EP2205440A2 - Dispositif de laminage, procédé de laminage et feuille - Google Patents

Dispositif de laminage, procédé de laminage et feuille

Info

Publication number
EP2205440A2
EP2205440A2 EP08793854A EP08793854A EP2205440A2 EP 2205440 A2 EP2205440 A2 EP 2205440A2 EP 08793854 A EP08793854 A EP 08793854A EP 08793854 A EP08793854 A EP 08793854A EP 2205440 A2 EP2205440 A2 EP 2205440A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
foil
laminating
substrate
tension
laminating foil
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP08793854A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2205440B1 (fr
Inventor
Ike Gerke de Vries
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO
TNO Institute of Industrial Technology
Original Assignee
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO
TNO Institute of Industrial Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO, TNO Institute of Industrial Technology filed Critical Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO
Priority to EP08793854.4A priority Critical patent/EP2205440B1/fr
Publication of EP2205440A2 publication Critical patent/EP2205440A2/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2205440B1 publication Critical patent/EP2205440B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32—LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32B—LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B38/00—Ancillary operations in connection with laminating processes
    • B32B38/18—Handling of layers or the laminate
    • B32B38/1825—Handling of layers or the laminate characterised by the control or constructional features of devices for tensioning, stretching or registration
    • B32B38/1833—Positioning, e.g. registration or centering
    • B32B38/1841—Positioning, e.g. registration or centering during laying up
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32—LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32B—LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B38/00—Ancillary operations in connection with laminating processes
    • B32B38/04—Punching, slitting or perforating
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32—LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32B—LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B38/00—Ancillary operations in connection with laminating processes
    • B32B38/18—Handling of layers or the laminate
    • B32B38/1875—Tensioning
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T156/00—Adhesive bonding and miscellaneous chemical manufacture
    • Y10T156/10—Methods of surface bonding and/or assembly therefor
    • Y10T156/1052—Methods of surface bonding and/or assembly therefor with cutting, punching, tearing or severing
    • Y10T156/1062—Prior to assembly

