EP2276650A1 - Procédé et dispositif de commande pour commander au moins un moyen de sécurité - Google Patents

Procédé et dispositif de commande pour commander au moins un moyen de sécurité

Info

Publication number
EP2276650A1
EP2276650A1 EP09731577A EP09731577A EP2276650A1 EP 2276650 A1 EP2276650 A1 EP 2276650A1 EP 09731577 A EP09731577 A EP 09731577A EP 09731577 A EP09731577 A EP 09731577A EP 2276650 A1 EP2276650 A1 EP 2276650A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
feature
class
feature vector
driving
classification
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP09731577A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Marcus Hiemer
Mike Schwarz
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Robert Bosch GmbH
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Robert Bosch GmbH filed Critical Robert Bosch GmbH
Publication of EP2276650A1 publication Critical patent/EP2276650A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
    • B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
    • B60R21/013—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
    • B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
    • B60R2021/01122—Prevention of malfunction
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
    • B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
    • B60R21/013—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
    • B60R21/0132—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value
    • B60R2021/01322—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value comprising variable thresholds, e.g. depending from other collision parameters
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60W—CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W30/00—Purposes of road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. of systems using conjoint control of vehicle sub-units
    • B60W30/08—Active safety systems predicting or avoiding probable or impending collision or attempting to minimise its consequences
    • B60W30/095—Predicting travel path or likelihood of collision

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for controlling at least one security means according to claim 1, a control device for controlling at least one security means according to claim 10, a computer program according to claim 11 and a computer program product according to claim 12.
  • triggering algorithms for personal protective equipment do not or only too imprecisely evaluate a history of the motion of a vehicle in order to perform an optimal release of safety devices.
  • a deployment decision is made based essentially on the acceleration signals that occur in the event of an accident and are measured via acceleration sensors.
  • Predictive systems such as PreCrash try to pre-condition the triggering algorithms, for example, with RA-DAR or LASER sensors, but these signals are not or only insufficiently combined with the information of the other sensors installed in the vehicle, so that a combined analysis of the data All of the principle already available sensor signals for reasons of complexity of such evaluation is currently not done.
  • DE 10 2006 038151 A1 discloses a device and a method for controlling personal protection devices, in which the activation of the personal protection means is carried out using a support vector machine.
  • the evaluation of an accident sensor signal is carried out using different classification trees, in which a binary classification is performed.
  • the use of the support vector machine has the advantage that for each classification problem an optimal solution can be found, which can also be determined relatively easily.
  • the present invention provides a method for controlling at least one security agent, the method comprising the following steps:
  • the invention is based on the recognition that a classification of signal characteristics of an accident sensor signal in more than two classes ' by a classifier on the basis of statistical learning theory a significant improvement of the linking possibilities and the rapid evaluation of such signal characteristics is possible. Essentially, this optimization is based on the fact that the various classes can be used to classify directly into more than two classes and that the signal characteristics can be well processed or separated, which simplifies signal processing in a drive unit following in the signal path.
  • classifiers on the basis of statistical learning theory on the one hand numerically efficient and fast work and on the other hand can process a large number of signal characteristics, can be optimally evaluated by using such classifiers also a large amount of already available in the vehicle accident sensor signals , This speeds up the desired fusion of the active and passive safety systems with their corresponding sensors.
  • classifying using the classifier based statistical theorem theory comprises using a multi-class support vector machine.
  • the use of such a multi-class support vector machine provides an excellent choice for a fast, numerical, or circuit efficient, and most importantly, precise, classifier based on statistical learning theory.
  • the activation of the security device in accordance with a driving instruction for a first feature class may include activating a personal protection device.
  • the activation of the security device in accordance with a driving instruction for a second feature class may also include the activation of a driving dynamics assistance control.
  • the actuation of the safety device also takes place by using at least one feature of the feature vector or of a further feature from a signal of the accident sensor system.
  • the one feature from the feature vector itself or the feature of the signal from the crash sensor system can be used in a physical core algorithm, which forms a fallback during the control of the corresponding safety means.
  • tripping occurs reliably even in the event of a malfunction of said classifier, wherein an improvement and / or specification of the triggering of the corresponding safety means can then be implemented by the classifier described above. This implies an exclusive gain in security in the implementation of this embodiment of the invention.
  • Classification function value takes place. This represents a further refinement of the classification result, since not only a class as such, but also a differentiation of the triggering within a class is possible. Such a differentiation on the basis of the classification function value then makes possible an even more precise control of the corresponding safety means, for example by a graduated activation of different airbag stages.
  • the driving of the security means may be carried out according to an activation rule based on a decision threshold value.
  • an activation rule based on a decision threshold value.
  • the tax law can be changed according to a feature class dependent on the change rule.
  • an increase or decrease of the decision threshold value can take place or the decision threshold value can be replaced by a second decision threshold value.
  • This easy-to-implement change of the driving instruction can very well improve the safety of the occupants of a vehicle by classifying a feature vector into several (especially more than three) classes.
  • changing or replacing the decision threshold value also requires only slight changes to the structure of the corresponding security means or its associated triggering circuit.
  • classifying may be based on class boundaries between the feature classes loaded from a memory.
  • a classifier for example, is pre-trained in the manufacturer's laboratory and already optimally based on accident scenarios or simulations set, after which the trained parameters are then stored in a memory.
  • a classifier is obtained which operates quickly and precisely during operation, since a complex adaptation of the settings of the classifier during operation is no longer required.
  • a control device for controlling at least one safety means may also be provided which comprises the following features:
  • At least one interface which is designed to form a feature vector of at least two features from at least one signal of an accident sensor system; an evaluation circuit designed to classify the feature vector formed into one of at least three possible feature classes using a classifier based on statistical learning theory; and a drive unit configured to drive the safety means in accordance with a drive instruction for the feature class into which the feature vector has been classified.
  • the object underlying the invention can be solved quickly and efficiently.
