte gefertigt, was das Gesamtgewicht der Mahlscheibe 1 entsprechend reduziert. Dadurch können höhere Rotationsgeschwindigkeiten erzielt werden, was nicht nur die Belastungen auf die Wellenlager verringert, sondern auch einen höheren Materialdurchsatz erlaubt.Due to the higher modulus of elasticity, as well as the higher density, the at least one
Die zumindest eine Deckschicht 10 kann etwa aus glasfaserverstärkten oder kohlenstofffaserverstärkten Laminaten gefertigt sein, oder mithilfe einer Verwendung so genannter "Prepregs" gefertigt sein, bei denen es sich um eine vorkonfektionierte Kombination aus Harz und Fasern handelt. Letztere bieten den Vorteil, dass eine genauere Verteilung zwischen Harz- und Faservolumen erfolgen kann, sodass letztendlich gleichmäßigere Materialwerte erzielbar sind. Als Harzsysteme können Epoxyharze, Cyanesterharze, Bismaleimide (BMI) und Polyurethan verwendet werden. Die zumindest eine Trägerschicht kann aus einem geschäumten oder wabenförmigen Werkstoff gefertigt sein. Verbundwerkstoffe dieser Art weisen einerseits eine hohe Biegesteifigkeit und Zugfestigkeit auf, andererseits aber auch geringes Gewicht, und sind außerdem billiger herzustellen, als die derzeit verwendeten Mahlscheiben aus Stahl. Die Biegesteifigkeit wird dabei in erster Linie von der Deckschicht 10 mit hohem Elastizitätsmodul verursacht, wie aus der
In der
Mithilfe einer erfindungsgemäßen Vorrichtung kann somit trotz der hohen mechanischen Belastungen eine einwandfreie Mahlqualität sicher gestellt werden. Des Weiteren können bekannte Vorrichtungen so optimiert werden, dass höhere Rotationsgeschwindigkeiten, und somit höherer Materialdurchsatz, ermöglicht werden. Dabei sind niedrigere Kosten, sowie höhere Betriebssicherheit erzielbar.With the aid of a device according to the invention, it is thus possible to achieve perfect performance despite the high mechanical loads Milling quality can be ensured. Furthermore, known devices can be optimized to enable higher rotational speeds, and thus higher material throughput. This lower costs, and higher reliability can be achieved.
Claims (4)
- Device for size reduction of a cellulosic compound in wood processing, particularly in the manufacture of pulp, paper and panelboard, with the aid of refining discs (1) that hold refining plates (4) and rotate in relation to one another with a narrow gap in between, and a screw conveyor (8) for conveying the compound to the refining discs (1), characterised by a layered structure with at least one top layer (10) and at least one supporting layer (11) forming at least one of the refining discs (1) in axial direction, where the at least one top layer (10) has a higher elasticity module and a higher density than the at least one supporting layer (11).
- Device according to Claim 1, characterised by the at least one supporting layer (11) having a greater overall thickness than the at least one top layer (10).
- Device according to Claim 1 or 2, characterised by the at least one top layer (10) being made of a glass-fibre or carbon-fibre reinforced laminate.
- Device according to one of Claims 1 to 3, characterised by the at least one supporting layer (11) being made of a foamed or honeycombed material.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT20122008A AT507724B1 (en) | 2008-12-23 | 2008-12-23 | DEVICE FOR DISCONNECTING A CELLULOSE-RELATED APPLICATION GROUND |
PCT/AT2009/000493 WO2010071911A1 (en) | 2008-12-23 | 2009-12-21 | Device for comminuting a cellulose-containing feedstock |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2367975A1 EP2367975A1 (en) | 2011-09-28 |
EP2367975B1 true EP2367975B1 (en) | 2012-11-21 |
Family
ID=42111062
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP09807591A Not-in-force EP2367975B1 (en) | 2008-12-23 | 2009-12-21 | Device for comminuting a cellulose-containing feedstock |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2367975B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102264980A (en) |
AT (1) | AT507724B1 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0923685A2 (en) |
CL (1) | CL2011001541A1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2011129071A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010071911A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102021132158A1 (en) | 2021-12-07 | 2023-06-07 | Aikawa Fiber Technologies Inc. | Refiner filler with multiple coatings on rods |
Family Cites Families (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3327952A (en) * | 1964-08-01 | 1967-06-27 | West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co | Method for the preparation of fibrous materials for the production of paper and cardboard |
CN85103088A (en) * | 1985-04-23 | 1986-10-22 | 美商贝洛特公司 | Composite flexible pulp refiner disk and method for making thereof |
US5042726A (en) * | 1989-11-13 | 1991-08-27 | Sunds Defibrator Ab | Apparatus and method for conjoint adjustment of both the inner and outer grinding spaces of a pulp defibrating apparatus |
FR2667804B1 (en) * | 1990-10-11 | 1995-02-10 | Technogenia Sa | ANTI-ABRASION SURFACE PLATE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME. |
FR2707677B1 (en) | 1993-07-13 | 1995-08-25 | Technogenia | Plate for defibering or refining paper pulp, and process for its production. |
DE19712653C2 (en) * | 1997-03-26 | 2002-10-24 | Voith Paper Fiber Systems Gmbh | Method and device for dispersing a waste paper pulp |
DE19955009C2 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2001-10-18 | Voith Paper Patent Gmbh | Process for the production of sets for the mechanical processing of suspended fiber material |