Definitions

  • the manufacturing process can take place in a continuous production line so as to keep production costs at a moderate level.
  • the foils tend to stretch due to the force with which they are transported.
  • the amount of stretching is difficult to predict, as it depends on various factors, such as the influence of the temperature of the environment on the foil, the variations in the elasticity of the foil, e.g. due to variations in the thickness of the foil.
  • the amount of stretching further depends on the nature of the specific electronic structures applied in the foil, i.e. a density with which the structures are applied and a direction with which they are applied.
  • WO 98/06576 describes a lamination device wherein a substrate foil and a laminating foil are mutually aligned.
  • the motion of the foils is controlled by cogs at a roll that cooperate with perforations in the foils. By pulling and knocking the foils are realigned.
  • a Method for laminating a substrate foil with at least a laminating foil comprising the steps of providing the substrate foil, providing the laminating foil, applying weakened portions in the laminating foil, the weakened portions extending in a direction transverse to a longitudinal direction of the laminating foil, said weakened portions being spaced at intervals along the longitudinal direction, and having a width substantially smaller than the length of said intervals, maintaining a tension to the laminating foil in the longitudinal direction, thereby stretching the laminating foil in the weakened portions, attaching the stretched laminating foil to the substrate foil, wherein the laminating foil and the substrate foil are allowed to move freely relatively to each other until attaching the laminating foil to the substrate foil to form a laminated foil, aligning the laminating foil with the substrate foil by measuring a longitudinal position of the laminating foil relative to the substrate foil, using said measurement by controlling the tension in the laminating foil dependent on said measured relative longitudinal position, and transporting the laminated foil by friction between the laminated
  • the weakened portions in the laminating foil allow that foil to be stretched in its longitudinal direction, and therewith to prevent an accumulation of disalignments in that foil relative to the substrate foil. Additionally, the stretching allowed in the weakened portions minimizes the stress exerted to the functional areas in the laminating foil between the weakened portions, and therewith reduces the risk of negative consequences for performance and reliability.
  • the position of laminating foil relative to the substrate foil can be controlled continuously as the laminated foil is transported by friction. After the substrate foil is laminated with the laminating foil, the combination of the first and the laminating foil can serve as a next substrate foil and the subsequent foil applied as a laminate on the substrate foil as a laminating foil.
  • the foil that is provided with weakened portions shall be denoted as the laminating foil and the other one as the substrate foil. If both foils are applied with weakened portions an arbitrary one shall be denoted as the laminating foil and the other one as the substrate foil. If a new foil is added to a stack of foils then it is most practical to add the weakened portions to the new foil. Accordingly in that case the new foil is the laminating foil and the stack of foils is the substrate foil.
  • the weakening of the laminating foil may be expressed as a percentage that indicates the relative strength of the foil after weakening as compared to the strength before weakening.
  • the strength is expressed as the ratio of a force F applied and the amount of stretching (elastic or plastic) occurring in the material.
  • the strength is reduced to between 10% and 50% of the original strength of the foil. If the reduction in strength is substantially smaller, e.g. to a remaining strength of 90% of the original value, then the stress in the functional areas between the weakened portions tends to remain too high. If the reduction of strength is substantially larger, e.g. to 1 % of the original strength, the laminating foil becomes difficult to handle, and the risk exists that the foil tears in the weakened areas.
  • the weakened portions are applied directly before the process of stretching and attaching the laminating foil to the substrate foil or whether the material for the laminating foil is already provided as a foil of material having a longitudinal direction and having weakened portions extending in a direction transverse to the length direction, the weakened portions being spaced at intervals along said length direction, and having a width substantially smaller than the length of said intervals.
  • a required amount of tension may be calculated, taking into account circumstances as a temperature in the environment, and material characteristics.
  • a position of the laminating foil is measured and the tension applied in the longitudinal direction is dependent on a deviation between said position and a desired position. In this way the required amount of stretch in the weakened portions can be determined very accurately.
  • a position of the laminating foil is measured and the amount of weakening applied to the laminating foil is dependent on a deviation between said position and a desired position relative to the substrate foil. For example more or less material may be removed from the weakened regions depending on the nature of the deviation. In this way the tension in the laminating foil may be maintained at a level optimal for the manufacturing process and for the laminating foil.