  • a classifier on the basis of statistical learning theory with the possibility of classifying the feature vector into one of at least three feature classes, a more precise, faster, and thus better than the prior art, evaluation of the available sensor signals is achieved possible.
  • a computer program which executes all the steps of the method according to one of the embodiments described above, when it runs on a control unit.
  • This computer program may originally be written in a high-level language and is then translated into machine-readable code.
  • a computer program product with program code which is stored on a machine-readable carrier such as a semiconductor memory, a hard disk memory or an optical memory and for carrying out the method according to nem the AusSteu ⁇ gsformen described above is used when the program is executed on a control unit.
  • a machine-readable carrier such as a semiconductor memory, a hard disk memory or an optical memory
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a first Ausfatu ⁇ gsbeispieis of the present invention as a unit installed in a vehicle.
  • Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a second embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a third embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a fourth embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a fifth embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a first exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • the control unit SG according to the invention is explained in more detail with connected components.
  • the control unit SG is arranged, which is connected to various components.
  • the components necessary for understanding the invention are shown outside and inside the control unit.
  • a structure-borne sound sensor KS such as a structure-borne sound sensor KS, a Beministeru ⁇ gssensorik BS1, a pressure sensor DS and an environment sensor US.
  • Other sensors such as a driving dynamics sensor and / or rotational rate sensors, etc. may be connected in addition to or instead of the sensors described above.
  • Various installation positions in the vehicle FZ are known to the skilled person.
  • the structure-borne sound sensor KS and the acceleration sensor system BS1 are connected to a first interface IF1 of the control unit SG, wherein the interface 1F1 supplies the signals of the evaluation circuit .mu.C, which is designed according to the first embodiment as a microcontroller .mu.C.
  • a second interface IF2 to which, for example, an air pressure sensor DS and the environmental sensor system US are connected, provides these signals to the evaluation circuit .mu.C.
  • the air pressure sensor DS can also be installed in the side parts of the vehicle and should then serve as a side impact sensor.
  • the environment sensor system US may include various environmental sensors such as radar, LIDAR, video or ultrasound to analyze the environment of the vehicle FZ with respect to collision objects.
  • the microcontroller .mu.C contains further sensor signals from an acceleration sensor BS2 within the control unit SG via an internal control unit interface. Additional sensors can be located within the control unit SG and deliver signals to the MTkr ⁇ controller ⁇ C via appropriate interfaces. These include driving dynamics sensors and / or structure-borne noise sensors.
  • the interfaces receive the signals from the accident sensors, extract certain characteristics from this accident sensor signal such as an acceleration, an Integra! a speed, etc., and combine a certain number of these features into a feature vector.
  • the signal can be an acceleration signal and one of the interfaces can determine the speed by simple integration and then form the acceleration and the velocity into a two-dimensional feature vector, which is made available to the evaluation circuit, especially the classifier.
  • a classifier based on the statistical learning theory is arranged, which will be explained in more detail below.
  • This classifier is supplied with the feature vector, whereby the classifier also processes a multi-dimensional feature vector, depending on how many features are to be included in the classification can.
  • the classifier divides the feature vector into one of at least three feature classes K1, K2 or K3. These feature classes characterize, for example, different types of accidents or accidents, so that for each type of accident or for each severity of severity the control of correspondingly suitable safety means can take place.
  • a first personal protection device PS1 in the form of an airbag can be effected by the first drive circuit FL1C1 if the classifier in the microcontroller .mu.C has classified the feature vector into the feature class K1.
  • a second personal protection means PS2 for example, a belt tensioner
  • a second drive circuit FLIC2 can be activated by a second drive circuit FLIC2 if the classifier in the microcontroller .mu.C has arranged the feature vector in the second feature class K2.
  • a vehicle dynamics control FDR (such as, for example, an ESP control) can be activated via a third drive circuit FL1C3.
  • This transfer can be particularly secure if it is done via the SPI bus (serial peripheral interface bus).
  • SPI bus serial peripheral interface bus
  • This activation of the corresponding drive circuits can be done very easily by, for example, by the classification in a (feature JKIasse K1, K2 or K3 only a (binary) on / off Akti vation of the corresponding drive circuit takes place, which is quickly and inexpensively evaluated ,
  • control unit SG has a housing that can be made of metal and / or plastic.
  • the microcontroller ⁇ C itself has an internal memory, but can also access external memory, which is also located in the control unit SG.
  • the memory can also store class boundaries, which were determined, for example, in a pre-training of the classifier in the laboratory, as will be described in more detail below. Using these class boundaries, the classifier in the microcontroller .mu.C can implement the feature vector very quickly and easily in the different feature classes K1, K2 or K3.
  • the communication of the interfaces IF1 and IF2 to the microcontroller .mu.C can be done, for example, via the controller-internal bus SPI.
  • the SPI bus can also be used for the communication between the microcontroller .mu.C and the drive circuits FLIC1, FL1C2 and FLIC3.
  • the drive circuits FLIC1, FLIC2 and FLIC3 consist of one or more integrated circuits which, for example, have power switches and, in the case of actuation, energization of the ignition or ignition circuits Activation elements of the personal protection means PS1 or PS2 or of the driving dynamics controller FDR.