DE202004003743U1 (en) * | 2004-03-10 | 2004-05-19 | Voith Paper Patent Gmbh | Grinder and grinding set for paper pulp |
CN2719396Y (en) * | 2004-07-09 | 2005-08-24 | 田光发 | High-speed shearing-industry colloid mill |
US20090045278A1 (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2009-02-19 | Ulrich Bech | Crushing element and mills with grinding bodies, mixers, extruders and a pressing worm provided with said crushing elements |
-
2008
- 2008-12-23 AT AT20122008A patent/AT507724B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2009
- 2009-12-21 RU RU2011129071/12A patent/RU2011129071A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2009-12-21 WO PCT/AT2009/000493 patent/WO2010071911A1/en active Application Filing
- 2009-12-21 EP EP09807591A patent/EP2367975B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2009-12-21 BR BRPI0923685A patent/BRPI0923685A2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2009-12-21 CN CN2009801524514A patent/CN102264980A/en active Pending
-
2011
- 2011-06-21 CL CL2011001541A patent/CL2011001541A1/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AT507724A3 (en) | 2011-01-15 |
WO2010071911A1 (en) | 2010-07-01 |
AT507724B1 (en) | 2011-03-15 |
EP2367975A1 (en) | 2011-09-28 |
RU2011129071A (en) | 2013-01-27 |
BRPI0923685A2 (en) | 2016-01-19 |
CL2011001541A1 (en) | 2011-10-14 |
AT507724A2 (en) | 2010-07-15 |
CN102264980A (en) | 2011-11-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE60023658T2 (en) | DISC MILL WITH TANGENTIAL EXTRACTION | |
DE2535979C3 (en) | Disk mill | |
DE2633041A1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TREATMENT OF A BASE MATERIAL CONTAINING LIGNOCELLULOSE | |
EP0406644A2 (en) | Air current-roller mill | |
DE202020104647U1 (en) | Wood fiber board and corresponding manufacturing plant | |
DE19741224B4 (en) | Plug-screw feeder | |
EP1749922B1 (en) | Device for treating a fibre suspension and disk segment for use in such a device | |
EP2367975B1 (en) | Device for comminuting a cellulose-containing feedstock | |
DE102006062396A1 (en) | Grit mat forming method for use during manufacture of timber material plate, involves allowing grit to strike on equalizing area, transferring grit to scatter area of roller carpet, and distributing grit on length of form strap | |
EP3396064B1 (en) | Device for dewatering, disassembling and conveying waste paper, pulp or wood chips | |
DE102015223333B4 (en) | Process and plant for processing high-strength paper products | |
DE69839346T2 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TREATING FIBER MATERIAL | |
DE102006022886B4 (en) | Device for comminuting feed material | |
DE102006062285B4 (en) | Fiberboard and process for its production | |
EP1663593B1 (en) | High-pressure gluing in a fiber mixer | |
EP1702103A1 (en) | Method for refining paper or cellulose fibres in an aqueous suspension | |
EP2983828A2 (en) | Method and device for comminuting | |
EP2468952B1 (en) | Refiner | |
DE10337921A1 (en) | Refining assembly, for a suspension of papermaking paper/cellulose fibers, forms a fiber layer on the inner surface of the rotating drum with beater rollers pressed against it and a constant liquid flow in and out of the layer | |
DE102005016318A1 (en) | Process for grinding aqueous suspended paper or pulp fibers and grinding device for its implementation | |
WO2022171905A1 (en) | System and method for obtaining fibres from feedstock containing lignocellulose, more particularly from straw | |
DE19807622C1 (en) | Preparation of materials for pressing into chipboards | |
EP1414629B1 (en) | Panel consisting of a derived timber product and produced in an environmentally-friendly manner | |
DE2120823A1 (en) | Process for the production of wood pulp | |
DE102015113645B4 (en) | Device for cutting solid materials |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20110614 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: MAYER, ANNA Inventor name: HOERNER, STEPHANE |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 585147 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20121215 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502009005466 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130117 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20121121 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130304 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130221 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130321 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130222 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: ANDRITZ AG Effective date: 20121231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130221 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121231 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20130830 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121231 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502009005466 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130702 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20130822 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130702 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130121 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20091221 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20131221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131231 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 585147 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20141221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |