EP2316576B1 - Système de collecte de particules de poussière hybrides - Google Patents

Système de collecte de particules de poussière hybrides Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2316576B1
EP2316576B1 EP09174340.1A EP09174340A EP2316576B1 EP 2316576 B1 EP2316576 B1 EP 2316576B1 EP 09174340 A EP09174340 A EP 09174340A EP 2316576 B1 EP2316576 B1 EP 2316576B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
bypass
esp
dust
fraction
electrostatic precipitator
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP09174340.1A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2316576A1 (fr
Inventor
Andreas Bäck
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Technology GmbH
Original Assignee
Alstom Technology AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Alstom Technology AG filed Critical Alstom Technology AG
Priority to PL09174340T priority Critical patent/PL2316576T3/pl
Priority to EP09174340.1A priority patent/EP2316576B1/fr
Priority to ES09174340T priority patent/ES2421715T3/es
Priority to DK09174340.1T priority patent/DK2316576T3/da
Priority to PT91743401T priority patent/PT2316576E/pt
Priority to CN201010539247.2A priority patent/CN102069035B/zh
Publication of EP2316576A1 publication Critical patent/EP2316576A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2316576B1 publication Critical patent/EP2316576B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03C—MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03C3/00—Separating dispersed particles from gases or vapour, e.g. air, by electrostatic effect
    • B03C3/02—Plant or installations having external electricity supply
    • B03C3/04—Plant or installations having external electricity supply dry type
    • B03C3/14—Plant or installations having external electricity supply dry type characterised by the additional use of mechanical effects, e.g. gravity
    • B03C3/155—Filtration
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03C—MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03C3/00—Separating dispersed particles from gases or vapour, e.g. air, by electrostatic effect
    • B03C3/017—Combinations of electrostatic separation with other processes, not otherwise provided for
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03C—MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03C3/00—Separating dispersed particles from gases or vapour, e.g. air, by electrostatic effect
    • B03C3/019—Post-treatment of gases

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a hybrid dust particulate collector system comprising an electrostatic precipitator and a barrier filter located downstream of said electrostatic precipitator.
  • the invention also relates to a method for removing dust particles in such a hybrid particulate collector.
  • US patent no. 5,024,681 discloses a method for removing particulates from a gas, the method comprising the steps of first passing the gas and the particulates through a conventional electrostatic precipitator (ESP) whereby 90-99% of said particulates are removed, and then passing the remaining particulates and said gas leaving said ESP to a barrier filter placed downstream of said electrostatic precipitator.
  • ESP electrostatic precipitator
  • JP 2008 012060 relates to an air-cleaning fan comprising a pre-filter of barrier type, in series with an electrostatic filter.
  • the pre-filter is located, with respect to the direction of a main airflow, upstream of the electrostatic filter.
  • a stream of filtered air is returned upstream of the barrier filter, and "active species", i.e. hydroxyl radicals are generated in the filtered air in the return path by means of an electric streamer discharge unit.
  • a particulate removal system requires periodic maintenance and consumes energy during operation; hence, there is a need to reduce the energy consumption and ease the maintenance demand of such systems. There is also a constant strive to increase the total particulate collection efficiency of hybrid particulate collector systems.
  • a method for removing dust particles from a raw gas stream which comprises raw gas dust particles, in a hybrid dust particulate collector system comprising an electrostatic precipitator (ESP), and a barrier filter located downstream, with respect to a main gas flow direction through the system, of said electrostatic precipitator, the method comprising cleaning at least a major portion of the raw gas stream in the electrostatic precipitator, so as to obtain an ESP cleaned gas stream portion; and transferring a bypass fraction of said raw gas dust particles to a bypass fraction return region located in or downstream of an outlet of said electrostatic precipitator, and upstream of said barrier filter, said bypass fraction having a coarser dust particle composition compared to the composition of dust particles remaining in the ESP cleaned gas stream portion.
  • ESP electrostatic precipitator
  • the "coarseness" of a dust particle composition is defined by the mass mean diameter D MMD of a dust sample having that dust particle composition.
  • the higher the mass mean diameter D MMD of a dust sample the coarser the dust particle composition of that sample. In more general terms, this means that the more of the total dust particle mass M carried by a gas stream that is represented by larger particles, the coarser is the composition of the dust particles carried by that gas stream.
  • D MMD may also be accurately approximated by making the sums not over individual particles, but over particle size intervals.
  • the relatively coarse raw gas dust particles transferred to the bypass return region will thereby build up a relatively porous and permeable dust cake on the barrier filter.
  • a porous dust cake formed with the aid of a coarse bypass fraction dust particles may allow a longer interval of cleaning of the barrier filter.
  • Less frequent cleaning of the barrier filter reduces the wear on the barrier filter, and hence prolongs its service interval.
  • Less frequent cleaning may also reduce the total particulate emission to the ambient air, since an emission dust peak is often observed in the cleaned flue gas immediately after cleaning the barrier filter.
  • a more porous dust cake may result in a lower gas pressure drop over the barrier filter. This reduces the amount of energy required for forcing the gas through the barrier filter.
  • said bypass fraction is carried to said bypass fraction return region by a non-ESP cleaned bypass portion of said raw gas stream.
  • said non-ESP cleaned bypass portion may be transferred from a bypass entry region upstream of the electrostatic precipitator to said bypass fraction return region by means of a bypass duct.
  • a duct may easily be dimensioned to fit the exact bypass needs of existing installations, such that retro-fits of the invention are facilitated.
  • said non-ESP cleaned bypass portion may be transferred to said bypass fraction return region via a bypass path through an inactive portion of said electrostatic precipitator, such that said non-ESP cleaned bypass portion is transferred through the electrostatic precipitator without being cleaned by means of an electric field.
  • this is a very inexpensive and compact embodiment.
  • the bypass through the electrostatic precipitator may be opened and closed at will, for example by switching off or switching on bus sections.
  • said bypass fraction comprises a portion of the dust particles separated from the ESP cleaned gas stream portion in a first field of the electrostatic precipitator.
  • the first field of the electrostatic precipitator typically removes the coarsest particles from the raw gas stream. By returning a portion of the coarse particle fraction collected in the first field, an even more porous dust cake may be obtained on the barrier filter.
  • said bypass fraction of said raw gas dust particles amounts to 2 - 30%, by mass, and more preferably 3 - 20% by mass, of the total amount of dust particles in the raw gas stream.
  • said benefit of the dust removal in the ESP is still maintained at an attractive level, while the dust entering the barrier filter has a particle size composition that allows forming a porous dust cake.
  • the method comprises adjusting the amount of bypass fraction to be transferred to the bypass fraction return region to a selected amount of bypass fraction.
  • adjusting the amount it is possible to adapt the amount of bypass fraction to the particular process conditions.
  • the method comprises controlling, based on an event in equipment downstream or upstream of the electrostatic precipitator, the amount of bypass fraction to be transferred to the bypass fraction return region. Thereby, it is possible to adjust the amount of bypass fraction in response to changing process conditions.
  • the transfer of said bypass fraction is controlled based on the initiation of a cleaning of the barrier filter, such that the barrier filter is primed by the bypass fraction.
  • Some types of barrier filters are particularly sensitive to blinding just after having been cleaned.
  • a protective porous dust cake may be built up rapidly, before the barrier filter has been exposed to large amounts of the fine particles entrained in the ESP cleaned gas stream.
  • a hybrid dust particulate collector system for removing dust particles from a raw gas stream, which comprises raw gas dust particles
  • the system comprising an electrostatic precipitator and a barrier filter, said barrier filter being connected downstream of said electrostatic precipitator, the electrostatic precipitator being configured for cleaning at least a major portion of the raw gas stream so as to obtain an ESP cleaned gas stream portion
  • the system comprising a transferring device configured for transferring a bypass fraction of said raw gas dust particles to a bypass fraction return region located in or downstream of an outlet of said electrostatic precipitator, and upstream of said barrier filter, the transferring device being configured to transfer a bypass fraction that has a coarser dust particle composition compared to the composition of dust particles remaining in the ESP cleaned gas stream portion.
  • the "coarseness" of a dust particle composition is defined by the mass mean diameter D MMD of a dust sample having that particle size composition.
  • the relatively coarse raw gas dust transferred by the transferring device to the bypass return region will build up a relatively porous and permeable dust cake on the barrier filter.
  • a porous dust cake formed with the aid of a coarse bypass fraction may allow a longer interval of cleaning of the barrier filter. Less frequent cleaning of the barrier filter reduces the wear on the barrier filter. Less frequent cleaning may also reduce the total particulate emission to the ambient air, since an emission dust peak is often observed in the cleaned flue gas immediately after cleaning the barrier filter. Furthermore, a more porous dust cake may result in a lower gas pressure drop over the barrier filter. Thereby, the amount of energy required for forcing the ESP cleaned gas through the barrier filter is reduced.
  • said transferring device is configured to transfer said bypass fraction to said bypass fraction return region carried by a non-ESP cleaned bypass portion of said raw gas stream.
  • said transferring device comprises a bypass duct, connecting a bypass entry region upstream of the electrostatic precipitator to said bypass fraction return region.
  • the bypass duct may, according to a particular embodiment, be provided with a control valve, such that the transfer of a bypass fraction may be initiated or adjusted at will.
  • said transferring device comprises a bypass path through an inactive portion of said electrostatic precipitator, such that said non-ESP cleaned bypass portion may be transferred through the electrostatic precipitator without being cleaned by means of an electric field.
  • the transferring device may according to a particular embodiment further comprise a controller, which is configured to, during operation of the hybrid dust particulate collector system, temporarily de-activate at least said portion of the electrostatic precipitator, such that said non-ESP cleaned gas stream portion may be transferred through the electrostatic precipitator without being cleaned.
  • a controller which is configured to, during operation of the hybrid dust particulate collector system, temporarily de-activate at least said portion of the electrostatic precipitator, such that said non-ESP cleaned gas stream portion may be transferred through the electrostatic precipitator without being cleaned.
  • said transferring device comprises a bypass duct, connecting a dust collecting hopper of a first field of the electrostatic precipitator to said bypass fraction return region, said bypass duct being configured for transferring collected dust that has been separated from said ESP cleaned gas stream to said bypass return region.
  • said transferring device is adapted for transferring 2 - 30%, by mass, and more preferably, 3 - 20% by mass, of the total amount of dust particles in the raw gas stream.
  • said transferring device comprises a control system for controlling the transfer of the bypass fraction to the bypass fraction return region.
  • the control system is, according to an embodiment, configured to control, based on an event in equipment downstream or upstream of the electrostatic precipitator, the amount of bypass fraction to be transferred to the bypass fraction return region.
  • the control system is configured to initiate a transfer of said bypass fraction based on the initiation of a cleaning of the barrier filter, such that the barrier filter is primed by the bypass fraction.
  • said electrostatic precipitator and said barrier filter are comprised in the same housing. This embodiment is particularly well suited for compact installations.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates a first embodiment of a hybrid dust particulate collector system 10 as seen from the side and in cross-section.
  • the system 10 of fig. 1 comprises an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) 12, which is connected in series with a barrier filter 14.
  • ESP electrostatic precipitator
  • the barrier filter 14 illustrated in fig. 1 is in this example a fabric filter of the baghouse filter type described in more detail in US 4,336,035 .
  • the ESP 12 has an ESP inlet 16 for raw, dust particle laden gas 18, and an ESP outlet 20 for ESP cleaned gas 22, from which most of the dust particles have been removed.
  • the raw gas 18 may, for instance, be flue gas from a boiler 24, in which a fuel such as coal is combusted.
  • the boiler 24 of fig. 1 which is controlled by a boiler control system 25, is connected to the ESP 12 via a raw gas duct 26.
  • the electrostatic precipitator 12 has a casing 28 in which a first field, a second field, and a third, and last, field, are provided. Each field is provided with a number of discharge electrodes, of which twp discharge electrodes 30 are shown in Fig. 1 , and a number of collecting electrode plates, of which one collecting electrode plate 32 is shown in Fig. 1 , as is known in the art, for instance from US patent No 4,502,872 . In fig. 1 , only the electrodes of the first field of the ESP 12 are illustrated for reasons of clarity. Typically, the collecting electrodes 32 are kept at ground potential, while the discharge electrodes 30 operate at a positive or negative potential of several kV.
  • Each of the ESP fields is provided with current from an electric power supply.
  • the first field of the ESP 12 receives an electrode current from a first electric power supply 34
  • the second field receives current from a second electric power supply 36
  • the third field receives current from a third electric power supply 38.
  • the output current of each electric power supply 34, 36, 38 is controlled by a control system 40.
  • the control system 40 also controls rapping of the collecting electrode plates 32, in the manner well known to those skilled in the art.
  • Each field of the ESP 12 is also provided with a hopper 42, which is arranged below that field's respective collecting electrode plates 32, such that, when the collecting electrode plates 32 are rapped, collected dust particles will fall from the collecting electrode plates into the hopper 42. Collected dust 44 is removed from the hopper 42 and disposed of elsewhere.
  • the bag filter 14 is provided with a bag filter inlet 46, which is connected to the ESP outlet 20 via a duct 36, and a bag filter outlet 50, which is connected via a clean gas duct 48 to a stack 52 for emitting clean flue gas to the ambient air.
  • the bag filter 14 is further provided with an inlet compartment 54, which communicates with the bag filter inlet 46 so as to receive ESP cleaned gas 22 from the ESP 12, and an outlet compartment 56, which communicates with the clean gas duct 48 via the bag filter outlet 50.
  • the clean gas duct 48 may comprise an optional fan 49 for drawing the gas through the bag filter 14.
  • the two compartments 54, 56 are separated by a wall 58, which is configured so as to allow gas to pass from the inlet compartment 54 to the outlet compartment 56 only via a filter fabric.
  • the filter fabric consists of a number of filter bags 60, only two of which are shown for reasons of clarity. Dust remaining in the ESP filtered gas stream will thereby be collected on the outside of the filter bags 60, and eventually form a dust cake on the surface of the filter bags 60. After a period of operation of the bag filter 14, this dust cake will have been built so thick and compact that it will blind the filter bags 60, and thereby induce a significant pressure drop over the bags 60.
  • the filter bags 60 are periodically cleaned by clean air pulses directed, with respect to the flue gas flow, in the reverse direction through the filter bags 60, such that the dust cake is forced to release from the filter bags 60 and fall down into a hopper 61.
  • clean air nozzles 62 fed by a pressurized air tank 63, are arranged at each filter bag 60.
  • the pulsing of clean air is controlled by a barrier filter control system 64.
  • the pulsed air cleaning is, according to established art, typically performed sufficiently often to keep the pressure drop over the filter bags 60 reasonably low, but unnecessary cleaning is avoided. Cleaning by pulsed air too often consumes energy and exposes the filter bags to excessive mechanical wear.