  • These personal protection means PS1 or PS2 or the driving dynamics controller FDR can also have different characteristics, which consist of one or more integrated circuits and / or discrete components.
  • Classifiers based on statistical learning theory which subdivide a feature vector into one of at least three feature classes, are particularly suitable for use in the present invention.
  • the automatic evaluation of any simulated accident situations can advantageously take place, allowing an even better training of the classifier.
  • the classification of the feature vector into one of more than two feature classes results in a more detailed evaluation of the features of accident signals than is possible in the prior art.
  • different branches of the further algorithm processing can be activated by the feature class-based control based on the finely graduated classification of the characteristics of an accident signal into many feature classes. Due to the advantageous early classification of the characteristics of an accident signal and the correspondingly fast control of the most suitable safety means, on the one hand, the reaction time of the safety means is reduced and, on the other hand, only those safety devices are actuated that are actually affected by the current driving situation. This saves resources.
  • the classifier can be easily tuned to customer-requested hazard and accident situations by using simulation data.
  • the use of machine-lime-based processes also significantly reduces the application time, so that trajectories with comprehensive signal combinations for training the cassifier in a laboratory can be carried out in a realistic time.
  • the proposed classifier can be trained much better, which is advantageous in its use in a more precise selection of the correct feature class for a given feature vector.
  • a multi-class support vector machine (MSVM) is used because such a multi-class support vector machine as well as a support vector machine always provides an optimal solution and a low tendency for specialization (ie memorizing the trained data).
  • SVM support vector machine
  • the Mehrtren- is support Vector Machine (MSVM) is able to distinguish several classes, especially more than 3 classes.
  • MSVM is also a machine learning based method of the class of statistical learning theory in which the classifier is trained by pairwise specification of feature vectors and associated class. The training of such an MSVM will be discussed in more detail below.
  • the concrete use of a classifier on the basis of the statistical learning theory is briefly sketched in FIG.
  • the classifier which is arranged, for example, in the microcontroller .mu.C, M1 and M2 of accident signals (for example, with respect to a wheel speed, a yaw acceleration, an integral of the longitudinal acceleration or a degree of coverage of an accident sensor (PreCrash sensor)) and receive trained such that the individual feature classes K1 to KN map different vehicle states (such as "skidding", "frontal crash”, “light side crash soft crash”, ...)
  • different control circuits or algorithms parts or control rules for controlling For example, when classifying the feature vector from the features M1 and M2 into the feature class K1, a first sub-algorithm T1 can be activated as a triggering algorithm in the microcontroller .mu.C, which then uses a drive control FLIC for a front airbag to protect the person tel PS1 in the form of squibs, rev.
  • a second sub-algorithm T2 in the microcontroller ⁇ C be activated, which in turn activates the drive circuit FLIC for performing a soft-crash functionality, which in turn then activates a vehicle dynamics controller FDR1 in the form of a brake specification.
  • a separate component for implementing the second sub-algorithm T2 and the functionality of the FLIC can be used again.
  • a third part algorithm which is not explicitly shown in FIG. 2, can be activated, which then uses the drive circuit FLIC, here in the form of a control unit, to improve the vehicle dynamics, a second vehicle dynamics controller FDR2 activates wheel-selective braking or steering.
  • a fourth sub-algorithm which is also not shown in FIG. 2, can be activated.
  • This fourth sub-algorithm can trigger via the drive circuit FLIC the second person protection PS2, such as a side airbag, initiate, so that the second personal protection PS2 accordingly squib or rev. Restraints on.
  • the representation from FIG. 2 can also be continued for a classification of the feature vector into any number of (but more than three) feature classes, in which case suitable safety means are activated by activating a correspondingly fitting partial algorithm and the drive circuit FLIC.
  • suitable safety means are activated by activating a correspondingly fitting partial algorithm and the drive circuit FLIC.
  • the design of the classifier for the classification of the feature vector in at least three feature classes thus makes it possible to precisely activate those parts of a safety system of a vehicle that are needed precisely in the driving situation that has occurred, from the characteristics of one or more accident signals. An elaborate execution of all available algorithm parts of the security system or a permanent activation of all control circuits can thus be dispensed with.
  • FIG. 3 shows a third exemplary embodiment of the present invention as a block diagram illustration, with a single partial algorithm T of the partial algorithms T1 to TN shown in FIG. 2 being shown specifically to illustrate the mode of operation of the invention.
  • the invention can also be used only using a single sub-algorithm T, so that not several sub-algorithms are needed.
  • the classifier used is a multi-class support vector machine MSVM in the microcontroller .mu.C, which is acted upon by the features M1, M2 and M3. These features can be generated, for example, from an accident signal, as described above with reference to FIG. speed signals, yaw acceleration, vehicle acceleration, etc., or their integrals.
  • the classifier MSVM can divide the features M1, M2 and M3 into a first, second or third feature class K1, K2 or K3 and feeds them to the sub-algorithm T, which activates a drive circuit FLIC1.
  • a triggering instruction is thus implemented numerically and / or by circuitry, by means of which, in response to the accident signal features M4 and M5, the personal protection means PS1, for example an airbag, is activated.