  • the position in the laminating foil is measured using markings on the laminating foil and the substrate foil. Markings can be applied that facilitate detection of the position of the laminating foil relative to the substrate foil. Various methods are known in the art to provide such markings. Instead of applying separate markings position detection may be based on features already present in the foils for other purposes, e.g. patterns formed by electronic circuitry present in the foils.
  • the laminating foil may be weakened in various ways, for example by thinning the foil, or by locally weakening the foil by a chemical reaction. In an embodiment the weakened portions in the laminating foil are perforations in the foil. In this way the amount of weakening can be determined very accurately.
  • the laminating foil comprises a first, continuous, layer that is relatively elastic, i.e. that has a low Young modulus and a second, interrupted layer that is relatively inelastic, i.e. that has a relatively high Young modulus.
  • the laminating foil comprising this combination of layers can be achieved by co-extrusion, lamination and the like.
  • the interruptions in the second layer may be applied by laser cutting , or knife cutting for example. Those portions of the laminating foil where the second layer is interrupted form weakened portions.
  • the first layer may be relatively elastic with respect to the second layer in that it has a smaller thickness.
  • the first layer may be constructed of a material that is intrinsically more elastic that the material of the second layer.
  • polyethylene therephtalate (PET) and polyethylene naphtalate (PEN) are examples of suitable materials having a high Young modulus.
  • Suitable materials having a low Young modulus are for example polyethylene (PE) metallocene, and ethylene derivates, such as ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and ethylene methyl acrylate (EMA).
  • EVA ethylene vinyl acetate
  • EMA ethylene methyl acrylate
  • the weakened portions in the laminating foil are applied by thermally softening the foil.
  • the foil may be locally heated for example by radiation with a laser, or by contacting the foil with a heated rod.
  • the portions may be permanently or temporarily weakened.
  • the weakening may be caused by a change of the elastic properties due the heating, or by a plastic deformation, e.g. caused by a phase transition during the heating. It is sufficient that the portions remain weakened as long as a stress is applied on the foil.
  • the perforations are applied as at least a first and a second series of perforations applied in the direction transverse to the longitudinal direction, and wherein the second series is transversely displaced relative the second series.
  • This embodiment has the advantage that it allows for an elastic deformation.
  • the way in which the remaining material is patterned allows for a harmonica like deformation.
  • an apparatus for providing a substrate foil with at least a laminating foil of material comprises a first facility for guiding the substrate foil in a longitudinal direction of the substrate foil, a second facility for guiding the laminating foil in a longitudinal direction of the laminating foil, weakened portions being applied in the laminating foil, the weakened portions extending in a direction transverse to the longitudinal direction of the laminating foil, said weakened portions being spaced at intervals along the longitudinal direction, and having a width substantially smaller than the length of said intervals, a facility for maintaining a tension to the laminating foil in the longitudinal direction, thereby stretching the laminating foil in the weakened portions, a facility for attaching the stretched laminating foil to the substrate foil in order to form a laminated foil, a facility for controlling a position of the laminating foil relative to the substrate foil, comprising a facility for measuring a position of the laminating foil relative to the substrate foil, and a facility for aligning the laminating foil with the substrate
  • the tension in the laminating foil may be controlled by one or more actuators, i.e. electro-mechanical convertor elements such as a motor, e.g. a rotational motor.
  • the actuators may be used actively, by driving an element, such as a guiding roll, or passively, by braking a roll.
  • a control facility for controlling the actuators may comprise dedicated hardware, or a programmed general purpose processor, or a combination thereof.
  • Figure 1 schematically illustrates a first embodiment of an apparatus according to the invention
  • Figure 2 shows a laminating foil according to the invention
  • Figure 2 A shows a detail of the laminating foil of Figure 2
  • Figure 2B shows a detail of a first alternative embodiment of a laminating foil according to the invention
  • Figure 2C shows a detail of a second alternative embodiment of a laminating foil according to the invention
  • Figure 2D shows a detail of a third alternative embodiment of a laminating foil according to the invention
  • FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a second embodiment of an apparatus according to the invention
  • Figure 4 shows in a perspective view a third embodiment of an apparatus according to the invention
  • Figure 5 shows a schematic view of the apparatus according to the third embodiment as well as a control facility therefore
  • Figure 6 shows in more detail a control facility for use in an embodiment of an apparatus according to the present invention
  • Figure 7 shows a model used for simulation of various embodiments of the present invention
  • Figure 8 shows a result of a first simulation
  • Figure 9 shows a result of a second simulation
  • Figure 10 shows a result of a third simulation
  • Figure 11 schematically illustrates an end product comprising a stack of foils manufactured by a method according to the invention
  • Figure 12 schematically illustrates a method according to the invention
  • FIG. 1 schematically illustrates an apparatus for providing a substrate foil LO with at least a laminating foil Ll.
  • the apparatus comprises a first facility 10 for guiding the substrate foil LO.
  • the first facility comprises a first supply roll 12 that is unrolled to supply the substrate foil LO.
  • the unrolled substrate foil is guided along an idler roll 14 to a first and a second pair of S-wrap rolls 16, 17 and 18, 19 respectively, of which roll 17 is driven by a motor (not shown).
  • Idler roll 14 gives the substrate foil LO a predetermined angle with respect to the S-wrap rolls 16-19.
  • the foil LO is guided via the rolls 16-19 to a glue dispensing unit 15 for applying a glue to the foil LO.
  • the apparatus comprises a second facility 30 for guiding the laminating foil Ll.
  • the second facility 30 includes a second supply roll 32 that is unrolled to supply the laminating foil Ll of material. From the second supply roll 32 the laminating foil Ll is supplied to a third and a fourth pair of S-wrap rolls 34,35 and 36, 37 respectively.
  • the roll 34 in the pairs of S-wrap rolls is driven by an actuator, motor 42 to control the tension in the foil.
  • Roll 37 is a lateral guiding roll which is controllably displaceable in a direction transverse to the longitudinal direction to position the laminating foil Ll relative to the substrate foil in said transverse direction.
  • the laminating foil Ll and the substrate foil LO are pressed together by press-rolls 50, 51 and pulled through a fifth and a sixth pair of S- wrap rolls 54, 55 and 56, 57 respectively, of which roll 56 is driven by a motor (not shown).
  • the substrate foil LO and the laminating foil Ll attached thereon are rolled on a storage roll 64.
  • the rolls 54 - 57 form a facility for transporting the laminated foil by friction.
  • the laminating foil Ll and the substrate foil LO are allowed to move freely relatively to each other until attaching by the press rolls 50, 51.
  • the apparatus according to the invention comprises a facility for applying weakened portions in the laminating foil Ll.
  • the facility comprises a laser 82 controlled by a controller 84.
  • the controller 84 controls an intensity of the laser 82 as well as a position of the laser in a direction transverse to the longitudinal direction. Additionally the controller 84 may control a position of the laser 82 in the longitudinal direction.
  • a mechanical punching machine may be used as facility for applying weakened portions. However, applying the weakened portions by a laser or other source of concentrated radiation has the advantage that the laminating foil Ll can move continuously.
  • the foil Ll is locally heated to above glass-transition temperature.
  • a combination of heating and structuring the material may be used. In this way the areas to be heated are minimized.
  • the weakened portions 100 extend in a direction transverse Dtr to a longitudinal direction Dlong of the laminating foil Ll.
  • the weakened portions 100 as spaced at intervals along the longitudinal direction, and have a width w substantially smaller than the length ⁇ of said intervals.
  • the laminating foil Ll has a plurality of functional areas 110.
  • the S-wrap rolls 34, 35, 36, 37 in the apparatus according to the invention form a facility for providing a tension to the laminating foil Ll in the longitudinal direction.
  • the tension applied to the laminating foil Ll causes a stretching of the laminating foil Ll in the weakened portions.
  • the press rolls 50, 51 form a facility to attach the stretched laminating foil Ll to the substrate foil LO.
  • the glue applied between them is hardened by UV-radiation from a curing unit 53.
  • at least one of the substrate foil LO and the laminate foil Ll may be a self gluing foil. In that case a glue suspension unit 15 and a curing unit 53 are superfluous.
  • a longitudinal position of the laminating foil Ll is measured and the tension applied in the longitudinal direction is dependent on a deviation between said position and a desired position.
  • the position is measured by cameras 86, 87 that provide an input signal for a controller 88 that controls an amount of tension applied to the laminating foil Ll by the S-rolls in particular by control of the motors for driving rolls 34, and 56.
  • Camera 86 measures a lateral position of the foil Ll
  • cameras 87 measure a difference in the longitudinal position of the laminating foil Ll and the substrate foil LO.
  • the controller may control a tension in the substrate foil LO by control of the motor that drives roll 17.
  • the relative position in the laminating foil Ll is measured using markings on the laminating foil Ll and on the substrate foil LO.
  • the markings are provided with a high contrast so as to facilitate detection by the camera 86.
  • the speed of the laminated foil is measured with sensor rolls 60, 61.
  • a more detailed view of the weakened portions is shown in Figure 2A, 2B and 2C.
  • the weakened portions in the laminating foil Ll are formed by perforations 102 in the foil.
  • the perforations are transversely arranged rectangular areas.
  • Figure 2B square perforations are applied at an angle of 45o relative to the longitudinal direction.
  • the perforations are applied as at least a first 104 and a second series of perforations 106 applied in the direction transverse to the longitudinal direction, and wherein the second series 106 is transversely displaced relative the first series 104.
  • Figure 2C shows according to enlarged cross-section IIC-IIC a portion of the foil Ll in a different embodiment. Therein the weakened portions 100 are applied as grooves 108 on both sides of the foil Ll. Longitudinally between subsequent grooves 108 on one side of the foil Ll a groove 108 on the opposite foil is arranged. It is not necessary that material is removed from the foil Ll. Alternatively the foil may be provided with incisions as shown in Figure 2D.
  • Figure 3 shows a second device for carrying out a method according to the invention. Parts therein corresponding to those in Figure 1 have a reference number that is 200 higher.
  • the device shown in Figure 3 does not have a facility for applying weakened portions in the laminating foil Ll. Instead a roll 232 wherein the weakened portions are already formed by a separate facility is applied in the apparatus.
  • a glue dispensing unit 215 is arranged between roll 219 and press rolls 250 and 251.
  • the glue may be provided with conductive particles, e.g. having a size of l-10 ⁇ m and in a percentage of e.g. 15-25 vol. % to facilitate conduction between corresponding contact points in mutually neighboring foils.
  • the foils LO and Ll are pressed against each other by pressing rolls 250, 251 and the glue between them is hardened by radiation from a UV-radiator 253.
  • Suitable materials for the substrate foil LO, the laminating foil Ll and possible further foils are polyethylenes, such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) and polyimides such as KAPTON ® for example.
  • PET polyethylene terephthalate
  • PEN polyethylene naphthalate
  • polyimides such as KAPTON ® for example.
  • the apparatus has a second camera 287.
  • a control system coupled to the second camera 286 provides for a prediction and approximate control of the position of the laminating foil Ll.
  • a control system coupled to the second camera 287 provides for a fine positioning of the laminating foil Ll.
  • Figure 4 shows in a perspective view a third embodiment of an apparatus according to the invention. Parts therein corresponding to those of Figure 3 have a reference number that is 100 higher.
  • the apparatus further comprises a control facility for controlling a longitudinal tension in the laminated foil depending on a longitudinal tension in the substrate foil and in the laminating foil.
  • the tension TO in the substrate foil LO is measured by a tension sensor 323 and the tension TO is controlled by control of the motor 322 for driving roll 316.
  • the tension Tl of the laminating foil Ll is measured by a tension sensor 343 and the tension Tl is controlled by control of the motor 342 for driving roll 334.
  • the tension T3 in the laminated foil L2 is measured by tension sensor 373 and is controlled by control of the motor 372 for driving roll 355.
  • the tension TO in the substrate foil LO and the tension Tl in the laminating foil may vary.
  • the tension T2 in the laminated foil L2 is preferably maintained at a value substantially equal to the average value of the tensions TO, Tl in the substrate foil LO and the laminating foil Ll.
  • Figure 5 shows a schematic view of the apparatus according to the third embodiment, as well as a control facility therefore. Parts therein corresponding to those in Figure 4 have the same reference numerals.
  • the apparatus in Figure 5 includes a controller 388 that receives input signals (indicated by thin broken lines) from the velocity sensor 360, and the tension sensors 323, 343 and 354 for sensing a value TO, Tl, T2 of the tension in the substrate foil LO, the laminating foil Ll and the laminated foil L2 respectively.
  • the controller 388 provides control signals (indicated by thick broken lines) to the motors 321, 322, 341, 342, 371, 372 and 374. Therewith the press rolls 350, 351 are controlled at a constant speed.
  • Figure 6 shows in more detail how the tension in the TO in the substrate foil LO and the tension Tl in the laminating foil is controlled.
  • a difference ⁇ x in the alignment between the substrate foil LO and the laminating foil Ll is measured.
  • the facility Cl comprises for example the pair of cameras 87 in Figure 1.
  • a facility C2 is arranged for calculating a setpoint TOs for a required tension to correct the alignment error.
  • the setpoint TOs is provided to a control loop ClO for controlling a tension in the laminating foil Ll.
  • the control loop ClO comprises a subtraction element ClI for calculating a difference ⁇ T1 between a required tension TOs in the laminating foil Ll and a momentaneous tension TIm.
  • the momentaneous tension TIm may be measured with a tension sensor, but may otherwise be estimated.
  • the signal representing the difference ⁇ T1 is applied to a controller that controls an motor that changes the tension TIm in the laminating foil Ll.
  • the actual change in tension is determined by the mechanical behaviour of the laminating foil Ll and the transport elements mechanically coupled to the motor, either directly or indirectly via the laminating foil Ll. This mechanical behaviour is represented by block C13.
  • the setpoint for the tension TIs is further provided to a control element C3, that calculates a required tension TOs in the substrate foil LO.
  • the signal representing the required tension TOs is provided to a control loop C20 for controlling tension in the substrate foil.
  • the control loop C20 comprises a subtraction element C21 for calculating a difference ⁇ T0 between the required tension TOs in the substrate foil LO and a momentaneous tension TOm.
  • a signal representing this difference ⁇ T0 is provided to a controller C22 for controlling an motor that changes the tension TOm in the substrate foil LO.
  • the tension TOm is maintained at the same value as the tension TIm. In this way a warping of the laminated foil is prevented.
  • the actual change in tension of the substrate foil LO is determined by the mechanical behaviour of the substrate foil LO and the transport elements mechanically coupled to the motor, either directly or indirectly via the substrate foil LO. This mechanical behaviour is represented by block C23.
  • block C4 represents the process of laminating the substrate foil LO with the laminating foil Ll resulting in the laminated foil Ll for which the relative position between the substrate foil LO and the laminating foil Ll is measured.
  • the tension in each of the foils LO, Ll may be controlled at various positions.
  • the motor for controlling the tension in the laminating foil Ll is present in the supply roll, e.g. the supply roll 32.
  • This has the advantage that a single motor can be used for controlling the unwinding of the supply roll and for maintaining the tension of the foil.
  • the same argument applies in favour for controlling the tension in the substrate foil LO by an motor that controls the unwinding substrate foil.
  • a disadvantage thereof is however that the relation between the tension in the substrate or laminating foil LO, Ll and the torque applied at the supply roll depends on the amount of foil remaining at the supply roll.
  • the tension of the laminating foil is controlled by an motor that is mechanically coupled to an intermediate roll guiding the laminating foil from the supply roll to the facility for attaching the stretched laminating foil Ll to the substrate foil LO.
  • an motor that is mechanically coupled to an intermediate roll guiding the laminating foil from the supply roll to the facility for attaching the stretched laminating foil Ll to the substrate foil LO.
  • the motor is preferably directly coupled to the intermediate roll that is nearest the facility for attaching in said trajectory.
  • Analogous arguments apply to the arrangement for an motor for controlling the tension in the substrate foil.
  • An additional motor may be applied for applying a pretension to the supply roll.
  • the motor that controls the intermediate roll can be a relative small motor that is capable of a rapid response.
  • the tension in the foil may be measured by a tension sensor, for example the sensor 323 used for measuring the tension TO in the substrate foil LO in the embodiment of Figure 4, and the sensor 343 used for measuring the tension Tl in the laminating foil Ll in the embodiment of Figure 4.
  • the tension sensor 323 measures the sum of the tension in the web of LO between rolls 318 and 319, and the tension in the web of LO between rolls 319 and 350.
  • the tension sensor 343 measures the sum of the tension in the web of Ll between rolls 334 and 335, and the tension in the web of Ll between rolls 335 and 351.
  • the tension in LO may be determined indirectly by measuring the rotational position of a roll used in the facility for attaching the foils and a roll that guides a foil to the facility for attaching.
  • the difference in rotational position of roll 37 and the press roll 50 in Figurel or the difference in rotational position of roll 319 and the press roll 350 in Figurel.
  • the difference in rotational position between these rolls 37 and 50 indicates the amount of strain of the web between those rolls. From this amount of strain and the mechanical properties of the web, the tension of the web can be estimated.
  • This method has the advantage that the tension can be estimated with relatively cheap means. Only an encoder arranged at each of the rolls between which the tension of the web is to be measured suffices. When estimating the tension in this way it should be taken care that slip between the web and the relevant rolls is prevented, to promote an accurate measurement.
  • a measurement of the tension of the laminating foil LO using a tension sensor 423 coupled to intermediate roll 419 was considered to be included.
  • the motor for controlling the tension in web 3 of laminating foil Ll was considered to drive the intermediate roll 419, which is the intermediate roll that is nearest the facility for attaching the foils LO, Ll.
  • the alignment error of 100 ⁇ m between the foils can be compensated in approximately 0.1 s.
  • the laminating apparatus comprises a facility for measuring a tension in the laminating foil that provides an input signal to a control system for controlling the motor for controlling the tension of the laminating foil,
  • FIG 11 shows by way of example a part of an electronic circuit manufactured by the method according to the invention.
  • the substrate foil LO comprises a conductive pattern PO.
  • a laminating foil Ll is applied to the substrate foil LO, having a conductive via Vl that contacts the conductive pattern PO.
  • a next laminating foil L2 is applied to this combination of the substrate foil LO and the laminating foil Ll.
  • a conductive pattern P2 in this foil L2 contacts the conductive pattern PO in the substrate foil LO through the via Vl.
  • a product comprising an arbitrary number of foils may be manufactured in this way. Theoretically it would be possible to attach the multiplicity of foils in one processing step, but this would be more complicated, and require a more expensive apparatus.
  • Figure 12 schematically shows the method for providing a substrate foil with at least a laminating foil of material. The method comprises the following steps:
  • steps Sl, S2 the substrate foil and the laminating foil are provided respectively. These steps can be performed at the same time.
  • step S3 weakened portions are applied in the laminating foil.
  • the weakened portions are applied for example by punching, laser drilling or by chemical erosion.
  • the applied weakened portions extend in a direction transverse to a longitudinal direction of the laminating foil.
  • the weakened portions are spaced at intervals along the longitudinal direction, and have a width substantially smaller than the length of said intervals.
  • a tension is applied to the laminating foil in the longitudinal direction. Thereby the laminating foil is stretched in the weakened portions.
  • the tension may be regulated by regulating a power with which the foil is pulled through the apparatus, or by regulating an amount of friction exerted on the foil upstream.
  • the tension may be regulated at a constant level, while the weakening of the foil in the weakened portions is controlled so as to minimize a deviation in the position of the laminating foil relative to the substrate foil.
  • the stretched laminating foil is attached to the substrate foil. For example by gluing