  • the dust cake also contributes significantly to the total filtering effect of the bag filter 14; when the dust cake is removed, the cleaning efficiency of the bag filter is temporarily somewhat reduced.
  • Bag blinding may in general terms be described as the condition where the dust cake obstructs the gas passage through the filter bags.
  • a particular type of bag blinding occurs when fine particles penetrate deep into the fabric of the filter bags; a relative small amount of fine dust may be sufficient to cause a significant blinding of the bags.
  • Hybrid particulate collector systems of prior art are based on the paradigm that the more particles that are removed in each consecutive filter, the better. Therefore, in a hybrid system of prior art, all the raw gas is passed through, and cleaned by, the ESP. However, the ESP not only removes particles; it also changes the particle size composition, since larger particles have a higher tendency to be collected by the ESP.
  • the particle size composition of the fraction remaining in the ESP cleaned gas stream therefore has a higher relative portion of fine particles, and is more prone to blind a filter bag than the particle size composition of a raw, non-ESP cleaned gas stream.
  • the higher blinding effect of the ESP cleaned gas stream is attributed to the fact that fine particles are prone to penetrate deep into the fabric of the filter bags, and also to the fact that fine particles tend to form a more compact dust cake than coarse particles do.
  • Coarse particles on the other hand, do not penetrate deep into the fabric of the filter bags, and even prevents penetration of fine particle into the fabric of the filter bags.
  • Coarse dust particles in particular particles having a diameter of more than about 30 ⁇ m, tend to form a very porous dust cake, which not only allows a high gas flow therethrough, but is also capable of adsorbing a relatively large amount of finer dust particles.
  • the presence of very coarse particles downstream of the ESP may be particularly beneficial for the dust collecting efficiency of the barrier filter; an ESP induced change of particle size composition of the gas stream may therefore reduce the dust collecting efficiency of the barrier filter.
  • the hybrid particulate collector system of fig. 1 comprises a bypass duct 66 connected between the raw gas duct 26 and the ESP cleaned gas duct 36.
  • the bypass duct 66 operates so as to allow a non-ESP cleaned bypass portion 68 of the raw gas stream 18, said bypass portion 68 carrying a bypass fraction of the dust in the raw gas stream 18, to bypass the ESP 12, and mix with the ESP cleaned gas stream 22 in a bypass fraction return region 70 downstream of the ESP 12.
  • the dust entering the bag filter 14 will form a more porous dust cake on the filter bags 60 than would the fine dust of the ESP cleaned gas stream 22 alone. In other words, the blinding of the filter bags 60 will be reduced thanks to the coarser dust composition entering the bag filter 14.
  • the bypass duct 66 may be provided with an optional control valve 72, for controlling the amount of raw gas to be bypassed, and hence, also for controlling the amount of dust that will be bypassed to a location downstream of the ESP 12 completely unaffected by the ESP 12.
  • the control valve 72 may, by way of example, be a damper of any of the types known to those skilled in the art.
  • the bypass duct may also be provided with an optional fan 73, for maintaining the flow of the bypass portion 68 of the raw gas stream 18 at a high speed.
  • the use of a fan may be beneficial to assure that the coarsest dust particles of the bypass fraction do not fall down onto the floor of the bypass duct 66, but are maintained in the bypass flow all the way to the bypass fraction return region 70.
  • the fan 73 may also be used instead of, or in combination with the valve 72 for controlling the bypass flow rate through the bypass duct 66.
  • Preferably, about 70-98%, and more preferred, about 80-97% of the raw gas stream 18 in the raw gas duct 26 is passed through and cleaned by the ESP 12, while the remaining about 2-30%, or more preferred, 3-20%, of the raw gas stream 18 in the raw gas duct 26 is bypassed via bypass duct 66 to the bypass fraction return region 70 downstream of the ESP 12.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates a numerical example, based on results from actual measurements at a coal-fired plant.
  • the numerical example illustrated in Fig. 2 assumes a 97% (by dust mass M ) dust removal efficiency of the ESP 12, and a bypass portion 68 of the raw gas stream 18 amounting to 7 % of the raw gas stream 18.
  • the bypass portion 68 of the raw gas stream 18 is assumed to carry a bypass fraction having an identical composition, with respect to particle size, as the raw gas stream 18.
  • the dust mass M as a function of the particle diameter d; more precisely, the dust mass dM per logarithmic diameter interval d(log(d)), passing a respective portion of the hybrid particulate collector 10 per time unit, is plotted against the logarithm of the diameter, log(d).
  • the respective curves illustrate the total mass of raw gas dust particles 19 carried by the raw gas stream 18 from the boiler; the mass of the bypass fraction 17 carried by the bypass portion 68 of the raw gas stream 18; the mass of the fines dust fraction 21 remaining in the ESP cleaned gas stream 22; and the total mass of the mixed dust particle fraction 23, i.e. the sum of the fines dust fraction 21 and the bypass fraction 17, entering the bag filter 14 downstream of the bypass fraction return region 70.
  • a fines dust fraction 21 comprising 3% by mass of the raw gas dust entering the ESP 12 exits the same, carried by the ESP cleaned gas stream 22.
  • the fines dust fraction 21 is mixed with the bypass fraction 17, which corresponds to 7% of the raw gas dust 19, so as to form a mixed fraction 23.
  • the fines dust fraction 21 carried by the ESP cleaned gas stream 22 more than 10% of the particle mass belongs to the submicron size fraction having a diameter d below 1 ⁇ m (log(d) ⁇ 0).
  • the mixed fraction 23 downstream of the bypass return region 70, less than 5% of the particle mass belongs to the size fraction having a diameter below 1 ⁇ m.
  • the difference between the fines fraction 21 and the mixed fraction 23 is even more striking; a large portion of the mixed fraction 23 consists of very coarse dust particles, whereas the fines fraction 21 contains very little such coarse dust particles.
  • the dust carried by the flue gas stream will, downstream of the bypass fraction return region 70, behave essentially as a raw gas stream with respect to filter bag blinding, while at the same time comprising less than 10% of the dust mass initially carried by the raw gas stream 18.
  • an additional effect of bypassing a bypass portion 68 of the raw gas stream 18 is that in the bypass fraction return region 70, the bypass fraction, which is carried by the bypass portion 68 of the raw gas, will be mixed with the fines fraction of electrically charged fine dust particles remaining in the ESP cleaned gas portion 22.
  • fine dust particles being electrostatically charged after having passed the ESP 12, will agglomerate with uncharged, bypassed, relatively coarse particles, so as to form even coarser, agglomerated particles.
  • the duct 36 is provided with an optional static mixer 71 just downstream of the bypass return region 70.
  • the static mixer 71 of fig. 1 which could just as well have been located within the bypass return region 70, is shown as a set of two mixer blades inside the duct 36, even though many different types of static mixers are well known to those skilled in the art.
  • Fig. 3a is a diagrammatic side view of a second embodiment of a hybrid dust particulate collector system 10.
  • the system 10 of fig. 3a comprises an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) 12, which is connected in series with a bag filter 14, in a manner similar to what is described above with reference to fig. 1 .
  • the ESP 12 has an ESP inlet 16 for raw, dust particle laden gas 18, and an ESP outlet 20.
  • the electrostatic precipitator 12 of fig. 3a is divided into consecutive fields, the operation of which may be controlled independently.
  • the ESP 12 is divided into two fields: a first field, and a second, last field.
  • Each field is provided with a number of discharge electrodes 30 and a number of collecting electrode plates 32, as will be further elucidated below with reference to fig. 3b .
  • only one collecting electrode 32 and two discharge electrodes 30 are, for reasons of clarity, schematically illustrated in only the first field of the ESP 12.
  • each field is, in this example, divided into three parallel independent units, called bus-sections.
  • a bus-section is defined as an individual unit of the ESP 12, having its own electric power source for supplying current to the electrode(s) of that bus section.
  • the first field has three parallel bus-sections 74a-c, and the second field also has three parallel bus sections 76a-c.
  • Each bus-section 74a-c, 76a-c is provided with discharge electrodes 30 and collecting electrode plates 32.
  • Each of the bus-sections 74a-c, 76a-c is also provided with an independent electrical current source 34a-c, 36a-c, each of which applies a current and a voltage between the respective discharge electrodes 30 and the collecting electrode plates 32 of that specific bus-section 74a-c, 76a-c.
  • Each of the current sources 34a-c, 36a-c is individually controlled by a control system 40 ( fig. 3a ).
  • All electrodes 30, 32 are arranged in a housing 28, which comprises an inlet funnel 27 and an outlet funnel 29.
  • the precipitator 12 of fig.3a-b is configured so as to receive a raw gas stream 18 from a raw gas duct 26.
  • the division of the ESP 12 into parallel, individually controlled bus sections 74a-c, 76a-c makes it possible to render a selected path 74b, 76b through the ESP 12 inoperable. This may be done, e.g., by adjusting the current and voltage across the electrodes of a subset 74b, 76b of the bus-sections 74a-c, 76a-c, to zero.
  • a bypass portion 68 of the raw, non-ESP cleaned gas stream 18, which carries a bypass fraction of the dust from the raw gas stream 18, may pass along the de-activated path 74b, 76b of the ESP 12 without being cleaned by the ESP 12.
  • the bypass dust fraction carried along the de-activated path 74b, 76b of the ESP 12 by the bypass portion 68 of the raw gas stream 18 has essentially the same particle composition, with respect to size, as the raw gas stream 18 in the raw gas duct 26.
  • the bypass portion 68 is mixed with the ESP cleaned gas stream 22 in a bypass fraction return region 70 downstream of the electrodes 30, 32 of the ESP 12; in this example, the bypass fraction return region 70 is located in the outlet 20 of the ESP 12.
  • the outlet 20 of the ESP 12 is defined as the location immediately downstream of the electrodes 30, 32 of the last field of the ESP. In the example shown in fig. 3b , this means that the outlet 20 is located upstream of the outlet funnel 29 of the ESP 12.
  • the de-activated path 74b, 76b through the ESP 12 of fig. 3a-b has essentially the same function as the bypass duct 66 of fig. 1 .
  • the bus-sections to be de-activated are selected by a control system 40, or by an operator, such that a selected amount 68 of raw gas is passed through the ESP 12 without being cleaned.
  • a selected amount 68 of raw gas is passed through the ESP 12 without being cleaned.
  • a person skilled in the art is aware that, in order to de-activate a bus-section, it is not necessary to lower the applied voltage and current over the electrodes of that bus-section to zero; it is sufficient to lower it to a value below a selected maximum value, at which maximum value that bus-section is rendered essentially inoperable with respect to dust removal efficiency.
  • bypass path 74b, 76b be arranged in separate bus-sections provided with individual electric power sources 34b, 36b.
  • An alternative would be to connect the electrodes of the bypass path 74b, 76b, via a respective de-activation switch, to the power sources 34a, 36a.
  • the electrodes of the bypass path 74b, 76b may be operated as slaves to the bus sections 74a, 76a during times when no bypass path is desired.
  • the electrodes of the slave section 74b, 76b may be de-activated by disconnecting them from the power sources 34a, 36a by means of the de-activation switches.
  • a permanent bypass path it is possible to, during construction of the ESP, reserve a bypass path through the ESP 12 by simply omitting to provide a portion of the ESP 12 with discharge electrodes, and preferably also shielding this path from any portions of the ESP 12 that are operable for cleaning gas.
  • This alternative may also be attractive for retrofits to existing installations.
  • the ability to open or close a bypass path at will during operation of the filter also opens up additional possibilities, as will be further elucidated below.
  • the control system 40 for controlling the operation of the electrodes 30, 32 of the bus-sections 74a-c, 76a-c is also connected to a control system 64 for controlling the cleaning of the filter bags 60 of the bag filter 14.
  • a control system 64 for controlling the cleaning of the filter bags 60 of the bag filter 14. Instead of continuously bypassing a bypass portion 68 of the raw gas stream 18, it is sometimes preferred to vary the fraction of bypassed dust in a time-dependent manner.
  • priming the filter bags 60 in this way they will be less sensitive to blinding by finer dust fractions received from the ESP.
  • a method for operating the hybrid dust particulate collector system of figs 3a-b so as to prime the filter bags 60 with relatively coarse dust particles will now be described with reference to fig. 4 .
  • the bag filter controller 64 initiates cleaning of at least a portion of the filter bags 60 of the bag filter 14, e.g. by releasing a jet of compressed air, via the clean air nozzles 62, into the filter bag(s) 60 to be cleaned. This event triggers, in step 112, a bag filter cleaning signal to be sent to the ESP controller 40, which in this example also acts as a bypass controller, such that the ESP controller 40 will be made aware that the filter bags 60 are now clean and exposed to being blinded by fines dust.
  • the ESP controller 40 in step 114, opens a bypass path through the ESP 12 to the bypass return region 70 by de-activating all the bus-sections 74a-c, 76a-c, i.e. the entire ESP 12.
  • step 116 the bypass path is kept open during a bypass time, such that a selected bypass portion 68 of the raw gas stream 18, carrying a bypass fraction of dust, may pass.
  • This bypass fraction having a dust particle composition than the dust carried by the ESP cleaned gas coarser stream 22 prior to de-activating the ESP 12, will now prime the cleaned filter bags 60.
  • the bus-sections 74a-c, 76a-c are once again re-activated so as to resume normal, dust-removing operation of the ESP 12.
  • the bypass time i.e. the duration of the bypass
  • the bypass frequency which in the example above is identical to the bag filter cleaning frequency.
  • the bypass time is selected so as to keep the bypass open between 2 and 30%, and more preferred, between 3 and 20 % of the time.
  • bypassing the entire flue gas flow through the ESP it is also possible to de-activate only a few bus-sections, corresponding to the desired gas flow capacity of the bypass path, when opening the bypass.
  • the bypass path may be limited to bus-sections 74b, 76b by disabling only the power supplies 34b, 36b.
  • the control system 40 for controlling the operation of the electrodes 30, 32 of the bus-sections 74a-c, 76a-c is also connected to the boiler control system 25.
  • the opening and closing of a bypass path may thereby also be controlled based on events taking place in the boiler 24 ( fig. 1 ).
  • Such events may be, by way of example, events that effect the composition of raw gas dust particles carried by the raw gas stream 18, such that a change in the bypass flow is motivated.