  • the sub-algorithm T can be designed such that it implements a physics-based core threshold decision whose decision threshold value is influenced by the feature classes K1, K2 or K3.
  • the triggering or activation of the personal protection means PS1 takes place in response to the accident signal features M4 and M5, which, however, may be identical to or derived from one or more of the input features M1 to M3.
  • the influencing of the decision threshold value can consist of a discount or a surcharge in accordance with a modification rule for the respective selected feature class K1 to K3. In this way, it is ensured that even with a possibly incorrect classification, the personal protection means PS1 is always activated by the partial algorithm T with the physically-based core threshold separation implemented therein (although not optimal but nevertheless).
  • post-training classification can be based on a mathematical relationship such as the following equation
  • the variables y (r ctj and b results of the training or k (x ⁇ , x) are the used trained kernel function of the multiclass support vector machine
  • the result of this classification function corresponds to the class determined in the classifier, where, for example, a real, ie non-binary, classification function value of 3.1 corresponds to the feature class K3, which comprises all the classification function values between 3.0 and 3.9
  • the sub-algorithm T in Figure 3 can then be replaced by a (binary) on / off ⁇ Activation of the signal path for the feature class K3 for activation, the transmission of the precisely determined classification function value of 3.1 to the partial algorithm T takes place, as a result, for example, of a quantitatively more exact increase or reduction of the decision threshold!
  • Figure 4 shows a fourth embodiment of the present invention in a block diagram representation.
  • a classifier in the form of a multi-class support vector machine MSVM is again provided in a microcontroller ⁇ C, to which features M1 to M3 are supplied by one or more accident signals.
  • the features M1 to M3 are combined in the classifier MSVM (or via an upstream integrated interface) to a feature vector M and this classified into one of the feature classes K1 to K3.
  • Each of these feature classes K1 to K3 serves to control a partial algorithm T1 to T3, which in each case again receives the characteristics M4 and M5 of an accident signal.
  • the features M4 and / or M5 may again be identical to or derived from one or more of the input features M1 to M3 of the kiassifikator MSVM.
  • a triggering instruction in the form of a physical core threshold decision can be implemented in each case, wherein the classification of the feature vector into one of the feature classes K1 to K3 makes it possible to switch between different core thresholds in the different subalgorithms T1 to T3.
  • a first decision threshold value can be implemented in the first sub-algorithm T1, wherein the first sub-algorithm T1 is activated by the classification of the feature vector into the feature class K1.
  • a personal protection device PS1 such as an airbag, can be activated via the first control circuit FLIC1.
  • a second decision threshold different from the first decision threshold can be implemented, the second sub-algorithm T2 being classified by the classification of the feature vector into the feature class K2 is activated.
  • the second sub-algorithm also again uses the features M4 and M5 to trigger a security agent and also implements again a physical-based core threshold decision.
  • the third sub-algorithm T3 can be activated, which implements a third physical-based core threshold decision with a further decision threshold using the features M4 and M5.
  • the decision threshold value in the second or third sub-algorithm T2 and T3 can again be changed by evaluating a transmitted classification function value for the second and third feature classes K2 and K3.
  • the second sub-algorithm T2 and the third sub-algorithm T3 can activate a vehicle dynamics control FDR1, for example a control of an ESP function, via a common second drive circuit FL1C2.
  • a comparison of the two activation signals of the second and third sub-algorithms T2 and T3 for the first personal protection means PS1 according to a predefined specification makes it possible to check the activation of this protection means PS1.
  • the second decision threshold is lower than the third decision threshold, there must be an error if the second sub-algorithm T2 signals that a value from the considered features of the accident signal is below the second decision threshold but the third sub-algorithm T3 signals that the value from the considered features of the accident signal is above the third decision threshold.
  • the first and second drive circuits FLIC1 and FLIC2 may also be implemented together in a drive circuit, as shown in FIG. 2, respectively.
  • the individual sub-algorithms can also be executed together in the microcontroller ⁇ C or on separate signal processing modules.
  • the first decision threshold value can for example be loaded from a look-up table or a memory into the first sub-algorithm.
  • the second decision threshold value can be loaded from a look-up table or a memory into the second subalgorithm and the third decision threshold value from the look-up when the feature vector is classified into the third feature class K3 Table or memory into the third sub-algorithm.
  • the vehicle dynamics control FDR1 for example an automatic brake controller
  • the vehicle dynamics control FDR1 can be controlled to different degrees (for example in different stages) via the activation of the second or third sub-algorithm T2 and T3, as shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 1 such an embodiment is represented by the two dashed lines, in accordance with the embodiment of Figure 4, the microcontroller .mu.C several control signals, which are obtained from different subalgorithms, to a single drive circuit provides (dashed line between the microcontroller .mu.C and the first drive circuit FLIC1) or that according to Figure 2, a drive circuit activates a plurality of protection means (dashed line between the second drive circuit FLIC2 and the first personal protection means PS1).
  • An application of a single partial algorithm with a plurality of classification signals according to the exemplary embodiment from FIG. 3 is not explicitly shown in FIG. 1; However, it is obvious to a person skilled in the art that also this further combination of the obvious embodiments is easy to implement.