Landscapes

  • Lining Or Joining Of Plastics Or The Like (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention porte sur un procédé pour doter une feuille substrat (L0) d'au moins une feuille de stratification (L1) de matériau. Le procédé comprend les étapes consistant à se procurer la feuille substrat (L0) et la feuille de stratification (L1), puis à créer des parties affaiblies (100) dans la feuille de stratification (L1). Les parties affaiblies s'étendent dans une direction transversale (Dtr) à une direction longitudinale de la feuille de stratification, et sont espacées par des intervalles dans la direction longitudinale. Les parties affaiblies ont une largeur (w) sensiblement inférieure à la longueur (Δ) desdits intervalles, procurant une tension à la feuille de stratification (L1) dans la direction longitudinale (Dlong). De ce fait, la feuille de stratification (L1) est étirée dans les parties affaiblies, puis la feuille de stratification (L1) étirée est fixée à la feuille substrat (L0).
EP08793854.4A 2007-06-29 2008-08-22 Dispositif et procédé de laminage Not-in-force EP2205440B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP08793854.4A EP2205440B1 (fr) 2007-06-29 2008-08-22 Dispositif et procédé de laminage

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP07111448A EP2008813A1 (fr) 2007-06-29 2007-06-29 Dispositif de laminage, procédé de laminage et feuille.
EP08793854.4A EP2205440B1 (fr) 2007-06-29 2008-08-22 Dispositif et procédé de laminage
PCT/NL2008/050562 WO2009005356A2 (fr) 2007-06-29 2008-08-22 Dispositif et procédé de stratification

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2205440A2 true EP2205440A2 (fr) 2010-07-14
EP2205440B1 EP2205440B1 (fr) 2013-07-17

Family

ID=38705060

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07111448A Withdrawn EP2008813A1 (fr) 2007-06-29 2007-06-29 Dispositif de laminage, procédé de laminage et feuille.
EP08793854.4A Not-in-force EP2205440B1 (fr) 2007-06-29 2008-08-22 Dispositif et procédé de laminage

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07111448A Withdrawn EP2008813A1 (fr) 2007-06-29 2007-06-29 Dispositif de laminage, procédé de laminage et feuille.