  • One particular example is the start-up of a coal fired boiler, using oil as a start-up fuel for pre-heating the boiler. Oil combustion may produce finer dust particles than coal combustion; bypassing of oil combustion flue gas to a barrier filter is therefore in most cases not desired.
  • Fig. 5 illustrates an example of a start-up procedure for operating the hybrid dust particulate collector system 10 of figs 3a-b .
  • step 210 the boiler control system 25 transmits a start-up warning signal to the ESP controller 40, so as to notify the ESP controller 40 that the boiler 24 ( fig. 1 ) will undergo a start-up procedure.
  • the ESP controller in step 212 verifies that the ESP 12 is in operation and that any bypasses are closed.
  • the ESP controller 40 transmits a verification signal to the boiler control system 25.
  • the combustion in the boiler 24 is, in step 214, initiated by the boiler control system 25 or by an operator.
  • the boiler 25 is started using an oil based fuel.
  • step 216 the bypass path is kept closed, i.e. all bus sections 74a-c, 76a-c of the ESP 12 are kept operational, while the boiler 24 is running on oil or a mixture of oil and coal.
  • step 218 the boiler control system 25 switches over the boiler 24 to coal combustion.
  • the boiler control system 25 After having verified that stable, normal operation of the boiler has been obtained, i.e. that the boiler 24 has been running on 0% oil for a predetermined period of time, the boiler control system 25 transmits a normal operation verification signal to the ESP controller.
  • the ESP controller 40 in step 220, opens a bypass path through the ESP, e.g. by de-activating the bus-sections 74b, 76b.
  • the bypass path thus formed will now allow a bypass portion 68 of the raw gas stream 18, said bypass portion 68 carrying a bypass fraction of dust, to bypass the ESP 12 and be mixed with the ESP cleaned gas stream 22 in the bypass return region 70.
  • the methods described above with reference to figs 4-5 are not limited to use in conjunction with the hybrid dust particulate collector system of figs 3a-b ; they may advantageously also be combined with the embodiment of fig. 1 .
  • the bypass control valve 72 of fig. 1 may be configured so as to respond to control signals from any of the control systems 25, 40 or 64.
  • the methods may also be combined with the embodiment that will now be described with reference to fig. 6 .
  • the hybrid dust particulate collector system 10 of fig. 6 comprises an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) 12, which is connected in series with a bag filter 14, in a manner similar to what is described above with reference to figs 1 and 3a-b .
  • the ESP 12 has an ESP inlet 16 for a raw, dust particle laden gas stream 18, and an ESP outlet 20 for an ESP cleaned gas stream 22.
  • the electrostatic precipitator 12 of fig. 6 is divided into consecutive fields, the operation of which, even though this is not necessary, may be controlled independently.
  • the ESP 12 is divided into two fields: a first field, and a second, last field. Each field is provided with a number of discharge electrodes 30 and a number of collecting electrode plates 32; again, only the electrodes 30, 32 of the first field of the ESP 12 are schematically illustrated for reasons of clarity. Electrical power is supplied to the first field by means of a first power supply 34, and to the second field by means of a second power supply 36.
  • the first field of the ESP 12 is further provided with a first field hopper 41, which is arranged below the first field's collecting electrode plates 32, such that, when the first field's collecting electrode plates 32 are rapped, a collected portion of raw gas dust particles 44 will fall from the collecting electrode plates 32 into the first field hopper 41.
  • the second field is provided with a hopper 42.
  • the ESP 12 by its fundamental operating principles removes coarse particles more efficiently than it removes fine particles.
  • the collected portion 44 of raw gas dust particles, which are collected by the first field are coarser than the dust particles collected by the second field, which in turn are coarser than the fine dust particles remaining in the ESP cleaned gas stream 22.
  • the particle composition of the collected portion 44 is typically even coarser than the composition of the particles entrained with the raw gas stream 18.
  • the hybrid dust particulate collector system 10 of fig. 6 is provided with a bypass duct 66, which is connected between the first field hopper 41 and a bypass fraction return region 70.
  • the bypass duct 66 is configured so as to transfer a bypass fraction of the collected portion 44 of raw gas dust particles collected by the first field of the ESP 12.
  • the bypass duct is provided with a compressed air blower 72, for blowing the bypass fraction of said raw gas particles along the bypass duct 66 to the bypass fraction return region 70.
  • the amount of dust to be transferred to the bypass return region 70 may be controlled by varying the flow rate of a raw gas bypass portion 68, e.g. by varying the flow through a control valve or the size of a bypass path through an ESP.
  • the amount of dust to be transferred to the bypass return region 70 may be controlled, by way of example, by feeding collected dust 44 to the compressed air blower 72 at a selected rate.
  • an air blower 72 By way of example, a screw conveyor may be used, or the collected dust may be transported by the force of gravity on a fluidized bed conveyor to the bypass fraction return region 70.
  • a hybrid dust particulate collector system comprising an electrostatic precipitator in series with a bag filter, for cleaning a flue gas stream.
  • the system is provided with bypass means for bypassing a coarse fraction of the dust contained in the flue gas stream to a location downstream of the electrostatic precipitator.
  • the coarse fraction comprises a mass percentage of dust particles falling below 1 ⁇ m in diameter that is lower than the mass percentage of dust particles falling below 1 ⁇ m that remains in the fines dust fraction carried by gas cleaned by the electrostatic precipitator.
  • the coarse fraction also comprises a mass percentage of dust particles exceeding 30 ⁇ m in diameter that is higher than the mass percentage of dust particles exceeding 30 ⁇ m that remains in the fines dust fraction carried by gas cleaned by the electrostatic precipitator.
  • a fabric filter of bag filter type is operated so as to accumulate dust on the outside of the filter bags.
  • the filter may also be operated in the reverse direction, i.e. so as to accumulate dust inside the bags in the manner well known to those skilled in the art.
  • bag filters also other types of fabric filters, as well as barrier filters in general, can be used to implement the invention.
  • barrier filters is ceramic filters of the type described in US 4,862,813 .
  • the invention may be used in combination with boilers for combusting many different types of fuel, such as coal, waste, peat, and biomass fuel, such as wood chips.
  • the invention is not limited to cleaning flue gas from a boiler; also other types of dust-laden gas, emanating from other types of processes, including metallurgical processes, may be cleaned by means of the invention.
  • the electrostatic precipitator and the barrier filter are illustrated as separate components, they may also be arranged in the same housing.
  • the boiler, ESP, and barrier filter controllers 25, 40, 64 are illustrated as separate components, they may, in fact, be implemented on the same printed circuit board, in the same computer, or in the same software on the same computer.
  • the controllers 25, 40, 64 may also, for that matter, be separated into more than three separate control units.
  • a bypass fraction may be transferred through one or several bypass ducts, through one or several inactivated paths in an ESP, or through a combination of bypass ducts and inactivated paths, to an arbitrary number of bypass fraction return regions downstream of the active parts of the ESP.