  • FIGS. 3 and 4 not only is a binary classification decision output, but a distinction is made between a plurality of feature classes. This is advantageous since it is desirable in the classification of an accident to be able to differentiate between different accident types and it is often not precise enough, at the output of a classifier or a drive circuit only a binary "Fire7" No Fire decision for Depending on the classification result, the components of a vehicle safety system required in the current driving situation can be specifically added, for example, based on the type of accident classified in more detail a core threshold in a drive unit to change the same so that the triggering requirements are met for the classified accident type . This substantially corresponds to the embodiment shown in Figure 3.
  • the multi-class Supp ⁇ rt vector machine is in the Able to distinguish several, especially more than two, feature classes.
  • the multi-class support vector Maschi ⁇ e is also a ler ⁇ bastertes method, being trained by pairwise predetermining Pleasesmerkmalsvektore ⁇ with the features to be trained accident signals and output signals in the form of the respective feature class to be assigned the classifier. This calculates in training the support vectors, which contain the most important data points of each class.
  • the support vectors can be understood as the support vectors of a dividing line or separation surface separating each class.
  • the remarkable thing about the multi-class support vector machine as well as the support vector machine is that by calculating the support vectors exactly that Dividing line is determined, which has the maximum distance to the different classes. This is particularly advantageous since, in the case of sensor signal fluctuations, this means the most robust separation of the classes. Another advantage is the fact that this optimal separation line is always found, which is not the case with other machine-based methods such as neural networks.
  • the training takes place in a laboratory, wherein the found support vectors, for example, in a memory (such as an EEPROM of an airbag control unit in the form of a microprocessor) are stored.
  • a memory such as an EEPROM of an airbag control unit in the form of a microprocessor
  • the abovementioned variables of the listed equation can be determined in training, so that during the runtime of the algorithm before or in the event of the accident, the classification can carry out the classification of the feature vector with the aid of the (trained) simple equation reproduced above.
  • a first training variant (“One versus One") is based on successively training two classes against each other, in the case of 3 classes, first class 1 against class 2, then class 2 against class 3 and thereafter the class 3 is trained against class 1.
  • the results of the classification are then combined, and a second training variant ("one versus rest") is based on successively training one class against all the remaining classes.
  • class 1 is trained against classes 2 and 3, then class 2 against classes 1 and 3, and thereafter class 3 against classes 1 and 2.
  • the classification results achieved are then also combined.
  • the first training variant can be used once and the second training variant can be used the other time. In this way, the application time of additional functions for triggering a security agent can be significantly reduced by the automated calculation of the separating surface.
  • Figure 5 shows a fifth embodiment of the present invention.
  • the invention is designed as a method 50 for controlling at least one safety device according to the procedure described above in the operation of such a classifier on the basis of the statistical learning theory.
  • the method 50 has a first step 52 of detecting at least two features M1, M2 from at least one signal of an accident sensor system, in order to determine one of the detected features To form feature vector.
  • the feature vector formed is classified using a classifier on the basis of statistical theory in order to classify the feature vector into one of at least three possible feature classes K1, K2, K3.
  • a third method step 56 the security means FDR, PS1, PS2 are activated in accordance with a control specification for that feature class K1, K2, K3 into which the feature vector has been classified.
  • the method according to the invention can be implemented in hardware or in software.
  • the implementation can be carried out on a digital storage medium, in particular a floppy disk, a CD or a DVD with electronically readable control signals, which can interact with a programmable computer system such that the corresponding method is carried out.
  • the invention thus also consists in a computer program product with a program code stored on a machine-readable carrier for carrying out the method according to the invention, when the computer program product runs on a computer.
  • the invention can thus be realized as a computer program with a program code for carrying out the method when the computer program runs on a computer.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Automotive Seat Belt Assembly (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé destiné à commander au moins un moyen de sécurité (FDR, PS1) et présentant une première étape de détection d'au moins deux caractéristiques (M1, M2, M3) à partir d'au moins un signal d'un système de capteurs d'accident, afin de former un vecteur de caractéristique à partir des caractéristiques détectées (M1, M2, M3). Au cours d'une deuxième étape suivante du procédé, on effectue une classification du vecteur de caractéristique formé, à l'aide d'un classificateur (MSVM), sur la base de la théorie d'apprentissage statistique, afin de classer le vecteur de caractéristique dans une des trois classes de caractéristiques possibles ou plus (K1, K2, K3). La troisième étape du procédé consiste à commander le moyen de sécurité (PS1, FDR1) en fonction d'une instruction de commande (T1, FLIC1, T2, T2, FLIC2) pour la classe parmi les classes caractéristiques (K1, K2, K3) dans laquelle le vecteur de caractéristique a été classé.
EP09731577A 2008-04-16 2009-02-16 Procédé et dispositif de commande pour commander au moins un moyen de sécurité Withdrawn EP2276650A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102008001215A DE102008001215A1 (de) 2008-04-16 2008-04-16 Verfahren und Steuergerät zur Ansteuerung von zumindest einem Sicherheitsmittel
PCT/EP2009/051748 WO2009127453A1 (fr) 2008-04-16 2009-02-16 Procédé et dispositif de commande pour commander au moins un moyen de sécurité