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US8435365B2 (fr)
EP (2) EP2008813A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP5606311B2 (fr)
KR (1) KR101511809B1 (fr)
TW (1) TWI434767B (fr)
WO (1) WO2009005356A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9757109B2 (en) 2010-12-10 2017-09-12 Illumix Surgical Canada Inc. Organic light emitting diode illuminated surgical retractor

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2673041A1 (fr) * 1991-02-19 1992-08-21 Gemplus Card Int Procede de fabrication de micromodules de circuit integre et micromodule correspondant.
DE19632795A1 (de) * 1996-08-15 1998-02-19 Cicorel S A Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Laminieren von Folienbahnen
JP2005014478A (ja) * 2003-06-27 2005-01-20 Toppan Printing Co Ltd ロールシートラミネート方法及びラミネート装置
EP1713882B1 (fr) * 2004-02-04 2007-08-29 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Feuille souple mobile par des moyens non mecaniques
JP2008155465A (ja) * 2006-12-22 2008-07-10 Fujifilm Corp 感光性積層体の製造装置及び製造方法

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2009005356A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2009005356A8 (fr) 2010-04-22
WO2009005356A3 (fr) 2009-10-29
US20110011519A1 (en) 2011-01-20
JP2012500733A (ja) 2012-01-12
WO2009005356A2 (fr) 2009-01-08
TW200918314A (en) 2009-05-01
EP2008813A1 (fr) 2008-12-31
TWI434767B (zh) 2014-04-21
EP2205440B1 (fr) 2013-07-17
KR101511809B1 (ko) 2015-04-14
US8435365B2 (en) 2013-05-07
JP5606311B2 (ja) 2014-10-15
KR20110033100A (ko) 2011-03-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Lee et al. Register control algorithm for high resolution multilayer printing in the roll-to-roll process
US8461562B2 (en) Web carrier, web carrying method, and web carriage control program
US8870480B2 (en) Roll-to-roll printing system
AU2002363025B2 (en) Feedforward control system for an elastic material
KR101409488B1 (ko) 속도, 장력, 중첩정밀도의 독립제어 가능한 롤투롤 인쇄전자 공정 시스템 제어방법
KR101507915B1 (ko) 롤투롤 시스템에서의 고속 미세 기판 정렬 장치
KR20080015472A (ko) 인쇄 배선 기판 제조 방법
EP2205440B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de laminage
WO2010131626A1 (fr) Dispositif de transport de feuille et procédé de correction de méandres de feuille
Lee et al. Control scheme for rapidly responding register controller using response acceleration input in industrial roll-to-roll manufacturing systems
WO2007114420A1 (fr) Dispositif de laminage
JP5915861B2 (ja) ラミネート装置
US10864663B2 (en) Imprint apparatus and method of detecting peeling defect in the same
Zhao et al. Controlling peeling front geometry in a roll-to-roll thin film transfer process
EP2268488B1 (fr) Dispositif de stratification et procédé de stratification
JP3555926B2 (ja) フラットケーブルの製造装置及び製造方法
US20240027291A1 (en) Systems and methods for measuring tension distribution in webs of roll-to-roll processes
EP2840048B1 (fr) Système et procédé de mesure de la longueur de produit non tendu lors de la production d'une bande
US20140331880A1 (en) Closed-loop control of untensioned product length on a web press
JP4552742B2 (ja) 金属箔と絶縁接着フィルムの積み重ね装置
US20200055305A1 (en) Printing apparatus
Seshadri et al. Interaction analysis of control systems employed in roll-to-roll printing
Chang et al. Robust Sliding Mode Control for a Roll-to-Roll Machine.
JP2011173679A (ja) 可撓性基板の位置制御装置
Seshadri et al. Design of delay independent state feedback control for roll-to-roll printing applications

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20100125

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20130328

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 621908

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008026116

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130912

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 621908

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130717

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131117

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131118

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131017

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130828

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131018

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130831

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130831

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20140422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130822

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008026116

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20080822

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130822

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20180827

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20180821

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20180823

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20180822

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602008026116

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20190901

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20190822

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190831

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190901

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200303

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190822