Landscapes

  • Electrostatic Separation (AREA)
  • Filtering Of Dispersed Particles In Gases (AREA)

Claims (22)

  1. Procédé d'élimination de particules de poussière d'un flux (18) de gaz brut comportant des particules de poussière de gaz brut, dans un système hybride (10) de collecte de particules de poussière comportant un précipitateur électrostatique (12) et un filtre (14) à barrière situé en aval, par rapport à une direction principale d'écoulement de gaz à travers le système (10), dudit précipitateur électrostatique (12), le procédé comportant une étape consistant à épurer au moins une majeure partie du flux (18) de gaz brut dans le précipitateur électrostatique (12), de façon à obtenir une partie (22) de flux de gaz épurée par ESP, et étant caractérisé par
    une étape consistant à transférer une fraction de dérivation desdites particules de poussière de gaz brut jusqu'à une région (70) de retour de fraction de dérivation située dans ou en aval d'une sortie (20) dudit précipitateur électrostatique (12) et en amont dudit filtre (14) à barrière, ladite fraction de dérivation présentant une composition de particules de poussière plus grossière en comparaison de la composition des particules de poussière restant dans la partie (22) de flux de gaz épurée par ESP.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, ladite fraction de dérivation étant transportée jusqu'à ladite région (70) de retour de fraction de dérivation par une partie (68) de dérivation non épurée par ESP dudit flux (18) de gaz brut.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 2, ladite partie (68) de dérivation non épurée par ESP étant transférée d'une région d'entrée de dérivation en amont du précipitateur électrostatique (12) à ladite région (70) de retour de fraction de dérivation au moyen d'un conduit (66) de dérivation.
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 2, ladite partie (68) de dérivation non épurée par ESP étant transférée à ladite région (70) de retour de fraction de dérivation via un parcours de dérivation à travers une partie inactive (74b, 76b) dudit précipitateur électrostatique (12), de telle sorte que ladite partie (68) de dérivation non épurée par ESP soit transférée à travers le précipitateur électrostatique (12) sans être épurée au moyen d'un champ électrique.
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 4, comportant en outre une étape consistant à désactiver temporairement au moins une partie (74b, 76b) du précipitateur électrostatique (12), de façon à créer ledit parcours de dérivation.
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 1, ladite fraction de dérivation comportant une partie des particules (44) de poussière séparées de la partie (22) de flux de gaz épurée par ESP dans un premier champ du précipitateur électrostatique (12).
  7. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, ladite fraction de dérivation desdites particules de poussière de gaz brut représentant 2 à 30% en masse de la quantité totale de particules de poussière dans le flux (18) de gaz brut.
  8. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comportant en outre une étape consistant à régler la quantité de fraction de dérivation à transférer à la région (70) de retour de fraction de dérivation à une quantité choisie de fraction de dérivation.
  9. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comportant en outre une étape consistant à réguler, sur la base d'un événement dans un équipement (24, 25, 14, 64) en aval ou en amont du précipitateur électrostatique (12), la quantité de fraction de dérivation à transférer à la région (70) de retour de fraction de dérivation.
  10. Procédé selon la revendication 9, le transfert de ladite fraction de dérivation étant régulé sur la base du lancement (110) d'un nettoyage du filtre (14) à barrière, de telle sorte que le filtre (14) à barrière soit amorcé par la fraction de dérivation.
  11. Système hybride de collecte de particules de poussière, destiné à éliminer des particules de poussière d'un flux (18) de gaz brut comportant des particules de poussière de gaz brut, le système (10) comportant un précipitateur électrostatique (12) et un filtre (14) à barrière, ledit filtre (14) à barrière étant raccordé en aval dudit précipitateur électrostatique (12), le précipitateur électrostatique (12) étant configuré pour épurer au moins une majeure partie du flux (18) de gaz brut de façon à obtenir une partie (22) de flux de gaz épurée par ESP, le système étant caractérisé par un dispositif de transfert configuré pour transférer une fraction de dérivation desdites particules de poussière de gaz brut à une région (70) de retour de fraction de dérivation située dans ou en aval d'une sortie (20) dudit précipitateur électrostatique (12), et en amont dudit filtre (14) à barrière, le dispositif de transfert étant configuré pour transférer une fraction de dérivation présentant une composition de particules de poussière plus grossière en comparaison de la composition de particules de poussière restant dans la partie (22) de flux de gaz épurée par ESP.
  12. Système hybride de collecte de particules de poussière selon la revendication 11, ledit dispositif de transfert étant configuré pour transférer ladite fraction de dérivation vers ladite région (70) de retour de fraction de dérivation, transportée par une partie (68) de dérivation non épurée par ESP dudit flux (18) de gaz brut.
  13. Système hybride de collecte de particules de poussière selon la revendication 12, ledit dispositif de transfert comportant un conduit (66) de dérivation, reliant une région d'entrée de dérivation en amont du précipitateur électrostatique (12) à ladite région (70) de retour de fraction de dérivation.
  14. Système hybride de collecte de particules de poussière selon la revendication 13, ledit conduit (66) de dérivation étant muni d'une vanne (72) de régulation.
  15. Système hybride de collecte de particules de poussière selon la revendication 11, ledit dispositif de transfert comportant un parcours de dérivation à travers une partie inactive (74b, 76b) dudit précipitateur électrostatique, de telle sorte que ladite partie (68) de dérivation non épurée par ESP puisse être transférée à travers le précipitateur électrostatique sans être épurée au moyen d'un champ électrique.
  16. Système hybride de collecte de particules de poussière selon la revendication 15, ledit dispositif de transfert comportant en outre une commande (40) qui est configurée pour, pendant le fonctionnement du système hybride (10) de collecte de particules de poussière, désactiver temporairement au moins une partie du précipitateur électrostatique (12) de façon à créer ledit parcours de dérivation, de telle sorte que ladite partie (68) de flux de gaz non épurée par ESP puisse être transférée à travers le précipitateur électrostatique sans être épurée.
  17. Système hybride de collecte de particules de poussière selon la revendication 11, ledit dispositif de transfert comportant un conduit (66) de dérivation, reliant une trémie (41) de collecte de poussière d'un premier champ du précipitateur électrostatique à ladite région (70) de retour de fraction de dérivation, ledit conduit (66) de dérivation étant configuré pour transférer la poussière recueillie (44) qui a été séparée dudit flux (22) de gaz épuré par ESP à ladite région (70) de retour de dérivation.
  18. Système hybride de collecte de particules de poussière selon l'une quelconque des revendications 11 à 17, ledit dispositif de transfert étant prévu pour transférer 2 à 30% en masse de la quantité totale de particules de poussière dans le flux (18) de gaz brut.
  19. Système hybride de collecte de particules de poussière selon l'une quelconque des revendications 11 à 18, ledit dispositif de transfert comportant en outre un système (40) de commande servant à commander le transfert de la fraction de dérivation à la région (70) de retour de fraction de dérivation.
  20. Système hybride de collecte de particules de poussière selon la revendication 19, ledit système (40) de commande étant configuré pour commander, sur la base d'un événement dans un équipement (24, 25, 14, 64) en aval ou en amont du précipitateur électrostatique (12), la quantité de fraction de dérivation à transférer à la région (70) de retour de fraction de dérivation.
  21. Système hybride de collecte de particules de poussière selon la revendication 20, ledit système (40) de commande étant configuré pour commander ledit transfert de ladite fraction de dérivation sur la base du lancement (110) d'un nettoyage du filtre (14) à barrière, de telle sorte que le filtre (14) à barrière soit amorcé par la fraction de dérivation.
  22. Système hybride de collecte de particules de poussière selon l'une quelconque des revendications 11 à 21, ledit précipitateur électrostatique (12) et ledit filtre (14) à barrière étant incorporés dans le même boîtier.
EP09174340.1A 2009-10-28 2009-10-28 Système de collecte de particules de poussière hybrides Not-in-force EP2316576B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL09174340T PL2316576T3 (pl) 2009-10-28 2009-10-28 Hybrydowy układ kolektora cząstek pyłu
EP09174340.1A EP2316576B1 (fr) 2009-10-28 2009-10-28 Système de collecte de particules de poussière hybrides
ES09174340T ES2421715T3 (es) 2009-10-28 2009-10-28 Sistema colector híbrido de partículas de polvo
DK09174340.1T DK2316576T3 (da) 2009-10-28 2009-10-28 Hybridt støvpartikel-opsamlingssystem
PT91743401T PT2316576E (pt) 2009-10-28 2009-10-28 Sistema híbrido de recolha de partículas de poeira
CN201010539247.2A CN102069035B (zh) 2009-10-28 2010-10-28 混合式尘埃颗粒收集器系统

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP09174340.1A EP2316576B1 (fr) 2009-10-28 2009-10-28 Système de collecte de particules de poussière hybrides

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2316576A1 EP2316576A1 (fr) 2011-05-04
EP2316576B1 true EP2316576B1 (fr) 2013-05-29

Family

ID=41718663

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09174340.1A Not-in-force EP2316576B1 (fr) 2009-10-28 2009-10-28 Système de collecte de particules de poussière hybrides