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2276650A1 true EP2276650A1 (fr) 2011-01-26

Family

ID=40584772

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09731577A Withdrawn EP2276650A1 (fr) 2008-04-16 2009-02-16 Procédé et dispositif de commande pour commander au moins un moyen de sécurité

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20110153164A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP2276650A1 (fr)
CN (1) CN102007019A (fr)
DE (1) DE102008001215A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2009127453A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102008040192B4 (de) 2008-07-04 2020-06-04 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Steuergerät zum Ermitteln einer mehrdimensionalen Auslöseschwelle
DE102009001902A1 (de) * 2009-03-26 2010-09-30 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Steuergerät zur Ermittlung von Merkmalen zum Treffen einer Auslöseentscheidung eines Insassenschutzmittels eines Fahrzeugs
DE102010027969B4 (de) 2010-04-20 2020-07-02 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Bestimmung eines Typs eines Aufpralls eines Objektes auf ein Fahrzeug
US8708366B2 (en) * 2012-05-29 2014-04-29 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Vehicle side impact detection using vehicle yaw
DE102012216529B4 (de) * 2012-09-17 2020-09-17 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren zur Auslösung zumindest eines Personenschutzmittels sowie System und Computerprogrammprodukt zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
JP6088251B2 (ja) * 2013-01-11 2017-03-01 株式会社日本自動車部品総合研究所 車両走行支援装置
JP5817745B2 (ja) * 2013-01-17 2015-11-18 株式会社デンソー 車両事故歴記録装置
DE102013212092B4 (de) * 2013-06-25 2024-01-25 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Betreiben einer Fußgängerschutzeinrichtung eines Fahrzeugs, Fußgängerschutzeinrichtung
FR3047951B1 (fr) * 2016-02-22 2019-04-19 Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa Dispositif d'analyse de signaux de commande delivres par des moyens de controle d'equipement(s) de securite d'un vehicule
US10671062B2 (en) * 2017-04-19 2020-06-02 Infineon Technologies Ag Testing a crash sensor device during vehicle operation
KR20200074946A (ko) * 2017-09-05 2020-06-25 엠디고 엘티디. 차량 충돌시 승객의 기관에 대한 외상 평가 및 보고를 위한 자동화 시스템 및 방법

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH07186876A (ja) * 1993-12-27 1995-07-25 Asuko Kk 車両用安全装置のための制御装置
GB2311157B (en) * 1996-03-14 1999-11-03 Autoliv Dev Improvements in or relating to a crash detector
US6535800B2 (en) * 2001-05-29 2003-03-18 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Vehicle rollover sensing using angular rate sensors
AU2003214228A1 (en) * 2002-03-19 2003-10-08 Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. Vehicle rollover detection system
JP2003344196A (ja) * 2002-05-24 2003-12-03 Denso Corp 乗員状態検知方法及び装置
DE10231364A1 (de) * 2002-07-11 2004-01-22 Robert Bosch Gmbh Anordnung zur Ansteuerung von Rückhaltemitteln
ATE411968T1 (de) * 2004-06-22 2008-11-15 Carrelli Elevatori Cesab Sicherheitsvorrichtung für einen gabelstapler
DE102006038151B4 (de) 2006-08-16 2020-06-10 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ansteuerung von Personenschutzmitteln
GB2442987A (en) * 2006-10-16 2008-04-23 Autoliv Dev Vehicle safety system for detecting a side impact
DE102006049262A1 (de) 2006-10-19 2008-04-30 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ansteuerung von Personenschutzmitteln
DE102007027649B4 (de) 2007-06-15 2015-10-01 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Steuergerät zur Ansteuerung von Personenschutzmitteln sowie Computerprogramm und Computerprogrammprodukt

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2009127453A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102008001215A1 (de) 2009-10-22
US20110153164A1 (en) 2011-06-23
WO2009127453A1 (fr) 2009-10-22
CN102007019A (zh) 2011-04-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2009127453A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de commande pour commander au moins un moyen de sécurité
DE102007027649B4 (de) Verfahren und Steuergerät zur Ansteuerung von Personenschutzmitteln sowie Computerprogramm und Computerprogrammprodukt
DE102006038151B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ansteuerung von Personenschutzmitteln
DE102010027969B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Bestimmung eines Typs eines Aufpralls eines Objektes auf ein Fahrzeug
DE102015212923A1 (de) Automatische Erkennung und Bewertung von Low-Speed-Crashs
WO2018001799A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de commande d'un véhicule
DE102011085843B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Analyse einer Kollision eines Fahrzeugs
EP3994041B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner un véhicule à moteur dans une situation de collision et véhicule à moteur
DE102020214032A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Steuern einer Sicherheitseinrichtung eines Fahrzeugs und Sicherheitssystem für ein Fahrzeug
DE102009002375A1 (de) Verfahren zur Aktivierung und/oder Ansteuerung von mindestens einem Schutzsystem zur Beeinflussung einer Fahrzeugzeugbewegung
EP2167351B1 (fr) Procede et appareil de commande destines a commander des systemes de protection des personnes dans un vehicule
DE102007030313A1 (de) Verfahren und Steuergerät zur Ansteuerung von Personenschutzmitteln
DE102019133469B3 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Rückhaltesystems für ein Kraftfahrzeug sowie System zum Durchführen eines derartigen Verfahrens
DE102011087008A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ansteuerung von Personenschutzmitteln für ein Fahrzeug bei einem Seitenaufprall
DE102007004345B4 (de) Verfahren und Steuergerät zur Ansteuerung von Personenschutzmitteln
DE102006049262A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ansteuerung von Personenschutzmitteln
DE102016209902A1 (de) Verfahren zum Ansteuern einer Personenschutzeinrichtung eines Fahrzeugs und Steuergerät
DE102009000080B4 (de) Verfahren und Steuergerät zum Erkennen eines Fahrzustands eines Fahrzeugs
DE102015224739A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Auslösen von Fußgängerschutzmitteln und/oder Fußgängerwarnmitteln
EP2229295B1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de commande pour la commande de moyens de protection de personne pour un véhicule
WO2018114939A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de commande servant à la protection des piétons pour un véhicule
DE102004012916A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Anordnung von Personenschutzmitteln
DE102007017125A1 (de) Verfahren und Steuergerät zur Ansteuerung von Personenschutzmitteln
DE102006038842A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ansteuerung von Personenschutzmitteln
DE102013217934A1 (de) Verfahren, Vorrichtung und Computerprogrammprodukt zur Ansteuerung von Personenschutzmitteln in einem Fahrzeug

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20101116

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20130829

R18D Application deemed to be withdrawn (corrected)

Effective date: 20130903