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2316576B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN102069035B (fr)
DK (1) DK2316576T3 (fr)
ES (1) ES2421715T3 (fr)
PL (1) PL2316576T3 (fr)
PT (1) PT2316576E (fr)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2599556B1 (fr) * 2011-11-29 2021-06-30 General Electric Technology GmbH Procédé pour nettoyer un précipitateur électrostatique
ES2912939T3 (es) * 2012-12-03 2022-05-30 Emd Millipore Corp Método para una filtración estéril redundante
CN105327781B (zh) * 2014-08-13 2017-12-29 戴若夫 除霾新风系统主动清洗静电除尘过滤器的控制方法及系统
CN104190537B (zh) * 2014-08-19 2017-03-29 阮海生 一种dep净化处理单元
CN104307638B (zh) * 2014-08-19 2017-05-24 阮海生 高效dep电极结构、形成的电极板及电极阵列
CN104174492B (zh) * 2014-08-22 2017-03-29 成都代代吉前瞻科技股份有限公司 一种高效静电‑介电电泳除尘器
CN105709931B (zh) * 2016-02-02 2020-06-02 青岛海尔智能技术研发有限公司 一种静电除尘空气净化器
CN105536422B (zh) * 2016-03-18 2017-11-03 温州职业技术学院 家用多功能除雾霾进风设备
CN106110797A (zh) * 2016-08-29 2016-11-16 南丹县南方有色金属有限责任公司 硫化锌精矿流态化焙烧炉的开炉烟气环保处理工艺
JP7194190B2 (ja) * 2018-10-26 2022-12-21 バッファロー フィルター エルエルシー フィルタリングシステム、装置、及び方法
CN110478993B (zh) * 2019-08-12 2024-08-16 常州锡联环保科技有限公司 一种生活污泥焚烧烟气的处理系统
CN114602654A (zh) * 2022-04-07 2022-06-10 张家口宣润冶金环保设备有限公司 一种复合型烟尘电除尘器

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3733784A (en) * 1971-10-05 1973-05-22 Air Preheater Electro-bag dust collector
GB1587983A (en) * 1977-03-16 1981-04-15 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Electronic air cleaner
DE3723544A1 (de) * 1987-07-16 1989-01-26 Man Technologie Gmbh Elektrostatischer filter zum reinigen von gasen
US5024681A (en) * 1989-12-15 1991-06-18 Electric Power Research Institute Compact hybrid particulate collector
DE4208204C1 (fr) * 1992-03-14 1993-03-18 Metallgesellschaft Ag, 6000 Frankfurt, De
PL1690599T3 (pl) * 2005-02-10 2008-01-31 Alstom Technology Ltd Sposób i urządzenie do przyspieszenia odbijaka elektromagnetycznego
JP2008012060A (ja) 2006-07-05 2008-01-24 Daikin Ind Ltd 空気清浄機

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DK2316576T3 (da) 2013-07-29
CN102069035A (zh) 2011-05-25
CN102069035B (zh) 2014-01-08
EP2316576A1 (fr) 2011-05-04
ES2421715T3 (es) 2013-09-05
PL2316576T3 (pl) 2013-10-31
PT2316576E (pt) 2013-07-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2316576B1 (fr) Système de collecte de particules de poussière hybrides
Jaworek et al. Hybrid electrostatic filtration systems for fly ash particles emission control. A review
US8092768B2 (en) Advanced particulate matter control apparatus and methods
US4308036A (en) Filter apparatus and method for collecting fly ash and fine dust
US5024681A (en) Compact hybrid particulate collector
US4374652A (en) Filter apparatus and method for collecting fly ash and fine dust
US7883558B2 (en) Electrostatic particulate separation for emission treatment systems
US20130074690A1 (en) Method for operation of dust collection device, and dust collection device
US20100251895A1 (en) Electrically stimulated air filter apparatus
KR101577340B1 (ko) 복합형 집진 장치
RU2321463C1 (ru) Способ ионизационной сепарации дисперсных материалов и устройство для его осуществления
Jaworek et al. Hybrid electrostatic filtration system for fly ash particles emission control
US8398744B2 (en) Method and apparatus for air pollution control
KR100344756B1 (ko) 집진장치
US7300496B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for air pollution control
JP2001062338A (ja) 集塵装置及び集塵装置のクリーニング方法
JP4170005B2 (ja) Ｎｏ２脱硝システム
CN110404349A (zh) 一种高效脱除垃圾焚烧烟气粉尘和二噁英的装置
RU2635261C2 (ru) Способ и устройство модернизации электрофильтра
Gebert et al. A new filter system, combining a fabric filter and electrostatic precipitator for effective pollution control behind cement kilns
KR20160088703A (ko) 복합형 집진 장치
JPH10216560A (ja) 電気集塵装置の灰処理方法
JP2019118885A (ja) 集じん装置
Bäck et al. Fractional bypass of raw gas to improve performance of ESP-FF hybrids after coal-fired boilers
JPH03224646A (ja) 集じん装置及びその集じん方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20111102

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20120120

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 614017

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20130712

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602009015971

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130725

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2421715

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20130905

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 614017

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130529

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130829

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130830

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130929

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20130529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130829

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20140303

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009015971

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140303

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20131028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131031

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131028

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20091028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20151023

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602009015971

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: ANDRITZ AKTIEBOLAG, SE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: ALSTOM TECHNOLOGY LTD., BADEN, CH

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602009015971

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: RUEGER | ABEL PATENT- UND RECHTSANWAELTE, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602009015971

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: RUEGER ABEL PATENTANWAELTE PARTGMBB, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602009015971

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: RUEGER, BARTHELT & ABEL, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602009015971

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY GMBH, CH

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: ALSTOM TECHNOLOGY LTD., BADEN, CH

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602009015971

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: RUEGER ABEL PATENT- UND RECHTSANWAELTE, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: PC2A

Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY GMBH

Effective date: 20161013

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

Owner name: ALSTOM TECHNOLOGY LTD, CH

Effective date: 20161124

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20210922

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20210921

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20210922

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20210929

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20210921

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20210923

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20210924

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602009015971

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: ANDRITZ AKTIEBOLAG, SE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GENERAL ELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY GMBH, BADEN, CH

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20210921

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20211102

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FI

Ref legal event code: PCE

Owner name: ANDRITZ AKTIEBOLAG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: PC2A

Owner name: ANDRITZ AKTIEBOLAG

Effective date: 20220531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602009015971

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20221031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230428

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221031

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221029

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221028

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20231201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221029

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221029

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221028